Robert Mueller Of The FBI Is A Traitor
Robert Mueller not only needs to be immediately fired from the FBI, but prosecuted as a traitor to his country.
Read at: http://fbi-federalbureauofinvestigation.com/fbi-director-robert-mueller-is-a-traitor
robert (21)
Robert Swan Mueller III is a traitor.
In March of 2004, FBI Director Robert Mueller, along with Acting Attorney General James B. Comey, offered to resign from office if the White House overruled a Department of Justice finding that domestic wiretapping without a court warrant was unconstitutional. Attorney General John D. Ashcroft denied his consent to attempts by White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and White House Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales to waive the Justice Department ruling and permit the domestic warrantless eavesdropping program to proceed. On March 12, 2004, President George W. Bush gave his support to changes in the program sufficient to satisfy the concerns of Mueller, Ashcroft and Comey. The extent of the National Security Agency's domestic warrantless eavesdropping under the President's Surveillance Program is still largely unknown.
In March of 2012, FBI Director Robert Mueller said he was not sure if it was illegal or unconstitutional to kill American’s without arrest or trial. He went on to say he would have to go back and check with the Department of Justice whether Attorney General Eric Holder’s “three criteria” for the targeted killing of Americans also applied to Americans inside the U.S.
Pressed by House lawmakers about a recent speech in which Holder described the legal justification for assassination, Mueller, who was attending a hearing on his agency’s budget, did not say without qualification that the three criteria could not be applied inside the U.S.
“I have to go back. Uh, I’m not certain whether that was addressed or not,” Mueller said when asked by Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga., about a distinction between domestic and foreign targeting. Graves followed up asking whether “from a historical perspective,” the federal government has “the ability to kill a U.S. citizen on United States soil or just overseas.”
“I’m going to defer that to others in the Department of Justice,” Mueller replied.
In other words, Robert Mueller in his official capacity as Director of the FBI wouldn’t exclude assassinating American citizens within the United States of America. This clearly makes him a traitor, for he must know the so called legal framework Eric Holder laid out for doing so is unconstitutional.
UPDATE: June 16, 2013
To Hell With Justice.
FBI Director Robert Mueller is in no hurry to get to the bottom of the IRS’s multi-year abuse of conservative groups, despite Obama and his administration’s promise to investigate.
Attorney General Eric Holder promised in mid-May 2013 that the FBI would get to the bottom of the IRS’s behavior by opening a criminal investigation.
“I can assure you and the American people that we will take a dispassionate view of this,” Holder told congressional investigators on May 15 2013. “This will not be about parties, this will not be about ideological persuasions. Anybody who has broken the law will be held accountable.”
But in separate testimony before congressional investigators June 13, 2013, FBI Director Robert Mueller seemed completely unaware of the progress of any such investigation.
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan lit into Mueller for his lack of knowledge during a House judiciary committee hearing.
“This is the most important issue in front of the country in the last six weeks, and you don’t know who the lead investigator is?” Jordan asked, sounding shocked.
“At this juncture, no I do not,” Mueller responded.
“Do you know if you’ve talked to any of the victims?” Jordan went on. “Have you talked to any of the groups that were targeted by their government? Have you met with any of the tea party groups since May 14, 2013?”
“I don’t know what the status of the interviews are by the team that’s on it,” Mueller said.
To put it simply, FBI Director Robert Mueller and the Obama cult have again lied and refused to abide and enforce Constitutional Law.
Robert Swan Mueller served as the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2001 to 2013.
In 2017, Mueller from within the United States Department of Justice Office became head of the Special Counsel investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and related matters.
However, Mueller's investigation is an outright farce. It's real purpose is an attempt to gather false testimony and information so the Democrats can treasonously impeach President Trump. They are attempting to do this by targeting specific people in digging up unsubstantiated “crimes” to prosecute them for under the blatant double-standard by which the full weight of the law is hoisted on Republicans while Democrats seemingly escape justice.
Mueller’s investigation is blatantly biased, for Mueller’s team is largely composed of several individuals known to be “major Democratic donors” and operatives, but “no Republicans.” It should be further noted that 14 of the 17 special counsel prosecutors were registered Democrats, while not a single one was a registered member of the GOP.
Mueller is not even trying to appear fair, and it’s no wonder that from the very beginning, this investigation has centered around one man, and one man only, and that’s your president, Donald Trump.”
Without question, this is a team of “angry Democrats” that Mueller has assembled around him in retaliation for the Republicans winning the presidential election in 2016.
Mueller’s team is investigating Trump and his various associates in search of crimes, even creating “process crimes” to charge them with when no real crimes could be found. It is worth noting that none of the crimes found — or created — have anything to do with alleged collusion during the 2016 election.
As a history reminder, the communist Soviet Union used to investigate specific people to find crimes for which they could be charged, the opposite of how America is supposed to operate (we investigate specific crimes and attempt to find the responsible perpetrator, not the other way around).
This is a “disgusting, despicable, two-tiered system of justice” in which Republicans like Trump and his associates are “aggressively pursued for months on end” for prosecution while Democrats accused of committing crimes are allowed to “get away scot-free.”
Every American should be very concerned and worried by what is a completely unfair precedent in this country.
UPDATE: December 3, 2018
A new report by journalist Paul Sperry says Robert Mueller withheld evidence from the court that would exonerate President Trump from the latest accusations of Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
In other words, Dirty Cop Robert Mueller LIED to the court by withholding information that would exonerate President Trump.
Via Real Clear Investigations:
Contrary to media speculation that Robert Mueller is closing in on President Trump, the special prosecutor’s plea deal with Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen offers further evidence that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russians during the 2016 election, according to congressional investigators and former prosecutors.
Cohen pleaded guilty last week to making false statements in 2017 to the Senate intelligence committee about the Trump Organization’s failed efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. Discussions about the so-called Moscow Project continued five months longer in 2016 than Cohen had initially stated under oath.
The nine-page charging document filed with the plea deal suggests that the special counsel is using the Moscow tower talks to connect Trump to Russia. But congressional investigators with House and Senate committees leading inquiries on the Russia question told RealClearInvestigations that it looks like Mueller withheld from the court details that would exonerate the president. They made this assessment in light of the charging document, known as a statement of “criminal information” (filed in lieu of an indictment when a defendant agrees to plead guilty); a fuller accounting of Cohen’s emails and text messages that Capitol Hill sources have seen; and the still-secret transcripts of closed-door testimony provided by a business associate of Cohen.
On page 7 of the statement of criminal information filed against Cohen, which is separate from but related to the plea agreement, Mueller mentions that Cohen tried to email Russian President Vladimir Putin’s office on Jan. 14, 2016, and again on Jan. 16, 2016. But Mueller, who personally signed the document, omitted the fact that Cohen did not have any direct points of contact at the Kremlin, and had resorted to sending the emails to a general press mailbox. Sources who have seen these additional emails point out that this omitted information undercuts the idea of a “back channel” and thus the special counsel’s collusion case.
If justice is still alive in America, then at the very least Robert Mueller should be tossed in prison for lying,
UPDATE: December 3, 2018
Now this…
Author Jerome Corsi filed a criminal complaint against Special Counsel Robert Mueller for his attempts to seek false testimony against President Trump.
Conservative author Jerome Corsi on Monday filed a “criminal and ethics complaint” against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, accusing investigators of trying to bully him into giving “false testimony” against President Trump.
The complaint, which Corsi had threatened for days, is the latest escalation between Mueller’s team and its investigation targets.
The 78-page document, asserting the existence of a “slow-motion coup against the president,” was filed to a range of top law enforcement officials including Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, D.C.’s U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu and the Bar Disciplinary Counsel.
“Dr. Corsi has been criminally threatened and coerced to tell a lie and call it the truth,” the complaint states.
Corsi, who wrote the anti-President Obama book “The Obama Nation” and is connected with political operative Roger Stone, has claimed for the past week that he was being improperly pressured by Mueller’s team to strike a plea deal which he now says he won’t sign.
According to Corsi’s complaint, they wanted him to demonstrate that he acted as a liaison between Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on one side and the Trump campaign on the other, regarding the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.
The complaint states that Mueller’s office is now “knowingly and deceitfully threatening to charge Dr. Corsi with an alleged false statement,” unless he gives them “false testimony” against Trump and others.
The purported threat of a false statement charge, according to the complaint, pertains to a July 2016 email from Stone asking him to “get to” Assange and get the pending emails.
Corsi’s complaint says he was unable to initially give “accurate” testimony on that point, until he could reload emails on his laptop. The complaint says he later amended his answers. In an interview last week with Fox News’ "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Corsi said Mueller’s team “was happy” with his answers until he couldn’t “give them what they wanted.”
Asked about Monday's complaint, Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said they would decline to comment, as did a Justice Department spokesman.
As part of the complaint, Corsi’s legal team included a draft court filing from Mueller’s team to be used for Corsi to plead guilty to making false statements.
That document includes an Aug. 2, 2016 email between Corsi and Stone, where Corsi references Assange and the forthcoming release of hacked emails.
“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps,” Corsi wrote to Stone, about 10 weeks before Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails were released.
In the complaint on Monday, Corsi’s lawyers denied that Corsi had inside knowledge and was colluding with Assange. Instead, they make the argument Corsi “logically concluded” more emails would be released.
“Employing his professional skills and considerable experience as an analyst and investigative journalist, Dr. Corsi logically concluded that WikiLeaks would release Podesta’s emails soon in a second round ‘data dump’ from the same group of DNC emails stolen on July 5, 2016,” the complaint reads.
Corsi, the onetime Washington bureau chief of the right-wing website Infowars, told host Tucker Carlson last week that he has had "no contact with Julian Assange whatsoever."
The complaint is the latest sign of turbulence between Mueller’s team and investigation targets and witnesses. The team recently accused ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort of breaching his plea deal by lying to investigators.
Meanwhile, the special counsel’s office stunned Washington with the revelation last week that it had struck a plea deal with former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen, who is speaking to investigators about Trump’s real estate pursuits in Russia among other topics.
While Trump maintained his stance that there is no collusion and blasted Mueller’s investigation in stark terms last week, the developments showed the probe focusing more closely on Trump himself.
Corsi is represented in his complaint by Larry Klayman, a conservative lawyer who founded Judicial Watch and is known for filing lawsuits against former President Bill Clinton. In the complaint, Klayman argues that the activities of Corsi, as an "investigative journalist," are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Read more at: http://www.patriotortraitor.com/robert-swan-mueller-iii/
HILLARY’S ELECTION RIGGING WARRANTS SPECIAL PROSECUTOT
By
Daniel John Sobieski
And don’t forget Uranium One, Fusion GPS, keeping classified emails on an iunsecured private server, deleting 33,000 emails under subpoena, and, well, you get the idea. Unfortunately our AWOL AG Jeff Sessions, whose face was last seen on the side of a milk carton, does not. So we are left with the absurdity of a spcial prosecutor looking into Trump-Russia collusion where there is none while overlooking the multiple Clinton elephants in the room.
The revelation that both the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign were funneling money through a law firm to Fusion GPS to produce a slimy and fake dossier on Trump culled from foreign sources was bad enough. Now we find, courtesy of the one truthful and remorseful Democrat on this planet, former DNC Chairperson Donna Brazile, that the DNC was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton, who probably violated multiple FEC campaign laws in rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders and shifted cash around in a manner that could only be called, what’s the word Robert Mueller would use, money-laundering:
In an excerpt from her upcoming book, Brazile says she discovered a document that explained why the Clinton campaign had such a stranglehold on the DNC. It was published in Politico Thursday.
“When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard,” she wrote, “I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.”
The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias — specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.
Hillary Clinton staged a political coup worthy of a banana republic. Brazile has confirmed what the Sanders campaign claimed as early as May of 2016, charges that Hillary Clinton was engaging in money-laundering to help her campaign:
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, on Monday criticized a Hillary Clinton campaign fundraising scheme that state party leaders told Politico has been used as a self-serving “money-laundering” conduit.
Despite Clinton’s pledges to rebuild state parties, Politico found that less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by the Victory Fund has stayed in the state parties’ coffers.
“Secretary Clinton is looting funds meant for the state parties to skirt fundraising limits on her presidential campaign,” Weaver said. “We think the Clinton campaign should let the state parties keep their fair share of the cash.”
Sanders’ and Clinton’s primary campaigns both raised about $26 million in April, but Politico documented how the Hillary Victory Fund, a supposedly joint fundraising committee, has been exploited to inflate her presidential primary campaign.
“Secretary Clinton has exploited the rules in ways that let her high-dollar donors like Alice Walton of Wal-Mart fame and the actor George Clooney and his super-rich Hollywood friends skirt legal limits on campaign ontributions,” Weaver added. “If Secretary Clinton can’t raise the funds needed to run in a competitive primary without resorting to laundering, how will she compete against Donald Trump in a general election?”
Turns out that even with money-laundering, Hillary couldn’t win. On a receny edition of Fox News Sunday. House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-SC, notes that in addition to laundering her campaign cash through her wholly-owned subsidiary, the DNC, Hillary Clinton used a law firm to funnel cash to Russia-linked Fusion GPS:
Gowdy said, “I’m not an election law expert, but the good news is you don’t have to be too understated the absurdity believing you can just launder all of your campaign money by just hiring a law firm. Imagine if you and I were running for Congress, and we just hired a law firm and said ‘Hey, you go to all the opposition, you go buy all the television, you go buy all the bumper stickers, you go higher all the experts, and we will launder all of this through a law firm. I can’t think of anything that defeats the purpose of transparency laws more than that.”
He continued, “I am interested in that, and I am also interested in sharing some memory tricks with folks at the DNC because no one can remember who paid 10 million dollars to a law firm to do oppo research. I find that stunning. $10 million and no one can remember who authorized it, who approved it. So you’ve got two issues, a memory issue and then the lack of transparency by laundering money through a law firm.”
And did we forget the Clinton Foundation? As Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett notes, it was used in an influence peddling scheme to enrich the Clintons and advance their political ambitions, colluding with the Russians to, among other things, sell 20 percent of our uranium supplies to interests and donors aligned with Moscow:
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity.
But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
Hillary Clinton was the godfather, or is it godmother, that ran multiple criminal enterprises. The existence of a special prosecutor investigating Trump-Russia collusion is based on a fake dossier she controlled the financing of. Paul Manafort and his co-defendants could make the “fruit of a poison tree” argument, that since the dossier that sparked the investigation into collusion and resulting indictments was politically motivated and financed, and its unverified contents may have been used by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants, anything that resulted from it should be summarily dismissed.
As for the aforementioned Marc Elias, his involvement in Hillary’s crimes is just one facet of his involvement with the crimes of Hilary and the Democrats. Remember he sat between former DNC Chair and Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and John Podesta as they invoked the Sergeant Schultz (no relation) defense regarding Fusion GPS
Did DNC and Team Hillary attorney Marc Elias lead John Podesta and Debbie Wasserman Schultz into a perjury trap? According to CNN, the two testified to congressional investigators that they did not have any knowledge of the funding for the Fusion GPS dossier that prompted an FBI probe into Donald Trump campaign figures.
In recent closed-door interviews with the Senate intelligence committee, Podesta and Wasserman Schultz said they did not know who had funded Fusion GPS, the intelligence firm that hired British Intelligence Officer Christopher Steele to compile the dossier on Trump, the sources said.
Podesta was asked in his September interview whether the Clinton campaign had a contractual agreement with Fusion GPS, and he said he was not aware of one, according to one of the sources.
Sitting next to Podesta during the interview: his attorney Marc Elias, who worked for the law firm that hired Fusion GPS to continue research on Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC, multiple sources said. Elias was only there in his capacity as Podesta’s attorney and not as a witness.
Whether or not this testimony was under oath, it is a crime to provide false testimony to Congress.
Indeed it is. Add it to the list of crimes that go uninvestigated and unprosecuted as AG Jeff Sessions contemplates his navel. A special prosecutor needs to be appointed and a grand jury empanelled to investigate this list of crimes that would make a mafia don proud. Justice should be blind and not brain-dead. Unless there is a double standard at play here, there is no equal justice under the law and Hillary Clinton was right when she said laws are for the little people.
Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
WHY IS SESSIONS HIDING URANIUM ONE INFORMANT?
By
Daniel John Sobieski
Perhaps as startling as the revelation that the FBI was investigating the Hillary Clinton/Russia/Uranium One collusion and that key figures like Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Special Counsel Robert Mueller and Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe knew about it and said nothing, is the refusal by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to remove the non-disclosure agreement gag order on the FBI informant who arguably could put Bill and Hillary Clinton and a few others in federal prison.
It was said the Jeff Sessions recused himself from all things Russian because of election campaign conflicts but is it really because he thought it would insulate him from having to divulge what he knew about Uranium One and the people who at the very least knew about the deal, some who approved the deal, including past and present members of the FBI, the DOJ, and Special Counsel Robert Miller’s team? Is Jeff Sessions part of the Uranium One cover-up? If not then he needs to explain why he is thus far refusing Sen. Chuck Grassley’s request to lift the gag order imposed by the Obama administration as part of the Uranium One cover-up :
A top Senate Republican is calling for the Justice Department to lift an apparent “gag order” on an FBI informant who reportedly helped the U.S. uncover a corruption and bribery scheme by Russian nuclear officials but allegedly was “threatened” by the Obama administration to stay quiet….
“Witnesses who want to talk to Congress should not be gagged and threatened with prosecution for talking. If that has happened, senior DOJ leadership needs to fix it and release the witness from the gag order,” Grassley said in a statement.
Victoria Toensing, a lawyer for the former FBI informant, told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” that her client has “specific information about contributions and bribes to various entities and people in the United States.”
She said she could not go further because her client has not been released from a nondisclosure agreement but suggested the gag order could be lifted soon. Toensing also claimed that her client was “threatened by the Loretta Lynch Justice Department” when he pursued a civil action in which he reportedly sought to disclose some information about the case.
In a letter sent Wednesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Grassley said such an NDA would “appear to improperly prevent the individual from making critical, good faith disclosures to Congress of potential wrongdoing.”…
The Hill reported earlier this week that the FBI had evidence as early as 2009 that Russian operatives used bribes, kickbacks and other dirty tactics to expand Moscow’s atomic energy footprint in the U.S. Grassley on Wednesday released a series of letters he fired off last week to 10 federal agencies, raising the question of whether the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which approved the uranium transaction was aware of that FBI probe -- and pointing to potential “conflicts” involving the Clintons. The committee included then-Secretary of State Clinton.
So why not just lift the gag order, vacate the non-disclosure agreement, which Sessions has the power to do, and key the informant come forward with information on how and why the Clintons conspired to put 20 percent of our uranium assets under Russian control while lining the pockets of the Clintons and their pay-for-play foundation? As Toensing notes, Sessions could do it, and thereby bring to light the details of this criminal enterprise:
The lead investigators on the case included Rod Rosenstein, who is now the deputy attorney general, and Andrew McCabe, who is now the deputy FBI director. Rosenstein is the DOJ official who appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller to investigate alleged collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the collusion/campaign investigation. He could waive the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) signed by the informant, said Toensing. "Yes, Jeff could do it," she said. "He is not recused from this matter and should not be."
However, Rod Rosenstein "is conflicted," said Toensing, "because he was the U.S. attorney who oversaw the case involving my client." Toensing added that she has "asked an oversight committee to pursue the release" of the NDA so her client may testify before Congress about what he knows.
In lifting the gag order, Sessions might have to explain the real reasons behind his recusal and why people who knew of actual collusion between Russia and the Clintons were silent, only to reappear to investigate and pursue prosecution of non-existent collusion between Russia and Team Trump. He might have to explain why Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstein and other were allowed to hide the truth from the American people and why they should not be summarily fired. As Grassley notes, neither Sessions or anyone in the Justice Department has the authority to block the informant from testifying before Congress or issue non-disclosure agreements to thwart Congressional oversight:
“The Executive Branch does not have the authority to use non-disclosure agreements to avoid Congressional scrutiny," Grassley wrote. "If the FBI is allowed to contract itself out of Congressional oversight, it would seriously undermine our Constitutional system of checks and balances. The Justice Department needs to work with the Committee to ensure that witnesses are free to speak without fear, intimidation or retaliation from law enforcement."
Again, perhaps the reluctance of Jeff Sessions stems from the web of deceit and complicity that ensnares many in the FBI and the Justice Department. As Fox News analyst Gregg Jarrett notes on the Uranium One scandal:
It seems it was all covered up for years by the same three people who are now involved in the investigation of President Donald Trump over so-called Russian “collusion.”…
But why has there been no prosecution of Clinton? Why did the FBI and the Department of Justice during the Obama administration keep the evidence secret? Was it concealed to prevent a scandal that would poison Barack Obama’s presidency? Was Hillary Clinton being protected in her quest to succeed him?
The answer may lie with the people who were in charge of the investigation and who knew of its explosive impact. Who are they?
Eric Holder was the Attorney General when the FBI began uncovering the Russian corruption scheme in 2009. Since the FBI reports to him, he surely knew what the bureau had uncovered.
What’s more, Holder was a member of the “Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States” which approved the uranium sale to the Russians in 2010. Since the vote was unanimous, it appears Holder knowingly and deliberately countenanced a deal that was based on illegal activities and which gave Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium assets.
It gets worse. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney, was supervising the case. There is no indication that any of these men ever told Congress of all the incriminating evidence they had discovered and the connection to Clinton. The entire matter was kept secret from the American public.
It may be no coincidence that Mueller (now special counsel) and Rosenstein (now Deputy Attorney General) are the two top people currently investigating whether the Trump campaign conspired with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Mueller reports to Rosenstein, while Comey is a key witness in the case. It is not unreasonable to conclude that Mueller, Rosenstein and Comey may have covered up potential crimes involving Clinton and Russia, but are now determined to find some evidence that Trump “colluded” with Russia.
Boom. The question is now whether Jeff Sessions wants to help President Trump to drain the swamp be vacating the gag order and letting evidence come forth proving the Clintons orchestrated the greatest criminal conspiracy in U.S. history at the expense of American national security or whether he is just another swamp thing committed to clogging up the drainage pipes. Justice may be blind, but it should never be gagged.
Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
ROBERT NUELLER ADOPTS STALIN TACTICS
By
Daniel John Sobieski
We may be thankful to Alan Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School, for reminding us of the delicious irony of an investigation which began with “reports” of collusion with the Russians by Team Trump and charges of Russian hacking of our elections, noe reverting to the tactics of Russia’s most murderous tyrant, Josef Stalin. As Dershowitz writes in the Washington Examiner:
Special counsel Robert Mueller was commissioned to investigate not only crime but the entire Russian "matter." That is an ominous development that endangers the civil liberties of all Americans.
Federal prosecutors generally begin by identifying specific crimes that may have been committed — in this case, violation of federal statutes. But no one has yet identified the specific statute or statutes that constrain Mueller's investigation of the Russian matter. It is not a violation of any federal law for a campaign to have collaborated with a foreign government to help elect their candidate….
One does not have to go back to the Soviet Union and Lavrentiy Beria's infamous boast to Stalin, "Show me the man and I will show you the crime," in order to be concerned about the expansion of elastic criminal statutes. There are enough examples of abuse in our own history.
From McCarthyism to the failed prosecutions of Sen. Ted Stevens, Rep. Thomas DeLay, Gov. Rick Perry and others, we have seen vague criminal statutes stretched in an effort to criminalize political differences.
Indeed, now we here reports that Mueller’s investigation will range anywhere from Jared Kutchner’s finances to perhaps any unpaid parking tickets Sean Spicer may have. To paraphrase the boast of head of Stalin’s secret police , show Mueller the man, and he will find a crime, just as Mueller’s best friend, James Comey, found with Martha Stewart.
There too we see a vindicative prosecutor in search of a crime and it doesn’t have to be the original charge, if there is an original charge. As the Daily Caller reported:
FBI Director James Comey declined to recommend criminal charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified material Tuesday. But back in 2004, he led what legal observers call a “petty and vindictive” prosecution against interior design icon Martha Stewart for a lesser offense.
Stewart served a five-month prison sentence in 2004 at the Federal Prison Camp in Alderson, West Virginia, also known as “Camp Cupcake,” for lying to federal investigators about possible insider trading. In the years since the case, there is a consensus in the legal community that Comey’s prosecution was overzealous and vindictive.
The Cato Institute’s Gene Healy condemned Comey’s actions as temperamental and political in a 2004 column. Healy argued that Stewart’s indictment was largely possible because the sheer volume of federal laws makes it possible to indict almost any individual on some basis — reasonable or unreasonable. Quoting former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Healy wrote prosecutors “will pick people that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted.”His Cato colleague Alan Reynolds argued Comey prosecuted Stewart for “having misled people by denying having committed a crime with which she was not charged.”
We saw this Stalinesque persecution in the case of Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff. Libby was convicted, again of lying to the FBI, because he misremembered events under relentless questioning. He was charge long after prosecutors knoew it was Richard Armitage who leaked the name of CIA desk jockey Valerie Plame to the press. Instead of dropping the investigation at hat point, prosecutors persisted, knowing they had to find a crime committed by someone somewhere to justify their existence.
Libby was Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff when he was charged with obstruction of an investigation into the “outing” of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative. Plame was in fact a desk jockey at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia, not a secret agent in harm’s way. As Investor’s Business Daily noted:
Remember the alleged outing of the already known CIA officer and desk jockey Valerie Plame? We were told then that the Vanity Fair cover girl's 15 minutes of fame jeopardized our national security even if everybody already knew who she was.
"Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, went to jail because his memory of events and who said what to whom regarding Plame differed from the recollections of others, particularly news reporters.
Yes, Virginia, this is a witch hunt. Robert Mueller III was appointed special cunsel after his friend, the vindictive James Comey, committed a federal crime by leaking a memo which was a government record to the press. Mueller has picked staff and prosecutors as if he were stocking Hillary Clinton’s Department of Justice. He has picked a bevy of Clinton donors, an attorney who worked for the Clinton Foundation, a former Watergate assistant prosecutor, and evn a senior advise to Eric Hiolder. Objective professionals all (snarkiness intended ).
Mueller is in fact colluding with Comey to enact revenge on President Trump for Comey’s firing, something which even Comey said Trump was constitutionally entitled to do. There is no evidence of collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. It is not obstruction of justice for a President to exercise his legal and constitutional authority.
The facts and the lack of an actual crime will not stop Robert Mueller. Just show him the man, or woman, and he will show you the crime.
Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
Make no mistake about it -- Robert MacDonald, the President's choice to head the Veteran's Affairs department -- is a marketing expert.
While the announcement of his appointment plays up the fact than MacDonald graduated from West Point (no small accomplishment) it doesn't exactly give as much attention to the fact that he served only 3 years (1975-1978) in the military before going to the University of Utah to get his MBA.
But an MBA is good, right? It would be useful to have a businessman trying to fix the problems of the VA.
It would -- if his business experience was relevant. MacDonald was an executive at Proctor Gamble. While it would be useful to have an executive with experience in insurance or health care, MacDonald's core experience is with the business of P&G.
What business is P&G in? MARKETING.
While P&G is a large corporation with a lot of product lines, these are mostly commodity products. Many of them are repackaged versions of other products with no formula difference (a product sold as a laundry detergent can be also sold as a floor cleaner). What allows you do differentiate? MARKETING.
So it appears what the President believes the problem at the VA is doesn't come to organization or providing services to America's military Veterans. The problem is one of MARKETING and messages.
In other words, it's a PR problem.
So don't expect substantive changes at the VA. Expect better spin.
National Movement Moves under Press Radar for Presidential Coalition 2016
FEARTURE EDITORIAL: The Post & EmailA growing sentiment exists among Americans that is swelling nationally. More Americans are awakening to the facts that neither the Republican nor the Democratic Party is really taking a stand for the Constitution of the United States. The blatant disrespect for the Supreme Law of the Land is not going unnoticed by Americans.
The politicians in the arena of considerations as candidates, or potential candidates for President 2016, have been flexing their muscles a little bit lately. Paul Ryan was featured as potentially becoming the strongest member of Congress with the retirement of Michigan Representative Dave Camp.
Senator Rand Paul recently made headlines in building up a 50 state national network that could potentially be a vehicle in the race for President in 2016.
The Democratic Party has set itself up for a primary split on the ticket with rumors of Hillary Clinton's run for President and V.P. Joe Biden also announcing he is putting together a campaign for President.
Unnoticed but equally formidable is the potential for an Independent Candidate especially one who actually has a record of taking a stand for the Constitution. With the biggest national security threat going unnoticed by main-stream candidates Americans are finding that their main-stream candidates are easily thrown into the Misprision of felony busObama is driving in actually working from their pulpits to keep Obama's fraudulent identity covered up.
Cody Robert Judy has distinguished himself over the last 8 years in Presidential Politics running against all odds. As the Obama fraudulent long form birth certificate, mis-matched social security number, phony draft registration, closed foreign-student college registration status, self reported author essay all testifying against Obama's qualification for the Office of the President as a "natural born citizen" are ignored and covered up by mainstream candidates, their actions are not going unnoticed.
Aligning and arming himself with the truth of the principles of the qualifications of the Office of the President Cody has also distinguished himself as the only candidate in America in 2008 and 2012 to hold both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama responsible in Court Records reaching into the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.
According to law there has never been any doubt for those meeting the two prong test 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents', and Cody says we are reaping the rewards now of the cover up created with Sen. John McCain's request for his fellow Senators Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama/Soetoro to co-sponsor non-binding senate resolution 511, officially recognizing Sen. McCain was not born in the U.S., and knew he failed the test of qualification for the Office of President.
Of course Sen. Barack Obama knew he would have his clock cleaned on the principle established for the Office of the President if he didn't have a needle and thread suing up Republican's mouths and Sen. Res. 511 did just that, creating a wide spread and saturated clothe in the political arena of a mis-prision of felony throughout those who actually hold offices or have held offices within the Government of the United States.
Cody as a candidate for President within the Democratic Party in 2012 reported this to Georgia Attorney General and the Georgia Courts with the professional evidences of conclusion held in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case PosseMarch 2nd,2012, the day after the release of the report.
Defending the Constitution's very simple request for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President, Cody asks you to consider if your Candidate for President is unwilling to defend, protect, and preserve this simple line that holds so much power and sway in the qualifications for President, how much easier is it for them to neglect other parts of the Constitution that have your individual Civil Rights at stake?
Clearly with the over-reach of Government spying and the 24 crawling scandals coming out of this administration thus far, the largest rooting itself directly to Obama's handing out his long form fabrication at the White House Press Core room, one can easily conclude that something is amiss with all the other candidates in collaboration with Obama's cover-ups.
Both Republican Candidates as well as Democratic Candidates have the stink of Obama's fraud upon their feet that they haven't wiped off in the duty to report these dangerous circumstances to the public and to the proper authorities. Traditionally in America, presidential candidates have come from some other elected office including Mayors, Governors, U.S. Representatives, U.S. Senators, though being elected to some other office is certainly not a requirement for becoming President of the United States. Being a 'natural born citizen' is a requirement as well as being over 35 years of age. With Obama's massive cover-up glued to heels of so many in office, we are seeing again the wisdom of the Constitution's declarations before our eyes.
With the Sheriff Kits being distributed to all Congress, Senators, Governors, and Mayors and available to the public the window is narrowing on those elected in their offices at this time not being subjects of misprision of felony. A federal grand jury has been convened to probe Governor Chris Christie's involvement role in bridgegate under the authority of New Jersey's Federal Attorney General.
If indeed the federal grand jury finds evidence of involvement according to law, we will understand that those reporting the incident who were involved as Democrats in elected positions were protecting themselves from misprision of felony by reporting the incident. Christie's Office is also the subject of an investigation by a State Legislative Panel.
If this were a model to the Federal Office of the President of the United States in Obama's identity and qualification scandal, attorney general Eric Holder would be convening a Grand Jury to submit the evidences of Obama's fraudulent identity and qualification for the Office of the President to those members of the Grand Jury, and the U.S. House of Representatives as well as the U.S. Senate would also be holding hearings so that all the evidences might be considered and heard to exempt themselves from misprision of felony charges.
That's the duty of the Congress if the President shall fail to qualify. All of the Presidential Candidates for 2016 will indeed be responsible for answering the questions about Obama's identity and qualifications and why they chose to act according to their record on the matter, considering the evidences presented and laid out to them by professional criminal investigators.
Due to the Office of the President having such great power and authority to prosecute, profile, and target individuals who are Americans indeed foreign allegiances of dual citizenship are prohibited from and only from the Office of the President for good reasons involving national security.
Though Cody Robert Judy is the only Presidential Candidate in America to file a record in Court in a non-partisan and non-racial stand for the principle in the United States Constitution against both McCain and Obama, those candidates for President in 2016 would either undoubtedly be charged or questioned for a Caucasian discrimination or in fact just a blatant disregard for the Constitution, neither one of which is something they would want on their resume.
How much sense does it make to elect and in such hire a President of the United States who has a record of blatantly refusing to uphold the law? How much sense does it make to put your trust in someone who has an actual record of working to cover-up Obama's fraud and deception which has then been perpetrated upon every American with horror and scandal? This cover-up is no longer in the shadows of "I dont know", or "My trust lies in the media report". Its at their door step.
While Cody Robert Judy's platform includes securing borders, working to pay down the debt, and create a more independent America for future generations, the exact same thing might be said by far more popular conservative candidates in the Presidential Election for 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZIlBt8IDgY
Cody insists that discernment in fact is embedded in the heart of each American. The trust to do what you say is embedded in the record of each Candidate and so always remains in their past actions of taking a stand. While Cody's Presidential Team may be seen as a JV Team compared to the Varsity Teams of Hillary Clinton, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Joe Biden, and others, at the very least Americans have a record with Cody's actions to put some trust into where it is extremely lacking in these other elected officials.
Cody says he wishes that other candidates actually would have taken this issue more seriously given the national security threat posed by it upon every American. "I don't think they have considered the ramifications of Obama's fraud upon the familys of every American. If their own family being blackmailed is in question then their leadership position should be retired quickly, 'land of the free and home of the brave' is a theme not a passing thought in leadership postions, and if its just the Constitution they have a problem with then of course they believe their oath a passing thought also. We are seeing the cave in the Republican party on Obamascare right now.", said Cody.
Though a bit obscure in the report by National Media, a quick look at those supporting Cody Robert Judy for 2016 on a new facebook page shows a demographic of national support. This is very revealing on the candidate’s national conscience, broad scope of appeal, and is actually quite shocking.
Usually you would find a concentrated local appeal for a given candidate in a particular home base, such as you would find in an elected leaders appeal to their home state or elected seat. This is just not the case with Cody Robert Judy's Presidential page and reflects a broad demographics appeal that is not concentrated and completely random to the first 120 likes on facebook page.
Indeed if you didn't know it, you'd think there is in fact as reported with Sen. Rand Paul a network that has been set up nationally to handle a presidential run in 2016 that is flying under the radar of the National Press.
The weekly challenge has invited all those leaders who have liked Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 to get 5 more people they know to like the fb page. Won’t you join a team who can claim taking a stand for the Constitution with a record behind it that doesn't include covering up for Obama's identity fraud creating a constitutional crisis?
First 2016 Pres. Commercial
Staff of CRJ for President 2016
Cody Robert Judy
P.S.
Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on.http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html
How You Can Help
Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and2013.
Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.
Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.
If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here
You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.
Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book:Taking A Stand
FEARTURE EDITORIAL: The Post & EmailA growing sentiment exists among Americans that is swelling nationally. More Americans are awakening to the facts that neither the Republican nor the Democratic Party is really taking a stand for the Constitution of the United States. The blatant disrespect for the Supreme Law of the Land is not going unnoticed by Americans.
The politicians in the arena of considerations as candidates, or potential candidates for President 2016, have been flexing their muscles a little bit lately. Paul Ryan was featured as potentially becoming the strongest member of Congress with the retirement of Michigan Representative Dave Camp.
Senator Rand Paul recently made headlines in building up a 50 state national network that could potentially be a vehicle in the race for President in 2016.
The Democratic Party has set itself up for a primary split on the ticket with rumors of Hillary Clinton's run for President and V.P. Joe Biden also announcing he is putting together a campaign for President.
Unnoticed but equally formidable is the potential for an Independent Candidate especially one who actually has a record of taking a stand for the Constitution. With the biggest national security threat going unnoticed by main-stream candidates Americans are finding that their main-stream candidates are easily thrown into the Misprision of felony busObama is driving in actually working from their pulpits to keep Obama's fraudulent identity covered up.
Cody Robert Judy has distinguished himself over the last 8 years in Presidential Politics running against all odds. As the Obama fraudulent long form birth certificate, mis-matched social security number, phony draft registration, closed foreign-student college registration status, self reported author essay all testifying against Obama's qualification for the Office of the President as a "natural born citizen" are ignored and covered up by mainstream candidates, their actions are not going unnoticed.
Aligning and arming himself with the truth of the principles of the qualifications of the Office of the President Cody has also distinguished himself as the only candidate in America in 2008 and 2012 to hold both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama responsible in Court Records reaching into the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.
According to law there has never been any doubt for those meeting the two prong test 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents', and Cody says we are reaping the rewards now of the cover up created with Sen. John McCain's request for his fellow Senators Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama/Soetoro to co-sponsor non-binding senate resolution 511, officially recognizing Sen. McCain was not born in the U.S., and knew he failed the test of qualification for the Office of President.
Of course Sen. Barack Obama knew he would have his clock cleaned on the principle established for the Office of the President if he didn't have a needle and thread suing up Republican's mouths and Sen. Res. 511 did just that, creating a wide spread and saturated clothe in the political arena of a mis-prision of felony throughout those who actually hold offices or have held offices within the Government of the United States.
Cody as a candidate for President within the Democratic Party in 2012 reported this to Georgia Attorney General and the Georgia Courts with the professional evidences of conclusion held in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case PosseMarch 2nd,2012, the day after the release of the report.
Defending the Constitution's very simple request for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President, Cody asks you to consider if your Candidate for President is unwilling to defend, protect, and preserve this simple line that holds so much power and sway in the qualifications for President, how much easier is it for them to neglect other parts of the Constitution that have your individual Civil Rights at stake?
Clearly with the over-reach of Government spying and the 24 crawling scandals coming out of this administration thus far, the largest rooting itself directly to Obama's handing out his long form fabrication at the White House Press Core room, one can easily conclude that something is amiss with all the other candidates in collaboration with Obama's cover-ups.
Both Republican Candidates as well as Democratic Candidates have the stink of Obama's fraud upon their feet that they haven't wiped off in the duty to report these dangerous circumstances to the public and to the proper authorities. Traditionally in America, presidential candidates have come from some other elected office including Mayors, Governors, U.S. Representatives, U.S. Senators, though being elected to some other office is certainly not a requirement for becoming President of the United States. Being a 'natural born citizen' is a requirement as well as being over 35 years of age. With Obama's massive cover-up glued to heels of so many in office, we are seeing again the wisdom of the Constitution's declarations before our eyes.
With the Sheriff Kits being distributed to all Congress, Senators, Governors, and Mayors and available to the public the window is narrowing on those elected in their offices at this time not being subjects of misprision of felony. A federal grand jury has been convened to probe Governor Chris Christie's involvement role in bridgegate under the authority of New Jersey's Federal Attorney General.
If indeed the federal grand jury finds evidence of involvement according to law, we will understand that those reporting the incident who were involved as Democrats in elected positions were protecting themselves from misprision of felony by reporting the incident. Christie's Office is also the subject of an investigation by a State Legislative Panel.
If this were a model to the Federal Office of the President of the United States in Obama's identity and qualification scandal, attorney general Eric Holder would be convening a Grand Jury to submit the evidences of Obama's fraudulent identity and qualification for the Office of the President to those members of the Grand Jury, and the U.S. House of Representatives as well as the U.S. Senate would also be holding hearings so that all the evidences might be considered and heard to exempt themselves from misprision of felony charges.
That's the duty of the Congress if the President shall fail to qualify. All of the Presidential Candidates for 2016 will indeed be responsible for answering the questions about Obama's identity and qualifications and why they chose to act according to their record on the matter, considering the evidences presented and laid out to them by professional criminal investigators.
Due to the Office of the President having such great power and authority to prosecute, profile, and target individuals who are Americans indeed foreign allegiances of dual citizenship are prohibited from and only from the Office of the President for good reasons involving national security.
Though Cody Robert Judy is the only Presidential Candidate in America to file a record in Court in a non-partisan and non-racial stand for the principle in the United States Constitution against both McCain and Obama, those candidates for President in 2016 would either undoubtedly be charged or questioned for a Caucasian discrimination or in fact just a blatant disregard for the Constitution, neither one of which is something they would want on their resume.
How much sense does it make to elect and in such hire a President of the United States who has a record of blatantly refusing to uphold the law? How much sense does it make to put your trust in someone who has an actual record of working to cover-up Obama's fraud and deception which has then been perpetrated upon every American with horror and scandal? This cover-up is no longer in the shadows of "I dont know", or "My trust lies in the media report". Its at their door step.
While Cody Robert Judy's platform includes securing borders, working to pay down the debt, and create a more independent America for future generations, the exact same thing might be said by far more popular conservative candidates in the Presidential Election for 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZIlBt8IDgY
Cody insists that discernment in fact is embedded in the heart of each American. The trust to do what you say is embedded in the record of each Candidate and so always remains in their past actions of taking a stand. While Cody's Presidential Team may be seen as a JV Team compared to the Varsity Teams of Hillary Clinton, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Joe Biden, and others, at the very least Americans have a record with Cody's actions to put some trust into where it is extremely lacking in these other elected officials.
Cody says he wishes that other candidates actually would have taken this issue more seriously given the national security threat posed by it upon every American. "I don't think they have considered the ramifications of Obama's fraud upon the familys of every American. If their own family being blackmailed is in question then their leadership position should be retired quickly, 'land of the free and home of the brave' is a theme not a passing thought in leadership postions, and if its just the Constitution they have a problem with then of course they believe their oath a passing thought also. We are seeing the cave in the Republican party on Obamascare right now.", said Cody.
Though a bit obscure in the report by National Media, a quick look at those supporting Cody Robert Judy for 2016 on a new facebook page shows a demographic of national support. This is very revealing on the candidate’s national conscience, broad scope of appeal, and is actually quite shocking.
Usually you would find a concentrated local appeal for a given candidate in a particular home base, such as you would find in an elected leaders appeal to their home state or elected seat. This is just not the case with Cody Robert Judy's Presidential page and reflects a broad demographics appeal that is not concentrated and completely random to the first 120 likes on facebook page.
Indeed if you didn't know it, you'd think there is in fact as reported with Sen. Rand Paul a network that has been set up nationally to handle a presidential run in 2016 that is flying under the radar of the National Press.
The weekly challenge has invited all those leaders who have liked Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 to get 5 more people they know to like the fb page. Won’t you join a team who can claim taking a stand for the Constitution with a record behind it that doesn't include covering up for Obama's identity fraud creating a constitutional crisis?
First 2016 Pres. Commercial
Staff of CRJ for President 2016
Cody Robert Judy
P.S.
Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on.http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html
How You Can Help
Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and2013.
Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.
Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.
If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here
You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.
Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book:Taking A Stand
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Charlie, We'd like to Report "Your Fired"
Here we thought you were interested in reporting news Charlie. We've contacted your publisher/editor and informed them of your rude discourtesy at receiving press releases.
Dear Ogden Standard Examiner Editor-In-Chief:
We have received the following email from Charlie Pomerleau and would like to report it as a discourtesy, not simply to the Campaign, but to the subscribers and readers of the Ogden Standard Examiner.
Mr. Pomerleau has been a reporter for political events like "Occupy" and other political active events here in Utah, and it is frankly surprising to us here at the Campaign to find such a bias in the reporting atmosphere at the Ogden Standard Examiner.
Our Press Releases are a matter of public notices as Mr. Judy is a registered candidate in the Federal Election Commission record, and he has also taken Barack Obama clear to the United States Supreme Court case no Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and this is not simply the assertion of Mr. Judy, but the conviction of thousands of hours of law enforcement personal, that Mr. Pomerleau has referred as a "rant".
We would like an apology from Mr. Pomerleau, or we will consider publicly protesting the Ogden Standard Examiner in front of the community as endorsing and fully representative of Mr. Pomerleau's comments, and position on "the news" that's reported.
If this is the position of the Ogden Standard Examiner, we would not expect any reply. In the National News it is worth a mention that the Ogden Standard Examiner is "receiving" the news from reporters afar.
1-
Latest News
Oh look, story number 5 an actual Standard Examiner reporter, and we also notice 6 simply to highlight preceptable 'rants' as actually report able assuming at least a kernel of truth in Mr. Pomerleau's professional insult. Thank goodness for Becky Wright's concern over Utah's past time Mardi Gras, "barely registers in the history books". In real time comparison a Ogden Utah Candidate for U.S. President in the Democratic Party, has the man in the White House on record as ineligible with the results of a full law enforcement investigation included.
In fact as we scan popular stories from the Ogden Standard Examiner we see barely a glimpse of Obama criticism. Even for a Republican State reporting unbiased news that seems a little strange.
While the watch-dog for the Public may be concerned with an actual authority to report Obama's fraud and forgery presented to the public out of the White House Press Room, his fabricated selective service card, his total non-transparency on college transcripts and registration profile we assume based on his foreign student gifts from the U.S., his law licence being stripped based on his failure to report going under any other name, and his social security card number not even passing e-verify, (also a big problem for other illegals using forged birth certificates, we have to wonder why exactly the law requires any age restriction on a drivers licence, or entry into a bar, for all must similarly be dismissed to allow the same rules Obama is playing by under the Constitution), ultimately a simple report to the The People, might be a place to start.
Popular Stories
As we assume frankly the Ogden Standard Examiner is remiss to report anything remotely 'national' that doesn't come from Washington DC, we simply can think of no better excoriation than to public transfer this report to every possible colleague of Mr. Pomerleau, as the definitive definition of a lame reporter using his own rant's to define the public news.
While it might be an easier story to sell of a disgruntled political loser whose crying because the media won't report a case in the United States Supreme Court against the occupant of the White House, ... wait a minute... disgruntled political losers don't get to the United States Supreme Court. Call up any attorney and ask them what it cost to take a case from ground zero to the United States Supreme Court, then do a detailed analysis of every republican candidate's expenses from the time they entered the presidential race to the time they ended it.
Now consider the time necessary to create some 180 Commercials and a 500 page blog that you don't get paid for, all while maintaining your bills and you might come up with a simple dedication to the public trust, our Country and Constitution, that has motivated Cody Robert Judy. If that kind of dedication, tenaciousness, and courage against all odds is simply deserving of no more than a dismissive rant, it seems the real friends to the Country and the Constitution must be parked in some unreported battle giving their life's in a raging war also. God forbid that's your son or daughter.
Mr. Judy said, " You know I myself did not expect to still be in the Presidential Race in September of 2012 when we entered a week before Republican Gov. Rick Perry which I believe was Aug 13,2011. Its been an unbelievable test of grit working through the Courts on this very important issue of Obama's eligibility. The whole State of Kansas is seriously considering taking Obama off the ballot, it just seems the general population is just catching on but we started this defensive fight the first round in the New Hampshire Primary and then worked into Georgia both states going to the Supreme Courts. Ultimately we do believe the U.S. Constitution is the hallmark of the United States Supreme Court it just takes time to get there, but we did it and did so before the general election. I'm so unbelievably proud of every person and contributor that helped us get here. It wasn't done with big PACs or corporations, this is politics at the Mom and Pop stage and I can think of no better claim or compliment for America in general."
Charlie- We'd like to report three things to you 1) Your fired. 2) This blog has sold over 50,000 newspapers , http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/09/could-sept-24th-in-scotus-be-obamas-d.html , not bad for a city like Ogden, Utah. 3) of course we've reported it to far more. We look forward to Washington DC reporting the news to you after Sept. 24th, 2012, at which time you'll look even more ridiculous then you already do for not informing the General Public of the story handed to you. . Of course, that's a bet we know your willing to take and its one we've put far more time and money in than you, so you shouldn't have to worry about your losses?
While we're no fan of Mitt Romney and have highlighted his lack of courage for the eligibility issue we consider to be a national security issue and a direct link to our slagged economy, with friends like this we don't think Mitt Romney needs enemies.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Staff Report
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:01:39 -0600
From: cpomerleau@standard.net
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: The Dark Days of America's Scammers in Presidential Politics
Please unsubscribe me from your rants. I don't care to receive your material.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-dark-days-of-americas-scammers-in.html
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Mitt Romney's Clandestine Form of Politicking for The Constitution
Please help spread this . Cairo Embassy attacked, 4 dead including U.S. Amb Chris Stevens,1.5 Billion to Muslim Brohood,Obama apologizes on 11th Ann of 911 to Muslims makes wonder why people wouldn't want to double their odds at getting Obama out in the U.S. Supreme Court and helpn out a little because Obama's seeing the writing on the wall. He's beating Mitt Romney. Please help support the SCOTUS Effort everyone! We might not get another shot at this.
In light of this we call on all Media Sources to quit hiding from the American Public the enormously important case of Obama's ineligibility for the Office of President coming up for conference in the United States Supreme Court Sept 24th,2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 ., that Americans might be free to choose to support with an intelligence of what is going on ,rather then being told what or whom to support. We see the "cloak" of this case as a covert action to undermine America's Constitution with our entire political and journalistic system at the stake as we know it and call for the removal of "The Iron Curtain".
Cody Robert Judy's message to the media, " If you have nothing to fear, why don't you dare to share?"
We would like to express our sincere and heartfelt sorrow for the families of those who were slain and pray for those families in whom this tragedy has come to bear such enormous impact. May God bless them in this time of grief and loss of family members.
While Gov. Romney and Obama share jabs at the timing of each other's remarks, we share an added emphasis in the tragedy on exactly what American sovereignty means. We share an added emphasis on exactly what makes America different from the rest of the world. Gov. Mitt Romney strongly endorsed American values and our Constitution in his platitude. We would challenge Gov. Romney's statement as nothing more then lip service or a clandestine form of watered down politicking simply because he hasn't taking a stand against the greatest threat to our national security in Obama's ineligibility and the facts that through the office of the Presidency our enemies can gain more leverage against America then any terror action across the globe.
Not only have our enemies been embolden by the apologetic tone of the Obama usurpation administration, but we Americans are all mocked and chided at having a Usurper in the White House by our allies as well by our enemies and are seen as nothing more than hypocritical at our best and worst. With Mitt Romney covering up for Obama's ineligibility, Obama gains the platitudes of anti-american disdain of which our enemies soak and distribute as gasoline to be ignited against our Constitution and Country.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
Help Tear Down the Iron Curtain of the Media w Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
| Candidate ID | P20003372 |
| Committee ID | C00501593 |
script
CRACK THE IRON CURTAIN
Hi my Constitutional Friend of the USA ; )
You know many more people are tuning into the Presidential Race after the conventions now and I have a very special date coming up. That date, TWO WEEKS from now, is Sept. 24th,2012 in The United States Supreme Court, case Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and I need your help because there’s an IRON CURTAIN in the Media that I need your help with in TEARING DOWN! Remember Ronald Reagan saying that? Well guess what its’ here in America now.
As a facebook friend of mine 100 to 1 your conservative and will probably vote for Mitt Romney in the general election, however, I want to ask you if you’d like to double your odds at getting Barack Obama out of the White House before that; for $25.
You know as well as I do Mitt’s behind in 2 major, of the most reliable, polls right now, and there’s at least a 50% chance he won’t win anyway, so why not DOUBLES YOUR ODDS? Talk about a good deal for $25 dollars. Please,..let me explain.
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
One normal $50 dollar commercial for any company only cost a Presidential Candidate about $25 dollars and is estimated VERY conservatively to reach over one thousand people. I have about 4,500 facebook friends. If each gives $25 dollars we can reach conservatively four and a half million people and tune them into what’s happening in the United States Supreme Court in two weeks; but that’s not all.
With 4,500 commercials we gain major credibility ground with the networks that must air our commercials or can face big law suits for denying the Federal Guideline Standards of Advertisement for Presidential Candidates. That’s a law suit any attorney would delight to get their hands on because of the huge fine. We also gain credibility in the face of the Court which has never been done at this level!
Now $25 dollars is just between you and me, your name does not have to be reported to the FEC unless your contributions exceeds $200, so Mitt Romney is never going to know and you could still vote for him in Nov if you choose. Be my guest if you can contribute more than $200! (smile)
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
As you know Mitt’s taking on Obama on just the economy, but I’ll bet within the next two months you see gas prices going down, as well as employment numbers reported to the media and by the media by you- know-who. I’ll bet $25 that you might see it reported as 7.9% the first of November and guess what? Mitt Romney loses the economy battle as hope has suddenly and miraculously sprung back into the economy, we have to face it, that’s the way a major portion of our fellow Americans think.
That’s exactly what happened in reverse to John McCain in 2008 to help Obama out; thanks in large part to Saudi Arabia’s kings Obama bowed himself so low to. Don’t you think there was not a reason Obama bowed so low. Of course a U.S. President should never be beholden to a foreign power.
So, we Birthers have one more shot at this in the U.S. Supreme Court that is liberal of course, but guess what? I’m running as a Democrat in the same party objecting to campaign damage because Obama won the nomination and isn’t ‘playing by the same rules’ as Mrs. Obama quoted they think America should, and ‘it’s just not fair’. It’s a no brainer and my case has Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse investigation set in it and has from the onset from the lower Superior Court in Georgia. This has never happened in BIRTHER HISTORY exactly!
How about holding the Obama’s to the same standard they profess? Wouldn’t that be a treat for $25?
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
If you absolutely positively can’t do $25 dollars today, please send this to 25 friends and we’ll call that just as good; deal?
Otherwise I need you to hit this link now and send me $25 today ok; we only have 2 more weeks to make a statement!
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
Doubling your odds to get Obama out, preserving your vote for Mitt Romney, and being able to tell God in your prayers tonight you have done all you could do. That’s pretty good deal, and I believe you could hold yourself blameless before God if you could do that.
You see I am a Christian and I don’t mind telling you in my opinion God will do most of the work. He only wants us to just show a little faith in him. Think of coming an inch while God has come a whole mile.
Well most of the work is done. Our case is in the U.S. Supreme Court now; the Campaign has been built from scratch, we just need a little publicity. That’s the inch I think God just wants to see from you, and I believe we can be successful together. I just can’t do it alone.
Here’s a little rhyme for you to think about: “It may come down to one single Justice and I believe God can handle one heart if you will just show him your little $25 part. WE can build this truck together!
Well I believe our Constitution was inspired by our Creator, and I know our Founders and Framers did to. You might not agree with their religious principles or mine, but we both neither can deny the freedom and liberty our Constitution has given to us our whole lifes.
George Washington is my favorite U.S. President, can’t say as I’ve met him, but I’ve sure felt his spirit as a hand on my shoulder throughout the 12 courts over the last 4 years I’ve been through to get to this moment in the United States Supreme Court against Obama’s eligibility. Can you pitch in a little?
A commercial is intelligence and knowledge for the general public and in 1796 Pres. Washington said, “it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened”, “A primary object for our youth should be education of our youth in the science of government. In a Republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important?”, and he said it was our duty, communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of our country.
If you see any other Presidential candidates around with Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court before the General Election I recommend you contribute $25, otherwise my friend, I hope you’ll log on now and get that $25 to me in my goal to reach 4,500 commercials in two weeks. Together we can build this truck!
Can you please help me out and log on to my web site now and contribute that $25? Thank you so much.
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODE4PRES
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
and
Obama 2016 - The 'ACTION' of 'INACTION' Obama Voting Present
As an Illinois Senator Obama voted 'present' effectively side-stepping a "Ayes" or "Nays" vote some one hundred and thirty times in order to stay in the good graces of his constituents and his future political career which was, make no mistake, orchestrated.
Obama is also M.I.A as a constitutionally qualified president. Obama is not a natural born citizen which has been been interpreted by the Congress as a legislative mandate over 225 years, born in the United States to Citizen parents on the record by literally examining the fact that its never been over turned in our history while its been attempted over 24 times.
One thing most people agree on is that the purpose of the 'natural born citizen' clause is to protect the nation from foreign influence. Americans hold the work of the Founding Fathers in such reverence that they've added to it only 17 times since 1791.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a Judiciary committee member, sees merit in the restriction and said in 2004, "I don't think it is unfair to say the president of the United States should be a native-born citizen," she said at the hearing. "Your allegiance is driven by your birth."
Republican U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch-R from Utah said in October 2004,"The restriction on the foreign-born "has become an anachronism that is decidedly un-American."
Maria Shriver Kennedy at one time supported her husband Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger pushing for a constitutional amendment that would allow the Austrian-born 2004 California governor to run for the White House as soon as 2008.
As we see UT. R. Sen Orrin Hatch's proposed amendment failed in 2004, Maria (Kennedy) Shriver filed divorce to Schwarzenegger in 2011 for infidelity but as of July 2012 the divorce isn't final, and another 2008 candidate who isn't a natural born citizen duped Americans running and successfully usurped the White House in 2008.
If you haven't seen the conservative documentary of the decade stunning Hollywood Obama's present from Rocky Mountain Pictures, "Obama 2016", you need to go see it. I took my mother this last Friday even as the hour and twenty-nine minute documentary was expanding from its modest handful of movie screens to 1,900 screens nation wide earning another $5.1 million of its now 18.3 million.
Its an interesting side-note that Michael Moore producer of No. 1-ranked "Fahrenheit 9/ 11," which topped $119 million leading documentaries all time, this last week told Democrats to get used to the words "President Romney".
The foreboding feeling you feel walking out of Obama 2016 with the audience is worth the price of the ticket. To tell you the truth I personally was relieved to be able to sit quite next to my mom and let someone else do the talking as there have been many a family argument over the work I've been engaged in since 2008 suing McCain and Obama in 2008 on the eligibility issue as a candidate for President and continuing the stand in 2012 as a Democrat Presidential Candidate.
While I don't say this in justification of failure in the home,there's probably more then a truth or two about my last two marriages ending because of taking a stand for the Constitution in political races that ended unsuccessfully with the finances of my family in a crisis - the reality of underfunded campaigns for any candidate.
The truth of any political race is there is only one winner, and no matter how many people vote for the second place finisher, all the funds, all the votes, all the hoopla for the campaign doesn't make that campaign any better than the least voted candidate with the most under-voted campaign- it's still a loss and a calculable failure.
This brings me to the crux of this blog that is actually a question for everyone to ask themselves.
If Mitt Romney is unwilling to fight Obama on the grounds of the Constitutional demands of qualification for the Office of the President, allowing the usurpation, allowing the history to go down without justice to the fraud and forgery Obama has been apart of with the cover-up, spewing out false identification documents according to law enforcement investigations documented in my case Judy v. Obama now set for conference in the United States Supreme Court Sept. 24th, 2012, allowing Obama to build his presidential library and dis-honoring American culture with shocking racism sending blacks back to a time before color television, then how do you suppose Romney is going to preserve, protect and defend America's Constitution any more then Obama has?
And if Romney is not going to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution any better the Obama, what makes your vote for Romney worth the disgrace to God for setting America aside as a peculiar nation of a distinct Republic for which we Americans stand?
While I would not base my vote on any man or women's religious preference, there are some who do. In my opinion one of the finest distinctions in America is the freedom of conscience in America, let them worship who, what, or how they may, for that is the ultimate test of your own religious freedom here in America.
Saying you wouldn't vote for a "Mormon" is just as easily said about any other religion that is a minority at any given point and is not representative of the United State's Congress Standards outlined in the Constitution, which are chosen by We The People as our Representatives and Senators.
God knows they let us down as the electorate reported the election in 2008 and their popularity has shown this sinking to an all time low, however the legislative mandate has stood the test of time not to allow any but a "Natural Born Citizen", or a "Citizen" before the ratification of the Constitution, to become President.
With that said and understanding Obama was not born before the Constitution was ratified, a "Natural Born Citizen" is born in the United States to at the very least parents who are "Citizens", or "Natural Born Citizens" themselves.
I believe Dr. Pastor James David Manning makes a credible argument for justice in the following video, as Obama did in legislative session 130 times,by simply voting present when it comes to the President by writing my name in on your ballot "Cody Judy", if the Democrats and Republicans and United States Supreme court refuses to demand justice for the honor of black people, white people, yellow people and any color of people in America.
You absolutely do not need to disgrace yourself before your God, or higher power, by voting for a lesser of two evils, and I do believe that in this case "inaction" or something that appears futile,ultimately can be seen as 'action' to protect the way that God or your higher power, thinks about you if you think that is relevant and important to you.
Talking to Iowans Obama this week said something to the affect "that their is always a choice and Americans were gonna have to make one", and Pastor Manning makes it a credible argument here, which has in large part not been articulated by any religious figure in America, that voting for the lesser of two evils is not voting for principle that makes a bit of sense.
So, I'll say you don't have to "not vote" for anyone, you can always write-in my name Cody Judy understanding no other qualified candidate on the ballot has stood up for and taken a stand against Obama's Eligibility other than me, as actually your present to Obama.
Perhaps Obama would win, but perhaps he will win anyway, and perhaps you will look better to your God in not choosing the lesser of two evils, and simply just choosing someone who took a stand and took it to the U.S. Supreme Court. They may be the highest court we can see in America, but I believe there is one above them in the heavens; that in Gods hands.
If Obama were to win in America in 2012 perhaps it will be the lesson needed to the majority who put him there, from God, to make of you Patriots of Freedom and Liberty like nothing else would. I know being enslaved myself 8 years as a prisoner of a usurped Constitution by the majority in Utah and the deaf ear of the United States Supreme Court for evidence held by the Presidency of the Mormon or LDS Church, that I became a Patriot of our Constitution like I had never been before.
Then by God your prayers would reach into the heavens and I think that while God might be slow to hear you he would, by the bloodiest revolution America has ever pondered, set your free again, and by that you wouldn't forget it for 1000 years.
In God's mind, perhaps the greatest lesson to the greatest amount of people, is the best lesson anyway and by that standard I sure wouldn't put it past him, in my own religious sentiment.
So, minus the words that voting for a "Mormon" is a no can do, and perhaps inserting the understanding that voting for a President who has taken a stand against Obama's eligibility consistently since 2008 is a must, here is Dr. James David Manning's articulate report on that matter that rings truth in the matter of apposing a political loss for Obama because he still gets the pension and the presidential library, and the obamanation of history I am apposed to as my founding fathers in America were also.
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
| Candidate ID | P20003372 |
| Committee ID | C00501593 |
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
and
Cody Robert Judy's U.S. Supreme Court Case Boosted for Conference
In David Weldon v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5.htm you'll notice it was docketed July 2nd, and now was scheduled for distribution of conference Aug 8th for Sept. 24th. That is 36 days in between the time it was docketed and the time a docket report was made Aug 8th of the distribution for conference.
My case Judy v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5276.htm My case was docketed July 17th and its been 44 days and it is still there has been no docketed date for it or when it is distributed for conference.
Now, according to Van Irions- Liberty Legal "Some have suggested that the Court’s failure to order the President to respond to LLF’s petition is a sign that the Court has already decided that it will deny our petition. Normally it is true that if the Court is interested in a case it will order the opposing side to file a response to the petition.However, because of the importance of this case it could be that the Court has decided to accept the case without needing to review a response from Mr. Obama. It is also possible that the Court has recognized that ordering a response could delay the case beyond the November election.
As we learned last June, it is very difficult to determine what the Supreme Court will do in any given situation. We are glad to know that we will have an answer before the end of next month."
Van Irions also has promised to file an Emergency Motion that the case be heard before the Nov. Election, but no record indicates it has been done. I filed my Emergency Motion and it was docketed as "Petitioner's Supplemental Brief" on the docket.
Of course I'm wondering what might be up. Logically, the court might have received more cases so that the ratio of time of docket to time of setting for conference is not kept. I thought I shouldn't be more then 14 days behind their case, but I'm also wondering if what Van Irions is saying is correct- and the Court was indeed forwarded my Emergency Brief and has looked at my case.
Understanding that Obama's lawyer also received my Emergency Brief and refused to answer, and because my Emergency Brief outlined time to respond and time to argue, that the Court would consider Obama's Team in default to ANY RESPONSE OR ORAL ARGUMENT, and thus simply rule on the merits of my case THAT they are free to make a decision on now anytime. I wonder if we could be actually that close and not even realize it?
This morning I called the United States Supreme Court Court case analyst assigned to me and inquired of the discrepancy and it was immediately rectified, in away that surprised me.
Not only was my case set for conference but it was set for the very first date available for conference after Summer Recess which was Sept 24th, 2012 and is the same day that Weldon v. Obama was set.
Now the interesting thing about this is the Court will consider all the Georgia Cases appealed at the same time. What they will find however is the normal dismissal for standing and cause of action upon which relief can be granted that thus far has been the BIGGEST factor in dismissing the cases does not exist in my case.
The other factor that must be considered now also is the IF Obama is made the Democratic Party nominee in the Sept 6th at the Democratic Party National Convention, Mitt Romney could conceivably contend Obama is NOT QUALIFIED as a Natural Born Citizen, and it would send the Democratic Party back to a state prior to the National Convention in which delegates would perhaps have to re-think their nomination or ultimately sacrifice the election to Mitt Romney entirely.
I am very pleased to have actually been boosted at least 2 weeks from my docketing date and to receive the Sept. 24th, 2012 conference date as of today, August 30th, 2012.
Please enjoy the latest commercials that the Campaign has put out.
1 Min Spot The Trial of Leadership- Obama's not a Natural Born Citizen
2- 30 Sec. Spot Birtherism American Exceptualism
3- 30 Sec. Spot Mitt Romney Believes in America?
Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
| Candidate ID | P20003372 |
| Committee ID | C00501593 |
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE REPUBLIC- The Trial of Leadership
Hello and Good Day from The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. We hope you are having a good day and we are looking forward to a great Convention. A couple of things to share:
Today we release the 3rd Commercial in as many days. Yes, we are working hard because we believe that Cody's Law Suit in the United States Supreme Court is going to be a factor in the upcoming election.
This 60 Second Commercial brings something very important that both the Mitt Romney Campaign and the Barack Obama Campaign seem to be purposely glossing over. The Constitution is certainly not only about "Obama's Eligibility as disability to the Natural Born Citizen demand for President", however we must all pause briefly and understand just how big of a part that clause is when it comes to our individual rights.
We have seen Obama sign Executive Orders like we have never seen before, and for the most part, we believe Mitt Romney is right behind him in making comments like, " Yeah, I'd sign that one too, and I'll just promise never to use it". Our Nation has run at times at a stand still, and often wise men have inclined that 'standing still' was better than progressing over a cliff, or sliding back into an abyss.
Indeed Conservatives actually like it slow because more trouble is avoided in far more instances at being slow then in rushing off in a knee jerk reaction, such as we saw Congress do with the Patriot Act which opened the door wide open for the Government to spy and search and detain on Americans without a warrant from the Judicial Branch. Now Obama can just kill you if he wants too.
You see as those precious liberties are infringed we see the rise of intensity toward Tyranny. Perhaps you think Mitt Romney would never use those powers, or Obama would never detain Americans without cause or charges, but these intense deprivations and dilapidation's of the Constitution have English Writers memorializing our Constitution as something that has indeed passed away.
There is no greater force within our Constitution than the trust the People have given the American President, and that is why the demands of a natural born citizen, (born in the United States to Citizen Parents) was detailed so wisely into the Constitution. What was to make us different from England or any other Democracy but our Republic. Its the Republic , the Constitutional Republic for which we stand. Remember that 'Pledge of Allegiance"? How long has it been since you recited it?
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all." Did you know that "under God" was added in 1954? What about that liberty and justice for all? Has it become just to hard, or burdensome to protect the individuals rights?
Boy, wait till you need them, and believe me you will want them someday, and could really say they wouldn't want them for their children or grandchildren? Speaking of this I just have to say how much I enjoyed Ann Romney's speech at the Republican Convention. I know I'm running as a Democrat, but I'll tell you she is one elegant, classy, intelligent, heart warming women and certainly is the love of Mitt Romney's life.
I was just thrilled to hear her story and romance and courage echoing throughout America of what is possible. They have had a great life and it is really nice to see that love that is out there. As she spoke of wanting that for her children, and grandchildren, I just had to bite my lip and wonder if she realized how important our Constitution was and how important it was to uphold on the eligibility of the Office of the President?
How could she not understand that? She spoke of the security that is wanted for women who are single and how women were the ones that really did the hardest work at home holding the family together. I wondered, "What responsibility do women have for Obama's eligibility?"
.
I wondered at a flash forward horror show that Ann Romney might see if our Constitution is not upheld specifically on Obama's Eligibility? What would happen to our children and grandchildren if the umbrella under which we find ourselves under God, is folded up and our Nation plummets into the ravages of dictatorship, tyranny, chaos, not on some foreign battle field, but in our own backyards?
For one reason or anther Mitt Romney just doesn't get it. It doesn't matter why, he just doesn't get it, but I do and I understand the danger that compromising our Constitution places us all in, both economically and militarily. That's why I had to run for President. No one else was seeing this and I just couldn't understand why.
Well, Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276 is in the United States Supreme Court now, and it will have its day in Court. I pray not for Obama's reputation not to be smeared or stained, I pray for our children and our grandchildren and their lives. How they will know the freedom and liberty in America if we don't take a stand? Wherever you are, whoever you are, I pray earnestly that your heart feels the same as mine and that you will forward this to someone your heart cares for in the great concern of this election.
New 60 Second Spot- The Trial of Leadership- Obama's not a Natural Born Citizen
The trial of leadership begins with the defense of the Constitution in America because without the Constitution individual rights are compromised. Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign 60 Sec. Spot.
Also, The Campaign was pleased to earn a Principle Focus on MORAL MATTERS. ORG with this important story.
MORAL MATTERS.ORG
Cody Robert Judy: Mitt Romney soft on Obama America and the Constitution
http://moralmatters.org/2012/08/29/cody-robert-judy-mitt-romney-soft-on-obama-america-and-the-constitution/
Cody's in 2nd place now on the poll being conducted over at Birther Headlines, so check that out and if you haven't voted, please have some fun and vote in a fun poll.
Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
| Candidate ID | P20003372 |
| Committee ID | C00501593 |
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Democratic National Convention Delegates Consider Tea Party as Tipper in Presidential Candidates
Its easy to see that in the Presidential Race of 2012 its a close call with Obama and Romney especially if The Tea Party-Birthers-& Independents abandon Obama based on the Economy drudging and lack luster. There is one scenario the Democrats have to play which may bring the Tea Party, Birthers, and Independents back out of the Romney camp and onto the Democratic Party ticket for a win of the White House in 2012.
Cody Robert Judy though relatively unknown by the national media is very well known in the Tea Party , Birther, and Independent circles and is running as a Presidential Candidate on the Democratic Party ticket and could conceivably wrestle the nomination away from Obama especially given he has an eligibility challenge on Obama in the United States Supreme Court.
Its no secret any more that Mitt Romney is courting the Tea Party, Independents and Birthers with the shot over the bow he made this last week in a comment that "no one had asked him for his birth certificate".
The comment drew a huge response from the crowd and was necessarily a defining sentence at what Mitt Romney is prepared to do to win the Presidency. In a close down-to-the-wire call Mitt Romney very conceivable as the Republican Nominee after his nomination at the Republican National Convention could challenge Obama's eligibility after the Democratic Party National Convention, if Obama were to be made the nominee.
The United States Supreme Court precedent case Minor v. Happersett has concluded that a 'natural born citizen' was a person born in the United States to Citizen parents. Obama's declared father was not a citizen of the United States at any time, and because Obama's long form birth certificate has been proven a forgery by a law enforcement agency investigation, doubts have surfaced on whether Obama was even born in the United States.
Why go to the trouble of forging a birth certificate,draft registration, and using a social security card that doesn't pass e-verify if everything is legit with your identity? This is obviously an Achilles problem for Obama under the Constitution's demands for a natural born citizen.
In addition Obama's law licence earned from a degree at Harvard was suspended permanently for his failure to disclose that he had indeed gone under the name of Barry Soetoro. Over 2200 hours of investigation from the Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio has shown further evidence of identity tampering from other government agencies further eroding the trust America has in her own government.
Cody has the whole law enforcement investigation forwarded to the Untied States Supreme Court. With the election in November, and possible challenge coming from Mitt Romney should he come up just short of enough electorate votes, Obama's eligibility question could throw the whole election into the Untied States Supreme Court anyway at an even more precarious time.
Cody Robert Judy's Case in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276 could be the answer before the critical General Election whereby millions of Democratic Party votes would not be dis-enfranchised, and moreover could spell out a win for the Democratic Party in the White House much more friendly than a Mitt Romney win.
The time has come for the Democratic National Delegates to consider the possibilities if the United States Supreme Court refuses to answer the urgent request of Cody to hear his Emergency Appeal for its decision before the Democratic Party National Convention Sept 5th, 2012 in Charlotte,North Carolina.
The quandary has inspired Cody to write,produce, and perform the song "The Birther Train- Money Can't Buy You Love'.
Its dual purpose was both a warning to the Democratic Party Delegates that Obama's Campaign, though well funded, may not be the ticket for 'love' or the win in 2012, and simultaneously act as a declaration to Mitt Romney, that though he has millions of dollars stashed off shore refusing to invest it in America, that balking on actually defending the Constitution as the President's oath declares is both a harbinger and a definition of his character that ultimately will not win him any 'love' from the voters in the general election.
Cody Robert Judy has consistently asserted in his political platform and decade long political activism running for office in elections '02,'04,'08,'10 and now 2012, that America can handle and face the truth and understand that the Economy can recover if America will turn back to its founding principles espoused in the Constitution.
Cody said today, " Its time America woke up and realized that Mitt Romney has been around for a long time and if he has some 'magic key' for the economy has indeed refused to give it unless he was 'President'? That sounds more like a hostage or ransomed price to pay. I didn't tell America that I would take a stand for the Constitution against any usurper if they would elect me. I just did it because it was right and I did it before being elected as a gift that necessarily would not have or hasn't had any immediate reward. I may never get paid for it, but living in America and having the opportunities I have has helped me understand that freedom isn't free and is something to be grateful for. The gift of our Constitution under the banner of our Creator came at great financial sacrifice and the ultimate price of many lives."
Perhaps its time America realized that deeds for the Constitution aren't cheap, and though Mitt Romney is very wealthy and blessed in the standard of the dollar, he has performed very poorly in the defense of the Constitution as a candidate for President in 2008 and 2012 in defending the qualifications of the President declared in the Constitution, that represents a breach in the national security of our nation, and necessarily the key to Obama's actions on the economy thus far. Mitt Romney let's face it has been an Obama supporter for many years.
Now you know the story, enjoy the Original Music Video written,produced, and performed by The Cody Robert Judy Band.
Democratic Party National Convention in Charlotte , NC Aboard the Birther Train Money Can't Buy You Love
Money Can’t Buy You Love
Vs.1 You say its just a cover-up
While you were sleeping I had woken up
Now your wondering at the site you see
Baby there’s no way your going to blame me
Worry’n about the dough failing to hear my whistle blow
Don’t you know you reap what you sew?
Vs.2 While I begged for your attention
You know God gave me his redemption
You know I love you it’s just how I feel
But your still passing on me as a good deal
The tide comes in there’s an ebb and a flow
You bought his lie now there’s nowhere to go… there’s just no where to go
Vs.3 If you swim deep the heart won’t hide
The love for you I’m feeling inside
You know his love for you was always shallow
He shared nothing deep his shell always hollow
Now your seeing I’m the man – he’s just a ribbon boy
And I can see your about to grow up out of that toy… your about to grow up out of that toy.
Chorus: MONEY CANT BUY YOU LOVE- MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE- MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE
Speaking- Money can’t buy you love - Money can’t buy you love.
End Chorus:
Money can’t buy you love, Money can’t buy you love
The lust just turns to rust; the lust just turns to rust
And now you’ve got no trust, now you’ve got no trust
Money can’t buy your love, Money can’t buy your love
The Birther Train- Money Can’t Buy You Love is an exclusive CRJ campaign video that describes the cover-up of the Constitution by the Republican Candidate Mitt Romney. America has one campaign in the Democratic Party that puts the Constitution, America’s sovereignty, and our national security on the big train of the platform. Cody Robert Judy’s taking a stand and showing that through the principles of our Constitution our Economy can get back on track. Visit Cody’s Camp at www.codyjudy.us and enjoy the show where you as a Citizen of America have the courage to go.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
and
HOW CONSERVATIVE DOES ONE WIFE MAKE YOU?
Of course Romney and Ryan would like you to believe they represent 'mainstream' America, but with the Nation at about a 50% divorce rate how do politicians who have never been divorced expect you to look at them and know what your talking about?
The same philosophy is touted by Mitt Romney in the jobs arena. He says because he was a successful businessman he can produce jobs. So how does being married to one women help him with the 50% divorce rate in America? The truth is it doesn't, and actually Mitt Romney hasn't been in the same condition financially that the shrinking middle class, the unemployed, and the poor are facing, well, let's face it, he never has been in the middle class or the poor class.
Millions of Americans are suffering from greater stress because of the financial melt down of politicians who because they haven't supported the Constitution have increasingly made America either the policeman of the world propping up governments that are questionably a real threat, or busy making a nanny-state. It works for awhile, but the buck just keeps getting pushed back to another generation.
The stress at home has never been greater in this generation with kids moving back in with parents,and parents increasingly at odds with children who've got used to 'having it all, all at once".
The truth is there are a lot of good solutions coming from Cody Robert Judy, both in the social arena as he has been through divorce as a child and adult as well as the small business end that is desperately needed to fuel America's economy back into working order.
What most people don't understand is just how valuable of a blue print our Constitution is and how its principles when followed could have kept us out of the trouble we are in.
The other thing people say is that Washington DC is so far gone that it just can't get back on track. Well, that may be true as far as the impact a single Representative or Senator might have, but when it comes to the President a lot can happen if someone is in office actually holds to the Constitution and governs with its principles in mind.
That's why Cody Robert Judy took a stand for the Constitution drawing a line in the sand with Barack Obama's eligibility requirements not being fulfilled as a natural born citizen and now has a case in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276.
Cody is asking the United States Supreme Court to actually hold up its own precedent and the Constitution in the 'natural born citizen' clause. If the court is unwilling to protect the Constitution in the office of the President from foreign influence the other principles of the Constitution might as well be chucked also, as is characteristic of what is happening in so many executive orders being signed and congressional acts being passed like the NDA, which allows Americans to be held without charges and incarcerated and of course the Patriot Act.
With Washington DC Politicians increasingly out of the loop of main stream America, the time has come to set Washington DC straight and clean both houses up and Cody is hoping that can begin in his United States Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 12-5276. If it happens both the Democrats and Republicans who have been playing games with the Constitution and their oaths will be put on notice.
Let's hope the United States Supreme Court Justices still feel that interpreting the Constitution as a check and balance at protecting the integrity of our offices, the demands for qualifications made, and of course their own jobs is important.
Enjoy the latest campaign commercial
ROMNEY/RYAN - How Conservative Does One Wife Make You?
The idea of saying your conservative because you've been married to one person is about what Romney and Ryan want you to choke down, especially given they completely turn their back on the Constitution in Obama's eligibility, and the fraud and forgery coming out of the White House as identification documents.
And please log on to www.codyjudy.us and make a contribution to this campaign Taking A Stand, the title of Cody's book.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Emergency Notification to Chief Justice John Roberts- Will he take a stand for the Constitution?
The ink hasn't yet dried on the opinions of the Justices in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Cases that Chief Justice John Roberts sided on as Constitutional because of the 'legal taxing abilities of Congress' and the Chief Justice has upon his desk an EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION regarding the eligibility of Barack Obama in the competitive race for the Democratic Nomination being held September 5th, 2012 in Charlotte North Carolina.
Cody Robert Judy has pleaded his case through the Judicial Branch in Georgia all the way up to the United States Supreme Court asserting that Obama is not a natural born citizen, and if made the National Democratic Party Nominee may face an Eligibility Challenge from the Republican National Nominee in a tight race that could debilitate the Democratic Parties chances to recover before the General Election in November.
In the Emergency Notification that demands Chief Justice Roberts attention during the Summer Recess of the Court, Petitioner and Registered Democratic Party Candidate for President Mr. Judy asserts that the Court's recess during Summer is in conflict with the Democratic National Convention being held September 5th, 2012, and that unless the Court decides the case in August in a Special Session, the Court may well prejudice itself out of Redressability, as well as open the door for it to be decided in the General Election that could cause much more wide spread discontent, as well as prejudicing himself as the petitioner.
The Emergency Notification to Justice Roberts was sent July 30th,2012 and indeed places the eligibility of Barack Obama as a 'natural born citizen in sharp contrast with the eligibility demands of the United States Constitution.
To date the United States Supreme Court has never heard the case of Barack Obama's eligibility dismissing half a dozen other petitions seeking the Court's supervisory powers due to conflicts in Standing and Jurisdiction.
Cody Robert Judy asserts his case is the first case to come to the Supreme Court of the United States in living action during the race, before a Democratic Party National Nominee was chosen, by another Candidate running for President in the same party.
Cody's case is the first of its kind to also submit evidence to the lower Courts that has reached now the U.S. Supreme Court from a law enforcement investigation. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse released evidence on March 1st, 2012 that included 2200 hours that reasonably questioned and now has concluded that Barack Obama's released long form Birth Certificate is definitely a forgery as well as problems with his Draft Registration.
Judy's complaint surrounds the Eligibility of Barack Obama placed on the Primary Ballot by the Democratic Chairmen's of each State, but is ultimately certified by the Secretary of State(s) whose duty is more to the tax payers who pay for Primaries and the Constitution of which Secretary-Of-States swear an oath to, then to the Democratic Party Chairmen's who have prejudiced his name as a choice for voters in the Primaries.
"If the Democratic Party were to nominate Barack Obama as the National Nominee, and the election were close, the Republican National Party Nominee would have every Constitutional Right to challenge Obama's eligibility after September 5th,2012", Judy said, "Its much better if we deal with it prior to the General Election and the Nominations of both major parties, and that's the reason I've pulled the Emergency handle of the United States Supreme Court which should be used only in rare instances."
The Republican Party's National Convention held in Tampa, Florida precedes the Democratic Parties this year, and is scheduled for August 27th - 30th 2012.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Remember our Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276
In a newly released video The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign reflects the principles and standards of our framers and founders that have been ingrained in us. This certainly presents a genuine reflecting pool for Americans to all ponder.
From one who earned a reputation as a great communicator , Ronald Reagan said, "Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again."
It is very easy to see that in no point in our modern history has our Constitution come under such a heavy domestic threat from the very people who have enjoyed the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Getting close to politicians, the press in many cases now days, must often acquiesce their stories for Government approval for the politically correct establishment of the State. While
'being in' is certainly "no sin", the price is often compromising professional journalism.
No where in our American history have we seen this placed upon the sacrificial table more then Obama's fraudulent identification transparency by the press. Indeed it may well be said in our future that "The Press" lost itself in the dis-ease of the "State" and they along with the United States Supreme Court Justices become relics to the principle they once served that was surrendered by their own hands.
Remember Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama United States Supreme Court 12-5276
Cody Robert Judy reflects on his childhood and compares the demolition of his fathers house to the demolition of the United States Constitution. "Yet", he reflects, " The founding fathers built on straight and sound principles and those have been ingrained in me". The Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court Case challenges the crooked and twisted path of Obama's fraudulent identification transparency.
Cody Robert Judy continues to raise the voice of warning and fight with courage the onslaught of negativity that comes from the very people he is fighting to protect: Those who actually depend upon the Constitution but "think" they don't or that it will never change.
Asked upon where he draws the strength to continue Cody has no problem acknowledging the Creator whose blessings of love flow from Heaven like the sweetest nectar one could imagine.
"I've endeared things that I thought I couldn't endure", Cody said, " I remember the onslaught of abuse I received from those in power and control who kept me locked down 23 hours a day in a space as big as your everyday bathroom for nearly 4 years of my 8 years of incarceration because of the length of my hair. It didn't make the least bit of common sense but they did it every day just waiting for me to crack."
"The guards would come and mock me and tell me it was NEVER going to change; that the Supreme Court would never rule in my favor. That things were set and that's just the way it was. There were men who didn't cut their hair because of religious reasons who also had suffered this miserable cruel and unusual treatment, but I didn't sue them because of that. I sued them because it wasn't a sanitary or health care problem as they insisted, because the women inmates had a code that was one sentence long, "Women inmates can grow their hair as long as they want", it was a discrimination of gender. Something the Supreme Court agreed on".
"Most people could understand that, but somehow someway the ones who got into powerful positions had lost their common sense. They had gone crazy and were the loons. That's a scary situation to be in and we are very close to that when it comes to the respect of our Constitution, and the understanding of exactly what freedom and liberty creates verses the lock down of an enslaved population."
"What Ronald Reagan said is very true, 'Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again." Much of the press ignores the actions of Obama releasing compromised identification papers, and a host of other willful malfeasance and called it legit, and instead want to focus on my incarceration which is over on an offense of words made in a religious meeting some 20 years ago. That doesn't make any sense."
"I've told people I paid society what they wanted completely and our United States Constitution declares that we will NOT discriminate in the political arena denying people the right to vote, and in such the right to run for office, based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude. In truth this is a great lesson on forgiveness we are pressed to understand. You don't keep asking for freight money on something that has been paid for, while some one who hasn't paid any freight, like Obama, is loading the ship up heavy and walking away with it."
"This case in the United States Supreme Court is not about me and my wrong doing, its about Obama's not telling the truth on his "Declaration of Candidacy" and the fall out from that one lie that continues to rack up points on being the biggest fraud and forgery in our history! For all intensive purposes the Utah Media is Republican.. the majority of Politicians in Utah are Republican, and this "was the place" that had no problem doing to me what they did which is consistent with the national Republican Party sweeping their own complacency under the rug of the biggest fraud and forgery case in American history. How can they deny that?"
"Now asking me how they should feel about it, is not something I care to comment about. Maybe it is something you should ask them about, because it doesn't make any sense to me? That to me is bizarre, loony, crazy, and just plain weird as it relates to the sound conservative principles of the Founders and Framers of the United States of America?"
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Commemorating Memorial Day in honoring our Military personnel, those who have died, been injured, and those who are fighting for the United States Constitution I am excited to release this new song and video, 'The Lion's Share". In creating this song, and feeling myself to be kind of an instrument from which this music and creation came, I was moved to depict two things:
An honor for military's service and and honor for America's good deeds. So many times the chain reaction of good deeds is unnoticed and I wanted to depict that chain reaction which is amplified clear up to the Constitution of the United States and the honor we as Americans have living under it as The Supreme Law of the Land.
This song is not fiction but a story that is true much of it happening in one day. The song is a celebration of gratitude. Happy Memorial Day - Enjoy! The LION'S SHARE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Go5aQm8kBE
Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Commemorating Memorial Day in honoring our Military personnel, those who have died, been injured, and those who are fighting for the United States Constitution I am excited to release this new song and video, 'The Lion's Share". In creating this song, and feeling myself to be kind of an instrument from which this music and creation came, I was moved to depict two things:
An honor for military's service and and honor for America's good deeds. So many times the chain reaction of good deeds is unnoticed and I wanted to depict that chain reaction which is amplified clear up to the Constitution of the United States and the honor we as Americans have living under it as The Supreme Law of the Land.
This song is not fiction but a story that is true much of it happening in one day. The song is a celebration of gratitude. Happy Memorial Day - Enjoy! The LION'S SHARE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Go5aQm8kBE
Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODE4PRES
I just created a petition entitled The Child Support Equality Act, because I care deeply about this very important issue.
I'm trying to collect 150000000 signatures, and I could really use your help.
To read more about what I'm trying to do and to sign my petition, click here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/the-child-support-equality-act?share_id=HaHPQfUfGw&pe=d2e
It'll just take a minute!
Once you're done, please ask your friends to sign the petition as well. Grassroots movements succeed because people like you are willing to spread the word!
