The reader may not like Rajjpuut's line of reasoning . . . but here goes . . . let's look at the "Guardians of the Free Republics" story . . . .
However, like so many stories involving, Progressive Democrats, unions, and would-be marxists . . . unfortunately, a bit of a pre-amble is necessary. In this case three pre-ambles.
A. Faithful readers of Rajjpuut have come across the names Cloward and Piven and Alinsky often in the past. Cloward-Piven strategy should be understood by every patriotic American as well as its connection to the deliberate welfare overload and subsequent bankruptcy of New York City in 1975 (as its practicioners bragged and proudly published). ACORN's role in creating the sub-prime lending crisis has not been reported by the lamestream media, but it also was a Cloward-Piven attempt to overload the system (in this case, to abuse three ill-considered and faulty mortgage-guarantee laws) and to set up a hoped for groundswell for a socialist/marxist movement.
Cloward and Piven were disciples of Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky in his infamous "Rules for Radicals" loved to preach about the value of "misdirection." For example, this week in Nevada union folks and a well-known Democratic leader*** supporting Harry Reid first tried to misdirect buses of TEA Partiers going to a rally and then threw eggs at the TEA Party buses and then blamed the journalist covering the story for FOX news (of course, it was all on videotape and their "Alinsky Misdirects" didn't work) when a policeman came by. Less well-known is that the TEA Party got accused of racism and spitting on members of congress (neither charge proved) without documentary evidence and all the mainstream-lamestream media who have been talking about "the potential for violence" from these "splinter groups of extremists," ran with the story without video or audio footage as if it were real. This is literally straight out of the radical playbook.
Cloward and Piven were disciples of Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky in his infamous "Rules for Radicals" loved to preach about the value of "misdirection." For example, this week in Nevada union folks and a well-known Democratic leader*** supporting Harry Reid first tried to misdirect buses of TEA Partiers going to a rally and then threw eggs at the TEA Party buses and then blamed the journalist covering the story for FOX news (of course, it was all on videotape and their "Alinsky Misdirects" didn't work) when a policeman came by. Less well-known is that the TEA Party got accused of racism and spitting on members of congress (neither charge proved) without documentary evidence and all the mainstream-lamestream media who have been talking about "the potential for violence" from these "splinter groups of extremists," ran with the story without video or audio footage as if it were real. This is literally straight out of the radical playbook.
B. The greatest legacy of such dirty tricks comes from a progressive Republican named Richard Nixon and before him a fellow who blew up a building in Berlin and blamed it on Communists: Adolf Hitler. So its been used by unscrupulous people from all over the political spectrum.
C. Often times the greatest benefit from the dirty tricksters lies in the "natural" tendency to respond by the victims of the dirty tricks. Looking at Gandhi's and Martin Luther King's experiences with non-violent protests, the authorities confronted all too often were all too willing to provoke violence from the protestors so that they might have a "reasonable" opportunity to counter with a truly heavy-handed retaliation. OK, back to the mystery of the "Guardians of the Free Republics" . . . .
The general truths when following any mystery is "follow the money" and "locate the beneficiaries" (and beneficiaries can benefit by power, fame, elimination of obstacles or other boons rather than just merely from money ) . . . In light of the big media to-do about this mysterious group calling themselves “Guardians of the Free Republics” who recently sent out letters apparently to ALL the state governors asking them to resign in three days or “be removed,” Ol’ Rajjpuut made an excursion to: http://guardiansofthefreerepublics.com
Where he was treated to a rather arrogant display with this message:
"Private web site under non-corporate venue.
This seal conveys immunity from public scrutiny, discretion, regulation or trespass.
Trespassers beware.
Co-claimant fee applies to impairment"
And a big red "Accept" button . . . .
Immediately the question, "Who's been talking about controlling the internet recently anyway?" (the Democrats) and the words "Horsecrap" and “Bullfeces” popped into the Ol’ boy’s brain. Since the only way to proceed was to click on "accept" and not understanding the legal mumbo-jumbo from a free unpassword protected internet domain that was talking about “tresspassers,” Rajjpuut hit the “Accept” button. But here again, more pretension. You have to hold down control and hit “Accept” simultaneously. Those little “Twilight Zone” sounds began to sputter in Rajjpuut’s tortured brain.
Another pretentious screen pops up. In the first paragraph . . . reference was made to “a bold achievable plan” (with "achievable" underlined) to “reconstruct the de jure instruments of government” which Rajjpuut in his plain-talking way responded to with the plainspeak comment “more Bullfeces” and interpreted to mean that they were saying they had a plan to replace the current government. OH, Yeah! What exactly are they smoking? Who exactly are they? Why this pretension? Why the secrecy and unspoken threats in their letters to the governors? Who would benefit if this farcicial group is made to appear real and violence against governors does occur (Many of the states are now suing the federal government and acting like the TEA Party goal of Constitutionality and fiscal-conservativism are their goals too . . . If an excuse for martial law occurs, Barak Obama is the only one who benefits if this group is real or in the more likely case that it's a put on to win him sympathy and power), who would benefit?
Next the site claimed that “After consultation with high ranking members of the United States armed forces, the Plan is in the process of assembling the Guardians of the Free Republics and reinhabiting the De jure Grand Juries to: . . . . with a list of 26 rather pretentious and megalomaniacal aims (considering that the site is anonymous and almost certainly has not talked with anybody of consequence in the military) some of which sound good to conservatives and most of which sound like something some 60’s hippy dreamed up after an encounter with a lot of bad mushrooms. This was followed by a link “for media inquiries only.”
Next the site claimed that “After consultation with high ranking members of the United States armed forces, the Plan is in the process of assembling the Guardians of the Free Republics and reinhabiting the De jure Grand Juries to: . . . . with a list of 26 rather pretentious and megalomaniacal aims (considering that the site is anonymous and almost certainly has not talked with anybody of consequence in the military) some of which sound good to conservatives and most of which sound like something some 60’s hippy dreamed up after an encounter with a lot of bad mushrooms. This was followed by a link “for media inquiries only.”
Rajjpuut’s immediate feeling was this was something Barak Obama or his supporters cooked up to make conservatives sound like a-holes and take some of the sting away from the grassroots uprisings in favor of honoring the Constitution and returning the country to fiscal-conservativism. In short a way to win back the sentiment of the voters for Democrats they now distrusted. By the way, the persons trying to bankrupt the states with Obamacare are not TEA Party members but rather Barak Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and 59 Democrats in the senate and 219 in the House of Representatives. And only they would benefit if the individual states or their governors were attacked and Obama could institute martial law as a result. Without 50 individual centers of government complaining about federal abuse a single country called "America" under Obama's rule is a marxist dream . . . none of that messy states' and individuals' rights to have to deal with . . . .
Conclusion: The Guardians group is a joke at best. More likely Left-wingers are up to more dirty tricks to justify violence and suppression of the people’s anti-big government sentiments and anti-socialist leanings. So Rajjpuut would say, the Guardians group is a left-wing imitation of Richard Nixon's Dirty Tricks Operations created
to cast disdain upon the TEA Party. In that light, the group is very dangerous and its ultimate intent is to make Barak Obama a de facto dictator via martial law . . . can't prove it, but that's the only logical conclusion to be drawn given the not-so-surprising timing of its overnight birth into our society. AMEN!
to cast disdain upon the TEA Party. In that light, the group is very dangerous and its ultimate intent is to make Barak Obama a de facto dictator via martial law . . . can't prove it, but that's the only logical conclusion to be drawn given the not-so-surprising timing of its overnight birth into our society. AMEN!
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
*** documented with videotape @breitbart.com
Comments