What's disturbing about this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On June 17, 2012:

“Frances Fox Piven, co-architect of a strategy to overload the U.S. welfare system to precipitate a transformative economic crisis, was an early builder of the socialist-leaning New Party.

Scores of other New Party activists, meanwhile, have been tied to President Obama.

The now-defunct controversial third party is coming under increased scrutiny after new information further indicates Obama was a New Party member.

The New Party sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

In 2008, Obama’s campaign denied the president was ever a member amid reports, including from WND, citing the New Party’s own literature listing Obama as a member.

Last week, researcher and author Stanley Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported on documentation from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society that “definitively establishes” that Obama was a member of the New Party.

Kurtz reported Obama also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

A July 20, 1992, article in The Nation magazine by New Party founder Joel Rogers, meanwhile, lays out the case for the establishment of the party and lists several of the group’s early founders and activists.

In that article, titled “Out with the Old Politics, in with the New Party,” Rogers cites Piven as an early activist in the formation of the New Party, which he describes as a “social democratic” party.

Piven, together with her late husband, activist and fellow Columbia professor Richard Cloward, developed the Cloward-Piven strategy, which called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system.

The duo’s stated goal was to agitate a financial crisis that would collapse the U.S economy and replace it with a national system with “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.”

Other early New Party activists listed by Rogers have ties to Obama. Those activists and others were also listed as New Party “builders” in the party’ newsletter, the New Party News.

Some of the key New Party activists with Obama ties include:

• Madeline Talbott, listed as national field director of ACORN. Talbott is a former colleague of Obama’s from his 1990s Project Vote! Chicago Coalition, which worked directly with ACORN when Talbott was ACORN’s lead Illinois organizer. She has also written about working with Obama as a fellow Chicago community organizer in the 1990s. Obama himself has linked his work on Project Vote to Talbott’s Illinois ACORN. When he sought the endorsement of ACORN for his 2008 presidential bid, Obama said, “When I ran Project Vote, the voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it.”
• Manning Marable, a socialist Columbia University professor. Marable in 1998 helped found the Black Radical Congress, where he worked with controversial race scholar Cornel West, an Obama friend and 2008 campaign adviser who introduced the politician at his first campaign stop in Harlem.WND disclosedthat during that 2007 introduction, West first railed on stage against the “racist” U.S. criminal justice system of the “American empire.”In 2007, Marable was elected chairman of Movement for a Democratic Society, or MDS, an arm of the radical Students for a Democratic Society from which the Weather Underground terrorist organization later splintered. Some Weathermen terrorists, including Bill Ayers, participated in Marable’s MDS.
• Marxist activist Carl Davidson. Davidson later co-founded Chicagoans Against the War in Iraq, the group that invited Obama to speak at its Oct. 2, 2002, anti-war rally in Chicago – an address that was said to propel Obama to national attention.
• Quentin Young, key organizer of the Physicians for a National Health Program. Young reportedly was present at a 1995 meeting at the home of Bill Ayers that was said to have launched Obama’s political career. He was an adviser to Obama in the late 1990s. Young himself took credit in March 2009 in an interview with the Democracy Now network for “turning Barack Obama into a ‘single payer’ advocate when the president was an Illinois state senator.”

Socialist goals

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party disbanded in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.

The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

WND first reported on the event in 2010.

Obama listed as New Party member

In 2009, WND reported on newspaper evidence from the New Party’s own literature listing several new members of the New Party, including Obama.

Last week, Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported Obama signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.”

• With research by Brenda J. Elliott

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-tied-to-architect-of-u-s-collapse/

Note: My following blog posts and article and/or blog post relate to and/or support the above article and/or blog post-You Decide:

I. OBAMA JUST CAUGHT IN BIG LIE? ‘Documents confirm he was member of socialist party!’-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On June 7, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPost%3A763299&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post

II. STUDENTS FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY (SDS)-FOUNDED 1959!-Posted TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On April 14, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/students-for-a-democratic-society-sds-founded-1959

III. Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis!-Posted On American Thinker-By James Simpson-On September 28, 2008:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

IV. WHO IS THE WHITE HOUSE MOLE?-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On June 16, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/who-is-the-white-house-mole

Continue Reading:

Is Obama Employing the Cloward-Piven Strategy?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/is-obama-employing-the-cloward-piven-strategy/

Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/is-president-obama-inciting-riots-across-the-us/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

“Food For Thought”

God Bless The U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

What's disturbing about this picture?

Posted on News With Views!-By Cliff Kincaid-On June 16, 2012:

“There has been a series of leaks of classified information from the White House in an effort to portray President Obama as a tough American foreign policy leader, but no official has resigned from the administration or the Obama campaign in disgrace or protest. This suggests the betrayal of state secrets is being condoned or ignored at the highest levels. Not surprisingly, Eric Holder’s Department of Justice is resisting the appointment of a special or outside counsel to probe the scandal.

If it is so easy to turn over national security information to the media, it may be just as easy to turn the state secrets directly over to the enemy. Either way, our adversaries benefit.

Starting with Obama and then moving through Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and on to campaign adviser David Axelrod, we have individuals who could not pass a basic FBI background check.

Obama says, “The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive. It’s wrong.” This is from the candidate who concealed the identity of his communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, in his book, Dreams from My Father. Such a cover-up should have disqualified Obama from the office of the presidency.

The connection to Davis has never been investigated by the major media, let alone Congress. For their part, Republicans are afraid of being called racist McCarthyites if they challenge Obama’s allegiance to the United States and raise questions about his communist connections and Islamic upbringing.

In a roundabout way to get at the truth, Republicans are pleading for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the damage that has been done by the leaks. Holder thumbs his nose at them. Even if they get their special counsel, the damage is done and the results won’t be available until probably next year, after the elections.

Congress is part of the problem and got us into this mess to begin with.

Congress gave Panetta a pass when he became CIA director and then Secretary of Defense, despite his long record of associations with identified communist Hugh DeLacy, who had connections to the Chinese government. Not surprisingly, the Soros-funded Media Matters came to Panetta’s defense, accusing conservatives of a “smear” for raising the inconvenient facts about his record, including opposition to President Reagan’s anti-communist defense policies. Media Matters has White House connections and specializes in intimidating the media when they dare to question the White House line.

Fortunately, the facts, including some of a personal nature, were included in a column by the courageous Diana West, who commented that the evidence showed that Panetta had “a cordial, long-term relationship in the 1970s and 1980s” with Hugh DeLacy, a Communist Party USA member elected to one term in Congress while pretending to be a Democrat in 1944. Incriminating “Dear Hugh” and “Dear Leon” documents were obtained by researcher Trevor Loudon at the University of Washington.

West went on, “DeLacy later co-founded the communist-penetrated Progressive Party that nominated Henry Wallace for president in 1948. By the 1970s, DeLacy was still politically active, with connections to known Soviet agents including Victor Perlo of the infamous Perlo spy group, and Frank Coe and Solomon Adler of the equally infamous Silvermaster spy group. DeLacy is also associated with suspected Soviet agent John Stewart Service of the ‘Amerasia’ spy case.”

She noted that “DeLacy was of sufficient interest to Communist China to have scored a paid junket to the People’s Republic in 1974,” and there “met up with Service, Coe and Adler, who was then thought to be working for Chinese intelligence.”

“Our legislative branch is falling asleep on the job over stories that should be giving them—and us—night sweats,” West said, in a column titled, “Give Panetta the Pinko Slip.” But Republican senators—some of the same people now expressing outrage over leaks—put on their blinders. They didn’t want the public to notice them dozing off.

Another suspicious Obama associate, David Axelrod, is a former Chicago Tribune reporter who became Obama’s chief strategist and appears regularly on television as the face of the campaign. He once worked closely with David Simon Canter, a communist operative investigated by Congress as an agent of the Soviet Union. Axelrod was “within the extreme orbit of the old Chicago CPUSA [Communist Party] apparatus,” writes Professor Paul Kengor, author of a forthcoming book on Frank Marshall Davis and his Chicago and Hawaii networks.

Axelrod, who reportedly attended some counterterrorism meetings in the White House Situation Room, insists that the White House didn’t leak the national security information to the Times. With a straight face, he told ABC News that “the authors of all of this work”—The New York Times reporters—have made that assurance.

We see the damage being done, as Obama tries to look like an international tough guy in order to be re-elected. In addition to the leaks to The New York Times about U.S. policy toward Iran and al-Qaeda, producers of a film about the killing of Osama bin Laden, to be released before the November 6 presidential election, were given classified briefings at the Pentagon. Panetta denies anything improper was done, but Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has released emails from the CIA and Pentagon showing “unprecedented and potentially dangerous collaboration” between top Administration officials and the filmmakers. Judicial Watch obtained the documents.

King, however, runs the House Homeland Security Committee, with jurisdiction over the Islamic threat. What Congress needs, in order to get to the bottom of the scandal, are internal security committees or subcommittees in both houses. They were all abolished by congressional liberals in the 1970s.

It seems as though Republicans can’t come to grips with the nature of the problem that faces them and the country. A conservative attorney who has been probing into the backgrounds of Obama and his associates tells the story of attending a speech by Republican Rudolph Giuliani in 2011 and asking the former New York City mayor if he had ever considered the possibility that Obama was a mole. “What? A mole? God, I hope not,” was the response.

It is a serious charge to make, let alone mention in a printed piece such as this. Yet, the new book by retired U.S. intelligence analyst Christina Shelton, Alger Hiss: Why He Chose Treason, is a reminder of how and why questionable individuals get into positions of extraordinary power. Hiss was a founder of the United Nations because of his position as a high State Department official. He might have become Secretary of State, were it not for the revelations of communist defector Whittaker Chambers. A video on the website of Shelton’s book includes interesting information from the author about Hiss’s communist motivations.

It is significant that Anthony Lake, an adviser to and fundraiser for then-presidential candidate Obama in 2008, had previously withdrawn his nomination as Bill Clinton’s CIA director when outrage developed over his public doubts about Hiss’s guilt. That didn’t bother Obama, who took Lake’s advice and fundraising help and then gave him a job at the United Nations. A video shows Lake taking his oath of office as an “international civil servant of the United Nations.” The U.N. is notorious as a nest of spies.

Panetta’s background as a former member of Congress helped to make his confirmation process easy and fast. It worked. Now, Republican senators are reluctant to admit they made a mistake, as Panetta skillfully fends off charges that the Pentagon and the CIA released the secret information about the bin Laden raid to the pro-Obama filmmakers.

Conducting “bipartisan” investigations with the Democrats will not get the job done. Obama, whose foreign policy approval ratings are already better than Romney’s, is sitting pretty and laughing behind-the-scenes at the GOP. Our national security crumbles before our eyes, making the nation more vulnerable to what in the corporate world would be termed a “hostile takeover.” The catch is that it is a takeover from within.”

Source:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff618.htm

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and videos reveal Leon Panetta’s Communist ties-You Decide:

Top spy points finger at Panetta friend!-Posted on America’s Surival-By Wes Vernon-On June 20, 2011:

http://www.usasurvival.org/ck06.20.2011.html

Media Blackout: CIA director accused of links to Communist spy contact—scandal ignored!-Posted on RenewAmerica-By Wes Vernon-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/vernon/110613?utm_source=getresponse&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=asinews&utm_content=%5BASI%5D+Is+the+Panetta+Scandal+the+Next+Alger+Hiss+Case%3F

Leon Panetta Praises Communist Party USA Member!-Posted on America’s Survival-By Cliff Kincaid-On June 13, 2011:

http://www.usasurvival.org/ck06.13.2011.html?utm_source=getresponse&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=asinews&utm_content=%5BASI%5D+Leon+Panetta+praises+identified+Communist+Party

Obama’s CIA Director Linked to Spies Through Communist Party Figure!-Posted on TrevorLoudon.com-By Trevor-On June 8, 2011:

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/panetta-hearing-for-secdef-on-thursday-obama’s-cia-director-linked-to-spies-through-communist-party-figure/

Leon Panetta’s U.S. Senator Armed Services Committee Confirmation Hearing On June 9, 2011:

http://armed-services.senate.gov/Webcasts/2011/06%20June/06-09-11%20Webcast.html

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this issue-You Decide:

I. Saul Alinsky Takes the White House!-Posted on The American Spectator-By Quin Hillyer-On November 6, 2008:

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/11/06/saul-alinsky-takes-the-whi…

II. Video: Saul Alinsky Takes the White House!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX0B4xlt9Qg&feature=related

III. Rep. West Doubles Down On Communist ‘Ideology’ Of Progressive Caucus!-Posted on Western Journalism-By BREAKING NEWS-On April 19, 2012:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/rep-west-doubles-down-on-communist-ideology-of-progressive-caucus/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=d31963b88c-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

IV. Allen West: I Don’t Regret Whatsoever My Comments About Progressives Being Communists!-Posted on Western Journalism-By DANIEL NOE-On April 18, 2012:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/allen-west-i-dont-regret-whatsoever-my-comments-about-progressives-being-communists/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=f448230b43-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

V. Rep. Allen West: Democratic group is Communist!-Posted on USA Today-By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY-On April 11, 2012:

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/allen-west-democrats-communist-party-/1#.T4XDLWA1DYV

VI. Video: Allen West to Democrats: Get your leftism the hell out of America!-Posted on The Right Scoop-By The Right Scoop-On January 28, 2012:

http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-democrats-get-your-leftism-the-hell-out-of-america/

VII. Communist Party USA Just Endorsed Obama For 4 More Years!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On August 3, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329449

VIII. Valerie Jarrett, Her Father-in-Law and The Communist Party!-Posted on The New Media Journal-By Trevor Loudon-On June 8, 2011:

http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/1792

IX. MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Admits That He’s A Socialist!-Posted on Politik Ditto-On November 6, 2010:

http://www.politikditto.com/2010/11/msnbcs-lawrence-odonnell-admits-that.html

X. Barack Obama and the Communist Party!-Posted on KeyWiki:

http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_Communist_Party

XI. The Communist and “Progressive” Movements!-Posted on USASurvival.org-By Herbert Romerstein-On 2008:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Wallace_to_Ayers_Communist_Progressive.pdf

XII. Surprise! Nancy Pelosi is really, and officially, a self-confessed Socialist!-Posted on Free Republic-By jmstein7-On May 14, 2004:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1140124/posts

XIII. Pelosi leader of ‘Progressive Caucus’: Dems’ likely top House official part of powerful, socialist-linked bloc!-Posted on WND.com-On November 11, 2002:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=15866

Continue reading more on this issue:

OBAMA JUST CAUGHT IN BIG LIE? ‘Documents confirm he was member of socialist party!’-Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On June 7, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPost%3A763299&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post

The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/

“Food For Thought”

God Bless The U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake