All Posts (28572)
Sort by
Source; WeThePeopleUSA https://gettr.com/post/p3jyyay6905
THE SOROS SHADOW SYSTEM: HOW ONE BILLIONAIRE THREATENS ELECTION INTEGRITY
While Americans Focus On Presidential Politics, George Soros Has Quietly Implemented A Far More Effective Strategy To Reshape America—Buying District Attorneys Who Control Whether Election Laws Are Enforced.
This Isn't Conspiracy Theory—It's Documented Fact.
According To 2022 Data From The Foundation For Government Accountability, Soros Spent $40 Million Electing Progressive District Attorneys Who Gained Prosecutorial Power Over 70 Million Americans.
For 15 Million Citizens, These Soros-Backed Prosecutors Were The Only Officials Authorized To Charge Election Crimes.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Showcases This Strategy's Next Evolution.
After Successfully Capturing Local Prosecutor Offices, Progressive Donors Have Shifted Focus To Securing Judicial Positions That Can Overrule Any Election Enforcement Attempts.
This Creates A Multi-Layered Defense System Against Accountability—Politically-Motivated DAs Decide Whether To Prosecute, While Ideologically-Aligned Judges Determine What Laws Mean.
The Systematic Nature Is Chilling.
In 22 States Representing 145 Million Americans, Local DAs—Not Attorneys General—Control Election Crime Prosecution.
Wisconsin Exemplifies This Vulnerability, Where A Level 3 Designation Means The Attorney General Cannot Independently Prosecute Election Violations Without Cooperation From Local Prosecutors.
These Same Soros-Backed Prosecutors Demonstrated Their Willingness To Ignore Laws They Dislike—Decriminalizing Theft, Dropping Felony Charges, And Watching Crime Skyrocket In Their Jurisdictions.
In Philadelphia And Delaware County, Pennsylvania, Homicides Increased Dramatically After Soros DAs Took Office. When Election Violations Go Unprosecuted, The Message Is Clear: Certain Laws Don't Matter.
This Destroys Confidence In Our Entire Democratic System.
When Election Violations Go Unprosecuted, The Message Is Clear: Certain Laws Don't Matter. This Destroys Confidence In Our Entire Democratic System.
States Must Grant Attorneys General Concurrent Authority To Prosecute Election Crimes—Before Soros Completes His Shadow Takeover Of American Justice.
Source; SNGLR also known as Roger
Tort reform, something neither political party has seriously addressed, even though the cost of frivolous lawsuits has outraged us all. neo-liberals/democrats, especially, have been in the pockets of trial lawyers for years.
Many of us don’t really think about tort reform, but there’s a reason why law firms spend millions creating radio and TV ads asking us to file lawsuits: They stuff the wallets of lawyers and their clients. We’re all human, and it’s easy to sympathize with people who’ve been injured or wronged, but tort is a slippery slope, and too many people have abused the system for monetary gain or publicity. The tipping point may have been the infamous 1994 case in which a woman sued McDonald’s because she spilled hot coffee on herself. Since then, people have cashed in on their own clumsy mistakes or on happenstance. Other examples include people suing Jelly Belly for listing evaporated cane juice instead of sugar in the ingredients, Junior Mints for not filling the box to the brim, and starbucks for putting too much ice in a coffee.
Sadly, left-wing/democrats don’t think there’s any such thing as a frivolous lawsuit, and they’ll back any effort to take power and money away from companies. In their minds, Big Business is always in the wrong. It’s no wonder that Republicans see tort reform as a winning issue in Senate battleground states where people have grown weary of outlandish lawsuits that raise the cost of goods and services, spike insurance premiums, and create a culture of irresponsibility. Ramsey Touchberry makes the case: “The contentious legal issue is a long-standing priority among Republican elected officials... based on the premise that predominantly left-leaning lawyers abuse class-action and other civil lawsuits against companies for harm or injury.”
Tort reform has a far-reaching impact on our country, and while Republicans need to make this a national issue, it’s the states where we’re making inroads against frivolous lawsuits. “Governors and state lawmakers spend a lot of time focusing on legislation that will improve tax and regulatory climates, understandably so,” writes Patrick Gleason. “But — as is now on display in Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, and elsewhere — governors and lawmakers are also focused on the ways in which their state’s legal climate is another significant driver of the cost of living and doing business, which is why tort reform is now being debated in some of the largest and fastest-growing states.”
Tort reform has already been approved in Georgia(1), and other states considering similar measures include South Carolina, Arkansas, and Texas. The South Carolina Senate recently passed a tort reform bill that seeks to remedy rising costs in the food and beverage industry’s liquor liability insurance. In Arkansas, a new law will eliminate what is known as “phantom” medical charges in which plaintiffs could sue for a full amount even if a medical provider later reduces the bill. Several industries, including trucking, support a renewed effort to pass tort reform in Texas. A report by Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse released a study just this month showing that Texas residents pay a “lawsuit tax” of $1,725 per year due to higher costs for consumer goods.
Critics of tort reform claim victims will no longer be compensated for damages, but none of the state measures under consideration or recently passed into law prevents lawsuits against companies. They merely limit damages to what is fair and reasonable. After tort reform, injured parties may still file lawsuits and companies will be liable for damages, but we’ll have a more just system. And maybe more people will hold onto that hot cup of coffee in the drive-thru instead of taking advantage of a system that punished companies but hurt everyone else in the process.
1. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said the Georgia bill will: “create a fairer legal system that protects businesses, consumers, and communities.” And the Savannah Morning News reports that “supporters of Senate Bill 68 argued tort reform is needed in Georgia to reverse a pattern of excessive jury awards in civil lawsuits they said are driving up liability insurance premiums, making it harder for the small businesses that are the state’s economic mainstay to grow and create jobs.”
WATCH: Officials snatch 1-month-old breastfeeding baby from her mom and Navy veteran dad at gunpoint, without charges, a crime, or due process
'This is government terrorism. And every man in America needs to understand: if it can happen to me, it can happen to you'
A U.S. Navy veteran and his wife were subjected to the full weight of the government's iron fist as Child Protective Services—backed by armed deputies—stormed their home and seized their one-month-old, breastfeeding infant.
There was no warrant. No due process. No criminal charge.
This happened not in communist China, nor in North Korea. It happened in suburban Virginia. In America. In 2025.
Farzin Yazdani, a Navy veteran, father, and respected engineer, has become the latest victim of a weaponized family court system—a system increasingly aligned with radical bureaucrats and progressive ideologues who seem hellbent on dismantling the American family under the guise of state welfare.
"I'm begging everybody who's reading this that there's a crime in progress currently, Loudoun County Government has abducted and falsely imprisoned a one-month-old breastfeeding baby from its innocent mother. Please spread the story far and wide. Interact with it like it Do whatever the algorithm needs to spread this story for the love of God," Yazdani wrote on X.
Loudoun County Child Protective Services (CPS), flanked by armed deputies from the sheriff's department, stormed the Yazdani home in what the father describes as a "coordinated ambush" based on a false affidavit from a bitter ex-wife embroiled in a custody battle.
For decades, the U.S. economy played the part of the rich guy at the table -- picking up the check for a global order that no longer worked in our favor. We hollowed out our industrial base. We enabled unfair trade imbalances under the illusion of diplomacy. We subsidized demand for cheap imports while outsourcing the hard questions about how our domestic workforce would adapt. Eventually, that had to stop. It was unsustainable -- financially, politically, and morally. We couldn’t keep pretending that a consumption-led economy held together by zero-interest rates and global fragility was a long-term solution. We need a rebalancing, a smarter America-first policy that pushs for fair treatment, reciprocal agreements, and a real industrial strategy rooted in technological superiority, national security, and capital formation. When you're the US -- when you sit at the helm of the global economic engine -- every policy you roll out reverberates through capital markets, supply chains, boardrooms, and governments. Words become signals. Signals become pricing. Pricing becomes pain -- or progress.
Supplemental Info:
pros & cons
