Have you seen the news about the Sudan refusing to let us increase the Marine presence at the Embassy there? It's only a company sized unit. On second thought, a company of armed Marines could probably defeat the entire Sudanese army, clean out the Islamists and take over the country. I can understand their concern.
On the other hand, any country is within their international rights to provide protection for diplomatic sites and personnel irrespective of the wishes of the host country. Since the Sudan has proven their inability (or unwillingness) to get the job done, I think a company of Marines is a conservative response. I would rather see a regiment on the ground. If Sudan continues to be a collective butthole, give the Marines diplomatic passports. That way, they and their kits cannot be detained or confiscated. Diplomatic immunity, pure and simple. As for rules of engagement: if they are threatened, use whatever force level necessary to protect the embassy and the diplomatic staff. If this means bodies in the streets, so be it. Violence is the language of the caliphate. Bloodshed is the voice of reason in these countries. Death is not only accepted, but yearned for. I say accommodate them......
Comments