What with all the political garbage that has surfaced in the past several months I believe that if that Great Lady holding the Torch were alive she would be shedding a river of tears.
All Posts (29702)
Sort by
Why do black Americans vote Democratic when the democratic pro-choice philosophy has resulted in countless black babies being aborted. One black politican, E. W. Jackson, the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor of Virginia stated: “Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was.” The following was reported by Kelsey Hazzard of LifeNews.com.
Democratic activists are going nuts over statements by E. W. Jackson, the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor of Virginia. The quote all the news pieces are highlighting: “Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was.”
Reporters are treating this as an unimaginable gaffe. Their theme is that, by picking a candidate who would say such a thing, the GOP has proven that it hasn’t learned anything from its poor performance in recent elections. I won’t comment on whether or not the GOP has learned anything; only time will tell. My gripe with this news coverage is that none of the reporters bothered to point out that what Jackson said about Planned Parenthood is factually accurate.
In 2011, the last year for which figures are available, Planned Parenthood performed 333,964 abortions in the United States. Nationally, 37% of abortions are performed on black women, according to the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute. We can therefore surmise that in one year alone, Planned Parenthood killed approximately 123,567 unborn African-American children.
As for the KKK, estimates vary. The Tuskegee Institute has documented 3,446 lynchings of black Americans between 1882 and 1968. But not all KKK murders were done by lynching, and some lynching incidents were committed by racists independent of the KKK. In any event, the number of blacks killed by the KKK, in its entire history, does not approach 123,567.
To my mind this is another example of "Don't confuse me with the facts because I've got my mind made up!"
Vote conservative to straighten out the U.S.!!!
Does the Federal Government work for US or do we work for the Federal Government.
To listen to some of people today you would think that we the people work for the Government. That is how thoroughly the media and anti-American entities have brainwashed the public. Let set the record straight. The people who work for the Government are called Civil Servants and there is a good reason for it.
VOTE OUT ALL LIBERALS, CLOSET LIBERALS, THOSE WHO PRETEND TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND REPLACE THEM WITH AUTHENIC CONSERVATIVES. ONLY CONSERVATIVES CAN STRAIGHTEN OUT AMERICA CONTRARY TO THE BULL YOU HEAR AND READ IN THE MEDIA. Work within the system to elect honest, God-fearing, men and women of integrity and support them while in office.....instead of cursing the darkness or giving up.
Every State
"Gun Rights Across America" (GRAA) is doing something that has NEVER been attempted in the history of our great nation, for the purpose of stopping the 2nd Amendment infringements.
GRAA has formally invited every pro gun, pro 2nd Amendment organization to an event to be held in all 50 states on July 20, 2013. This will be a day where all groups and organizations can come together, not to worry about each groups personal agenda, but rather about uniting to save the 2nd Amendment. This will be a day of networking, shaking hands, discussing how we as gun rights organizations can work together, and fun. Some states will incorporate volleyball, food, softball, fun events for kids, etc.
For more details on the event in your state please check the GRAA website for your state's fb Page. http://www.gunrightsacrossamerica.com/GRAA_States.html
Sarah Palin Returns to Fox News as Conservative Tea Party Champion and movement leader
With the stroke of a pen, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin returns to Fox News as a contributor while liberal bombast Chris Matthews of MSNBC loses his weekend syndicated show in July. Does this spell the resurrection of the political street bona fides of Palin who has been a lightning rod for conservatives and the national Tea Party movement since its inception?
What seems clear is that Roger Ailes, the chairman of Fox News has reached a conclusion that the scandal beleaguered administration of President Barack Obama is fair pickings for conservatives. And what better conservative to have on your news team than Sarah Palin who has done considerable heavy lifting for the conservative movement since Obama took the oath of office as president in 2009.
This is especially critical when one considers that the upcoming mid-term elections of 2014 are rife for the political pickings in terms of governorships, the U.S. Senate and increases in the GOP House majority.
Examine the landscape of the world of politics now where the polls are pointing toward a downward slide regarding Obama’s favorability and a notable upward surge in the public’s rejection of Obama’s handling of Benghazi, the IRS attack on Tea Party organizations’ First Amendment rights and spying on journalists.
The surge in public outrage has changed dramatically since Obama’s reelection when he cobbled together a number of key state victories with Chicago style political strong arming that would make dishonored former President Richard Nixon blush. Yet, while America was having its news hijacked by a compliant mainstream media, Sarah Palin remained on the forefront using their own vehicles to communicate the cracks in Obama’s administration armor.
You remember Benghazi, the murder of four honorable Americans, including America’s Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens scandal that would not go away? The investigation by the House Republicans continued to peel back the wall of lies constructed by the White House and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice under the direction of unnamed State Department and White House officials.
The Dems tried to recall Scott Walker and Sheriff Joe in AZ. Why not recall Obama? How signatures would that take? Impeaching Obama would take too long, the Senate would never go along with it and in the end we would be left with Biden. We need to force a new election. This time without Soro's rigged voting machines, no early voting, everyone has to produce ID, all military votes get counted and all voter rolls are cleaned up to eliminate dead and non eligible voters. Anyone caught casting a fraudulent vote gets an automatic 10 years sentence. Any area that shows more voters than eligible voters get disqualified. How do we get started on this?
Barak, you said "if the political wind blows in an ugly direction you will stand on the side of Islam". I want you to know that if that happens I will stand on the side of God the Constitution and our Republic. Therefore you would, in effect, become my enemy, as if you aren't already. Better start practicing because if you use force against those things I stand for and took an oath to protect, you need to know I am a sharpshooter. Wouldn't you be better served if you simply resigned and crawled back in the gutter you slithered out of? I have never, and will never strike a first blow, however, I will not submit in any way whatsoever to your vision for America! I'm not alone by a long shot!
Elevengun
Ye who worship false gods need to run tell your master all I have written here or he will surely punish you. Before you get over excited and wet your nickers be informed this is not a threat of any kind, just resistance to the threats Barak has made through his minions. Wishing you a very bitter day!
ISLAM STINKS..to quote my favorite cartoonist...
What kind of Religion is Muslim when its members are afraid to speak up against EVIL INCARNATE
among its rank?
Muslims come to America to escape RADICAL MUSLIM. Now they want America to support their
belief while keeping quiet about THE DARK SIDE of Islam, some even going so far as to support versions of Islam here that condone EVIL in its many versions...women beware beware...
A Religion that co-exists among its perverted versions is not a Religion at all, only a Hostage of EVIL..
Cal
Elevengun
Art Phillips © 2010
Let's write to Congress (www.contactingthecongress.org or at petition2congress.org) to impeach President Obama. Mr. Obama has given himself unconstitutionally-expanded martial law, war powers, and control of all communications and business in "peacetime and conflict" via Executive Orders. The presidential election was compromised (See http://www.soesoftware.com/media/scytl_press_release_3_5_12.pdf AND http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/2012-election/) and the U.S. Attorney General (Eric Holder) is complicit with President Obama's actions and will not be investigating or prosecuting Obama. So, our only option is to impeach. PLEASE write your own email or send the one below. Note that the short version, which can be cut, pasted, and emailed to your Representatives, is the last paragraph of this Petition. Please also pass this Petition (www.impeachpresidentobama.weebly.com) to others intact and sign it at http://www.petition2congress.com/10013/impeach-obama-treason/
The impeachment process is as follows: 1) Grounds of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors are recognized; 2) The House of Representatives issues Articles of Impeachment; and, 3) The Senate conducts a trial and must have a two-thirds vote to impeach. The penalty is being removed from office and disqualified from further public office.
Title 18 of the U.S. Code defines treason: "§ 2381. Treason. Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office in the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)" (Emphasis added)
Even though President Obama has committed many unconstitutional actions of a traitorous nature, the House of Representatives has been silent. Therefore, it is up to the citizenship to speak up and demand that a hearing be conducted, that Articles of Impeachment be issued, that the Senate impeach President Obama, and that Congress and the courts restore the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land by striking down any and all government agency regulations, Executive Orders, and laws in opposition to the United States Constitution.
Dear Representatives of We the People:
The Declaration of Independence says:
". . . when a long train of abuses and usurpations,
pursuing invariably the same, object evinces a design
to reduce them under absolute depotism, it is their right,
it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to
provide new guards for their future security."
Let it now be a civilized revolution against Presidential tyranny in order to uphold and reinstate the United States Constitution (which includes the Bill of Rights and all Amendments) as the supreme law of the land and to reclaim under and realign our governmental agencies with the United States Constitution. This revolution needs to be done within our system in order to preserve our system. Let us merely reset Presidential power and reaffirm our Constitution and the governmental restrictions therein.
A revolution to reset government is needed because President Obama, on his own initiative and with no explanation, expanded his power under the NDAA and in March 2012 re-enacted, unconstitutionally expanded, and redefined the Defense Production Act by Executive Order (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness), in effect rewriting the law authorizing President Obama's "legal" and in effect takeover of the country, initiating marshal law and war powers even before any crippling attack and with only vague references to national security, defense (effective "under both emergency and non-emergency conditions"), and national disasters, and with no restrictions or time limitations whatsoever, which facilitates his presidency becoming a kingship and his never leaving office.
By unconstitutionally-expanded Executive Order, President Obama has also taken control over all communications, nullified the Second Amendment (http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/executive-orders), and has signed the United Nation's Small Arms Treaty which, if ratified by the Senate (the vote merely being on hold), will unconstitutionally restrict the sale of small arms to U.S. citizens. Along with this, President Obama has prepared large FEMA camps in almost every state and has unconstitutionally assigned U.S. troops to guard them (See http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf AND http://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/browse-career-and-job-categories/legal-and-law-enforcement/internment-resettlement-specialist.html AND http://www.uscg.mil/directives/cim/3000-3999/CIM_3010_14.pdf AND http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr645/text AND http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf AND http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=C67234C7049D2AB2F3D897B805FEFEC2 AND http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm). On June 25, 2012, President Obama declared a standing bogus state of emergency (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/06/25/executive-order-russian-highly-enriched-uranium) in order to be able, at any moment, excuse the use of all the inflated and unconstitutional powers he has granted himself.
In addition, President Obama has signed an unconstitutionally-expanded Executive Order making the Department of Homeland Security (See the Order: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/10/26/executive-order-establishing-white-house-homeland-security-partnership-c) to be the all-encompassing and all-powerful United States authority which answers only to the President. Mr. Obama claims his actions are being undertaken to stop terrorists, even though his previous actions have actually facilitated jihad inside the United States. President Obama has prohibited the criminal intent of Islamic jihad, even prohibiting the words "jihad" and "Islam," from being used in the investigation and prosecution of jihad crimes. Therefore, jihadists can now merely claim their actions were accidents and their true intentions (Islamic jihad and the seditious enforcement of Shariah law) cannot be investigated or prosecuted as sedition, hate crimes against non-Muslims, or acts of war. Yet, the Department of Homeland Security can, under this new Executive Order, restrict the constitutionally-protected civil liberties and rights of (United States) law-abiding citizens by directly subjecting them to its undefined and unlimited priorities.
This Executive Order also establishes and mandates "partnerships" between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ALL state and local authorities (and even non-governmental agencies such as churches) in order to "support [non-defined] homeland security priorities." With this Executive Order, President Obama, in effect, voided the United States Constitution and made the United States Government a Socialist/Communist entity with its own self-enforcement agency (DHS). Then, President Obama provided the unconstitutionally-supreme authority of the Department of Homeland Security with its own army. (See http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/q42012/homeland-security-graduates-first-corps-of-homeland-youth/?emailListSignupSuccess=1 AND http://www.americorps.gov/pdf/femacorps_faqs_apps_members.pdf AND http://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/browse-career-and-job-categories/legal-and-law-enforcement/internment-resettlement-specialist.html).
Concurrently and at a time when we were and are at war with Islamic jihad organizations (al Qaeda and the Taliban) which are parented by the Muslim Brotherhood, he has actively and with United States taxpayer money and troops courted, enabled, supported, and facilitated what he referred to as the Muslim world (global jihad) and enabled Islamic Sharia law enforcement through governmental agencies. He continues to funnel hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood and other factions (such as Boko Haram and other Islamic terrorist groups); and he has worked for the establishment of Islamic democracies (Islamic constitution enforced by Sharia law) around the world. Because President Obama has stated he favors the Muslim Brotherhood and will negotiate with the Muslim Brotherhood there is danger of his signing an Islamic dhimmitude contract in the form of a peace agreement with the Muslim world via the Muslim Brotherhood. Mohammad called such false peace agreements "hudna" agreements. The Muslim Brotherhood's stated goal, since its inception in 1928, has been to establish the Caliphate (i.e., rule of Islamic Sharia law) over the entire world. Therefore, any "peace" agreement with the Muslim world via the Muslim Brotherhood or with any of its factions or with the United Nations (which is dominated by the largest voting block of 56 Muslim nations plus the PLO called the OIC, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation) (See http://www.oic-oci.org/member_states.asp AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey-TRpkUiPI&feature=youtu.be), would supersede our Constitution and make United States citizens submit to Islamic Sharia law. We need to prevent such an overthrow of the United States.
President Obama has also taken actions in direct opposition to the supreme rule of the United States Constitution. He has used U.S. troops for international ambitions on his own accord, sending troops into Libya without approval or even consultation with Congress as required by the United States Constitution and the War Powers Act. President Obama simply declared he did not have to address the Constitutional limitations of his office and chose to submit to international consensus instead (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faRjF3-WGVA&feature=player_embedded&noredirect=1 AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geqTT14AXwE) Congress has never approved U.S. troop involvement in Libya, and Congress has legislated that such action by a president is an impeachable offense. Specifically:
"Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution." H.CON.RES.107, March 7, 2012
President Obama has similarly unconstitutionally sent troops into Africa to fight AGAINST the only opposition to the genocidal Islamic jihad happening in the oil-rich countries there, thereby aiding and abetting the genocidal jihad takeovers in Northern Africa. President Obama's declared international "legal basis" for such deployment of U.S. troops makes the United States Military at the disposal of foreign powers/organizations (i.e., the UN/OIC, Arab League, African Union, etc.) and under the authority of foreign law. Such use of the United States Military is unconstitutional. (See http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html)
President Obama and his Administration facilitated the deaths of the Special Forces heroes responsible for killing Osama bin Laden. (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=rqtJrJ40Cio)
In addition, President Obama has been overtly using taxpayer money to "respect" the establishment of Islam and to unofficially enforce Sharia law (which enforces Islamic principles found in the Qur'an and Sunnah) within the United States and all over the world. The First Amendment Prohibition Clause of the U.S. Constitution states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting AN establishment of religion . . . " (Emphasis added)
However, President Obama has been using U.S. Governmental agencies (i.e., regulatory law) to, in his own words, specifically "respect" Islam both at home and abroad, and he is unofficially enforcing Sharia law by making U.S. Governmental agencies and their regulatory law Sharia-compliant out of such "respect." As stated above, he has worked to remove even the words "jihad" and "Muslim" from the criminal investigation and prosecution of jihad crimes against non-Muslims, thus preventing the prosecution of the criminal intent of extracting jizya (tribute by non-Muslims), abusing, raping, and murdering non-Muslims BECAUSE they are non-Muslims and the murdering of those who rebel (honor killing) or convert away from Islam. Such jihad crimes are perfectly "legal" under Sharia law as the Qur'an and Sunnah state, for example:
"The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah." Sunnah: Sahih Muslim 33.
"Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves." Qur’an 48:29.
"There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die.")." Reliance of the Traveller (sic) 08.4 (Shariah law)
Under United States law, however and for example, to kill someone because they do not share your religious beliefs or to save face (honor killing) is First Degree Murder, but not if their criminal intent is purposely excluded from investigation and prosecution by law enforcement agencies and the judiciary. Under such conditions someone who has committed an honor killing could claim the murder was an accident and there would be no refuting the claim. Such governmental agency policy and regulation unofficially enforces Sharia law.
President Obama and the Obama Administration also knew of the Benghazi attack on the United State's Consulate, an act of war, in real time and military reinforcement was denied! (See http://video.foxnews.com/v/1920570366001/new-information-on-benghazi AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lljKmmZyCiw AND http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57582929/official-we-knew-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-get-go?utm_source=newsletter_202&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=joomlacontent-577-type-title) However and instead, President Obama let the jihadists take out the Consulate, kill the Ambassador, and kill the heroes who disobeyed orders to stand down (if there were orders to stand down the distress call was heard and an answer given). Only the President would have the authority to make the CIA and the military stand down. After the fact and like Oliver North, someone is coming forward to ridiculously fall on his sword. The Obama Administration even supplied the weapons used in the attack! (See http://video.foxnews.com/v/1920570366001/new-information-on-benghazi AND http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/) Then, President Obama used the attack as a way to enforce and further Shariah law's criminalization of any analysis of, criticism of, or insult to Islam or Mohammad using the low-budget video of part of the Sira, "The Innocence of Muslims" as a justifiable reason for the attack (i.e., justified under Shariah law). President Obama is also sending F-16's and tanks to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood President Morsi (See http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/22/gift-us-f-16-fighter-jets-en-route-to-egypt-amid-criticism/), and he has even gone to far as to waive any restrictions on tax-payer money sent to the PLO (See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/presidential-memorandum-presidential-determination-regarding-waiver-rest). Mr. Obama needs to be impeached for treason in aiding our enemies and seditious facilitation of United States takeover via Shariah law. The United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, is the one who would investigate and prosecute the President for treason, but Mr. Holder is apparently complicit in President Obama's seditious agenda and is unlikely to do his job.
In accord with his Marxist and elitist backing, President Obama has also incorporated the United Nation's Agenda 21 plans into his promised "change." (See http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml). The "President's Council on Sustainable Development ("Council") was established by Executive Order (NOT Congress) No. 12852, dated June 29, 1993 (See http://clinton2.nara.gov/PCSD/Charter/index.html). The Council is solely advisory in nature, but it shows how seriously the plan has been/is being taken by the Presidency. Agenda 21 essentially restricts the majority of the population into sustainable cities, while the elitists overtly control the majority of the land and its resources, and covertly control the profits and benefits from those resources. It is supported by the United Nation's Biodiversity Assessment (See http://www.un.org/earthwatch/biodiversity/assessment.html) and promoted under the guise of global warming prevention. So, as President Obama courts and accommodates the Muslim world, enforcing Sharia law and giving global jihadists free reign to commit jihad in the United States and all over the world, he also appeases his Marxist and elitists supporters by pushing their unconstitutional Agenda 21, using the Muslim Brotherhood's global jihad as allies and the Russian nuclear arsenal to enforce its initial implementation in taking on war powers (see above). Agenda 21 wipes out individual rights and is thus unconstitutional.
In addition, President Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States. The United States Constitution says:
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen
of the United States at the time of the Adoption of
this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
President . . ."
A natural born citizen of the United States, as defined by United States Federal case law and statute, is a citizen who was born in the United States by parents who were BOTH citizens of the United States at the time of birth. There is much evidence of fraud by President Obama in providing a fraudulent birth certificate and covering up his true citizenship. However, even if he was born in Hawaii and is a native born citizen, President Obama's legal father (married to his mother at the time of his birth, no matter what the gossip about his "true" father) was never a United States citizen, and was a citizen of Kenya. (See http://barackhobamafoundation.org/Barack-H-Obama-Sr.html) Therefore, according to the United States Constitution Barack Hussein Obama is simply not eligible to be President. This provision of the Constitution prevented Arnold Schwarzenegger from running for President. When this issue was originally brought up in the Obama/McCain election, an investigation was conducted because McCain is the son of two United States Citizens and his father was in the United States Military but stationed outside the United States at the time of Mr. McCain's birth. However, because Mr. McCain was not born in the United States military hospital where his father was stationed, the Senate conducted an investigation as to his eligibility to be president. A Bill was also introduced to clarify the law and ensure that children born to United States citizens while serving overseas in the military are eligible to become president, but the Bill languished in committee (See http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/s2678). The Senate has never investigated President Obama's eligibility, even though he is not a natural born U.S. citizen. (See http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/the-mystery-of-barack-obama-continues/)
There have been many attempts to oppose President Obama's actions in and eligibility for the presidency. Lt. Colonel Terry Laken has been imprisoned for refusing to be sent to war by a president who is not a natural born United States citizen as required by the United States Constitution. Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick was arrested because he attempted to bring charges up against President Obama for treason (See http://riseupforamerica.com/). A non-governmental citizen grand jury and trial indicted and convicted Barack Hussein Obama on 14 counts of sedition and treason. The transcript of that citizen trial is found here: http://www.scribd.com/collections/2682941/The-Official-C-I-A-Columbia-Obama-Sedition-and-Treason-Trial-Transcripts. Many citizen militia groups have been formed out of concern for the United States Constitution and the freedoms guaranteed therein being trampled. Act for America (actforamerica.org) was established to educate United States citizens regarding the dangers of Islamic jihad conquest and calls for the unified reclaiming of Constitutional freedoms and has responded many times to President Obama's unconstitutional actions. Catholic Bishops in the Unites States have written letters to their diocese asking parishioners to pray for and be active in protecting our freedom of conscience specifically relating to President Obama's agenda of abortion funding via Obamacare. The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and its Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) program is calling for an investigation of President Obama's leaking defense secrets of our ally against jihad terrorism (Israel) to Iran (See http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/8282719338.html). The Tea Party has been working to establish President Obama's ineligibility to be president, believing him to have been actually born in another country. There are many more citizen movements taking place against many of the actions of President Obama and the "change" he has wrought.
President Obama needs to be impeached as a traitor for breaking his oath of office to "PRESERVE, protect, and defend the United States Constitution" (Emphasis added), in unconstitutionally expanding his presidency, via Executive Orders, into a kingship. President Obama is also guilty of treason for adhering to, aiding and abetting the enemies of this country by using taxpayer money to finance the Muslim Brotherhood's global jihad and working to replace our Constitution with a Shariah-compliant, New World Order, Socialist/Communist agenda. Also and in the alternative, President Obama is not a natural born citizen (or even native born) and, according to the United States Constitution, he is not eligible to be the president. Please do your duty as a member of Congress and impeach Mr. Obama and his Administration and restore the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land by repealing/striking down via legislation any and all government agency regulations, Executive Orders, and laws in opposition to the United States Constitution.
Let's write to Congress (www.contactingthecongress.org or at petition2congress.org) to impeach President Obama. Mr. Obama has given himself unconstitutionally-expanded martial law, war powers, and control of all communications and business in "peacetime and conflict" via Executive Orders. The presidential election was compromised (See http://www.soesoftware.com/media/scytl_press_release_3_5_12.pdf AND http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/2012-election/) and the U.S. Attorney General (Eric Holder) is complicit with President Obama's actions and will not be investigating or prosecuting Obama. So, our only option is to impeach. PLEASE write your own email or send the one below. Note that the short version, which can be cut, pasted, and emailed to your Representatives, is the last paragraph of this Petition. Please also pass this Petition (www.impeachpresidentobama.weebly.com) to others intact and sign it at http://www.petition2congress.com/10013/impeach-obama-treason/
The impeachment process is as follows: 1) Grounds of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors are recognized; 2) The House of Representatives issues Articles of Impeachment; and, 3) The Senate conducts a trial and must have a two-thirds vote to impeach. The penalty is being removed from office and disqualified from further public office.
Title 18 of the U.S. Code defines treason: "§ 2381. Treason. Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office in the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)" (Emphasis added)
Even though President Obama has committed many unconstitutional actions of a traitorous nature, the House of Representatives has been silent. Therefore, it is up to the citizenship to speak up and demand that a hearing be conducted, that Articles of Impeachment be issued, that the Senate impeach President Obama, and that Congress and the courts restore the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land by striking down any and all government agency regulations, Executive Orders, and laws in opposition to the United States Constitution.
Dear Representatives of We the People:
The Declaration of Independence says:
". . . when a long train of abuses and usurpations,
pursuing invariably the same, object evinces a design
to reduce them under absolute depotism, it is their right,
it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to
provide new guards for their future security."
Let it now be a civilized revolution against Presidential tyranny in order to uphold and reinstate the United States Constitution (which includes the Bill of Rights and all Amendments) as the supreme law of the land and to reclaim under and realign our governmental agencies with the United States Constitution. This revolution needs to be done within our system in order to preserve our system. Let us merely reset Presidential power and reaffirm our Constitution and the governmental restrictions therein.
A revolution to reset government is needed because President Obama, on his own initiative and with no explanation, expanded his power under the NDAA and in March 2012 re-enacted, unconstitutionally expanded, and redefined the Defense Production Act by Executive Order (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness), in effect rewriting the law authorizing President Obama's "legal" and in effect takeover of the country, initiating marshal law and war powers even before any crippling attack and with only vague references to national security, defense (effective "under both emergency and non-emergency conditions"), and national disasters, and with no restrictions or time limitations whatsoever, which facilitates his presidency becoming a kingship and his never leaving office.
By unconstitutionally-expanded Executive Order, President Obama has also taken control over all communications, nullified the Second Amendment (http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/executive-orders), and has signed the United Nation's Small Arms Treaty which, if ratified by the Senate (the vote merely being on hold), will unconstitutionally restrict the sale of small arms to U.S. citizens. Along with this, President Obama has prepared large FEMA camps in almost every state and has unconstitutionally assigned U.S. troops to guard them (See http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf AND http://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/browse-career-and-job-categories/legal-and-law-enforcement/internment-resettlement-specialist.html AND http://www.uscg.mil/directives/cim/3000-3999/CIM_3010_14.pdf AND http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr645/text AND http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf AND http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=C67234C7049D2AB2F3D897B805FEFEC2 AND http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm). On June 25, 2012, President Obama declared a standing bogus state of emergency (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/06/25/executive-order-russian-highly-enriched-uranium) in order to be able, at any moment, excuse the use of all the inflated and unconstitutional powers he has granted himself.
In addition, President Obama has signed an unconstitutionally-expanded Executive Order making the Department of Homeland Security (See the Order: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/10/26/executive-order-establishing-white-house-homeland-security-partnership-c) to be the all-encompassing and all-powerful United States authority which answers only to the President. Mr. Obama claims his actions are being undertaken to stop terrorists, even though his previous actions have actually facilitated jihad inside the United States. President Obama has prohibited the criminal intent of Islamic jihad, even prohibiting the words "jihad" and "Islam," from being used in the investigation and prosecution of jihad crimes. Therefore, jihadists can now merely claim their actions were accidents and their true intentions (Islamic jihad and the seditious enforcement of Shariah law) cannot be investigated or prosecuted as sedition, hate crimes against non-Muslims, or acts of war. Yet, the Department of Homeland Security can, under this new Executive Order, restrict the constitutionally-protected civil liberties and rights of (United States) law-abiding citizens by directly subjecting them to its undefined and unlimited priorities.
This Executive Order also establishes and mandates "partnerships" between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ALL state and local authorities (and even non-governmental agencies such as churches) in order to "support [non-defined] homeland security priorities." With this Executive Order, President Obama, in effect, voided the United States Constitution and made the United States Government a Socialist/Communist entity with its own self-enforcement agency (DHS). Then, President Obama provided the unconstitutionally-supreme authority of the Department of Homeland Security with its own army. (See http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/q42012/homeland-security-graduates-first-corps-of-homeland-youth/?emailListSignupSuccess=1 AND http://www.americorps.gov/pdf/femacorps_faqs_apps_members.pdf AND http://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/browse-career-and-job-categories/legal-and-law-enforcement/internment-resettlement-specialist.html).
Concurrently and at a time when we were and are at war with Islamic jihad organizations (al Qaeda and the Taliban) which are parented by the Muslim Brotherhood, he has actively and with United States taxpayer money and troops courted, enabled, supported, and facilitated what he referred to as the Muslim world (global jihad) and enabled Islamic Sharia law enforcement through governmental agencies. He continues to funnel hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood and other factions (such as Boko Haram and other Islamic terrorist groups); and he has worked for the establishment of Islamic democracies (Islamic constitution enforced by Sharia law) around the world. Because President Obama has stated he favors the Muslim Brotherhood and will negotiate with the Muslim Brotherhood there is danger of his signing an Islamic dhimmitude contract in the form of a peace agreement with the Muslim world via the Muslim Brotherhood. Mohammad called such false peace agreements "hudna" agreements. The Muslim Brotherhood's stated goal, since its inception in 1928, has been to establish the Caliphate (i.e., rule of Islamic Sharia law) over the entire world. Therefore, any "peace" agreement with the Muslim world via the Muslim Brotherhood or with any of its factions or with the United Nations (which is dominated by the largest voting block of 56 Muslim nations plus the PLO called the OIC, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation) (See http://www.oic-oci.org/member_states.asp AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey-TRpkUiPI&feature=youtu.be), would supersede our Constitution and make United States citizens submit to Islamic Sharia law. We need to prevent such an overthrow of the United States.
President Obama has also taken actions in direct opposition to the supreme rule of the United States Constitution. He has used U.S. troops for international ambitions on his own accord, sending troops into Libya without approval or even consultation with Congress as required by the United States Constitution and the War Powers Act. President Obama simply declared he did not have to address the Constitutional limitations of his office and chose to submit to international consensus instead (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faRjF3-WGVA&feature=player_embedded&noredirect=1 AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geqTT14AXwE) Congress has never approved U.S. troop involvement in Libya, and Congress has legislated that such action by a president is an impeachable offense. Specifically:
"Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution." H.CON.RES.107, March 7, 2012
President Obama has similarly unconstitutionally sent troops into Africa to fight AGAINST the only opposition to the genocidal Islamic jihad happening in the oil-rich countries there, thereby aiding and abetting the genocidal jihad takeovers in Northern Africa. President Obama's declared international "legal basis" for such deployment of U.S. troops makes the United States Military at the disposal of foreign powers/organizations (i.e., the UN/OIC, Arab League, African Union, etc.) and under the authority of foreign law. Such use of the United States Military is unconstitutional. (See http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html)
President Obama and his Administration facilitated the deaths of the Special Forces heroes responsible for killing Osama bin Laden. (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=rqtJrJ40Cio)
In addition, President Obama has been overtly using taxpayer money to "respect" the establishment of Islam and to unofficially enforce Sharia law (which enforces Islamic principles found in the Qur'an and Sunnah) within the United States and all over the world. The First Amendment Prohibition Clause of the U.S. Constitution states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting AN establishment of religion . . . " (Emphasis added)
However, President Obama has been using U.S. Governmental agencies (i.e., regulatory law) to, in his own words, specifically "respect" Islam both at home and abroad, and he is unofficially enforcing Sharia law by making U.S. Governmental agencies and their regulatory law Sharia-compliant out of such "respect." As stated above, he has worked to remove even the words "jihad" and "Muslim" from the criminal investigation and prosecution of jihad crimes against non-Muslims, thus preventing the prosecution of the criminal intent of extracting jizya (tribute by non-Muslims), abusing, raping, and murdering non-Muslims BECAUSE they are non-Muslims and the murdering of those who rebel (honor killing) or convert away from Islam. Such jihad crimes are perfectly "legal" under Sharia law as the Qur'an and Sunnah state, for example:
"The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah." Sunnah: Sahih Muslim 33.
"Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves." Qur’an 48:29.
"There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die.")." Reliance of the Traveller (sic) 08.4 (Shariah law)
Under United States law, however and for example, to kill someone because they do not share your religious beliefs or to save face (honor killing) is First Degree Murder, but not if their criminal intent is purposely excluded from investigation and prosecution by law enforcement agencies and the judiciary. Under such conditions someone who has committed an honor killing could claim the murder was an accident and there would be no refuting the claim. Such governmental agency policy and regulation unofficially enforces Sharia law.
President Obama and the Obama Administration also knew of the Benghazi attack on the United State's Consulate, an act of war, in real time and military reinforcement was denied! (See http://video.foxnews.com/v/1920570366001/new-information-on-benghazi AND https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lljKmmZyCiw AND http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57582929/official-we-knew-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-get-go?utm_source=newsletter_202&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=joomlacontent-577-type-title) However and instead, President Obama let the jihadists take out the Consulate, kill the Ambassador, and kill the heroes who disobeyed orders to stand down (if there were orders to stand down the distress call was heard and an answer given). Only the President would have the authority to make the CIA and the military stand down. After the fact and like Oliver North, someone is coming forward to ridiculously fall on his sword. The Obama Administration even supplied the weapons used in the attack! (See http://video.foxnews.com/v/1920570366001/new-information-on-benghazi AND http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/) Then, President Obama used the attack as a way to enforce and further Shariah law's criminalization of any analysis of, criticism of, or insult to Islam or Mohammad using the low-budget video of part of the Sira, "The Innocence of Muslims" as a justifiable reason for the attack (i.e., justified under Shariah law). President Obama is also sending F-16's and tanks to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood President Morsi (See http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/22/gift-us-f-16-fighter-jets-en-route-to-egypt-amid-criticism/), and he has even gone to far as to waive any restrictions on tax-payer money sent to the PLO (See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/presidential-memorandum-presidential-determination-regarding-waiver-rest). Mr. Obama needs to be impeached for treason in aiding our enemies and seditious facilitation of United States takeover via Shariah law. The United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, is the one who would investigate and prosecute the President for treason, but Mr. Holder is apparently complicit in President Obama's seditious agenda and is unlikely to do his job.
In accord with his Marxist and elitist backing, President Obama has also incorporated the United Nation's Agenda 21 plans into his promised "change." (See http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml). The "President's Council on Sustainable Development ("Council") was established by Executive Order (NOT Congress) No. 12852, dated June 29, 1993 (See http://clinton2.nara.gov/PCSD/Charter/index.html). The Council is solely advisory in nature, but it shows how seriously the plan has been/is being taken by the Presidency. Agenda 21 essentially restricts the majority of the population into sustainable cities, while the elitists overtly control the majority of the land and its resources, and covertly control the profits and benefits from those resources. It is supported by the United Nation's Biodiversity Assessment (See http://www.un.org/earthwatch/biodiversity/assessment.html) and promoted under the guise of global warming prevention. So, as President Obama courts and accommodates the Muslim world, enforcing Sharia law and giving global jihadists free reign to commit jihad in the United States and all over the world, he also appeases his Marxist and elitists supporters by pushing their unconstitutional Agenda 21, using the Muslim Brotherhood's global jihad as allies and the Russian nuclear arsenal to enforce its initial implementation in taking on war powers (see above). Agenda 21 wipes out individual rights and is thus unconstitutional.
In addition, President Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States. The United States Constitution says:
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen
of the United States at the time of the Adoption of
this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
President . . ."
A natural born citizen of the United States, as defined by United States Federal case law and statute, is a citizen who was born in the United States by parents who were BOTH citizens of the United States at the time of birth. There is much evidence of fraud by President Obama in providing a fraudulent birth certificate and covering up his true citizenship. However, even if he was born in Hawaii and is a native born citizen, President Obama's legal father (married to his mother at the time of his birth, no matter what the gossip about his "true" father) was never a United States citizen, and was a citizen of Kenya. (See http://barackhobamafoundation.org/Barack-H-Obama-Sr.html) Therefore, according to the United States Constitution Barack Hussein Obama is simply not eligible to be President. This provision of the Constitution prevented Arnold Schwarzenegger from running for President. When this issue was originally brought up in the Obama/McCain election, an investigation was conducted because McCain is the son of two United States Citizens and his father was in the United States Military but stationed outside the United States at the time of Mr. McCain's birth. However, because Mr. McCain was not born in the United States military hospital where his father was stationed, the Senate conducted an investigation as to his eligibility to be president. A Bill was also introduced to clarify the law and ensure that children born to United States citizens while serving overseas in the military are eligible to become president, but the Bill languished in committee (See http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/s2678). The Senate has never investigated President Obama's eligibility, even though he is not a natural born U.S. citizen. (See http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/the-mystery-of-barack-obama-continues/)
There have been many attempts to oppose President Obama's actions in and eligibility for the presidency. Lt. Colonel Terry Laken has been imprisoned for refusing to be sent to war by a president who is not a natural born United States citizen as required by the United States Constitution. Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick was arrested because he attempted to bring charges up against President Obama for treason (See http://riseupforamerica.com/). A non-governmental citizen grand jury and trial indicted and convicted Barack Hussein Obama on 14 counts of sedition and treason. The transcript of that citizen trial is found here: http://www.scribd.com/collections/2682941/The-Official-C-I-A-Columbia-Obama-Sedition-and-Treason-Trial-Transcripts. Many citizen militia groups have been formed out of concern for the United States Constitution and the freedoms guaranteed therein being trampled. Act for America (actforamerica.org) was established to educate United States citizens regarding the dangers of Islamic jihad conquest and calls for the unified reclaiming of Constitutional freedoms and has responded many times to President Obama's unconstitutional actions. Catholic Bishops in the Unites States have written letters to their diocese asking parishioners to pray for and be active in protecting our freedom of conscience specifically relating to President Obama's agenda of abortion funding via Obamacare. The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and its Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) program is calling for an investigation of President Obama's leaking defense secrets of our ally against jihad terrorism (Israel) to Iran (See http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/8282719338.html). The Tea Party has been working to establish President Obama's ineligibility to be president, believing him to have been actually born in another country. There are many more citizen movements taking place against many of the actions of President Obama and the "change" he has wrought.
President Obama needs to be impeached as a traitor for breaking his oath of office to "PRESERVE, protect, and defend the United States Constitution" (Emphasis added), in unconstitutionally expanding his presidency, via Executive Orders, into a kingship. President Obama is also guilty of treason for adhering to, aiding and abetting the enemies of this country by using taxpayer money to finance the Muslim Brotherhood's global jihad and working to replace our Constitution with a Shariah-compliant, New World Order, Socialist/Communist agenda. Also and in the alternative, President Obama is not a natural born citizen (or even native born) and, according to the United States Constitution, he is not eligible to be the president. Please do your duty as a member of Congress and impeach Mr. Obama and his Administration and restore the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land by repealing/striking down via legislation any and all government agency regulations, Executive Orders, and laws in opposition to the United States Constitution.
A new word from the "weather" media.. Derecho, have you heard it? Know what it is? Here ya go. derecho (də-reh-choh, from Spanish: derecho "straight") is a widespread, long-lived, straight-line wind storm that is associated with a fast-moving band of severe thunderstorms.
Now stop and think about this. Is this unusual ? Nope... we get them all the time... but SUDDENLY the new word comes up making a line of thunderstorms into something different than before.
Derecho, what's the underlying possiblity? This word is a spanish word meaning Straight.. just that simple so why the "hype"? Possibility ??? Indoctrinating the SPANISH language into our daily lives ONE WORD at a time. How many people do you know who greet you with the word Hola??? I see it more and more every day. What happened to HEY ! or Howdy ?? Or simply Good Morning ??? That is ENGLISH .. Hola, Derecho is NOT !!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !! Passive Aggressive is the way of TODAY ! Don't fall into this pit of manipulation.
Just a short note to let you know your easy ride is coming to an end. Your false little god is exposed for the cheap street punk he has always been. Now you will likely see the damage he has caused America and, I for one, will not be offering you even a bread crumb unless you work your lazy butt off for it! Wishing you a bitter future along with Obama.
Elevengun
Courtesy of "The Casey Report"
Is There a “Dollar Clamp” in Your Future?
Jeff Thomas, International Man
The photo above shows a queue of people waiting at a currency exchange booth in Montevideo, Uruguay. Only a year ago, such queues were uncommon, but now they exist, literally at every such booth, at every hour of the day.
Are Uruguayans suddenly becoming spendthrifts who need repeated daily infusions of cash to get through each day? No; and in fact, very few of those in the queues are Uruguayan. They are Argentines.
The reason these people are in a foreign country, trying to extract a foreign currency from the exchanges is that the Argentine currency has been devalued dramatically through inflation and is on the way to further inflation. Argentines have understandably sought to bypass the peso in favor of the US dollar, in order to keep from losing their purchasing power any more rapidly than necessary.
In response, the government of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner has imposed a "dollar clamp," which is intended to limit the use of dollars by Argentines. Not surprisingly, Argentines are trying everything they can think of to circumvent that dollar clamp, including taking the one-hour Buquebus ride across the Rio de la Plata to Uruguay to extract US dollars from their peso-based Argentine credit cards, for "spending money."
The day-tripper "tourism" has become so extreme that Cristina Fernández has passed a new credit-card limit to Argentines. An Argentine overseas now may extract only US $800 per month. More pointedly, if the destination is a neighbouring country (read: Uruguay), the limit is $100 every three months.
No need to question whether $100 every three months would actually pay for the expenses of a visit across the river – there has been no attempt to disguise the measure as anything but a currency control. The purpose is that, as the monetary collapse completes its downward spiral, the sheep are penned in ever more firmly, to ensure that the final shearing may be as productive as possible. As one Argentine commented to me recently, "After October, there will be no more new Versace for Cristina. They have to take all they can from us now." That's a reference to both Mrs. Fernández's rather extravagant wardrobe expenditures and the expected outcome of the October elections.
But surely, all the above are the machinations of a south-of-the-equator, tin-pot dictatorship and have little relevance to the First World.
Not so.
Argentina provides us with a very useful lesson. Over the decades, its politicians have repeatedly collapsed the economy through the classic progression of governmental overspending/creation of massive debt/dramatic inflation/currency controls. Historically, this progression has always led to an eventual collapse of the economic system (wherever and whenever it has occurred, not just in Argentina). We can therefore observe the developments as they occur in Argentina and project out as to what may be on the way in the First World.
The First World countries have most certainly reached the point of having top-heavy governments that have enormous appetites for funding, and are expanding those appetites dramatically at a time when they should be cutting back dramatically. As governments in this situation always do, they have turned to indebtedness as a solution, in order to prolong the current trend as long as possible. In order to cope with the debt, massive money printing is undertaken, which leads directly to inflation. Inflation leads to an outflow of wealth from the country in question, which is then addressed through currency controls and protective tariffs.
Argentina is in the last stage of this progression and is poised to go over the edge. Its last production of this economic stage play was in 2001, and when the collapse came, the situation in Buenos Aires became so volatile that Argentina went through five presidents in just three weeks.
The US, on the other hand, has reached the point in its money-printing scheme that it is now buying $85 billion per month in Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities and is committed to continuing to do so "until conditions improve." This is equivalent to a railroad train approaching the cliff of the Grand Canyon whilst a crew of workers shovel dirt into the canyon to fill it in, in time to prevent a train wreck.
If the classic progression continues as it does historically, we can anticipate dramatic inflation, followed by currency controls and protective tariffs in the US and other First World countries.
As yet, there is little on the news regarding protective tariffs, but currency controls are very much in the works. Many have been implemented, and more are to come.
At this point, anyone whose primary address is in a First World country might wish to ask the question, "Is there a dollar clamp in my future? Will my government soon be at the stage that my national currency will be inflating dramatically; and if I choose to divest myself of it, shall I find that I am unable to do so, as a result of hastily implemented government controls?"
The answer is unequivocally "Yes." Governments are in the habit of claiming that their first priority is the safety and well-being of their citizens. However, when a citizen of any country chooses to exit from the relationship, either physically or monetarily, governments have a nasty habit of turning, suddenly and forcefully, vindictive.
For those who have a difficult time getting their heads around this fact, the following may be useful in providing a very real perspective. Picture a situation in which you are married and have reached the decision that your spouse's wasteful spending is crippling you personally. You then request a divorce. You make plans for splitting up the bank accounts and personal possessions and are hit with an injunction from your spouse's attorneys. You say, "But these possessions are mine. This money is mine. I worked with the sweat of my brow to earn them." The attorneys then advise, "That's not the way we see it. We regard them as community property, and we're prepared to negotiate with you as to how much we will allow you to walk away with."
The above situation is virtually the same as one in which you choose to split the sheets with your government, should you choose to do so at a time when that government is facing economic collapse. Your net worth is not your own; it is community property, and your government can, if anything, become more vicious than a divorce lawyer.
First Worlders are not yet queued up, as are the Argentines in the photo above, because the First World has not reached that stage in the progression as yet. What these Argentines are doing is a last, desperate measure. However, First Worlders may use the Argentine situation to forewarn themselves. They may choose to diversify their wealth beyond the confines of the nation-state to which they are presently married – and to do so whilst they still retain a modicum of control over their own wealth.
Jeff Thomas is British and resides in the Caribbean. The son of an economist and historian, he learned early to be distrustful of governments as a general principle. Although he spent his career creating and developing businesses, for eight years he penned a weekly newspaper column on the theme of limiting government.
He began his study of economics around 1990, learning initially from Sir John Templeton, then Harry Schulz and Doug Casey, and later others of an Austrian persuasion.
Once again, the amnesty bill doesn’t even mention the 12.506 million “unemployed”, 6.437 million wanting jobs, or the 6.896 million who have been scrubbed from the workforce! Nothing is said about another 25.228 million lost between 40 hour full time work and the BLS average 34.4 hours! Be it 12.5 million, 25 million, or 50 million, IT’S A CATASTROPHIC HARDSHIP ON ALL CITIZENS!
The highly educated and experienced senate body is more than qualified to multiply $100,845 times 12 million and then 20 million to determine the economic productive value of an average working citizen is $1.1 trillion per year @ 11 million and $2.0 trillion @ 20 million workers.
With equal certainty they and the GAO should already know their BLS average wage $42,537 @ 34.4 hours is $49,462 @ full time 40 hours, plus the reality of 30% ($14,838) employer taxes brings the average worker economic productivity value to $64,300! Because they are needlessly unemployed, government taxes citizen workers $36,545 to provide jobless food, shelter, etc, the total becomes around $100,845 per jobless citizen.
We also know government is illegally subsidizing alien invaders $36,545, ($402 billion @ 11mmm would be $731 billion @ 20mm???)! That is part of the economic cost. The total becomes $137,391 EACH, and $1.5 trillion @ 11 million to $2.7 trillion @ 20 million, PER YEAR. We're paying that cost today because our legislative-executive officers REFUSE TO ENFORCE OUR CONSTITUTION AND LAW! ENFORCE THE LAW AND IT WILL GO AWAY!!!
Laws by Immigration = Emanate Migration of even More voters for Big Govt. = not enough Working People to Shoulder the Cost Cost Cost and more Cost.
By The Way;
Benghazi, IRS, A.G., NSA, ETC...
Do you think the "ORIGINAL" SnoopDoggie, J. Edgar Hoover, is looking up from where-ever and laughing his hot buns off?!
Cal
It appears as though the entrenched Republican (rhino) leadership is setting the stage for another GOP defeat in 2016. At the moment their favorites are Christi and Romney. Christi is so toxic to the GOP base he is unelectable. Christi has proven to be nothing more than a Democrat in an elephant suite. They way he romances Obama combined with the influx of Democrat money going to his campaign fund make it quite obvious where his true loyalty is. As far as Romney goes, even with fewer voters voting for Obama Romney couldn't draw enough of his base to make a good showing. Therefore, if the choice offered the GOP base is between these two, Democrats would have little problem getting any misfit they run elected.
Elevengun
In a recent interview with CNN, former CIA officer, Robert Baer, for whom I have great respect, opined that Edward Snowden was likely a spy for the People's Republic of China.
Well, like Mr. Baer, we're all entitled to our opinions. And, of course, the diligent among us must always consider all possibilities until the full, unadulterated truth is fully disclosed--if it ever is.
That said, having thrice listened to the Guardian's interview of Snowden and carefully observing his facial patterns & manner of expression, I could not detect the slightest telltale sign of pretention or concealment. What I saw was a genuinely bright, very well-spoken, remarkably poised and, yes, lonely and beseiged American who thought he was doing the right thing for America, and was willing to take the hits for doing so. And until there is solid, incontrovertible proof to the contrary, I am compelled to adhere to that view. Not exactly scientific. But no less scientific than Mr. Baer's position.
Though I suspect both detractors/dissemblers and supporters alike are working on it, missing so far is a more comprehensive background analysis and objective psychological profile of Snowden, both of which would be helpful to those of us who have more than a passing interest in his motivations and in any proof of NSA's lawlessness. In any event, to date nothing in his background has suggested the makings of either a hero OR a spy. And had there been hints of either, one could logically deduce that the security clearance check he was subjected to by the US Government would have disclosed such dispositions. One would hope so anyway.
Curious to me is Mr. Baer's opining that Snowden is likely a spy for the PRC because, I gather, Snowden opted to flee to Hong Kong. To me, that is a rather foundationally flimsy deduction on Mr. Baer's part. Reportedly, albeit unsuccessfully, on more than one occasion Mr Snowden brought the issue of NSA's highly questionable and likely unconstitutional actions to the attention of his superiors. And there's the nub of my disagreement with Mr. Baer's preliminary assessment: why would Snowden run the risk of exposing himself to his superiors as a "troublemaker" IF he were a spy? Makes little sense to me.
My bet is that Snowden fled to Hong Kong because 1) it was geographically closer to Hawaii than Iceland, and 2) the chances of PRC's extraditing him to the US was minimal to nil. On balance, and assuming he gave the matter of asylum at least a modicum of consideration before fleeing, HK is where I would have gone had I been in his shoes.
Mysterious and worrisome is the fact that as of this writing, Snowden's current whereabouts is unknown. He has simply dropped out of sight. Did he defect, or was he swept up by the PRC or other hostile entity? We just don't know. Being so high-profile, I can't imagine how Snowden could easily remain concealed for long, unless, of course, his concealment was forced on him. We can only speculate as to his whereabouts at this time. We'll just have to wait and see.
Finally, let's not rush to final judgement about Mr. Snowden. The NSA apologists, and there are many, will attempt to discredit him. Those who fear the worst about "our" government, which are also numerous, will applaud his nobility and courage. However, those seeking the unvarnished truth about Snowden and the NSA will give him the benefit of the doubt and await developments to render a final conclusion.
This is the stuff of spellbinding novels, for sure. But, for me, the big concern is NOT whether Snowden was a spy, which, at this juncture strikes me as fanciful at best, but whether or not "our" government was/is spying on us. Which of the two scenarios should be more concerning to an American? Hands down, I'd say the latter--in spades!
