Rudy Tirre's Posts (5090)

Sort by

Wednesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

aTa3zzdLXaZZ1imnnrMNif7RdULLMm1aOWlAql8CizbkvMbGO9CZEbn7chIdt6XWrWs80P6SwE1wRq-u1NLq23zj6rzgNo_bkiDgbPNSTnvxBqW6L9zAO3LjwqrKhXJVP36Bns_pqtym2_DCv3E0YEinLqOl=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 

Keith Ellison: The Latest Step In the
Democratic Party’s Abandonment of
Israel & Its Jewish Supporters
by Jeff Dunetz
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 How to Talk to Your Liberal Relatives 
at Thanksgiving 
3uSxtrwU7fx73ZkRXa8SLu6-S-LdR08ga7if49PZbHvKV9S30DnIf8CExoEhbK9hk1VuFGHrVQ-UQPvzGX4mJWLotKdTKAmZQZMqk2zVR5nDBd2gFh_yLv-yIXBwPw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Nate Jackson: As we all enjoy Thanksgiving dinner with family, many of us will attempt to avoid political conversations with our liberal relatives. But what if you can't? Well, we here in our humble shop don't typically write in first person, but I'm going to break out of that mold today. My own liberal cousin recently asked my perspective on the election. Her questions essentially amounted to a cry, "Is our nation really full of ignorant bigots?" So maybe my letter to her will help provide a template for a civil Thanksgiving dinner discussion about assumptions and perceptions rather than division and accusations.

First of all, I'm glad you asked my perspective on the election and am thankful that you're at least seeking to understand the other side. I could write a book answering your questions, but I know you're a busy mom and teacher, so I'll try to be brief.
          I know good people who had good reasons for voting for either Donald Trump or liar-Hillary Clinton. As for the general electorate, I'm going to make some sweeping generalizations, but they're important for perspective.
          Liberals (and I think I'm being fair to include you) see government as the best and biggest possible force for good. You see injustice in the way women, minorities, gays, the poor, etc. are treated. You want equality. You see people killed left and right with guns, and you want to protect your family and your school kids. And you want to rectify all of that where it'll make the most difference for everyone — from Washington, DC.
          It's really important for you to realize that conservatives see the same things. We want to solve those problems, not create or defend them. Obviously, however, our solutions are different, and there are some disagreements over what the problem actually is.
          We want to protect our right to defend our own families. We want a rising tide to lift all boats — JFK said that about tax cuts — and we want good schools, good jobs, fair pay, equal justice and opportunity (which doesn't mean equal outcome) for everyone. We just don't think DC is the place to accomplish that. Our families, churches, local communities and states are better suited because we're nearer to the problem than some distant bureaucrat or corrupt national politician.
          So to the election. This election was a reaction to the last eight years. During that time in particular, anyone who didn't support massive growth of government through liar-nObamaCare, financial overhaul, the stimulus, increased minimum wage, same-sex marriage, etc. has been told they're not just wrong but horrible people.
          To be sure, there are some haters who claim to be on the Right — people who troll the internet to say awful things to and about liberals. Heck, they say awful things about other conservatives if they're not "pure" enough. I've been called plenty of ugly things by Trump's truest believers whenever I've written the slightest criticism. And I can only imagine that you, along with many liberals, minorities, women, and others, felt that Trump grossly offended your humanity with some of the horrible things he's said.
          But to Trump voters, it's the liberals in power — whether in media or elected office — who are smearing regular Americans who just want to be left  alone.
          For example,
this sentiment from Slate columnist Jamelle Bouie: "There's no such thing as a good Trump voter: People voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes. They don't deserve your empathy." That column has well over 100,000 shares on Facebook, so it's not just one dude's opinion. He evidently struck a chord for liberals.
          But 700 counties voted for liar-nObama twice. 209 of them voted for Trump this time. Are they now racist?
          Liberal philosopher Noam Chomsky, in apparent seriousness, calls the GOP "the most dangerous organization in world history."
          And of course liar-Hillary
labeled Trump supporters a "basket of deplorables" who are "irredeemable."
          When was the last time you reacted kindly to someone who completely besmirched your character? Who assumed the absolute worst about you? And not only that, but someone in power who wanted to force you to do things their way?
          Reactions can be bad, too, though. "That jerk just cut me off in traffic!" Well yes, but maybe he was just distracted as he rushed to the hospital because his wife is dying. Was it right to cut you off? No, but maybe he needs a little grace. The same can be said of politics.
          Trump voters look around and see corruption in government, factories moving to China, illegal immigrants taking their jobs, riots in major cities — and a media complex that blames them for it. You certainly don't have to agree with those voters to realize that if they see things that way, they'd latch on to the vehicle they think will best rectify those wrongs.
          You asked specifically about the margin of white evangelicals voting for Trump. First, I'd say that the term "evangelical" is so broad as to be mostly meaningless. There are seemingly countless denominations that don't even agree on what it means to be a Christian, much less about political agendas. That said, certainly some evangelicals were really for Trump, which may be perplexing given his glaring character flaws. But I suspect most are like the believers I fellowship with every Sunday morning: They were against a woman who supports abortion without restriction, funded by taxpayers; who is no friend of religious liberty; and who would nominate Supreme Court justices who agree with these positions. This election perhaps more than any I've ever read about was a "lesser of two evils" election, and Christians chose according to their perceptions of that "evil."
          Next, you asked about Trump's incoming chief strategist, Steve Bannon. Here, I'm going to
quote The Wall Street Journal: "We've never met Mr. Bannon, and we don't presume to know his character, but maybe one lesson of 2016 is that deciding that Americans who disagree with you are bigots is a losing strategy. Politics would be healthier if accusations of racism in the country that twice elected the first black President were reserved for more serious use."
          Really, that sums up my answer to your overarching question: What happened? I believe Trump voters simply tired of being told how awful they are, and many of them didn't bother to share that with pollsters in advance. They just voted.
          Finally, I really appreciate you asking these questions. Obviously, you're interested in hearing what I have to say, and responding to you has helped me consider things from your point of view. I suppose remembering that perceptions influence our thinking at least as much as facts will help when considering that people don't see things the same way.
           I'm certainly not trying to convert you to conservatism with one simple letter —though you'd be welcome into the fold — nor do I expect you'll even agree with my framing. But I do hope I've shown that a handful of hateful people on both sides of the political aisle don't define the vast and overwhelming majority of Americans.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/digests/4609

 .

AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

.
 
liar-nObama Lying, Whining
His MSM Propagandists Defeated By
“Fake News” Citizen Journalists
by Rick Wells
czCHZBgCTVP4XLYL0FbJtZ9051pS6AT-3oDsI0h30UBvRmQSrBf-YMKv_UIGCaOO-EwqoLrxUUl717VD6czX6UxWUGluE_UkfJ4ZKYmbEwT3r-OH9KlD7U2tjhnEPcQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ liar-nObama understands that the ability to circumvent his propagandists in the mainstream media by average Americans utilizing the alternative media played a huge role in the defeat of liar-Hillary Clinton... He and his anti-American world government comrades had the message all scripted, packaged, and coordinated and through the networks, entertainment, celebrities, musicians, actors, everybody that is supposed to know more than the deplorable peasant citizens, yet it still wasn’t enough, the corrupt globalist lost. So now he’s taking the next logical step, discrediting the truth tellers, those who he and his comrades don’t control, labeling them as “fake news.” Eventually, the outlets will be identified and marginalized in some way, probably on a semi-gradual basis leading up through censorship to complete elimination. It’s been happening through Facebook and Twitter already, with conservatives being censored and their sites taken down, sometimes permanently. It’s a common headache for most of us in the alternative news field...  http://rickwells.us/obama-lying-whining-msm-propagandists-defeated-fake-news-citizen-journalists/
.
Gowdy, Chaffetz Double Team Secret Service Obstructionist, Threaten With Contempt
by Rick Wells
fw_Q4WkqHJEGmiydTnF5L_Sj2MR_3DuV3QXKm0e6II-w1t6_V2GkKm7Yfq9QPjie3OUfB1AngilJM4MJikrVeRsdNqhFRUlyFxtS-SqxN2KtXtXjYwQdI_kaOUPyF4-pgY1wjRv9WjVvxutZxv2S=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Rep Trey Gowdy and Chairman Jason Chaffetz of the House Oversight and Reform Committee faced a hostile witness in Tom Dougherty, the Chief Strategy Officer for the United States Secret Service... From Mr. Dougherty’s testimony it seems that the number one strategy of the Secret Service is consistent with every other agency under the liar-nObama executive branch, hide what you’re doing. Gowdy and Chaffetz are faced with what has become a familiar posture for government witnesses before Congress, Dougherty minces and parses his words in his effort to avoid compliance with Congress for all of the documents they had subpoenaed. Congressman Trey Gowdy does his best to convince the holdout to cooperate but he was having no part of it. There is one document that they refuse to produce and others that have been substantially redacted, both Chaffetz and Gowdy attempt to get a straight answer out of Dougherty. Chaffetz repeatedly asks “What is it you think Congress has no right to see?” in one form or another and is stonewalled every time. They eventually are forced to warn him that he’s in danger of being held in contempt...  http://rickwells.us/gowdy-chaffetz-double-team-secret-service-obstructionist-threaten-contempt/
.
Muslim Brotherhood-Tied Group Paid for
Keith Ellison to Visit Mecca in 2008
by Brent Scher
LQ7ReLlYCke24MaO5C7dnzekW_dQBqJ7Rhx7NHLRWd0HPzHrr6ZYxtQs6MWCNVl1uEZBeP7hL70V7oCWFAP8cdt-nkOq=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{freebeacon.com} ~ The House Ethics Committee opened an investigation into Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) after he failed to disclose that a group founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood paid for him to make a pilgrimage... to the Islamic holy site of Mecca in Saudi Arabia. Top Democrats have considered shifting to the left by electing Ellison party chairman, but critics say his previous association with radical groups should disqualify him from the leadership role. Ellison has associated with the Muslim American Society, a Virginia-based group founded by Muslim Brotherhood members in 1993 to act as the “overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States,” according to federal prosecutors in 2007. The United Arab Emirates recently added the group to a list of terrorist organizations...  http://freebeacon.com/politics/muslim-brotherhood-tied-group-paid-keith-ellison-visit-mecca-2008/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=5d8b764128-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2016_11_21&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-5d8b764128-45611665
.
Trump drops threat to pursue
charges against liar-Hillary
by Bob Unruh
{wnd.com} ~ President-elect Donald Trump will not appoint a special prosecutor to investigate liar-Hillary Clinton criminally, according to his former campaign manager... He’s working now, she said, to address the major issues facing the U.S., and “things that sound like the campaign aren’t among them.” In a statement to MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program, Kellyanne Conway said, “I think when the president-elect, who’s also the head of your party now … tells you before he’s even inaugurated he doesn’t wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong message, tone and content to the members.” “And I think liar-Hillary Clinton still has to face the fact that a majority of Americans don’t find her to be trustworthy, but if Donald Trump can help her heal, then perhaps that’s a good thing,” Conway continued...
.
Video Shows Syrian 'Rebel' Group
That Beheaded Child Still Using
 CIA-Provided TOW Missiles
by Patrick Poole
1ARNn7pfWDxlBkwRl6L-WLVmSWaVOwNQNmZnObF-tC9M1SYZmn0191F6RYnKiirhwhsimZdPbGYMrDLQsWEc96IIHpBPJPntVMqVjCZQFda8EXnVr6Aj6O1HKGqNqTGK27vHQcf5FIe26PvX7zl2XbXRswiMJy60PrrFAfRaEkwDt54kGtKMh4yB0aZ1Aw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{pjmedia.com} ~ Syrian "rebel" group Nour al-Din al-Zanki, which was widely condemned this past July after beheading a child soldier and posting the video... raising questions about their CIA-"vetted" status -- continues to use U.S.-provided TOW missiles according to a video published on its Twitter feed yesterday. The ongoing use of TOW missiles by the group was first noticed by Thomas Joscelyn at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Later, the terror group published a video to its YouTube account showing members using the TOW missile:...  https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/11/22/video-shows-syrian-rebel-group-who-beheaded-child-still-using-cia-provided-tow-missiles/
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Keith Ellison: The Latest Step In the
Democratic Party’s Abandonment of
Israel & Its Jewish Supporters
by Jeff Dunetz
iYtloD3cyivKpShvTC4hbOVCxxL0qr7Zd3COQS7Wqdh-jnt2_zKz-ucKaVnRVniWyxF40PRM5hFnLaOaib6lNXPTplnu9m706A2mweDqB8EGjdHFOD6-f7NxCT1TUprGDP603cvOaOTJnmXs_6vnbDwvKHEbAWjyeFMhHA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{lidblog.com} ~Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison is a leading contender to become the new Chairman of the Democratic Party. He’s garnered endorsements from party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer, Mass. Senator Elizabeth dinky-Warren Vt. Senator Bernie Sanders, as well as President liar-nObama.
 
A supporter of Lewis Farrakhan with a track record of being both anti-Israel and Antisemitism, should Ellison garner the spot it would be another signal of the Democratic Party moving to become the anti-Israel party, something recommended by the Center for American Progress back in 2011
 
As Caroline Glick recently wrote,
“Ellison’s association with the Nation of Islam dated back at least since 1989 and stretched at least until 1998. During that period, he not only knew about the Nation of Islam’s Jew hatred, he engaged in it himself.”
During Ellison’s run for congress in 2006, the The Washington Post reported that Ellison had defended Farrakhan against accusations of Antisemitism in 1989 and in 1990 as well as calling affirmative action a “sneaky” form of compensation for slavery, calling instead for reparations.
 
Also during Ellison’s initial congressional campaign, Scott Johnson of the must-read site Power Line , exposed Ellison’s Antisemitism and work with Louis Farrakhan in a Weekly Standard piece.  One incident he described, occurred in February 1997 when Ellison was a practicing attorney:
Ellison appeared as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam with the last name “Muhammad.” He spoke at a public hearing in connection with a controversy involving Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson was alleged to have said, “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Jackson denied making the statement or insisted that it had been taken out of context. Ellison appeared before the MIAR on behalf of the Nation of Islam in defense of Jackson’s alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Ellison said:
 
Speaking for the Nation of Islam, Ellison appeared before the MIAR in defense of the truth of Jackson’s alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Ellison said, ‘We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to Ms. Jackson, and by her right to express her views without sanction.’ He finished his comments with, “Also, it is absolutely true that merchants in Black areas generally treat Black customers badly.”
The last sentence alluded to another of Jackson’s alleged statements, providing a personal basis for characterizing Jews as “the most racist white people” she knew. Ellison’s May 28 letter acknowledges only that others supported Jackson’s alleged statement in that controversy while falsely denying that he himself did so.
 
Since entering congress Ellison has used every opportunity possible slam Israel.
 
For example, in 2010, Ellison convinced 53 other Democratic members of congress to sign the infamous “Gaza 54” letter to President liar-nObama, which falsely accused Israel of humiliating and wreaking “collective punishment” on Gaza residents and demanded that President liar-nObama should pressure Israel to lift the Gaza blockade
 
In 2014, Ellison was one of only 8 members of Congress voting against a bi-partisan bill to provide $225 million to Israel’s “Iron dome” missile defense system vs. 395 who voted for it. Think about that one for a moment, how many times in recent years have 395 members of Congress agreed on anything?
 
Ellison is a featured keynote speaker at many BDS organization events including the American Friends Service Committee which runs a BDS boot camp, Progressives for Palestine, and is a favorite of the anti-Israel group ironically called Jewish Voice for Peace. In a rare occurrence of disagreeing with progressives, The Jewish Voice for Peace was named by the Anti-Defamation League as one of the 10 most anti-Israel organizations in America I am sure their mothers are proud.
 
There are many more examples of Ellison’s, anti-Israel and anti-Semitic actions, plus his connection to Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas associated groups such as MAS, CAIR, and ISNA. MAS even paid for his Haj to Saudi Arabia. But in the interests of keeping this post a readable size will be reserved for future posts.
 
Interestingly, while the Anti-Defamation League has made very public claims of Antisemitism against Trump adviser Steven Bannon based on one unsubstantiated charge by his ex-wife, the ADL has been silent about the possible election of Ellison as DNC chair despite his track record of defending Farrakhan’s Antisemitism, making anti-Jewish comments of his own, and his anti-Israel actions in the congress.  But then again it is not surprising as in 2011 the ADL asked Jews to pledge not to criticize Barack liar-nObama’s anti-Israel policies.  Their treatment of Bannon vs. Ellison reinforces the ADL’s image as caring more about protecting progressive politics than protecting the Jewish people.
 
Ellison was on the 2016 Democratic Party platform committee and tried to insert language criticizing Israel for her “occupation” of Palestinian lands. Ellison’s attempt was defeated by liar-Clinton supporters, possibly because they feared the language would cause Jewish donors and voters to recognize the former secretary of state’s history of opposing Israel.
 
After his defeat in the platform committee, Ellison went on complain in this interview with NPR’s Amy Goodman. During the interview he mourned his loss the occupation plank, and threw in some lies about the Jewish State and Gaza for good measure:
Rep. Keith Ellison: Well, I can—I can lay out in sum, summary. One is that we—that there were six members of the Democratic drafting committee from the liar-Hillary Clinton campaign, five from Bernie Sanders, four from the DNC. We took the base document, and we made several amendments at the drafting committee. We heard testimony over the course of two days. A lot of it was really, really startling and important.
 
I think we have the best statement on Native American rights we’ve ever had. We have strong language that does critique the TPP, although it falls a little short of openly opposing it, which we tried to do but were not able to achieve. It takes a position in favor of $15 and a union for a federal minimum wage. It takes a position on a whole range of things, including the environment, that are progressive steps forward.
 
What did we not achieve? A complete opposition to fracking, we don’t have that. What is else not achieved? There are some things on some foreign policy fronts that I think would and could be better, some saber-rattling with regard to Iran that I don’t think is helpful and good to be in our platform. I think that it would be—I think that we could have had a clearer statement on two-state solution and the U.S.’s aspiration to have peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians. I think we were a little bit weak on that.
 
Amy Goodman:  Can you explain what you would like to see there, Congressmember Ellison?
 
Rep. Keith Ellison: Well, I think that it is important that, you know, the United States state that we don’t think that the occupation of the—what will be the Palestinian state should continue. I don’t think there’s any fear of using the O-word, if you will. I mean, Ariel Sharon used it. You know, the U.N. uses it. I mean, it’s a commonly used phrase to describe what’s going on. I think we could have also made some stronger statements about the—
 
Amy Goodman:  What is that word?
 
Rep. Keith Ellison: Occupation.
 
Amy Goodman: That they’re not using the word “occupation”?
 
Rep. Keith Ellison: Right. I think that there is a humanitarian crisis going on in Gaza. In fact, you know, the—because of the electricity power plant has been destroyed, the sewage is not being processed, and raw sewage is going up into the Mediterranean. In fact, it’s so bad that it’s flowing up into north, and the Israeli desalinization plant is not able to use its—that plant, because of the sewage that is in the Mediterranean coming from Gaza, because Gaza cannot process their own sewage at this point, because of the horrible situation that is going on there. So, there are some more—so, things like that, I think, really could have been identified much more clearly.
What the Ellison forces did accomplish was to keep the pro-Israel planks removed in 2012 from being reinserted in 2012. Four pro-Israel planks were removed in 2012, but the Jerusalem is Israel’s capital provision initially removed in 2012, and added back during the convention over the objections of the delegates was left in the 2016 platform.
 
The pro-Israel planks eliminated in 2012, remaining out in 2016 include
 
*The United States and its Quartet partners should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and abides by past agreements.
*The creation of a Palestinian state through final status negotiations, together with an international compensation mechanism, should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel.
*All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949.
 
In 2011, Politico reported that the Center For American Progress (CAP) which was at the time run by liar-Hillary Clinton’s future campaign manager John Podesta was fighting with the more mainstream Democrats about Israel.  They want to change the party to the Anti-Israel party.
 
When one considers the “walk-backs” to the 2012 platform which were maintained in 2016,  and the support for the anti-Israel, anti-Semitic Keith Ellison for the chairman of the Democratic Party, it seems as if the Center For American Progress is getting its way. The only remaining question is, will American Jewry which overwhelmingly and sometimes blindly supports the Democratic Party finally wake up and smell the truth.
 
 
Read more…

Wed/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Don't Let the Election Ruin Thanksgiving
by Susan Stamper Brown
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Trump's Day One Agenda 
mJ-LE-0W0MwOEvBMDLyw2FEBBMF4UMxgCAX5VFIwEn86fo2UIVUYSEhAxdp98o7RyGUtRjGFa0OkmRXj8adkL639jAvjNFf2psEWcplq6cfNcjt18XwqNBVwQ6FElg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Breaking from past presidents who gave regular press conferences updating the progress of their transition, Donald Trump has maintained a more guarded stance limiting press access. Clearly, Trump, who was quite critical of the press while campaigning, has shown that he will seek to control as much of the message as possible.
          In that spirit, Trump released a video yesterday in which he outlined an update on his agenda for his first 100 days in office. In the video, Trump re-iterated his core principle of "putting America first." He then focused on the executive actions he would initiate on his first day in office, such as withdrawing from TPP and negotiating new deals. He also plans to cancel job-killing restrictions on coal and shale, curb regulations, bolster national security and drain the swamp by implementing a five-year lobbying ban on former administration officials.
          What was conspicuously absent from the video was any mention of repealing liar-nObamaCare, building a boarder wall and changing the tax code. On the immigration issue, Trump did note that he would authorize the Department of Labor to investigate all abuses of the visa program as a means of protecting the American worker.
          Overall, Trump’s focus was positive and action-oriented. He was clearly displaying his business background in targeting many issues that directly deal with the current economic climate in America. However, it was troubling that there was no mention of nominating a Supreme Court justice. For many conservatives, this was the primary justification for voting Trump. While concerning, there is no need for alarm yet as Americans are sure to hear more from Trump in the coming days. 
~The Patriot Post
.
 Trump Should Announce SCOTUS Nominee Now 
uKMny_nnJAqLPEedPd-8IJ29ZsyLuOUSDoguQg8B0mqvurDEwNJzJXVb4osjTJrZeF1Jx11HYKACvR8kOMHFRYq2hNum8tn6U3NkQJElZ1PYKwFlSgRJTyfHAQWn5A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Donald Trump is in the process of vetting and nominating candidates who will hopefully promote a conservative agenda. As chance has it, the new president's task includes picking a successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia. In fact, selecting Scalia's replacement is rightly considered by many to be the most important decision Trump will make; it's one major reason liar-Hillary Clinton was ultimately dethroned. So when should Trump announce the nominee? Unveiling a decision sooner rather than later would provide both the incoming administration and conservative voters numerous benefits.
          That's the case being made by The Wall Street Journal editorial board. "Apart from the national-security and Treasury jobs, the next Justice may be the most important to move on quickly," the editors contend. At minimum, a hasty announcement would give the next administration a crucial head start: "While Mr. Trump won't be inaugurated until Jan. 20, the new Congress convenes in the first week of January. With the continuity from the current to the new Senate, the GOP-led Judiciary Committee could begin vetting Mr. Trump's nominee as soon as it gets the name. A vote could take place soon after the President-elect is sworn in and can formally submit the nomination."
          Getting the process underway now will help temper the leftist lower courts. The editors continue, "Numerous cases challenging the liar-nObama Administration's dubious rule-makings are moving through the federal courts, which President liar-nObama has moved sharply left over eight years. The circuit courts of appeal might be inclined to rubber stamp those regulations, which means they would become law in those circuits unless the Supreme Court takes the cases. A 4-4 High Court ruling means the lower-court decision stands. Knowing a new Supreme Court is ready for review could give some lower-court judges pause before they issue rulings likely to be overturned." Moreover, "An early nomination could also get ahead of the game if Mr. Trump's choice runs into confirmation trouble."
          But there's another important reason for Trump to nominate someone soon, and it has to do with the fact many conservatives voted for Trump based on his pledge to nominate a justice whose views are commensurate with those of Scalia's. As Mark Alexander wrote last week, "I voted for the presidential candidate who vowed to appoint constitutional constructionists to the Supreme Court — appointments critical to the protection of our Republic and its foundational Rule of Law." Two good options are Diane Sykes and William "Bill" Pryor. Over the last week Trump has recruited good leaders to his cabinet. That's a good start. But Trump also needs to make good on his promise regarding SCOTUS. Choosing an originalist and doing so quickly will show loyalty and bring solace to those who reluctantly took a gamble on him.  ~The Patriot Post.
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=http
.

The False Premise of Palestine and Peace
by Barry Shaw
M8Y1L30fkx92TcqYpCpe6fJD6n-URwTFbZdmUikj8_i_CM8OSIQtbL1XHQWj1MzvOCYTVrHuQ9wpUBH8sInAJLykDFLAdg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ The notion that the creation of a state of Palestine will herald everlasting peace is naïve in the extreme... After 50 years of a two-state failure, the French and other diplomats, in their duplicitously-named "peace initiative," have no other idea for how to settle the Palestinian problem, except to behave like parched men trudging across a burning desert toward a distant mirage that they think is an oasis paradise. It is not, and the same diplomats will take no responsibility for cleaning up the dangerous outcome of such a disaster. The international community is pressuring Israel to make wholesale concessions in territory and security, risking social and political upheaval, to grant the so-called Palestinians a state of their own...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9387/israel-palestine-peace
.
The Democrats Are Proving How
Deaf They Really Are!
by Joe Messina
iULyeLPi5nHa3curlLfeusW4k9boNsW9nJrbug_OdfV6vik_4osGKtD392dDf2rMXU9E5LY27fuCe63i15C5HhaURgMNBdUFKtCCMycG8v_TcfGCTlF8v6gOPpoY5mKAOe_TooG_s7bKkCSJY4uPlaozMKLGrbNpUpkhO7udrHQsDnfb8g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{lidblog.com} ~ The transition team is in disarray! Trump’s team is falling apart! Trump’s team is bonkers! Ben Carson won’t take a position on the cabinet, what does he know that we don’t?... We all know the planet is flat! The sun and planets all revolve around the Earth and whatever else the Loons on the Left will try to throw at us!According to the Left, ALL the key appointments President Elect Donald Trump has announced so far are terrible for the country. Mind you, these same people said Trump could never win. He wasn’t a serious player. Don’t let them pick your lottery tickets. He named three appointees on Friday, including retired Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn as National Security Adviser. The Democrat News Network (DNN) aka: CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC and more actually say that this choice shows Trump doesn’t understand how government works. I say GOOD! They say Flynn was too hard charging and he may have been fired from the Defense Intelligence Agency. I’ll bet it wasn’t for using a personal email server and lying about classified emails...
.
Mark Levin Exposes Potential DNC Chief’s
Ties to Muslim Brotherhood
by Chris Pandolfo
tNCt1jrMU1FwfWWkGAho9adQ_ASM_kA_jRXvxnYgWe9Qp7Gi06aacfxwTJpIuarVEVwWbuxXWddokmazOKXMSHOficmkPPk9V8ZUe-Gqv8bf1X77fLXwhv2hKWvRpcRm6Q9a3Zpudc6LfHLyWZ6HPVYMj8Rt_n38zs5gwQ7sLA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{conservativereview.com} ~ Opening the week on the attack, Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin sounded off on the Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.-endorsed frontrunner to be the next chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn... “This guy’s a hater, he is a radical leftist … and he has connections to very dangerous organizations.” Levin said. “And Chuck Schumer supports him!” Rep. Ellison’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood are disturbing. Almost as disturbing as Democratic leadership pushing Ellison to be the public face of the party as DNC chair despite those ties to a terrorist group. And yet still more disturbing is the mainstream media’s complete silence on this subject...
.
Schumer says GOP will ‘rue the day’ it
repeals liar-nObamacare
by Amanda Carpenter
VfKjzsd-2v6pIl3sgEbQVPmSr8mIvOmF4J1RkfZ5iys_H1o4gZ2ss8hSqvn8GnO9Rwb0MbllGWhgcwS_ultONhvLC4yP_lz8U34vLq45OGUeFU41wV35Rdd4SPvSpc4jgPvU4qRJpjHPwOVVTODhDe2kjGJJrbdZeQ6ZnkI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{conservativereview.com} ~ The man who will soon be the country’s most powerful elected Democrat is openly struggling with understanding the impact liar-nObamacare has had on the country and the GOP, for anyone who cares to see it... Judging by the comments incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. has made over the years, it’s apparent he can’t decide if Republicans were mistaken for opposing liar-nObamacare, or if Democrats were mistaken for passing it. In 2010, shortly after liar-nObamacare became law, Schumer confidently projected that “As people learn about the bill, and now that the bill is enacted, it’s going to become more and more popular.”...He has no idea on the impact it has on America. Or does he?  https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/11/schumer-says-gop-will-rue-the-day-it-repeals-obamacare
.
'Sanctuary Cities' Vs. National Security
and Public Safety
by Michael Cutler
16ZRi7wP4_TOrbdRka0ffFfmMPV6pa4ACZQu5z4FhsaYMP7nAYKDINq18c5Zk2Kfl4qD4k-mHbC34oucXMsPpcRQR05DzOcGgW1jhyajrfBpEGYC7bHsTqjJExZD8zj6iAuzHZRz2hLU8IOU-rSal5iwFnl-QH6pCYzfjOQFYGjW2jbMZw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{frontpagemag.com} ~ The lunacy of the immigration executive orders and other actions of the liar-nObama administration to block the enforcement of our immigration laws and immigration anarchy will be brought to a screeching halt... on the day that Donald Trump replaces Mr. liar-nObama in the Oval Office. However the “Immigration All-Clear” will not be sounded across the United States in cities and states that have been declared “Sanctuaries” by the mayors and governors who have created a false and very dangerous narrative that equates immigration law enforcement with racism and bigotry. This insidious false claim has been heartily embraced by the demonstrators who are rampaging across the United States to protest the election of Donald Trump and his promises to secure the U.S./Mexican border and enforce our immigration laws...  http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264864/sanctuary-cities-vs-national-security-and-public-michael-cutler
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Don't Let the Election Ruin Thanksgiving
by Susan Stamper Brown
ieYXQZV3uFwOOrq3qEprczageXfx_78jMfxRCuOalJGjyhyYvfXBdB_tEXO5WXioDTaDjtoqYrLtJ76_roegr3dotXkOj6bhubYOGu49Q8fvbDgiYJMamzgj-p8zqirIG6Dq90uHnZtz79oz7Ob0ULI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ If Americans figured out how to get along after the Civil War, there is no excuse for people canceling their Thanksgiving Day plans because of the 2016 presidential election.

If that's the case, obviously, their problems extend far beyond politics.

After the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln had to deal with a bloodied nation divided by war and understood the only way to restore unity was repentance, followed by thanksgiving.

So, he set aside the last Thursday of November as a day of "thanksgiving and praise...with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience" to "fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility and union."

Big words there, but in the end, the uniquely-American Thanksgiving Day was birthed, wherein families gather together to give thanks despite who wins an election. And they love each other enough to overlook the loudmouth relative standing over the turkey wielding a carving knife who won't stop talking about why her candidate lost or won.

Don't be that relative.

Researchers tell us that a consistent attitude of gratitude makes people happier and healthier physically, emotionally and spiritually. It seems we need an extra big serving of thankfulness to go with that pumpkin pie this year.

So, let me begin. My heart overflows. I'm thankful, in no particular order, for a large assortment of things including strong coffee. And homemade calzones. And for the northern lights during dark winter days and for salmon fishing on endless summer nights. I'm thankful that the big grizzly who likes our yard finally hibernated and that my rescue dogs rescued me when they scared away the mother moose who charged me.

I'm thankful the squirrel I fed last winter came back this year and the orphaned black bear figured out how to make it on his own. I'm thankful that one glance out my kitchen window reminds me that no matter how crazy this world gets, the One who created it remains in control. And I remain thankful that sometimes at church, I can almost hear what sounds like my dad's voice bombastically belting out a hymn's chorus during worship when I close my eyes.

I'm thankful our freezer is stocked with caribou and salmon and garden goods and we still have running water and don't have to use the outhouse on our land.

I am thankful that my team, the Dallas Cowboys, is first in the NFC East this year and said "no" to all the unpatriotic knee-taking.

I am thankful for what WikiLeaks exposed.

I am thankful that there is a return to sanity in America and that the forgotten Americans in flyover country spoke en masse with their votes. I am thankful for our forefathers who penned the U.S. Constitution so prudently, America didn't buckle under the weight of this administration and for patriots who are willing to sacrifice their all in its defense.

I am thankful for friends and family near and far who fill a place in our hearts when they can't fill a place around our table.

I am humbled beyond measure for you, dear readers, for whether we agree or not, we can at least celebrate together our freedom of speech. And as always, it goes without saying how thankful I am that the too-many-times empty seat at our Thanksgiving table will be warmed again this year by the one who warms my heart.

To you and yours, Happy Thanksgiving.
Read more…

Wednesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Trump's National Security Picks Want to
Air liar-nObama's Iran Secrets
by Eli Lake
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Sanctuary City Showdown 
A7yjCE8ng7FReJZZ6UePwlQ0wwPAMvQo-TR9Js1xdOidCn4kR2DWqWdKSFR421jinZnJYpBYPFRlHDBOpOxYBpwIrY35WhYmbkwCPRCaaOJvMGR4M0Pgn3Xbn0KSkg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Arnold Ahlert: "To be clear about what Chicago is, it always will be a sanctuary city. To all those who are, after Tuesday's election, very nervous and filled with anxiety as we've spoken to, you are safe in Chicago, you are secure in Chicago and you are supported in Chicago. Chicago will always be a sanctuary city." —Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel
          Perhaps nothing defines progressive arrogance better than the idea the Rule of Law can be ignored when it doesn't align with the Left's "superior" wisdom. Thus, of all the battles president-elect Donald Trump will wage against entrenched progressivism, the effort to deconstruct sanctuary cities is one of the most important.
          Trump has the law on his side. Section 1373 of the U.S. Federal Code is clear: "Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual."
          It further notes that no person or agency may prohibit, or in any way restrict, the same entities from exchanging such information with ICE, maintaining it, or exchanging it with any other Federal, State, or local government entity. Reciprocally, ICE is expected to respond to those entities "seeking to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law, by providing the requested verification or status information."
          There's also Section 133 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that allows the U.S. attorney general to enter into an agreement with a state, or any political subdivision therein related, to carry out "the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States." This authorizes the AG to train local police for the purposes of identifying and detaining illegals.
          Despite these statutes, more than 340 municipalities in the nation have been identified by ICE as having polices non-cooperative with, or obstructive of, law enforcement.
          A report released last August by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) illuminates the damning consequences of that defiance: Between January 2014 and September 2015, more than 17,000 ICE detainers were rejected by these municipalities — including about 11,800 detainers for individuals with prior criminal histories.
          Detailed information of crimes committed by illegals would go a long way toward underscoring the recklessness of sanctuary city policies and galvanizing public opinion against them. Yet the same government agencies that crunch numerous sets of crime statistics are either unable — or unwilling — to provide comprehensive data on illegal alien criminal activity. Former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams, who characterizes immigrant crime as a "wave of staggering proportions," explains why: "These numbers would expose how serious the problem is and make the government look bad."
          How bad? U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow released hard numbers for illegal aliens "imprisoned for homicide-related offenses" in five states — Arizona, California, Florida, New York and Texas — with high illegal alien populations. Assuming they only committed one murder apiece, these illegals accounted for approximately 5,400 homicides.
          For illegal immigrant advocates, that level of slaughter is apparently tolerable because "using the data we have, it seems impossible to responsibly claim that those immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than their American-born neighbors," writes columnist Alan Gomez. In other words, Americans are supposed to take solace from the idea that people who shouldn't be here are at all might be murdering, raping, molesting and otherwise accosting them at lower rates than American criminals are.
          It doesn't get more intellectually or morally bankrupt than that. A Trump administration aims to cut federal funding for sanctuary cities. By contrast, until Congressman John Culbertson (R-TX) used his position as chairman of the Commerce, Justice, and Science Subcommittee on Appropriations to force the liar-nObama administration to reverse course, it was actually rewarding sanctuary cities with hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grant money.
          Thus, is it any wonder why politicians in cities like Chicago, New York, Seattle, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Oakland, Denver and Washington, DC, etc., insist they will maintain their sanctuary status? Mayor Emanuel, whose city has endured more than 600 murders and 3,000 shootings so far this year, epitomizes their arrogance. "I would say to the president-elect that the idea that you're going to penalize Boston, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Philadelphia — these are the economic, cultural and intellectual energy of this country," he contended.
          No, they are not. They are leftist strongholds populated by elitist, illegal-immigration-supporting officials who believe they're entitled to defy the law and embrace de facto anarchy.
          Trump's efforts to stop this nonsense will be hindered by one certainty and one possibility. In South Dakota v. Dole, the Supreme Court ruled that any withholding of federal funds by Congress must be "reasonably related" to the purposes for which those funds are allocated. Thus, it is likely law enforcement agencies in various locales will take the hit, and it remains to be seen if political officials will be willing to endure the likely wrath of American citizens who realize their safety is being held hostage to progressive-inspired lawlessness.
          It also remains to be seen if a GOP-controlled Congress can summon the will necessary to withhold that funding. The Senate failed to pass a couple of bills targeting sanctuary cities because vote totals fell short of the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster. That's the same 60-vote threshold eliminated by former Senate Majority Leader Harry dinky-Reid's invocation of the "nuclear option" when it suited Democrat purposes. It remains to be seen if traditionally spineless Republicans are willing to return the favor, especially those attuned to the leftist siren song of "comprehensive immigration reform."
          Nothing says reform better than reining in the rampant lawlessness sanctuary cities epitomize. Trump's nomination of staunch anti-illegal immigration advocate Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) for U.S. attorney general is a great first step.
          A suggestion for Sessions: In addition to exploring ways of limiting funding, the DOJ could lend its unambiguous support to citizens like the parents of Kate Steinle, murdered by seven-time felon Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez who had been deported five times. They have filed a suit against former San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, the city and federal officials for failing to do their respective jobs.
          Successful litigation by sanctuary city crime victims, making officials liable for large cash awards, should be pursued with vigor all over the nation. There's nothing quite like the prospect of facing personal financial calamity — for supporting lawlessness — to focus the progressive mind.
          In 2016, millions of Americans voted to upend the status quo. Sanctuary cities are one of the worst aspects of that status quo.
          American have lived with lawlessness orchestrated by leftist politicians long enough. Being a nation of laws is about having respect for all laws. Not just the ones leftists like. 
~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

George Soros’ War on America: Time to Prosecute
the Billionaire's Global Crime Spree
by William F. Jasper
aJOnUpzLSI1B8DvOGsB6Zgi4Htn6Wcp2QdROSczr4JA_eJ77ZG--3JAz6nIsHr0JFMqS47gS2eb9EtfQWLUIdRJQi5HHDzSdSOax45bDa9yjpyG7vqofWha7c_4wq3e4ifm8ZbM7zG7Xx58uVt6I=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{thenewamerican.com} ~ “Not My President! Not My President!” Day after day, in cities from coast to coast, the chanting mobs of rioters have illegally blocked streets and freeways, set fires, thrown Molotov cocktails, injured police officers, destroyed property, and defaced public buildings with graffiti... Portland, Oregon, a bastion of “progressive” Democrats, has been the epicenter of much of the violent action aimed at president-elect Donald Trump. Of course, as we have previously reported, not only did most of the Portland rioters who were arrested fail to register to vote, a large percentage of them appear to be professional, paid protesters. Many of them, no doubt, were hired in response to the advertisements for paid anti-Trump protesters that appeared on Craigslist and other media in Seattle, Portland, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Boston, Denver, Philadelphia, New York, and elsewhere. Many of these “spontaneous” protests/riots would not have occurred without organized efforts involving hundreds of busses transporting thousands of protesters/rioters, many of whom appear to have travelled across state lines... http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/24665-george-soros-war-on-america-time-to-prosecute-the-billionaire
.
Anti-Trump Activists Threaten
Presidential Electors
by Steve Byas
OzAHYovXQHcJwS8zO5iOu850JYBImaxvsRecDtWXR69uZxmR2uc3GJs0txEa6fu32JbRgI7r8hbPBZxahkoHkbnNJpR7fNtBWT4EBCX-p82-PW3_eS3a_u7_DXPWZc6dfBFecug1BY2nNMdb8RYp=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{thenewamerican.com} ~ Twenty-two-year-old Michael Banerian, a political science major at Oakland University, and one of Michigan’s 16 electors, has received death threats from individuals who do not want him to cast his vote for Republican Donald Trump... Since Trump has apparently won Michigan, all 16 electors are Republicans. “It’s mostly just a lot of angry people who don’t completely understand how the process works,” Banerian said. Either that, or they believe the end justifies the means. Layne Bangerter and Melinda Smyser, two electors from Idaho — another state carried by the Republican nominee Donald Trump — have said they've been overwhelmed with e-mails, telephone calls, and Facebook messages urging them not to vote for Trump...
.
The New York Times' Dishonest Reporting
on the Iran Nuclear Deal
by FRED FLEITZ
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ You may have read that in response to criticism about its biased coverage of the Trump campaign, the New York Times has rededicated itself to honest reporting... After you get up off the floor from laughing hysterically, consider this story that ran days after the Times' renewed commitment to ethical journalism: On November 14, the New York Times ran an article with the headline: "76 Experts Urge Donald Trump to Keep Iran Deal." In the second paragraph, the article claims this report was signed by "former officials from both major political parties." Not until the sixth paragraph does the story mention that this report was issued by the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). This is the kind of dishonest reporting we have come to expect from the New York Times...  http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-new-york-times-dishonest-reporting-on-the-iran-nuclear-deal?f=must_reads
.
Keith Ellison Headlined Fundraiser
For Muslim Activist Who Called For
Palestinians To Embrace ‘The Jihad Way’
by Chuck Ross
rrTDhkHHxnhM6-_x-toGu97h3qTq2_nmZMpX0pFWEPhNwK7rnCcZfB8aeC5jstAwdrdoTj534qF3HGtkeOlbFzQrafuWYsu6kFQhJb9L8HBxWTlXJPvk4GKOKL5S1ricWRp4no6jahbwcPxLv6mJGaEnv_79KXLh=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailycaller.com} ~ Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, the favorite to take over as chairman of the Democratic National Committee, campaigned in 2009 for a Libya-born activist who once called on Palestinians to embrace “the jihad way” in order to get free of Israeli control... The activist, Esam Omeish, a former candidate for Virginia state delegate, has also praised one of the founders of Hamas and commended the work of Palestinian suicide bombers. Omeish’s positions had been publicized when Ellison, the first Mulsim ever elected to Congress, headlined the July 2009 fundraiser for Omeish, who served as president from 2004 to 2008 of the Muslim American Society, a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group...  http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/21/keith-ellison-headlined-fundraiser-for-muslim-activist-who-called-for-palestinians-to-embrace-the-jihad-way/
.
liar-nObama Admin Fines Police
Department For Not Hiring Non-Citizens
by Blake Neff
jbkiaOY1-z0u-g-GWcQT_fC69LGBpH9NYmevo-uuYI1fU0sl2_v7XrpFNW-3S-wmHj2HYENI7bSWwGNcQppwRDYW_3w9gxNWreAfjw-VyFcKS_p1lD2FAxgRciMBVkHSvoXxeFXJn8Kkam3UZBnuDIgGSJjFX_mha0fnGJO52MKTamz0IY8y5fbrM8Lu2eNJseM_ZHQBefHDeKPVCUEti4mCSuM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailycaller.com} ~ Denver County’s sheriff office has been slapped with a fine by the Department of Justice (DOJ) because it refused to hire non-citizens as deputies... From the beginning of 2015 through last March, the Denver Sheriff Department went on a major hiring binge, adding more than 200 new deputies. But those jobs ended up only going to citizens, because the department made citizenship a stated requirement on the job application. The department admitted as much in a new settlement with the U.S. government, which requires it to pay a $10,000 fine. The department will also have to comb through all of its job applications from the past two years, identifying immigrants who were excluded from the hiring process and giving them due consideration...This should make your blood boil.  http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/21/obama-admin-fines-police-department-for-not-hiring-non-citizens/
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump's National Security Picks Want to
Air liar-nObama's Iran Secrets
by Eli Lake
R_EGHBb1SPj90uZ_MbFpe4X3WsACMQ1bx6ddPncu4TyjtV_RlSkVloknfmSXen7TyhvCi99qzQo2a8i1xBNS5HDDuEuFYQVd1y5WhkMn3BoJ26gg8dXj6qg2zreDWsvPBloo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ For years, many Republicans and conservatives have charged that President Barack liar-nObama was shielding embarrassing intelligence and policy details about Iran in order to support the nuclear deal reached last year.

With Donald Trump's upset victory, the party of Lincoln will have an opportunity to declassify and disclose this information. While no decisions have been made, two early picks to Trump's cabinet suggest this is going to happen.

Let's start with retired general Michael Flynn, the next president's choice to be national security adviser. Flynn served for two years as liar-nObama's director of the Defense Intelligence Agency from 2012 to 2014. Just as relevant, however, is that in 2011 he ran a team at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that reviewed the troves of material captured in the 2011 Osama bin Laden raid.

Under liar-nObama, the intelligence community has declassified a small fraction of those documents and released them in drips and drabs. This prompted Flynn, after he retired in 2014, to charge that the disclosures were selective. Flynn has said in interviews and writings that some documents captured in the bin Laden raid showed a much tighter relationship between Iran and al-Qaeda than previously disclosed.

The book he wrote this year with historian Michael Ledeen, "Field of Flight," says, "One letter to bin Laden reveals that al-Qaeda was working on chemical and biological weapons in Iran."

The next revealing pick in this regard is Representative Mike Pompeo, Trump's choice to be the CIA director. As a lawmaker and member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Pompeo mastered the details of the Iran agreement and became one of the most potent foes of the nuclear bargain in Congress. He traveled to Europe to warn businesses, banks and governments against foreign investment in Iran in light of remaining U.S. sanctions that would likely be enforced if a Republican won the 2016 election.

Pompeo also launched his own campaign to get to the bottom of the cash payments the U.S. delivered to Iran as it released the Americans the regime had detained. On Oct. 7, for example, Pompeo wrote to Attorney General Loretta Lynch asking for answers on how the cash payments were approved by the Justice Department. She replied later that month that she wasn't obliged to answer his questions.

Pompeo and Flynn are now occupying top positions in Trump's national security cabinet. After the inauguration, they will no longer have to ask to get answers to their questions about liar-nObama's Iran policy.

There is some precedent for this. liar-nObama himself in 2008 campaigned against the sitting president's policies on waterboarding and enhanced interrogation. One of the first things his government did when he took office was to declassify and release the legal memos that justified and revoked these practices. It looks like the Republicans are about to return the favor.
 
Read more…

Tuesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
The Worst Excesses Of The Left
by Erick Erickson
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 liar-nObama Reserves Right to Criticize 
xQlj1ebb5C74wpFIWYOiitMYge7KWeL_rFCiM7AzAc0CFaPi9EaBKLyqQHtOgW-T7NoODgSgqz4JRK7-nEuvy9aUKt1ZOZ5yItkkHDx3wSQIn7mZskAAb0G1SUV0vw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
An unwritten rule of outgoing presidents, considering the many challenges the position brings, is to respect the office by making a commitment to refrain from publicly criticizing the incoming president and his policy decisions. No one has exemplified this commitment better than George W. Bush, who despite being blamed almost incessantly by Barack liar-nObama for everything from the poor economy to Iraq never fought back or attempted to defend his legacy. He left it for historians to judge generations from now.
          While every president desires to leave a lasting, positive legacy, once the individual has left the office he has no control over what becomes of his policies or how future historians will judge his time in office. The office is and always has been greater than the individual. liar-nObama seems to think otherwise.
          On Sunday in Lima, Peru, liar-nObama — while acknowledging the respect George W. Bush showed him, saying he "could not have been more gracious to me when I came in" — showed he'd learned very little from his predecessor. Contending that he reserved the right to comment on Donald Trump's policy decisions, liar-nObama stated, "As an American citizen who cares deeply about our country, if there are issues that have less to do with the specifics of some legislative proposal or battle or go to core questions about our values and ideals, and if I think that it's necessary or helpful for me to defend those ideals, I'll examine it when it comes." And what may those "values" be of which liar-nObama speaks? We're betting that Americans will find out soon enough as liar-nObama is sure to continue his legacy as the lecturer in chief. ~The Patriot Post
.
 OPINION IN BRIEF 
John Goodman: "One family canceled Thanksgiving dinner so they wouldn’t have to be with pro-Trump relatives. Another family canceled a Christmas reunion for the same reason. One couple changed the date of their wedding so that a pro-Trump relative wouldn’t be able to attend. Another couple chose to get married in Italy — a place too distant for their relatives to travel to. These are just a few of the ruptures that have followed the election of Donald Trump, as reported by The New York Times. Are we a deeply divided nation? Maybe. But if we are divided the cause of that division comes squarely from the left, not the right. In virtually every case, the people who are canceling reunions and refusing to talk to their friends and family members are liar-Hillary supporters. The Times reported not a single instance of a Trump voter shun. What’s the cause of all this? I think it is identity politics. ... Identity politics works on some voters. I have heard stories of women who break down crying at the mere mention of the election results. Are they crying because NAFTA may be renegotiated? Or the pipeline may be built? Of course not. If elections are about identity, then elections are about you in a very personal way. If the other candidate wins, you have been personally rejected. I would probably cry too if I were naïve enough to believe all that." 
~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

Donald Trump and the Return of
European Anti-Americanism
by Soeren Kern
pnR5c63L_jMw2DNp4VI8UaWct4Gpjw3EAhgLiVziRwYAM9SbihWl8dLFqlBWjPbSkJz-w1UZTCTgnbdKgftqIZ8ODXDDhA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ European anti-Americanism — which was on the wane during the presidency of Barack liar-nObama, who steered the United States on a course of globalism rather than nationalism — is back with a vengeance... Europe's media establishment has greeted Donald Trump's election victory with a vitriol not seen since the George W. Bush presidency, when anti-Americanism in Europe was at fever pitch. Since the American election on November 9, European television, radio and print media have produced an avalanche of negative stories, editorials and commentary that seethe with rage over the outcome of the vote. European criticism of Trump goes far beyond a simple displeasure with the man who will be the next president. The condemnation reveals a deep-seated contempt for the United States, and for American voters who democratically elected a candidate committed to restoring American economic and military strength...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9372/trump-europe-anti-Americanism
.
Schumer Threatens 'Tooth and Nail' Fight
Over Supreme Court Nominee
by Susan Jones
V3goHsJi8VzWG9IzGxwjBQvH0A5nRUn36P1InIqZrn7vAyGk37nsCBzrjr2_vJGMxP6hH7MnKyUi63teo0zxNiTLv0PkAXi8B2RkAPyep6po_6ar6NAds1_nJqYvSuAa2LMLzh8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{cnsnews.com} ~ Come January, Republicans will control the House, the Senate and  the presidency, but with only 52 Republicans in the Senate. That will not give them the 60 needed to break a Democrat filibuster... Appearing on various Sunday talk shows, Schumer was asked if Senate Democrats will filibuster Trump's Supreme Court nominee, whoever it may be. "I would hope first and foremost that President Trump nominates a mainstream nominee capable of getting bipartisan support," Schumer told "Fox News Sunday."...  http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-trump-should-name-mainstream-supreme-court-nominee-or-dems-will?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT1Rjek1qRTRNVEkzTXpWaCIsInQiOiJKWnpWWExpZ2h2UXBTNkxBNUN3b2kzd2d5K0drXC9mZHZTSXFuU1Q2Ym14VFdNSmtGcndudWlzclFDOExuSTB0UERWTnl2UVVBYXVvN1VcL1BcL3FnYmRERldpSWFPeFpYZlNCUVwvNm9Udko1VXc9In0%3D
.
UN Globalist Claims US Trapped –
liar-nObama Climate Hoax Irreversible
by Rick Wells
UKAsu-JgA2XSnfXgy82HhRK5F9I0RAAyzWZs4yClZLUUQ8Fj3KpmBD8a0j-aVtlZoxOFLjzkdIKwoAIfYfKcnScVlpo0quux3vYdmFrPOvxrWMGzbr9_2WJeBCf-kwPr2go=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ What is it about the climate hoax that has its proponents so committed to its implementation? There is no flood of seawater and no submerging coastal areas anywhere on the planet unless erosion or other forces are at play... The temperature, globally, is not rising and in fact we may be in a cooling period due to reduced sunspot activity. The reality is that the effect of the actions of a segment of the surface dwellers, mankind, even in its most draconian enforcement of the existing Paris and Agenda 2030 agreements, will have virtually no impact on global temperatures. So what is behind their hand-wringing hysteria? The UN climate models, those trusted by the alarmist’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, indicated that the world would be only 0.137 degree C cooler by 2100 if the US eliminated all of its CO2 emissions, an impossibility. Expanded to all of the industrialized world similarly moving into caves and banning fire, it still is an insignificant 0.278 degree C the year 2100. Does killing the economies and a lot of the residents of the planet for a decrease in temperature of one fifth of a degree over 84 years really seem like a good idea? Are those who think it is really leadership caliber people?...  http://rickwells.us/frenchy-fried-un-globalist-claims-us-trapped-obama-climate-hoax-irreversible/
.
Trump Would Relish a Supreme Court Fight  
by John Fund
0mS6mcUfiA8sMF27XYNy2jdfUuYeFH7LvgdJT0-XGlrEZFLCWweB3tgxWGLUIbKMGdeoHja_xVUkYFX1XkGFPNkQ5jAgC6VgwqKfngxpTzuSxcvnRcPcx26uSCO5JuV7ay-REH7td2axnVda3DQxO5td4OpUqLirOCTEA04siq07SdEQgEbCIPB7ug=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{nationalreview.com} ~ Chuck Schumer, the incoming leader of Senate Democrats, warned Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press that any Supreme Court nominee of Donald Trump’s will be filibustered if he or she isn’t  “mainstream.”... “If he doesn’t nominate a mainstream candidate, we’re going to go at him with everything we have . . . go at the candidate with everything we’ve got because this is so, so important,” Schumer said. He then falsely claimed that all four of the nominees put forth by President liar-nObama and President Bush had won wide bipartisan support. Not true. Justice Samuel Alito was confirmed in 2006 with the votes of only four out of 44 Senate Democrats. Schumer’s threat is real. Schumer’s threat is real. During the debate on Alito, Harry dinky-Reid, who was then the Democratic leader of the House, and then-senator Barack liar-nObama attempted a filibuster against him...  http://www.nationalreview.com/article/442343/donald-trump-supreme-court-fight-reid-schumer-threaten-filibuster?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Trending%20Email%20Reoccurring-%20Monday%20to%20Thursday%202016-11-21&utm_term=NR5PM%20Actives
.
Death Threats: Last Bastion
for liar-Hillary Clinton Supporters
by Dawn Gaye
Cy-AMQLZLVeHV_3kR_-jGxsQmcnEbrcHHDlbyQdh8snLWTSuZscI0AGVJVNifkDcSw4m6LvhFFDtGoyUnIsAn1shtjyq7SmfTP8eLW7AIyj1t0KVOVRCA9T_KPi96OIAqnaH8oD7BtUtZDLi6ugCsfG6-g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{theblacksphere.net} ~ The Left will attempt to maintain power by any means necessary, and their tactics include the threat of death. Or in the case of this young man we discuss, the very real death where he merely joked about voting for Trump... The Federalist Papers reports on 22-year-old Mike Banerian, an official elector in Michigan: “You have people saying ‘you’re a hateful bigot, I hope you die,’” Banerian said. “I’ve had people talk about shoving a gun in my mouth and blowing my brains out. And I’ve received dozens and dozens of those emails. Even the non-threatening-my-life emails are very aggressive.” The Detroit News has verified one message containing a death wish and another containing a death threat, in which the person told Banerian he would “put a bullet” in his mouth...These people are really sick.  http://theblacksphere.net/2016/11/death-threats-last-bastion-hillary-clinton-supporters/
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Worst Excesses Of The Left
by Erick Erickson
26AEfmBrgkMu52V4ASyaEhF3S_KF2xv6N4QoopDmwxE3AICcNwZEISjcvAkT9T2D_NgIyGw6ZusODFnN-F8ZKGGlAPBqGYnDclYk2PqUsM4jU_mQa73AbGV_RfvIS-nmRYlZoXEL3QoIcBa5pN0zatVo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{freedomsback.com} ~ In the past week, as conservative opponents of Donald Trump have come to terms with his victory, nothing has done more to help them give Trump the benefit of the doubt than the complete meltdown by the American left. Having written just last week that those of us who got the election wrong exercise some humility and consider we might have gotten Trump wrong too, leftwing activists have flooded my inbox with hate mail for selling out to fascism.

Therein lies a problem for the left. After the election, Noam Chomsky, the left’s conscience, declared the Republican Party “has become the most dangerous organization in world history.” He went on to claim the party “is dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life.”

Shortly after the election, at the Democratic National Committee, a staffer named Zach began yelling at the interim DNC Chairwoman, Donna Brazile, “You and your friends will die of old age and I’m going to die from climate change. You and your friends let this happen, which is going to cut 40 years off my life expectancy.” Jamelle Bouie, a CBS News analyst and writer, wrote a piece entitled “There’s No Such Thing as a Good Trump Voter.” His subtitle is, “People voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes. They don’t deserve your empathy.”

On college campuses across America and in the streets of major cities, the left is protesting, rioting, threatening, crying and bullying. The CEO of the company GrubHub sent a letter to his employees denouncing Donald Trump and asking any Trump supporters who agreed with Trump’s policies to resign from the company.

At Rutgers University, police took a lecturer named Kevin Allred in for a psychological evaluation. Allred, a self-styled feminist, made statements about killing white people. Allred is a white, gay male from Utah living in New York. Among other things, Allred tweeted, “if i see any Trump bumper stickers on the road today, my brakes will go out and i’ll run you off the road.” After the police showed up, Allred claimed it was “proof positive that Trump’s crackdown on free speech has absolutely begun.” Needless to say, Allred is a lecturer at a liberal university in a liberal city run by a quasi-communist mayor in a country presided over by Barack liar-nObama, not Donald Trump.

The supposedly progressive left is convinced that Donald Trump is going to get us all killed due to global warming. Trump is also, supposedly, going to round up Muslims, Jews, and Hispanics. He will strip children of their gender identity, though he supports transgender rights, and he will eradicate gay marriage, though he supports it. In fact, many of Donald Trump’s major policy initiatives are spending programs previously championed by liberals. But the American left is convinced doom is at hand and Trump is going to kill us all.

It raises a troubling question. If Noam Chomsky really believes the GOP is the “most dangerous organization in world history” and it is “dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organized human life” how can the left not take up arms? If the left really believes Trump is going to put black people back on plantations, Jews in incinerators and gays in closets, how can they not physically fight back?

That is the danger of the hyperbole and rhetoric. In 2013, gay rights activist Floyd Lee Corkins attempted to storm into the Family Research Council with a gun and chick-fil-a sandwiches. He intended to murder the employees of the socially conservative group and stuff their mouths with the sandwiches. Corkins got the idea after seeing the organization listed as a hate group on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website.

No one serious expects Jamelle Bouie or Noah Chomsky to pick up a gun. But with rhetoric that shrill, let us not be surprised if they inspire the next Floyd Lee Corkins. After all, according to Bouie, all Trump supporters are racists, and according to Chomsky, the GOP is going to kill us all. Why wouldn’t the left turn deadly if they really believed that?
Read more…

Tues/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
The Ellison Challenge
by Caroline B. Glick
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Former NSA, CIA Director Hayden: World
Needs a Set of Cyber Norms
by Megan Eckstein
10uD5mI8tsXMCmywEmOLm7OpFeLpaNNXen5OyATDOWpFzpNWhw_bNzJzRG-9Phq8bH0H5D3w0ZKU0p6APdSJTlDlcloQz5Gf8Jq19iLvhZBtZHDel7o_kavcBDoT5cBiPReTK2IIXal2cA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{usni.org} ~ The United States should help create an international set of norms for cyber behaviors – to distinguish between accepted behaviors like espionage and non-accepted behaviors like cyber theft and destruction... and then craft laws and policies that allow U.S. cyber warriors to succeed in that domain, a former director of the National Security Agency and Central Intelligence Agency said today. Michael Hayden, speaking at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said U.S. military and intelligence organizations haven’t even agreed on terminology to talk about offensive and defensive cyber capabilities, and that a new framework was needed to move forward in the cyber realm. For example, the retired Air Force general said, many people have rushed to call the Russian cyber attack on the Democratic National Committee a cyber crime. Hayden, on the other hand, views the hack itself as “honorable international espionage” and similar to what the U.S. and most other countries routinely do:...  https://news.usni.org/2016/11/18/former-nsa-cia-director-hayden-world-needs-set-cyber-norms?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=675880fcf6-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-675880fcf6-231491269&mc_cid=675880fcf6&mc_eid=3999f18767
.
What dismantling Dodd-Frank can do
by Peter J. Wallison
eyZSHHdbnSskfVcw21c0JB60FwJzDHROTd-Keonx4ln78wzCda-LAHMhF-X2jwjCIukr6oTVnleITxjkLTWn6hhuqJXHKGMfGCxECfT7062_fBgY9mkCvQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{aei.org} ~ The sharp rise in the Dow Jones Industrial Average after Donald Trump’s election could be short-lived, but based on what the president-elect has promised to do it is an accurate assessment of the U.S. economy’s prospects... All through his campaign, Mr. Trump said regulatory relief for the economy was a priority, including the repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act. Repeal or thoroughgoing reform of that destructive law is certainly a key step toward an economic recovery. Signed into law in 2010, Dodd-Frank was based on the idea that insufficient regulation, particularly of Wall Street, had allowed a buildup of subprime mortgages, a housing bubble and, ultimately, the 2008 financial crisis. The Democrats who controlled the Congress elected in 2008 acted quickly to follow out the implications of this diagnosis by adopting Dodd-Frank, the most restrictive financial legislation since the New Deal...  http://www.aei.org/publication/what-dismantling-dodd-frank-can-do/?utm_source=paramount&utm_medium=email&utm_content=AEITODAY&utm_campaign=112116
.
 Bennett: Submarine purchase essential
to Israel's security
by Uzi Baruch
A2HqId8_LGo3IcKtWgdfRXliYCY0YD6aiREtVPu7_pGAR0hHz3jE3uS30WFguDmuTIAoZVYBPL7oZyxC5w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{israelnationalnews.com} ~ Education Minister Naftali Bennett (Jewish Home) came to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s defense on Monday, rejecting criticism of the recent purchase of four naval vessels and three submarines from Germany... The deal is now under investigation by the Attorney General, following a report by Channel 10 last week which suggested a conflict of interest in the Prime Minister’s Office, noting that Netanyahu’s attorney, David Shimron, has also represented the Israeli businessman who represents the German manufacturer of the submarines sold to Israel. No one claims he profited in any way by the deal...
.
Iran Nuclear Deal: What liar-nObama Has Wrought,
Let Trump Put Asunder
by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC
-m4op1iUq0cBxqrPXUO7kRlsunIkORsrubyN1rW53tp2tt_etPJc5pw6jI5YkSKhTIGncK9R_292K3JM7kSM3tGeDZhA23PxS5DHtP7fs_ecZjElirs4UpzLUym1gP4LU4I5JXgS8eOg5aiu5Sc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ We have heard President Barack liar-nObama, on several occasions, endeavor to allay fears about world violence. His nuclear deal with Iran does not do this... It now is up to President-elect Donald Trump either to re-negotiate an agreement that will or to reject it. liar-nObama's false assurances the world is safer have sounded like a broken record. In 2011, he suggested, after U.S. Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden, "I think we can all agree... the world is safer. It is absolutely imperative President-elect Donald Trump re-negotiate or kill the Iran nuclear agreement. In doing so, Americans need to realize just how bad it is... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/iran-nuclear-deal-what-obama-has-wrought-let-trump-put-asunder?f=must_reads
.
Can the American-Israeli Alliance Go to Sea?
by ANDREW E. HARROD
3i9nunVDzUNdvetQKE8IklB7GUw-WJzNFnT59oez7L69Ol1in-nC472WUbCGUcjFPJFXfESsPGFLmtn-cTUELljUEBGVxhJrJTxq--xUo9RK1l7ei1-_r4H92A1vEc1tHI-ZHlW-OtXf5BFyTOANBUOkFPs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ "In a world of important and rapidly transforming regions, none is more strategically significant and wildly volatile than the Eastern Mediterranean."... During a recent Hudson Institute panel, former Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith echoed a report that has been co-written by the Hudson Institute and the University of Haifa and which calls for the United States and Israel to collaborate in a mutually beneficial Mediterranean naval buildup amidst increasing global naval threats. According to Hudson Institute naval expert Seth Cropsey, the United States Navy's Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean once had two aircraft carriers and a large contingent of marines permanently assigned to it. This is in dramatic contrast to the report references, which pointed out that following post-Cold War cuts, the "Sixth Fleet's permanent naval presence is now a single command ship in Italy and four Aegis destroyers equipped for ballistic missile defense, all based in Rota, Spain, just outside the Mediterranean." Retired United States Navy Admiral Gary Roughead said that Americans "have essentially ceded the Eastern Mediterranean, at least from a maritime perspective."... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/can-the-american-israeli-alliance-go-to-sea?f=must_reads
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Ellison Challenge
by Caroline B. Glick
DPP2Sc3qmM70OGz0hUzjZ7Xx9FHQv_y-fvHig4vkcj1hNll1utblWoPfWef0X6XUAzYbIFLmKMynRfzHKFQiFJL3c879gRCE29fqHyULoRNxwY92BmwwHO9ngVPAWIzrk17OHgTTt_ZVJCuE93c3GSXkWQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ Out of power in the White House and both houses of Congress, the Democrats must decide what sort of party they will be in the post-liar-nObama world.

They have to basic options.

They can move to the Center and try to rebuild their blue collar voter base that President-elect Donald Trump captivated with his populist message. To do so they will need to loosen the reins of political correctness and weaken their racialism, their radical environmentalism and their support for open borders.

This is the sort of moderate posture that Bill liar-Clinton led with. It is the sort of posture that liar-Clinton tried but failed to convince his wife to adopt in this year’s campaign.

The second option is to go still further along the leftist trajectory that President Barack liar-nObama set the party off on eight years ago. This is the favored option of the Bernie Sanders wing of the party. Sanders’s supporters refer to this option as the populist course.

It is being played out today on the ground by the anti-Trump protesters who refuse to come to terms with the Trump victory and insistently defame Trump as a Nazi or Hitler and his advisers as Goebbels.

For the Democrats, such a populist course will require them to become more racialist, more authoritarian in their political correctness, angrier and more doctrinaire.

It will also require them to become an antisemitic party.

Antisemitism, like hatred of police and Christians, is a necessary component of Democratic populism.

This is true first and foremost because they will need scapegoats to blame for all the bad things you can’t solve by demonizing and silencing your political opponents.

Jews, and particularly the Jewish state, along with evangelical Christians and cops are the only groups that you are allowed to hate, discriminate against and scapegoat in the authoritarian PC universe.

From the party’s initial post-election moves, it appears that the Democrats have decided to take the latter path.

Congressman Keith Ellison from Minneapolis is now poised to be selected as the next leader of the Democratic National Committee. This position is a powerful one. The DNC chairman, like his Republican counterpart, is the party’s chief fund-raiser.

When a party is out of power, the party chairman is also treated like its formal leader, and most active spokesman.

Ellison is the head of the Democrats’ Progressive Caucus. His candidacy is supported by incoming Senate minority leader Sen. Chuck Schumer and outgoing Senate minority leader Harry dinky-Reid. liar-nObama has indicated his support for Ellison. Sen. Bernie Sanders is enthusiastically supporting him.

Ellison made history in 2006 when he was elected to serve as the first Muslim member of Congress. As the representative of an overwhelmingly Democratic district, once he won the Democratic primary in 2006, he was all but guaranteed that he could serve in Congress for as long as he wishes.

As Scott Johnson, a prominent conservative writer who runs the popular Power Line blog website reported extensively in 2006, Ellison is an antisemite. He also defends cop killers.

As Johnson reported, Ellison was a long-standing member of the antisemitic Nation of Islam. During his 2006 congressional campaign, the local media gave next to no coverage to this association. But when it did come up, Ellison soothed concerns of Minneapolis’s Jewish community by sending a letter to the local Jewish Community Relations Committee.

In the letter Ellison claimed that he had only been briefly associated with Louis Farrakhan’s outfit, that he was unfamiliar with its antisemitism, and that he had never personally expressed such views.

The local media and the Jewish community were happy to take him at his word.

But as Johnson documented, he was lying on all counts.

Ellison’s association with the Nation of Islam dated back at least since 1989 and stretched at least until 1998. During that period, he not only knew about the Nation of Islam’s Jew-hatred, he engaged in it himself.

As Johnson noted, in 1998, Ellison appeared at a public forum as a spokesman for the Nation of Islam.

He was there to defend a woman who was under fire for allegedly referring to Jews as “among the most racist white people.”

Whereas the woman herself denied she had made the statement, Ellison defended and justified her alleged statement. Referring to her slander of Jews he said, “We stand by the truth contained in the woman’s remarks... Also it is absolutely true that merchants in Black areas generally treat Black customers badly.”

As Johnson reported, aside from engaging in anti-Jewish propaganda and actively promoting antisemitic messages and leaders, decades before the Black Lives Matter was formed, Ellison was a prominent defender of murderers of policemen.

After the September 11 attacks, Ellison likened the attacks to the Reichstag fire in 1933, intimating that the al-Qaida strike was an inside job. He then agreed with an audience member who said that “the Jews” gained the most from the attacks.

As a member of Congress, Ellison has been among the most hostile US lawmakers toward Israel. He has close relations with Muslim Brotherhood-related groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America. Both groups were unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism funding trial, implicated in funding Hamas and al-Qaida.

And now, Sens. Schumer, Sanders and dinky-Reid and President liar-nObama along with the Democratic grassroots activists and other party leaders are supporting Ellison’s bid to serve as chairman of the DNC.

As Ellison’s statement about “merchants” makes clear, the Democrats’ Jew-hatred may not be of the “Jews are the sons of apes and pigs” variety. In all likelihood, it will be propagated through angry rhetoric about “bankers” and “financiers,” and “the rich.”

Ellison, a supporter of the antisemitic BDS movement, has libeled Israel by likening the Jewish state to apartheid South Africa. Under his leadership, we can expect for Democratic politicians to veer even further away from Israel and to embrace the slander that Zionism is racism.

The populist Sanders route seems more attractive to the Democrats than Bill liar-Clinton’s moderate path because the notion is taking hold that Sanders would have been a stronger candidate in the general election than liar-Clinton was.

This view is hard to accept. Most Americans reject socialism, and populist or not, it is difficult to see how Sanders would have sold his radical positions to an uninterested public.

The other problem with the “Sanders would have won” argument is that it misses the distinction between Trump’s populism and Democratic populism.

Trump’s populism stemmed from his willingness to say things that other politicians and authority figures more generally wouldn’t dare to say. Trump’s allegation that the political system is rigged, for instance, empowered Americans who feel threatened by the authoritarianism of the politically correct Left.

Trump’s opponents insist that his populism empowered white power bigots. But that was a bug in his ointment. It wasn’t the ointment itself. Trump’s willingness to seemingly say anything, and certainly to say things that were beyond the narrow confines of the politically correct discourse, empowered tens of millions of voters. It also empowered white bigots at the fringes of the Right.

Whereas empowering white bigots was a side effect of Trump’s populism, empowering bigots is a central feature of leftist populism. And this is where it gets dicey for Jews.

As liar-nObama – and Ellison – have shown, when Democrats channel populism, they use it to demonize their opponents as evil. They are “fat cats on Wall Street.”

They are “racists,” and other deplorables.

There are scattered voices on the Left that are calling for their fellow leftists to revisit their authoritarian practice of labeling everyone who doesn’t walk lockstep behind them as racists and otherwise unacceptable. But for the most part, the populists are winning the argument by essentially demanding more ideological radicalism and more rigidity.

This policy is completely irrational from a political perspective. It’s hard to see the constituencies that will be swayed to support an angry, hateful party.

But this brings us to the Jews, who voted 3:1 for the Democrats, and to the American Jewish leadership whose support for liar-Clinton was near unanimous.

When antisemitic, populist voices like Ellison’s began taking over Britain’s Labour Party, British Jews began heading for the exits. When push came to shove they preferred their individual rights and their communal rights as Jews above their partisan loyalties.

So far, this doesn’t appear to be the case among Jewish Democrats.

Consider the Anti-Defamation League’s unhinged onslaught against Trump’s chief strategist, former Breitbart CEO Steve Bannon.

While ignoring Ellison’s record of antisemitism and support for Israel’s enemies, as well as his ties to unindicted co-conspirators in funding Hamas, the ADL launched a scathing assault on Bannon, accusing him of being an antisemite.

The ADL’s assault on Bannon follows its absurd claim in the final days of the campaign that Trump’s ad criticizing George Soros was antisemitic. It also follows the group’s bizarre condemnation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent video clip in which he stated the plain fact that the Palestinian demand that Jews be ethnically cleansed from the territory they wish to take control over is an antisemitic demand.

As many prominent US Jews on both sides of the partisan divide have made clear, the accusation that Bannon, whose Breitbart website is one of the most pro-Israel websites in the US, is antisemitic is appalling on its face. The allegation is simply unsubstantiated.

So why do it? Why allege that a friend of the Jews is a Jew-hater while ignoring the actual antisemitism of another man? The answer is depressingly easy to discern.

The ADL appears to be trying to give cover to the rising forces of antisemitism in the Democratic Party.

By falsely accusing Bannon and through him Trump of antisemitism, the ADL defuses the real problem of Democratic antisemitism. And if the ADL doesn’t think there is a problem with Ellison taking over the DNC, but alleges that Republicans hate them, then rank and file Jews will stay put.

The ADL of course isn’t alone in sending this message.

Following the election, Conservative and Reform congregations in major cities throughout the US organized communal shivas, to mourn liar-Clinton’s defeat as if it was a death in the family. Such actions, along with characterizations of Trump and his advisers as Nazis or Hitler or white supremacists work to bind Jews to a party that is inhospitable to their communal interests while blinding them to the fact that Republicans do not hate Jews or the Jewish state.

For decades, American Jews have been at the forefront of every major social movement on in the US.

But the Democratic Party’s move toward antisemitism, a move made apparent through Ellison’s rise, is one movement the Jews mustn’t lead.
 
Read more…

Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Slurs Not Working Anymore
by Tom McLaughlin
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 The Mindless MSM Talkingheads — Time to Detox 
0RtZsU8T5IwuPcLDHbobKV1T0wtsErNWQAZATWZ6pnEXUVTgp5fcEFQjpUeZiHCmMr5hWIj4gCtXZevfKOpvCdJmoTz64TaxuxPt2o2XYbrBFgD3fE-fl9eSbR72lg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Long before sunrise each day, Patriot Post editors are reviewing hundreds of news and policy reports in order to segregate the few important trending stories from the endless loop of mainstream media noise.
          All that noise occurs because news and opinion platforms, whether print, cable or online, are almost universally sustained by noxious advertising. Thus, those outlets are, first and foremost, compelled to recycle the hype, ad nauseam, in order to keep the ad revenue flowing. Some of the "conservative news" media outlets are as guilty of this hype as the Leftmedia — a prime example being the now-ubiquitous "Fox News Alert" banners.
          Of course, print and cable media hold great contempt for competing online media — though print and cable media increasingly depend on their own online presence for ad revenue — arrogantly asserting that they are the only legitimate arbiters of news, policy and opinion.
          A case in point would be a CNN story this week: "Trump supporters call to boycott Pepsi over comments the CEO never made, which is both a hit piece about "Trump supporters" and a condemnation of online media, particularly Facebook, where many people now get their news. (The Patriot Post now has more than 500,000 Facebook followers.)
          According to the CNN story, which, by the way can be read on Facebook, "Fake news has been a major issue during the election." CNN goes on to blame "Facebook for not doing enough to remove false content," and complains about "sites designed to trick people."
          Facebook is already blocking reputable conservative news and commentary, but that is beside the point. CNN leads the pack of propagandist "fake news" sites, and the ubiquitous reference to "Trump supporters" in this headline betrays that bias — as if there are not a plethora of examples of leftist groups propagating false information to foment discontent. Indeed, this CNN "news report" ends with a reference to some obscure "white supremacist" group in an effort to equate them with "Trump supporters," no doubt evidence of yet another "whitelash" in the election night words of CNN talker Van Jones...
          Fact is, consumers should be skeptical of all media sources — print, cable and online — especially those creating and recycling news hype, notably incessant polling, in order to generate ad revenue. But the most unfettered resource for news, policy and opinion is the online medium, where the reputable exercise of First Amendment "freedom of speech" and of "the press" are most vibrant. It is time to detox from the relentless MSM claptrap.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 OPINION IN BRIEF 
Michael Barone: "Liberal pundits Jonathan Alter and E.J. Dionne characterized the liar-Clinton email lawbreaking and lies as non-scandals. Maybe they weren't scandals in Chicago and Massachusetts, where they grew up, but they were in the outstate Midwest. Hints of liar-Clinton's general election weakness came in Democratic primaries, when she lost outstates badly in Wisconsin and Michigan and ran barely even in Iowa, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Maybe outstaters were voting not for Bernie Sanders' socialism but against liar-Clinton's 'damn emails.' Team liar-Clinton is now saying it was beaten by FBI Director James Comey's intervention. But Comey would not have been heard from if liar-Clinton hadn't broken the law. That's a vote-loser in the outstate Midwest — and an election-loser in America."   ~The Patriot Post
.
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-nObama undermines Trump
with ambitious new climate change plan
by Ben Wolfgang
RbUd2G1_SHY8D0oNzugqWKGUSID3ooQFsi4fDBT1gJd_8fFgz5otXQ-3NNYUANN3_wztl3VtUcBfvOgSRKYtRs3HIdvdvIRHW-ahJx0vTGZdkxs_gn2OXEd5hR5u_94GxzGTNc9XObnEJ_S3Stcy1Z_UX9S7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{washingtontimes.com} ~ President-elect Donald Trump says he’ll abandon his predecessor’s global climate change deal, but that didn’t stop the liar-nObama administration this week from rolling out a new, even more ambitious plan to cut U.S. emissions by 80 percent by 2050... undermining the incoming president on the world stage two months before his inauguration. The latest proposal, which critics on Capitol Hill say is dead on arrival as soon as Mr. Trump enters the White House on Jan. 20, is being sold to the rest of the world as a long-term road map to U.S. greenhouse gas reductions. It comes as Mr. Trump is also under growing pressure from foreign governments and leading U.S. companies not to walk away from President liar-nObama’s climate change vision. Seeking to reassure the rest of the world, Secretary of State John F. hanoi-Kerry told a United Nations climate conference in Morocco that U.S. progress against global warming essentially is permanent, all but ignoring the fact that Mr. Trump has made it crystal-clear he plans to scrap the administration’s climate agenda immediately...
.
Liberal Distortionist Attempts To
Twist Rep King’s Words...
by Rick Wells
WUvLEdTNvx677tG8q8_zqlzadqnlNIPX5VM0qNXNEnGAWSZcfABfrLuR3URK5ms8jFXVOMlqovk3FK5YFS0NbV7vW0JJTjryDRFKGgLk0s7FSEbRFq3P_vUZlZeY080I0G84e9svJeMz=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ The witch Rep Steve King agreed to an interview with is named Stephanie Ruhle, but Stephanie Rude is more appropriate... as are other names that Democrat activists are normally referred to by, most of which are not family friendly. She smiles at the beginning and the end of the interview, aside from those two instances, it’s one failed gotcha attempt after another. She’s got one job, promoting the Democrat agenda, and clearly, being well informed, objective, fair or professional are not necessary qualifications. She leads off by jumping on the “Steve Bannon is Satan” train, citing Mitch McCon-nell’s personal cowardice in not supporting him as some kind of a benchmark of what is reasonable. McCon-nell is not a standard for anything other than duplicity and submission. He’s the last person by which others should be measured...  http://rickwells.us/liberal-distortionist-attempts-twist-rep-kings-words-dealt-humiliating-shut-out-loss/
.
Fake News Mainstream Media Push For Censorship
Of Truthful Alternative Media
by Rick Wells
HRceVuOOpG0wDiDrPsS_xarDCDvWVn91BoDq8hZEbMrGwi6rqEcynM_0Bch1IChLPSqcB2kGJG23LoI36e9Gkk_I6jWRYJcl0QPho7dKsKcEZYD4LImR5_VrnXmq=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ With accolades for Donald Trump delivering our Republic from the brink of death and there being no better selection for Attorney General than Senator Jeff Sessions... Alex Jones notes that Sessions is going “to burn the globalists to the ground.” He references the globalists efforts now underway to salvage their program that is collapsing in on them around the world, quoting liar-nObama as having said that “Globalism is in crisis.” Paul Watson offers up his views on the latest assault on those exposing the globalist agenda, their being labeled and targeted by the illegitimate mainstream media as a serious issue, fake news outlets. He begins, “Having lost the election and lost the argument, the butt-hurt left and the rigged media is desperate to salvage some scrap of credibility. So they’ve decided to create a new panic of a so-called, ‘fake news.’ Pressuring Google and Facebook to take action against ‘fake news’ websites.”...
.
Incoming CIA Director Has Reputation
for Confronting Iran
by Adam Kredo
oIgfZ87D4Qf0RDOGmHHSmnE8-m8QrscktAE9pTWRAeg1Dbaj4Inw57jTMDl4ekGEzaj5dIUhbRwv0Mvilh_Ig-q-d28s5E9oGA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{freebeacon.com} ~ President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) to serve as the next CIA director is garnering early praise from senior congressional insiders and foreign policy experts... who told the Washington Free Beacon on Friday that the lawmaker has won plaudits for taking a tough line on Iranian intransigence and investigating the liar-nObama administration’s secret negotiations with Tehran. Pompeo, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, earned a reputation among his Republican colleagues for his aggressive investigations into liar-nObama administration secrecy surrounding last year’s nuclear agreement with Iran, multiple sources confirmed. Multiple investigations by the lawmaker unearthed documents showing that senior U.S. officials engaged in secret talks with Iran that led to the payment of nearly $2 billion to Tehran by the United States...
.
Allred Smears Of Trump Failed,
Issued Laughable Warning Against Retaliation
by Rick Wells
Z_HSG06oXjlc51K00rIAf8HFl5m_K6gC5PwAQBp3SarkB63eJ2a9ghAzExlnX64t5H2fWk79UOJEpA77djDxxg4zqrmsfOMbbnV7kKovWOaYn8CYjvAV7A8uOBS8C2R2yerRM9AIpt8MFeDRC0AZlw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ A couple of days after the election results came in with surprising results for most of those who don’t have a clue as to what is going on in America, Gloria Allred and one of her “clients” went before the public to do a little damage control... It’s really bad; so bad that it can’t be ignored, if for no other reason than to help clear Mr. Trump’s name and reputation. The smear merchant broken-nose parasitic attorney Gloria Allred stepped in it with both feet and her lying clients have found themselves now covered in it from head to toe – deep doo-doo. The Donald Trump victory blew the heck out of their plans to extort money from the man who will now soon be president. We can imagine the preparation for this theatrical presentation that went on between Allred and Summer Zervos, the embarrassing, pathetic gold-digger and really bad actress sitting next to her. Allred probably told her, “We’ll go out there and warn Mr. Trump, with all of these sympathetic media types on our side as witnesses...
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Slurs Not Working Anymore
by Tom McLaughlin
IknVO3Tl.jpg
{tommclaughlin.blogspot.com} ~ Racist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, misogynist — all these epithets now aimed at Donald Trump and his supporters used to be directed my way. Why? Because I was a teacher who taught students to think critically. I was “poisoning young minds,” said leftists who believed they knew better how issues should be covered in public school — their way and no other. I didn’t just offer “both sides,” because seldom are there only two. I offered multiple viewpoints on controversial issues, encouraged each student to pick what sounded best and defend it. I fostered the kinds of diversity that genuinely improve education: diversity of thought and opinion. To many on the left — and it may now be accurate to say most — the only kinds of diversity that count are those of skin color, sex, or ethnicity. However, Those don't help if everyone thinks alike, and that’s how it is throughout academia now, kindergarten through graduate school.
False%2BDilemma.jpg
About once a month, I wrote up classroom Socratic dialogues and published them, maybe two hundred or so. Most of my other columns expressed my own opinions on the issues of the day and after about 1993 or ’94 those opinions were increasingly conservative. Many readers on the left assumed I was pushing my opinions on students and tried to have me disciplined, silenced, fired, or have my teaching license pulled. All along the way, letters to the editor appeared with the slurs listed above. I read them in class and students were surprised.

“But you don’t tell us what to believe,” they responded.

“Evidently they don’t know that,” I’d answer.

“We should all write letters back and tell them,” some suggested.

“You can if you want,” I’d say, “but not in class. You have to do it on your own.” Several did.
Graham%2527s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg.png
There were classroom dialogues on affirmative action in which I’d explain how racial quotas worked in college admissions, hiring, and awarding public contracts. After publishing those, I was “racist.” There were discussions about jihad and Koranic verses encouraging Muslims to kill infidels, etc. After them came “Islamophobic” slurs. We discussed illegal immigration and I described what I saw after flying down to the Mexican border. After those came out, I was “xenophobic.” We discussed referendum questions on Maine’s ballot about gay rights, gay marriage, partial-birth abortion, Indian casinos, and others. After writing up them up, I was “homophobic”; “misogynist” ; “racist”; and so forth.
Thomas-Sowell-on-Racism.jpg
When I read those letters aloud in class, students asked: “Don’t they bother you?”

“They did at first,” I responded, “but they don’t anymore. Calling me ‘racist’ or ‘misogynist’ doesn’t make it so. Name-calling indicates the writers have run out of arguments, and slurs are all they have.”
46338_517548524956538_1933009854_n.jpg
I enjoyed playing devil’s advocate with students. It was easy to parrot arguments from left, right, or middle because I held them over the years. Like liar-Hillary Clinton and Barack liar-nObama, I had been an Alinskyite radical. Then I moved right to become a liberal before finally emerging as a genuine conservative in my forties. My evolution, as described first by either Georges Clemenceau or Winston Churchill, went thus: “If you’re not a liberal when you’re twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a conservative when you’re forty, you have no brains.” Unless they read my column regularly, students didn’t know what I really thought.
a4ba5bd435d3e3d7d126100fae89a51e.jpg
Efforts by leftists to have me silenced or removed from teaching flared up sporadically for ten or twelve years and I kept a file throughout. After retiring, I wrote it up and tried to shop the manuscript around to various agents with no success. Times are a-changin’ however, as witnessed by the evening and morning of November 8 and 9. Liberals controlling media were shocked to discover that, like me, there are millions out here who have become inured to their ubiquitous slurs. They shot everything they had at Donald Trump and others who didn’t march in lockstep, then sat back expecting their favored candidates to win as they always had, and were shocked when they didn’t.
MSNBC-hosts-AP.png
From 9:00 pm Tuesday night and 1:00 am Wednesday, I flipped through the liberal news channels: NBC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, and ABC. Pundits were all lined up but gone were the smug expressions of election nights past. They were ashen — all of them. How could we have been so wrong? they asked each other. Why did all those “working class” white guys switch to Trump? Did they not listen to us? Well no, they didn’t. They heard you cry wolf for decades and they’re not listening anymore.
socialfeed.info-hillary-clinton-addresses-racial-issues-in-america-debatenight.jpg

Maybe it’s time to shop my manuscript around again. I had been calling it “Poisoning Young Minds,” but maybe it’s time to call it something else. “Teaching While Deplorable” perhaps? “Irredeemable Instructor”? "Privileged Pedagogue”? I have to think about this.

http://tommclaughlin.blogspot.com/2016/11/slurs-not-working-anymore_21.html

Read more…

Monday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
What Comes After the Uprising
by Peggy Noonan
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 The Future of Marriage 
PSGa29-d5vuidFGYO9Q-et7YHNB3vmIrTRYyCuMPn4UhdkqEpMdQZxUMghHf4h7EN_YujL7RsOi6bMAO_wuS1sKr0p1lwxCCmAe_LpObqerSRrCAeTIqdisI7ImjFg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Michael Swartz: In the early days of his presidential campaign, Donald Trump was asked by an interviewer if same-sex marriage was now a dead issue. "[A]nybody that's making that an issue is doing it for political reasons," Trump asserted. "The Supreme Court ruled on it." Trump reiterated his belief this past weekend in a "60 Minutes" interview, telling conservative Americans who just elected him, "These cases have gone to the Supreme Court. They've been settled, and I'm fine with that."
          If a voter was serious about preserving the Supreme Court's same-sex marriage decision, this was an election where that voter had no wrong choice: Democrats tried mightily, but they couldn't pin the homophobe label on Trump — even if they complained his rainbow flag was upside down. Writing at National Review, Ian Tuttle summarized it well by stating, "Contrary to liberals' fever dreams, Donald Trump is the most socially progressive candidate the Republicans have ever put forward."
          The fact that Trump considers the marriage dispute settled law is a major rebuke to a party whose platform adopted just this summer contends, "Our laws and our government's regulations should recognize marriage as the union of one man and one woman and actively promote married family life as the basis of a stable and prosperous society. For that reason ... we do not accept the Supreme Court's redefinition of marriage and we urge its reversal, whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to the states."
          This dichotomy is of particular interest to millions of evangelical Christians who voted for Trump. Many likely did so in hopes that he would nominate conservative jurists, and that still could be the case. At that point, his opinions on marriage don't matter. While Trump has from time to time spoken about the fig leaf of what's called a "reasonable compromise" for those who oppose same-sex nuptials on the grounds of religious liberty, those who wish to avoid the fate of Sweet Cakes by Melissa may not have enough time, nor deep enough pockets, to wait for a legion of like-minded jurists to restore marriage to its proper station. They will instead simply shrug their shoulders, pray for forgiveness, and submit so as not to attract the ire of the Rainbow Mafia.
          In any case, it's unlikely that the Supreme Court would hear a same-sex marriage case in the next few years. As "gay libertarian" Casey Given points out, the chances of overturning Obergefell are diminished with "61% of Americans approving of the institution." He argues that the issue is settled at the federal level, so the next step in advocacy would be to fight the inevitable rear-guard actions within the several states. Given also delights at the prospect of homosexual appointees such as Richard Grenell, whom he cites as a favorite to be our UN ambassador. Another prominent such Trump supporter, PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, is on the executive committee of Trump's transition team.
          Yet a nation of believers pinning their hopes for saving marriage on an unelected body of judges, or (more particularly) on a man who is deeply morally flawed on several counts — notwithstanding the fact that some in the religious community consider our president-elect a born-again "baby Christian" — is pure folly. For the time being, evangelical Americans will have to deal with the fact that there's a small segment of the population being catered to by the Left (and increasingly the Right) in the effort to wield vast and crushing political power. In that case, being right or wrong based on biblical values isn't a consideration.
          What we're up against is a philosophy eloquently outlined by the late Justice Antonin Scalia in his Obergefell dissent. He wrote, "This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves."
          Our hope is that Republicans in Washington and around the country, fresh off a sweeping electoral win, can safeguard and restore some of the Liberty of which Scalia so eloquently wrote. Trump's position is consequential, but it won't make or break the issue.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

Clinics sue feds over order
to perform gender transitions
by Bob Unruh
hW1ar6HdBQblWBdIW9UfPIbuVE8JVeeO2vYO6fPvPcHcgTaioMLQ68cxw0CUF_yxDnE50ZTdGVkzzU0WijKa56rT_lpws8zaEO4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{wnd.com} ~ A number of health clinics, hospitals and a university have joined the state of North Dakota in a lawsuit against a new federal regulation that demands that doctors – all of the estimated 900,000 in America... be ready, willing and able to perform gender-transition procedures on children. That’s even if the physician believes such treatment could harm the child. The federal regulation, announced earlier this year, is the target of a lawsuit filed by the clients of the Becket Fund. “No doctor should be forced to perform a procedure that he or she believes will harm a child,” said Lori Windham, a senior counsel for the group. “Decisions on a child’s medical treatment should be between families and their doctors, not dictated by politicians and government bureaucrats.”...
.
Ted Cruz Signals Openness
To Supreme Court Appointment
by Kevin Daley
b3kz1ov1NgIQ35DVs04YsuKrspxH8jCVDWYtxELhlRWNvK6KDQOW-DYLASKEBdH-c-sBlTCm0r8-8rIMcws1DXvtj3StvRwPxnuN6c3mNyYziiL2A7-fQ2AATSIZoAExtCtYcI4WI6LK=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailycaller.com} ~ Republican Sen. Ted Cruz signaled willingness to fill the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat on the U.S. Supreme Court Friday afternoon at a conference of conservative and libertarian lawyers in Washington, D.C. ... “What I will say is that history is long and can take unexpected paths,” he said in response to an audience question about his filling the vacancy. “I think it is absolutely vital that that seat and every other seat that comes vacant on the court be filled by principled constitutionalists who will be faithful to the law and will check their own policy preferences at the door and simply honor their oath.” “I can also tell you that I have right now the privilege of serving in the United States Senate, of representing 27 million Texans,” he said. “That is a privilege and a responsibility I take very, very seriously. And I look forward to continuing to carry out that responsibility and continuing to fight for the principles of freedom and the principles embodied in the Constitution and Bill of Rights,” he added...  http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/18/ted-cruz-signals-openness-to-supreme-court-appointment/
.
 
"Allah, Kill the Despicable Christians"
by Raymond Ibrahim
BqLwfnZqbDKFmfHmv6CPKCAsVdeeVmtm_xmztlpufKF5vjwklYBBt49TqgA0S9r0PTlNdMvX86XFkSOJ6ccsU6zsSSEd4w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Abu Musab al-Barnawi, the new leader of
Nigeria's Islamist group Boko Haram
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Islamic hate for Christians was on display throughout the month of August. Shortly after an 80-year-old Catholic priest in France was slaughtered by Muslims who stormed his church during mass... the 16-year-old Muslim son of an Islamic cleric living in Belgium made a video and posted it on social media. In the video, he appears walking along the main street of the Belgian city of Verviers during Ramadan while making prayers to Allah, which include: "Allah, kill the despicable Christians. Allah, kill each and every last one of them...." According to Immigration Minister Theo Francken: "It's obvious that his father, the imam, is promoting such ideas not just to fighters to join the battle in Syria, but also to his own children. The young man who appears in the video reflects the father's views, and I understand and empathize with the great concern that city residents have over this." A deportation order was last reported as pending a court appeal...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9350/kill-despicable-christians
.
Germany Launches Massive Raid
Targeting Islamist Terrorist Group
by Kerry Lear
2hWiVYQvZYIgjb5awF04KyTSLTEklrUY18GjtNE-uII42fxAy0L8X_POmsxQOS7LjslhjaEArQEaUzsRn9YcM_Y2BApa23nvLCc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{punchingbagpost.com} ~ German police have been sweeping 60 cities in the country in an attempt to stop the Islamist group, True Religion... So far authorities have searched 190 mosques, office, and apartments looking for members of this group. True Religion, also known as Read, was outlawed Tuesday after the government determined that the group was secretly recruiting jihadists to fight in Iraq and Syria...  http://punchingbagpost.com/germany-launches-massive-raid-targeting-islamist-terrorist-group
.
El-Sissi says don't 'jump to conclusions' on Trump
FLOEzCgKA41sbC5fdF1Piflp3QSGhrJRd5M05odR0uhTfGkhWEjqQ3CvOJvtDsq89WBZzY1akfEGOShFfqE6jan3CZw5oCiU8yHriRG_gL7ishUJ-zRH=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{ap.org} ~ Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi has praised U.S. President-elect Donald J. Trump, saying that his inflammatory statements from the campaign trail do not necessarily reflect the actions he will take as president... El-Sissi, in an interview with Portuguese news agency LUSA released on Saturday, said, "let's not jump into conclusions or worry" about future U.S. actions or policies in the Middle East. The army chief-turned-president was interviewed prior to his upcoming Nov. 21 visit to Portugal. El-Sissi was among the very first foreign leaders to congratulate Trump's on his presidential victory. "We have to distinguish between the rhetoric that takes place within presidential campaigns and the real and actual administration of a country after the inauguration," he said. "There will be a chance for more thorough readings."... http://bigstory.ap.org/article/2978c951fe3040cbbf38eb000076e2e3/el-sissi-says-dont-jump-conclusions-trump
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
What Comes After the Uprising
by Peggy Noonan
1kp78KAyjtIVKe-2VhKy0n2Lmi4uV7ySA3bKWFox6JY5k7aXOZWcvhsntXUc1tGxLqrT2A6AgAifd06pOnQdZuqKhhd-cQ071g513KKIfsLir2mZWxXHWfcIpYsWYs8_Y64detv_vw10DLBANcAHFLw9eEY41gsw1w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Sometimes there comes a crack in Time itself.
Sometimes the earth is torn by something blind. . . .
Call it the mores, call it God or Fate . . .
That force exists and moves.
And when it moves
It will employ a hard and actual stone
To batter into bits an actual wall
And change the actual scheme of things.
—Stephen Vincent Benét, “John Brown’s Body”

{peggynoonan.com} ~ Hand it to him, the hard and actual stone who changed the actual scheme.

There were actually many stones, some 60 million, but Donald Trump did it, battering not just the famous blue wall but a wall of elites and establishments and their expectations.

The moment for me that will never be forgotten:

I was in a busy network green room late on election night. We were scrolling down, noting margins in various battlegrounds, looking for something definitive. Then someone read aloud from his phone: “AP calls it—Donald Trump elected president of the United States.” There was quiet for just a moment. I wrote in my notes “2:32 a.m., 11/9/16.” Soon we went into the newsroom for a panel, and I said what I thought, again from my notes: “We have witnessed something epochal and grave. It is the beginning of a new era whose shape and form are not clear, whose personnel and exact direction are unknown. But something huge and incalculable has occurred. God bless our beloved country.”

I am not one of those who knew how the evening would end. I saw liar-Hillary Clinton winning for all the usual reasons. Now the usual reasons are pretty much out the window.

But some things should be said:

First, our democratic republic is vibrant and alive. It is not resigned. It is still capable of delivering a result so confounding it knocks you into the next room.

Nobody rigged this. Nobody hacked it. There weren’t brawls at polling places, there was kindness and civility. At the 92nd Street Y I got to embrace three neighbors. All this in a highly charged, highly dramatic and divisive election. We did our democratic work and then went home. It all worked.

Second, Donald Trump said he had a movement and he did. This is how you know. His presidential campaign was bad—disorganized, unprofessional, chaotic, ad hoc. There was no state-of-the-art get-out-the-vote effort—his voters got themselves out. There was no high-class, high-tech identifying of supporters—they identified themselves. They weren’t swayed by the barrage of brilliantly produced ads—those ads hardly materialized. This was not a triumph of modern campaign modes and ways. The people did this. As individuals within a movement.

It was a natural, self-driven eruption. Which makes it all the more impressive and moving. And it somehow makes it more beautiful that few saw it coming.

On the way home Wednesday morning I thought of my friend who runs the neighborhood shoe-repair shop. He is elderly, Italian-American, an immigrant. I had asked him last winter who would win the Republican nomination and he looked at me as if I were teasing. “Troomp!” he instructed. I realized at that moment: In America now only normal people can see the obvious. Everyone else is lost in a data-filled fog.

That was true right up to the end.

Those who come to this space know why I think what happened, happened. The unprotected people of America, who have to live with Washington’s policies, rebelled against the protected, who make and defend those policies and who care little if at all about the unprotected. That broke bonds of loyalty and allegiance. Tuesday was in effect an uprising of the unprotected. It was part of the push-back against detached elites that is sweeping the West and was seen most recently in the Brexit vote.

But so much depends upon the immediate moment. Mr. Trump must move surely now. When you add up the votes of Mrs. liar-Clinton, Jill Stein,Gary Johnson and others, you get roughly 52%. Between 47% and 48% voted for Mr. Trump. It was an enormous achievement but a close-run thing, and precarious.

The previous 16 months were, for the Trump campaign, the victory project. What has to begin now is the reassurance project. The Democratic Party is in shock but will soon recover. Mainstream media, tired and taken aback, will reorient soon. Having targeted Mr. Trump in the campaign, they won’t be letting up now. Firing will quickly commence.

There is something I have seen very personally the past few days. The impolite way to put it is the left believed its own propaganda. The polite way is that having listened to Mr. Trump on the subjects of women and minorities, etc., they sincerely understand Mr. Trump and Trumpism to be an actual threat to their personal freedom. Trump supporters are overwhelmingly citizens of good will and patriotic intent who never deserved to be deplored as racist, sexist, thuggish. But some were not so benign or healthy.

The past few days I’ve heard from a young man who fears Jews will be targeted and told me of Muslim friends now nervous on the street. There was the beautiful lady with the blue-collar job who, when asked how she felt about the election, told me she is a lesbian bringing up two foreign-born adopted children and fears she will be targeted and her children somehow removed from her.

Many fear they will no longer be respected. They need to know things they rely on are still there. They don’t understand what has happened, and are afraid. They need—and deserve—reassurance. Trump apparatus: Find a way.

The president-elect should make a handful of appointments quickly, briskly, with an initial emphasis on old hands and known quantities. Ideological foes need not be included but accomplished Washington figures, especially those from previous administrations, should be invited in. It is silly to worry that Mr. Trump’s supporters will start to fear he’s gone establishment. They believe in him, are beside themselves with joy, and will understand he’s shoring up his position and communicating stability.

Third, there are former officials and true experts with esteemed backgrounds who need to be told: Help him.

They wouldn’t advise him during the campaign because of the stigma he carried as a barbarian and likely loser. It might damage their stature. Better to watch him go down to defeat and continue their career as big brains in exile.

But that’s over.

A Trump administration will be populated by three kinds of people: loyalists, opportunists and patriots.

The loyalists earned their way. “To the victor belong the spoils.” Back a long shot for president, and you’ll get a midlevel office in the Executive Office Building. The opportunists have a place in every administration—they spy an opening, have a friend who has a friend, wind up as undersecretary to the assistant secretary. That’s life among the humans, especially the political humans.

It is the patriots who matter, many of whom kept away from Mr. Trump in the past. They are needed now. They have heft, wisdom, experience and insight.

Donald Trump doesn’t know how to be president. He isn’t a reader of the presidency. He’s never held office. There’s little reason to believe he knows how to do this.

The next president needs you. This is our country. Help him.

Read more…

Mon/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Beyond Trump’s Wall
by Steven Malanga
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 MoH Recipient Uninvited From Marine Ball 
gFYi8HTzQtkxWDlXRgngPQBjBDesifX0YMsFRfOW_z-PtAmOLy3AqMTSeB04xtMZW3ri_DGWaiVr-OHoJCfklD1HtlSSLkEbIS7W5v8bVNW2smPyJNB6PUZnE5dfBg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Why would one of the Marine Corps' biggest heroes be uninvited from the Marine Corps Ball in Afghanistan?
          Sergeant Dakota Meyer received the Medal of Honor for his actions on Sept. 8, 2009, during the Battle of Ganjgal, in which five Americans and eight Afghan security personnel were killed in action. Meyer made five runs into enemy fire to evacuate wounded personnel and recover the bodies of American KIAs.
          For this year's Marine Corps Ball held to celebrate the 241st birthday of the Marine Corps, Meyer had been invited to attend in Afghanistan, where he had served with Embedded Training Team 2-8. According to a report by tribunist.com, the celebration was to be held at the American embassy in Kabul due to security concerns. Such concerns are valid, as a recent murder-suicide bombing at Bagram Air Base left four Americans dead and wounded 17 others.
          Meyer's invite was reportedly rescinded at the direction of Amb. P. Michael McKinley over Meyer's "political views." On his Facebook page, Meyer has been vocally critical of the liar-nObama administration on a number of issues, including a push for additional gun control laws. Meyer's wife, Bristol Palin, is also the daughter of former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin.
          "It's disheartening that he's using the Marine Corps Ball as a chance to be petty and political. This should be beyond politics and a time for him to support the men and women who defend he and his staff at the embassy," Meyer said. On his Facebook page, Meyer added, "I want to make sure the Marines in Afghanistan know I really wanted to join them for our birthday, but politics got in the way. Let me know when you guys get back in country and we'll rock out then!"  ~The Patriot Post
.
 Incoming AG Sessions and a liar-Clinton Prosecution 
-NNMdyuhp-4hMOlfyVDRn1MXm9DGa604Fzul_VvnLyNL0Jln9elLeWsACPBBggnmjcE2749tASxoQZf0I3XEtCw0vpPiN_NVMkF1-5R63c83fm7qzdzpkf_DzyeuuA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
There's been much discussion since liar-Hillary Clinton's stunning defeat of whether or when she'll be pardoned. Of course, the first thing about a pardon would be the admission of guilt, so that much is interesting all by itself. Barack liar-nObama's spokesman, Josh Earnest, pointedly did not answer the question of whether his boss would pardon liar-Clinton. And Donald Trump has so far demurred about continued prosecution, even going so far as calling the liar-Clintons "good people" and saying, "I don't want to hurt them."
          Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy wrote a fairly lengthy consideration of the various options. (Don't miss the whole thing.) Would liar-nObama or Trump pardon liar-Hillary? What political capital would it cost to do so? Conversely, would Trump allow the FBI's investigation to proceed, or would he seek a special prosecutor as he warned on the campaign trail? McCarthy writes, "This is one of what will no doubt be many things that Mr. Trump will find were easier to say in the heat of the moment (a contentious debate between the candidates) than to do in his new political reality. During the campaign, nothing damaged liar-Clinton as badly as the specter of criminal jeopardy. But now Trump has been elected, and he has a governing agenda that will require cooperation from Capitol Hill. A prosecution of liar-Clinton would provoke Democratic outrage, which means media outrage, which, in turn, means Republican panic."
          Besides, Hot Air's Jazz Shaw muses, "At this point it almost seems as if she's being punished more thoroughly than any judge could manage. liar-Hillary has essentially become the villain in a Larry Bond novel who works on her evil plot for decades and is within moments of detonating a tactical weapon on the National Mall when some geek comes along at the last second, clips the correct wire on the device and notifies the authorities to come haul her away. She's serving a four year sentence in a prison named Anywhere But The White House."
          On the other hand, our own James Shott argues, "As secretary of state, liar-Clinton breached security and put at risk sensitive national security information, destroyed evidence, and lied to Congress about it. Others who have done similar things have suffered criminal penalties for their wrongdoing; retired Army General David Petraeus, active-duty Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier, and many others were punished through the legal system for security breaches. So, too, must liar-Clinton be." In order for Rule of Law to be restored, justice must be applied equally.
          Enter Trump's pick for attorney general, Jeff Sessions. That puts Sessions in charge of both the Justice Department and the FBI, each of which has some form of open probe into liar-Clinton and her email and/or Foundation. Sessions has been quite critical of both agencies' handling of the investigations thus far and has called for a special prosecutor. This ups the ante for liar-nObama to issue a pardon, because it seems unlikely that Sessions will let liar-Hillary's loss be punishment enough. In any case, stay tuned... ~The Patriot Post
.
 AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-nObama DOJ Lawyers Pull Plug On
Illegal Amnesty – Good Guys Won
by Rick Wells
SRI7f5t6X2-OaoRDxdEMZl1AAX0EmkPfNUgO1o_s0VD6umOTt5VJnC3LafBdLtw7MCBziunyySnBy0g4I9XcL9rLM3Fz2hvn_g_QM8Bf9oD2DPxa3vPsZZqcmW0oGX8sySndC3M=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ The dictatorial amnesty declarations for illegal aliens may now finally be dead, as Judge Andrew Hanen has advised both parties that he is declaring a waiting period to be in effect to allow time for the Trump administration to weigh in and offer their positions in the debate... On Friday the liar-nObama regime halted their efforts and agreed with Judge Andrew Hanen that it was appropriate to suspend further action in the case. In a joint statement, the Justice Department and lawyers for the State of Texas agreed, “Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit that further proceedings on the merits of this case, including the submission of a schedule for resolving the merits, should be stayed until February 20, 2017.” Judge Hanen became a household name and a hero to many Americans in February of 2015 when Congress had repeatedly failed to act in standing up to the dictatorial actions of liar-nObama. He came out of nowhere two days before the authoritarian amnesty declaration was to go into effect and stood for the American citizens, blocking the usurpation of federal immigration law...  http://rickwells.us/obama-doj-lawyers-pull-plug-illegal-amnesty-good-guys-won/
.
Muslim Leader in US: “Islam is not here to
Integrate. Islam is here to Dominate”
by Tim Brown
cwqR-D2iVdPKCI9GX4ZayAKJA8NSYMXQg22utYSXgU3rLUiJp8cl-ELg_UBUar-BwAaRfy801sQ5_qPz8euNQFRSrt9cQGwKmIArbcfd8tf9U909k8NBjBk6-rDXBcBbPT8corEMv_IYskl-c-vx8bPZtM2_-6AhaS80keWNpmthxNWnqMgdkCBfAOG4SQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{freedomoutpost.com} ~ At least there is one Muslim in America who is open and honest about what Islam is and what it is here for... "The Prophet said: 'There is no god but Allah,' said Thbait. "Instead the elites of Mecca rejected. They offered the Prophet wealth, status, and political representation – a seat on the executive branch within Mecca's secular order – all to avoid this statement and its implications. Yet he rejected their offers and continued his journey towards radical change, providing us with step-by-step instructions on how to make this religion supreme." "The elites of Mecca would use every possible measure to coerce or contain Muhammad's call for change within specific parameters," he added. "Those parameters would permit the changing of anything that did not threaten their system and infringe on their power. But this message is not here to integrate. It is here to dominate. Islam is here to dominate! This was an ideological struggle, the sole purpose of which was to organize Man's affairs in accordance with a system revealed by Allah."...  http://freedomoutpost.com/muslim-leader-in-us-islam-is-not-here-to-integrate-islam-is-here-to-dominate/
.
Judge Jeanine Tears Into Hamilton Hypocrites
For Disrespecting VP Pence
by Rick Wells
GXtKNENZaLWutfuwSwMz8Bp3_HwqEvANbsB1lOfuGsp9nVmOwINjbEGlFLXSQy4gSvYTlyL5W41tth8zMUA1ScbuKUzLLKvg5-2MFchJipfcRz9WtrVQEwBlfNNwAr1_3cLu41Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Judge Jeanine Pirro’s opening statement begins at the 2:20 mark in the video. She’s fired up about the totally inappropriate treatment that Vice President-elect Pence received when he went out for a little relaxation... to get away from the rigors of preparing the incoming administration. She says, “The treatment of Vice President-elect Mike Pence last night in New York City, where he was booed on the way in to the play Hamilton and lectured from the stage on his way out, was both outrageous and embarrassing. What happened in that theater, one block from this studio, was out and out reverse racism and teed up hate for a man who has done nothing to deserve this inappropriate and disgusting behavior by those who take it upon themselves to use what was supposed to be a night of art and recreation and appreciation for our American history as a political bully pulpit to chide the incoming vice president...
.
Carlson Destroys Libtard Lard Tub For Total DNC
Hack Job On Trump Cabinet Pick
by Rick Wells
wetXm5JbYHNgqVE33-BUUa9eRBTpYsiDUX68rmIAiYg90PSEj1bMAj7JBPpiT8BpAQXu7MPEJTcijrIaz2rTL25-YzMaUwRFKV67-pU3H11mzktHvmXfhUgi5XGXMn17DONT4uAt36D-Z4h1Lm5Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Tucker Carlson describes a hit piece by Roll Call writer Jonathan Allen as one of the most unfair things he’s ever read. As has been the common practice of late... the hits are no longer primarily being aimed at President-elect Trump personally but rather at those who have served him to this point and those he’s nominating for future positions. In this case the object of the liberal aggression is Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions, a man who is so popular in his home state that he ran unopposed in his last election, in either party.  Carlson describes the article as a “pure download from the DNC website.” As part of his attack on the Senator, Allen states that he is a favorite of a white supremacy group called “Storm Front.” Carlson asks if there is any evidence that Sessions has any contact with this group or is he just smearing him on the basis of their support of him...  http://rickwells.us/carlson-destroys-libtard-lard-tub-total-dnc-hack-job-trump-cabinet-pick/
.
Juan Williams Smacked Down By Laura Ingraham,
Broad, Vague Smears Not Enough
by Rick Wells
pYCpCkIegIJWLwjZvcvhin1xC8rK14XewOEboGeXeWMRN8eoxIQkn0oxKdUplCc69YF3bPvQGtFiOSXgumjAWCS2vN1-lNlykFLJhvWhQOauHfQXtoki_vbFXGkrnClzBpbgVtPdLVw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Liberal Juan Williams bit off more than he could chew and had much of it stuffed back in his stunned face as Laura Ingraham, already a top contender for White House press secretary in the Trump administration... might have iced the job with this defense of the Trump team. Williams followed the typical liberal methodology of throwing out broad, unsubstantiated accusations, something that she put a stop to in short order. In a discussion on Fox News Sunday, Williams said, “of Lt. General Mike Flynn, “You look at his ties to Russia, his ties to Vladimir Putin, when they think about his ties to Turkey.” Ingraham asks, “Juan, what are you talking about, you’re just throwing out these…” He offers up his foundation, stretched beyond what might be plausible, saying, “Not only did he go to a dinner, he went to a dinner for Russia Today and was with Putin and he was taking money from the Turkish government. These are facts, Laura.” Williams is purposely vague and deceptive. Being with Putin in terms of sitting at a dinner table is much different from being with him in the sense of an alliance or politically. Taking money from the Turkish government does not mean the same thing as taking money from the Saudis did in the case of liar-Hillary Clinton. Once is honest, above board and public, one is secret and filtered through a foundation slush fund...
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Beyond Trump’s Wall
by Steven Malanga
k4BEKjKeADLsSlGwdJCIutKVW-Kp5WeMzaVLjRkkr0dASR-9o9gEN2phlXLoqSIpBmKcW3tZT58znBsoWPLNyWDBRVjeRwrXXiY5WZOZvPBW2eQQsLrXouN_THxG3JmriwVpeyAInReCHjD6-bz-t-S7T8FZOUABvB0O5rg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 

{city-journal.org} ~ While President-elect Donald Trump made immigration a cornerstone issue of his campaign, much of his program revolved around stemming the flow of illegal immigration. But the United States also has a flawed legal immigration system, which allows some 1 million people to gain lawful status here every year. The bulk of these legal immigrants enter based on family ties. By contrast, many developed nations have shifted to a skills-based approach to immigration, one that seeks to admit residents with talents that the country needs and skills that are likely to make them successful, productive citizens. America should do the same.

About 15 percent of legal immigrants to the United States receive work visas for people with special skills, advanced degrees, or money to invest in job-creating enterprises. The total, about 150,000 people, includes spouses and minor children of these individuals. Another 10 percent of legal immigrants in recent years have been refugees or asylum-seekers. The country also has a so-called diversity visa, which it uses to grant legal status to about 50,000 immigrants annually from countries that haven’t sent the U.S. many immigrants lately. What remains, about 65 percent of legal immigration, is based on family ties—spouses, children, parents, and siblings of adult American citizens, as well as spouses and minor children of legal permanent residents.

The current family system derives from 1965 legislation that replaced strict national quotas with preferences for family ties. The more people the U.S. admitted legally, the longer the backlist of relatives waiting to get in grew. Under pressure, Congress kept expanding the program to allow more and more legal immigrants into the country—from about 300,000 annually in 1964, the year before the legislation, to the 1 million annually of last year—based on nothing more than family ties.

More than just growing the number of immigrants, however, the new system also changed the mix of immigration. Before the 1965 law, nearly 70 percent of immigrants to the U.S. hailed from Europe or Canada. After 1965, immigrants from Latin American and Asian countries constituted about 85 percent of legal immigration. As the mix changed, the ability of those coming to integrate themselves culturally and economically has flagged. A study of Census data by Harvard economists George Borjas and David Katz looked at Mexican immigrants arriving in the United States in the 1970s. Even after 20 years, these immigrants earned less than 50 percent of the average American worker’s wage. That’s a distinctly different outcome than what immigrants during the great waves of the early twentieth century experienced. Then, foreign-born workers took an average of just 15 to 20 years to close the wage gap with native-born workers.

Defenders of the current system, including President liar-nObama, say that it promotes family unification. That’s only really true in extreme cases, though, such as for refugees from war. By contrast, most of those coming here legally are doing so by choice, mostly to seek a better life. There is nothing inherently humanitarian about allowing them to bring along their children, spouses, parents, and adult siblings with their families.

Many countries have moved away from immigration systems that emphasize family preferences. In the late 1980s, Australia began trying to attract workers with training and experience in the jobs that the country’s businesses needed filled. In 20 years, Australia flipped its system completely from one in which about 70 percent of legal immigrants were granted status based on family connections to one in which seven in ten immigrants are granted entry because of their trade. In Canada, the country to which many anti-Trumpers supposedly want to emigrate, those applying for legal immigration status earn points for certain desirable characteristics, such as advanced degrees and the ability to speak English or French.

Over the years, many bipartisan attempts to transform our legal immigration system have foundered. In the 1990s, the so-called Jordan Commission, created by President Bill liar-Clinton and chaired by former Texas congresswoman Barbara Jordan, concluded after extensive study that our current system had tipped the balance too far toward low-skilled immigrants. The commission argued instead for a skills-based revision, but advocates of the family system blasted the recommendation as “anti-family,” and liar-Clinton withdrew his support.

Similarly, the 2007 immigration-reform act, largely pushed by Senators John McCain and Ted Kennedy, advocated moving away from family criteria to a Canadian-style points system. Critics on the left termed the bill “anti-family,” and it died quickly when those on the right objected to the legislation’s path to legalization for illegals.

Though Trump campaigned on building a wall and refusing admission to refugees from parts of the world that have served as recruiting bases for terrorists, he also pledged to “reform legal immigration to serve the best interests of America and its workers.” The best way to do that is to leave behind our outdated family-preference system.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/beyond-trumps-wall-14865.html

Read more…

Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
liar-nObama's Disconnects and Delusions
by David Limbaugh
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 liar-nObama's Effort to Swamp Trump 
TO4bp5KyaxB8UqUBHEOPyCNvE9P5Tv7O9FQvfZ-2kccKi5EiTQDGNQtRIw_qrfYl-DrfSxSw3x3q2yCb8q8uI9fxK-_ZKmk6FygOuMyBmpWaQCiUDsw5hAK_Oz4Flg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Donald Trump's post-election visit to the White House — owing him "an open mind and the chance to lead" and "rooting for his success in uniting and leading the country" — appear to have been little more than empty words. Shocking, we know. Since the election, liar-nObama has actively and aggressive sought to do everything in his power to stymie Trump's stated agenda of reversing many of liar-nObama's failed socialist policies.
          To that end, the Washington Free Beacon reports, "The liar-nObama administration set a new record Thursday by producing 527 pages worth of new rules and regulations in a single day, bringing the president's Federal Register up to 81,640 total pages for 2016, the most ever." Meanwhile, Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry announced at the UN climate conference in Morocco that the U.S. is setting a new long term goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by the year 2050. That's on top of liar-nObama's recent signing of the Paris Agreement. Trump has been clear in his plan to remove the U.S. from the agreement due to the damage it would cause to the economy and his skepticism over supposedly "settled climate science."
          liar-nObama is figuratively pouring concrete into Washington's toilets, making Trump's job of cleaning the DC sewer that much more difficult and time consuming.
          On a final note, though, if Trump's choices for cabinet members and department heads are any indication, he is well prepared for the clean-up job. While he has often been derided for his ego and being overly sensitive to criticism, the choices Trump is making are quite encouraging. For example, Trump plans to meet with Mitt Romney to discuss a cabinet post rumored to be that of secretary of state. That would be quite a remarkable instance of the two men burying the hatchet. Trump clearly understands that being a good CEO means surrounding yourself with the best talent out there in order to achieved the desired goals — goals that include dismantling liar-nObama's awful legacy.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 Democrats' Deal With the Devil? 
30vsHEgDu8XUOnMtBwiIP_veEOKExFJz_SzRi-0tu0b8a9b0Qt0BEpAsw0TfoXdSD2w2arAzjeRniLyEqe64tLWGqWsl-EjRHhwgZoTtZYti_3ODVQOjd3qlU08hnw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
If you listen to Democrats, Donald Trump is the worst thing ever to happen to our nation. But that evidently doesn't mean they're above working with him to get some of their agenda going. The Democrat National Committee New York Times reports, "Congressional Democrats, divided and struggling for a path from the electoral wilderness, are constructing an agenda to align with many proposals of President-elect Donald J. Trump that put him at odds with his own party. On infrastructure spending, child tax credits, paid maternity leave and dismantling trade agreements, Democrats are looking for ways they can work with Mr. Trump and force Republican leaders to choose between their new president and their small-government, free-market principles." Divide and conquer — it's the Democrat way.
          First off, don't trust the Times, even if they have promised to "rededicate" to honest reporting. But we'll come back to that.
          There's reason to think the Demo strategy might work. For one thing, incoming Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer took more political cash from Trump than any other senator, dating all the way back to 1996, and the two have somewhat of a bond. "I've known Schumer for many, many years and I have a good relationship with him," Trump said last year. "The fact is, that I think it is time maybe that we all do get along." And for his part, Schumer said this week, "We're not going to just, as some have done here in the past, say just because it's President Trump's idea or thought, we're going to oppose it."
          Schumer may know that the best way to Trump's heart is through flattery. And it's also true that Trump isn't ideologically opposed to things like more infrastructure spending or the other things the Times report listed.
          That said, here's a reality check for the Gray Lady: Mike Pence, Paul Ryan and Mitch McCon-nell will have a thing or two to say about what gets done. And given the thrashing Republicans just gave Democrats up and down the ballot, we'd venture to guess Trump isn't quite as eager to work with Democrats as the Times would have us believe. After all, they'll do anything to sell a picture of a fractured Republican Party.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Dems Hint They’ll Sabotage Senator Sessions In Confirmation Hearings
by Rick Wells
9es6XFBRbyWUn-0CvxmslaIJGU3FVMU8djhNGuiEJWZebLQ9R3mUoKV2qZXIyZCDRB9zwlYD8xTZvTw1AG62uSY86rhQDYjMaqVer4G3BdESg8x6IOQ6CDOb5PoQ0ZQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ The Democrats and their propagandists at CNN are gunning for anybody that was instrumental in Mr. Trump’s victory or who might serve in an significant way in the Trump administration... It doesn’t matter that it’s our country, supposedly one that they also care about and swore an oath to that could be denied the service of a qualified public servant. What matters to Democrats, particularly ones still stinging over the defeat of their criminal opportunist candidate, is their Party. America is a distant second at best. Senator Jeff Sessions was nominated by Ronald Reagan back in 1986, but the self-righteous Democrats obstructed his path forward. He was never confirmed although he did win a moral victory by returning as a United States Senator ten years later. He is now one of the most respected members of their group and one of the few true statesmen, if not the only one, among their number. The fact that Sessions was from Alabama was surely a strike against him among the self-righteous Senators deciding his fate. Every Yankee Democrat knows that all Alabamans are born racists. Among them the current anti-Constitution Vice-President, Joe “the Groper” loose lips-Biden and the coward who killed a woman in a car crash and then ran away to hide until she was discovered by others, “Chappaquiddick Ted” Kennedy...  http://rickwells.us/dems-hint-theyll-sabotage-senator-sessions-confirmation-hearings/
.
After Trump Won, Border Patrol Agents Listens to Trump, Not liar-nObama – He’s Pissed!
by Harry Hibbs
{gopthedailydose.com} ~ Under President Barack liar-nObama, Border Patrol agents were handcuffed in their duties almost as much as the men and women they were trying to catch... Now that Donald Trump is the president-elect, however, there’s a new day at our southern border. According to LifeZette, the head of one of the largest Border Patrol unions said that agents were unlikely to listen to directives from the liar-nObama administration to turn a blind eye to illegal immigration, as many would either be looking forward to a Trump administration or fearful of demotion or firing because of their ineffectiveness against illegal immigration. This is in spite of the fact that most experts expected a flood of immigrants in the last days of the liar-nObama administration, before the Trump administration could take any action at the border...
.
New Documents Show
liar-Clinton Conflicts of Interest
by Judicial Watch
OYFSeP4UO4gd8ndAqHFUFssrMq8ORedqOdTDASqp_NalfJ0M7LZpD5RlTiE4YLLYkGQ-C19Tnow0JNfiKLaIFPPx7U0yDvCKTvO8fiiudBWYhInmtsDlB37LGtv34CfK8g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{judicialwatch.org} ~ Judicial Watch announced that it has received 508 pages of documents in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking information about possible conflicts of interest between the actions taken by liar-Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and Bill liar-Clinton’s activities... More than 440 pages of the documents were redacted either in full, or with only minor notations remaining. The documents were released as a result of a federal court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department on May 28, 2013, (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00772)). The documents also include a lengthy March 2009 email from liar-Clinton Foundation Director of Foreign Policy Amitabh Desai to former Assistant Secretary of State Andrew Shapiro and subsequently forwarded to top liar-Clinton aide Jake Sullivan containing the names of nearly 200 then-current and former heads of state to be invited to the 2009 liar-Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting. The list includes dignitaries from Saudi Arabia, which gave $14.5 million to the liar-Clinton Foundation; Kuwait, which gave between $5 and $10 million; Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar – all of which donated between $1 and $5 million over the years. In February 2015, the Washington Post reported, “A third of foundation donors who have given more than $1 million are foreign governments or other entities … and foreign donors make up more than half of those who have given more than $5 million.”...  http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-documents-show-clinton-conflicts-interest/
.
Tucker Carlson DESTROYS Jonathan Allen
from The Hill and it was AWESOME
-MNySkxP2Q0bMOhbBaqqE88uKfz0lbkJk5_V_Mi4ByIH4hZgDG_Oulu9xrSiohXq737CoMQ0RViI-8I7J2ILpnG63qL0iXvZYXiPJvnD5OGToxyVg5b0M-QhY2lxBCc5ag_s7gJZr2FMRL6PYLw1ycZCLT51ZavMd54sD3EeSVtq9pLhnzrZrwtB1NcXFRqd9cunYi9-KP6Y9gCBsa_mFm_lPFfcFg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{conservativevideos.com} ~ This was probably the most fun television programming of the evening. Fox News made the best decision to give Tucker Carlson his own program every night at 7pm ET Monday through Friday... This is one of the personal reasons many of us love Tucker. In this interview Tucker talks about the article written about Senator Jeff Sessions that was not only unfair but it was the most blown out lie anyone has told today from the liberal media machine...  http://conservativevideos.com/tucker-carlson-destroys-jonathan-allen-hill-awesome-video/
.
Islamic Terrorists not Poor and Illiterate, 
but Rich and Educated
by Giulio Meotti
3ugzgBHrfRhA9TDttTTQs-NqDFrWuOsg81arbUjmfz9CY5UETkYXnRZyZz_0KkwSxz9FbdTgjNwl_RxzmqzWmrpGYZg7XA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Terrorists seem to be models of successful integration. Mohammed
Bouyeri shot the filmmaker Theo van Gogh (right) to death,
then stabbed him and slit his throat in 2004.
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ "There is a stereotype that young people from Europe who leave for Syria are victims of a society that does not accept them and does not offer them sufficient opportunities... Another common stereotype in the debate in Belgium is that, despite research which refutes this, radicalization is still far too often misunderstood as a process resulting from failed integration... I therefore dare say that the better young people are integrated, the greater the chance is that they radicalize. This hypothesis is supported by a lot of evidence." That was the result of extremely important Dutch research, led by a group of academics at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam. Terrorists seem to be models of successful integration: for instance, Mohammed Bouyeri, the Moroccan-Dutch terrorist who shot the filmmaker Theo van Gogh to death, then stabbed him and slit his throat in 2004. "He [Bouyeri] was a well-educated guy with good prospects," said Job Cohen, the Labor Party mayor of Amsterdam... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9343/terrorism-poverty-despair
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-nObama's Disconnects and Delusions
by David Limbaugh
SkaYVu1u8sWnjOXfE4zHuBzQ2Cutla0CraQbohUv3DkpocGxpgvdY899A-7nGK5-8ErOLI6qUK0bY38tkG4NudWOjGurLAb4WvIrloq3RZdzeRFEkIS77NXubtxbnqpfy6V8JlsAiG3McGgaYKdYs0o=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ President liar-nObama, in Greece, said world leaders should learn from the U.S. presidential election and pay attention to the public's fears and frustration about the economy. Why? He never has.

How can a man living in such a fantasy world presume to tell other people how to perceive others and react to problems as if he's been an innocent bystander witnessing these horrors for years?

Scratch that. He doesn't think we've experienced horrors. He thinks the U.S. economy has been wonderful under his watch. Listening to him characterize his eight-year record is to witness willful blindness on a scale my willing suspension of disbelief is incapable of processing.

The American economy, said liar-nObama, was contracting faster than it did during the Great Depression. "We had to fight back from the worst recession since the Great Depression. ... But we were able to intervene, apply lessons learned and stabilize and then begin growth again." He tastelessly bragged, in front of his Greek audience, that his economy recovered better and faster than most of Europe's. Then he began critiquing Greece's economy, as if he is a wizard of economics.

No American politician -- and certainly no president -- in my lifetime has caused such destruction and suffered so little personal accountability for it. It was ridiculous when he still blamed George W. Bush for his own lackluster economy and unconscionable deficits in the latter half of his first term. It was amazing that he kept making this argument with a straight face through the 2012 presidential election.

But why not? It worked. When you've got a liberal media covering your tracks and slanting everything in your favor, you can apparently fool millions.

But liar-nObama is still making the same arguments today after eight straight years of malaise. So how did he fight against the worst recession since the Great Depression? Well, he spent money we didn't have like a drunken sailor, increased taxes and smothering regulations, bad-mouthed entrepreneurship and producers, and vilified the "wealthy" for not paying their fair share.

How did that work out? Contrary to his bizarre self-assessment, we have had the worst economic recovery in 60 years. So he's bragging about that? We've had a stagnant economy his entire tenure in office, and he is touting it as sustained growth? Of course he is, and the media continue to cover for him.

He talks about the unemployment rate's going down, but this obscures the reality that tens of millions have opted out of the workforce in despair. The media know that the unemployment figure is meaningless when factoring in the labor participation rate. Whether liar-nObama is able to accept it, given what this knowledge would do to his unreflective ego, is debatable.

liar-nObama covers his bases. He gets to have his cake and keep it, too, and, if you haven't noticed, he remains skinny. He tells us the economy's great; then he kind of says it isn't. Otherwise, why would he still have to blame Dubya? Why would he have to blame the recent election results on an angry populace? Why would he say, "The problem was I couldn't convince the Republican Congress to pass a lot of my agenda items"? What problem? I thought things were rosy.

You see, he thinks the main economic problem we face is income inequality. He thinks people are angry because others are making more money than they do and so they had a temper tantrum and elected Donald Trump. But hasn't there always been income inequality? Isn't that guaranteed in a free system? But if the people are inconsolable with envy, that might have something to do with liar-nObama's constant harping on it, railing against the rich.

Nope. The hoi polloi are just restless; there's nothing to see here. "The country," he says, "is indisputably better off, and those folks who voted for the president-elect are better off than they were when I came into office, for the most part."

But here was the punchline: "People," he said, "seem to think I did a pretty good job. And so there is this mismatch, I think, between frustration and anger. Perhaps the view of the American people is that we just need to shake things up."

Well, if there's any mismatch or disconnect here, it's liar-nObama's perception of his performance and reality. His narcissism makes him allergic to self-doubt, and his dogged ideology and oversize pride preclude him from admitting his failures.

This same ideology compels him to project onto others his own prejudices. He has been saying since before he was elected that "bitter" Bible toters who "cling to guns" in small-town America are just suspicious of people who don't look like them. But that's offensively false. He is the one who always has race on his mind, and he's a virtuoso of bitterness.

Remember when his Homeland Security Department was on the lookout for returning military personnel and tea party types, rather than Islamists, as possible domestic terrorists?

Pro tip: These peace-loving, ordinary, patriotic Americans have had their fill of his attacks on their traditions, their worldview and their lifestyle. They sent that message resoundingly in the congressional elections in 2010 and 2014, yet he escaped accountability with his own re-election in 2012. Another frightful disconnect.

But there can be no mistaking this year's election results. The people's rejection of his agenda and liar-Hillary Clinton is so severe that we are seeing a major restructuring of the electorate. He, his media co-conspirators and the liberal punditry can blame liar-Clinton's flaws for this, and they are indeed part of it, but liar-nObama's leftist agenda got shellacked up and down the ticket and in state elections throughout the country.

This was not a glitch; this is a wave. And the longer he and his cohorts remain in denial about it the more it will grow. That, my friends, is a beautiful thing.
Read more…

Saturday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
In post-Arab Spring Egypt, freedom and
enlightenment still means increasing
attacks by Muslims on Christians
by Sudarsan Raghavan
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Democrat Insanity 
q6IrAE3-OUBdDGNRjUf7OwmNgYmXQFLtDAnC5QMjX9peWWGkSiRslDzurZLoexUU6ooqv5VuonpA-YUnQJD5vgwjrtqxG2T-GQLctramO5mUWy_Xa2V2ddWLTPT9OQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Allyne Caan: On the campaign trail, Barack liar-nObama repeatedly emphasized that the November 8 election would be a referendum on his legacy.
          Yes, yes it was. If ever there were a final smack down to end a disastrous eight-year presidential tenure, last week was it. But it should hardly come as a surprise. Since liar-nObama's ascension to office in 2009 amid the gospel of Hope 'n' Change™, he has been an albatross to Democrats not only in the halls of Congress but also in governors' mansions and state legislatures across the country.
          Since liar-nObama took office, Democrats have lost a net total of 10 U.S. Senate seats, 63 House seats and 12 governorships, but also roughly 900 state legislative seats.
          This is hardly a short-term setback from which Democrats can simply bounce back. As The Wall Street Journal notes, "One result of Mr. liar-nObama's tenure is that Democrats lack a deep bench of younger candidates for federal office, including the Presidency in 2020. A third of all House Democrats will now come from a mere three states — California, New York, and Massachusetts." That's astounding.
          When you consider that, as of 2014, 44 U.S. senators and more than 200 House members were former state legislators, this reality becomes a painful indicator to Democrats that their immediate congressional future looks bleak.
          Ironically, what's not yet clear to Democrats is the reason for their stunning and repeated losses. Indeed, at a press conference earlier this week, liar-nObama claimed, "I believe that we have better ideas, but I also believe that good ideas don't matter if people don't hear them and one of the issues that Democrats have to be clear on is that, given population distribution across the country, we have to compete everywhere."
          That's right, it's not bad policies; it's bad PR. As if Democrats don't have a massive super PAC in the form of the Leftmedia.
          And as one Democrat strategist put it, "We have to take the time to figure out what happened. It's obviously much more than cyclical."
          You don't say. While they take time to discover the obvious, Democrats are still blaming everyone and everything but themselves, including FBI director James Comey. Meanwhile, the Leftmedia pinned liar-Hillary Clinton's loss on a "white-lash." Because not voting for a white woman is racist — perhaps, we suppose, because her husband was the first black president.
          The alternative explanation — that Americans may actually be rebelling against the Democrats' increasingly radical left-wing policies — is simply unimaginable.
          But rebelling they are. liar-nObamaCare, the pinnacle of liar-nObama's achievements, is crumbling, executive overreach has extended farther than ever, and Americans are generally fed up with the government. But Democrats aren't willing to swallow that pill.
          And instead of thinking that perhaps they've veered too far left, Democrats are now debating among themselves whether to head even further left — as evidenced by the fact that Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, a radical black Muslim member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, has launched a credible campaign to be the next DNC chair. Ellison launched his career as a member of the anti-Semitic Nation of Islam, and he's a man who likened 9/11 to the Nazis' Reichstag fire — in other words, an inside job meant to create a pretext for going after Muslims. And Democrats are considering putting him in charge of the party.
          Reason's Scott Shackford writes, "As the Democratic Party struggles to figure out what it's going to stand for now, we're going to see a lot of 'progressive vs. centrists' framing." But as progressives aim to drive the party even further left, tomorrow's centrists will likely be today's leftists.
          Only in a party that's already pivoted sharply left could socialist Bernie Sanders gain a credible foothold, only to be bested by an establishment candidate who holds some positions even more radical than Sanders'. Shackford explains, "[W]hat made Sanders remarkable as a candidate was not that he was a democratic socialists getting open popular support from Americans ... [but] that there were parts of his ideology — his foreign policy and support for privacy — that were less interventionist than liar-Clinton."
          You'd think that after repeated and crushing defeats under the lar-nObama banner (and now liar-Clinton's), Democrats would begin to tie the defeats to that banner. Instead, they're waving it even higher, because naturally, if we as Americans disagree with them, the error is not theirs, but ours.
          Perpetuating the attitude that cost them this election is unlikely to win them the next one. So by all means, Democrats, keep up the good work. ~The Patriot Post
Congress Introduces Bill to Combat
BDS Worldwide
by Tyler Stapleton
2GHYMRR8iAiIZhDDQBTpiwDbQwfCWTJyDcmD2FOxTES-WkM3Vc_xclb8BZfRArUzFmwVmFffM0Xs3bJm55odKEySOCufynCiHQypqYqc_CpR_grUfDpIQYAgMXg1NfHI7X4avTTp8IzAmjT2IU5Vvsfq8fxcZg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{defenddemocracy.org} ~ Congress introduced the Protecting Israel Against Economic Discrimination Act this week to combat efforts at the UN to blacklist companies doing business with Israel, and calls on the U.S. Export-Import Bank to consider denying applicant companies engaged in politically-motivated boycotts of the country... The legislation – introduced by Representatives Peter Roskam (R-IL) and Juan Vargas (D-CA) – is the House companion of a Senate bill introduced in September by Senators Rob Portman (R-OH) and Ben Cardin (D-MD). The bill comes in response to efforts at the UN Human Rights Council to create a database of companies doing business beyond Israel’s 1949 armistice lines, including all parts of East Jerusalem. Such a blacklist would imperil the jobs of thousands of Israelis and Palestinians who work in 15 industrial zones in the West Bank. It would also jeopardize Qualifying Industrial Zones set up to allow Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, and Egypt to take advantage of the Israel-U.S. Free Trade Agreement by partially sourcing their products in the Jewish state...
.
Iran Tightens Military Ties with China
by Behnam Ben Taleblu & Patrick Megahan
BnxnNDctPlj3CTldwSUOYThxmMX5fy0TuDOq5I7Hf0F151tM9cgd-24dN3jm1Gv3qyr9-7CFEQVf8HDgyB1h8WzjSDDNB6F-YPvL-9QAuEOo5UUUR7lDuZZysayBDuI8V-U_qS1G=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{defenddemocracy.org} ~ Iranian and Chinese security officials signed a military-cooperation agreement this week to establish a joint commission to boost defense ties... Since the 1979 Islamic revolution and the subsequent severing of U.S. military assistance, Tehran has relied on Chinese arms to supplement its defense industry. This week’s agreement, however, will significantly bolster ties that for decades existed mostly behind closed doors, and underscore the countries’ shared interest in challenging U.S. supremacy in their respective regions. Iran’s close defense ties with Beijing started in the 1980s, when the Islamic Republic was engulfed in a bloody war with Iraq and desperate for arms. China, seeking secure energy sources and a bulwark against America, was eager to provide advanced weapons to Tehran. Among them were Silkworm anti-ship missiles, which targeted Kuwaiti oil tankers during that decade’s Tanker War...
.
Bill Still – liar-Clinton, Soros Can Try
To Steal Electoral College...
by Rick Wells
wJuIzNbwJGFQCPf25drwvTtdU6rPJuXxD2Oo_D32D_cfT95pV8BgVuT03A2pl7QucKJXUCeS5AcpEedLpEwdEwKgbxHm5JPZld_XG4kXkooYjWF9Nzfz9Etub_p110cLwW3e7u85dyAlD1-Wpsmew-Jlzyw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Bill Still says he gets emails almost daily asking him if the liar-Clintons can still “bribe or otherwise coerce sufficient electoral college electors to actually steal the White House from Donald Trump?”... Obviously the lack of character of the liar-Clintons is well known among the American people. He cites a New York Post headline of four days prior which read, “The one scenario that could still get liar-Hillary into the White House.” Still says, “If you have followed the crime careers of the liar-Clintons as I have since they came to town, you know that you can put nothing past them, including threats of Arkansicide towards anyone who gets in their way, labeling them as “the world record holders in getting away with stuff.” He points out that with the finalization of the Arizona vote count, Donald Trump receives an extra eleven electoral college vote count boost, and once Michigan is finalized he’ll have 305, a cushion of 35 more than the 270 needed for victory. He notes that while it is illegal for the electors to ignore the will of the voters in 21, less than half of all states, the penalties are relatively light, at one thousand dollars and being ostracized socially. 29 of them have no laws against being a “faithless elector,” and voting as one pleases, irrespective of the will of the people. 25 of those states are ones in which Trump won the popular vote...  http://rickwells.us/bill-still-clinton-soros-can-try-steal-electoral-college-heres-theyll-fail/
.
Lou Dobbs – Charge Sanctuary City Mayors
As Accessories To Illegal Alien Crimes
by Rick Wells
KyWOeEi6bzxaqVKOIS_LfR7rE4VGaTKWQJWVXz4Bx2vyjka9Uu3HJRltDGkG-7lub329ca-NmBaJLXDHKu1Y3TK-ZBvFh2ryX9OuwowVJHaoMDCn9_GuT0D7M5Di01UJ4GlVl2rbkQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs welcomes Chris Plante and Eboni Williams for a discussion of Mr. Trump’s options for dealing with rebellious scofflaw mayors intent on serving their globalist masters and maintaining their sanctuary city policies... Dobbs notes that Trump has a lot of firepower behind him in dealing with this issue. Eboni Williams leads off  the discussion with an observation that Mr. Trump “has all of the tools behind him because, guess what, just like ‘president’ liar-nObama told the State of Arizona a few years back, you do not get to make statewide immigration policy.” She notes that the supremacy clause of the US Constitution puts federal law supreme, enforced by federal officers. She says, “All Rahm Emanuel, de Blasio and these sanctuary city guys are doing, they’re creating a fake narrative that makes them look like heroes around this issue to illegals.” Dobbs inserts his view, “They’re pandering to a constituency.” Williams responds that, “They’re talking about a bunch of nothing because all they really are doing is saying something that they can’t do.” Dobbs brings Plante into the conversation, noting that Trump is targeting the criminal elements of the illegal alien population first, “And these mayors, for whatever reason think that they can successfully pander by supporting illegal immigrants and protecting them from the consequences of being criminals.”...  http://rickwells.us/lou-dobbs-charge-sanctuary-city-mayors-accessories-illegal-alien-crimes/
.
liar-nObama Tells Rioters To Keep Agitating –
He And Soros Want More Chaos
by Rick Wells
hAFAIEh8JGOun65dcoS0DnITig1wvfhv0JnZJX-jnxd6UyQBWgmgE7N5ZJzBDFTAB4E9zTD43rE_Q40BlvirIc29rLS44grKzGUjkHiFTLSSrGGUeJDguFlytwfZ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Hussein liar-nObama loves to refer to our system of government as a democracy because it reinforces his wealth redistributive objectives for fundamental transformation from our Republic to the mob rule... in which the masses will take the property and assets of the middle class to form the collective. Against that backdrop he endorses the rioting that his financier George Soros and Democrat Party comrades are facilitating, telling some poor unsuspecting fool in Germany who doesn’t know the nature of the serpent that stands before them that riots are a good thing. liar-nObama said, “One of the great things about our democracy is that it expresses itself in all sorts of ways. Uh, and that includes people protesting. I’ve been the subject of protests during the course of my eight years and I suspect that there’s not a president in our history (pretend ‘presidents’ included) that at some point hasn’t been subject to these protests.”...  http://rickwells.us/obama-tells-rioters-keep-agitating-soros-want-chaos/
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
In post-Arab Spring Egypt, freedom and
enlightenment still means increasing
attacks by Muslims on Christians
by Sudarsan Raghavan
Gcb8EA4jCj_Hg32eqSxn_m26pd6J8Tq2lfuSwj2dXQhwE9D0y8MSax-h_Koq6BZ9IlwRIRIgEi7R0AWQ4EAv2ywccl_Ady8PGWl5-XMVjUk_Sz2TdO4ReJnMTRhiwGgmdEX4nYm8Op-6QO99KrI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ The Christian and Muslim villagers grew up together, played on the same soccer fields as kids, and attended the same schools in this riverside hamlet. But that didn't matter on a recent day: An argument between boys sparked clashes between neighbors, with Muslims torching shops owned by Christians.

Gamal Sobhy, a Christian farmer, ran into the melee to protect his two sons. Someone in the crowd hit him with a stick. Then others jumped in, striking him repeatedly until he fell to the ground with blood seeping from his head.

"The Muslims were yelling, 'Kill him, kill him,' " Sobhy said a few days after he was released from the hospital.

Five years ago, many among Egypt's minority Orthodox Coptic Christians thought the discrimination they had long faced from Muslims would begin to disappear when President Hosni Mubarak was ousted in Egypt's revolution and the military seized control of the country.

But in the years since then, as an Islamist government was elected and overthrown, that sense of hope evaporated.

Attacks against Christians have intensified as mistrust between Christians and Muslims deepens. Today, community leaders and human rights activists say the smallest of matters are setting off violence, often pitting neighbor against neighbor.

At a time when President Abdel Fatah al-Sissi's government is jailing its opponents and struggling to revive a sinking economy, the violence adds a new layer of populist frustration: Christians strongly supported Sissi's rise, expecting him to protect them after the former army general led a coup that toppled the Islamists.

"As Egyptian citizens, Christians don't feel they are equal to their Muslim counterparts," said Bishop Makarios, the head of the Coptic diocese in Minya province, where Asem is situated. "They feel oppressed, and marginalized by the law."

Christians across the region have endured horrific assaults in the turbulent aftermath of the Arab Spring uprisings.

In Syria and Iraq, Islamic State militants have destroyed churches, abducted Christians and carried out forced conversions. Thousands of Christians have fled their homes in northern Iraq. In Libya last year, Islamic State militants beheaded 21 Egyptian Christians and an additional 31 Ethiopian and Eritrean Christians in two separate attacks. And earlier this year, the Islamic State's affiliate in Egypt asserted responsibility for the fatal shooting of a priest.

In Egypt, a "disturbing wave of radicalism" has emerged from the uprising and changes in government and as the economy has worsened, said Bishop Angaelos, head of the Coptic Orthodox Church in the United Kingdom.

Egypt's Christians, who make up 10 percent of the population of 94 million, have felt besieged for decades. In a nation where Islam is the state religion, successive secular but authoritarian regimes have restricted Christians from practicing their beliefs, even though freedom of religion is enshrined in the constitution.

But since January 2011, 77 sectarian attacks have taken place in Minya alone, according to the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), an activist group.

Nearly half of those attacks occurred in the past three years, after Egypt's elected Islamist President Mohammed Morsi was ousted in the military coup led by Sissi in 2013. In the days that followed, mobs of hard-line Muslims targeted Christian schools, businesses and churches in a wave of attacks. Many Islamists accused Christians of conspiring with Sissi against them. Since then, tensions have been raw.

At least 25 sectarian attacks have been reported around the nation this year, activists say.

"When an individual is acquitted after an attack, the community knows they can get away with attacking Christians," Makarios said.

Before the revolution, Christians were targeted mostly by militant groups and thieves. "Now the violence has a societal element to it, with Muslim and Christian citizens turning against each other," said Ishak Ibrahim, a researcher at EIPR.

Asem, the trigger was a minor dispute.

It was the early days of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha in mid-September. One of Sobhy's sons was returning from the fields when he was stopped by Muslim youths who had blocked the road. The boys exchanged insults, and soon the fight erupted, drawing in Sobhy's other son as well as dozens of villagers from their homes.

Security forces arrived, and 20 Muslims and 17 Christians were arrested.

"The Muslims did a lot of things that shouldn't have happened," said Othman Al Montaser Othman, a member of parliament from Minya who is Muslim. "They vandalized a barber shop, a furniture shop. Even if you had a fight with one person, you shouldn't have taken it out on everyone else."

It wasn't the first time, nor will it be the last, villagers said. Their region is the crucible for Egypt's sectarian divides. In Minya, a poor province roughly 150 miles south of Cairo, Christians make up about a third of the population - the largest concentration among the nation's 27 provinces.

In Asem, a Christian-majority village, Christians spoke of economic divisions that have contributed to the tensions - they own most of the stores and businesses, as well as the farmland.

"The Muslims are green with envy," said Ishak Haddad, whose furniture shop was burned by the mob, and his furniture dumped into the river. "They see we have a lot of money, and they don't."

Muslims say they have no problems with their Christian neighbors. Some noted that in Asem they are a minority, and so cannot afford to antagonize Christians.

Unemployment and illiteracy are high in Minya, and government services are limited. Radical Islamists have filled the void, influencing people with anti-Christian rhetoric, community leaders and activists say. The province is a stronghold of extremist Islamist groups, in particular Gamaa Islamiya, which the United States and its allies consider a terrorist organization.

In June, a crowd of Muslims stabbed a Christian death. That came days after a mob torched the houses of Christians over a rumor that they wanted to convert buildings into churches.

A month earlier, a Muslim mob forced a 70-year-old Christian woman to strip naked and parade down the street of their village after rumors spread that her son had had an affair with a Muslim woman. The rumor proved to be false.

Her assailants were arrested but swiftly released on bail. The case has gone nowhere, though Bishop Makarios and other leaders asked Sissi to intervene.

"The president pledged to follow up on the case, but sadly the judicial system did not follow," Makarios said.

It wasn't the first time the law had let them down.

Local officials often pressure Christians into mediating disputes instead of going to court and coerce them into changing their testimony, activists say.

"These kinds of reconciliation sessions replace the rule of law," Makarios said. "In most cases, the Christian victims are asked to give up their rights."

That's what happening in Asem today.

Othman and other Muslim leaders blamed Muslims for the attacks but also say they weren't sectarian. Speaking on his cellphone, Othman instructed a Muslim community leader to say the attack was not motivated by religion, a conversation heard by two Washington Post reporters seated in the room during the call.

Two hours later, the community leader, Anwar Osman, said: "It was not sectarian. It was a childish prank." The Christians were just trying to get the public to "sympathize with them," he said.

Local officials and lawmakers insist that life is back to normal. "We all now talk to each other and visit each other," Osman said. "Reconciliation has already happened."

But Christians say that is not true.

"They claim that things are back to normal and we reconciled, just to make the public feel they have ended the crisis," said Ishak Sobhy, Gamal's brother. "We expected life to be better under Sissi for our community. But it's actually getting worse."

Some Christians said they no longer walk in the village at night because they are afraid of being attacked. Others no longer trade in livestock, fearing they could be targeted in the fields.

But Ishak Sobhy said his family refuses to drop the case. Gamal is still visiting doctors and recently learned that he has a detached retina. The Muslim man accused of instigating the clashes turned himself in but is out on bail, authorities said.

"Life goes on," Ishak Sobhy said. "But we remain worried."
 
Read more…

Saturday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
It’s Time to Call out the Left’s Hypocrisy
by Michael Brown
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 GOP Punts on Earmarks 
UldIbm5bxVw3ZZdR4xcxhWFDKDb9RnbZxrMnqW1fyWGmg60bgDLE8tqQFxR6q9Vw2ogsD1UYKeGEEDe5AAOug6IwShmpQBLSIOtpB1hk_acjbB30Iydr02NzSdO9Ow=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The issue of lifting the ban on earmarks brought forth by several House Republicans was gaining momentum until Speaker Paul Ryan stepped in. He put the brakes on a vote because reinstituting earmarks would have been perceived by the public as yet another instance of government cronyism. As one source in the room put it, Ryan "said we just had a 'drain the swamp' election and cannot turn right around and bring back earmarks behind closed doors." Ryan postponed the vote until early 2017 and pledged to study the issue further. It's alarming to conservatives that so many Republicans favor lifting, at least in part, the ban on earmarks — a ban that many have credited for giving Republicans the House majority in 2010.
          Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), who supports lifting the ban, argued that Barack liar-nObama's "administration took the money for water projects and decided who would be the winner and who would be the loser, not based upon the feedback of the Corps of Engineers or members of Congress." He believes that Republicans in Congress "overplayed their hand" by enacting the earmark ban in 2011, "so we're trying to balance that out." Proponents of reinstatement argue it's a separation of powers issue related to the power of the purse.
          While frustration over how liar-nObama directed spending is well founded, the solution is not through re-enabling greater cronyism and corruption. As former Sen. Tom Coburn stated, "Washington, DC, is broken and no one is interested in fixing it. The arrogance of power is just as dangerous in the hands of Republicans as it is in [the hands of] Democrats." Finally, the mere fact that outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry dinky-Reid called himself the "king of earmarks" and boasted about them to his constituents should give every Republican pause in contemplating lifting the ban.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 Vets Storm American Governance 
pxUgSfpftcygY3DbpJaZxIVUC5ABdAic8fqay4y1DsVRfimmb18XXUK2XaCFzNdVjm9qlG4t9OUavcDgC1fyXNg-ngBEGr1FD45FOwfEQpX8BC-BN4sYVIrErwHhPQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Veterans once filled the overwhelming majority of congressional seats. In fact, according to the American Enterprise Institute's Gary Schmitt and Rebecca Burgess, "In 1971, veterans made up 72 percent of the House of Representatives and 78 percent of the Senate. In 1991, the Congress that approved the use of force against Iraq in Operation Desert Storm had only slightly more veterans than non-veterans." Fast forward to now, however, and the statistics are reversed: "In today's Congress, veterans hold 20 percent of Senate seats, while 18 percent of House members are veterans."
          Schmitt and Burgess contend that today's proportional number of veterans to general population doesn't provide an adequate reason for the drop. "The decline of veterans in public office has been sharper than the decline of veterans within the general population," they write. "Why? Perhaps the most significant reason is the current cost of running for Congress. The price tag for a Senate campaign stands near $10.5 million, the House near $1.6 million."
          Which makes the relatively recent electoral wins by veterans Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton and even Democrat Tammy Duckworth all the more remarkable, if not inspiring. Last week, another veteran was added to American governance — Republican and decorated ex-Navy SEAL Eric Greitens, who will succeed Jay Nixon as governor of Missouri. Do these gains portend even broader wins for veterans down the road? There's at least reason for optimism.
          "Any reversal of the declining trend in veterans in the halls of Congress," write Schmitt and Burgess, "will probably begin with the one tried-and-true way to gain legislative experience, build name recognition, and increase access to a fundraising network — election to a state legislature. State legislative office is a traditional steppingstone to federal office, with 50 percent of the 114th Congress, for example, composed of former state legislators. From this perspective, the good news is that no fewer than 1,039 out of 7,383 state legislators have military experience — 14 percent."
          The authors note that, because of military evolution and other circumstances, "veterans in American legislatures will not reach again the high levels of the 1970s." In any case, a growing number of Patriots are taking up an important new endeavor — taking the fight from the battlefields to legislatures locally and on Capitol Hill.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
North Korean Threat Pushing U.S., Korea and Japan
Closer in Ballistic Missile Defense Cooperation
by Sam LaGrone
d9lFGClNwtPkjUI1pmvn8jZLayYxmjIjOFH6P8UeBLiL3UmXzAD6JWy0hWt-L7Gj9Z1OF_sMr9EBi1fQRxlzE0zR7NlW-W4a-tkN0uuHzC1e7ou-NcfIvQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{usni.org} ~ Operating under the assumption that North Korea can — or is close to — fielding a ballistic missile tipped with a nuclear warhead, the U.S. is working more and more closely with Japan and South Korea in the realm of ballistic missile defense (BMD)... Speaking on Tuesday, U.S. Pacific Command commander Adm. Harry Harris said the ballistic missile and nuclear threat from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is far from dissipating. “I believe they have clearly stated their intent … We know they are working on their missile technology – their intercontinental ballistic missiles – they are seeking to miniaturize the nuclear warheads, mate them to the missile and threaten the United States,” Harris said during a Tuesday event at Defense One. “I believe it when Kim Jong Un expresses his intent… I assume for the worst case and prepare accordingly and that’s what you all want me to do.”...  https://news.usni.org/2016/11/17/north-korean-threat-pushing-u-s-korea-japan-closer-ballistic-missile-defense?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=2952a1ddce-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-2952a1ddce-231491269&mc_cid=2952a1ddce&mc_eid=3999f18767
.
The Morality of Corruption
by TOM MCCAFFREY
gTtjcN6X-QJcQwFNeM8rAApuOf_LHojAAbhndpAAIEY1p5kwVfaUyXJAKqSkr5KbEe_j5gJ-5Vh9B9w7A89hTWtJY3C3U3k2_0KRAn_WGvJ1O1LXWoal6Qo7eRMtPljVxcyV=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ "We are going to have to rebuild within this wild-wild-west-of-information flow some sort of curating function that people agree to," said President liar-nObama recently in Pittsburgh... "There has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through information that passes some basic truthiness tests and those that we have to discard, because they just don't have any basis in anything that's actually happening in the world," he continued. "The answer is obviously not censorship, but it's creating places where people can say 'this is reliable' and I'm still able to argue safely about facts and what we should do about it." This is vintage liar-nObama in its dishonesty. If we call it "curating," suggests Mr. liar-nObama, then it is not censorship. But it is dishonest in a way that has characterized Mr. liar-nObama's utterances since the first days of his presidency. It is dishonesty that no honest, halfway intelligent person would be fooled by. It is so transparent as to be almost childish. But it is not intended to persuade the honest, intelligent person. Mr. liar-nObama is the first president who was able to dispense with appealing to the honest, intelligent American... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-morality-of-corruption?f=must_reads
.
State Department Is Stalling Again
On liar-Clinton Documents
by JUDICIAL WATCH
6ktjlTOk7hcVP38GK0ponOLY5WWRmolwFlTjxKFQU8hNohc4heOTeE_2IcdL7IkiFASJ13BPKR7mqLItxWiKR0bAiyzmQj3v4_Da6yOx3L8N6u9vZBZr2Wx7xZReoJZ8RafPA9ogZ2mL7_tkN0L1Raxp-GM1hHpU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ I suspect liberal media interest in the liar-Clinton email scandal will fade, but the public interest will remain high in securing accountability under the rule of law... Indeed, the day before the election, Judicial Watch lawyers were in federal court again pushing for liar- Clinton email discourse in a key Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking emails sent or received by former Secretary of State liar-Hillary Clinton in her official capacity during her tenure as secretary of state. The State Department has been producing liar-Clinton email recovered by the FBI under a September 23, 2016, court order issued by U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg.  The State Department confirmed in September that the FBI turned over to the State Department at least 15,000 new liar-Clinton emails as a result of Judicial Watch's litigation seeking all of liar-Clinton's work-related emails. At the hearing, we found out that the FBI also turned over 31,000 other liar-Clinton documents to the State Department. State suggested the court should wait as long as five years to see them. Obviously, the State Department is slow-walking the release of liar-Hillary Clinton's deleted and hidden emails. Ironically, this liar-Clinton/liar-nObama State Department stonewalling has guaranteed that the liar-Clinton email scandal won't be resolved for years... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/state-department-is-stalling-again-on-clinton-documents?f=must_reads
.
Secret Service Can’t Find Tons
Of Its Guns, Phones, Badges And Cars
by Kathryn Watson
0-caoIGPgJdqpA72vnEa_bgS-DA__1mwpouf-LcWaen0wOPHUddvNenLZwcSIzZbd1avQDw1ncplvhilL8sul-rAMj8JrbKSPQhER7LkmEVItf5Id6Q7BmPndwRkC5mElAWVe5faPd9CQVxavy_Qk7mPZbUL3Dn-3SIUuytmoSatYagRm4YFicbISU1XepbpU1-dfwpFLijoRzY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailycaller.com} ~ Thousands of sensitive assets belonging to U.S. Secret Service agents, including firearms, computer laptops, work badges, telephones and even motor vehicles, have been lost during the past 15 years... according to documents obtained by nonprofit government watchdog Judicial Watch. “This is supposedly an elite law enforcement agency — how did all this equipment get stolen?” or lost. “This is alarming. Every American should be alarmed about this,” Judicial Watch’s Irene Garcia told The Daily Caller News Foundation. Secret Service agents reported 11,780 lost or stolen assets between fiscal years 2001 and 2016, according to the data Judicial Watch received, although the agency didn’t distinguish between lost and stolen items...  http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/17/secret-service-cant-find-tons-of-its-guns-phones-badges-and-cars/
.
liar-nObama Should Pardon ‘Dreamer’
Immigrants, Democrats Say
by Laura Litvan 
tLKUaCJBqLiGGZyB4VnNw3yQ3dzsl0xUGzzT6DevqQ2Vw6UXn-xZAw13eV55KfCALBxiE-do1sfx4u44VNr4tFCYAKc8widF1EyOyDqtIEsjD14z7d8Lj7w6ZGyX7FR_=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{bloomberg.com} ~ A group of House Democrats called on President Barack liar-nObama to pardon about 750,000 young undocumented immigrants who are temporarily shielded from deportation under a 2012 executive order... a move that reflects growing concern about a shift in immigration policy expected after President-elect Donald Trump takes power in January. “By no fault of their own, these Americans are prisoners in their own country, living their daily lives, not knowing if they will be deported to another country,” Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard, a California Democrat, said at a news conference. She and a group of other lawmakers active on immigration policy sent a letter to liar-nObama with their request Thursday...No their not Americans.  http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-17/obama-should-pardon-dreamer-immigrants-house-democrats-say?AID=7236
.
 
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
It’s Time to Call out the Left’s Hypocrisy
by Michael Brown
8Y5ESM9I9NeU_v5brKd3vHcRXbPKHW_HjOPvQte07bnGYRXyN13jwxnDMuO4cg1zXz7n_hrl-poHqYOXFT0D2nMKpFsqUy3YH7yE3SWtNlz3trS61gKEXeKMoy9kOSNWhjUbZRakyA5LLZG8yek9XnQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ Please allow me a moment to vent.

I assure you that it will be controlled venting, without vitriol, hyperbole, or vindictiveness.

But venting it will be. Shall we call it holy venting?

Perhaps it will also reflect some of the holy frustration in your own heart.

But first, some caveats.

I do understand why many Americans are deeply upset with Donald Trump’s election, and up until election day, I said that I respected those who could not vote for him, urging them instead not to vote for liar-Hillary.

I have also spoken with Mexican Americans and African Americans who have shared their concerns with me, and seeing the world through their eyes, I understand their fears. Of course, I’ve read many comments from Muslim Americans that express their concerns too.

What, exactly, will the president’s immigration policy look like, and what, exactly, does he mean by being a “law and order” candidate? And why is it that so many far-right groups both here and abroad are excited about his victory?

I have also heard from enough concerned women, some very close to me, to recognize just how offensive his comments and attitudes have been and to see why they can’t fathom how a God-fearing Christian could vote for him.

And I understand why his high-level appointment of Steve Bannon is so controversial, despite the apparently exaggerated nature of many of the concerns. Is this the way to unify the nation?

But having said all that as a representative sampling of major caveats, I am sick and tired of leftwing hypocrisy, and it needs to be called out.

Let’s focus first on the demonstrations.

I agree that people have a legal right to demonstrate but not break the law, and it’s understandable that people are frustrated. But a lot of what’s happening is simply the immature reaction of those who don’t know how to lose or to accept responsibility for why they lost.

Get over it.

Ironically but not unexpectedly, we’re learning that many of those protesting didn’t even vote, so they’re blocking traffic and setting things on fire because of their own lack of participation.

Rather than shouting profanities in the streets, they should be looking in the mirror.

Pollster Frank Luntz tweeted, “I saw a Trump protester with a sign on the subway… He said he was 19… I asked him if he voted, and he said no.” And a report from Portland, Oregon indicated that, “More than half of the anti-Trump protesters arrested in Portland didn’t vote, according to state election records.” What do you know!

And right on cue, race-baiters and responsibility-evaders have raised their heads, claiming that, “The Electoral College Is an Instrument of White Supremacy and Sexism.”

A group of civil rights leaders has also stated that, “While racial voter suppression was widespread, voter suppression was generational as well. Millennials, as a multiracial demographic, also were targeted by strict ID laws and poll closings affecting millions of youth, college and high school students, as well as young professionals.”

Seriously?

You mean to tell me that is why millennials, along with blacks and Hispanics, did not turn out in the expected numbers? It had nothing to do with lack of enthusiasm for liar-Hillary Clinton?

As for “strict ID laws,” give me a break. It’s outrageous that voter ID is not universally required, and there are more than enough examples of voter fraud coming to the surface every day.

And it is nothing less than absurd to claim that early poll closings particularly affected “millions of youth, college and high school students, as well as young professionals,” as if they of all people can’t make it to the polls on time while older professionals and non-students can.

This is nothing less than the victim mentality that is destroying the left.

As for the leftwing mantra that “love trumps hate,” David Jaroslav aptly remarked, “Love trumping hate involves a lot more assault & arson than I expected.” Indeed! (Jarsolav’s remarks were tweeted by Ben Shapiro.)

So, go ahead and protest, but please don’t call it love. And quit playing the blame game.

How about the left’s selective outrage with respecting the election process and the rule of law?

The outcry against Donald Trump was shrill when he said that he could not guarantee in advance that he would accept the outcome of the elections for fear that things would be rigged.

Yet now, in the aftermath of those elections, government officials as high as Chicago’s mayor, Rahm Emmanuel, and the Los Angeles police chief, Charlie Beck, have stated that they will defy the order of the president to deport illegals from their city should such an order be made – and Trump has most recently stated that he is referring to illegals who have committed crimes here.

Yet Emmanuel emphasized that, “Chicago will always be a sanctuary city,” while Beck said, “We are not going to engage in law enforcement activities solely based on somebody’s immigration status. We are not going to work in conjunction with Homeland Security on deportation efforts. That is not our job, nor will I make it our job.”

There might be nuances to what these men are saying, but again, it’s the issue of hypocrisy.

Just imagine how the leftwing media would be responding had liar-Hillary been elected and a Republican mayor or police chief declared that they would not heed her directives. If they were men, they would have certainly been branded sexist, and the media outrage would be extreme.

And since I mentioned Steve Bannon earlier, let’s compare the leftwing media’s almost hysterical reaction to his appointment as Trump’s chief strategist – as if Trump had appointed a neo-Nazi to that position – to that same media’s lack of strong reaction to the possible appointing of Muslim congressman Keith Ellison to the DNC chair.

Fox reported that, “Democratic leaders are scrambling to unite behind a candidate for the party's chairmanship – and have landed for now on a Louis Farrakhan-linked congressman who once called for Dick Cheney’s impeachment and compared George W. Bush to Hitler.”

Apparently, these charges are of little or no concern, but the charge that Bannon is a racist or anti-Semite – a charge vigorously disputed by a Catholic priest, an Orthodox rabbi, and a Harvard professor, among others – is worthy of outrage.

Why the glaring double standard?

And how many in-depth investigative reports did you hear about liar-Hillary Clinton’s right-hand woman, Huma Abedin, and her alleged connections to radical Islam?

Just imagine if Bannon had the same baggage as did Ellison or Huma. The leftwing media would have even more of a field day. (Again, I’m neither defending Bannon or accusing Ellison or Huma; I’m addressing the left’s inconsistency and hypocrisy.)

And on and on it goes, with example after example of extreme leftwing hypocrisy.

But I’d best stop here rather than belabor the point.

And the truth be told, that felt good.

Perhaps you feel better as well?
Read more…

Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
The Federal Bureau of Political Investigation
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Hate Crime Hysteria Is Way Off Base 
PefmLjTXrBMcfADNKFM6qVRsm7xcE2_YOFJ6X0vEu2CQHTZnkLNIBMQhVuvuUqfvtUTy4MxgotYCnCb11UOypwD16EHRfuJDAlMjqh1FichTi47JkwYaxR14MpOLrQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Louis DeBroux: Fresh off the election of Donald Trump, the nation was greeted by news of the stunning rise in "hate crimes," as detailed in the FBI's latest iteration of its Hate Crimes Statistics report. At first blush, it offers frightening prospects for the safety of various minority groups across America. At second blush, not so much.
          New York Magazine writer Eric Levitz breathlessly begins his article, "Hate Crimes Against Muslims Increased by 67 Percent Last Year," with the angst-ridden declaration that these crimes had reached "their highest levels since the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, according to FBI data released on Monday."
          From the fainting couch, he continued, "In 2015, there were 257 reported crimes rooted in anti-Muslim bias, up from 154 incidents the previous year. Notably, this uptick coincided with a GOP presidential primary in which a candidate who decried the Justice Department's concern with violent, anti-Muslim rhetoric finished second to one who proposed banning all Muslims from
the country."
          As usual, the devil is in the details, so let's point out a few that drastically change the narrative.
          For example, the FBI analyzes incidents reported in 2015, but it wasn't until late in the year that Trump's candidacy really took off, so one would be hard pressed to explain why the increase could be attributable to Trump. Other factors are far more plausible, including the series of deadly Islamic terror attacks (Paris and San Bernardino among the targets), or the contention fomented by Barack liar-nObama's attempt (with the help of the Rainbow Mafia) to force Americans to allow grown men to share bathrooms with women and little girls, or violent protests led by Black Lives Matter thugs. Is it possible that maybe, like Newton's Third Law of Motion, these actions triggered opposite reactions?
          Another critical point to understand is that the number of these incidents is incredibly small, and the threshold by which an action qualifies as a "hate crime" is ludicrously low.
          Of all hate crimes reported in 2015, two-thirds did not involve any form of physical violence. And of those that did, nearly 70% involved only simple assault, which the FBI defines as an incident where no weapon is used and no serious injury occurred. This category of crime includes intimidation (including verbal threats or name-calling), which accounted for 41% of all "assaults." And considering how many privileged, weak-spined snowflakes roam America — grown adults reduced to sobbing when their "safe space" has been violated by the presence of "offensive" Halloween costumes — this number should be taken with a truckload of salt.
          Simple assaults, including slapping, shoving, or spitting on, accounted for 39% of "hate crimes." In other words, only a small fraction of hate crimes — the kind that spring to mind when we hear the phrase, like aggravated assault (18.7%), rape and murder (well under 1% each) — actually include significant physical violence.
          Keep all this in mind as you read back over that headline of a 67% increase in hate crimes against Muslims. The total number of reported "hate crimes" against Muslims in 2015 was 257, and using the aforementioned percentages as a guide, that means that 51 Muslims were seriously assaulted in 2015, out of a total American Muslim population of roughly 3.3 million. So one out of every 64,706 Muslims suffered physical violence as a result of a hate crime in 2015, and one out of every 1,079,823 blacks. In fact, there were almost as many black-on-black murders in the city of Chicago in 2015 as there were total "hate crimes" against blacks in the entire United States the same year. Again, assuming these crimes were specifically motivated by hateful bigotry.
          It should go without saying that unprovoked attacks against ANY individual, regardless of race, sex, religion, or any other factor, are completely unacceptable. At the same time, it is dishonest to portray America as a place where blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, homosexuals, transgenders, and women are living in constant fear of attack. That's the narrative Democrats like Harry dinky-Reid despicably advance, though.
          Another thing to consider is that these numbers are based on crimes reported to law enforcement authorities. Yet when there are numerous examples of hate crime hoaxes being perpetrated — like the Muslim woman claiming she was beaten by white male Trump supporters as they screamed racial slurs, who now admits she made it all up — even the reported numbers become suspect.
          Oh, and by the way, Jews are more likely to be the victims of hate crimes than Muslims. But that doesn't fit the narrative. Not when even criticizing Islam is a "hate crime" to some people.
          The bottom line is that each and every violent criminal deserves to be prosecuted and jailed, and no decent, honest American should ever be subjected to this kind of abuse. But categorizing name-calling and being offended as "hate crimes," or lying about these kinds of attacks, makes it harder for true victims to be believed and protected, and it instills in some of us an unjustified fear of fellow Americans, whom some erroneously believe to hate them. This serves no one except those who profit from social, racial and political discord.  ~ The Patriot Post
.
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump And Romney Meeting Sunday To
Discuss Major Role In Trump Administration
by Rick Wells
tWu9csoL5nzo4LzUJGvmv02hehQTgIfdJWh3sZpC1Ddch_phwNj4l73wAdKRYFxsoKz3QiK4jqdVjIma52HQgEd52SuAT8FraiA5X1gfibWLpdpJJIIPEMLCtkHeUQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Some things seem almost too outlandish at first to be believed and this news fits into that category rather nicely... According to CNBC, Mitt Romney will be sitting down with Donald Trump this Sunday to discuss his possible appointment to be Secretary of State in the Trump administration. It’s bizarre given that, outside of liar-Hillary Clinton, Romney was arguably Trump’s most vocal and visible foe during the election. It’s also worth remembering that Mr. Trump labeled Romney a choker for his loss to liar-nObama and that he has deep connections to the same establishment that Trump has vowed to eradicate. Unless it’s some sort of odd variation on the Pulosi “you have to vote for the bill to see what’s in it,” logic, a Trump “you have to fill the swamp before you can drain it” theory, something else is at play. Maybe he’s the best man for the job. The smart guys at CNBC think it’s a great idea, that Romney is certainly capable and that patching things up will go a long ways towards making the Trump presidency effective. It could be that Mr. Trump is adapting, having recognized that a certain amount of marsh land is needed in order to make the former swamp inhabitable and to provide a more firm footing...  http://rickwells.us/trump-romney-meeting-sunday-discuss-major-role-trump-administration/
.
Trump "Protests" Manufactured by Leftist Elites and Manned by Professional Protesters
by C. Mitchell Shaw
{thenewamerican.com} ~ The radical resistance against Trump — funded and manned by the Left throughout his campaign — has shifted into high gear in the wake of his electoral victory... The “protests” against candidate Trump have turned into riots against president elect Trump. In cities all across America, large crowds — many violent — have taken to the streets since the election results came in. In city after city, they are all carrying the same signs and shouting the same slogans. Who is behind these “spontaneous” protests? Within a day of Donald Trump’s election, protests and riots began in cities as far apart as New York and Los Angeles and almost everywhere in between. In some of the protests, participants can be seen carrying larger-than-life Donald Trump heads on large sticks. In all of the protests, professionally-made signs bearing the same images and slogans can be seen. Since the “spontaneous” uprising began less than a day after the election results were known, it seems odd that the protesters already had signs and Trump heads all ready to go. Given that even a rush print job of that magnitude would be both hard to fill and quite expensive, the questions which need to be asked are:...  http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/24649-trump-protests-manufactured-by-leftist-elites-and-manned-by-professional-protesters
.
Trump Has Huge Opportunity To Kill NAFTA
by Steve Byas
hNulk4pnRVHAENwYHI_UIKWVDpKmrJOUvPMMU2Ab4tyr1bVLZRrrD_sFs-E9Az4GF-eIu2FuYOqsGoTELaA-4QJS-kfOz2UGTUcYma-jONLq2YyjljktarmuG8sM7HGgyOxy5DIAgszEG5g7q5yv=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{thenewamerican.com} ~ The globalist modus operandi of handing over to the president immense powers to act unilaterally without Congress may now come back to bite them... During the recent presidential campaign, President-elect Donald Trump often railed against the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), charging that it was hollowing out American industry, costing hundreds of thousands of Americans good-paying jobs, and promising to do something about it were he to be elected. Turns out, the provisions of NAFTA may very well allow President Trump to act on his own to change tariff rates, force negotiations to modify the pact, or even withdraw the United States from it. With NAFTA blamed for job losses in the industrial Midwest, Trump was able to crack the so-called Blue Wall of the Democrats, taking the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ohio in the election. It is the best a Republican candidate has done in this area, sometimes referred to as “the Rust Belt,” since Ronald Reagan was on the ballot...  http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/24645-trump-has-huge-opportunity-to-kill-nafta
.
Justice Sotomayor: 'We Can't Afford Despair,'
So Oppose Trump
by Paul Bois
RHiNfUMhwiiRdRHWBUyyD98AyQ6Pu0zAKgT7mNwiYeloiHIRWCiETVmpz1OKeLTELZNuwzlwXYv4f4zaf_bqNM1Tnukd20062vJB3-UXWTk6gYROqLJoLPzm2qCHoH_vtWnIUTKY-43-eF0wQ8Q47XSc7Gi9w2ojJasdhE8Rjs1R7IhhF1h1e42sybPXu8rdXBKw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Following her Freudian slip about how she occasionally fantasized about going all Joe DiMaggio on Justice Scalia with a baseball bat, Justice Sotomayor now tells her followers to oppose Trump or risk facing despair... Speaking in Washington at the Old Naval Hospital, Justice Sotomayor advised those present that they "can't afford for a president to fail" and should seek to support that "which is right and help guide him to those right decisions in whichever way we can find to do that." After throwing that Easter egg of national unity, Sotomayor was asked by moderator Bill Press if she felt "apprehensive about what happened in this nation last Tuesday." Donning her leftist robe, the lady Justice then made a call to protest by dressing it up under the guise of people "being heard."...She can be removed as others in the Court.   http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/justice-sotomayor-we-cant-afford-despair-so-oppose-trump
.
LA Times Lists Several Reliable Conservative
Outlets as Fake News Sites to Avoid
by Trey Sanchez
4GIwgR59AFQ2AYQZH-8lvm7XhRaTLMdX3fbxOVYPQgZOaeWZO_q2BD2v7IKb0VGqPQktvuXIyHwbrx580283HgAYpymJIgNbHPR26gNv2FtNvt-DZxcq11wLmOLQvCFFzvkz4YR0ieldfuI6blSv4uQCJTEdeiy0qDJVyE3I5SQ33z6fip-49IKFPqSYkcMFyxSsaD2TTbhhCA9I-Db11b-3LYAYb3detUFi3tEuiT9VMA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{truthrevolt.org} ~ The liberal media is having a tough time coming to grips with liar-Hillary Clinton losing the election. Some looked inward to see how they could’ve been so wrong about the electorate... Others are blaming “fake news sites” for spreading false information and influencing voters. Facebook is taking a lot of the blame for disseminating this so-called false information. But the sources of some of this “misinformation” are really a problem for Big Media because they are conservative websites and blogs. The Los Angeles Times published a list of “false, misleading, clickbait-y and satirical ‘news’ sources” to avoid which was compiled by Melissa Zimdars, Assistant Professor of Communication at Merrimack College in Massachusetts, according to Legal Insurrection — you know, one of those "fake" conservative sites that are simply passing along what the LA Times is publishing. Reliable conservative outlets like The Blaze, Breitbart, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, and RedState all made the list. Also making the cut is The Onion, a well-known and actual fake news site. So, you can see why Zimdars wanted the conservative outlets next to The Onion...  http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/la-times-lists-several-reliable-conservative-outlets-fake-news-sites-avoid
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

.
The Federal Bureau of Political Investigation
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
8FElg3IL3EkYavSIhdqyYLtJ-A_KELBBWfEaYci-o2L_PerwKeUlJuymHhS_E_i63TEYPry_L3a-AWxYPiDb0k7nz4cjgCIK-9_ANiSQdApFPpMMo2sNW72nAuuVju7g4NQDnayDUXlkKx0YTQgqwd4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ When liar-Hillary Clinton delivered a campaign post-mortem to her major supporters in a telephone conference call late last week, she blamed her loss in the presidential election on FBI Director James Comey. She should have blamed the loss on herself. Her refusal to safeguard state secrets while she was secretary of state and her failure to grasp the nationwide resentment toward government by the forgotten folks in the middle class were far likelier the cause of her defeat than was Comey.

Yet it is obvious that law enforcement-based decisions in the past four months were made with an eye on Election Day, and the officials who made them evaded the rule of law.

Here is the back story.

The statutory obligation of the FBI is to gather evidence to aid in the prosecution or prevention of federal crimes or breaches of national security. The process of complying with this obligation necessarily involves making some legal judgments about the relevance, probity and even lawfulness of the gathered evidence. These judgments are sometimes made on the streets in an emergency and sometimes made after consultation and consensus. But the whole purpose of this evidence-gathering and decision-making is to present a package to the Department of Justice, for which the FBI works, for its determination about whether or not to seek a prosecution.

In cases in which subpoenas are needed, the FBI must work in tandem with the DOJ because subpoenas in criminal cases can be issued only by grand juries and only DOJ lawyers can ask grand juries to issue them. Usually, the FBI and the DOJ work together to present what they have to a grand jury in order to build a case for indictment or to induce a grand jury to issue subpoenas and help them gather more evidence.

Federal judges become involved when search warrants or arrest warrants are needed. These are often emergent situations, as the evidence to be seized or the person to be arrested might be gone if not pursued in short order. They require the presentation of evidence to a judge quickly and in secret. It is the judge's role to decide whether the DOJ/FBI team has met the constitutional threshold of probable cause. Probable cause is met when the prosecutorial team shows the judge that the evidence the team seeks from the execution of the warrant more likely than not will implicate someone in criminal behavior.

Having issued many search and arrest warrants myself, I know that judges need to be curious and skeptical. After all, only one side is appearing before the judge, and the whole appearance is often quick, unorthodox and in secret. A healthy curiosity and skepticism will cause a prudent jurist to ask whether the grand jury really needs what the search warrant seeks. If the reply is that there is no grand jury, most judges will terminate the application and conclude that it is a fishing expedition -- or going "sideways," as law enforcement says -- not a serious criminal investigation worthy of judicial involvement.

All of this is commanded by law to be kept secret so as to preserve evidence, avoid tipping off a potential defendant capable of flight and preserve the reputation of a person not indicted.

That is at least the way these things are supposed to work. Yet none of this happened in the recently reopened and re-terminated investigation of the misuse of emails containing state secrets by liar-Clinton.

In that investigation, the DOJ did not present evidence to a grand jury. Thus, it did not obtain any subpoenas. And it did not seek any search warrants. It cut deals left and right, promising not to prosecute those from whom it sought problematic evidence. After accumulating a mountain of evidence of liar-Clinton's guilt, the FBI did not present it to the DOJ.

Rather, Director Comey held a news conference on July 5, at which he declared that he and his colleagues in the FBI -- not the DOJ -- had concluded that "no reasonable prosecutor" would take the case; so liar-Clinton would not be prosecuted. He then proceeded to outline in detail the gathered evidence (SET ITAL) against (END ITAL) liar-Clinton.

He endured a firestorm of criticism for his public presentation of the gravity of the evidence in the case and his unilateral determination of no prosecution. The firestorm was generated largely by his own FBI agents who had become convinced of liar-Clinton's guilt of the failure to safeguard state secrets (espionage), as well as their collective belief that someone somewhere had told Comey what to do.

Then, just 11 days before the 2016 presidential election, Comey saw a chance to redeem himself with his critics. He unlawfully announced the unexpected discovery of a treasure-trove of 650,000 emails that he and his team had not then examined but that they thought might affect the decision not to prosecute. This caused a second firestorm, in which this writer and others accused Comey of profound violations of federal law, not the least of which was an assault on liar-Clinton's right to due process.

Knowing this announcement -- not the resumption of the investigation but the announcement of it -- was unlawful, Attorney General Loretta Lynch did nothing to prevent it.

liar- Clinton began to sink in the polls. Her Republican opponent, Donald Trump, now the president-elect, began to gloat and celebrate. Then, two days before the election, Comey announced that the FBI had reviewed all 650,000 recently discovered emails in a week and concluded that none of them affected the decision not to prosecute liar-Clinton. Shortly thereafter, a DOJ official announced that the email investigation was closed -- for a second time.

What have we here?

We have the gross mismanagement of the nation's premier law enforcement agency. We have a DOJ uninterested in the truth and willing to shield a target of a criminal investigation for political reasons. We have the improper and unlawful revelation of matters the law quite properly commands be kept secret.

We have the dangerous injection of the FBI into elective politics, which can do ruinous harm to the rule of law.

And we had a candidate who should blame only herself for the whole controversy.

http://townhall.com/columnists/judgeandrewnapolitano/2016/11/17/the-federal-bureau-of-political-investigation-n2246919?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=[-MAILING_REFERENCE_NUMBER-][-CURRENTDATE-]

 
Read more…

Fri/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Anti-Trump Riots and America’s Lost Generation
by Susan Stamper Brown
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Pro-Abortion Celebs Taunt Pence 
qXLq_OqkWIQLPVbsWAcm4bm1uWGz88vVB36TwF6qpmilyxQ6jY_DYM6DHgEa4h5tExJyDwD1tb325d9HULBYp8VFrGy4gz3yb82wBK8fI4nL9K4vwusslBNC6XGfaQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
In today's celebrity-obsessed culture, people often get caught up supporting particular causes based not upon well-reasoned and principled arguments but rather upon emotionally alluring appeals from self-proclaimed social justice warrior celebrities. Sadly, this type of manipulation produces a crowd of foolish lemmings motivated by a desire for acceptance into the "right group" or being on the "right side of history" rather than by the cause of "justice."
          Katy Perry, Amy Schumer, Amber Rose and several other celebrities have started a drive on social media to encourage people to donate to Planned Parenthood in the name of Vice President-elect Mike Pence. Why in Pence's name? Well, rather than attempting to promote the "justice" of their cause — that of supporting the nation's largest provider of abortions — they have deemed it more beneficial to mock and disparage those who would stand opposed to their vile agenda.
          Pence has a long history of defending the rights of the unborn against those who espouse as supreme the rights of sexual liberation and personal convenience. Since those who are pro-abortion are finding it increasingly difficult to argue against the charge that abortion does indeed destroy a human life, they have often pivoted and attacked the messenger rather than the message.
          It would be more accurate if Perry, Schumer and Rose said they want you to donate to Planned Parenthood because the lives of kids don't matter until they're born. But they'll never make an honest argument. And sadly, many will jump on board simply because it's what Katy, Amy and Amber want.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 OPINION IN BRIEF 
Terence Jeffrey: "When voters practice their faith, it hurts the liberal cause. Now, imagine an unmarried 22-year-old, who lives in a city, works part-time making $20,000 per year, and has not gone to a religious service in four years. How would that person be likely to vote? Suppose, then, this same person gets married, starts working full-time and overtime, earns more than $50,000 per year, buys a home in the suburbs, and regularly attends religious services with the spouse and children. How would this person be likely to vote then? But what if this person followed another path? They married and then divorced, decided it was not worth it working full-time, went on food stamps and never went to church. The ultimate question is not how a person will vote, but what will give them a fulfilling life. It is not what persons will hold political office in United States of America, but what values will keep us free and prosperous. The same values that made this nation great can unite this nation again. They are family, faith, hard work and the desire to live a long and good life without government standing in your way."  ~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Hezbollah Shows Off Stolen US
Weapons to Threaten Israel
by Micah Halpern
FSSsGCEtC7IkoKS0DZkZ2jsvVF7Smv5jqiiPQHDe_169aOY3FREpl5gtYXNRBcP1ASS5hLX5cbNK3ypZJ06mnjsl8TIxsDRyScCKiVcBwIx3Ns1v6SNYWfuxX2DkDlBqsSMv4IsjNLnF7c88PNoSc3Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{observer.com} ~ It is common knowledge, for over a year now, that Hezbollah has amassed over 160,000 rockets, according to Wikipedia. Quoting from sources in a BBC report and the Israeli paper Haaretz... Wikipedia lists the rockets by number and by type. Boosting that claim, this week the Arabic press was covered with pictures of Hezbollah’s artillery: photos of tanks, armored personnel carriers, anti-aircraft weapons, even motorcycles for rapid response teams to quickly maneuver through rugged terrain. Pictures were posted on social media sites on Sunday, November 13, and the posts showed a huge parade of Hezbollah weapons. Social media reported that the area was closed and only Hezbollah members were permitted to participate and gawk and proudly strut around as the arsenal passed by. It was a first. Hezbollah has never permitted pictures like this. They have always wanted their assets to be kept a highly guarded secret—and for good reason...  http://observer.com/2016/11/hezbollah-shows-off-stolen-u-s-weapons-to-threaten-israel/?utm_campaign=Observer_National_Politics&utm_content=National%20Politics%20-%20Panerai%2011/17&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Observer%20News%20%26%20Politics
.
Jewish Leftists, when will they ever learn?
by Phyllis Chesler
gpugFEbOT4e2gP3DrcEkYisQ0a695XqC8W1mxXwccy2zRfijgwMHWKtSowwQl9qpojN4EQpDDM23DsRn2ludFX-luzTefymTxrH_6JmCc8k7h8Kzv8k374AH-PVMG1FLlPpmn3WSdiu5oX9j-VhBaB3tVA9OnzVE_-rEL2HScur2oqgjEA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{frontpagemag.com} ~ And so, the American Jewish Committee has chosen the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) to launch a “Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council.” Many distinguished (liberal) Jewish names have signed on... but the Muslim signatories are not  exactly their counterparts. Only (liberal) Jews “reach out” to understand the Other. Only (liberal) Jews “reach out” to appease the Other. Only (liberal) Jews in America—who have just lost their fabled access to the White House, are making common cause, not with Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists or with secular humanists in America, but with the very religion in whose name Jews and other infidels are being slaughtered right now in Israel and world-wide, including in America; the very religion whose record on human rights, women’s rights, and gay rights leaves everything to be desired; the very religion in whose name a Holy War is being waged against both Muslims and infidels—and against Western civilization...
.
'Break the Cross!' Muhammad Commands It
by Raymond Ibrahim
9Il49FyJzHoEWo3v0Z07_u6MC0Bs9dtSGaktyUnsfyqz0taA2tlilopwVvGjp2F6A6uzBaCVU73sHhISCNzocTTkwSGf6-fm_VU2ZZ8uKGLaVrvGYOlkDcuNYLGON9dgq4YvEB-C5VPMTNlpa_538ZMykTZGwceLTvgriE21sQRZdERFgJrzJGP55_4WlIlVE3nY2sc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{frontpagemag.com} ~ What more evidence is needed to prove that Islam is at war with Christianity than its well documented hatred for the quintessential symbol of Christianity: the Cross?... This recently occurred to me as I was surfing Arabic language videos and websites discussing Christianity—only to encounter one hostile video, fatwa, or sermon after another against the cross. Only one seemingly spoke well of the cross—though for a reason that again demonstrated Islam’s hostility for Christians. According to Al Azhar professor Dr. Salim Abdul Galil, Muslims can be tolerant of the cross—they can even wear and pray to it—but only when in need of deceiving Christians, whom the learned cleric portrayed as the natural enemies of Muslims... http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264847/break-cross-muhammad-commands-it-raymond-Ibrahim
.
No, hate crimes have NOT
‘intensified’ since Trump’s election
by renee nal
{trevorloudon.com} ~ One of the many lies stemming from the mainstream media in the wake of Donald Trump’s election is that hate crimes have increased. The source of this ridiculous whopper is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)... whose embarrassingly biased reports from partisan hacks are reflective of the mainstream “news” outlets that cite the group as a legitimate source. Any reasonable journalist can take the most cursory of glances at the silly report to see at best, that it is not a valid source. The “hateful intimidation and harassment” cited by the SPLC are, of course, not listed and therefore cannot be subject to scrutiny. This information, according to SPLC, was “collected through news reports, social media, and direct submissions via SPLC’s #ReportHate page” and is “largely anecdotal.”...  http://www.trevorloudon.com/2016/11/no-hate-crimes-have-not-intensified-since-trumps-election/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NewZeal+%28New+Zeal+Blog%29
.
Israeli Ambassador to UN: See You in Court, BDS
by Stand for Israel
AvPbmoIzavlVClqZOYuTXsmjTIK5oJLxYT1GU58od-lHLxF9HEt9dhPyNH2hoyC1hZmAyFMMkpkMI-9L4zaB8qKHoALSwBRNItB4OB0rD2sh-3bPnBkvS1Zc9V5cSncYc5rh4IGJuWk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{ifcj.org} ~ Yesterday, Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations held a special forum at U.N. headquarters to discuss the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement... The Jerusalem Post's Danielle Ziri reports that Ambassador Danon told the audience that the days of BDS' lies and intimidation are "coming to an end": “We are here to send a simple message to the BDS movement: to the bullies who harass students on campus, to those who use the language of civil rights to mask their hate, to the activists who are conducting this illegal and unjust campaign of hate; your time is over, your movement based on lies and intimidation is coming to an end,” he told the crowd. “We will use every tool and every legal measure to stop the hate.” Putting a stop to the anti-Israel movement, Danon said, should be at the top of the UN agenda. “We will focus on lawfare, the use of legal procedures, to fight bias and discrimination and to stand up to boycotts. We are here to learn from the experts to think of new ways to collaborate so we can tell BDS activists: See you in court!”...  http://www.ifcj.org/news/stand-for-israel/Israeli-Ambassador-to-UN-See-You-in-Court-BDS.html?utm_campaign=sfi%20daily%20dispatch&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

.
Anti-Trump Riots and America’s Lost Generation
by Susan Stamper Brown
8Y5ESM9I9NeU_v5brKd3vHcRXbPKHW_HjOPvQte07bnGYRXyN13jwxnDMuO4cg1zXz7n_hrl-poHqYOXFT0D2nMKpFsqUy3YH7yE3SWtNlz3trS61gKEXeKMoy9kOSNWhjUbZRakyA5LLZG8yek9XnQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ Watching the recent anti-Trump post-victory riots on television and the temper tantrums on social media, it’s become obvious that, without Divine intervention, the ever-fearful Millennial generation will become known as America’s Lost Generation.

As someone who has been forced to face a few of her biggest fears against her will, I can say with some authority that while everything you fear will probably never come to pass, those things which do can make you better. Safe spaces are the last thing these crybabies need.

During his first inaugural address in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke to fear before a justifiably fear-ridden nation during the Great Depression telling them, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”

Depression-era Americans were dealing with real fears like massive unemployment, homelessness and starvation. Families lucky enough to have jobs lost 40 percent of their income. Many people lost all their savings when banks collapsed leaving millions homeless and hungry, resulting in a 50 percent rise in parents turning their kid’s over to custodial institutions to prevent starvation.

Additionally, upwards of 250,000 kids too young to leave home hitchhiked or rode the train rails in search of work or a better place to survive, unlike today’s coddled snowflakes blessed with full bellies and equipped with the latest iPhones who are currently in meltdown mode due to groundless fears over a duly elected president.

After the election, despondent snowflakes lit up social media with fear-filled updates about the world ending and how a Trump presidency would ignite racism. Meanwhile, many so-called “love trumps hate” Trump haters were burning cities, vandalizing cars and attacking innocent bystanders, sometimes simply because they were white, or, God forbid, Republican.

A fear of offending peers also caused them to remain silent when Twitter accounts erupted with calls for the assassination of President-elect Trump and Vice President-elect Pence. The idea that blacks can be racist too is lost on them, even after viewing the YouTube video of a mob of black thugs pummeling an elderly white man to the ground, savagely delivering repeated blows to his head while voices in the background taunted, “You voted Donald Trump…Beat his a**... Don’t vote Trump.”

Our snowflakes also acknowledge fear over Trump’s take on immigration, although their coolest president ever, President liar-nObama, “deported more people than any other president’s administration in history,” ABC News reports.

 Evidently, some are so frightened by Trump’s victory they believe people must die like the young Latina woman on cable news who said, “There will be casualties on both sides…because people have to die…Trump, enough with your racism. Stop splitting families. Don’t split my family.” Apparently, because he’s black, liar-nObama can’t be labeled “racist” for deporting more than 2.5 million people between 2009 and 2015.

Trump’s words about borders and legal immigration send our delicate snowflakes into their respective safe spaces when they aren’t throwing temper-tantrums. They have no clue their safe spaces aren’t safe if ISIS sympathizers come calling as they’ve vowed to do. They fear a man who promises to make their safe spaces safer when he curtails the terrorism that’s skyrocketed domestically and worldwide under liar-nObama.

Apart from a relative few, logic and rational thought is all but lost on what is at this point, America’s Lost Generation. Especially compared to America’s Greatest Generation, whose young people faced real fears, survived the Great Depression, then lined up in droves to fight in World War II. Or like the Generation Xers who were predominately the major heroes after the September 11 terrorist attacks as leaders of Flight 93’s revolt, first responders in New York City and patriots who joined the military to fight.

In sharp contrast and just as FDR alluded in his fateful first speech, too many Millennials have allowed “nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror” to prevent “needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”
Read more…

Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
The Slacker Mandate and the
Safety Pin Generation
by Michelle Malkin
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 GOP House: The Good and the Bad 
bhDAIOEHXhCGYaGyanUF7MlOYOa8Cn3uQWkveZnKrHuRiGD88accFH1z7mEB4Cp2mKBJRKQ1nE1SyVoTgY9XbdxUU4X6W3ITvy8s6zNJLIU0wP1gyR5kM9thNHiQ0w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Some change is good and some not so good, but the concept of change simply for the sake of change is often a recipe for disaster. Yesterday, House Republicans unanimously voted to keep Paul Ryan (R-WI) as speaker of the House. While it's clear not every Republican is a fan of Ryan and he probably won't get unanimous support for the upcoming speaker election, this display of party unity is significant. It strengthens the party for the inevitable policy opposition and battles it is sure to face from Democrats and the Leftmedia. This also bodes well for Donald Trump's policy plans since both Reince Priebus and Mike Pence are good friends of Ryan — having the three work together to craft policy should encourage conservatives.
          Unfortunately, the bad news is that several House Republicans are seeking to revive earmarks, a practice the GOP disallowed upon retaking the House in 2010. Earmarks have been associated with causing corruption in Washington. It's this type of government cronyism, which caters to special interest groups, that Trump specifically identified as needing to be cleaned up. And for all his faults, former House Speaker John backstabber-Boehner detested earmarks and defended the ban.
          Andy Koenig, vice president of policy at Freedom Partners, said, "Hard working Americans want their tax dollars spent wisely and transparently." Tea Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin warned, "Any member of Congress who votes to bring back old-school, backroom, pork barrel spending through earmarks is putting himself or herself firmly against the American people who just elected Donald Trump president, as he campaigned emphatically on the issue of draining the swamp in Washington." And Ken Cuccinelli, president of Senate Conservatives, argued, "Americans are tired of politicians in Washington using their power to rig the system for special interests. ... It would be a major mistake for Republicans to bring back earmarks as their first act after the elections. It would be a slap in the face to the millions of Americans who just voted to drain the swamp." The House is voting today via secret ballot. Let's hope this proposal is defeated.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 liar-nObama's Denial Tour 
vfa_jemm137flApudb00iKwnILGjqXy2zalajc4zzSxBXbAt1WIbhctXQl-t8_9iYMdiIlDu0bdfOECSq3edMBgQnK6DcA6D2hHLyF-ugOyJ6O781XoU_U5IsMdb4Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Among the first things Barack liar-nObama did upon assuming office in 2009 was to embark on his infamous apology tour, visiting various world leaders to express his heartfelt sorrow for America's failings. Now on his last foreign trip, billed as an attempt to reassure allies after Donald Trump's election, liar-nObama has revived his apologize-for-America rhetoric, while at the same time attempting to defend his own record. It's as if liar-nObama were saying to his leftist, globalist, elitist buddies, "It's hard work attempting to rule those obstinate and ignorant rubes."
          In Greece, liar-nObama declared, "We have to deal with people's fears that their children won't do as well as they have. The more aggressively and effectively we deal with those issues, the less those fears may channel themselves into counterproductive approaches that pit people against each other. And frankly, that's been my agenda for the last eight years." What a completely disingenuous statement given liar-nObama's incessant practice of "pitting people against each other." liar-nObama, the divider in chief, rarely let an opportunity go by to blame some group — whether it be the "gun lobby" or "racist cops" or those "do-nothing" Republicans or, his seemingly favorite target whenever referencing the poor economy or the problems in the Middle East, George W. Bush.
          While seeking to protect his legacy and continue to promote his ideal of globalism, liar-nObama also sought to warn the world against populist movements. He cautioned that people around the world "are going to have to guard against a rise in a crude sort of nationalism, or ethnic identity, or tribalism." This too is ironic, as it was his administration that endlessly practiced identity politics based entirely on tribalism.
          In one of liar-nObama's more narcissistic moments, he attempted to explain why Americans seem to like him but rejected so much of what he accomplished. He boasted, "People seem to think I did a pretty good job, and so there is this mismatch I think between frustration and anger. Perhaps the view of the American people is that you just need to shake things up." In other words, he wasn't the problem; Americans just don't know what's good for them. Maybe he forgot that he spent the entire campaign running around telling anyone who would listen that he wasn't on the ballot but his policies were. Americans do know one thing: We don't much like those in government dictating to us what we're allowed to think and speak~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
DOJ Civil Rights Lawyers Ponder Future Under
Potentially ‘Terrifying’ Trump Presidency
by Ryan J. Reilly
OFJje-gCH799UfiZX9oB_lsen_yWNNEjLg_VERhrOnJY959lXiObbXELL7eEjIEyN4wHVE4HphsOa3h9btFKn37daD62IAmcN4zE0vOJl7GYBQlau7nS3MIR_eAHNGK8oZ_EOOeV5QmOOgPmhEY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{huffingtonpost.com} ~ Lawyers in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division ― a branch President Barack liar-nObama rejuvenated after the Bush administration neglected many of its key duties... are worried that President-elect Donald Trump’s administration might dismantle the work they’ve done over the past eight years. Under liar-nObama, the Civil Rights Division has fought Republican-backed voting restrictions, prosecuted anti-gay hate crimes for the first time, and mounted major investigations of police departments in Chicago and Ferguson, Missouri...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-doj-civil rights_us_582a189be4b060adb56fb8c7?
.
Globalists Tell Trump That Climate Deal
 Is Irreversible; It's Not!
by Steve Byas
doyEGLJh8-tzmruFXHlqlFsqkP135ySBNqHLK_QD5MYvLWvXOh18ZItYdhig8IaFlvd-6ZAUhA2LObO687MAyS56JdkpsJ7qTAhD2a2Tq2jR_Az--dUSAJh29vewaLa9V3UVUWmauwNYBMBWbtqJ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{thenewamerican.com} ~ In a bold attack upon our national sovereignty, French President François Hollande and United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon insisted on Tuesday that the United States “must respect the commitments it has undertaken”... with the global 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change, because the agreement is “irreversible.” But it is not. Though President Barack liar-nObama and Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry certainly made a “commitment” to the deal last year, the U.S. Senate did not. And, under the Constitution of the United States, which is the “supreme law of the land," the president does have the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties but only provided two thirds of the senators present concur (Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution)...  http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/24639-globalists-tell-trump-that-climate-deal-is-irreversible-its-not
.
Dobbs – Paul Ryan Is The Biting Snake In
Story Trump Told During Campaign
by Rick Wells
Hp2Trj654ddml9iO3Ra51P2S7KEu_bQjxg_ql_EfavHCBK3aHkq0-zD0BNvZjWVPlD6MwwItONsoNhyaVlaq8gl6YNRaMiCnqYC65dsu2RcG586sJinmCoau3OL9UCdpuJX-Hi4o=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs offers a few thoughts on what he describes as “a curious direction taken in our national swamp, you know, the one the president-elect promised to drain, and a dangerous, dangerous course it seems to be... All is now set to hold House leadership elections tomorrow, Speaker Paul Ryan running unopposed for reelection.” Dobbs reminds his viewers, “This is the same Ryan who was working more closely with ‘president’ liar-nObama than his own conference, who, dare I mention this? Who betrayed his party’s nominee for president? Ryan, after all, was on a losing, not winning Republican ticket just four years ago, and he was crushed in the debate that year by none other than Joe loose lips-Biden.” “This is the same over-full Hamlet who took a month to endorse Trump after he became the presumptive nominee,” says Dobbs, “who said he had an obligation to ‘call out’ Trump? He slammed Trump and attacked his immigration proposals. Ryan criticized and deferred and never once advocated for Trump.”...  http://rickwells.us/dobbs-paul-ryan-biting-snake-story-trump-told-during-campaign/
The Left's Political Warfare Against
Steve Bannon is Simply Proof of His Effectiveness
by SECURE FREEDOM MINUTE
mSYYGW8USdWQXRXp6f3355Cibo01ilw1k4H5AKQuWGSlBxT6W8N0_GZjnqjyFOZZR7gHd_lX4PH32yZEyYzVg4qx1oIViV_dWndNaz4HRCaUi150j5JcPg5MZ4A1bJ4pBTtVPMoJxA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ The radical left seeks through vilification to neutralize those that they consider to be formidable adversaries. Generally speaking, the more formidable, the more vitriol... Evidently, electorally challenged leftists are absolutely panicked over President-elect Donald Trump's selection of Stephen Bannon as his Counselor and chief strategist. And with good reason. Few people in public life today have a keener mind, a clearer vision, a stronger attachment to the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees and a more demonstrated ability to bring those qualities to bear decisively than Steve Bannon. His success as CEO of the Trump campaign in the critical closing months augurs well for the Trump presidency - and poses a serious problem for its assorted critics...
New Judicial Watch Release Of IRS
Docs Shows Groups Targeted
Based on ‘Party Affiliation’
by Jeff Dunetz
EZuiU6lbXOmE3EBnvKtRpB4pSWMU-odf5IvVxYpf9pny6HJupWgJC_S5RP4Nz-xBx7kY1q9XdD4EMheUyo8QYjq_VragQogooJXkLnc8IZg8ppxK8VfMRYEj-dGe7NqbiFgWO-gn__oshypv9KxO3nYrgOdXGlU3rqSmRP82dtE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{lidblog.com} ~ We all knew that the bottom line of the IRS scandal was that the agency was engaging in viewpoint discrimination, targeting groups whose philosophy differed with the liar-nObama administration... Now thanks to Judicial Watch we have proof…from their own hands. The latest release from the watchdog group announced it had received 1593 pages of new documents from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from its Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit against the agency. Included in the pile of documents were handwritten notes from a 2011 interoffice meeting that revealed a top IRS official admitting the famous Cincinnati office was targeting organizations requesting tax exempt status based on “guilt by association” and “party affiliation.” According to former IRS Director of the Office of Rulings and Agreements Holly Paz, “they think they know what the org is really doing, rather than looking at actual activities.”...
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

.
The Slacker Mandate and the
Safety Pin Generation
by Michelle Malkin
7UiScl0_g7H8iaIlGCD4qYlJSGeDmdeGObSWy3CbxVNl61aFTz1TgRISL1tgEZjq9DhQaKYF5_9xhOymrg3sf_mbhGSS0-p-aFylJC8LnYV5n3wlKrABbyEbbye8IT8p=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

{freedomsback.com} ~ News flash, kids: Things aren’t free. Things cost money. And “free” things provided to you by the government cost other people’s money.

Donald Trump gets it — somewhat. He vows to repeal liar-nObamacare’s most burdensome federal mandates that are jacking up the price of private health insurance. But he also plans to preserve the most politically popular provisions of the Orwellian-titled Affordable Care Act, including the so-called “slacker mandate.” It’s the requirement that employer-based health plans cover employees’ children until they turn 26 years old.

That’s right: Twenty-freaking-six.

Is it any wonder why we have a nation of dependent drool-stained crybabies on college campuses who are still bawling about the election results one week later?

Trump briefly mentioned during a “60 Minutes” interview on CBS this weekend that the slacker mandate “adds cost, but it’s very much something we’re going to try and keep.” That’s because most establishment Republicans in Washington, D.C., are resigned to keeping it. Once the feds hand out a sugary piece of cradle-to-grave entitlement candy, it’s almost impossible to snatch it back.

Who pays for this unfunded government mandate? As usual, it’s responsible working people who bear the burden.

Earlier this year, the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the No Slacker Left Behind provision resulted in wage reductions of about $1,200 a year for workers with employer-based insurance coverage — whether or not they had adult children on their plans. In effect, childless working people are subsidizing workers with adult children who would rather stay on their parents than get their own.

Moreover, according to company surveys and other economic analysis, the slacker mandate has resulted in overall increased health care costs of between 1 and 3 percent. The nonpartisan American Health Policy Institute reported one firm’s estimate of millennial coverage mandate costs at a whopping $69 million over 10 years.

At the time the federal slacker mandate was adopted in 2010, some 20 states had already adopted legislation requiring insurers to cover Big Kids — some up to age 31!

Yes, thirty-freaking-one.

In Wisconsin, the slacker mandate covered not only adult children, but also the children of those “children” if they lived in single-parent homes. In New Jersey, champions of the provision claimed it would help cover 100,000 uninsured young adults. But health policy researcher Nathan Benefield of the Commonwealth Foundation reported that “only 6 percent of that estimate has been realized” in its first two years. “The primary reason — health insurance is still too expensive.”

That has only gotten worse, of course, as liar-nObamacare’s other expensive mandates — especially guaranteed issue for those with pre-existing conditions — sabotage the private individual market for health insurance, leaving young and healthy people with fewer choices, higher premiums and crappier plans. The solution is not more mandates, but fewer; more competition, not less.

The liar-nObama White House will brag that the slacker mandate has resulted in increased coverage for an estimated 3 million people. As usual with liar-nObamacare numbers, it’s Common Core, book-cooked math. Health care analyst Avik Roy took a closer look and found that the inflated figure came from counting “(1) young adults on Medicaid and other government programs, for whom the under-26 mandate doesn’t apply; and (2) people who gained coverage due to the quasi-recovery from the Great Recession.”

To add insult to injury, another NBER study found that roughly 5 percent of people younger than 26 dropped out of the workforce after the provision was implemented. They used their spare time to increase their socialization, sleeping, physical fitness and personal pursuit of “meaningfulness.”

Then there are the hidden costs of the millennial mandate: the cultural consequences. All this “free” stuff, detached from those actually paying the bills, reduces the incentives for 20-somethings to grow up and seek independent lives and livelihoods. Why bother? The societal sanctions have been eroded.

Now, the nation is suffering the consequences of decades of that collective coddling. Precious snowflakes can’t handle rejection at the ballot box or responsibilities in the marketplace. Appropriately enough, the new virtue signals of tantrum-throwing young leftists stirring up trouble are safety pins — to show “solidarity” with groups supposedly endangered by Donald Trump.

Safety pins are also handy — for holding up the government-manufactured diapers in which too many overgrown dependents are swaddled.

http://freedomsback.com/michelle-malkin/the-slacker-mandate-and-the-safety-pin-generation/

Read more…

Thursday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Undoing the Iran Deal? Easy
by Lee Smith
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Will Trump Repeal, Replace or Amend liar- 
 nObamaCare? 
xt4LZHrpmphE6XBZAfaTBCEir3MptZg6Aca9y2iAZ7Id-A-7uTdU1nYSfseATbnNndM-_J6On7Rl1WpL0jzsq_1QVDXY0JCWikkj4R2Pkl2oglM-1di2ZsDZ103AEA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Paul Albaugh: Most conservatives remain relieved this week after Donald Trump's victory over liar-Hillary Clinton last Tuesday. But much remains unknown about what Trump will try to do. He has laid out an agenda for his first 100 days in office and one of the first things on his agenda is repealing the atrocious monstrosity of liar-nObamaCare.
          Conservatives would love for Trump to push for a full repeal of the grossly misnamed "Affordable Care Act." Despite an overwhelming majority of Americans loathing liar-nObamaCare, it's liar-nObama's signature accomplishment in his agenda to fundamentally transform America. Democrats in Congress have defended liar-nObamaCare on every occasion and have all but declared war to preserve it — even though it cost them dearly in this election (not to mention 2010 and 2014). Conservatives should fight back.
          On the campaign trail, liar-Hillary Clinton promised to keep and expand liar-nObamaCare. Trump, on the other hand, promised to move "very, very quickly" on repealing liar-nObamaCare. Republicans in Congress made dozens of moves during liar-nObama's tenure to push for repeal or for reforming the health care law but only one of those measures made it to liar-nObama's desk, where, of course, he vetoed it.
          Trump's own health care plan, which he put out during his campaign, is quite reasonable. It calls for the complete repeal of liar-nObamaCare, allowing health insurance to be sold across state lines, scrapping the individual mandate, implementing tax deductions for purchasing health insurance, and encouraging people who are healthy to put money into Health Savings Accounts. His plan also calls for Medicaid block-grants for the States and removing regulatory barriers for drug providers to enter the free market.
          During an interview with The Wall Street Journal — on the heels of his White House meeting with liar-nObama — Trump's tone changed slightly and there is indication that he is open for compromise instead of full repeal of liar-nObamaCare. Specifically, Trump indicated there are two particular provisions in the law that he's willing to keep. In the Journal's phrasing, he "said he favors keeping the prohibition against insurers denying coverage because of patients' existing conditions, and a provision that allows parents to provide years of additional coverage for children on their insurance policies." He also stated, "Either liar-nObamaCare will be repealed, replaced or amended." Those may not be the exact words conservatives want to hear, but Trump has signaled that he's willing to work with Republicans in Congress.
          And by all indications, the Republican led Congress is ready to get to work on dismantling liar-nObamaCare. House Speaker Paul Ryan said during a press conference, "This Congress, this House majority, this Senate majority has already demonstrated and proven we're able to pass legislation and put it on the president's desk." Ryan added, "Problem is, President liar-nObama vetoed it. Now, we have a President Trump who has promised to fix this."
          Senator Majority Leader Mitch McCon-nell echoed similar sentiments and stated that liar-nObamaCare's repeal is a priority for the GOP-led Senate. "It's pretty high on our agenda as you know," he said. "I would be shocked if we didn't move forward and keep our commitment to the American people."
          The bill that was sent to liar-nObama called for the repeal of the individual and employer mandates, Medicaid expansion, tax credits, medical device tax and Cadillac tax. In addition, it stripped the government of its authority to run the exchanges set up under the law and eliminated the fine for failing to comply with the mandates. Let's see if Republicans can at least duplicate that effort.
          Aside from Congress, Seth Chandler a visiting scholar at George Mason University's Mercatus Center and professor at the University of Houston Law Center, says there are several things Trump can do immediately to start the repeal of liar-nObamaCare. The first thing is to end cost-sharing reductions, which are payments the federal government makes to insurance companies that provide silver-level plans to consumers. Trump could also begin the rule-making process to roll back regulations implemented under liar-nObamaCare, which include the contraception mandate and the essential benefits requirement.
          Regardless of what takes place in the coming months, any steps to repeal and replace liar-nObamaCare will be steps in the right direction. It will take time. But under a Trump presidency we must demand a significant shift away from the current health care disaster that we experienced under liar-nObama. 
~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.

Ancient Jerusalem Tombs Damaged
In Suspected Arson Attack
by James Macintyre
g3P8-63s3HJ9hSGzB_w9Zj7qJoW_VohRi6SJOXVF8BP9HwjPLjO41gdnoYD_g4rAFJ5ctQwekrsf6t7EJFtl1Xm4eO6V7lSrAtCDiFM28IAC3Ce2noQSMpZ8xJaVlpnmarLgn1ohbXrH2oMfyXozjg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem
{christiantoday.com} ~ Two ancient tombs were severely damaged by fires outside Jerusalem's Old City in suspected arson attacks on Friday... Investigators in Israel do not know who set fire to Absalom's Tomb in the Kidron Valley, opposite the Temple Mount, and the adjacent Tomb of Jehoshephat. The tombs, which date to the Second Temple period, are among a cluster of ancient graves at the base of the Mount of Olives. Absalom's Tomb is traditionally identified as a monument to the biblical figure of the same name, though archaeologists have dated the edifice to the 1st century BC...
.
Palestinians: The Message Remains No and No
by Khaled Abu Toameh
5UfNpqE5D0YBhq7Y3FEe3fTeGHswfxEd9TfLiB9zIIbBvbvC0H6edujTtXjZq5FR0Opy940AewgVL93mCkcMyehKHApAOg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Last week, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas tipped his hand concerning his ultimatum on any revival of the peace process with Israel... "I'm 81 years old and I'm not going to end my life drooping, making concessions or selling out." Thus declared a defiant Abbas at a rally in Ramallah, marking the 12th anniversary of the death of his predecessor, Yasser Arafat. Abbas in this way relayed to the hundreds of Palestinians who gathered in Ramallah to commemorate Arafat: "I have no intention of going down in history as a leader who compromised with Israel."...Now if our leaders can realizes that. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9334/palestinians-rejectionism
.
Bad News for the Brotherhood:
Frank Gaffney Advising Trump Team
by Daniel Greenfield
1hK6PhGRBBCAzxRcVjuKY_ZwM_4RFUJaNXICP3Lu3vVw2civjs5T7YtL4zTDJIxJCInOuPoFupZGSwgOJuBOVatxcOitJiPAH20CItBT4s8CZgiLjEuC8voHy7yDhSE2psM3AZA4eIDSfQQ9xiHkvgPi-XUx5Ez_xz6tyNk1zxyJm48CgriP4tgqsuuSjynMptfxCEKB4Hu9=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{frontpagemag.com} ~ I doubt Grover Norquist is too happy right now. And very few Muslim Brothers are lifting a glass of lukewarm water in celebration... Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy is now reportedly advising Trump's transition team. The media is reporting this with lots of scare quotes about his views on "Islam". Pretty soon there will be interviews with more preemptively frightened Muslims. Though I imagine even the media will grow tired of faking those after two or three months. The public will have long since tuned out. Frank Gaffney is a serious expert. And having him actually in a place of influence would matter more than some of the celebrity names being tossed around...  http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/264851/bad-news-brotherhood-frank-gaffney-advising-trump-daniel-greenfield
.
Congressional Dems Put Sanders in Leadership...
by Burgess Everett & Elana Schor
IMSincL2D4R3Vt5yySb518VvCe0QMEhb-a8KDzd9h9MvnsXWWQPaF-INnJv02LGA-wlPk9CKQNJya8rLaHWPavFtfsXrclOoCBGl9lKYb76LaEfsBg-5l5j_jHqv_UC1tL9C-IfXykY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{1776coalition.com} ~ Facing a party in turmoil, with moderates and progressives battling to sway its direction after a devastating election, incoming Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer decided to try to make everyone happy... The newly-elected top Senate Democrat navigated a potentially messy fight between two party leaders and expanded his team to include disparate voices from the liberal Bernie Sanders to the moderate Joe Manchin. It’s not a move without risk for the New York senator. His leadership team now numbers 10 senators, a potentially unwieldy group that encompasses more than a fifth of a 48-member caucus poised to be the spear of opposition to President-elect Donald Trump. Schumer’s moves to diversify the leadsership ranks comes on the heels of Trump’s success among blue-collar voters and as liberals try to keep pushing the party to the left...  http://www.1776coalition.com/featured-content/congressional-dems-put-sanders-in-leadership-gop-keeps-establishment-leadership-in-place
.
Ford Challenges Trump – Will Move
Small Cars To Mexico Despite Tariff Threat
by Rick Wells
yB46-ToRzI4pleXnqJfNzHOJZdL3JzUSUY4WnzDlpAXlxyXVOTEXaRuilxgnmEXjWvrdlevJ04WJLk1YUYL8b-CGG0pLdsVK3cCihyCbgVYNUn9iSMEX5zLWXA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Motor Company CEO Mark Fields announced Tuesday from the sidelines of the Los Angeles Auto Show, that Ford is moving forward with its plans to move its small car production from Michigan to Mexico... They offered a carrot that we’ve heard before, that no jobs will be impacted because other vehicles will be manufactured there instead of the small cars. He made no commitment as to how long they’d be manufactured or at what levels, but it’s feared that an increase in oil prices could negatively impact the larger vehicle production. President-elect Trump has criticized Ford for their decision to shift production of their Focus small cars to Mexico in 2018 and has warned of a 35% tariff being attached to Mexican-made cars. Fields told Reuters, “We’re going forward with our plan to move production of the Ford Focus to Mexico, and importantly that’s to make room for two very important products we’ll be putting back into Michigan plants. There will be no job impact whatsoever with this move.”...
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

.
Undoing the Iran Deal? Easy
by Lee Smith
Csj51vff7aK0bPvzZAZlYKEm0wxN37FfDCR8YDRqYWQDv0UTK3hC1fMgJ_vwW45hAtsbcIe1XWy7o9p82X67pNZWUzgfIls8mFkqihfs85eXsSExjgelWj8zBeFmf6kBYKu4iXUDdVSJk1_ZzpuaT4-9v5fHZRH4n2-B=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{weeklystandard.com} ~ The election of Donald Trump signals bad news for the Iran nuclear deal, Barack liar-nObama's signature foreign policy initiative. Calling it "the worst deal ever negotiated," the author of The Art of the Deal has threatened to tear up the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on day one of his presidency.

Supporters of the agreement and liar-nObama allies warn that shredding the deal will only benefit Iranian hardliners, the very people it was supposed to restrain. "The big winner in the aftermath of a Trump victory is Iran's Supreme Leader," Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert at the Brookings Institution, told Reuters. Ali Khamenei, she explained, "will be able to walk away from Iran's obligations under the JCPOA while pinning the responsibility on Washington."

Well, it's true that the nuclear agreement is in big trouble, but Trump's election has little to do with it. Indeed, the agreement would likely have collapsed under a liar-Hillary Clinton administration as well. The problem, as the commander in chief-elect correctly noted, is the deal itself. And that's why the liar-nObama administration has gone to extraordinary lengths to protect its "achievement"—by bribing Iran, drumming up business for the clerical regime, blocking Congress from imposing non-nuclear sanctions, and turning a blind eye to Iranian violations of the deal.

Last week, Iran was again in violation of the JCPOA. According to a report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran exceeded the deal's threshold for heavy water, a material used in the production of weapons-grade plutonium. The White House acknowledged Iran had exceeded the limit and then, bizarrely, praised the regime for its forthrightness in "making no attempt to hide" the violation. In other words, the liar-nObama administration is not just protecting the nuclear agreement, but also rationalizing the Iranian regime's violations of it. All that needs to happen for the deal to fall apart is for the Trump White House to do what the liar-nObama administration has refused to do—enforce its provisions.

The history of the agreement shows a series of deceptions by the liar-nObama administration. Just to keep the Iranians at the negotiating table, the White House bribed Tehran. Every month from January 2014 through July 2015, when the JCPOA was signed, the administration facilitated the transfer of $700 million to Iran from its frozen escrow account in the United States.

Since the deal was signed, the administration has given Iran more money to persuade it not to walk away. Among other sums, the White House paid Iran $8.6 million for 32 tons of heavy water after it was found to have exceeded the threshold stipulated in the agreement last February. The purpose was to protect the deal—even as it gave Iran an incentive to keep overproducing heavy water as a revenue earner.

Most spectacularly, the administration paid Iran $1.7 billion in ransom for four Americans illegally detained by the clerical regime. Iran is holding at least two more American citizens hostage and reportedly demanding money in exchange for their release, a deal the current administration will almost surely make in order to keep Iran from trashing liar-nObama's prize foreign policy win. If the Trump White House simply stops bribing Iran, the regime will walk away from the deal.

To justify inking the agreement with Tehran, the liar-nObama administration contended that the sanctions regime was about to collapse. We couldn't keep our European and Asian allies on board much longer, claimed White House officials. Iran was such a promising market and everyone around the world was in such a hurry to get back in that we had to get a deal signed before sanctions started to backfire.

As it turns out, European and Asian banks and corporations have proven very reluctant to do business with Iran. Why? Because unlike the liar-nObama administration, private industry stakes its own money, not that of the American taxpayer. Global financial institutions and companies were concerned that a post/liar-nObama White House might reimpose sanctions, thereby putting their investments at risk. More important, CEOs realized that dealing with a state sponsor of terror developing a nuclear weapon and at war throughout the Middle East was a risky investment, regardless of who sits in the Oval Office.

Hence the Iranians are unhappy, because they're not seeing all the money the White House promised would come to them from Asian and European investment. That's why a large part of Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry's brief in the last year has been to travel the world to drum up business for Iran. If the Trump administration doesn't act like Iran's investment banker, the regime will walk away from the deal.

The liar-nObama administration told Congress that the deal did not eliminate non-nuclear sanctions, like those related to terrorism, ballistic missiles, and human rights. After it was signed, however, and Iran was emboldened throughout the Middle East, the White House blocked congressional efforts to enforce existing non-nuclear sanctions and impose new ones. If the Trump administration doesn't block Congress from reinstating and imposing sanctions, as member have wanted to do over the last year, the regime will crash the deal.

The same holds for overlooking Iranian violations of the JCPOA. Last week's transgression was a repeat of the regime's February violation of the heavy-water threshold. When the White House coughed up cash for the 32 tons, it legitimized a state sponsor of terror as a nuclear supplier. If the Trump administration merely stops overlooking Iranian violations of the JCPOA, the regime will very likely opt out of liar-nObama's chief foreign policy achievement.

The liar-nObama administration was able to sustain its agreement with Iran only because it repeatedly deceived Congress, the American public, and the press about the deal—it bribed Iran, lied about the imminent failure of the sanctions regime, lied about imposing non-nuclear sanctions, and defended Iran's violations. In the next two months, the liar-nObama administration can be expected to try to protect the JCPOA, perhaps by trying to put Iran beyond the reach of U.S. economic pressure. Still, all the next White House has to do is enforce the strict terms of the agreement, and it is the Iranians themselves, not President Trump, who will undo the deal.

At that point, the next White House will have an important decision to reach, one made even more urgent by the mendacious tactics of its predecessor. What happens if the master of the art of the deal can't get Iran back to the table for an agreement that better suits American interests? What if the regime pushes ahead with its nuclear weapons program? Estimates suggest the Iranians are about a year from a nuclear breakout. Will the next White House take action to stop it or will it, too, push a phony agreement and put American citizens, allies, and interests at risk?
Read more…

Thurs/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Anti-Trumpers, Leave the Kids Alone
by Debra J. Saunders
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Division and Vitriol 
gf6XCk066k1B0DZaAq8fH_LcSg3AMkMGK1asXVgq3pU5UKI_GDiXZ9aXYPb7Ign-aDpkUWGc2WlmMC51nM_gdmvmIjsC7cp_TRB5DOVO35kvp7-_lUMofn-KB_1GSA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
According to a new Gallup poll, just 84% of Americans have said they accept Donald Trump as a legitimate president. What are the other 16% doing about it? Protesting, rioting, beating people and threatening jobs.
          As protests rage in several of the nation's largest cities over Trump's election, the Leftmedia are content to act as apologists for the unruly and emotionally juvenile mobs. Chanting a variety of noxious complaints such as "Not My President," protesters who evidentially don't have jobs — or as Trump has suggested, are professional agitators — have been demonstrating since last Wednesday. Some of them were bussed in. Worst of all, at least one protester in the nation's capital even held up a "Rape Melania" sign, in reference to the incoming first lady. What vile human being would advocate such a thing?
          The day after the election, Matt Maloney, CEO of popular food delivery service GrubHub, sent an email to his employees telling those who supported Trump to submit "your resignation because you have no place here." He later claimed he wasn't against people having voted for Trump. We in our humble shop have our doubts.
          Leftmedia support the accusations and stoke fears by referring to a few rather obscure accounts of people — say, paid leftist protesters — shouting disparaging remarks toward liar-Clinton supporters. Meanwhile the mainstream press conveniently ignores a much more disturbing video gaining wide play on social media. The video, shot in Chicago, shows an older white man under vicious assault by several black youths while others yell, "Beat his ass! You voted Trump! Don't vote Trump!"
          Where is Barack liar-nObama calling out this deplorable behavior born out of bigoted and racist rage? For that matter, where's liar-Hillary Clinton? Bernie Sanders is practically alone among Democrats calling on leftists to cease their temper tantrums. The response demonstrated by many of these radicals is exactly why identity politics is so destructive, for it thrives on pitting groups against each other. The result is an increased divisiveness with little common ground.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 Failed Foreign Policy President Offers 
 'Reassurance' 
K65UeSdT9nhrYx9ZYow9h16NtGcyugAs8PGQ1QpIOCKu7K483soMBRJCe_Zf1V7RZ5SryZ0eDjpJ8aYppduMN--owjiKsZbB6DhT-EogQDmt5MTasuF7h6m2f52z0Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Barack liar-nObama began his first term with an "apology tour" — a phrase that describes liar-nObama's trotting around the globe to offer condolences for American exceptionalism and alleged U.S.-rooted "injustices." It was a rejection of longstanding protocol and a blatant jab at his predecessor, George W. Bush, whose foreign policy included prosecuting the wars against jihadists in Iraq and Afghanistan.
          But whatever one thinks of Bush's decisions, it is more fallacious to believe liar-nObama wrought anything better. In fact, his apology tour was the beginning of a profoundly failed foreign policy — one that, with the help of liar-Hillary Clinton, resulted in the creation of the Islamic State. It also did nothing to improve our allies' perception of the world's lone superpower.
          That's not to say Donald Trump's ascension hasn't rattled the globe. But there's rich irony in liar-nObama using his final months to provide "reassurance" to those who fear populism will continue to reverberate. “I still don’t feel responsible for what the president-elect says or does,” he said in his first remarks overseas. "But I do feel a responsibility as president of the United States to facilitate a smooth transition."
          According to The Washington Times, "President liar-nObama embarks on his final foreign trip Monday, leaving behind a Donald Trump wave in the United States and heading straight into another Trump-like wave in Europe. The lame-duck president is hoping to reassure allies about the stability of U.S. policy, while the president-elect is gearing up to unravel some of Mr. liar-nObama's biggest foreign policy initiatives, including the Paris climate change agreement and the Iran nuclear deal."
          The Times continues, "Mr. liar-nObama will be largely powerless to deal with rising concerns among European leaders that upcoming elections in Italy and France could be swayed by the same sort of anti-establishment forces that contributed to Mr. Trump's victory and British voters' decision to leave the European Union. The U.S. president was on the losing side of both votes, and he's also spoken out in support of the Italian prime minister's proposed constitutional changes to consolidate power, a referendum to be held next month."
          Of course, what liar-nObama won't admit is that his socialist overreach created the Trump phenomenon. "People seem to think I did a pretty good job, so there is this mismatch between frustration and anger," liar-nObama said. "Perhaps the view of the American people was we just need to shake things up."
          He sought to belittle America by subjugating it to the rules and governance of other nations. Yet voters here and all over the globe are rejecting the policies this administration wants so badly to permanently instill. Trump has a lot to prove, both domestically and internationally. But that doesn't change the fact that the departing president is underscoring the disaster of his own reign by offering our partners reassurance. After all, he created their apprehension.  ~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Marxist/Muslim Axis:
‘Enemies Within’ Documentary
Exposes Proposed DNC Chair Keith Ellison
by Trevor Loudon
qjTQBmK8DivA9lCN2tiCwpMxBNVlnl3dhs5freieUDcAiPTCZukmCGl6CO6OKxJ_QkX27X-KsFlD3zHpnWfpHR5IFQwa_evXPJhyWEhY_XDzEpM5mEik8tHgvRuWwzAU1YfXnur1WCRYm-JQq-vRRq10tPkxdv6al59dG1lSdT17UW1zw3gXC5DZUw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{noisyroom.net} ~ Keith Ellison, a Marxist/Muslim Democratic Congressman from Minnesota, could soon become the Democratic National Committee chairman... With the endorsements of Senators Harry dinky-Reid, Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders and more than 250,000 signatures on an “Ellison for chairman” petition, Representative Ellison is the early favorite for the position. Many writers have focused on Ellison’s Islamic beliefs, but few have examined his extensive Marxist connections...
.
House GOP Weighs Proposal to Bring Back Earmarks
by Rob Bluey
l2oDdcsCbNP1Doi7YqGe3hDeSItrFDg_tVzQAvLqOirfANa2FlB9Ov81M_OhXskSMRhrQc2CiOvDiTMkoO_9Heea5ICA9Vwt-YPaVcnh87z9CQVyKRK8cqVzBw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{dailysignal.com} ~ One week after Donald Trump won the presidency on a promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington, House Republicans will vote on a proposal to bring back earmarks... The vote will take place Wednesday when House Republicans meet to adopt their rules for the next Congress. The House earmark ban dates to 2010 when the GOP won control of the chamber. Now, a trio of Republican lawmakers wants to return to the practice of earmarking, which became synonymous with government waste and pork-barrel spending during the GOP-controlled Congress of the early 2000s... http://dailysignal.com/2016/11/14/house-gop-weighs-proposal-to-bring-back-earmarks/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CapitolBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTmpZeE5qTmxOR0ptTmprMCIsInQiOiJDOVZ0SU9ZblJMYXBNbmFkMTMyc0VpMXBlKzJ2VWpQZnI5Mzl3R0ZMK2VpOGVBcU1laTdtamp5UDkwZkJwWGlOSElab0JTak9vU0kxSm1LYnRcLythUDZWVTJlVkdVdTFORkRpZ0MrcGNvOTg9In0%3D
.
Trump Appoints Head of Immigration Team…
Illegals, Liberals HORRIFIED
STaU2i1gYSoo06GFDdz2fELqcnfgriBZaYi73II6e-jDIx6gK2Bi4XLsLtazcl1FY8Lb7qEyH8318EFk4tYirK_jntMT7nxMmRGEVjdZerz7pMLySLYDknUWPsyt1k8YMGvEmg0bw8UbjRgEPPd5lF0dBw5VEg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{conservativetribune.com} ~ The architect of Arizona’s SB 1070, considered by many the strictest anti-illegal-immigration law passed in recent history, has been tapped to provide consultation to President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team... and both illegal immigrants and their liberal supporters were horrified. “I’m a member of the immigration policy transition team, and there’s going to be a lot to do there, in part because Mr. Trump and Mr. liar-nObama are diametrical opposites when it comes to immigration policy, so there will be a lot of changes,” Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach told Wichita news station KWCH last week. This was horrifying news for illegal immigrants but a breath of fresh air for die-hard patriots who believed in national sovereignty and rule of law...  http://conservativetribune.com/trump-appoints-head-of-immigration/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_campaign=CTDailyEmail&utm_content=2016-11-15
.
House Dems Delay Leadership Vote:
Is Pulosi On Her Way Out?
by Trey Sanchez
wbB5m4ktlJwrauT7xgGaLKhdAb_AbGVJG3YYtI5QQStFhRvEh3xN_61hq9dbZZ2BqRvfUJefYG777DOw9azKy_Qj0g6NCsCWaF7BrcQJB1pHya_FwkEgqI3UnKodqlJvtg6dEOPMRWoaVgz5xZk_aT2bM1iOPY5lcR7zgWKlMRdwMXBH2XNoEHjgVd_iqtpwJgs-dHoI1tuuEE2nm80r5KUfLrk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Democrats are still reeling from an epic defeat on election day, and as a result, House Democrats have delayed leadership votes that were scheduled for Thursday... With a new incoming roster that includes a DNC chair and Senate leader Chuck Schumer, the question remains whether or not House Leader Nancy Pulosi will keep her job. Democrats sent a letter asking her to postpone the election so they could reflect on the devastating results of the election: It is vital that our Caucus take the time to listen to the American people and learn the lessons of this difficult election in order to put our Caucus in the best position to fight the potentially dangerous agenda of President-elect Donald Trump and to have a realistic chance of taking back the House in 2018...
.
Streisand to liar-nObama:
Appoint Supreme Court justice now
by Chelsea Schilling
mFEL1b3z53ktLwFrVdXgDTNdnRFHV3lLZnqA6eLHFP6JxfDcsQIfD9sX2pdImE0Gm9GunXwOfi3XcUitOregHxCiWvu-8ms-eNLtVlWnFOUO5ZAZkKbW-2d8B5aQog6NNeNBH5DH3A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{wnd.com} ~ Singer Barbra Streisand, a major liar-Hillary Clinton supporter and one of Hollywood’s most outspoken leftist activists, is calling on President liar-nObama to bypass Congress and unilaterally appoint his pick for the U.S. Supreme Court... The Senate declined to hold hearings or votes on Judge Merrick Garland’s nomination as part of its broad “advice and consent” power. liar-nObama nominated Garland in March to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Now that Donald Trump has won the election and is set to nominate a judge, Streisand has circulated a petition urging liar-nObama to quickly appoint Garland to the court before Trump can be sworn in as president...It won't work.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Anti-Trumpers, Leave the Kids Alone
by Debra J. Saunders
FJzuQ7Hm8NW1L4622k7UGTVRQE1Sk0h91e1vcTfRyedql8VbGIQN6phADRPTeOIS1V8W9O-a4rmfO4evLVKuTlb7kz4bdgvkkLUqpTPzFfKVadXQteh76Y_XqYTwkzZ4PTe3AjnZlBV8MR3kwXUFdPo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ liar-Hillary Clinton voters, I feel your pain. I've been on the losing side more times than I cared to be. It's painful and personal. I would venture to add that Donald J. Trump's victory probably is more bitter than a liar-Clinton win would have been for conservatives because you didn't see it coming. You lost and you were sucker punched. Ouch.

For most of you, the approach voiced by Kevin Eckery, a GOP consultant who did not vote for Trump, should be instructive. "We got head-faked," Eckery told me. The election was never about Trump, it was about his voters. In the future, Eckery plans to "listen with a little more humility."

Over time, one gets used to election loss, the stab of betrayal recedes from sharp to dull pain. You learn to accept it. At least Trump is capable of pleasantly surprising.

Sunday, protesters surrounded Oakland's Lake Merritt to renounce the president-elect. As long as they don't destroy people's businesses and block traffic, they are free to voice their concerns and proudly exercise their First Amendment rights.

Partisans, however, do not have a right to turn classrooms into Democratic caucuses, as suggested in a lesson plan which San Francisco Unified Assistant Superintendent Bill Sanderson sent to schools. It instructed teachers: "Let us please not sidestep the fact that a racist and sexist man has become the president of our country by pandering to a huge racist and sexist base."

And: "DO NOT: Tell them that we have LOST and that we have to accept this. We do not have to accept ANYTHING except that we must and will fight for justice against an unjust system and against unjust people."

It is scary to think that people entrusted with children's education are so clueless that they see it as their job to inculcate students with a cartoonish view of Trump voters. Also, the lesson includes no recognition that the people have spoken. Many Democrats were aghast when Trump said he wasn't sure if he would accept the verdict of the election. Yes, it was poor form, but I knew that if the tables were turned, many liar-Clinton voters would not be real zen about it.

I've had many adults tell me they didn't know how they could tell their children Trump won. May I suggest that some kids would not be so "traumatized" if their parents hadn't whipped them into a lather of indignation about "The Other"?

But also, while the lesson says it wants all students to feel respected, it doesn't give so much as a nod to the notion that some students might like Trump. In San Francisco, Trump won 10 percent of the vote. That's probably more than the number of transgender students administrators work overtime to make feel welcome. So share the love.

The California Education Code prohibits school employees from engaging in political activities on the job. "Even if not directly unlawful, a question still arises as to whether or not an employee recommending the substitutionary lesson for the day's assignment is appropriate and allowable," explained Bill Lucia of the school reform advocacy group EdVoice.

All racists, eh? One-third of the 676 counties that elected President liar-nObama twice switched to Trump. Inquiring minds should want to know why. liar-nObama might call this one of his "teachable moments," but that only works for those ready to learn about other people.
Read more…

Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
What Now?
by Thomas Sowell
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 OPINION IN BRIEF 
Peggy Noonan: "Donald Trump said he had a movement and he did. This is how you know. His presidential campaign was bad — disorganized, unprofessional, chaotic, ad hoc. There was no state-of-the-art get-out-the-vote effort — his voters got themselves out. There was no high-class, high-tech identifying of supporters — they identified themselves. They weren’t swayed by the barrage of brilliantly produced ads — those ads hardly materialized. This was not a triumph of modern campaign modes and ways. The people did this. As individuals within a movement. It was a natural, self-driven eruption. Which makes it all the more impressive and moving. And it somehow makes it more beautiful that few saw it coming. On the way home Wednesday morning I thought of my friend who runs the neighborhood shoe-repair shop. He is elderly, Italian-American, an immigrant. I had asked him last winter who would win the Republican nomination and he looked at me as if I were teasing. 'Troomp!' he instructed. I realized at that moment: In America now only normal people can see the obvious. Everyone else is lost in a data-filled fog. That was true right up to the end."  ~The Patriot Post
.
 liar-nObama's Obnoxious Condescension 
-37ghLE9xApnQZ9YqRY2nL0FOQkPJh5c2Ds7BOb8E-LHKUeAmMj7qjA4P37lSsRb-ypEs4qSq0K0UgN3MKeJdbdzFvC330EWvaskNSu6ikSrp8d8qg0xp6KzD_Hmxw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
On Monday, Barack liar-nObama held what we can only hope is his final press conference. Predictably, it was filled with both patronizing contempt and backhanded "compliments" directed at president-elect Donald Trump. In what has become his signature lecturing fashion, liar-nObama played the role of the erudite elitist sneering at that rube, Trump.
          liar-nObama suggested that Trump really doesn't know what he's gotten himself into, and that he's in over his head. "I think that he successfully mobilized a big chunk of the country to vote for him. Regardless of what experience or assumptions he brought to the office, this office has a way of waking you up. And those aspects of his positions or predispositions that don't match up with reality, he will find shaken up pretty quick. Because reality has a way of asserting itself." Translation: Yes, Trump won, but his ridiculous campaign ideas just won't work, and he'll learn that pretty quick.
          Even The Wall Street Journal bought into liar-nObama's condescension, "reporting" that Trump "seemed surprised by the scope" of the job and that his aides were "unaware that the entire presidential staff working in the West Wing had to be replaced at the end of Mr. liar-nObama's term." We're not sure how such pathetic White House agitprop ended up in the Journal, but its normally astute editors should be ashamed.
          Back to the press conference, liar-nObama sneered, "I think it'll be important for him to have the room, to staff up, to figure out what his priorities are, to be able to distinguish between what he was campaigning on and what is practical — what he can actually achieve." Translation: Don't dream too big, because your ridiculous plans are going nowhere. liar-nObama continued, "You know, there are certain things that made for good soundbites but don't always translate into good policy." Of course, liar-nObama knows a thing or two about soundbites that don't translate into good policy. "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan," anyone?
          liar-Obama also decided to play the role of amateur psychologist, saying, "There are going to be certain elements of his temperament that will not serve him well unless he recognizes them and corrects them." This coming from a man who is possibly the thinnest-skinned narcissist to have ever occupied the Oval Office.
          As he did when he campaigned for liar-Hillary Clinton, liar-nObama is attempting everything in his power to save his legacy. The fact is, it's his legacy that won the election for Trump. It's his legacy that a majority of Americans rejected. liar-nObama needs to hear his own lecture. It's time for him to graciously follow the lead of George W. Bush and remove himself from the political forum, for the good of the United States of America.  ~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Putin & Trump discuss Syria and US-Russia relations in phone call – Kremlin
JeF8pNvxqrFsVt3NShkyg4nQ6E60gceuvSWqbTcxQIXKbLWo3NTy411H2Lm7Ta_-NSO9yqqVPpydMgF3wuXxPdHuLZ9t7xlAaW4wNRiK4VO3WV4wvO0nRWvJ_bE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rt.com} ~ The US and Russian leaders have never had such similar positions on the key issues of world politics as Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President-elect Donald Trump... Vyacheslav Volodin, speaker of the Russian parliament, said. “Putin and Trump have numerous common points and shared views,” Volodin told Russian NTV Channel in an interview published Sunday. Volodin expressed hope for improvement in US-Russian relations, but also called for caution saying that Trump is yet to make practical steps towards rapprochement with Russia and show that his statements were not just empty promises...
.
Trump Orders 1 Immediate Change to
White House… Reverses liar-nObama’s
Disgusting Decision on Churchill Bust
rga6l1cSE2vQ1HaVAT8rfU_-a8Ky3ZQk-p_xLormlrH6xy664UBHgBPmop0ppkpNowE2gpofE4xsuj6VMi_LHwC4dxtWA4SXSFkD-iIO_mTS-iQk2Y9Z5xSRV4uRpUDIAkQySf15e__AGDa71mO0GtdGMDE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{conservativetribune.com} ~ One of the first actions of President Barack liar-nObama upon taking up residence in the White House was to remove a bust of legendary British Prime Minister Winston Churchill from the Oval Office... a move that was viewed by Americans and Brits alike as a slap in the face to America’s closest ally, the United Kingdom. But now that liar-nObama is about to leave and President-elect Donald Trump is preparing to move in, it appears that Winston Churchill’s bust will be making a glorious re-entrance into the White House along with him, according to the U.K.’s Express. Nigel Farage, interim leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party, promoter of Brexit and outspoken Trump supporter, shared the news about Churchill’s bust after recently meeting with Trump in New York following Trump’s surprising electoral victory...  http://conservativetribune.com/trump-change-white-house/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_campaign=ConservativeBrief&utm_content=2016-11-15
.
Left Threatens Peaceful Transition of Power with 'Nationwide Shutdown'
by Michael Haverluck
Zp66QNhEV1iCK-WXmzO5iwbXDPSZFTpkoCoL5slp7v2NSnfcPNc92ec42tprVjLJna5Af25mMZEohNbNupseONdtmfFTbYPn8wnwfs-G19Tlr3_AAIQOjg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Portland, Oregon
{gopusa.com} ~ In addition to tens of thousands protesting in America’s largest cities from coast to coast, progressives are now threatening to pull off a nationwide shutdown on President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration day... With violent protests taking place in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, New Orleans, Chicago and Portland, Oregon – just to name a few – Democrats upset that their presidential nominee liar-Hillary Clinton lost are waging war against the conservative candidate that Americans legally voted into office at the ballot box. Their protest in The Big Easy saw one of the monuments there being vandalized with the word “Die whites die” emblazoned on it...  http://www.gopusa.com/?p=17146?omhide=true
.
Trump may turn U.S. foreign policy and
military planning upside down
by R. Jeffrey Smith
OMmFehOVwLUFhrfBDDldQkmhjqtfTxJns5e6iPEN6tXcrJf02Zm8HnTKZiOXvtAl4u04VzG2lipXLS63OaE_R0j7OU6_jqQn_hUm_V91oG46eLXdfoIO0aIb0zGsw-JNzM-nvnyFNPknH2I7Y41eTdVq4ltqG55zo_KKUUqoD1Fv=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{publicintegrity.org} ~ As a political outsider who campaigned with venomous disdain for Washington’s national security establishment, Donald Trump appears likely to overhaul the nation’s military leadership... displace many of its top civilian advisers, and provoke turmoil inside the intelligence community. If he keeps his campaign promises and secures the support of Republican lawmakers who will retain a majority next year in both houses on Capitol Hill, Trump will engineer a substantial increase in the defense budget to build more ships and planes, and enlarge the Army and the Marine Corps, fulfilling a long-held dream by those services and the contractors that support them. He’s also said he wants to double down on the liar-nObama administration’s multi-billion dollar investment in weapons systems designed to defend against attacking missiles, though these systems haven’t worked well in tests to date. And he’ll accelerate America’s production of nuclear warheads, as well as the bombers, submarines, and ballistic missiles that carry them, despite worries among budget hawks that these agenda items are unaffordable in light of other pressing defense needs...  https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/11/10/20463/trump-may-turn-us-foreign-policy-and-military-planning-upside-down?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=watchdog&utm_medium=publici-email&goal=0_ffd1d0160d-5bdb4049fe-100318285&mc_cid=5bdb4049fe&mc_eid=19f9d76dda
.
Report: liar-Hillary 'physically
violent' after losing
by Bob Unruh
4hipuwFerLUqkCd99yUi7g39U1X6lp9lOd0bQfLBVVfr6imRFDCW4Q9PIOOgIvv07tbQBtmLHLjSOH3pwNBJsc5f1irRscHhKrk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{wnd.com} ~ Ed Klein, former editor-in-chief of the New York Times Magazine and bestselling author of the book  “Guilty As Sin,” about the liar-Clinton political family, says Bill and liar-Hillary had a screaming match... only days before her election loss that ended with Bill liar-Clinton throwing his phone off the roof of his penthouse apartment in Arkansas. And it gets worse. According to sources cited by “The Kincannon Show” on radio, liar-Hillary Clinton lost her composure entirely when her loss to Donald Trump became evident, “crying” so much that it was “hard to understand what she was saying.” Klein said she even turned combative against her staff. Many wondered on election night why liar-Hillary Clinton didn’t come out and address supporters when it appeared Trump had won. Instead, campaign Chairman John Podesta told the crowd gathered in New York City that votes were still being counted and they should all go home for the night...
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
What Now?
by Thomas Sowell
SeWasp8366yyG88UHEk781V3u-f_1c5f49L1UwRfZz9ppON66krvx2blfJOiZgTKWLXOeossvuL-mYdkjUhruTm-7WOqrokZnDf4nlFQV8-gLYR8R0M_iMiUQD5Qn6AanWbZOzgJ03D1UFpbQhXxwMwWl_YzpPubEoxE2pwG3l9wUU8dlmtFAFKvHh0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{townhall.com} ~ A liar-Hillary Clinton victory would have meant a third consecutive administration dedicated to dismantling the institutions that have kept America free, and imposing instead the social vision of the smug elites. That could have been the ultimate catastrophe -- not just for our time, but for generations yet unborn.

In one sense, Donald Trump's victory was a unique American event. But, in a larger sense, it represents the biggest backlash among many elsewhere, against smug elites in Western nations, where increasing numbers of ordinary people are showing their anger at where those elites are leading their countries.

There, as here, mindlessly flinging the doors open to peoples from societies whose fundamental values clash with those of the countries they enter, has been a hallmark of arrogant blindness and disregard of negative consequences suffered by ordinary people -- consequences from which the elites themselves are insulated.

Nor is this the only issue on which the blindness of elites has set the stage for a political backlash. The anti-law enforcement fetish among the insulated elites has even more tragically sacrificed the safety of the general public. This too has been common on both sides of the Atlantic.

Riots in London, Manchester and other cities in England in 2011 were incredibly similar to 2014 riots in Ferguson, Missouri, 2015 riots in Baltimore and similar riots in other American cities.

The fact that the rioters in England were mostly white, while those in America were mostly black, gives the lie to the facile excuse that such riots are due to racial oppression, rather than being a result of appeasing mobs and restricting the police.

Nor is the election of Donald Trump likely to lead the elites to having second thoughts about the prevailing dogmas of their groupthink. On the morning after Mr. Trump's upset victory over Mrs. liar-Clinton, a newswoman at CNN mentioned the disappointment of some women that "the glass ceiling" was not shattered as expected.

What an insult to everyone's intelligence is that catch phrase, "glass ceiling." What does "glass" mean, if not that you cannot see the ceiling, but somehow you just know that it is there? And how do you know? Because it has been repeated so often.

It is like the fable of the emperor's new clothes, but a fable for adults.

Demagogues like liar-Hillary Clinton can point to the fact that women as a group do not receive as much income as men as a group. But, factual studies over the past 40 years have shown repeatedly that, when you compare women who work as many hours a year as men, and as many continuous years in the same occupations as men, the income differences shrink to the vanishing point, and sometimes even reverse.

But how many politicians or media people care about facts, when the facts go against their preconceptions?

Donald Trump's unexpected victory should send a lot of people back to the drawing board to rethink their assumptions about many things. That includes not only the political left but also the Republican establishment. But don't count on it.

The Republican establishment has been called many things, but introspective is not one of them. One thing they might reconsider is their assumption that they alone know just what kind of presidential candidate is needed to win elections.

But the two most surprisingly successful Republican candidates of the past half century -- Ronald Reagan and now Donald Trump -- bore no resemblance to the candidates who epitomized the Republican establishment's model, such as Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitt Romney.

Among others who could also use some rethinking is Donald Trump himself. When he acted like a petulant adolescent, he may have gotten the adulation of his core constituents. But it was only toward the end, when he began to act like a responsible adult seeking the highest office in the land, that he began to overtake liar-Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump is a wild card. We don't know whether he was play-acting when he carried on like a juvenile lout or when he played the role of a mature adult. But he and the country could both benefit from some serious introspection on his part.
 
Read more…

Wed/Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
When the Trump Team Comes Looking for
the Secrets of liar-nObama’s Iran File
by Claudia Rosett
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 NYT to 'Rededicate' Itself to Honest Reporting 
6UxiaaJGUh-pxIJpLSRpC5Xb7cRbetPjBcf2k0ulauA5RWJV2_KlafX8mDWHxnaSNGoO7ioppeHYNlY4j96FLVZcj4lybzjcRPnVM7GcPievvlNc4wNm54D1N83lnw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
The Leftmedia really blew it in this election cycle, not because they misread opinion, but because they tried to dictate it. And The New York Times was at the forefront of that effort, including its August front-page call to abandon what was left of objective journalism in favor of defeating Donald Trump. On Friday, the paper's publisher, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., penned a letter to readers promising to "reflect" on the paper's coverage. He wrote, "We aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor." If you believe the Times has the slightest intent to report honestly after Trump's election — especially when the same letter claims to "believe we reported on both candidates fairly" — we have some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you. Likewise if you buy that anyone at the Times thinks they, and not Trump's voters, are the ones who blew it.
          New York Post columnist and former Times reporter Michael Goodwin got it right: "Because [the Times] demonized Trump from start to finish, it failed to realize he was onto something. And because the paper decided that Trump's supporters were a rabble of racist rednecks and homophobes, it didn't have a clue about what was happening in the lives of the Americans who elected the new president." The real purpose of Sulzberger's letter was to stop the bleed of subscribers. But the Times will no doubt continue its elitist ways of condescension and grossly biased reporting, further driving a wedge between it and the rest of the country. It's just what leftists do.  ~The Patriot Post
.
 Some Call for California Secession 
sADPcEtMunv57ZDSdi4iobTd3YjmWIE8hvfgP62Qi_M3ZWZW66biT7w1pL9XUX_ic6mcXbxScPAJrLwBZHBchrUggdZE_eVgUAwwF8V5nurjqyqXabN0P-l78i9EDQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
What do American citizens do when things don't go their way? Well, if they're California leftists they call for secession "to become [their] own nation." As Silicon Valley venture capitalist Shervin Pishevar said, "It's the most patriotic thing I can do." That's right, for some California leftists the definition of patriotism is to leave one's country when the opposing political party wins the election.
          As liberals across the nation struggle to come to grips with the election of Donald Trump, California Democrats may feel it more acutely than others. California, the most populated state in the union and holding 55 electoral votes, went almost three to one in favor of liar-Hillary Clinton, 61.5% to 33.3%. In fact, if liar-Clinton ends up winning the final popular vote total, she can thank the Golden State. And yet, before the state's ballots were done being tallied the election had been called for Trump.
          Will California secede? Of course not. Notably there are a lot of conservatives in California, however outnumbered at present -- recall that Ronald Reagan was a Californian! However, if California did manage to leave the union, it would be a long time before America saw another Democrat in the White House again. The truth is, leftists, for all their calls for tolerance and acceptance, have the most difficulty tolerating and accepting ideas and leadership with which they disagree. And protesting the election and making threats of secession do nothing but reinforce the hypocrisy of the Left.
          And a footnote: Donald Trump has established a good relationship with Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto. As an alternative to secession, perhaps Donald can convince Enrique to open the Mexican state of Baja Norte to all the California leftists who hate America!  ~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Yes, Trump's Going to Dump the Iran Deal
by FRED FLEITZ
-m4op1iUq0cBxqrPXUO7kRlsunIkORsrubyN1rW53tp2tt_etPJc5pw6jI5YkSKhTIGncK9R_292K3JM7kSM3tGeDZhA23PxS5DHtP7fs_ecZjElirs4UpzLUym1gP4LU4I5JXgS8eOg5aiu5Sc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ In the days following Donald Trump's victory, a variety of experts - mostly Trump critics - pronounced that, despite Trump's frequent statements during the presidential campaign... that the July 2015 nuclear deal with Iran is one of "the worst deals ever made by any country in history," he has no choice but to stick with the agreement after he assumes office. Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif was one of the first to insist as much, claiming a Trump administration cannot back out of the nuclear deal because it is not a bilateral agreement between the United States and Iran but "an international understanding annexed to a Security Council resolution." In a November 11 Foreign Policy article, he argued Trump can undermine the Iran deal but cannot directly dismantle it because the JCPOA is a multilateral agreement "codified by the UN Security Council." Any attempt by a Trump administration to renegotiate the deal would violate international law and isolate the United States, Parsi said...  http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/yes-trumps-going-to-dump-the-iran-deal?f=must_reads
.
George Soros Demands Voters
Return Control of Country to Him
by Daniel Greenfield
G1jo-QcdDGIWetv4BTPy4HbK2dXEYfc42o4eK0PF1iWe3gE23Fol3nq_uO-Z6yYb33rViFQ6XHBtM2devufw4y5XXcEVNo2wTya4MwIm74QkdN_EwAwZEvvBH5Xupo75xJLd1ezmrSbEgy_1S4rxHEi_KnytFuI5jJgev_UXytQoAMzlhwR3dg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{frontpagemag.com} ~ George Soros and other rich liberals who spent tens of millions of dollars trying to elect liar-Hillary Clinton are gathering in Washington for a three-day... closed door meeting to retool the big-money left to fight back against Donald Trump. The conference, which kicked off Sunday night at Washington’s pricey Mandarin Oriental hotel, is sponsored by the influential Democracy Alliance donor club, and will include appearances by leaders of most leading unions and liberal groups, as well as darlings of the left such as House Democratic leader Nancy Pulosi, Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren and Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairman Keith Ellison, according to an agenda and other documents obtained by POLITICO...
.
U.S. Officials ‘Concerned’ as Iran, Russia
Plan $10 Billion Arms Deal
by Adam Kredo
UIO7yQSpmLrT6V7Nvtc5rTyAaUFrID-9zrHG-9KCaDGznS5VAb3VgMJLYBAiv7fhJRFfya3aS8NV0nr2KuV1ewYIb6cP6B9ITg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{freebeacon.com} ~ U.S. officials are expressing concern about a budding arms pact between Iran and Russia estimated to be worth more than $10 billion... according to State Department officials who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon and expressed alarm over the “increased Iranian military capability.” Iran’s negotiations with Russia for new weapons and military hardware come after senior officials in Tehran dismissed the recent election of Donald Trump and warned his incoming administration against taking a firmer stance against the Islamic Republic’s continued military buildup. Iran is angling to purchase T-90 tanks, artillery systems, and aircraft from Moscow that are expected to keep the Islamic Republic fully armed over the next several years, according to reports in Iran’s state-controlled media...  http://freebeacon.com/national-security/u-s-officials-concerned-iran-russia-plan-10-billion-arms-deal/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=65981b16dd-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2016_11_14&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-65981b16dd-45611665
.
PA Vows to Make US Miserable
If It Moves Embassy to Jerusalem
aOezj41Sj02QHnAAkcv1dcvubPcAJOlC69Jh4ZsHx38SWXnAEytOnAI-woY5D22JR287YNayV_0Xdpu1Lr9VsQOa3AAihfT4P7V61kWCZfJtHFK2RCJE6YeVtVGRDIYPxw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{ifcj.org} ~ One of the promises of the incoming American administration is to move the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem... Israel Hayom reports that if this move should occur, the Palestinian Authority has threatened that it will "unleash all diplomatic weapons" against the United States: The Palestinian Authority on Sunday vowed to "unleash all diplomatic weapons" at its disposal to prevent President-elect Donald Trump's administration from meeting its campaign promise to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Russian news network RT quoted Palestinian U.N. envoy Riyad Mansour as saying such a move would be in violation of international law and U.N. resolutions, and that should any steps be taken to realize it, the Palestinian Authority would "make life miserable for the White House."...  http://www.ifcj.org/news/stand-for-israel/PA-Vows-to-Make-US-Miserable-If-It-Moves-Embassy-to-Jerusalem.html?utm_campaign=sfi%20daily%20dispatch&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
.
Arab Countries Accuse Iran of Sponsoring Terror
jqVNn4w-bKQtdkqdscvELAGQ1K6ZUkRDgCmfQDRNt3bsxuehj4HvumMA_cd_xS9v3skvm-cJHPdJ3KCrCDqH60A38Tv4-qsKM2ZDdK4h0YEOu0prqvKrVoX_Wy7PY2uziMuv4BiYV-27DeaHtMTLDg2OhAkGg_xdjMVm3Up4CSWUeDJQl2iyUTxRorl1-A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{ifcj.org} ~ Nearly a dozen Arab nations have submitted a letter to the United Nations accusing Iran of what we already know to be true - that the Islamic Republic is a sponsor of terrorism... The Times of Israel reports that eleven countries cautioned U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon that Iran has increased its support of terrorist groups since the signing of the nuclear deal: A UN watchdog on Monday hailed a letter by nearly a dozen Arab nations that accuses Iran of sponsoring terrorism throughout the Middle East, and of ramping up its support of jihadist groups since the signing of its nuclear deal with the US-led P5+1 nations last year. The October 27 letter to outgoing UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon cautioned that Iran “continues to play a negative role in causing tension and instability in our region,” and cited Tehran’s “expansionist regional policies, flagrant violations of the principle of sovereignty and constant interference in the internal affairs of Arab States.”...  http://www.ifcj.org/news/stand-for-israel/Arab-Countries-Accuse-Iran-of-Sponsoring-Terror.html?utm_campaign=sfi%20daily%20dispatch&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
.

AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
When the Trump Team Comes Looking for
the Secrets of liar-nObama’s Iran File
by Claudia Rosett
13PoMVD15VycxhCqmuzJq1-RhNSBNS8kbOEKs1W56uTvBdsoNS-ypObQHK0aVkPkTe7xnlf80o9AL3UzaFAHIpmS9nfGTLt4Zpe4eAqgdaRpFim4sTMs5rXw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{aim.org} ~ Thursday’s cordial meeting between President-elect Donald Trump and President Barack liar-nObama was a reassuring ritual of democracy. But liar-nObama was far from convincing when he told Trump “we are now going to do everything we can to help you succeed.” There are some highly disparate ideas here about what constitutes success, both foreign and domestic. There are also big areas in which one might reasonably wonder if liar-nObama and his team are in a quandary over the prospect of a Trump administration inheriting the internal records of the most transparent administration ever.

Take, for instance, the Iran nuclear deal, liar-nObama’s signature foreign policy legacy, the chief accomplishment of his second term. The liar-nObama administration’s Iran file has been a realm of murk, crammed with dangerous concessions and secret side deals for terror-sponsoring Tehran — to a degree that has left some critics wondering if liar-nObama’s real aim was to empower Iran as the hegemon of the Middle East equipped with ballistic missiles to complement its “exclusively peaceful” nuclear program.

The cherry on top — officially separate from the nuclear deal, but highly coincident — was the liar-nObama administration’s secret conveyance to Iran early this year of cash totaling $1.7 billion for the settlement of an old claim against the United States.

Like liar-nObama’s other legacy achievement, the unaffordable Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. liar-nObamacare, these Iran dealings were so intricate, extensive and opaque that we are still discovering just how duplicitous the official narratives were. liar-nObama never submitted the Iran nuclear deal as a treaty for ratification by the Senate. Instead, he rushed the deal to the United Nations Security Council for approval less than a week after the final text was announced, and left Congress wrestling through the ensuing weeks, during the summer of 2015, to try to extract vital details from the elusive liar-nObama and his team, subject to a legislative bargain so convoluted that the process, and the deal, never came to a vote.

For simplicity’s sake, let’s focus on the $1.7 billion “settlement” paid to Iran, which liar-nObama and Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry, apparently with no prior notice to Congress, announced this past January.  liar-nObama and hanoi-Kerry did not mention at the time that the administration was shelling out the funds in cash, to be airlifted into Iran — a form of payment especially handy for Iran’s illicit ventures, such as terrorism and procurement for its ballistic missile program the usual role of ballistic missiles — which Iran has continued testing — being to carry nuclear weapons, which liar-nObama has assured us Iran under his deal is not developing.

liar-nObama and his team also neglected to mention that $1.3 billion of his administration’s cash bonanza for Tehran had come from the pockets of American taxpayers, via an obscure channel at Treasury called the Judgment Fund. It took months before such specifics came to light, which they did thanks not to the administration, but to the efforts of the press, and a number of persistent questioners in Congress — to whom the administration sent tardy and evasive replies.

Questions continue to swirl around this cash-for-Iran arrangement. Was it a ransom for American prisoners released by Iran on the same day the liar-nObama administration announced the $1.7 billion settlement? The liar-nObama administration has repeatedly asked the public to swallow the logical fallacy that because it is not U.S. policy to pay ransom, this was not a ransom.

Why did the administration — until outed in August and September in a series of stories by the press — make a secret of the cash, the conduits and the dates of delivery? What were — what are — the full terms of this confidential arrangement? Which, according to a Sept. 29 report in The Wall Street Journal, included, as part of a package of three secret documents signed in Geneva, U.S. backing for the lifting of UN sanctions on two Iranian state banks blacklisted for financing Iran’s ballistic missile program.

Why have the relevant texts of all this wheeling and dealing been kept secret? Why has the administration repeatedly stonewalled questions from Congress? What were the machinations behind liar-nObama’s claim, after The Wall Street Journal on August 3 broke the story of the first tranche of $400 million in cash for Iran, that the U.S. government had no choice but to pay Iran with a mountain of hard-currency banknotes? Based on what internal calculus did the administration refuse to provide public confirmation for another few weeks — until after the news broke in the press — that the additional $1.3 billion in taxpayers funds had also been paid in cash? On the basis of what information, precisely, did Attorney General Loretta Lynch certify that Treasury paying out those tax dollars to Iran was in the interest of the United States?

The government of terror-sponsoring Iran knows the answers to many of these questions. The American public does not. But we can reasonably speculate that as this cash-for-Iran saga unfolded, it left a trail of records within the liar-nObama administration. Classified, quite likely — but surely there are some illuminating documents that someone with the proper clearances might wish to read.

Once upon a time, we would have called this a paper trail; these days it would more likely be digital. But at the very least, there ought to be the secret texts, the related justifications, requisitions and all the to-and-fro that would presumably be involved in the State Department, the Pentagon and Treasury at the behest of the Justice Department, on behalf of State, with the blessing of President liar-nObama, secretly organizing cash shipments totaling $1.7 billion for Iran — and then, for months, despite persistent questions from Congress and the press, covering it up. Add to that the overlap — or was it, as appears more likely, the coordination? — of all that clandestinely conveyed cash with the return of American hostages. Then amplify this scene dramatically, to include the manufacturing of the mothership Iran nuclear deal itself, and the related handling of sanctions (which, as the 2014-2015 Iran talks stretched out from the initially planned six months to 17, appeared, despite administration protests to the contrary, to be ever more casually enforced).

Which brings us back to America’s presidential election a mere three days ago, in which it sure looks like liar-nObama and his team were blind-sided by Trump’s defeat of liar-Hillary Clinton. Misled by their own narratives, by their echo chamber in the press, by erroneous polls, by the same arrogance that begat the presidential rule of pen-and-phone and Ben-Rhodes-narratives, liar-nObama and his team were expecting a handover to liar-Hillary. She might not agree with them on everything, but as a former insider herself, as a candidate who was running to continue liar-nObama’s trajectory and cement his legacies, she wasn’t someone whose access to the Iran file was likely to cause anyone currently in the White House to lose sleep (provided she’d really ditched her non-secure home-server proclivities).

And then liar-Hillary lost.

Instead, here comes Trump. It’s a good bet that until Tuesday night, the liar-nObama White House never expected any such imminent intrusion by the Trump team into its closets. Trump has called the Iran nuclear deal “disastrous,” and has said, variously, that he’ll dismantle the Iran nuclear deal, or renegotiate it. On Thursday, one of Trump’s foreign policy advisers, Walid Phares, told CNN that Trump will demand changes in the deal.

Whatever Trump does with the Iran deal, once he takes office he’s entitled to have access to what’s actually in it — preserved in full, including any secret documents, understandings, promises or related bargains. This should include information that holds the answers to a great many lingering questions, among them the full rationale and terms of liar-nObama’s prolific concessions to Iran — not least, the $1.7 billion cash payola to the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.

Even with such access, assuming the records are in good-faith preserved and turned over in full, disentangling the truth from the liar-nObama narrative could be complicated. Andy McCarthy, on PJMedia, warns the Trump transition team against trusting liar-nObama’s politicized intelligence on ISIS and al-Qaeda. It would be folly to rule out similar bias on Iran.

But if liar-nObama has any desire to see his signature Iran deal sustained, presumably he, or his team, will have to divulge to his successor whatever his end of this bargain actually and fully entails, beneath the narrative and behind the official gloss. Otherwise, with no particular help from Trump, the deal may implode anyway. For liar-nObama, during this transition period, it is, one might suppose, an unexpected and not entirely comfortable choice.
Read more…

Wednesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Post-election thoughts from a 'deplorable'
by Alicia Colon
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 The Electoral College Preserves Inclusion 
oLS_ZR7CrqPH_s3-6Ns0d4hf8uVF01AIBmTgqj-DL4KYm8ynWNPNda_oWvKU07_Mj374AdhTTjCf5OtT2AvlEJVarsHljHkHLb4UNe7dNvcN3Yev0mh7sYD3QztuFA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Arnold Ahlert: In yet another demonstration of their "respect" for the nation's laws and our Constitution, many leftists are calling for the elimination of the Electoral College following the election of Donald Trump. "The only reason he's president is because of an arcane, insane 18th century idea called the Electoral College," insists filmmaker Michael Moore. Like so many of his fellow travelers, Moore demonstrates a profound ignorance of a constitutional mechanism the Founding Fathers put in place to limit the power of what millions of Americans just voted against: an all-powerful federal government that has routinely ignored them.
          There is a reason this country is called the United States of America. It's because we are not a direct democracy, but a constitutional republic consisting of 50 separate entities plus the District of Columbia, operating under a federal umbrella. And while the Founders recognized the need for the extra layer of government, they were also extremely wary of politicians who would see it as an opportunity to eviscerate states' rights. The Electoral College was the vehicle they used to preserve those rights and simultaneously maintain democratic legitimacy.
          The process operates as follows. According to constitutional provisions and limits, each party chooses a slate of potential Electors, which are then chosen by the state's voters on Election Day. These 538 Electors — equal to the number of people in Congress plus three addition Electors from the District of Columbia — then convent in December to cast their ballots. Congress certifies the results in early January.
          There are no constitutional provisions or federal statutes that require Electors to abide the popular vote in some of their respective states. Thus it is unsurprising that ordinary leftists and their celebrity allies are circulating petitions urging the Electors to "go rogue" and ignore the wishes of their states' voters. Moreover, a group called FaithlessNow is targeting 160 Electors in 15 states Trump won that don't require a commitment to the winning candidate. In 25 states and the District of Columbia, Electors are bound by state law or pledges to cast their vote for a specific candidate. The penalties for failing to do so range from being replaced and/or paying a fine, to a fourth degree felony in New Mexico.
          Thankfully, the odds of reaching a critical mass of so-called "faithless Electors" is exceedingly slim. As the New York Times reveals, more than 99% of Electors have voted as pledged throughout the course of the nation's history, and the last faithless Elector was an anonymous Minnesota Democrat who cast his 2004 vote for VP candidate John Edwards instead of presidential candidate John hanoi-Kerry.
          Hence, some Americans — campus crybabies accommodated by canceled classes and exams, "disaster" counseling and other infantile coping mechanisms including Play-Doh, coloring books and therapy dogs; rent-a-mob thugs whose idea of democracy consists of violent protests, brutally beating up Trump supporters and inundating Twitter with Trump assassination threats; and those who wish to secede from the union — will be forced to deal with unpleasant reality.
          That goes double for a Leftmedia yet to discover that their overt bias during the campaign is very likely to result in Trump being able to talk right past them directly to the American public. And because they've already denigrated Trump and his supporters in every way possible, from calling him a misogynist, a homophobe, an Islamophobe, a racist, a bigot and a xenophobe, to enabling those comparing him to Hitler, Stalin and Satan, future attacks will ring increasingly hollower. In fact, by completely squandering the trust of the American public, the Leftmedia may have just accomplished the unthinkable: enabling their own irrelevancy.
          It's worth remembering that many of the same Americans now calling for the Electoral College's elimination were confident of a liar-Clinton victory precisely because they believed a blue state Electoral College-inspired "firewall" was impossible for Trump to overcome. Now that he has, they will continue their efforts, led by a group called the National Popular Vote, to further erode states' rights and require Electors to vote for the candidate who wins the national vote. NPV's efforts have been well-received, mostly by Democrat-controlled legislatures. Ten states and the District of Columbia representing a total of 165 Electoral votes have signed on. If they reach the 270 total required to elect a president, they will have effectively circumvented the Constitution to get their way. What else is new for leftists?
          If it were up to those in favor of eliminating the Electoral College, liar-Clinton would be heading for the Oval Office. Yet far more important, she would be doing so based on a huge vote advantage in only three states: New York, California and Illinois. Moreover, the votes in those states were undoubtedly driven by a big edge in four cities: New York City, Los Angeles San Francisco and Chicago.
          Now let's remember why Trump is president-elect: Millions of Americans rejected a cadre of arrogant and condescending elitists in government, media and academia united by their utter contempt for the "bitter clingers" who populate "flyover country." And yet, rather than come to grips with that rejection, the elitists and their followers would rather institutionalize their contempt, and effectively turn national elections into referendums controlled by a handful of populous locations. It is precisely the effort to prevent that from happening that gave rise to the Electoral College.
          In other words, the Founding Fathers recognized that direct democracy is "two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." The wolves lost in 2016. And just like liar-Clinton, it's time they accepted it.  ~The Patriot Post
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Where are the Mass
Media Firings and Resignations?
by Cliff Kincaid
bvBQbjUDiDOmIuS3VinY2uvg7X4ZIRHk95HP6vcWDc4pr-VTFfpYBCPBHpSPDFA5yPmgrSXsD6d87O7Fect4FKPpbfC53dAcOKicC7pCwXe4QH2Bo8LY1DzB7YpgsGmIRxfCKnrZ59U=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{aim.org} ~ I missed a few losers in my column on the big media losers of the 2016 campaign. One person told me, “Bret Stephens of The Wall Street Journal has totally lost all credibility... with his anti-Trump rants in his weekly column right up to the very end. We used to be ardent fans of his, but no more!!!” I agree that Stephens is a big loser. His attacks on Trump were relentless and he declared that he wanted to build a new political party to compete with Trump. Sounding like The Huffington Post, Stephens used his November 8 column to find Trump guilty of “unrelenting and apparently irrepressible bigotry, misogyny, bullying and conspiracy-mongering…” After the election, his readers responded with comments like:...YOU ARE FIRED!  http://www.aim.org/aim-column/where-are-the-mass-media-firings-and-resignations/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email111416&utm_medium=email
.
Hamas Funding Sources Drying Up
by Yaakov Lappin
Ss5ns44KsiY7QZIK1B4hKENdmqzZaDsiZjgDZDxgdgFcNgSpLgsLc1SCHdcjV1DFN_nRFcv_fQ0aMAXpLPEJm_nlRuS1gOKmfiKySYc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{investigativeproject.org} ~ Hamas in Gaza is facing an acute financial crisis as its overseas cash sources dry up. This is forcing the Islamist regime and its armed terrorist wing, the Izzadin Al-Qassam Brigades... to resort to increasingly desperate measures, such as using international aid organizations to funnel cash away from Gazan civilians. Hamas's dire financial situation has multiple causes. Egypt has effectively blocked off many smuggling tunnels linking Gaza to Sinai, which previously were used to transfer money into Gaza from Hamas donors. Additionally, Hamas finds itself without a clear international backer these days. Not only is Egypt under the rule of President Sisi decidedly hostile, but relations between Hamas and Iran are unstable, rising and falling periodically due to disagreement over conflict raging in Syria...  http://www.investigativeproject.org/5699/hamas-funding-sources-drying-up
.
Bernie Sanders Building A New Communist
Jihad Friendly Democrat Workers Party
by Rick Wells
eVMkTBqDy1hZr3JiuYN1hJz-7aU1zWWC3KH5ZOouhF5o9G9QzedQ9xOZMFTD6edYIrs3g4FIPEK0ZfDS5O7G5uNzMQr7JwB28CZWVJKogENgoYokfAZmWLGn9uPrpbkr=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ The communist who has inexplicably and dangerously become a rock star of sorts among the young people of our nation and others who don’t really understand or care about the consequences of “feel good,” good sounding socialism, made an appearance Monday on “CBS This Morning.”... Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders joined the hosts under the unblinking gaze of the ever watching eye of big government media to help nudge the lost and disheartened Democrats into the next phase of fundamental transformation. Sure, the election of Donald Trump has effectively put out their fire for now, but the Democrats are regrouping and they never rest. They will be back and soon. With the liar-Clinton loss Sanders has suddenly emerged as the socialist, lighter public face of communism, sage voice among Democrats. He has become the man who possibly could have delivered the White House if not the recipient of dirty tricks waged against him by the loser and his temporary home party. Sanders positions himself as analyzing why they lost but perhaps he’s just delivering the initial party propaganda offerings in the rebuilding process. The official unofficial position and statement of what is to come...
.
Trump Plans Quick Withdrawal From Climate Pact
IetzoLvzBXgt8FOBTzZUEFLb6EzQcmPJIxDn4qX5LEK3ScLHn8fcBqWkwQkkZhBI9Mp7m4IbpcoOSWiTG4wB0Axq8-6Q6gMv3FEMwuOxQwQg11V3OXcDgsTQeT1EP8HDWmGK_GfTMJ5F69wD=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{fixthisnation.com} ~ According to sources inside Donald Trump’s transition team, the president-elect is looking for avenues through which the U.S. can quickly withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement... that went into effect on November 4, four days before the election. Trump, who has expressed doubt as to the validity of man-made global warming, made a campaign pledge to get the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement, and sources inside his team say he means to make good on that promise. But if Trump withdraws in accordance with the rules of the pact, it would mean going through a four-year process. Trump is eyeing ways around that drawn out procedure. “It was reckless for the Paris agreement to enter into force before the election,” the source told Reuters...  http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/trump-plans-quick-withdrawal-from-climate-pact/
.
European Temper Trumptums
by Judith Bergman
hg4wkyFrFzYj6ETio672mwy7fz5roZ7q6GXpSnvpMDj02_ca9wOmabJAgr8AEZWhRp6SxTyZN882tm4tNEiaQE52d2eyTw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ "A world is collapsing before our eyes", tweeted the French ambassador to the United States, Gerard Araud, as it became clear that Donald Trump had won the US presidential election... Although he later apparently deleted the tweet, the sentiment expressed in his tweet encapsulates the attitude of the majority of the European political establishment. Deutsche Welle (DW), Germany's international broadcaster, described the reaction to Trump's victory across Germany's political spectrum as "shock and uncertainty." Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen described Trump's win as a "heavy shock." German Justice Minister Heiko Maas tweeted: "The world won't end, but things will get more crazy". Green party leader Cem Özdemir called Trump's election a "break with the tradition that the West stands for liberal values."...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Post-election thoughts from a 'deplorable'
by Alicia Colon
_ytyCHam9tFc_pvOC_eZ7TdZ_cYgvDKg9YY-X0Xwfalq11hQ6FRvTevkMH0HbkqxCOHYaHt97xKwxkByv3_ad7a5AgpeQA82wo3Fxy4kYJlXhnrybDP30yp17XpemeZeQJ0MHA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ Although the media and liberal pundits in both parties express shock that Donald Trump was elected president, we, who belong to the 'deplorables,' as liar-Hillary dubbed us, had seen the signs that augured this historic victory. If these liar-Clinton diehards had opened their eyes and shed their biases, they would have seen the writing on the wall.

The rallies

The 'yuge' numbers at Trump rallies and the enthusiasm missing from the comparable sparse attendees at liar-Clinton rallies. The only large crowds at liar-Hillary events were due to celebrity guests and entertainment not the candidate. Trump supporters came by the thousands just to see and hear what he had to say.

liar-Clinton's flaws

liar-Hillary was a very flawed candidate with her gender being her sole qualification. The Wikileaks proved again and again that her so-called experience in the State Department benefited her and the liar-Clinton Foundation not the country. It's really pathetic to hear her apologists blame sexism for the reason she lost to Trump. Most of those on the right would have voted in a heartbeat for a woman like Condoleezza Rice, one of the most highly qualified individuals in public service. It wasn't liar-Hillary the woman who lost. It was liar-Hillary the undeserving and corrupt who did.

Faulty polls

Wikileaks also exposed the collusion with the liar-Clinton campaign and pollsters and the MSM; thus the public refused to believe those polls showing liar-Hillary winning. Trump also cited a warning of this deceit. We no longer believed anything reported in the mainstream press which had abdicated all journalistic ethics by their blatant bias for liar-Clinton.

Trump supporters are no dummies

We are not stupid. Although we have been labeled as uneducated, sexist, racist and simply deplorable, we are none of the above. The membership in the deplorables includes physicians, academics, lawyers and many with advanced degrees. A friend I hadn't spoken to in a long while expressed her opinion of Trump supporters that came straight from the New York Times and other MSM pundits; that we are basically uneducated and Trump is a sexist racist who mocked the disabled. I told her that didn't happen but when I listed all the pertinent facts of that misinformation, she ended the conversation with, "I don't want to talk about it."

The prospect of four more years of liar-nObama's policies

For the past eight years, America has been subject to the monarchy of Barack liar-nObama who by fiat and endless executive orders has managed to sink this nation into weakness and economic stagnation. In her speeches, liar-Hillary Clinton proved that she would continue the president's policies and we simply could not afford this.

The left never really looked at us or our movement. If they had just bothered to look us in the eyes rather then looking down on us, Trump's election would not be a surprise at all. We are religious. We are pro-life and mourn the daily deaths of thousands of unborn children. We believe in God and He is definitely not in the Democrat platform. In fact we remember when He was booed at the 2012 Democrat Convention. The Evangelicals, practicing Catholics and their clergy, the pro-lifers, all joined together on social media to voice their right to religious freedom and the fear that the Supreme Court would take this away and our right to defend ourselves. The next president would be naming at least two justices and we wanted those to respect the Constitution.  On November 8th, we broke out our bibles, rosaries, prayer beads and shawls and prayed for our country and Donald Trump.

We were heard.
 
 
Read more…

Tuesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
 The Events of the Week -- Featuring: 
Israel in the Trump Era
AAefwqeEaAKHp2B9-f8F2rHFcKAAZrM0QqAImGrDCVQl2AJeiXL8GyxLXoIma6t9YBXs-DpRMIFiA-xjDOI10hmU5gQOIgGziKn57IUiJ30yHEosMnRiId1iQNAGJMCcXMcQ2mqt4-_4zKQFiuXh3bcdzvTi3GskvK9mki5NrQUZldz6oNwjKP77UxnIWVTX2KfIaPn5eSUwVVPBvoo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Caroline Glick
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Stopping The Global Jihad: Why Is The U.S. Failing?
by Jeff Ludwig
S9F4E2NWFTFQ-UUaL9U3Mqd4UmlhUkc2zQEXX_qv31TOs7RO0X_JSFA_gmrF7__Uu4o6_HVOgFUDPhH2iWIoHkixGOzDtHHq13p3MT7C7sW_PL88jR93_HIAmBk-xX7M7d0tUCO9UT5mUG3SZGUmTL6ESN1GCiDwNDexNDSoovez7LqNaA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{frontpagemag.com} ~ This writer is one of the numbed masses of people who have spent their entire adult lives witnessing mass atrocity after mass atrocity committed against Americans around the world and on U.S. soil by evil persons acting in the name of Allah... Actually, attacks by militant Islamists on Americans go all the way back to the administrations of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. Those attacks on American ships and sailors off the coast of what is today Libya were finally stopped by the Marines led by Stephen Decatur. Fast forward to World War I. At that time, the U.S. joined with Britain and France to fight against, and defeat, the aggression of the Central Powers of Europe that were allied with the Islamic Ottoman Empire. Only after that victory was this last caliphate dismantled into the various Islamic nation-states we now find in the Middle East. The post-World War I decades have seen the expansion of Arab oil wealth and continued internecine quarrels within the divided Arab world. Further, Islamist aggression internally and against the West – nay, against the entire world -- has not only continued but grown exponentially with each passing decade since 1918...  http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264784/stopping-global-jihad-why-us-failing-jeff-ludwig
.
liar-nObama Rushes to Implement
Climate Treaty Without Congress and
Before Trump Can Cancel It
by Eric Blair
2LKyUwIz9kdsuiAby5Sta_b3iBYnk3Tu-RAI9JKZ3QJPw4UIVIJqViZQwC5KpydUA1Icma-QuGnkLwqgx-hl6FwCC_vm__gxi-oSTXgWE0beVHOINLBzFyBXP_bttvNaZTXVN77Sl6FW77s=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{activistpost.com} ~ The liar-nObama Administration is rushing to implement a global treaty on climate change without a vote in Congress and before Trump can “cancel” the agreement... Put another way, US will be under global governance without input from the people’s elected representatives. Those protesting the prospect of “fascism” might want to pay attention to this story. The US Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry says he will continue his efforts to implement the Paris Agreement on global warming, until the day President Barack liar-nObama leaves office. President-elect Donald Trump has called climate change a hoax and said he would “cancel” US involvement in the landmark Paris deal...  http://www.activistpost.com/2016/11/obama-rushes-implement-climate-treaty-without-congress-trump-can-cancel.html?utm_source=Activist+Post+Subscribers&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=be9c337a14-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_b0c7fb76bd-be9c337a14-387888649
.
Trump's plan to bring back coal country
places EPA in crosshairs
by John Siciliano  
uxPu2V01rJTyQ_7HypeAzR06YFaBmaq5pADaUPaB6oGPbvu5pxB9JqxOJy51C9v0XBcvXbwqblMMAcrR2NoOq3XjHZg1hmLNe6ZHMGslvd4GR641DDGMbUt7841Pukew6uf8-CiawEEBQQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ President-elect Trump's plan to bring back the coal industry will likely start by scrapping the Environmental Protection Agency's climate change agenda, according to a newly appointed member of his transition team... The agency would be dialed back to focus strictly on "genuine pollutants" that pose immediate harm to public health, and not carbon pollution blamed for causing manmade global warming, said Kathleen Hartnett-White, a member of Trump's economic advisory council, in an interview with the Washington Examiner. "He's very much for clean air and clean water," she said. "But the better home for considering this discussion about carbon dioxide and climate is in the Department of Energy."...  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2607222/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Examiner%20Today&utm_source=StructureCMS
.
China Fires 1st Warning
Shot at President-Elect Trump
by Arjun Kharpal
EY7hYSzlKnbsc5m-AfDoyGLaLn1kSZOhnAqPb1ppLlR8r0s7BI7-4b6N8pzjQ4Zj6gFpmdevNVEelwbHv_3u5CitUp1AdCC_JhM2qvhBcy1WLsJAGN8tXUcKgEUd9_VeE7dgvn3R_n5MzLKz9WIx=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{cnbc.com} ~ Apple iPhones and other U.S. goods could suffer sales hits in China if President-elect Donald Trump goes through with his “naive” plan of slapping a large import tariff on Chinese products... a state-backed newspaper warned on Sunday. During his election campaign this year, Trump spoke of a 45 percent import tariff on all Chinese goods while failing to outline how it would work. Should any such policy come into effect, China will take a “tit-for-tat approach”, according to an opinion piece in the Global Times, a newspaper backed by the Communist party. “A batch of Boeing orders will be replaced by Airbus. U.S. auto and iPhone sales in China will suffer a setback, and U.S. soybean and maize imports will be halted. China can also limit the number of Chinese students studying in the U.S.,” the Global Times article read...  http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/14/apple-iphones-could-be-hit-if-trump-imposes-a-45-percent-tariff-on-china-exports-beijing-warns.html
.
Terrorist Training To Blend With “Refugees” –
How To Get Past Screeners
by Rick Wells
4legPf-5ZUQMvyl_Vxupw-mPoaLUHQ9C6yl67eEhGbw4RnJzP5CG3kUwJWEFg-4fjaXa1xxKTGSC5Xdyo-ZREuDOX9jiaE1JhXWYFJw2FNFvWk54Wto7bgy7p4hxxdC9EOouaiGurCIWJ2c=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{rickwells.us} ~ Intelligence reports quoted in a leading German newspaper have finally gotten around to stating the obvious, that ISIS has been training their operatives how to behave like refugees... including the critical component of how to respond to questions during their interviews and how to apply for asylum in order to successfully infiltrate the populations and gain access to the targeted Western nations. Rainer Rupp, a former German Intelligence officer agrees with the host that it’s a huge terrorist threat to Europe, if the information is correct, but it’s nothing new. He says, “Once you’ve opened the floodgates for people to come into the country by over a million in one year, without being checked and especially for “refugees” or migrants from Syria. He mentions the exacerbated circumstances created by a “special rule” that “in view of the many that came, they wouldn’t be checked in detail for a minimum of one but probably a minimum of two years, as actually inviting trouble...  http://rickwells.us/terrorist-training-blend-refugees-get-past-screeners/
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Israel in the Trump Era
AAefwqeEaAKHp2B9-f8F2rHFcKAAZrM0QqAImGrDCVQl2AJeiXL8GyxLXoIma6t9YBXs-DpRMIFiA-xjDOI10hmU5gQOIgGziKn57IUiJ30yHEosMnRiId1iQNAGJMCcXMcQ2mqt4-_4zKQFiuXh3bcdzvTi3GskvK9mki5NrQUZldz6oNwjKP77UxnIWVTX2KfIaPn5eSUwVVPBvoo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Caroline Glick
{truthrevolt.org} ~ What can we expect from President- elect Donald Trump’s administration?

The positions that Trump struck during the presidential campaign were sometimes inconsistent and even contradictory. So it is impossible to forecast precisely what he will do in office. But not everything is shrouded in mystery. Indeed, some important characteristics of his administration are already apparent.

First of all, President Barack liar-nObama’s legacy will die the moment he leaves the White House on January 20. Republicans may not agree on much. But Trump and his party do agree that liar-nObama’s policies must be abandoned and replaced. And they will work together to roll back all of liar-nObama’s actions as president.

On the domestic policy front this means first and foremost that liar-nObamacare will be repealed and replaced with health industry reforms that open the medical insurance market to competition.

With the support of the Republican-controlled Senate, Trump will end liar-nObama’s push to reshape the US Supreme Court in the image of the activist, indeed, authoritarian Israeli Supreme Court. During his four-year term, Trump may appoint as many as four out of nine justices. In so doing he will shape the court for the next generation. Trump made clear during the race that the justices he selects will oppose the liar-nObama-led leftist plan to transform the court into an imperial judiciary that determines social and cultural norms and legislates from the bench.

Trump will also clean out the Internal Revenue Service. Under liar-Obama, the IRS became an instrument of political warfare. Conservative and right-wing pro-Israel groups were systematically discriminated against and targeted for abuse. It is possible to assume that Trump will fire the IRS officials who have been involved in this discriminatory abuse of power.

To be sure, much is still unclear about Trump’s foreign policy. But here, too, certain things are already known. Trump will vacate the US’s signature from the nuclear deal with Iran.

Trump will not be able to repair the damage the deal has already caused – at least not immediately. He will not be able to reimpose the multilateral and UN Security Council sanctions on Iran that the nuclear deal canceled. Such a move will require prolonged negotiations and their conclusion is far from assured.

Trump will likewise be unable to take back the billions of dollars that Iran has already received due to the abrogation of economic sanctions and through cash payoffs from the liar-nObama administration.

At the same time, from his first day in office, Trump will change the trajectory of US policy toward Iran. He will oppose Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons. He will oppose Iran’s rise to regional hegemony.

A second conclusion that it is already possible to draw about the Trump presidency is that Trump will be much more like the hands-off Ronald Reagan than the hands-on liar-nObama. His past as a businessman along with his lack of governmental or political experience will lead Trump to set general policy guidelines and goals and delegate responsibility for crafting suitable policies and programs to his cabinet secretaries and advisers.

This means that personnel will very much be policy in the Trump administration. Whereas liar-nObama’s cabinet members and advisers have been more or less interchangeable since liar-nObama himself determined everything from the details of his policies to the ways that the policies would be sold to the public (or hidden from the public), and implemented, Trump’s pick of advisers will be strategically significant.

Clearly it is too early to know who Trump’s advisers and cabinet members will be. But there is good reason for Israel to be encouraged by the advisers who have worked with Trump during the campaign.

Vice President-elect Mike Pence is one of the most pro-Israel policy-makers in America. Former speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is an outspoken ally of Israel and of the US-Israel alliance.

Likewise, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, former senator Rick Santorum, retired general Mike Flynn, and former UN ambassador John Bolton are all extraordinary champions of the US alliance with Israel.

Trump’s Israel affairs advisers during the campaign, David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt, are also among the strongest advocates of the US-Israel alliance who have arisen in decades.

The striking friendliness of the Trump election team is even more notable when we consider what Israel would have faced from a liar-Hillary Clinton administration. liar-Clinton’s cabinet in waiting at the George Soros-funded and John Podesta- run Center for American Progress contained no serious advocates of the US-Israel alliance.

And her stable of advisers were not merely indifferent to Israel.

The WikiLeaks revelations from Podesta’s emails, like the correspondences published by Judicial Watch from liar-Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, made clear that liar-Clinton’s team included several advisers with deep-seated hostility if not animus toward Israelis and toward the Israeli government. The third thing that is already clear about the nature of the Trump administration is that it will not hesitate to abandon received wisdom on a host of issues and initiate policies that the bipartisan policy elites wouldn’t be caught dead even talking about.

Trump’s victory was first and foremost a defeat for the American elite, what Prof. Angelo Codevilla memorably referred to as America’s “ruling class.”

Trump’s campaign did not merely target the Democratic establishment. He attacked the Republican establishment as well. True, in his victory speech Trump said that he intends to heal the rifts in American society – presumably starting with his own party. But at least one thing ought to be clear about that reunification. As the president-elect, Trump will set the terms of the healing process.

There is every reason to expect that at a minimum, Trump will not soon forgive the Republicans who refused to support and even opposed his presidential bid. Members of the Never Trump camp will be denied positions and influence over the Trump administration and sent into the political desert.

Another establishment that fell on its sword in this election is the American-Jewish establishment. Led by the Anti-Defamation League, the American-Jewish establishment, including its largest donors, stood almost as one in its support for liar-Clinton. The members of the American- Jewish leadership placed their partisan preferences above their communal interests and responsibilities. In so doing they enfeebled the community in a manner that will be difficult to repair.

Both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party have antisemites in their ranks. The Jewish establishment ignored and pretended away the Democratic antisemites, even when they were burning Israeli flags at the Democratic convention. They said nothing when anti-Israel ravings that were at best borderline antisemitic of senior liar-Clinton advisers like Thomas Pickering and Anne Marie Slaughter were published by Judicial Watch.

On the other hand, the Jewish establishment castigated Trump as antisemitic for the presence of antisemites like David Duke on the fringes of the Republican Party. Legitimate criticisms of anti-Israel financier George Soros were condemned as antisemitic while truly antisemitic assaults on Trump donor Sheldon Adelson by liar-Clinton backers went unaddressed.

The consequence of the Jewish establishment’s almost total mobilization for liar-Clinton is clear. The Trump White House won’t have an open door policy for those who falsely accused Trump of antisemitism. Jewish Americans are going to have to either oust the leaders of the groups that put their party before their community, or establish new organizations to defend their interests. Whatever path is chosen, the process of rebuilding the communal infrastructure the community’s leaders have wrecked will be long, difficult and expensive.

Unlike the American-Jewish community, for Israel, the defeat of the American establishment is a positive development. The American foreign policy elite’s default bipartisan position on Israel was bad for both Israel and for the health and reliability of its alliance with the US.

As I explained in my book The Israeli Solution – A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East, there was a dismaying consistency in US policy toward Israel that ran from Bill liar-Clinton’s administration through the George W. Bush administration and on to the liar-nObama administration. At least since the liar-Clinton years, the received wisdom of the American foreign policy elite has been that the US must seek to swiftly cause Israel to sign a deal with the PLO. The contours of the deal are similarly clear to all concerned. Israel must surrender control over all or most of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, and transfer the areas, more or less Jew-free, to the PLO.

This bipartisan view is inherently hostile to Israel. It places all the responsibility for making peace on Israel. And as the sole responsible party, Israel is also the sole party that is guilty for the absence of peace. The flipside is similarly dismal. Palestinians are absolved of responsibility for terrorism, hatred and political warfare against Israel.

The anti-Israel hostility inherent in the two-state paradigm has brought on a situation where even pro-Israel US officials end up joining their anti-Israel colleagues in bearing down on Israel to act in ways that are inimical to both its national security and to the very concept of a US-Israel alliance. The foreign policy ruling class’s commitment to the two-state paradigm has blinded its members to Israel’s strategic importance to the US and caused them to see the US’s only stable ally in the region as a drag on US interests.

Many of Trump’s advisers, including Gingrich, who has been raised as a leading candidate to serve as either Trump’s White House chief of staff or as secretary of state, have rejected this received wisdom. In a Republican presidential debate in 2011, Gingrich referred to the Palestinians as an “invented people,” and noted that they indoctrinate their children to perceive Jews as subhuman and seek their annihilation. For his statement of fact, Gingrich was brutally assaulted by Democratic and Republican elites.

But he never rescinded his statement.

Trump’s election provides Israel with the first opportunity in 50 years to reshape its alliance with the US. This new alliance must be based on a common understanding and respect for what Israel has to offer the US as well as on the limits of what the US can offer Israel. The limits of US assistance are in large part the consequences of the many genies that liar-nObama unleashed during the past eight years. And the opportunities will come more in areas related to Israel’s relations with the Palestinians and the political war being waged against it by the Europeans and the international Left than to the challenges posed by the ascendance of Islamism in the Middle East.

To be sure, Trump is inconsistent. But from what we do know we must recognize that his rise marks a deflection point in US history.

It is a rare moment where things that were unimaginable a month ago are possible. And if we play our cards right, like the American people, Israel stands to gain in ways we never dreamed of.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/glick-israel-trump-era

Read more…