WITH THIS, DEMOCRATS WE NEED THE JOBS, DO NOT BELIVE THAT JOB RATE DOWN. MANY PEOPLE HAVE GIVEN UP TRYING TO FIND REAL JOBS. DO NOT BELIVE THE JOB RATE IS DOWN. IT WAS HOLIDAY HIREING. VOTE STRIGHT REPUBLICAN.
All Posts (29503)
Sort by
Leaving behind a year of bruising legislative battles, President Barack Obama enters his fourth year in office having calculated that he no longer needs Congress to promote his agenda and may even benefit in his re-election campaign if lawmakers accomplish little in 2012. Obama congress 2012 Absent any major policy pushes, much of the year will focus on winning a second term. The president will keep up a robust domestic travel schedule and aggressive campaign fundraising and use executive action to try to boost the economy.
THIS IS THE ANSWER FROM GOD'S WORD:~......................
I'm not one to belabor the issue; therefore I will let GOD's WORD speak to the facts! In the
book of [I Sam 15:22-23] the scripture reads~ {22} The Prophet, Samuel said, "Which does
the LORD prefer: Obedience or Offerings and Sacrifice? It is better to obey HIM(GOD)
than to sacrifice even the best sheep to HIM. {23} Rebellion is against HIM and as bad as
witchcraft, and arrogance is as sinful as idolaltry. Because you have rejected the LORD's
Command, HE has rejected you! "[1 Sam. 15:22-23] {Today's English Ver.}
I HOPE THAT WE BUILD BETTER DRONES THAT WE CAN CONTROL.
I CALL IT MAKING US WEAK THATS THERE GOAL FROM THE START, CALL HOME OUR TROOPS FROM JAPAN AND GERMANY THOSE WARS HAVE BEEN OVER FOR 60 YEARS. THEY DONT FIGHT THEY JUST HAVE BABYS AND WIFES. AND COST US BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, BUT THE DEMOCRATS LIKE TO SPEND MONEY WE DO NOT HAVE, THEIR GOAL IS TO BANKRUPT US, THEY ARE DOING A GOOD JOB SPENDING MONEY WE DO NOT HAVE, THEY CALL IT BANKRUPTY.
Dear Fellow Patriots:
What follows is a letter that I recently sent to our NM U.S. Senator regarding a request that I forwarded today to our NM Secretary of State requesting that President Obama be removed from the NM 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot:
“January 5, 2012
The Honorable Tom Udall
United States Senate
110 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-3101
Dear Senator Udall:
On or about December 12, 2011, I wrote to you and informed you that there was an issue that I had previously presented to you in the recent past that was currently heating up around our country, which I believed was even more important in size and scope than any other issue that I had previously presented to you because it dealt with the question of whether or not our President was eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our Armed Forces and graciously asked that you give me your take regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue.
In my letter to you of December 12, 2011 I also provided you with what I considered to be a preponderance of undisputable evidence that I believed collectively proved that our President is in fact ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces since ‘he did not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status’ because when he was born in 1961 his father was not a U.S. citizen and therefore he can never be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ as that term was defined by a ‘1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett’ in which the court defined ‘natural-born citizens’ as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’
To date I have not received a response to my letter from your office and therefore, as a matter of courtesy, I would like to now inform you that I recently forwarded the following letter to our NM Governor informing her that I had recently forwarded a letter to our NM Secretary of State requesting that President Obama be removed from the New Mexico 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot:
Letter to Governor Martinez follows:
"January 5, 2012
Dear Governor Martinez:
I wanted to take the liberty of sharing the following email that I recently forwarded to Mrs. Dianna Duran, New Mexico Secretary of State for your information.
This disturbing issue literally keeps me up at night because, after conducting my own extensive investigation and/or research into this issue, I now believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence, which I have shared with Mrs. Duran, that collectively prove that President Obama is in fact ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces.
Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions and/or need any additional information from me regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue.
Thank you for the excellent and professional job that you are doing as our Governor.
May you and your loved ones have a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”
Respectfully yours,
Jake L. Martinez
Email to NM Secretary of State Follows:
January 5, 2012
Mrs. Dianna J. Duran
New Mexico Secretary of State
325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300
Santa Fe, NM 87503
Phone: (505) 827-3600
Fax: (505) 827-8081
Dear Mrs. Duran:
On or about December 13, 2011, I wrote to you requesting that your office provide me with some direction and/or guidance that would assist me in getting President Obama removed from the New Mexico 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud because I now believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence, which I also shared with you in my letter, that collectively prove that he in fact is ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces.
To date I have not received a response to my letter from your office and therefore, as an American citizen of the United States and a registered Democrat voting native New Mexican, I am now writing to request that President Obama be removed from the New Mexico 2012 presidential primary election ballot, since “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status” because when he was born in 1961 his father was not a U.S. citizen and therefore he can never be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ as that term was defined by a ‘1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett’ in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’
This was in fact substantiated when the White House released his ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ on or about April 27, 2011. A copy of which is provided again for your information:
http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
As you are aware, the natural born citizen minimum qualifications are set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V of our U.S. Constitution, along with the ‘Specific Eligibility Requirements and Duties (Section 1-8-18(A) and 1-4-16(B) NMSA 1978),’ which includes the office of the President of the United States, as outlined in the following ‘New Mexico 2010 Candidate Guide’:
https://mylocalgov.com/currycountynm/ShowImage.asp?thumb=0&rowid=1099&show=0
For your information, I would also like to take the liberty of sharing the following information that has transpired since my letter to you of December 13, 2011, which I believe further substantiates and/or supports my above request:
On or about January 3, 2012, Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings refused to dismiss a series of complaints that were brought against President Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 election primary ballot, an action that had been sought by President Obama. He also granted a motion to sever the cases and scheduled a hearing for January 26, 2012.
Source:
Judge denies president’s motion to dismiss challenge to 2012 candidacy!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/open-letter-to-judge-michael-malihi-of-georgia/
Additionally, on this same date an open letter was forwarded to Judge Malihi by an editor of an electronic newspaper, The Post & Email (www.thepostemail.com), who covers constitutional issues and government corruption to express her sincerest appreciation for his ruling to refuse to dismiss the complaints that were brought against President Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 election primary ballot.
Source:
Open Letter to Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia: ‘The Rule Of Law Must Be Upheld!’-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/open-letter-to-judge-michael-malihi-of-georgia/
Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions and/or need any additional information from me regarding my request.
I look forward to hearing from your office regarding this disturbing matter, which I believe is extremely time sensitive due to the fact the 2012 Primary Election Proclamation will be issued by our Governor on or about January 30, 2012, as noted on the ‘2012 Candidate Guide.’
Thank you again for the excellent and professional job that you are doing as our Secretary of State.
May you and your staff have a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”
Respectfully yours,
Jake L. Martinez
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Governor Martinez’s Office Regarding My Email Above:
Thank you for taking the time to share your comments and concerns with my office. A constituent service representative will be in contact with you regarding your issue.
Sincerely, Susana Martinez”
Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions regarding any of this information.
Thank you again for all you continue to do for our Veterans, our state and our country.
May you and your loved ones have a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”
God Bless You and God Bless America.
Respectfully,
Jacobo L. Martinez
Captain-USMC-Retired
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:
Thank you for your message!
I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.
Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.”
Note: Americans are waking up!
Thanks to WND’s un-wavering commitment and fortitude many Americans across the country are starting to wake up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.
Sources:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen
Additionally, Several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.
Sources:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico
Word of Caution: Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.
So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide.
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
Rev. Jerry L. Robertson’s Words of Inspiration
27] "The power and greatness of all the kingdoms on Earth will be given
to the 'people of the Supreme GOD'! Their royal power will never end; all rulers and leaders upon Earth will serve and obey them." (Daniel 7:27) {Today's English Ver.}
The Harbinger: The Ancient Mystery That Holds the Secret of America's Future
Synopsis:
Is it possible... That there exists an ancient mystery that holds the secret of America's future? That this mystery lies behind everything from 9/11 to the collapse of the global economy? That ancient harbingers of judgment are now manifesting in America? That God is sending America a prophetic message of what is yet to come? Before its destruction as a nation, ancient Israel received nine harbingers, prophetic omens of warning. The same nine harbingers are now manifesting in America--with immediate ramifications for end-time prophecy. Hidden in an ancient biblical prophecy from Isaiah, the mysteries revealed in The Harbinger are so precise that they foretold recent American events down to the exact days. The revelations are so specific that even the most hardened skeptics will find it hard to dismiss or put down. It sounds like the plot of a Hollywood thriller - with one exception... IT'S REAL. The prophetic mysteries are revealed through an intriguing and engaging narrative the reader will find hard to put down. The Harbinger opens with the appearance of a man burdened with a message he has received from a mysterious figure called The Prophet. The Prophet has given him nine seals, each containing a message about America's future. As he tells of his encounters with The Prophet, from a skyscraper in New York City, to a rural mountaintop, to Capitol Hill, to Ground Zero, the mystery behind each seal is revealed. As the story unfolds, each revelation becomes a piece in a greater puzzle - the ramifications of which will even alter the course of world history.
More Product Information
Release Date: 1/31/2012
Pages: 272
Binding: Paperback
Print Size:
Dear Fellow Patriots:
What follows is a letter that I recently sent to our NM Governor regarding a request that I forwarded to our NM Secretary of State requesting that President Obama be removed from the NM 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot:
"January 5, 2012
Dear Governor Martinez:
I wanted to take the liberty of sharing the following email that I recently forwarded to Mrs. Dianna Duran, New Mexico Secretary of State for your information.
This disturbing issue literally keeps me up at night because, after conducting my own extensive investigation and/or research into this issue, I now believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence, which I have shared with Mrs. Duran, that collectively prove that President Obama is in fact ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces.
Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions and/or need any additional information from me regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue.
Thank you for the excellent and professional job that you are doing as our Governor.
May you and your loved ones have a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”
Respectfully yours,
Jake L. Martinez
Email to NM Secretary of State:
January 5, 2012
Mrs. Dianna J. Duran
New Mexico Secretary of State
325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300
Santa Fe, NM 87503
Phone: (505) 827-3600
Fax: (505) 827-8081
Dear Mrs. Duran:
On or about December 13, 2011, I wrote to you requesting that your office provide me with some direction and/or guidance that would assist me in getting President Obama removed from the New Mexico 2012 presidential primary election ballot over allegations of fraud because I now believe that there is a preponderance of undisputable evidence, which I also shared with you in my letter, that collectively prove that he in fact is ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces.
To date I have not received a response to my letter from your office and therefore, as an American citizen of the United States and a registered Democrat voting native New Mexican, I am now writing to request that President Obama be removed from the New Mexico 2012 presidential primary election ballot, since “he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V concerning the natural born citizen status” because when he was born in 1961 his father was not a U.S. citizen and therefore he can never be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ as that term was defined by a ‘1875 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett’ in which the court defined “natural-born citizens” as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’
This was in fact substantiated when the White House released his ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ on or about April 27, 2011. A copy of which is provided again for your information:
http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
As you are aware, the natural born citizen minimum qualifications are set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause V of our U.S. Constitution, along with the ‘Specific Eligibility Requirements and Duties (Section 1-8-18(A) and 1-4-16(B) NMSA 1978),’ which includes the office of the President of the United States, as outlined in the following ‘New Mexico 2010 Candidate Guide’:
https://mylocalgov.com/currycountynm/ShowImage.asp?thumb=0&rowid=1099&show=0
For your information, I would also like to take the liberty of sharing the following information that has transpired since my letter to you of December 13, 2011, which I believe further substantiates and/or supports my above request:
On or about January 3, 2012, Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings refused to dismiss a series of complaints that were brought against President Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 election primary ballot, an action that had been sought by President Obama. He also granted a motion to sever the cases and scheduled a hearing for January 26, 2012.
Source:
Judge denies president’s motion to dismiss challenge to 2012 candidacy!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/open-letter-to-judge-michael-malihi-of-georgia/
Additionally, on this same date an open letter was forwarded to Judge Malihi by an editor of an electronic newspaper, The Post & Email (www.thepostemail.com), who covers constitutional issues and government corruption to express her sincerest appreciation for his ruling to refuse to dismiss the complaints that were brought against President Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 election primary ballot.
Source:
Open Letter to Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia: ‘The Rule Of Law Must Be Upheld!’-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/open-letter-to-judge-michael-malihi-of-georgia/
Please feel free to contact me at my home address listed below, if you should have any questions and/or need any additional information from me regarding my request.
I look forward to hearing from your office regarding this disturbing matter, which I believe is extremely time sensitive due to the fact the 2012 Primary Election Proclamation will be issued by our Governor on or about January 30, 2012, as noted on the ‘2012 Candidate Guide.’
Thank you again for the excellent and professional job that you are doing as our Secretary of State.
May you and your staff have a “Happy and Prosperous New Year.”
Respectfully yours,
Jake L. Martinez
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Governor Martinez’s Office Regarding My Email Above:
Thank you for taking the time to share your comments and concerns with my office. A constituent service representative will be in contact with you regarding your issue.
Sincerely, Susana Martinez”
Note: Americans are waking up!
Thanks to WND’s un-wavering commitment and fortitude many Americans across the country are starting to wake up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.
Sources:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen
Additionally, Several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.
Sources:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico
Word of Caution: Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.
So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide.
Continue Reading:
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
It is time for the 'Redeemed of the LORD', to say so. As I have often proclaimed to all who
would listen, since early in the 1990's, the problems that plague our nation, have but one cause!
That my friends is disobedience and rebellion. And we all stand responsible for the state of
our Nation. Long before the beginning of 'Baby-Boomer Generation', the seeds of rebellion
were already planted and thriving in the land.
I'm not one to belabor the issue; therefore I will let GOD's WORD speak to the facts! In the
book of [I Sam 15:22-23] the scripture reads~ {22} The Prophet, Samuel said, "Which does
the LORD prefer: Obedience or Offerings and Sacrifice? It is better to obey HIM(GOD)
than to sacrifice even the best sheep to HIM. {23} Rebellion is against HIM and as bad as
witchcraft, and arrogance is as sinful as idolaltry. Because you have rejected the LORD's
Command, HE has rejected you! "[1 Sam. 15:22-23] {Today's English Ver.}
It does not matter, whether you believe in GOD, nor believe that you have another option.
The fact remains, that we all stand accountable as citizens of this Republic of The United
States. This day, it is time for all of us to repent from being like Samson, and even though
knowing, who he was- < 'a Nazerite' >! He wanted to live like the Philitines and go about
philandering and partaking if all that the world had to offer.
Now is the time for us all to pray according [2Chron. 7:14] "If the people pray to ME(GOD)
and repent and turn away from the evil they have been doing, then I WILL Hear them in
HEAVEN, Forgive their sins, and Make their land prosperous again."[2 Chron.7:14]{Today's
English Ver.}
Now, I know that there will be many that dispute this word, that I have shared! And I'm also
aware, there are still those who want to stone the prophet's. For those, who would like to
have more information, there is fortunately a good source, that I recommend to everyone.
This has just been released into print by a 'Messianic Rabbi ', who with GOD's Help, through
the leading of HIS Holy Spirit has found the truth revealed. Not only does it address the
judgment that has been adjudicated, but also illustrates the truth from scripture and as well
as the true established history of this Republic of the United Sates of America.
The book is 'The Harbinger" , presented by Johnathan Cahn....! Even for the most suspicious
and all the 'doubting-Thomasa's' that find it difficult to accept the real-truth, will find that
they will be riveted to the pages of this book, unable to lay it down until they have totally
examined every last page.
That is the best description that I can offer. But, many of you will be surprised at the facts
portrayed in this book. I encourage everyone to take a good look, and examine yourselves
carefully. My regards,
ALL IN WITH JESUS~ Rev. Jerry L. Robertson
cont'd page 2
In the past few days, President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership have ramped up their attacks on the Tea Party.
In fact, attacking the Tea Party is now the main focus of the Left’s strategy. Here’s what the Obama team said in response to the Iowa caucus results: “The extremist Tea Party agenda won a clear victory.”
Between Christmas and New Year’s Day the Pelosi-led Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out nine emails targeting the Tea Party in their “Defeat The Tea Party campaign.” Here’s what they said......................
- “Tea Party radicals” want to raise taxes
- Republicans are appeasing “Tea Party extremists…”
- “Tea Party Republicans” are on the “attack”….
- The “Tea Party” is “incapable of moving our country forward”
That’s TEN emails from the Obama/Pelosi machine in the past week with one theme -- attack the Tea Party!
DO NOT LET IT HAPPEN HERE WE LIKE THE OLD AMERICA, WITH NO NO CHANGES BY THE DEMOCRATS.
THE TEA PARTY MY FIGURE SOMETHING OUT , LETS HOPE SO. AND SOON.
We are now 40,000 new laws further away from freedom!
Is America better off?
On January, 01,2012 more laws took effect in this country than at any other time in the history of this Republic. The only Main Sewer Media exposure was on, of all places, the Main Sewer National Broadcasting Company (MSNBC)
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
The new laws consist mostly of state passed legislation with California leading the way with over 10% of the new laws affecting everything from education to personal rights:
A law in California adds lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans, persons with disabilities, and others to the list of cultural groups whose roles and contributions to the development of the United States should be accurately portrayed in social science instructional materials. California SB 48
A law in California amends the Fair Employment and Housing Act to add gender identity and gender expression to the enumerated characteristics that require equal rights and opportunities under the law and prohibit discrimination. California AB 887
The state laws passed are again within the Framers of the Constitution intent of the 10th Amendment for states to direct and control their own destiny based on the elected directives of the states voting population. If you don't like where the state is headed you can pack up and pick up and get the hell out before it sinks under the weight of its own stupidity as California, Oregon, Illinois and a few other Socialist states are soon to experience.
What should frighten the hell out of every Freedom loving Red Blooded American who believes in the inherent greatness of this Constitutional Republic is the passing of the following law:
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.
Every Single person who voted for this bill is GUILTY of Treason for violation of their Oath of Office!
Even the progressive socialists at the Huffington Post and the Washington Post and even the ACLU denounced the signing of this traitorous legislation. A breakdown of the bill from E.D. Kain at Forbes.com pretty much summarizes this bill:
The National Defense Authorization Act is the Greatest Threat to Civil Liberties Americans Face
An excerpt from that article and a brief breakdown on this legislation from the above article in Forbes is below.
"Over at Wired, Spencer Ackerman gives us the long and short of things:
There are still changes swirling around the Senate, but this looks like the basic shape of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. Someone the government says is “a member of, or part of, al-Qaida or an associated force” can be held in military custody “without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.” Those hostilities are currently scheduled to end the Wednesday after never. The move would shut down criminal trials for terror suspects.
But far more dramatically, the detention mandate to use indefinite military detention in terrorism cases isn’t limited to foreigners. It’s confusing, because two different sections of the bill seem to contradict each other, but in the judgment of the University of Texas’ Robert Chesney — a nonpartisan authority on military detention — “U.S. citizens are included in the grant of detention authority.”
An amendment that would limit military detentions to people captured overseas failed on Thursday afternoon. The Senate soundly defeated a measure to strip out all the detention provisions on Tuesday.
So despite the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a right to trial, the Senate bill would let the government lock up any citizen it swears is a terrorist, without the burden of proving its case to an independent judge, and for the lifespan of an amorphous war that conceivably will never end. And because the Senate is using the bill that authorizes funding for the military as its vehicle for this dramatic constitutional claim, it’s pretty likely to pass.
I seriously don’t care if you’re a liberal or a conservative or a libertarian or a Zen anarchist. So long as you aren’t Carl Levin or John McCain, the bill’s architects, you can join the Civil Liberties Caucus. Spencer writes:
Weirder still, the bill’s chief architect, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), tried to persuade skeptics that the bill wasn’t so bad. His pitch? “The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States,” he said on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill would just let the government detain a citizen in military custody, not force it to do that. Reassured yet?
Civil libertarians aren’t. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) said it “denigrates the very foundations of this country.” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) added, “it puts every single American citizen at risk.”
E.D. summarizes it well with this statement:
"So much for innocent until proven guilty. So much for limited government. What Americans are now facing is quite literally the end of the line. We will either uphold the freedoms baked into our Constitutional Republic, or we will scrap the entire project in the name of security as we wage, endlessly, this futile, costly, and ultimately self-defeating War on Terror."
Here is the senatorial roll call for the voting on HB: 1540
-The Roll Call of Honor - Senators Who Voted Against Imprisonment Of Americans Without Charge:
Senator Benjamin Cardin, Senator Thomas Coburn, Senator Mike Crapo, Senator Jim DeMint, Senator Richard Durbin, Senator Al Franken, Senator Tom Harkin, Senator Mike Lee,Senator Jeff Merkley, Senator Rand Paul, Senator James Risch, Senator Bernard Sanders,Senator Ron Wyden
- The Roll Call of Shame -
Senators Who Voted In Favor Of Imprisonment Of Americans Without Charge:
Daniel Akaka, Lamar Alexander, Kelly Ayotte, John Barrasso, Max Baucus, Mark Begich,Michael Bennet, Jeff Bingaman, Richard Blumenthal, Roy Blunt, John Boozman, Barbara Boxer, Sherrod Brown, Scott Brown, Richard Burr, Maria Cantwell, Thomas Carper, Robert Casey, Saxby Chambliss, Daniel Coats, Thad Cochran, Susan Collins, Kent Conrad, Chris Coons, Bob Corker, John Cornyn, Michael Enzi, Dianne Feinstein, Kirsten Gillibrand, Lindsey Graham, Charles Grassley, Kay Hagan, Orrin Hatch, Dean Heller, John Hoeven, Kay Hutchison, James Inhofe, Daniel Inouye, Johnny Isakson, Mike Johanns, Tim Johnson, Ron Johnson, John Kerry, Mark Kirk, Amy Klobuchar, Herb Kohl, Jon Kyl, Mary Landrieu, Frank Lautenberg, Patrick Leahy, Carl Levin, Joseph Lieberman, Richard Lugar, Joe Manchin,John McCain, Claire McCaskill, Mitch McConnell, Robert Menendez, Barbara Mikulski, Lisa Murkowski, Patty Murray, Bill Nelson, Ben Nelson, Robert Portman, Mark Pryor, Jack Reed,Harry Reid, Pat Roberts, John Rockefeller, Marco Rubio, Charles Schumer, Jeff Sessions,Jeanne Shaheen, Richard Shelby, Olympia Snowe, Debbie Stabenow, Jon Tester, John Thune, Pat Toomey, Mark Udall, Tom Udall, David Vitter, Mark Warner, Jim Webb, Sheldon Whitehouse, Roger Wicker
Here is the link to Congressional roll call and vote ( I need room for my rant! ) http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2011-932
This is socialist totalitarianism and is a direct violation of our Constitution and their oath of office and is sedition and treason by any name or deed. And their "good intentions" have paved this Republics road to hell by giving this Marxist tyrant occupying our highest office the last tool needed to end our Liberties as defined by the Bill of Rights.
Benjamin Franklin said: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty"
Thomas Jefferson said:“Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
And my favorite Jefferson quote:
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
I have quoted the opening of The Declaration of Independence on numerous occasions for a reason, it still speaks the truth as loudly today as it did 235 years ago. The Socialist progressive ruling class elites have ignored it and us for 145 years now, ramming their agenda down our throats. It ends now or never!
We are truly at the precipice where all other Republics in mans collective history have fallen apart, from ancient Greece to post WW1 Germany and the Wiemar Republic. The Constitution that formed the backbone of this Republic and the foundation of our Liberties has been assaulted by every party elected and rendered null and void by this Administration and the supporting cast identified above.
They are all as culpable and all guilty of treason!
It is time to throw off these despots and return to a free and Represented form of Government of the people, by the people and for the people before it does perish from this earth!
In our ever diminishing Freedom,
Dr. Keith C. Westbrook Ph.D.
the U.S. only needs one large military in Israel for defence in middle east, the U.S. has nuke subs off the coast of Korea. this is aa we need in these areas. bring rest of military home. using these military men & women thats home set up military posts on our borders. this would stop 100% of drugs & illegals coming,& 100% of money & guns from going to Mexico. ASAP
TEA PARTY CONADATES MAY ALSO GET TO GETHER.
OORAH!!
Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On January 3, 2012:
“Others, including top constitutional expert Herb Titus, contend that the term “natural-born citizen,” which is not defined in the Constitution, would have been understood when the document was written to mean the offspring of two U.S. citizens. That argument is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision
Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father, as identified on the “Certificate of Live Birth” image released by the White House, was a foreign national who came from Kenya to study in the U.S. and never was a citizen.
The ruling came today from Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings.
In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.
While Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had argued that the requirements didn’t apply to candidates for a presidential primary, the judge said that isn’t how he reads state law.
“Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this court finds that the cases cited by [Obama] are not controlling. When the court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the ‘first step … is to examine the plain statutory language,” the judge wrote. “Section 21-2-1(a) states that ‘every candidate for federal and state office’ must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary.”
The decision from Malihi came as a result of a series of complaints that were consolidated by the court. They were brought against Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 election primary ballot by David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by attorney Orly Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield.
The judge’s decision was to refuse to dismiss the complaints, an action that had been sought by Obama. He also granted a motion to sever the cases, and he scheduled a hearing at 9 a.m. on Jan. 26 for the complaint brought by Weldon. Following immediately will be hearings for the cases brought by Swensson and Powell, and the issue raised by Farrar, Lax, Judy, Malaren and Roth will be third.
Malihi’s ruling said: “The court finds that defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
There are similar challenges to Obama’s 2012 candidacy being raised before state election or other commissions in Tennessee, Arizona and New Hampshire as well.
Taitz told WND she will present the decision to a court in Hawaii, where she is arguing to have access to Obama’s original birth documentation as it exists in the state, which for many years allowed relatives of babies to simply make a statement and register a birth, even though the child may not have been born in Hawaii.
Irion had argued in his opposition to Obama’s demand to dismiss the concerns that, “The only fact relevant to this case is the fact that the defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen. This fact has been repeatedly documented and stated by the party opponent, defendant Obama. This fact is also evidenced by plaintiff’s exhibit 6, previously submitted with plaintiff’s pre-trial order, and apparently authenticated by defendant’s citation to this exhibit in defendant’s ‘Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute,’ number 7.
“The lengths to which the defendant goes in order to avoid the one relevant fact is telling. The defendant asks this court to interpret Georgia election code in a way that leaves the code in conflict with itself, goes against the plain language of the law, leaves the law without meaning, and conflicts with common sense. He then cites freedom-to-associate precedent to support an assertion that has never been supported by such precedent, and which would nullify election codes in several states. All of these arguments are futile attempts to distract from the undeniable conclusion: Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of president of the United States,” Irion wrote.
He continued, “It is true that some states lack election codes authorizing any state officials to screen candidate selections from political parties. In these states political parties have essentially unfettered authority to determine which candidates appear on ballots. However, these instances represent decisions of the states to not screen candidates. It is the states’ right to decide how to administer its elections. The fact that some states have decided to not protect their citizens from unqualified candidates does not mean that other states don’t have the right to screen candidates. It simply means that some states have left the screening to the political parties.
“Georgia has determined that it is in the best interest of its citizens to screen candidates prior to placement on the ballot.
“Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, the defendant can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court. Therefore, the defendant cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of president. See U.S. Const. Art. II Section 1.5 Georgia election code requires such a candidate to be stricken from any Georgia ballot.”
The U.S. Supreme Court opinion cited is Minor v. Happersett from 1875. It includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Irion said the goal would be an injunction that would deprive Obama of Democratic Party certification.
“Without such certification from the party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election,” his organization said in an announcement when the cases were launched.
Liberty Legal said it is not addressing Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate.
“These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” the group said.
WND has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into whether Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012. A full report is expected within weeks.
The White House in April released an image of a “Certificate of Live Birth” from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama’s claim that he was born in the state. The White House has not addressed the questions raised by Obama’s father’s nationality. In addition, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated the document image appears to be a forgery.
The image that the new lawsuits contend is irrelevant:
http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.
“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”
If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.
“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Open Letter to Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia: ‘The Rule Of Law Must Be Upheld!’
Right ON!
Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On January 3, 2012:
“January 3, 2012
Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi
Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings
230 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 850
Atlanta, GA 30303
Dear Judge Malihi:
I am editor of an electronic newspaper, The Post & Email (www.thepostemail.com) which covers constitutional issues and government corruption, and I am writing to express my sincerest appreciation for your ruling today which supported Georgia law O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a) in favor of a voter’s right to challenge the eligibility of any candidate for public office.
For more than three years, a debate has raged as to whether or not the man who occupies the White House is eligible to serve as President and commander-in-chief. The questions surrounding his eligibility do not have to do with the number of years he has resided in the United States nor his age, but rather, the “natural born Citizen” requirement expressed in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
There are questions about whether or not a person born to a father who was not an American citizen can be considered “natural born” and whether or not Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims. There are questions about whether or not birthplace is a determining factor for “natural born” citizenship or if it is something else altogether.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear all challenges to Obama’s eligibility on the merits, the American people have been forced to live under the exigencies of a constitutional crisis since the 2008 election. No public servant in any branch of government has upheld his or her oath and commenced scrutiny of the meaning of the “natural born Citizen” clause in relation to Obama’s background. The legislative, judicial and executive branches of government at every level have failed in their duty to their constituents, instead issuing purposely-deceitful form letters, relying on faulty information which they have repeated ad nauseum, and denying U.S. military members discovery so that they might know that the orders they have received are legally issued.
The Congressional Research Service has published four memos to members of Congress which obfuscate and even omit relevant parts of law cases which directly impact whether or not Obama is eligible for the position he holds. The U.S. Justice Department has managed to have all cases brought to obtain the truth dismissed on technicalities rather than simply presenting the evidence. It is now clear that our government is perpetuating a charade of mammoth proportions while holding the American people hostage, not unlike that which catapulted the 13 colonies into revolution in 1776 and eventual independence from Great Britain.
The Framers of the Constitution specifically included the term “natural born” for the office of President to indicate a higher level of qualification than simply “citizen.” Originally, they had used the term “citizen” but changed it after considering John Jay’s letter to George Washington cautioning that the highest office in the land required absolute allegiance to the new nation.
In order for our state and federal governments to operate properly, those elected to serve must respond to those who placed their trust in them. For more than three years, millions of Americans have asked questions about Obama’s eligibility and been rebuked, ridiculed, rebuffed, ignored, or lied to by their representatives. It is a fact that the term “citizen” is not the same as “natural born Citizen,” yet our elected representatives would have us believe that their meanings are identical. Judges have used the “no standing” excuse myriads of times rather than hear a case on the merits, whether out of cowardice, fear, lack of principle, or perhaps something more sinister.
True statesmen and public servants are very hard to find in today’s America, and I believe it is accurate to state that confidence in our government is dangerously low.
The U.S. military has a right to know if its commander-in-chief is eligible to issue orders. The American people have a right to know if the President has foreign allegiances which affect his ability to make decisions in the best interests of their country. Because of your decision issued today, perhaps we will finally have that opportunity, and for that, I thank you.
During a time when morality, ethics, high standards and doing what is right are rare things, my deepest respect is extended to you, sir, for reading the law as it is stated rather than making excuses for allowing this horrendous situation to continue. There is an abundance of evidence that many, if not most, judges in this country today issue decisions which are not based on the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, but rather, on a whim, a political viewpoint, or worse, a bribe. For example, if one examines the judiciary in Monroe County, TN, it becomes obvious that our founding documents have not seen the light of day there in a very long time, and the rule of law is nonexistent. This is what all of America will become if her laws are not enforced.
When we know for a fact whether or not Obama is eligible, the outcome will be dealt with and the nation can begin to heal from the tremendous conflict which has torn it asunder for so long. Constitutional eligibility is not a Democrat or Republican issue; it is a fundamental constitutional issue which must be addressed. I believe that today’s decision was the first step in that direction.
Very truly yours,
Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email
editor@thepostemail.com
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT 06076”
Source:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/open-letter-to-judge-michael-malihi-of-georgia/
II. Lawmakers: Obama ballot challenge unfairly denied!
Right ON!
Posted on Concord Monitor-By Maddie Hanna / Monitor staff-On January 4, 2012:
“New Hampshire election law officials previously rejected their request to remove President Obama’s name from the ballot in advance of next week’s presidential primary, but that hasn’t stopped several state representatives, who yesterday presented what they said was proof that officials had unfairly denied their challenge to the president’s citizenship.
“Our complaint was denied, but there appears to be an inconsistency in the process of the challenge,” said Rep. Larry Rappaport, addressing several reporters and a group of supporters at a press conference called on the eve of the new legislative session. The lawmakers demanded an investigation into Obama’s eligibility to appear on the state’s primary ballot.
In a new twist on the challenge made in November, when California attorney Orly Taitz appeared before the state Ballot Law Commission to question the veracity of Obama’s birth certificates and Social Security number, Rappaport and other Republican representatives - including Lucien and Carol Vita, Harry Accornero and Laurie Pettengill - say the New Hampshire secretary of state’s office has been inconsistent in evaluating whether candidates meet the citizenship requirement established by the U.S. Constitution.
The representatives - who say Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen because his father was Kenyan - cite two instances from 2007 and 2011 in which prospective presidential candidates were told by the secretary of state’s office they had to be natural-born citizens to appear on the ballot. They see a discrepancy between those actions and statements made during the November ballot law hearing by a representative of the secretary of state’s office, which said its purview was restricted to ensuring that candidates properly filled out their paperwork and paid the requisite filing fee.
Given the precedent for denying a candidate based on citizenship, “we believe the secretary of state should launch an investigation,” Rappaport said. He also filed an affidavit yesterday morning with the state attorney general’s office describing a conversation he said he and the Vitas had in 2009 with Attorney General Michael Delaney, who told them Obama’s citizenship was a question for the federal government and “refused to investigate,” Rappaport said.
He and other supporters seemed to believe that giving the office that affidavit would lead to action. “They’re going to be forced to do something about it, an obstruction of justice, now that they’ve been served with that information,” said Mark Rossetti, a Manchester man who attended and said he helped organize the press conference.
But the attorney general’s office doesn’t plan to respond. “There’s no request in it,” said Associate Attorney General Richard Head, when asked about the affidavit yesterday. “I honestly can’t figure it out.”
Secretary of State Bill Gardner, meanwhile, said the examples cited by the representatives had far different circumstances than the challenges to Obama’s eligibility. In the first situation, an Egyptian man who filed a declaration of candidacy in 2007 was disqualified after the man acknowledged he wasn’t a natural-born citizen.
But the office didn’t learn that as the result of an investigation, Gardner said. He couldn’t remember how it came to his office’s attention that the man was Egyptian, but when it did, the office called the man, and he said he didn’t realize citizenship was a requirement, Gardner said.
In the second example, which happened in 2011, a man wrote to Gardner’s office saying he met all the constitutional requirements to become president - except for being a natural-born citizen, Gardner said. The man had filed a federal lawsuit asking a court to overturn that requirement.
Assistant Secretary of State Karen Ladd sent the man a letter the next day saying the office would not accept a filing for a person who is not a natural-born citizen.
“If the person admits it, then we can take you off the ballot,” Gardner said. “But if you don’t admit it, we don’t investigate. We don’t deal with Social Security or try to find out. We’ve never done that.”
The state Ballot Law Commission is charged with addressing challenges to a candidate’s eligibility, but the complaint that was filed by Taitz and backed by the state representatives alleged criminal activity, which is beyond the commission’s authority to decide, Gardner said.
Head said his office had received a request for a criminal investigation of Obama, “which we declined to do.” He said complaints about the qualifications of a sitting U.S. president should be handled by Congress, and the attorney general’s office would not be investigating questions about Obama’s eligibility.
Representatives at yesterday’s press conference repeatedly tried to distance themselves from the “birther” movement. They are “in no way making a consideration about where he was born,” Rappaport said - and described their concerns as constitutional and nonpartisan in nature.
But state Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley, who attended the event, disagreed with that characterization.
“There’s no legitimate Democrat certainly north of the Mason-Dixon Line that is involved in any way with this,” Buckley said.”
- Maddie Hanna can be reached at 369-3321 or mhanna@cmonitor.com.
Source:
III. Video: Press Conference with New Hampshire Representatives Regarding Obama Ballot Access Challenge and Fraud!-Posted on YouTube.com-By bikerbillnh-On January 3, 2012:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OR__vYime8
IV. BREAKING!!! Georgia Court to Hear Natural Born Citizen Case vs Obama!-Posted on The National Patriot-By Craig Andresen-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=3722
V. SHERIFF JOE TARGETED FOR OUSTER: ‘Faces ‘resign now’ campaign as Cold Case Posse prepares Obama eligibility report!’-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/sheriff-joe-targeted-for-ouster/
VI. Video: Arpaio Slaps Down Critics Who Tell Him to Step Down!-Posted on YouTube.com-By abc15com-On December 29, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a2Fz5513gg&feature=player_embedded#
Americans are waking up!
Thanks to WND’s un-wavering commitment and fortitude many Americans across the country are starting to wake up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.
Sources:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen
Additionally, Several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.
Sources:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico
Word of Caution: Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.
So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide.
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
I KNOW THE TEA PARTY DOES NOT LIKE THE WAY IT WENT MITT A MODERT.
FINALLY! Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. will have her day in court! On Jan. 26, the court will hear two atty.s here in Georgia AND Dr. Taitz as they present evidence regarding Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot here for the 2012 election. Obamalinsky had filed a motion to dismiss, and the judge TURNED IT DOWN. For Orly's take on this, http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29976
For those of you who listened in on Tea Party Radio a few weeks ago, Dr. Taitz joined us on the program and this was one of the topics of discussion. Go to the link above for more detailed information from Dr. Taitz herself.
Tune in tomorrow, Wednesday, Jan. 4, for Tea Party Radio where we have as our featured guest conservative columnist Mychal Massie. He will be joining us @ 9 pm EST and we will be discussing his latest observations posted on World Net Daily, and his blog @ http://mychal-massie.com/premium/
With your continuing participation and voice, we can and will make a difference!
All the possessions we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly as a man must work to appreciate the value of life. Not only the value of his own life but that of others. Heaven alone knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if LIFE, LIBERTY and FREEDOM should not be highly rated.
What does God think about where we as a nation place the value of life, liberty (freedom) and the pursuit of happiness today?
From sea to shining sea as a nation we have been richly blessed by the Lord God Almighty. He has shown us many times that everything we have is provided by Him and that we are in control of none of it. Any time He wants he can take it all away. We are his people and yet we run from doing His will and seeking to bless Him.
Look back in history to the times the future of our nation was on the line. Times like the revolutionary war, the civil war, WWI and WWII, the great depression, the sixties, 9-11, Katrina, and the financial crash of ’08 we should ask ourselves why would God let this happen to his people. Why would He allow the Islamic wars today?
The answer is God is in control He uses these times of trials and tribulations to purify us. He is doing a good work in us to clarify, our view on life, our rules, our regulations and how we relate to one another. God controls our destiny, as a nation we can follow Him in faith as the founders did and receive His continued blessings. If we chose not to follow Him He has other options.
We cannot deny that we are a Christian nation as some would like. To do so is to invite the wrath of God, for it is in times of affliction that people will earnestly seek Jesus Christ. They must come to the point they realize that He is in control of everything; nothing is outside of His sovereignty.
If we seek Him as a nation He will guide us and give us strength to will and to work for His good pleasure and we will find in doing so that we are richly blessed and provided for in ways that do not fail.
The question is what more does God have to do to get our attention? What is next on the road traveled by the prodigal son that we seem to be following? What will it take to purify our collective conscience to the point that we seek to find acceptance in our father’s love? How low must we go to become humble and seek God's forgiveness and return from our evil ways? Must we return to the captivity of Egypt?
As a nation each crisis we face when viewed in the passage of time has served as a blessing to the nation as a whole drawing us closer as a people and closer to God. Our greatest leaders have come in difficult times when they have recognized their dependence on God.
Jesus Christ is the ultimate blessing and leader our heavenly father has bestowed upon us, GOD himself in human flesh, who came and died to take the punishment for our sins which bankrupt our souls and left us questioning why these disasters happen to us. All we have to do as a Nation is cry out to Him and admit our guilt and once again as history has shown, He will bless his people. His grace covers all.
Where do we place our faith? In our government, may it never be. Spending all that fiat money on old technologies like trains, obsolete power distribution systems, dysfunctional over crowded roadways, social security and a socialist medical insurance system, will not buy security. In GOD we trust is printed on the United States dollar for a reason. GOD is in charge of everything and we need not worry about tomorrow; for tomorrow will care for itself. We should place our faith in GOD.
We could be on the cusp of one of the most dramatic technological, social and environmental transformations ever undertaken. As a nation we are the envy of the world.
We have the opportunity to build entirely new information, manufacturing and transportation economies which will create a foundation not only for our country to build upon but which can also inspire the world to reach new heights.
Are we ready to lead the world? No. The pervasive dissolution of our culture due to the lack of moral principles will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the radical Muslim enemy who stands ready to fill the void.
Without common integrity and virtue, we appear to be ready to surrender our liberties to either the highest bidder or the most secretive invader.
We have totally forgotten that "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever."- Thomas Jefferson was correct!
Have we forgotten that the basis of our country is on the Bible, the perfect law, the law of Liberty?
The Word of God is the means of regeneration, a mirror reflecting man's defects, the ethical guide for Christian living, and the standard for judgment. The Law serves as a tutor to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. As such one should expect that when the Bible is rejected as a trusted source of wisdom and living principles all liberty will be lost. Because where there is no God there can be no freedom, liberty or constitutional law. When man becomes the ultimate authority, there is no respect for God or fellow man. Everyone acts on behalf of their own good thus secular Humanism, where man is god, becomes the religion of the land.
America, consider your ways, as a people you are looking for government to provide what God has withheld. As a nation we have turned our backs on Him and tried to be our own provider. Frustration and futility are the corrective disciplines of God.
Who is left among us who saw the country in its former glory? How do you see it now? Does it not seem to you like nothing in comparison?
Even in today's circumstances the Lord of hosts, says take courage and work for "I am with you;--- My Spirit is abiding in your midst; do not fear."
The Spirit of the Lord is with us when we follow Him in wholehearted obedience. We have the reassurance of the empowerment of the Spirit when we choose to work with Him on the building of His house here on earth.
We cannot provide a rebirth of individual virtue based on moral character, only God can stir up the spirit of the remnant of His people still living in the land.
Holiness characterizes the entire life of God's people- private, personal, public, cultural and as a nation.
The Spirit comes not only to renew human life from within but also this sanctifying renewal spreads to the full range of human activities and the society at large. There is no limit to the operation of the Holy Spirit!
Hence we should be humble and pray for the renewal of the Spirit in America for when we are unified in Spirit with God all things are possible through Him. Men are imperfect and power corrupts. It is only with humility before God that we learn to lead, and through knowledge of our ignorance that we learn to seek the truth.
God specifically says that "If My people who are called by My name humble them-selves and pray, and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." "but if you turn away and forsake My statutes and My commandments which I have set before you and shall go and serve other gods and worship them, then I will uproot you from My land which I have given you, -----and everyone who pasted by it will be astonished and say, Why has the Lord done thus to this land and to this house?" and They will say why have you despised the word of the Lord, the God of your fathers, by doing evil in His sight? Why have you removed yourself from God's blessings by totally disregarding His commands, even removing them from the court houses of your land?
Wither we choose to try and follow the Ten Commandments or totally remove them from our society God still has a purpose and a calling for this nation. Which one is it? That we should be known as a former Christian nation that was once the greatest nation on earth with intelligent strong and wealthy people until they turned their backs on God. Or, Could it not be that the purpose is that we live and witness and serve as a people of God reflecting the great spiritual heritage of our ancestors.
Be humble; let the rectitude of your intentions be made know with your declaration of independence from the laws of man knowing that you will stand before the judgment seat of God the Supreme Judge of the world. Join with our founding fathers, humble men who declared that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" as citizens of the United States of America we should work like the life of our country depends upon following the Ten Commandments, and pray continually for God's mercy. With a declaration of faith in Jesus Christ we are free from the laws of man but forever we shall remain under the simple laws of the God of all creation.
The 10 commandments come from Exodus 20:1-17. Here are the verses:
And God spoke all these words, saying: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.You shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself any carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.
You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your manservant, nor your maidservant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor’s.”
The above commandments need no explanation. They mean exactly what they say.
The awareness of the Ten Commandments in your heart, soul, mind and strength of your being will engineer a new way of life when you accept by faith that Jesus Christ was sent by GOD that your sins would be forgiven.
God knows what goes on inside our minds. He evaluates our intents and motivations. The internal aspects of our character count the most with Him. He considers our behavior in light of what is in our hearts. Our human Character is comprised of our innermost thoughts, motives and attitudes.
The heart of a nation is used to describe a nations character just as the heart of man is used to describe his character. Our nation is nothing more than a collection of individuals; it does not function on its own but rather reflects the character and morality of the men who are willing to accept the responsibility of leadership and the people who select them as leaders. If as a society we have no provision for teaching Godly character to our children we can expect more of the moral decay we see today. For, ultimately, liberalism in democracy acknowledges no limitation upon individual will except that which is imposed by individual conscience.
The whole obligation for realizing order in a democratic society rests upon the individual, specifically, upon individual conscience. Only conscience, belief in God, bids the individual to follow the dictates of reason rather than those of desire and unrestrained pleasure. Therefore, Conscience, the corner stone of individual character is the foundation upon which democracy exists. Ultimately the character and moral conscience of the individuals in our society determine the choice between order and anarchy.
Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story wondered if we could survive as a nation if we did not teach our children about religion and morality as restraints upon the liberal sensual desires of freemen. Well since June 25, l962, students are forbidden to do what they and their predecessors had been doing since the founding of our nation - publicly calling upon the name of the Lord at the beginning of each school day. The prayer which prompted the Engel vs. Vitale ruling had simply prayed: "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence on Thee and beg Thy blessing over us, our parents, our teachers and our nation." As a result of this decision which removed the Bible, prayer and any mention of God from our schools we have been brought to our knees. And that is where we should stay in prayer for our nation and our children’s future.
If we are going to emerge from our youthful indiscretions to become a nation of character the United States will have to provide for the re-introduction of the Bible into our schools as the text book for teaching morality to our heirs. The Bible’s teachings have brought us thus for and we must repair the cracks in our foundation if we are to survive as a nation. There is nothing more important than teaching our children and our citizens about the foundations of our God given Liberty.
Therefore we should all pray as everything depends on God the Father, Jesus Christ His son and the Holy Spirit for life and guidance. The Lord is the Spirit and where the Lord is, there is Liberty. Our nation’s founders knew that no man is perfect that only through God's grace do we have liberty!
My continued prayer as an individual and for my nation is break me, Lord, Until I am wholly yours and Renew your spirit within! For through you and to you are all things, and my sole desire is to bring you glory. Let your Spirit be my guide and our guide as a nation.
God Bless the United States of America, One Nation Under God Indivisible with Liberty and Justice for All. The sum total of the decisions we make as individuals represents who we are as a nation. When we stand together we all win.
The outcome of the ensuing conflagration is in the hands of God!
See my web site: http://theaveragejoeforpresident.com/ following is an Interview with the CW of New Hampshire:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgYvHLNhL6U
As Americans we must Be Humble.
In Christ,
Joe Story
12012 Flynn Road
Jacksonville, Florida 32223Phone 904-260-7791
theaveragejoeforpresident@gmail.com
http://theaveragejoeforpresident.com/
What’s wrong with this picture?
Posted on America’s Survival-By Cliff Kincaid-On December 28, 2011:
“A May 24 Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) Frontline program quoted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as saying he’d never had any contact with Bradley Manning and that he had no information indicating that the former Army intelligence analyst was the source of the classified U.S. intelligence information released by WikiLeaks.
On December 19, Frontline posted this follow-up information, “New Evidence of Assange-Manning Link,” and came clean in acknowledging that the new evidence in the case casts the statements by Assange in serious doubt:
{…}
“In an interview last April with Frontline correspondent Martin Smith, Julian Assange flatly denied that he’d ever had any contact with Bradley Manning, the young Army private accused of leaking half a million classified documents to Assange’s WikiLeaks. Asked about the implication in online conversations apparently between Manning and ex-hacker Adrian Lamo that Manning had gone around WikiLeaks’ normal protocols and established a personal relationship with Assange, Assange was adamant, even suggesting that Manning might have been inflating himself to others by claiming a relationship that did not exist. ‘We don’t have sources that we know about. And I had never heard the name Bradley Manning before. I never heard the name Bradass87 before.’”
Manning had used the name “Bradass87” in on-line chats and bragged about engineering “possibly the largest data spillage in American history.”
The new evidence in the case, disclosed in Manning’s preliminary hearing, established a direct connection between Assange and Manning. Frontline noted that Army digital forensics contractor Mark Johnson, testifying in Manning’s pretrial hearing, “says that he found communications between Manning and a chat user named ‘Julian Assange’ on Manning’s personal computer and a phone number for Assange in Iceland…”
The evidence puts Manning and Assange “in a precarious legal position,” Frontline now acknowledges. In effect, the evidence demonstrates that they were engaged in what amounts to a conspiracy to steal classified information from U.S. Army computers. This is espionage.
As such, Assange may have been lying about his contact with Manning in order to avoid implicating himself in a conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act. The WikiLeaks founder, an Australian and convicted computer hacker, is facing deportation from Britain to Sweden on sex crimes charges. He could eventually face deportation to the U.S., if he is ever indicted by the Obama/Holder Justice Department.
Meanwhile, more statements from Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul defending WikiLeaks, the recipient of the largest release of classified information in American history, are starting to get media attention. These appearances included:
- On the Fox Business Network Paul said, “This whole notion that Assange, who’s an Australian, that we want to prosecute him for treason. I mean, aren’t they jumping to a wild conclusion? This is media, isn’t it? I mean, why don’t we prosecute The New York Times or anybody that releases this?”
- On the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives he said, “Is there not a huge difference between releasing secret information to help the enemy in a time of declared war, which is treason, and the releasing of information to expose our government lies that promote secret wars, death and corruption?”
- Paul went on Twitter to declare that WikiLeaks was providing “truth.”
Referring to the Fox Business Channel appearance, Politico said that Paul was “taking a stand as one of Julian Assange’s few defenders in Washington, arguing that the WikiLeaks founder should get the same protections as the media.”
In contrast to Paul’s support for WikiLeaks, Assange, and Manning, whom Paul called a “hero” and “patriot,” both Democrats and Republicans have called for Assange to be prosecuted. More than a year ago, on December 2, 2010, U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Christopher (Kit) Bond (R-Mo.), vice chairman of the committee, sent a letter to Attorney General Holder requesting prosecution of Assange. They said the unauthorized release was “a serious breach of national security and could be used to severely harm the United States and its worldwide interests.”
{…}
The May 24 PBS program featured correspondent Martin Smith and was written and produced by Marcela Gaviria and Smith. It repeatedly tried to suggest, through interviews with Assange and “experts” like Eric Schmitt of the New York Times, that any direct connection between Assange and Manning was highly unlikely, if not impossible.
Schmitt said, “We don’t really know whether Manning approached WikiLeaks or people around WikiLeaks, or if it was the other way around. But my theory is whichever way it is, there’s an intermediary.”
Schmitt added, “I think Assange is savvy enough that he would have tried to avoid at all costs any direct contact with Bradley Manning, understanding that that could later lead to a much easier prosecution on the grounds of conspiracy to commit espionage.”
This, then, is why it was necessary to try to suggest some distance between Assange and Manning. Evidence of a direct connection would facilitate prosecution of Manning AND Assange on espionage charges.
Martin Smith of Frontline recognized the possibility, saying to Schmitt, “In other words, if WikiLeaks actively helped someone violate secrecy laws, Assange and his colleagues could be held criminally liable.”
“Assange says he designed WikiLeaks so that he wouldn’t even know who his sources were,” Smith reported, getting Assange off the hook.
Assange was brought back to say, “We do not know whether Mr. Manning is our source or not. And of course, if we did know, we are obligated ethically to not reveal it.”
It now looks like Assange wasn’t concerned with ethics but his own hide. He was trying to avoid or postpone an indictment on espionage charges.
Although some of the information released by WikiLeaks was seen as not harmful or just embarrassing to U.S. officials and U.S. allies, the controversial website also released classified information about U.S. counter-terrorism operations and the locations of facilities vital to national security and vulnerable to terrorist threat. Such disclosures clearly assisted the enemies of the United States, an official charge being leveled against Manning.
As PBS acknowledges, the new evidence released during his preliminary hearing was explosive in terms of establishing the link between Manning and Assange. Many different media organizations now acknowledge the strength of the government’s case.
As Wired put it, “a government digital forensic expert examining the computer of accused WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning retrieved communications between Manning and an online chat user identified on Manning’s computer as ‘Julian Assange’…Investigators also found an Icelandic phone number for Assange…” Manning’s computer also revealed a chat with a hacker located in the U.S. in which Manning said he was responsible for the leaking of an Apache helicopter video released by WikiLeaks in spring 2010, the publication said.
{…}
But there’s more. Wired added, “Assange’s name was attached to a chat handle ‘dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de’ listed in Manning’s buddy list in the Adium chat program on his computer. That Jabber address uses the same domain name allegedly mentioned by Manning in the chat logs that ex-hacker Adrian Lamo gave to the FBI and to Wired.com last year. In that earlier chat log, Manning was making reference to a domain that Assange was known to use.”
The publication added, “in Manning’s buddy list there was also a second handle, ‘pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de,’ which had two aliases associated with it: Julian Assange and Nathaniel Frank. CCC.de in the domain refers to the Chaos Computer Club, a hacker club in Germany that operates the Jabber server.”
{…}
The Daily Mail cited much of the same evidence and said, “He [Assange] has denied direct contact with Manning, but his lawyers believe the evidence produced in the military court would form an espionage conspiracy case against their client.”
Assange had counted on the international media to cover for him and treat WikiLeaks as a legitimate news organization, rather than the criminal enterprise it is. His cover is now blown and prominent news organizations which quoted him uncritically have egg all over their faces.
Columnist Doug Mataconi had been suspicious of Assange’s claims, noting, “Assange has always denied direct contact with Manning, although he has never revealed how the materials that Manning stole just happened to come into the possession of Wikileaks. These revelations appear to provide at least a clue on that last part, and suggest that Assange has been lying about his contact with Manning.”
As the New Yorker put it, “The new evidence is not only bad news for Manning, who will find out early next year what charges he will face if his court martial proceeds, but for Assange as well. In a separate federal investigation, the Justice Department is considering several offenses with which to charge Assange — including conspiracy and trafficking in stolen property.”
Not only is Assange under renewed scrutiny, but those media organizations which accepted and publicized his claims of non-involvement are facing questions as well. PBS is only one of them.
NBC News chief Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski produced a January 24, 2011, report which said:
“U.S. military officials tell NBC News that investigators have been unable to make any direct connection between a jailed army private suspected with leaking secret documents and Julian Assange, founder of the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.
“The officials say that while investigators have determined that Manning had allegedly unlawfully downloaded tens of thousands of documents onto his own computer and passed them to an unauthorized person, there is apparently no evidence he passed the files directly to Assange, or had any direct contact with the controversial WikiLeaks figure.”
Clearly, Miklaszewski’s “sources” were all wet and had no knowledge of the evidence against Manning.
{…}
However, Miklaszewski went on to quote Assange in his own defense: “Assange told MSNBC TV last month that WikiLeaks was unsure Army PFC Bradley Manning is the source for the classified documents appearing on his site. ‘That’s not how our technology works, that’s not how our organization works,’ Assange said. ‘I never heard of the name of Bradley Manning before it appeared in the media.’”
Assange told MSNBC that allegations that WikiLeaks had conspired with Manning were “absolute nonsense.”
The evidence, however, even impressed the Washington Post, for it ran a story under the headline, “Prosecutors say Manning collaborated with WikiLeaks’ Assange in stealing secret documents.” The story by Ellen Nakashima and Julie Tate said that military prosecutors had presented “new and detailed evidence” showing that Manning “collaborated” with Assange “in stealing more than 700,000 documents from classified computer systems and publishing them on the Internet.”
The story included these revealing paragraphs:
“In just over an hour of closing arguments at a pretrial hearing, the prosecutors disclosed three new excerpts of chat logs taken from Manning’s personal Macintosh laptop. In one, he allegedly asks Assange for help in figuring out a password. In another, he allegedly tells Assange ‘i’m throwing everything i’ve got on’ Guantanamo detainee reports ‘at you now’ and estimates the ‘upload is about 36 pct’ complete.
“To which Assange replied, according to the prosecutors’ PowerPoint presentation, ‘OK ... great.’”
While media organizations duped by Assange into thinking he had no contact with Manning now look like complete fools, Ron Paul’s defense of WikiLeaks and Assange is even more serious, considering his desire to be President and in possession of the state secrets of the United States.
Source:
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.28.11.html
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. How did Bradley Manning ever get control of 700,000 secret military files?-Posted on Western Journalism-By BREAKING NEWS-On January 2, 2012:
II. Hot Post: WikiLeaks’ Internal E-Mails Revealed: Show Intent To Bring Down The U.S. Government And Possible Connections to George Soros-Posted on NewsReal Blog-By JOSEPH KLEIN-On December 5, 2010:
III. Soros and WikiLeaks: Time To Investigate Their Connection-Posted on NewsReal Blog-By JOSEPH KLEIN-On December 2, 2010:
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/02/soros-and-wikileaks-time-to-investigate-their-connection/
Note: The following article and/or blog post reveals how the Main Stream Media is assisting President Obama and his minions to bring down capitalist America, as the propaganda machine of the neo-fascist Left-You Decide:
The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Individuals and news organizations that leaked Wikileaks documents should be prosecuted!
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
If you live in Iowa, please vote for me today. I am the other condidate. Here are some words to live by...."Do what is right, not what you think the high headquarters wants or what you think will make you look good."
Norman Schwarzkopf
