All Posts (30874)
by Giulio Meotti
by Mac Slavo
by Ted Goodman
At the bottom of the ad were two additional slogans:
Health for all
Rights for everyone
But what could health for all possibly mean? Health even for the dying? Or immortality, perhaps?
No doubt there has always been high-sounding verbiage in the world, but it is never entirely innocent, in as much as it implicitly demands consent without thought, much less contestation.
No one bothers to argue with a slogan, especially when it is so obviously virtuous, for what kind of monster would wish illness on anyone? Health for all is obviously desirable: as are many other impossible things.
The slogans do not explicitly say that health is a right, but the proximity of "health for all" with "rights for everyone" certainly encourages their conflation.
And indeed, it is not difficult nowadays to find not only health care but also health itself propounded as a human right.
The absurdity of this is obvious. If I discover tomorrow that I have a fatal tumor, my rights have not been denied me, any more than they were when I was born less handsome than I should like to have been.
Even health care is not a right, though it is obviously desirable that everyone should have access to it, for the simple reason that it is better to prevent or relieve suffering than not to do so.
But how can an idea as absurd as a right to health have become current? Actually, it fits in well with a certain kind of thinking about freedom and equality under the law.
Critics of the classical liberal concepts of freedom and equality point out that the opportunities of the rich to exercise their freedom of choice, and also to influence or escape the rigors of the law, are much greater than those of the poor.
As the jibe has it, the rich man and the poor have equally the right to sleep under the arches of a bridge. And, incontestably, this argument has had an effect on social policy in most countries.
What goes for money, however, also goes for health. The healthy man and the paralyzed have equally the right to play tennis: but in order for them both to have equal rights in practice, it is necessary either to cure the paralyzed of his paralysis or prohibit the healthy man from taking up his racquet.
Again, in practice, the second is far easier than the first.
In other words, those who demand of freedom and equality under the law that everyone should in actuality be placed in the same condition or position will soon destroy freedom without having achieved equality.
But to explain why requires more than six words on an advertisement at a bus stop.
Alabama: Muslim Wanted to Behead People, Had Bomb-making Materials
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
An update on the Muslim arrested last week from this post Alabama: Muslim arrested in terror plot that included US Army’s Redstone Arsenal.

via Prosecutor: [Muslim] Man discussed beheadings, planned police bombing
Alabama prosecutors say a man jailed on terror-related charges pledged allegiance to Islamic State and talked about wanting to behead people.
State authorities outlined evidence against 22-year-old Aziz Sayyed during a hearing Wednesday in Huntsville.
A defense attorney for the North Carolina native is asking a judge to set bail so the man can get out of jail. But prosecutor Jay Town told a judge Sayyed claimed he wanted to behead people, and he practiced using a knife.
Authorities have said the man had bomb-making materials, and Town says he planned to use them at a police office after pledging allegiance to Islamic State.
found some interesting details on Aziz’s employer, via Alabama Muslim Arrested On Terrorism Charges Accidentally Reveals Links To Palestinian Terrorists
What is more interesting- and in our opinion, relevance- to this incident is his employer.
Tayseer is that he is the franchise owner of not just one, but a chain of IHOP restaurants, and as with all franchises, they are not cheap to start. In the case of IHOP, it costs approximately $50,000 to open one restaurant, let alone multiple restaurants in multiple states:
When he relocated to Colorado, one can see from public records that he purchased a property for one of his IHOP’s for over $2 million.
Another interesting fact about Tayseer is that he is a Palestinian Muslim. As we have documented extensively here and our very own Walid knows from lived experience growing up as a Muslim in the Holy Land, too often times Palestinian Muslims, especially in the USA, have been tied to or associated with groups advocating for the genocide and destruction of Jews and Christians in Israel, as well as with causes tied to Islamic terrorism.
A little bit of digging to Tayseer’s background reveals a character that is all too common. On the surface, he has a story of an idealized Muslim American immigrant- somebody who comes to the USA, goes into business, does very well, has a nice family, and who is an open Muslim but promotes “peace and tolerance” in terms of his religion.
…
But then after getting past the superficial distractions and we get to learn more about him, we find out that back in 2012, he was interviewed and complained of ‘anti-Muslim discrimination’ because he was on a Federal terrorism watch list that obstructed his ability to fly on an airplane:
Tayseer Zuaiter never expected to be on a list of suspected terrorists.
But the Denver Muslim and restaurant owner was detained at Denver International Airport last month because his name popped up on an FBI database.
After security officials questioned him for several hours, Zuaiter was allowed to fly to Las Vegas for a business conference. As it turns out, the man officials were looking for has no left arm.
,,,
Denver’s Muslim leaders have recently started pushing their communities to reach out and educate others about Islam. (source, originally posted at Denver Post)
Now there are a lot of people who were wrongly placed on these lists. Could it be that he was one of those people who was wrongly added?
Maybe. But then, why would he be listed online as a point of contact with MSA in Colorado, which as has been known for years, is a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood? Likewise. Tayseer is involved in many different “Palestinian rights” groups. His name is listed in the directory for Palestineremembered, and he signed a petition for the absolute right of return of ‘all property’ (often times used as a way to promote war and ultimately, genocide against Israelis), as well as another petition from protesting Israeli policies concerning Palestinians, which again is often times used as a cover for evil intentions.
However, the biggest piece of evidence comes from his Facebook page:
Note that picture on the lower left corner:
How interesting it is as well that Tayseer is also licensed as a Federal Firearms Dealer out in Colorado (source).
If this is not convincing enough, then what about his children? After all, a man’s children often times reflect the values they were raised with. For example, the little girl in the picture above, Dalal, is now in college, and not only did she “like” the above picture of a Palestinian terrorist, but her Facebook profile speaks for itself:
Notice again, the picture of Dalal herself on the lower right taken from her Facebook pictures feed, which yields even more photos:
But enough about his daughter. What about his son, Hani, who was interviewed for the article? His Facebook page likewise is quite revealing:
It also seems a child (perhaps one of his own, perhaps a family member) aspires to follow in this path:
Another interesting fact revealed from his photos is that Hani is a pilot:
He also likes to take a LOT of photos when flying. Something I noticed, at least from a few of the photos, is that he was flying very close to the US Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, AL, which also borders on Redstone Arsenal, where the US Government makes a large number of their rockets and other explosives for the Military:
As noted in the original Creeping Sharia post on Sayyed’s arrest, RedStone Arsenal was one of his intended targets.
Agents could not go into details of the allegations but said the threat included the Huntsville and Madison County area, including Redstone Arsenal.
Also noted previously at Creeping Sharia, Muslims have used IHOP’s in the U.S. for nefarious purposes in Ohio and Indiana: Muslim who turned IHOPs into money laundering, illegal alien harboring, identity theft dens pleads guilty.
As concludes:
Details have yet to come out as to what the circumstances surrounding Aziz Sayyed actually are. However, what merits further investigation are his connections with both Tayseer and Hani Zuaiter, because from their own public associations, they are indicative of a pattern characteristic to Islamic terrorist activity in the West: feign assimilation, deny connections with any kind of “Islamist” movements, publicly promote “peace” and “anti-discrimination,” secretly support terrorist activity, and if caught, deny everything and try to hide the evidence.
Will the FBI or any other agency investigate these men or their operations?
Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts
France: Jihadi synagogue plotter jailed: Told cops “I had planned (…) to cut out your children” “The Qur’an says you must kill”
( Muslims do not ASSIMILATE! They INFILTRATE! )
Of course, this garners little news coverage — because it’s a synagogue and the attacker is Muslim.
Mohamed Chebab was on a terror watch list and had been previously arrested fifteen times. Why was he walking the streets?
“The Qur’an says you must kill. You did well to take my knives because I had planned to use them, to cut out your children … then said Mohamed Chebab. “You have to kill all your children and your wives,” said the man who was counting in Syria to join his brothers. (Translation here)
A French reader sent this article in with this note: “Aged 33, Mohamed Chebab had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State organization. He claimed to want to kill Jews in Marseilles. He was preparing an imminent attack on the great synagogue of Marseilles. Mohamed Chebab, 33, was sentenced Tuesday to two years in prison. The judges therefore ordered him to remain in detention. The defendant who was a ‘Fiche S’ (an indicator used by law enforcement to flag an individual considered to be a serious threat to national security) was arrested on 11 May 2016 in La Ciotat, Bouches-du-Rhône. While his companion had managed to escape from the mobile home where they lived and where he had been hiding her for several days.”
During the police intervention, two large knives were placed on a table. “I had planned (…) to cut out your children” During his arrest, Mohamed Chebab shouted “Allah Akbar, the Islamic State will remain” several times, and told the police: “The Qur’an says that you must kill you, you did well to take my knives because I ‘ I wanted to go there, I’m talking about Daech … You do not know who you stopped.”
Sentenced fifteen times between April 2002 and April 2014, Mohamed Chebab told the investigators of his intention to go to Syria with his companion and said he went to Molenbeek to meet “brothers” in Belgium. “Planting Jews”, “at least three” On several occasions he referred to the project of “stabbing Jews in a synagogue in Marseilles”, saying he wanted to “kill at least three” before being arrested. Saying that he had sworn allegiance to Daech, the Islamic State group, he said, referring to the attacks in Nice and Saint-Etienne du Rouvray, that “to crush 80 people with a truck or to kill a priest, do nothing.” At the time of the investigation, a psychiatric expert concluded that psychological disturbances had altered his discernment while a psychologist referred to “a narcissistic hanging up to a radical Islamic ideology tending to give meaning to his existence.”
Islamist who planned to attack French synagogue jailed
By JTA, July 5, 2017 (thanks to Alex):
(JTA) — A Muslim man who said he was planning to attack the main synagogue of Marseille was sentenced to two years in prison.
A Marseille court sentenced Mohamed Chebab, 33, on Tuesday, a little over a year after he was arrested for praising the Islamic State terrorist group, l’Express news site reported. He was convicted of supporting acts of terrorism.
Counterterrorist researchers monitoring jihadist circles in Marseille, a city in southern France, flagged Chebab, according to the report. After his arrest in May 2016, Chebab told law enforcement that he had been planning to travel to Syria to fight with jihadists there and to Belgium, to the heavily Muslim Molenbeek neighborhood of Brussels, to meet “brothers” there.
He also said he was planning to “smoke some Jews, at least three” at the Grand Synagogue of Marseille, l’Express reported. At the time of his arrest, Chebab cried out for Allah and yelled slogans supportive of the Islamic State, promising the police officers who seized him he would behead their children.
Separately, a 23-year-old man was charged with plotting to assassinate French President Emmanuel Macron at France’s Bastille Day parade in Paris, a judicial source told the AFP news agency on Monday.
The self-described nationalist, who was arrested last week, told investigators he wanted to kill Macron at the July 14 national day march, a source close to the investigation said. He said he also wanted to attack “Muslims, Jews, blacks, homosexuals,” the source added.
Islam not compatible and too many immigrants in France, majority of French say
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
Look for new sharia-speech laws to quell the conquered and crush dissent.
In a separate question, some 78 percent of French people are of the view that Islam “seeks to impose its way of life on others.” Everybody knows.

Too many foreigners in France and Islam not compatible, majority of French say
Most French people say there are too many foreigners in France, immigrants do not make an effort to assimilate and Islam is incompatible with the French values.
France’s new president clearly has some healing to do when it comes to two longstanding divisive issues in France.Immigration and the place of Islam in society, are still very much contentious questions for the French, a new annual survey has revealed.A poll by the Ipsos institute for Le Monde newspaper has revealed that a majority of 65 percent of French people say there are too many foreigners in France, a figure that has remained elevated in recent years, with the figure as high as 70 percent in 2017.Another stat demonstrating a majority of French people are uncomfortable with immigration was the 60 percent of people who agreed with the statement: “Today I no longer feel at home like I did before”.
On top of that some 61 percent of French people share the belief that “immigrants in France do not make an effort to integrate”.Some 46 percent of French people believe it’s not difficult for an immigrant to integrate.Unsurprisingly the percentages are far higher among those on the far right – 95 percent of National Front voters believe there are too many foreigners in France compared to those on the left (46 percent of Socialists).When it came to the other ever divisive issue of the role of Islam, 60 percent of the people questioned for the survey titled “French Fractures 2017″, believe the religion of Islam is incompatible with the values of the French Republic”.In a separate question some 78 percent of French people are of the view that Islam “seeks to impose its way of life on others”.Regarding radical Islam, 46% of the French polled said that “even if it is not its main message, Islam still contains within it the seeds of violence and intolerance”.That reflects a jump of five percentage points on last year’s survey.France has been at the receiving end of a string of Jihadist terror attacks in recent years, including the November 2015 attack at the Bataclan which claimed 150 lives.The repeated terror attacks, which have exposed the deep insecurity around “l’identité nationale”, have led to demands for foreigners to assimilate, rather than just integrate into the French way of life and culture.In September 2016, The Local reported that French politicians were aggressively demanding immigrants drop their own identities and assimilate into French culture and way of life.Rows over the influence of Islam regularly flare up in France, whether its over the wearing of the veil, school dinners for Muslim pupils or most notably the wearing of burkinis on French beaches, an issue which made global headlines last Summer when the swimwear was banned by around 30 French mayors last year.Photo: AFP
France has had a longstanding tradition of demanding immigrants assimilate, dating back to the 19th century when it was used as a policy towards its Jewish population and then towards colonized countries.In August 2016, The Local reported that another poll by Ipsos showed that just 11 percent of the French felt that immigration had an overall positive impact; with an average figure over the 22 countries surveyed of 20 percent, ranging from six percent in Turkey to 36 percent in Canada.
![]()
‘None of This Happened’: White House, Pentagon Call Trump ISIS Story Into Question
The White House did not ask defense officials to help come up with ideas to brand the Trump administration’s anti-ISIS efforts differently from the Obama administration, Senior Pentagon and White House officials told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
“The White House has asked defense officials to come up with new ideas to help brand the Trump campaign as different from its predecessor,” The Daily Beast reported Wednesday, citing two defense officials and a senior administration official.
“None of this happened,” a senior White House official told TheDCNF, vehemently denying the report.
“I’m not familiar with any such effort,” Pentagon Spokesman Navy Capt. Jeff Davis similarly told TheDCNF. The senior White House official further corroborated Davis’ denial, referencing discussions with National Security Council officials. (Read more from “‘None of This Happened’: White House, Pentagon Call Trump ISIS Story Into Question” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/07/none-happened-white-house-pentagon-call-trump-isis-st
James O’Keefe Drops Another Video Bomb on CNN
CNN associate producer Jimmy Carr says Chris Cuomo is only anchor of CNN’s “New Day” because his brother is governor of New York in yet another undercover video from James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas.
In the video posted Wednesday, Carr said of Cuomo’s rise, “I don’t have a brother who’s the governor, so … ”
The undercover reporter stroked Carr’s ego saying he had just as much “gravitas” as Cuomo and he responded saying, “Just can’t stand the guy when he talks, we’re like shut up.”
The Veritas reporter asked for clarification as to who he was talking about and he reaffirmed that he was referring to Cuomo . . .
Carr backed up his past comments on other videos such as calling the American electorate “stupid as sh-t,” and admitting to pushing stories on Russia strictly for ratings. (Read more from “James O’Keefe Drops Another Video Bomb on CNN” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/07/james-okeefe-drops-another-video-bomb-cnn/
by Ian MIles Cheong
Yes, sir, because you cannot control a free people. You can’t control a moral people. You have to demoralize them in order to control them.And as I write in “The Antidote: Healing America from the Poison of Hate, Blame and Victimhood,” not all, but most black Americans are suffering not due to racism but the destruction of the family and a lack of moral character. It’s about that. And if we dealt with the family issue and the lack of character, black Americans’ lives would change overnight, and they Democrats and the left don’t want that.
It marks as well Israel’s coming of age as a nation.
When in 1992, India and Israel forged full diplomatic relations, the Indian government was reacting to a transformation in the international arena, rather than to changes that were specifically related to the Jewish state.
In 1991 and 1992, in response to the US victory over the Soviet Union in the Cold War, a large group of countries restored or inaugurated full diplomatic relations with Israel. These states – including the Russian Federation and China – had by and large been either on the Soviet side of the war, or leaned toward Moscow. Their refusal to forge full ties with Israel, a key US Cold War ally, became a liability in the US-dominated post-Cold War global order. Hence, they abandoned their Cold War rejection of Israel and instead embraced it.
Although ingratiating themselves with Washington loomed large in the considerations of most governments involved, they also took the step due to Israel’s independent power. If Israel had been a strategic basket case facing an uncertain future, then even in the face of the demise of the Soviet Union, Moscow and its allies could well have had second and third thoughts. Why anger the Arab world by recognizing a soon-to-be gone Jewish state?
Had Israel recognized and built on the sources of its power and attraction for other governments, it would have spent the rest of the 1990s strengthening itself still further – defeating Hezbollah in Lebanon, weakening the Iranian regime and working with the Americans to end its ballistic weapon program. It would have moved quickly to liberalize its economy to enable the million new Israelis from the former Soviet Union to immediately transform Israel into the global innovator rather than waiting for this to gradually occur over decades.
Instead, in 1993, then prime minister and defense minister Yitzhak Rabin and then foreign minister Shimon Peres decided to go off on a strategic tangent.
Ignoring or failing to understand the implications of the US Cold War victory and the economic and national security implications of the aliya wave from the former Soviet Union, Rabin and Peres decided the key to everything was appeasing the PLO – a terrorist organization whose declared intention was to annihilate Israel through a mix of terrorism and political warfare.
As far as they were concerned, nothing that had just happened in the world had strategic implications for Israel. Rather, Israel’s diplomatic, military and economic power were all contingent on making peace by appeasing the PLO.
To implement that strategy, Rabin and Peres and their government lobbied foreign governments to support the PLO militarily, financially and politically not that anyone needed much convincing.
And they transformed the IDF. Rabin and Peres instructed the IDF General Staff to “change its diskette” in relation to the PLO and to fighting terrorism.
No longer were Israel’s generals to aspire to defeating terrorists. They were instead ordered to facilitate appeasement – through the transfer of land and military power to the PLO. The PLO, Rabin told them, could defeat terrorism more effectively than the IDF could. And all Israel needed to do to induce Yasser Arafat to defeat the forces he built, paid and commanded was shower him with money, territory, firepower and international legitimacy. The PLO was not Israel’s enemy. It was Israel’s peace partner.
Not surprisingly, this didn’t work out at all.
Israel’s diplomatic position collapsed. The international community effectively sided with the PLO against Israel when it rejected peace and initiated its terror war against Israel in 2000. Since then Israel has found itself targeted by political and economic warfare from the EU, its second largest trading partner and its previously fairly supportive strategic ally. Following Europe’s lead, the American Left has incrementally abandoned its pre-1993 embrace of Israel.
As for security, in the seven years of the peace process that ended with the PLO’s rejection of peace and instigation of its terror war against Israel, the number of Israelis killed by Palestinian terrorists was twice what it had been in the previous 15 years. More than 1,500 Israelis have been killed by Palestinian terrorists since 1993. More than 10,000 have been wounded.
Buffeted by the utter and complete failure of the appeasement strategy, since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned to power in 2009, he has gradually restored Israel to the classic notions of national development.
Building on the market reforms he initiated in his first tenure as prime minister from 1996 to 1999 and his stint as finance minister from 2003 to 2006, Netanyahu has overseen the continued liberalization of the economy and expansion of Israel’s international markets to ensure the continued expansion of the economy and increase Israel’s attractiveness as a trading partner and investment hub.
Abandoning the PLO appeasement strategy, which made Israel’s diplomatic standing contingent on PLO approval, Netanyahu has based his diplomatic strategy on Israel’s economic and attractiveness and stability. He has emphasized the aspects of Israel’s economy – technological and agriculture prowess – among other things, where Israel has a comparative advantage to draw international actors to its shores.
While decoupling Israel’s diplomacy from the PLO, he has also gradually rolled back the legitimacy Israel unwisely conferred on the terrorist group 24 years ago.
The fact that Modi has opted not to visit the PLO-controlled Palestinian Authority in Ramallah demonstrates the wisdom and success of the strategy. Modi may or may not be interested in establishing a PLO state, but he is very interested in developing his own economy. Modi recognizes the synergies between Israel’s comparative advantages in military and economic technologies and India’s needs.
As the leader of a democracy, his first interest is advancing his country’s needs. Whether or not there will be peace between Israel and the Palestinians has no impact on India’s security and prosperity.
Modi’s historic visit is a good opportunity for Israel to understand where it now stands and what it must do to maintain and expand its current success into the future. We must never again be seduced into believing that our nation’s fate will be determined by eternal factors. Whether Israel continues to prosper in security in the company of friendly trading partners and strategic allies is largely in our hands.
If we continue the hard work of growing our economy and defeating rather than appeasing our enemies while basing our diplomacy on what we have to offer the nations of the world we will ensure our prosperity and build a peaceful future for ourselves and all of our neighbors.
{nationalreview.com} ~ About ten days before he died in mid-May, an 81-year-old man who did not work for the Trump campaign told the Journal he had speculated that, but did not know whether, 33,000 of liar-Hillary Clinton’s e-mails had been hacked from her homebrew server. The now-deceased man, “a longtime Republican opposition researcher” named Peter W. Smith, had theorized that the e-mails must have been stolen, “likely by Russian hackers.” But he had no idea if this was actually so, and he himself certainly had nothing to do with stealing them.
Smith’s desire to obtain the hacked emails, if there were any, peaked around Labor Day 2016 — i.e., during the last weeks of the campaign. This was many months after the FBI had taken physical custody of liar-Clinton’s homebrew server and other devices containing her e-mails. It was also two months after the Bureau’s then-director, James Comey, had told the country that the FBI had found no evidence that liar-Clinton had been hacked . . . but that her carelessness about communications security, coupled with the proficiency of hackers in avoiding detection, meant her e-mails could well have been compromised throughout her years as secretary of state.
In other words, Peter W. Smith was one of about 320 million people in the United States who figured that liar-Clinton’s e-mails had been hacked — by Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, the NSA, the latest iteration of “Guccifer,” and maybe even that nerdy kid down at Starbucks with “Feel the Bern” stickers on his laptop.
Besides having no relationship with Trump, Smith also had no relationship with the Russian regime. Besides not knowing whether the liar-Clinton e-mails were actually hacked, he also had no idea whether the Kremlin or anyone close to Vladimir Putin had obtained the e-mails. In short, he wouldn’t have been able to tell you whether Trump and Putin were colluding with each other because he wasn’t colluding with either one of them.
But — here comes the blockbuster info — Smith was colluding with Michael Flynn. Or at least he kinda, sorta was . . . except for, you know, the Journal’s grudging acknowledgement that, well, okay, Smith never actually told the paper that Flynn was involved in what the report calls “Smith’s operation.”
Huh?
If you’re confused, I’d ordinarily suggest that you go back and read the report a time or two. But life is short and rereading would not much clarify this spaghetti bowl hurled against the wall, in the hope that some of the Flynn sauce might stick.
Flynn, of course, is the retired army general who became a top Trump campaign surrogate, and who, later and fleetingly, was President Trump’s national security adviser. As the press likes to say, Flynn was sacked over his contacts with Russia, which were the subject of an FBI investigation. What they unfailingly fail to add is that (a) Flynn was fired not because he had contacts with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak but because he misled Vice President Mike Pence about the substance of them; (b) there was nothing inappropriate about Flynn’s having discussions with foreign counterparts during the Trump transition; (c) the FBI investigation targeted not Flynn but Kislyak, who, as an agent of a foreign power, was under FBI surveillance when he spoke with Flynn; and (d) therefore, the FBI recorded the Flynn-Kislyak communications and knew that Flynn had made no commitment to address Russian objections to sanctions imposed by President liar-nObama (i.e., there was no quid pro quo for Russia’s purported contribution to Trump’s election).
General Flynn is loathed by liar-nObama, who fired him as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency; by the liar-nObama-era intelligence-agency chiefs, whom Flynn called out for politicizing intelligence reporting; and by the FBI, against whom Flynn supported an agent who was claiming sexual discrimination. The liar-nObama Justice Department was giddy over the prospect of making a criminal case against Flynn: dispatching the FBI to interrogate him over the Kislyak conversations, and even weighing an indictment of Flynn under the Logan Act, an unconstitutional 18th-century law that bars Americans from free-lancing in foreign policy — a law that is never invoked, has never been successfully prosecuted, and would be especially ludicrous to apply to a transition official.
Flynn, whose judgment leaves much to be desired, has made himself an easy target. Putting aside whether the FBI had a good reason to interrogate him as if he were a criminal suspect, he was reportedly no more candid with the agents than he was with Pence in recounting his Kislyak conversations. He also got grubby after leaving the military in 2014, starting a private intelligence agency that cashed in paydays from outfits tied to the unsavory regimes of Russia and Turkey. There are legal issues stemming from his apparent failures to register as a foreign agent and to disclose what he was paid. In addition, Flynn’s son became so notorious for trading in conspiracy theories that the Trump transition cut ties with him — imagine how out there you’d have to be to get booted from Trump World for incendiary tweeting!
Thus, Flynn has provided Democrats and their media friends with plenty of help advancing the Trump-Russia narrative. The strategy has been transparent for months: Make Flynn radioactive, turn Flynn’s name into a synonym for “collusion,” and, presto, anyone Flynn touches becomes evidence that Trump “coordinated” with Putin to steal the election from liar-Hillary — regardless of whether the anyone in question has anything to do with Trump or Russia.
This week’s Journal report is the latest in this genre. In the interview ten days before his death, Smith claimed to know Flynn but did not implicate Flynn in his “operation.” And what exactly was this “operation”? Like many other people during the campaign stretch-run, Smith convinced himself that someone out there in the cyber-verse must have hacked liar-Clinton’s e-mails. This calculation was based not on a belief that Trump was colluding with Russia, but on liar-Clinton’s own recklessness in using a non-secure server system.
The Journal does not see fit to remind readers that the 33,000 e-mails Smith was trying to dig up were the ones liar-Clinton had tried to destroy, even though they contained records of government business which it is a felony to destroy, contained at least some classified information which it is a felony to mishandle, and had been requested by congressional committees whose proceedings it is a felony to obstruct by destroying evidence.
These penal inconveniences aside, there were also explosive political implications. liar-Clinton had insisted that the e-mails in question were strictly of a personal nature, involving yoga routines, daughter Chelsea’s wedding, and the like. She maintained that she had turned over any and all government-related e-mails to the State Department. She had also laughably claimed that her homebrew server system was adequately secure. And there is every reason to believe many of these destroyed e-mails related to liar-Clinton Foundation business — the Bill and liar-Hill scheme to monetize their “public service” — which was liberally commingled with government business during Mrs. liar-Clinton’s State Department tenure. Public disclosure of these e-mails, then, would have been very damaging, concretely demonstrating her dishonesty and unfitness.
Understand: None of that is Russia’s fault, or Trump’s, or Flynn’s, or Flynn Jr.’s, or Smith’s. It was solely the fault of liar-Hillary Clinton. She was a five-alarm disaster of a candidate. That’s why she lost.
Starting around Labor Day, Smith undertook to locate these e-mails. The team he assembled included technology experts, lawyers, and — because he suspected Russian hackers as did everyone else on the planet — a Europe-based investigator fluent in Russian. Scouring the hacker community, Smith said he located five groups that claimed to possess the e-mails, including two that “he determined were Russians.” I know you’ll shocked to hear this, but Smith apparently identified none of these hacker groups in his Journal interview.
And it all came to . . . what?
Nothing.
Smith claimed that he was offered sample e-mail batches by the five hacker groups. The e-mails, however, did not appear to be authentic, so he didn’t dare leak them. Indeed, assuming these samples really existed, nobody has leaked them — not Smith, not WikiLeaks, and not the five hacker groups themselves.
To summarize: Smith had no proof of Trump–Russia collusion, no proof the liar-Clinton e-mails were hacked, no proof that any e-mails any hackers claimed to possess were the real thing, and no proof that the hackers — assuming they really were hackers — were tied to the Kremlin.
So why is this a story? Because, while Smith did not tell the Journal that Flynn was involved in his “project,” he apparently told other people that he was “talking to Flynn.” He “implied” to other people that Flynn, Flynn’s son, and Flynn’s private intel firm were interested in liar-Hillary’s e-mails.
And why wouldn’t Flynn have been interested?
Other than the media, who wasn’t interested? Trump himself certainly was. The Journal reminds readers of the late July 2016 press conference at which the then-candidate stated, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That quip, we all remember, ignited media hysteria about how Trump was encouraging foreign interference in American presidential politics in a way that the tens of millions of foreign dollars that poured into liar-Clinton Foundation coffers somehow did not.
All this sound and fury turns out to be throat-clearing. The juicy news in the Journal’s report is not about Smith; it stems from yet another leak of classified information. According to “U.S. investigators” involved in the Russia probe (i.e., the Mueller investigation), there are intelligence reports that “describe Russian hackers discussing how to obtain e-mails from Mrs. liar-Clinton’s server and then transmit them to Mr. Flynn via an intermediary.”
Who are these investigators? The Journal doesn’t tell us — the actual crime of leaking classified intelligence being of less interest than the non-crime of “collusion.” The purported Russian hackers are not identified either. Nor is Flynn’s “intermediary” — the Journal cannot say whether the leak is accurate, whether there really was an intermediary, or whether Smith could have been the intermediary. There is, moreover, no indication that any supposed Russian hacker actually made any effort to obtain the liar-Clinton e-mails, much less that Flynn — let alone Trump — had any knowledge of or involvement in such an effort.
Quick: somebody start writing up the articles of impeachment!
As the press strains to keep the collusion narrative alive, three things emerge.
First, there plainly was no conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian regime to meddle in the election. If there had been, it would be unnecessary to trace attenuated, unconsummated arrangements between obscure partisans, anonymous hackers, and nameless intermediaries. There would have been no need for Trump to use a press conference to express hope that Putin would find the missing e-mails. There would have been no need for Flynn and Jared Kushner Trump’s son-in-law and adviser to try to set up a back channel to the Kremlin weeks after the November election. If there were anything to the “collusion” tale, the Trump and Putin circles would have had all this covered during the campaign.
Second, there are crimes in these media reports, but the media seems decidedly indifferent about them: Mrs. liar-Clinton’s e-mail follies and the leaking of classified information by government officials.
Finally, there is a quite astonishing variance in the standards of proof applied by Democrats and their media allies. On the one hand, we have damning evidence that liar-Clinton destroyed government files and mishandled classified information. On the other, there is a dearth of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. Now riddle me this: Who got a complete pass, and who is the earth being scorched to nail?
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449161/trump-russia-collusion-nonsense
GERMANY BEATS BRITAIN in number of Islamic jihadists living there
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
Britain recently announced that there were 23,000 Muslim extremists on their terror watch list. But Germany has even more – 24,400 potential Muslim terrorists now call Germany their home.
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CYeklHHWYAAphls.jpg?resize=600%2C338" alt="" width="590" height="332" />
UK Daily Mail (h/t John H) Germany should brace for further attacks given growing numbers of potential Islamist militants, top security officials warned on Tuesday as they vowed to step up efforts to prosecute, convict and deport suspects. The country is still home to 24,400 Islamic extremists, according to a report from Germany’s BfV domestic intelligence agency.
Germany was hit by five Islamic jihad attacks in 2016, including a December attack on a Berlin Christmas market that killed 12 people. Seven additional attacks failed or were thwarted, Hans-Georg Maassen, president of Germany’s BfV domestic intelligence agency, told reporters.
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/GermanMuslims-e1411592887330-800x475.jpg?resize=800%2C475" alt="" width="590" height="350" />
‘We must expect further attacks by individuals or terror groups,’ Maassen said, citing growing evidence and over 1,000 expressions of concern from the general public about growing risks.
‘Islamic terrorism is the biggest challenge facing the BfV and we see it as one of the biggest threats facing the internal security of Germany,’ he said.
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2w993qhighc0.bild_-e1499216323125.jpg?resize=640%2C360" alt="" width="590" height="332" />
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/b0e0007b9fb0bef38ed.jpeg?resize=640%2C336" alt="" width="590" height="310" />
The agency’s annual report for 2016 said there were 24,400 Islamists in Germany, including around 9,700 Salafists, and the number of Salafists had increased to 10,100 this year. The total also includes some 10,000 members of the Turkish Islamic Milliu Gorus movement, the report showed.
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/10703523_1089209467756621_7244791401438844221_n.jpg?resize=800%2C759" alt="" width="590" height="560" />
The total number of suspected Islamofascists marks a drop from the year earlier, but the report said that did not mean the threat had diminished.
‘In fact the opposite is the case,’ the report said, citing a shift towards ‘a more violence-prone and terrorist spectrum …’ The report said hundreds of Muslim ‘jihadists’ had entered the country among the over one million Muslim migrants who had come into Germany over the past two years.
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ll.jpg?resize=800%2C450" alt="" width="590" height="332" />
Altogether, security officials were keeping tabs on some 680 potential Islamic jihadist threats, most of whom were influenced by Salafist ideology, Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere said.
He said Germany had dramatically stepped up its efforts to combat Islamic militancy, with a record number of arrests, prosecutions and deportations seen over the past year. Maassen said an estimated 930 Muslims had left Germany to fight with Islamic State in Syria or Iraq, of whom about 20 percent were women.
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-3.jpg?resize=800%2C450" alt="" width="590" height="332" />
Chairman of German Police Union says Muslims will never fit into German society and police are unable to control them because of political correctness
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
Rainer Wendt warns that ‘anti-social and violent behavior of Arab Muslim migrants, including rapes, robberies, and assaults will persist because they know there are virtually no consequences for their actions. Muslims do not respect German laws and there should be a system for swift deportations.’
To read more and watch video http://www.barenakedislam.com/2017/07/04/chairman-of-german-police-union-says-muslim
Muslims ‘OFFENDED’ Their Kids Have To Learn and Recite National Anthem…THIS is What They Said About It…
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
The Islamic Activist group, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, said they are against the “forced assimilation” of Muslims by such practices as “singing the National Anthem” and “pledging to support Democratic values”. What they said is that this enforcement is against Islamic values and is a form of oppression.
This “forced assimilation” can effect refugees fleeing from persecution, danger, economic hardship that come to America just to get away from somethings. Making the refugees look like victims is telling a lot about the people that make the culture.
They come to our country and want to continue living as before, but in order for them to do that they should become full Americans that are legal. So, maybe this “forced assimilation” is not so bad after all.
The mic activist group, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, stated:
“REQUIRING SCHOOLCHILDREN TO SING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM, AND THE CITIZENSHIP PLEDGE SUPPORTING DEMOCRATIC VALUES, ARE A PART OF AN OPPRESSIVE CAMPAIGN BY AUSTRALIAN AUTHORITIES OF ‘FORCED ASSIMILATION’ OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY.”
Muslim Cleric Prays in Al-Aqsa Mosque Address: “Oh Allah, enable us to slaughter the Americans! And the Europeans!”
( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )
You know these pious Muslims, they were Obama’s peace partners. We can hope that President Trump will not fall for “Palestinian” taqiyya.
“Sheikh Nidhal Siam Prays in Al-Aqsa Mosque Address for Allah to Enable the Slaughtering of the Americans and Europeans,” MEMRI, June 18, 2017:
In an address at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Palestinian cleric Sheikh Nadhal Siam, also known as “Abu Ibrahim,” criticized the Saudi and Qatari regimes, which, he said, were “immersed in collaboration” with the Americans and the English, respectively….
“Oh Allah, enable us to slaughter the Americans!”
Audience: “Amen!”
Nadhal Siam: “And the Europeans!”
Audience: “Amen!”
Nadhal Siam: “And our criminal and treacherous [Arab] rulers!”
Audience: “Amen!”
Nadhal Siam: “Oh Allah, bring about their downfall soon!”
Audience: “Amen!”
Nadhal Siam: “Oh Allah, do not leave a single one of them on the face of the earth!”
Audience: “Amen!”
Nadhal Siam: “Oh Allah, bring about their downfall and their annihilation soon!”
Audience: “Amen!”
Nadhal Siam: “Oh Allah, replace them with the Emir of the Believers!”
Audience: “Amen!”
|
|---|
|
PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!
Mainstream Media Now Advocating ‘All Citizens’ Spend Time in Prison as ‘Service’ to Country
Corporate media achieved a new level of absurdity last week, when Jesse Ball, writing for the Los Angeles Times, suggested every American be required to spend a stint behind bars every ten years as a veritable guarantee to improve conditions of incarceration in the United States.
In the piece titled, “Everyone should go to jail, say, once every ten years,” Ball writes,
A notable demand that is made upon the citizens of the United States of America is that of jury duty. Although many despise, hate and avoid it, there is a general sense that the task is necessary. We believe a society is only just if everyone shares in the apportionment of guilt.
To this demand of jury duty, I would like to add another, and in the same spirit. I propose that all citizens of the United States of America should serve a brief sentence of incarceration in our maximum-security penitentiaries. This service, which would occur for each person once in a decade, would help ensure that the quality of life within our prisons is sufficient for the keeping of human beings.
Without foreknowledge on length of stay and other details, citizens would languish behind the same bars as convicted criminals under Ball’s proposal — albeit in a section separated from offenders, assumedly not to confuse jailers and inmates, or endanger anyone serving ‘incarceration duty.’
But Ball misses the point — feeding the elephant in the room of overcriminalization of daily life, excessive laws, and, worst by far of all, the normalization of incarceration as conditional to the American way of life — lecturing all of us to walk a mile in the shoes of the convicted rather than declaring the brazen failures of the Injustice System evidence enough, itself, for dismantling the whole dysfunctional mess.
After all, according to the Prison Policy Institute, the United States now cages some 2.3 million of its roughly 326.5 million total people — the largest per capita incarcerated persons of any nation on the entire planet.
An interplanetary traveler would logically conclude it a prison nation — or, at least, one astonishingly rife with thugs, murderers, thieves, and worse.
Even the more law-and-order, authoritarian among us could see the flaws evident in a system claiming freedom, while locking away proportionally more than even the dictatorial fascist regimes our troops putatively combat.
While undoubtedly posited from a place of compassion as a plea for ethics in imprisonment, Ball’s somewhat tongue-in-cheek proposal unfortunately evinces the frequency with which Band-aids are applied as a fix for gaping structural flaws which should otherwise condemn the system to demolishment.
But, worst of all, this proposition capriciously normalizes the American Incarceration State.
Consider how those 2.3 million souls wound up stuffed into the cramped confines of the nation’s myriad federal, state, and local facilities; or, worse — judging by a voluminous body of anecdotal accounts — one of the altogether notorious prisons-for-profit, managed by private corporations intent only on thrift in housing its human commodities to save the State some pennies.
Most of the convicted behind bars have committed nonviolent crime — but moralizing on personal vice and legislation enacted sanctimoniously against substances have exploded the nation’s prison population to alarming proportions.
A court or jury decision of guilt in no way can be characterized on par with ‘laws’ governing ethics and human rights — for, if a candid observation of inmate records were ventured, a sweeping sum could be said to have landed in prison by violating the State’s prohibition on the cannabis plant.
And not violently so.
Forgetting for a moment ‘the law is the law,’ to describe a society as just, which chooses to not only cement unjust ideas into law, but imprison violators of aberrant legislation — particularly in cases of medicinal use — must be the pinnacle of hypocritical pomposity, if not the telltale heart of a dying empire.
Sure, forcing (on penalty of prison?!) yet more behind bars to prove how base the conditions behind bars might actually assist the vocal calling to improve conditions behind bars, but if so many have been locked there for reasons only justifiable for the violation interned in the print of legal tomes, the plan is an exercise in pure futility.
Unless it simply normalizes prison life as a veritable inevitability — might as well prepare for the eventuality some offensive chunk of life will be wasted rotting between the torrid walls of a prison cell.
The irony, palpable.
No, we do not need to send the relatively innocent to prison to endure torturously foul food and varying degrees of inhospitability to prove locking people in cages does nothing to curb crime — indeed, the opposite is arguably true.
It’s the system, broken — not people’s compassion.
Juries convict based on flawed evidence, evidence omitted by technicality, and an embarrassing list of other inexcusable conditions accumulated on the books over centuries — and more laws and regulations find their way to the ledger every day.
They’re creating additional ways to make you a criminal — so, in that sense, Ball might be onto something.
‘Get ready for prison, dear young people, by the time you’re an adult, there won’t be a thing you can do without somehow breaking the law,’ the writer unintentionally asserts between the lines.
“I wonder,” Ball continues, “once all you citizens of the United States are passing in and out of prison on a regular basis, will the conditions there not seem singularly urgent? Just picture congressmen, priests, stock traders, truck drivers, people of every faith, color, description, all for once sharing in something.”
Sharing in the memory of peering out from inside prison walls isn’t conducive to solving the issue of mass incarceration.
Scrapping unjust, unethical, amoral, and otherwise ludicrous laws governing every conceivable aspect of daily life, however, is. (For more from the author of “Mainstream Media Now Advocating ‘All Citizens’ Spend Time in Prison as ‘Service’ to Country” HERE) oemiller.us/2017/07/mainstream-media-now-advocating-all-citizens-spend-tim













Photo: AFP

