All Posts (28937)

Sort by

The Life Force

I know the pastor of a local Baptist Church who was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer that had metastasized to his liver. He had zero chance of surviving.  He told me that he died in the hospital and begged God to not take him; he had not finished his work here.  Today he is alive and well, without a trace of cancer.  It sends a strong message to all of us to be ever-aware that we are here for a purpose.

 

The water-planet Earth allows advanced life. Earth is the only water-planet in the solar system. Earth orbits the sun at exactly the right distance to allow advanced life.  We humans are the only advanced life with conscious awareness that allows us a certain amount of control of nature.  The latest science concludes that without consciousness nothing would exist.  The universe must be ordered. To be the law, it must be ordered liberty.

 

Couple the above two paragraphs with the opening verses of the book of Genesis. After God created heaven and earth, and lower life, God said, Let us make man in our image (Gen.1:26).  Who is us? Since no distinction follows, we can assume us is each of us.  The latest science maintains that we interact with matter; that we observe and this becomes our reality.  For instance, we observed the workings of the microcosmic and came up with the atom bomb. Quite obviously, as the ages roll by, our purpose has increased.  It boils down to this: each of us has a greater personal responsibility.

 

This brings me to the Gospel According to St. Matthew, the first book in the New Testament, and Jesus’ new way looking at our purpose: we are our brother’s keeper.  Jesus told us it is on earth as it is in heaven.  What Jesus meant was that we come to the time-space universe with an immortal soul—the essence of our being, our animating principle, or our actuating cause of life. In a state, nothing moves. We come from a boundless eternal state of consciousness to make improvements.  This theory comes from the latest science.  Before the universe, something has to exist, as from nothing you get nothing. The something is consciousness.  The latest science: the physical universe could not exist without consciousness in the mix.    

 

As we celebrate the birth of Christ, the words of John Quincy Adams come to mind.

 

Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day?  Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation?

 

Absolutely! We now enter the Age of Aquarius, the age of brotherhood and fraternity. The United States of America was born under the sign of Aquarius. I was born under the sign of Aquarius.

 

Jesus was born at the beginning of the Age of Pisces. The Piscean nature, we read, is impressionable, wants to do the right thing, but is weak willed.  Before he was crucified, Jesus remarked that before the cock crowed, Peter would deny him three times. In all the 2,000 years of the Age of Pisces, history records that we’ve been easily impressed, have wanted to do the right thing, but have been weak willed.

 

Jesus said he would return.  The American people have never been more divided.  We are in a state of crises.  A great change is inevitable.  It takes great strength of character and fierce personal belief to stand against the establishment.  We face a clear bias in the makers and keepers of the law against all who refuse to conform.  For failure to conform, Jesus was crucified.  The Aquarian, by nature, is a nonconformist, is fiercely independent, strongly against coercive government, and for people working together for a better world.  Aquarians believe in self-government.   They believe in natural law, which comes from nature’s God.

 

Jesus said we can’t serve two masters.  Jesus said, “Seek ye first the kingdom of God.” Aquarians don’t look to government or religious authority; they look within, to God’s kingdom for guidance.  

 

I came to a jumping off place in 1975. I could have fallen into the abyss.  On Christmas Eve 1975, I set sail on the South Atlantic Ocean on a sailboat I named Bold Venture, the pioneer seeking to find my real identity.  During my two years at sea, several miracles occurred.  I was reborn at sea, in the womb of all life in the beginning, and departed captain of my ship. The establishment would tell you that I was an accident waiting to happen.  My life has gotten better and better. At age 85, I don’t think life could get any better.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read more…

Is the Income Tax Confiscatory?

“And it came to pass in those days that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed. And all went to be taxed, everyone to his own city. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; to be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child. And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn”- in the Gospel according to St. Luke, in Chapter 2.

 

Glenn Beck spent an hour the other day talking about our God-given rights. I’m here to talk the nitty-gritty on how to get our God-given rights back;  how, once again, to make an American ideal our reality.

 

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in the case of Joseph W. Smith, Jr., Petitioner (me) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on appeal from the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in the U. S. Supreme Court in the October term of 1980, citing Brushaber v. Union Pac. R.R. as an authority  for taxing me out of house and home, the Commissioner stated in his Memorandum for the Respondent that I had no basis to claim the income tax is an unconstitutional confiscation of property without due process of law.  We will now discuss the Commissioner’s claim.

 

In that I had a personal stake in the outcome, my very existence, this “tax protester” was permitted by law to take my issue to the Supreme Court.  I did not go to jail, as the press was reporting at the time that I protested.  Also, please take note that the obviously biased federal judiciary at the time of my tax protest, who was telling the press that I was a “spurious constitutional objector,” I was not; I was the protector of the law, the Commissioner a lawless, lying fraud protected by a federal conspiracy against the American people.

 

The fact that I was before the Supreme Court with a personal stake in the outcome, my existence, with the claim that the income tax is confiscatory, questions the makers and keepers of the law.  They are not as powerful as they try to make you think they are. I’m not a lawyer, but I made it my business to know the law. Neither government lawyers, the press, judges, nor politicians could stop me. I ask you, could, or would a lawyer have done as much for you?  Never!  A lawyer told me, right or wrong, it is best to pay the IRS all that it demands.  What I did was a do-it-yourself thing, the unexpected.  Nobody is as concerned for your existence as they are for their own.  Consequently, tax and spend in America is a wheel of fortune. Thanks to America’s lawyers, the IRS is permitted to grab the existence money of the meek. Lawyers only take the tax cases of millionaires.  They get tax breaks.  Thanks to America’s lawyers, the whole system has been turned upside down.  Only you and I can turn it right side up.

 

 It’s always the meek who get taken.  That was my case, and for that reason I was going to prove my case, whatever it took.  My question to you: Is your government your servant or your master?  If you allow your government to kick your butt, you are its slave.  With this in mind, and my question—is the income tax confiscatory—if you hope to keep your liberties, it is essential that you know what your government is claiming.  Don’t be stupid! Washington knows full well what it is doing to your rights.  Let your representatives know, if you agree with me, that you are not going to take it anymore, and stand behind it.

 

“No basis to claim the income tax is unconstitutional” means no reason.  Ha!  This tax collecter is a boot licking jerk, doing the will of Congress.  “Without due process of law” means I was claiming I was not heard in a meaningful way in a meaningful place.  Well, my dear friends, please allow me to give you a few of the facts of my case, and then decide if the federal judiciary is loyal to the Constitution or conspiring with Washington’s lawless bandits to grab every right you have.  

 

A  renegade federal tax collector cited Brushaber as his authority to rip me off. Brushaber, in part:  “Under the seeming exercise of the taxing power, the taxing statute is so arbitrary as to compel the conclusion that it was not exaction of taxation, but the confiscation of property, or is so wanting in basis for classification as to produce such a gross and patent inequity as inevitably to lead to the same conclusion.” 

 

This excerpt from Brushaber  doesn’t take a Philadelphia lawyer to understand.  The Commissioner was lying when he cited Brushaber as his authority.   He knew, absolutely, that he no authority, and so did the judges I appeared before.  The scum bags did this to me because they knew I was out of sight, out of mind.  What they did, actually, was to hang themselves with their own rope.  

 

The Commissioner stated that my charges of fraud and harassment by the IRS were similarly without merit, claiming the charges were based on an error made by the IRS.  If what the IRS did was in error, then your liberties are zero, but an error is exactly what the federal judiciary called it. My case was well documented. I was dismissed by the Supreme Court without one word.  When you know the facts, you will know the reason why.  One word by the Supreme Court in favor of the Commissioner would have been a lie.  

 

Does the Supreme Court have the authority to ignore the lawless acts of your government?  Not according to The Palm Beach Post. I took my record to The Post. An investigation was made. The following are excerpts are from a front page story in The Palm Beach Post.

 

“Holger Euringer, IRS public relations officer in Jacksonville said last week that the agency had been wrong all along and that Smith soon would receive a letter of apology from the IRS district director.”

 

Congress held hearings on IRS foul play. The victims who testified were hidden from public view.  The Commissioner said he would take care of the problem.  Did he? I received no apology from the district director. I received a warning letter. The Commissioner attempted to take our home, claiming we owed $35,000 in unpaid tax, penalty and interest. After I went to my congressman with the facts, it turned out to be an error.  Put yourselves in our place, senior citizens left homeless by an IRS error.  Euringer: “We did make numerous mistakes in the collection procedures. . .We did not intend in any way to harass or intimidate him, but I can see why he might have that impression.” Can you believe this could ever happen in America?

 

The Post: “Court documents, IRS letters and Smith’s files tell a chilling story of IRS bumbling that began in 1975 when the agency disagreed with Smith on how much he owed in 1973 and 1974 taxes.  . .Smith disagreed so the IRS took out of money he was owed in rebates as a result of business losses in other years.  Smith filed suit, but the government kept the money until just before the 1978 hearing in the U.S. Tax Court, when IRS officials admitted the assessment was inaccurate, according to court records.”

 

“Euringer said the IRS is not allowed to withhold refunds pending the outcome of court cases unless the total amount is applied to taxes owed.” Euringer: “If what he said is correct, we were wrong.” 

 

What I said was that my business enterprise was on the rocks; my wife was divorcing me; everything I had was tied up in a divorce trial, and I was working on a minimum paying job, giving 20 percent of my meager wages in withholding tax. I couldn’t pay my rent. I was locked out because the IRS withheld my rightful refund money.

 

I’m a World War II veteran.  I was a combat rifleman in Nazi Germany.  I risked my life so you could be free. The tax collector lawlessly  put me on the street.  After the fact, the IRS: “We were wrong.” 

 

The Post: “Then in 1980, the IRS took a second look at Smith’s 1973 and 1974 tax returns and said he owed $2,556 plus interest. The IRS took that money out of proceeds from the sale of a condominium in Portland, OR.”

 

“Smith said he told the IRS about the previous tax court decision and said he didn’t owe the money. The IRS stuck by its decision, and he filed a refund claim for the $2556, which he said the IRS failed to answer.”

 

The Post left out the fact that the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected my claim that the income tax was unconstitutional by reason that Congress had allowed the tax collector to be above the law. 

 

Appeals Court Goodwin, Sneed, and Reinhardt: “Despite the fact that the amount of taxes owed by the taxpayer may be less than the amount the United States must spend to collect that amount, this is a case in which the excess should be expended to validate once more the legitimacy of the federal income tax.” 

 

Goodwin, Sneed, and Reinhardt were given irrefutable evidence that the IRS had thumbed its nose at the Tax Court’s order—evidence that the IRS confiscated my lawful property. The Commissioner did not defend what he did. He did not even mention it. It isn’t wrong unless the government admits it is wrong. Isn’t this something to be concerned about? The IRS was only wrong after being exposed to the world what it did to this one taxpayer. What about you?  Goodwin, Sneed, and Reinhardt, because those three skunks under the woodpile could, they made a sham out of America’s system of justice.  Where was the ACLU?  They aren’t lawyers. They are unconscionable scammers.  My life, liberty, and property didn’t mean any more to those judges than a Jew’s life meant to Nazi Germany’s judges.  Next it will be your life.  You will never hear from a lawyer what I’m revealing. Leave the kind of government in place, my friends, and your lives will be meaningless soon enough. Your life, liberty, and property are yours to defend. Nobody else is going to protect you.   

 

“In 1983, Smith filed suit in U. S. District Court in West Palm Beach to get the money back. But before the case could go to trial, according to documents from the tax division of the U. S. Justice Department, the division declared the $2556 assessment a wrongful levy.”

 

The Justice Department declared the $2556 assesment a wrongful levy, after the fact. The Court of Appeals saw no evil in the IRS ignoring the Tax Court order and the Supreme Court dismissed me without a word.

 

The Post wanted to know why this. The following was the answer.  “Kayla Lettow, a tax auditor with the examination section of the agency’s Problems Resolution Office, said last week that the assessment was dropped because Oregon IRS revenue officer W. J. Manderfeld incorrectly analyzed Smith’s tax liability.”  Is that an answer?  Why didn’t the system correct the wrong?  There is only one answer. The system is corrupt through and through.  The IRS has to go.

 

The Taney Court held that Dred Scott, an escaped slave who was captured by a bounty hunter, was a white man’s property.  America’s slaves were freed.  The reason the IRS is above the law is because Franklin D. Roosevelt left the American people with the idea that government has a duty to us.  Anything government deems good for all is good.  The courts disallow any question. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know what is going on in today’s America. The same expedience that allowed Dred Scott to be a white man’s property now allows taxpayers to be government property.  Justice Brandeis: “Property is only a means. It has been a frequent error of our Court that they have made the means the end.”  The courts see IRS error as good. If the end is good, the means are good. Only you can change that.   It was the same Oregon Problems Resolution Office—probably W. J. Manderfeld—who claimed we owed $35,000 in unpaid tax, penalty, and interest.

 

The Post: “On Nov 5,” after having refunded the $2556  wrongful levy, “the IRS issued a notice to Barnett Bank of Palm Beach saying it wanted the $960 in Smith’s bank account because he owed $961.70 on his 1974 return. Euringer said the Nov. 5 bank account levy was a mistake.”

In light of Brushaber , the tax collector’s stated authority to tax me, taken with the facts,  did I have “no basis” to claim the income tax is unconstitutional?  According to due process of law, another way of saying governmental fairness, did I have a meaningful hearing in a meaningful place?  Yep, anything the government and courts deem good is good.  You have no God-given rights.

 

Miracles never cease. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s. Jesus said, Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.  We must come to regard that which is human as a bigger than life cause.  I did. My reward has been to see all of my dreams fulfilled.  To the 100 million Tea Party members, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year; may your dreams come true.

Read more…

Merry Christmas From The Baker Family

Tonight will be Christmas eve and it seems to me that the country is a little sadder, a little more reflective, a lot more realistic, and a little less hedonistic this year.  I know that this sounds like a weird opening for a Christmas message, but I think this is a healthy thing.  I think many of us are longing for a simpler, more honest time in America. 

I really miss Christmas and long for the feeling of Christmas I had as a child.  For so long we have made Christmas so glitzy and vulgar that we have missed the real joy of this season.  It is sad, but it's a part of the identity loss we are suffering as a people.  Maybe this year, this adversity we are going through, is not all bad.  And while I sympathize with families out of work at this time of year, perhaps this is giving us pause to reflect on all we've had, all we've lost, and all we have stopped being.

4063263283?profile=originalChristmas during my childhood is one of my sweetest memories.  Sure, we had the tree and the presents, and the trappings of Christmas.  But what I remember is not the presents or the trees, but the hot chocolate made with real cocoa.  I remember the Christmas cookies made with all the love of Christmas past.  I remember practicing for the Christmas pageant that the church children put on every Christmas eve.  I remember going to the small little house of my grandparents on Christmas day with all of my aunts and uncles and all of their kids.  I remember the snowball fights, warming by the old stove, and the giggling conversations of children amerced in the innocence of yesteryear.  The Christmas meal wasn't about just eating, it was about family, tradition, and remembering. 

4063263354?profile=originalI can still see my long lost uncle from New York sitting there at the table with his brothers and sisters and watching the bond being reformed ... becoming family all over again.  I remember the story telling and the good natured ribbing.  I remember the presentation of the turkey and the home made noodles (weird Christmas tradition at the Baker's Christmas table) which I loved. 

4063263310?profile=originalI can recall so vividly the color of the sky as evening set in on Christmas day.  That was a time when all the world was right.  By this time in the evening, all the kids were wet, cold and tired and ready for more hot chocolate and freshly baked homemade pie.  And following the pie came games.  The kids would be at the table in the basement playing board games and the adults would play cards at the huge dining room table, which would comfortably seat about 12 to 14 people.   Grandma and Grandpa had eight children and a large table was a necessity. 

 

4063263323?profile=originalI remember the drive home to our little town of Rochelle in northern Illinois near the Wisconsin border.  There was one street over which the trees made a tunnel in the summer, but in the winter, on those Christmas night rides home, I remember the way the moon silhouetted those leafless trees.  I remember the blue and purple tint to the moonlight that colored the snow and made everything look cold, but somehow peaceful. 

4063263294?profile=originalBut I also remember what we celebrated.  I know that Christmas is not the real time of the birth of the Messiah, but then we didn't know that … we just knew that this was a special event.  From my earliest remembrance we knew the story of the shepherds watching their flocks by night.  We knew about Mary, the young mother tenderly caring for her child lying in swaddling clothes in a cold dark manger.  We knew of the star of Bethlehem and the wise men.   We knew of the glory of the angels filling the sky as even the heavens could not contain the power and the joyous rapture of this event. 

Luke 2: 8 And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.

9: And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.

10: And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

11: For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.

12: And this [shall be] a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.

13: And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,

14: Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.

4063263373?profile=originalPeace on earth good will toward men.  And yet there is no peace on earth.  This Christmas we have members of our armed forces braving the elements and facing Islamo extremism around the world; our politicians have betrayed us again and again in Washington D.C., and state capitals around the country.  Our financial crisis threatens to destroy our economy and millions of our country men are jobless and scared.  Justice evades our courts and arrogance rules in the White House. 

But even in this midst of this turbulence and betrayal, we can look forward to a time when all of this will be replaced with a prophesied righteous government which will be established forever.  And fortunately, we have the surety, the down payment of the promise posited with us at this Christmas season.  Let me share with you the prophecy of that time of righteous government, which came as the spirit moved the prophet Isaiah, 700 hundred years before the birth of the Messiah.

Isaiah 9:6  For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

9:7: Of the increase of [his] government and peace [there shall be] no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even forever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

4063263344?profile=originalThere will come a time when all that we see: the violence, the corruption, and the brutality of humankind come to an end and there will come to this earth that which the very earth itself has cried out for ... peace.  The peace of Christmas; the peace that was wrought when the King of kings chose to make himself the peace offering for all of us. 

It is indeed astounding to think that the Creator of all things would humble Himself to the birth of a peasant that we might be made kings and priests; And from that rude, cold and dark manger the world would find life, and light, and finally the peace that passes all understanding and brings joyous hope to an otherwise sad and broken humanity.  How great is our salvation? How great is our God? How sure is the hope of those whose God is the Lord?

4063263454?profile=originalThis Christmas season, Katie and I wish for you memories of the innocence of Christmas past, the  joy of the shepherds as they gathered at the manger celebrating the fulfillment of all their hopes and dreams throughout the generations of Israel and in your heart, we wish for you, peace ... the peace that comes from knowing that our Messiah is no longer a helpless babe in a manger but the Lion of Judah and our loving redeemer that came to this earth for all, but more importantly He came for you.  Had there been no one else on this planet but you ... he still would have come, for you.

That, dear friends, is the message and meaning and the Peace of Christmas and it is that, we wish for you all. 

 

Jake & Katie Baker

 


We created a special present for our family and friends ...hundreds of Christmas music videos... Click HERE.  Allow a little time to initially download due to the size of the files.


 

 

 


 

 

Read more…

  i was looking atthe actions of the lame duck session and how the intereity of the military was trashed by the democratic senators and 6 republicans.

  The constiution and the federal laws, which are backed by the laws in each state, allow the voters in that state to approach thier secretary of state and request to do a petition drive to force a recall elecetion to make these democrtic and republican us senators and us represenatives made to face a vote of confidence (a recall election) and answer for thier lying to the voters and going the path of barrack obama and the radical elements of the communist party.

i may be viewd as a homophopic, but were inm the wordl are we fighting two wars and other to come, downtown san franciso where homosexuals and lesbians are tolerated?  HERE IS FACTS. 1. WE ARE IN HARDCORE MUSLIM COUNTIRES WHERE HOHSEXUALS AND LESBIANS ARE EXECUTED, AS THEY ARE SHARIA COMPLIANT.

 HERE IS A HARD FACTS, IF THE AIM IS TO DEFEAT THE MILITANTS DO WE MAKE ALL MUSLIM COUNTRIES HATE US EVEN MORE AND HAVE GAYS OPENLY DISPLY HIER LIFESTYLES IN THESE COUNTIRES IN A TIME OF WAR.

IF THE LEITE THINK NOTHING WILL HAPPEN, THEN LET THEM GO AND FIGHT IN THOSE COUNTIRES AND SEND THE STRAIGH PEOPLE BACK TO THEIR LOVE ONES. SINCE THIS WILL UNLEASH MORE HATRED TOWARDS THE US THAN ANY ACTION THE ENEMY COULD EVEN TRY AND CARRY OUT.

 SO THE BLOOD SHED BY  OBAMA EMBRACING THE GAYS RIGHT TO SERVE OPENLY WILL BE ON HIS AND  EVERY US SENATOR AND US CONGRESSMAN THAT VOTED TO LIFT THAT BAN.

 EVEN AS THE FCC IS OUT TO STOP FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EVERY OTHER CZAR IS PIT TO MAKE THE US A COMMUNIST AND SOCIAL NATOPN, WE RELIED ONM THE REPUBLICAN US SENATORS TO B ACK UP THE COUNTRY AND THEY SOLD US OUT TO BARRACK OBAMA AND THE RADICAL RIGHT AGENDA.

 THAT IS WHY I STOPPED ALL MY DONATIONS TO THE RNC, THE RNSC AND THE REBUPLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE AND DIVERTED THE $150,000,000,000.00 TO THE TEA PARTY TO CARRY OUT THE RECALL AND HOLD THOSE SIX US SENATORS AND THE ENTIRE DEMOCRATIS AND US REPRESTIVES ANSWER TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IN AN IMMEDIATE RECALL ELECTION.

 

Read more…

THE DEFECTIONS OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS !

 

 

 SO WHO SOLD OUT ?

 

   THAD COCHRAN, MISSISSIPPI

    BOB CORKER, TENNESSEE

    MIKE CRAPO, IDAHO

    TOM COBURN, OKLAHOMA

    LAMAR ALEXANDER, TENNESSEE

    JONNY ISAKSON, GEORGIA

 

 

   M.CRAPO AND T. COBURN  VOTED FOR CUTTING THE DEDUCTIONS FOR HOME MORTGAGES AND CHARITABLES.

   $ 1 TRILLION IN NEW TAXES !

 

    LET US REMEMBER, IN THE NEXT PRIMARY.4063263209?profile=original

 

Read more…

What Went Wrong in America?

4063263059?profile=original

The preacher at a nearby Baptist church recently paid me a visit. He had heard that I played the guitar. He brought his guitar with him.  My neighbor had told me he was in the hospital with pancreatic cancer.  I’d never heard of anyone recovering from pancreatic cancer, and I told him how amazed I was to see him alive and well. He told me he died in the hospital and begged God not to take him. He loved his wife and she needed him.  He said he was here by God’s grace. We played our guitars and sang gospel songs. I have not been a member of a church since the 1960s. I don’t like the doctrines and dogmas. The preacher asked me to play at a special musical they were doing at the church.  I accepted. There are a great many Americans who feel God’s presence. I’m one of them.

 

At age 35, I felt like I was 85. My joints were aching. My teeth were abscessing. I had advanced pyorrhea.  My lymph glands in my groin were swollen. My doctor feared I had Hoskins Disease. Hoskins Disease is a killer cancer without a remedy. My doctor put me in the hospital to have groin issue examined. The test was inconclusive.  I told my dentist I thought my teeth were the problem but that my doctor rejected that notion.  I told my dentist to go ahead and pull my teeth, even though my doctor said I could be dead within 24 hours.  With my teeth out my health immediately improved.

 

When I was 65, I was experiencing tightness in my chest. My doctor gave me a stress test to find out if I had a heart blockage. He told me I had a serious heart blockage. He ordered an angiogram.  Die was injected in my groin. An X-ray machine would show how bad the blockage was. It was determined that I had a 21 percent blockage in my main heart artery, on the second try. The X-ray machine broke on the first.  I questioned charging me twice. The hospital asked me why I complained. My insurance paid the bill.  My doctor told me that within five years I’d have to undergo open-heart surgery. He ordered me to take a drug that caused my throat to spasm. It was very painful. My doctor told me to continue taking the drug. 

 

Much later I learned that a 21 percent heart blockage was nothing to worry about and that a stress test would not indicate a heart blockage unless the blockage was more than 50 percent. I’m 85 now. I didn’t take the drug. I didn’t have open-heart surgery.  I don’t have tightness in my chest, even when walking up steep grades.  I’m in good health.  My doctor was connected with the hospital. I was conned.

 

I’m reading Suzanne Somers’ knockout. I read about her similar experience to mine, only hers was much worse.  Somers went to the E.R. unable to breathe and her body covered in red whelps. She was dying. They injected her and put her on oxygen. She slowly revived. They did a Cat scan.  Somers was told she had full body cancer, the same is saying you are as good as dead. Two days later they told her the diagnosis was mistaken; she probably had either tuberculoses or leprosy.  They went down her throat to take tissue from her lung, which could have damaged her vocal chords. Somers is a singer.

 

They put Somers in isolation and told her it would take 6 weeks or longer to make a determination. They put her on drugs, which cost Somers $5,000.  Had she taken them she probably would not be alive today.  They misdirected the drugs’ use.  Finally, it was determined that Somers had Valley Fever, which comes from a fungus in the soil in the area of Somers’ home. She had been working the soil in her garden. 

 

An investigation found that the hospital failed to look at the blood test they performed, as a matter of protocol, which would have told them where to look.

 

Somers reports in Knockout, after an extensive investigation, that chemotherapy is a $200 billion a year racket.  There are cancer cures that cost a fraction as much that actually cure cancer; chemotherapy doesn’t.  In many cases chemotherapy kills the patient.  Doctors who are actually curing cancer are being arrested and treated as criminals. A swat team used a battering ram to bust down the door of one doctor. They ordered him to get on his knees. They put pistol to his head.  One doctor on trial had a number of witnesses to testify that he had cured them of cancer when they were told their cancer was terminal.  The doctor was acquitted. 

 

America’s health care has skyrocketed in cost.  It now consumes 14 percent of the national income.

 

Shades of the past, I claimed the income tax was unconstitutional. IRS goons took it upon themselves to lawlessly tax me and withhold my large tax refund when I was struggling to exist. My business was on the rocks and my wife was divorcing me. The IRS lawlessly put me on the street. I took the IRS to the Supreme Court; the news media reported that tax protesters were being sent to prison.  Judges were reporting to the news media that tax protesters were “spurious constitutional objectors.”  I can tell you that America’s judges would not know the Constitution from a book of nursery rhymes.  Justice Black said the Constitution is what we say it is. The Supreme Court refused to hear my case. I took the court record to The Palm Beach Post.  An investigation was made. You know the record had to be absolutely outrageous.  A front page story told the world that IRS had violated the U. S. Code a number of times and had violated court orders.

 

There was not one peep from anyone.  Senator Bob Graham wrote me that the IRS was permitted to use “draconian means” of collecting income tax.  Senator Lawton Chiles wrote that he received more mail protesting the income tax than all the rest of his mail put together. He reasoned that it was because the income tax directly affects the individual.  What is going on in America is so absurd that one wonders if we haven’t reverted back to lower animal intelligence. It doesn’t make any difference anymore to a growing number the American people, if it doesn’t make them feel good, they don’t want to hear it.   

 

Who is the President of the United State? The American people voted for the former community organizer of South Chicago. America has become a giant mafia. Need I say more?  

 

You know what went wrong in America. The question now is what are you going to do about it?

 

 

Read more…

The "Almost Immoral" Rich

4063262911?profile=originalVice President Joe Biden thinks it is “almost immoral” that the rich are not going to be taxed more than they are now on their incomes. What makes Biden come up with this kind of remark? The fact is that the lowest fifty percent pay only three percent of the income tax and the so-called rich pay 70 percent. Why is it almost immoral that they are not required to pay more?  Biden is indifferent on how the poor spend our money. Who or what is behind Biden’s remark? Let’s explore.

 

Biden and his colleagues are on a spending spree, bankrupting the nation, morally, spiritually, and fiscally. The money he takes from the rich and gives to the poor means that people are not going to be hired. It’s a double edge sword. What has Biden got to show after two years of being in charge?  Unemployment is higher and the national debt is at an all-time high.

 

Biden’s fraud lost big in the midterm election. And now Biden stands before us lying like a dog. It deserves comment when the Vice President makes such remarks—and Obama, too, whose arrogance is highly questionable.  We’ve never had a pair like these in high office.  What went wrong?

 

Since Obama and Biden, America has become significantly less secure, and now it looks like Obama will be successful in weakening our security in favor of Russia, who has never been our friend. Everything this pair does has a weakening effect on the nation. There has got to be a reason.  

 

All but the hardcore left have turned thumbs down to Biden and Obama.  One-world socialist billionaire George Soros and his shabby shadow government is what went wrong.  Soros, who has brought four governments down so far, knows what it takes: Joe Biden, a Soros pick, the control freak who loves to lord it over others, Biden’s type is in most of the key positions in the United States.  Yep, we’ve  got the conquering Philistines, the sea people of the Canaanites, Attila, the Hun, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and more lately Chavez. Once again, following the course of history, the fickle finger of fate is about to take America down.  

 

 Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, a Harvard man, prides himself with knowing God.  He tells us he had 12 years of Catholic schooling.  Bill lauds George Soros for the good he does.  O’Reilly is sitting on the fence.  Jesus said you can’t serve two masters. True, Soros gives millions to charities, and for an ulterior purpose.  Every dime Soros gives is to help his own cause.  I don’t give Bill much credit. If being a Harvard man isn’t enough, 12 years of Catholic schooling is quite enough to say brother Bill doesn’t know whether he is afoot or horseback.  

 

Soros, who sees himself blessed with superior awareness, knows nothing about the workings of the universe.  Obsessed with power, Soros knows the weaknesses of man here on earth, which he exploits. Obama and Biden are Soros pawns. Brother Bill admits he’s confused about their motives.  When you listen to Biden and Obama, you are hearing Soros stultiloquence (Latin for viscously, ungodly inspired pleading. It used to be subject to fine.)

 

I’ve never set foot in a law school. I know the law; those who have gone to law school don’t. I think that may be one of O’Reilly’s big problems. Seems to me that O’Reilly went to Harvard law school.  Obama is a Harvard lawyer, a Marxist who has a problem with the Constitution.  All of those Obama folks charitable Soros has had a hand in empowering are revolutionaries who have put on neckties and now hold respected positions. They remain with the same goals.  

 

Up jumped the devil. Soros didn’t count on the Tea Party. For the sake of our liberties, it is essential that the Tea Party be aware.

 

If you want to know how something works you take it apart and examine the parts. Soros and company have it all worked out for us.  They have envisioned a desirable end. Their end justifies the means they use, whatever it takes.  The end justifying the means does not work.  It turns into mayhem.  Hundreds of millions die to no avail.

 

The ancient Egyptian priests were very adept at taking the universe apart.  Pythagoras, who studied under Egyptian priests, known as the father of mathematics, used geometry, which he learned in Egypt, as his means of saying if this is so that is so.     

 

America doesn’t know what Jesus meant when he said in earth as it is in heaven. By the way, America was born under the sign of Aquarius and I’m Aquarius rising.  

 

What comes around goes around, excepting the Tea Party, which falls under Werner Heisenberg’s mathematical formula called the uncertainty principle, the forerunner of quantum mechanics.  Coincidentally, Heisenberg published the uncertainty principle in September 1925, the month and year of my birth.

 

Speaking of in earth like it is in heaven, that which Jesus said, there is progressive order in the universe. We are given increasing purpose. It runs through and links the ages.  When I was born, Saturn was trine Pluto. This means that I would have an understanding of the subtle workings of the universe. We are moving now from the Age of Pisces into the Age of Aquarius, an age when brotherhood and fraternity will prevail.  We are leaving an age when people have been impressionable and weak willed. Clearly Soros and company are moving against the tide, yet the liberal press, like birds on a telephone wire chirping, “Obama is the Comeback Kid,” it is hard to believe how much in denial the liberal press is.  In “Custer’s last stand,” Custer won.  Yep, we’ve gone bonkers.

 

 

As to the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, there are immutable laws that govern the movements of the universe, but there are happenings the cutting edge of science has determined that are left to the selection of the mind. Behind this selection is the will.  The will is connected with a common control center we refer to as God, actually the supreme consciousness of the universe.  God is not an entity. It gives us the idea that God can be this or that, for earthbound authority’s benefit. We are blessed with conscious awareness. It is not limited to this or that. In the before reality world, we are observers with quantum minds that interact. We make our reality.   

 

 

I was born with Aquarius on the rise, which means that as I grew older I would become more Aquarian in nature, but not necessarily.  I possess choice and there are conflicting influences in my astrological makeup.  Uranus, which astrologers call my ruling planet, had traversed to a position opposing itself when I was born when I was in my forties.  To astrologers, it meant pressure to change.  It happened in my forties. My business enterprise went on the rocks and my wife divorced me, forcing me to change.

 

I made a clean break with the past. On Good Friday, 1975, I headed for Florida. My plan was to buy a live-aboard sailboat and sail the South Atlantic.  I arrived in Miami, Florida on Easter Sunday for the first day of my new life. I had not planned it, but quite by the movements of the planets I became Aquarius in nature, and more lately have discovered that Jesus and Aquarius have a lot in common. It is interesting that the first day of my new life was Easter Sunday, 1975.     

 

Shortly after my departure, by chance, I met an astrologer.  For the fun of it, I had him create my astrological chart.  I was not impressed, at least at the time. Although it didn’t fit me at the time, I grew into my astrological predictions.

 

After spending two years at sea, during which time miracles occurred, I departed my sea life captain of my ship. The miracles continued.  In 2001, retired and nothing better to do with my time, I decided to write my memoirs. One morning, first thing, I wrote down my thoughts. I’ve being doing that ever since.  The events of my life connect. 

 

Before my departure, if anything could go wrong it did. After my departure, when everything could have easily gone wrong, everything went right. Today all of my dreams have come true.  I don’t think it was the luck of the draw.

 

I draw a comparison in what took place in my life and what is taking place in America.  There came the time when I was forced to change.  I looked within for my answers. They turned out to be right. Hearing Joe Biden tell America he thought it “almost immoral” that the rich are not going to be taxed more caused me to wonder how he could make such a statement.  Biden was talking to the socialists, communists, and anarchists, the easily impressed and weak willed Americans who encouraged to hate America. This easily understandable scenario what Soros uses to bring governments down.  

 

The choice is yours.  It takes determination to keep your freedom.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read more…

Sharia Law v. Constitutional Law

With all due respect for those who don’t allow profiling, and help us to imagine that they stand with the law, what once stood as twin towers in the Center of Manhattan, a gleaming capitalist monument reaching to the heavens—under constitutional law—now under Sharia law, remaining nine years after being destroyed a sacred hole in the ground, President Obama has proclaimed that our Constitution protects the right of Sharia law advocates to build a monument to their law adjacent to their sacred hole.  It is an insult to my intelligence. 

 

And now New York City meatheads, including Mayor Bloomberg, favoring  Sharia law, or the law of might makes right, as demonstrated in said sacred hole in the ground, it took only nineteen Sharia law advocates to accomplish this monumental feat, Obama and the other meatheads now pay them a tribute—having all fliers groped by federal agents—making it as tough as they can on the American people, all in the name of disallowing profiling, look out for these wolves in sheep’s clothing. Obama’s kind always have their cause for justice.  Under Nazi law, it was Jews, and the Grand Mufti of Islam was a Nazi during World War II. Now under Obama’s anti-profiling law, we are guilty without cause. Take your pick. Make it easy on yourself, be groped or be fined and go to jail.  It bears no resemblance of constitutional law. They have the gall to call my kind Nazis and themselves angles of mercy. Get them out of here before you lose every vestige of your freedom.   

 

Obama has stated many times that he has a problem with America’s Constitution. I really think he does. Under Obama’s particular cause for justice, claiming the Constitution allows him to do this, in the name of no profiling, Obama ordered his Attorney General to sue the State of Arizona over law meant to protect Arizona’s citizens from life-threatening illegal Mexicans. How can we allow this insanity? The majority of the American people sees America heading for the rocks. The minority Obama represents, as it now turns out, his popularity now down in the 30s and falling, remain clinging to the wheel of the ship of state for dear life. Now forced to change the course one degree, they are screaming their heads off.  We’ve got to change their course much more or end on the rocks.

 

 

On the idea of Obama law, or you might say Harvard Law School law—Marxist class warfare law—the  ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle advanced this idea: Of political justice—Marxist justice—part is natural—that which everywhere has the same force—legal that which is originally indifferent; that is to say, of the state’s contrivance, Marxist, or Sharia law, or the law of might makes right. So I ask you, does the Constitution either state or imply that a monument to Sharia law must be permitted to be built adjacent to said sacred Muslim hole in the ground?  The law I know is based on reason and logic. The law Obama goes on—Harvard law—has zero substance.  Naturally, Obama, a master of platitudes, would refuse to discuss his Harvard interpretations of the Constitution—law from La La land, with absolutely no substance. My law is based on substance. I studied law at the county law library, without the help of Marxist teachers.  Voices of the past spoke to me. I had a bigger than life calling.

 

Roman judge Cicero, said to be the father of modern law, asserted: “We are born for justice.”  Of political justice, Cicero: “right is not the mere arbitrary construction of opinion, but an institution of nature.” So, what is Obamacare? Obamacare is unscrupulous men’s attempt to override natural law. Government has no business getting involved in making decisions about our health.  You need to know your Constitution. On that notion, Black’s Law Dictionary, under “lawful:” “the word ‘legal’ is used as the synonym of ‘constructive’ which lawful is not. Thus ‘legal fraud,’ or Obamacare, is fraud inferred or implied by law.”

 

A Harvard law school lawyer on the news said, “I’ll bet my hat Obamacare is constitutional.” We’ll see. That lawyer, I can tell you, does not know the law.  I challenged the United States on the constitutionality of the income tax, not per se, but as it applied to me. Sharia law doesn’t give me the right. The Constitution, under the Fifth Amendment, does.  America’s activist judiciary maintains that other rights, “penumbras” make my right under the Fifth Amendment irrelevant.  A penumbra:  the partial or imperfect shadow outside the complete shadow of an opaque body, do you call that the law? It is Harvard law: shadow government. What other rights make my right to exist irrelevant?  I can tell you for sure that you will not get the answer from the political activists now in control of your lives.  

 

The IRS called me a Fifth Amendment freak. Justice Brandeis, citing Harvard law, the law of might makes right—he didn’t get it from the Constitution—said,  “Property is only a means. It has been the frequent error of our Court that they have made the means an end.”  Obama’s, or Harvard law, has it that the end result justifies the means. It’s the same under Sharia law. In other words, for the good of all, we must conform to Islam’s law—or Marxist law—or the law of might makes right—law without substance. Under Harvard Law, it is one for all and all for one. Obama’s Harvard calling is from the seat of his pants—breaking wind in a gale, and your rights are gone with Obama’s Harvard backwind.  Nice folks, those Harvard lawyers.  Their grandiose plans for the world are the only thing that will save us from ourselves.

 

Cicero: “the laws are the foundation of the liberty which we enjoy; we are all the laws’ slaves that we may be free.” The Supreme Court’s test as to a right is whether the right at issue is “of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty,” by reason that neither liberty nor justice would exist if such a right were sacrificed.  Do we not have the God-given right to exist on the fruits of our own labor? The IRS, operating under the law of might makes right, lawlessly put me on the street. I took my tax case all the way to the Supreme Court, proof that Sharia law does not hold, at least not yet. Those illustrious Harvard keepers of the law could not stop me.

 

The U. S. Attorney General didn’t believe me when I wrote him that I’d see him in court over the unconstitutional income tax. I studied the law. Harvard law having painted the makers and keepers of the law into a corner, the Attorney General of the United States could not enforce the law without lying. The respondent, the Solicitor General, lied to the Court. My case was not heard.   Not to be stopped, I took the court record to The Palm Beach Post.  You won’t believe this but an investigation was made. A front page story on my case appeared in December 1986. Those illustrious Harvard trained lawyers, from this self-trained keeper of the law, were forced to eat crow.  

 

Yet they look you straight in the eye and say, “We know the income tax is unfair, but we are fixing the problem.” They’ve been fixing the problem for at least 30 years.  And they bet their hats Obamacare is constitutional.

 

The fact and evidence speak loud and clear.  Under Sharia law, faithful to their cause, Muslims took down the World Trade Center, killed thousands of people, and threw the U. S. economy for a loop.  What better example of might making right. It only took 19 believers in Islam to accomplish this monumental feat.  Millions of Muslims rejoiced. Thousands danced in the streets. Where were the American people in December 1986? Were you afraid of standing and being counted?  

 

No one knows those lying dirt bags wrecking your lives better than me. By myself, with the help of my Constitution, I made the those bald-faced lying frauds of the super-power of the world eat crow.  Not a peep from anyone. Is it any wonder our freedoms hang by a thread?

 

Jesus, in Matthew 6:33: “But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.” There is nothing righteousness about Sharia law.  I’m an Aquarian messenger. We are at the threshold of a quantum leap forward. Jesus said that it is the same on earth as it is in heaven.  We are now entering the Age of Aquarius.    The Age of Aquarius is an age of brotherhood and fraternity.  The Muslim god gives us Sharia law. It figures. Muslim fools want to take us back in time. Time can’t be turned back. We are leaving the Age of Pisces.  Those of the age we are leaving, desperately clinging to the past—and so easily influenced—they try very hard to do the right thing, but weak willed and letting external factors rule their thinking, the characteristics of Pisceans. Do you want to be left with Obama and the Pisceans at the switch?   

 

Dr. Laurie Roth, Ph.D. – “Obama and the far left continue to circle the freedom sucking wagons around the American people. . .” Dr. Jerome Corsi Ph.D. – “End the Income Tax Now!” Whose God is the greater, mine or the Muslim’s Allah? Whose God is greater, mine or Obama’s god of “collective salvation?” What freedoms have collective salvation and Sharia law brought you? Is Allah or Obama your master, or my savior and redeemer?  When I cut from the herd and looked within for my answers, miracles occurred. All of my dreams have come true.  

 

 

Read more…

A play on Words

A PLAY ON WORDS

 

Just playing around here, but:

 

Have you ever noticed how some people say PIN Number, or VIN Number, and things like that?

 

Have you done so yourself?

 

Consider what is being said.

 

PIN is an acronym for Personal Identification Number, therefore PIN Number is in fact the Number of your PIN or your Personal Identification Number's NUMBER. For myself that would usually be 1 as I usually employ only a single PIN for any particular given purpose.

 

The same would hold true for your Vehicle or Vessel when using the acronym VIN. Most vehicles and vessels also have only one identifying number so the number of that number should always be 1, regardless what the VIN actually is.

 

I bring this up because there is a great deal in the NEWS about the current START “TREATY”.

START, in this case means ST ratigic A rms R eduction T reaty. Does this mean that everyone is talking about a Treaty on the proposed Treaty? Frankly, I am not even certain myself just what that would mean, but I do doubt that this is the case. Should this not be referred to as the STAR Treaty? Or simply START?

 

I also play the same game with Nuclear and NewCUElar.

 

Among other things, a CUE is a clue or hint.

 

I have never concerned myself with fear of NewCUElar weapons as they are figmentary and born only of the imaginations of the New CUELESS.

 

Whenever any State or other Public official, some stupid actor, or worse, some reporter goes public and says NuCUElar, I immediately classify them as a fool. And, yes that does go for Bush the second.

 

On the other hand, Nuclear weapons, those actually capable of massive destruction from the detonation of fissionable Nuclear materials, are a real concern.

 

We need our officials to concern themselves with real concerns, not treaties about treaties or imaginary weapons.

 

But, like I said at the start, I am only playing around here.

 

All Y’all have a Good Christmas and may we all enjoy a Happier New Year.

 

Read more…

Please consider this article, found on Mlive.com, a site dedicated to Michigan news:

 

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2010/12/benefits_jobless_relieved_life.html

 

As most know, Michigan has been hit as hard as any other state during this recession (perhaps Republican Governor elect Rick Snyder will outperform Dem. Granholm in this aspect).  It breaks my heart to see how some of my fellow Michiganders are reacting to the rise in unemployment.

 

The article reviews how individuals are affected by legislation signed by President Obama extending unemployment benefits and cutting taxes.  While the majority of this article should get your blood steaming, the kicker for me came in  paragraphs twelve and thirteen, in which the former jewelery and fashion saleswoman, now on unemployment, classifies herself as above '"[settling] for a low-skill, low-wage job, saying she's not going to "throw [herself] into poverty."'  This coming from a woman who professes having done everything it takes to find a job, and wanting nothing more. '"That's just making people settle for whatever can be had," she said. "Speaking for myself, I didn't spend 25 years in a career that was supposed to be my livelihood for the rest of my life to go work at a Starbucks."'

 

My thought is this; logic deems that if you cannot pay your bills, you are not above any job.

 

Government subsidized living is not the answer! Too many Americans are too proud, and need to realize that the work ethic and reform we are calling for in D.C. needs to start with us.  My thanks to everyone who shows up everyday to ANY type of job to do the best they can for their family.  True Americans work, no matter what job they're doing.


Read more…

Don't Ask Don't Tell - A Behind The Scenes Look

Until now I have been silent on the “Don't Ask, Don't Tell” (DADT)debate.  I guess I figured that sanity would prevail.  Now we know that is not the case.  As a continued act of betrayal, eight Senate Republicans stood with 53 democrats and 2 independents to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell, a policy which has been in place since 1993. 

The eight Republicans were: Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts (newly elected with the help of the Tea Party), Lisa Murkowski of Alaska (re-elected as a write-in candidate), newly elected Mark Kirk of Illinois, liberal retiring lame duck George Voinovich of Ohio took one last opportunity to betray his party, newly reelected Richard Burr of North Carolina, John Ensign of Nevada (who is up for election in 2012), Susan Collins of Maine (who is up for reelection in 2014) and Olympia Snowe of Maine (who is up for election in 2012).

I will go into the moral side of this discussion later, but let us address first the consequences and real agenda of the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell.  

4063262439?profile=originalIf you are foolish enough to believe that the anti-American, anti-military factions that are pushing this agenda are doing so because of their love and admiration for the homosexual community, you are dangerously naive, far too gullible to be in a position of leadership, or your family tree stopped forking a few generations back. This will do to the military what a computer virus does to a hard drive.  More on this later, but let me start with where I stand on the issue. 

I am not a "seek and destroy Christian zealot" who believes the government should reside in the bedroom of American homes.  I don't believe that what goes on between a man and a woman is any of government's business.  Nor is it the business of the community unless it affects the community.  If you turn your home into a brothel, you are making my neighborhood unsafe for my family by bringing in a criminal element and potential sexual predators.  You will have my full attention at that point in time. 

4063262476?profile=originalLikewise, I am not interested at all in the private consensual behavior of the homosexual community.  If you live in my neighborhood and I hear whispers about these "guys" who live in that house on the corner, I am forced dismiss such rumors because under the law that I honor, Biblical law, unless there are two eye witnesses, no charge cannot be brought against anyone for anything.  However, the minute you start having raucous parties where public indecency is displayed, you have made your lifestyle my business.  Further, when one begins parading up and down the city streets of major cities in America (see: San Francisco Gay Pride Parade) naked, flaunting one's sexuality, and demanding special rights, you and I will find ourselves on opposite sides of the sexual divide … no ifs ands or butts about it.   

4063262401?profile=originalLikewise, when you join the military and demand special rights to accommodate your sexual lifestyle, you have crossed the line.  If we, as a nation, have to make special provisions to accommodate your sexual proclivities, where does it end?  Should we not then have special provisions for polygamists?  How about people that love their animals in that "special way" … shouldn't they have special protection?  If homosexuality is "natural human behavior," isn't bestiality as well?  After all, didn't God make us all the way we are?

And, of course, everyone knows we need special protections for those who love little boys, like NAMBLA.  They are so misunderstood and hated, but didn't God make them that way?  Why should they be punished for "natural human behavior"?

And how about other groups like necrophilias?  Do you have any idea how difficult a public relations task selling this life style is?  It’s just so hard to find understanding for these poor folks.  Their outlook is so grave that I believe Harry Reid should sponsor a bill yet today just for them.  Who knows … in this lame duck congress (that for the bestiality folks), even a bill for necrophilias may not be dead on arrival, which would probably leave necrophilias with mixed emotions. 

4063262499?profile=originalBack to Don't Ask Don't Tell.  There are some good sides to having openly gay men in the barracks with straights.  First, it might stimulate the economy.  I mean, if we have a couple million soldiers all buying soap on a rope, it is bound to boost the economy of soap on a rope makers.  And I think serving in a forward position with an openly gay man would have a tendency to keep one awake in the foxhole … or anywhere else for that matter.  Awkward isn't it?   Being in forward position while fighting a rear guard action?  But I digress.  There are, in reality, serious health issues at stake.    

A study of homosexual men shows that more than 75% of homosexual men admitted to having sex with more than 100 different males in their lifetime; approximately 15% claimed to have had 100-249 sex partners; 17% claimed 250-499 partners; 15% claimed 500-999 partners, and 28% claimed more than 1,000 lifetime sexual partners according to Wiki.answers.com.

Homosexuality seems to be a highly lustful lifestyle with the average homosexual having hundreds of sex partners during their lifetime.  How is that going to play out in the barracks?  Are the barracks going to become a hedonistic brothel filled with Caligulan scenes of sexual romp and lust?  And if not, how about "tender moments" of hand holding and "cuddling" … is that going to be allowed in the barracks?  And if such behavior is banned, how long will it be before the ACLU is suing the Army and the federal government on the grounds that the gay community is being singled out and discriminated against for only exercising "natural human behavior" already condoned by both the military and the federal government, when they revoked the DADT policy. 

Then there is the privacy question.  We do not allow men to live with women in the barracks.  Experience has taught us that a separation of the sexes prevents a lot of potential problems, like inter-barracks relationship problems, interpersonal conflicts created by jealousy, breakups, pregnancy (which probably won't be an issue in this case), and other "natural human behavior". 

4063262609?profile=originalThen there is the problem of inappropriate sexual behavior.  We avoid the potential problems which can be created when a few good men have been out partying for a few too many hours coming back to the barracks to join a vulnerable Private Jane Doe in the co-ed showers.  But even the innocent appearance of an obviously amorous male in the co-ed shower area might well be, or at least should be, an affront to the modesty of the female soldiers or now after the repeal of DADT, male soldiers.

How are straight men going to respond when they walk from the shower to their bunk and the scene turns to a "B" flick lewd prison backdrop complete with catcalls and whistles?  How will that affect training, discipline, and self confidence?  Will the barracks become “us” against “them” ... straights against gays? 

Perhaps homosexuals should be separated from the rest of the troops to avoid the possibility of sexual harassment.  But that is akin to asking men and women to bunk together isn't it?  So what does one do with openly gay individuals in the military? 

As stated earlier, the homosexual lifestyle for over 75% of gay men is all about sexual encounters, hundreds of them.  How does that affect hygiene in the military? 

  • Over 70% of all AIDS diagnoses in Canada in adults over the age of 15 up to June 2004 were in homosexual men (13,019 out of 19,238). 60% of all positive HIV tests are found in homosexual men. This contrasts with just over 15% of all positive HIV tests which are due to heterosexual contact. (Public Health Agency of Canada. HIV and AIDS in Canada. November 2004).

  • Dramatic increases in syphilis in many large cities such as Los Angeles, San Francisco, but also in London and Manchester, UK are in the majority observed in homosexual men. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Trends in primary and secondary syphilis and HIV infections in men who have sex with men. MMWR 2004; 53: 575-8. and Nicoll A. Are trends in HIV, gonorrhea, and syphilis worsening in Western Europe? BMJ 2002; 324:1324-7.)

  • According to "Gay author Gabriel Rotello the perspective of many gays that "Gay liberation was founded . . . on a 'sexual brotherhood of promiscuity,' and any abandonment of that promiscuity would amount to a 'communal betrayal of gargantuan proportions.'" This reinforces my point earlier concerning their demand for equal sexual rights and the glut of court cases that would result in any attempt to limit what to them is "Natural Human Behavior."

    4063262640?profile=originalFinally, I know that its passé to remind anyone of moral standards, but morals are no small part of the argument.  What liberals in America have forgotten is that those of us who hold Judeo Christian values are the norm and that dissenting voices, pushing homosexuality, are the contrarians.

 We, as traditional Christian America, have rights too.  The left does not have a right to inflict their religion of liberal one world humanistic theology on us. Their religion is humanism and their theology, which sees intellect as Divine Spark, is anathema to millions of Americans who hold a Judeo Christian understanding of life.  The left tells us that we have no right to force our religion and morality on them, but they have no problem erasing over four centuries of Judeo Christian heritage and morality on this continent and imposing their vulgar religion of humanistic licentiousness on us.

Every belief system is religious by its very nature.  It determines both the course and correction of a society.   History is replete with nations which have traded Christianity for the humanistic religion of the left and history is replete with the stories of failure, collapse and finally the replacement of freedom with the despotism of Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler.

4063262566?profile=originalSo what will it be America the religion of Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank, who has really gotten behind the repeal of DADT, or the religion of our Creator who saw our forefathers through the impossible victory over the invincible British Empire?  Was their confidence in themselves or their military prowess?  Hardly!  Their faith was this:  “With a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence." 

Nor did our founders believe that humanism could lead a nation.  "Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."  John Adams          

Will the law of the Creator, whose Triune God-head our fathers celebrated in the creation of a tripartite government, be our guide or will we desert that safe harbor for the humanistic worship of intellect and power preached Marx, Lenin, and the American Left? 

Unfortunately, what most Americans don't realize is that the religion of George Soros and his ilk, and their minions like Barrack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid, is the religion of power.  Their goal is not to raise up America to a new enlightenment.  Their agenda is to collapse America and level the playing field with the rest of the world. They believe that our power and influence is what stands in the way of their NWO.  Their constant piling on of debt to the nation isn't about doing good for the poor, it is about caving in the economy causing panic and confusion, from which only they will be able to lead us to safety.  The goal is always destruction that they might rebuild the world in their image of what it should be and under their wise leadership. 

Finally, if they are to be successful in their quest to build this New World Order, the strategy has to include the control of every aspects of society.  Among these are the economy, the media, education, government, the courts, and the military.  One of the remaining two obstacles is the media the other is control of the military. 

General degradation of the military can be accomplished through the appointment of socialist generals by a lackey of the NWO, which Mr. Obama (despite the constitutional restriction under Article 1 Section 8 which reserves to the states the appointment of general officers) has already done.  The other is to generally degrade the capability of the military.  That, my friends, is the real purpose of the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell.  This move alone will do more to disrupt the military than any other single move that could have been made. 

4063262579?profile=originalSure, we have fought endless wars to tax our military, extended them beyond human endurance, and created impossible rules of engagement for them to follow. But, our soldiers are the best in the world.  And despite these brutish tactics they have stood tall and exceeded even these draconian demands placed upon them.  They are nothing short of heroic.  But injecting the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell into the military is akin to inserting a computer virus into a hard drive.  It begins chipping away at programs and the registry and then begins causing such chaos as to make the device unusable.  For the military, that virus is Don't Ask Don't Tell.   Through disease, social disruption, breakdown of military order, legal chaos, and the destruction of morale, this may well do what no Fabian bureaucrat or no army in the world can do ... beat the American military.

So, now that our weak kneed politicians have gotten all mushy and politically correct on the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, think about the ramifications and the unintended consequences (or perhaps more properly, intended consequences) of what we are doing and the potentially catastrophic cause and effect this repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell will have on the defenses of America. 

Read more…

We Just Don't Need All That "Damned" Cussing

I have to tell you, I love Glenn Beck.  His creative energy is undoubtedly the envy of "talkers" everywhere.  He is a machine - he just never quits. 

So, it was with great anticipation that I tuned in to watch his show on the 15th of December to hear him live from Wilmington, Ohio.  The first show was really good.  It was touching to see him offer the gift of hearing to that little boy.  Wow, what a moment. To say I was moved would be an understatement. 

Glennpointing.jpg?width=112Unfortunately, he was unable to broadcast the second show. Apparently, there were technical problems that killed the live stream to Insider Extreme members.  No problem.  I'll look at it on demand tomorrow, which is what their posting said would happen.  However, the technical Grench stole that as well and the stream was delayed again.  But then we heard the news from the Judge who was guest hosting for Glenn that the show would be aired Friday night.  Great, I'll catch it then. 

As Friday night rolled around we gathered around the TV to watch Glenn.  The program was ok.  It was not the "home run" the first live hour had been, but that is not the purpose of this opine.  I am writing because I was disappointed with Glenn's language.  I had to wonder where all that cussing came from. 

MurphyTheatre.jpg?width=186After all, when something is billed as a Christmas show, one has a responsibility to make sure that the program and its language is appropriate for all ages.  I know Glenn tries really hard to both share information and entertain the crowd.  But to his credit, Glenn had already done his radio program, signed books, greeted people for hours, prepped his staff, done the first hour live, and then came out to a hot theater in a heavy Santa suit.  He was probably exhausted, the rhythm just wasn't there, and old habits just appeared.  That being said, I still believe that "cussin up a bluestreak" isn't the appropriate.  

But again, to put this in perspective, Glenn Beck is probably the hardest working, most creative person in media. I enjoy Glenn Beck and will continue to enjoy his programs as much as ever. 

And perhaps this is a good reminder to all of us that none of us is perfect save One.  And maybe this is the perfect time of year to remember that.  Maybe this is also the perfect time to remember that while Glenn is pretty good at telling us what is about to happen next, I know of another source that is even better than Glenn ... the Bible.  Want to know just how good it is?  Go to Isaiah, Chapter nine, beginning at verse six and continue through verse seven:

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.  Of the increase of [his] government and peace [there shall be] no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even forever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

 

Manger.jpg?width=208Seven hundred years before the birth of the Messiah, the prophet Isaiah said that blessed event would come to pass.  He prophesied that this Messiah would be from the house and lineage of David and that he would establish His justice forever.  Isaiah said that the “zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.” 

So while we enjoy and are informed and animated by Glenn's passion for the truth, we need to remember who we are, and whose we are; and that when it is all said and done, there is only one Truth.  May the zeal of the LORD bring to pass in you not just the knowledge of the Savior's birth, but even in these difficult and turbulent times, the peace that comes with the understanding that soon righteous government will return to this earth. 

It is indeed overwhelming to think that Yeshua, the Creator of all things would humble Himself to the birth of a peasant, that we might be kings and priests forever with Him;  and that from that rude, cold, and dark manger the world would find life, light and finally peace that passes all understanding that brings joyous hope to an otherwise sad and broken humanity. 

How great is our salvation … How great is our God … How sure is the hope of those whose God is the Lord!

 

Read more…

Entitlement

Entitlement: giving someone the right to a privilege others don’t receive, like health care. Millionaires are receiving taxpayer financed health care on the notion that said millionaires are buying insurance with their FICA tax. The government claims that forcing people to buy health care insurance is the same as tax. A federal judge has ruled that government can’t call health insurance tax.  What about the  Federal Insurance Contributions Act, known as FICA tax?  The Supreme Court ruled that Roosevelt’s Social Security tax could not be called insurance.  It had to be called welfare.  During World War II federal withholding tax was called Victory Tax.

 

The grandfather of government entitlement, Franklin D. Roosevelt, admitted that government entitlement was not written in the Constitution, but that government had the duty to keep people from starving with individual grants in aid.  There is no comparison in giving people able to care for their own needs grants in aid. Politicians use government entitlement as their means of buying votes. Government entitlement has proven to be unaffordable.  It is welfare and only those who are unable to care for their own needs, as determined by a qualified professional, under the Constitution, according to court ruling, are qualified to receive taxpayer money.  For the sake of America’s children, government entitlements must be phased out.  Don’t expect politicians to act in our best interests.  It will take a grassroots movement.

 

Without government entitlements, many of our current problems would be solved.  People illegally in the United States would not be living on the taxpayers backs.  Before government entitled health care the cost of health care was a small fraction of today’s cost.  Before government entitlement, nobody but the rich paid any tax on their incomes. It took only one breadwinner.   Without government entitlement, the number of government workers would be a fraction of today’s number, and as well in the private sector.  All of those people would be employed making goods or providing services for us.  The economy would soar.

 

Government entitlement is strictly for government. It is unconstitutional.  The courts have ruled against it. Do your kids a favor. Get rid of government entitlement.  

 

In Knockout, Suzanne Somers asks how you heal a damaged soul.  Hers was damaged by the brutal treatment she got in a hospital.  She maintains that hospitals are not safe.

 

Our bodies are the temples of our souls, left to us to protect, which is not what government entitlement does.  It’s the cookie cutter approach.  Somers says understand the past to understand the future. In Knockout, you will find that anyone trying to get out of the establishment box is intimidated, the same as I was when I challenged the IRS.

 

Somers had breast cancer. She was offered a chemotherapy treatment that was known to be ineffective 92 percent of the time. Knowing that, she turned it down.  There is a way of testing the effectiveness of chemo drugs.  But it requires the doctor to spend his time on the individual. Chemotherapy is mass production.  Oncologists are not interested individualization. Ever since government got in the health care act, the individual has been getting less and less care for more and more cost. Big bucks sets the course.  That’s government for you.

 

Politicians can’t be concerned about individual needs.  The income tax and redistribution is the cookie cutter approach.  What did Jesus do about the problem?  He turned over the money changers tables.  The Tea Party is the answer, individuals turning the tables on politicians.  

Read more…