Michigan: Muslim shouting ‘allahu akbar’ stabs police officer at Flint airport

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

Source: Canadian Charged in US Airport Attack Investigated as Terror – Bloomberg

Flint, Mich. (AP) — A Canadian man shouted in Arabic before stabbing a police officer in the neck Wednesday at a Michigan airport, and referenced people being killed overseas during the attack that’s now being investigated as an act of terrorism, federal officials said.

Amor Ftouhi, 49, of Quebec, was immediately taken into custody. A criminal complaint charging him with committing violence at an airport says Ftouhi asked an officer who subdued him why the officer didn’t kill him.

The attack at Bishop International Airport in Flint, Michigan, is being investigated as an act of terrorism, but authorities have no indication at this time that the suspect was involved in a “wider plot,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge David Gelios.

“At this time we view him as a lone-wolf attacker,” Gelios said. “We have no information to suggest any training.”

The criminal complaint says Ftouhi stabbed airport police Lt. Jeff Neville with a large knife after yelling “Allahu akbar,” the Arabic phrase for “God is great.” According to the FBI, Ftouhi said something similar to “you have killed people in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and we are all going to die.”

More charges against Ftouhi could be filed as prosecutors take the case to a grand jury seeking an indictment, Gelios said.

Neville was in satisfactory condition after initially being in critical condition, airport police Chief Chris Miller said at a late afternoon news conference where the charge against Ftouhi was announced.

Ftouhi appeared in federal court in Flint to hear the charge and will get a court-appointed attorney. A court spokesman says Ftouhi will remain in custody until a bond hearing next Wednesday.

The attack occurred just before 10 a.m., prompting officials to evacuate and shut down the airport and add security elsewhere in the Michigan city about 50 miles (80.46 kilometers) northwest of Detroit. White House press secretary Sean Spicer said President Donald Trump was briefed on the stabbing, and U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he was “proud of the swift response” by authorities from both the U.S. and Canada.

Police in Canada were searching a Montreal apartment. Montreal police spokesman Benoit Boiselle said officers with their department were assisting the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in the search on behalf of an FBI request. A number of police stood guard outside the apartment building in the east end of Montreal located on Bélair St. in St-Michel borough. Canadian TV footage showed police escorting at least one person from the building where Ftouhi is believed to have lived.

Gelios said Ftouhi legally entered the U.S. at Champlain, New York, on June 16 and made his way to the Flint airport on Wednesday morning.

Ftouhi spent some time in public, unsecured areas of the airport before going to a restroom where he dropped two bags before attacking the officer with a 12-inch knife that had an 8-inch serrated blade, Gelios said.

Ftouhi never went through any security screening, Gelios said. He described Ftouhi as “cooperative” and talking to investigators.

Witnesses described seeing the suspect being led away as Neville was bleeding, a knife on the ground.

“The cop was on his hands and knees bleeding from his neck,” Ken Brown told The Flint Journal. “I said they need to get him a towel.”

Cherie Carpenter, who was awaiting a flight to Texas to see her new grandchild, told Flint TV station WJRT she saw the attacker being led away in handcuffs. She described the man in custody as appearing “blank, just totally blank.”

Miller, the airport chief, said Neville “fought him to the end,” managing to stop the stabbing and bring Ftouhi to the ground as Miller and other officers arrived to help.

Stabbed in the neck or attempted to behead? According to Coed.com, Ftouhi is a Tunisian.

Here’s what #FakeNews CNN tried to sell its few remaining viewers:

Germany raids homes of 36 people accusing of “hateful” social media postings

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

June 22, 2017 9:55 am By Robert Spencer 3 Comments

Most of them were for “right-wing incitement.” The problem with this entire enterprise should be obvious, but probably isn’t: nowhere in this article does any German authority explain (and the New York Times of course does not ask) by what criteria they determine that someone is guilty of “hate speech” or “right-wing incitement.” Facebook and Twitter have placed tight clamps on referrals from this website, which went down 90% from both in mid-February 2017 and have never recovered. Clearly they view honest reporting about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat to be “hate speech.” But is it? Is it really “hate speech” to oppose jihad violence and the oppression of women, non-Muslims, gays and others that is mandated by Sharia?

These raids were an authoritarian undertaking that threatens the freedom of Germans and all free people, and makes the state a tyranny that cannot be questioned, for after all, such questioning would be “hate speech.”

“Germany Raids Homes of 36 People Accused of Hateful Postings Over Social Media,” by David Shimer, New York Times, June 20, 2017:

BERLIN — In a coordinated campaign across 14 states, the German police on Tuesday raided the homes of 36 people accused of hateful postings over social media, including threats, coercion and incitement to racism.

Most of the raids concerned politically motivated right-wing incitement, according to the Federal Criminal Police Office, whose officers conducted home searches and interrogations. But the raids also targeted two people accused of left-wing extremist content, as well as one person accused of making threats or harassment based on someone’s sexual orientation.

“The still high incidence of punishable hate posting shows a need for police action,” Holger Münch, president of the Federal Criminal Police Office, said in a statement. “Our free society must not allow a climate of fear, threat, criminal violence and violence either on the street or on the internet.”

The raids come as Germans are debating the draft of a new social media law aimed at cracking down on hate speech, a measure that an array of experts said was unconstitutional at a parliamentary hearing on Monday.

The measure, championed by Justice Minister Heiko Maas for passage this month, would fine Facebook, Twitter and other outlets up to $53 million (50 million euros) if they failed to remove hate speech and other forms of illegal content.

Under German law, social media users are subject to a range of punishments for posting illegal material, including a prison sentence of up to five years for inciting racial hatred.

Under the draft statute, networks must offer a readily available complaint process for posts that may amount to threats, hate speech, defamation, or incitement to commit a crime, among other offenses.

Social media outlets would have 24 hours to delete “obviously criminal content” and a week to decide on more ambiguous cases. The law, approved by Germany’s cabinet in April, would be enforced with fines of up to $53 million.

According to a recent government study, Facebook deleted just 39 percent of illegal hate speech within 24 hours in January and February, despite signing a code of conduct in 2015 pledging to meet this standard. Twitter deleted just 1 percent.

“We are disappointed by the results,” Klaus Gorny, a Facebook spokesman, said in a statement this year regarding the study. “We have clear rules against hate speech and work hard to keep it off our platform.”…

“Uncle Tom” “Coconut”: The racism of Leftists and Muslims toward ex-Muslims

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

June 22, 2017 9:31 am By Robert Spencer 3 Comments

Here is a riveting personal memoir of the hypocrisy and racism of Leftists and their Islamic supremacist allies. While accusing their opponents of “dehumanizing” them, they are once again projecting: it is they who traffic in the most incendiary rhetoric regarding their foes. The violence against conservatives that we are seeing increasingly was inevitable given the climate of hate the Left has created.

“The New ‘Uncle Toms’: Islamists and Leftists Target Reformists and Ex-Muslims With Racial Epithet,” by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, June 21, 2017:

Imagine growing up ­being told everything about who you are as a person is wrong. That it doesn’t conform to what is expected of you simply because of how you were born.

When it comes to LGBT issues, the political left is so thoroughly in tune with such predicaments.

But they’re also the primary abusers of another set of people who are surrounded by hatred and bigotry just for being them: reformist, or ex-Muslims.

Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, dealt with the issue for blacks in the United States. That book was published in 1852, and according to African-American culture magazine The Root:

Today nobody wants to be called an Uncle Tom, but 150 years ago, it was a compliment… Uncle Tom is a martyr, not a sell-out. His devotion to his fellow slaves is so unshakable that he sacrifices a chance for freedom and, ultimately, his life to help them.

It’s now 2017 – a “current year” factoid always thrown in our face by progressives – and the forcefulness by which the political left and fundamentalist Muslims utilise the phrases “house Muslim” or “uncle Tom” to shame those who don’t conform is not just abundant, it is growing.

I have a pretty thick skin. I hear these things every day. I feel ashamed, not of who I am, but of my fellow human beings who find it appropriate to race-shame someone, or religion-shame them.

I’m told every day, perhaps even several times a day, that I’m a “coconut”, or I hear sardonic expressions of how “proud my parents must be” of me. It’s fine, I can take it. When it comes from Muslims I put this down to envy. The green-eyed monster and the green, Arab-clad flags co-ordinate well together.

But I recall vividly an incident from my early days in politics.

I was so excited to be trotting around the House of Commons with a Labour Party friend of mine I had met at the Sports and Social bar (more commonly referred to as the Sports and Socialist). We had a few beers, and went for a walk around the Parliamentary estate. I guess I was 23 years old at the time.

In a moment of unguardedness, my new friend turned to me in the hallway and said something to the effect of, “You know, Raheem. You should be one of us”.

Flattered, for a moment, I thought, “Wow this guy’s trying to recruit me because he sees talent”. But he continued, before I could say anything.

“Yeah, you’re brown. Your parents are immigrants. You should be one of us”.

I was stunned. Offended, even. And that’s pretty hard to achieve.

The idea I should vote a certain way, or think in a certain manner, simply because of the colour of my skin or the religion my great, great, grandparents happened to convert to.

He later apologised, of course, realising the error. Perhaps we can blame it on the beer.

But there is undoubtedly an ingrained bigotry on the political left, shored up by Muslim fundamentalists who want to shame people like me into acting a certain way.

I have been accused of being a traitor to my race, but more worryingly, a betrayer of Islam.

I suspect those who accuse me of the latter know precisely what they are doing. They know what the punishment for apostasy is.

When the Iranian Human Rights Commission – an organisation about as oxymoronic in name as the Senate Intelligence Committee – decided to appoint me ‘Islamophobe of the Year’ in 2014, they knew they were putting a target on my head.

By the by, this is the same group the BBC and the UK government fawned to following the attack near Finsbury Park mosque in June 2017.

Never mind, I thought. Instead, I owned it, splashing it across the pages of Breitbart London.

But for people of weaker will; perhaps those who grew up not reading Christopher Hitchens’s Letters to a Young Contrarian, or for those who are reliant on their families for housing, or child support, or even for those who are simply ill-prepared, this assault on identity can be devastating, especially when it is endorsed by leading figures.

London’s Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan told the Iranian state-backed Press TV in 2009: “The point is, you can’t just pick and choose who who you speak to. You can’t just speak to Uncle Toms. You can’t just speak to people who will say what you want them to hear.”

The Muslim Public Affairs Council (UK) even published an article as recently as 2016 endorsing the epithet. It stated:

Calling another Muslim an ‘Uncle Tom’ is not racist, it is a political statement, but to paint it as a racist title is a classic Uncle Tom tactic.

In short, ‘Uncle Tom’ refers to an individual who is slavishly and excessively subservient to authority figures, particularly a black or brown person who behaves in a subservient manner to white people; or any person perceived to be complicit in the oppression of their own group.

Ms. Beecher Stowe is no doubt turning in her grave.

Zain, an ex-Muslim in the United Kingdom who spoke to me anonymously (how could he not?) said:

“I’ve been called a fake, told that I never was a Muslim, that I’m a traitor, I have had a person call me an Uncle Tom. I feel really sad. When my parents came into this country they fought hard to exercise their religion. I feel sad that they then decide I cannot exercise my freedom and leave Islam. That’s what angers me the most. I don’t hate them, but I am angry.

“How dare they try and kill someone who leaves Islam? Three of my friends were almost murdered. One lady left Islam and her husband stabbed her. He went to prison but asked for a transfer to an Iranian jail and the government granted his request. As soon as he got there he was released.

“If we don’t stand up and challenge our community and say this is happening… the outsiders need to know this stuff exists.. they will keep on deluding the outsiders that there’s no issues there”.

Zain has never even met his brother, who his parents had after he left Islam and was shunned.

In 2015, Nissar Hussain was brutally beaten by his Muslim neighbours in Bradford, England, for leaving Islam and declaring himself a Christian. He told Revelation TV in early 2017:

“There is no middle ground. It came as a complete shock to myself. A shock to the system actually. Growing up in this country, being British… you have this wonderful respect for other people, for their religions, rights, freedoms, regardless of one’s creed and colour. It was a real blow. We realised there were going to be issues where I was going to be cut off, shunned from my friends and family… but I never in my wildest imagination realised it was going to be so terrible by fellow Pakistanis.

“From the name calling it then becomes a bit more brazen and then you’re confronted by groups of young men who have absolutely no respect for you, spitting, cursing, I was called all sorts of names. “JewDog”, I couldn’t [comprehend] the contempt, the venom they were spewing out. Before you know it I had a car rammed, attacks to the property, I had another car torched outside my home. Your house becomes a target. Graffiti, using very descriptive, very terrible language. What we would say ‘hate crime’. Bricks are going through the window. You’re being intimidated, harassed, your home becomes a prison because these people act with such impunity, such lawlessness, you think ‘well, I might as well be in Pakistan’.

“The police have completely failed… they never once acknowledged it as a hate crime, never mind religious… we were suffering acts of terrorism”.

The link here, between “mere” name-calling and acts of aggression, violence, and “terrorism” as Hussain calls it is abundantly clear. Especially in neighbourhoods dominated by Muslims, those who want to leave the faith are met with a response that only the most fragile of ideologies tend to implement: force.

When 1,000 Muslims in the United Kingdom were polled in 2007, a whopping 36 per cent of those aged 16-24 at the time said the punishment for leaving Islam should be death. Nineteen per cent of those over 55 said the same. If the average is somewhere in the middle, let’s say, that means there are around 900,000 Muslims in Britain – nearly a million people – who want to see “Uncle Toms” put to their deaths.

In other words, the use of phrases such as “Uncle Tom” — or perhaps the comical sounding “chai wallah” – is an attempt to leverage the Islamic concept of death for apostasy. Even those who still regard themselves as practicing or reformist Muslims find themselves on the receiving end….

The Daily Jot Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can! 

Please Read Part 51:

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 51)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 20, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-most-dangerous-and-treacherous-times-in-u-s-history-part-51

The following recent article revealed that the 2008 Presidential Election may have been decided by 5.7 million illegal voters. Surprised?-You Decide:

2008 Election May Have Been Decided by Illegal Voters!-Posted on Freddom Outpost-By MIchael DePinto-On June 21, 2017:

The claim that illegal aliens/non-citizens voting and influencing the direction of US politics has long been tarred by the brush of ‘conspiracy theory’ by the media. The mainstream media is quick to rubbish any such claims as that of the losing party being ‘sore losers’. Yet, a recent study of 2008 post-election data shows that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted.

In the following video, Today’s Yellow Snow (formerly Right Wing News) looks at the analysis done by James Agresti of the Just Facts group. Using a more conservative margin of sampling error, Agresti’s conclusion shows an even higher figure of illegally registered noncitizens compared to a previous study done at Old Dominion University.

And while Harvard/YouGov released a contradicting study, it seems to have made some seriously flawed assumptions such as that respondent citizens sometimes misidentified themselves as noncitizens but also concluded that noncitizens never misidentified themselves as citizens. Did illegal votes decide the 2008 election? What about the 2012 election?

Video: Surprise! Look What Decided the 2008 Election!!!-On YouTube.com-By Today's Yellow Snow-On June 21, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWZeKWBAEoU

Eagle Rising Reports:

This does not surprise me in the tiniest element. A new study just came out showing that the selection of 2008, Obama’s “shining moment”, may have actually been decided by illegal votes.

We already know that it is possible for illegal immigrants to vote in our elections. Just look back at all the votes for Hillary Clinton in this last election that were deemed either illegal, or the stolen identity of a dead person.

DO NOT MISS: Proof That Donald Trump Won the Popular Vote Too

DO NOT MISS: Sorry Protestors: Hillary Didn't Win By Popular Vote Either

That would also explain Obummer’s uncanny support for illegal immigration into our country.

Federalist Papers reports that a new study is claiming that almost 6 million “non-citizens” may have voted in the election of 2008.

The conservative think-tank Just Facts told The Washington Timesthat they took a second look at the post-election polling for the election that gave us President Barack Obama. With fresh eyes, they have concluded that far more illegal ballots were cast than originally believed.

The group’s president, James D. Agresti, said he and his team looked at data from an extensive poll done every two years that has a sample size of tens of thousands of voters. Some of them admit they are non-citizens and therefore ineligible to vote.

He estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted.

These numbers are more in line with the unverified estimates given by President Trump, who said the number of ballots cast by noncitizens was the reason he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.

Last month, the president signed an executive order setting up a commission to try to find on-the-ground truth in illegal voting. Headed by Vice President Mike Pence, the panel also will look at outdated voter lists across the nation with names of dead people and multiple registrants.

For 2012, Just Facts said, 3.2 million to 5.6 million noncitizens were registered to vote and 1.2 million to 3.6 million of them voted.

Agresti defended his calculations to the paper, saying he compared census bureau data with his own information. In addition, noncitizens overwhelmingly vote Democratic.

“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.

So while CNN is too busy with their nose up the crack of a non-existant Russian collusion, they are letting information like this fall through….or perhaps burying it as quickly as they can!

For anyone who hasn’t seen it, the following video has Tucker Carlson and Brit Hume discussing the Georgia Special Election race between Jon Ossoff and Karen Handel. It’s hard not to laugh at Democrats. They still just don’t get it. Democrats have been thoroughly SHELLACKED in the last THREE elections, losing over 1,000 seats across the country, and they just keep doubling and tripling down on hate and utter nonsense. Keep it up Democrats! Let’s go for FOUR in a row and 1,250 seats! 

Video: Tucker: Democrats Don't Know Why They Keep Losing!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Liberty Hound-On June 20, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWpIakMAdSU

Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

Source Link:

http://freedomoutpost.com/2008-election-may-have-been-decided-by-illegal-voters/

The following recent article revealed that 1.2 million to 3.6 million non-citizens may have voted in the 2012 Presidential election. Surprised?-You Decide:

New Study: Millions of Non-Citizens May Have Voted in '12!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Daniel Greenfield-On June 22, 2017:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/267081/new-study-millions-non-citizens-may-have-voted-12-daniel-greenfield

The following recent article revealed that in an interview with Breitbart, a Liberal lawyer representing Bernie Sanders supporters in a class-action lawsuit against the DNC called the committee’s actions “the ultimate Ponzi scheme” and said that, if the suit goes further, they “expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct” in helping Hillary Clinton cheat her way to the nomination. Surprised?-You Decide:

Lib Lawyer Blasts DNC Over Cheating for Hillary in Election!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Martin Lioll-On June 21, 2017:

In an interview with Breitbart, a lawyer representing Bernie Sanders supporters in a class-action lawsuit against the DNC called the committee’s actions “the ultimate Ponzi scheme” and said that if the suit goes further they “expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct” in helping Hillary Clinton cheat her way to the nomination.

Jared Beck of Beck & Lee Trial Lawyers is representing Sanders donors in the case Wilding v. DNC Services Corp. He said his clients had an expectation of impartiality when they donated to the candidate during the 2016 campaign.

Instead, he said hacked emails released from the DNC reveal that the organization was mostly in the tank for Clinton. The plaintiffs are currently awaiting a ruling on the DNC’s motion to dismiss. He also blew the whistle on what he said was an attempt by the office of former DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz to interfere with the case.

During the interview, Beck said the suit rested on common law principles of misrepresentation and fraud.

“If there is anything ‘new,’ it is the application of these principles to the sphere of political campaigns,” Beck said. “One might view this application as a natural consequence of Citizens United — an opinion that crystallizes campaign contributions as the quintessential form of American political participation.

“By equating political participation with financial contribution, Citizens United, by inference, incorporates all of the common-law principles of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, etc. that typically govern in the economic sphere. Americans have a cognizable interest in the transparent and fair conduct of primary campaigns precisely because they, through their campaign contributions, are also financiers of the campaign.”

Beck had some very harsh words for the DNC’s methods during the interview…

“I would think of this as a case against the ultimate political Ponzi scheme,” Beck said of the DNC’s actions.

“We are used to the concept of Ponzi schemes in the investment world. In my view, the DNC is really no different: it was purporting to be ‘selling’ a fair primary process but in reality was serving as a front for the Hillary Clinton campaign. People lost well over $200 million as a result.”

Beck also elaborated on a mysterious phone call his office received from a number tied to former DNC head and Clinton functionary Debbie Wasserman Schultz. According to The Daily Caller, the person on the other end of the line inquired about the case while using voice disguising software.

“The incident was startling at the time it happened and we are still very puzzled and concerned by it,” Beck said “The caller had altered his or her voice to be unrecognizable, and refused to identify themselves.

“But please understand that this is just one in a number of disturbing events that have occurred throughout the case … I have no idea who was behind the call, but according to the defendants, the matter has been referred to the Capitol Police,” he added.

Beck was confident that, if the lawsuit moved forward, more corrupt dealings would be exposed.

“If we do get to the discovery phase, I think it is safe to say that we expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct, with the publicly released material being only the tip of the iceberg,” Beck said.

“Also, we will be able to place all of the material witnesses under oath and take their depositions. In addition, we will be able to conduct discovery on the question of how the DNC’s internal documents came to be placed into the public domain by Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, which may ultimately be the most important question of all.”

If Beck’s allegations are true, things are about to get very dicey for the Democrats. The DNC’s role in the 2016 nomination process is the last thing the party wants to be dealing with as it tries to unify the establishment and base in the run up to the 2018 midterms. Dealing with a lawsuit which implies that the party process is rigged in favor of the former group isn’t going to help — and it could yet again dig up the misdeeds of Hillary Clinton for all of America to see.

Source Link:

http://conservativetribune.com/lib-lawyer-clinton-cheating/

Note:  I believe that the disturbing information revealed in the above articles regarding voter fraud relates to and/or further supports the information contained in my following blog from the recent past-You Decide:

Vote Fraud – What They Aren’t Telling You!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 7, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/vote-fraud-what-they-aren-t-telling-you-part-1-of-3

The following recent article revealed that a video has just resurfaced showing WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange dropping a series of bombshells about Hillary Clinton that serve as a reminder of just how big of a criminal she really is. Surprised?-You Decide:

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Drops CHILLING New Video – Every American Should See This…!-Posted on The MRC Blog-By Mr. Conservative-On June 20, 2017:

https://www.themrcblog.com/2017/06/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-drops-chilling-new-video-every-american-see/

The following recent video revealed that Russia recently went public on Obama’s “Secrets,” which allegedly “Happened During Obama’s Terms.” Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Russia Goes Public on Obama’s “Secrets” that “Happened During Obama’s Terms”!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Hill Gossip-On June 23, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCIBttz4KRY

The following recent article revealed that the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch announced Monday that allegedly the National Security Council cannot hand over records relating to former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s surveillance of Americans, because they have been moved to the Obama presidential library and may be sealed for as many as five years.  Surprised?-You Decide:

Judicial Watch: Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Documents Moved from NSC to Obama Library!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Kristina Wong-On June 19, 2017:

The National Security Council cannot hand over records relating to former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s surveillance of Americans, because they have been moved to the Obama presidential library and may be sealed for as many as five years, conservative watchdog Judicial Watch announced Monday.

The NSC informed Judicial Watch in a letter dated May 23 that materials related to Rice’s requests to know the identities of Americans swept up in surveillance of foreign targets, including any Trump campaign or transition officials, have been moved to the library.

The NSC’s Director of Access Management John Powers said in the letter:

Documents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.

Judicial Watch earlier this year filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for those documents, including of communications between Rice and any intelligence community member or agency regarding any Russian involvement in the 2016 elections, the hacking of Democratic National Committee computers, or any suspected communications between Russia and Trump officials.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the group will seek to find out when the records were moved, and warned of legal actions. He said:

Prosecutors, Congress, and the public will want to know when the National Security Council shipped off the records about potential intelligence abuses by the Susan Rice and others in the Obama White House to the memory hole of the Obama Presidential Library. We are considering our legal options but we hope that the Special Counsel and Congress also consider their options and get these records.

In April, blogger Mike Cernovich, Bloomberg, and Fox News revealed that Rice had requested to “unmask” — or unveil the hidden names of — Trump transition officials who were caught up in surveillance of foreign targets.

Typically, in surveillance of foreign targets’ communications, U.S. citizens mentioned or participating in them would have their names “masked,” or hidden, due to ethical, legal, and privacy concerns. However, government consumers of the intelligence can request to have their names unmasked if it is important to understanding the communications.

According to Cernovich, The White House Counsel’s office identified Rice as the person who had requested the unmasking, after examining her log requests, Cernovich reported on April 2. Bloomberg and Fox News would later corroborate the report. The revelation lent credence to Trump’s assertion that the Obama administration had been surveilling his transition team.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board has argued Rice had no reason to request the unmaskings. Since then, the House intelligence committee has also subpoenaed the intelligence community for information on unmasking requests by Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan, and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power.

The misuse of unmasking came under media scrutiny after U.S. officials illegally leaked to the Washington Post a private conversation between former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak on December 24. Flynn resigned after those communications, not because anything inappropriate was found, but because he had misrepresented those communications to Vice President Mike Pence.

NSC Unmasking Records Response by Kristina Wong on Scribd

{…}

Continue Reading:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/19/judicial-watch-susan-rice-unmasking-documents-moved-from-nsc-to-obama-library/

The following recent article revealed that former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Wednesday that the Russian government did not alter ballots, ballots counts, or the reporting of votes in last November's U.S. presidential election. Surprised?-You Decide:

Jeh Johnson Testifies: Russians Did Not Alter Ballot Counts!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Melanie Arter-On June 21, 2017:

(CNSNews.com) - Former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Wednesday that the Russian government did not alter ballots, ballots counts, or the reporting of votes in last November's U.S. presidential election.

In his written testimony Johnson said, “To my current knowledge, the Russian government did not through any cyber intrusion alter ballots, ballot counts or reporting of election results. I am not in a position to know whether the successful Russian government-directed hacks of the DNC and elsewhere did in fact alter public opinion and thereby alter the outcome of the presidential election."

{…}

During questioning by Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), Johnson confirmed that the Russians in no way altered any votes.

“You said in your opening statement, or in your prepared remarks, that to your knowledge, there was no vote-tallying changes--that no one’s vote was, they voted one way and it was recorded some other way. Is that still your opinion with respect to the ‘16 election that the intrusions or attempted whatever it is the Russians or others did not affect the actual voting itself?” Conaway asked.

“Based on everything I know, that is correct. I know of no evidence that through cyber intrusions votes were altered or suppressed in some way,” Johnson said.

Conaway noted that Johnson had designated the U.S. voting system "critical infrastructure" and asked him why he believed that was important.

"It was important in my mind because 'critical infrastructure' receives a priority in terms of the assistance we give on cybersecurity. That's number one," Johnson said.

“There’s a certain level of confidence, confidentiality that goes into the communications between critical infrastructure and the department that are guaranteed,” he said, adding that “when you’re part of critical infrastructure, you get the support of the international cyber norms: thou shalt not attack critical infrastructure in another country.”

“And so, those were the principal reasons to do this. There are 16 sectors already that are considered critical infrastructure, and in my view, this is something that was sort of a no-brainer and in fact, probably should have been done years before, and I’m pleased Secretary Kelly has reaffirmed it,” Johnson said.

“Does that include the parties and the infrastructure around candidates or is that just the mechanics of voting itself?” Conaway asked.

“If you read the way I wrote the statement on January 6, it’s pretty much confined to the election process itself, election infrastructure itself, not the politicians, not the political parties,” Johnson said.

Continue Reading:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-arter/jeh-johnson-russian-government-did-no-through-any-cyber-intrusion-alter

The following recent video revealed that Trey Gowdy destroyed former DHS chief, Jeh Johnson during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday when the Former DHS chief under Obama stated that the DNC, to his ‘disappointment,’ did not cooperate with DHS to respond to the hacks and that he first became aware of intrusions into DNC systems sometime last year in the fall, months after the FBI had learned of the problem.

It also revealed that Trey Gowdy stated, “If they had turned the server over to either you or Director Comey, maybe we would have known more and maybe there would have been more for you to report,’ along with, “So I guess what I’m asking you is, why would the victim of a crime not turn over a server to the Intelligence community or to law enforcement?” Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Gowdy Destroys Jeh Johnson on DNC Hacking Claims: ‘Why Would the Victim of a Crime Not Turn Over a Server?’-Posted on Gateway Pundit-By Cristina Laila-On June 21, 2017:

Trey Gowdy destroyed former DHS chief, Jeh Johnson during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday.

Former DHS chief under Obama, Jeh Johnson said that the DNC, to his ‘disappointment,’ did not cooperate with DHS to respond to the hacks.

The DNC rejected help from the DHS following Russian hacks into its computer systems during the 2016 election cycle, according to former DHS chief Jeh Johnson.

Jeh Johnson also said that he first became aware of intrusions into DNC systems sometime last year in the fall, months after the FBI had learned of the problem.

Trey Gowdy: “If they had turned the server over to either you or Director Comey, maybe we would have known more and maybe there would have been more for you to report. So I guess what I’m asking you is, why would the victim of a crime not turn over a server to the Intelligence community or to law enforcement?”

This is the million dollar question. If the DNC is a victim of hacking, then why hasn’t any intelligence agency taken a look at the servers? Don’t they want to get to the bottom of the Russian hacking? Don’t the Democrats want to prevent this from happening again? Clearly they have something to hide otherwise they would hand over their servers.

Jeh Johnson replied, “Uh, I’m not going to argue with you, sir. Uh, that was a leading question and I’ll agree to be led.”

What we do know is that the DHS was also caught trying to hack into the Georgia elections. Typical projection from the left. They are accusing others of doing exactly what they do. The left were the obstructionists; the leftists were rigging the election.

{…}

Continue Reading:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/gowdy-destroys-jeh-johnson-dnc-hacking-claims-victim-crime-not-turn-server-video/

The following recent article revealed that Democrats in DC are great at deflection and it’s amazing that mainstream media can only find “anonymous” reports of “alleged” illegal actions that can’t be corroborated by anyone or anything except other anonymous sources, along with revealing that mainstream media can’t find anything wrong with any actions of any Democrats no matter how much proof is offered, but are looking for a conviction against any allegation made against a Republican. Surprised?-You Decide:

Finally, Proof of Collusion between Russia… and the Democrats!-Posted on Constitution.com-By Joe Messina-On June 21, 2017:

Democrats in DC are great at deflection. It’s amazing that mainstream media can only find “anonymous” reports of “alleged” illegal actions that can’t be corroborated by anyone or anything except other anonymous sources. Mainstream media can’t find anything wrong with any actions of any Democrats no matter how much proof is offered, but are looking for a conviction against any allegation made against a Republican.

They still don’t get it!

Let’s start with the leaked information about a Russian dossier that would bury President Trump! Many mainstream sources reported that the dossier had information that could be used to blackmail Mr. Trump. The dossier would prove that the Trump team and Mr. Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election.

Originally funded by the Republicans and then picked up by the Democrats after Trump won primary, the dossier seemed to never surface. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper admitted it existed but that there was no evidence of collusion. CNN claimed to have it, or pieces of it, and that it had been floating around the National Security groups but again, it never surfaced. Clapper would later say there was interference by Russia, but never ties to Trump. Curious.

Trump, according to the Left, is guilty of sexual assault against numerous women who came forward during the campaign but seemed to fade away when most were proven to be without merit. The press still called him guilty, but were never willing to get on Billy Bob Clinton when women showed up in numbers to accuse him of sexual assault, even though Bill paid for them to go away. I guess that’s not proof!

Even though mainstream media and all elected Democrats say there is proof that Donald colluded with the Russians, Josh Marshall working with Special Counsel Bob Mueller was tasked with finding and exposing ANY criminal activity by Trump or his associates. Marshall said that there might be some kind of “conspiracy,” but I doesn’t look like there is any real criminal activity. Darn! Remember, bad actions are not always illegal actions. Think that one through!

Mainstream media would have us believe that Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey to stop the investigation against him. Really? How does that work? Mr. Comey was NOT part of the investigation. The FBI was conducting the investigation (with or without Comey). And at the time of this writing, the investigation continues on! The amount of fake news put out by this group of Democrats is almost embarrassing.

And this is only the tip of the iceberg of allegations that have no basis in any truth or even a half-truth!

Remember on May 3^rd Comey told the Senate, under oath, that he had NOT been pressured to halt ANY investigation. Then in his recent answers under oath, all of a sudden he remembered he was pressured to let any investigation of General Michael Flynn go simply because the president said he “hoped” Comey could let it go. Now hoping is a crime!

Acting Director McCabe alluded that the investigation into Hillary’s campaign colluding with Russians was also being looked into. Though Mrs. Clinton kept saying all was good, the optics say something else. But mainstream won’t bring it to you!

Billy Clinton got paid over half a million dollars in 2010 for a speech he gave. Paid for by the Russian Company, Renaissance Capital.

The Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from Uranium One, a company sold to the Russian government in 2010 after they got access to 20% of American uranium. You say no big deal. The sale needed the approval of the CLINTON State Department. Yet mainstream media is having big heartburn that Trump companies are seeing a bump in revenue from foreign companies. It seems like foreign donations to the Clintons and Democrats are OK for any reason. But earned dollars for real services offered at Trump hotels is an impeachable offense EVEN though Trump has divested himself from many of these entities.

Mrs. Clinton agreed to divulge all foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation under President Obama. But they seem to have forgotten to post the over $2 million they received from Uranium One and when pushed to do so, they refused. No outrage from Dems or mainstream media.

John Podesta, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager, failed to disclose that he got 75 thousand shares in stock from a Kremlin-financed company that he was the director of from 2010 to 2014 when he left to join the Obama Administration. Nothing to hide, except that in 2013 Podesta started a shell company and transferred the shares into it so he would not have to report them as a foreign interest before he went to Obama’s regime. Nothing to see here, right?

John’s brother Tom was paid over $24 million as a lobbyist for Sberbank. It seems this Russian bank was looking to have sanctions lifted that were placed on Russia by the Obama Administration. Both Podestas were lobbying for relief and believing Mrs. Clinton would make things happen. A little curious?

John Breaux helped produce radio ads for Mrs. Clinton’s campaign while working for Gazprombank, Russia’s 3rd largest bank. Nothing to see here.

Campaign officials met several times with the Russian ambassador. They don’t deny it, but refuse to reveal anything about the discussion. Mainstream media is good with it!

The New York Times wrote a piece complaining about similar items against Trump, every one of them! But not a PEEP about the Clintons or Obamas.

So, let’s just call it what it is, a concerted effort by the mainstream media and Democrats to bury Trump and the Republicans. They don’t care about justice, truth, or integrity. They are willing to lie, steal, cheat, and overlook to help the Democrats win. And that includes impeaching Trump, even when he’s broken no laws.

I saw a meme that’s perfect. It went like this:

First Trump should plead guilty. Pence should pardon and then nominate him for VP.
Once affirmed Pence should resign, Trump would become president and then nominate Pence for VP.

Problem solved.

If that doesn’t work, then the freaked out Dems need to look at the recently discovered Constitution a little more closely. They would have to impeach nearly a dozen people to even come close to getting the presidency. Unless they are planning a coup. And based on their current actions, that may very well be in the works.

Long Live Nancy Pelosi!

Source Link:

http://constitution.com/finally-proof-collusion-russia-democrats/

The following recent article revealed that foreign Soros-Backed Media outlet bashes Conservatives with US taxpayer dollars. Surprised?-You Decide:

Foreign Soros-Backed Media Outlet Bashes Conservatives With US Taxpayer Dollars!-Posted on The Daily Signal-By Maiya Clark / Mike Gonzalez-On June 21, 2017:

http://dailysignal.com/2017/06/21/foreign-soros-backed-media-outlet-bashes-conservatives-us-taxpayer-dollars/

The following recent article revealed that coming July 2, to a Democrat-controlled city near you, the March for Impeachment! In fact, kowabunga, it’s gonna be a **world-wide** march, in case they want to impeach Donald Trump in Venezuela, Zimbabwe, or some other Democrat role model state. Surprised?-You Decide:

Leaked! Trump Impeachment Articles!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Lee Duigon-On June 22, 2017:

https://newswithviews.com/leaked-trump-impeachment-articles/

The following recent article revealed that the Deep State trio, which include Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller allegedly aim to destroy President Trump and his administration. Surprised?-You Decide:

Deep State Trio: Comey, Rosenstein And Mueller, Aim To Destroy Trump!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Kelleigh Nelson-on June 23, 2017:

https://newswithviews.com/deep-state-trio-comey-rosenstein-and-mueller-aim-to-destroy-trump/

The following recent video revealed Fox News’ Sean Hannity revealed that a soft coup is currently taking place in USA in an effort to remove President Trump from office. Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: BREAKING NEWS TRUMP: Do you think America is at a turning point?-Posted on YouTube.com-By Shayetet-On June 21, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5q76rdaipAk

The following recent video revealed that President Trump has recently gone on the offensive against the “Deep State.”-You Decide:

Video: TRUMP goes OFFENSIVE! Alex Jones Infowars!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Info Wars Live-On June 26, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxIy-R2AiLk

The following recent video revealed that former President Obama allegedly never did anything about Russia’s election interfering because he believed that Hillary Clinton was going to win the 2016 Presidential election, along with revealing former Attorney General Lynch’s obstruction of justice and former FBI Director Comey allegedly paying $50K for President Trump’s fake Russian Dossier.  Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Sean Hannity - Fox News Today!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Hymes Jeff- June 26, 2017:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm7r9p3vLh4

The following flyer by a true Patriot reveals HR 2552, which is a Bill in the U.S. House of Representatives to stop federal taxation of your Social Security Benefits, along with a recent column that includes suggestions-Please share with family & friends-You Decide:

HR 2552 Bill In US House Of Representatives To Stop Federal Taxation Of Your Social Security Benefits!-By Devvy Kidd-On June 21, 2017:

http://www.rense.com/general96/HR2552.html

Seniors To Get Screwed – A Third Time?-By Devvy Kidd-On June 21, 2017:

http://www.rense.com/general96/seniors.htm

Please Read Part 53:

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 53)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 25, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-most-dangerous-and-treacherous-times-in-u-s-history-part-53

I believe that the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:

Obama: Submit to Globalism or Face War, Death, Destruction!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 17, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/obama-submit-to-globalism-...

Nazi Collaborator Soros Continues Multi-pronged War on Trump, Calls Him “Would-be Dictator”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nazi-collaborator-soros-...

Not Since JFK, Has a President Spit Into the Face of the Globalists, Until Now!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 21, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/not-since-jfk-has-a-pres...

Russian Election Intervention Is Nothing New: ‘The Kremlin’s history of backing the losers’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 14, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/russian-election-interve...

Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/saudi-arabia-implicated-...

Attention Obama: Ft. Leavenworth is Calling You For Treason!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 10, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/attention-obama-ft-leave...

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

The MSM conglomerates are the most prolific and insidious "fake news" propagators in the marketplace of ideas!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-msm-conglomerates-ar...

Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-rep...

Call for the investigation & adjudication of Chuck Schumer, George Soros, Maxine Waters, Al Green, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Michael Moore and others for disruption of government, attempted overthrow without legitimate cause of a sitting president, and the destabilization of American society and economy for criminally-motivated political and financial gain.
We also seek the investigation & adjudication of all others in acting and deep-state government as well as the corrupt "news" media outlets complicit in these acts of fraud, slander and treason, including but not limited to Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, CoryBooker Nancy Pelosi and others following the “Rules for Radicals” playbook.

GoTo: We the People Rights site and Voice your support On Line.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-people-rights

                                           ROBERT NUELLER ADOPTS STALIN TACTICS

                                                                                     By

                                                                       Daniel John Sobieski

We may be thankful to Alan Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School, for reminding us of the delicious irony of an investigation which began with “reports” of collusion with the Russians by Team Trump and charges of Russian hacking of our elections, noe reverting to the tactics of Russia’s most murderous tyrant, Josef Stalin. As Dershowitz writes in the Washington Examiner:

Special counsel Robert Mueller was commissioned to investigate not only crime but the entire Russian "matter." That is an ominous development that endangers the civil liberties of all Americans.

Federal prosecutors generally begin by identifying specific crimes that may have been committed — in this case, violation of federal statutes. But no one has yet identified the specific statute or statutes that constrain Mueller's investigation of the Russian matter. It is not a violation of any federal law for a campaign to have collaborated with a foreign government to help elect their candidate….

One does not have to go back to the Soviet Union and Lavrentiy Beria's infamous boast to Stalin, "Show me the man and I will show you the crime," in order to be concerned about the expansion of elastic criminal statutes. There are enough examples of abuse in our own history.

From McCarthyism to the failed prosecutions of Sen. Ted Stevens, Rep. Thomas DeLay, Gov. Rick Perry and others, we have seen vague criminal statutes stretched in an effort to criminalize political differences.

Indeed, now we here reports that Mueller’s investigation will range anywhere from Jared Kutchner’s finances to perhaps any unpaid parking tickets Sean Spicer may have. To paraphrase the boast of head of Stalin’s secret police ,  show Mueller the man, and he will find a crime, just as Mueller’s best friend, James Comey, found with Martha Stewart.

There too we see a vindicative prosecutor in search of a crime and it doesn’t have to be the original charge, if there is an original charge. As the Daily Caller reported:

FBI Director James Comey declined to recommend criminal charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified material Tuesday. But back in 2004, he led what legal observers call a “petty and vindictive” prosecution against interior design icon Martha Stewart for a lesser offense.

Stewart served a five-month prison sentence in 2004 at the Federal Prison Camp in Alderson, West Virginia, also known as “Camp Cupcake,” for lying to federal investigators about possible insider trading. In the years since the case, there is a consensus in the legal community that Comey’s prosecution was overzealous and vindictive.

The Cato Institute’s Gene Healy condemned Comey’s actions as temperamental and political in a 2004 column. Healy argued that Stewart’s indictment was largely possible because the sheer volume of federal laws makes it possible to indict almost any individual on some basis — reasonable or unreasonable. Quoting former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Healy wrote prosecutors “will pick people that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted.”His Cato colleague Alan Reynolds argued Comey prosecuted Stewart for “having misled people by denying having committed a crime with which she was not charged.”

We saw this Stalinesque persecution in the case of Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff. Libby was convicted, again of lying to the FBI, because he misremembered events under relentless questioning. He was charge long after prosecutors knoew it was Richard Armitage who leaked the name of CIA desk jockey Valerie Plame to the press. Instead of dropping the investigation at hat point, prosecutors persisted, knowing they had to find a crime committed by someone somewhere to justify their existence.

Libby was Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff when he was charged with obstruction of an investigation into the “outing” of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative. Plame was in fact a desk jockey at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia, not a secret agent in harm’s way. As Investor’s Business Daily noted:

Remember the alleged outing of the already known CIA officer and desk jockey Valerie Plame? We were told then that the Vanity Fair cover girl's 15 minutes of fame jeopardized our national security even if everybody already knew who she was.

"Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, went to jail because his memory of events and who said what to whom regarding Plame differed from the recollections of others, particularly news reporters.

Yes, Virginia, this is a witch hunt. Robert Mueller III was appointed special cunsel after his friend, the vindictive James Comey, committed a federal crime by leaking a memo which was a government record to the press. Mueller has picked staff and prosecutors as if he were stocking Hillary Clinton’s Department of Justice. He has picked a bevy of Clinton donors, an attorney who worked for the Clinton Foundation, a former Watergate assistant prosecutor, and evn a senior advise to Eric Hiolder. Objective professionals all (snarkiness intended ).

Mueller is in fact colluding with Comey to enact revenge on President Trump for Comey’s firing, something which even Comey said Trump was constitutionally entitled to do. There is no evidence of collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. It is not obstruction of justice for a President to exercise his legal and constitutional authority.

The facts and the lack of an actual crime will not stop Robert Mueller. Just show him the man, or woman, and he will show you the crime.

          Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.               

Sweden: No “no-go zones,” just areas of “parallel societal structures, religious extremism”

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

June 21, 2017 9:49 am By Robert Spencer 13 Comments

See? Problem solved. What were you so worried about, you greasy Islamophobe?

“5,000 criminals in Sweden’s vulnerable areas: police,” by Emma Löfgren, The Local, June 21, 2017 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):

Sweden’s national police chief has presented a new report about the country’s problem areas, increasing the number of districts classified as vulnerable or especially vulnerable.

The report, which is likely to grab headlines in Sweden and abroad, follows another high-profile report from 2015 which listed 53 so-called vulnerable areas, including 15 considered especially vulnerable.

In the new report, 61 areas are now on the list, of which 23 are considered especially vulnerable, 6 are risk areas (areas that are at high risk of becoming especially vulnerable) and 32 are vulnerable.

Some of these were revealed last week, but the full version was presented today.

The term “no-go zone” famously caught on in some international media back in 2015 after it was used by a Swedish newspaper columnist to label these areas, but it has been strongly rejected by police and emergency services themselves.

The police definition describe these districts as socio-economically vulnerable areas with a generally high crime rate. In an especially vulnerable area there are also often parallel societal structures, religious extremism and police regularly have to adapt their methods to the volatile situation. Residents also often do not report crimes, either out of fear of retaliation or because they think it will not lead to anything….

FBI Making Big Announcement in GOP Baseball Shooting Investigation

The FBI is holding a press conference Wednesday morning to announce the results of its investigation into last week’s attempted mass assassination of Republican lawmakers and staffers, the agency announced on Tuesday.

FBI Assistant Director in Charge Andrew Vale and Special Agent in Charge Timothy Slater will be joined by Alexandria Police Chief Michael Brown, U.S. Capitol Police Chief Matthew Verderosa and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Special Agent in Charge Michael Boxler.

The Daily Caller was the first to report last week that FBI officials discovered a list of Republican lawmakers in James T. Hodgkinson’s possession when he opened fire at a congressional baseball practice, wounding four people including Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise. All six lawmakers on the list were members of the House Freedom Caucus — the most conservative members in the lower chamber.

The FBI also recovered a cell phone and computer from Hodgkinson’s van at the scene, the agency announced last Thursday. (Read more from “FBI Making Big Announcement in GOP Baseball Shooting Investigation” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/06/fbi-making-big-announcement-gop-baseball-shooting-invest

The Deep State has a plan they are going to stop at nothing to overthrow the government. If they stop they know they will be filling the Federal prisons with not many being able to escape. this is not the first time that the deep state has tried this. It was tried before led by Prescot Bush just before WW2. Stopped by the man they thought they were putting in charge Smedley Butler a true Patriot after finding out all the players he went to President Roosevelt and told him. Roosevelt exposed them but decided not to prosecute them.  coming out of the depression he felt the economy could not withstand the loss of their money in it.  So here we are today. the left, the Bush loyal GOP, the elite and the NWO are ready to try again. They think they have all their bases covered. But again they neglected to see the power of Patriotism. And they didn't understand what Trump did. Trump was not part of their club not on their team, and he could not be bought off. He was not afraid of the Elite the NWO and all of the powerful groups of corp. America. And he was energized by millions of Patriots. All overlooked by the smug criminals in charge. He not only made a statement he won. This caught the Elite with their pants down. They had neglected to cover up all of their criminal activities and their preparations to destroy America as we know it. They counted on another one of them would be in the Whitehouse after the election, willing to continue covering for who they replaced. But Trump won and he didn't,t owe anyone no corporate promises no lobbyist at his side. He came in very sincere and hateful to those that had been harming the country that he loves. This has set the Elite in a panic. They fear to lose their global plan. Some fear to lose their freedom. So they have made a plan to overthrow the elected government. They are attacking our Republic on two fronts. First, with the deep state those embedded in the government loyal to their agenda.  On this front, they are hiding,distroying and covering up as much of the evidence of what they have been up two for the past 25 years. They are along with the fake media set in motion a propaganda machine filled with lies and false accusations. This is intended to keep the administration busy fending them off rather than finding their skeletons and fixing a country in need of fixing. On the other front, they have the snowflakes. While not caring about the people of the country they have dumbed down a generation of Americans. They have filled their heads with outlandish thoughts on what right or wrong. they have made them question everything about themselves their gender their identity. They have been taught to think that success is bad and winning worse. they have been fooled that everyone would be better off in a new system where nothing is expected from anyone. They have been taught to leave the thinking about what's best for them to the government and the government will take care of them. And that government has told them to take it to the streets to the campuses and stop those that they tell them to stop. To destroy property and hurt all that are not with them. To stop them from spreading any opinion that is not theirs. They have started them in the inter-cities with riots that they inflamed. And now moved it to the colleges and the suburbs. They are starting to arm them and calling for them to step it up and start to kill the opposition rather than fight them. They have told them that they will take care of them don't worry.  They will continue this and add fuel to them until one or more of them comes with a full clip and sprays a group from the right killing many. That's when the awakening will begin. The right will say enough and they will rise. The Oath protectors are already there, The preppers and the gun freaks have been ready for years. The fifty-something White males will jump at the chance to retaliate for all they have been hearing. The Vets will rise and the bikers will roll. It will be a long weekend leaving the dumbasses bleeding and dying. And those that are responsible will be hiding. Never planning on standing up for their sheep. Just sacrificing them for their own protection. TO BE CONTINUED WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO STOP THIS AND STOP THOSE THAT ARE OUT TO HURT AMERICA AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. GOD BLESS THE USA.