If you believe that homosexuality is sick the communist micromanagers tell you that you can't say that anymore. You aren't likely to go to jail for saying it, but you might well be penalized in a variety of ways by the thought and culture police from the politically correct far left. Look at how Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty was treated by the media and culture in general for expressing his views on homosexuality. He was fired, made to apologize for his own views, etc. That’s why a man or woman  who refuses to apologize to one of the commie’s iconic untouchable totems, is such a courageous person. Look how courageous the female Kerntucky clerk was. (What did you do to support her?) If you express views, especially about anything related to the homosexual agenda, that are not politically correct, the far left will everything they can to destroy you. Today's news reports a coach for Colorado State University's football team, who alleged called the opposing team's quarterback a “faggott” during the game, and is suspended without pay for that incident. Again, you can't offend the homosexual movement without grave consequences. For using that word, the assistant coach was basically made to apologize to the “GLBTQ community” and required to participate in mandatory anger management and “sensitivity training.”

While this issue is one of censorship, culturally, by the far left, it goes beyond that. It's part of the far left's attempt to enforce conformity and destroy anything and anyone that doesn't comply. It's not enough that you don't express your hideous and politically incorrect views in public, you can't even think them and if you do, you need to be re-educated. The far left won't stop until it has stamped out every bit of even thought that homosexuality is wrong, or sick, or unnatural, or sinful. The far left doesn't want you to believe it, or even think it.

If you dare to make politically incorrect statements about these issues, the far left wants you destroyed. They will try to get you fired from your job even completely blackballed from whatever profession you're in. But stopping you from earning your living isn't enough of a consequence for the far left, for your act of speaking out against the left's politically correct imposed morality. They will get you blackballed from social groups and circles, and make sure you don't get the holiday cards from certain people (can't call the Christmas cards) or invited to the parties, or what it is they can run you out of. Leftists are quick to point out you aren't going to prison for expressing your views, but the ways the far left seeks to destroy can be almost as bad in real life consequences.

But they just stop at punishing you for what you said. In many instances, like the assistant coach at Colorado State, they make you apologize to the very elements you spoke out about in your comments, which is really rubbing your nose in it. So if you spoke out against homosexuals, you're made to apologize to the “homosexual community,” whoever that is. You can't even think the things you said either. They will send you to so-called “diversity training,” which is actually politically correct re-education to badger you into not thinking those politically correct views, and not even believing them. The purpose of such “sensitivity training” is to get you to believe in perversity, accept as normal that which you don't believe in normal, and not only to stop you from holding your politically correct views, but reverse your thinking and turn you politically correct as well. And if they succeed, they want you to come out of sensitivity training preaching against your former views with the zeal of an ex-smoker lecturing smokers to give up their cigarettes. The far left won't stop until you've been completely converted to the politically correct left, or otherwise destroyed and culturally oppressed for speaking out.

Every time they make someone apologize, and cause them to get fired or suspended, for speaking their minds and uttering politically incorrect views, they further enforce the conformity and extend the cultural fascism. Cultural oppression can be very effective in many ways, and it's a lot less expensive to stamp out what the far left finds offensive this way, than to go the old fashioned way and pass laws to ban such speech and put people in jail for doing it. Sure, the left loves to say, we don't put you in jail for saying such things, you still have freedom of speech. But they are the ones quick to put you in the cultural gulag for speaking your mind.

Our course of action, is as plain as the past cowardice of the white majority. We must organize a white political party that is like a labor union in its protection of its members. Every time a member speaks the truth and is punished, we strike back and ferociously pull every tactic of battle that we can think of, legal suits, demonstrations, propaganda and also recruit. If no member speaks we set up situations wherein we call out our enemies.   After awhile white people will be capable of many forms of self defense. Then we become aggressive and force our enemies on the defensive. The cultural war thus becomes real.

America is Burning While You Read Racist Lies by Commie Lovers of MLK

If you drive up Buford Highway, Route 13 out of Atlanta, you head towards the northern suburbs of Chamblee and Doraville. Both used to be upper class dwelling areas, I know, I used to live there. Of course black racism rules urban Atlanta but foreigners already outnumber blacks and whites. The area is filled with every type of Hispanic and Asiatic, including ChiComs.

Along the Buford Highway travelers cannot fail to notice a mélange of foreign strip malls. This part of balkanized America shows little signs of such Americana as Comfort Inn and Waffle House. Instead businesses run by foreign merchants who communicate in every Hispanic, Asian and Islam dialect,  tell the story of what this place is.

Of course all the relics of the former south are gone along Buford Highway, replaced by the new “obama America” (7 years old) where white men are hated and Islamic thugs rule. Along Buford Highway you will find Tu Banco Local (1^st International Bank) and the Buford Farmer’s Market is controlled by central American  immigrants. Despite its bucolic name, the Buford Farmers Market sells oxtails and bull testicles wrapped in plastic for $3.99 a pound.

The locals call Chamblee, “Chambodia”, but the term hardly describes its occupation by a variety of foreign maggots of every stripe and language. Anybody can come here and disappear, and you can purchase iron clad IDs if you darken your skin and pretend not to be white. The landlords don’t require any kind of identification and as long as you keep your mouth shut and pay rent on time, you can live along the network of roads on both sides of Buford Highway. Of course, armed foreign gangs, whom obama has permitted to ignore his anti-gun edicts,  rule. In fact you can buy crew served weapons there, and much more in the future. White slavery is a growth business along Buford Highway and in Atlanta, and many beauteous young southern belles disappear from rural Georgia, annually, to serve evil masters before they die young. Robbery by foreign criminals along with rape and murder of females, is rampant in the Atlanta , Georgia area. The local police have been out-gunned and overrun.

I have gone disguised there, and I can tell you a sorry fact. One day in a couple of years, Buford Highway will bristle with fortified Moslem strongholds and roadblocks, demanding toll “payments” and abusing any white stopped by their road blocks, on the way to Florida. The US government, unless Trump is elected, will favor such activities, as the democrats and republicans smirk that, “its about time that whites got a taste of the third and fourth worlds.” You see, Atlanta has been selected as the epicenter of the new “Islamic Caliphate of America”. You try to fight them and you have to take on the commie army and bureaucracy first.

"Judicial Tyranny Towards Americans Is Not Limited Only To Kim Davis"

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT... http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2015/09/judicial-tyranny-towards-americans-is.html

By Oscar Y. Harward

While many Americans may pronounce the 2015 SCOTUS Decision ‘OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, (No. 14–556)’ as the law, and must be obeyed immediately, our US history will show many instances of SCOTUS’s ‘wrong’ rulings. 

The OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES decision is certainly one example as another one of these ‘wrong’ SCOTUS verdicts. 

Over the years, many Americans have chosen to oppose other earlier and unacceptable SCOTUS ‘Decisions’; based on ‘wrong’ SCOTUS findings: 

1.  Scott v. Sandford (1857) (60 U.S. 393) SCOTUS ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States.  African Americans did not have the right to sue in federal court.  SCOTUS ruled that the federal government could not prohibit slavery in the territories.  Later, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution provided that anyone born or naturalized in the United States is a citizen of the nation and of his or her state. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/60/393 

At this point, may I suggest that this must have included ‘legally’ born, and not for those born ‘illegally.  As an analogy, when a criminal robs a bank, it is crime.  It is an ‘illegal’ act.  Just getting away does not allow the robber to keep the money. 

2.  ROE v. WADE, (1973) No. 70-18  SCOTUS declared a pregnant woman is entitled to have an Abortion until the end of the first trimester of pregnancy without any interference by the state. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/roe_v._wade_1973  

Since this 1973 SCOTUS decision, there have been approximately 57,762,169 abortions that have destroyed the lives of unborn children. http://www.lifenews.com/2015/01/21/57762169-abortions-in-america-since-roe-vs-wade-in-1973/  

3.  Texas v. Johnson (1989) (No. 88-155)  As far as I am concerned in this case, SCOTUS is and was ‘wrong’.  In this ‘Decision’ SCOTUS ruled that Johnson’s burning of the American flag was a 1st Amendment ‘Freedom of Speech’ ‘Right.  Near 600,000 have died while serving in the US Military for defending (y)our American flag.  https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/491/397 

One of my first classes in Army’s Basic Training at Ft. Bragg, NC, we were taught and/or reaffirmed was to always uphold our USA, our Constitution, and our American flag.  

The incident of Kim Davis being jailed as she refused to honor our Judiciary’s conclusions with the SCOTUS ruling was and is ‘wrong’ as a majority members of SCOTUS have overruled our Constitutional 1^st Amendment’s ‘Freedom of Religion’. 

It appears a majority of SCOTUS Justices have disregarded our Constitutional ‘freedoms’ as determined by our founding Fathers based on Judeo-Christian values.  Our historical ‘Federalist Papers’ will substantiate these findings as facts. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html  

In SCOTUS’s majority decision rejecting ‘God’s Law’, our Holy Bible, as addressed by many of our Founding Fathers,  it could well be compared to Rev. Martin Luther King’s decision on ‘Civil Rights’. 

Many other instances in US History will disclose that many Americans have been rejected on other Constitutional ‘Rights’; members within (y)our majority and minority communities across the USA. 

Today is a sad day for a SCOTUS majority of Justices to disallow our US Constitutional freedoms, including our 1^st Amendment’s ‘Freedom of Religion’, and based on Judeo-Christian values to be disallowed as the ‘law’ of (y)our precious nation.

Conservatism is an "attitude".  A constant force performing a timeless function in the development of a free society.

It has its roots in the American revolution and its commitment to sovereignty of the people and the rights and liberties of all Americans.  Some constants are the respect for traditional values, the rule of law, the support of religion and a strong defense of Western civilization from the challenges of totalitarian governments.

Those Republicans who claim to be conservative should revisit its meaning.

"Don't rock the boat" seems to be the position of many of the senators and reps in congress. As we slowly sink to the bottom.    Our present form of term limits is to vote for someone else.  If we did not re-elect anyone in congress who has 20 or more years in office, a great change could occur, hopefully, for the better.    Those 20 plusers do not want the boat rocked...from both parties.    So what should we all do ?  Throw them out !   We can only improve the situation if we do.

This is part 2 of a five part series taken from my blog at whileweslept.org

Former Indiana Senator Evan Bayh once described the vetting process for high political office as ‘totally invasive… like having a colonoscopy, except they use the Hubble telescope on you.’ And he would certainly know, after being on the shortlist of VP candidates for Al Gore, John Kerry, and Barack Obama. By comparison the vetting process employed by the media and the American public is much less invasive but has the potential to be considerably more deadly. Consider the swift rise and abrupt collapse of Howard Dean’s candidacy back in 2004.

On December 9, 2003 Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean by saying, “I’m very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean to be the next president of the United States of America..”

Al Gore’s endorsement was highly coveted, and CNN reported that it “could cement Dean’s status as the leading Democratic candidate….“

On January 19 after placing third in the Iowa primary, Dean gave a passionate speech, saying:

“If you had told us one year ago that we were going to come in third in Iowa – well, we’d have given anything for that. And you know something, not only are we going to New Hampshire; we’re going to South Carolina, and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota… and then we’re going to Washington D.C. and we’re going to take back the White House…”

And then it happened: he let out a cackly, off-pitched battle cry. Watching this clip now, more than a decade later, is nothing less than heartbreaking. He is standing there surrounded by flags and supporters in what for him was a pinnacle moment. It’s impossible not to feel sorry for this man who at the time had no idea that he was destroying his bid for the White House. There is no teleprompter. There are no speech notes. There is just Howard Dean – bright-eyed and fully charged with raw emotion. That battle cry, that joyful “hee-ya!” was all anyone needed to convict him, in their own minds, of a rabid lust for power.

That was just over ten years ago. Things have certainly changed. We are less than a year away from both Democrats and Republicans announcing their presidential candidates. Earlier this morning I came across an article about Hillary Clinton’s inevitable nomination that stated, “Unless she is indicted, she will surely win the Democratic nomination.”

Let’s reflect on that for a moment.

Amidst all of the allegations swirling around the Clinton campaign, I wonder if there is anything that could prove to be as damaging as Howard Dean’s Rebel Yell… Certainly Benghazi and the subsequent private server/email findings as well as the gross mishandling of classified material all should have been – not to mention the very real links to Hillary Clinton using the Clinton Foundation as a channel for terrorist nations and regimes to purchase backing from the State Department. Somehow it has all managed to withstand public scrutiny.  

For those of us who are old enough to vividly recall the scandalous years of the Clinton White House, this is beyond belief, yet not at all surprising. However, for the 93 million Millennials who will be able to cast a vote in 2016, who were born after ‘Billary’, the seriousness of understanding the Clinton standard of fraudulence cannot be understated. While she herself may regard her own history of ruthless and illicit conduct as “old news”, it is vital that we endeavor to apply the same ‘intrusive and rigorous’ vetting procedures to her just as we would to anyone else seeking the highest office in our land.

Even the most casual meandering through our recent history reveals a very real and disagreeable pattern – travelgate, whitewater, filegate, pardongate and the dozen or so others. These colorless terms certainly benefit the culprits by sounding trivial and easily discarded. I’m sure that most folks, given the opportunity, would prefer to hear about a sex scandal over one involving the White House travel office. However, when held to proper scrutiny, these scandals reveal a consistently contemptuous, underhanded, self-serving, and dangerous political duo that are eerily comparable to Frank and Claire Underwood in House of Cards.

While campaigning for the Presidency in 1992, Bill Clinton remarked that by voting him into the White House, America would be getting ‘two for the price of one’ in reference to the role Hillary would play in his administration. At the time, such an admission was certainly provocative, even exciting to our nation. It had been less than a generation since the integration of the Feminist Movement into our collective principles.

Four months into their Presidency, the first of more than a dozen public scandals, Travelgate, surfaced. Four months after the Clintons took office, they announced that they would be firing all seven of the employees in the White House office that arranges travel for the media and first family. Though it may seem inconsequential to most, this announcement was particularly striking to the media and Washington insiders. These seven employees had faithfully served the administrations of seven Presidents – Republican and Democrat alike – and were well-known, respected civil servants.

After reportedly denying longtime Clinton business acquaintance Harry Thomason access to the White House charter business (worth 31 billion dollars annually), Travel Office Director Billy Dale was promptly locked out of his office while officers removed several boxes of paperwork.

Shortly after being allowed back into his office Mr. Dale was told that he, along with the six others who comprised the travel office team, had been fired for criminal misconduct. Additionally, he was slapped with a lawsuit for allegedly embezzling fourteen thousand dollars because the logs were ‘missing’. Also during this time, out of pure coincidence I’m sure, Mr. Dale received a letter from the IRS informing him that was to be audited, and for the next thirty months he was investigated. His son and daughter were subpoenaed. As the case went to trial in the fall of 1995, a long line of Washington journalists volunteered to serve as character witnesses to Mr. Dale. The jury needed less than two hours to reach a verdict of not-guilty.

Though the final report found that Mrs. Clinton’s sworn statement was ‘factually inaccurate’ and that she had indeed spoken with Harry Thomason on numerous occasions regarding his takeover of the travel office, Billy Dale did not get his job back despite being only a few months away from retirement. Further investigations by the FBI, Department of Justice, and The House Oversight Committee scrutinized Hillary Clinton for playing a central role in this debacle and for making false statements under oath.

The methods administered by Hillary Clinton – the whimsical misuse of law enforcement authority while dragging someone’s reputation and family through the mud in retribution for having been inconvenienced – are contemptible and terrifying.

In that same year, Mrs. Clinton had hired Craig Livingstone for the position of Director of White House Security and given him the highest security clearance despite lacking any sort of high-level security experience – unless you would count working as a bouncer in a D.C. nightclub as sufficient.

While investigating the Travelgate catastrophe, the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight had found that some 900 unauthorized FBI background reports had been pulled by Livingstone at the request of Mrs. Clinton. The FBI files covered White House employees from Republican administrations and then current political adversaries. The Director of the FBI acknowledged this as an “egregious violation of privacy”, as the files contained detailed information about such things as extramarital affairs and personal medical problems. The politics of personal destruction made easy by improperly obtained, private files of political rivals to be used for professional gain.

The House Oversight Committee ordered an investigation on September 24, 1996 to determine if the events surrounding the files were “a blunder, the result of colossal incompetence, or whether they are established to be more serious or even criminal.” During the investigation the FBI learned that Craig Livingstone – the man who had obtained the files at her request – was the son of a friend of Hillary Clinton’s. They had managed to find photographs with Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Livingstone. Hillary maintains that she doesn’t know her and that she had nothing to do with hiring Mr. Livingstone. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.  

Also in July of 1993, Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions. This was the first time that an FBI Director had been fired by a President. Clinton-appointed Attorney General Janet Reno said that Sessions had exhibited some “serious deficiencies in judgement” by using an FBI plane to visit his daughter on several occasions. Sessions denied that he had acted improperly and refused to give a letter of resignation. On the 19th, Clinton used his powers to dismiss him immediately.

The very next day, Vincent Foster – long-time friend, coworker and confidant of Hillary Clinton and then current Deputy White House Council – was found dead in a federal park in Virginia. He’d been shot in the head. Due to the recent vacancy of FBI Director, the park police were assigned to handle the case. The park police had certainly never dealt with a case of this magnitude and were vastly unqualified. The official position was that Foster, who had recently been prescribed a suspect dosage of trazodone for insomnia and depression, had killed himself.

After searching his briefcase a full three days later, a suicide note did turn up. It had been torn into twenty-eight pieces, of which twenty-seven were recovered. There were no fingerprints to be found. After examining the remaining pieces forensic experts agreed that the ‘note’ was a fake.

A few months later, a White House volunteer intern named Kathleen Willey nervously made claims to other White House staffers that President Bill Clinton had kissed and groped her during a private meeting regarding the possibility of Willey joining the permanent White House staff in the Oval Office. The alleged encounter occurred on November 29. Hours after her meeting with Clinton concluded, her husband Edward Willey committed suicide over a large debt. Another puzzling coincidence, I’m sure. The Clintons again escaped any sort of charges. The final report of the U.S. Office of Independent Council reads – “Willey and President Clinton are the only direct witnesses to their meeting, and their accounts differ substantially on the crucial facts of what occurred”.

These situations all end in a similar fashion: due to a lack of evidence the final verdict comes down to a ‘your word versus mine’ scenario. While digging through this ‘old news’, I often wonder what Mrs. Clinton and our media would have to say about these wrongdoings if they involved, say, a Republican Senator from Texas or a conservative Governor from Florida. Would they even be allowed the opportunity to run any sort of campaign, let alone one for the highest office in the land?

Over the years, time and time again when publically addressing her innocence in any one of these scandals the narrative changes from her involvement in them to how she responds to being asked about them. Instead of realizing and reflecting on the kind of character that emerges from the connecting of these innumerable dots, we instead hear about how she is “unflappable”, that “the real message is her attitude and poise” and that her “confiding tone and relaxed body language immediately draws approving reviews”.

And now, when people in her own party and large segments of the electorate describe her as “a terrible candidate”, “not easy to trust”, and Secret Service members consider it a punishment to be assigned to her detail because she is so foul and mean-spirited, it is crucial to remember that Hillary Clinton is the first First Lady to come under criminal investigation – not once – but several times.

There is a deeply troubling standard that arises even when considering these accounts individually, but when they are assembled into a timeline we are confronted with the fact that when a Clinton is granted a position of influence we really do get “two for the price of one”.  

This is part one of a five part piece taken from my blog at whileweslept.org

As the tide of political correctness rolls over our nation there are millions of Americans who will wear their vote as a civic crown of acceptance; of broad-mindedness. Just as a vote for Barack Obama seven years ago was seen as an exclusive gesture of modernity by pronouncing our transcendence of race, this election may well be the same for gender. The landscape seems to have been assembled with that in mind.

Let us realize that for over thirty years Hillary Clinton has been the beneficiary of the American public’s short-sighted memory. And now, as she hopscotches her way into position as the front-runner for the Democratic Party it is important the we look objectively at the trail of wreckage that both she and her husband have left behind.

Has there ever been a Presidential candidate so mired in controversy? For example, as I write this, despite the preponderance of evidence that during her time serving as Secretary of State she broke a number of federal laws – regarding the handling of classified material as well as operating on a personal server instead of the required government appointed one – there are still millions of people who seem to regard the Oval Office as Mrs. Clinton’s just reward for her long pursuit of it.

Many people who may vote in the democratic primary election and the general election in 2016 have no genuine knowledge of Mrs. Clinton. Millions of first-time voters will not remember the dozens of prior scandals that date back to the late-seventies. As the public’s critical vetting of a candidate has been reduced to an embarrassing confluence of smack-down banter and feckless mudslinging many have lost sight of Hillary Clinton’s sustained tradition of using felonious methods to further her own self-interest.

For those of us who remember headlines like ‘Travelgate’, ‘Filegate’ and ‘Whitewater’ this will serve as a reminder; for those whose image of her is a convoluted knot of sound-bytes about the ‘middle class’ and ‘college loans’, this will exhibit a forty year quest by an arrogant, sanctimonious, and reckless collectivist who has created inexhaustible resources through deceit and treacherous means.  

Surely, most potential voters are likely to associate Hillary with Benghazi but what does it mean? During a recent conversation with a lifelong Democrat and Clinton supporter I asked what she thought about what happened in Benghazi: “C’mon, it’s just like everything that happens over there.”

Actually, it isn’t.

It is in fact, a grotesque and criminally negligent mishandling of a terrorist attack that occurred on the eleventh anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks. On September 11, 2012 a group of Islamist militants launched an organized attack the American Consulate. Chris Stevens had been appointed to Ambassador just two months prior to the attack. Upon his arrival in Benghazi he’d asked for an additional 13 security guards citing the increasingly dangerous situation on the ground. His request went unanswered. 5 weeks prior to attack, Ambassador Stevens sent an urgent cable to Hillary Clinton personally requesting a protective detail bodyguard. Three days later, Hillary Clinton ordered the removal of his entire security team. In fact, there were hundreds of messages sent to the State Department and to Mrs. Clinton personally describing how Al-Qaeda militias had been patrolling the area around the Benghazi Consulate. There had been as assassination attempt on the British Ambassador nearby. In April of 2012, terrorists threw an IED (improvised explosive device) over the Consulate wall. In June of that same year terrorists blew a large hole in the Consulate gate.

At the onset of the attack on September 11, 2012 newly appointed Ambassador Chris Stevens and State Department Information Manager Sean Smith become separated from their meager security. They take refuge in the main building of the compound behind a fortified door with metal bars but the militants set fire to the building. Shortly thereafter, Ambassador Stevens is captured. He is raped and tortured before being killed. His body is dragged through the streets. Sean Smith dies of asphyxia caused by smoke inhalation.

A militant group advocating the strict implementation of Sharia law across all of Libya – Ansar al-Sharia – claims credit for the attack.

Around this time a U.S. surveillance drone arrives over the compound. It sends real-time footage back to the White House, the State Department and the CIA.

About a mile from the Consulate Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty (both former Navy Seals) were at the CIA Annex when the attack began. They radioed to their higher headquarters asking for permission to help and they were denied per the State Department. Also nearby, a Foreign Emergency Support team trained specifically for when a Consulate comes under terrorist attack had been deployed – but was held back by the State Department under the direction of Hillary Clinton. CIA officers on the ground nearby during the attack sent three separate requests for help but those, too, were denied. Woods and Doherty waited another hour and sent another request that was immediately denied. In a devastating exhibit of heroism, while knowingly disobeying their orders, they made their way to the Consulate to help. They requested air support. They called for ground support. The fighting went on for more than six hours with an unarmed drone hanging in the sky directly above them. Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by a mortar shell nearly seven hours after the fight began. One of them was on the roof with a laser pointer on the mortar team – that laser could have helped guide in an armed drone easily. Tyrone’s body was found slumped over his machine gun.

Eight minutes after Doherty and Woods were killed Hillary Clinton issued an official statement in which she claims that the attack was a spontaneous response to ‘inflammatory material posted on the internet” and not a planned terrorist attack. The alleged ‘inflammatory material’ turned out to be a low budget satirical depiction of the early life of Muhammad.  

Two days later, as Doherty and Woods were returned to the U.S. in boxes, Obama again blamed the attack on this internet video. Hillary Clinton told Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone, “We will make sure the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted” and indeed the filmmaker was jailed. On September 20 the White House began airing apology ads for the internet video – apology ads.

This is the story the precedes the current email scandal.

Perhaps that according to Mrs. Clinton is another attempt by the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ to knock her off from her pedestal.  

Perhaps you have scrolled through various headlines reporting on recent developments in this ongoing email scandal that alleges that while Clinton was Secretary of State she operated her communications through a private email server instead of the government-issued server. An email scandal may not have a dire ring to it – unless of course, the emails and files that were deliberately scrubbed from Mrs. Clinton’s private server contained detailed information regarding the illegal shipment of millions of dollars of arms to terrorist cells operating in Syria, Qatar, Libya, and Turkey.

In 2011 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with the aid of President Obama authorized the sale of literally hundreds of millions of dollars in arms to the government of Qatar which then, at their request, were sold and given to Libyan and Syrian rebel groups in the hopes that these rebels would overthrow their governments. It is a chilling fact that the Libyan rebels who attacked the American Consulate in Benghazi did so with weapons procured from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department.

This is what all the headlines spring from. The irritating banter from the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ that Mrs. Clinton has been advancing for so many years has been brought on by her own criminal arrogance.  

The State Department has the power to authorize the sale of weapons to other countries and organizations. They can also declare a country or state a terrorist nation, in which case the selling of arms to these nations would be a felony. However, Libya and Syria were on the U.S. terror list hence the sale of weapons to them is a felony. This is where Hillary’s private server comes into play. If Hillary Clinton had been conducting business as the U.S. Secretary of State on her government-issued email address (you know, ending in .gov instead of clintonemail.com) then her emails would have been subject to the Freedom of Information Act. That means that anyone can access them at any time through the proper legal channels. Government servers are encrypted and backed up regularly. Her personal email address had no encryption, meaning that it is safe to assume that the rumors alleging that both Russia and China had hacked her email account years ago are true.

By mandate, all electronic government communication is copied, stored and backed up. Since Mrs. Clinton was running her email through a personal server her communications were completely off the grid.

In fact, her tenure as Secretary of State enriched more than Syrian rebels and terrorist cells from Qatar. Though it is against the law to pay an government employee like a Secretary of State directly for any services, Hillary Clinton found a convenient loophole by using The Clinton Foundation as well as payments made to her husband Bill for ‘speaking engagements’. Isn’t it curious that in 2011 the Kuwait American Foundation wanted to buy arms from Boeing and shortly thereafter Bill Clinton gets paid 175,000 dollars by that very same foundation for giving a forty-five minute speech at a gala event. Quite suddenly, Kuwait is no longer considered a terrorist nation – so it is absolutely safe to sell weapons to them. In that same year, Bill Clinton is paid 625,000 dollars to speak at an event put on by Goldman Sachs (one of the largest donors to Hillary’s 2016 campaign). Two days later Goldman Sachs is awarded a contract to sell arms to Algeria; arms that would aid in the human trafficking industry. At the time Senator Richard Luger noticed these parallels and reported it to the media, who promptly tossed the story in the dustbin of history. Let us not forget that it is our job to discover who our ‘public servants’ really are. Hillary Clinton is banking on the notion that you won’t. 

Take a Close Look At America's Future. Obama Has Already Put out Feelers About a Third Term

Those insisting that “black lives matter” — and shouting down politicians such as former Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley for saying “all lives matter” — are unfazed by this shocking increase in black murders of whites. BLM activists call for murder of police and all whites. Some wear shirts with the words “Assata taught me” — a reference to the woman, now a fugitive in Cuba, convicted in 1977 of murdering a New Jersey state trooper. BLM activists marching outside the Minnesota State Fair chanted, “Pigs in a blanket. Fry ’em like bacon.” That was a day after the Democratic National Committee, meeting in Minneapolis, approved a resolution “condemning extrajudicial killings and affirming black lives matter” and hailing “a generation of young African-Americans who feel totally dismissed and unheard as they are crushed between unlawful street violence and unjust police violence.” “We need to start killing these officers,” shouted a crowd as police arrested a violent woman in Madison, Wisconsin — an ultraliberal university town where, incidentally, blacks are arrested at ten times the rate of whites because they carry out 100 times the crimes.. Across the country some people seem to be acting on that advice. Last December, after the protests of the death in custody of a man on Staten Island, two New York Police Department officers were shot and killed in Brooklyn. On August 2, a policeman was killed during a routine traffic stop in Memphis. On August 29, a sheriff’s deputy was gunned down in Houston. On August 31, a police officer was killed in Fox Lake, Illinois. No wonder a Rasmussen poll conducted on August 31 and September 1 found that 58 percent of Americans think there is a “war on police” today. This violence has evoked little response from Barack Obama, who weighed in unnecessarily on the arrest of scholar Henry Louis Gates in July 2009 and the death of Trayvon Martin in March 2012. In August 2014 he said that the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri — after he robbed a convenience store and charged a policeman — “awakened our nation” to a reality blacks already understood, all of which sounds like the BLM narrative. It is folly to wait out these black murderers, they will only get worse!

By: Craig Andresen and Diane Sori / Right Side Patriots on CPR Worldwide Media / www.cprworldwidemedia,net

“I’ve weighed the cost and I’m prepared to go to jail, I sure am…this has never been a gay or lesbian issue for me. This is about upholding the word of God.” – Kim Davis, the woman who has made herself the flag bearer for the anti-gay marriage issue

Diversions…deflections…and all modes of roadblocks for a woman who’s been turned into a martyr by the religious far right as she, a civil servant, used her personal religious beliefs as a weapon of sorts to stop others…in this case a same-sex couple…from accessing their now SCOTUS awarded Constitutionally given legal right to civilly marry.

Now please understand before we go forward that this co-written article in no way is an attack on Christianity nor on anyone’s personal beliefs, know that we both are straight, and that we both are believers in the one true living God of the Christians and the Jews.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

When the phone rings and your child’s school is calling, can you be certain that your child is safe, not from physical harm but from the school’s administration? Are you willing to bet that today your child will not have their pro-life views criminalized and shut down in their school classroom?  What will you do?

According to the Daily Caller, Angelique Clark a high school student who attends the magnet high school West Career And Technical Academy in Las Vegas saw her efforts to start a pro-life-club blocked by the school.

The Nevada legislature has introduced legislation, Assembly Bill 120, approved by the Governor in May 2015, that “clarifies rights that public at public schools are entitled to express themselves in a manner consistent with the rights guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, provided that such expression doe not disrupt instruction at a public school, is not used to bully or intimidate any person and is not organized, broadcast or endorsed by the public school.”

Clark is a Christian who faced an anti-Christian barrier that many school administrators across America create for Christian students who refuse to bend or abandon their faith. This student’s school had already impeded her efforts to establish a pro-life club in the last school year, while the school already had a gay-straight alliance club which reflected a hypocritical contradiction.

In addition, she had already identified 25 students who wanted to join the pro-life school club.

Unlike last year, when the school administration had simply run the clock out, Clark started her efforts to establish a pro-life student club at the beginning of the school year. This time when she made efforts to launch the pro-life club and was met by opposition she contacted the Thomas More Society; a conservative legal issue support group.

Read more at  http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/commentary/when-christian-views-are-suppressed-by-the-public-schools-48129/#PlMXZKZ0uHR51m1w.99

There you go again you lying bigoted media saying: "Only trump could get away with that..." Have you forgotten how you communist media types have covered up for dictator obama, in a thousand different ways, for 8 years? Your refusal to criticize any of obama's thousands of crimes, should convince the most moronic idiot that the media is a gang of biased commie propagandists and the media must be dismembered. Media swine should be hauled outside their studios and hung like the traitorous rats they are. There is no honest, fair or objective media. You are a communist propaganda machine sending out lies, brainwashing and intimidating white people 24-7. You have turned most white people into stupid, ignorant, voyeuristic cowards. But not all of us, there is a growing core of hatred against the media that one day will blossom out and annihilate you enemy propagandists. When it comes to the supporting other traitors who wipe their asses on american flags, while you gleefully snap the pics, you media traitors are right their hurrahing black racist traitors. When it comes to black racist murders, rapes, threats , intimidation and special privileges, you media traitors are always on their side, twisting the truth, belittling innocent white people and scaring white sheeple with your biased terrorism. You are pro-muslim, although moslems are a phony murder cult that wants to turn the world into a charnel house. There is always the US media backing them up. Obama is a crooked marxist racist moslem dictator but to you media swine, he is a demi-god. You coined the term "birther" in a childish attempt to intimidate those who know that obama is illegal, a foreign born hater of america. But the media always lies for him  because , like the media says, "obama can say or do anything, we will make sure of that." You media are marked as totalitarian criminals and you will be treated like all the others of your ilk when justice comes for you. In the meantime you have perverted the idea of a free press. It does not exist. It  is either a commie media that hates everything America once stood for and is a clear and president danger to white people (that's what we have) or a patriotic media that represents the majority. That's what we don't have. Media scum are crazy commies, they have got away with every crime in the book too long by exploiting the lie that freedom of the press leads to a fair and honest press. We will never forget how you media protect obama, filled the world with lies and are a pressure group for authoritarian, totalitarianism Your power and evil must be destroyed along with your twin propaganda advertising.. Damn you to hell forever!

E mails are wonderful things. People send them to announce joyful things like the birth of a baby to relatives far away, or sad things like the death of a loved one. In business, product sales and collaboration on projects are made easier by e mails, and whole business processes can be accomplished without ever meeting in person. E mails make it easier and quicker that ever to get things done.
And then this is the government. In government, e mails can be used to coerce, to intimidate, to hide all the machinati0ons that this administration does not want the citizens to know. Government recordkeeping is, on purpose, spotty and incomplete. From Fast and furious, to the IRS, and now to Hillary Clinton, lost or deleted e mails are the focus of damage done to this country by a socialist administration. It is so easy for them to say there is nothing to show when all it takes is the pressing of the delete button.
As far back as 2012, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chairman Rep. Daniel Issa was asking questions about Hillary used private e mail for government work. Issa wanted to know about the departments policies of using private e mails for government work, what the active private e mails were, and if there were hidden accounts under other names. There were other questions as well, such as are the private accounts listed on federal records and if there is any disciplinary actions taken against those in government who illegally use private e mails. Copies of this letter was also sent to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Interior Secretary Kan Salazar Attorney General Eric Holder, and others in the administration. The only response received was from Thomas R. Gibbons the acting assistant secretary for legislative affairs.
In October of 2012 Clinton called for a review of Benghazi, convened the Accountability Review Board which requested all documents pertaining to Benghazi. This was at the same time when the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Raymond Maxwell, confirmed that there was a Benghazi document “sorting session”. It was revealed that Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan were present at the “sorting session” at the State Department
After Clinton resigned from the State Department seven weeks after Issas’ letter was sent to the State Department, it was several more weeks, until Feb 1, 2013 that a response was sent to Issa. The response was sent from the office of Thomas B. Gibbons and consisted of an overview of State Department policy on e mails and did not answer any of the questions that Issa requested.
Two points could be clearly inferred from the Gibbons response. One, that it was a clear violation of State Department policy to use personal email for official business. And two, that training was available for the proper use records and e mails.
The questions that Issa asked on that letter are at the heart of the Benghazi e mail scandal of which Hillary was an integral part. When the State Department was asked about why Issas questions were not answered, the response from State Department Spokesman Alec Gerlach was “ We respond to thousands of congressional inquiries and requests each year.” A perfect non-answer.
Even the New York Times was taken aback when FOIA requests to the State Department concerning the terror attack in Benghazi came back empty. The same can be said of the correspondence between Hillary and Sid Blumenthal, someone that even Obama would not allow in the administration but was a conduit for Hillary to Libya.
A response from James Carville, a Hillary sycophant is that the Republicans are mean, and that they were using the e mail scandal as political ammunition. It appears that Carville isn’t concerned about National Security or what information had been hacked from the server or by whom.
When Hillary became aware that the private e mail server would become a problem, close to 30,000 e mails were deleted by someone as yet unknown. These e mails were claimed to have been private emails and had no relation to official government business. No one but Hillary and her staff made that determination, and it appears there was no outside oversight by either the State Department or any other government agency. There are two takeaways that must be considered at this point.
1. It is abundantly clear that these e mails were deleted AFTER Issas request for information.
2. Hillary Clinton assumed the SHE was the sole arbiter of what should be made public and what was personal.
There was also a questions of Hillarys aides using personal e mails to correspond with her about Benghazi. Hillarys response were that all the messages were sent to other government employees who were using the government addresses they should use according to government policies, and they could be found there. This would give her the opportunity of saying she did not need to keep them, documents she had already claimed to have turned over.
Clinton, after the Susan Rice Sunday shows continued to blame the violence of Benghazi on the video. This is what she told the families, Jake Sullivan tried to tell Hillary that she was in the clear, that Susan Rice would be confronted but that Hillary was in the clear because she never characterized the motivations of those in the attacking party.
It has been found that there are very large gaps in the Benghazi emails that have been turned over to the House Select Committee and that none of them discuss military security at Benghazi, a subject that was discussed extensively before the attack. A military contingent stationed there could have blunted the attack and saved the four men who died there. There were repeated requests for military security to be placed in Benghazi and all were ignoed by the State Department. In fact the State Department actually reduced the security at the consulate. It was further shown that the Benghazi consulate was purposely set up without the “mandatory Standards” of a consulate.
It is time for Hillary to answer the questions that remain. Some questions are:
Why was Sid Blumenthal, someone even the Obama Administration didn’t want anything to do with, working in concert with the State Department under Hillary?
Why the person in charge of the State Department was allowed to use a private server against all regulations?
Why were the requests for more security in Benghazi turned down.
There are many more questions that we have received answers around the edges but no definitive answer. We need to push for the answers because with Hillary attempting a run at the Presdient, at this point, it DOES make a difference.

I am working on a book about the strange psychology of US progressives (neo-communists) and so-called “conservative-republicans”  (republicans are a wholly owned subsidiary of the neo-communist democrat party).  Following is an excerpt from that book.

     Many “conservative republicans” white people harbor incongruent, highly stressful, and contradictory thoughts about black racism and “white racism”. Such people are mostly leftists, just under the skin, who swear that they are not leftists. However, their stress level is very high as they observe large numbers of hate crimes, rapes, riots, murders, bullying and criminal behavior by blacks, 24-7. White “conservative-republicans” are afraid to face the truth about the sorry attitudes of: racism, racial-supremacy, minority parasitism and anti-Constitutionalism among blacks. Most blacks harbor no patriotism for the government and flag, that exploits the white majority’s hard economic labors in order to treat blacks like an ersatz nobility of crime.   

      “Conservative-republicans” also fear black violence, bullying, rioting, and hate crimes for which blacks are never punished. They also choose to remain in ignorance about the endless number of above-the-law, special privileges extended by federal government racists to petulant, hate-filled blacks. “Conservative-republicans” can be summed up as pretending to harbor, "white middle-class goodness," an orientation that is more concerned with establishing anti-racist (wnti-white) bona fides than with confronting systematic black racism in all its evil forms.

          Internal psychological contradictions between black racist reality and false leftist fantasies of down-trodden, angelic blacks, cause much suffering among white people trying to lie to themselves and others. There are complex relationships between class and race that seriously endanger contemporary white identity. In fact black racists rave about totally genociding not only white values but also white lives.

       There are four ways pro-black orientation is expressed among white people, each serving to establish their own lack of racism: the denigration of lower-class white people as responsible for ongoing white racism, the demonization of antebellum slaveholders, an emphasis on colorblindness-especially in the context of white childrearing-and the cultivation of attitudes of white guilt, shame, and betrayal.

True white liberals, on the other hand, are even sicker. They deny ALL evidence of black racist crime and displace it entirely, as blame on other whites. Is it any wonder that so many of them are drug addicts, drunks, and practitioners of sexual perversion?  US leftists pretend that blacks are law-abiding, non-criminal, not-racists, not minority parasites and are of no danger to white families.

White people should become aware of black supremacist reality and quit denying it, since “the ostrich approach” encourages more black demands and murders. White men and women, should ask themselves if their tax-paying (used to give black racists a free ride), is actually morally correct.  They should also ask why they are being taxed without enjoying fair representation in government or in any aspect of society. They should further ask themselves, “why do blacks get away with so much criminal behavior unpunished,” while whites are punished very hard for “crimes” that could more honestly described as impotent venting or speaking one’s mind.

Whites need a new ethos of moral courage and aggressiveness that honestly acknowledges black criminality, racism, race supremacy, constant deceit, minority racism, bullying, special racial privileges and intimidation. Then whites should band together for self defense and political action, by creating a political party that represents ONLY the best interests of the white majority. A new, white-representative political party will transform whites into more fully functioning human beings who will be honest and courageous role models for their children.  White people, must mobilize their whiteness in the pursuit of racial justice against black criminality, racism, race supremacy, constant deceit, minority racism, bullying, special racial privileges and intimidation, rather than seeking a self-righteous distance from it.

By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist -  clearglobal2016@gmail.com

Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.

Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.

Free trade kills the American dream.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-shockingly-high-cost-of-free-trade-10-reasons-why-globalism-is-bad-for-middle-class-americans

I am 78 years old and I have experienced the takeover of our country by the oligarchs. It is the super-rich that control the US corporations and the elite of the Republican Party Neocons warmongers, that in a strategic partnership with the Democrats; systematically pushed back the progress of the American working class and all the effort of growing and improving our national economy.   Since Ronald Reagan, Via the mainstream news media the propaganda machinery of the oligarch and the Republican party neocons, they feed the American people their unchecked misinformation and disinformation, the Republican Party Neocon Elite has even shanghaied the emotional support of everyday ordinary Republican party members and the Americans people into taking this non-sensible political positions against their own best economic and self-interests and supported all of the free trade ill policies that destroyed the American dream.

Today the people is waking up and seeing the results of the free trade policies that were implemented by the puppets of the oligarchs “Bill Clinton and the majority of the neocons Republicans and the Democrats whores” that sell out to the oligarchs. Americans today find themselves to an increasingly unaffordable healthcare, a true unemployment of 12% with no private sector job growth opportunities, poor quality education and few good teachers that really care to educate their children, a police force that is overpay and abuse their power and become the number one killers of the minority working class in this country. The fact is that the American worker is the one that suffer the consequences of free trade; no one can deny that most American today works long hours and no benefits and get pay slave wages.  The American worker today,  many do not earned enough to cover their living expenses and few only have very little money after they paid for gas, food, housing and insurance to paid for other things they need; we are on the path toward a third-world country, but it is not too late to change this path of self-destruction, millions of people recognize what is happening and they are join the BERNIE SANDERS political revolution to help all of us the ordinary American, in a sustained effort to get off our country from the path toward a third world country status and restore the American dream. Thanks God we have some Republicans and Democrats that believe in our country’s mission, that our country was founded by the people and for the people; under the ideology that our government was formed to protect and defend our God given freedom and liberty to self-determination in support of our economic and welfare. Our US constitution and our Bill of rights it is based on the Bible principles “The laws of nature are the laws of God, whose authority can be superseded by no power on earth.” 

 It is not too late to recognize, that what is happening in our country is the result of greed for power and money, the love for money destroy our nation moral responsibility toward the American people. God is giving us hope to take our country back and reclaim our moral principles, take responsibility for the making of our future and embrace God’s laws as our guiding light to build a country with moral responsibility toward all humanity.

Greed destroyed the moral leadership of our country-and passed many free trade legislations that destroyed the American dream. http://biblescripture.net/Bill.html

Join the revolution and re-store the American dream.

https://berniesanders.com/remarks-at-afl-cio-conference/

Washington lost their moral responsibility.

http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2007/02/outsourcing_wheres_uncle_sam.html

American corporations are the world’s exploiters of humanity.

http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2007/06/overseas_sweatshops_are_a_us_responsibility_1.html

September 5, 2015

Freedom from Religion Atheists tackle Football Players

In the film A League oif Their Own, manager Tom Hanks advises a tearful player on a women’s baseball team, “There’s no crying in baseball.” According to the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), a group of permanently offended atheists that are also in a league of their own, there is no praying in football, not to mention “Hail Mary” passes to win the big game. Tim Tebow call your office.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/freedom_from_religion_atheists_tackle_football_players.html#ixzz3kyKOdXQb
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Why does nearly everyone of you never criticize the hate crimes of black supremacists? The "black lives matter" movement has advocated hate crimes including white genocide,  innocent whites have been murdered because of the hate crime propaganda of your brothers. That's double hate crimes! Why do you not renounce that? Why are black supremacists allowed to spread propaganda on this site, while white people  are not allowed to address your racist black sites? Why should blacks be allowed to get away with murder, advocacy of murder and circulation of pictures of blacks wiping their asses on the US flag?  That flag represents a government of traitors whose power is "black-racistly" brought to bear ONLY on enemies of black racism! The Confederate Flag represents civil rights for white people. If you are as objective as you pretend, why don't you denounce black hate crime? Does that mean that you agree with murder of whites as justified black supremacy privilege? Race criminality law was supposed to apply to all, not just whites. No more special privileges for blacks! We are the majority and we should demand that every BLACK HATE CRIME be punished!

Kim Davis, a devout Christian has been sent to jail for the belief that homosexuality is immoral. The Christian church has been under considerable pressure to change its teachings on homosexuality to conform to the modern “standards” that are being forced on society, Christian children in public schools are being indoctrinated into believing that homosexuality is a “right” because the Supreme Court said so. The State is not required to follow and religious teachings as evident in some of the decisions that our courts have made. Neither do the courts, as symbols of the state have to ability to enforce laws against religious teachings.
Mrs, Davis is an employee of the State and as such is required to fulfill the duties of her office as required by law. She is paid well, and as any employee, is required to follow the rules as pertains to her job. Being a Member of public service she is required to follow the laws and do the jobs as given to her. Even the White House, through Josh Earnest stated today that” she should follow the law just as President Obama does”. (OK, stop laughing, Earnest really said that, I saw it on video.)
Mitch McConnell, that bastion of conservatism, wouldn’t comment, calling it a state issue. Rand Paul stated this” If you want to convince people that same sex marriage is something that should be acceptable, I would say try to persuade people. If you are going to use the federal government and get involved in every locality it is going to harden peoples resolve.”
That being said, there are troubling issues here. Christians are being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. Following the word of God is the responsibility of every Christian. The damage is done when the word of a tyrannical government is considered more than the word of God.
I am confident in saying there is no right anywhere in the Constitution that requires gay marriage be allowed. It is only the power of the Supreme Court and five progressive judges who sit there that has given this so called right to homosexuals. The constitution makes quite clear that the states have the right to make laws on subjects not specifically given to the federal government. This is one of those cases where the Supreme Court is making laws rather than examining, and enforcing them. County attorney Watkins, said “ he will not and can not support her” in her refusal to obey the Constitution. I would appreciate if he could show me where the founders wrote anything that condones homosexual marriage. This is a Christian nation founded on Christian principles no matter how much the atheist and progressives dislike it.
Kim Davis is a Christian, of that there in no doubt. She is willingly putting her Christian faith above all else in an act of civil disobedience that puts all she holds dear at risk.
Of course, rather than holding a respectful discussion about what should be done in this situation, the gay mafia descended. She has been threatened to have her house burned down she has had her personal past thrown to the wolves in the media, and has even been threatened with bodily harm. This from the same gay lobby that only a few years ago claimed they would have been happy with civil unions, that they only wanted to be recognized. It is hard for them to understand that there are those who will not agree with their lifestyle, but wish them no harm. It is depressing that they feel all must agree with tem, or pay the price that they feel is sufficient to make the point. We must bake them cakes, we must perform wedding ceremonies, we must do everything they want in order for them to feel they are superior to a heterosexual way of life. I always chuckle when I hear those who confidently espouse, “She must follow the law or get out”. What a bunch of self righteous self centered tyrants. What makes you think you are any better than anyone else, or that you have all the answers. There are a great many people who refuse to live in your culturally decadent world, and live by God’s law not mans.
If we don’t we are castigated like Mrs. Davis. Words will be splashed everywhere about our personal lives. They will make sure everyone knows she has been married four times and divorced three. She has I am sure made other mistakes in her life as we all have that will be trumpeted to all as soon as they are found. What all the news reports don’t tell you is that she found Christ at the age of 44 about four years ago. As all Christians can, she has repented her sins and pledged to live her life for the Lord. Does this mean she will sin no more, of course not. We are all sinners and it is only through the grace and mercy of God that we are saved. She is an Apostolic Christian, whose followers are strict adherents to the teaching of the Bible as the infallible word of the Lord. I belong to a congregation that is much the same. I came to God at 55, after thirty years of laughing at those who believed in God. There are things that I have done in my past that I am not proud of, but there is a deep fundamental peace that non believers can not understand. So they ridicule those that do believe abd try to shake their faith. I imagine Mrs, Davis faith is being attacked from many sides right now, by the media, by progressives and other non believers who always fight so hard to tell you that you are wrong about something that they claim doesn’t exist. But her faith will hold, and as Christ said in the Bible “ let he who is without sin cast the first stone’.