HILLARY’S ELECTION RIGGING WARRANTS SPECIAL PROSECUTOT

                                                                                     By

                                                                       Daniel John Sobieski

And don’t forget Uranium One, Fusion GPS, keeping classified emails on an iunsecured private server, deleting 33,000 emails under subpoena, and, well, you get the idea. Unfortunately our AWOL AG Jeff Sessions, whose face was last seen on the side of a milk carton, does not. So we are left with the absurdity of a spcial prosecutor looking into Trump-Russia collusion where there is none while overlooking the multiple Clinton elephants in the room.

The revelation that both the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign were funneling money through a law firm to Fusion GPS to produce a slimy and fake dossier on Trump culled from foreign sources was bad enough. Now we find, courtesy of the one truthful and remorseful Democrat on this planet, former DNC Chairperson Donna Brazile, that the DNC was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton, who probably violated multiple FEC campaign laws in rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders and shifted cash around in a manner that could only be called, what’s the word Robert Mueller would use, money-laundering:

In an excerpt from her upcoming book, Brazile says she discovered a document that explained why the Clinton campaign had such a stranglehold on the DNC. It was published in Politico Thursday.

“When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard,” she wrote, “I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.”

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias — specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

Hillary Clinton staged a political coup worthy of a banana republic. Brazile has confirmed what the Sanders campaign claimed as early as May of 2016, charges that Hillary Clinton was engaging in money-laundering to help her campaign:

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, on Monday criticized a Hillary Clinton campaign fundraising scheme that state party leaders told Politico has been used as a self-serving “money-laundering” conduit.

Despite Clinton’s pledges to rebuild state parties, Politico found that less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by the Victory Fund has stayed in the state parties’ coffers.

“Secretary Clinton is looting funds meant for the state parties to skirt fundraising limits on her presidential campaign,” Weaver said. “We think the Clinton campaign should let the state parties keep their fair share of the cash.”

Sanders’ and Clinton’s primary campaigns both raised about $26 million in April, but Politico documented how the Hillary Victory Fund, a supposedly joint fundraising committee, has been exploited to inflate her presidential primary campaign.

“Secretary Clinton has exploited the rules in ways that let her high-dollar donors like Alice Walton of Wal-Mart fame and the actor George Clooney and his super-rich Hollywood friends skirt legal limits on campaign ontributions,” Weaver added. “If Secretary Clinton can’t raise the funds needed to run in a competitive primary without resorting to laundering, how will she compete against Donald Trump in a general election?”

Turns out that even with money-laundering, Hillary couldn’t win. On a receny edition of Fox News Sunday. House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-SC, notes that in addition to laundering her campaign cash through her wholly-owned subsidiary, the DNC, Hillary Clinton used a law firm to funnel cash to Russia-linked Fusion GPS:

Gowdy said, “I’m not an election law expert, but the good news is you don’t have to be too understated the absurdity believing you can just launder all of your campaign money by just hiring a law firm. Imagine if you and I were running for Congress, and we just hired a law firm and said ‘Hey, you go to all the opposition, you go buy all the television, you go buy all the bumper stickers, you go higher all the experts, and we will launder all of this through a law firm. I can’t think of anything that defeats the purpose of transparency laws more than that.”

He continued, “I am interested in that, and I am also interested in sharing some memory tricks with folks at the DNC because no one can remember who paid 10 million dollars to a law firm to do oppo research. I find that stunning. $10 million and no one can remember who authorized it, who approved it. So you’ve got two issues, a memory issue and then the lack of transparency by laundering money through a law firm.”

And did we forget the Clinton Foundation? As Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett notes, it was used in an influence peddling scheme to enrich the Clintons and advance their political ambitions, colluding with the Russians to, among other things, sell 20 percent of our uranium supplies to interests and donors aligned with Moscow:

It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.”  The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns.  It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121).  This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.

Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained.  In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity.

But that’s not all.  Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband.  Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.   

Hillary Clinton was the godfather, or is it godmother, that ran multiple criminal enterprises. The existence of a special prosecutor investigating Trump-Russia collusion is based on a fake dossier she controlled the financing of. Paul Manafort and his co-defendants could make the “fruit of a poison tree” argument, that since the dossier that sparked the investigation into collusion and resulting indictments was politically motivated and financed, and its unverified contents may have been used by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants, anything that resulted from it should be summarily dismissed.

As for the aforementioned Marc Elias, his involvement in Hillary’s crimes is just one facet of his involvement with the crimes of Hilary and the Democrats. Remember he sat between former DNC Chair and Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and John Podesta as they invoked the Sergeant Schultz (no relation) defense regarding Fusion GPS

Did DNC and Team Hillary attorney Marc Elias lead John Podesta and Debbie Wasserman Schultz into a perjury trap? According to CNN, the two testified to congressional investigators that they did not have any knowledge of the funding for the Fusion GPS dossier that prompted an FBI probe into Donald Trump campaign figures.

In recent closed-door interviews with the Senate intelligence committee, Podesta and Wasserman Schultz said they did not know who had funded Fusion GPS, the intelligence firm that hired British Intelligence Officer Christopher Steele to compile the dossier on Trump, the sources said.

Podesta was asked in his September interview whether the Clinton campaign had a contractual agreement with Fusion GPS, and he said he was not aware of one, according to one of the sources.

Sitting next to Podesta during the interview: his attorney Marc Elias, who worked for the law firm that hired Fusion GPS to continue research on Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC, multiple sources said. Elias was only there in his capacity as Podesta’s attorney and not as a witness.

Whether or not this testimony was under oath, it is a crime to provide false testimony to Congress.

Indeed it is. Add it to the list of crimes that go uninvestigated and unprosecuted as AG Jeff Sessions contemplates his navel. A special prosecutor needs to be appointed and a grand jury empanelled to investigate this list of crimes that would make a mafia don proud. Justice should be blind and not brain-dead. Unless there is a double standard at play here, there is no equal justice under the law and Hillary Clinton was right when she said laws are for the little people.

          Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.               

Obama Rigged Deal To Secretly Smuggle US Uranium To Europe, Asia

Posted on November 3, 2017 by Rick Wells in Foreign Policy, Globalism World Govt, Obama, Organized Leftist Opposition, Political Corruption, Soveriegnty, Take Our Country Back // 0 Comments

Obama manipulated the deal to provide a method of secretly transporting the Uranium One uranium out of the US, to Canada, Europe and Asia despite promises otherwise…

The interview with John Solomon of the Hill and Sarah Carter exposes another false claim that was made by the Obama regime and others who stood to benefit from the Uranium One deal, that none of our uranium would be exported outside of the United States.

Solomon says that claim is “definitely disproven,” there’s not any doubt that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission authorized, through a back door, a third party license to let Uranium One export to Canada and then according to the Department of Energy records and according to a statement that Uranium One gave us, some of that uranium left Canada and went to Europe and possibly to Asia.”

Asked if we know where in Europe or Asia, Solomon replies that we do not, that “it’s proprietary information, the final destinations, at least so far, we’ve not been able to get that.”

He notes that they’ll keep digging but says “The most important point is we’re a country that has to import most of our uranium. Here’s uranium in the United States and for some reason we let it go to Canada and possibly to Europe and beyond.

He notes those were the concerns of lawmakers who objected at the time, and the assurances they were given are now exposed as lies. Hannity questions Solomon on another aspect of his reporting which links Hussein Obama directly to the nefarious deal.

Hannity says, “Barack Obama purposely manipulated the process to allow this trucking company to be the conduit by which they got the uranium out of the country.” Solomon explains there were a series of decisions made by the Obama administration, time and time again between 2010 and 2012, that are incredibly favorable to Rosatom, the state owned Russian nuclear energy industry.”

He notes, “Time and again these decisions are being made while the FBI knows that there is criminality going on by that company’s executives.” Hannity injects the examples of “bribery, extortion, money laundering, racketeering and so on.”

Solomon continues, “And there’s a second thing that I’m just starting to report out now but there were also concerns in the Obama administration, very specific concerns that Russia was engaged in a uranium scheme, that it was going to get enough control of Uranium, dump it on the market, drive all the prices down and put all the other people out of business.”

He says, “Those are two legitimate national security concerns that don’t seem to have an effect on all of these giveaways. Sara Carter also has troubling information about a Department of Energy employee that she shares.

Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells at https://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/, https://gab.ai/RickRWells, https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RickwellsUs and on my website http://RickWells.US

When the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation published their inaugural survey on American attitudes toward socialism and communism last year, the results revealed some very disturbing trends in American society.

Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation (VCMF), a D.C.-based nonprofit were startled to see that one out of every two millennials in the United States say they would rather live in a socialist or communist country than a capitalist democracy such as the United States.

VCMF Reports:

This year’s centennial anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution has caused many to reflect on communism’s place in our collective memory. It has been a full century since Vladimir Lenin’s Bolsheviks seized power in Petrograd and communism made its bloody debut on the world stage. Authors, activists, and politicians alike are asking the question: what has America learned from one hundred years of communism?

The answer? Apparently, not much.

When the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation published our inaugural survey on American attitudes toward socialism and communism last year, the results revealed some disturbing trends in American society.

We discovered a rampant amnesia about the crimes of communist regimes and a growing inclination among younger Americans toward favorable views of communism and socialism.

This week we completed our second annual study, tracking how opinions about communism among Americans have changed since 2016. The results are not encouraging.

For starters, as of this year, more Millennials would prefer to live in a socialist country (44%) than in a capitalist one (42%). Or even a communist country (7%). The percentage of Millennials who would prefer socialism to capitalism is a full ten points higher than that of the general population.

The significance of this finding cannot be overstated—as of last year, Millennials surpassed Baby Boomers as the largest generational cohort in American society.

The largest generation in America would prefer to live under socialism or communism than under a free market system that respects the rule of law, private property, and limited state intervention. This finding is coupled with the fact that, despite Millennials’ enthusiasm for socialism and communism, they do not, in fact, know what those words mean.

U.S. Senator Demands Communist West Point Graduate Be Removed

Our study indicates that the attraction of socialism for Millennials has less to do with their familiarity with the ideology and more to do with their discontent with the current economic system, the flaws of which they blame on free-market capitalism.

At 53%, Millennials reported the highest levels of discontent with the American economic system and indicated their belief that the American free enterprise system worked against them. Seven in ten Americans felt that the highest earners in America do not pay their fair share. Half of them indicated that increased taxes on the rich are the way to solve inequality, while 37% advocated for a “complete change of the American economic system.”

One remarkable finding of our survey is that over two thirds of Americans favor absolute protections for free speech, regardless of their views of communism or socialism. This is good news and indicates that the violent protests and intimidation of guest speakers on American college campuses is not widely sanctioned behavior.

Communists in particular and socialists more broadly have historically and ideologically favored state regulation of the press, speech, and voluntary association.

Our results suggest that Millennials who favor socialism and communism have not thoroughly considered the implications of their stated political beliefs.

Given the apparent growing preference for socialism, one might think that Millennials would be familiar with the world’s newest socialist country—Venezuela.

Unfortunately, Americans are as ignorant of the developing situation in socialist Venezuela as they are of the definition of socialism itself. Six out of every ten Americans surveyed were wholly unfamiliar with Venezuela’s socialist dictator, Nicolás Maduro, and the economic crisis and human rights abuses that have occurred under his rule.

So, 100 years after the Bolshevik Revolution, the majority of the largest generational cohorts in America show great enthusiasm for socialism while completely failing to correctly identify its definition when asked or examine its consequences. It gets worse.

Seven in ten Americans drastically underestimate the number of people killed at the hands of communist regimes over the last century. This is unsurprising, given the fact that half of all Millennials say they have never heard of Mao Zedong, a man whose policies killed nearly 60 million people, making him the greatest mass murderer of the twentieth century.

Unfortunately, these data points are not the only indication of the pervasive ignorance in the West regarding communism’s legacy of fear, genocide, and destruction. This year, communist ensigns emblazoned with hammer and sickle waved opposite Nazi flags in Charlottesville. Ireland issued stamps of Ernesto “Che” Guevara—a racist, homophobic murderer—as thousands gathered in Cuba, Bolivia, and Argentina on the 50th anniversary of his death.

A West Point cadet and Afghanistan veteran wore Che’s image in uniform while publicly proclaiming that “communism will win.” Violent, militant groups on the far left intimidate and antagonize in the name of “anti-fascism” and are praised in the media for doing so. News outlets publish articles extolling the virtues of life under communism, pointing out “all the good things” that communism accomplished.

Meanwhile, communist China’s leader—newly christened the most powerful man in the world—rules the most populous nation on earth with an iron fist while his underlings proclaim him the new Mao Zedong. At home, he uses force and intimidation to consolidate his power while denying his people the most basic human rights. Abroad, he uses deceit, misinformation, and cyber espionage to shut down publishing houses and drown out critical voices while engaging in the most ambitious imperial project since the Soviet Union’s “Evil Empire” days.

Communism isn’t back:  It never left. We simply forgot about it. And as it rears its ugly head once more, openly and shamelessly, we seem far less prepared to meet the ideological challenge in this century compared to the last.

A communist revolution in 1917 launched the bloodiest century in human history. In 2017, we have all but forgotten the appalling legacy of this gruesome ideology. We continue to be led astray by the false promises, the mendacious rhetoric, and the ignorant romanticizing of history’s most effective death cult.

Thankfully, there is a silver lining. Compared to last year, more Millennials now think communism is still a problem today. Additionally, Millennial favorability toward communist figures like Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and Che Guevara has dropped over the past year. Meanwhile, America’s youngest generation—Generation Z—exhibits an appreciation of individuality and a deep mistrust of collectivism in all its forms, especially that of communism. Having come of age after the Great Recession, they are frugal, entrepreneurial, and confident that the American economic system works in their interest.

Despite this positive trend, America’s youngest generation is still largely ignorant of the crimes of communist regimes or how Marxist ideology directly enables such atrocities.

If we want to truly put this horrific ideology on the ash heap of history, we have a responsibility to warn a new generation of Americans about its dangers. We have a responsibility to tell the truth.

Within the inaugural survey, the data is very revealing.

The key findings found:

• The First-of-its-kind YouGov Poll Shows “Bernie Sanders Bounce” for Collectivism
• Surprising Support for Socialism and Communism Among Younger Americans
• 45% of 16-20 year olds would vote for a “Socialist”; 21% for a “Communist”
• One-third of Millennials Believe George W. Bush Killed More People Than Stalin
• Vast Majority Unaware of Communism’s Death Toll
• More Millennials Prefer Words of Karl Marx Over the Bible
• Bernie Sanders’ Philosophy Wins More Support Than Milton Friedman’s

News

White QB Tackled By Black Teammates For Not Kneeling Just Made Shocking Admission About What Else They Did To Him

( People still support kind of behavior by still going to the games and watching on T.V. )

It’s the twenty first century, year 2017, and I am still surprised how things like this still happen and are relevant. Things have escalated very quickly, as a white quarterback suffered a season-ending injury due to extreme racism on the field.

The attitude of black players in the NFL over the past month is getting out of hand. The protests have taken a racist turn, as they are giving black power salutes, inspired by Michael Bennett, a player from The Seattle Seahawks.

Except Derek Carr, all of Oakland Raiders’ players are black. He was the only one from his team that stood proud for the national anthem, as his entire offensive line sat it out.

The talk among the black players who sat out the anthem was, “If he [Carr] wants to stand alone for the National Anthem, he can stand alone on the field.”

The players who needed to protect Carr were not doing their job after the protest. He went on to be sacked four times in a row and had sustained a season-ending injury.

Football is an aggressive sport and we shouldn’t be blaming the other team’s players, after all they were doing their job. It’s Carr’s teammates who are in the wrong, not shielding him and leaving him alone in the field, that attitude lead to Derek sustaining a career-ending fractured spine.

The game came to a complete stop when Carr took a vicious hit. The medics rushed in to help him, but he wasn’t moving at all. He was carried away to a medical tent as the fans were in complete shock to what just occurred.

The Ringer:

“Carr was scrambling in the backfield trying to avoid a sack from multiple Broncos defenders when, falling toward the ground, it appeared he took a knee in the back from Broncos defensive end Adam Gotsis. Carr stayed down on the field before heading to the blue medical tent on the sideline, and eventually the locker room.”

Throwing a game is illegal, and the black players of the Seahawks could go in jail for that, said TV Host Bill O’Reilly later in the broadcast.

Carr’s injury can’t be ruled out as coincidental, because of what his teammates said about leaving him alone on the field. We hope that Carr recovers as soon as possible.

LORETTA LYNCH PLEAD THE FIFTH A WHOPPING 74 TIMES DURING CONGRESSIONAL HEARING

Brazile revelation tears at Democratic scab

Democrats struggling to rebuild their party after their stunning 2016 presidential defeat were dealt another blow on Thursday: Donna Brazile’s acknowledgement that the Democratic National Committee tipped the scales in favor of Hillary Clinton during last year’s primary.

In a surprising excerpt from her upcoming book, Brazile, who took over the DNC on an interim basis last year after Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (R-Fla.) stepped down as chair, criticized the agreement between Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the DNC meant to keep the party financially viable.

The arrangement, she wrote in a book excerpt published in Politico, was “not illegal, but it sure looked unethical.” 

“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before voters had decided which one they wanted to lead,” Brazile wrote. “This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.” 

Democratic circles were abuzz on Thursday after Brazile’s piece was published because, as one former Clinton aide put it, “it poured buckets of salt on the wounds” of the party.

“It's another episode of the 2016 soap opera everyone wishes was over, that’s for damn sure,” said Tracy Sefl, a Democratic consultant who served as a surrogate to the Clinton campaign during the 2016 race. 

Democrats appearing on cable television on Thursday were asked about Brazile’s revelations, and entered the unending fight.

Asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if the Democratic Party was indeed rigged for Clinton, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) offered a simple “Yes.”

Sanders aides and supporters said Brazile’s admission proved that they were right all along when they said the DNC was tipping the scales in favor of Clinton. 

Jeff Weaver, who served as Sanders’s former campaign manager, called the DNC actions “egregious” and “undemocratic” in an interview with CNN’s Brooke Baldwin.  

“It can’t be allowed to happen again,” Weaver said. 

“Let me tell this to the elites who today still control much of the Democratic Party apparatus: If you do not open up the party, if you do not allow the people in, if you do not advocate for the types of reforms that we need, you will be destroying the opportunity we have to take on Donald Trump,” Weaver cautioned. 

In the interview, Weaver hinted that the DNC’s behavior could have prevented Sanders from ultimately vying against Donald Trump. 

“There is no doubt that he would have defeated Donald Trump,” he said.

A Clinton spokesman did not return a request for comment. 

Wasserman Schultz ducked reporters in the Capitol on Thursday, stepping into an elevator and referring questions to her office. Her office issued a brief statement, attributed to the congresswoman, that ignored all of the charges lodged by Brazile.

 

"It was a tremendous honor to be asked by President Obama to serve as chair of the DNC. I am proud of the work our team did to support Democrats up and down the ballot in the 2016 election and to re-elect the President in 2012," the statement read. 

 

"With Donald Trump in the White House, Democrats must stay focused on enacting a progressive agenda to protect our citizens, our values and our democracy and remain united towards our goal of electing Democratic congressional majorities in 2018."

The Brazile excerpt comes as tensions between the Clinton and Sanders camps linger.

Multiple Democrats have talked to The Hill about how those tensions complicate the party’s efforts to rebuild.

In her new book, Clinton accused Sanders of inflicting damage on her campaign. And Clinton supporters were miffed when Sanders was asked to speak at a women’s event in Detroit last month. 

“The problem is, some Hillary people still can’t accept the reality that she was a flawed candidate, so they’re trying to blame it on anybody else just like she did in her book,” Bill Press, a Sanders surrogate and radio talk show host, said in an email to The Hill. (Press a regular columnist for The Hill.) 

Sanders aides appearing Thursday generally sought to take the high road.

Weaver in his interview with Baldwin repeatedly said it was important for Democrats to move on and unify in opposition to Trump's policies.

Press argued that that Sanders is “doing the right thing” by refusing to “get drawn into Hillary bullshit, while criss-crossing the country in support of progressive candidates and helping rebuild the Democratic Party.” 

But when it comes to putting the pieces back together, Democrats say they’re concerned about how the party will unify.

“I think it’s a problem. It really is,” said Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist. “It’s going to make it that much harder to come together. And now that there’s confirmation that this actually went on, it makes it increasingly difficult to incorporate the Bernie people."

“And I don’t blame them either,” Bannon added. “Now there’s confirmation of it, and they have every right to be angry about it because they knew it all along.” 

This story was updated at 8:54 a.m. to include a statement from Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.).

It was a little while ago that Sen. John McCain was awarded the Liberty Medal from the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.  The Liberty Medal is given to those who have “secured the blessings of personal liberty to people the world over.” In the speech McCain spoke brashly about of the current President. It is alarming that this particular award was given to a Senator who has constantly ignored the damage done to civil liberties in the search for “national security”. Senator McCain has never worried about past conflicts started without Congressional approval, at least until Donald Trump became President. Now he wants in on the action and to make the decisions for going to war that are not his to make.

The speech was nothing more than Trump bashing by the ultimate RINO. He talks of abandoning the “Ideals we have advanced around the globe” but neglects to mention embracing the gangs of thugs in the Middle East from Saudi Arabia, to Libya, and even as far back as Kosovo. McCain has thrown his policies behind the Yemen debacle that has led to war crimes and disasters to the people of the poverty stricken country. The foreign policy that has been developed by this senator has led to wars in countries we should not be in because McCain has pushed for agreements that do not benefit those countries. There have been conflicts started by our country with countries that had the temerity to disagree with this man. Of course, McCain clothes it all up in patriotism and freedom, values that disappear with the dust hanging heavily from the bombings over the areas like a evil cloud. While McCain spiels of “half baked nationalism” he continues to push an interventionism that is at best irresponsible and at worst criminal.

On the domestic front, McCain has clearly turned his back on the American people. Calling President Trump “poorly informed” and “impulsive” McCain has turned against the Wall and instead wants a “comprehensive” immigration bill that the progressive/socialist Democrats and the other RINOS can rally around. This was the same man who called “Antifa” and “Black Lives Matter” are the true Americans after Charlottesville. McCain tweeted “ There’s no moral equivalency between racists and Americans standing up to defy hate and bigotry.” Does this man not know that the main agenda of Antifa is to make American ungovernable. Perhaps that is what the globalists such as McCain really wants, to make America ungovernable. And isn’t this the same old man who called the Tea Party “wacko birds” and “hobbits” because they wanted to control spending and lower taxes. That should explain whose side McCain really is on.

Before our military leaders Defense Secretary James Mattis and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Joseph Dunford, that made the decisions that make this country safe, McCain refused to allow nominations for positions of national security because they refused to state in an open forum what the processes were in place to move forward. Questions abound over this new McCain doctrine. Where was McCain when the “ leading from behind was failing so miserably, or when Obama went on his apology tour, or the ransom of over $1 billion paid to Iran or when the country’s Uranium was sold to the Russians by our government? Where was McCain when North Korea, Syria, Iran and Russia treated our country with impunity, knowing that our Muslim in Chief would do nothing to stop them. This is the abandoning of America’s Ideals that Sen. McCain is so vocal about now with President Trump. Where were you then Sir? I suggest the speech that you so knowingly gave when you awarded the Liberty Medal was about eight years too late.

It is a given that McCain has never forgiven President Trump saying he was not a war hero because he was captured. Now a globalist, McCain is using the rhetoric of the Soros backed globalists of which he is one.

The Trump dossier is also a sticking point that McCain has yet to explain. Aleksej Gubarev, a Russian tech executive that was named in the dossier is claimed to have been recruited by the FSB, the Russian intelligence agency. The question that is at the forefront of this situation is who gave the dossier to Buzzfeed to publish. According to Evan Fray-Witzer, Gubarev’s lawyer claimed that Buzzfeed asked Fusion GPS for the dossier and were refused, so how did they get it? Sen. McCain and a former official at the McCain Institute funded by George Soros, were told about the dossier and Kramer flew to London to met with Steele and procure the dossier. There are no answers forthcoming and even the Congressional committees are at a stalemate because Fusion GPS has pleaded the fifth.

McCain, understandably has been given leeway because he was a war hero from the same Vietnam War that I and many others also fought. The damage done to this country, to the military and the psyche of the conflict will never be over for many. Those who fought and died there on the whole did their part for a country that they loved.

On March 25^th,1999 two of McCain fellow POW’s Ted Guy and Gordon Larson told the Phoenix New Times that they doubted McCain was physically harmed. While he was at The Plantation” he was not physically abused. The Plantation was the compound that people were released from and no one was ever physically abused. Upon his transfer to the Hanoi Hilton and by his own account McCain cracked after two or three days.McCain promised them military information if they would take him to the hospital where he denies that he received any special medical treatment. In the first two weeks in the hospital, the Hanoi government started press releases and announcements from John McCain. Divulged by McCain were specific military information and intelligence the location of his carrier and pertinent information on strength and numbers and even the location and number of rescue boats. The information about routes of incoming American aircraft helped the Hanoi government to increase the effectiveness of their air defense systems. Included in the information was altitude, direction and alist of targets American aircraft were intending to hit. This led to a an increase of 60% more aircraft lost and resulting in calling off of bombing of North Vietnam.

Is this a violation of the Code of Conduct, not if your father and grandfather were both U.S. Navy admirals

 Cpl. Bob Dumas USA (Ret).  Has claimed “He didn’t want nobody to check his background because a lot of the POW’s said he was a collaborator of the enemy.

Dr. James Lucier former U.S. Senate Chief of Staff “We did know that when he was in the Vietnamese prison he co-operated with the communist news services in giving interviews that were not flattering to the United States”..

  Information shows that he made over 32 tapes of propaganda for the North Vietnamese government. The Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain and the U.S. Veteran Dispatch continue to investigate and expose the real “war hero” John McCain.  The truth, long hidden by the government and the military higher ups will come out. Even though McCain has passed legislation to classify his records forever, it will be soon be clear that this man is not only not a true Republican, but not an America hero.

NY Deputy Police Commissioner: “This isn’t about Islam, this isn’t about the mosque he attends”

November 1, 2017 9:59 pm By Robert Spencer 88 Comments

Sayfullo Saipov screamed “Allahu akbar” as he murdered people. Why did he do that? Does John Miller understand what the significance of that cry in the context of a jihad attack is? How can he be so sure that this is not about Islam, when Saipov himself associated his act with Islam?

Video https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/ny-deputy-police-commissioner-this-isnt-about-islam-this

And how does Miller know that this isn’t about the mosque he attends? How does he know the mosque didn’t exhort Saipov to commit an act of violent jihad for Allah? Is that a possibility that is just too politically damaging for the de Blasio administration to contemplate?