ADMIN

Confessions Of An Election Thief

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fsites%2Fkunr%2Ffiles%2F202011%2Fstop_the_steal_protest_-_donald_trump_-_joe_biden_-_2020_election_-_election_results_-_carson_city_-_nevada.jpg&profile=RESIZE_400xPOSTED FOR AN ANONYMOUS MEMBER

How much longer do we wish to empower corruption? Is it time to declare "enough!"?

For the record I am NOT an Election Thief but a concerned citizen. 

If I Stole an Election, (which I would never think of doing such a thing)

Here is what I would do:

The states will soon confirm the midterm election results. One key race remains uncertain. As is typical of Republicans, they appear resigned to the loss of the Red Wave, blaming themselves for failing to do what was necessary to win.

But we failed to fix our electoral systems when we had the time and resources to do so. We were aware voting by mail was a recipe for fraud, and that our soiled voter rolls encouraged abuse. We were aware that vulnerabilities in voter identification, chains of custody, and other areas had been exploited in the past, but we naively believed this time would be different. The definition of madness...

The theft of an election is not a dummy!  We are now prepared to attest every vote was counted, including those which shouldn't have been. Oh, people console themselves by asserting that while election fraud is true, it occurs infrequently and has little impact on large-scale elections. Our own government has frequently informed us of this, and they never lie, do they?

Now we pose the question: Is it conceivable to manufacture enough fake votes to impact the outcomes of elections in numerous states, while minimizing the danger of being discovered? Yes is the basic answer. Not only is there at least one way that can be employed, but it appears to have been utilized in at least the two most recent national elections, and perhaps for many more in the past. Yes, it is extremely difficult to detect, but it can add tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of ballots to an election. However, let's begin by examining the electoral manipulation strategies and tactics.

If I were to steal an election, (once again I haven’t but playing the Devil’s advocate) I would not do so with greed. I would allow my competition to win a few races to dispel any doubts. If I won every election, the legitimacy of the elections would be called into question. By limiting myself to a handful of crucial races, I could refute interference charges by referring to the races I "lost." The majority of people want to think our elections are fair and honest, and are willing to accept the outcome of a few races as proof that the election process functioned as intended. This will also benefit me when I'm willing to sacrifice a few races in order to win the ones that matter.

The following concern is how to ensure I win the races I desire. I would like a method that would be difficult to detect, would be able to inject a large number of votes into the counting process, and if discovered, would be difficult or impossible to track back to me. Probably as long as there have been elections, election fraud has occurred, although the majority of traditional approaches fail one or more of the criteria I listed. There is, however, one that, if I am patient, stands out as virtually perfect.

With the assistance of my ‘buddies’. This method is relatively new, as it is a blend of modern and old techniques. Changes to voting procedures, particularly the increasing use of mail-in balloting, have multiplied its effectiveness. I will not elaborate here but instead provide a summary.

In many states, at least 10 percent of voter rolls contain fake voters. How they got there is the subject not addressed here, but these entries act as "voters" I may use to build ballots for my selections. If I were the one who planted them, I would have all the information necessary to create ballots that look identical to valid ones, including signature images I could print on the return envelope which corresponded to those on the state's voter lists.

The state will mail actual ballots to the addresses I supply, which I may then mark as I desire. When I return them, the state will see the "voter" is on the voter rolls and has an exactly matching signature, so it will be counted as if it came from a real voter. If there is a dispute of ballot authenticity, the only available information is the name and return address on the ballot envelope, which is not mine.

With minimal time and effort, I can generate tens of thousands of ballots, each of which is associated with a fictional voter on the rolls and votes for my preferred candidates. I can return the ballots in state-provided vote drop boxes or by mail. Yes, these are all felonies, but how can they capture me? Once the ballots are removed from their envelopes, they are mixed with the rest of the ballots, making it impossible to distinguish them from the real ones.

A flawless mechanism. Or is it? not so flawless after all this method appears to be the ideal method for election manipulation: it is nearly impossible to detect, it can produce enough votes to sway practically any election, and it is nearly impossible to track back to its source if it is identified. What is there not to like?

As it turns out, this strategy and others like it can be countered in a variety of ways. Small organizations across the nation have been striving to find and identify the various puzzle parts. It has been tough and time-consuming, but significant progress has been made. I have been collaborating with a small group that is compiling evidence to demonstrate not only is the procedure feasible, but it has also been widely employed and has rendered the outcomes of at least the three most recent national elections ambiguous. We are working on the last measures required to create a compelling case of widespread election tampering, including the identification of the culprits.

Back to the past. Now we return to the midterm elections. The Republicans did not attain a majority in the Senate, and the party may potentially lose parity there. If I were to steal an election, I would consider that a victory. Despite the weak Republican majority in the House, I would view this as the ideal smokescreen to conceal my theft. On most topics, Democrats tend to vote in lockstep, with dissent highly discouraged.

On the other side, it is nearly impossible to get Republicans to agree on anything. On nearly every issue, a minority of Republicans will either agree with Democrats or at least disagree with other Republicans. Even with a small Republican majority, it is a fair bet enough Republicans will back Democrat views to guarantee passage of Democrat-favored legislation. If I were to steal the election for the Democrats, I would be doubly successful.

Unless anything unexpected occurs, we have two more years of a Democratic presidency and a Democratic House. Considering all the harm done over the past two years, what can we anticipate for the following?

  • Will the Supreme Court expand? Probably.
  • Ban all semi-automatic firearms? Most likely.
  • Mandate universal immunizations against covids? Yup!
  • Prohibiting the use of natural gas for residential heating, cooking, and electricity production? Absolutely!
  • Climate lockdown? Yes, for the greater good!

Our only limitation is our creativity. All of the above might be accomplished with "bipartisan" legislation.

Will America Sink Into The Swamp?

Thus, we return to midterm certification. Those who would rob us of our liberties are becoming increasingly brazen in their endeavors. We need only look to the events in Arizona for confirmation. We must become much more skeptical of our elections, as well as much more demanding of transparency and procedures that minimize the numerous avenues for fraud that already exist.

Specifically, we must examine the most recent elections to see whether they truly reflect the desire of the people or instead reflect the intent of those who wish to maintain and expand their power.

 We were aware of the fraud and its repercussions in 2020, but we decided to wait until 2022 to take action. Now that we've seen what 2022 has delivered, we look forward to 2024, when we'll be able to address things effectively.

How much longer do we wish to empower corruption? Is it time to declare "enough!"?

We should anticipate opposition. As we have previously observed in various settings, the law and the state will be used against individuals who seek the truth. This confrontation between those who seek power and those who seek freedom has never been simple.

We need only look to history and the nations that have lost this battle to see the consequences we may face if we do not triumph.

 

….and oh, by the way, I am only a concerned citizen coming up with these ideas, what if I were a real Election Thief being highly paid through some nefarious charity funded by your tax dollars?

How dangerous could I be? …..a lot!

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Great article! Glad you are on our team! 

    • ADMIN

      10/4 Roger That! 

This reply was deleted.