newsmanager@foxnews.com PLEASE EMAIL THEM.
Ask them why they won't cover Supreme Court Hearing Fri. Feb. 15, 2013
THIS WOULD HELP. PEOPLE ARE ALL TALK BUT NO ONE SEEMS TO HELP THIS LAWYER.
She has the proof, stacks of it.
newsmanager@foxnews.com PLEASE EMAIL THEM.
Ask them why they won't cover Supreme Court Hearing Fri. Feb. 15, 2013
THIS WOULD HELP. PEOPLE ARE ALL TALK BUT NO ONE SEEMS TO HELP THIS LAWYER.
She has the proof, stacks of it.
In one of this website’s last mini commentaries about the Obama Benghazi scandal, I stated that the investigation won’t amount to a hill of beans. I still think so. Why would it? Influential politicians who refuse to call out Obama for his unconstitutional usurpation to the office of US president, won’t insist on removing Obama from his White House occupation. They would soon have America to be sacrificed to socialism, Marxism and Islamic influence than to muster some moral courage to insist that the illegal Obama be removed from the White House. [Please note 3rd pic at the end of this article with informational links]
![Obama's Identity lie: He [falsely] claimed to be a Christian to snooker the Christian bloc vote. Here, Obama is wearing a white kufi on his head. Only devout Muslims wear it. This pic was reportedly posted back in 2007 regarding Obama campaigning for Kenya’s Muslim Riala Odinga. See link at the bottom of this page.](http://nathanbickel.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/obamawhitemuslimhat1.jpg?w=380&h=300)
This pic illustrates 0ne of Obama’s identity lies. Example: He claimed to be a Christian to snooker the Christian bloc vote. Here, Obama is wearing a white kufi on his head. Only devout Muslims wear it. This pic was reportedly posted back in 2007 regarding Obama campaigning for Kenya’s Muslim Riala Odinga.
However, it isn’t just the do nothing US politicians who are at fault. It is the voting public. A leader can’t be a leader if he doesn’t have the following. Until more and more Americans refuse to acknowledge Obama as a legitimate US president, he will continue his destruction of traditional, patriotic and Constitutional America. Enabling Obama by accepting him as a genuine US president, only furthers America’s demise. Americans need to wake up and realize that Obama has cheated his way to the office of US chief executive! They need to follow due course and be like some state governors have reported to being doing; – not recognizing and implementing parts of Obama’s signed Obamacare legislation. Americans need to be like some Utah sheriff’s refusing to implement Obama’s gun laws: ........ Continued..............
Please note: For the whole article and informational links, please access its original source @:
Nathan M. Bickel
JG Vibes
theintelhub.com
Oct 11, 2012
A farming family in Letha, Idaho recently had their house raided and were assaulted after a neighbor called the police when overhearing a verbal argument between the husband and wife who owned the house.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oLx1hfMOz14
In any other situation they would have had a simple knock on their door and the police would check in to make sure that no one was being hurt.
However, Marcella Cruz and Michael Gibbons were flagged in the police department’s database as dangerous individuals because one or both of them identified as “constitutionalists”.
Due to this identification their simple domestic disturbance call was met with a full on swat raid, with the officers scouring the house for evidence of Marijuana.
The officers ripped Marcella Cruz out of the house, and had both her and Michael on the ground in handcuffs, with guns against their heads.
The police found an aquaponics system that was growing tomatoes in an upstairs room of the house and celebrated, thinking that they had found a Marijuana grow operation.
Much to their disappointment they were informed that it was obviously tomatoes, since after all, this was a farm house.
In a recording that surfaced after the raid it is explicitly stated that this couple is being targeted because of their political beliefs. The recording shows the following exchange:
“Are you familiar with these guys?” asked a deputy identified in the 911 recordings as “Officer 57.”
“Negative,” answered another deputy designated “Officer 56.”
“I am, and it’s affirmative, there is [sic] weapons,” continued Officer 57. “He is – or at least was – anti-law enforcement. We’ve had issues with him. He’s a Constitutionalist.”
It seems that the only “issues” that they had with him were the ones that were mentioned, his political beliefs, because otherwise Gibbons has a totally clean record.
According to a recent article about the altercation, the only run in that Gibbons has had with police in this area, is when he was the victim of a theft and they refused to help him.
More than a year ago, Marcella contacted the Sheriff’s Office to report that a man calling himself “Greg Hall,” who had lived with them for an extended period, had stolen money and jewelry from them.
Marcella provided me with copies of e-mail messages in which she and Detective Perecz had discussed the theft – including the suspect’s specific location, which at the time was just across the Snake River in Ontario, Oregon.
“He told me that he couldn’t help us, because the suspect had fled the jurisdiction,” Marcella related to me. “But it’s not as if he couldn’t pick up a telephone and inform the Malheur County Sheriff’s Office, or the Ontario Police.
The bogus `domestic violence’ report that led to the raid on our home was originally received by Payette County and relayed to Gem County. It’s not as if these people can’t talk to each other.”
The Families account of the story is confirmed by what looks to be police video, in the video police dont identify themselves before entering the house, and you can see them rush the house like thugs, ripping Marcella Cruz out by her arm and throwing her to the ground.
The brutal treatment she was given by police left her sore and bruised for weeks, which is sadly ironic considering they were called to the house over a bogus domestic disturbance call that was made by a feuding neighbor.
This is just the most recent situation in a string of cases where people have been targeted with extreme force because their political beliefs were flagged in a state database.
The officer who assaulted Marcella Cruz has been identified as Detective Rich Perecz and so far has suffered no consequences for his actions.
If you have any questions or disagreements feel free to email me at jgvibes@aotmr.com
J.G. Vibes is the author of an 87 chapter counter culture textbook called Alchemy of the Modern Renaissance and host of a show called Voluntary Hippie Radio. He is also an artist with an established record label and event promotion company that hosts politically charged electronic dance music events. You can keep up with his work, which includes free podcasts, free e-books & free audiobooks at his website www.aotmr.com .
This article was posted: Thursday, October 11, 2012 at 4:55 am
Tags: constitution, domestic news
The Quran makes it difficult for non-Muslims to have sincere discussions with shariah-compliant Muslims because of a theological rationalization for lying.
Under shariah, lying is not only permissible, but obligatory for Muslims in some situations. This complicates efforts to understand the true nature of the threat – and to have confidence in those Muslims at home and abroad with whom the government hopes to make common cause.
Shariah has two standards of truth and falsehood. In general, the Quran disapproves of Muslims deceiving other Muslims. It declares, “Surely God guides not him who is prodigal and a liar.” Yet Quranic passages and statements attributed to Mohammed in reliable hadiths provide exceptions even to the usual prohibitions on lying to fellow Muslims.
Authoritative classical Islamic texts such as the 14th century Reliance of the Traveler provide practical examples of where lying even to Muslims can be appropriate. Reliance also shows further examples in quotes from Mohammed, one of which is, “I did not hear him permit untruth in anything people say, except for three things: war, settling disagreements, and a man talking with his wife or she with him (in smoothing over differences).”
These exceptions are sufficiently broad to cover most cases in which lying would be expedient.
Shariah demands, moreover, that its adherents lie where it will be advantageous in dealings with infidels whose submission is a Quranic obligation. Consider the legal guidance provided in Reliance. In the Reliance sub-book titled “Holding One’s Tongue,” one finds sections on “Lying” and “Permissible Lying.” These cite the iconic Islamic legal jurist Imam Abu Hamid Ghazali:
“This is an explicit statement that lying is sometimes permissible for a given interest. . . . When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N: i.e., when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is prevent one from doing something permissible) and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.”
An example of the Quranic basis for the shariah standard of lying is: “Allah has already sanctioned for you the dissolution of your vows.” Indeed, in some places, it is Allah himself who is described approvingly as a capricious deceiver: “Say, ‘God leads whosoever He wills astray.’”
Team B notes that the authoritative Sahih Al-Bukhari wrote that Mohammed personally authorized a permissive attitude toward telling the truth: “The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.’”
Besides lying, there is also guidance in Reliance about giving a misleading impression: “Scholars say that there is no harm in giving a misleading impression if required by an interest countenanced by Sacred Law.”
The issue of lying as a morally justified obligation under shariah leads us to another deceptive concept, known in Arabic as taqiyya, that national security professionals must understand in order to combat the enemy more effectively.
We will discuss taqiyya in Part 5 of this series.
http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-4-debating-shariah/
Some idiot gun grabbing congressman said that he didn't need an assault weapon to hunt ducks. This is a tactic used by the left. You may have a better chance of winning an argument if you can control what the question is. The question is not whether or not you need an assault rifle to hunt. The question is why does the constitution give us the right to keep and bear arms.
To begin with, all you need do is read the Declaration of Independence. Which enumerates 27 reasons for separating from England. The King of England: Cut off the colonist from trade with the rest of the world, He would protect British soldiers from punishment with mock trials for any murders which they may commit, He made judges dependent on is will alone for their offices and salaries, For imposing taxes without the consent of the people, he was transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete his works of death desolation and tyranny. And the list goes on and on.
The founders of this country having seen first hand, man's inhumanity against man knew that the God-given rights of the people had to be protected. So not only did they write the Constitution they provided for each individual the right to defend himself and his state if his Constitutional government turned into a tyranny.
When the British sent soldiers to put down the American revolt why do you think they brought muskets? Because that was the cutting edge technology of the day. When the colonists met the the British soldiers on the battlefield they didn't show up with crossbows. They too had muskets. So, if the American people had to defend against tyranny or fend off a foreign invasion and the opposing force is on the battlefield with M-16's or AK-47's what should we have, Muskets? because that's what was available when the Constitution was written? The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is not to have the right to hunt or fish. It is to fight and destroy a tyrannical government, and reestablish a Constitutional government along with our rights and freedoms.
Rodney Heard
Peekskill,NY
Violent jihad dominates the attention of those responsible for national security. But the more dangerous long-term threat, the Center for Security Policy’s Team B report found, is what the Muslim Brotherhood calls “civilization jihad.”
This pre-violent form of jihad, according to the totalitarian ideology of sharia, is considered an integral, even dominant element of jihad.
Team B, which used open-source information to compile its groundbreaking report, Sharia – The Threat to America, takes a look at civilization jihad as part of enemy threat doctrine. Here’s a summary.
While it is true that many Muslims do not follow the directives of shariah, let alone engage in jihad, too many of them provide the proverbial sea in which the jihadis swim. By offering little meaningful opposition to the jihadist agenda, a large number of Muslim communities and nations generally project a tacit agreement with jihadis’ ends, if not with their means.
Under shariah, civilization jihad – a “pre-violent” form of jihad – is considered an integral, even dominant element of jihad that is at least as obligatory for shariah’s adherents as the violent kind.
Such tactics are ostensibly “non-violent” (and therefore “moderate”) not because the Muslim Brotherhood eschews violence out of principle, but because it has decided that this phase of battlefield preparation is better accomplished through stealthy means. Hence civilization jihad can be considered “stealth jihad.”
Civilization jihad is a form of political and psychological warfare that includes multi-layered cultural subversion, the co-opting of senior leaders, influence operations, propaganda and other means of insinuating shariah gradually into Western societies.
The violence is always implicit in the overall strategy (such as that idea that we must proceed with the Ground Zero mosque, lest our opposition incite Muslim violence), albeit held in reserve for the final stages of the offensive. It is the combined effect of the violent and pre-violent strains of jihad that constitutes the most serious threat to America and its free people.
Origins of civilization jihad
We get the concept of civilization jihad from, among other sources, a document that was entered into evidence in the 2008 United States v Holy Land Foundation terrorist finance trial. The document, titled An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group, was written in 1991 by Mohamed Akram, a senior Hamas leader in the United States and a member of the board of directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.
The Explanatory Memorandum (click here for the original document in Arabic) explains that the Muslim Brotherhood-organized “Islamic Movement” in the US is a “settlement process” to establish itself in the United States and, once entrenched, to undertake a “grand jihad” characterized as a “civilization jihadist” mission under Muslim Brotherhood direction.
Specifically the document describes the “settlement process” as a “grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated.”
The Muslim Brotherhood is relying on non-Muslims in America to aid it, usually inadvertently, to destroy America from within.
Subjugation
Dawa, the call to Islam that by Islamic law must precede jihad, is all-too-often dismissed, as are its manifestations under the rubric of non-violent jihad, simply because this kind of assault does not kill. Instead, it intends “merely” to subjugate.
Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, told a Toledo, Ohio, Muslim Arab Youth Association convention in 1995, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through the sword, but through dawa.”
Absent an appreciation of the threat posed by stealth jihad, the pre-violent civilization jihadist is free to proceed unimpeded under the radar in Western societies, infiltrating and subverting along lines specifically tailored to today’s liberal, multicultural-minded non-Muslim populations. It does so in ways that are genuinely difficult to recognize, oppose or counter.
The objective of civilization jihad, also known as stealth jihad, is the same as the violent form of jihad: subjugation of Dar al-Harb (the “House of War,” or the non-Muslim world) to shariah, which would result in the non-Muslim population of humanity being subsumed under Dar al-Islam, or the House of Islam.
Team B deals with the issue at length in its section on the Muslim Brotherhood, because the Brotherhood has the dominant role with respect to the prosecution of the pre-violent form of jihad in the United States and in the West more generally. The insinuation of shariah and its adherents into America’s academic, banking and finance, government, intelligence, law enforcement and military institutions – as well as civil society more generally – is quite far advanced.
Official U.S. doctrine on threat development requires that threat assessment begin with an unconstrained analysis of the enemy’s stated threat doctrine. The first two sections of the Team B report make plain that it is indeed possible to know the enemy and his intentions with certitude.
If adherents to shariah have sworn to destroy us, it is their doctrine that we are required to know. Whether that doctrine is judged by Team B to be accurate, appropriate or even identifiable with “genuine” Islam is irrelevant.
If it can be demonstrated that the enemy refers to and relies on this doctrine to guide and justify his actions, then that is all that matters in terms of the enemy threat doctrine. US civilian and military leaders must thoroughly understand and orient upon this threat doctrine for the purpose of defeating such foes.
Failing to orient an enemy’s self-identified doctrines not only violates our own doctrine on threat analysis but renders us unable to defeat the enemy because we have failed properly to identify him.
Rush Limbaugh said something extremely profound at the end of his depressing monologue in which he declared that there is no resistance to Obama. Rush said sooner or later something will turn it around. It always does.
Well, the time is now and that something is us! We The People in the form of the tea party are still here. Though severely wounded, extremely discouraged, brutally battered, devastatingly betrayed and soundly rejected, we the resistance survived and are poised for battle. What's that line from the pop song? “What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.”
We cried, moped and many in a moment of frustration and hopelessness, temporarily gave up. We are human. Our pain is great. But when the dust cleared, and upon stabilizing our emotions, patriots defaulted back to what motivated them to join the resistance four years ago – love – love for the greatest nation on the planet and a burning desire not to allow it to be transformed into an abomination of the vision of our Founding Fathers. No Mr President, not on our watch!
As a Christian, I believe that as long as we stay faithful to Godly principles and values (Conservatism) we can expect a miracle at any moment. The Bible tells how one day Joseph was hopeless in prison with no release in sight. The next day Joseph was summoned to the King which led to him becoming a ruler, the King's right hand man. With God any and all things are possible.
Also, history confirms that no one knows enough to be fatalistic. From the ashes of the Goldwater campaign came the beginning of the legacy of Ronald Reagan.
After Bill Clinton beat George HW Bush in 1992 there was a sense that Clinton and the New Democrat Party were unstoppable, but it was the 1994 Midterms that saw the emergence of Newt Gingrich and the Republican Revolution that resulted in one of the largest shifts in political power in Congress in our nation's history.
Someone wisely said, “Pray for help, but swim for home!” In other words, along with praying for our nation, the resistance/patriots are organizing, and preparing, everyone doing their part to restore America to the constitutional principles of individual liberty and freedom on which our country was founded.
We at Conservative Campaign Committee have launched our first national TV ad, The Imperial President, which exposes Obama's unlawful tyranny.
Tea Party.net has organized Day of Resistance rallies across America protesting Obama's agenda, Feb 23rd.
God, Guns and the Constitution national town hall meetings are happening across America.
Strategically ignored by the liberal media, a huge Pro-Life rally took place a few weeks ago.
Resistance to Obama is out there folks. Karl Rove coming out of the closet announcing that the GOP is at war with the Tea Party could be a gift from God – serving to fire up demoralized patriots. Mr Rove, if you think the Tea Party was a force to be reckoned with in the past - you “ain't” seen nothing yet.
So yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus (Barack Obama). And yes Rush Limbaugh, there is resistance to Obama/Santa Claus – The Tea Party!
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman, Conservative Campaign Committee
LloydMarcus.com
| Handicapped Woman Refused Smart Meter, Her Power Is Cut |
A handicapped woman in western Ohio had to battle the freezing winter weather this weekend because she refused to allow the local power company to install a “smart meter” on her property. At least, that was until TheBlaze broke the story of this cruel action. Ohio Gov. John Kasich contacted us for more details and three hours later, the power was back. Get all of the details HERE. |
|
Listen to John Guandolo and be prepared to be shocked.
DOES YOUR CHILD ATTEND A SCHOOL THAT HAS A CSCOPE-LIKE PROGRAM?
CHECK OUT... http://www.txcscopereview.com/
Abortion is a total and absolute disgrace. 55 MILLION AND COUNTING. What a National disgrace. What a black mark on the nations history. What a dark night of the nation's soul. When will Americans wake up to the horror and violence of abortion? When will they realize that they have severely offended God their creator and have intervened in his plan of creation? When will their conscience's give them sorrow? When will they realize that they will have to answer to a just God on Judgment day? When will they realize that they risk the possibility of spending eternity in the hell?
What does Saint Alphonsus De Liguroi say about sin?
Saint Alphonsus De Liguroi in his book entitled "Preparation for Death," stated the following in Chapter 26 (The Pains of Hell): "........But all these torments are nothing, compared with the pain of loss. Hell does not consist in the darkness, stench, shrieks, and fire; the pain which constitutes hell is, the pain of having lost God. "Let torments," says St. Bruno, "be added to torments, and let them not be deprived of God." And St. John Chrysostom says that a thousand hells are not equal to this pain. According to St. Augustine, if the damned enjoyed the vision of God, "they should feel no pain, and hell should be converted into a paradise." To conceive some notion of this pain, consider that, should a person lose a jewel worth a hundred crowns, the loss would occasion great pain, but were the jewel worth two hundred crowns, his pain is doubled; and if it were worth four hundred crowns, the pain is still greater. In a word, the pain which he suffers increases in proportion to the value of what he has lost. What have the damned lost? They have lost God, who is infinite good. Hence St. Thomas says that the pain of the damned is, in a certain manner, infinite. This pain is dreaded by the saints. St. Ignatius of Loyola used to say: Lord, I am willing to bear every pain, but not the pain of being deprived of Thee. But, because they live in the midst of darkness, sinners who are content to live for months and years without God do not understand this pain. However, they will know at death the great good which they lose. At its departure from this world, the soul, as St. Antonine says, instantly sees that it has been created for God. Hence it will suddenly rush forward to embrace its Sovereign Good: but, if it be in sin, God will cast it off. At its separation from the body, the soul is naturally drawn to God, but sin drags it away and sends it to hell, at a distance from Him. 'Your iniquities,' says the Prophet Isaias, 'have divided between you and your God.' The entire, then, of the hell of the damned consists in that first word of the sentence of their condemnation----"Depart from Me, you cursed." Go Jesus Christ shall say; I do not wish you ever again to see my face........."
Listen to his radio show by a true conservative who espouses Conservative principles: http://tunein.com/radio/The-Larry-Kudlow-Show-p67495/
I have heard testimony, all that I can stand to listen to anyway, on the Benghazi attack of September 11, 2012 and find it more and more disgusting as each day of “testimony” comes and goes. No one on these “investigative panels” really wants the citizens to know what happened or why it happened. If they did they wouldn’t be asking Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta, and the rest of the regime “explainers” being “called before Congress”.
Read More:
http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/02/the-benghazi-hearings-a-bipartisan-whitewash/
|
http://homeofheroes.com/hallofheroes/1st_floor/flag/1bfc_pledge.html