WE HAVE BEEN LISTENING TO THE DEBATES AND LEARNING ABOUT THE PAST ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF EACH OF THE CANDIDATES BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 2011 ACOMPLISHMENTS? HAVE THEY IMPLEMENTED ANY OF THE ASPECTS OF THEIR PLANS WITH ACTION. THEY ALL HAVE HAD SOME GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE BUT HAVE THEY USED THE CONNECTIONS FROM THAT EXPERIENCE TO TRY TO GET SOME THING DONE ABOUT OUR CURRENT PROBLEMS?

I AM PRESENTING THIS THIS CHALLENGE IN AN EFFORT TO BECOME BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE LEADERSDHIP POTENTIAL OF THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES AND AS AN UNBIASED OBSERVER TRYING TO DECIDE WHICH WOULD BE THE BEST PRESIDENT IN LEADERSHIP AND ACCOMPLISHMENT POTENTIAL. 

HERMAN CAIN HAS WORKED FOR THE FED AND IF HE WAS EFFECTIVE, HE PROBABLY MADE SOME POWERFUL CONNECTIONS WITHIN GOVERNMENT CIRCLES, HAS HE USED THOSE CONNECTIONS TO TRY GET SOME LEGISLATIVE ACTION ON ANY PART5S OF HIS OVERALL PLAN FOR AMERICA?  IF SO HERMAN TELL US ABOUT THEM.

GOVERNOR PERRY HAS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB IN ATTRACTING LARGE BUSINESS TO LOCATE IN A RIGHT TO WORK STATE WITHOUT A STATE INCOME OR CORPORATE INCOME TAX AND IS CONTENDING WITH BORDER PROBLEMS ON A DAILY BASSIS, BUT HAS HE INSTITUTED ANY NEW TEXAS POLICY WHICH WOULD REMOVE THE INCENTIVES FOR PEOPLE TO ENTER OUR COUNTRY ILEGALLY?

HE HAS ADMITTED TO INSTITUTING ONE STATE POLICY WHICH IS ACTUALLY AN INCENTIVE FOR ILLEGAL ENTRY, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE EXTRA COSTS INVOLVED FOR EDUCATION AND STATE OFFERED WELFARE PROGRAMS. WHERE ARE THE POLICY REQUIRING PROOF OF LEGAL ENTRY TO QUALIFY FOR ENTRY INTO ANY OF THOSE PROGRAMS. TELL US ABOUT THE THINGS YOU ARE DOING NOW GOVERNOR.

GOVERNOR HUNTSMAN HAS DONE A MARVELOUS JOB FOR UTAH ALSO BUT MANY OF THE NATIONAL PROBLEMS PLAGUING THE COUNTRY HAVE NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON HIS STATE, HAS HE INITIATED ANY STATE INITIATIVES TO LIMIT THOSE NEGATIVE EFFECTS. SHOW US THAT YOU ARE A MAN OF ACTION GOVERNOR.

GONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, YOU TOLD US THAT YOU WANT TO ABOLISH THE FED, DO YOU HAVE ANY PENDING LEGISLATION TO EITHER LIMIT THE POWER OF THE FED OR TO ABLOLISH IT?. AS A CONGRESSMAN, HAVE YOU SIGNED TO CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANS LEGISLATION TO REPEAL OBOMACARE AND DOD FRANK? DO YOU HAVE ANY PENDING LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE THINGS YOU TELL US ABOUT ON THE DEBATES?   LET US, THE PEOPLE SEE HOW YOU ARE LEADING.

RICK SANTORUM YOU HAVE SERVED PENSYLVANIA WELL OVER THE YEARS AND YOU KNOW HOW THE CONGRESS WORKS, HAVE YOU TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THAT KNOWLEDGE AND INFLUENCE TO WORK AT GETTING THE 15+ JOBS BILL THAT THE HOUSE HAS PASSED INTO COMMITTEE AND ON THE SENATE SCHEDULE FOR A VOTE?

MR ROMNEY, YOU HAVE BUILT A ENVIOUS RECORD AS GOVERNOR. STATESMAN, BUSINESS MAN, SAVIOUR OF THE OLYMPICS,ETC. YOU ARE ONE OF TWO CANDIDATES WHO COULD HAVE THE MOST INFLUENCE WITHIN GOVERNMENT CIRCLES AND YOU HAVE PRODUCED A VERY COMPREHENSIVE AND COMPLEX PLAN FOR AMERICA BUT WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH IT? HAVE YOU USED YOUR INFLUENCE TO PREMOTE ANY OF THE ASPECTS OF YOUR PLAN IN THE CURRENT CONGRESS? TELL US WHAT YOU ARE DOING BEFORE ELECTION TO HELP GET OUR COUNTRY BACK ON TRACK.

NEWT GINGRICH, YOU ARE PROBABLY THE MOST ACOMPLISHED AND KNOWLEDGABLE MAN ON THE STAGE, YOU HAVE EARNED A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESPECT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE SO WHY ARE YOU JUST SITTING AROUND TALKING ABOUT YOUR SUCESSES, I AM DISAPOINTED IN YOUR LACK OF ACTION CURRENTLY. YOU, MORE THAN ANY OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES COULD HAVE HEATED THINGS UP FOR THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO GET SOMETHING DONE. WHERE IS THE WARRIOR THAT WE ALL HAVE ADMIRED FOR YEARS?

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMAN, IT APPEARS THAT YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE OF THIS GROUP WHO HAS THE COURAGE TO STEP AND WORK AT GETTING SOME OF YOUR BELIEFS ACTED ON WITH YOUR APPEAL OF OBOMACARE AND DODD/FRANK.  WORKING TO GET THOSE PROPOSALS ADVANCED IS A MONUMENTAL TASK  AND IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOW EFFECTIVE YOU CAN BE.

AND YOU ARE TO BE COMMENDED FOR THE VALIANT EFFORT YOU ARE PUTTING FORTH.

WATCHING THIS DEBATE ON C-SPAN 2 TURNED MY STOMACH AS THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORS KEPT PLAYING THE SAME OLD SONG ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS SANDBAGGING THE PRESIDENTS PLANS.  THE REPUBLIC HOUSE HAS PASSED 15 JOBS BILLS WITH NO TAX INCREASES OR TAX SURCHARGES BUT THE DEMOCRATS REFUSE TO  LET THEM ON THE SENATE FLOOR EVEN THOUGH THEY ALL PASSED THE HOUSE WITH SUBSTANTIAL DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT. THE PUSH FOR BRIDGES, ROADS, ETC ARE FOR PROGRAMS THAT WOULD TAKE MONTHS AND YEARS TO IMPLEMENT DUE TO THE CUMBERSOM REFGULATORY PROCESS. I WATCHED THE HOUSE DEBATE IN THE HOUSE ON THE REGULATOR REFORM SUBJECT AND I RECALL HEASRING THAT THE COST OF COMPLIANCE OF THE REGULATIONS WOULD RUN OVER A MILLION DOLLARS PER PROJECT AND TAKE 2 OR MORE YEARS TO COMPLETE AND THIS WAS PROVEN BY THE LACK OF SHOVEL READY JOBS PROMISED BY OBOMA'S FIRST INFRASTRUCTURE STIMULUS.  THE DEMOCRAT PACKAGE CONTAINS A SURTAX ON THE PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE DEPENDED UPON TO PROVIDE MATERIAL AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE JOB.  THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT THE INCOME FROM THE SURTAX WOULD STILL BE THERE AFTER THE COSTLY AND LENGTHY REGULATORY PROCESS, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY A FEE IF YOU WANT TO GET THE JOB.

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE HOUSE REGULATORY REFORM BE PASSED BEFORE ANY OTHER PLANS ARE IMPLEMENTED  IN ORDER TO MAKE THE PROJECTS MORE PALATABLE OR THERE COULD B E A  SHORTAGE OF BIDS FOR THE PROJECTS. WHO IS SANBAGGING WHO HERE AND HOW STUPID DO THE DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS.  I GUESS THE DEMS ARE SO USED TO HAVE THEIR FOLLOWERS  FOLLOW BLINDLY THAT THEY ARE VILIFYING ANY ONE WHO OPENS THEIR MINDS AN EYES TO WHAT IS GOING ON  

IF A FEDERAL FLAT TAX IS INSTITUTED, IT WILL DEFINITLY IMPACT YOUR STATE TAX.  A FEDERAL FLAT TAX IS GREAT IN STATES LIKE TEXAS WHICH HAS NO STATE INCOME TAX BUT IT WOULD AFFECT THE FILING AND PROCESSING COSTS FOR YOUR STATE INCOME TAX.  THE STATES THAT DEPEND ON AN INCOME TAX FOR OPERATING REVENUE OF THE STATE HAVE A DEVELOPED INCOME TAX SYSTEM WHICH MIRRORS THE FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM. STATE INCOME TAX SYSTEMS USE THE FEDERAL TAX FORM AS A BASIS TO DETERMINE THE INCOME TAX THAT ITS CITIZENS SHOULD PAY ACCORDING TO THE TAX LAWS UNIQUE TO EACH INDIVIDUAL STATE.  THEREFOR STATE RETURNS INTERACT WITH THE FEDERAL RETURN ELECTRONICALLY. 

ELECTRONIC FILING OF FEDERAL AND STATE TAX RETURNS IS ALSO INTERCONNECTED, THE STATE RETURN IS PIGGYBACKED ON THE FEDERAL ON THE ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF THE TAX FORMS. THERE IS ALSO AN AUTIOMATIC ELECTRONIC COMPARISONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE RETURNS IN REGARDS TO THE INCOME ITEMS AP;PLICABLE TO EACH.  THIS SYSTEM REPLACES THE OLD SYSTEM OF INCOME COMPARISONS BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE WHERE AS THE FEDERAL AND STATE TAX SYSTEMS HAD A SEPERATE INCOME SHARING PROCESS  WITH EACH STATE FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL USING THE INDIVIDUALS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AS A BASE REFERENCE, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE BOTH THE FEDERAL AND STATE TO INVESTIGATE ANY DISCREPENCIES OF INFORMATION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL AND WHICH USED TO PICK UP ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD USE DIFFERENT IN FORMATION TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FEDERAL AND STATE TAX LAWS .  THE REMOVAL OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM WOULD INCREASE THE COSTS OF BOTH THE FEDERAL AND STATE TO DETERMINE THE PROPER TAX LIABILITY FOR EACH ENTITY.  WHEN COSTS OF PROCESSING AND INFORMATION SHARING INCREASE, THOSE ADDED COSTS WILL FIND THEIR WAY INTO THE TAX LIABILITY OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER.  

MR. HUNTSMAN TOWN HALL MEETING AS BROADCAST IN C-SPAN 3 THIS MORNING WAS A UNIQUE EXPERIENCED. THE ENTIRE ATMOSPHERE WAS UNUSUAL FOR A POLITICIAN.  MR HUNTSMAN SAT AT A TABLE RARHER THAN STANDING OR USING A DESK. THE ATMOSPHERE HE PRODUCED WAS MORE LIKE A GROUP OF FRIENDS SEATED AROUND  AND HOLDING A CASUAL DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING OUR COUNTRY.  THERE WAS NO LECTURE TYPE OR USED CAR SALES TYPE ATTITUDE,  JUST A COMFORTABLE FEELING ABOUT THE MAN PRESENTING HIMSELF IN A FRIENDLY MANNER, THIS FORMAT WAS CONDUCIVE TO A FEELING OF CONFIDENCE AND ADMIRATION ABOUT THIS MAN. THISW WAS SO DIFFERENT FROM THE DEBATE FORMAT OR THE SALES TYPE OF PRESENTATION THAT IS USUALLY ENCOUNTERED AT THE POLITICAL GATHERING TYPE WE HAVE ALL BECOME ACCUSTOMED TO,  MR HUNTSMAN SPOKE IN A CALM MANNER WHICH GAVE THE BELIEF THAT HE WAS TALKING TO EQUALS, NOT LECTURING OR SELLING, JUST BEING AN ORDINARY TYPE PERSON.

IT WAS A REFRESHING EXPERIENCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE HIGH VOLTAGE ATMOSPHERE ENCOUNTERED AT OTHER POLITICAL EVENTS.

DURING EVERY DEBATE EACH OF THE CANDIDATES TALKS ABOUT WHAT HIS/HER PLAN WILL DO FOR AMERICA.

HOWEVER THE ONLY CANDIDATES PLAN THAT I CAN LOCATE IS MICHELE BACHMANS 11 POINT PLAN WHICH SHE POSTED ON HER FACEBOOK PAGE BACK IN EARLY OCTOBER. THIS PLAN IS PRESENTED IN A BRIEF BUT COMPREHENSIVE FORMAT WITH VERY LITTLE USED CAR SALESMANS RHETORIC. ALL I CAN FIND ON  RICK PERRY, MIT ROMNEY, HERMAN CAIN, AND RON PAULS WEBSITES ARE THE SALES PITCH  WITHOUT SUBSTANCE, GIVING ME NOTHING TO APPLY MY OWN UNIQUE POWERS OF COMMON SENSE AND REASON TO.

I WOULD APPRECIATE BEING INFORMED OF ANY PLAN PROPOSED BY ANY OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES WHICH HAS BEEN POSTED ON THE INTERNET AND CAN BE PRINTED OUT FOR MY PURUSAL. I LIKE TO FORM MY OWN OLPINION OF A PLAN WITHOUT HAVEING TO CUT THROUGH THE SALES PITCH.

CONGRESS WOMAN BACMANS PLAN COVERS ITEMS LIKE THE 1.2 TRILLION US DOLLARS BEING HELD OFFSHORE BECAUSE OF THE HIGH US TAXATION RATE IF IT WOULD BE BROUGHT BACK INTO THE US AND SHE HAS CITED A METHOD OF REPATRIATION OF THESE FUNDS. SHE ALSO COVERS THE EXCES SPENDING HABITS PRACTICED BY THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION AND HER EFFORTS IN TRYING TO CORRECT IT. HER EFFORTS OF TRYING TO REPEAL OBOMACARE AN DODD-FRANK CAN BE VIEWED IN THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. HER VIEWS ABOUT CUTTING TAXES ARE ALSO DISCUSSED IN HER PLAN AS IS HER SOLUTIONS TO THE ENERGY DEPENDANCY ON OTHERS THAT IS HANDICAPPING AMERICAS GROWTH DEVELOPMENT. THE BURDENSOME GOVERMENT REGULATIONS WHICH ARE STRANGLING GROWTH OF OUR INDUSTRIES AND MAKING IT VIRTUALLY IMPOSSABLE FOR MADE IN  USA PRODUCTS TO BE COMPETATIVE IN WORLD MARKETS AND THE COST TO CITIES AND STATES IN PROVIDING SERVICES WHICH SHOULD ONLY BE AVAILSBLE TO CITIZENS BUT ARE BEING ELEVATED TO UNSUSTSAIN ABLE LEVELS BY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

THIS PLAN IS THERE FOR EVERY ONE TO SEE AND TO HOLD HER ACCOUNTBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING IT.

I THEREFORE CHALENGE ALL THE CANDIDATES TO SHOW US THEIR PLANS IN  THE SAME MANNER THAT CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMAN HAS WITHOUT THE SALES PITCH SO WE, THE FREE THINKING VOTERS CAN FORM OUR OWN OPINIONS. 

i WAS FIRST MADE AWARE OF THIS INCOME TAX INCREASE  EARLY THIS YEAR WHEN AN EMPLOYEE OF ONE OF MY PAYROLL CLIENTS SHOWED AN INCREASE IN HIS TAX WITHOLDING. THIS MAN SUFFERING FROM CANCER WORKED PART TIME EARNING $200.00/WK AND HAD NO INCOME TAX WITHELD FROM HIS PAY FOR 2 YEARS WHEN SUDDENLY IN 2011 HIS $200.00/WK WAGE GENERATED AN INCOME TAX DEDUCTION OF $4.81. I THOUGHT THAT WAS ODD BECAUSE HI SS DEDUCTION WAS REDUCED BY $4.00/WK DUE TO THE GENEROUSITY OF PRESIDENT OBOMA BY GRANTING A 2% REDUCTION FOR THE EMPLOYEES SS CONTRIBUTION.

THE INCOME TAX RATES DID NOT CHANGE BUT THE INCOME BRACKETS FOR EACH RATE  DID CHANGE.

BY USING SEVERAL HUNDRED ARITHMETIC MODELS, I DETERMINED THAT RAISING OR LOWERING THE INCOME BRACKETS BY AN AVERAGE 2% WOULD HAVE AN EQUIVELENT OF AN AVERAGE OF 4% IN THE IN INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING SO WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE PRESIDENT, AN EFFECTIVE TRANSFER OF WITHOLDING FROM THE SOCIAL SECURITY TO GENERAL REVENUES WAS ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT THE ENCUMBERANCE OF BEING A LOAN OR SALE OF BONDS.  THIS CHANGE IN NET PAY ALSO WOULD BE AN INSIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE NET PAY OF MOST PAYCHECKS AND THEREFORE WOULD BE UNDETEIBLE BY THOSE RECIEVING A PAY CHECK.

BUT WE HAVE TO REALIZE THAT THE SECRETARY OF TREASURY WHOSE JURISDICTION INCLUDES THE OPERATION OF THE IRS. AND THE CURRENT TREASURY SECRETARY WAS EXPOSED AS AN INTENTIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE EXPERT. WELL I LEAVE IT UP TO ALL OF YOU TO YOUR OWN OPINIONS.    

THE DEFICIT REDUCTIONSCOMMISSION HAS THE FOLLOWING DRASFT PROPOSALS ON THE TABLE

Tax cuts and changes

 Consolidate the tax code into 3 individual rates and one corporate rate-Based on the options, the bottom tax rate will be between 8% and 15%, the middle rate would be between 14% and 25% with the top rate capped at 35%, Tjhe corporate rate would be cut to 26%

Repeal the alternative maximum tax

Triple standard deduction to $30,000 ($15000 for indivuals)

Repeal state & locval tax deductions, cafeterria plans and itemized deductions

Limit mortgage interest deduction to exclude 2nd residences, home equity loans and mortgages over $500,000

Treat capital gains and dividends as ordinary income

15 cent increase in the gas tax

Gradually increase the taxable minimum to capture 90 % of wages by 2050 (vs 82% at the end of this decade

Social , medicare and health care changes

Tjhe SS retirement age would rise to 68 in about 2050 and 69 in 2075, as the retirement age is indexed to increases in longevity

Pay doctors and other providers less, improve efficiency, and reward quality by speeding up payment reforms and increases drug rebates

Pay lawyers less and reduce the cost of defensive medicine by adopting comprehensive tort reform

Replace existing cost sharing rules with universal deductible, single co-insurance rate and catastrophic cap for medicare part A and B

Add a robust public option and/or all-payer sysrtem in the health exchange system

Add a new special minimum benifit to keep full career minimum wage workers above the poverty threshold

Give retirees the choice of collecting half their benifits early and the other half at a later age to support phased retirement options

Federal and militart changes

Use the highest 5 years to calculate civil service pensions and ask federal workers to contribute half the cost (not 1/14th)

Reform COLA payments for civilian & military retirees

Reform military retirement system to vest after 10 years (not 20), defer collection until age 60

Reducing congressional and white house budgets by 15%, freezing federal salaries  and cutting  the federal workforce by n10%

Freeze defense department salaries and non combat pay at 2011 levels for 3 yearsd, cutting overseas bases by one third  and doubling proposed cuts in military contracting

IT IS ALWAYS GOOD  TO REMEMBER THAT, MORE SO WITH POLOTICIANS THASN OTHER, THAT THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETASILS 

GOVERNOR RICKS PERRY PERFORANCE AT THE LAS VEGAS DEBATES HAS ALTERED MY OPINION OF HIM.

I FOUND GOVERNOR PERRY'S BEHAVIOUR IN LAS VAGAS DISRESPECTFUL AND UNPROFFESSIONAL AS HE RESORTED TO AL GORE'S STYLE OF DEBATE. I AM REFFERING TO AL GORES DEBATE WITH ROSS PEROT ON LARRY KING LIVE, WHERE HE REFUSED TO ALLOW MR PEROT ANY OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO ANYTHING AND HOGGING THE TIME ALLOWANCE. WHEN EVER MR PEROT ATTEMPTED TO SPEAK, GORE BEGAN A TIRADE WITH INCREASED VOICE VOLUME AS GOV PERRY DID TO MR ROMNEY.  SUCH BEHAVIOR SHOWS ME THAT GOV PERRY WAS AFRAID TO LET MR ROMNEY RESPOND.  WHAT IS PERRY AFRAID OF, WAS HE AFRAID THAT MR ROMNEY'S RESPONSE WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE THAN HIS ALLEGATIONS? I FOR ONE WANTED TO HEAR MR ROMNEY'S REPLY. I DO NOT LET MY PERSONAL IMPRESSION OF MR ROMNEY AFFECT MY INTEREST IN WHAT HE HAS TO SAY AS I HAVE ALREADY UP MY MIND TO VOTE FOR WHOMEVER IS THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE BECAUSE I DO NOT BELIEVE ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF OBOMA AND HIS CRONIES WOULD BE ANY THING BUT DISASTER FOR THE COUNTRY

I HAVE MY FAVORITE IN THESE DEBATES BUT I SINCERELY BELIEVE THAT ANYONE ( GOOFY AND DAFFY DUCK) WOULD BE BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE NOW

I APPLAUD NEWT FOR CALLING OUT THE MODERATOR WHO APPEARED TO ENJOY THE ROLE OF INSTIGATOR

I WOULD APPEAL TO ALL CANDIDATES TO CONCENTRATE ON SELLING THEMSELVES WITH POSITIVE REMARKS RATHER THAN ENGAGING IN VICIOUS ATTACKS ON EACH OTHER. CRITICISM DOES NOT HAVE TO BE VITRIOLIC, IT CAN BE PRESENTED IN A POSITIVE AND RESPECTFUL MANNER.

THE GREAT DEBATE ABOUT THE FLAT TAX COMES FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE MANNER THAT INCOME TAXES EFFECT INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYERS. I AM AN INCOME TAX PFOFFESSIONAL WHO HAS BEEN HELPING PEOPLE WITH THEIR INCOME TAX FOR OVER 40 YEARS. I DEAL DIRECTLY WITH INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYERS AND THE LARGE NUMBER OF VARIATIONS IN THE MANNER WHICH THEY LIVE. I HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE IN INCOME TAXES  SINCE BEFORE THE GREAT TAX SIMPLIFICATION ACT THAT PRESIDENT EISENHOWER INSTITUTED THROUGH THE INCOME TAX REFORM ACT OF PRESIDENT REAGAN AND ALL THE COMPLEX ALTERATRIONS THAT HAVE PROGRESSED OVER THE YEARS.  WHEN I SIT DOWN AITH A CLIENT TO HELP THEM PREPARE THEIR TAX, I CONDUCT A COMPLETE AND COMPLEX  INTERVIEW INTO THE FINANCIAL AND PERSONAL LIFE OF EACH CLIENT SO I MAY PLAN THE BEST TAX STRSATEGY FOR THEIR INDIVIDUAL SITUATION AND DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TAX CODE DUE TO THE CONTINIOUS EFFORTS TO PROVIDE FAIRNESS ON AN INDIVIDUALS FINANCIAL AND PERSONAL SITUATION, THESE INTERVIEWS HAVE BECOME LONGER AND MORE INTRUSIVE INTO THE LIVES OF THE INDIVIDUAL.  DESPITE THE WELL MEANING EFORTS OF SEVERAL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OVER THE YEARS TO PROVIDE CONSIDERATION FOR EACH INDIVIDUALS SITUATION, IT IS IMPOSSABLE TO CUSTOMIZE THE VAST AND VARIOUS CONDITIONS AND SITUATIONS WHICH EXIST IN OUR SOCIETY, SO SOME ADJUSTMENTS HAVE TO BE MADE.  I USED TO BE ABLE TO COMPLETE 30-35 TAX RETURNS IN AN 8 HR DAY AND NOW WITH COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, IT IS DIFICULT TO FINISH  COMPLETE 12-15.

SO WHAT WOULD A FLAT TAX DO? A FLAT TAX DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR THE DOLLARS THAT EACH FAMILY NEEDS  FOR FINANCIAL SURVIVAL.  THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT SITUATIONS WITHIN EACH INCOME GROUPING. YEARS AGO THE I R S DEVELOPED A COST OF LIVING WORK UP WHICH THEY USED TO USE IN DETERMINING A PROPER PERCENTAGE OF INCOME NEEDED FOR AN INDIVIDUALS FINANCIAL SURVIVAL AND THEN USED AN APPROPRIATE TAX PERCENTAGE ON THE REMAINDER WHICH ALSO ALLOWED FOR UNEXPECTED EXPENSES. I AM NOT A FAN OF THE I R S BUT I DID FEEL THAT THIS TYPE OF PLAN WOULD BE BENIFICIAL AS CITIZENS WOULD HAVE THEIR CHOICE OF LIFE STYLE COMENSURATE WITH THEIR STANDING IN THE COMMUNITY, EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL CIRCLE. A FLAT TAX WOULD NOT GIVE CITIZENS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GROW, PERSONALLY, PROFFESSIONALY OR SOCIALLY  THEREFORE DEPRIVING MANY CITIZENS OF THE AMERICAN DREAM OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND HAPPINESS.

I HAVE STATED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS THAT CONGRESSMAN MICHELE BACHMAN HAS MORE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE TAX SITUATION THAN ALL THE OTHER CANDIDATES COMBINED AND THE DEBATE PERFORMANCE OF ALL THE CANDIDATES KEEPS PROVFING MY POINT. TO MUCH RELIANCE IS GIVEN TO ECONOMISTS AND EXPERTS WHO HAVE NEVER DEALT WITH THE GENERAL PUBLIC LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME PEOPLE OR THE REALY SMALL BUSINESS PERSON, THE LOCAL CARPENTER, MASON ELECTRICIAN, CHILD CARE PROVIDER GAS STATION OPERATOR, BARBER, BEAUTICIAN  AND THEY CAN NOT BE EXPECTED TO BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEMS OF THE COMMON WORKING PERSON

THE OWS CLAIMS BUSINESS PROFITS ARE EVIL AND IF THAT IS FACT AS THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION SEES FACT, THEN EVERYTHING WE ENJOY TODAY IS EVIL.  WHEN I WAS A SMALL BOY, AND VISITED MY GRANDPARENTS FARM, THE FIELDS WERE PLOWED BY HORSE DRAWN PLOWS, NOT TRACTORS AND TRACTORS WOULD NOT BE HERE MTODAY IF NOT FOR BUSINESS PROFITS WHICH PAID FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT, THE LIGHTING IN THE FARM HOUSE WAS CVOAL OIL LANTERNS, THE PRINCIPLE HEAT WAS THE WOOD BURNING STOVE IN THE KITCHEN, WE HAD TO GO DOWN A PATH TO GET TO THE UNHEATED AND UNLIGHTED TOILET, MY FATHER AND OTHER FARMERS FAMILY'S SPENT A LOT OF TIME DURING THE WINTER CUTTING LARTGE BLOCKS OUT OF THE HUDSON RIVER AND PUT THEM IN AN ICE HOUSE TO BE USED IN THE SUMMER TO KEEP FOOD FROM SPOILING AND WHEN YOUNG BOYS HORMONES BEGAN HEATING UP THEY HAD TO GO INTO THE MICE MHOUSE AND SITT ON THOSE BLOCKS OF ICE UNTIL ,THEY COOLED OFF. MANY PEOPLE WHO HAD CARS HAD TO START THEM BY CRANKING.  SO IF PROFITS ARE EVIL,THEN SO ARE THE CARS, HEATING FURNACES, AIR CONDITIONERS, REFRIGERATORS, STOVES, COMPUTERS, MICROWAVES, AIRPLANES, BOATS, LIGHTS AND ON AND ON  BECAUSE THEY ALL WERE DEVELOPED, IMPROVED AND CONSTRUCTED WITH PROFITS. THOSE AMERICAN INDIANS USED TO LIVE IN WICKIEUPS, AND TEPEES HEATED BY A FIRE IN A HOLE IN THE GROUND  AND HAD TO KILL A VARIETY OF ANIMALS WITH WOODEN OR STONE CLUBS FOR FOOD AND CLOTHING.  EVEN SOME OF THE THINGS THAT OWS PEOPLE USE ILLEGALY, LIKE POT, ETC ARE EVIL BUT THEY CONTINUE TO USE ALL THESE EVIL THINGS TO ATTACK THOSE WHO CREATE PROFITS BECAUSE PROFITS ARE EVIL AND THEREFORE SHOULD BE SHARED WITH ALL THOSE POOR FOLKS WHO PREFER TO BE PROTESTERS INSTEAD OF PRODUCERS 

I HAVE WATCHED EVERY DEBATE OF PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS. AND I HAVE MADE MY OWN JUDGEMENTS.

ROMNEY- A MAN OF EXCEPTIONAL BUSINESS ACUMEN BUT VERY STUBBORN RE ANY MISTAKES HE HAS MADE I QUESTION WHETHER OR NOT HE HAS LEARNED ANYTHING ENOUGH FROM THOSE MISTAKES TO MAKE CORRECTIONS IN HIS REASONING

PERRY- HE HAS DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB IN TEXAS, A STATE THA5T HAS NO INCOME TAX, IS A RIGHT TO WORK STATE WHICH DOES NOT GIVE HIM ANY EXPERIENCE IN DEALING WITH COMPLEX LABOR OR TAX PROBLEMS

CAIN- A REMARKABLE GENTLEMAN IN MANY RESPECTS BIT I DON 'T BELIEVE HE UNDERSTANDS THE COMPLEXITIES OF OUR SOCIETY AND DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ABLE TO GRASP THE VASTNESS OF THE VARIABLES THAT MAKE UP OUR SOCIETY. LAST NITE HE REFERRED TO HIS TEAM OF ECONOMISTS THAT CREATED HIS 999 PLAN. IT HAS BEEN MY EXPERIENCE IN MY 82 YEARS THAT THESE HIGH PRICED PROFFESSIONALS DEAL MAINLY WITH THE PROBLEMS OF THE AFFLUENT AND HAVE NO CONCEPT OF THE REST OF THE WORLD.  MY 50+ YEARS AS AN INCOME TAX PROFFESSIONAL PROVES TO ME THAT HE HAS NO UNDERSTANDING WHATEVER OF THE EFFECTS TAXES HAVE ON THE COMMON PEOPLE, WHERE I HAVE 50 YEARS OF OBSERVING THOSE EFFECTS AND HIS 999 PLAN PUTS EVERONE IN ONE SIMPLE LITTLE BOX WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY INDIVIDUALS SITUATION.   

PAUL- A STRICT LIBERTARIAN WHO DOESNT SEEM TO UNDEWRSTAND THAT LIFE IS NOT NESESSARILY WITHIN THE STRICT BOUNDARIES OF LIBERTIAN CONCEPTS.  LIFE IN OUR SOCIETY RESULTS IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH CANNOT BE RECONCILED TO STRICT LIBERTARIAN PRINCIPLES

GINGRICH- A MAN WHO HAS STUDIED A WIDE VARIETY OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS AND IS WELL AWARE OF THE ADVANTAGES AND PITFALLS OF EACH- HIS EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE WOULD PROVE INVALUABLE IN A VICE PRESIDENTIAL ROLE 

HUNTSMAN- AN EXCELLENT STATE GOVERNOR AND A GOOD AMBASADORE TO CHINA WITH A LOT OF KNOWLEDGE FORIEGN AFFARS EXPERIENCE BUT I BELIEVE THAT A MORE VARIED EXPERIENCE IS NECESSARY FOR A PRESIDENT

SANTORUM- I ALWAYS LIKED HIM AS A SENATOR ANDS HE HAS A GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF THE CURRENT POLITICAL SYSTEM CURRENTLY PRESENT IN WASHINGTON AND HOW TO GET THINGS DONE IN CONGRESS

MICHELE BACHMAN- A DELIGHTFULL CHANGE OF PACE FROM THE TRADITIONAL POLITICIAN. HER PASSION FOR THIS COUNTRY  AND THE PRINCIPLES THAT MADE THIS COUNTRY GREAT IS SO OBVIOUS AND REFRESHING TO SEE. I SUPPOSE I HAVE AN AFFINITY FOR HER AS SHE HAS WORKED AS A TAX ATTORNEY AND I HAVE BEEN A PRACTICING INCOME TAX PROFFESSIONAL FOR OVER 50 YEARS.  SHE HAS DISPLAYED A KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTSANDING OF TAXES MUCH GREATER THAN ALL THE OTHER CANIDATES COMBINED.  SHE IS THE ONLY ONE OF THE 8 WHO HAVE ATTEMPTED TO GET RID OF SOME UNPALLETABLE LEGISLATION THAT HAVE BEEN SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS BY THE CURRENT EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION. SHE HAS PROVED THAT SHE IS A DOER, NOT JUST A TALKER.

I HAVE ALSO GIVEN A LOT OF THOUGHT OF HOW EACH CANDIDATES TALENTS COULD BEST BE USED BY WHOMEVER WINS THE ELECTION. THIS IS MY PERSONAL EVALUATION AND I WOULD APPRECIATE ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS IN THIS REGARD.

ROMNEY- HIS BUSINESS EXPERIENCE WOULD  BE INVALUABLE AS THE COMMERCE SECRETARY

PERRY-I BELIEVE HE WOULD MAKE AN EXCEPTIONAL LABOR SECRETARY

CAIN-THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SHOULD BE HIS CUP OF TEA

PAUL- A LIBERTARIAN ATTORNEY GENERAL SHOULD BE JUST THE TICKET

GINGRICH- I HAVE PREVIOUSLY TAGGED HIM AS THE PERFECT VICE PRESIDENT

HUNTSMAN-SECRETARY OF STATE

SANTORUM- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

BACHMAN-TREASURY SECRETARY

ANOTHER INTRIGUING THOUGHT HOW ABOUT SARAH PALIN AS AMBASSADORE TO THE UN, COULD THERE BE A BETTER SPOKESPERSON TO UPHOLD AMERICAN VALUES.

I AM CONSTANTLY EVALUATING THE ANNOUNCED AND UNANNOUNCED POLITICAL WANNABEES.

MITT ROMNEY- A COLD CALCULATING BUSINESS AUTOCRAT WHO WOULD BRING MANY PROFFESSIONAL GIFTS TO THE PRESIDENCY OR TO  A CABINET POST DEALING WITH THE BUSINESS OF RUNNING THE COUNTRY

RICK PERRY- ONE WHO IS ADEPT, YET INFLEXIBLE AT ADJUSTING TO CHANGING CONDITIONS, BUT UNWILLING TO CHANGE HIS PHILOSOPHY WHEN SOMEHING DOESN T WORK IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY

HERMAN CAIN- A GIFTED BUSINESS MAN WHOSE ONLY EXPERIENCE IS IN BUISINESS' OF A MINISCULE NATURE WHEN COMPARED TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE CHANGING PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY. COULD BEN EXCELLENT CHOICE FOR A CABINET POSITION

MICHELE BACHMAN- A BEAUTIFUL LADY ON A MISSION WHICH I FEAR IS TO COMPLEX FOR HER EXPERIENCE, I THINK SHE CAN CONTRIBUTE MORE TO THE WELFARE OF THE COUNTRY SERVING IN THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

NEWT GINGRICH- A BRILLIANT AND KNOWLEDGABLE MAN WHOSE KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES WOULD BE OF GREAT VALUE FOR A VICE PRESIDENT

SANTORUM- A SKILLED LEGISLATOR WHOS TALENTS WOULD BE MORE VALUABLE IN THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

HUNTSMAN- A TALENTED GOVERNOR WHO WOULD BE A GREAT ADDITION TO A CABINET POOST

DNALD TRUMP- DONALD IS DONALD AND WOULD BE GREAT AT SHAKING THINGS UP BUT SOMETIMES HAS THE MENTALITY OF A BULL IN A CHINA SHOP. HAS TALENTS THAST COULD PROVE INVALUABLE IN A CABINET POST

SARAH PALIN- ONE OF THE MOST REMARKABLE WOMAN WE WILL EVER HAVE THE PLEASURE OF REPRESENATING US.  THERE WOULD BE A PERIOD OF NOVICENESS WITH HER, BUT SHE IS A QUICK LEARNER, VERY ADAPTABLE AND FLEXIBLE TO SITUATIONS, SHE IS BRUTALLY HONEST IN HER BELIEFS AND IN EVERYTHING SHE SAYS, NEVER AFRAID TO ADMIT THAT THERE IS A BETTER PLAN AND SHE DOESN'T ALLOW HER POLITICAL IDEALOGY GET IN THE WAY OF HER PEOPLE ORIENTATION.

O K IF YOU DISAGREE WITH MY EVALUATIONS, LET ME KNOW, I AM NEVER TO OLD TO LEARN

I LOOK FORE THE SAME QUALITIES IN A LEGISLATOR AS I DO FOR PRESIDENT

MORE PEOPLE ORIENTED THAN POLITICAL IDEOLOGY ORIENTED, THE COURAGE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITION OF THE UNITED STATES WHICH WAS WRITTEN WITHOUT ANY PARTISAN IDEOLOGY EVEN WHEN THEIR PERSONAL POLITICAL IDEOLOGY IS IN CONFLICT, ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS OF THIS NATION REGARDLESS OF POLITICAL AFFILIATION OR PERSONAL BELIEF.  I DON'T NOW OF ANYONE IN THE CURRENT BATCH OF POSSABLES WHO I AM SATISFIED WITH ACCORDANCE TO THESE QUALITIES.  WE ARE A HYBRID POPULATION WITH A COMPLEX SOCIETY DEVELOPED THROUGH THE VAST MIXTURE OF SOCIETY'S. IT IS IMPOSSABLE FOR ANY ONE PERSON TO SATISFY EVERY BODY.  THE FOUNDERS OF THIS COUNTRY UNDERSTOOD THAT AND INSTALLED A MIXED GOVERNMENT SO THAT ALL PEOPLES COULD BE PROPERLY REPRESENTED.  THE ALSO REALISED THAT A MIXED GOVERNMENT COULD BECOME CLANNISH, TRIBAL OR WHATEVER GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH DIFFERING VALUES.  I BELIEVE THAT GOD WANTED US EACH TO RETAIN OUR INDIVIDUALITY OF INTELLEGENCE AND TALENTS. I DO NOT BELIEVGE WE WERE EVER INTENDED TO BE DOM INATED BY ANY ONE GROUP OR CLUB.  UNFORTUNATLY POLITICS HAS DEGENERATED TO A STATUS OF A POWER STRUCTURE AND WHOVER HAD THE MOST POWER HAD THE ABILITY TO CONTROL AND DOMINATE THE MASSES.

UNFORTUNATLY, THOISE WHO HAVE ATTAINED THAT LEVEL OF POWER LOSE THEIR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT THE FEELINGS AND BELIEFS OF ANYONE, EVEN THEIR OWN FAM ILY.

THIS IS EXACTALY THE REASON THAT WE, AS A PEOPLE MUST ROTATE THE POWER STRUCTURE AND GET HOSE WHO LET POWER GROW THIER EGOS AND TEND TO DOMINATE EVERYTHING AND EVERYBODY

I REFUSE TO BE DOMINATED BY ANY ONE, ANY GROUP, ANY POLITICAL ENTITY AND WILL FOREVER EXCERCISE MY FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AAND INDEPENDANCE AND IF WE ALL RISE UP AND SAY-I DONT EXPECT TO ALWAS AGREE WITH YOU BUT I WILL NEVER GIVE UP MY FREEDOM TO DISAGREE.  

LAST NITE, I RECIEVED A PHONE CALL FROM REPRESENTATIVE TONKO WHO IS A CHARTER MEMBER OF MISTRESS NANCY PELOSI'S DUNGEON, TELLING ME THAT I WILL BE PART OF A TELEPHONE TOWN HALL TONITE

I HAVE RECIEVED 100% POSITIVE RESPONSES FROM THE LAST 2 RECOMENDATIONS THAT I HAVE SUBMITTED TO

SEVERAL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND PUT ON TWITTER, FACEBOOK, LINKEDIN, AS WELL AS BLOGGING HERE.

I AM ACTIVE IN A TAX FORUM ON LINKED IN  WHICH HAS SEVERAL TAX ATTORNEYS, C P A'S AND MANY PROFFESSIONAL TAX PROFFESSIONALS ALL OF WHOM AGREE THAT MY SUGGESTIONS ARE TO RATIONAL FOR THE COMMON POLITICIAN BECAUSE THESE POLITICIAN CAN NOT GET PAST THEIR POLITICAL IDEAOLOGY TO BE COGNIZANT OF RATIONAL THINKING.  BUT I THINK THAT SOME OF MY COMMON, RATIONAL THINKING IS CREATING CHINKS IN THE POLITICAL ARMOR OF SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE. THIS IS BECAUSE I AM SENDING WEEKLY MESSAGES TO SEVERAL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. THIS IS WHAT I MEANT IN MY "CALL TO ACTION" BLOG, I DONT WANT TO GIVE THEM TIME FOR MORE THAN ONE DEEP BREATH BEFORE I GET BACK TO WORK TRYING TO OPEN THEIR MINDS TO COMMON SENSE.  

I HAVE RECIEVED A NICE LETTER FROM DEMOCRATIC REPRESENATIVE PAUL TONKO IN REPLY TO MY REPORTING TO HIM ON THE FORIEGN TAX CREDIT AND THE MANNER THAT G E IS USING IT TO AVOID PAYING ANY DOMESTICE INCOME TAX.

IN HIS LETTER HE STATES THAT HE WILL BE INTRODUCING LEGISLATION TO "CLOSE SOME OF THE MOST EGREGIOUS LOOPHOLES TO BIG OIL COMPANIES AND PUT THOSE SAVINGS TOWARD RENEWABLE ENERGY INITIATIVES, ALTERNATE FUEL TECHNOLOGY AND CLEAN ENERGY JOBS".  TYPICAL HEAD UP THE ___ OF THOSE WHO WANT TO PROLONG THE CURRENT UNAFFORDABLE INCREASE IN THE ENERGY CONSUMPTION EXPENSE WE ALL NEED TO SURVIVE. MORE EXPENSIVE INVESTMENT OF OUR MONEY IN THE EXPERIMENTS OF THE PAST 25 YEARS THAT HAVE NOT PRODUCED ANY BENIFIT TO US, RATHER THAN TO APPLY ANY SAVINGS TO THE NATIONAL DEBT THAT THESE SAME PROGRAMS HAVE MADE A CONSIDERABLE CONTRIBUTION TO SHOULD BE LIMITED TO 20% OF THE PROJECTED COST.  I WILL BE RESPONDING TO MR TONKOS LETTER WITH MY OWN RECOMENDATIONS TO  REFORM THE FORIEGN TAX CREDIT AND ALL, OTHER TAX BENIFITS THAT ENCOURAGE AMERICAN COMPANYS TO EXPORT OUR DEVELOPED MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION METHODS AND JOBS OVERSEAS.

I WILL RECOMEND THAT CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS BE MET BEFORE AN FINANCIAL SUBSIDIES OR BAIL OUT FUNDS CAN BE HANDED OUT.

REQUIREMENT #1 SUBSIDIES SHALL NOT BE GRANTED TO ANY COMPANY WHO HAS DEMONSTRATED A WILLINGNESS TO TRANSFER MANUFACTUERING OR PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES TO ANY ENTITY OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRETORIES AND POSSESSIONS.

REQUIREMENT #2 INCOME TAX CREDITS WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE TO ANY COMPANY WHO MAINTAINS ANY FORIEGN OPERATIONS EXCEPT FOR MARKETING PURPOSES FOR PRODUCTS MADE IN AMERICA BY AMERICANS.

REQIREMENT#3 ANY AMERICAN COMPANY MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCING ANY TYPE OF GOODS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO IMPORTING TARIFFS IF THOSE GOODS AND PRODUCTS ARE EXPORTED INTO THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRETORIES OR POSSESSIONS.

REQUIREMENT #4 THE IMPOSITION OF EXPORT TARRIFS ON ANY COMPANY EXPORTING ANY FORM OF MANUFACTURING OR PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES OR EXPERTISE DEVELOPED IN THE UNITED STATES.

REQUIREMENT #5 THE IMPOSITION OF IMPORT TARRIFS ON ANY IMPORTING OF ANY TYPE OF LABOR WITH NTHE INTENT OF USING THAT LABOR TO REPLACE ANY AMERICAN LEGALIZED CITIZEN.

I WOULD APPRECIATE COMMENTS AND OPINIONS ON THESE REQUIREMENTS

THE PRESIDENTS SPEECH WAS AS USUAL "LET CHARLIE DO IT" HE CALLED FOR AN IMMEDIATE PASSAGE OF A JOBS BILL HE DID NOT WRITE AND DID NOT EXIST.  IN OTHER WORDS "DO AS I SAY, DONT THINK ABOUT IT, JUST DO IT" AND HE CALLS HIMSELF A BIPARTISAN AMERICAN. IT SEEMS THAT HE INSULTS THE INTELLIGENCE OF ALL AMERICANS WITH HIS ORATORITICAL SKILLS IN LECTURING.  NO HE DIDN'T DISAPOINT ME, HE JUST REINFORCED MY ORIGINAL IMPRESSION OF HIM AS AN EMPTY SUIT LECTURER.  WELL, HE IS FINDING OUT THAT THERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO WILL NOT FOLLOW BLINDLY, THANKS TO THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT. LETS KEEP BOMBARDING HIM WITH OUR GOD GIVEN INDIVIDUAL INTELLECT BECAUSE THIS DISPLAY OF FREE THINKING AND THE BALLOT BOX ARE PUTTING THE FEAR OF LOSING IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THOSE MINDLESS FOLLOWERS OF THE CHOSEN ONE. THATS WHY THEU KEEP ATTACKING US WITH THEIR GARBAGE MOUTHS.

HE IS ALL FOR JOB CREATION THAT WILL SATISFY HIS BIG UNION BUDDIES AND SCREW EVERYBODY EVERY BODY ELSE.

THERE ARE MANY WAYS THE RICH GET RICHER AND THE REST OF US KEEP ON PAYING.

ONE SUCH IUS THE PAYROLL TAX THAT REWARD THE WELL TO DO WITH HIGHER WAGES AND EXORBITANT BONUS",  IS SOCIAL SECURITY WHICH SEEMS TO ALWAYS BE IN TROUBLE.  THERE IS A CONTRIBUTION CAP ON WAGES AND BONUS' OF $106,800 AFTER WHICH NO SOCIAL SECURITY IS WITHELD OR MATCHED BY EMPLOYERS. THE USUAL WITHOLDING AND MATCHING FUNDS IS 6.2% OR 12..4% OF ELIGIBLE WAGES AND BONUS' HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL INCOME WOULD A ONE MILLION DOLLAR BONUS CREATE (12.4% OF 1,000,000 DOLLARS=$120,000)

MULTIPLY THE TOTAL OF SEVERAL MILLIONS OR MAYBE BILLIIONS OF WAGES AND BONUS' OVER 106,800.

THEN WE HAVE THOSE SUPER RICH WHO DO NOT TAKE WAGES OR BONUS' OUT OF THEIR BUSINESS OPERATIONS BUT HAVE OTHER WAYS OF REMOVING MILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM THOSE BUSINESS OPERATIONS WITHOUT CONTRIBUTING A PENNY TO SOCIAL SECURITY.

AND JUST THINK THE REST OF US ARE PAYING INTO THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUND ALL OUR LIVES .

REMUNATION IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO SOCIAL SECURITY. BENIFITS COULD BE PAID WITHOUT HAVING TO USE THE GENERAL FUNDS OF THE COUNTRY. AND INCREASE THE REVENUE STREAM, WHICH THE DEMOCRATS ARE SO INTENT ON ACCOMPOLISHING.

PROBLEM- THIS WOULD HURT THE SACRED COW SOURCES OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BUT WOULD BE PLACING THE WELFARE OF THE COUNTRY OVER THE URGENCY TO GET ELECTED