http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2013/04/2-prosecutors-dead-dead-cops.html

http://youtu.be/GD4gBKfYkxM?t=48s
"SUFFER THE LITTLE CHILDREN LET THEM COME UNTO ME FOR SUCH IS THE KINGDOM OF GOD. UNLESS ONE COMES TO ME AS A CHILD HE SHALL IN NO WISE INHERIT THE KINGDOM"
The need for "child like faith" in these dark times has never been greater....
S E L A H
OP-ED 16 MARCH 2013 Rev James Wesley Jr
This struggle looks like one of the ole "Soap Operas" you know "AS THE STOMACH TURNS OR "ALL THE OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN",OR "SLIPPIN INTO DARKNESS" OR "MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT"... All of these sarcastic titles have something in common with their real TV counterparts...They are a "Continuous Loop" of unending "Drama"....These Social/Political and Cultural struggles we are heading toward a conclusion that will be declared by the return of JESUS CHRIST,HE IS a righteous JUDGE,completely incorruptible, absolutely powerful,has told the "END OF THE MAN'S STORY FROM THE BEGINNING"
AND WROTE IT "IN DETAIL IN A LOVE LETTER CALLED THE BIBLE"...SOME ASK THE QUESTION "HOW CAN A
LOVING GOD ALLOW ALL THIS MESS?" READ THE BOOK..."MAN WAS CREATED ,AND GIVE SOMETHING THAT SETS HIM APART FROM ALL OTHER CREATED BEINGS" THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE!!! HE WAS WARNED AND CHOSE NOT TO OBEY AND ALL OF CREATION AND SPECIFICALLY "MANKIND" HAS BEEN SUFFERING THE
CONSEQUENCES. THE BOOK CLEARLY EXPRESSED HIS PLAN TO GET HIS CHILDREN OUT OF THIS MESS! FROM THE PROMISE TO ADAM AND EVE THAT "THE SEED OF THE WOMAN" WOULD CRUSH THE HEAD OF THE SERPENT" TO ISAIAH "A VIRGIN SHALL CONCEIVE A CHILD AND HIS NAME WILL BE EMMANUEL GOD IS WITH US" IN ISAIAH 53 "HE WAS BRUISED FOR OUR TRANSGRESSION HE WAS CRUSHED FOR OUR INEQUITIES AND CHASTISEMENT OF OUR PEACE WAS LAID UPON HIM,AND BY HIS STRIPES WE ARE HEALED. NOW THERE ARE TOO MANY TO MENTION PROPHESIES THAT ARE SPECIFIC CONCERNING HIS BIRTH AND REASON FOR COMING...IT IS LAID OUT IN THE CLEAR IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN THE THIRD CHAPTER SIXTEENTH VERSE"GOD SO LOVED THE WORLD THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON THAT WHOSOEVER BELIEVES IN HIM SHALL HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE.. THE BOOK UNLIKE ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS DOCUMENT HAS PROVEN 100% ACCURATE IN BOTH THE PROMISES,AND WARNINGS! THAT BEING SAID,i CAN SAY THERE WILL BE NO ONE IN HELL WHO DID CHOOSE TO GO AND LIKEWISE NO ONE IN HEAVEN WHO DOES NOT WANT TO BE THERE....
S E L A H
OBAMA PROMISED THAT OBAMACARE WOULDN’T RAISE TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS
PROMISE: Obama Promised That He Wouldn’t Raise Taxes On The Middle Class. OBAMA: “I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase, not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.” (Senator Barack Obama, Remarks, Dover, NH, 9/12/08)
The Middle Class Will Be Hit By ObamaCare Taxes
FAIL: The Associated Press Headline: “ObamaCare Credits Could Trigger Surprise Tax Bills.” (Stephen Ohlemacher, “ObamaCare Credits Could Trigger Surprise Tax Bills,” The Associated Press, 4/2/13)
Millions Of Americans “Could Get Stung By Surprise Tax Bills.” “Millions of people who take advantage of government subsidies to help buy health insurance next year could get stung by surprise tax bills if they don’t accurately project their income.” (Stephen Ohlemacher, “ObamaCare Credits Could Trigger Surprise Tax Bills,” The Associated Press, 4/2/13)
“Millions Of Middle-Income Families” Could Get Hit By Higher Tax Bills If They Fail To Accurately Project Future Income. “What happens if you or your spouse gets a raise and your family income goes up in 2014? You could end up with a bigger subsidy than you are entitled to. If that happens, the law says you have to pay back at least part of the money when you file your tax return in the spring of 2015. That could result in smaller tax refunds or surprise tax bills for millions of middle-income families.” (Stephen Ohlemacher, “ObamaCare Credits Could Trigger Surprise Tax Bills,” The Associated Press, 4/2/13)
Former Health Care Counsel For Internal Revenue Service: “I Can’t Think Of What Else They Do In The Tax System Currently That Works That Way.” “‘I think this will be the hardest thing for members of the public to understand because it is a novel aspect of this tax credit,’ said Catherine Livingston, who recently served as health care counsel for the Internal Revenue Service. ‘I can’t think of what else they do in the tax system currently that works that way.’ Livingston is now a partner in the Washington office of the law firm Jones Day.” (Stephen Ohlemacher, “ObamaCare Credits Could Trigger Surprise Tax Bills,” The Associated Press, 4/2/13)
ObamaCare Contains “The Largest Set Of Tax Law Changes In More Than 20 Years.” “The health care law ‘includes the largest set of tax law changes in more than 20 years,’ according to the Treasury inspector general who oversees the IRS. The agency will have to hire thousands of workers to manage it, requiring significant budget increases that already are being targeted by congressional Republicans determined to dismantle the president’s signature initiative.” (Stephen Ohlemacher, “The Tax Man Cometh To Police You On Health Care,” The Associated Press, 7/7/12)
The Nonpartisan Joint Committee On Taxation Projects That The Tax Will Cost The Middle Class $40 Billion. “Twice since the health care law was passed Congress has increased the caps for how much people will have to repay. Combined, the two measures are expected to raise more than $40 billion over the next decade, according to Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation.” (Stephen Ohlemacher, “ObamaCare Credits Could Trigger Surprise Tax Bills,” The Associated Press, 4/2/13)
OBAMA PROMISED AMERICANS THAT THEY COULD KEEP THEIR HEALTH CARE PLAN
PROMISE: Obama: “And If You Like Your Insurance Plan, You Will Keep It. No One Will Be Able To Take That Away From You. It Hasn’t Happened Yet. It Won’t Happen In The Future.” OBAMA: “They’ll see that if Americans like their doctor, they will keep their doctor. And if you like your insurance plan, you will keep it. No one will be able to take that away from you. It hasn’t happened yet. It won’t happen in the future.” (President Barack Obama, Remarks By The President On Health Care Reform, Portland, ME, 4/1/10)
Many Americans Will Be Forced Out Of Their Current Health Care Plan
FAIL: CNN Money Headline: “Most Individual Health Insurance Isn’t Good Enough For ObamaCare.” (Tami Luhby, “Most Individual Health Insurance Isn’t Good Enough For ObamaCare,” CNN Money, 4/3/13)
Americans Are Finding Out That Obama’s “Keep Your Plan” Promise Is Just Not True. “President Barack Obama promised over and over during the health care debate that ‘if you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.’ It turns out that, for a lot of people, that isn’t true.” (David Nather, “4 Hard Truths Of Health Care Reform,” Politico, 3/16/12)
University Of Chicago Study Found That A Majority Of Health Plans Will Have To Change To Meet ObamaCare Standards. “Just over half of the individual plans currently on the market do not meet the standards to be sold next year, when many key provisions of President Obama’s Affordable Care Act kick in, according to a University of Chicago study. That’s because the law sets new minimums for the basic coverage every individual health care plan must provide.” (Tami Luhby, “Most Individual Health Insurance Isn’t Good Enough For ObamaCare,” CNN Money, 4/3/13)
ObamaCare’s Requirements Will Likely Lead To “Higher Premiums Than Today’s” Plans. “Most individual plans sold next year, even the lowest-level ‘bronze’ plans, are likely to charge higher premiums than today’s most bare-bones individual insurance.” (Tami Luhby, “Most Individual Health Insurance Isn’t Good Enough For ObamaCare,” CNN Money, 4/3/13)
Current Health Care Plans That Don’t Meet ObamaCare Standards “Will Likely Disappear.” “So what happens to the plans that don’t meet the new minimum standards? They will likely disappear. A handful of existing plans will be grandfathered in, but the qualifying criteria for that is hard to meet: Members have to have been enrolled in the plan before the ACA passed in 2010, and the plan has to have maintained fairly steady co-pay, deductible and coverage rates until now.” (Tami Luhby, “Most Individual Health Insurance Isn’t Good Enough For ObamaCare,” CNN Money, 4/3/13)
OBAMA PROMISED THAT OBAMACARE WOULD PROVIDE “COST SAVINGS” TO BUSINESSES
PROMISE: Obama Promised that ObamaCare Would Provide “Cost-Savings” To Employers. OBAMA: “Americans who get their insurance through the workplace, cost-savings could be as much as $3,000 less per employer than if we do nothing. Now, think about that. That’s $3,000 your employer doesn’t have to pay, which means maybe she can afford to give you a raise.” (Barack Obama, Remarks At George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 3/19/10)
Obama Has Delayed “A Major Selling Point” Of ObamaCare That Would Lower Health Care Costs For Businesses
FAIL: The Obama Administration Is Delaying “A Major Selling Point” Of ObamaCare That Would “Provide Affordable Health Insurance To Small Businesses.” “Unable to meet tight deadlines in the new health care law, the Obama administration is delaying parts of a program intended to provide affordable health insurance to small businesses and their employees – a major selling point for the health care legislation.” (Robert Pear, “Health Law Provision For Small Business Delayed,” The New York Times, 4/1/13)
The Measure “Was Portrayed As A Major Advantage” Of ObamaCare. “The promise of affordable health insurance for small businesses was portrayed as a major advantage of the new health care law, mentioned often by White House officials and Democratic leaders in Congress as they fought opponents of the legislation.” (Robert Pear, “Health Law Provision For Small Business Delayed,” The New York Times, 4/1/13)
Coal Operators Shared With The Federal Reserve That “Rising Health Insurance Premiums” Are A Concern. “We heard several reports of layoffs by coal operators. Many of our contacts pointed to rising health insurance premiums as a concern.” (“Current Economic Conditions,” Federal Reserve, 3/6/13)
Cleveland’s Manufacturing Sector Cited “Rising Health Insurance Premiums” As “A Challenge.” “Wage pressures are contained, although rising health insurance premiums remain a challenge.” (“Current Economic Conditions,” Federal Reserve, 3/6/13)
As The Cost Of Health Care Continues To Increase, Employers Plan On Shifting The Higher Costs On To Employees. “Costs for healthcare and other benefits continued to increase; some contacts noted that they were passing along the higher costs to employees.” (“Current Economic Conditions,” Federal Reserve, 3/6/13)
The Obama Administration Has “Failed” Small Businesses. “The key incentive for small businesses to support ObamaCare was that they would be able to shop for the best deals in health care super-stores-called exchanges. The Administration has had 3 years to set up these exchanges. It has failed to do so.” (Joe Klein, “ObamaCare Incompetence,” Time, 4/2/13)
OBAMA PROMISED THAT AMERICANS WOULD SAVE ON THEIR HEALTH CARE PREMIUMS
PROMISE: As A Candidate, Obama Promised That His Health Care Reform Would Save American Families $2,500 By The End Of His First Term. OBAMA: “If you’ve got health insurance, we’re going to work with you to lower your premiums by $2500 per family per year. And we will not wait 20 years from now to do it or 10 years from now to do it. We will do it by the end of my first term as president of the United States of America.” (Senator Barack Obama, Remarks At Campaign Event, Columbus, OH, 2/27/08)
The Obama Administration And The Nonpartisan Society Of Actuaries Have Concluded That ObamaCare Will Raise Premiums
FAIL: “The Obama Administration Acknowledged Tuesday That Some People Could See Their Premiums Rise Under The Health Care Reform Law.” (Elise Viebeck, “Premiums Could Rise Under Health Care law, Sebelius Concedes,” The Hill’s Health Watch, 3/27/13)
Obama’s Promise To Americans That ObamaCare Will Bring Down Health Premiums “Seems A Stretch Now.” “Obama has promised that the new law will bring costs down. That seems a stretch now. While the nation has been enjoying a lull in health care inflation the past few years, even some former administration advisers say a new round of cost-curbing legislation will be needed.” (Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, “Study: Health Overhaul To Raise Claims Cost 32 Percent,” The Associated Press, 3/26/13)
The Nonpartisan Society Of Actuaries Has Found That ObamaCare Will Increase Health Insurance Costs “By An Average Of 32 Percent Per Person.” “The Society of Actuaries, a nonpartisan professional association, has issued a new report warning that the cost of medical claims in the new individual-insurance market could rise by an average of 32% per person over the first few years the law is in place, as more people with higher medical needs get coverage, and that the impact will be very different depending on the state. Medical bills are another key factor in determining premiums.” (Louise Radnofsky, “Sebelius: Some Could See Insurance Premiums,” The Wall Street Journal, 3/26/13)
The Premium Increases Come From ObamaCare’s Effect On “Medical Claims Costs — The Biggest Driver Of Health Insurance Premiums.” “Medical claims costs – the biggest driver of health insurance premiums – will jump an average 32 percent for Americans’ individual policies under President Barack Obama’s overhaul, according to a study by the nation’s leading group of financial risk analysts.” (Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, “Study: Health Overhaul To Raise Claims Cost 32 Percent,” The Associated Press, 3/26/13)
An “Overwhelming Majority” Of States Will Face Double-Digit Increases. “While some states will see medical claims costs per person decline, the report concluded the overwhelming majority will see double-digit increases in their individual health insurance markets, where people purchase coverage directly from insurers.” (Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, “Study: Health Overhaul To Raise Claims Cost 32 Percent,” The Associated Press, 3/26/13)
Whats on my mind??? Hmm lets see. The question was asked here in the community a few days ago concerning "how pervasive is the corruption in our Three Branches of Government" the focus fell on the "Judicial" and how can it be compromised? This is my response... YES THE SUPREME COURT CLERKS ARE LIKE "EXECUTIVE
SECRETARIES TO A CEO"...CLASSIFY,CATEGORIZE, PRIORITIZE, AND SUBMIT COURT BRIEFS ON EVERY SOCIALLY IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT BROUGHT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT, EACH JUSTICE HAS A CLERK,THESE ARE "APPOINTMENT" NO REVIEW NECESSARY! THEY HAVE BEEN "CAUGHT" SUPPRESSING RELEVANT BRIEFS IN ARGUMENTS FROM ROE V WADE, GAY MARRIAGE,THE ISSUE OF OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP,ETC,ETC,ETC. THAT'S IN EVERY FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION ALLEGEDLY.
S E L A H
An open letter to Congress; House and Senate
Honorable Gentlemen and Ladies;
I write today asking why you are not watching out for this Nation, why you are so easily deceived by the rhetoric, smoke and mirrors.... why you are not immediately taking action to protect this Nation, it's assets and its Citizens?
Or are you onboard with this administration?
Back in 2009 this administration forced a policy on this Nation that was extremely ill advised and the result of that failed policy is our economy in shambles, housing market in shambles, homeowners in foreclosure and a $43 Trillion dollar lawsuit for Racketeering and Money Laundering directed against White House staff, Mr. Eric Holder, numerous Bankers - and others.....
And I quote from the article found at; http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks
" This lawsuit represents the most massive scale of corruption, theft of public funds, laundering, racketeering, and failure of the government to pursue its duty to the citizens of America in history. It promises to unveil and divulge the corrupt inner workings of the federal government along with its malignant relationship with the banking industry, Wall Street, and government officials who have considered themselves cunningly beyond the law!"
Mr. Obama, just the other day, claimed he wants to do the same thing again and has begun his attempts to coerce banks to provide sub-prime mortgages..... this has been widely publicized and easily found in the Washington Post.
Honorable Gentlemen and Ladies; I submit that some among you may argue history's cyclic nature - but this one is not only close, it is exactly the same. The Chinese proverb comes immediately to mind - and this looks like insanity - or an agenda.
It may be designed to provide a springboard to declare martial law with executive orders as our Nation revolts when Citizens discover our Nation is now bankrupt because this administration has completely drained our National resources. And this may be the actual reasons...
How serious are you about "Honor" and upholding the oath of Office you were required to swear to sit that office? It does not matter what party you belong to, what the color your skin is, what religion you adhere to - we are talking about America and the Citizens of America.
Bottom line: "We the People" elected you to do a job. Like any employer, we expect our employees to do what "WE" want them to do, not what "they" want to do and certainly not what others (also elected) - want them to do....
In any business or enterprise - when employees refuse to listen to the Boss - they get fired. This is a given. To think otherwise - you are deceiving yourself.
This crosses party lines..... Do the job our Constitution demands you do and put an immediate stop to this. Pull the money plug on this administration immediately.
Respectfully,
Aubrey Mason
San Antonio, Texas
Whats on my mind????.... PETITIONS!! I have sent petitions to my Rep & Senators concerning the "eligibility" of the present POTUS. I'VE "PAID" TO HAVE "OFFICIAL" FAXES DELIVERED TO THE "HOUSE JUDICIARY" COMMITTEE CONCERNING THE APPARENT "SUPREME COURT'S" RESISTANCE TO ADDRESS THE PET IONS BEFORE THEM THAT HAVE BOTH "MERIT" AND "CREDIBLE" EVIDENCE CONCERNING THE ISSUE. i ALONG WITH THOUSAND OF OTHER PATRIOTS BOMBARDED THE COMMITTEE DEMANDING THE COURT STOP "STONEWALLING"...WELL LO-AND BEHOLD IF STUMBLE OVER THE FACT THAT JUST A COUPL
E OF DAYS AGO THEY BROUGHT TWO OF THE JUSTICES BEFORE THEM...THE ISSUE WAS NOT ADDRESSED DIRECTLY BUT MADE A "JOKE" OFF!!! LIKE THEY WERE ON "JAY LENO"....THEY ALLOWED THE REP FROM PORT A RICO TO PUT FORTH 5 MINS OF RIDICULOUS HYPOTHETICAL S CONCERNING "HIS" ELIGIBILITY???? THE COMMITTEE SHOULD NOW BE BURIED UNDER LETTERS OF PROTEST CONCERNING THEIR SINCERITY ON THIS HISTORICAL ISSUE. I HAVE ATTACHED THE VIDEO WATCH IT WOULD LIKE TO KNOW YOUR TAKE... S E L A H
I was ask by a community Sister had I sent her U TUBE video by "Dr Fauci" one of the researchers credited with discovering the "AIDS" virus...This took me back a lot of years to my early years in ministry...having read many books from different authors just trying to find the simple truth which was in very short supply concerning this devastating condition..the who,what and why. Two books stood out that were just "basic information" no slant like "jack Web" "Just facts sir"...e was the "AIDS COVER-UP THE OTHER AID:RAGE AND REALITY WHY SILENCE IS DEADLY" both by GENE ANTONIO. The following is the "cut and paste from my response".... No but I have many of the early reports and "Ignored",Med WARNING and OP-Eds from the late 70's when it was still just barely understood and killed so swiftly with such massive fatalities. Back then it was called "GRIDS" "GAY RELATED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME"...THAT IS A STORY ALL
WITHIN ITSELF, FOR INSTANCE THIS IS THE FIRST RECORDED INSISTENCE OF A "RETRO-VIRUS",BEING FOUND IN HUMANS...THIS SET OFF ALARM BELLS DOWN AT THE "CDC" IN ATLANTA...AT THAT TIME IT WAS 99% ISOLATED TO THE "HOMOSEXUAL" COMMUNITY...THERE WAS AN INSTANT PUSH FOR QUARANTINE BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A "DISEASE" BUT RATHER A "SYNDROME" WHICH MEANS IT IS PROPAGATED AND TRANSMITTED BY BEHAVIORAL "CHOICES"....THIS IS WHEN THE "RADICAL HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT" FIRST "FLEXED" IT NEWLY "ACQUIRED" POLITICAL INFLUENCE. THE DECISIONS MADE AT THAT TIME WOULD FORESHADOW ALL OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE MIGHTIEST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM ON THE PLANET TO THE VERGE OF DESTRUCTION, AND "OBAMA CARE". THERE WAS A "WHOLESALE" RESIGNATION OF MANY RESEARCHERS FROM THE "CDC" BECAUSE "COMMON SENSE" QUARANTINE" PROTOCOLS WERE NOT "IMMEDIATELY" ESTABLISHED. ONE INTERVIEW EITHER ON AN EARLY CHRISTIAN STATION OR MAYBE EVEN "60 MINS"...THE EXPERT SAID AND I QUOTE "THIS WILL DESTROY OUR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM"...WELL OVER THE PAST 28 PLUS YEARS THIS HAS PROVEN "PROPHETIC"...THE FULL POWER OF BIG "PHARMA" AND "UNIVERSITY"
RESEARCH WENT INTO A "MANHATTAN" PROJECT MODE TO DEVELOP THE HYPER EXPENSIVE "ANTI-VIRAL" COCKTAILS THAT FOR ALL ADMITTED PURPOSES GAVE THE AVERAGE HOMOSEXUAL IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AND "AVERAGE LIFESPAN",BUT AT A COST!!! THE EXPENSE OF THIS BREAKTHROUGH VIRAL RESEARCH WHICH ALLOWED THEM TO CONTINUE WITH ALL THE UNNATURAL PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH "SODOMY, AT THE U.S. TAXPAYER'S EXPENSE!!! THEY CAME "OUT OF THE CLOSET" AND JUMPED INTO EVERYONE'S POCKET! THE LEGITIMATE "CIVIL RIGHTS" MOVEMENT "POST MARTIN LUTHER KING", UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF "MEDIA ANOINTED" BLACK LEADER JESSE JACKSON'S "RAINBOW COALITION" BECAME THE PERFECT "TROJAN HORSE" THAT GAVE THE HOMOSEXUALS SOMETHING ALL THEIR MONEY COULD NOT PURCHASE "PSEUDO LEGITIMACY"...WHICH ALLOWED THEM TO LEVERAGE THEIR IMMENSE FINANCIAL RESOURCES (HOLLYWOOD,MADISON AVE,THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM)THE MEDIA.. INTO POLITICAL POWER!!! THEY NO LONGER NEEDED EGOTISTICAL "REV JACKSON"...HE WAS "DISCARDED AND FORGOTTEN". ALL THE COST WERE DEFERRED TO MEDS ACROSS THE BOARD HENCE SKYROCKETING PRESCRIPTION DRUG COST...THE PRACTICE OF BEING "BI-SEXUAL" HELPED INFECT A LARGER PERCENTAGE OF THE "HETEROSEXUAL" COMMUNITY. BUT IT'S LIKE A "LAYER CAKE"..INCREASED INSTANCES OF "ANTI-BIOTIC RESISTANT" SUPER BUGS,TB,STD'S,HEP A,B,C.. WEIRD GASTROINTESTINAL ISSUES,DEMENTIA BEYOND KNOWN SOURCES LIKE "AYLSLHYMERS"..ON AND ON... IN EVERY HUMAN LIFE SYSTEM PROLIFERATED... COST CONTINUE TO ACCELERATE...AND HERE WE ARE.
S E L A H
Earlier this week we all have seen Mr Obama tell the country he wanted to lower housing interest rates....
Here is my take on this - and I think I'm correct in my assessment.
In 2008 this failed "policy" provided a means for this administration to steal (my opinion) taxpayer monies and claim they were bailing out the economy.... A $43 TRILLION dollar lawsuit emerged for Racketeering and Money Laundering against White House staff, Eric Holder and many others.....
And I quote from the article;
"This lawsuit represents the most massive scale of corruption, theft of public funds, laundering, racketeering, and failure of the government to pursue it’s duty to the citizens of America in history. It promises to unveil and divulge the corrupt inner workings of the federal government along with its malignant relationship with the banking industry, Wall Street, and government officials who have considered themselves cunningly beyond the law!"
Continue reading at http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks
That was then; has anyone seen a penny of that money find it's way back into our Treasury? No, we are told it will take years as it wends it's convoluted way through the Court System. WHY?
It seems to me that $43 Trillion dollars would help our economy out, it would likely put us back in the black..... so why wait? Why drag it out?
Now, we have Mr Obama attempting to do the very same thing all over again..... and not a peep is heard in dissension.
I submit to you that we have been lied to, our National Treasury has been raided by thieves calling themselves elected, we have a felon in charge of the Nation's highest Law Enforcement office - and Congress is doing nothing to prevent any of this.
I submit that should Congress allow Mr Obama to decrease interest rates again, allow him to force or coerce Banks to provide sub-prime mortgages - we will see another Multi-Trillion dollar loss of taxpayer dollars to thieves calling themselves elected... providing an excellent springboard for a marxist/communist/muslim/illegal alien to take complete control of our Nation.... as he invokes martial law when the public finds out the Nation is bankrupt and revolts.
Why has this entire issue dropped completely off the radar and why are there no Congressional Leaders standing up to protect the Nation?
Why has the House refused to cut off Mr Obama and his extremely frivolous spending?
Can anyone give me a valid reason why this has disappeared off the radar?
You would think - with this amount of taxpayer money involved - that SOMEONE in Congress would get behind it and sound off....
The WH and DOJ are both involved..... why is no one in Congress taking action? What exactly are you afraid of?
Inquiring minds want to know.
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks
The insensitive determination of "Confederate apologists" to push a twisted view of the shameful history of slavery in this country is a "wedge" of division and "suspicion" at a time "unity and trust" are necessary if we are to overcome and defeat the Liberal agenda.....NO EXCUSE,PREJUDICE,VAIN GLORY by a few who for the sake of stubburn pride would give ammunition aide and comfort to those who daily try to paint the "TEA PARTY" AS A RACIST MOVEMENT.... S E L A H
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039753_DHS_ammo_purchases_blatant_lie.html#ixzz2PYBoZIYG
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, a group of women enjoying a “girl’s day out” noticed something amiss in Beverly Hills California. They noticed that the Beverly Hills Hotel was flying the Mexican flag next to the American flag.
They proceeded to enter the hotel and ask why a hotel located in Beverly Hills, CA was flying the flag of a foreign nation alongside Old Glory.
Brandon (who did not give his last name) the front desk manager working in the hotel told them it had been raised to honor the heritage of Mexican farms that were located on the land before the hotel was built.
He then proceeded to tell them to “get used to it” and had security escort them from the building.
Apparently this is not the first time this issue has been raised with the hotel: http://immigrationbuzz.com/?p=2321
Why were American Citizens escorted from the premises for asking that question?
Why were American Citizens told to “get used to” seeing the Mexican Flag fly above a hotel located within the United States of America?
Not only does the day manager’s explanation sound dubious, it does not jive with the history shown in the hotels own video: http://www.beverlyhillshotel.com/anniversary-video
Anyone acquainted with American history knows that California has been part of the United States since the Mexican-American War (1846–1848) ended with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which determined that the states of California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Utah would became U.S. Territories, while the lower region of California, the Baja Peninsula, remained a part of Mexico.
America assumed a $3.25 million dollar debt and paid out $15 million more for California. Translated to today's money, that $15 million comes to $376 billion.
Quite simply, this is part of the “progressive” assault upon America. This is happening while “progressives” within both major American political Parties attempt to devalue American Citizenship through “comprehensive immigration reform.”
Not only should American Citizens contact Congress and tell them granting American Citizenship to foreign nationals who broke the law to come and stay in America unwarranted, they should contact the Beverly Hills Hotel immediately and let them know that flying the flag of a foreign country within the United States of America is completely unacceptable.
Reservations@thebeverlyhillshotel.com 310-276-2251.
http://mjfellright.wordpress.com/2013/04/04/welcome-to-the-hotel-mexifornia/
Will White Students be denied entrance to College Admissions Office
If you are a white student walking into a Michigan college admissions office, you have to be wondering whether you are going to be admitted based on your grades or denied because of your ethnicity. This may soon become the reality for a countless number of white college students across the wolverine state, or America if the U.S. Supreme Court rules to invalidate state voters that voted against using race to determine college admittance in 2006.
Of course racial discrimination is unfair, repugnant and dangerous to the social viability of a nation when it is used to deny the rights of its citizens. The problem which voters in Michigan thought had been corrected was to toss out race-conscious affirmative action admission plans with a fairer race-neutral approach.
At the core of the case is the notion that fifty-eight percent of Michigan voters were seriously in error in amending the Michigan constitution to prohibit discrimination in admission to state colleges on the basis of national origin, sex, race or ethnicity.
To most voters in Michigan this seemed like a relative no-brainer. How could anyone oppose not using discriminatory practices to deny a prospective student entry to college?
It seems that the liberals and race baiters who thrive on erecting barriers to race neutrality and color blind solutions wanted a different result. Instead of desiring to work to determine real solutions to any potential problems minorities might be experiencing in matriculating from high school to college admittance, they took the more convenient route to cry racism!
This approach taken by the civil rights organizations in the state and nationally have determined without much effort, to use a formula that strips sanity from the law and replaces it with fear and racist scare tactics. The goal is to scare the judicial community and moderates who are lukewarm on everything, to abandon common sense and support a fraud which has no foundation in law or on recent facts.
Where is the proof that there is continued discrimination against minorities since the voters in Michigan decided that reverse discrimination is unjustified and beneath the dignity of a state that wants equal treatment for all of its citizens? What about a state’s sovereignty under the 10th Amendment, where the state and its citizens have a right to determine its own course in order to balance justice and equality under the law?
Another key question of law which the court must grapple with is whether or not a state amendment that bars discrimination in its constitution can be found to be unconstitutional because it does not allow discriminatory practices and remedies.
Are you confused now?
You should be, because in effect, what the advocates of affirmative action are arguing is that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment should allow a state to openly and intentionally discriminate against a race or ethnic group as a means to remedy previous discriminatory practices.
We have a drug supported mental industry that has no honor! I have been overseas and saw that so many had no mental illness because it was not supported or was non-existent! Our States in the USA get Federal dollars to give mental patients addictions! It is not the drugs, but the care! A special diet by a Doctor in California totally healed my sister. It was predicted that the diet, because of past State healthcare would have to be for at least 5 years, would totally cure her!
My niece, her daughter, brought her to me. She was on the diet and totally normal! I was shocked. I mean fully normal! Much of her life she got drug rehab and special State care. She became addicted, not to the drugs per-say, but the attention given in State healthcare! Now these were our major mental problems.. one was bi-polar. The other was switch of her personality to make adjustment. This Doctor in California had given her the cure! It was diet and not drugs!
I tried to take care of her but found that she was addicted to the care, not the drugs! She is now in a care center in California instead of here in Michigan. The reality of a cure shocked the appointed State mental health giver who came to talk to me. He, I found,, moved her away from me against her daughter's wishes and mine. Why... MONEY! I told him about her diet and said it was totally successful. It did not support State care was what came out! Money with Liberals is more than with our Conservatives and is always the case. This is a biggie when we are accused. I like that when I saw I get 26k a year but have honor!
Some very good comparisons between Bush and Obama. Enjoy!
http://personalliberty.com/2013/04/04/what-if-george-w-bush-were-president/
Ralph V. Boccia of the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders runs a cancer clinic that is in danger of losing funding due to the sequester cuts. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)
Cancer clinics across the country have begun turning away thousands of Medicare patients, blaming the sequester budget cuts.
Oncologists say the reduced funding, which took effect for Medicare on April 1, makes it impossible to administer expensive chemotherapy drugs while staying afloat financially.
Patients at these clinics would need to seek treatment elsewhere, such as at hospitals that might not have the capacity to accommodate them.
“If we treated the patients receiving the most expensive drugs, we’d be out of business in six months to a year,” said Jeff Vacirca, chief executive of North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates in New York. “The drugs we’re going to lose money on we’re not going to administer right now.”
After an emergency meeting Tuesday, Vacirca’s clinics decided that they would no longer see one-third of their 16,000 Medicare patients.
“A lot of us are in disbelief that this is happening,” he said. “It’s a choice between seeing these patients and staying in business.”
Some who have been pushing the federal government to spend less on health care say this is not the right approach.
“I don’t think there was an intention to disrupt care or move it into a more expensive setting,” said Cathy Schoen, senior vice president of the Commonwealth Fund, which recently released a plan for cutting $2 trillion in health spending. “If that’s the case, we’re being penny-wise and a pound-foolish with these cuts.”
Legislators meant to partially shield Medicare from the automatic budget cuts triggered by the sequester, limiting the program to a 2 percent reduction — a fraction of the cuts seen by other federal programs.
But oncologists say the cut is unexpectedly damaging for cancer patients because of the way those treatments are covered.
Medications for seniors are usually covered under the optional Medicare Part D, which includes private insurance. But because cancer drugs must be administered by a physician, they are among a handful of pharmaceuticals paid for by Part B, which covers doctor visits and is subject to the sequester cut.
The federal government typically pays community oncologists for the average sales price of a chemotherapy drug, plus 6 percent to cover the cost of storing and administering the medication.
Since oncologists cannot change the drug prices, they argue that the entire 2 percent cut will have to come out of that 6 percent overhead. That would make it more akin to a double-digit pay cut.
“If you get cut on the service side, you can either absorb it or make do with fewer nurses,” said Ted Okon, director of the Community Oncology Alliance, which advocates for hundreds of cancer clinics nationwide. “This is a drug that we’re purchasing. The costs don’t change and you can’t do without it. There isn’t really wiggle room.”
Okon’s group has sent letters to legislators urging them to exempt cancer drugs from the sequester or, as a back-up, only shave 2 percent off the money they receive to administer the medications.
Doctors at the Charleston Cancer Center in South Carolina began informing patients weeks ago that, due to the sequester cuts, they would soon need to seek treatment elsewhere.
“We don’t sugar-coat things, we’re cancer doctors,” Charles Holladay, a doctor at the clinic, said. “We tell them that if we don’t go this course, it’s just a matter of time before we go out of business.”
Cancer patients turned away from local oncology clinics may seek care at hospitals, which also deliver chemotherapy treatments.
The care will likely be more expensive: One study from actuarial firm Milliman found that chemotherapy delivered in a hospital setting costs the federal government an average of $6,500 more annually than care delivered in a community clinic.
Those costs can trickle down to patients, who are responsible for picking up a certain amount of the medical bills. Milliman found that Medicare patients ended up with an average of $650 more in out-of-pocket costs when they were seen only in a hospital setting.
It is still unclear whether hospitals have the capacity to absorb these patients. The same Milliman report found that the majority of Medicare patients — 66 percent — receive treatment in a community oncology clinic, instead of a hospital.
Non-profit hospitals will likely have an easier time bearing the brunt of the sequester cuts. A federal program known as 340B requires pharmaceutical companies to give double-digit discounts to hospitals that treat low-income and uninsured patients.
Eastern Connecticut Health Network began preparing for additional volume after a local oncology practice sent out notice that it would stop seeing certain cancer patients.
“What we’re trying to do in the hospital is prepare for this,” ECHN spokesman Eric Berthel said. “We’re making sure we have access to the pharmaceutical companies and that we have appropriate staff on hand. We’re hoping the oncology practice will be successful in renegotiating this. It’s so fresh, so we’re pretty unsure.”
Some cancer clinics are counting on the federal government to provide relief, and continuing to see patients they expect to lose money on.
“We’re hoping that something will change, as legislators see the impact of this,” Ralph Boccia, director of the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders in Bethesda, Md., said. “I don’t think we could keep going, without a change, for more than a couple of months.”
An analysis prepared by his clinic estimates that, if the full 2 percent cut takes effect, between 50 and 70 percent of the drugs it administers would become money losers.
Boccia estimates that 55 percent of his patients are covered by Medicare, making any changes to reimbursement rates difficult to weather.
“When I look at the numbers, they don’t add up,” he said. “Business 101 says we can’t stay open if we don’t cover our costs.”
The reality of "abortion" has left me tormented , horrified, shocked and in despair. I don't know what America is anymore, I don't know what Americans are anymore and I continue to think , perhaps our day of judgement has come, worse yet , I am hoping it has come. There are millions of Americans out there who condone and revel in their "right" to murder and torture infants who are trapped in the womb of evil incarnate. I am not talking about the first month or two of the infants life in the womb. I am talking about infants that after mother and Dr fail to murder them inside the womb and fail are born alive! Babies born alive, moving in agony and fighting for life, struggling for life giving air as the mother and Dr look on. The infants are placed on a metal tray and left there to breathe their last.
I don't think we are worth saving anymore , I think Americans have become sick, twisted , demented animals who have rotted inside from their self serving , selfish attitudes. This society is darkly sick, evil and I honestly do not know if recovery is possible and if it is are the people of this nation worth fighting for. I don't know right now.
GOP Senate Chances Good
By DICK MORRIS
Published on TheHill.com on April 2, 2013
Printer-Friendly Version
Having blown five likely Senate wins on bad candidates and worse consulting, it is best not to count chickens before they hatch, but the prospects for Republican gains in the Senate in 2014 are brightening. And there is a solid shot at regaining control.
Two seats seem poised to fall into Republican laps. In West Virginia, the retirement of Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller leaves a void that Republican Congresswoman Shelley Moore Capito seems likely to fill. Moore Capito is the daughter of longtime West Virginia Gov. Arch Moore (a former client), who remained popular even after his conviction and imprisonment on corruption charges. It's hard to see any Democrat beating her.
The retirement of South Dakota's Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson also creates a vacancy in a heavily Republican state. Republican candidates are likely to be either former Gov. Mike Rounds or at-large Rep. Kristi Noem. The Democratic nominee will probably be Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, the three-term at-large former congresswoman Noem beat in 2010. Before Johnson retired, Public Policy Polling had Rounds 11 points ahead of him and 5 up on Sandlin. Noem was 4 points ahead of Johnson and 1 behind Sandlin. We all need to remember how at-large Congressman Rick Berg managed to mess up his shot at the Senate in North Dakota last year, costing the Republicans an expected pickup; we can't take anything for granted, but South Dakota looks good for the GOP at this time.
In Arkansas, Democratic incumbent Mark Pryor is not retiring -- not voluntarily anyway -- but Basswood Research has him running 8 points behind newly elected Republican Rep. Tom Cotton. Pryor's job approval is dead even, at 36-36. As Arkansas has shifted from 3:1 Democratic to 4:0 Republican in its congressional delegation over the past two cycles, and after former Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln was trounced in 2010, Pryor's incumbency rests uneasy.
Beyond those three seats, Republicans are hungrily eyeing Sen. Tom Harkin's vacancy in Iowa, and have legitimate shots at Democratic incumbents in Alaska, Louisiana, Montana and North Carolina -- red states all.
Republicans should hang on to all their vacancies, but Republican Susan Collins of Maine could be endangered as she seeks another term.
The lessons of 2010 and 2012 loom large. The Republican Party threw away five likely Senate wins -- in Nevada, Delaware, and Colorado in 2010 and in Indiana and Missouri in 2012. In each case, a strong Tea Party conservative beat a mainstream Republican in the primaries and then blew the general election -- in Indiana, Missouri and Delaware by asinine comments, and in Nevada and Colorado by incompetent campaigns.
But remember that, without the Tea Party, we would never have won 68 seats in the House in 2010. So we shouldn't reject all Tea Party insurgents, but rather be more sensible in our choice of candidates.
To win, Republicans must end the Democratic hegemony among Latino voters. The GOP performance on immigration reform will tell the story.
And Republicans must stop saying stupid things about abortion. In the narrow sense, we must make sure that we defeat in primaries any candidate who favors a ban on abortion in the case of rape. Such a nominee would be too far to the right to be elected in any of these swing states.
In a larger sense, Republican nominees should move away from the legal front on abortion and toward the practical way to vindicate a pro-life agenda. After 40 years of Roe under Republican courts, let's all realize that it is not about to be overturned under President Obama. Let's instead emphasize our determination to reduce the number of abortions by birth control, abstinence education, counseling, adoption incentives and parental notification and consent. We have lowered the number of abortions from 1.4 million to 800,000 in the past two decades. We should set a goal of getting it under 500,000 -- a goal both mainstream liberals and conservatives can unite to accomplish.
The prospects are bright for 2014 if we can heed the admonition of the cartoon character Pogo: "we have met the enemy and he is us!"