William M. Finley's Posts (2815)

Sort by

How Muslims and Marxists delivered for Doug Jones

Exclusive: Trevor Loudon untangles web of DSA, CAIR operatives part of leftist coalition

Published: 16 hours ago

A coalition of Muslim and Marxist-led groups won the Dec. 12, 2017, Alabama U.S. Senate election for Doug Jones.

The activists consisting of Muslims, Hispanics and mainly black Christians formed a group called the “Stand As One Coalition.” After the election, representatives from the groups bragged in a press conference about making 63,880 robocalls, making 8,776 direct phone calls, knocking on 10,180 doors, delivering 54,600 mailers and engaging in “faith based preaching” to over 7,000 people on behalf of candidate Doug Jones.

As observed at AL.com:

More than 20,000 Muslim voters – about the margin of victory for Jones – turned out and voted almost without exception for Jones, said Khaula Hadeed, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Alabama. …

Hadeed joined other minority leaders at Greater Birmingham Ministries on Thursday, Dec. 14, who worked to get out the vote in an election that brought together the most marginalized groups, they said.

“It took a whole group of us working together,” said Isabel Rubio, executive director of the Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama.

“We touched as many people as we could,” said Scott Douglas, executive director of Greater Birmingham Ministries, speaking on behalf of the Stand As One Coalition.

Coalition leader Scott Douglas and his Greater Birmingham Ministries has been a major political and religious influence in Alabama’s black communities for decades.

Not-so-well-known is the fact that from the 1970s until 1991, Scott Douglas was a leading member of the Communist Party USA, even running as a candidate for the 5th Congressional District in Tennessee in 1972. Douglas left the party when it split in 1991, and for a time was active in the breakaway Marxist group “Committees of Correspondence.”

In recent years, Douglas has been associated with Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) front groups, such as the Rockwood Leadership Institute and the Pushback Network. The FRSO – with its close ally Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), this country’s largest Marxist organization – has been running radicals posing as Democrats across the South. Some examples of these radicals-posing-as-Democrats include DSA member Lee Carter, who recently won a delegate seat in the Virginia House against a top-ranking Republican incumbent; DSA-backed Randall Woodfin, who recently won the mayoralty of Birmingham; and FRSO-backed candidates Chokwe Antar Lumumba, who won the mayoralty of Jackson, Mississippi, and Andrew Gillum, the current mayor of Tallahassee, who now is running for governor of Florida.

Scott Douglas’ old comrade John Zippert also helped win the crucial Alabama “Black Belt” for Doug Jones.

According to CNN:

At a time when the Democratic Party has drastically scaled back operations nationwide in conservative bastions like Alabama, it fell to civil rights leaders – including activists and ministers, attorneys and businessmen – to organize and energize black voters to vote for Doug Jones. …

The numbers show they got the job done well. As the vote totals rolled in, Selma – the site of storied civil rights and county seat – supplied the coup de grace, delivering nearly 75 percent of Dallas County’s votes to Jones

You could see the movement’s force in Greene County, near the state’s western edge. The area was a hotbed of civil rights activism in the 1960s, when Dr. King and his top lieutenants paid multiple visits.

The torch later passed to local leaders like John Zippert and Carol Zippert, who have spent decades running programs for an organization, the Federation of Southern Cooperatives, that helps black farmers get access to credit and land. The Zipperts also publish a newspaper, the Greene County Democrat, that urged voters to the polls.

The county seat, Eutaw, features a casino, Greenetrack, whose CEO is Luther Winn, a politically active businessman who supports the local NAACP and the National Action Network, the organization run by the Rev. Al Sharpton.

Thanks in part to the efforts of Winn, the Zipperts and NAACP activists, Jones carried Greene with an overwhelming 87 percent of the vote, a larger margin than Moore won in any county.

John Zippert, his newspaper and his “Federation of Southern Cooperatives” was a major part of the winning Jones coalition. Like Scott Douglas, John Zippert also comes out the communist movement.

In the mid-1960s, John Zippert moved south to join the civil rights movement. He had been student body president at City College of New York and an active member of Students for a Democratic Society and the Communist Party USA youth wing W.E.B. DuBois Clubs. In the 1980s, like many Southern Communist Party supporters, Zippert moved into the Maoist orbit, working closely with the ultra-radical Marxist-Leninist organization “Line of March.”

Speaking of the DSA, it should be noted that CAIR-Alabama also works closely with the Birmingham local (DSA branches are referred to as “locals”) of the DSA. On Nov. 5, 2017, newly-signed-up DSA member Linda Sarsour addressed a CAIR-Alabama annual benefit event in Birmingham along with CAIR leader and self-proclaimed Hamas supporter Nihad Awad. The theme of the event was “In Liberty and Social Justice for all.”

loudon171219a

Alabama’s four DSA locals (Birmingham, Huntsville, Mobile and Tuscaloosa) did not openly endorse Doug Jones, but Mobile and Birmingham DSA did congratulate him on his victory, the latter expressing the wish to “work together to improve the lives of all Alabamans.”

If scandal had not dogged Roy Moore’s campaign, Doug Jones likely would have lost the election by 10 or more points. The left smelled blood in the water, so they threw everything they could at the race. Their efforts paid off.

The takeaway from the 2017 Alabama Senate race is not poor Republican messaging, or poor vetting. They were important, but they were not the deciding factor.

The real lesson is that the left is pouring big resources into registering hundreds of thousands of black and Latino voters in Southern states – especially North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, Texas and Arizona. They have already flipped Colorado and Virginia; if they can push over two or three more Southern dominoes, the Republicans will be in deep trouble.

If Alabama’s Muslim and Marxist communities had not rallied thousands of black, Latino and Muslim voters behind Doug Jones, President Trump would be sitting on a safer Senate majority today.

Read more…
December 18 at 6:37 AM
A ‘coup in America?’ Fox News escalates anti-Mueller rhetoric
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ba4b9fec-8120-4bd6-abac-86916d475306">

Republican lawmakers and Fox News question the integrity of the FBI, as special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe intensifies.

President Trump and his supporters at Fox News have used many words to describe the investigation by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III into the possible collusion between his campaign and Russian operatives to influence the 2016 presidential election.

There’s Trump’s personal favorite: “witch hunt.” Fox News commentators have called the investigation “illegitimate” and “corrupt.” Sean Hannity charged earlier this month that Mueller has put the country “on the brink of becoming a banana republic.”

Conservative commentators on Fox have compared the FBI to the KGB, the notorious Soviet-era spy organization that routinely employed torture and summary executions. Fox News legal commentator Greg Jarrett argued on a segment of “Hannity” earlier this month that Mueller “has been using the FBI as a political weapon. And the FBI has become America’s secret police.

“Secret surveillance, wiretapping, intimidation, harassment and threats. It’s like the old KGB that comes for you in the dark of the night banging through your door.”

Hannity assured viewers, “This is not hyperbole you are using here.”

Tom Fitton, president of the conservative organization Judicial Watch, made the same comparison on Fox News on Wednesday, saying, “Forget about shutting down Mr. Mueller. Do we need to shut down the FBI because it was turned into a KGB-type operation by the Obama administration?”

Apparently these strong words weren’t strong enough. Saturday night, Fox suggested that the Mueller probe might be “a coup in America.”

Fox News host Jesse Watters told viewers the investigation into Trump’s campaign “has been crooked from the jump.”

“But the scary part is we may now have proof the investigation was weaponized to destroy his presidency for partisan political purposes and to disenfranchise millions of American voters,” Watters said. “Now, if that’s true, we have a coup on our hands in America.”

As counselor to the president Kellyanne Conway spoke to Watters, a chyron appeared on the screen with the words “a coup in America?”

“The fix was in against Donald Trump from the beginning, and they were pro-Hillary,” she said. “They can’t possibly be seen as objective or transparent or evenhanded or fair.”

Conway and Watters were referring to revelations that counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok was removed from Mueller’s team in July after text messages were discovered in which he discussed his dislike of Trump and support of Hillary Clinton with FBI lawyer Lisa Page. Their text messages were released by the Justice Department last week and are still under review.

A coup? The language did not sit well with some.

“Use of the word ‘coup’ by @FoxNews after Russia has deliberately worked to destabilize US democracy is extremely irresponsible and should be roundly condemned,” tweeted Ron Nehring, a California Republican and former spokesman for Ted Cruz’s 2016 presidential campaign.

“The scary is ratcheting up,” tweeted Yascha Mounk, a lecturer on government at Harvard University and a senior fellow at the left-leaning think tank New America.

Fact check: The Russia investigation is not a coup d’état, which involves the use or threat of force (usually by people inside the government) with the aim of seizing control over the national political authority.

Egypt’s coup during the summer of 2013 is a prime example. On the heels of political turmoil and protests, the country’s military carried out a coup to oust President Mohamed Morsi from power and replace him with Gen. Abdel Fatah al-Sissi. Scores of people were killed in ensuing demonstrations and clashes between Morsi supporters and opponents.

Still, the word has clearly become the latest scary rallying cry among some conservative commentators in the United States.

And it’s not the first time the concept of a “coup” has been used by Trump allies to describe the Mueller probe.

In a speech on the House floor last month, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) called for Mueller to resign or be fired, alleging he has “indisputable” conflicts of interest.

“We are at risk of a coup d’état in this country if we allow an unaccountable person with no oversight to undermine the duly-elected president of the United States,” Gaetz said.

The term “silent coup” has also been invoked on the right repeatedly in extreme accusations against President Barack Obama, particularly from conservative radio host Mark Levin, The Post’s Derek Hawkins has reported. In March, Levin argued during his evening show that the Obama administration had orchestrated a “silent coup” against President Trump.

The Obama Justice Department, he claimed, had wiretapped and spied on the Trump campaign when it investigated Russian interference in the election and had leaked information to the media to undermine the new president.

In 1991, a private investigator named Len Colodny published “Silent Coup,” which aimed to prove that President Richard Nixon was actually forced out of office because a “formidable national security party” opposed his foreign policy.

The Washington Post at the time slammed its “wild charges and vilifications,” and the New York Times said it showed a “stunning ignorance” of how government operated. One of the subjects, former White House counsel John Dean, went on to secure an out-of-court settlement in a $150 million libel lawsuit against the publisher.

Read more…

U.S. vetoes U.N. call for withdrawal of Trump Jerusalem decision

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States was further isolated on Monday over President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital when it blocked a United Nations Security Council call for the declaration to be withdrawn.

The remaining 14 council members voted in favor of the Egyptian-drafted resolution, which did not specifically mention the United States or Trump but which expressed “deep regret at recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem.”

“What we witnessed here in the Security Council is an insult. It won’t be forgotten,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said after the vote, adding that it was the first veto cast by the United States in more than six years.

Sponsored

“The fact that this veto is being done in defense of American sovereignty and in defense of America’s role in the Middle East peace process is not a source of embarrassment for us; it should be an embarrassment to the remainder of the Security Council,” Haley said.

The U.N. draft resolution affirmed “that any decisions and actions which purport to have altered the character, status or demographic composition of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal effect, are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with relevant resolutions of the Security Council.”

Trump abruptly reversed decades of U.S. policy this month when he recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, generating outrage from Palestinians and the Arab world and concern among Washington’s western allies.

“In the wake of the decision of the United States ... the situation has become more tense with an increase in incidents, notably rockets fired from Gaza and clashes between Palestinians and Israeli security forces,” U.N. Middle East peace envoy Nickolay Mladenov told the Security Council ahead of the vote.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley vetos an Egyptian-drafted resolution regarding recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem, during the United Nations Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East, including Palestine, at U.N. Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., December 18, 2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

EMERGENCY GENERAL ASSEMBLY SESSION

Trump also plans to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv. The draft U.N. resolution had called upon all countries to refrain from establishing diplomatic missions in Jerusalem.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Haley and Trump for the veto in a video clip posted on his Facebook page.

Slideshow (5 Images)

Israel considers Jerusalem its eternal and indivisible capital and wants all embassies based there. Palestinians want the capital of an independent Palestinian state to be in the city’s eastern sector, which Israel captured in a 1967 war and annexed in a move never recognized internationally.

Following the U.S. veto, Egypt’s Foreign Ministry said Arab states, which had agreed earlier this month to seek a Security Council resolution, would meet to evaluate the situation to determine what their next steps might be.

Read more…

Sweden: Malmö police retract “unfortunate” advice warning women not to go out alone after dark

( Is this what you want for American? This what the Socialist Democrats want for American!!!! )

Unfortunate advice indeed, coming from police in heavily Muslim Malmö: it was a tacit acknowledgment that the police were capitulating to predatory Muslim rape gangs, and unable to stop them from attacking and raping Swedish women. Now they have retracted the statement under pressure, but it remains to be seen whether or not they will actually protect their people.

“Malmö police retract ‘unfortunate’ advice warning women not to go out alone after dark,” The Local, December 18, 2017 (thanks to Fjordman):

Malmö police have retracted their advice to women not to go out alone after darkness, admitting it was ‘unfortunate and unclear’.

Local police had made a much-criticised public statement advising women not to go out alone after darkness following the brutal rape of a 17-year old girl in central Malmö at the weekend.

It the third rape attack in the city in around a month, and occurred after midnight when the victim was walking through a playground area. On Sunday, the police officer leading the investigation was widely quoted in Swedish media advising women only go out in pairs or as part of a group after darkness.

This morning Malmö police issued a formal statement retracting the officer Anders Nilsson’s remarks as being “unfortunate and unclear”.

A Malmö police press spokesperson told The Local that the police firmly advocates that the “public live their lives as usual” and “not to give into fear”. Much of the critique directed towards Nilsson’s statement centred on it pushing responsibility on the public to stay safe, with critics pointing out the police are expected to keep the public safe….

Read more…

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Read more…

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Read more…

Canada: Trudeau Disagrees with Public Safety Minister, Thinks Returning ISIS Fighters Can Be “Deradicalized”

70

Goodale is right, Trudeau is wrong. If these “deradicalization” programs won’t deal with the motive, the inspiration for this holy war — namely, Islam — how could they possibly be successful? I mean, really.

The only way to deradicalize a Muslim is to convert him to something else. At very least, why not deal with motive, end jihad recruitment and preaching in prisons, and demand that the mosques stop preaching jihad and submit to being monitored? But Canada certainly isn’t going to do those things. How many Canadians will have to die in jihad attacks before Trudeau is thrown out of office?

“REPORT: Trudeau Disagrees With Public Safety Minister Goodale, Thinks Returning ISIS Fighters Can Be ‘De-Radicalized,'” Spencer Fernando, December 15, 2017:

The Public Safety Minister says possibility of de-radicalizing ISIS fighters is “remote,” yet Trudeau seems to disagree.

When Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale was asked whether he believes returning ISIS fighters can be “re-integrated,” his response was that it was a “pretty remote” possibility.

Considering that Ralph Goodale is in charge of public safety – and is one of the few cabinet ministers with real experience – you would think that Justin Trudeau would trust his judgement.

Nope.

In a year end interview with CTV, Trudeau said the following:

“There’s a range of experiences when people come home. We know that actually someone who has engaged and turned away from that hateful ideology can be an extraordinarily powerful voice for preventing radicalization in future generations and younger people within the community.”

He just doesn’t get it.

It’s not just the issue of danger to Canadians – which is a real problem.

It’s also about right and wrong, and it’s dead wrong to do anything other than jail, deport, or eliminate ISIS fighters.

The fact that Trudeau either doesn’t understand that fundamental truth, or doesn’t care, is incredibly disturbing. And even worse, he has people in his own government in charge of public safety who disagree with him, and he won’t even listen to them….

Read more…

UK: Christmas jihad massacre “could happen any time” as 20,000 jihadis roam the streets

( Is this what you want for American? This what the Socialist Democrats want for American!!!! )

Principles for a FREE SOCIETY

William Finley

31

They have an army. 20,000 jihadis roam the British streets, and the UK Home Office, when it was headed by the current Prime Minister Theresa May, banned me from the country for opposing jihad terror. It is clear that Britain has capitulated utterly. The land that gave the world the Magna Carta is dead. Now its jihad conquest and subjugation under sharia, already rapidly advancing, is only a matter of time. If there are any free people in the Britain of the future, they will curse the name of Theresa May.

“‘An attack could happen at any time’: Former anti-terror chief says there should be ‘no surprise’ if terrorists strike Britain before Christmas as he warns 20,000 extremists currently roam our streets,” by Joe Sheppard, Mailonline, December 16, 2017:

A terrorist attack in Britain over Christmas is likelier than ever as around 20,000 extremists roam the country’s street, a former anti-terror chief has warned.

Chris Phillips, who was once head of the National Counter Terrorism Security Office, has said there should be ‘no surprise’ if terrorists strike before December 25.

His warning comes after ISIS propaganda threatening to attack Christmas shoppers on Britain’s High Streets.

‘The threat level is severe, which means an attack could happen at any time,’ Mr Phillips told the Daily Star Online. ‘Attacks are more frequent so no one should be surprised if there is another attack before Christmas.’

He warned that it would be impossible for police to ensure the entire country’s safety because of the sheer number of potential threats.

‘There are 20,000 people on a list. Police can’t watch them all. Police have to make difficult decisions.’

The UK was hit by four major terror attacks this year at Westminster, Manchester Arena, London Bridge and Parson’s Green Tube station.

The country’s current threat level has seen more armed police on the streets and bollards erected on pavements to prevent vehicle attacks….

Read more…

The Essential Arabic Muslims Don’t Want You To Know

Allahu Akbar = Allah Is Greater — ‘Allah’ is not simply the Arabic word for ‘God,’ but the name of Islam’s chosen deity and ‘Akbar’ does not mean ‘great’, but ‘greater’. Greater than what? The answer is, Allah is greater than whatever God, government, philosophy, or political system you happen to follow or live under.

Understanding Islam is to know Allahu Akbar is the foundation of Islamic Supremacism.

The precedent for Allahu Akbar was set by Muhammad when he attacked and murdered the Jews of Khaybar.  “

We reached Khaybar early in the morning and the inhabitants of Khaybar came out carrying their spades, and when they saw the Prophet they said, “Muhammad! By Allah! Muhammad and his army!” The Prophet said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” (Bukhari 64.238.4198)

Most every follower of Islam knows this Bukhari Hadith, over glorifying Mohammad’s massacre of defenseless Jewish farmers and the first use of Allahu Akbar as a battle cry.

Did you know most all followers of Islam say Allahu Akbar no less than 111 times a  day totaling  40,515 times  a year in their 5 daily prayers.  The repetition of saying Allahu Akbar 111 times a day becomes a conditioned supremacist response for the follower of Islam.

When the New York Times or CNN reports that Allahu Akbar is nothing more than a kind salutation, they are lying to you.  Muslim advocacy groups like CAIR understand the full supremacist significance of Allahu Akbar and their job is to tell non-Muslim’s that Allahu Akbar means only God is Great like the Christians say, no big deal.   Islamic apologists are desperately afraid you non-Muslims will learn the true Islamic supremacist meaning of Allahu Akbar – Allah is Greater than all others.

Your next question should be – What do  these Islamic supremacists call those who reject their Islamic supremacist ideology when talking amongst themselves?

Kuffar – Derogatory word for a non-Muslim.  Kuffar is an Arabic word that literally means “ingrate or infidel”  For a follower of Islam to call someone a Kuffar is as offensive as using the N word in America.

When a follower of Islam calls you a Kuffar they believe you are the vilest of creatures, referring to Qur’an 8:55.  The next time you hear the word Kuffar, it is one of the worst put downs a Muslim can say to anyone.

The followers of Islam also use the word Kuffar to describe their fellow Muslims, in the worst of ways, and is often a precursor to Muslim on Muslim violence.  Like the recent Sunni on Sufi Muslim attacks we just saw in the recent Mosque bombing in Egypt killing 235 Muslims by Muslims  where the Jihadis were screaming Allahu Akbar.  Why you ask? The Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims have been killing each other for 1400 years because they believe each other to be a Kuffar or Mushrikin.  In this Egypt attack above,     we have Sunni Muslims killing Sufi Muslims who are viewed as Kuffar by the Sunni.  Confused yet?  Keep reading and it will all make perfect sense.

Jihad – “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims,and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion (Islam).” Umdat al Salik P.599.

When Muslim Advocacy groups like CAIR, ISNA, MSA, tell you  Jihad is a personal spiritual struggle like losing weight or doing daily chores,  it is a deception of the most clever kind.  Spiritual Jihad is a deception because Mohammed said in  Qur’an 9:111 that those who fight in the way of Allah are assured paradise.

In Islam, getting into paradise is not guaranteed.  Mohammad says violent Jihad in the advancement of Islam will guarantee you a place in the highest levels of paradise.  That makes dying in the way of Jihad a noble religious act and taking as many Kuffar with you assures ones place in paradise or Jannah.

Killing oneself in the act of Jihad brings honor upon your family, tribe, and village.  Mohammad says the dead Jihadi can intercede for 70 of his family members assuring them all a place in paradise.  For the followers of Islam, this  is such a big deal parents of Jihadis often celebrate when their children die in Jihad.  Yes – you heard me right – parents celebrating the death of their own children.

The arabic word for a Jihadi Martyr is Shaheed and garners instant respect in the Muslim world.  This is why a devout Muslim parent will sometimes encourage their children to martyr themselves.  Here in the West, our immediate response is, that can’t be true because its so evil!  In the eyes of a follower of Islam becoming a Jihadi martyr is a spiritual religious act displaying ones love for  Allah and Islam.  In many cases, the Jihadi believes they are showing love for their non-Muslim victims who are living a sinful life by not reverting back to Islam.  The Jihadi, in Mohammad’s teachings is keeping these Kuffar from living a sinful life,  killing them is seen as an act of love.

Islamic apologists will say, “So why aren’t the worlds 1.3 billion followers of Islam going Jihadi and jumping on the Martyr death train securing their place in Islamic paradise?”

Mohamad was clever and knew not every follower of Islam is a warrior ready to die for Allah.   So Mohammed taught there is Jihad with your money, Jihad with your pen, civilizational Jihad in non-Muslim lands, and the personal Jihad of losing weight or to stop smoking.  If a follower of Islam does not tell you the entire meaning of Jihad, they are willfully lying and you should be offended because they think you are stupid.

What you don’t hear about is the large number of Muslims who want to leave Islam but are afraid they will be killed as apostates.  Islamic law states, leaving Islam is a traitorous act and death is the punishment. Many scholars say the apostate loophole is the glue of fear holding Islam together.

Dar al Islam and Dar al Harb – The Islamic Worldview and Definition of Peace

Dar al Islam and Dar al Harb is arabic for the House of Islam and the House of War.

Dar al-Islam is the name for those territories where Islam dominates and submission to Allah is observed. Key point:  Dar al Islam is the only place where followers of Islam believe peace and tranquility reign.

The definition of a true Islamic Peace is a countries complete submission to Allah and the Shariah Islamiyya (Islamic Law).

Dar al Harb  means anyplace on earth that fails to follow Allah’s will.  These countries, including the United States, are not considered legitimate powers because they don’t derive their authority from Allah.

The confusing duplicity is that Islamic governments (Dar al Islam) are allowed to enter  into temporary peace treaties with people of Dar Al Harb(Harbis) to facilitate commerce, one sided immigration flows, or alliances against other Islamic Countries if necessary.

This duplicity is how Bin Laden can attack the United States and the Islamic State of Pakistan can provide protection to Bin Laden while engaging in peaceful diplomatic and joint military exercises with the United States as a partner and ally of convenience.

Are you confused?  If not you should be because this Eastern logic is the exact opposite of standard Western thought and geopolitics.

Shariah Islamiyya = Islamic Law

For a follower of Islam, the Shariah is the “way of life”.  In Arabic Shariah means the straight path to the watering hole.  For the desert dweller, water is life.

Side Note: For those of you who say Shariah Law, Arabic speakers hear ‘Law Law’ and inwardly laugh at you as an ignorant infidel Kuffar – no offense it just is.

Shariah provides the legal framework for the functioning of an Islamic society, it also details moral, ethical, social and political codes of conduct for Muslims on both an individual and collective level.

Now that you know  Shariah is from Allah and Mohammad you know it is considered timeless and of divine origin to the followers of Islam. The punishments in Islamic Law apply to non-Muslims too,  giving you another clue exposing its Islamic supremacy.

Internalize this,  Shariah is from Allah and is superior to all man made laws and religions like, Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, Humanism Christianity, Judaism, Taoism, Hinduism, Agnosticism, Paganism, Democracies, Republics, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Bill of Rights, Constitutional Monarchies, Buddhism, and Unitarian-Universalism to name only a few.

Shariah dictates to the followers of Islam how to pray, run an Islamic government, brush your teeth, what to wear, how many wives you can marry, exact legal penalties from death sentences, chopping off of body parts,  blood money for murder, death sentence for gays, what you can say and not say, what you can and can’t listen to, and how to behave in the land of Dar al Harb / Non-Islamic countries.

Shariah teaches that when the followers of Islam are weak, or small in number, then one must follow the rules and laws of the non-Islamic country they live in.  As the followers of Islam’s numbers increase,  Muslims begin to demand accommodations for Islamic culture, dress, food, and religion especially  when they conflict with the host countries culture and man made laws.

This is the stage we are at here in America.  The followers of Islam are trying to push Hate Speech laws on Americans as a vehicle to silence our Freedom of Speech,  using our man made legal system to do it.  Why you ask?  Because Islamic Law dictates it is a capital offense to speak negatively about Islam, Mohammad, or Allah.  That is why Muslim Advocacy groups go unhinged if a non-Muslim explains what Islam is and what Islam is not – like I’m doing here.

When you see people throwing around charges of Hate Speech against those speaking freely and legally about Islam – they are enforcing Shariah blasphemy laws on you, in violation of Article 6 of the US Constitution.

Lets Recap – What We Learned

  1. Allahu Akbar means Allah is Greater than whatever God, Government, Science, or Political System you happen to follow or live under. Allahu Akbar is the war chant of Islamic Supremacism said 111 times each by most followers of Islam in their 5 daily prayers.
  2. Jihad – “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims,and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion (Islam). Jihad is the violent struggle to advance Islamic Supremacism in the name of Allah.
  3. Dar al Islam & Dar al Harb = House of Islam & House of War – This is the definition of Peace In Islam. If you and your country are in the House of Islam there will be Peace.  It’s just that simple.  The followers of Islam also use the Interfaith Movement to preach a message of coexistence, peace, and love with everyone here in America and the West.  So how can two completely opposite messages be true?  Because Islamic doctrine makes it true.
  4. Shariah = Islamic Law Shariah is an all encompassing Islamic guidebook for all followers of Islam to follow.  Shariah covers how Islamic Governments are run, how to chop off your hands for stealing, how to kill apostates,  how to dress, brush your teeth, eat, clean your private parts, and most importantly what you can and can’t say – NO Free Speech.  The Islam advocacy groups in America are pushing legislation to make ‘hate speech’ against the law.  You guessed it, ‘Hate Speech’ is saying anything negative about Islam, Mohammad, or Allah thus shredding our 1st Amendment Constitutional right to Free Speech. 

Conclusion:  The Duality of Islam

We’ve learned 5 Important Arabic words and concepts today that have opposite meanings to the Muslim and Non-Muslim alike.

Most Muslims are so nice and integrated here in America , yet other Muslims target and kill non-Muslims in the name of Islam while screaming Allahu Akbar. Two opposites like this are perfectly normal to the followers of Islam.  As long as you are confused, blind, or don’t believe it – then you are right where the Jihadis want you.  Think about that for a second – go ahead read that last sentence again.

Each time a follower of Islam executes a violent Jihadi operation, we can count on the America Muslim advocacy groups like CAIR to say, “These terrorists don’t represent Islam”, yet when these terrorists are screaming Allahu Akbar we know its being done in the name of Islam.  Manufactured mixed messaging is meant to confuse and paralyze the victims of Jihad.  For example,  CAIR always  says after Jihadis kill, “this is not my Islam or we fear a backlash after  most every terrorists attack.”  Nihad Awad executes this black propaganda play like clockwork.  The good  news  is people are growing tired  of CAIR’s lies and arrogance.

Bill Warner sums it up in his 2007 Article ‘Duality and  Political Islam

“The kafir (non-Muslim) can be treated in one of two ways. They can be treated well or they can be robbed, killed, or cheated if it advances Islam. On more than one occasion Mohammed said to deceive the kafir (non-Muslim). Jihad as a political method killed, robbed and enslaved the kafirs (non-Muslim). This is a dualistic ethical system.

Islamic dualism is hidden by religion. The “good” verses of the Meccan Koran cover the verses of jihad in the Medinan Koran. Thus religious Islam shields political Islam from examination.

Scientific analysis shows us that there is a political Islam as well as a religious Islam. To argue about religion is fruitless, but we can talk about politics. We need to discuss political Islam, a system of ethical and political dualism.”

Read more…

BOMBSHELL: Obama Protected Hezbollah Drug and Human Trafficking Rings To Appease Iran

In a bombshell report by POLITICO‘s Josh Meyer, the Obama administration is accused of protecting Hezbollah drug and human trafficking rings to help ensure a nuclear deal with Iran was achieved.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/pjimage-14-1-748x420.jpg 748w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" width="600" height="338" />

POLITICO reports:

Project Cassandra reached higher into the hierarchy of the conspiracy, Obama administration officials threw an increasingly insurmountable series of roadblocks in its way, according to interviews with dozens of participants who in many cases spoke for the first time about events shrouded in secrecy, and a review of government documents and court records. When Project Cassandra leaders sought approval for some significant investigations, prosecutions, arrests and financial sanctions, officials at the Justice and Treasury departments delayed, hindered or rejected their requests.

The Justice Department declined requests by Project Cassandra and other authorities to file criminal charges against major players such as Hezbollah’s high-profile envoy to Iran, a Lebanese bank that allegedly laundered billions in alleged drug profits, and a central player in a U.S.-based cell of the Iranian paramilitary Quds force. And the State Department rejected requests to lure high-value targets to countries where they could be arrested.

“This was a policy decision, it was a systematic decision,” said David Asherseasoned illicit finance expert who helped establish and oversee Project Cassandra as a Defense Department illicit finance analyst.

“They serially ripped apart this entire effort that was very well supported and resourced, and it was done from the top down.”

The Obama administration is believed to have deliberately put the kibosh on charging numerous drug dealers and arms dealing, such as Hezbollah operative nicknamed the ‘Ghost,’ and Abdallah Safieddine, the terrorist organization’s de facto envoy to Iran. All the while both Hezbollah and Iran made massive sums selling “drugs, weapons and used cars, [along with] diamonds, commercial merchandise and even human slaves,” say ex-Project Cassandra agents.

According to Meyer, Project Cassandra’s finding were so damning that the Obama administration believed they threatened fragile nuclear negotiations with Iran.

They said senior Obama administration officials appeared to be alarmed by how far Project Cassandra’s investigations had reached into the leadership of Hezbollah and Iran, and wary of the possible political repercussions.

As a result, task force members claim, Project Cassandra was increasingly viewed as a threat to the administration’s efforts to secure a nuclear deal, and the top-secret prisoner swap that was about to be negotiated.

“During the negotiations, early on, they [the Iranians] said listen, we need you to lay off Hezbollah, to tamp down the pressure on them, and the Obama administration acquiesced to that request,” a former CIA agent revealed to POLITICO.

With the operation largely neutered due to the Iran deal, Asher had no choice but to bring many of his findings public before a congressional hearing in May 2015.

Shortly after the Iran deal was signed, U.S. and EU law enforcement officers arrested a network of Hezbollah in France.

In announcing the arrests, the DEA and the Justice Department disclosed for the first time the existence of Project Cassandra

These dealers were small potatoes compared to the big fish the Obama administration seemingly refused to charge.

Under the Trump administration, the operation has picked back up.

Once the Obama administration left office, in January 2017, the logjam of task force cases appeared to break, and several task force members said it wasn’t a coincidence.

An alleged top Hezbollah financier, Kassim Tajideen, was arrested in Morocco — seven years after Treasury officials blacklisted him as a sponsor of terror — and flown to Washington to stand trial. Asher said task force agents had kept his case under wraps, hoping for a better outcome in whatever administration succeeded Obama’s.

But many DEA agents are still bitter about the Obama administration protecting the Islamic terror organization to achieve a nuclear agreement with Iran.

“They will believe until death that we were shut down because of the Iran deal,” Senior DEA official Derek Maltz told POLITICO.

“My gut feeling? My instinct as a guy doing this for 28 years is that it certainly contributed to why we got pushed aside and picked apart. There is no doubt in my mind.”

Read more…

The Daily Jot - Dems emboldened

S.gif
S.gif
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
Dems emboldened
NOTEWhen writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
  
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Doug Jones is the new Democratic Senator from Alabama. He beat Roy Moore by a small margin in Tuesday's special election. The Democratic Party believes this is historical in that Jones is the first Democratic senator elected in the state in some 25 years, it is believed to be a rejection of President Donald Trump's agenda, and an indicator of how democrats will make great gains in the upcoming midterm elections. If you are a Democrat, this is all good news. If you are a Republican, it's bad news. If you are an American, the election was historic in a very bad way. The recruitment of reputable people to run for office will become far more difficult in this vile environment. Bad may well beget worse.
 
There have been many accusations against candidates for sexual impropriety over the centuries. Many remember the rumors flying about Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, and so on. But nothing on the political landscape has matched the accusations of a sexual nature that have occurred in recent years. For some reason, the mere mention of sexual harassment, unproven, innuendo, or whatever has become the Achilles Heal to bring candidates down. Make the accusation, get the story, repurpose the story for mass media, and the firestorm begins that never ends.
 
Politics never has been a clean game. But the level to which it has now fallen is compounded and weaponized by 24/7 news media. Complicating matters even more is a news media that is predominately leftist. The news cycles are very competitive and try to "one-up" each other, causing a din of leftist rhetoric, rarely fact checked, emotionally driven and without concern for truth, facts, context or human decency. Any self-respecting person with a desire to do what is right in the eyes of the Lord, governed by the Golden Rule, would have to think long and hard before entering the sordid ring of politics where he will be accused of things his mind probably couldn't even comprehend. This is the nation we are living in.
 
This causes a downward spiral of the quality of candidates and their character. Wait to see-President Trump will be accused repeatedly for sexual harassment. This will not go away. It will stymie the business of the nation, grind the good things government could do (tax relief, border security, regulation reduction, etc.) to a standstill. The angry, misinformed, disingenuous, evil ones who believe victory is theirs will be further emboldened thinking this vile way of conducting politics is working to their advantage. As Christian Americans, we must be ever vigilant to understand our purpose and not be deceived. As is written in James 1:22, "But you be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves." Stay true to the Lord. He has us in the palm of his hand, but we cannot be complacent, we must be doers. 
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
Read more…

UN Peacekeepers Coming to US? Chicago Official Meets With UN Asst. Secretary General, Requests Deployment of UN Troops


Chicago official, Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin recently met with the Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations during which he requested that the world governing body send troops onto the violence-plagued streets of Chicago.

While no one can deny the fact that Chicago is essentially a war zone, the fact that a liberal city commissioner is planning to use United Nations peacekeepers to confront said violence should send shockwaves down the spine of any freedom-loving American.

“We are headed to the United Nations to meet with the assistant secretary general to talk about the violence in Chicago, the gun violence in particular, the bloodshed that is taking place in too many of our communities,” Boykin said at a press conference before the meeting.

Boykin then went on to stunningly reveal that he is actually seeking to have the United Nations police the civilian population in Chicago.

“I’m hoping to appeal to the UN to actually come to Chicago and meet with victims of violence, and maybe even possibly help out in terms of peacekeeping efforts,” Boykin continued.

After being asked by a reporter why he believes using UN troops to curb violence rather than actual American police would be a good idea, Boykin revealed that he does indeed want the requested troops to essentially become the police in Chicago.

“They have been able to help in places like Africa, where they have sent troops in, sent forces in, to help protect minority and vulnerable populations, so frankly I think the same can be said for here in Chicago,” said Boykin.

While so-called conspiracy theorists have long believed that globalist forces would eventually send United Nations troops to the streets of America, we now have absolute, 100% proof that this is indeed the plan.

Liberal leaders in Chicago are now openly planning to declare martial law, complete with UN shock troops on the streets to police the American population. (For more from the author of “Chicago Official Meets With United Nations Asst. Secretary General, Requests Deployment of UN Peacekeeping Troops in Cook County” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/12/cook-county-official-meets-united-na

Read more…

Defending National Sovereignty From The NWO

pixel.gif?s=ip-172-18-62-183&ip=24.1.168.116&wid=108474&cb=1513615647879&c=US&d=&ik=2017121808_74ecabe2971b09a6a78fcf774ecd1f72px.gif

Defending National Sovereignty From The NWO

Defending National Sovereignty From The NWO | national-sovereignty-quotes-2 | Globalism Government New World Order

“Sovereignty…as understood in the Declaration of Independence was originally, and by nature, the equal and unalienable possession of individual human beings. The original equality of all human beings was an equality of sovereignty; no man had more right to rule another than the other had to rule him.” 

― Harry V. Jaffa

In a world that is virtually unrecognizable from the universal principles that underpinned Western Civilization, the fundamental concept of national sovereignty is being attacked as a relic of a former age. The New World Order is designed to eliminate the self-government of sovereign nations. While individuals live under the domain of established states, the fact that specific regimes operate within and often under the auspices of international hegemony that routinely violates the independence of specific countries is undeniable. The “world community” is not a voluntary association of collaborating governments; it is a euphemism of a top down despotic authoritarian system for global control and punishment for uncooperative governments. 

When the United Nations was established after World War II, the true objective of destroying the axis of competing Neo Global Totalitarianism exposed its real path and agenda for worldwide domination.  The New World Order emerged with the full blessing of the United States. An uninterrupted march towards imposing the will of global elites upon individual countries has been the results from setting into motion the forces of internationalism. 

America has been totally betrayed by our designated and appointed officials during the decades of systematic dismantling of our independence and economic prosperity. With this assault against the nation-state, the peoples of the world have been herded into a global concentration camp that far exceeds the wildest dreams of the Nazi SS. 

I Felt Like Someone Was Blowing Up A Balloon In My Stomach... Now I Know Why

I Felt Like Someone Was Blowing Up A Balloon In My Stomach... Now I Know Why

NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY: WHY IT IS WORTH DEFENDING by Cornell professor Jeremy Rabkin, who provides a compelling argument. Review his book, The Case for Sovereignty. 

“Many people criticize national sovereignty as implying that there is no appeal beyond the sovereign state. But there is always some appeal, because there are always other states offering competing examples and places of refuge for those fleeing the most onerous policies of particular states. The idea of national sovereignty is inseparable from the idea of a multitude of sovereignties, hence there is some possibility for choice, which implies the possibility of mistakes or wrong choices which others may avoid. Where there is least chance for appeal is from a world that is governed by one and only one set of world standards.” 

Now what happens when the planet rushes towards a one world government? Jeremy Rabkin continues on some pressing questions in the interview, A Defense of Sovereignty. 

“All members of the EU have now bound themselves to a scheme in which the European Court of Justice treats mere treaties as superior to national constitutions–and national courts give priority to the rulings of this European Court, even against their own parliaments and their own national constitutions. This is way, way, way, beyond anything we could accept in America. To find an analogy, you must imagine that NAFTA officials in Montreal claim the authority to override the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court–and federal judges in America agree that the NAFTA policy must take priority.  

What makes the European scheme particularly bizarre–at least from our point of view–is that Europeans aren’t really prepared to pursue their “Union” to its logical conclusion. They don’t trust the EU to have an army or police or even criminal courts of its own. So Europeans are entrusting supremacy to a government they don’t really trust–at least not enough to entrust with traditional attributes of sovereignty.” 

Americans are not much different from their European cousins. They no longer trust the political class. Selected leaders are not elected but must pass a screening process to gain office. They do not protect the common culture and national integrity, but only serve the interest of the globalists.   

Steven Groves asks, Why Does Sovereignty Matter to America?  

“A people subject to foreign taxation, or to being transported across the seas to face criminal charges in a foreign land, are not truly independent. In the Declaration, the Founding Fathers gave notice that these infringements on American sovereignty would not stand. 

But today, our sovereignty faces new threats. International organizations and courts seek to reshape the international system. Nations are to give up their sovereignty and be governed by a “global consensus.” Independent, sovereign nations will be replaced by “transnational” organizations that reject national sovereignty. 

The demand that the United States bow to this “global consensus” does not respect American sovereignty. The offenses the Founders complained of in the Declaration of Independence now have an international flavor. This new project is filled with examples of institutions, courts, and “taxes” that violate the spirit of the Declaration:” 

Some traditionalist cast the dilemma in a framework that no longer applies in a world where counties are unable, and certainly unwilling, to wage war against hostile governments. 

The Thomas More Law Center promotes a Just War viewpoint in their Defending National Security introduction. 

“The Thomas More Law Center supports America’s First Military Principles of Virtue, Honor, Patriotism and Subordination, established by John Adams in 1775. The U.S. military is the most effective fighting force in the history of the world, and it is the only institution Americans can depend on to defend our Nation and our Constitution. The Law Center opposes any attempt to downsize, degrade or dismantle the combat effectiveness of our Armed Forces. 

The Law Center opposes any attempt to surrender our national sovereignty to the United Nations or any other international organization. In addition, the Law Center supports the right of States to protect their borders against the massive invasion of illegal immigrants.” 

Posing a dialectic nature between national sovereignty and the NWO misses the most important aspect of the post WWII migration into a global gulag. Primary elements behind the organization of the New World Order are the evil elites that actually run and dictate their master plan on America itself.  

Long before the American Revolution, the European dynasties of cosmic control lusted for total domination. America, from its inception posed the last best hope for humanity. The persistent and methodical encroachment into the very fabric of independent self-government has been part of the eternal struggle, which was transplanted into the new world. 

Over the centuries the disease of populace subjugation grew with each succeeding generation. The breakdown of awareness and the sapping of the will to resist the drive to impose governance in place of self-determination has resulted in the internationalization of the body politik. 

Efforts like that of THE CENTER FOR SOVEREIGNTY & SECURITY, have a noble objective. 

“An informed and engaged citizenry is vital to the health of our Republic. Freedom Alliance’s Center for Sovereignty and Security educates lawmakers, opinion leaders, and the public at large on a host of issues – particularly those that relate to national sovereignty, national security, and constitutional government.”   

However, it is a losing battle to view the conflict in a simple us against them context. When the us is a primary director of the global tyranny, how can our own government be trusted to direct its energies to abolish the NWO traitors that have become the actual architects of the globalist system of aristocratic privilege.  

Because of this fundamental quandary, informed and rational patriots are now targeted as the ‘Enemy of the State”. In order to transcend this false perversion of national sovereignty, the true nature and meaning of nation needs to be crystal clear. A nation is the embodiment of the people. The sovereignty resides within the individual person before he or she provides consent to any governmental organization or structure that operates only under the authority granted by a free population.  

As it stands now, the American government has forfeited any claim as a legitimate steward of the public trust. Compounding this fact is that the technocratic superstructure of agencies, institutions and authorities has become integral parts of inflicting the New World Order upon the entire world.  

Contrary to the hopes and dreams of the few remaining loyal Americans of the revolution, there is no George Washington coming to your rescue on a white horse. 

True national sovereignty starts with resistance to all forms of government compliance that fosters and is part of  Obeying the Nefarious Warrior Organism. 

When the Marquis de Lafayette speaks of “natural and imprescriptible rights”, those civil liberties are endowed by our creator and cannot be rightfully be removed by any regime.  

Citizens must come to embrace their Inherent Autonomy. Throughout all of history, force and coercion has been the primary tool used by governments to compel a given population into compliance.  

The New World Order certainly follows this convention but uses and relies upon a much more potent component. Public acquiescence and voluntary abidance is the primary factor that feed the cavalcade of capitulation.  

A global outcry of opposition to the integration and consolidation of the New World Order dictatorship is required in order to defend national sovereignty. Democracy has proven that electing champions of a traditional society has failed because the quality of the character of citizens has sunk to the level of dullard serfs. 

The burden of responsibility falls upon the remaining moral and honorable souls to defend all that is worth protecting.

Read more…

“ABSOLUTE RED LINE”: Eric Holder Issues Second Warning Against POTUS Trump Firing Mueller

Former Obama-era Attorney General Eric Holder called for mass protests if President Trump fires special counsel Robert Mueller. This is the second warning Holder has issued this week in respect to rumors about President Trump relieving Mueller of his duties as special counsel. 

“ABSOLUTE RED LINE: the firing of Bob Mueller or crippling the special counsel’s office. If removed or meaningfully tampered with, there must be mass, popular, peaceful support of both. The American people must be seen and heard – they will ultimately be determinative,” tweeted Holder on Sunday.

As previously reported, Holder threatened Republicans against removing Mueller a day after House members grilled Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein over the special counsel stacking his team with investigators with links to Hillary Clinton.

Holder issued his threat in a tweet Wednesday morning.

“Speaking on behalf of the vast majority of the American people, Republicans in Congress be forewarned:any attempt to remove Bob Mueller will not be tolerated.These are BS attacks on him/his staff that are blatantly political-designed to hide the real wrongdoing. Country not party,” Holder tweeted.

Holder’s former Department is facing scrutiny of epic proportions after it was revealed a top Justice Department official, Bruce Ohr, made contacts with the Fusion GPS, the shady opposition research firm behind the discredit ‘Trump dossier.’

Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) revealed to Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro Saturday evening that the House Judiciary Committee will subpoena Bruce Ohr along with his wife and former Fusion GPS employee Nellie Ohr “in their ongoing inquiry into claims of bias against President Donald Trump.”

Holder’s outspokenness pertaining the firing of Mueller comes amid Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-CA) claiming President Trump aims to fire Mueller before Christmas.

The California lawmaker told KQED Newsroom on Friday that, “The rumor on the Hill when I left yesterday was that the president was going to make a significant speech at the end of next week. And on December 22nd, when we are out of D.C., he was going to fire…Robert Mueller.”

President Trump’s lawyer, Ty Cobb, dispelled the rumor, telling Fox News on Saturday that “Mueller will not be fired.”

Read more…

What is a Trump Deplorable?

by Linda Barton

I must admit last year’s Presidential Election was one for the books. We watched as a man with NO political experience took on quite possibly one of the most influential political machines in our lifetime: Hillary Clinton and her army of mindless minions. From the day then private citizen Trump rode down that escalator with his beautiful wife, Melania, the future of this country would NEVER be the same.

For years we have watched those we’ve elected to represent us go to the halls of government and conveniently forget the many promises they made during the campaign. Or we were forced to choose the ‘lessor of two evils’ and then watch them fail miserably to win their desired office. Campaign after campaign and candidate after candidate only caused the average American voter to wonder why even try… then the unthinkable happened.

Electricity filled the air when Donald Trump announced his bid for the White House. In all my years as a voter, the last time I felt excited was when Ronald Reagan trounced Jimmy Carter for the Presidency. Our country was at an emotional low, and President Reagan made us proud to be Americans again. We had 8 exciting years of growth under President Reagan. However, it didn’t stop those on the Left from trying to destroy any success we achieved as a country.

After Reagan left office and George HW Bush was elected things began to fall apart. I have never been a fan of the Bushes. In my opinion, they are too Progressive and cozy with those on the far-left.  I still remember when Daddy Bush (George HW Bush) gave his speech where he proudly proclaimed we needed to be part of a NEW WORLD ORDER. Now, for those of you who don’t know that’s NOT a good thing. What it means is the end of a nation’s sovereignty. That’s right, there would be NO borders, and we would be ruled by a small, unseen group of powerful, unelected people.

Then, of course, we had to endure eight years of the Bill Clinton Presidency with all its scandals. Next, we had George W Bush. Now, I had tried to like him, but there was always a small voice telling me to not be completely trustful of him. However, I never could quite put my finger on it until years later. Then after eight years of another Bush, the American people decided to show how genuinely STUPID and GULLIBLE they can be by electing Barack Hussein Obama as President. I know some may think me Islamophobic, but HOW could we elect a man with that name? A man who said hearing the Islamic Call to Prayer is one of the most beautiful things a mere few years after the 911 attack? Maybe I’m too old to understand this new way of thinking, but I remember how I felt that day when Islamic terrorists murdered thousands of innocent people in the name of a radical view of their religion. I’m sorry, but I don’t buy into the whole Religion of Peace crap. I’m convinced millions of freedom-loving Patriots gave a collective sigh of relief when it was time to replace Obama as our President.

Now enters the 2016 Presidential election cycle. I must admit the primary was a wild ride. All bets were on Jeb Bush taking the bid to run as the Republican candidate with Hillary running for the Democrats. To hear the political pundits crow on the nightly news, it was a given to be a Bush/Clinton faceoff. However, something happened that NONE of them saw coming.  Bernie (Feel the Burn) Sanders came busting out of the gate and wowed the liberal side of the race.  He drew huge crowds and had an ever-growing account of campaign donations.  Young voters were treating the then 74-year-old like a rock star, while Hillary Clinton needed celebrities like Beyonce and Jay-Z to fill her venues and hopefully get voters to the polls for her.

Those on the Republican side had NO idea what they were in for with a candidate Trump in the race. The debates were media events, drawing some of the largest numbers of viewers in the history of televised Presidential Debates. However, that didn’t stop the liberal lap-dogs in the media from trying to destroy his campaign. From the very first debate, Megyn Kelly decided to make a name for herself and went after Candidate Trump over accusations of sexual assault made by several women. However, Ms. Kelly never expected the backlash from the Fox News viewers, and she soon found the ratings of her once top-rated nightly show crash and burn. Now she’s schlepping the liberal trash on one of the alphabet networks. I’m not sure which one she’s on and to be honest, I really don’t care.

As the primary swung into high gear, one by one the Republican candidates found themselves trampled under the mighty weight of the Trump Movement. And Superstar ‘Feel the Burn’ Sanders regardless of his massive crowds and enthusiastic supporters soon found himself on the sidelines and out of the race. You see, the Democrats have a strange way of choosing their candidate. Those Super Delegates do not represent the average Democrat voter. Nope, they can vote for whoever they want, and probably to be honest with you, whoever pays them the most.

Now the political world was shocked to see Business Mogul Donald Trump as the Republican candidate facing the mighty Clinton machine and the smartest woman ever, Hillary Clinton on the Democrat side. I never believed that smartest woman stuff, but I’d heard many try to convince us it was true.

As the general election advanced, the pundits and pollsters claimed it was a Clinton shoe-in. They touted polls where Hillary was often winning by double digits, while somehow not reporting her small number of supporters showing up for her rallies. However, it was the opposite for then-candidate Trump. His crowds were not only ‘YUGE’ as he would say, but they were motivated. We didn’t care what the media fools were spewing. We believed in Donald Trump and his promise to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

It didn’t seem to matter if Trump was ahead of Hillary in the polls. It didn’t matter if his venues were filled to capacity with supporters standing outside for hours. It didn’t matter if we were called haters, we believed in the movement, and we supported Donald Trump. Then something changed. Something no one expected. The one thing that sealed Hillary’s demise and she had NO ONE to blame but herself.

While giving a speech to a group of LGBT supporters, in her typical arrogant manner, Hillary said those words that would forever haunt the remainder of the campaign: Basket of Deplorables. Standing at that podium, flailing her arms about in a dismissive manner Hillary delivered the speech that would drive the death-nail in her campaign…

“I know there are only 60 days left to make our case — and don’t get complacent, don’t see the latest outrageous, offensive, inappropriate comment and think, well, he’s done this time. We are living in a volatile political environment. You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people — now 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks — they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.”

Nothing could have united a group of Americans tired of the same old elite crap than calling us a Basket of Deplorables. In those three simple words, Hillary Clinton proved how those in power honestly feel about us, the little guy and gal. We don’t matter. Our hopes and dreams are foolish. We are to shut-up and keep handing power to the Elites and be happy about it. Well, my fellow Deplorables, I’m sure you have the same message for them as I; WE ARE DONE! We are no longer going to remain silent while you destroy the country we all love. We are no longer going to allow you to pit us against each other to hold onto power. We are PROUD Deplorables. Fear us for we are coming after YOU!!

Read more…

Read more…

Minnesota: Still no charges after Muslim cop murdered unarmed woman; attorney says investigators “haven’t done their job”

via Freeman: No evidence yet to prosecute officer in Justine Damond’s death – StarTribune.com

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman said Wednesday that he does not yet have enough evidence to file charges against a Minneapolis police officer in the shooting death of Justine Ruszczyk Damond, blaming investigators who “haven’t done their job.”

Freeman made the comments during a union event after being confronted by activists, who recorded the interaction. They asked Freeman why it has taken so long for him to decide if Officer Mohamed Noor was justified in shooting and killing Damond on July 15.

“Fair question. I’ve got to have the evidence, and I don’t have it yet,” Freeman responded. “Let me just say it’s not my fault. So if it isn’t my fault, who didn’t do their job? Investigators. They don’t work for me. They haven’t done their job.”

Freeman said coming to a decision “is the big present I want under the Christmas tree.”

Damond’s family was “deeply distressed and unhappy” following Freeman’s remarks, said Bob Bennett, the attorney representing the family.

“We expected a quality investigation that would be fair, complete and accurate, and apparently that hasn’t happened,” Bennett said.

The video was made by union members who were also members of the Twin Cities Coalition for Justice 4 Jamar, a group formed after the November 2015 death of Jamar Clark, who was shot and killed during a struggle with two Minneapolis police officers. Sam Sanchez, who was part of the group that made the video, said Freeman was not told he was being recorded. The group posted the video on its Facebook page Wednesday night.

Asked how investigators failed to do their job, Freeman responded via e-mail: “Good questions and I respect you asking them. We are working very hard to complete our review of the facts provide[d] in the investigation to date and to assist in helping to complete the investigation.”

Noor shot and killed Damond on July 15, after she called 911 to report a possible sexual assault outside of her south Minneapolis home. Noor and his partner, Matthew Harrity, responded to the call. When she approached the squad, Noor, from the passenger’s seat, shot across Harrity in the driver’s seat, striking Damond in the abdomen.

The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, which investigated the shooting, turned over the case to Freeman for charging consideration on Sept. 12.

Freeman has said repeatedly he would make a decision on whether to charge Noor by the end of the year.

But during a news conference Tuesday, he softened that stance, saying it was now “the goal” to make a decision by the end of the year. Otherwise, he has remained publicly silent on the case.

In the six-minute video, the activists approach Freeman at the Wednesday event. After Freeman said he did not have the evidence to charge Noor, blaming investigators for not doing their job, one man said, “I don’t understand why this seems to be such a hard thing.”

“Fair question,” Freeman responded. “I have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, the moment he shot the gun he feared for his life, and he used force because he thought he was going to be killed. But he won’t answer my questions. … I can’t talk to her because she’s gone, and the other cop just gave us [expletive]. So guess what, I’ve gotta figure out angles of the shot, gun residues, reckless use of force experts. …

“But if you look at this, here’s a nice lady who hears something bad outside, she calls the cops, they don’t come, she calls again, they drive up in her alley, and she comes out in her jammies and she’s killed by a cop. Sounds easy doesn’t it? Can I prove that the cop shot her? I could have done that the first day.”

Freeman told the group that before he charges anyone, he has to have “sufficient admissible evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.”

“Would you like me to charge your friend just because I think maybe he did it, and let a jury decide?” Freeman said on the videotape. “I’m ruining his life by doing [that].”

“That’s just how the justice system works,” one of the activists responded. “You do it to innocent poor people all the time Mike, so why is it so difficult when it’s a police officer?”

“I have to follow the law,” Freeman said. “We’ll get it done, OK?”

Freeman then thanked the group, but said he would continue to seek more evidence.

“I’m not going to make it worse by just doing a knee-jerk charge and seeing what the jury decides, no no,” he said. “I have to know what happened before I can charge. And that’s when I’m doing my job. And thanks for having some patience. Trust me, nobody wants it done more than me. That’s the big present I want under the Christmas tree.”

BCA spokeswoman Jill Oliveira declined to address Freeman’s comments, saying only that the agency “continues to work with that office regarding this ongoing investigation. … [T]he collaboration between prosecutors and investigators as a case file is reviewed under the statutes is a typical part of the review process.”

Sanchez, one of the activists who made the video, said several politicians attend the annual union holiday event to seek support for their campaigns. Freeman is up for re-election next year.

“If he needs our help, he needs to be held accountable,” Sanchez said.


Another article inadvertently explains why Noor hasn’t been charged. via Minneapolis police brace for backlash on decision over officer in Justine Damond shooting— whatever it is

Jaylani Hussein, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Minnesota chapter, acknowledged the Somali community will be angered if Noor is charged.

“Our entire community is going to be dragged into this mess,” Hussein said.

The head of the Minnesota chapter of the NAACP, Jason Sole, said he’s heard from members who would be angry if Noor were charged because he’s black.


As we wrote in a previous post:

Still no arrest of the Muslim cop, no charges and no answers from anyone in city management. Justine Damond ‘didn’t have to die’. Her death is the result of years of diversity and affirmative action politics that placed a mayor, a police chief and a Muslim refugee in positions they were all unprepared for.

 

Read more…

"The only thing that remains is whether we have the fortitude to not just fire these people immediately, but to take them out in cuffs...." My :Video https://twitter.com/JudgeJeanine/status/942217

Read more…