Forum

As the House Oversight Committee braces for what could mark a pivotal moment in its probe into the scandals of the late Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton face mounting pressure to appear for sworn depositions. Originally slated for this week, the sessions—demanding under-oath accounts of their connections to the disgraced financier and convicted sex trafficker—have been pushed to early January amid ongoing negotiations.

In a recent segment on "Wake Up America," Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) framed these subpoenas as a crucial breakthrough in unraveling the web of influence around Epstein's elite network. Issued in August 2025 following a bipartisan subcommittee vote in July, the orders extend not just to the Clintons but also to several former attorneys general and FBI directors, underscoring the inquiry's broad scope into federal handling of Epstein's crimes.

"This isn't your run-of-the-mill request—it's a congressional subpoena with real teeth," Comer asserted. "Passed with votes from both sides of the aisle in the Oversight Committee, it'll hold firm if challenged in court." He revealed that staff attorneys are deep in talks with the Clintons' legal team, but compliance remains non-negotiable. "They're expected to show up and field questions directly, or risk contempt charges," Comer warned.

At its core, the committee's push targets straightforward, long-elusive facts about Bill Clinton's documented interactions with Epstein, including multiple flights on the financier's private jet and appearances in flight logs. Comer pointed out a stark contrast: "President Trump has fielded endless interrogations on his Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell links, yet Bill Clinton hasn't publicly addressed a solitary one." The depositions, Comer confirmed, will be fully transcribed, with lawmakers from both parties joining the line of questioning to ensure a balanced examination.

Importantly, Comer reiterated that this effort isn't about leveling criminal allegations against the Clintons but about fostering openness and holding powerful figures accountable to the public. "We're not claiming any misconduct here, but facts are facts: Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's convicted accomplice, attended Chelsea Clinton's wedding—a small, intimate affair that signals a notably tight-knit dynamic."

The chairman didn't hold back in lambasting what he sees as Democratic sabotage of the process, labeling their tactics around Epstein-related disclosures as "deeply frustrating" and overtly partisan. "This probe got the green light through bipartisan consensus to pursue justice for survivors and deliver unvarnished truth to everyday Americans," Comer stated. Yet, he accused opponents of sowing confusion by disseminating altered images and selective leaks aimed at implicating Trump without basis. "Democrats on the committee have turned it into a farce—dropping redacted photos to imply guilt where none exists," he charged. "Ultimately, their playbook shows zero regard for the victims; it's all about pinning blame on Trump at any cost."

As the January date draws near, the standoff hints at deeper resistance from the Clinton camp, which has floated written affidavits as an alternative to live testimony—a proposal the committee has rebuffed. With legal heavyweights like David Boies and Philippe Reines in their corner, questions swirl: Will memory lapses or Fifth Amendment invocations shield them from scrutiny? Only time—and the gavel—will tell.

Final Word: Will the Clintons simply not remember or plead the 5^th?