di (1)

Mainstream Media Aligns with Political Class,

Diametrically Opposes Mainstream America

If you’ve got the money to own a TV network, Rajjpuut guesses, you might think you’ve got the money to own America and all Americans in it. For example 70% of the network news coverage of the Arizona Immigration law was favorable for those protesting the law and only about 5% favorable for the state. Nationwide, 73% of citizens view the law favorably and only 25% view the protestors favorably. So clearly the networks are picking and choosing who they interview to present their own interpretation. In virtually all coverage since January of 2009, the networks have favored the political class’s or the progressive Democrats’ (or both) message and opposed mainstream America. Since the journalistic ideal is neutral, balanced and fair coverage of all stories . . . it’s easy to see why so many Americans say they do not trust the broadcast news channels.

At least one newscaster on each of the mainstream media made a big deal about the purported hardships that the would-be Times Square SUV-bomber has faced . . . how utterly idiotic. Omitting twelve of his thirteen trips to Pakistan would presumably cover his mortgage. When Rajjpuut has a bad day, he almost never puts into motion plans to indiscriminately murder and maim unknown strangers . . . does that truly warrant empathy? One gal on NBC ? went so far as to say, “I was really hoping the bomber would NOT turn out to be a Muslim . . .” and then justifying her ridiculously biased and unprofessional statement (doesn’t sound neutral, balanced, fair or objective now does it?) by saying now the extremist bigots would show intolerance to Muslims. Gaaaa-roooovy! 9/11 three attacks and right up to Ft. Hood and where is all the intolerance? Show us! And, of course, the people she and her network had been labelling as biased and intolerant, the TEA Party folk have proven to be about as peaceful as any group in American history has . . . the only violent group has been the protestors against the Arizona law, pushing and throwing objects at police, for example . And the coverage of the TEA Party by the mainstream media has been six hundred times more hateful and bigotted than anything that group has done.

Given that 90% of journalists label themselves liberal or progressive . . . these kinds of story can be expected often. But the straw that breaks the camel’s back is the utterly left-wing agenda of the ownership today. Without owners that take pride in their outfits’ professionalism, journalism degenerates into something like a high school newspaper’s overt favortism and fondness for certain cliques. The proof of this statement?? The biggest story involving the media is what they deign NOT to cover. For example, in late November, Climate-Gate in Europe was researched fully and the issue of global warming is now considered a betrayal and fraud by climate scientists at the Climate Research Unit in East Anglia University, England. The liberal London Times ate crow and published the story even if eleven days after every other paper got it down.


Yet today, five and a half months later . . . Americans have not really been exposed to Climate-Gate and that media scandal goes on day after day.

Even more surprisingly, “Cap-and-TradeGate,” the scandal of Obama’s and Gore’s complicity and huge conflict of interest related to their involvement in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) goes totally unreported. Obama and Gore and their cronies are planning to bilk the American economy of $10 TRillion every year if and when they can push Cap and Trade legislation through the senate. This is the greatest political betray since Aaron Burr and we’ve heard absolutely NOT ONE PEEP about it in the mainstream media. Here’s a little 4-chart presentation on the scandal . . . .


What this means is that if the American economy is $15 TRillion worth of goods and services that as soon as Cap and Trade is passed the economy becomes $25 TRillion worth of goods***, services and blue sky. So everything that cost you sixty $60 now costs $100 and the $10 TRillion passing through the CCX every year generates monstrous commissions for John Ayers (brother to Bill Ayers Weatherman convicted bomber and ghostwriter for “Dreams from My Father”), Barack Obama, Richard Sandor, Joel Rogers, Andy Stern, Valerie Jarrett, Al Gore, Van Jones, several Goldman Sachs big wigs, Franklin Raines, Paula Di Perna, Gores Generation Investment Management, Goldman Sachs the company itself, and unions like the AFLCIO and SEIU as well as several individuals connected to the United Nations Climate investigatory bodies. The communism index of this group is at least an 11 on a scale from 1-5 with the possible exception of Gore, who’s just in it for the $9 Million mansions he can buy. The direct connection to progressive money-funnelling foundations like the Tides Foundation, Joyce Foundation, Emerald Cities Collaborative, Enterprise Community Partners and the Apollo Alliance and the smooth way they funnel money back and forth to each other would make a Mafia Money-Launderer ultra-envious.

You might NOT be surprised to discover that George Soros is the inspiration for the Tides Foundation and other progressive foundations that fund all this semi-anonymously and that Joel Rogers, the communist prof from Wisconsin is the brains of the outfit. Rogers has famously been quoted on videotape as saying, “Capitalism is monstrous” and encouraging his followers to make up studies and statistics to sell their takeover message. The Obama stimulus put $80 Billion into Rogers’ Apollo Aliance last year. How many jobs did they create? If they actually created one real job other than secretaries to shepherd their money around, Rajjpuut would be inordinately shocked. By the way, ACORN (now undercover under 51 different names) played a slimey role in all this too -- shocker, huh?




This is the single biggest story of our time and the mainstream media have deliberately ignored it. They haven’t so much as said, “Extremist right-wing groups are claiming that . . . “ or otherwise shown any inclination to investigate the story. You don’t have to trust Ol’ Rajjpuut. The record is all there on the internet. Do it this way: Look up the foundations mentioned above; look into their board members listing; look into their founders; look into how they were funded initially and how various projects have been funded. The same key dozen names will keep popping up. Right now CCX is worth???? ????? $0.00 that’s right nothing. But let Cap and Trade pass and in a matter of months 40% of our economy will be channelled through CCX and much of into the pockets of the Dirty Dozen.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

^^ If you expect as Rajjpuut does, that sooner or later all chickens come home to roost (the truth will out), then you might want to make this link one of your favorites so you can understand this very complex little fraud as its talked about in the U.S. Senate during the upcoming impeachment trial (Of course President Obama wants to make the internet a "public utility" . . . a loose translation needed? "Public" means "government controlled." So Rajjpuut guesse that any voices not already in his camp will be "controlled.")
*** How is this done, you ask? Cap and Trade forces exchange of "carbon credits" ( . . . like Obamacare forcing people to buy insurance . . . forced transactions commanded by the government) to the tune of roughly $10 TRillion worth of forced deals every year (according to CCX founder Richard Sandor) . . . that money has to come from somewhere . . . that somewhere is from the American consumer (and to a far lesser extent from foreign consumers) who would then pay 67% more for everything American they buy. If you thought it was difficult to compete with China before . . . now it will be utterly impossible. This bill, with the help of the CCX, will absolutely cut the legs out from under the U.S. economy. Where did the 67% more expense come from? 40% fake economy divided by 60% genuine economy = 67% greater expense with the fake blue sky economy.
Read more…