ACTION

@RepAlGreen’s #SexualAssault victim #LucindaDaniels was paid with $875,317 taxpayers money to silence her. We the people must demand/petition @GOP @TheDemocrats @HouseGOP @HouseDemocrats @SenateGOP @SenateDems to make Al Green pay it back & Expel him from Congress now!

In an excellent article today entitled "Trump Vows to Fight Democrat Racism, Sexism", Breitbart News reports that Trump intends to expose Democrats' notorious history of racism and sexism. FINALLY!

But, in the article the writer alludes to the misnamed "civil war" and Abraham Lincoln as stellar examples of Republicans' historical purity on this issue.

In the comments section I entered the following:

"Good article, but PLEASE PLEASE get beyond the prevailing and wholly erroneous revisionist belief that 'ole Abraham Lincoln fought the so-called "civil war", aka War of Northern Aggression or War for Southern Independence, to free the blacks.UNMITIGATED HOGWASH!
Like most of his contemporaries in the North, Abe was a shameless white supremacist who tore the country apart for his own political and economic purposes. He ain't no hero of mine, nor should he be to any clear-headed American anywhere.

That said, glad Trump is turning these issues back on the Liberals whose history in these areas has been notorious! About time a GOP candidate is willing to tell it like it is, to tangle with the devil, to fight fire with fire!"

For starters, I urge truth-seekers to read a scholarly and extremely well-documented book entitled "The Real Abe Lincoln". Sobering and educational to say the least, the book should remind us that it is always the victor in war who writes the history of that conflict, calculatingly skewed, tendentious and revisionist though that account may be.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(“If anybody tries to penetrate the past with the knife of the present will always act in vain. The past is invulnerable. Such attempts can only cause the present or the future to bleed." - Gregor Brand”
― Simon Schwartz)

(“Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.”― Chinua Achebe)

As a Black American, I am so ashamed of the fact that Martin Luther King, Jr.​s legacy is being tarnished by charlatans like Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson.

What sickens me most, is the fact that the new civil rights movement is being led by the same people, who considered us sub-humans and denied us our God-given civil liberties.

They are leading the ignorant and uninformed right back to oppression in the form of invisible chains . Their champion of cause is a thug who robbed a convenience store and tried to murder a police officer with his own gun.

The so-called leaders (including the half black man at the top), have obliterated the work that real civil rights leaders have done and set the Black Race back for decades. At the same time the blind are being led back down into the bowels of the slave ships chanting; "Black lives matter"

I love our country!  I am happy liberals can put forth their ideas, however warped in my opinion, under the Constitution of the United States.  However, don't pretend these are liberal ideas when, in fact, they are socialist, communist and anti-constitutional drivel. There is nothing..NOTHING..you can present that will be accepted by Americans when you try to destroy this country...NOTHING!!!   At least have the courage to claim what you are..socialist, communist..anarchist.  Stop pretending you really want what's best for America.  Americans know better.

Over 500 million "peace loving individuals" have been slaughtered by fanatics in the past 100 years. How many more will have to die at the hands of Islamic "fanatics" before we wake up and kill them before they kill us? They will NEVER be our friends.

A German's View on Islam - worth reading. This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.' We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers. The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun... Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts--the fanatics who threaten our way of life. Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just ignore this contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this and think about it. Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too, while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.

And we are silent.......

What IS a Conservative? Or a Liberal?

I am going to share a Couple of dictionary definitions of both Liberal and ConserWhat IS a Conservative? Or a Liberal?

I am going to share a Couple of dictionary definitions of both Liberal and Conservative. WARNING... This is going to surprise most or you so fasten your seat belts!

Wikipedia:

Conservatism as a political and social philosophy promotes retaining traditional social institutions. A person who follows the philosophies of conservatism is referred to as a traditionalist or conservative. Some conservatives seek to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity, while others, called reactionaries, oppose modernism and seek a return to "the way things were"

Free Dictionary.com

Conservatism, in politics, the desire to maintain, or conserve, the existing order. Conservatives value the wisdom of the past and are generally opposed to widespread reform. Modern political conservatism emerged in the 19th cent. in reaction to the political and social changes associated with the eras of the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution.

I know not too many surprises there, but wait for it. Wait for it...

Wikipedia:
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.

The term Liberal came into being during the French Revolution. Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition.

So you see Thomas Jefferson was a flaming Liberal in his day. All of the founding fathers were and they were so adamant that they were willing to risk their '...liver, fortune and honor...' to set up a new government. They were the traitors of their time, reviled by most nations and their governments. So just this one time I say thank you God for giving us those traitors!

So what happened? Here is what: According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, "In the United States, liberalism is associated with the welfare-state policies of the New Deal program of the Democratic administration of Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, whereas in Europe it is more commonly associated with a commitment to limited government and laissez-faire economic policies."[11] Consequently in the U.S., the ideas of individualism and laissez-faire economics previously associated with classical liberalism, became the basis for the emerging school of libertarian thought.[12] Today, liberal political parties remain a political force with varying degrees of power and influence on many countries (see Liberalism by country).
So when you here that the 'Liberal Party' in England or France wins an election try to remember that is a GOOD thing.

Enough with the back ground. What is today's Conservative and Liberal. That is tougher to define than you might think. There is a gentleman that frequently posts to a Tea Party Face Book page that would have you believe that if you don't agree with him and the Liberty Alliance, you're a liberal. Or at the very least a RINO. The man has never been wrong. Even when called on something his answer is that the other person is a RINO or an out and out Liberal. I know a 'Liberal' that believes wholeheartedly the Democrat's platform, but thinks Obama is a stupid criminal that should be shot after a fair trial and both Pelosi and Reid are just ignorant mouthpieces for that selfsame criminal. So you see it is possible to find areas of agreement with some of the people on the left. :)

I guess I am going to have to offer my definition of these two terms for good or ill. Here goes:
A Conservative is a person that believes the Constitution after a Christian God, is the supreme law of this land and should be followed under a strict constructionist discipline, but recognizes that even that amazing document has developed flaws. Flaws not in its basic principles, rather due to the evolution of society. The founding fathers could never for see where children could not, by government fiat, be punished and did not fall under the discretion of their parents. They could never for see such an anomaly as a professional politician, or a tyrannical president with sycophants ruling the Congress they so carefully set up as a separate power.

What is a Liberal, in my view? A Liberal is that person that believes that the Constitution is an old and antiquated document whose time has passed. It is time for the Government to step in and run things. We need the Government to take care of so many things. The raising of our children and oversee their education. Things like that just can't be left in the hands of educators and, God forbid, the parents. Health care must be mandated whether the simple minded voter wants it or not. The Federal Government must delve into our personal lives in the name of our home land's security. Their can be no privacy. Who knows what plots may be fostered by the people if they continue to function without Government oversight?

Strong Language? Not really. Not if you are truly aware of the situation in this country today. And no, I don't think I have put words into any liberal's mouth. That is just the facts, Mam. OK So some of them won't admit to them in public, but far too many live them.

As usual I have run out of self constraining space for this time. Hope you learned something or at least became involved enough to get angry with me. Or perhaps just nod and smile. Until next we meet.vative. WARNING... This is going to surprise most or you so fasten your seat belts!

Wikipedia:

Conservatism as a political and social philosophy promotes retaining traditional social institutions. A person who follows the philosophies of conservatism is referred to as a traditionalist or conservative. Some conservatives seek to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity, while others, called reactionaries, oppose modernism and seek a return to "the way things were"

Free Dictionary.com

Conservatism, in politics, the desire to maintain, or conserve, the existing order. Conservatives value the wisdom of the past and are generally opposed to widespread reform. Modern political conservatism emerged in the 19th cent. in reaction to the political and social changes associated with the eras of the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution.

I know not too many surprises there, but wait for it. Wait for it...

Wikipedia:
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.

The term Liberal came into being during the French Revolution. Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition.

So you see Thomas Jefferson was a flaming Liberal in his day. All of the founding fathers were and they were so adamant that they were willing to risk their '...liver, fortune and honor...' to set up a new government. They were the traitors of their time, reviled by most nations and their governments. So just this one time I say thank you God for giving us those traitors!

So what happened? Here is what: According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, "In the United States, liberalism is associated with the welfare-state policies of the New Deal program of the Democratic administration of Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, whereas in Europe it is more commonly associated with a commitment to limited government and laissez-faire economic policies."[11] Consequently in the U.S., the ideas of individualism and laissez-faire economics previously associated with classical liberalism, became the basis for the emerging school of libertarian thought.[12] Today, liberal political parties remain a political force with varying degrees of power and influence on many countries (see Liberalism by country).
So when you here that the 'Liberal Party' in England or France wins an election try to remember that is a GOOD thing.

Enough with the back ground. What is today's Conservative and Liberal. That is tougher to define than you might think. There is a gentleman that frequently posts to a Tea Party Face Book page that would have you believe that if you don't agree with him and the Liberty Alliance, you're a liberal. Or at the very least a RINO. The man has never been wrong. Even when called on something his answer is that the other person is a RINO or an out and out Liberal. I know a 'Liberal' that believes wholeheartedly the Democrat's platform, but thinks Obama is a stupid criminal that should be shot after a fair trial and both Pelosi and Reid are just ignorant mouthpieces for that selfsame criminal. So you see it is possible to find areas of agreement with some of the people on the left. :)

I guess I am going to have to offer my definition of these two terms for good or ill. Here goes:
A Conservative is a person that believes the Constitution after a Christian God, is the supreme law of this land and should be followed under a strict constructionist discipline, but recognizes that even that amazing document has developed flaws. Flaws not in its basic principles, rather due to the evolution of society. The founding fathers could never for see where children could not, by government fiat, be punished and did not fall under the discretion of their parents. They could never for see such an anomaly as a professional politician, or a tyrannical president with sycophants ruling the Congress they so carefully set up as a separate power.

What is a Liberal, in my view? A Liberal is that person that believes that the Constitution is an old and antiquated document whose time has passed. It is time for the Government to step in and run things. We need the Government to take care of so many things. The raising of our children and oversee their education. Things like that just can't be left in the hands of educators and, God forbid, the parents. Health care must be mandated whether the simple minded voter wants it or not. The Federal Government must delve into our personal lives in the name of our home land's security. Their can be no privacy. Who knows what plots may be fostered by the people if they continue to function without Government oversight?

Strong Language? Not really. Not if you are truly aware of the situation in this country today. And no, I don't think I have put words into any liberal's mouth. That is just the facts, Mam. OK So some of them won't admit to them in public, but far too many live them.

As usual I have run out of self constraining space for this time. Hope you learned something or at least became involved enough to get angry with me. Or perhaps just nod and smile. Until next we meet.

Senator Boxer(D) and Senator Feinstein(D) of California introduce bill that could ultimately lead to the confiscation of your guns!

The bill would allow anyone to seek a "Firearm" Restraining Order against anyone else they deem is dangerous to themselves or others.

This bill is too vague and doesn't define any necessary terms or precautions with something as huge as this, as are most bills from people like these, so they can purposely interpret the bill and enforce it any way they need to.

You don't need new laws to stop violence. As in the case of the Las Vegas shootings that happened this last Sunday, there were a lot of people that knew what the shooters intended. The room mate of the shooters admitted they told her of their plan. All it would have taken is for someone in this case to call the police and inform them of the situation.

We don't need any new laws to get warped by the liberals to fit their agenda.

Here is a link to the story...

http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/gun-confiscation/

I've uploaded this video - - - How do I get it placed in the "Featured Videos" line? - - 

http://www.nagsx.com/wddim.wmv

OK..... let me see if I understand this.... Bill Clinton just released some presidential papers in which it came out that Hillary was talking about how she was pushing health care at that time - and she admits that she can't tell everyone that health care would be free - because she knew they couldn't deliver on that promise and everyone would know she lied..... fast forward to Obamacare, and she hears him telling the same lie, and SHE doesn't SAY ANYTHING!!!!

OH YEAH, she would make a GREAT president .....[[(((NOT)))]].

Time and time again I have been accused of being on the “wrong side of history” when it comes to the arguments over abortion and, especially, to so-called gay marriage. This linguistic fad has exploded in use lately as if history itself is the sole arbitrator of what is right and true. It is the weapon of utter dismissiveness that is boldly and routinely wielded by the Left.

One should, in reality, not be interested in being on the “right side of history,” but on the right side of right and wrong.

The most recent and sudden burst of Leftist momentum in the culture wars have Progressives engaging in histrionic vitriol on a massive scale. Progressives make the fundamental mistake of feeling that being in lockstep with, or creating, social fads and whims of popular opinion at this particular moment in history is equivalent of being on the “right side of history.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

History is full of misguided ideological isms that seized the moment and manipulated cultures, societies, and circumstances all the while declaring themselves on the “right side of history.” The “right side of history” argument is an appeal to the authority of an imagined future that hasn’t even happened yet and an attempt to convince the opposition that resistance is futile while their agenda is inevitable. Few in our present generation fully realize that national socialism, fascism, Marxism, and even anarchism were each considered by a great number of people not that long ago the new, great, and inevitable ideology that would usher in a new utopian age.

They were mostly seen as movements of the young, often centered on charismatic personalities, challenged the old norms and values, and were to be the great correctors of all the societal ills and wrongs that had come before them. They could not picture themselves as being anything but on the “right side of history.” In the end, each ended up being cast upon the ashbin of history were they belonged. Opposing them was choosing to be on right side of right and wrong, despite being declared as being on the “wrong side of history” and obstructing their “inevitable” whirlwind of social and cultural change.

The conservative ideology has never overly concerned itself with the whims of popular opinion and the surges of mob mentality that have on occasion affected the political realm. It is a political philosophy that seeks to stand on the shoulders of the wise men who preceded us and the tried-and-true principles of the past while seeking to bring hope and intelligent change to the future. Conservatives reject the concept of governing by the whims of the moment, the passing fads of popular opinion, or the panic of momentary crisis.

Progressives, like the other radical isms of the last century, seek to overturn the morals, traditions, and values of the past instead of building and improving upon them. And that is a stark contrast to conservatism. Progressivism declares that rejecting the concept of the sanctity of innocent human life and cheerleading all attempts to redefine, degrade, trivialize, breakdown, mock, and otherwise downplay marriage and the family as it has been traditionally defined since the beginning of mankind is being on the “right side of history.”  They could not be more wrong.

While the Right sees traditional marriage and family structure as the most elementary and important building block of civilization the Left views it as little more than a confining legacy that is nothing but a breeding ground of patriarchy and misogyny and should be, at best, viewed with suspicion and perhaps even with some open hostility. That explains the recent, full-fledged assault on the institution of marriage and what it is has always been. For as soon as marriage is anything other than a compact between one man and one woman then it loses its cohesion and structure and becomes just whatever one chooses it to be. And once it has been degraded enough, the institution of marriage loses its integral role and structural place in modern culture and society. Destroy the family, and the State has to fill that role and void in society. That is the ultimate goal of the new social engineers and their idea of the “right side of history.” There should be no shame in opposing such agendas.

Progressivism deserves all the scorn and contempt that has ever been heaped upon it. Its various isms and championed causes are in direct contradiction to the tried and true principles that have been passed down throughout history and it is as much a morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest ideology as any of the more infamous ones that preceded it. When mankind fails to build upon the wisdom of the ancients and rejects the most basic of tried and true principles and institutions, then it loses its way as it blunders blindly into the future. In reality, history does not have sides, only historians do. I care not what some historian may someday declare of my ideological views or advocation of timeless principles. What I do care about, in the end, is having been a champion of what is right and true no matter what.

In case you didn’t know, since the 17^th of January the Liberal News Media happens to be on life support.  They’re huddled in their little nooks and crannies trying to figure how to throw the remark by Rocky Seto of the Seahawks out of the ball park never to be heard again.  I’d say the Seahawks have one up on the Liberals, because they just quietly and without malice announced to the World that Jesus is in their corner and they’re darn proud of it…

"Literally, Jesus is the greatest treasure in the universe," said Rocky Seto, who is on the Seahawks coaching staff. "It just makes sense. It's not like you give up your life and then you get something worse. He gave us everything. We had nothing, He gave us everything, so literally it's just one plus one equals two, it's that simple. Jesus is better than anything… even better than the Super Bowl, better than an NFL career, any of that."

"If you have Jesus it's still going to be awesome, win or lose," the Seahawks' defensive passing game coordinator said. There’s a quiet movement stirring in the athletic world - there are many athletes who stand up for “God.”

Here’s a short roster of athletes who are very outspoken about their faith.  Zach Johnson (Golf), Michael Waltrip (NASCAR), Tim Tebow (football), Tom Dungy (coach of the 2007 Super Bowl-winning Indianapolis Colts), Joe Gibbs (NASCAR), Derek Fisher (basketball), Allyson Felix (Gold Medalist), Jake Peavy (San Diego Padres pitcher), Shaun Alexander (football) and many, many more. 

Wow, what a breath of fresh air to hear young men and women stand up for “Jesus.” This is the kind of message that should make headlines on a daily basis – yet seldom do we hear this message anymore because many are afraid to stand up for Jesus.  They’ve been told it isn’t politically correct and they’ve been threatened with lawsuits. 

Little children are being chastised for mentioning God or the Bible in school. The college crowd has been put in their place and must hide their religious beliefs behind closed doors. Those who hit the freeways daily (so far) are free to say a prayer or two on their way to work, but not in the work place because the Liberals have put a zipper on their lips.

Prayer removed from schools, the 10 Commandments removed from Court Houses and the Atheists are fighting our God given rights to remove God from public view. The Supreme Court struggled in 2013 trying to come to a decision whether prayer is allowed at local Government meetings – why the struggle?

The Supreme Court has fallen victim to Liberalism and the relentless attacks from the left.  Anyway by the time they finish rewriting the new law on prayer – very likely we will have to limit prayer to our bathroom.

Note that Congress and the Supreme Court open with prayer. The Supreme Court opens with,"God Save The United States and This Honorable Court."

Eighty-five members of the House of Representatives — including six from Florida, 11 from Texas and six from North Carolina — have signed on to a brief akin to the Senate's that endorses legislative prayers.  Only 12 House members joined an opposing brief that urges tighter scrutiny, and no senators did.-   

Marco Rubio wants the Senate to continue opening with a prayer.  Here’s what Marco said, "For a few minutes each morning, politics and party are set aside," Rubio and 33 other senators advised the Supreme Court in a legal brief. "Instead of debate, senators reflect on their duty … mindful of the nation's core values and their need for divine assistance in carrying out their responsibilities."

Scuttlebutt on the street is that Obama and his administration have joined conservative state and federal lawmakers in urging the Supreme Court to tolerate prayers during government meetings.

Although Obama has attacked God from all sides and tried to remove him from our Nation it’s obvious that he believes there is a “God”- in all of his arrogance and dictatorial actions when push comes to shove he moves over for God and wants him present at government meetings.  Obama has met his match – God is alive and well, need I say more?

As Always,

Little Tboca

They’re talking about income equality, poverty, unemployment extensions, the sun, the moon, global warming and all in between hoping that once again they can distract Americans from the real problems.

Problems like murder in Benghazi, the Fast and Furious Gunrunner scam, spying on Americans, stealing taxpayer’s money, forcing a healthcare system on us that will cause and is causing financial and physical stress on millions of Americans are issues they slide under the rug. . 

 But, let’s put everything into perspective the real issues of the day are the Fast and Furious scandal that resulted in the murder of two brave American men, Brian Terry and Jaime Zapata.   Obama and Eric Holder own this but even though Holder lied under oath the scandal was never solved.

Then there’s the Benghazi scandal - family members are waiting, waiting for someone to give them honest answers and put those responsible behind bars.  They have a right to know why their dear ones were murdered, who was responsible for the deaths of their brave family members, Christopher Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Sean Smith

The families of our four American men murdered in Benghazi are left to fend for themselves, because so far the hearings, investigations and political posturing has merely been the White House’s usual “dog and pony” show by Obama, Democrats and Republicans. Nothing done the scandal never resolved!

Next is Obamacare - Obama, Democrats and the Liberal News Media have collaborated to defend this unconstitutional and poorly choreographed healthcare law come hell or high water.  They are trying to convince us the ACA website is purring along without any major glitches – that’s all garbage.  While the front end of the website may be functioning to some degree the back end is doomed to crash at any minute.

Insurance companies are facing unbelievable problems daily because Obama dumped everything in their lap  – there are 13,000 Americans as of January 8^th 2014 who have been totally lost in the system .– this doesn’t include the millions who lost their insurers. The broken down website has assigned the same case numbers to more than one individual or individuals along with ghost files where the insured has an enrollment record, but the Government doesn’t.  Either way these Americans don’t have health insurance

On top of all that the Insurers don’t have an automated system to identify the insured – the ACA website sort of forgot that important piece, just like they forgot to install software that would protect American’s vital information.  Many with life threatening illnesses who originally had good insurance and signed up for Obamacare have been lost or eaten up by the Government healthcare website. 

These are the real issues of the day – it’s time to get real and solve these scandals and put those behind bars who are responsible. 

Obama & John Boehner are way too busy playing politics and both obviously have forgotten the oaths they took when entering office.  Obama’s desperate because very few Americans admire, trust or believe anything he says – his polls show this statement to be very true.

Boehner keeps straddling the fence and doesn’t want to offend the Democrats or the Old Republican establishment, so he opts for doing absolutely nothing versus doing his duty as Speaker of the House. 

Obama, the Democrats and Liberal news media are the first inline to attack, demonize and destroy anyone that might interferes with their political agenda.  Observe how they’ve pounced on Chris Christie over the bridge scandal or Ted Cruz over repealing Obamacare.  Notice that they’re always MIA when it comes to the critical issues facing our Nation.

Bill Gates nailed the Obama Administration when he said, “I felt that agreements with the Obama White House were good only as long as they were politically convenient.” The past five years under Obama backs up what Bill Gates said – that is why Benghazi, Fast and Furious, NSA, IRS and Obamacare have been relegated to the ancient history shelves. 

Obama is responsible for these scandals – all occurred on his watch and before 2014 there’s a strong possibility there will be more Americans dying on his watch due to Obamacare. Those with terminal illnesses or life threatening illnesses have had their insurers, their medical teams and their hospitals taken from them – many may succumb to their illnesses due to this selfish, dangerous dictator.

Until Americans wake up and realize the war is on our turf and Obama must be removed from office before 2016 - we will remain the victims of a Socialistic Government.

Republicans and Democrats are playing Russian Roulette in the White House - they’re responsible for a weakened Nation, an entitlement society, Big Government, unsecured borders, weakened Military  and excessive violations against our Constitution. 

As Always,

Little Tboca