Super Tuesday voters have an important task ahead of them tomorrow. Their choices could very well decide the fate of the nation. We have let this election turn into a circus and it is time for it to stop. We cannot afford to be blinded by a slick talking shyster who tells us what we want to hear and feeds on our fears, and anger. It is time to be sober and thoughtful, to put away wild conspiracy theories and pointless arguments and vote with common sense. It is mind boggling how anyone who calls themselves a conservative can even consider Donald Trump a serious candidate, and yet we've let him get this far. Please for the sake out our country, all you Trump supporters, please reconsider. Too much is at stake to let that clown into office. We've already suffered enough with one petulant narcissist in the White House. Please super Tuesday voters, don't saddle us with another.
All Posts (30915)
Columnist and playwright Jim Grimsley penned an editorial last week in the Los Angeles Times that accused white people—all white people—of being racist. Grimsley, who is white and grew up in Georgia at the tail-end of the Jim Crow era, railed against the cluelessness of white America on the issue of race. Even white people who consider themselves enlightened on racial issues, he argues, are often unaware of the racism that lurks within their own hearts. “…I have found that black people are all too aware that progress on racial issues has hardly moved forward at all, while white people are nearly as blind to their racism as ever,” he wrote.
I wish Grimsley had been clearer on one point—that is, whether white racism is cultural or genetic. Within the space of the same sentence he seems to blame both nature and nurture for white racism. Grimsely writes: “…[T]hese are symptoms of the insanity of white culture and our refusal to understand that racism is part of our makeup — each and every one of us, north, south, east and west — from cradle to grave.”
At first glance he seems to be blaming culture; he even identifies it by name. But look closer. If culture were to blame there would surely be exceptions to the rule because it couldn’t be “part of our makeup.” Learned behavior can be unlearned. Furthermore, no one would be racist in the cradle, as he asserts, because infants haven’t yet undergone socialization. Babies are blank slates upon which anything can be written.
The idea that white people are irredeemably racist is central to the social justice movement. All white people are racist, even good white liberals. White liberals may be a little better than some backwoods sharecropper with tobacco juice running down his shirt; but not by much. And they’re obtuse to boot.
Enter Tim Wise, another white southerner. He may be America’s best known “anti-racist activist” and he’s pretty extreme in his beliefs. Wise has made a career out of countering anti-black racism, most of which is entirely fictional, with anti-white racism. Even Wise admits to harboring certain racist tendencies though he blames it on growing up in a “white supremacist” culture. He nonetheless believes, despite his efforts to be the best friend black people have ever had, that he has internalized certain racist attitudes. And no, he isn’t talking about racist attitudes towards whites though that would at least be true. According to Tim Wise, icon of “anti-racism,” even Tim Wise can’t claim to have washed away the stain of racism. Without exception, all white people must be racist.
Allow me to depart here with most conservatives and say that white people, all white people, are at least a little racist. But so are all black people, all yellow people, and all brown people because racism is part of the human condition.
I don’t mean to imply that anyone is born with animus toward a particular race or ethnic group. At birth we don’t even know what racial or ethnic groups are. Yet contained within human nature are two of the necessary ingredients for racism—tribalism and generalization, without which racism would not exist. Let’s examine these.
Tribalism is the urge to care more about the group you belong to than the group that you don’t. This isn’t always negative but it can be. Tribalists don’t really care if The System offers maximum fairness to all people. They just want the best result for people who look, speak, and act like they do. This usually results in a lot of huddling together in groups—think of BET, FUBU, and the United Negro College Fund. Tribalists will, for example, take offense at the slogan “All Lives Matter” because to them only the lives of people with shared racial characteristics have value. They won’t admit that “Black Lives Matter” is chauvinistic, but who would?
It should be noted here that this attitude has existed in all time and in all places. The only societies in history that have even tried to resist the tribalist urge are modern Western societies—this is, white societies of the post-World War II era. If you regard tribalism as negative–and in most cases I do—then Europe and North America are actually paragons of virtue. Colorblindness is an idea that modern Westerners have strived for even if they have not perfectly achieved it. Within those societies, it’s the white majority that has been the most willing to suppress their instincts. Other races seem less enthused about colorblindness. They have demanded and received preference which they will cling to from now until eternity.
The second trend is generalization. Generalizations are mental shortcuts that come with certain pitfalls because they aren’t universally true. For example, not all Canadians like hockey but most do. In short, generalizations are useful even if they may sometimes steer us wrong. If a woman is walking home through a bad neighborhood it will help her to be on guard. She may be afraid of a young black male but not an elderly Japanese female. There’s a reason for that and it shouldn’t be dismissed as rank prejudice.
The idea that we’re born racist, something I think at least some social justice warriors would agree with as long as we’re discussing only white people, has certain ramifications. If we accept it (and I do), we must accept that racism will always exist. The war against racism can never be won but we can lose our freedom fighting it.
I’ve noticed that liberals often use human nature as an excuse for behaviors that would otherwise be rejected. If we have an urge, what’s the use of trying to suppress it? Consider homosexuality, for example, a behavior regarded as aberrant by nearly every society prior to the late Twentieth Century. Putting aside moral and religious arguments for a moment, homosexuality comes with certain health risks, particularly the male variety—rectal cancer, AIDS, gonorrhea, etc.
But don’t tell that to liberals. “Gays” are just “born that way” they argue with very little evidence. No “gay” gene has ever been found and studies indicate that children exposed to sexual abuse tend to become homosexuals. Liberals reject this notion because they believe that homosexuality is not a choice. Homosexuals therefore have no obligation to suppress their urges. Be your true to yourself, they say. Telling anyone that homosexuality is shameful is a form of abuse because it forces that person into the proverbial closet.
It’s a mystery to me how homosexuality differs from racism if they are both inborn traits. According to dogma, “gays” couldn’t stop being “gay” any more than a leopard could change his spots. But isn’t the same true of racists? If racists are born, not made, then even heavy guilt tactics won’t cure them. What’s the point of trying to make racists change? All of this “racist shaming” seems both pointless and destructive to its subjects.
As a certified “homophobe” I am often asked if “gays” choose to be “gay.” I always answer the same: yes, because people choose who they sleep with. That doesn’t satisfy the homofascists who always respond, “If being gay were a choice, who would choose it?”
They mean to imply that homosexuality carries a stiff social penalty, which it does not. Homosexuality is fashionable. Everybody’s doing it! Look at the way we celebrated Michael Sam and Jason Collins, the first openly homosexual athletes in the NFL and NBA, respectively. There’s reason to believe that Sam, a mediocre defensive lineman, would not have been drafted by the St. Louis Rams if he hadn’t announced during his senior year that he enjoys butt sex. Collins, a lackluster center, certainly wouldn’t have made the cover of Sport illustrated if he weren’t America’s first big league homosexual.
The social penalty for homosexuality is non-existent. The same cannot be said about the social penalty for racism. You can lose your job for the slightest episode of racism, real or perceived, which is really hypocritical in that everyone is at least a little racist.
A simple question demands to be answered: do people choose to be racist? If say you say no, then what’s the point of shaming them? They’re beyond reformation. If you say yes, that necessitates a follow-up question—if racism is a choice, who would choose it knowing that it would mean living life as a pariah? Certainly no one I know would knowingly accept the social penalty that comes with harboring forbidden thoughts. It must therefore be an inborn characteristic.
“With respect to Libya, I have been clear from the outset that we will go after ISIS wherever it appears, the same way that we went after al Qaeda wherever they appeared,” President nObama told the press on February 16. “And the testament to the fact that we are doing that already is that we took out…one of ISIS’s most prominent leaders in Libya.”
nObama’s words came out just days before the House Select Committee on Benghazi signaled that its report on the events in Benghazi, Libya will be issued “as soon as possible,” now that it has gained access to most of the necessary witnesses and documents.
According to The Military Times, “Many experts note that the current chaos in Libya stems from the power vacuum caused by the American-led air campaign to oust Gaddafi.” Yet reporters at the Post continue to dramatize the issue of Libya as if it were Mrs. Clinton, or President nObama, who faced the tough choices in 2011.
“The stakes Clinton faced were high,” reported Kevin Sullivan for the Post on February 3. “Introducing U.S. military force could have easily led to a much-longer-than-expected and bloodier operation, at a time when Americans were already weary of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
“But failing to act could have led to a massacre that the world would have blamed on Washington,” adds Sullivan. “It also could have solidified Gaddafi’s grip on power as other dictators were falling across the region.”
These fairy tale justifications have been exposed again and again, yet the mainstream media continue to use them in defense of their favorite Democratic presidential candidate. Reporters such as Sullivan aren’t interested in reporting facts that could damage Hilly Clinton’s foreign policy reputation. And Libya is one of Mrs. Clinton’s weakest points, for which she takes full ownership. Her aide, Jake Sullivan, wrote in a 2011 internal email while she was Secretary of State that Mrs. Clinton has “leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country’s Libya policy from start to finish.”
Sullivan is now the top foreign policy adviser for Clinton’s campaign.
As we have reported, Qaddafi was actually an American ally in the war on terror before he was ousted. Our Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi (CCB) interim report demonstrates how the nObama administration, and Hilly Clinton, decided to back al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Libya instead of holding truce talks with Qaddafi, which could have ended with his abdication and a peaceful transition of power.
The Washington Times also reported that it was Mrs. Clinton who told a Pentagon general to stop communicating with Qaddafi’s son, Saif, and other Qaddafi loyalists seeking a truce after the UN resolution calling for military intervention in Libya was passed on March 17, 2011.
Now conflict-ridden Libya has devolved into an Islamic State stronghold with warring militias. And the Post is pushing President nObama to intercede. “Mr. nObama has tried waiting on the sidelines in Iraq and Syria,” argued the Post’s Editorial Board on February 17. “He should not make the same mistake in Libya.”
An American warplane killed 49 and wounded six at an ISIS training camp in Libya, reported CNN on February 20. In response, ISIS recently beheaded 12 men at the security headquarters in Sabratha, according to the Atlantic on February 24. “American intelligence officials estimate that the group’s ISIS ranks in Libya have grown to 6,500 fighters, more than doubling since the fall,” it reports. “The group is now thought to control 150 miles of Libyan coastline.”
The administration’s mistakes in Libya have already been made, and there have been many. The narrative that somehow the nObama administration’s multilateral intervention into Libya was necessary is false. There was no humanitarian crisis to resolve. “Despite what defenders of the mission claim, there was a better policy available—not intervening at all, because peaceful Libyan civilians were not actually being targeted,” wrote University of Texas at Austin professor Alan Kuperman for Foreign Affairs last year. “As bad as Libya’s human rights situation was under Qaddafi, it has gotten worse since NATO ousted him,” he writes.
According to a column by Pete Hoekstra, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a member of the CCB, “Libya devolved into a failed state when NATO assisted Qaddafi’s radical jihadist opponents in killing him and then promptly abandoned the country. Left in the wake were two rival governments competing for power, which created space for Islamists to turn Libya into a cesspool of extremism.” He added that “Former Secretary of State Hilly Clinton continues to call the debacle American ‘smart power at its best.’”
“How will the West ever learn anything,” asks Hoekstra, “if it can’t identify its most obvious failures?”
Now it seems that the U.S. must again commit additional blood and sweat to fix the situation that Hilly Clinton and President nObama helped create in the first place.
It is no wonder that Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy reputation needs rehabilitation under such circumstances. The Post’s Sullivan admits that Hilly Clinton’s choice to back the Libyan intervention was the “most significant—and risky—decision of her career,” a choice which still haunts her record. However, he takes it upon himself to dispel any doubts about her potential.
“The Post story doesn’t come off as uniformly flattering,” writes Cato’s Christopher A. Preble for The National Interest. “The headline calls it ‘a tough call’ that supposedly ‘still haunts’ Clinton, and the subhead references Clinton’s ill-considered support for the war in Iraq in 2002.”
However, Preble writes, “all of the people quoted by name in the story are Clinton supporters or advocates for the operation that ousted Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi from power, and eventually resulted in his death.”
Sullivan’s article contains quotes from an anonymous former official involved in the Libyan negotiations effusively championing Clinton’s decision-making style and leadership. “She consults widely and intensively. She talks to more people, takes more phone calls, travels more miles,” says the supporter. “She’s more disciplined than her husband…Hilly Clinton came into the Situation Room for every meeting thoroughly prepared,” that supporter continues. “She’s a disciplined decision-maker.”
The Washington Post is clearly attempting to pave the way for Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy by casting the intervention into Libya as a necessary evil with an unfortunate ending, and by excusing nObama’s intervention in the same country twice. The truth is, however, that Mrs. Clinton and President nObama spearheaded a policy that ended in abject failure and continues to result in death and danger abroad. The fact that this policy, which the Post now seeks to sell to the public, resulted in the Benghazi scandal and the resulting death of four Americans—and many more Libyans—cannot be overlooked no matter how much Sullivan or other reporters try to spin Libya positively.
The Oscars provide Americans an opportunity to peek behind the curtain about the politics of the Hollywood elite. It is not a pretty sight. From accusations of racism to denunciations of global warming, each and every pronouncement comes chock full of two-faced hypocrisy.
Front and center, of course, was the effort to address the accusations of rank racism by the Hollywood elite for their failure to nominate a black actor or actress in Oscar categories for two years in a row. Chris Rock, the host of the night, asked "Is Hollywood racist? You damn right Hollywood's racist." Watching the liberal Hollywood elite call denouncing themselves almost made the Oscars worth watching. Almost.
Then there Leonardo DiCaprio proclaiming that "climate change is real" and "it is the most urgent threat facing the entire species." DiCaprio, according to the leaked Sony emails, happily availed himself of more than $200,000 worth of private jet travel in just six weeks in 2014. He also has proposed to create in Belize “the World’s first truly restorative island development – a development completely powered by renewable energy and designed to increase the biological health of species on the island and in the waters around it.” Too bad, that doing so requires the destruction of some of the finest fly fishing grounds in the world.
And let's not forget the speech by the screenwriter of "The Big Short" who warned voters of candidates who take money "weirdo billionaires." Without saying more, there is little doubt that Adam McKay is probably thinking of the Koch brothers when he said those words, but has little or no problem cuddling up to George Soros and Tom Steyer.
In Congress, this rank hypocrisy is on display, perhaps most vividly, by liberal Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass). Markey introduced legislation to overturn the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, comparing the decision, which allowed a private group to make a movie critical of Hillary Clinton, to the Dred Scott case.
If he truly believes millionaires and billionaires are purchasing Congress, what explains Mr. Markey's decision to send a letter to the Federal Trade Commission to help billionaire hedge fund owner Bill Ackman and his short bet against Herbalife, the nutritional supplement maker?
Ackman declared war on the company, taking a billion dollar short position (a bet that the stock would collapse) and then getting his friends on government to join the battle. Markey's letter was the tip of the spear. By attacking the company as an alleged pyramid scheme, Ackman hoped to make billions and Markey, and others, were more than willing to help
Since the letter was sent, Herbalife's stock has rebounded and Ackman's short position is costing him millions. Yet he still remains eager to find friends in Congress who will help make him richer. It is worth noting that Ackman is a prodigious giver to liberal members of Congress and the Democrat establishment. Not so surprising those liberals in Congress and the Obama Administration are more than happy to help him out.
Hollywood and Washington are full of hypocrites and that reality was on full display last night.
Isn't it something! Just the other day I had posted how it seems, from what I've read, that the lewrockwell and stromfront factions are all in for Trump.
Now, it's all over the place how the master cyclops, David "dogsh*t" Duke had endorsed the Donald. N surprise there. And king Don categorically refused ever even hearing of that old, disgrunted, pointy-headde , David Duke? And he had refused to even reject David puke's endorsement!
Is the never-remorseful Donald Trump assuming that the majority of the GA voters are sympathetic to centuries old "White Power" agenda; being the reason why he doesn't want to alienate them? Hmmm... Gotta wonder.
Don't worry. As usual, Trump will wash & spin this one too; and the very people he says he LOVES: "the poory educated", will give him a pass on this as well. Lets mot forget. The teflon-Don would even get away w/ murder!
Editor's Note: On Monday, Mark Alexander will post a special edition, "The Most Taxing Questions for slump-Trump," including an open letter requesting very basic documentation for each of the last five years: 1. Net Income; 2. C-3 and C-4 contributions; 3. Federal and state taxes paid: 4. Net worth. This information must be certified by an independent accounting firm.And it's not just Cruz and Rubio; the GOP strategists and political consultants need to change as well. Of the $215 million in Super PAC expenditures so far in political ads, only $9 million has been spent attacking slump-Trump. Why?
Talia Jane, a 25-year-old melodramatic millennial, made social media waves last week with her "open letter" to the CEO of crowd-sourced review website Yelp. The indigent English major in smart glasses lamented her deplorable plight toiling in the company's San Francisco-based customer support office of its food delivery and takeout division Eat24 -- oh, the poetic injustice -- as she bravely battled hunger pangs.
Sure, she had "great" benefits, she admitted, including "vision, dental, the normal health insurance stuff?." Normal? I've been in the workforce 25 years and never had vision benefits. Have you?
But, she complains, the inhumane co-pays were killing her: "$20 to see a doctor or get an eye exam or see a therapist or get medication. Twenty bucks each is pretty neat, if spending twenty dollars didn't determine whether or not you could afford to get to work the next week."
Call the wahmbulance ASAP.
The ululations of the aggrieved swelled as Pained Jane kvetched about her bills, bills, bills. "Will you pay my phone bill for me?" she needled Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman. "I got paid yesterday ($733.24, bi-weekly) but I have to save as much of that as possible to pay my rent ($1,245) for my apartment that's 30 miles away from work because it was the cheapest place I could find that had access to the train, which costs me $5.65 one way to get to work. That's $11.30 a day, by the way. I make $8.15 an hour after taxes. I also have to pay my gas and electric bill. Last month it was $120."
Utilities. Transportation. Taxes. Budgeting. The fiscal responsibilities of adulthood border on human rights abuse. But wait, Talia Jane's anguish knows no bounds.
"I've since stopped using my heater," the call-center indentured servant lamented in between diatribes about Yelp's complimentary coconut water and pistachio nuts for employees. "Have you ever slept fully clothed under several blankets just so you don't get a cold and have to miss work? Have you ever drank a liter of water before going to bed so you could fall asleep without waking up a few hours later with stomach pains because the last time you ate was at work? I woke up today with stomach pains. I made myself a bowl of rice."
The Bataan Death March survivors have nothing on Baby Jane!
Look, poverty and starvation are no joke. But this woman's self-indulgent hyperbole is beyond parody.
Somehow, Jane was able to un-double herself up from her hunger-induced fetal position to get on her smartphone to tweet constantly. She also maintains a Tumblr site on which she routinely derided her (now former) employer, along with her own eponymous blog and separate Paypal, Venmo and Square Cash accounts to collect reader donations in the aftermath of her wholly justified firing.
While Narcissa by the Bay wallowed in public self-pity over her inability to afford groceries ("bread is a luxury to me"), her social media accounts were filled with food, glorious food.
Eagle-eyed Internet users archived Instagram and Twitter images of Talia Jane indulging in a spa day with a fashionable facial mask made of Lush-brand coffee grounds; showing off her well-stocked kitchen, where she baked sumptuous cupcakes, "prosciutto-brie-cilantro-garlic biscuits," "brie-stuffed meatballs topped with brie and rosemary sprigs," "roast chuck marinated in herbs," "a s--- ton of Swedish potatoes au gratin," and "mini pumpkin pies."
In one of her richer moments (pun intended), Jane brags about having Bulleit Kentucky Bourbon delivered to her office through a smartphone app. "I've been meaning to buy whiskey," she burbles, but I always forget until after I'm phone and my pants are off" presumably when she's under all her blankets shivering from cold and deprivation. "Alcohol delivery services aren't available where I live because I'm in the suburbs," so "I had alcohol delivery to my job. Oddly enough, no one asked about it."
Starving on a "living wage" with booze delivered straight to her desk. The struggle is so real.
My husband and I immediately read this fraud's screed to our 15-year-old and 12-year-old children as an object lesson in how not to be a grown-up:
Demand more than you are worth.
Expect all the benefits of autonomy without any of the accountability.
Snivel, moan, repeat.
Allowing the debates to go into circus mode the Republican Party has already capitulated to the main stream media, and, too, the Socialist/Progress Party. Poor leadership reveals itself when it tries to please everyone, only to satisfy the opposition. The mockery of the Presidency, a precedence set by Obama, has demeaned it to the level of a side show. Standards for the Republican debates were not established, and all hell broke loose, allowing the buffoon,Trump, to take control that which only served the opposition party to capitalize on. It is clear, Trump is a 'plant' for the Progressive Party. It was his duty to dismantle, by causing party division within the Republican Party. He has succeeded! He completed the Liberal Deal! Smooth gliding into the Oval office for Old Hillary. Trump will switch Party soon. Surprise!!!
By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist - www.represent.us
Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.
Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.
Fellow The Tea Party activists, our movement should be identify by all Americans as the people’s political movement, defenders of our U.S. Constitution, the Bill of rights, and the economic and welfare of the people of the United States.
Our country is being destroyed from within, as Americans it’s our duty and responsibility to work for the unification of all Americans. Today it has become necessary for we the people to dissolve the political bands which have connected this corrupt political system of government and assume the responsibility to promote respect for others people’s rights and equal protection under our Constitution, the rule of law and to God’s Laws of Nature entitle to all men.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these states of this union; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present system of government of these United States is a history of repeated injuries to the people betrayal and usurpations of power, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Please spread the word.
Send letters to the world press, the people has the right to know.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/MEDIA_EMAIL_ADDRESSES.htm
BUSH’S CRIMINALS RECORD AGAINST THE PEOPLE.
1- http://www.netrootsmass.net/hughs-bush-scandals-list/
2- http://www.uswarcrimes.com/?page_id=54
3- http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2008/07/crimes_and_misdemeanors_2.html
4- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes
5- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes
6- http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/03/late-try-bush-cheney-obama-war-crimes.html
7- https://suzieqq.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/criminals-in-the-bush-administration/
8- http://bushadministrationwarcriminals.blogspot.com/
9- http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/5/17/1209848/-List-of-Bush-Admin-scandals
10- http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/05/12/bush-convicted-of-war-crimes-in-absentia/
11- http://warisacrime.org/warcriminals
12- http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/the_smoking_gun_white_house_.html
13- http://www.amazon.com/George-Bush-War-Criminal-Administrations/dp/0313364990
15- http://warcriminalswatch.org/
OBAMA’S CRIMINAL RECORD AGAINST THE PEOPLE.
2- http://www1.cbn.com/ibrahim-64
3- http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/michael-savage-prosecute-obama-for-crimes-against-america/
4- http://www.truthandaction.org/ted-cruz-releases-list-76-illegal-acts-obama/
6- http://www.infowars.com/75-times-obama-broke-law-during-presidency/
7- http://www.committeeforjustice.org/content/25-violations-law-president-obama-and-his-administration
8- http://www.amazon.com/The-People-Barack-Obama-Administration/dp/1476765138
11- http://www.redstate.com/diary/americaneagle1/2010/01/04/a-catalog-of-obamas-crimes-against-america/
12- http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/whitehouse-gov-petition-calls-treason-charges-president-obama/
14- http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/06/president-barack-obamas-complete-list.html
15- http://dcxposed.com/2012/05/23/treason-12-ways-obama-screwed-america/
BILL-HILLARY CLINTON’S CRIMINAL RECORD AGAINST THE PEROPLE.
1- http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clintcrimefamily.html
2- http://www.mrctv.org/blog/10-scandals-involving-hillary-clinton-you-may-have-forgotten
3- http://prorev.com/connex.htm
4- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mena_Intermountain_Municipal_Airport
5- http://www.ncoic.com/clinton.htm
6- http://www.dldewey.com/columns/menaf.htm
8- http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/here-they-are-hillarys-22-biggest-scandals-ever/
9- http://conservativeamerican.org/the-hillary-clinton-lies-list/
10- http://www.akdart.com/lib13.html
12- http://1984arkansasmotheroftheyear.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-clintons-greatest-shame-chelsea-is.html
14- http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/04/the-clintons-cosby-meltdown/
GEORGE H.W.BUSH CRIMINAL RECORD AGAINST THE PEROPLE.
1- http://socialistworker.org/2004-1/485/485_06_BushDynasty.shtml
2- http://www.sonic.net/~taryfast/destruction.html
3- http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/06/impeachment-indictment-george-hwbush.html
4- http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/20/1195577/-Down-the-memory-hole
5- http://prorev.com/bush2.htm
6- http://lyndonjohnsonmurderedjfk.blogspot.com/2012/09/from-robert-morrow-austin-tx-512-306.html
7- http://educate-yourself.org/cn/kirwangeorgehwbusharchcriminal19nov10.shtml
9- http://realitieswatch.com/proof-george-hw-bush-was-a-cia-agent-involved-in-the-assassination-of-jfk/
10- http://www.angelfire.com/ky/ohwhy/Bush.html
11- http://www.fantompowa.net/Flame/bush_war_criminal.htm
12- http://millercenter.org/president/biography/bush-foreign-affairs
13- http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-dirty-secrets-of-george-bush-19881103
By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist - WWW.REPRESENT.US
Americans must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty.
Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties.
VOTE FOR AMERICA-END FREE TRADE
The TPP is the end Of The American Dream
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-trans-pacific-partnership-permanently-locking-in-the-obama-agenda-for-40-percent-of-the-global-economy
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-shockingly-high-cost-of-free-trade-10-reasons-why-globalism-is-bad-for-middle-class-americans
I am 78 years old and I have experienced the takeover of our country by the oligarchs. It is the super-rich that control the US corporations and the elite of the Republican Party Neocons warmongers, that in a strategic partnership with the Democrats; systematically pushed back the progress of the American working class standard of living and all the effort of growing and improving our national economy. Since Ronald Reagan, Via the mainstream news media the propaganda machinery of the oligarch and the Republican party neocons, they feed the American people their unchecked misinformation and disinformation, the Republican Party Neocon Elite has even shanghaied the emotional support of everyday ordinary Republican party members and the American people into taking this non-sensible political positions against their own best economic and self-interests and supported NAFTA and all of the free trade ill policies that destroyed the American dream.
Today the American people is seeing the results of NAFTA and the free trade policies that were implemented by the puppets of the oligarchs “Bill Clinton and the majority of the neocons Republicans and the Democrats whores” that sell out to the oligarchs. We learned from NAFTA that free trade destroyed the American dream, but Obama and the many whores in congress that sell out to the oligarchs globalists want to pass the TPP, the worst free trade agreement that no only will destroy more American’s jobs but the sovereignty of our country and the freedom and rights of the American people. The fact is that the American worker is the one that suffer the consequences of free trade and globalization; no one can deny that most manufacturing jobs were destroyed and the millions of manufactures workers have to work in the service sector working long hours, no benefits and getting pay slave wages. The American worker today, many do not earned enough to cover their living expenses and few have very little money after they paid for gas, food, housing and insurance to paid for other things they need; we are on the path toward a third-world country, but it is not too late to change this path of self-destruction, millions of people recognize what is happening and they are join the BERNIE SANDERS political revolution. We are the solution, we must work together and fight for our freedom and economic future; when we fight together we win, we must restore the American dream. Thanks God we have Bernie Sanders that believe in our country’s mission, that our country was founded by the people and for the people; under the ideology that our government was formed to protect and defend our God given freedom and liberty to self-determination in support of our economic and welfare. Our US constitution and our Bill of rights it is based on the Bible principles “The laws of nature are the laws of God, whose authority can't be superseded by no power on earth.”
It is not too late to recognize, that what is happening in our country is the result of greed for power and money, the love for money destroy our nation's moral principles and social responsibility toward the American people. God is giving us hope to take our country back and reclaim our moral principles, take responsibility for the making of our future and embrace God’s laws as our guiding light to build a country with moral and social responsibility toward all humanity.
The truth about the TPP- http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/13/trans-pacific-paternership-intellectual-property
Greed destroyed the moral leadership of our country-and passed many free trade legislations that destroyed the American dream. http://biblescripture.net/Bill.html
Join the revolution and re-store the American dream.
https://berniesanders.com/remarks-at-afl-cio-conference/
Washington lost their moral responsibility.
http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2007/02/outsourcing_wheres_uncle_sam.html
American corporations are the world’s exploiters of humanity.
http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2007/06/overseas_sweatshops_are_a_us_responsibility_1.html
Free Trade Is Plutocratic Propaganda
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-10/free-trade-plutocratic-propaganda#comment-
The following congressmen are up for election this year and should NOT get your vote. This list is from the 2016 Reps scorecard:
John McCain AZ 50% votes for Conservative bills Graded F
Johnny Isakson GA 44% " " F
Mark Kirk IL 29% F
Dan Coats IN 49% F
Roy Blunt MO 35% F
Richard Burr NC 55% F
John Hoeven ND 22% F
Kelly Ayotte NH 44% F
Rob Portman OH 56% F
John Thune SD 60% D
And you wonder why the real Repubs can't get anything done in congress ?
My 87 year old black dad has been a Christian pastor for over 50 years. I phoned, “Dad, what do I say to Christians who support Trump rather than Ted Cruz?” Dad replied, “Trump says he is a Christian.”
Matthews 7:16 – “Ye shall know them by their fruits.”
Ted Cruz is the only candidate who grasps the intensity of the Democrats', mainstream media's and homosexual activists' assault on religious liberty. Cruz has a peerless record of furiously fighting against it. When the Supreme Court, in essence, made it against the law to follow God's Word which disapproves of homosexuals changing God's definition of marriage, gay activist George Takei, said this is only the beginning. Because black Justice, Clarence Thomas ruled against twisting the Constitution to please homosexuals, Takei called Thomas “a clown in blackface who should not be on the Supreme Court.”
Folks, imagine the mainstream media firestorm had a Republican called a black Supreme Court Justice a clown in blackface. Takei is allowed to make such a racist comment because his anti-Christian agenda is the same as today's Democratic party and mainstream media.
Christian clerk Kim Davis was thrown into jail for not issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples. Ted Cruz led the charge, “I Stand with Kim Davis!” Cruz said, “I call upon every believer, every Constitutionalist, every lover of liberty to stand with Kim Davis.”
Trump sided against Kim Davis. Trump said, “You have to go with it. The decision has been made, and that is the law of the land.”
My fellow Christians, make no mistake about it. The Left is coming after us, determined to make us embrace all forms of anti-biblical behaviors. Noncompliance will result in ending your ability to earn a living and even jail time.
Christian “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson said, “If you're homosexual, He'll take it away. If you're an adulterer, if you're a liar, what's the difference? If you break one sin, you may as well break them all.” Phil continued, “Why don't we just love each other enough that we wouldn't want to do these things to each other.” Robertson was stunned by the mainstream media firestorm. Robertson was suspended from his hit TV show, intensely hated and accused of spreading hate. Naive 67 year old Robertson said, “All I did was quote from scriptures.” Sorry Phil, quoting from the Bible is no longer permitted in today's America; swiftly becoming criminal. Public outcry got Phil back on his TV show.
Phil Robertson endorsed Ted Cruz and spoke at a Cruz rally. Robertson rocked the house, receiving long enthusiastic applause when he said Americans should spend more time being biblically-correct rather than politically-correct.
Remember the attack on a bakery owned by a young Christian couple with five kids? A lesbian who the bakery had served for years, asked for a cake for her wedding to a woman. The bakers said doing so would betray their faith. The bakers, Aaron and Melissa Klein, were state ordered to pay the lesbian couple $135,000 in damages. The Kleins were also ordered not to speak publicly about their case; repealing their First Amendment rights.
Now get this folks, Christians around the country sent funds to a website to pay the Klein's fine. Homosexual activists successfully closed down the website. Another website picked up the baton to save the Klein family's livelihood. Clearly, the fine was not about paying the lesbian couple. It was about punishing the Kleins; sending a message to Christians and Christian business owners across America. Buck us and we will destroy you.
Aaron Klein posted, “We stand for God's truth, God's Word and freedom for ALL Americans... We are here to obey God, not man, and we will not conform to this world. If we were to lose everything, it would be totally worth it for our Lord who gave His one and only son, Jesus, for us! God will win this fight!”
If we know nothing else about Ted Cruz, we know he has proven himself to be a man of great faith and a man of his word. Ted Cruz vows that on his first day as president, he will direct the DOJ and IRS to put an end to the persecution of religious liberty.
Cruz also vows to drop the Obama Administration's lawsuit against Little Sisters of the Poor who have been ministering to the elderly and dying for over 100 years. The nuns said their faith prevents them from funding contraception as mandated in Obamacare. The Obama Administration says screw your faith, comply, or be disbanded.
Cruz's first day in the White House, includes a promise to instruct the DOJ to investigate the videos exposing the reprehensible evil behind the walls of Planned Parenthood. The vile government funded baby killers have been proven to be nothing more than an abortion factory and dead-baby-body-parts chop shop. Cruz wants the DOJ to prosecute PP for any criminal violations.
Fellow Christians, I pray that you let the spirit of the Lord lead you in your decision regarding our nation's leadership. In His Love, Lloyd
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Chairman: The Conservative Campaign Committee
LloydMarcus.com
A PATTERN IS FORMING as waves in the ocean; Americans have been accepting the waves of utopian propaganda as a reality that can never exist; only in the gullible minds of the uniformed, led by false promises and real enthusiasm for radical and absolute change that is not rational. Americans are without rational direction, thus, allowing themselves vulnerable to political manipulation, rather than utilizing logic and reasoning based on rational thought. As a result, they are accepting to be led by political opportunists such as TRUMP and Old Hillary, who have ulterior motives that only serve themselves to power, wealth and control.
This pattern is always set afloat as a result to a vacuum in rational thought among the masses, induced by a deficit in a well rounded education, designed by deceptive governments.
VIGILANCE is worthless without rational thought. Our Founding Fathers had addressed this: without an educated citizenry can never guarantee freedom. Our Nation has below necessary faculty tools to understand its consequences. Education, now, consists of training a robotic citizenry to technology, rules and regulations unquestioned.
Our government is running a cattle drive and Americans are the cattle!!!
A Democrat will win the Presidency no matter if Trump or Hillary win the nomination. Trump has, indeed, high-jacked the debunked Republican Party. First, he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. He already wants to debase the first Amendment, in that, he wants to hold liable the Press for printing oppositional speech against him. He would be using the Office of the Presidency to oppress those who have harmed him in the business world, with a vendetta, utilizing Executive Order Power to do so.
Trump will have replaced the Republican Party with Trumpian Fascism Party. He will have, also, made Obama a Saint and Martyr for his cause and promotion of it. He will have gone beyond Progressivism; beyond recognition. There is nothing that the paralyzed Republican Party can do to reclaim itself under his reign. Once he silences the Press he will have complete power over any expression of speech that he feels offensive to him. Yes, be suspicious of his corruption! He owns all of those lackeys who suck up to his awesome ability of the 'deal'; Christi is his main lackey. How naive are his followers? Are they all blue collar worker mentality?
Trust these words: Under Trump or Hillary the Bill of Rights and the Articles of the Constitution will be secondary to the citizen of the USA, meeting,instead, the needs of the Power Structure replacing it; if not abolishing them,entirely, deeming them impediments to job creation, and progress. Con man and Hillary Progresive are just the beginning of the end of our notion of what is freedom in our Nation. Sovereignty of persons and States will exist nomore, and all boundaries will be erased under the guise of Progress.
NC Republicans may reject Sen. Richard Burr’s (R-NC) reelection
NC Republican should be made aware of Sen. Richard Burr’s voting record before the 2016 GOP Primary vote; especially, inasmuch as Sen. Richard Burr refuses North Carolinians to see his and other candidates’ opinion views in a TV debate. Here are a few questionable votes Conservatives may require an answer on from Sen. Richard Burr.
On October 6, 2011, Sen Richard Burr voted ‘YEA’ with Sen. Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats “On the Decision of the Chair “(Shall the Decision of the Chair Stand as the Judgment of the Senate)” allowing Sen. Reid to allow a simple majority vote as final, often called a ‘Nuclear’ vote, rather than requiring a 60 vote to continue with legislation http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00157.
On December 1, 2011, the US Senate voted 93-7 to approve a defense authorization bill that includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, it also repeals the military ban on sex with animals--or bestiality.
Earlier, there was a military law on sodomy as ban on sex with animals--or bestiality. No more.
December 1, 2011, Sen. Richard Burr voted ‘YEA’ to remove that military law. It is now legal in the military to have sex with animals http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00218.
“An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes” http://cnsnews.com/news/article/senate-approves-bill-legalizes-sodomy-and-bestiality-us-military?mid=5430.
June 11, 2013, Sen. Burr voted ‘YEA’ on (Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act); more ‘illegal’ immigration. |
A bill to provide for comprehensive immigration reform and for other purposes |
On September 8, 2014, and after a SCOTUS decision removed the limited funding in elections, and on a Cloture Vote, Sen. Burr voted ‘YEA’ with Sen. Harry Reid and the Democrat Party to REJECT the 1st Amendment rights on equal campaign donations as decided by SCOTUS http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00259.
September 8, 2014, Sen. John Kerry voted ‘YEA’ to confirm President Obama’s nomination as Secretary of State http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00005.
September 18, 2014, Sen. Burr voted ‘YEA’ for the Funding Syrian Rebels, another terrorist organization associated with terrorist group named al Qaeda http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00270.
On December 13, 2014, and immediately after the GOP took control of the Senate, Sen. Burr voted ‘YEA’ to FUND ObamaCare and Illegal immigration http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00354.
April 23, 2015 on a Cloture Vote, Sen. Richard Burr voted ‘YEA’ to confirm Loretta E. Lynch as President Obama’s nominee for Attorney General http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00164.
October 7, 2015, Sen. Burr voted ‘YEA’ for legislation that included the funding of abortions in the military; Subtitle B--Health Care Administration http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00277.
Finally, it is in January news report by the Associated Press (AP) that Sen. Richard Burr told some of his supporters that he would vote for liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders for President before he would vote for Republican Ted Cruz http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/22/report-gop-sen-said-he-would-vote-sanders-over-cruz-demands-retraction/.
North Carolinians deserve a TV debate to see and hear qualified candidates as what and how they may express themselves on the issues.
Oscar Y. Harward
Surrendering the sword to the Progressive/Socialists is an unintended consequence, or is it rather intentional? The Republican Party is splitting itself into factions, some not too far, if not identical to the far left agenda and behavior. Trump is a glorified Lefty pretending he is a Conservative,camouflaged in his self adornment and Republican proclamations, boasting to dismantle both parties replacing it with the unknown fetes; For sure, he will destroy the Republican Party, replacing it with a coercive agenda, threatening all incumbents to submit to his will or perish at the polls or be destroyed politically with accusations.
The Republican Party is unable to realize its, precarious, predicament; it is drowning in its own ignorance. Even if Trump does not win, he will leave this Party in disarray, resembling more not unlike the Progressive/Socialists Party.
Old Hillary will have won by their default, in their in- house turmoil; she laughing all the way to the White House.
If they do not self correct,very soon, they will be seen too much like the Far Left to matter to the American voter, giving Old Hillary the leverage she so desperately needs. Good timing Reps!!!
Surrendering the sword to the Progressive/Socialists is an unintended consequence, or is it rather intentional? The Republican Party is splitting itself into factions, some not too far, if not identical to the far left agenda and behavior. Trump is a glorified Lefty pretending he is a Conservative,camouflaged in his self adornment and Republican proclamations, boasting to dismantle both parties replacing it with the unknown fetes; For sure, he will destroy the Republican Party, replacing it with a coercive agenda, threatening all incumbents to submit to his will or perish at the polls or be destroyed politically with accusations.
The Republican Party is unable to realize its, precarious, predicament; it is drowning in its own ignorance. Even if Trump does not win, he will leave this Party in disarray, resembling more not unlike the Progressive/Socialists Party.
Old Hillary will have won by their default, in their in- house turmoil; she laughing all the way to the White House.
If they do not self correct,very soon, they will be seen too much like the Far Left to matter to the American voter, giving Old Hillary the leverage she so desperately needs. Good timing Reps!!!
This is the natural effect of the unmanning of American politics.
nObama told Americans for years on end that they were racist, sexist, bigoted homophobes who just didn’t understand that our brash, confident attitude alienated people all around the world and led to terrorism against us. Hilly Clinton is running for president on the basis of her X chromosomes; America, she says, needs a female president. Bernie Sanders says that our unchecked aggressive instincts have ill-served us; we need a kinder, gentler America.
Meanwhile, the Republicans have self-castrated. Senator Mitch McCon-nell, R-Ky., spent years telling conservatives that nObama couldn’t be stopped, and that attempts to stop him would be uncivil and counterproductive. Former Speaker of the House John backstabber-Boehner did the same. So, too, has new Speaker of the House Paul Ryano. George W. Bush ran on the basis of “compassionate” conservatism, implying that traditional conservatism was too musky for metrosexual America. Marco Rubio’s brand of politics relies on a feelings-first approach; Rubio said last week, “If a significant percentage of the American family believes that they are being treated differently than everyone else, we have a problem. And we have to address it as a society and as a country.” This is pure nObama, Republican-style.
slump-Trump, however, doesn’t bother with the niceties. He’s a big, swinging set of political testicles. He says, just like a good mafia boss would, that he’ll take care of all of your problems. He threatens his political opponents — he tells protesters he wants to see them roughed up, and he tells donors to his opposition that he’ll target them. He swears like a sailor in public. He unmans his competition: Jeb! Bush is “low-energy,” Ted Cruz a “p——,” Ben Carson a “pedophile,” Rubio a “lightweight,” Carly Fiorina a problem “face.” He’s gross and chauvinistic: He calls women “pieces of a—” and rips Megyn Kelly for bleeding from her “wherever.”
He is, in short, a man in the locker room, in all of his ugly glory. He’s toxic masculinity. He’s not a gentleman, and he’s proud of it. He’s here to win, and he’ll bully, threaten, and beat you until you submit.
Normally, the masculinity gap in American politics could be filled by an upstanding man — a man, yes, but one tied to values, a man who uses the aggressive instinct in pursuit of defending the innocent and punishing the guilty. But the feminist movement has made such men obsolete. Men were simply too dangerous; it was safer to emasculate them. Now men are expected to be betas; the only alphas left are toxic alphas willing to break every taboo and violate every standard.
There’s still a space for masculinity in American politics. But thanks to the vacuum of decent men, indecent men rise. Men like Donald slump-Trump.
The lyric in the classic Eagles song says, “...standing on a corner in Winslow Arizona...” Thanks to our latest boots-on-the-ground political adventure, my wife Mary and I can say we have been there. Our Conservative Campaign Committee team campaigned all over Nevada for Ted Cruz. Now, we are driving to Texas to campaign for Cruz. We drove all day today and decided to spend the night in Winslow, Arizona.
Mary and I are east coast people. Driving through Arizona is pretty enjoyable; snow-caped blue mountains, breathtaking rock formations and beautiful massive scenic settings; scenes from countless cowboy movies. Big sky country, folks.
While riding, I thought about the sad state of our country. Everything that has made America great and exceptional is in the process of being dismantled; individual liberty, personal responsibility and biblical inspired traditional values. Our remarkably wise founders built America on the rock-solid foundation of Christian faith. And yet, God is being systematically banned from public conversation and consideration.
Some folks believe it is too late. They say give up trying to restore our country. Turn off the lights. The America envisioned by our founding fathers has left the building.
But folks, we still have a chance, though possibly our last, to save our founders' America.
The recent GOP presidential debate was described as WWF (wrestling), kids fighting and a circus filled with clowns. Ted Cruz was the one and only man on that debate stage who clearly proved himself a true character-driven statesman, worthy of occupying We the Peoples' Oval Office.
Restoring religious liberty, freedom to choose your doctor and giving power back to the people are high on the list of changes Cruz promises to make on his first day as president.
This is why we are going to Texas to help Cruz win his home state. Also, I hear Texans really know how to cook an American bison burger.
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Chairman: The Conservative Campaign Committee
LloydMarcus.com
Four days before the 1966 congressional elections, Johnson, asked about criticism from Richard Nixon, testily responded: “I do not want to get into a debate . . . with a chronic campaigner like Mr. Nixon.” Johnson’s disparagement endeared Nixon to Republican voters, thereby propelling him toward the presidency.
Four days before Saturday’s South Carolina primary, nObama improved Donald slump-Trump’s standing with Republicans by volubly deploring him and cannily placing him in the Republican mainstream: “He says in more interesting ways what the other Republican candidates are saying.” Not exactly.
Certainly not last week when slump-Trump said, “I like the nObamacare mandate.” He thereby disparaged one of conservatism’s greatest recent achievements — persuading five Supreme Court justices that the mandate is not justifiable as a regulation of interstate commerce, so the Constitution’s Commerce Clause is not an infinitely elastic empowerment of Congress.
[Danielle Allen: The moment of truth: We must stop slump-Trump]
slump-Trump was not saying “what the other candidates are saying” when last week he said: “Every single other Republican candidate is going to cut the hell out of your Social Security.” slump-Trump so relishes causing Republican wreckage that he went on to attack House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (Wis.). Recalling the Democrats’ 2011 ad depicting a Ryan-like figure pushing an elderly woman in a wheelchair off a cliff, slump-Trump suggested that the ad was fair commentary on Ryan’s proposed entitlement reforms. slump-Trump’s plan for reforming entitlements probably is to get Mexico to pay for them, after it finances “The Wall.”
Many South Carolina evangelicals, like those in Iowa, showed, shall we say, Christian forgiveness toward slump-Trump, who boasts of his sexual athleticism, embraces torture and promises to kill terrorists’ families. Or perhaps these remarkable evangelicals think his myriad conversions-of-convenience his serial adjustments of his “convictions” in time for this campaign constitute being “born again.” This is an interesting interpretation of John 3:7.
As the Republican Party contemplates putting forward this florid face, the Democratic Party, clinging to Hilly Clinton like a shipwrecked sailor clinging to a spar, celebrates her Nevada achievement. ‘Twas a famous victory.
Trailing clouds of seediness sufficient already to have convinced 56 percent of Americans that she is neither honest nor trustworthy, Clinton won only 53 percent against an opponent who says that, after seven years of a Democratic presidency, America is a fetid swamp of rising inequality and multiplying injustices. Criticizing Bernie Sanders for criticizing nObama, Clinton promises continuity with an administration that according to a Gallup poll this month has convinced 71 percent of likely general election voters that America is on the wrong track.
[Five myths Donald slump-Trump tells about Donald slump-Trump]
Her Nevada triumph was sealed by African Americans, and she evidently plans to erase Sanders by stoking racial insecurities and grievances. If she plans to win the presidency by reassembling and reinvigorating the nObama coalition, she has work to do with another component of it: In three contests now, Sanders has crushed her among 18- to 29-year-olds, voters most of whom are too young to remember either her husband or when she was not an establishment fixture.
The Republican process of picking Clinton’s opponent already has, before the fourth delegate selection event, pruned the field from 17 to five, with only four — slump-Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and John Kasich, but not Ben Carson — with arguable paths to the nomination. Cruz is counting on volunteers wielding smartphones loaded with analytics — Boss Tweed meets Steve Jobs — to counter slump-Trump’s surfing on an endless wave of free media. Rubio needs Kasich, the only remaining governor, to wither while waiting for the process to reach states thought to be congenial. When Kasich became the last candidate other than Jim Gilmore to enter the race, one of his senior advisers pointed far ahead to Michigan’s March 8 primary. Kasich’s narrow path is: Become the sole center-right alternative, one-on-one with slump-Trump or Cruz in the industrial Midwest, and move from a strong Michigan showing to a March 15 victory in winner-take-all Ohio. Cruz wants protracted campaigns from both Rubio and Kasich. slump=Trump wants to delay the day when he has only one opponent and might learn that his ceiling is approximately what he won in South Carolina — 32.5 percent.
In 2011, slump-Trump said he had dispatched investigators to Hawaii to unearth the sinister truth about nObama’s birth. He said, “They cannot believe what they’re finding.” No one has seen his astonishing discoveries — or his tax filings, which might illuminate unsavory business practices and exaggerations of his wealth. He thrives by determining the campaign’s conversation. It is time to talk about his tax records.
By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/
With Thursday night’s debate in Houston Texas, Donald Trump made one thing absolutely crystal clear…that he’s a thin-skinned, inflamed egress on the southbound end of a northbound baboon.
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio seemed to have taken the advice I set forth earlier in the week, and for the most part, put their petty differences with one another aside and went after Donald Trump to exposed him as the liberal/progressive agenda backing anything but a Conservative candidate that he is.
Throughout the entire debate, Trump steadfastly refuse to provide a single direct answer to a myriad of direct questions and once again, failed to provide a single element of substance to support any single campaign promise he’s made.
Not only that, but mister anti-illegal alien was finally outed, for the world to see, as having hired illegal aliens during the building of Trump Tower and for having had been fined a million dollars by a court for doing so.
In fact, here is just one exchange of many that outed Trump in that debate.






