All Posts (30852)

Sort by

New Law Allows Govt to Seize Children If Parents Oppose Their ‘Gender Identity’

Legislation passed by the Canadian province of Ontario has granted authorities the right to take children away from parents who refuse to accept their children’s “gender identity.” Critics of the new measure launched a petition aiming for a repeal of the “totalitarian” child abuse bill.

Out of Ontario’s 86 legislators, 63 voted in favor of Bill 89 or “The Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017” on June 1.

The legislation replaces the Child and Family Services Act which used to govern child protection, foster care and adoption services in the province.

The new law includes “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered by child protection services “in the best interests of the child.”

It deprives parents of their earlier right to “direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” (Read more from “New Law Allows Govt to Seize Children If Parents Oppose Their ‘Gender Identity'” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/new-law-allows-govt-seize-children-parents-oppose-gender

Read more…

Obama Admin. Election SCANDAL

Obama Admin. Election SCANDAL

WITHOUT EVIDENCE …

Toobin’s take … Shortly after the public testimony of James Comey ended, CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin casually dropped a bomb, without evidence. Toobin said that President Donald Trump was under criminal investigation. He is pretty much the only one saying that, and he didn’t say why he thinks that. Nothing in the Comey testimony confirmed it. Take a deeper look

Dershowitz slams pundits like Toobin … For a few weeks, liberal law professor and ardent constitutionalist Alan Dershowitz has been trying to explain that the president has the legal authority to stop any investigation. Comey reluctantly admitted as much during his testimony yesterday. Now Dershowitz is taking a victory lap of sorts and admonishing those who are pushing a false narrative.

Media won’t cover Lynch bombshell … CNN’s John King admitted that the bombshell testimony of James Comey — that Loretta Lynch allegedly intervened in the server investigation on behalf of Hillary Clinton — won’t get much coverage. King said that “this won’t get much attention because it’s in the rearview mirror …” Our friends at NewsBusters have the full story.

LIVE BY THE TWITTER, DIE BY THE TWITTER …

He thought it was manga … Vanity Fair’s Kurt Eichenwald got caught with his cyber pants down. When he tweeted a photo including a browser tab with “hentai” on it, instead of coming clean, he chose to blame his kids. His story was that he was merely trying to show his wife that people look at deviant things with tentacles, and he did it for his kids because their mom wouldn’t believe them. Sometimes it is best to stop digging, Kurt.

It couldn’t be the Obama administration … NYT editor Jonathan Weisman tweeted out that “Comey says Attorney General Sessions told him not to call Russia probe an investigation but a ‘matter.’ Led him to step away from DOJ.” Which is completely opposite to what Comey actually said. It was Loretta Lynch who told Comey to call the Clinton server investigation a “matter.” Another instance of the media acting “without evidence.”

Marc Ambinder not much better … Former White House correspondent and current Annenberg Media fellow Marc Ambinder tweeted about the Lynch admission. But he left out a lot of detail. Here’s the tweet where he said, “The AG asked him to call it a ‘matter,’ not an investigation.” Um … Marc, which AG, and which matter?

All the news fit to tweet … I know you were breathlessly wanting to know if Trump broke his own record for not tweeting. Well, probably not. But the Washington Post’s Philip Bump thought you wanted to know, so he tweeted it. I’ll let you go straight to the record by clicking to see Bump’s tweet. File under “yawn.”

(For more from the author of “Obama Admin. Election SCANDAL” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/obama-admin-election-scandal/

Read more…

Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
YouTube Banned Me, But Not the Hate Imams
by Michelle Malkin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Paris Climate Accord Pollaganda 
NirV4TbCiU9gL39b7v7mFpMc0qNLcuqSA_JbKv8jDrUoD8IBL5upCkPAkhsUyFJIxwRhXoN85F0l5tY6xC0DYahyCiL3GvSnfnPotoqLrsGkV-rNvIMAEdzNxUmoujk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Plastered among this week’s headlines (some even sporting the “Breaking News” banner) are the findings of a new poll on public opinion regarding Donald Trump’s decision to say au revoir to the Paris climate accord. A Washington Post headline emphatically declared, “Post-ABC poll: Nearly 6 in 10 oppose Trump scrapping Paris agreement.”
          According to the survey, 59% of Americans overall disagree with Trump’s decision. In contrast, a paltry 28% support it. Unsurprisingly, the majority of that support comes from Republicans, 67% of whom condone Trump’s move. Also unsurprisingly, 82% of Democrats and 63% of Independents believe the exit was wrongheaded (if not flat out apocalyptic). However, Democrats — besides having lost the climate accord battle — don’t necessarily have a lot to celebrate in this poll, for two reasons.
          First, there’s a major caveat in these numbers that reflects the Democrats' worst bane: Their failure to garner overwhelming support for their statist policy prescriptions. The fact that just 59% of Americans supposedly oppose Trump’s move actually represents a remarkable failure on the Left’s part. Why? For 30 years climate alarmists have been lecturing, pleading with and vilifying climate skeptics. And 59% support is the best they can muster?
          Of course, that’s assuming the poll is even accurate (a dubious proposition), which brings us to the second point. We define Pollaganda as “polling used to manipulate public opinion and advance a particular bias,” or “instruments designed to generate a preferential outcome.” In the minds of leftists, the Post-ABC poll shows just how “out of touch” Trump is with the majority of America. But polls — particularly Leftmedia ones — prove nothing because they are manipulated from the start.
          The next time the Post uses damning surveys to belittle Trump’s policy decisions, just remember this: Those same surveys unanimously, prematurely and wrongly predicted a blowout victory for liar-Hillary Clinton. Moreover, remember that the Paris exit is good for America (and, more importantly, the Constitution) regardless of opinions so-called experts try to extract from polls.  ~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/digests/49505
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Indiana: Muslims enraged by
billboard telling truth about Muhammad
TWYMSykRoCMZzyiJaMLtWiWStiNyk6dZ8m8VRAFO-lpzHTB8Q9YfWBX55ImTbqHnSMgd7LVcZm083pdw8DlYpstOC6qxgvstW3Ew5b8XoUA0YMtoa42CzOO5i3UnSI9HLALzNEgEpOhxtlZ2=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by ROBERT SPENCER
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Rep. Andre Carson "said he believes the billboard is untrue and that the billboard's author takes Islamic text and history out of context ‘just like al-Qaeda, ISIS and the Klan do to religious texts to justify their bigotry.'"... "Untrue" is not the same thing as "out of context," and of course the latter is the tried-and-true dodge of Islamic supremacists when presented with uncomfortable passages of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Notice also Carson's invocation of "al-Qaeda, ISIS and the Klan." Two are international jihad terror organizations that have mounted murderous jihad attacks all over the world and continue to be global threats. The other is a tiny organization of nuts that would get no notice at all were it not for its usefulness to the Leftist establishment. Carson is trying to give the impression that, as we hear so often, every religion has its "extremists," and so Islamic jihad terrorism really isn't all that unusual. "Faryal Khatri, a spokeswoman for the Indianapolis-based Islamic Society of North America, said not only is the billboard not true, it is hurtful to her as a practicing Muslim. To Khatri, the most disappointing aspect of the sign is that it could incite hate crimes toward Muslims or people perceived to be Muslim."...The billboard is true and correct. This needs to be sent to all. http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/indiana-muslims-enraged-by-billboard-telling-truth-about-muhammad?f=must_reads
.
Clapper Smears Trump To
Australia Media, Worse Than Watergate
qFOIHs0VY2CguNO7ZcwiRWFFEEy_7NoI6W0T1YRi_i7aMq2iDPyqIqlSwFk9Yglw11QjQOfKrTwMqj4B2e2Vuk1rM9w2jmekaLx1WL42a1zNWauPY00UWvtazdGvYSA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs has a few thoughts on “the latest efforts of the Dems, the left, the deep state to subvert the Trump administration... and to try to damage President Trump in any way they can with the help of the left-wing national media.” Dobbs continues, “Earlier today, deep state spymaster, former Director of National Security James Clapper was at it again. Talking his usual spook-speak that enthralls only the deadheads on Capitol Hill, Clapper, who previously has admitted there’s not a scintilla of evidence that President Trump or his campaign ever colluded with the Russians, travelled all the way to Canberra, Australia.” Dobbs explains Clapper was there, “To tell Australia’s national press club about the difference between Watergate and the concocted claims of collusion with the Russians.”... http://rickwells.us/dobbs-clapper-smears-trump-australia-media-worse-watergate/
.
Comey hearing: Ex-FBI director
talks Trump, Russia investigation
RxrWKO9fRe7u784WDBX30W2yxPYYWCejs9SEpNU9MZLVBYevCUmYbuRa_AJkeUI2DhMcGH_HcP127c-y5w16yB2ByoSYHAjnXj_C1cpLXxfHp1AxHvIgJFBmqqIt-mVhzO34wE7Kut7fwb5qYQU_r5X1T3jZPXUXbkLwilcgv55Z4xfcWJsaazc77Tg17r5rhZgZYs1ePr_0VHTFPsPyevuSpcJm=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{foxnews.com} ~ Former FBI director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intel Committee on his conversations with President Trumphttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/08/comey-hearing-ex-fbi-director-talks-trump-russia-investigation-live-blog.html
.
Trump didn't ask me to stop Russia investigation
Lynch/liar-Clinton meeting was why email probe went public
Trump didn't order me to drop Flynn probe
James Comey Admits He Leaked Information To Media
Comey Debunks NYT Report About Trump Campaign Having Repeated Contacts With Russians
.
Levin on Media’s Rehabilitation of
James Comey: ‘The Media Will Run with Anything’
OJMzjm7wamFXBeaKNdPbVyfgAlECkpl2xvhYnGTQldzTQDNG7zgj9ZgeoBx-0z_cwFGoTUbuLRullvGTuhcuVG3y5FZj0w6bb8QYRUETqVrHslcLZuPZTXt6ZcekIIPycOTcqyexMFLeK7RIEyMfIMKXvt4O0_ZifyUid6xB6MiRJQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Theresa Smith
{cnsnews.com} ~ During his nationally syndicated radio show on Tuesday, Mark Levin called out the liberal media’s inconsistency toward former FBI Director James Comey, saying, “The media will run with anything.”... “Now, the media will run with anything,” stated Mark Levin. “The media will do anything. All of a sudden, they rehabilitated James Comey.” Levin read from a story from ABC News regarding former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before congress members, which provoked Levin’s comments... http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/theresa-smith/levin-medias-rehabilitation-james-comey-media-will-run-anything?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWW1RMFpHUmtPRFpqWXpjMCIsInQiOiJDUnVmMXBMQmk5Nk
5WZ1Rxd3FteGxiMnB3VHIydFBrejVBQWNwK3g3RXhZNytWQ09WdHdvMlVXdHp
BaXNkSEVuZmpRVW13MnRlMk4wUFA2NTF5Ykl5eUZkUFFuSlhsQjg1RjhiTzU5Q
TVla05vb0s0cE43QW1rbGFKWE0rYzZBViJ9
RNC's talking points for
James Comey hearing revealed
oprELlzA2Rl6d8dJt5Ohea83Y9qhvyvghL72FDwOeNaR67lqu0OrJt80Z0PZynottewhjilU-gdTbiMkVyKSIcf0iMxV83r8YlNOhvIliysqioX7rmdumwDZVAcfoUz6Svc7N27RcMgM3JE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Washington Examiner Staff
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~
The Republican National Committee has a battle plan for former FBI Director James Comey's testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday... In talking points obtained by the Washington Examiner, the RNC offers Republicans a number of pointers including how to respond to Comey's opening statement, which was released on Wednesday. He is expected to testify at length about his private conversations with President Trump while keeping talk about the ongoing federal investigation into Russian interference relatively brief. Here's a sneak peek of the line of attack Republicans are encouraged to take Thursday:... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/rncs-talking-points-for-james-comey-hearing-revealed/article/2625307
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
YouTube Banned Me, But Not the Hate Imams
by Michelle Malkin
{truthrevolt.org} ~ One of the many maddening takeaways from the London Bridge jihad attack is this: If you post videos on YouTube radicalizing Muslim viewers to kill innocent people, YouTube will leave you alone.

But if you post a video on YouTube honoring innocent people murdered by barbaric jihadists, your video will get banned.

I know. It happened to me in 2006. Eleven years later, the selective censors at Google-YouTube still can't competently distinguish terrorist hate speech from political free speech. Islamic hate preachers such as Ahmad Musa Jibril, whose bloodthirsty rants against non-Muslims reportedly inspired the London Bridge ringleader, have flourished.

Meanwhile, other anti-jihad and conservative content creators have been throttled, flagged, demonetized and kicked off the site since the P.C. hammer first came down on me.

My two-minute clip, which I titled "First, They Came," spotlighted authors, editors, politicians, and other targets of Islamic intolerance and violence. Among those featured in the video on radical Islam's war on Western free speech: Theo van Gogh, the Dutch filmmaker murdered by jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri for his outspoken criticism of Muslim misogyny; Salman Rushdie, whom the Ayatollah Khomeini cast a fatwa upon after he published the "blasphemous" "The Satanic Verses"; Oriana Fallaci, the fiery journalist put on trial in Italy for "defaming Islam;" and the editors of the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper, who faced death threats for publishing cartoons of Mohammed, which prompted violent riots and terror plots around the world.

I contrasted the plight of those killed with the hordes of Muslim protesters in London's safe spaces fearlessly waving their signs demanding that the faithful "Behead all those who insult Islam" and "Exterminate those who slander Islam."

Several months later, YouTube yanked the innocuous, harmless, nonviolent, nonprofane, nonhateful, and nonthreatening mini-film. The company informed me that the video contained "inappropriate content." I complained across social media — posting additional YouTube videos calling attention to the ban. But "First, They Came" stayed deep-sixed on my YouTube channel. Other bloggers and video consumers tried to subvert the censors by posting the clip on their sites; it became a game of whack-a-mole as the YouTube police hunted it down.

Counterjihad activists nicknamed YouTube "JihadTube" or "Dhimmitube" to mock the censors' acquiescence to Islamist restrictions on acceptable speech by infidels — as Islamic radicalization videos festered on the site.

Three pieces in The New York Times covered my skirmish over the little video. Reporter Tom Zeller Jr. reported that YouTube had emailed him a statement suggesting that my video "violated the company's terms of service." YouTube also told the newspaper, "Our customer support team reviews all flagged videos before removing them."

The statement "specifically referred to the part of the YouTube user agreement that forbids users from submitting material that is 'unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, threatening, pornographic, harassing, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive, or encourages conduct that would be considered a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, violate any law, or is otherwise inappropriate.'"

George Washington University law professor Jeffrey Rosen wrote in a New York Times magazine article on "Google's Gatekeepers" that he "watched the 'First, They Came' video, which struck me as powerful political commentary that contains neither hate speech nor graphic violence, and I asked why it was taken down. According to a YouTube spokesman, the takedown was a routine one that hadn't been reviewed by higher-ups."

Only after receiving fair exposure in The New York Times (my, how times and the Times have changed) did the video magically reappear on my channel.

Now, contrast Google/YouTube's ridiculous stifling of "First, They Came" with its hands-off treatment of murder-inciting videos of hate imams Ahmad Musa Jibril and Abu Haleema.

Their rancid rants encouraging jihad by the sword and murder of non-Muslims have racked up millions of views over the past five years. Millions. Counterterrorism officials in multiple countries have tied their social media poison to jihad plots. The company told Conservative Review's Jordan Schachtel that it had reviewed the hate imams' channels and "found that they do not violate YouTube's guidelines on extremist or hateful content."

The enlightened peace-and-love progressives of Silicon Valley don't just have egg on their faces. They have blood on their hands.
 
Read more…

Friday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Are Anti-Trump Leftists Also Anti-American?
by Susan Stamper Brown
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Visa Overstays Are a Growing Problem 
8EVhecMQ8GohCLoS88B28Vtttot0jA9aoDsfuWcjI7qAWKb3p2HaZtokLzz6myvai3l4IcaW05JpUVjOvT4MsenUdY61JUYyqMykgsCSdjR_YNM-fn_n_hkbxl94Ig=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
While building a wall along the U.S. southern border, as well as hiring more Border Patrol agents, would help significantly in solving the problem of illegal immigration, another often less focused aspect of the problem has seen an increase. The Department of Homeland Security recently released its "Entry/Exit Overstay Report," which estimates that as much as 40% of all illegal immigration is due to overstayed visas. This isn't a new problem.
          In fiscal year 2016, some 628,799 individuals overstayed their visas. Of that total, 544,676 are believed to still be in the country. These are individuals who lawfully entered the U.S. but remained beyond their allotted time and for whom no record of departure exists. Unfortunately, the percentage of overstays has seen recent increases — in 2015, it was 0.9%; in 2016, it increased to 1.07%. The greatest offenders tend to be students and exchange visitors whose visa overstays are 5.48%.
          Homeland Security has been heavily invested in developing better biometric and biographic technology screening for those seeking entry, while focusing on tracking down visa overstay offenders has been less of a priority. Clearly, more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are needed to track down these growing numbers of visa overstays.
          While most illegal aliens do not engage in violent criminal behavior, it's a good reminder to note that two of the 9/11 hijacker terrorists overstayed visas. And while visitors to the U.S. are very much welcome, the laws are designed to protect citizen and visitor alike from those who would seek to exploit our nation's good will for their own nefarious purposes.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
COMEY EXCEEDING His Authority
Was OK For liar-Clinton, But Not Trump
_DJfutLKdorGvpJuRVDT8XVF6kvy95udFcL2-CvDlJTyYrXjxmZKN350eBMvWYKaFH0vsvNMd_2FZvXd6ct_ImasGrZ6W-kuQnLsELKvZFgGvgEzxMCKAF5zH62Uge0D=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ CNN propagandist Wolf Blitzer provided California Democrat Rep Adam “Shifty” Schiff with the customary leftist sounding board and platform from which to attack President Trump or speak in service to the siege in general... In his Wednesday comments Schiff spoke regarding the text of Comey’s testimony provided in advance of his appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday. It’s an appearance which will require Comey, in order to preclude himself from self-incrimination, to support the statements of President Trump. The Democrats, including Schiff, are obviously disappointed. Blitzer starts things off by asking, “Were you surprised to read in Comey’s testimony that he did, in fact, tell the President on three separate occasions that the President was not under investigation?” Perhaps Schiff and Blitzer are still accustomed to every word coming from the White House occupant being a lie, having refused to accept that Donald Trump is now the President and that the imposter squatting there before is really gone. Returning to the “good old days” of a pathological, lying criminal in the White House is,  after all, the reason they’re engaged in this whole Russia hoax to begin with, supporting the narrative of liar-Hillary Clinton... http://rickwells.us/schiff-comey-exceeding-authority-ok-clinton-not-trump/
.
Iran Blames Trump, Saudis For ISIS
Terrorist Attack On Iranian Parliament, Shrine
DWk5uXb3ZnQWA_TXPG6P4HpSFdM7FmIs2c8Gv_KVe4d0TkQVredsYffhgx9gklO1270Y8XI93rUNzdhzmWa12xxsuXaytIBhyGh4JDx9iCf_9OVkwpdWpKnnDkSEL5Cvz-ZBIw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ In February Secretary of Defense James Mattis labeled Iran the world’s “biggest state sponsor of terrorism.” His comments came a day after President Trump imposed new sanctions against Iran... in response to a ballistic missile test. Mattis added, “We have seen their, Iran’s misconduct, their misbehavior, from Lebanon and Syria to Bahrain and to Yemen and it’s got to be addressed at some point.” We all remember the terrorist hijacking of US Navy patrol boats as Hussein liar-nObama was preparing to make his final State of the Union speech last year, touting their negotiated release as “assistance” due to the liar-nObama regime’s diplomatic prowess. But they are usually less obvious in their actions.  Beyond carrying out direct attacks,  Iran has regularly committed terrorism by proxy through Hezbollah, who committed the June 25th, 1996 attack that killed 19 Americans in the Khobar Towers, Hamas, the Taliban, militias in Iraq, and a variety of other terrorist groups. President Trump responded to the attacks in a statement saying, “We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times. We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”...http://rickwells.us/iran-blames-trump-saudis-isis-terrorist-attack-iranian-parliament-shrine/
.
Comey Says Loretta Lynch Tried to Get
Him to Downplay the liar-Clinton Investigation
aWKlqVTU9eS-hDVGXpQSqNVwUhy-bzViIQpFiN5ER9xHp95dcadFLR5f85n7mzNmpRi05nU3dYCECkZe_IszxvS6y5oSYQBDWTSFhciZGBVyNYbj7WEVhrjZVvi-JbmOPh18=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Erick Erickson
{theresurgent.com} ~ In his sworn testimony before the Senate, James Comey just testified that Barack liar-nObama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, tried to get James Comey to downplay the investigation into liar-Hillary Clinton... She tried to get him to refer to it as a “matter” and not as an “investigation.” Look for much of the media to ignore this point today as they focus on Trump and claim that is old news. But it puts the Democrats in an amazingly hypocritical position to claim President Trump was trying to obstruct justice when Loretta Lynch did that. This comes on the heels of Comey saying he largely scrapped the liar-Clinton investigation because of Lynch’s private meeting with Bill liar-Clinton. That sounds way more like obstruction of justice than Trump just asking Comey if he might wind down the Flynn investigation when Comey did not do so afterwards. http://theresurgent.com/breaking-comey-says-loretta-lynch-tried-to-get-him-to-downplay-the-clinton-investigation/
.
Homeland Security sounds
alarm over ‘terrorist travel,’...
M-f-noduhlHzTiWF0EmF65qq9pnjPFPtRwL-o2KZkHTf2R1dh1egkCbW81_BHbOjY7JuL8UaG_FSBzFbLsNSTeRze2OrBUXhXy21TsxGsydkbEKGJ8NivlaTTn8wvrkIz__9AVMvETpD6LcVdAMm4UcMlMqidl6n-rr7KB1Ii5a03gj9Rf6FmPyH7OJC0Hg0GYlfFHYLuy8ZKYj9QHDqWNQpzYusRrvz5fvY1nNe39H_Lt0gT8cFTT4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Stephen Dinan
{washingtontimes.com} ~ Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly sounded a loud alarm Tuesday over an “unprecedented spike in terrorist travel” including to the U.S., moving to shore up the defense of the administration’s travel ban... one day after President Trump’s tweets seemed to undercut his case before the Supreme Court. The threat from terrorist “foot soldiers” is as great as ever, he said, and they are returning from training in Iraq and Syria home to Europe with orders to attack. Mr. Kelly said he expects some will try to reach the U.S. — but his hands have been tied by the federal courts... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/6/john-kelly-terrorist-travel-threat-backs-up-trump-/
.
FSM VIDEO
 
WATCH LIVE COVERAGE OF THE JAMES COMEY HEARING (10 a.m. June 8, 2017)
.
New report accuses liar-nObama admin and AG Eric Holder of hiding info on gun scandal
.
Media Hypes Comey’s "Blockbuster," "Super Bowl" Testimony
.
President Trump Touts Infrastructure in Ohio: Shovel Ready Wasn't Shovel Ready, Not Going To Repeat That Mistake

_touts_infrastructure_in_oh_shovel_ready_wasnt_shovel_ready

_not_going_to_repeat_that_mistake.html

.

Jay Sekulow: Former FBI director's Comey statement a complete vindication of President Trump
.
TUCKER: "If This is Watergate, What's the Crime?": Tucker Spars with California Dem Rep on RussiA
.
Piers Morgan Slams London Mayor On Terrorism and Over the Jihadists in London
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Are Anti-Trump Leftists Also Anti-American?
4m1JLy9KMO6mPcNhbB3aKfowdi2_h8xPdUdc9-Rj4chJvDtMyfhxi51xC41hyp-sb3vZ6UvRcDTTTGAJ3kzNqycizuvdKeDr6CVqFfFIyrzGp5av-K_Y5_hfgoPTmQ3zQZg8iLiPnu98M3yucHwSwLEe=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Susan Stamper Brown
{
townhall.com} ~ In 1997, Osama bin Laden said on CNN, “We declared jihad against America because America is unjust, criminal and tyrannical.”

Bin Laden’s sentiment for America differs little, if any, from how leftists feel about America today. Maybe that’s why a leader like Donald Trump who vowed to “Make America Great Again” is met with great resistance.

Consequently, we’ve seen a disturbing alliance between the American left and the Muslim right (extreme). On Fox News, Muslim Reform Movement co-founder Asra Nomani raised deep concerns about the Democratic Party joining arms with pro-Sharia advocate Linda Sarsour to coordinate anti-Trump marches.

Nomani said, “The American left and its rabid hate for Donald Trump has just aligned themselves with somebody who is very counter to cohesion in America.”

Nomani’s statement begs the question: Are leftists more comfortable with Sharia law than American values and the United States Constitution?

Nomani’s explanation may also shed light on why comedian Kathy Griffin thought it was okay to channel the veritable evil of our day, the Islamic State, when she paraded around a fake, bloody and decapitated Donald Trump head.

Maybe that is why leftist judges felt free to block constitutional travel bans created to prevent what’s happening in Europe to happen here.

This could also explain why leftists in the media diverted attention away from the June 3 London attack by trashing Trump.

After the attack, Trump tweeted an appropriate message that America needs to get tougher on terrorism.

In short order, a savory CNN host named Reza Aslan, who once participated in cannibalism by eating human brain (not joking), called Trump “a piece of s**t” and an “embarrassment to America and a stain on the presidency.”

Trump also tweeted: “We must stop being politically correct and get down to the business of security for our people. If we don’t get smart it will only get worse.”

In response, MSNBC anchor Thomas Roberts said this: “The president doesn’t want us to be politically correct, right? So, let’s not be PC about this. Is the president trying to provoke a domestic terrorist attack with this twitter rant to prove himself, right?”

If Roberts really wanted to discuss presidents provoking terrorist attacks, he should have looked no further than former President liar-nObama who not only provoked terror, he financed it, when he gave $150 billion to the mother of all terrorist states, Iran.

If Roberts really cared about what might cause domestic terrorist attacks, he’d recall the liar-nObama administration kept its head in the sand when it came to potential terrorists. The liar-nObama administration ignored communications exposing that both the Fort Hood shooter and the Boston Marathon bombers were radicalized human time bombs. Of course, liar-nObama’s Department of Homeland Security made it their mission to remove references to the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Islam but had no problem calling pro-life advocates and military veterans potential terrorists.

Also consider how often leftists dance around motives or change the subject after terror attacks, even if terrorists shout their intentions for all to hear. In typical fashion, after the San Bernardino terrorist attack, President liar-nObama “consoled” Americans by raking them over the coals for their own lack of tolerance. Following the Orlando Pulse nightclub massacre which was the deadliest attack on American soil post-9/11, leftists did their best to turn Omar Mateen into a self-hating homosexual although he pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. The FBI also confirmed Mateen was radicalized and under investigation.

On June 4, Trump vowed he would do whatever is necessary to protect Americans from a “vile enemy,” reiterating, “This bloodshed must end, this bloodshed will end.” Trump promised he would do whatever it takes “to prevent this threat from spreading to our shores and work every day to protect the safety and security to our country, our communities and our people.”

Meanwhile, leftists are resisting Trump at every turn. If we are attacked, those blocking his efforts should be held accountable.
Read more…

Fri/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Russia Goes Public on liar-nObama’s “Secrets” that “Happened During liar-nObama’s Terms”
by amorgan
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Politics Is Contentious Because So Much Is as Stake 
OmICet14OvrQFvLSZaMZ8udCIxhx4ilppKw5ZQdHQbEQF2iZV1dfeUCSQSlHfdFALQOkCqfWb2pAmY_KVMA57B6r71UW8OTG47SycHrKaNrNT8xfsV6r461Rlsk1HgQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Todd Johnson: While much of the American media will be focused on James Comey’s testimony this Thursday or pursuing other ancillary stories pertaining to Donald Trump’s presidency, they’re missing a much larger development that will have a significant impact on national politics. It’s no secret the media is engaged in a war of words with Trump and his surrogates. But they have been so focused on the foibles emanating from the White House that they have completely ignored the Democrat Party’s failure to develop a coherent policy message or a plan that addresses any of the challenges facing the country.
          Following liar-Hillary Clinton’s dramatic loss last November, the Democrat Party was in a state of shock and disbelief. Much like the stages of grief, Democrats wrestled with the feelings of anger and depression following the election. However, since Trump became the president in January, Democrats have made a conscious decision to ignore the last stage of grief, acceptance. Instead, they are morphing into a vapid and recalcitrant mob more fixated on creating dissension at the national level and waging a war against any decision made by the current administration. They call it the Resistance™.
          This type of political polarization is not only dangerous for the two-party system but a critical symptom of a disease that has metastasized over the last 50 years — the ever-growing power of the national government.
          One of the main reasons for intense national power struggles is because of the amount of influence that resides in the nation’s capital. In his insightful analysis last fall, our own John Bastiat argued, “Decisions that used to be made by individual states or local governments are now decided somewhere in Washington, DC, often by a single branch, or even worse — and more often the case — an unaccountable sub-entity within that branch. As a result, elections nowadays are
‘for all the marbles.’”
          The solution to this vexing problem is to redistribute power amongst the three branches of government and back to the states. Sadly, this scenario won’t likely be happening anytime soon. This situation is one of the main reasons why the Democrat Party focuses so much time and energy on devoting assets to national races and eschewing races at the state and local levels.
          A look at the 2016 Democrat Party platform shows a leftist platform focused on usurping control from the lowest levels of government and bringing all decision-making to the national level. The Democrat Party has been in a tailspin for the last eight years, as evidenced by their loss of 12 governorships and numerous state houses. This dynamic doesn’t look like it will be changing anytime soon, as Republican candidates have won the last two special House elections and the mayor’s race in Omaha, Nebraska. In many ways, Democrats have zeroed in on the White House at the expense of building from the ground up.
          It’s ironic that the Democrat Party touts itself as being an inclusive entity, yet it has no problem shunning anyone who doesn’t march in lockstep with its progressive and far-left agenda. That’s why Democrats have difficulties finding quality candidates to run for office. It’s also a reason why their main power bases are relegated to the Northeast and Pacific regions of the country. However, this dynamic can change rapidly if the Republican Party fails to follow through on its promises from the last election cycle.
          If the Grand Old Party wants to continue holding majorities in the House and Senate, Republicans must find creative ways to enact changes to the personal and business tax codes, pass an infrastructure bill, replace the Affordable Care Act, and most importantly, avoid any legislation that takes power away from the state and local levels.
          While many Republicans had high hopes for President Trump, it’s apparent he has little appetite for leading the Party, and if he continues his self-destructive behavior, he will soon find his administration in no position to develop or execute policy. Therefore, it will be incumbent upon the GOP leadership to lead in a manner that reflects the values of the membership and act in the best interests of all Americans. Anything short of that will be political malpractice because, after all, a lot of marbles are at stake.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Supreme Court Set to Rule on
Massive Cell Phone Privacy Case
pNr6pozKGu9R9BFZUf-mjpsKJDsagcPZMrCI3FDHaXv1v12DFfgPcOMcybiotIL9j_7Q2NNx8vm9enQt3yYIp1TmMLXzxJej-6QP8w2ne77-3CcV3ZAGkg3TnZTsRmU_Kif_5g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Davis
{conservativetribune.com} ~ The Supreme Court has a history of court case rulings that have shaped American life for generations to come... One such case facing the nation’s highest court involves the issue of privacy. On Monday, the Supreme Court announced it will be taking up a case on the issue of cell phone location data, Politico reported. At stake is whether or not police and other law enforcement agencies will be required to obtain a warrant showing probable cause before they retrieve cell phone location data off a person’s phone from a phone company...http://conservativetribune.com/supreme-court-set-to-rule/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=patriotupdate&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=libertyalliance
.
UN Secretary-General
Launches Slanderous Attack on Israel
UsSYdj_HJ9xBR2QjZyWmbA6knak9sZ1rng4N2ZpaMa_lYywtdqnze3J70LZ3IZzxZZBi1EBlUShU5Rz5dvzoytrhOr10EhRkH3S2Yl_eo773X-hlOIARxzC3pFuEYoehOO047Y5IEiMmtHELZlGZfDleR5Nlcf1JnhAoJWclTMbXYQqdcQE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by P. David Hornik
{pjmedia.com} ~ At this time 50 years ago, Israel was fighting the Six Day War and conquering territories. Since then it has returned the Sinai to Egypt, withdrawn from Gaza, retained control of the Golan Heights... and created a self-governing Palestinian entity in part of the West Bank while retaining overall security control there. This 50-year anniversary has seen a flood of statements lauding or lamenting the Six Day War and its outcomes for Israel. Statements of the former kind emphasize that the war gave Israel defensible borders, a close alliance with the United States by showing that Israel was a regional power, and, eventually, peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan. Statements of the latter kind bemoan Israel’s “occupation” of the Palestinians and describe it as a disaster that has to end -- fast. And UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres offers some of the most egregious remarks in this vein...Guterres doesn't know the truth. And never will. https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2017/06/07/un-secretary-general-launches-slanderous-attack-on-israel/
.
Harris Badgering Witnesses Again –
This Time She’s Muzzled By Intel Chairman
QfV8Nw_6H13tQzgmEdgLKcpwlXzdkRIjZUP0AO_TNiC4PzuNbo7v8CHfvRDmBOqvwBaL6ISEAupK2Vs4tbXCqaFCa4X9WCr-iwzlRaNTNGxKmpdMSk_qtuKgRmAKn60=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Freshman Senator and Democrat hatchet hag Kamala Harris (D-CA) seems to have been watching too many Maxine Waters videos... and be tailoring herself to be the Senate equivalent of her California comrade, a less clownish, more calculating, more belligerent, progressive, counterpart. Harris obviously places a high value on rudeness, badgering and intimidation and has no place in the conduct of her interrogations for civility or genuine courtesy. It got to a point on Wednesday that intervention on behalf of the witnesses was required multiple times, including finally, by the Chairman  of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who stepped in to provide relief to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein. He forcibly placing a muzzle on the California cur and gave the witness an opportunity to answer the question...http://rickwells.us/harris-badgering-witnesses-time-shes-muzzled-intel-chairman/
.
North Korea launches multiple
ground-to-ship missiles, South Korean military says
 
{foxnews.com} ~ North Korea launched several ballistic missiles from its east coast Thursday, according to South Korea's military... "North Korea fired multiple unidentified projectiles, assumed to be surface-to-ship missiles, this morning from the vicinity of Wonsan, Gangwon Province," the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) said, according to the Yonhap News Agency. The missiles fired Thursday traveled around 120 miles, according to the military. North Korea conducted ballistic missile tests over three consecutive weekends in May going back to Mother's Day, but last weekend there were no launches... http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/07/north-korea-launches-multiple-ground-to-ship-missiles-south-korean-military-says.html
.
FSM VIDEO
 
TUCKER: Proposed law would pull funding from sanctuary cities to pay for Trump's border wall
.
Sparks Fly as Liberal Democrat Senator repeatedly interrupts Secretary of Homeland Security General Kelly
.
Frank Gaffney on Fox discussing how Trump can protect the U.S. from terror attacks
.
D-Day, June 6th 1944 - documentary
.
TUCKER: Spars With 'BLM' "Blacks-Only" Memorial Day Party Supporter
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Russia Goes Public on liar-nObama’s “Secrets” that “Happened During liar-nObama’s Terms”
sC9rXZWAKvVU06ly4s6fOKsgA-cpbrsJuQViR43APLAQg8zY9leTS9nxlLl4Gf-RPFvHL_b4oqsZkYRDHyE4zHSRR59TlpVsoJk1h1npag=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by amorgan
{consjournal.com} ~
Well, well, well.  It seems Moscow’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova gave a rather long winded answer when asked about the current state of U.S.-Russia relations.

And you haven’t heard about it, because it contains information about “secrets” the liar-nObama administration had asked the Russian government to keep private, and the liberal mainstream media conveniently kept quiet about it.  See her bombshell of a statement for yourself and – SPOILER ALERT! – pay extra attention to the second to last paragraph:

Question: “How do you see the future of Russian-US diplomatic relations in the context of the current atmosphere in Washington? Can you confirm that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will come to Moscow in April?”

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson, Maria Zakharova (Moscow): “Apparently, many volumes have been written about the development of Russian-US relations. I announced the release of the Foreign Ministry’s yearend Diplomatic Bulletin and even showed it at the previous briefing. I believe that about 20 per cent of that bulletin was devoted to Russian-US relations, the way we see them, how we want them to develop, what we expect from Washington, what we are willing to do with the United States, the priority areas of cooperation, areas where our cooperation should be revived without delay and the areas where this can wait, at least for a limited time. This issue has been covered in interviews by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, comments by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov and in numerous statements made at all levels by representatives from various Russian agencies, political analysts and politicians, as well as officials from the legislative and executive authorities. We can talk about bilateral relations with a different degree of mastery, but we would like to start implementing our relationship at long last.

We provided our views on bilateral relations and the reasons for blocking them under President liar-nObama. We said that we were willing to work with the new US administration, under President Trump. I don’t think we need to invent anything in this respect, because so much has been said before. Simply, we should start concrete practical work. We are ready for this.

You know that we always invite our American colleagues and diplomats to join bilateral or multilateral dialogues on issues in which the United States has traditionally played a big and active role, such as Syria, the consultations in Astana and many others. We expect Washington to formulate its foreign policy approaches in the form of a concept. We are ready for pragmatic and specific work on the principles that we have described many times.

As for the visit by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and the information about it, this is what I can say. It’s not a secret that preparations for any visit include the coordination of the time when it can be announced. Visits by foreign ministers are public events that are never kept secret. At least, I don’t know about any secret visits by foreign ministers in Russia or the United States. Preparations for such a visit also include the coordination of the format, agenda and the date it can be announced to the public. It is a matter of propriety and respect for each other’s interests. One side proposes a date, and the other side is expected to accept it. This date should be acceptable to both sides, because the foreign ministers have packed schedules. The issue also concerns the coordination of the agenda by experts. One side informs the other side of the issues it plans to discuss, and the other side needs to respond that the agenda is acceptable. In other words, the sides need to reach agreements on many issues, after which they can announce an upcoming visit. This is how we work with our colleagues.

To tell the truth, over the past few years we’ve seen many strange things happen in Washington in connection with preparations for visits or talks by our foreign ministers. The US Department of State has more than once asked us not to announce planned visits until the last minute. This is not our tradition. We have been operating openly for years, but we have respected the requests we have received from our colleagues in Washington in the past few years. But what happened after that? First, the US Department of State asked us to keep the planned visit quiet and not to announce it until the last possible minute, until we coordinated the date. We did as they asked. But a day or two later the information was leaked by the US State Department and sometimes by the US administration. Frankly, this put Russia and the media in a strange situation, because they didn’t know who to believe – the official agencies or the many leaks.

It is difficult to say if this diplomatic communication is a US tradition or the latest technique. But it definitely doesn’t correspond to our traditions. We believe that everything we coordinate should be made available to the media in accordance with diplomatic procedure. When we coordinate a visit and the date for announcing it, the information should be made public calmly and as agreed. This is what we do in relations with our colleagues from other countries.

As I said, such cases in our relations with the US Department of State have become a bad tradition over the past few years. So, I can say in response to your question that we will make the date and format of contacts between the Russian and US foreign ministers public after we coordinate them. We won’t keep them quiet. At this point, I don’t have any information I can share with you. I can say that this visit and such contacts are possible in principle, but it would be premature to talk about timeframes.

Also, I would like to say that if the practice of leaking information that concerns not just the United States but also Russia, which has become a tradition in Washington in the past few years, continues, there will come a day when the media will publish leaks about the things that Washington asked us to keep secret, for example, things that happened during President liar-nObama’s terms in office. Believe me, this could be very interesting information.

Our American colleagues must decide if they respect the diplomatic procedure, if they keep their word on the arrangements made between us, primarily arrangements made at their own request, or we create a few very nice surprises for each other.”

And there you have it.  However, this long-winded answer now raises a very important question:  If liar-nObama loyalists continue to leak intel, when will the Russian’s turn this threat into a promise and start leaking some intel of their own?  Fasten your seatbelts, folks.  This could get interesting.
Read more…

BBC censors “Allah” from a report about a brutal attack on a nursery school worker by three Muslim females shouting “Allah” as they beat her up and slashed her with a knife

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Bet they wouldn’t censor the word “Jesus” if it was shouted in an attack by Christians against Muslims.

Share this news

Read more…

Designated terrorist group CAIR-Missouri hosting open house Ramadan fast breaking dinner to stamp out “Islamophobia”

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate )

I wonder if they will be asking guests to participate in the Ramadan animal sacrifice event, where they slit the throats of conscious animals and joyfully watch them thrash around in agonizing pain for several minutes before they die? (See second video) http://www.barenakedislam.com/2017/06/09/designated-terrorist-group-cair-missouri-hosting-

Yep, watching this Ramadan video sure will do a lot for Islamophobia.

Read more…

Designated Terrorist Group CAIR demands U.S. Congress condemn South Carolina Rep for posting a photo that depicts mass European suicide from the Muslim invasion

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Send that representative a letter of thanks and be sure to keep re-electing him to Congress. 

Duncan posted an image of a white man, labeled “Europe,” with a hangman’s noose around his neck. The other end of the rope is tied to the trunk of a small tree, labeled “Islam.” The man is depicted watering the tree, with the clear implication that “white” Europeans are committing slow “suicide” by allowing Muslims within their borders. Well, they ARE!

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=ftLPTT_zxJI

Share this news

Read more…

Michigan: Up to 100 girls had genitals cut, Dershowitz joins to defend Muslim FGM perps

( Muslims do not assimilate, infiltrate! )

In my country you abide my our rules Sharia has no authority  here if you cannot do that leave! 

Principles for a Free Society

Source: Up to 100 girls cut in mutilation case, feds estimate

Detroit – As many as 100 girls may have had their genitalia mutilated during a 12-year conspiracy involving three Metro Detroit doctors, a federal prosecutor said Wednesday.

That’s a conservative figure, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sara Woodward said during a failed bid to keep two doctors jailed pending trial.

There is evidence eight girls were mutilated, the prosecutor said, but so far the nation’s first female genital mutilation case involves only two 7-year-old girls from Minnesota.

The government’s allegation is the latest development in a high-profile criminal case that is raising awareness about a procedure practiced by some members of the Dawoodi Bohra, a small sect of Shia Muslims.

Dr. Jumana Nagarwala of Northville is accused of mutilating the genitalia of two girls Feb. 3 at a Livonia clinic owned by Dr. Fakhruddin Attar.

The Farmington Hills man has been indicted along with his wife, Dr. Farida Attar, who is accused of helping arrange the procedure and being in the examination room while it was performed.

Fakhruddin Attar’s lawyer criticized the government for alleging 100 girls have been victimized.

“I think the government has overstated so many aspects of this case and this is another example,” attorney Mary Chartier told reporters.

The government made the estimate based on Fakhruddin Attar allegedly telling investigators that Nagarwala treated girls at his clinic for “problems with their genitals” five or six times a year.

Prosecutors allege the mutilation conspiracy started 12 years ago.

Chartier spoke after U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman freed the Attars pending an Oct. 10 trial.

The couple were placed on house arrest, and the judge barred them from using computers and accessing the Internet. They also cannot have any contact with alleged victims or witnesses, Friedman said.

For now, the couple cannot live with their 9-year-old daughter because state officials are trying to terminate their parental rights.

The judge’s decision comes less than two months after the couple were arrested and accused of accused of committing female genital mutilation, trying to cover up the crime and conspiring with Nagarwala to cut girls as part of a procedure practiced by their religious and cultural community, the Dawoodi Bohra.

Federal prosecutors allege the two 7-year-old girls who were brought to Metro Detroit on Feb. 3 suffered illegal genital mutilation at Fakhruddin Attar’s clinic in Livonia.

One girl told the FBI that Nagarwala “pinched” her on the “place (where) she goes pee,’ ” and a subsequent medical examinations showed the girl’s genitals did not appear normal and a section had been altered or removed, according to a court filing. A doctor also observed scar tissue and small healing lacerations.

The second girl identified Nagarwala as the doctor she visited in Detroit and a subsequent medical exam showed the girl’s genitalia had a small incision and a small tear, according to a court filing.


Meanwhile, FGM must be very lucrative for Muslims as they hire high power attorneys:  Dershowitz joins genital mutilation case defense team

Famed constitutional law scholar and attorney Alan Dershowitz has joined the defense team in the nation’s first female genital mutilation case in federal court.

The move adds legal firepower to a defense that appears to be focused on First Amendment issues and religious freedom. Federal prosecutors allege two 7-year-old girls who were brought to Metro Detroit earlier this year suffered illegal genital mutilation but defense lawyers say the girls underwent a benign religious procedure.

Dershowitz and prominent Birmingham defense attorney Mayer Morganroth were hired about three weeks ago by the Dawat-e-Hadiyah, an international religious organization overseeing a small sect of Shia Muslim mosques around the world.

“They hired us to protect the people charged and represent the religious organization,” said Morganroth…


It’s no secret that Muslims in the U.S. are preaching and practicing female genital mutilation. Recall, this post:

“Everybody knows somebody who has gotten their daughter cut [FGM] … but nobody wants to rat out their family members or friends”

Please Share & Help Wake America Up

Read more…

Idaho: Muslim refugees who sexually assaulted 5-year-old girl get probation, judge silences victims

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

When things reach this point it is time for the people of Idaho to stand up for the rights of a 5 year old AMERICAN GIRL AGAINST ISLAM THAT HAS VIOLATE HER AND HER RIGHTS!!!! DON'T JUST THERE DO SOMETHING NEXT TIME IT COULD BE YOU OR YOUR FAMILY

Principles for a Free Society! 

They and their families should be deported. ASAP. Source: Idaho girl’s refugee sex attackers walk free?

It’s as if it never happened.

A judge sentenced three Muslim refugee boys in the sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl in Idaho, but nobody knows the length or terms of the sentence because the judge has barred everyone in the courtroom, including the victim’s own parents, from speaking about the case.

The three boys — two from Iraq ages 7 and 10, and one from Sudan aged 14 — pleaded guilty in juvenile court in April to multiple counts of sex crimes in an incident that occurred last June in Twin Falls. The assault occurred at Fawnbrook Apartments, when 5-year-old Jayla, who is developmentally disabled, was lured into a laundry room, stripped of her clothing and sexually assaulted while the oldest boy filmed the entire incident.

Now, following a sentencing hearing Monday at the Snake River Juvenile Detention Center in Twin Falls, Judge Thomas Borresen of Idaho’s 5th Judicial District issued a gag order preventing everyone in the courtroom from saying anything about the sentence received by the boys.Judge Thomas Borresen at the Jerome County Court House

Borresen did allow the family to say they were unhappy with the sentencing, but threatened to jail them for contempt of court if they say why they are unhappy.

“We can’t talk about it since it’s a sealed case,” said Lacy Peterson, the girl’s mother, when contacted by WND Tuesday.

The family’s attorney also told WND he was bound by the judge’s gag order.

Mark Guerry sent the following text message to WND:

“Sorry but I am forbidden by court order from discussing anything that has gone on in the proceedings, especially the outcome of the sentencing. This is a juvenile case, which by its nature makes it a closed proceeding, and the judge has made it clear again that anyone who discusses it with the media, etc., will be held in contempt. Sorry but my hands are tied. All I can do is tell you the parents were not satisfied with the results of this case. They were especially upset with the prosecutor’s repeated statements in the media defending the juvenile defendants, rather than focusing on the victim. I can’t say anymore.”

Mathew Staver, chairman and co-founder of the nonprofit legal assistance agency Liberty Counsel, told WND that Judge Borresen was completely out of line in issuing a gag order after the fact in a criminal case.

“It’s unconstitutional for the judge to do that. There are gag orders that can be put on people during a jury trial, or if it’s a minor they can prohibit you from mentioning the name of the minor, but they can’t gag you after the fact,” Staver said. “This is public at this point. This judge, it just seems like he’s forgotten about the First Amendment in this case. He has no authority to do this, he can’t hold someone in contempt to keep them from speaking out about their displeasure with the case after the fact.”

Staver said case law is clear on the subject of gag orders.

“That’s a shame what happen to their little girl. This judge can’t gag them. They can voice their displeasure all they want to, this judge can’t do a thing to stop them,” he said. “Case law is clear. You cannot gag someone after the case is over. Anyone can comment on it, especially the victims. It’s my understanding what they wanted to do was criticize the outcome and they have that right.”

Staver said he feels so strongly about the issue of free speech that he would be willing to take the family’s case and challenge the judge’s order.

Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989.

This isn’t the first time an official in Idaho has tried to squelch free speech in relation to the Twin Falls sexual assault case.

After the case came to light last summer, the former Obama-appointed U.S. attorney for Idaho, Wendy Olson, threatened to prosecute anyone who promulgated “false or inflammatory information” about the crime or the perpetrators. She was later forced to walk back the comments after being criticized by constitutional experts.

In a op-ed for WND, anti-Shariah activist Pamela Geller called the judge’s decision “a Travesty of Justice as Idaho Muslim Migrant Rapists Go Unpunished.”


It gets worse, keep reading. via Travesty: Migrant attackers of 5-year-old unpunished

The travesty of justice in Idaho is now complete. In the summer of 2016, a 5-year-old girl was sexually assaulted and urinated upon by three Muslim migrant boys in Twin Falls, Idaho. Since then, instead of getting justice, the victim’s family has been abused by law enforcement and governing authorities as if they were the criminals – because what happened to their little girl contradicts the politically correct narrative about Muslim migrants. On Monday, the perpetrators were sentenced, and the final injustice was done to this poor girl.

The injustice began in the proceedings at the Snake River Juvenile Detention Center in Twin Falls when Judge Thomas Borreson of Idaho’s 5th Judicial District ordered the little victim’s parents to say nothing to anyone – ever – about what was said in the courtroom Monday, or to disclose the sentence he gave to the savage attackers. He did allow them to say that they were unhappy with the sentencing, but threatened to jail them for contempt of court if they disclosed why they were unhappy with it.

But even though the victim’s parents were not allowed to talk to me, there were 12 to 15 people in the courtroom who saw and heard the whole sorry business. I was informed of what happened by an anonymous source inside the courtroom – and the more I heard, the more I understood why this judge wanted to keep all the proceedings secret.

Janice Kroeger, the senior deputy prosecuting attorney, who was supposed to be trying these boys for their crimes, defended the boys and repeatedly attacked Lacy, the victim’s mother. A therapist for the boys was present, as well as a parole officer and a detective. Everything that was said was designed to portray the perpetrators as victims. Throughout the proceedings, they were repeatedly called victims, and the youngest one was called “the biggest victim of them all.”

The court heard all about how the attackers are doing well in school, and about how smart they are. They were praised for the supposed ordeal they had to go through. It was claimed that all three are suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from having to go through courtroom proceedings.

After this lovefest, which lasted for five hours in the courtroom, all three boys were sentenced, one after the other. All three were given probation. They were not found guilty of rape, but of sexually lewd conduct.

In the midst of this judicial mugging, every time Lacy’s lawyer tried to speak up, he was silenced. The little victim, Jayla, was never even mentioned once by Kroeger or the judge – or by the police or anyone else. Only Lacy mentioned her, when she made her statement. Lacy detailed how the poor girl is still suffering the effects of this attack: She is wetting the bed and having bad dreams, and more.

Yet when Lacy completed her statement, Kroeger lashed out not at the perpetrators or their parents, but at Lacy. She viciously tongue-lashed Lacy for a full 15 minutes, until finally Judge Borreson had to stop her.

Understandably, the parents of the victim were and are devastated. Back in April, when the attackers initially pleaded guilty, Twin Falls County Prosecutor Grant Loebs said: “I am pleased that we were able to resolve this case in a way that was approved and agreed to by the victim’s family. This continues to be a serious and sad case, but it was resolved properly.”

Nothing could be further from the truth. The resolution of the case was not accepted by the victim’s family, and it was not resolved properly.

From the beginning to the end, for Idaho officials this case was about one thing, and one thing only: not justice for this poor little girl who was brutalized and abused, but about making sure that Americans don’t start to realize what is happening and oppose the Muslim migrant influx. Idaho officials were willing to sacrifice this girl’s well-being for that goal – to their everlasting shame.

If there were any justice, Judge Borreson would be impeached and removed now. Meanwhile, please help the victim and her family meet their considerable expenses: Contribute here. https://www.gofundme.com/2a6rst6g

1.4k

Liberty & Justice

Hello I am the mother of the victim little 5 year old girl who was sexually assaulted by 3 Sudanese and Iraqi refudgee  children in June 2016.  The 3 children have pleaded guilty to tbe crimes they have commited. This gofundme was first made by a family friend for us so we can get some assistance since we were not receiving any assistance and were forced to move to a hotel for almost 2 months til we could find a place to live, now I am the one in charge of the gofundme now, this gofundme will be used to help our family with the financial burden that was put on us since we have moved and now that we are in a place that cost of living is alot more than it was where we were at, it will also be used so that our supporters cam donate to our family to help with counseling, and medical costs lawyer fees and household needs as they arise. WE want to thank everyone so much from the bottom of our hearts for all the support you have and continue to provide for our family, we will heal soon but it will take time. We appreciate everyone and will continue to update as much as we can.  It is a sealed case so it is hard to tell everything so we can only post what we are allowed to post. Thank you for understanding and got bless .  If you have any questions on how the donations will be used feel free to email me at lacyamy13@gmail.com and I will be willing to answer any questions.
      

Help spread the word!

Read more…

Ramadan in Germany: Muslim migrant murders psychologist during therapy session

( Muslims ,do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

There ain’t no cure for jihad.

“Police: Syrian refugee kills German psychologist in Saarbrücken,” DW, June 7, 2017 (thanks to Othmar):

A Syrian man has stabbed and killed a Red Cross mental health counselor in the southwest German city of Saarbrücken, police said. The attacker and the psychologist allegedly got into an argument during a therapy session.

German authorities tracked down the suspect soon after the Wednesday attack, finding him only few hundred meters away from the scene of the crime in Saarbrücken. The man was immediately hospitalized for serious injuries, which appeared to be self-inflicted.

The police believe that the 27-year-old Syrian killed a 30-year-old man working as a therapist in a counseling center for traumatized refugees. The migrant allegedly got into an altercation with the Red Cross psychologist during a therapy session, and stabbed him. The victim died at the scene. While the reason for the attack was not immediately clear, officials do not believe that the incident was linked with terrorism.

“We are all appalled and shocked,” German Red Cross chief Rudolf Seiters said, adding that all German Red Cross associates were “mourning a commendable employee.”

Police also found a knife at the scene, but did not immediately confirm that it was the murder weapon.

The victim has worked for the Red Cross since 2014. The counseling center in Saarbrücken, near the French border, specializes in treating refugees suffering from post-traumatic stress or newcomers having trouble adaptating to a new culture.

The attack appears reminiscent of a fatal stabbing in Sweden last year, when a 22-year-old female social worker was killed by a young migrant….

Read more…

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Read more…

Admiral James Lyons: “Outreach” to Muslim Communities Will Not Keep Us Safe

( They are Muslims! Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! Their loyalty is to Islam all you have to do is see what is going on in Europe are the Muslim Communities THERE keeping them safe NO! )

Principles for a Free Society   

Michael Breen

Former U.S. Army Capt. Michael Breen, executive director for the Center for National Policy and the Truman National Security Project, was quoted in Stars and Stripes recently recommending the reapplication of policies that have been tried and failed again and again in the decade and a half since 9/11.

Breen said: “Travel bans are not going to keep us safe, cracking down on civil liberties are not going to keep us safe….Having fundamentally strong community institutions and strong partnerships between security officials and leaders in our community will.”

This is a comforting vision, but Breen has no evidence to back it up. In reality, one of the proposals that he said we do not need is exactly what we do need. No one is suggesting any crackdown on civil liberties, and Breen and others do no good by falsely claiming that President Trump is proposing such a thing.

But travel bans from jihadi hot spots, as mired in the courts as they are, are urgently needed.

It is an acknowledged fact that since we have refused to secure our borders, we have facilitated the transit and infiltration of al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists and narco-terrorists who are now living illegally in the United States. Unfettered immigration with open borders has allowed for seeding Islamic jihadists among the Muslim immigrants who have settled throughout the country.

This is a serious national security issue, and there is one critical incident that shows simultaneously the terrorism risks involved in this unrestricted immigration, as well as the abject failure of “having fundamentally strong community institutions and strong partnerships between security officials and leaders in our community” as a deterrent to jihad terror attacks. This quintessential example of this failure is the Boston Marathon bombing.

In June 2013, two months after two immigrants exploded two bombs at the Boston Marathon, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) confronted then-FBI director Robert Mueller about what the FBI had done to investigate and monitor the Islamic Society of Boston, which both bombers attended. Gohmert noted that “the FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15th attacks.” He pointed out numerous reasons why the FBI had reason to be concerned about the Boston Marathon bombers before their attack, as well as about the mosque they attended.

In the course of a heated exchange, Mueller inadvertently revealed the fatal weakness in the recommendations just offered in Stars and Stripes by Michael Breen. He told Gohmert: “We went to the mosque. Prior to Boston. Prior to Boston happening, we were in that mosque talking to imams several months beforehand as part of our outreach efforts.”

As part of our outreach efforts. Before the Boston Marathon bombing, the FBI had not investigated the Islamic Society of Boston, despite the many terrorists who have worshiped there. The mosque’s multiple ties to terrorists were well known not just to intelligence officials, but to the general public: right after the bombing, USA Today reported that “The mosque attended by the two brothers accused in the Boston Marathon double bombing has been associated with other terrorism suspects, has invited radical speakers to a sister mosque in Boston and is affiliated with a Muslim group that critics say nurses grievances that can lead to extremism.”

Despite this, the FBI had sent agents to the mosque only “as part of our outreach efforts.” The FBI was reaching out to this mosque in order to try to ensure that in Boston there were “strong community institutions and strong partnerships between security officials and leaders in our community.”

Clearly, it didn’t work. Nor has it worked elsewhere in the country. In January 2016, a Muslim named Abdul Shaheed (formerly known as Edward Archer) shot Philadelphia police officer Jesse Hartnett at close range. He turned out to be a regular member of Philadelphia’s Masjid Mujahideen. Ibrahim Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, who attempted a jihad terror attack at the Muhammad Cartoon Contest in Garland, Texas in May 2015, were members in good standing of the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix.

The FBI conducts outreach to mosques in Philadelphia and Phoenix as well as in Boston. These incidents establish that outreach, contrary to Breen’s claim, is not enough. In contrast, cutting off immigration from hotbeds of jihad terror is one of the key elements of a genuine solution to the problem of terrorism.

The President of the United States has the responsibility to take the necessary steps to stop threats to the security of this great country. Failure to do so would be a dereliction of duty.

Admiral James A. “Ace” Lyons, USN (ret) is the former commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

Read more…

Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Trump left the door open for a Jerusalem embassy
by Eli Lake
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Anti-Trumper Arrested for Leaking Top-Secret Info 
KNkatxggPJ82wVHgkJlJJi4l7gPo5btsQwtgo4RFbDxHKGAshDFy9kLZU8isaXWrvd6Lu9s0Ew2ft6yhXsTv35Y1TT2wjRD0-Z5CFACsg07uj7gHntueyR0PV7afPaY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
A 25-year-old government contractor, Reality Leigh Winner (yes, that’s her name, in reality), has been arrested and charged by the Justice Department for illegally handling and leaking top secret national security information. This past February, Winner took her top secret job with defense contractor Pluribus International working at Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia. She is alleged to have copied a classified top secret document from the National Security Agency on May 9th and sent it to The Intercept, which subsequently published the report. The document revealed that Russia had made attempts at hacking U.S. voting systems prior to the election.
          The DOJ stated, “Winner admitted intentionally identifying and printing the classified intelligence reporting at issue despite not having a ‘need to know,’ and with knowledge that the intelligence reporting was classified. Winner further admitted removing the classified intelligence reporting from her office space, retaining it, and mailing it from Augusta, Georgia, to the news outlet, which she knew was not authorized to receive or possess the documents.”
          That’s not all. Winner’s Facebook and Twitter accounts reveal her to be a fairly rabid leftist. “The most dangerous entry to this country was the orange fascist we let into the white house,” she tweeted. She’s a Bernie Sanders supporter and is strongly opinionated on leftist hot-button issues. Other social media posts include statements like “CLIMATE CHANGE is the biggest threat facing us all,” and that anger over flag burning was “white privilege at its finest.” It’s pretty clear that Winner was motivated by her anti-Trump sentiments to attempt to further the Resistance™ cause by leaking this top secret information. If convicted, she faces up to 10 years in prison. So in reality, she’s not a winner. ~The Patriot Post
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
NBC Publishes Blatant Lie, Quietly
Issues Correction After Damage Is Done
OTEJ9Wp1xZntq0NMLAl7daX2pyC71R19z8GZJlz5zw6p4eEilflaSk2rCvnclxjclCNNiMHdw5t7S9c92VbZOHkJl5QKywnm54SwQYlAQoNBAdNko8PaBXuQU573DsXL9-Wen2128ZMnsQG0QHU8XR2q-8_dscRdpLAdyu6QKHg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Kimberly J Smith
{conservativetribune.com} ~ NBC News proved just how irresponsible it is over the weekend when it took to Twitter and hyped an “exclusive” from Megyn Kelly’s interview with Vladimir Putin... which claimed Putin did not deny having compromising information on President Donald Trump. I suppose it’s the least the network could do to prop up the left’s fantasy that the president colluded with Russia while simultaneously promoting Kelly’s new program, “Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly.” The problem for NBC — and the Americans who rely on it for real news — is that Putin actually did deny having compromising information about the American president — in fact, he outright called the whole idea “nonsense.”...http://conservativetribune.com/nbc-blatant-lie-correction-done/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_campaign=CTConservativeBrief&utm_content=2017-06-07
.
Piers Morgan Slams London
Mayor On Terrorism, ‘Where Are They?’
UapDYjb9c00TLC0WpkiIUVEuda_fTkr9maXkQQCj8hn35pJ_fXTabjhRnotOfYAs1LIoTFS26BSxRdUZcH6xnXvnSsoalC43rtwA6UFmGYqpKO3_yOKRZ0_FVA4pbnn3WZIO10ffUJ1W637bYXke=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Nick Givas
{dailycaller.com} ~ Piers Morgan subjected London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s to a litany of questions regarding the number of terrorists returning to London during an appearance on “Good Morning Britain” Tuesday... The interview turned to the question of terrorists returning from war-torn Middle Eastern countries. Co-host Susanna Reid asked the mayor how many of the 400 hundred people abroad had returned to London. “The estimate is just over half,” Khan said while stuttering. “Where are they?!” Morgan shouted. “No seriously, where are they?” http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/06/piers-morgan-slams-london-mayor-on-terrorism-where-are-they-video/
.
NSA, ODNI, FBI and DOJ Tell Congress
No Investigation Interference by President Trump…
PgIPgmaR2pVyYurB0EzBpYfi8xwkp80XdaGOwrDw_AL3iNc-YDBNICuEPxTz4fAgdJwrStwYEaTIAptsMVRTBK5xGxqvrnGU-h-yNuojUKAIgfqr7POaumai8WXaELkTBeKNMdDFU0yBcTPvftV29mFMyzJ1HE4kyJE1DKjw0PjSANPzZw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~The MSM attempts to construct a narrative  about President Trump interfering with intelligence agencies and investigative agencies took a big hit today... as Mike Rogers (NSA), Dan Coats (ODNI), Andrew McCabe (FBI) and Rod Rosenstein (DOJ) each took turns telling the Senate Intelligence Committee that President Trump never attempted to interfere with their efforts. The entire construct of the “impeding with an investigation” narrative, part of the ‘much vast Russian Conspiracy’, begins to collapse. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/06/07/nsa-odni-fbi-and-doj-tell-congress-no-investigation-interference-by-president-trump/
.
AG Sessions Ends liar-nObama's
Settlement Payoffs to Left-Wing Groups
aZcVZbw5QcGRFHwwaHcmJsHH9ma-r2CN8fY91oPtsYTAkimATd52UzNLv6cwiFVIdxwbDyZl_9Wuz_-_PnbtMoS-KPwFXuQiIHts1sr9fHf82SPPtJoPR9vrkWmJdgMAcKJ3y_4IcNwj7WN0K6_OWL_yfLZU8ruDLFPX35Tvu9bNKMkU9v6QgawK_w9_=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Daniel Greenfield
{frontpagemag.com} ~ Attorney General Sessions put an end to one of the most corrupt policies of the liar-nObama years. In one of the more unbelievably criminal acts of his "scandal-free" regime... liar-nObama's DOJ bosses blackmailed corporate targeting into paying out money not to the victims, but to their left-wing non-profit allies. In short, liar-nObama robbed victims to fund left-wing hate groups like La Raza. It was a monstrous crime that should have led to legal consequences. But at least the practice is being shut down. Congressional bills have targeted it. And Sessions has blacklisted it... http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/266928/ag-sessions-ends-obamas-settlement-payoffs-left-daniel-greenfield
.
Trump to nominate Christopher Wray
to be FBI director
[foxnews.com} ~ President Trump on Wednesday said he intends to nominate former assistant attorney general Christopher Wray to be the next FBI director... Wray, currently a litigation partner at King & Spalding, would replace Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who took over when James Comey was fired by Trump in May. “I will be nominating Christopher A. Wray, a man of impeccable credentials, to be the new Director of the FBI. Details to follow,” Trump tweeted...http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/07/trump-to-nominate-christopher-wray-to-be-fbi-director.html
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump left the door open for a Jerusalem embassy
RFQXYiThFqWXMSVEOfseK5NYgcMHj8Omn3jCQlBAjE_GJ4lYv25PKpTbEwxLjV-Mt5FCANepnnxUygl-2UbvJCqMsq_o3cf5mOgzAtGc30GlQIc26dU5Ef0JpS8dYxUm7KuU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Eli Lake
{
jewishworldreview.com} ~ Donald Trump's presidency so far has followed a pattern of disruption. He snubs European allies. He tweets in atrocious grammar. He pulls out of international agreements. He shakes things up.

But in one important respect, Trump's presidency appears entirely conventional. That is in the Middle East.

Like his recent predecessors, he promised during the presidential campaign to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. And like his predecessors, he violated that promise now that he is in office.

So why did Trump do it? "To maximize the chances of successfully negotiating a deal between Israel and the Palestinians," according to a White House statement issued Thursday on his decision to sign a waiver of the Jerusalem Embassy Act, that would have set in motion the process for the U.S. moving its embassy to Israel's capital.

It doesn't get much more conventional than that. What modern president hasn't tried to maximize the chances of that ever-elusive peace deal?

It would be easy to end the story there. But in this case, Trump has left open the possibility that he will eventually keep his campaign promise: "As he has repeatedly stated his intention to move the embassy, the question is not if that move happens, but only when," the White House statement also said.

With Trump, it's never clear what promises, if any, he intends to keep. This is the same guy who campaigned on resetting ties with Russia, only to reach out to Russia's traditional rival, China, in his first weeks in office. During the transition he signaled he might recognize the sovereignty of Taiwan. Then, of course, he backtracked on that as well.

White House officials tell me that Trump, for now, believes he can use the embassy issue as leverage. Normally this would mean holding out the prospect of moving the embassy as a carrot to the Israelis in exchange for concessions on settlements.

In this case, however, it's a little different: Trump is using the prospect of an embassy move as a stick with Israel's Arab neighbors. It has been reported that Jordan's King Abdullah, whose country enjoys a peace treaty with Israel, warned Trump that an embassy move would mean riots. This is a familiar refrain for anyone who has followed this issue. The vaunted Arab Street will rise up if America deigns to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

Let's leave aside for a moment that this provides a heckler's veto on U.S. policy toward the world's only Jewish state. In another sense, it means that Trump is calling a longstanding bluff. If U.S. recognition is so bad for you, then help me help you avoid that, for the time being.

One White House official told me Trump is eyeing current discussions between Israel, Jordan and Egypt in this respect. This would allow Israel to sell natural gas to its neighbors, and pave the way for more agreements to allow Jordanian and Egyptian nationals to work in Israel as well as deals to share water resources.

Most important, though, Trump is banking on Jordan and Egypt to pressure the Palestinians in the peace negotiations his advisers would like to see restarted. So far, there are signs that a new peace process is in the works. The Palestinians are said, for example, to have dropped their preconditions for negotiations with Israel.

Under President Barack liar-nObama, the Palestinians demanded at first a settlement freeze and then later the return of Palestinian prisoners -- some of whom had killed U.S. citizens.

All of that said, there are many obstacles at the moment for getting peace talks going. To start, the current Israeli government is comprised of political parties that range from skeptical to hostile on the idea of land for peace. Even if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wanted a final status solution to the conflict, it's unlikely his government could deliver it.

Then there is Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority. He hasn't stood for an election since 2005. His political party was ousted from Gaza a decade ago. And he has yet to make any concession on Trump's request to end incitement to violence against Jews, to say nothing of the authority's program to pay off the families of suicide bombers and other terrorists.

This is why most Middle East experts say the time isn't right to push for a final deal that would create a Palestinian state out of the territory Israel won in the 1967 war. Those same experts would caution Trump against moving the embassy or otherwise signaling U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Given Trump's defiance of the experts on the peace process, it's entirely plausible that sometime in the future he will also defy them on Jerusalem. You could say it would follow a pattern.
Read more…

The Daily Jot - - Comey, C'mon man!

t?e=teQuhG8PacE&c=0&r=0&_ts=1497013653785Share:
S.gif
S.gif
S.gif
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
Comey, C'mon man!
NOTEWhen writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
  
Friday, June 9, 2017
Comey this, Comey that, Comey, Comey, Comey-the news reports on the James Comey testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee are beginning to sound like some sort of rock and roll song. I wasn't going to write any more on this, but there is no choice. This whole thing with Comey and his testimony is a dog and pony show on the biggest stage in the world showing how hypocritical and petty the Washington, D.C. political machine has become. It never was wonderfully honorable, but the hype aimed at destroying reputations and providing high-drama for political gain is held at the public expense of taxpayers over the insinuation and innuendo of political hack James Comey. It's embarrassing.
 
The one new revelation that came from the testimony of this Democratic Party operative and 5th Estate power monger is that Comey revealed just how underhanded the political tactics become when someone feels their power is threatened. He gave America insight into the shenanigans by admitting that he used a close friend of his-Columbia law professor Daniel Richman-to leak the content of his memos to himself to the New York Times in hope of triggering the appointment of a special counsel. What he did was write up his own (hear biased or politically motivated opinion) account of his private meetings with President Donald Trump and leaked them through a second party to the New York Times with hopes of undermining Trump's presidency.
 
That's the motive. It is not what the leftist news media will report, but it is-take it from a former political operative-how hardball is played. At the same time Comey is admitting to this underhanded chicanery, he also testified that he couldn't say whether Trump's request to shut down the investigation of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was an obstruction of justice. He said this issue was for a special counsel to determine. This is another political tactic to undermine Trump's presidency-answer a leading question without saying a law was broken, but imply that it was. The news picks up on it, and the reputation of the target suffers in the public irrespective of whether it is true or false.
 
So far, the Democrats are winning in their media war against Trump. They have a special counsel appointed. An investigation is underway even though top Democrats say there is no evidence of wrong doing. The witch hunt is aired in the public daily, undermining the public confidence in the presidency. And that is the goal-to make it so Trump cannot implement his agenda. It's a strategy of the coup. As long as the notion of wrongdoing is pounded into the public's minds, the strategy of this revolution is succeeding. As Ephesians 6:12 says, "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Don't forget it. This spiritual wickedness is very persuasive and can cause even the elect to misstep. 
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!
Read more…

Study shows Google was biased toward Clinton

Which came first, the bias or the search results? That’s a question worth asking after reading a (PDF) by a group of researchers looking at how search results could have affected the 2016 election.

In a short paper presenting their preliminary work, the social scientists showed that search results from Google, in particular, showed bias toward Hillary Clinton in the month leading up to the election. The same scientists, in 2015 (PDF), that biased search results may sway the results of elections. A further question in this case is, “Were the results skewed, or was the media reporting from which they sprang?”

Late last month Robert Epstein, of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT), Ronald E. Robertson, of Northeastern University, with Samantha Shepherd and Shu Zhang of AIBRT presented a paper that showed there was systemic bias in favor of Hillary Clinton in search results about the 2016 election. Here are some of the findings of the study:

1) Issue: Were search results provided by search engines in the U.S. biased toward one candidate or the other? Yes. Based on a sample of 4,045 election-related searches conducted during a 25-day period from October 15 to November 8 (Election Day) using the Google and Yahoo search engines through the Firefox browser, we found that search results were, on average, biased to favor Hillary Clinton on all of those days.

The authors answer another question regarding the bias: Were the native Google and Yahoo results, on their respective websites, equally biased in favor of Clinton? According to the research, the level of bias toward Clinton on Google, “was more than twice as high as the level of pro-Clinton bias we found on Yahoo.” This data seemingly proves what those in conservative circles have been saying about Google —that it overwhelmingly shows pro-leftist results in search. These criticisms predate the 2016 election.

The authors go on to show that the level of bias was dependent on a number of demographic factors, including gender; whether the search was in a blue, red, or swing state; age; and voting preference. While there were changes in the level of bias, all groups saw a pro-Clinton bias in their search results.

The researchers didn’t go into what could have caused the biased search results. That, of course, is the central question. Once bias is established, the next step is trying to figure out how that bias came about. There are a number of ways the bias could have come about. Here are a couple:

Algorithm programming … Search engine algorithms are ultimately programmed by people. Those algorithms could have filters which weigh non-mainstream news sources with a lower degree of importance. When Donald Trump accused Google of bias in their auto-complete in June of 2016, Google said they do not program bias into that feature. However, giving left-leaning or mainstream sources preference over conservative outlets would account for the bias.

Underlying bias of the media … Another, more probable, cause is the underlying bias of the mainstream media. Leading up to the election, the media reported that it was inevitable that Hillary Clinton would win. There have been numerous self-reflections on the election by the media, including this in The New York Times. Many of those reflections talk about group-think and confirmation bias. Based on how the media have treated now-President Donald Trump, however, it is doubtful they learned their own lessons.

In the upcoming months, the group of scientists will be expanding upon their findings. It will be interesting to watch what they report. The important thing they have shown is that there is a problem. The next step is watching to see if Google and Yahoo will admit they have a problem in order to correct it and identify the underlying source.

The mainstream media, and technology companies, have great power to shape the national narrative. As Epstein et al. have shown, that power can sway elections as much as anything the candidates themselves do. It is important to hold those who wield such power accountable. Bravo to the authors for attempting to do so. (For more from the author of “Study Shows Google Was Biased Toward Clinton” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/study-shows-google-biased-toward-clinton/

Read more…

Toobin: Trump Under Criminal Investigation, Provides No Evidence

Shortly after James Comey’s public testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee ended, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin casually let out a blockbuster that nobody else had reported. Toobin told Anderson Cooper that Trump was “under criminal investigation.” Toobin provided no evidence to back up his statement.

Here’s what Toobin said:

Toobin: … he said three times you told me that I was not under investigation and that was in May. Well, here we know in June Donald Trump is under criminal investigation, and that’s a big deal, and that’s important.

The only thing that was explicitly revealed in today’s testimony is the fact that before Comey was fired, Donald Trump was not under investigation. Comey was asked multiple times about this fact; each time, he answered no.

The only other mainstream news source with Toobin’s take is Newsweek. But the author doesn’t report that definitively. What is reported is a statement made by Comey that the Newsweek author, and presumably Toobin, interpret as meaning that Trump is under investigation. Here’s what Newsweek reports Comey as saying:

“I don’t think it’s for me to say whether the conversation I had with the president was an effort to obstruct,” he said in response to a question from Republican Senator Richard Burr, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “I took it as a very disturbing thing, very concerning. But that’s a conclusion I’m sure the special counsel will work toward, to try and understand what the intention was there and whether that’s an offense.” [Emphasis added]

That’s not Comey saying Trump is under “criminal investigation.” That statement is more like Comey saying he hopes Trump’s conversations with him will be investigated. This is a large leap by both Toobin and Newsweek.

Toobin owes it to CNN’s viewers to provide evidence to back up his assertion. CNN, and the rest of the mainstream media, has been quick to use the phrase “without evidence” when describing Trump’s statements. But CNN’s record has been less than stellar when it comes to this Comey business.

Just this week CNN said sources said Comey would testify that “he never told Trump he was not under investigation.” Which has now been proven false.

The media want the American people to trust them. Well, trust needs to be earned. Toobin, and by extension CNN, should share how he knows Trump is under investigation. (For more from the author of “Toobin: Trump Under Criminal Investigation, Provides No Evidence” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/toobin-trump-criminal-investigation-provides-no-evidence/

Read more…