ACTION

All Posts (28896)

Sort by

How to aid Trump and begin taking back our stolen rights.

Posted by The Tradesman on December 12, 2024 at 3:47pm

How to aid Trump and begin taking back our stolen rights.

SAVE for the 2026 - 2028 Elections;

Here is a way to bypass the corrupt and progressive owned media. It would cost about $30.00 per person, more or less depending on how many postcards you would send out in your district. 
The way is to write a simple but verifiable message on a regular prepaid postcard, with the message tailored to the Districts where the Progressives are going to be stumping to get re-elected. 
Simply set up a small but damning list of 3 or 4 critical issues where the Incumbent Democrat or RINO candidate has betrayed the public trust they are supposed to be representing, and end with the comment "Are you sure you you want to allow this to continue?" 
All postcards should be sent out about a week amnd a half before the Primary Elections, with a suggestion for a fully vetted challenger candidate in the case of RINO's, and a fully vetted write in candidate for the Progressive Democrats. 
The next wave of postcards should be sent out a week before the Regular election, with the vetted candidates promoted who are challenging the Incumbents. 
Do Not send write ins against the RINO's who made it through the primary process as that would split the vote.  
These postcards should have as the final line on them; Please tell all of your friends about this and/or send some postcards out to them as well.
 
Sample Format for main elections in 2028;
Postcard 1,
RepSen X voted for bill Y that's cost the people their rights.
(EXAMPLE);
Rep/Sen x voted against Picture ID for voting.
Rep/Sen x voted against Election Reform measures that would eliminate voter fraud.
Tailor the cards to what the most controversial issues are at the time for the Primaries
Rep/Sen x voted against the peoples wishes on bad Gun Control that will take away Constitutional Rights and make people easier victims.
Sen x voted against protecting the borders.
Rep/Sen x voted for Green Energy Production, GreenBatteries etc. that produces up to 10 to 20 times the pollution as conventional sources, and 100 times the toxic poisons in the disposal of used up elements.
 
Postcard 2 for All Primaries in 2026 - 2028;
(Example);
Rep/Sen x voted for a spending bill that lifted the debt ceiling and will cost the taxpayers an unknown amount more in taxes.
Rep/Sen x voted for a bill that gives Trans right to use any bathroom or play on any team.
Rep/Sen x voted for forced vaccinations.
 
List the most outrageous transgressions the official has done on these cards!!!
 
Of course the samples will have to be researched and tailored specifically for every State and every District to have valid information contained within them. the Progressives will not be able to discredit actual facts and figures in their controlled media at that late a date. Imagine if just 2% of the conservatives at large, did this, and of that sending another 2% of those who received it passed the information on, and so on and so on.
 
Read more…

Ramblings on the 14th Amendment

Posted by The Tradesman on December 12, 2024 at 2:22pm

14th Amendment are you Pro or Con and why?

part 1

I believe the 14th Amendment and the way it was forced on the Southern states basically at gun point by Congress citing they had to ratify it to again be recognized in the Congress, was the beginning of the end for States Rights. Don't forget the Civil War was originally fought over the question of States Rights, and not over slavery.
 
 
  • Here's something I found that explains my position even better than I could; Part 1
    The problem with the 14th Amendment is the premise under it that imply's; "WE ARE ALL U.S. citizens, under the 14th amendment. There are NO STATE Citizens." That, and that alone gives the Federal Government the FALSE and UNENUMERATED authority to do what they want. Given the Language of the Constitution and the meanings that prevailed then, that statement can not be construed as a legally valid statement! 
    Strictly speaking the 14th Amendment was the one that Quietly took away states Rights and was Unconstitutionally passed. 
    The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution should be held ineffective, invalid, and unconstitutional for the following reasons:
    1. The Joint Resolution proposing said amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a Constitutional Congress per Article I, Section 3, and Article V of the U. S. Constitution.
    2. The Joint Resolution was not submitted to the President for his approval as required by Article I, Section 7 of the U. S. Constitution.
    3. The proposed 14th Amendment was rejected by more than one-fourth of all the States then in the Union, and it was never ratified by three-fourths of all the States in the Union as required by Article V of the U. S. Constitution. The federal courts are not ready to give consideration to the subject, because the U. S. Supreme Court and inferior courts have used the the 14th Amendment to enlarge upon their ungranted powers without limit or reserve. To read a complete treatise on this and on the most comprehensive research and documentation of every angle in the unlawful procedures, check out this link;http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html it's a long but informative read.

    Consider this about the flawed ratification of the 14th amendment as the most critical points cited in the article;
    A) New Jersey was disenfranchised in the Senate by having its lawfully elected Senator accepted, and then rejected, and without a 2/3rds vote;
    B) Oregon's faulty ratification vote with unlawful state legislators being allowed to cast votes; and the lawfully constituted state legislature then rejecting the Fourteenth, but too late.
    C) Non-republican [Reconstruction] governments of the southern States imposed by military force and fiat, cannot ratify anything. Either the Fourteenth is legal and the anti-slavery amendment is not, or the anti-slavery amendment is legal and the Fourteenth is not. 

    Article I, Section 7 of the United States Constitution provides two things; Every bill which shall have been passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United States Congress, AND:
    "Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him shall be re-passed by two-thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill." 
    The Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite9 ) was never presented to the President of the United States for his approval, as President Andrew Johnson stated in his message on June 22, 1866 (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite9 ). 
    Therefore, the Joint Resolution did not take effect.

    It may be helpful to know that the 14th amendment proclamations of July 20, 1868, (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite51 ), and July 28, 1868, (http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html#cite53), were issued as Presidential Executive Orders.

    Presidential Executive Order No. 6 **, issued July 20, 1868. Ratification of the 14th Amendment certified as valid, provided the consent of Ohio and New Jersey be deemed as remaining in force despite subsequent withdrawal. **Signed by William H. Seward, Secretary of State. Has the form of a proclamation.

    Presidential Executive Order No. 7 **, issued July 28, 1868. 14th Amendment certified as in effect and ordered published. **Signed by William H. Seward, Secretary of State.

    From Presidential Executive Order Title List -- Presidential Executive Orders, 2 vols. (N.Y.: Books, Inc., 1944 Copyright by Mayor of N.Y. 1944), vol. 1, pp. 1-2.

    In this light the 14th (amendment), which has perplexed many, is an Executive Order, not an (Article) of Amendment to the Constitution of the united States of America, albeit a statute and so remains an Executive Order.
    ( above information is from barefootsworld.net research pages and reposted here for general information and education on the subject).

    Another challenge to the Article V Constitutionality of the Ratification of the 14th Amendment under it's requirements is that it only permits Congress to propose amendments whenever two thirds of both houses deem it necessary. that can and should be considered as two thirds of both houses as they were constituted before the forcible ejections caused by Reconstruction laws. Add to that, Congress violated Constitutional Requirements by depriving the Southern States of their equal suffrage in the Senate (The provision is; " no State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate." )and there are no exceptions to that in the article one's Constitutional Language, therefore it was forbidden for the then 'fragmentary congress' to do that. In fact the plain language within the Article is incontrovertible and not open to interpretation. It is not in the purview of Courts, or the Legislative bodies of either Federal or State governments to alter the fixed Constitutional methods of proper legal ratification of an Amendment.

    Neither you, nor a court, nor a legislative body, can raise an illegally proposed or illegally ratified amendment to the force of legal authority as part and parcel of the constitution if it is not legally ratified by any of the methods required by Article V. There is no such thing as an Amendment by congressional waiver, nor by Laches ( failure to do something at the proper time, especially such delay that will bar a party from bringing a legal proceeding). Congress cannot acquiesce an amendment into being, in fact you cannot give an amendment power by any means but the specific means set down in Article V of the Constitution.

     
    Part 2;
    When the mandatory provisions of the Constitution are violated, the Constitution itself strikes with nullity the Act that did violence to its provisions. Thus, the Constitution strikes with nullity the purported 14th Amendment.
    The Courts, bound by oath to support the Constitution, should review all of the evidence herein submitted and measure the facts proving violations of the mandatory provisions of the Constitution with Article V, and finally render judgment declaring said purported amendment never to have been adopted as required by the Constitution.
    The Constitution makes it the sworn duty of the judges to uphold the Constitution which strikes with nullity the 14th Amendment.
    And, as Chief Justice Marshall pointed out for a unanimous Court in Marbury v. Madison (1 Cranch 136 at 179):
    "The framers of the constitution contemplated the instrument as a rule for the government of courts, as well as of the legislature."
    "Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government?"
    "If such be the real state of things, that is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime."
    "Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."
    The federal courts actually refuse to hear argument on the invalidity of the 14th Amendment, even when the issue is presented squarely by the pleadings and the evidence as above.
    Only an aroused public sentiment in favor of preserving the Constitution and our institutions and freedoms under constitutional government, and the future security of our country, will break the political barrier which now prevents judicial consideration of the unconstitutionality of the 14th Amendment.
    A background on the 14th including the intent as stated by Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th and was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan. 
    ( http://www.14thamendment.us/amendment/14th_amendment.html ) What are your views? Should it be "Repealed", or should "the Supreme Courts added intent of birthright citizenship for a child having "Foreign National Parents illegally in this country", by the highly Liberal Earl Warren Court be removed from it?" 

    The Tradesman
Read more…

THE TRULY REGRETABLE RISE OF RIGHT WING WOKEISM ! ! !

Posted by RICHARD SANDERS on December 10, 2024 at 10:57am

The greatness of the American myth is that it is mostly real. Enough of the faux-conservatives, these woke rightists, judging America as not worth saving and smearing our heroes as tyrants or war criminals.

 

 

Read more…

AN EYE TOWARD SUSTENANCE

Posted by RICHARD SANDERS on December 10, 2024 at 8:21am

So if the "OLD GUARD" & NEWER R.I.N.O.S. and "NEO-COMMUNISTS" WOULD EMPLOY ANYTHING TO DESTROY CONSERVATIVE PATRIOTIC AMERICANS, IT'S A GOOD BET THAT THEY WOULD STARVE YOU TO DEATH....SO DO CONSIDER COMPANIES THAT SUPPLY TREEZE DRIED FOOD TO SUPPLEMENT YOUR LARDER. AMONG THEM ARE- - -  https://www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/mountain-house-essential-assortment-bucket-food-supply?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=PLA-High%20Margin-PMax&msclkid=dab02995206511234f794ecd7927846d&sku_id=10148276                        https://www.ebay.com/itm/275855178762?chn=ps&_trkparms=ispr%3D1&amdata=enc%3A17asOrPi-RA6pqL-Hp2HlHg42&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-213727-13078-0&mkcid=2&itemid=275855178762&targetid=4580771614098653&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=&poi=&campaignid=603247547&mkgroupid=1234752552191001&rlsatarget=pla-4580771614098653&abcId=9316119&merchantid=51291&msclkid=b6ecd64823d717b333fab1107a955b76                                                                                                  https://www.mypatriotsupply.com/products/4-week-emergency-food-supply-2-000-calories-day?variant=32174109098077&country=US&currency=USD&utm_medium=product_sync&utm_source=bing&utm_content=sag_organic&utm_campaign=sag_organic&g_productid=shopify_US_4602505789533_32174109098077&g_locphysical=&g_locinterest=&g_campaign=account&g_keywordid=pla-4585100935145471&g_ifcreative=&g_source={sourceid}&g_adtype=&g_ifproduct=&g_merchantid=72084&g_adgroupid=1304021944635240&g_campaignid=470376136&g_network=o&g_keyword=&g_adid=&g_acctid=738-967-2590&g_productchannel=Online&g_partition=4585100935145471&g_placement=&b_campaign=BLP%20%7C%20Shopping%20%7C%20Top%20Revenue%20Products&b_campaignid=470376136&b_term=default&b_productid=shopify_US_4602505789533_32174109098077&b_adgroup=Food%20Kits&b_adgroupid=1304021944635240&b_adid=81501427411630&b_termid=pla-4585100935145471&b_isproduct=product&msclkid=fd65d4189c04108b5483b340c607f39c&utm_term=4585100935145471                                                                         MY WIFE BELIEVES NOTHING IN AMERICA WILL CHANGE INCLUDING YOUR SUPERMARKETS. i THINK "THE NORMALCY SYNDROME" IS A BAD DISEASE---MAYBE LETHAL ....

Read more…

God and American Beliefs

Posted by The Tradesman on December 10, 2024 at 7:28am

God and American Beliefs

The only way to save America and it's traditional values.

I fail to see why certain liberal people get so upset when anyone talks about or even says they believe in God. They seem to get even more upset when anyone talks about Jesus as their Savior and Redeemer. The true Marxist/Socialists are non-believers, and they want to impose their lack of belief on everyone else. They want that because they want to be considered the highest power anywhere. America over the last two or three decades, has been slipping into the idea that there is no God, and, the Ten Commandments are mythological/antique artifacts whose time has past.

I personally believe there is a Supreme Being. A being that our small minds can not understand. We universely call that being GOD. We use analogies to try and comprehend what the being we call GOD is. That's why we have so many diverse religions. The divisions between Religions, and how they view God, and in their rituals to honor God. That causes much friction. 
It's strange because every Religion considers there is only one true God. So, in actuality we who revere and honor God, are all praying to and trying to please the same Supreme Being.

In general, all the major religions, have some form of the 10 commandments as an integral part of their belief system. The non-believers also have a system that mimics, but does not work as well as the moral lessons of the Ten Commandments. Commandments we used to try to incorporate into, and practice in our society.

When you look at it from a civilization viewpoint, you see the Ten Commandments are the most concise ground rules for a workable human society, bar none. They work! The concepts behind them work. They stop abuse and excessive behavior on moral grounds. They teach Honesty and Integrity. They also teach honor. Our Societies adherence to them in spirit and fact, offers a benevolent moral and spiritual society.  What's wrong with that? 

At one time America was a stalwart Christian Nation. Believing in God, and keeping the Ten Commandments. Our Founders were mostly all Christian, or saw the impact to our fledgling nation as benefiting from the moral and social foundation that Christian morality provided. They also saw the need to keep the spiritual aspect incorporated in creating our laws, but not writing Christian Religious Dogma into law. Therefore they wrote into law, a seperation of church and state. This did not mean the United States would be godless, it meant the United States would not have a sanctioned formal State Religion like England had.

The watershed moment when rejection of our traditional values manifested publicly, was with the Madalyn Murray O'hare ruling. The ruling where the extremely liberal/left Supreme Court of Chief Justice Earl Warren, took God out of schools, and the purge of God from Federal, State, and Local government began. That was the beginning of what some say immoral, and what some say Godless, decisions of courts and law makers began. It won't end until America takes God back into the process and returns to 'letting but not forcing' God back in schools and other government functions, then using the Ten Commandments as moral guidelines for laws and regulations we live by.
Read more…

We Must Reform or Lose

Posted by The Tradesman on December 10, 2024 at 7:20am

 

We Must Reform or Lose

Today, we need to re-evaluate our position on what this country needs to do, to reform itself back to the original intent of the Founders. The Founding Principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence, were categorized in the creation of the Constitution. Though it was a wonder in it's time, it still had many problems then, as it does now. That is the reason the Founders included Article-V. 

Just as the authority was given by act of Congress to revise the Articles of the Confederation of the Perpetual Union, it also gave a One Time Authorization, to the delegates of what became the Constitutional Convention. Article-V gives the Congress, and also the people through their States, the rights to amend, not the wording of the Constitution, but the way the Justice System interprets the intent of that wording. On how to apply Constitutional Law to every law, regulation, or practice. 

Article-V allows Federal Legislators authority to correct any problem the changing times creates. It also gives the people the 'Supreme Authority' to overrule their own government. So far our government, through the actions of Congress, has modified the intent of the Constitution 27 times. 

There have been approximately 11,000 other Amendments proposed and never ratified by the people into law. Affirming the people as the highest authority in the land, they have the final say on how they will govern themselves. 
(https://constitutionus.com/constitution/amendments/constitutional-amendments/) It is what keeps our Representatives from becoming our Overlords and Task Masters.

We have all seen how the Government has incrementally but consistently moved forward inserting itself as the ruler in our lives, instead of it's proper designated role as our servant.

We have seen how President Trump tried to reform the Federal Government. Likewise we have also seen how quick the embedded elements who created the usurpation of the peoples legitimate power, changed them back by edict or executive order. We can no longer allow that to happen. We can no longer believe our Federal Government will act in our best interests instead of their own.

The only way to take back our rightful authority is through the Amendment Process. The process is so lengthy and complicated to make it hard to change the interpretation of the Constitution for trivial reasons, and acts as a check and balance. The Congress has the authority to create laws, but those laws are constrained by Constitutional Limitations. The limitations are the checks and balances on Congressional law making powers.

Congress has seen fit to create all of the 27 amendments/changes interpreting the Constitution, since the Constitution was originally ratified. Strangely enough, the people through their States, have not had an amendment convention to propose/repeal amendments. In fact this action has been discouraged by many politically active naysayers over the years. If the people finally did Demand and Get a proposal convention, the main losers would be the Congressional powers taken from the people by some of the Congressionally proposed Amendments. 

As an example; The 17th Amendment gave people the right to vote for Senators. Until then, the Senators by Constitutional Law, were appointed Representatives of their respective States Legislatures under the Sherman Compromise, to insure Equal Representation in Congress, of every State in America regardless of it's population and size. Since the 17th was ratified, the Senators have devolved into representatives of their political parties and party agendas, instead of representing the People or the States in Congress to Congress.
My position is, this Amendment should be repealed like the 18th was repealed.

Another amendment which would benefit the people and their States, would be to get a term limit amendment ratified that included: 
Pay to be voted on by the people instead of allowing Congress to just give themselves a raise. 

Retirement and healthcare packages for Congress to be the same as given to the people by Social Security/Medicare, but not to disallow any private packages personally paid for by the individual, but independent from Government funds. 

Modifying the 14th amendment due process clause to forbid Anchor Babies. 
Preventing Congress from giving funds from social/welfare programs,et.al.to any illegal alien/s 

Eliminating the Federal Reserve and return money creation back to the Treasury under the original Tresury rules and regulations. All laws rules and regulations to be written in common language understood by average Americans. 

Allowing the Legal American Citizen Voters to overturn any law or ruling by a 70% vote against it in a scheduled or special election. 

Plus any more proposals the people may want to see. 

Those posibilities are why a States called Convention, is the greatest fear of the hidebound politician or political party. They would lose their say in how we decided to govern ourselves, and turn back into mere representatives of our wishes.

To preserve the Union, we must demand our State Legislatures petition Congress for an Article-V convention.
 
Read more…