Hi again, the reason 12 Naturalistic Alternative Medicine Doctors were Murdered this current previous last year of 2015 AD is because they all got together due to suspicion of something in vaccines making folks worse so they teamed together and did extensive research and found out that since 2014 AD an Enzyme that cancers and viruses make to cause the Immune System ignore those problems ie Nalgalase of which if given in large enough doses can cripple the human immune system,,, those 12 Doctors also found squaline in the vaccines which is a substance that causes sterilization of humans over time and all of those Doctors were murdered days before they were going to go public with their evidence,,, also concerning the zika virus, an Honest Alternative Medicine Doctor who lives in South America did when the recent outbreak of deformed babies happened did a detailed research study to find out how many of the mom's that gave birth to deformed babies had zika virus in their bodies during pregnancy and later and what else those mothers had in common and it turned out that only 10% of the mothers were infected with the zika virus whereas 100% of the mothers had received a mandatory vaccine, another reason I am a documented vaccine refuser of both my unofficial civilian capacity and my official U.S.ofA. Military and Federal Government capacity and if obama or any other left wing monster tries to get me to forcefully take a vaccine knowing what I know about vaccines which is more than what I have put here I will use my 16 plus sykic abilities to protect myself HOPEFULLY without hurting anyone just scaring the living daylights out of them so that they will leave me and my family alone,,, before I forget, in autistic children who at the time turned autistic all had Nalgalase in their bodies in massive doses,,, also an inside drug company whistleblower admitted that the drug companies know that the MMR (measles & rubela & mumps) vaccine does due to 2 things cause autism and those 2 things are # 1 the massive amount of mercury in that vaccine of which even though the drug companies claim they take the mercury out that is a known falsehood as they know that the mercury still sticks to the proteins of the vaccine even after skimming and #2 the large number of vaccines given within a very short time to children especially before 2 years of age, so all 3 things are known autism causers and during the 1990s I saw on C-SPAN hearings about autism and several autistics victims parents testified that when they gave their children chelation which removes heavy metals from the body all of their children's autistic signs disappeared, warning, you MUST consume large doses of minerals and vitamins when doing chelation as chelation removes such from the body and if you do not supplement you will die a painful death,,, GOD/Yahweh/Jehovah and His Only Begotten Son JESUS Bless all of us U.S.ofA. Tea Party Patriots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All Posts (30915)
A few weeks ago I ran an article on TeaParty.org and here on our forum, little did I know that it was so accurate and so telling. No, I don't have a crystal ball but sometimes things just add up.
So tell me what you think? Is Goof-Ball Beck imploding? ....or just early retirement?
What about this? Beck Plasters Face
Glenn Beck revealed that he has lost $500,000 campaigning with Ted Cruz , but said that has nothing to do with the recent firing of 40 of his employees.
“We are making the hard choices,” Beck explained. “We’re choosing principles over power. We’re staying true to the Constitution.”
“There’s a story maybe you have read, that came out yesterday, that is talking about how yesterday, my company The Blaze laid off 40 people, and my media empire is crumbling, and part of it is because I’m traveling around with Ted Cruz,” he said, referencing a Daily Beast story.
“Well, I want you to know,” Beck continues. “Yes, I’ve lost a lot of money traveling around with Ted Cruz. I’ve lost about half a million dollars. That’s my choice. I believe in something.”
“Did that cause the 40 people to lose their job? No.”
- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/glenn-beck-reveals-lost-500000-campaigning-ted-cruz-161074/#sthash.qebT348D.dpuf
{rickwells.us} ~ The reported existence of a terrorist training base just across the US-Mexican border at which thousands of terrorists may be being trained, in a lawless area controlled by Mexican drug cartels, should be enough to strike fear into the hearts of the American people... If we had a government that wasn’t complicit in the targeting its own citizens, we might even expect it to prompt a response or preemptive action. Adding to the uneasiness with that possible scenario is the belief that the terrorist running the camp, Shaykh Mahmood Omar Khabir, is said to have made repeated trips across the border into the United States and back, with Mexican cartel protection. A logical assumption is that he is doing so to evaluate potential targets or identifying routes of travel and staging areas for future terrorist strikes inside the United States. Judicial Watch has provided some disturbing information that indicates just such a situation exists. The porous southern border is a very real threat to the American people, our safety and our national security. Even representatives within the Mexican government are recognizing the role the nObama regime is playing in creating a situation which threatens the United States. They reported in a Tuesday article which read in part... http://rickwells.us/archives/28860
{freebeacon.com} ~ Conservative advocacy groups warned members of Congress against lifting restrictions on the government’s purchase of Russian-made RD-180 rocket engines for use during national security space launches... Leaders at Americans for Tax Reform and the Center for Individual Freedom appealed to members of the House Armed Services Committee ahead of a hearing Wednesday asking lawmakers to not allow the United States to send hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to a Russian manufacturer with ties to President Vladimir Putin. Both groups reacted to suspicions that some members of Congress would propose lifting restrictions on the Pentagon’s purchase of the Russian-made rocket engines during a markup of the fiscal 2017 National Defense Authorization Act on Wednesday...
{freebeacon.com} ~ Iran is preparing to conduct a major ballistic missile test in February 2017, following the inauguration of the next U.S. president into the Oval Office, according to a timetable issued by the Islamic Republic... Iran is continuing work on advanced ballistic missile technology and has been engaged in various tests to perfect this work. Iran conducted a test launch earlier this month of its Simorgh space vehicle, which has emerged as a key piece of the Islamic Republic’s goal to perfect intercontinental ballistic missiles that would be capable of striking the United States with a nuclear warhead... http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iranian-missile-test-us-inauguration/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=95f8e608ed-WFB_Morning_Beacon_04_28_164_27_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-95f8e608ed-45611665
{freebeacon.com} ~ Tom Coburn, the former senator currently leading a movement for a Convention of States, unloaded on Congress during a hearing before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Wednesday... “America doesn’t trust you anymore. That’s the truth,” Coburn said, appearing alongside the head of the Government Accountability Office during the hearing to discuss duplicative federal programs. The GAO recently released its annual report, finding the federal government could save hundreds of billions of dollars just by consolidating duplicative programs... http://freebeacon.com/politics/coburn-congress-america-trust/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=95f8e608ed-WFB_Morning_Beacon_04_28_164_27_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-95f8e608ed-45611665
{frontpagemag.com} ~ It’s been a long time in coming, but it finally happened.
The IDF General Staff has lost the public trust.
This is terrible for the General Staff. But it is more terrible for the country, because the public is right not to trust our military leaders. They have earned our distrust fair and square.
The final straw came in less than optimal circumstances.
But such is life. Things are never cut and dry. On Purim, Sgt. Elor Azaria killed a terrorist in Hebron as he lay on the ground, shot, following his attempted murder of one of Azaria’s comrades.
Still today, we don’t know whether Azaria acted properly or improperly. He claims that he believed the terrorist had a bomb beneath the heavy jacket he was wearing in the middle of a heat wave.
Azaria claims that he shot him because he feared that the terrorist – who was moving – was trying to detonate the bomb. This view was shared by emergency personnel at the scene caring for the wounded soldier.
But even before he had a chance to tell his story, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Gadi Eisenkot and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon had already declared Azaria guilty of murder. Based on an initial field investigation and a snuff film produced by the European-funded anti-Israel group B’Tselem, Eisenkot and Ya’alon excoriated Azaria and pronounced the soldier, who was decorated for his service just last year, a rotten apple.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initially joined them in their condemnations. But when he realized that the public wasn’t buying it and that the evidence was far from cut and dry, to his credit, Netanyahu walked back his remarks.
Ya’alon and Eisenkot, in contrast, have refused to let the uncertainty of the situation affect them.
Their continued assaults on the soldier have compounded the damage. Their stubborn refusal to give Azaria the benefit of the doubt and admit that he may well have comported himself properly indicates that they have no idea how their statements are being viewed by the public, or worse, they may not care. They may simply be playing for another audience.
And here lies the beginning of the real problem.
For the public – including the five thousand citizens who came to the support rally for Azaria at Rabin Square on Tuesday – the critical moment was when the film of Azaria being led away from the scene in handcuffs was broadcast on the evening news. That image, of a combat soldier who killed a terrorist being treated like a criminal, was the breaking point for the public. Whether he was guilty or innocent was beside the point. The point was that his commanders – beginning with the defense minister and the chief of General Staff – were treating him like a criminal instead of a combat soldier on the front lines defending our country from an enemy that seeks our destruction.
This image, combined with Ya’alon’s and Eisenkot’s increasingly shrill and caustic condemnations of Azaria, was a breach of the social contract between the IDF and the public. That social contract says that we serve in the IDF. We send our children to serve in the IDF. And the IDF values us and values our sons and daughters as its own.
The sense that our generals are not on the same page as the rest of us has been gnawing at us since at least April 2002, in the aftermath of the battle in Jenin, during the course of Operation Defensive Shield.
Back then, fearing CNN and the UN, IDF commanders sent a reserve battalion into Jenin refugee camp, the epicenter of the Palestinian murder machine, without air cover and without armored vehicles. Thirteen reservists were killed in one day. Twenty-three soldiers were killed in the three-day battle.
The sense of alienation continued through the war in Lebanon four years later when the IDF conducted one of the most inept campaigns in its history. Soldiers were sent willy-nilly into battles with no strategic purpose because the General Staff wanted to “stage a picture of victory.”
This sense has been maintained in successive inconclusive campaigns in Gaza.
Now, with the General Staff’s decision to turn Azaria into a scapegoat at a time when it is failing to defeat the Palestinian terrorist wave in Judea and Samaria, that gnawing sense that something is amiss has become a certainty.
Our generals are not on the same page as the rest of us. In fact, they aren’t even reading the same book.
Our generals are motivated by three impulses and strategic assumptions that are not shared by the majority of Israelis.
The first of those is their willingness to sacrifice soldiers in battles, and, in the case of Azaria, in show trials, in the hopes of winning the support of the Europeans and other Western elites. This impulse is not simply problematic. It is insane, because for more than a decade, it has been continuously proven futile.
At least since the battle in Jenin, it has been abundantly obvious that the Europeans will never support us. The Europeans, along with the UN and the Western media, ignored completely the lengths Israel went to prevent Palestinian civilian casualties in Jenin. They accused us of committing a Nazi-style massacre despite the fact that not only wasn’t there a shred of evidence to back their wild allegations. There were mountains of evidence proving the opposite. The Palestinians were massacring Israelis and would have continued to do so, had the IDF not retaken their population centers and so ended their ability to strike us at will.
And yet, despite the trail of UN blood libels from Jenin to the Goldstone Report and beyond, despite the faked media images of purported IDF bombings of civilians in Lebanon and Gaza, despite the hostility of EU diplomats and politicians and the open anti-Semitism of the European media and public, our generals still care what these people think about us.
Eisenkot and his generals still believe that by giving soldiers sometimes life-threateningly limited rules of engagement, by forcing every battalion commander to have a legal adviser approve his targeting decisions, the Europeans will be convinced that they should stop supporting our enemies.
The second impulse separating our generals from us is that almost to a man, members of the General Staff want a Palestinian state to be established in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem and they want that state to be joined in some way with Gaza.
After 15 years of Palestinian terrorism and political warfare, our security brass still believe that the PLO is Israel’s partner. It doesn’t matter to them that the PLO is driving the current wave of terrorism just as it drove all the previous ones.
This is the reason that Eisenkot and his ideologically driven generals insist that we leave the Palestinian population centers after we spent so much blood and treasure fighting our way into them 14 years ago.
This is the reason that while Eisenkot and his generals insist that the PA security services are helping us fight terrorism even though no help would be necessary if the PA wasn’t inciting terrorism.
The generals’ stubborn faith in the notion that Palestinian terrorists who seek the destruction of our country will magically be transformed into allies the minute we turn the keys to our security over to them, sets them apart from the vast majority of Israelis.
Most Israelis support a theoretical Palestinian state that is at peace with us. Most Israelis would be willing to give up substantial amounts of territory if doing so would bring peace with the Palestinians.
But most Israelis also recognize that the Palestinians are not interested in peace with us and as a consequence, it makes no sense to give them any land. Most Israelis recognize that you can’t trust the good intentions of leaders who tell their school-age children to stab our school-age children.
The third impulse separating our generals from the public is their embrace and glorification of weakness. On every front, for more than 20 years, members of the General Staff have embraced the notion that there is no military solution to any of the security threats facing the country.
Until the Syrian civil war, the generals believed that if we left northern Israel vulnerable to attack and invasion by giving the Assad dynasty the Golan Heights, then the Assads would be magically convinced to ditch their Iranian sponsors and make common cause with an Israel that could no longer defend itself.
They have opposed attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities, insisting that we can trust the US, even though it has been obvious for years that the US would take no action to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
As for the US, the IDF embraces strategic dependency on the US. They insist that we can trust the Americans even though the nObama administration sided with Hamas in Operation Protective Edge. They continue to argue that we can depend on American even though the nObama administration is actively enabling Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. Utterly foreign to them is the notion that Israel would strengthen its alliance with the US by acting independently against Iran’s nuclear facilities, because doing so would prove that Israel is not a strategic basket case but a regional power that commands respect.
They oppose destroying Hamas’s military capabilities.
As a consequence, they have conducted four campaigns in Gaza since the 2005 withdrawal that all lacked a concept of victory. And by the way, the General Staff enthusiastically supported the strategically irrational withdrawal from Gaza.
When the public gets angry at our generals for not striving to defeat Hamas, for instance, they look at us like we fell off of Mars. Why would they want to defeat Hamas? Their job is to contain Hamas. And they are doing their job so well that Hamas managed to dig a tunnel right under their feet.
What explains our generals’ embrace of positions that most Israelis reject? Why are they willing to sacrifice soldiers and embrace Orwellian notions that weakness rather than strength is the key to peace? It is hard to say. Perhaps it’s groupthink. Perhaps it’s the selection process. Perhaps it’s overexposure to Europeans or Americans. Perhaps they are radicals in uniforms. Perhaps it is none of those things.
But whatever the cause of their behavior, the fact is that behavior has alienated them from Israeli society. In treating Palestinian terrorists with more respect than it accords its own soldiers, the IDF General Staff is earning the public’s fury. And in their contemptuous dismissal of the public’s loss of trust, our generals – including Ya’alon – are demonstrating that they have become strangers to their own society. This of course is a calamity.
The IDF lost the public’s trust at Purim. Let us hope that at Passover, our generals will leave their bubble and begin repairing the damage they caused. They are not in Europe. They are here.
And they need to be with us.
Hi, my dad was a friend of Tesla and Tesla shared with dad many things and dad shared a lot of those things with me, one of those things is one of Tesla's Free Electricity Design which can be done either totally Free or with a small expence,,, Something Extremely Important is that every time there is a storm and the roads get clogged with fallen Tree debris etc and those Electricity Companies clean the roads all the time for you for a small electric fee,,, one of Tesla's Free Electric Designs that I recommend the small expence of purchasing a small gasoline driven Alternating Current Generator of a minumim wattage of 3300 watts output and you have going from that just mentioned Alternating Current Generator a standard 120 volt electric cord and have that electric cord go into a True Tesla step-up Transformer which can amplify volts and amps at the same time, and the first Tesla step-up Transformer needs to be made of a Transformer core either box or bundle style, I prefer the shape of a square doughnut of which each side of that square doughnut is either the input side or the output side and on the input side you wrap "Transformer wire" around the input side of the Transformer core without either the input wire or the output wire actually touching and on the input side you wrap your Transformer wire 100 wraps and on the output side 200 wraps well you just doubled your volts, and if you double the thickness of the Transformer wire you quadrupple the output amps,,, any person could set them selves up to be small time local electricity generators for their neighborhood(s) for blackout situations and/or EMP situations, an EMP is an electromagnetic pulse that is generated when a nuke goes off & an EMP fries all turned on electronics that are attached to the power grid because the grid acts like and antenna however it is also possible for any electronics that are turned on even if not connected to the grid to be fried during an EMP, at least having a good large stock pile of LED Light Bulbs is a good idea so that if there is an EMP you will at least have lights with a neighborhood electricity generator,,, Transformer wire is standard copper wire with a special almost totally see through brown insulation made for use as in being in closeness to other wire and have the amplification effect which is very hard to do with standard electric wire insulation that is thick,,, a automobile's ignition coil is a Tesla step-up Transformer,,, have fun Extremely Dear Fellow U.S.ofA. Tea Party Patriots,,, GOD/Yahweh/Jehovah and His Only Begotten Son JESUS Bless all of us on JESUS's and GODs side!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Monday, Barack nObama announced a change of plans for the U.S. military concerning operations in war torn Syria. With the quagmire of chaos and brutality that has ravaged Syria, Iraq and much of the Middle East, it seems as though nObama has come to the realization that airstrikes alone against Islamic State militants are just not working out as well as he expected. "Inherent Resolve," notwithstanding.
.
By Megan Eckstein
When easily made campaign promises can, just as easily, be kept – demanding little effort by a newly elected president to do so – but are not, the obvious question becomes “why?”
As a candidate, President Barack nObama made just such a campaign promise. In 2008, he promised to release information President George W. Bush had classified as secret. Its release, after nObama took office, would clearly have generated criticism of the 43rd president for failing to release it on his own watch. Yet nObama, who has repeatedly rushed during his term to criticize Bush whenever possible, still refuses to go public with the information.
Interestingly, while Bush’s decision to classify the material had strategic purpose, nObama’s motivation is personal.
The information in question consists of 28 pages, totaling 7,200 words, of an 800-page report on the 9/11 attacks against the U.S. released in 2002 by the U.S. House and Senate Intelligence Committees. It deals with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers involved, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals. Implicating Saudi Arabian government officials, Bush immediately classified the pages, rejecting a demand made the next year by dozens of senators to declassify them.
Bush’s declassification refusal made the issue a no-brainer for presidential candidate nObama. What Bush would not do, nObama assured the families of 9/11 victims in 2008, he, as president, would. But once in office, nObama failed to follow through.
Pressured in 2014 to make good on his promise, nObama finally ordered a declassification review of the pages in question to be conducted. Almost two years later, that review is yet to be completed.
With a trip to Saudi Arabia coming up later this month, nObama is again on the hot seat to expedite the review and release the information. National Security Council spokesman Ned Price reported, “That review process remains underway, but every effort is being taken to complete it before the end of the Administration.”
Since the review was ordered, it has inched along at a snail’s pace. It should not be taking so long to complete, lest nObama’s true intention is the pages never be released. If so, his reasoning as to why needs to be made very clear.
Before doing so, let us examine what information has been revealed about the pages’ content.
Two members of Congress, Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass), who have read the pages, tell us, although “absolutely shocked” by the level of foreign state involvement, they are prohibited by law from disclosing the identity of the country involved.
But other sources leave no doubt Saudi Arabia is the country in question. While a 2004 9/11 Commission report found no evidence of Saudi government involvement, a CIA memo found “incontrovertible evidence” of it. Additionally, the infamous twentieth 9/11 bomber, Zacarias Moussaoui, has given sworn testimony members of the royal Saudi family were involved.
If concrete evidence of Saudi government complicity existed, it would explain Bush’s unwillingness to go public with it. It would have taken the 9/11 attack out of the realm of an act of terrorism and into the same realm as the Pearl Harbor attack 60 years earlier, an act of war.
Undoubtedly, Bush rationalized, while some Saudi government officials were involved in providing logistical and financial support to the attackers, their actions may not have been sanctioned officially by the Saudi government. Additionally, with its gun sites already targeted on Afghanistan and Iraq, America could ill afford to expand the conflict to include Saudi Arabia as well.
For nObama to declassify these pages to reveal Saudi complicity – and Bush’s underlying intentions to hide it from the American people – would have provided him with the equivalent of a drug user’s rush. nObama would be able to further denigrate his predecessor, as has always been his wont. But nObama still rejects their release, and probably always will, for one extraordinarily personal reason – for which some background is necessary.
Saudi Arabia is recognized among all Muslims as performing a critical role under Islam. It is “custodian” of two of the religion’s holiest mosques – Makkah, the birthplace of Islam and Prophet Muhammad, and Madinah, where he was buried. A sacred trust exists between Saudi Arabia and all Muslims to preserve these two sites.
Thus, existentially speaking, Saudi Arabia is Islam and Islam is Saudi Arabia. Every aspect of Islamic life and thought is manifested within Saudi life and culture.
The reason nObama refuses to release the 28 pages is that it would destroy his legacy. Remember, he is a president who has spent eight years assuring us Islam is a peaceful religion. Yet, if Saudi Arabia – a Muslim ally of the U.S. for eighty years representing the gold standard of Islamic thought – were involved in the 9/11 attacks, it destroys the myth of “peaceful” Islam. It would become impossible for the “violent extremist” link to Islam, which nObama has refused to make, to be denied by him any longer. It would put the lie to his repeated peaceful assertions, exposing him as a fool for even promoting such a claim.
Ironically, 52 years after the Warren Commission report into President John F. Kennedy’s assassination was released in 1964, conspiracy theorists abound over its failure to link the killer to one. Meanwhile, the 9/11 Commission report wreaks of killers linked to a Saudi-assisted Islamic conspiracy, but gets little attention.
Where are all the conspiracy theorists when we really need them to expose Islam’s dark side?
On April 27st 2016, Barry Donadio endorsed David Bossie for RNC Maryland National Committeeman.
David N. Bossie has served as president of Citizens United and Citizens United Foundation since 2001.
Bossie is the former Chief Investigator for the United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. He has authored four books.
In 2010, Citizens United won a landmark First Amendment decision at the United States Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The case, which saw the government assert during oral arguments that it had the Constitutional authority to ban political books, struck down two decades of unconstitutional restrictions on free speech. Most recently, Bossie was ranked number two in Politico’s top 50 most influential.
As president of Citizens United Productions, Bossie has produced 25 documentaries since 2004, most recently, Rocky Mountain Heist hosted by Michelle Malkin, Occupy Unmasked featuring the late conservative icon Andrew Breitbart, Our Sacred Honor with Senator Rick Santorum, The Gift of Life with Governor Mike Huckabee, and the award winning films Nine Days That Changed The World and Ronald Reagan: Rendezvous with Destiny hosted by Callista and Newt Gingrich.
Born in Boston, Bossie attended the University of Maryland. He proudly served for 20 years as a volunteer firefighter in Montgomery County, Maryland where he resides with his wife, Susan, and their four children; Isabella, Griffin, Lily Campbell, and Margaret Reagan.
Barry Donadio stated “I am very pleased that we have a true conservative running as a candidate for this position. Conservative Republicans that want to see change the MDGOP should join me by endorsing Mr. Bossie. As Maryland Republicans, we can not afford to continue down the same business as usual path. Members of the Maryland Republican Party now have an opportunity to obtain new leadership and ideas from people like David Bossie. I vote Bossie."
In 2014, Barry Donadio was elected to the Queen Anne's County Republican Central Committee in Maryland. He has steadily gaining popularity in the Maryland Republican Party. Prior to becoming an Elected Official, he led a long and honorable career serving the public. He also served as as a Volunteer Firefighter, as did David Bossie. Barry Donadio relocated to Maryland from New York after taking a position at the White House in the U.S. Secret Service.
Later, he formed his private security and investigation firm "Public Security LLC". He is a major player in the anti-terror and executive protection industry.
In 2013 he released his book named "TWA Flight 800 First Responder Witness Account". Donadio remains the only person to write a book about the crash of TWA Flight 800 that was actually at the scene of the rescue on the night the plane crashed, July 17th 1996.
CONDI RICE ADMITTED IGNORING VLADIMIR PUTIN’S WARNINGS OF 9/11 “TIME BOMB”. SHE MUST NOT BE VP!
By Leni Friedman Valenta
April 27, 2014
Someone please warn Donald Trump. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is not qualified to be a heartbeat from the presidency. She has the politically correct gender and race, but she lacks the judgment. He could lose the general election because of her vociferous support of the 2003 Iraq War, but even more, her neglecting the warning of Vladimir Putin, and the repeated warnings of CIA Director George Tenet, counter-terrorism expert Dick Clarke, Gary Hart and others. Moreover, she denied the truth during her testimony before the 9/11 commission. This will come to haunt her along with the 28 pages about the Saudi’s involvement in the preparation of 9/11, also hidden by “W” and Condi.
Rice is often criticized as one of the architects of the 2003 war of choice and that is surely true. She was part of the group think that rushed to war on suspect and insufficient British intelligence. Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, was the former head of the State Dept. Planning Council in 2002. He has recalled how she came to him and told him, “The decision has been made,” i.e., no further vetting was needed. Haass later excoriated the Iraq war as one of choice not necessity and indeed, the mistakes of “W” were only made worse by Obama, who pulled out too soon.
But there’s more and much worse regarding Condi. Just read the memoirs of key people involved with our 9/11 tragedy. Clarke believes Rice was primarily responsible for the deaths of almost 3,000 people who died on September 11, 2001. Our research is summed up in our published article in The National Interest, “Why Trump is Right About Bush’s 9/11 Record.” We applaud Trump for his bipartisan explanation of our government’s folly, although some might consider it sacrilege. True is, Condi, as NSA, was not up to the job and “W” was not informed enough about foreign policy to know that she wasn’t as knowledgeable as he thought; surely not on the Middle East.
“…I was taken aback by Putin’s alarm and vehemence,” wrote Condi in her own memoir, “…. Putin though, was right; The Taliban and al Qaeda were time bombs that would explode on September 11, 2001.”
Magnus Nordenman
FRANK J. GAFFNEY, JR.
Richard Pollock
Donald slump liar-Trump shouldn’t just be promising to build a Mexican border wall. He and any other sovereignty-minded presidential candidate should be vowing to rebuild the decimated “wall” of first-line watchdogs, field enforcement and patrol officers on our northern border.
The urgency could not be greater.
The Canadian liberal government has fast-tracked tens of thousands of Syrian Muslims into its country over the past five months and now plans to double its interim 25,000 goal by 2019. The bleeding-heart Canucks are forging ahead despite reports this week of the country’s failed $16 million screening program to stop Islamic terrorists from slipping through the cracks.
Multiple databases are not interoperable. Information is outdated or useless. Canadian agents are delivering incomplete background checks too late to matter, anyway. Result: Garbage in, garbage out, and untold numbers of unvetted refugees from jihad hotbeds on the loose at our doorstep. As if the 1,500 Syrian refugees a month that the U.S. State Department is directly importing here through November aren’t enough of a security headache!
Instead of moving to fortify our northern border, Washington is diverting our boots on the ground and downsizing our fleet of surveillance pilots in the skies. Turnover is high, morale is low, and the jihadists’ path to illegal entry has never been smoother.
In Plattsburgh, New York, 45 miles from Syrian refugee dumping ground Montreal, the Customs and Border Patrol’s air branch has been slashed from 25 pilots down to a shocking six in the last three years. Shifts have been reduced to bankers’ hours, while terror plotters and smugglers never rest. Members of Congress have been alerted to the perilous impact of downsizing, but have done nothing except, that is, to fully fund the White House refugee resettlement racket.
In Montana, Reuters reported earlier this year, our federal enforcement force is still so understaffed that the Border Patrol depends on 100 private citizen ranchers along the northern border to police the U.S.-Canada boundaries.
Of 21,000 total Border Patrol agents, only 2,100 are assigned to the northern border. There are only about 300 agents guarding the entire northern border at any one time. That’s less than the number of Capitol police on duty to protect the Capitol complex in D.C. alone, Buffalo, New York, sector Border Patrol agent Dean Mandel of the National Border Patrol Council pointed out to Congress.
Little has changed since Border Patrol agents in Washington state first told me 15 years ago of vast, abandoned sectors protected by nothing but orange rubber cones — even in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
Little has changed since the 9/11 Commission spotlighted multiple al-Qaida operatives involved in cross-border traffic and incursions both legal and illegal from Canada.
Little has changed since the U.S. Government Accountability Office reported in 2011 that a measly 32 miles out of the 4,000-mile border was deemed secure by Border Patrol agents heavily dependent on non-DHS personnel for support.
A U.S. source who works for the Department of Homeland Security on the northern border told me last week that there remain vast “no-go zones” in his upstate New York sector that stretch for miles unpoliced — such as the smuggler-friendly Akwesasne reservation, where Mohawks are notoriously hostile to our Border Patrol, Air and Marine operations, and field operations agents.
“There’s a gigantic hole on our northern border,” my source described, where “people from countries of interest are crossing” into America. “Special interest countries,” as the U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security defines it, are those “designated by the intelligence community as countries that could export individuals that could bring harm to our country in the way of terrorism.”
“Yes, I’ve personally seen them. Every day. We call them ‘gotaways,'” my source sighed. These newest border-jumpers are detected by high-tech cameras and motion sensors, but neglected because the core national security mission is not a priority and no one’s around to act on the alerts.
On the southern border, “gotaways” spiked 100 percent between 2011 and 2013. This year, as illegal trespassers from dangerous special interest countries have increased through Mexico, a Border Patrol whistleblower told Congress two months ago that his supervisors ordered agents to fudge data on “gotaways” by omitting them from data reports.
Think the same whitewashing is going on up north? You betcha.
As the disgusted northern border CBP official told me: “The attitude is no paperwork, no problems.” No problems, of course, until that one ISIS operative toting a dirty bomb in his bag rolls right across the wide open U.S.-Canadian border — detected, but neglected — and our government’s malign neglect blows up in our faces.
To all my good friends who have jumped on the #TrumpTrain and believe that @theRealDonaldTrump is a true conservative outsider that will get things done and tells it like it is. I hate to burst your bubble but you have been played by the media, “The Donald” and the GOP establishment. I would bet that you have also been led to believe that the GOP rules of delegate selection are corrupt and rigged. Correct? Maybe it is time for you to sit down, do some serious research and educate yourself to the facts. Open primaries were created to allow for nonpartisan and independent voters to participate in the nomination of presidential candidates. The reason there is so much grief and anger today is because so many Democrats have crossed over for Trump and diluted the vote for the Ted Cruz, the real true conservative and outsider.
The even sadder fact is that many of these voters will move back and vote for Hillary where they can in the General Election while true conservatives will not even show up to vote for DT. The Trump can “talk the talk” but can or will he really “walk the walk”? Everything that he has said and done over the past twenty years proves that he is nothing more than just another left wing lying Democrat. Trump is not a GOP outsider nor is he a true conservative. He is a Frankenstein manufactured by the media and supported by the GOP establishment to clear the ground for their chosen RINO’s in order to maintain their status quo. Unfortunately, they have now lost control of their Frankenstein. Trump has gone rogue and has now become a liability.
So here we are nearing the end of the primaries with Trump in the lead, Cruz second with establishment minions Kasich and Rubio trailing behind as their backup spoilers. If nobody gets 1,237 on the first ballot the war will begin. As Limbaugh describes “the blowback” from the “Trumpsters” will begin. If Cruz manages to win by securing 1,245 delegates on the second or third ballots as Limbaugh describes “, we are gonna see a nuclear explosion like you’ve never seen before”. The nuclear meltdown of Trump and the GOP establishment and their party will have begun. Have we seen this happen before? Why sure, how do you think we elected the greatest conservative president in the past century? His name was Ronald Reagan.
When President Ronald Reagan attempted to reform and simplify our tax code in 1985 and 1986, he ran head-long into lobbyists and special interests who came out of the woodwork to protect their designated provisions in the tax code. The process was detailed in a book called “Showdown at Gucci Gulch.” The book showed the sausage-making that went into crafting the bill that was finally enacted. From a conservative perspective, the bill ended up being a sort of Frankenstein monster which lowered rates – a conservative goal – but kept and expanded many special interest provisions that permeate the tax code today.
Today’s version of “Gucci Gulch” is taking place over the fight to reform Puerto Rico’s economy and to bring it back from the verge of bankruptcy. The House of Representatives sent out to establish a control board – similar to the one used when Washington, DC, faced a similar crisis. It is certainly a better option that Chapter 9 bankruptcy which would allow the liberal big spenders to walk away from their debt or a bailout. That’s why some hedge funds and lobbyists are working to undermine and kill the bill before Congress. They get a better deal with a bailout than they do a control board.
For instance, President Obama’s former Chief Restructuring Officer at the Department of Treasury Jim Millstein’s firm MillCo Advisors could make hundreds of millions off the debt crisis. The New York Post reported the former Obama official – who left the government agency in 2011 – was slated to make as $52.4 million off of the contracts it has with the island and could make more if the Obama plan goes through. According to the Office of the Comptroller, Puerto Rico– which is $72 billion in debt – has around $34 million in contracts with the firm – a number that could skyrocket if they continue to amend and extend their contracts.
Anita Dunn, the former Obama official best known for proclaiming Mao Zedong as once of her political heroes, has been hired by the island (and their taxpayers) to push, not for a control board but for bankruptcy.
Hedge Funds like Canyon Capital, Aurelius Capital Management and others own about $4.5 billion in general obligation bonds and are working Capitol Hill to see legislation stalled or defeated. If they win, the taxpayers will lose as inevitably the islands leaders will demand a bailout from the taxpayers.
House Speaker Paul Ryan had promised the House would propose legislation that would help Puerto Rico to arrive at “a responsible solution” to their debt crisis. The House Committee on Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) released H.R. 4900, the “Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA).” “This is the constitutionally-sound solution that will provide real, long-lasting reform to the Commonwealth while respecting the rights of all parties and creditors. It is the Island’s best shot to mitigate its financial collapse and future calls for a bailout, which would be untenable. Congress must act now to avoid a humanitarian crisis that will severely impact 3.5 million Americans living in Puerto Rico and millions of Americans on the mainland,” Rep. Bishop said.
Some hedge funds and members of Congress are playing a dangerous game of chicken. The House bill prevents bankruptcy and a bailout. It isn’t a perfect piece of legislation by any stretch but it is better than the alternative. Conservatives should work to ensure that Millstein, Anita Dunn and the other Obama cronies who are working to kill the effort in the House can’t keep riding the Puerto Rico gravy train.
Gucci Gulch showed that legislating is not easy but a final product can be achieved with the right leadership. In this case, a final product must be accomplished as the alternatives are much worse.
Sandy Fitzgerald
Brian Padden
{lidblog.com} ~ Hilly Clinton is riding a wave of inevitability, Dem superdelegates carrying her onward toward the White House. As scandal after scandal unfolds, Mainstream media maintains their cover and coverage, acting every bit the messaging branch of Team Hilly... But, just as there are unsavory secrets in Hilly’s past, so too, the Democratic party owns a repulsive history. And do not be deceived: Dems and Dem operatives will do everything in their power to keep that history veiled. Enter Dinesh D’Souza... http://lidblog.com/the-secret-and-sordid-history-of-the-democratic-party-video/?utm_source=The+Lid+List&utm_campaign=b06f37321e-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_597b72c01c-b06f37321e-291705165

Let us not forget the same president who confused "corps" with "corpses" and exchanged a traitor for terrorists, also promised to fundamentally transform America. What we didn't know is that transformation would begin with the U.S. military, the protector of our nation and our values.
The wussification of our military is in full swing, thanks to all the empty suit "yes-men" clad with stars and medals prancing about the Pentagon promoting political correctness [PC]. nObama has done a remarkable job hiring, inspiring and attracting military leaders who check their backbones along with their cell phones at the Pentagon's front door. Valiant leaders like Gen. Stanley McChrystal had to exit before the spine removal surgery could begin.
You may recall the Washington Times piece awhile back reporting that Arizona State University Army ROTC cadets were allegedly pressured by leadership to walk around in high heels to "raise awareness of sexual violence against women." Raise awareness? I reviewed the pictures and fail to grasp how male soldiers sporting heels, many in uniform, did anything but serve to demoralize those who voluntarily serve.
Meanwhile, the Commander-in-Chief wearing mom jeans sits in the Oval Office with his pen and phone diligently working to leave his legacy of a softer, gentler, more touchy-feely military.
Mr. nObama recently added verbiage to the Army's section of the 2017 DOD budget, ensuring the Army "will provide every Soldier and civilian equal opportunities to rise to the level of their merit regardless of their gender, their race, or their self-identity," reports the Washington Times.
While unbiased opportunity is terrific, what place does "self-identity" have in an organization steeped in conformity and tradition, not individualism?
In this brave, new age of "Call Me Caitlyn" and Rachel Dolezal, the corrosive effects of political correctness in our public restrooms will do the same to the military. As it stands, the next president will inherit a squishy U.S. military, so slimmed down and overrun by political correctness it is virtually unprepared to address the rising threats of a dangerous world and defend the United States as the Constitution so charges.
A Heritage Foundation's 2016 index of U.S. military strength report scored our military in aggregate, "only marginally able" and trending toward "weak" to defend the United States. The analysis also found that while the current military force is "capable of meeting the demands of a single major regional conflict," it would be "very hard-pressed" to do more -- and is most likely ill-equipped "to handle two nearly simultaneous major regional contingencies."
This extremely poor score couldn't come at a more dangerous time, considering the same analysis also reports a rise in threats to U.S. vital interests. No wonder Russian SU-24s recently felt so emboldened, they repeatedly harassed a U.S. Navy destroyer on maneuvers in the Baltic Sea.
Now that they've wrecked the military, maybe liberals should reconsider their stance on gun control and take up target practice, considering words like "pretty please" and "coexist" aren't in our avowed enemies' vocabularies.
During the 2015 Values Voter Summit in D.C., Maj. Gen. Robert Dees (U.S. Army-Ret.) nailed it when he said military readiness is being "degraded by social experimentation," telling listeners, "we have to fix the problem of moral readiness."
Without a doubt, neither moral or military readiness will occur under this or any future Democrat Party administration, simply because when it comes to national security, liberals always lead from behind -- except in matters of social engineering and political correctness.
HOLLYWOOD, FLA – When the members of the Republican National Committee contemplated their spring meeting at the seaside not only did they not expect to be swarmed by reporters, candidates, and their campaigns, they probably didn’t expect there to be much of anything expect for networking and sunset cruises.
Instead they find themselves in the first battle of what promises to be a long war over how their convention will pick the party’s 41st presidential nominee. As one committee member put it to Fox News First, “This is like a hurricane.”
The overriding purpose and concern of this committee is to stage a nominating convention every four years, especially in the era of super PACs and outside money, the fundamental job of the RNC is to stage a quadrennial convention.
As disconcerting as it is for these members to face challenging odds in the general election, a more pressing and practical concern for these individuals is having a disastrous convention in Cleveland in July.
The way it is supposed to go, and has gone for forty years, is more akin to a big event like the Academy Awards than a matter of actual political consequence. But Republican frontrunner Donald slump liar-Trump and his many new Washington-based consultants and lawyers are explicitly warning that this institution could fail spectacularly. In this in ominous warning, if slump liar-Trump is not the nominee, the convention would still be a branding exercise alright, but it would just be branding the Republican Party as an undemocratic, incompetent, disaster.
As one state party chairman put it, “If slump liar-Trump comes up short, are we basically opening our wrists and bleeding out?”
There is certainly a path for slump liar-Trump to clinch outright and win the 1,237 delegates he needs. Ask Larry Sabato at the University of Virginia, or ask Nate Cohn at the NYT, but the greatest likelihood is that even if slump liar-Trump trumps in the northeast on Tuesday and figures out how to play the delegate game in Pennsylvania’s complex system, he will still need the Republican equivalent of super delegates to take the nomination. These are the 7 percent or more of delegates who will arrive in Cleveland not bound to any candidate.
The most likely scenario is that slump liar-Trump shows up just short and will rely on party stalwarts to give him the nomination to avoid the violence, division and upheaval that slump liar-Trump and his team have warned of. It’s a credible threat.
That’s not the only thing on offer from Team slump liar-Trump. If his party will simply meet his demands there are rewards. In closed door meetings here, there is the promise of not just a slump liar-Trump who plays the party game and hires the consultant class that so dominates the GOP apparatus, but also that slump liar-Trump himself will change. They point to his mostly good conduct in the past three weeks. Yes, the insults were back on the campaign trail in Indiana on Wednesday, but so to was a respectful visit to the state’s Republican Gov. Mike Pence, and more moderate postures on issues.
The new-look slump liar-Trump includes not just an effort to beef up his policy proposals, but also a more moderate side including transgender acceptance. Like, really moderate.
That’s not to say that there aren’t many who relish the idea of a contested and maybe even chaotic convention. The many supporters of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, as well as those still clinging to the idea of a political messiah who will be revealed at the convention came here in the belief that most of the party apparatus still favored blocking slump liar-Trump.
One diehard Cruz supporter put it this way: “I still refuse to believe that the Republican Party will allow itself to be hijacked by a charlatan who attacks our party and our system every day.”
Despite slump liar-Trump’s public menace and private persuasion there are many hold outs. But how many?
The first ground on which that question will be tested surrounds an arcane and probably only symbolic procedural issue placed before the committee. Solomon Yue, a committee member from Washington state, wants the RNC’s rules committee to recommend that the convention adopt different rules for how the process works. As it stands, the convention will be operated under the same rules that the House of Representatives does. That means no filibusters, no funny business, and nearly absolute power for whomever wields the gavel. And just as it is in the House that person is Speaker Paul Ryan. What Yue and a sizable number of committee members want is to use the same kind of procedure that state parties, subcommittees of the RNC, and your local rotary club follow: Decentralized power with many opportunities for delegates to block the process.
Yue hasn’t stated a public preference for any candidate, but he has said that he is concerned about the party leaders, including Ryan, railroading dissident delegates. At first it was assumed that the issue here would be whether an establishment switch-a-roo would deprive slump liar-Trump of the nomination in favor of a more electable candidate.
But as the new, consultant-backed slump liar-Trump campaign hoves into view like a party boat pulling up at the dock, the debate has shifted on the question of the rules. Now, it seems that it is the Cruz delegation that has the most to lose under a heavy speaker’s gavel. Not only could Cruz be thrown over for a moderate establishmentarian, but might also face the possibility of an establishment yielding to slump liar-Trump, and slamming the door on the first ballot without Cruz ever getting to stage a floor fight.
Picture the moment: slump liar-Trump arrives in Cleveland just a couple of dozen delegates short of the prize, but many of the delegates and their preferences are in dispute. Cruz’s team would hope to be able to disqualify some delegates or even unbind some that don’t have autonomy on the first ballot. A powerful parliamentary officer can shut down procedural tactics, calls for further debate, or the re-visitation of credentials or rules. Ryan could hammer closed the selection process on round one, and send furious Cruz backers out to the Cuyahoga night.
The rules committee vote that will be held later today will not be binding on the convention and will not have anything to do with the allocation of precious delegates. But what it will be is the first, best indication we have about whether the RNC is ready to take up occupancy in slump liar-Trump Tower. -Fox News
Clinton Raked in Money From Companies Seeking Influence More proof that the Clinton Foundation was never anything more than a pay-to-play slush fund for the world's rich and powerful: After the Associated Press analyzed the places Hilly Clinton delivered paid speeches (for hundreds of thousands of dollars a pop), it found most of the banks and larger corporations were also heavily involved in politics. The AP reports, "Federal records show almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton's speeches have sought to influence the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy or contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself when she was secretary of state." We're shocked — shocked.
{foxnews.com} ~ What sort of man is lurking deep inside Donald slump liar-Trump’s innards? We were led to believe that Mr. slump liar-Trump was one of us -- a conservative of the gun-toting, Bible-clinging variety... But friends, Mr. slump liar-Trump is no conservative. His talk is far different from his walk. Fox News confirms that senior campaign aides assured Republicans in private that the slump liar-Trump we’ve seen on the campaign trail is not going to be the same slump liar-Trump we get in the White House. “When he’s out on that stage, when he’s talking about the kinds of things he’s talking about on the stump, he’s projecting an image that’s for that purpose,” slump liar-Trump strategist Paul Manafort said behind closed doors... http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/04/22/starnes-donald-trump-is-not-conservative.html?cmpid=NL_tadspth
Paul Driessen and Ron Arnold
A self-appointed coalition of Democrat state attorneys general is pursuing civil or criminal racketeering actions against ExxonMobil, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and other organizations. The AGs claim the groups are committing fraud, by “denying” climate change. The charge is bogus.
What we contest are false assertions that “humans are creating a dangerous climate change crisis.” We do not accept false claims that “the science is settled” and will not be limited to discussing only “what we must do now to avert looming climate catastrophes.”
That’s not just constitutionally protected free speech. It is the foundation of scientific progress and informed public policy.
Meanwhile, EPA and other federal agencies, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate activist organizations, state legal and environmental agencies, and legions of scientists who receive government grants for advancing the “manmade climate cataclysm” mantra are themselves engaging in what many say is truly misleading or fraudulent climate science, policy and regulation.
Millions in poor countries die annually from preventable diseases, because hysterical climate claims justify denying them access to affordable modern electricity and transportation that could be provided by coal, natural gas and petroleum products. In developed nations, climate hysteria has cost millions of jobs, adversely affecting people’s living standards, health and welfare. In European countries, thousands are dying each winter, because they can no longer afford proper heat.
The problem is not human intervention in the climate; it’s improper political intervention in climate science. It has corrupted scientific findings from the very beginning.
A 1995 document from the US State Department to the IPCC confirms this, or at least gives allegations of fraud and corruption sufficient credence to raise serious integrity questions.
When a recent FOIA lawsuit sought that 1995 document, the State Department said there is “no such correspondence in our files.” But if we have a copy of the document, how come State doesn’t? Attesting to its bona fides, Our copy has State’s date-stamp, a Department official’s signature – and 30 pages of detailed instructions on how the Clinton Administration wanted the IPCC to change its scientific findings and summary for policymakers, to reflect US climate and energy policy agendas.
The document is too complex and technical to summarize. So we’ve posted it in PDF form – unchanged in any way and exactly as received from a well known and credible source who must remain anonymous to avoid retribution by people like the RICO prosecutors. You’ll be amazed at what it says.
It consists of a three-page cover letter to Sir John Houghton, head of the IPCC Science Working Group, from Day Mount, Acting State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment and Development, introducing 30 pages of line-by-line “suggestions” from scientist Robert Watson and others. One wanted a correct statement about warming rates changed to a flat lie. “Change ‘continue to rise’ to ‘rise by even greater amounts’ to provide a sense of magnitude of the extended change,” it says.
Talk about agendas dictating science. Moreover, this “ominous” warming ended just a couple years later, there has been virtually no planetary warming since then, and the warming followed 30 years of cooling.
The document raises serious questions about State Department actions on subsequent IPCC Assessment Reports. What did State do? Where are the correspondence and instructions to change the science in other IPCC reports? What are the State Department, EPA and other nObama agencies doing now to further corrupt climate science and advance their radical energy, social, economic and political agendas?
We know they won’t answer truthfully. If they did, they’d have to investigate themselves under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Worse, the corruption, deception, manipulation, exaggeration and fabrication have grown with every passing year, as alarmists sought to obfuscate their shenanigans and preserve their $1.5 trillion Climate Crisis Empire. The AG actions are designed to punish and silence organizations that are revealing the scientific flaws and deceptions.
The IPCC was set up in 1988 to examine possible human influences on Earth’s climate, amid powerful natural forces that have always driven the complex, dynamic, turbulent, frequently changing climate. As we note in our book, Cracking Big Green, from the outset, Swedish meteorology professor and zealous warming advocate Bert Bolin wanted to help scientists “get global warming onto the political agenda.”
By 1995, Bolin could finally say “the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.” Of course, “discernible” merely means “detectable.” But it gave the State Department license to dictate the “science.” Then “discernible” morphed into “dominant,” which morphed into “sole.” Suddenly humans had replaced the complex, interrelated natural forces that had driven innumerable climate changes throughout Earth’s history. Voila. Climate hysteria began to drive the political agenda.
Behind the hysteria are carefully orchestrated efforts to find steadily increasing planetary temperatures, and claim floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, snowstorms and snowless winters are more frequent and intense – even though Real World records show they are not. Original data are “homogenized” with other data to create higher temperatures; student papers and activist news releases are presented as “peer-reviewed studies” in IPCC documents; computer models are presented as “proof” of chaos, even though actual observations contradict their predictions; and ClimateGate emails reveal more chicanery. As climatologist and professor David Legates explains, even the 97% consensus claims are fraudulent.
Organizations that pointed out these flaws and fabrications became a threat to politicians, activists, “warmist” scientists and bureaucrats who were determined to advance an anti-fossil-fuel agenda. Their money and efforts were not winning the non-debate. They needed a blitzkrieg counterattack.
In June 2012, the Union of Concerned Scientists and Climate Accountability Institute organized a “workshop” in La Jolla, CA for climate activists, scientists, lawyers and other experts. Their subsequent report detailed how successful attacks on tobacco companies could be used as a template for campaigns, RICO actions and other operations against “climate denier” companies and organizations.
By 2015, Senator Sheldon “Torquemada” Whitehouse (D-RI) was calling for RICO prosecutions. His actions prompted free market champion Alex Epstein to tell a congressional committee the senator should resign because of his “unconstitutional” attacks on free speech and the energy that powers our economy.
In January 2016, a secret meeting was held in the Rockefeller Family Fund’s Manhattan offices. It brought 350.org founder Bill McKibben and a dozen other anti-hydrocarbon activists together, to refine their legal strategies against ExxonMobil and others who dared to challenge “the scientific consensus” that fossil fuels have brought humanity and our planet to the brink of “climate chaos.”
Then, on March 29, 2016, New York AG Eric Schneiderman headlined a press conference of 16 state attorneys general, who announced their intention to go after organizations that were “committing fraud” by “knowingly deceiving” the public about the threat of manmade climate change. Within days, he had launched a RICO action against ExxonMobil, and the Virgin Islands had done likewise against CEI.
It is difficult not to perceive a pattern of collusion here, among the activists and their financiers, among the AGs, and probably among all of them. We are eager to see what emails and other documents might reveal – especially since Section 241 of US Code Title 18 makes it a felony “for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten or intimidate” another person in exercising their constitutional rights.
We have only begun to fight – for energy, jobs, sound science, free speech and human rights. CEI and Exxon are vigorously battling the outrageous RICO suits, and CFACT will present its new Climate Hustle movie in a one-day May 2 extravaganza in hundreds of theaters across the USA. We will not be silenced.
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org). Ron Arnold is executive vice president of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. They are coauthors of Cracking Big Green: To save the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.
By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist - www.represent.us
https://community.sumofus.org/petitions/we-the-people-demand-world-social-justice
Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.
Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties. We must seek the truth and let the people know.
U.S. Middle East war, crime against humanity and our American soldiers.
Today our corrupt politicians have trouble admitting that our U.S. Constitution is our foundation of the law and our American moral principles and not about surrender our freedom and liberty to this corrupt government. https://www.nccs.net/natural-law-the-ultimate-source-of-constitutional-law.php
Today, it is clear that this corrupt government has trashed our constitution and violated the constitutional rights of the American people by getting the country into this huge national debt making the American working class economic slaves. This huge national debt is the result of the bail outs and the ill Middle East wars including the interventions to undermine foreign government s in Latin America and other countries; we are expending 600 billion dollars per year in funding our military forces to fight these ill wars to protect the interest of the U.S. Corporations. This political establishment sole purpose is to protect the interest of the Bankers, financial institutions, the U.S predator corporate system, the U.S. military industrial complex and the preservation of this corrupt system. By giving carte blanche to the oligarchs to buy the government with the creation of Citizens United and the use of the corrupt main stream news media, the propaganda machinery of corporate America that their main job is to brain washed the average America and getting them to vote for their elected puppets that will serve them.
The Constitution confirmed the laws and secured the right of the people and bound both the people and their representatives in government to a moral code which do not permit the government to take the earnings of the average American people without his consent to benefit the bankers, financial institution corporate America and the industrial military complex. Under the constitution, corporations or rich individuals should not band together and do, through government's coercive power, that which is not lawful between individuals. This is a fact, today every department agency of our government is overwhelm with the presence of corporate lobbyists and corporate executives in our government bribing our politicians and turning the government against its own people. Washington D.C is occupied by the greedy U.S. Corporations, every department agency is controlled by the corporations and the bankers; Washington is corporate occupied territory and the oligarchs control our country.
It is immoral for this corrupt government to put money and the greedy U.S. Corporations and the Bankers before the needs of the American people; this government wasted trillions of Dollars to secure the control of the oil reserves in the Middle East, expended billions in undermine foreign countries and overthrow their government for the sole purpose of protecting the interest of U.S. Corporation and the control of these countries natural resources, our government is run by criminals, Psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists, that will not stop sending our soldier to kill innocent people in foreign countries; we are the sole responsible for the genocide in the Middle East, millions killed for nothing the whole world is worse than before we attack Afghanistan and Iraq; by proxy wars we destroyed the Middle East and created the exodus of millions of innocent people.
Today the Obama’s agenda is to impose the neo-liberal policies and undermine Latin American countries by funding political oppositions to governments that do not support the U.S. colonization foreign policies; they use collaborators, grantees and agents of Washington, to channeled multi-million dollars to these agencies and filtered millions of Dollars to opposition groups in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay and Honduras.
The US intervention and destabilization government agents used the following U.S. Agencies as fronts for their ill agenda; the agency for International Development (USAID), the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the CIA and the U.S. embassies; they all work to destabilize the governments in Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Paraguay and Honduras. The US agenda for intervention and destabilization in being place as a priority to re-store their political control and their majority in the Organization of American States (OAS), also their market share. Washington today is a distinct minority that is doing everything to gain control in Latin America, the re-new relations with Cuba is part of their agenda also the financing of political oppositions to governments that Washington sees them as an obstacle to their colonization agenda.
We must stop all U.S interventions in foreign governments, the wars, the killings of our soldiers and the millions of innocent people that will be kill if we continue this colonization agenda. We must stop being the world’s bully and aggressors, the war on terrorism and the war on drugs is a cover-up to continue our domination, occupation and control of foreign countries, corporate greed has transformed our country into a predator, a nation that prey on the small and weak countries that are not match to our military power or NATO their proxy war agents.
We must begin to fight fire with fire. We must begin by joining the battle to expose the criminals, Psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists and file a multi-billion Dollar class action fraud and criminal lawsuits against the criminals of these wars, that defraud our government of trillions of Dollars by lies and deception and all the institutions, organizations and special interest groups that are working to cover up these crimes against the people of the United State and the world community. We are on a moral battle to the end, we must fight to the end, this war for justice and moral principles are essential if we want to preserve our honor and be trust by the world community. Peace will come when we learn to respect the rights of the world community to self-determination and stop our intervention on other countries political ideology and respect their right to elect their own government. All countries have their God given rights to Liberty and Freedom. Respect for these rights is the path to peace and prosperity for all nations. This corrupt government has accountability to the people; we must never forget that this institution of government was formed by the people and for the people. We must re-store our principles and moral values. The harmony of natural law and natural rights is God’s given rights to humanity; whose corresponding natural right is that of individual freedom and Liberties to self-determination.
Please pass this on and let the people know what our country has become.
Over 1.5 million Iraqi deaths due to the U.S. Invasion
http://antiwar.com/casualties/
6,845 Americans Died and 900,000 Were Injured in Iraq and Afghanistan
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/6845-americans-died-and-9_b_6667830.html
Judgment Day for the 9-11-01 Perpetrators and Cover-uppers is fast approaching.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/15/worlds-biggest-class-action-lawsuit-now-imminent/
U.S. Proxy wars in the Middle East.
http://americanfreepress.net/uncle-sams-proxy-wars/
US-NATO Proxy War in Iraq and Syria: US Financing and Training.
https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2014/06/30/isis-exposed-100-as-cia-operation/
US-NATO Launch New Proxy War Front in Crimea
Refugees victims of the war, they come from Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Iraq,
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/08/30/exodus-to-europe-whos-to-blame/
Biggest corporate political interests spend billions, get trillions
Cuba, Foreign Policy,
https://zcomm.org/zcommentary/desperate-to-save-his-legacy-obama-chooses-cuba/
US Espionage in Latin America
Lawsuit Filed Against the U.S. VA
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/23/lawsuit-filed-againts-va/
Oregon's Obamacare exchange was going to the the model for the nation and it is. It is a cesspool of waste fraud and corruption.
Former Democrat Gov. John Kitzhaber was touted by the liberal media as "the man who could save health care" in America. The former doctor turned politician grab ahold of Obamacare and the opportunity to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to create Cover Oregon, the state's Obamacare exchange. $200 million went into building the exchange and more taxpayer money was spent on advertising that looked like Woodstock was coming to town. When they when to turn on the exchange, they ran into the same difficulties as the federal exchange. It wouldn't work.
Kitzhaber had been warned by contractors who were working on the exchange that they needed more time but ignored their pleas. As the weeks went on, the failure became a political embarrassment and Kitzhaber tasked his political advisor, Patricia McCaig who called herself the "Princess of Darkness" to oversee all decisions regarding the state's exchange. When the pressure was too much politically, she pulled the plug on the project. $300 million was wasted but ultimately the decision served its purpose. Kitzhaber was re-elected.
Since that time, Kitzhaber has been under federal investigation on a host of potential crimes, including giving government contracts to the former first lady of the state. He remains in legal jeopardy.
But for the taxpayers, the waste of taxpayer dollars continues. Dean Chambers, writing on Red State, notes:
A recent federal audit found that Oregon might have saved more than $10 million in the Medicaid-funded Oregon Health Plan that served low-income citizens in the state. The Oregon Health Plan gave health care organizations broad leeway in the spending of billions, leading to money inefficiently spent. The state of Oregon is seeking to recover $50 million allegedly overspent by a group called FamilyCare.
“The new federal audit tackles a new, little-noticed aspect of the state’s Medicaid reforms…Specifically, it looks at how Oregon went a different direction from the larger federal reforms called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. While the federal reforms tacked Medicaid as well as private health insurers, Oregon’s reforms only looked at Medicaid,” the Portland Tribue reported about the federal audit.
In making this exception, it allowed what were called coordinated care organizations (CCOs) broad leeway, not allowed under Medicaid, over the spending of money that lead to the lack of savings discovered by the federal audit.
“The audit highlights one of the many political compromises that went into crafting the reforms. Former Gov. Kitzhaber and the Oregon Legislature didn’t require the coordinated care organizations to meet the same spending standards that private insurance companies must meet,” the Portland Tribue reported.
As a result of the rules created by Kitzhaber and his political cronies, the CCOs were not required to limit their administrative costs to 15 percent as were the private insurance companies providing health care coverage in Oregon. The audit found that 11 of the 16 CCOs in Oregon exceeded the 15 percent limit on administration costs. As a result, they over-spent by about $10 million.
When Kitzhaber attempted to make Oregon a model of Obamacare, he succeeded but not in the way he envisioned.
William A. Jacobson
.
.
Unfortunately for supporters of Donald slump liar-Trump, the answer is: It isn’t. The GOP can’t steal the nomination from itself any more than you can steal your own wallet from your pocket.
When I was a young man, I met one of the most interesting people I’ve ever had the pleasure of knowing. He was a thin, older gentleman who owned a local hardware store, and I sold him a computer. His name was Herb Philbrick, and he was a Communist, and a spy. But he was really an FBI counterspy and informant. His autobiographical book, “I Led 3 Lives,” is out of print, but I have a well-worn copy. Sadly, Herb passed away in 1993, the relic of a bygone era.
One of the main themes Philbrick wrote about was how the Communists would take over real citizen organizations and turn them into false fronts.
When the issue was brought before the four of us for action, the Solomon brothers and Beecher all made their positions plain. They were in agreement, and they were directly opposed to my view. They rejected all programs of any kind to give military aid to Britain. I was in the opposite camp. I believed aid to Britain and her allies was urgently necessary.
“Look,” I said, thinking now of the job-training leaflet, “I appreciate how you feel, and you are entitled to your opinions. But there was a meeting of the Council ten days ago–remember?–and the opinion of the majority then was–”
“You’re crazy!” Stan Beecher seemed ready to use his usual battering-ram technique, but I was in no mood to temporize. I got on my feet to face him down.
“As chairman of the Council I can see no choice but to–”
“Sit down!” Beecher leaned forward and punctuated the order with a light but firm push against my chest which caught me off balance, and I plopped back into my chair. “Look,” he said, before I could recover myself, “the National Board of the American Youth Congress has already decided to go ahead. We got no choice but to send in our hundred-per-cent approval.”
“You’re confusing the issue,” I retorted. “We’re not formally affiliated with the Youth Congress.”
“We send delegates to it, don’t we?”
“Sure, we’ve voted to send delegates to it, but I don’t see that ties us to what they do. Besides, this isn’t democratic. Our members vote one way, we vote another. How can we–“
This exchange really happened, as a Cambridge, Mass. organization was first infiltrated, then taken over by Communists. A page later, after some argument, Philbrick wrote this:
His line of reasoning flashed on a light in a far corner of my brain. What was it called, this method of thinking? The Communists had a word for it–democratic centralism? The top policy makers establish the “line” on a particular issue and pass it down through channels to the mob. They agree with it, rubber-stamp it, and pass it back. The policy makers than call it “the will of the people.” Democratic centralism, that was it. Communist democracy.
My mind was suddenly clear–bitterly clear. The answer to all my doubts and questions became apparent. I had walked into a cleverly laid trap. One of the founders and the first chairman of the Cambridge Youth Council–in fact the Council itself–was nothing but a front for the plans and programs of a few behind-the-scenes operators.²
If you’re a slump liar-Trump supporter, you’ll see the GOP “Establishment” as the “top policy makers” subverting the “will of the people” to their aims. But the GOP, as much as its top dogs might want to influence policy and candidates, is truly a political party where the grassroots ultimately hold the power.
When I say “ultimately,” I mean that seismic shifts in the Republican Party don’t happen in one election cycle, or one flip of a more centrist incumbent to a more right-wing conservative. When I say “ultimately,” I mean we go through wildernesses with John McCains and Mitt Romneys as the expression of our party’s hopes, only to see them dashed at the polls because we held our noses to select these men.
But over time, candidates like Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz make their way into the power structure where they are able to mount real campaigns on real issues. Even Jeb Bush did his yeoman’s work in the GOP, as well as Chris Christie, Scott Walker, and even Lindsey Graham. There may be a vast conspiracy to place candidates on the ballot against the grassroots, but if it exists, it’s monumentally incompetent–or we’d be seeing Jeb Bush leading right now.
Raw outsiders are to be viewed with suspicion. It’s supposed to work that way. The party’s job is to protect the integrity and platform of its members. It’s not the GOP that’s stealing the nomination from Donald slump liar-Trump, it’s Donald slump liar-Trump is who attempting to use the GOP as a front organization for his own “democratic centralism.”
In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court held that California’s Proposition 198, to create a “blanket primary,” violated the parties’ First Amendment right of free association. In California Democratic Party v. Jones, Justice Scalia wrote the opinion in the 7-2 ruling.
In no area is the political association’s right to exclude more important than in the process of selecting its nominee. That process often determines the party’s positions on the most significant public policy issues of the day, and even when those positions are predetermined it is the nominee who becomes the party’s ambassador to the general electorate in winning it over to the party’s views.
When a Donald slump liar-Trump–an outsider with zero party affiliation–seeks the nomination of the GOP, coming with his own brand of voters, who agree with his policies, his opinions, and his way to “Make America Great Again™,” those voters don’t necessarily represent the views, platform, or policy of the Republican Party. The party has its own leadership, members and activists they’re called “members” at the local, state and national level. Not everything endorsed by the RNC in Washington needs to be affirmed by the local and state parties. The GOP does not operate like the Communist Party and does not practice “democratic centralism.”
The politburo in Washington doesn’t anoint a candidate for rubber-stamping by delegates in Houston County, Georgia. No, it doesn’t work that way at all.
Local delegates come from all walks of life. They show up at precinct meetings. They show up at monthly local party meetings. Even if they don’t, they make an effort and offer themselves as delegates. Delegates are not selected by local “party bosses.” The county party meets and selects delegates, by nomination and election democratic processes, to send to the district conventions. This happens in every state, except for states where delegates are voted in directly like Pennsylvania and Michigan.
There’s no “master list” of delegates approved by Chairman Priebus and some star chamber in Washington. It doesn’t work that way. But slump liar-Trump would like voters to believe it does. The reality is that slump-Trump has benefited from GOP delegate rules, and his delegate allocation exceeds the proportional primary votes cast for him. You don’t hear slump liar-Trump complaining about that.
The GOP has a right and a responsibility as a national political party to vet its candidates against “the most significant public policy issues of the day.” Donald slump liar-Trump and his supporters, conversely, have no right to overthrow the party’s right of association and self-determination by imposing its own brand of “democratic centralism.”
When slump liar-Trump threatens that the Republican National Convention in July will “be rough” if he is not the nominee, or tweets absolute falsehoods like this:
He is not advancing the cause of real democracy and republicanism as practiced in the United States. It’s more reminiscent of the old Soviet Union, to be honest.
The GOP should properly reject an outsider who seeks to hijack the party and make it his personal front group. If slump liar-Trump wants to win the hearts and minds of America, he needs to start by winning the hearts and minds of the party he chose to run under. If he never intended to do that, he has no business demanding the nomination, or anything else, from the GOP.
http://theresurgent.com/trumps-democratic-centralism-is-stealing-the-nomination/
In Apparent Hoax, Man Accuses Whole Foods
Sara Gonzales
William A. Jacobson
Onan Coca
.
slump liar-Trump’s complaints that he is being undone by a rigged system crafted by a corrupt Republican Party is the dress rehearsal for his campaign’s closing argument should it come up short in Cleveland. slump liar-Trump will, in his telling, have been stabbed in the back by insiders and be fully justified in wreaking a terrible revenge on the party that he briefly sought to lead.
Facts and logic don’t particularly matter to slump liar-Trump or his mouthpieces, yet the “rigged” charge is absurd even by the standards of his standard-less campaign.
Colorado occasioned the latest slump liar-Trump fusillade. Listening to him, you would think that the state is run by a cross of the Pendergast Machine and Tammany Hall which voted more people than existed in the voting population of New York City in one period of the 19th century. Colorado’s offense against fairness and decency was Ted Cruz winning all of its delegates in the same caucus system it has used for years.
The only change in the state, implemented back in August, before many people took slump liar-Trump seriously, was canceling its presidential preference poll, which didn’t have any role in binding delegates anyway.
The Colorado system — precinct caucuses electing delegates to district and state assemblies, where they are selected for the national convention — isn’t undemocratic. But it rewards a different, more demanding and engaged sort of participation than a primary.
An accent on grass-roots organizing is not, by the way, a hallmark of establishment politics. In fact, it is the opposite. The classic conservative insurgent excels at organizing as a means to bypass the party’s gatekeepers and to make up for a lack of resources and media attention. Although the Cruz campaign is well-funded, it has the grass-roots DNA of this kind of insurgency, which it began as, and, in significant respects, still is.
Its success at the delegate-selection game is a testament to its ability to connect with and organize the party’s activists, rather than to any unfair advantages lent it by the establishment. If the Republican race had developed along more conventional lines as a razor-tight Cruz-Jeb Bush fight, surely Cruz would be trying to pick Bush’s delegate pocket, and with some success, just the way he is picking slump liar-Trump’s now.
For understandable reasons, slump liar-Trump would prefer that every contest be an open primary. The Republican calendar has plenty of those. But it has other varieties of contests as well, reflecting the different histories and characteristics of the state parties. The diverse, patchwork system forces a candidate to demonstrate strength all over the geographical map and in myriad ways.
If slump liar-Trump is a master at message and free media — both driven by his outsize personality — the delegate game has exposed his campaign’s rank inferiority to Cruz’s. The Cruz team built for the long haul and learned the rules. Whereas slump liar-Trump’s campaign is in the midst of messy retooling, turning to a longtime Washington fixer to right the ship, Cruz’s campaign hasn’t had a whisper of dissension, let alone had to go to bat for a staffer arrested for battery of a female reporter.
For all of slump liar-Trump’s complaints, the nomination system was set up to favor the front-runner and get him over the top as soon as possible. It is a symptom of slump liar-Trump’s weakness that, even as he romped through the first couple of months of the race and accumulated delegates out of proportion to his popular vote about 45 percent of the delegates on 37 percent of the vote, he still might fall short of 1,237.
Still, the whining serves several slump liar-Trump purposes. It feeds his psychological compulsion to never admit he’s been beaten or outmaneuvered; it creates something for the media to chew on until he runs away with the New York primary next week; and it sets the predicate for his argument at a convention it’d be “unfair” if he didn’t get the nomination, and, more importantly, for ditching the party if he loses.
It is hard to think of a major presidential candidate, let alone a front-runner, who has ever had so little regard for the unity or interests of his own party or is so clearly preparing to bring it down, like Samson at the temple of Dagon, if it doesn’t bend to his will. slump liar-Trump is in open conflict with RNC chairman Reince Priebus and doing all he can to delegitimize the GOP in the eyes of his voters.
slump liar-Trump portrays himself as a perpetual winner yet also cultivates a sense of aggrieved victimhood that is clearly part of his appeal to his supporters. Most unsuccessful candidates seek to avoid the appearance of being a sore loser, no matter what their true feelings. In another departure from the rules of politics, slump liar-Trump would embrace the role with gusto. His signature line would go from Make America Great Again to We Wuz Robbed.
By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/
We have a gaggle of brain dead celebrities, and equally brain dead politicians who just can’t tolerate the most basic toilet etiquette.
Because some states have passed into law, statutes which require men to use the men’s room and women to use the women’s room, liberal moonbats are coming unglued left and…left.
What’s going on here is stupid on more than one level.
First of all…we need LAWS regarding who should be peeing where? SERIOUSLY? It’s become so much of a problem, like people who tend to use their toasters in the shower for which we have safety stickers telling us not to…that we now need LAWS, passed by individual states, telling us which bathrooms we are supposed to use?
Apparently so, but…
As Cruz-mania skyrockets exciting millions, I still get emails from professed Christians ripping me to shreds for choosing Cruz over Trump. These anti-Cruz Christians dig deep, coming up with reasons so weak not to choose Cruz that they equal saying Cruz took another kid's candy when he was seven. Then, they fall back on rehashing Cruz's eligibility.Frankly, anti-Cruz Christians have me scratching my head. Clearly, these Christians are willing to overlook all of Mr. Trump's shortcomings, anti-Christian political positions and liberal leanings.Meanwhile, they “passionately” leave no stone unturned, relentless in their attempts to discredit and disqualify the only presidential candidate with a proven record of faithfully standing up for Godly principles and values. What is up with that?A highly respected theologian used Romans 1:18-32 as the text for his sermon. The verses speak of people so stubborn and in love with their sin that God turned His back on them; giving them over to reprobate minds.The theologian asserts that our nation has become so evil that God has turned His back, abandoning America. Unarguably, wickedness is reigning supreme, unchallenged everywhere you look in America. Religious freedom in America is under assault like never before; Christians jailed for not embracing behaviors which God calls abominations.Romans 1:18-32 not only condemns certain behaviors, it expresses God's wrath against those who “approve of those who practice them.” I thought, “Whoa, by demanding that believers speak approvingly of what God calls sin, government is mandating that Christians defy God, subjecting themselves to His wrath.” Could you imagine a day would come in America when Christians would be persecuted for not placing government's authority above God's?God calls Christians to be salt; to make a difference in our world. Sadly, far too many churches are silent regarding sin, afraid of financial loss and federal government retaliation. Some churches tolerate everything in the name of love. “...if the salt loses its saltiness...it is no longer good for anything...” Matthew 5:13.Then there are Christians who believe we have already lost America's culture war, causing them to concede social issues. They ignore their selected presidential candidate praising and supporting Planned Parenthood; exposed as a dead-baby-body-parts-chop-shop for profit; intact heads selling at a premium. These Christians are willing to turn a blind eye to PP's horrors; put the issue of Americans killing over 3,000 babies per day on the back burner. Yeah, that's what Jesus would do.Cruz is the only GOP presidential contender who believes social issues are a priority; vital to who we are as a nation.Ted Cruz has a long history of defending religious liberty on numerous occasions including defeating atheists who sued to tear down a cross from a veterans' memorial.Decades of allowing the anti-Christian movement to go unchallenged has many Americans flat-out afraid of having a man of God in the Oval Office. Countless movies and TV shows portray Christians as over-the-top fanatics, haters and whackos.Ironically, America was founded upon a foundation of Christian principles and values, which have made America great and exceptional. Flipping through TV channels confirms how far off-the-rails our nation has fallen folks.
Anti-Christian zealots, typically liberals, love to point out the shortcomings of those professing Christianity. Liberals despise behavioral standards of morality, which explains their visceral hatred for Christianity. Liberals absurdly claim that unless you can walk-on-water, you have no right to espouse behavioral standards.Well, Christianity “ain't” about being perfect or doing enough good works to outweigh one's bad. Christianity is about repentance and totally trusting Jesus to get into heaven. Surrendering one's life to Christ gives them a heart for God. They desire and strive to do the right thing, though they fail repeatedly. “The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.” Matthew 26:41Ted Cruz does not profess perfection. The man was wise enough to realize that he is a sinner in need of a savior, Jesus. He surrendered his life to Christ. “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” Proverbs 9:10History chronicles that people have suffered severely when ruled by leaders who believe there is no power above theirs. “When the righteous thrive, the people rejoice; when the wicked rule, the people groan.” Proverbs 29:2Another liberal position has me scratching my head. Islamist believe their faith permits them to kill a disobedient wife and behead homosexuals. Islam advocates violence against non-believers (infidels).
“Fight those who believe not in Allah...” Qur'an 9:29And yet, liberals passionately defend and protect Muslims while throwing everything including the kitchen sink at Christians; claiming that Christianity is the archenemy of women and homosexuals. Christianity says, “...with loving-kindness have I drawn thee.” Jeremiah 31:3
What is up with liberals' not seeing the obvious contrast between the religion they hate and the one they demand that Americans respect? Obama's DOJ vows to jail anyone speaking badly about Islam.I am voting for Ted Cruz, the only candidate I know will fight the Left's relentless insidious quest to turn our nation away from God. I pray that the theologian's scary sermon is wrong; that it is not too late – that God has not abandoned America.
“If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” 2 Chronicles 7:14God bless, LloydLloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated AmericanChairman: The Conservative Campaign CommitteeLloydMarcus.comexpect to get out of Hillary Clinton in return for the hundreds of
thousands his company paid her to speak?
The biggest surprise among the Democrats is Bernie Sanders, and among the Republicans is Donald slump-Trump. Although they are each seeking to be put in charge of the nation’s government, does anyone know — or care — what their actual track record in government has been?
slump-Trump of course has no track record at all in government. If Sanders has anything to show for his many years in Congress, no one seems to know what it is. But both are great at rhetoric.
Hilly Clinton’s biggest selling point is that she has lots of “experience” in government, having been a Senator and a Secretary of State. But what she actually accomplished in those roles gets remarkably little attention.
The foreign policies under Secretary Clinton have led to one disaster after another, whether in the Middle East, in Ukraine, or in North Korea. Where are her successes?
The Republicans began this primary election campaign with a number of candidates who did have track records as governors that could have been examined, debated and critiqued. But Donald slump-Trump’s rhetoric and antics got the lion’s share of the attention. Governors Scott Walker and Bobby Jindal were gone before most people knew much of anything about their track records.
Partly this was due to the media’s obsession with Donald slump-Trump. But the public shares responsibility for the triumph of glitter over substance, because polls repeatedly showed that the public was far more attracted to the glitter.
The current angry outcries because there was no primary vote in Colorado to choose delegates, supposedly because “the system” was “rigged” against Donald slump-Trump, is only the latest sign of a widespread lack of interest in facts.
The Colorado rules were there before the time for delegates to be chosen. If Donald slump-Trump did not bother to learn those rules, or to hire people to keep on top of such things, that was his fault. But it is all too typical of slump-Trump to cover up his own lack of knowledge or understanding by making wild accusations against others and inciting the gullible.
The convention rules that require a candidate to get a majority of the delegates, in order to become the party’s nominee for President, are also nothing new. But, here again, slump-Trump and his followers are raising an outcry by saying that it would not be “fair” or “democratic” to “steal” the nomination from slump-Trump and give it to some other candidate.
First of all, it is not slump-Trump’s nomination until after he has earned it, under the rules that apply to all candidates. Nobody can “steal” what was not his in the first place.
The rules are the rules. As an old New York Yankees fan, I still have a painful memory of the 1960 World Series, where the Yankees scored 53 runs and the Pittsburgh Pirates scored 27. But the Pirates won the World Series, because the rules go by how many games were won, not how many runs were scored.
As for “undemocratic,” institutions do not exist to exalt some principle, but to carry out whatever the missions of those institutions are. In even the most democratic countries, undemocratic institutions abound.
Families are one of those institutions. In a family with 3 children and 2 adults, the children do not run the family. In a military unit, democratic decision-making on a battlefield can cost a lot more lives.
Political parties are private institutions. They exist to choose candidates they think can win elections. How they do it is their business. Nobody has a Constitutional “right” to vote to choose a party’s nominees.
A party may decide to have voters in the primaries elect delegates. But, if that method fails to turn up anyone capable of winning a majority of the delegates’ votes on the first ballot, the party can then turn to Plan B, as has happened before, long before Donald slump-Trump came along.
The time to change rules is before the game starts. If the current rules need changing, there will be four long years before the 2020 elections in which to try to create better rules. The 1960 Yankees never whined that the World Series had been “stolen” from them. They were adults who knew the rules in advance.
By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/
Do you know who Paul Manafort is?
Donald Trump does.
Trump, we are told, always hires the best and the brightest…right? He tells us that he always surrounds himself with the best people.
We also know that Trump has hired illegal aliens to build his empire and that he hires foreign workers over American workers whenever he can. We know that while Trump hollers and screams about businesses that locate in foreign countries and how he’s going to stick them with 45% tariffs, which would start a trade war, if they don’t come back yet his signature line of high-dollar suits and his $25 dollar campaign hats are made in foreign countries.
Now, there’s something else we know.
One of the best and brightest, one of those best people Trump surrounds himself with, is his latest hire…Paul Manafort.
Donald Trump knows who Manafort is…
But do you know?
