Forum

Voters cannot be trusted with an election. Voting has now become symbolic rather than tangible. This is the new progressive, enlightened political doctrine being taught and now demanded. 

Progressive Governors, Members of the House and Senators shifted into high gear in their efforts to prevent Trump from appearing on the ballot and has caused quite a stir, with some seeing it as an attempt to manipulate the democratic process. In other words, elections can't be voter-driven, but must be controlled by only one party and one school of thought.  

Following a Supreme Court unanimous ruling, House Democrats are making a strong effort to block former President Donald Trump from being on future ballots. This action has sparked a passionate discussion about the fundamentals of democracy and the responsibility of elected representatives in influencing electoral procedures.

In response to the Democrats' move, Trump criticized them, calling them "losers." On the other hand, Democratic representatives like Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, among others, are leading legislative initiatives to prevent not only Trump but a considerable number of Republican candidates from running for office making voting symbolic rather than real.

      At the center of this debate is a fundamental question: should the outcome of elections be determined only by the voters?

Some Democrats are pushing for ballot disqualifications, claiming that specific individuals, such as Trump and Republicans in Congress, are a danger to democracy. They argue that blocking these individuals from seeking public office is essential to protect the credibility of the voting system but in reality they are saying, “elections cannot be entrusted to voters’.

However, the loud cry of ‘Democracy isn’t about 'can't leaving the election up to the voters', but insuring the voters can only choose single party approved candidates. Opponents of these initiatives view them as a challenge to democratic principles. Democrats are putting the integrity of elections at risk by trying to disqualify candidates over perceived threats to democracy. Additionally, the idea of proactively disqualifying candidates from the ballot raises worries about political censorship and disenfranchisement.

The recent Supreme Court decision not to intervene in state-led disqualification efforts making voting more symbolic rather than tangible has only added more fuel to the ongoing debate. Some Democrats see this decision as supporting their agenda, while others see it as a reminder the judiciary should not intervene in political disputes. Thereby leaving the Judicial system and the legislative system out of the democratic process but replacing them with ideological voter disenfranchising, 'but for the good of democracy'.

One of the key figures behind these disqualification efforts, Representative Jamie Raskin, has come under intense criticism for what opponents view as Orwellian logic. Raskin's argument by preventing certain individuals from running for office is "the most democratic" approach has been met with incredulity from those who view it as a thinly veiled attempt to manipulate the electoral process thereby declaring.....

                           “The people can't decide who wins” but come short in disclosing who can decide who wins.

Furthermore, the timing of these initiatives, following the events of January 6th at the Capitol, introduces an additional level of intricacy to the discussion. Although the protest of that day were widely criticized, using it as a basis for broad electoral changes raises concerns about capitalizing on a national remonstration for political purposes.

As the political debate heats up, it's uncertain how these initiatives will play out. The enlightened progressive masters have declared: "Voting is not a democratic process but only a symbol for voters to learn from and a benchmark to correct convoluted thinking."  Amid the possibility of more legal challenges and legislative conflicts on the horizon, the ongoing debate about election participation highlights the significant rifts in American society.

Final Word: Dear Gun-toting MAGA Extremists, Toxic Cult Members, and Smelly Walmart Shoppers: Someone has to defend us against using our unalienable right to select our own representatives, but who should it be? 

The same people who are orchestrating the tens of millions of votes cast by illegal aliens, vote mule schemes, duplicate vote harvesting, and the left's newest play-toy, Ballot Purification!

'Thank You' is not necessary, the Progressive’s see this as their duty to advance democracy and make the greater good viable.  Remember, under the careful eye of the enlightened and progressive’s you will be allowed to vote in a very democratic and fair manner, but your vote will be only symbolic.

So, enjoy the enlightenment! 🤣