All Posts (30062)

Sort by

Food Stamp Recruiters, Bingo, and Parties…. 2.2 Billion in erroneous payments…,Oh Snap!!!  This has to stop.

How about making more jobs??!!

Please read and let me know what you think.

Andrew

Food stamps are the most inefficient, vastly expanding social welfare program in the country, according to a new study.

Forty-seven million people participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, and costs have increased over 358 percent since 2000.

The increase in recent years cannot be attributed to the economic recession, according to Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, but lax eligibility requirements and an aggressive campaign by governments to boost their rolls.

“This program has expanded rapidly over the last decade in a way that is not justified by the recession that we went through,” Tanner said.

http://freebeacon.com/study-food-stamps-most-rapidly-growing-welfar...

Read more…

Muslim Obama

640x392_37451_237362

Bombshell Obama Vetting: 1979 Newspaper Article By Valerie Jarrett Father-In-Law Reveals Start Of Muslim Purchase Of U.S. Presidency

Sep 28, 2012

Why would Muslim oil billionaires finance and develop controlling relationships with black college students? Well, like anyone else, they would do it for self-interest. And what would their self-interest be? We all know the top two answers to that question: 1. a Palestinian state and 2. the advancement of Islam in America. The idea then was to advance blacks who would facilitate these two goals to positions of power in the Federal government, preferably, of course, the Presidency. And why would the Arabs target blacks in particular for this job? Well, for the same reason the early communists chose them as their vanguard for revolution (which literally means “change”) in America. Allow me to quote Trotsky, in 1939: “The American Negroes, for centuries the most oppressed section of American society and the most discriminated against, are potentially the most revolutionary element of the population. They are designated by their historical past to be, under adequate leadership, the very vanguard of the proletarian revolution.” Substitute the word “Islam” for the words “the proletarian revolution,” and you most clearly get the picture, as Islam is a revolutionary movement just like communism is. (Trivia: it is from this very quote that communist Van Jones takes his name. Van is short for vanguard. He was born “Anthony”). In addition, long before 1979, blacks had become the vanguard of the spread of Islam in America, especially in prisons.

Interestingly, in context with the fact that this article was written by her father-in-law, Valerie Jarrett has an unusual amount of influence over Obama (along with personal security that may be even better than his, another unusual and intriguing bit of business here). And equally interesting is that Obama, who may have been a beneficiary of this Muslim money, and may now be in this Muslim debt, has aggressively pursued both of the Muslim agendas I cited above. And, also equally interesting, is that Obama has paid a king’s ransom for court ordered seals of any such records of this potential financing of his college education, and perhaps, of other of his expenses.

Lastly, it’s very important to note that the main source for the article is Khalid Mansour, “the same lawyer who allegedly helped arrange for the entrance of Barack Obama into Harvard Law School in 1988.” (Valerie Jarrett, by the way, was born in Iran. The one country protected by Obama from the sweep of the Arab Spring.) Now all of this may seem sensational, but let’s face facts. What makes it most disturbing is that not only is it all logical, but it suddenly makes a lot of previously confusing things make perfect sense.Pat Dollard

Excerpted from Daily Interlake: Searching old newspapers is one of my favorite pastimes, and I have tried to use them many times to shed light on current events — or to inform readers about how the past is prologue to our very interesting present-day quandaries.

Recently, I came across a syndicated column from November 1979 that seemed to point 30 years into the future toward an obscure campaign issue that arose briefly in the 2008 presidential campaign.

Though by no means definitive, it provides an interesting insight, at least, into how Chicago politics intersected with the black power movement and Middle Eastern money at a certain point in time. Whether it has any greater relevance to the 2012 presidential campaign, I will allow the reader to decide. In order to accomplish that, I will also take the unusual step of providing footnotes and the end of this column so that each of you can do the investigative work for yourself.

The column itself had appeared in the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Evening Independent of Nov. 6, but it was the work of a veteran newspaperman who at the time was working for the prestigious Chicago Tribune and whose work was syndicated nationally. (1)

So far as I know, this 1979 column has not previously been brought to light, but it certainly should be because it broke some very interesting news about the “rumored billions of dollars the oil-rich Arab nations are supposed to unload on American black leaders and minority institutions.” The columnist quoted a black San Francisco lawyer who said, “It’s not just a rumor. Aid will come from some of the Arab states.”

Well, if anyone would know, it would have been this lawyer — Donald Warden, who had helped defend OPEC in an antitrust suit that year and had developed significant ties with the Saudi royal family since becoming a Muslim and taking the name Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour.

Al-Mansour told Jarrett that he had presented the “proposed special aid program to OPEC Secretary-General Rene Ortiz” in September 1979, and that “the first indications of Arab help to American blacks may be announced in December.” Maybe so, but I looked high and wide in newspapers in 1979 and 1980 for any other stories about this aid package funded by OPEC and never found it verified. (Continued after the jump)

You would think that a program to spend “$20 million per year for 10 years to aid 10,000 minority students each year, including blacks, Arabs, Hispanics, Asians and native Americans” would be referred to somewhere other than one obscure 1979 column, but I haven’t found any other word of it.

Maybe the funding materialized, maybe it didn’t, but what’s particularly noteworthy is that this black Islamic lawyer who “for several years [had] urged the rich Arab kingdoms to cultivate stronger ties to America’s blacks by supporting black businesses and black colleges and giving financial help to disadvantaged students” was also the same lawyer who allegedly helped arrange for the entrance of Barack Obama into Harvard Law School in 1988.

That tale had surfaced in 2008 when Barack Obama was a candidate for president and one of the leading black politicians in the country — Percy Sutton of New York — told an interviewer on a Manhattan TV news show that he had been introduced to Obama “by a friend who was raising money for him. The friend’s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas. He is the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men. He told me about Obama.” (2)

This peculiar revelation engendered a small hubbub in 2008, but was quickly dismissed by the Obama campaign as the ditherings of a senile old man. I don’t believe President Obama himself ever denied the story personally, and no one has explained how Sutton came up with this elaborate story about Khalid al-Mansour if it had no basis in fact, and in any case al-Mansour no longer denies it. (3)

Back in 2008, while actually supporting Hillary Clinton in the New York primary, Percy Sutton was interviewed on TV and said that he thought Barack Obama was nonetheless quite impressive. He also revealed that he had first heard about Obama 20 years previously in a letter where al-Mansour wrote, “there is a young man that has applied to Harvard. I know that you have a few friends up there because you used to go up there to speak. Would you please write a letter in support of him?”

Sutton concluded in the interview, “I wrote a letter of support of him to my friends at Harvard, saying to them I thought there was a genius that was going to be available and I certainly hoped they would treat him kindly.”

Until now, there really has been no context within which to understand the Sutton story or to buttress it as a reliable account other than the reputation of Sutton himself as one of the top leaders of the black community in Manhattan — himself a noted attorney, businessman and politician. But the new discovery of the 1979 column that established Khalid al-Mansour’s interest in creating a fund to give “financial help to disadvantaged students” does provide a clue that he might indeed — along with his patron, Arab Prince Alwaleed bin Talal — have taken an interest in the “genius” Barack Obama.

It also might be considered more than coincidence that the author of that 1979 newspaper column was from Chicago, where Barack Obama settled in 1986 a few years after his stint at Columbia University. It is certainly surprising that the author of that column was none other than Vernon Jarrett, the future (and later former) father-in-law of Valerie Jarrett, who ultimately became the consigliatore of the Obama White House.

It is also noteworthy that Vernon Jarrett was one of the best friends and a colleague of Frank Marshall Davis, the former Chicago journalist and lifelong communist who moved to Hawaii in the late 1940s and years later befriended Stanley and Madelyn Dunham and their daughter Stanley Ann, the mother of Barack Obama. (4)

And to anyone who has the modicum of a spark of curiosity, it is surely intriguing that Frank Davis took an active role in the rearing of young Barack from the age of 10 until he turned 18 and left Hawaii for his first year of college at Occidental College in Los Angeles. (5)

It is also at least suggestive that Obama began that college education as a member of the highly international student body of Occidental College in 1979, the same year when Vernon Jarrett was touting the college aid program being funded by OPEC and possibly Prince Alwaleed. The fact that President Obama has studiously avoided releasing records of his college years is suggestive also, but has no evidentiary value in the present discussion. (6)

The nature of Vernon Jarrett’s relationship to Khalid al-Mansour is likewise uncertain, but it is very likely they had known each other as leaders of the black civil-rights movement for many years. Under his previous name of Donald Warden, al-Mansour had founded the African American Association in the Bay Area in the early 1960s. He had also helped inspire the Black Panther Party through his association with black-power leaders such as Huey Newton and Bobby Seale. Seale, of course, had a famous association with Chicago later, when he was part of the Chicago Eight charged with conspiracy and inciting to riot at the Democratic National Convention in 1968. (7)

In any case, it doesn’t matter if Vernon Jarrett and Khalid al-Mansour had a personal relationship or not. For some reason, al-Mansour had used Jarrett as the messenger to get out the word about his efforts to funnel Arab oil money to black students and minority colleges at about the same time that Barack Obama began his college career. That doesn’t mean either Jarrett or al-Mansour knew Obama at that time, but eight years later when Obama was a rising star in Chicago, a friend of Bill Ayers and Valerie Jarrett, it is much more likely that he did indeed have the assistance of very important people in his meteoric rise. The words of Percy Sutton about what al-Mansour told him regarding Obama certainly have the ring of truth:

“His introduction was there is a young man that has applied to Harvard. I know that you have a few friends back there… Would you please write a letter in support of him? (That’s before Obama decided to run.) … and he interjected the advice that Obama had passed the requirements, had taken and passed the requirements necessary to get into Harvard and become president of the Law Review. That’s before he ever ran for anything. And I wrote a letter in support of him to my friends at Harvard, saying to them that I thought there was a genius that was going to be available and I certainly hoped they would treat him kindly…” (2)

What possible significance could all this have? We may never know, but Vernon Jarrett, back in 1979, thought that OPEC’s intention to fund black and minority education would have huge political ramifications. As Jarrett wrote:

“The question of financial aid from the Arabs could raise a few extremely interesting questions both inside and outside the black community. If such contributions are large and sustained, the money angle may become secondary to the sociology and politics of such an occurrence.” (1)

He was, of course, right.

As Jarrett suggests, any black institutions and presumably individuals who became beholden to Arab money might be expected to continue the trend of American “new black advocacy for a homeland for the Palestinians” and presumably for other Islamic and Arabic interests in the Middle East. For that reason, if for no other, the question of how President Obama’s college education was funded is of considerably more than academic interest.

http://patdollard.com/2012/09/obama-vetting-1979-newspaper-article-by-valerie-jarrett-father-in-law-reveals-start-of-arab-purchase-of-u-s-presidency/

Read more…

 

In an effort for Republican Conservatives to stop the deficit spending and defund the ‘job-killing’ ObamaCare, 87 House (RINO) Republicans voted ‘YEA’ with President Obama, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), all House Democrats, and ObamaCare.

 

 FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 550

(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

 

ObamaCare-premium & cost-sharing subsidies-Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

 

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2013/roll550.xml


      H R 2775      YEA-AND-NAY      16-Oct-2013      10:18 PM
      QUESTION:  On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments
      BILL TITLE: To condition the provision of premium and cost-sharing subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act upon a certification that a program to verify household income and other qualifications for such subsidies is operational, and for other purposes

Yeas

Nays

PRES

NV

Republican

87

144

 

1

Democratic

198

 

 

2

Independent

 

 

 

 

TOTALS

285

144

 

3

 

---- YEAS    285 ---

 

Andrews
  Bachus
  Barber
  Barletta
  Barrow (GA)
  Bass
  Beatty
  Becerra
  Benishek
  Bera (CA)
  Bilirakis
  Bishop (GA)
  Bishop (NY)
  Blumenauer
  Boehner
  Bonamici
  Boustany
  Brady (PA)
  Braley (IA)
  Brooks (IN)
  Brown (FL)
  Brownley (CA)
  Buchanan
  Bustos
  Butterfield
  Calvert
  Camp
  Cantor
  Capito

  Capps
  Capuano
  Cárdenas
  Carney
  Carson (IN)
  Cartwright
  Castor (FL)
  Castro (TX)
  Chu
  Cicilline
  Clarke
  Clay
  Cleaver
  Clyburn
  Coble
  Coffman

  Cohen
  Cole
  Connolly
  Conyers
  Cook
  Cooper
  Costa
  Cotton
  Courtney
  Cramer
  Crawford
  Crenshaw

  Crowley
  Cuellar
  Cummings
  Daines
  Davis (CA)
  Davis, Danny
  Davis, Rodney
  DeFazio
  DeGette
  Delaney
  DeLauro
  DelBene
  Dent
  Deutch
  Diaz-Balart
  Dingell
  Doggett
  Doyle
  Duckworth
  Edwards
  Ellison
  Engel
  Enyart
  Eshoo
  Esty
  Farr
  Fattah
  Fitzpatrick
  Fortenberry
  Foster
  Frankel (FL)
  Frelinghuysen
  Fudge
  Gabbard
  Gallego
  Garamendi
  Garcia
  Gardner

Gerlach
  Gibson

  Grayson
  Green, Al
  Green, Gene
  Griffin (AR)
  Grijalva
  Grimm
  Guthrie

  Gutiérrez
  Hahn
  Hanabusa
  Hanna
  Harper

  Hastings (FL)
  Hastings (WA)
  Heck (NV)

  Heck (WA)
  Herrera Beutler
  Higgins
  Himes
  Hinojosa
  Holt
  Honda
  Horsford
  Hoyer
  Huffman
  Israel
  Issa
  Jackson Lee
  Jeffries
  Jenkins
  Johnson (GA)
  Johnson, E. B.
  Joyce
  Kaptur
  Keating
  Kelly (IL)
  Kelly (PA)
  Kennedy
  Kildee
  Kilmer
  Kind
  King (NY)
  Kinzinger (IL)

  Kirkpatrick
  Kline
  Kuster
  Lance
  Langevin
  Larsen (WA)
  Larson (CT)
  Latham
  Lee (CA)
  Levin
  Lewis
  Lipinski
  LoBiondo
  Loebsack
  Lofgren
  Lowenthal
  Lowey
  Lujan Grisham (NM)
  Luján, Ben Ray (NM)
  Lynch
  Maffei
  Maloney, Carolyn
  Maloney, Sean
  Matheson
  Matsui
  McCarthy (CA)
  McCollum
  McDermott
  McGovern
  McHenry
  McIntyre
  McKeon
  McKinley
  McMorris Rodgers

  McNerney
  Meehan
  Meeks
  Meng
  Michaud
  Miller, Gary
  Miller, George
  Moore
  Moran
  Murphy (FL)
  Murphy (PA)
  Nadler
  Napolitano
  Neal
  Negrete McLeod
  Nolan

Nunes
  O'Rourke
  Owens
  Pallone
  Pascrell
  Pastor (AZ)
  Paulsen
  Payne
  Pelosi
  Perlmutter
  Peters (CA)
  Peters (MI)
  Peterson
  Pingree (ME)
  Pittenger
  Pocan
  Polis
  Price (NC)
  Quigley
  Rahall
  Rangel
  Reichert
  Ribble

  Richmond
  Rigell
  Rogers (KY)
  Rogers (MI)
  Ros-Lehtinen

  Roskam
  Roybal-Allard
  Ruiz
  Runyan
  Ruppersberger
  Ryan (OH)
  Sánchez, Linda T.
  Sanchez, Loretta
  Sarbanes
  Schakowsky
  Schiff
  Schneider
  Schock
  Schrader
  Schwartz
  Scott (VA)
  Scott, David
  Serrano
  Sewell (AL)
  Shea-Porter
  Sherman
  Shimkus
  Shuster
  Simpson

  Sinema
  Sires
  Slaughter
  Smith (NE)
  Smith (NJ)

  Smith (WA)
  Speier
  Stivers
  Swalwell (CA)
  Takano
  Terry
  Thompson (CA)
  Thompson (MS)
  Thompson (PA)
  Tiberi
  Tierney
  Tipton
  Titus
  Tonko
  Tsongas
  Upton
  Valadao

  Van Hollen
  Vargas
  Veasey
  Vela
  Velázquez
  Visclosky
  Walz
  Wasserman Schultz
  Waters
  Watt
  Waxman
  Webster (FL)
  Welch
  Whitfield
  Wilson (FL)
  Wittman
  Wolf
  Womack

  Yarmuth
  Young (AK)
  Young (IN)

 

---- NAYS    144 ---

 

Aderholt
  Amash
  Amodei
  Bachmann
  Barr
  Barton
  Bentivolio
  Bishop (UT)
  Black
  Blackburn
  Brady (TX)
  Bridenstine
  Brooks (AL)
  Broun (GA)
  Bucshon
  Burgess
  Campbell
  Carter
  Cassidy
  Chabot
  Chaffetz
  Collins (GA)
  Collins (NY)
  Conaway
  Culberson
  Denham
  DeSantis
  DesJarlais
  Duffy
  Duncan (SC)
  Duncan (TN)
  Ellmers
  Farenthold
  Fincher
  Fleischmann
  Fleming
  Flores
  Forbes
  Foxx
  Franks (AZ)
  Garrett
  Gibbs
  Gingrey (GA)
  Gohmert
  Goodlatte
  Gosar
  Gowdy
  Granger

Graves (GA)
  Graves (MO)
  Griffith (VA)
  Hall
  Harris
  Hartzler
  Hensarling
  Holding
  Hudson
  Huelskamp
  Huizenga (MI)
  Hultgren
  Hunter
  Hurt
  Johnson (OH)
  Johnson, Sam
  Jones
  Jordan
  King (IA)
  Kingston
  Labrador
  LaMalfa
  Lamborn
  Lankford
  Latta
  Long
  Lucas
  Luetkemeyer
  Lummis
  Marchant
  Marino
  Massie
  McCaul
  McClintock
  Meadows
  Messer
  Mica
  Miller (FL)
  Miller (MI)
  Mullin
  Mulvaney
  Neugebauer
  Noem
  Nugent
  Nunnelee
  Olson
  Palazzo
  Pearce

Perry
  Petri
  Pitts
  Poe (TX)
  Pompeo
  Posey
  Price (GA)
  Radel
  Reed
  Renacci
  Rice (SC)
  Roby
  Roe (TN)
  Rogers (AL)
  Rohrabacher
  Rokita
  Rooney
  Ross
  Rothfus
  Royce
  Ryan (WI)
  Salmon
  Sanford
  Scalise
  Schweikert
  Scott, Austin
  Sensenbrenner
  Sessions
  Smith (MO)
  Smith (TX)
  Southerland
  Stewart
  Stockman
  Stutzman
  Thornberry
  Turner
  Wagner
  Walberg
  Walden
  Walorski
  Weber (TX)
  Wenstrup
  Westmoreland
  Williams
  Wilson (SC)
  Woodall
  Yoder
  Yoho

 

---- NOT VOTING    3 ---

 

McCarthy   (NY)

Rush

Young (FL)

Read more…

The Senate secured the 50 signatures needed to prevent the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) -- a document signed by State Secretary John Kerry that threatens Second Amendment rights of American citizens -- from taking effect. "The letter, with its 50 signatories, ends any prospect in the foreseeable future of Senate ratification of the ATT," The Heritage Foundation notes. Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) was the lone Republican who rejected the pledge -- hardly surprising considering the state he resides in. We applaud the Senate for disavowing this legislation. Right Hook [Good, this was a foolish action by Kerry and thank goodness the Senate put a stop to it.]

Read more…

Politicians

Election time will come next year,

And there's just one thing I want to hear,

And that's how to get this country back on track;

Cause since '08, far as I can tell,

Our country has simply gone to hell,

And it's time "We the people" wake up and take it back.

We were told back then there'd be a better change,

If we'd only elect Barack Hussein,

So the country did, now look at where we stand...

A deficit that keeps on growing

And politicians that keep on blowing,

And times getting harder for the working man.

 

You know, most politicians in DC

Don't give a damn about you and me;

How quickly they forget the oath they took.

They swear before God and they swear before man

To uphold the Constitution, the law of the land,

With their right hand raised and the other on the Holy Book.

 

But politicians never do,

All the things they promise to,

They just tell us what they think we want to hear.

Then they create an image that's quite appealing,

Of one who's caring with lots of feeling,

Then market that image every election year.

 

We're told things are fine...they know what we need,

Then they pass bills into law they don't even read,

And to make matters worse and really show contempt,

They write laws to govern us "astro turfs"

That treats us all like medieval serfs,

But they ALWAYS seem to make themselves EXEMPT!!

 

Just how dumb do they think we are??

Well, we've let 'em get by with it so far,

So now, they truly think they're better than "We";

Yes, they truly think they're better than us,

They ride in limos...while we take the bus...

They really believe they're U-S royalty.

 

But it's the folks who's taxed and the Joe that works,

Who foots the bill for all THEIR perks,

No wonder the working class feels so dejected...

They continue to tax us more and more,

But where does it go and what is it for????

Why, that's money politicians need to get RE-ELECTED!!

 

All the "good causes" they talk about,

Involves staying in office and keeping THEIR clout,

They don't give one damn 'bout the folks who pay the the bills!!

They pass legislation to "help the poor"

Which ends up helping the politicians more,

Yep, that's what they learn when they get to Capitol Hill!!

 

When it comes to politicians, there's very few,

Who have managed a business or knows what to do,

But it's plain to see their pomposity has no limit...

To prove they're dumber than rocks...all it'll take,

Is to listen to the comments some of 'em make,

Remember, "...pass the bill so we can see what's in it"????

 

Those of us who have to work for a living,

Are sick to death of constantly giving

To those who only increase our nation's debt.

Far as I tell, we've got a "welfare" class,

Who sit in Washington flat of their ass,

And another welfare class that votes for all they can get!!!

 

Now, times are bad, our nation's in a crunch,

And it's time "We" de-throne the whole damned bunch

Of officials who think they're better than me and you...

We need representatives in D-C

Who'll HONESTLY work for you and me...

And it's time these "servants" learn who works for who!!!!!!!!!!

Read more…

NO APPOLOGY

I MAKE NO APPOLOGIES FOR THIS!
Not only do I not make no apologies for it, I can support it ethically and logically against any attack.  I am convinced that voting should be a right that is earned.  Having individuals vote who have done nothing for this country is counterproductive and only rewards negative behavior. Those perfectly able physically and mentally, pay no taxes, do nothing to contribute to the success of the country, and do not work have not earned the right to vote. There simply has to be some negative aspect for sloth and freeloading.
Elevengun

Read more…

ROUNDONECLANG!!

"The problem with Socialists is eventually they run out of other people's
money to spend."  Margaret Thatcher

Liberals chant "Law of the land now!" Like obamacare here to stay.
I have "NEWS" for them:
Once Women couldn't vote,
Blacks couldn't vote,
Prohibition, ETC...
I'm sure you all can think of MANY MORE that were "Law of the Land now!" and were overturned/changed...
Now here are my two key items for a stress free Turkey Day:
A road map and a full tank of gas..HAPPYHAPPY..
Cal

Read more…

BETTER LISTEN

NEXT ATTACK!  EXTREEM ALERT!
I can't reveal the source of this, believe it or not, your choice. 
I have just learned that Obama said he will now be able to collect guns in America.  He says Republican Senators have learned who the boss is and they will not oppose him again.  Obama and the scum supporting him are about to launch an all out assault on the second amendment. 
Never, Never let this government come and take even one of your guns.  If we allow this without fighting every way possible there will be no place on earth Freedom will exist.  When American people are disarmed the treasonous tyrannical scourge we have in Washington will spread tyranny over the entire Earth.  This will be a whole different fight, this is for all mankind worldwide!  You had better get mad, get tough and above all get right with God and pray.
Elevengun

Read more…

good job

good job all you people that voted no shame on you voted yesshame on you and I will not be voting for my senator from Arizona the next time if your aunts
Read more…

McConnell

Mitch McConnell Accused of Sneaking in $2 Billion ‘Kentucky Kickback’ in Budget, Debt Limit Deal
www.theblaze.com
Included in the McConnell-Reid bill that ends the government shutdown, funds Obamacare and lifts the debt ceiling, is apparently a roughly $2 billion increase

Read more…

McConnell

Mitch McConnell Accused of Sneaking in $2 Billion ‘Kentucky Kickback’ in Budget, Debt Limit Deal
www.theblaze.com
Included in the McConnell-Reid bill that ends the government shutdown, funds Obamacare and lifts the debt ceiling, is apparently a roughly $2 billion increase

Read more…

 

By Oscar Y. Harward

 

In January, 2009 as Barack Obama was sworn in as US President, our National debt was $10.63 Trillion.  Today, our National Debt is reaching $17 Trillion, an increase of some $6.3 Trillion in deficit spending in a period of less than 5 years.

 

According to the Treasury Department, when George W. Bush took office in 2001 the national debt was $5.73 trillion and when Bush left office in 2009, the national debt had increased to $10.63 trillion; an increase in deficit spending of $4.7 Trillion over his entire 2 Presidential terms of 8 years.  During President George W. Bush’s 8 years as President, America suffered one of the most expensive storms ever during Hurricane Katrina.

 

Additionally, under President George W. Bush’s tenure, our USA was attacked on 9/11/01 by radical Islamic Muslims by flying 2 hijacked airplanes into New York’s ‘twin towers’ and an effort to fly another airplane elsewhere.  

 

To protect Americans, President Obama and Capitol Hill legislators were forced to ‘finance’ our new Federal Government Department of Homeland Security Appropriations reaching out to all states, counties, and municipal governments with massive numbers of resources, equipment, and training for specialists in each and all of these branches of governments.

 

During these less than 5 years as President Obama, Capitol Hill Democrats continue to spend more of (y)our taxpayers’ money; most borrowed from the governments of Saudi Arabia and Communist China.  These debts are being left to our children, their children, etc.  Currently, every American citizen, young or old, owes $53,531 to our National debt.  Every US taxpayer owes $148,133 to our National debt.  At the same period of time, these same Democrat Party officials demand more and more of (y)our taxpayers’ earned income in higher taxes.

 

During these less than 5 years, our National debt has been ‘crammed down our throats’ some $6.3 Trillion deficit spending by President Obama, most Capitol Hill Democrats, and some ‘Republican In Name Only’ (RINO) Republicans.

 

The ‘problem’ is simple; excessive deficit spending is breaking our national economy, our individual freedoms, our families, and our Constitution.  The ‘solution’; stop the spending to save our economy, our individual freedoms, our families, and our Constitution.

 

When will an American electorate make a wise decision that ‘healthy’ Americans, as individuals, have a responsibility of earning and spending on themselves and their families, rather than depending on a mishandled authority from a freebie and forsaking government?

 

When will Capitol Hill legislators and other leaders recognize that ‘out-of-control’ spending is destroying our economy, our national economy, our individual freedoms, our families, and our Constitution?

 

As Margaret Thatcher, the ‘Iron Lady’ once said, "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."

 

Republican Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT), as well as other legislators and supporters who vote and aspire to ‘stop-the-spending’ to save America, our economy, our Constitution, and our families are ‘right on these issues’. 

 

Democrats, Republicans, Independents, etc. who continue to vote and aspire the ‘out-of-control’ spending are destroying our economy, our Constitution, our individual freedoms, and our families, as all of these individuals are ‘wrong on these issues’.  Wake up America!

 

God Bless America!

Read more…

4063756135?profile=originalNext February, we will celebrate the 5th anniversary of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). You know, President Obama's trillion-dollar spending spree that was sold to the American people as a means to save our economy from the brink of disaster and create American jobs. 

As the former-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in 2010, when she and her left-wing minions were forcing the Affordable Care Act on the American people, “But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of controversy.”

Quite the pathetic statement, however, it is eerily true for us American citizens, because we are either kept in the dark, lied to, or manipulated as to what our government is up to. And once any large piece of legislation is passed, time is what enables us to grasp its impact –– good or bad, corrupt or mismanaged –– and calculate the cost to us hard-working American taxpayers. History has already proven that our government has grown too large, too intrusive, and too expensive.  

To better understand this piece of the "green energy" scandal, let me remind my fellow Americans that President Obama promised to have, and claims to be, the most transparent administration in history. Yet here we are over fours yeas later with David Sanger, the New York Times reporter who has spent two decades reporting in Washington, slamming this theory by proclaiming that the Obama administration is the "most closed, control-freak administration" he's ever covered, reported POLITICO this month.
As if many of us didn't have that sentiment already, especially in the midst of a series of serious scandals that hit the White House this year. More so, when we learned that political appointees within the Obama administration, across several agencies, including the Energy Department, and recently the IRS, have been using secret or personal email accounts to conduct official government business. But secrecy is not the only thug tactic operating inside this administration: they have been known to intimidate inspector generals, as told by Gerald Walpin. "But I learned, through being fired by the Obama administration, that performing one’s responsibilities as one should, and potentially adversely affecting the administration’s image, is not the way to keep one’s job," Walpin wrote this past June.

This brings me to today's Green Corruption File, "The RAT in the Recovery and the Gang of Ten," which is the underbelly of this scandal. First is the deception: other than the overall "save the planet" manipulation, Americans were misled as to the real purpose of the stimulus package. Secondly, the Obama administration's "RAT maneuver" (and those behind it) leaves us with speculation (some will say proof) of premeditation and intention in regards to potential shenanigans with the stimulus funds. Last but not least, the "ten green stimulus authors" (yet there could be more) that I have uncovered and will expand upon in the third section of this post, were allowed to ensure that their "green" interests were represented in the stimulus bill, thus cashing in at the tune of tens of billions of tax dollars.

The RAT in the Recovery


What most don't know, not even the majority of Congress, is that there was a RAT hidden deep inside the 1,073-page stimulus bill, which was drafted by the Obama transition team and congressional aides.

Entitled the Obama-Biden Transition Project, it employed approximately 400 people and it was comprised of Obama bundlers and campaign contributors as well as lobbyist and those that operate inside Washington’s egregious revolving door. In the mix was a squadron of Center for American Progress (CAP) experts, the billionaire George Soros-funded liberal think tank. Within this transition group, we also find many that eventually operated inside this clean-energy scheme, of which I'll highlight later.

"From the first debates over the stimulus bill, the White House has promised unprecedented levels of transparency and accountability," noted U.S. News in 2009, even appointing Vice President Joe Biden as the nation’s stimulus spending cop, Stimulus Sheriff Joe, who ultimately went MIA.


Quite the contrary, and it all started when Team Obama starting planning their trillion-dollar spending spree, because “deep inside” the 2009 Recovery Act was a RAT, an attempt to suppress potential investigations, and only a few news outlets caught it in February of 2009: the Washington Post and the Washington Examiner.
As legislation was moving at rapid speed, and Congress continually failed to read the bills, the Obama administration had placed a “far-reaching and potentially dangerous provision." The creation of the RAT Board (Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board) was supposed to be “an oversight panel headed by a White House nominee.” 

The controversial provision emerged in a January 2009 draft of the bill prepared by Obama's transition team officials and members of the House Appropriations Committee, of which at that time it was labeled by the White House as “critical to prevent waste and corruption.” This RAT board gave them the authority to ask, “That an inspector general conduct or refrain from conducting an audit or investigation.”
 
Did you get that? An Obama appointee could dictate what to investigate and what investigations they wanted to squash. 

According to The Examiner...
When Iowa Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, a longtime champion of inspectors general, read the words “conduct or refrain from conducting,” alarm bells went off. The language means that the board — whose chairman will be appointed by the president — can reach deep inside a federal agency and tell an inspector general to lay off some particularly sensitive subject. Or, conversely, it can tell the inspector general to go after a tempting political target. …”
Senator Grassley (Republican from Iowa), also warned, "This is a dangerous provision that will hamper oversight, restrict transparency, and damage the independence of inspectors general."

Subsequent concerns arose, with Senator Claire McCaskill (Democrat from Missouri), who was alarmed by the sentence that allowed "the panel to order an inspector general to stop an investigation." As reported by The Post in February 2009...
The group representing federal inspectors general recommended that the entire disputed provision be deleted from the legislation, according to David R. Gray, counsel to Phyllis K. Fong, chair of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. 
Senate negotiators changed the board composition. While the president would appoint the head of the panel, the rest of the members would be inspectors general. 
House and Senate negotiators also added a line proposed by McCaskill saying that the final decision on whether to proceed is up to the inspector general. "The language sends a very clear message that the IG is in the driver's seat," she said.

As you can see, eventually lawmakers revised the original bill, and allowed “the watchdog agencies to reject the panel's decisions.” But only after they were BUSTED, leaving many wondering why another layer of bureaucracy? Worse, why would a panel be given that kind or power in the first place, power that was not entirely stripped away.

At that time, they named the former Interior Department Inspector General Earl Devaney, who helped uncover the Jack Abramoff scandal, as the head. Yep, we got a Stimulus Czar, and more taxpayer money going out the door: "The bill allotted about $350 million in oversight measures, including $84 million for the creation of an oversight board," as documented by U.S. News. Mr. Devaney has since retired, and in December 2011, President Obama appointed Kathleen S. TIghe Chair of the Board, with eleven Inspectors General from various federal agencies that serve with her. 

Moreover, “Per the Recovery Act, the Board's Recovery activities were supposed to end on September 30, 2013. However, in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act of 2013 to assist states and individuals impacted by Hurricane Sandy, Congress stipulated the Board provide oversight of the funding through 2015.”

The irony here is that the RAT Board's stated goals are “to provide transparency of Recovery-related funds and “to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and mismanagement.” While I can't speak for the entire stimulus bill, I know that tucked inside was $100 billion that Team Obama carved out for their big clean-energy push (save the planet funds). Money that I have been following since 2010, which has not only led to plenty of fraud, waste, and mismanagement, but also abuse, cronyism, corruption, and failure.

Most critically is that this “RAT” maneuver only leaves speculation of premeditation and intention in regards to potential shenanigans (an understatement) with the stimulus funds, and the daunting question, what has the RAT Board done about the massive pile of clean-energy dirt? 

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) 
& Its $100 billion renewable energy earmark 

Shortly after President Obama began his reign as our 44th president, in February 2009, he signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). This was a massive economic stimulus bill –– among the biggest in history –– that was sold to the American people as a means save our economy from the brink of disaster and create American jobs.  

By the beginning of 2012, revelations revealed the real intent behind Obama's trillion-dollar spending spree ("walking around money"): it was “a key tool for advancing the Obama administration’s clean-energy goals and fulfilling a number of campaign commitments.” In fact, the 2009-Stimulus package was jammed-packed full of clean-energy provisions, of which about 10 percent of the monies were earmarked for renewable energy. 

It's important to point out that the $100 billion in stimulus funds is not the only money being used to fuel the Obama administration's efforts to save the planet using other people's money.  I'd say it's closer to $150 billion to date, and counting, because they continue to dish out more. In short, other departments handing out "green" include the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Biorefinery Assistance Program, and we even find that there is a "Green War" being waged: "the Department of Defense has launched more green energy initiatives than any other federal agency and many are duplicative and wasteful," as reported by the Washington Free Beacon.
Another means where huge corporations and Obama's "green" pals get taxpayer money is through the taxpayer-supported Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im), who "has a Congressional mandate to support renewable energy and has been directed that 10% of its authorizations should be dedicated to renewable energy and environmentally beneficial transactions."

Additionally, the president's new Climate Action Plan, announced in July of this year, calls for releasing "$8 billion in loan guarantees for advanced fossil fuel and efficiency projects, and strengthen the Better Building Challenge to increase building efficiency 20 percent by 2020." Meanwhile, the "Obama administration is ready to restart the controversial automotive loan program designed to kick-start the development of alternative vehicles." This is the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing (ATVM) program that holds authority to award up to $25 billion in direct loans. 
Last fall, I chronicled how there were over 100 applicants for this section of the DOE's loan program, yet only the "FAVORED FIVE" were granted ATVM loans totaling $8.4 billion. Three of the five loans are directly tied to President Obama and the other two, both Ford Motor Co. and Nissan, were heavily engaged in negotiations with the administration over fuel economy standards for model years 2012- 2016 at the time DOE was considering their applications."
The ATVM is part of the Energy Department’s Loan Guarantee Program (DOE LGP) which has been a main focus throughout my work since April 2012. This is a program that consists of three separate entities: Section 1703Section 1705, and Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM), and has thus far guaranteed $34.7 billion of taxpayer money. Both Section 1703 and the ATVM programs were established during the Bush administration, and Section 1705 was created by the 2009-Recovery Act.

This is the same Energy Department program which the Green Corruption Files has exposed over and over how at least 90 percent of the winners have meaningful politically connections (bundlers, top donors, fundraisers, etc) to the president and other high-ranking Democrats –– in many cases, to both. It also brought you big alternative energy losers such as Solyndra, Beacon Power, Abound Solar, Vehicle Production Group, SoloPower, Nevada Geothermal, and Fisker Automotive, flushing billions of tax dollars down the toilet. Yet there are billions more still at risk, and we're keeping an eye on these DOE projects: AREVA and its $2 billion, Georgia Power Company and its $8.33 billion, NRG Energy, Inc. (BrightSource) and its $1.6 billion, First Solar and its $3 billion, and others.

Still, the Energy Department's loan program is not the only place where we find taxpayer-funded clean-energy losers. At the end of 2012, I calculated that "as many as 50 Obama-backed green energy companies were bankrupt or troubled." In May I revisited this area, with my new numbers reflecting that 25 are bankrupt, and there are four about to go under. Then, if we keep those that were having issues the same (at 29), the latest taxpayer-funded clean-energy failure list is about 60 –– with almost half bankrupt. Stay tuned for a new investigative report on this topic in the near future. 
Continue reading "The RAT in the Recovery and the Gang of Ten" at The Green Corruption Files...
Read more…

COUNTRYMEN!

WITH GRAVE SINCERITY:

Country men and women, With the exception of five or maybe six Senators it has become obvious that our representatives have something other than our country and its Constitution at heart.  Their actions are clear evidence that they were not to be trusted when they placed their hands on the bible and swore an oath. The vast majority of them have promoted the destruction of our Constitution, Freedom and Liberty.

 Most of those not promoting this treason stood by silent as the apostils did when Christ was crucified.  It is now time we accept the full responsibility for the defense of the Constitution.  You have the power to do this.  The question is, "are you willing to sacrifice"?  When Congress passes laws in defiance of the people it only becomes the last word if you allow it to.  With regard to Obama Care, this is the most destructive legislation to our Rights and Freedom in history.  There exist two ways to defeat it, the first is if enough people refuse to accept it and do not comply.  Yes, this takes courage and the only way it will work is if you get the word out and have people sign an oath to resist and defy what is an un-Constitutional crime on the American people. 

The only other way is to make the exhausting effort to get your state to refuse to implement it and make it unlawful in your state.  Remember, it is you, if you are reading this yes you, that has to take that first step in what will be a difficult journey.  Your other choice is surrender and servitude, no rights and the end of Freedom.  Those who make the choice to live free and sacrifice will never have to hang their heads in shame, those who do not ........... 

Making sacrifice does not include just posting on the internet, that is not sacrifice.  You have to put your dollars in the hands of those trying to fight, yes until it hurts! You have to get out and pass out information explaining the danger the country is in.  Sitting at your computer just does not cut it!  And yes I have sacrificed to the point of pain and personal loss so I am not asking anyone to do what I have not!  It is your last chance before your Constitution is a relic of historical curiosity. Elevengun

Read more…

 

All due respect to Ronald Regan, I must steal his comments on the Democrats to express my feelings on the Republicans.

I have been a Republican since I started voting in 1976.  I worked locally on President Regan's campaign in Texas in 1980.  Every election since, I have voted for a Republican President, mostly, as I have told my 2 eldest children who now can vote, not for the candidate, but against the other.

The events of the past few weeks, and the abandonment of any pretext of standing on values have brought me to the conclusion that I haven't been part of the solution, I have been part of the problem.

From this point forward I will only vote for conservative candidates, men and women that will stand for their beliefs in the face of the nay-sayers, the neo-Chamberlains, and the ad hominem attacks by the media.  I will let the Republican house of cards collapse on itself, much as they currently want the ACA to do.  In races where there is no conservative candidate running, I will regretfully abstain.

While I am sure that I will not always agree with the positions of these candidates, I will only vote for men and women that have the courage to state their beliefs regardless of whether I personally like it or not.  I will chose the candidate that meets my belief structure as closely as possible and rely on their courage and moral structure to lead them to the right position.

I hope all conservatives will do the same.

Will this mean more Democrats will be elected? Probably, but pray-tell, what is the difference between the current Republican leadership and Harry Reed?  My vision isn't good enough to distinguish between the two.  Only supporting true, stalwart conservatives will undoubtedly destroy the Republican party but it will put more men and women into office that will stand up and say, THIS FAR AND NO MORE.

Read more…

Protest of Privilege

Protest  of Privilege

This title is similar to the blog that I will quote from.

I used “of” versus “and”. I want to draw to attention to “Privilege ABUSED”.

Of Protests And Privilege

http://www.westernjournalism.com/protests-privilege/

The blog is a little long with some minor typos, but definitely worth reading.

Here is my takeaway

 = = = =

……. small protests turn into larger ones. Independents like bikers and truckers suddenly organize themselves loosely in protest and the media stomps all over it, attempts to steal or change the message, and the oligarchs in Washington DC plot and plan how to make any protest “hurt”.

Our “betters”, our “rulers” have overplayed their hand. The [ “y”] live lives of ease and seeming entitlement only because we the people have placed at great trust in their hands. They have clearly betrayed that trust and are in need or “correction” and “re-alignment” with the principles of the Constitution (which they currently ignore) and the Rule of Law which if applied correctly would see some of those “rulers” jailed and even hanged for treason.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/protests-privilege/#YzSCjtBYgPfkKAZ7.99

 = = = = = =

Obama and his ilk/gang/supporters will find, like humpty dumpty, that they cannot be put back together again………

My911@aol.com

 

 

 

 

Read more…