ACTION

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2010/07/yes-liberal-journalists-did-manipulate.html

http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/index.htm

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece

http://s-data.current.com/news/92533126_kill-white-babies-kill-crackers-it-s-ok-with-obama-and-eric-holder-uncut-black-panther-video-racial-bias.htm

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/first-came-climategate-now-its-journolist-whos-next-for-an-email-scandal-98967924.html

http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/23/journolist%e2%80%99s-anti-palin-crusade-of-2008/

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430.html

http://www.libertyjuice.com/2010/05/06/crime-inc/

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/van-jones-scandal-threatens-obama-presidency/

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/03/liberal-ugliness-revealed-on-journolist.html

CNN Tries Obama-Realism, MSNBC.com Hops Out of Barack’s Bed

Oh, those lovers’ spats! Following the revelation of the 13-year+ JournoList-scandal -- in which over 400 different journalists, bloggers, pundits, other media folk and university professors, all of the liberal persuasion, were plotting how to cover the news and how to protect Barack Obama and cut down opponents like Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin and John Mc Cain and even going back to female journalists and feminists “biting the bullet” rather than attacking Bill Clinton for his shenanigans with Monica Lewinsky – there does seem to be a bit of difference in the tone of the media coverage of President Obama in the last week.

Rasmussen Reports which had been documenting a gradual drop in positive stories about the president over the last eight weeks . . . showed an upsurge in positive remarks about Obama in the media from roughly 43% the previous week to just over 50% last week. But the biggest Obama-toadies of all MSNBC via MSNBC.com surprised with 60% of its Obama references negative -- a drastic shift. CNN showed a slightly higher percentage of negative references to Obama and a much higher percentage of neutrally-toned realistic stories covering both sides of the issues. So all the newly enhanced positivity for Obama came from ABC, CBS, The NY Times, Washington Post and the big online news agencies.

We’ll have to wait and see if the other liberal media jump on CNN and MSNBC.com the way they did when ABC broke the story of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s preacher, ranting, “NOT God Bless, America – God Damn America! The JournoList reaction then was quite bitter that one of the liberal brethern would betray their pact, break from the herd and get a monster scoop like that . . . but then they all came together and agreed how best to cover the story up by ignoring it and painting Mc Cain as a racist, wasn’t that nice?

Notable is that coverage of the JournoList scandal itself in the mainstream media (MSM) was virtually non-existent but much defense of the now defunct liberal listserv’s Journolist was everywhere else present among the internet commenters on all things gloriously liberal. Much like Climate Gate, the Obama donor list, DOJ Black Panther voter intimidation scandal, the Obama connection to ACORN and to the sub-prime lending crisis, the Van Jones Scandal, Obama’s communist upbringing, the communist essay written by Obama’s Kenyan birthfather, the NAACP praising thugs who beat up a Black entrepreneur they called an “Uncle Tom,” ACORN document shredding scandal, ACORN child prostitution ring scandal and CCX conflict of interest cap and trade scandal, and DOJ decision NOT to prosecute Black crimes against White victims . . . it appears yet again that for the most part, the MSM has decided they serve the public best by not shedding light on any liberal weaknesses.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut