by John Hawkins
{townhall.com} ~ Like a crack addict who can’t seem to think about anything other than his next fix, liberals can’t seem to think about anything but spewing their emotions at the world. They may be reflexively saying something that makes them feel compassionate, outraged, sensitive or angry, but liberals usually seem to be caught in the grip of some strong emotion.
Of course, it goes without saying that emotion unmoored from logic produces a lot of warped views, but it also mires a person in short term thinking….if you could even call it that. Because when you’re emotional, most of the time you’re not thinking; you’re reacting based on your “feels.” This is where a lot of liberals live 24 x 7 and so, it’s not shocking that their behavior is so thoughtless.
Take rock star Katy Perry’s reaction to the Manchester bombing, "No barriers, no borders, we all just need to coexist.” So, what does co-existing with radical Islamic terrorists who want to kill you mean? Is Katy Perry going to invite ISIS terrorists from Syria to bomb her next concert?
Can you imagine how bizarre the typical liberal reaction to terrorism must seem to the terrorists?
Terrorist: We want to kill you in the name of Allah because we’re good Muslims!
Liberal: No, you’re not. That’s not what you believe.
Terrorist: Yes, it is.
Liberal: No, no…you’re oppressed and probably upset about global warming.
Terrorist: Wait, what?
Liberal: Let’s all co-exist!
Terrorist: How did you miss the entire, “We want to kill you in the name of Allah” thing? What is wrong with you?
Then there are the Trump Administration leaks. Undoubtedly, some of the leaks inside the Trump Administration are coming from his staff, but others appear to be coming from the “deep state.” In other words, Democratic holdovers in the government bureaucracy are leaking information to the press in order to attempt to sabotage a rival political party. Obviously, these leakers are so consumed with their hatred for Trump that they feel politically motivated leaks are justifiable. Except what’s going to almost inevitably happen once a Democrat gets back into office? Republicans in the deep state are now going to leak things in an attempt to embarrass him.
Liberals are so overwrought with emotion that they don’t get the idea that they’re setting precedents when they do these sort of things. It’s like the shock and surprise they experienced when they used the nuclear option to keep Republicans from blocking Barack liar-nObama’s cabinet appointments, only to find that it also meant they couldn’t stop Trump’s cabinet appointments. Wait, you mean that applies to liberals, too? Yes, and those leaks? The next Democrat President is likely to be undermined in exactly the same way.
Look at the liberal threats and violence at universities that have become a regular occurrence. At worst, liberals riot when people they disagree with speak on college campuses and at best, they make threats and do everything they can to rob conservative speakers of their First Amendment rights. Liberals are so supportive of this kind of thing that the police in liberal cities or on liberal campuses refuse to stop the rioting or disruptions.
In other words, conservatives no longer get the same protection from the police. Even illegal aliens are treated better by the police on campuses controlled by liberals. So, when that’s the case, is anyone surprised to see that someone like Based Stick Man was warmly received by conservatives for breaking a stick over a violent ANTIFA protestor’s head? It wouldn’t surprise me if we start seeing armed gangs of conservatives policing marches to protect other people on the Right from armed gangs of liberals since the Left has convinced the police not to do it. This is the world liberals are creating with their short term thinking: one where both sides of the political argument will have armed factions at political rallies. How healthy does that sound for the country?
Liberals do the same thing on the deficit. “Supporting that program makes me feel good! Spend somebody else’s money on it and I don’t like thinking about the debt; so just ignore that.”
They did it with liar-nObamacare. They lied about the bill, assumed no one would recognize they were misled to when the bill became law and cared nothing about creating an expensive new entitlement program when the country is drowning in debt.
They get upset that Trump actually told NATO that if we’re going to be in a military alliance, then the nations involved will have to spend enough on their militaries so that they field an effective military force. How dare Trump try to make NATO useful again!
They’re so blinded by their emotions that they’ll even rank liar-Hillary Clinton as the 6th most beautiful woman on the planet. Seriously.
It is impossible to competently govern a nation based on pure emotion and short term thinking. Additionally as a practical matter, it’s impossible to cut a deal with people whose entire rationale for doing things is, “A celebrity told me what I should believe and now I have to do it” or “I heard a sad story yesterday; so everything has changed.” At some point, liberals have to engage in some long term thinking that goes beyond, “As long as we’re in charge, everything we do is okay,” or our country is going to get dragged down the tubes along with them.
All Posts (30866)
Muslims Crying Foul after a NYC High School Refuses to Cancel Prom Because It Conflicts with Ramadan For me, please visit us at http://vidmax.com/
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate )
Baroness Warsi
by Khadija Khan
by Susan Stamper Brown
{townhall.com} ~ Democrats just lost another election, this time in Montana. Unless they are willing to do some down-on-your-knees, cry-out-to-Jesus soul searching, the only way they’ll win another election is if they collude with the Russians to steal one the way Donald Trump didn’t.
It’s going to take much more than an Olivia Pope-style scandal “fixer” to fix what’s wrong with the Democratic Party. Putting a cowboy suit on an anti-gun, big government liberal like Rob Quist who regularly does gigs at a nudist resort in Idaho, was about as effective as putting lipstick on a pig.
It was also a naked attempt to blanket a semblance of normalcy over a Democrat Party that better represents the characters in the Star Wars cantina scene than those on Main Street or Your Street, U.S.A.
That’s why Greg Gianforte won Montana’s special election, despite being charged with assaulting a journalist one day prior.
After reading reports and listening to the audio of the altercation, I thought Gianforte’s response was kind of sexy. Before the snowflake generation evolved, that’s how manly men resolved their differences. And still do, in places like Montana and Alaska, where men aren’t ostracized for being men. They duke it out, brush it off, shake hands and go on their way.
Republicans should be on guard that the leftist-controlled media are not there to get facts; they are there to get at them. Reporters who “just happen” to have a recorder turned on will do their darnedest to bait politicians into physical altercations. As tempting as it might be, there’s no place in politics for body-slamming obnoxious metrosexual snowflake reporters, or any other kind for that matter.
Democrats and the left-leaning media had nothing to say when in 2004, Al Franken emerged from a crowd and body-slammed a guy who was trying to shout down then-Governor Howard Dean. Democrats promoted that clown to Senator but are outraged at Gianforte.
Let’s not forget that the violent political climate propagated by today’s progressive-left is to blame for fostering a culture of violence. Violence, not manly wrestling matches.
The Democrat Party is overrun by violent far-left extremists who regularly display their antipathy to things they dislike using violence. Setting fires, throwing Molotov cocktails, smashing windows, throwing rocks at police, destroying private property, and physically attacking Republicans like what happened at Berkley in February was the norm long before Donald Trump arrived on the scene.
Normal Americans watching this appalling behavior have come to understand that just like terrorists, these leftwing anarchists the Democrat Party harbors cannot be reasoned with, so defeating Democrats at the ballot box is America’s only hope.
Despite the barrage of Trump-Russia nothing-burgers the media cooks up and dishes out daily, regular Americans believe what the Democrat Party stands for is far worse. Democrats are out of touch to believe that their globalist, gun-grabbing, anti-Christian, anti-free speech, anti-capitalism, Russian-boogiemen-around-every-corner, race-baiting platform of victimhood would win the hearts and minds of regular people.
What’s flabbergasting to Democrats is that America’s proverbial “abused wife” on the other side of the aisle has finally conjured up the courage to put her foot down and say, “No more! Not in my house!” No more to the lies…no more to the abuse.
Shocking?
Only to those who refuse to take an honest look at themselves and the political party to which they associate.
While many of the ‘left-wingers’ in the Democrat Party choose to destroy and remove much of our USA history; our Founding Fathers narration as described in the Federalists Papers and inscribed in their July 4, 1776 Declaration of Independence, our Constitutional freedoms based on Judeo-Christian values, and our American flag and much of this destruction supported by many members of the ‘Main-stream’ Medias,
Many Americans and a movement to preserve our US History is alive:
EX-MUSLIM wipes the floor with Muslims who insist that Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
WHOOOOSH!
Share this news
May 29 2017
Designated Terrorist Group CAIR spokesjihadist says “U.S. military should NOT be honored on Memorial Day”
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ZahraBilloo-e1432663740687.jpg?resize=346%2C246" alt="ZahraBilloo" width="346" height="246" />Zahra Billoo (right), executive director of Muslim Brotherhood front group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-San Francisco), harbors a deep and abiding hatred for America and has decided that Memorial Day should not honor those American soldiers who have died, instead, it should honor those Muslim terrorists who were killed by American soldiers.
Top Right News (h/t Mike F) You read that right. As nearly all Americans come together on Memorial Day to honor those who paid the ultimate sacrifice for the country’s freedom and safety, two CAIR officials spent the holiday weekend differently: questioning whether U.S. troops deserve to be honored and tweeting that the country was “established upon white supremacy.”
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CAIR-Memorial-Day-HP-11-640x320.jpg?resize=640%2C320" alt="CAIR-Memorial-Day-HP-11-640x320" width="590" height="295" />
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group labeled by the Justice Department as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and “un-indicted co-conspirator” in a terrorism-financing trial, disingenuously claims that it is a moderate organization.
Yet, on May 23, Zahra Billoo, the radical executive-director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter, tweeted that she “struggles with Memorial Day each year” about whether to honor American soldiers who died in wars:
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/muslim-mem-1.jpg?resize=500%2C87" alt="muslim-mem-1" width="500" height="87" />
She also quoted another CAIR official, Dawud Walid, the executive-director of CAIR’s Michigan chapter, as questioning whether they should honor American soldiers that died in “unjust” wars and occupations.
That’s a direct insult to American soldiers currently serving in Afghanistan and those that have returned from Iraq, as CAIR officials consistently describe those wars with that terminology. Billoo quoted Walid as saying:
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/muslim-mem-2-1.jpg?resize=500%2C88" alt="muslim-mem-2-1" width="500" height="88" />
Billoo did, however, find one “soldier” she felt comfortably honoring. On May 26, she promoted an article from the anti-Semitic and anti-American Nation of Islam that asked for help for a “black liberation soldier” named Imam Jamil al-Amin:
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/muslim-mem-3.jpg?resize=500%2C83" alt="muslim-mem-3" width="500" height="83" />
Al-Amin was a member of the Black Panthers terrorist group and was convicted of murdering a police officer in 2000. He is also anti-American, stating “if America doesn’t come around, we’re gonna burn it down,” and “I say violence is necessary. It is as American as cherry pie.”
Al-Amin also said the U.S. Constitution is “diametrically opposed to what Allah has commanded.” THIS is who CAIR wants to honor on Memorial Day? A racist, anti-American cop-killer?
Walid, the other CAIR official, took it further yesterday Tweeting:
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/walid.jpg?resize=500%2C287" alt="walid" width="500" height="287" />
Some other notorious Dawud Walid tweets:
www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/708_large.jpg?resize=366%2C452" alt="708_large" width="366" height="452" />
And they are not the only CAIR officials caught defending terrorists. Last year, the Clarion Project reported on how the chairman of the board for CAIR’s Arizona chapter, sent out tweets depicting the U.S. military as “occupiers” and “murderers.”
So a Muslim organization that Barack Obama invites to secret White House meetings, and wants you to believe is as American as apple pie, is caught once against denouncing America, and supporting Muslim jihadists.
Apparently, this is the third year in a row this Islamobitch has spit on our war dead.
CAIR official stand by her Memorial Day bashing of our troops
Introducing sharia into America under the guise of religious freedom
( Muslims do not assimilate , they infiltrate! )
Political Sharia
Islam is introducing Sharia into America under the guise of religious freedom. We are told that Sharia is religious law and, therefore, we should not worry about it. This is, at best, a half-truth.
To understand the Sharia, you MUST understand that it is completely based on the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed (his words and actions that are the model for being a perfect Muslim). So, the Sharia is nothing more than a legal/social codification for every society to march in lock-step doing life’s smallest details modeled after what the Koran says and Mohammed said and did.
The biggest misunderstanding here is that Islam is simply a religion. If Islam were only a religion, it would not even exist today. And it would certainly not be feared. The story of Mohammed and the success of his mission is well known. The summary of it is in Islam’s growth curve:
Mohammed’s career had two stages, religious and political. As a religious leader he only converted about 150 Arabs into Muslims in his first 13 years in Mecca. When he went to Medina, he became a politician and a jihadist. Politics and jihad made Mohammed a success. When he died, every Arab was a Muslim. If he had stayed with religion, when he died there would have only be a few hundred Muslims and Islam would have collapsed. It was politics that made Mohammed a success and it was politics that made Islam a success for 1400 years.
Islam’s historical success has been due to jihad and Sharia law. Jihad overthrew Christian, Zoroastrian, Buddhist and Hindu governments and the Sharia was put into place. The inferior political position of Christians and all Kafirs under Islamic Sharia means their slow annihilation. Turkey, Middle East and Africa are but a few examples of this.
The secret of Islam is that the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed are primarily devoted to politics, not religion. The Kafir is a political class under Sharia rule and much of Islamic doctrine is about the Kafir. See the next chart:
Since it is based on Koran, Sira and Hadith, the Sharia must be political in nature. And indeed the Sharia is filled with both the religious law and political law. Hence, there is a religious Sharia and a political Sharia. Every Sharia rule that impacts the Kafir is political, not religious.
Note: strictly speaking–politics, culture, law and religion are unified in Islam and Sharia. However, such a unified vision gets muddled into: Islam is a religion, Sharia law is religious and therefore, Sharia trumps our politics. As long as Islam and Sharia are treated only by their religious aspect, we lose. The easiest way to do this is to separate out the political facet.
Here is a simple example that illustrates the difference between religious Sharia and political Sharia: in Europe and New York, Muslims commandeer the streets and sidewalks to pray. This is tolerated under “freedom of religion”. It is true that the prayer is religious, but commandeering the sidewalks and streets is strictly a political act. Kafirs are told to submit and not use the public thoroughfare. Each and every Muslim should be ticketed for blocking traffic, just as you and I would be if we blocked traffic.
Islam is based on two principles: dominance over all Kafirs and dualism. The Sharia fully incorporates both principles and as a result, political Sharia rules violate universal human rights.
From the Reliance of the Traveller, A Classical Manual of Islamic Sacred Law:
Apostasy (leaving Islam):
o5.4 There is no expiation [punishment] for killing someone who has left IslamWife beating:
m10.12 … may hit her, but not in a way that injures her, meaning he may not bruise her, break bones, wound her, or cause blood to flow. It is unlawful to strike another’s face.Jihad:
09.0 Jihad means war against Kafirs to establish Islam’s Sharia law.Inferior civil rights for Kafirs:
o11.1 A formal contract (dhimma) is made with Christians and Jews, they then become dhimmis.
There is absolutely nothing good for the Kafir in political Sharia. It denigrates and makes us submit to a profoundly foreign rule. Political Sharia violates human rights and our Constitution.
Absolutely no implementation of any aspect of political Sharia should be allowed in our government or organizations. All citizens must know the fundamental principles of political Sharia and resist its progress in every way.
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink /blog/jesus-akbar/
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Sesame Street wishes Muslims a blessed Month of Jihad
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
The liberals at Sesame Street would be the first to be thrown from rooftops, and not just during Ramadan. Another episode of:
For the unaware, Ramadan is The Month of Jihad.
Previously: ‘Sesame Street’ Goes Sharia With Hijab-Clad Muppet
Related
Univ. of Chicago students demand segregated housing and Islamic courses
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
A student group at the University of Chicago calling themselves, UChicago United, released a list of 50 demands that must be met by the university. The demands include segregated housing, six racially centered programs, and a sociology class focusing on Islamic history.
UChicago United did not detail what would occur if the school does not give in to these demands but simply stated on a Facebook page for a rally accompanying these demands that the list “will serve as the launch of a long-term campaign fighting for marginalized students.”
According to the event’s Facebook page, UChicago United includes groups such as the Arab Student Association, the PanAsia Solidarity Coalition, the Organization of Black Students, and the African Caribbean Students Association.
A copy of UChicago United’s list of demands available as a Google document contains 10 demands from the organization in general, as well as additional demands from various groups associated with UChicago United.
…
Additionally, the students demanded that the core curriculum requirements for graduation include a “Diversity and Inclusion” requirement and that the school offer “humanities and/or Social Science Core sequence on the works of the Islamic Golden Age and the important connection it makes to Western thought.”
They should start with this book: The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise Under Islamic Rule, but these spoiled snowflakes don’t want the truth.

Recall, University of Chicago that removed pews from the chapel to accommodate Islamic prayers.
Islamic State murders women and children for refusing sex
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
they are the worst abusers of women's right on the face of the plaint
At least seven women and several children were executed by the Islamic State militants…The execution was carried out after the victims had allegedly refused to practice the so-called sexual jihad.
The Islamic State “enshrines a theology of rape” and jihadis often recite the Qur’an with “religious devotion” before and after such atrocities against women and children. Yet it is not just the Islamic State. Sexual jihad (and murder) takes place routinely in Pakistan against Christian children just for being Christian.
Leftist ideologues continue to try to divert attention away from the real victims of these monstrous abuses and onto Muslims in their farcical “Islamophobia” drive.
“IS Executes 7 Women, Several Children in Mosul”, Basnews (thanks to The Religion of Peace) May 27, 2017:
MOSUL — At least seven women and several children were executed by the Islamic State (IS) militants last Thursday in the group’s held areas of western Mosul, monitoring group reported.
The execution was carried out after the victims had allegedly refused to practice the so-called sexual jihad with the extremists, said the Observatory for Defense of the Rights of Women and Children.
According to the monitoring group’s statement, IS carried out the executions in the public in Sarj khana district of Old Mosul.
“After they refused to have sexual jihad, IS placed them under house arrest,” the statement reads, noting that the jihadist group is further intensifying security measures to prevent civilians from escaping their areas…
Germany: Muslim students beat and abuse Jewish student, drive him out of school
9Muslims do ,not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); as fabricating things and falsely ascribing them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); claiming that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); loving to listen to lies (5:41); disobeying Allah and never observing his commands (5:13); disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more.
And now, courtesy Angela Merkel, all that has come to multicultural Germany.
“Jewish Student Driven Out of Berlin School by Threats and Violence from Muslim Classmates,” by Simon Kent, Breitbart, May 28, 2017:
Beatings and abuse from Muslim classmates have been cited by the parents of a Jewish teenager as the reason they removed him from a leading Berlin school.
The 14-year-old was born in London to a British mother and a German father. According to a report in the Sunday Times, the student was kicked and punched by students of Middle Eastern and Turkish origin so many times he was left fearing for his life. One of the attackers is alleged to have threatened to shoot him with a mock gun he believed was real.
The Central Council of Jews in Germany described the bullying allegations at the Friedenauer Gemeinschaftsschule in Berlin as “anti-Semitism of the ugliest form.”
The Times reports Ferdinand and his parents — Gemma, an entrepreneur from London, and Wenzel, a human rights organiser — chose a multicultural environment for their son’s schooling. Until recently the family had hosted a Syrian refugee in their Berlin home.
“I loved the fact that the school was multicultural . . . the kids and teachers were so cool,” Ferdinand said.
Yet within a week of enrolling last November, at a school where almost three-quarters of the pupils are from immigrant families, Ferdinand’s troubles began after he let slip that he was Jewish.
“First my Turkish friend Emre said he could no longer hang out with me because I was Jewish,” Ferdinand said. “Then other pupils started saying stereotypical things about how Jews only want money and hate Muslims.”
Daily beatings by a gang of pupils, all of immigrant origin, soon followed. These were accompanied by racial insults.
“This boy, Jassin, whose parents are Palestinian, asked me if I’m from Israel,” Ferdinand said. “I’ve never been to Israel. He said Palestine will burn Israel and his friends said Turkey will burn Israel. He kept kicking me.
“One day he came up to me from behind and he punched me in the back. I became dizzy . . . I had a bruise for a week or two. Every time something bad happened, I told myself I could manage it, but it only got worse.”
The experience of Ferdinand is not an isolated incident in the Berlin school system.
Aaron Eckstaedt, principal of the Moses Mendelssohn Jewish High School in Berlin, told the Jewish Chronicle that six to 10 Jewish parents apply to switch their children to his school every year.
The requests are generally “in reaction to anti-Semitic statements coming overwhelmingly from Arabic or Turkish classmates,” he said….
by Oren Cass
{city-journal.org} ~ Since welfare reform was enacted in 1996, annual spending on the nation’s anti-poverty programs has more than doubled. For the more than $1 trillion spent overall in 2016, we could have mailed a $20,000 check to every household with below-average income. Yet the Left’s appetite for more spending remains insatiable. A widespread belief holds that, since the liar-Clinton-era reforms, the welfare state “ceased its expansion and began to retreat”; that a safety net “torn to shreds” is “thin and getting thinner.” Proposals in the new Trump administration budget to check the extraordinary and unsustainable growth of welfare spending are “Robin-Hood-in-reverse policies in an unprecedented scale,” the common theme of which is “really hurting the poor.”
What, specifically, are these draconian policies that will inflict such pain on the neediest Americans? The largest change would be to Medicaid, which is funded today through a matching system: states choose how much to spend on the program and receive between one to three federal dollars for every state dollar spent—so Washington incentivizes growth in Medicaid by paying states to spend more. Unsurprisingly, this formula has driven aggressive expansions in state expenditures, and a commensurate federal obligation. Since 1975, more than 90 percent of the growth in safety-net spending (per person in poverty) has gone to health care.
The American Health Care Act passed by the House of Representatives earlier this month, and now the Trump budget, propose to reform Medicaid into a “block grant” that calculates each state’s payment based on the number of recipients, and a per-recipient dollar figure that increases over time. Medicaid spending would continue rising. But whereas the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forecasts the federal tab growing from $378 billion in 2017 to $688 billion in 2027 under current law, with reform the 2027 total would reach $524 billion.
Other reforms would seek to restrict eligibility or implement work requirements for various assistance programs, targeting food stamps in particular. The Associated Press describes Trump’s proposal as a “whopping $193 billion cut from food stamps over the coming decade—a cut of more than 25 percent.” But while food-stamp enrollment increased from 26 million to 48 million during the weak economy of 2007 to 2013, the rolls shed fewer than 4 million recipients as unemployment fell back below 5 percent. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) expects enrollment to fall naturally by about a quarter in the coming decade. But with another one-quarter reduction on top, enrollment would still remain above its early-2000s level—even after accounting for population growth.
So, despite the claims from critics that Trump is waging class warfare on the poor, this budget, if fully implemented over two terms, would leave social safety-net spending by 2024 higher than under any president not named liar-nObama.
How, then, are critics defining an acceptable level of anti-poverty spending versus one that is “cruel and short-sighted,” to quote House Minority Leader Nancy Pulosi? The only guiding principle appears to be “More.” If today’s spending were 10 percent higher and the GOP proposed a cut to the current levels that Democrats now defend, that would be “cruel and short-sighted.” Conversely, had spending in the past two decades grown at 3 percent instead of 3.6 percent, leaving it 10 percent lower, staying the course would be a responsible choice.
It is this philosophy of “More” that is truly short-sighted. The deficits it fuels are driving the costs on debt higher. The OMB estimates that, by 2021, we will spend more on interest than on Medicaid. But if interest payments could be held flat this decade, it would save twice as much as the Trump cuts. The philosophy also stifles effective countercyclical policy: ideally, spending would climb during a recession, but conservatives are unlikely to support that strategy if no consensus exists for scaling spending down once growth resumes.
Meanwhile, ever-greater funding has produced no greater results. The poverty rate (an imperfect measure, admittedly) remains within a percentage point of its level from 2005, 1995, and 1985. The 1975 level was a bit lower. Mobility measures are stagnant at best. liar-nObamacare’s enormous expansion of Medicaid has shown no effect on mortality, and one new paper indicates a failure to improve even the self-assessed health of recipients. Yet the default presumption remains: whoever writes the biggest check is the one who cares the most.
The left-leaning Center on Budget Policy and Priorities titled its survey of work-requirement studies “Work Requirements Don’t Cut Poverty, Evidence Shows.” In all 13 instances it examined, welfare programs with work requirements performed as well or better than programs that had no such requirements (often there was no statistically significant difference). The liberal takeaway from this analysis is that there is therefore no reason to impose work requirements, since giving money away no-strings-attached is equally effective. In the worldview of the Left, unconstrained spending is the default action; it is the spending cut, or any semblance of restraint, that must bear the burden of proof.
The Antifa Mob Gang is AntiAmerica/AnitCapitalism and AntiChristian(America Virtues) that their SLAVEMASTER(NWO Cartel Cabal Elite) by RINO/ Liberals Agents Order Antifa Gangs to cause unrest and riots in the public streets.
Not knowing that, their actions of hate and violence in public view will expose the perpetrators or, worst end their crimes for good by the Patriots. Any, Civil Crimes will be dealt with or, under serious consequence to(STOP THE THREAT) in defendind the people or, ourselves(Patriots) from danger and harm under America Common Law.
Thus, these Mob/Gangs of Obama are Atheist driven under the Elite Master Orders/ NWO of the Beast System. To divide the People and to infiltrate the masses with Socialism and Communism Terrorist Attacks. Against anyone that cannot be usurp into there cause and will not practice Satanism. Thus, Worshiping and Serving Lucifer Evil Acts to Humanity(Sin) against God.
Obama, is a Simple Slave for the Master NWO Elite Orders and Rulers;
Obama, is a Traitor and Back Stabber against America Virtues, Principles and Values;
Obama, is wild psychopathic Atheist Democrat, NWO Cabal Agent;
Obama, is a Mark of Lucifer/Satan/Demons works to remove and eliminate our Holy God/Lord Jesus Christ / Christians/ Patriots from the Face of The Earth;
It all boils down to Anarchy for America and its People.
Any real,true American patriot needs freedom from self-serving congressmen. TERM LIMITS !
Ex-MUSLIM is “stunned by the naivety of Christians in the West”
( Muslims do not assimilate, they i filtrate! )
They are sleep walking through their own extinction.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=12DBxpNKOmA
h/t ExMuslim TV
May 28 2017
When did putting up the American flag become controversial?
When we let the socialist take over our schools our government and allow the AMERICAN PEOPLE to be invaded by illegals and Muslims that hate us and desire to enslave us to Islam!
Principles for a Free Society
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYHm-Zvzggs
Share this news
New York: Shenendehowa High School sets aside classrooms for Muslim prayer
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
Were are the rooms set aside for all the other religions??
Shenen-dawah-stan. Taxation for Islamizaton. This sharia accommodation affects all students. What’s next, no music or eating during the day during Ramadan? And anyone who thinks the high school mini-mosques won’t continue after Ramadan must also believe Islam is a religion…of peace. It is not and Ramadan is known throughout Islamic history as the Month of Jihad, Martyrdom and Conquest. Congratulations Shenendehowa, you’ve also been conquered.
Source: Saratoga County high school setting aside classrooms for Muslim prayer | WRGB
CLIFTON PARK, NY (WRGB) – The largest school district in Saratoga County says it will allow Muslim students to pray in rooms in at its’ high school.
The Shenendehowa High School Principal says classrooms are being set aside so Muslim students can pray during Ramadan.
Since then, we’ve heard from parents who are against the move.
One parent sent us a letter explaining her concerns saying:
“Since prayer for other religions was removed from school years ago, I feel as Shen has crossed the line on allowing this on campus.”
Some folks we talked to in Clifton Park agreed, like David Chapleau.
“You just can’t bring religion into a public institution where were really trying to teach kids to the idea of opening their critical faculties,” Chapleau said.
The woman’s outcry is in response to an email from the Shenendehowa High School Principal to students and parents. It addresses the month of Ramadan, a time of fasting and prayer for Muslims. It says, in part:
“Prayer occurs on a daily basis for practicing Muslims. This can be challenging in today’s modern public high school. In an attempt to make reasonable accommodations for students and employees to meet their personal religious obligations, room 65 in High School West and room 109 in High School East have been set aside so students can incorporate this important aspect of their religion into their daily activities while at school.”
The letter explains two classrooms will be set aside for students to meet their religious obligations during school hours.
A school spokesperson says the decision was made after the high school principal met with the leader of a local mosque in an attempt to improve the school’s cultural proficiency. She says the school can’t refuse a student’s request to leave class for required prayer, and says the space allows Muslim students to return to class quickly after praying.
The school spokesperson says the school would honor a request like this for any religion.
This message is from Mr. Flynt, HS Principal:
Dear Parents/Guardians and Students,
The school district recognizes the diverse religious backgrounds and values represented in the school community and the importance of being sensitive to the needs of all students and personnel.
Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar. From Saturday, May 27 through Saturday, June 24, 2017, Muslims around the world spend the daylight hours in a complete fast. In addition to fasting, prayer occurs on a daily basis for practicing Muslims. This can be challenging in today’s modern public high school.
In an attempt to make reasonable accommodations for students and employees to meet their personal religious obligations, room 65 in High School West and room 109 in High School East have been set aside so students can incorporate this important aspect of their religion into their daily activities while at school.
Please note that this is voluntary and student-initiated. Involvement of school employees is a non-participatory capacity. The allowance of this does not materially and substantially interfere with the orderly conduct of educational activities within the school.
Students may arrange with Mr. Gutchell or Mrs. Lennon-McMahan at HSW to use room 65. Students in HSE may see Mr. Flynt or Mr. Smith to access room 109. Parents are encouraged to contact me at 881-0310, ext. 61415 or at flyndona@shenet.org with questions, comments or concerns.
As always, I appreciate your support of our high school students and programs.
Sincerely,
Donald Flynt
Principal
Parents and concerned citizens should contact school officials and the principal – email and phone above – even though they chose to go to an imam at a mosque and not parents.
Meanwhile, School District Stops Student Attendance of Off-Site Voluntary Bible Class
FREMONT, Mich. — A legal group representing a church in Michigan is pushing back after a school district recently decided to no longer allow students to leave school during lunchtime for off-site voluntary religious instruction.
“Bible Release Time is a program permitted by Michigan law, whereby children are released from school classes during school hours to attend religious instruction at a nearby location,” read a flyer sent home to parents with the permission slip.
However, the Michigan Association of Civil Rights Activists (MACRA) recently contacted the district to assert that the school’s role in offering the program to students unlawfully promotes Christianity and thus violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
“Without the school’s direct assistance, Pastor Perkins would not have access to recruit students. Handing out Pastor Perkins’ form from the school office is a violation,” the group explained on social media on Thursday. “[T]he school is involved in facilitating the Bible classes by announcing the class and herding the kids to the exits and bus—this is also a violation.”
“Third, the superintendent and principal both refer to the ‘Bible Release Time’ as ‘our program,’ which is another violation. No public school is allowed to have any program that involves religion. Period,” it said.
Civil rights groups are silent when schools aid and abet Muslim prayer in school, herd kids to and fro, promote mini-mosques in school, local and national newspapers and more.
UK: Muslim gang kidnaps men, takeover home, brutally kill one, force other to drink own urine
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate )
Meanwhile, Trump will nearly double the number of refugees coming into the U.S. this year and will increase the number of H-2B foreign worker visas. Prepare yourself. Source: Moment busker Paul Pass was frogmarched to his death | Daily Mail Online h/t @shoebat
A haunting photograph has captured the moment a busker was led to his death by drug dealers who savagely tortured him and left him to die.
A concerned member of the public took the chilling photo showing Paul Pass and his friend Mark Andrews being kidnapped by Abdulmalik Adua, 17, and Rezwan Islam, 19, following a row over drugs.
Just one hour later, Mr Pass was dead after being stabbed in a main artery and beaten with a guitar so ferociously the wood splintered.
In the same sickening and brutal ordeal, Mr Andrews was made to drink his own urine and had washing up liquid forced down his throat before he managed to escape and dial 999.
The gang targeted Paul, 49, and plied him with drugs in exchange for taking over his home – part of a nationwide crimewave dubbed ‘cuckooing’, which keeps dealers off the streets and away from the public eye.
The vulnerable addicts had been lured to a supermarket in Gloucester to meet the dealers, who offered to sell them drugs.
Three of Paul’s friends could see he was being exploited by the pair so robbed Adua, from Woolwich, London, and Islam, from Gloucester, of drugs and cash in an attempt to reclaim his flat.
But they did not realise the lengths the furious dealers would then go to to take revenge.
Adua and Islam attacked and robbed the men and the following day Islam met Bilal Ebrahim Moosajee, 19.
They lured Paul and Mark to meet them under the pretence of supplying them with more drugs.
The court heard they stamped out a burning cigarette on Mark’s face before stabbing him in the hand.
Paul’s acoustic guitar was smashed over his head and he was stabbed in the leg, severing an artery and bleeding to death within an hour.
The trio stole Mark’s mobile phone but he managed to escape to a payphone and dial 999, but by the time paramedics arrived, his friend had died.
Moosajee admitted kidnap and manslaughter but Adua and Islam denied charges of murder, supplying Class A drugs and GBH.
Islam also faced charges of kidnap and robbery, and a jury convicted the evil pair of everything brought against them after a trial at Bristol Crown Court.
New York Times tries to burnish Linda Sarsour’s image after AFDI protest
(MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE! )
IF YOU HAVE NOT FIGURED THIS YET THE THE NEW TIMES IS PART OF THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
Linda Sarsour is a pro-Sharia anti-Semite; that means the New York Times loves her.
Comments interspersed below.
“A Muslim-American Activist’s Speech Raises Ire Even Before It’s Delivered,” by Eli Rosenberg, New York Times, May 26, 2017:
Linda Sarsour, one of the most prominent Muslim-American activists in New York, says the messages have been arriving by the hour recently.
“Your time is coming.”
“A good Arab is a dead Arab.”
“You’re getting two bullets in your head.”
She “says” she has been receiving threats. This is news as far as the New York Times is concerned, although “journalist” Eli Rosenberg apparently doesn’t make any attempt to verify her claim. Meanwhile, Pamela Geller is the target of a fatwa from the Islamic State (ISIS). The Times, when it speaks about her, never leads with that information. Apparently, some death threats are just fine with the New York Times, if their targets are the Times’ ideological enemies.
Ms. Sarsour, one of the lead organizers of the Women’s March on Washington, has tackled issues like immigration policy, mass incarceration, stop-and-frisk and the New York Police Department’s spying operation on Muslims — all of which have largely inured her to hate-tinged criticism.
Note that everything the Times list shows her to be working actively to impede and obstruct counterterror efforts. The New York City of Sarsour’s dreams is supine and defenseless before the advancing jihad.
But it is the commencement address she is to deliver next week to about 100 students at the City University of New York School of Public Health that she says has drawn the most hostility and ire she has ever experienced.
“Linda Sarsour is a Sharia-loving, terrorist-embracing, Jew-hating, ticking time bomb of progressive horror,” the conservative media personality Milo Yiannopoulos said at a rally on Thursday outside CUNY’s main office, as protesters held signs with images associated with the often racist and anti-Semitic language used by what is known as the alt-right, a far-right, white nationalist movement.
Note that the Times makes no attempt to determine whether or not Milo’s charges are true (they are). It just quickly changes the subject to signs “with images associated with the often racist and anti-Semitic language used by what is known as the alt-right.” Associated by whom? Why, by the New York Times, of course. This paragraph is tantamount to saying, “Milo made some charges against Sarsour, but protesters were holding signs bearing images that we have previously smeared as racist.”
The controversy over Ms. Sarsour’s appearance is the latest dispute in a heated national dialogue over free speech on university campuses.
But in this instance, the roles have been reversed. Other protests have largely pitted left-wing students against conservative speakers like Mr. Yiannopoulos, Ann Coulter, Gavin McInnes and Charles Murray. This time, conservatives are leading the charge against Ms. Sarsour.
This is false. The controversy is not over her appearance at CUNY. We who are routinely barred from speaking on college campuses, or shouted down by fascists when we do, would never dream of saying she should not allowed to speak. In fact, I would be happy to go to CUNY at my own expense to debate her. The controversy is over whether she should be celebrated and lionized, given the honor of delivering the commencement address, in light of her numerous hateful, anti-Semitic, and pro-Sharia statements.
Her critics are a strange mix, including right-leaning Jews and Zionists, commentators like Pamela Geller, and some members of the alt-right.
They accuse her of sympathizing with terrorists, supporting Sharia law and anti-Semitism for statements she has made about politics in the Middle East.
And with good reason, although the Times never presents this evidence or bothers to debunk it.
The CUNY chancellor, James B. Milliken, has defended the appearance on the basis of free speech, and a group of CUNY professors, some prominent progressives and liberal Jewish groups have spoken in her support.
Free speech? Funny how universities seldom remember that principle when a conservative speaker comes around.
Fred Smith Jr., a constitutional scholar and assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, said the controversy was a reminder of the bipartisan nature of the outcry over free-speech issues.
“There are a few people who have been very effective in branding the left at shutting down free speech, but the moment they are confronted with leftist speech they don’t like, they are equally outraged and poised to suppress that speech,” he said. “I don’t think that’s the answer for either side. The more you try to suppress speech, the more the ideas of the suppressed speaker become salient to more people. It makes the person more well known and attracts more people to those ideas.”
Once again, this is off the point, and an apparently deliberate obfuscation. The controversy is not over whether or not she can speak. It is over whether or not she should be the commencement speaker.
The debate about Ms. Sarsour’s speech began last month with Dov Hikind, a conservative Democratic state assemblyman who represents a largely Orthodox community in Brooklyn. Mr. Hikind said Ms. Sarsour should not have been chosen, pointing to her recent appearance in Chicago with Rasmea Odeh, who was convicted in Israel of playing a role in the bombing of a supermarket that killed two civilians in 1969.
Mr. Hikind also pointed to a picture Ms. Sarsour once posted on Twitter of a Palestinian boy standing across from police officers with rocks in his hands. Ms. Sarsour wrote that the photo was “The definition of courage.”
Mr. Hikind said in a phone interview, “You can’t support a terrorist and then be the commencement speaker at a university that my taxes help pay for.”
Indeed. And there is no doubt that her speech will be a pep rally of anti-Israel, anti-American agitprop, with heavy helpings of self-righteousness and self-pity.
….Brad Lander, a Democratic city councilman from Brooklyn, described the accusations against Ms. Sarsour as “preposterous,” and pointed to her help in raising money to repair two Jewish cemeteries that were vandalized in St. Louis and Pennsylvania in February.
“She’s been in my synagogue,” he said. “She and my rabbi are friends. There’s no doubt that part of what this is is backlash against the idea of having a Palestinian-American as a visible leader and inheritor of the civil rights movement.”
He added, “One terrible feature of the Trump regime is that it threatens to tribalize all of us.”
The fact that she repaired these cemeteries does not negate her pro-Sharia or viciously anti-Israel statements. She even declared recently that feminists could not support Israel. Lander is taking an incident that was an obvious bid to wrongfoot her opponents as a reversal of her entire stance regarding Israel. It wasn’t.
At the protest, even Mr. Yiannopoulos briefly acknowledged Ms. Sarsour’s right to speak, before making a racially tinged joke about her getting paid in goats. He was more restrained in an emailed response to a question.
“Unlike some of the other speakers, I don’t want Sarsour canceled,” he wrote. “I want as many people as possible to hear her odious thoughts. That doesn’t mean I can’t explain why she is dangerous and wrong.”
Once again: the problem is that she is the commencement speaker. She should be canceled as the commencement speaker. And brought back to debate with Pamela Geller or some other defender of freedom.
Ms. Sarsour said she had nothing to apologize about for her views.
She said there were questions about the integrity of Ms. Odeh’s conviction many decades ago. The photo of the Palestinian boy was taken during a week when about 200 Palestinians had been killed, she said. And she said she had never planned to speak about Israel in the commencement address.
We’ll see about that. In any case, note how the Times gives Sarsour space to rebut the charges, and never bothers to check on her claims about Odeh’s conviction or the photo. The Times never offers this service to those who aren’t Leftists.
Ms. Sarsour said she believed she became a target for far-right conservatives in the days after the Women’s March, which she said was evidence of a larger “Islamophobia industry.”
The claim that there is a well-heeled “Islamophobia industry” churning out hateful material against Muslims is a staple of Leftist propaganda. Ironically, the organizations such as the Center for American Progress and others that have produced lavishly printed “Islamophobia” reports have budgets exponentially larger than those of the organizations they defame as “Islamophobic.” If there is any “industry” here, it is that of the truly well-heeled effort to defame and destroy those who oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression.
She has hired two private bodyguards to accompany her to public events. She says she regrets that she has not been able to shield her three children, all teenagers, from the vitriol and threats she has received online. Still, she said, she does not plan to be silent.
“I’m Muslim, I’m Palestinian, I’m a woman in a hijab,” she said. “I’m everything they stand against.”
She added, “I have a bigger mission here.”
Polish PM: “Where are you headed, Europe? Rise from your knees.”
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate )
“Where are you headed, Europe? Rise from your knees and from your lethargy, or you will be crying over your children every day. If you cannot see that terrorism has the potential to hurt every country in Europe, and you think that Poland should not defend itself, you are going hand in hand with those who point this weapon against Europe, against all of us. Do we want politicians who say we have to ‘get used to’ terrorist attacks?”
If Europe had any will to survive, it would immediately install Beata Szydlo as head of the European Union, and allow her to implement sane migration policies. But Europe has no will to survive.
“‘Rise from your knees!’ Poland’s PM destroys EU … we won’t be blackmailed into taking your migrants,” by Samantha Chang, BizPac Review, May 27, 2017:
Polish prime minister Beata Szydlo said Poland will not be “blackmailed” into accepting thousands of refugees under the EU quota system, especially after the Manchester suicide bombing that killed 22 people, including two Poles.
Szydlo slammed weak-willed EU leaders for allowing the slow death of European culture and its people by taking in millions of refugees that are destroying the Western nations financially, socially and culturally.
In a defiant speech before the Polish Parliament on Wednesday, Szydlo urged lawmakers to protect Poland and its children from the scourges of Islamist terrorism and cultural suicide:
Where are you headed, Europe? Rise from your knees and from your lethargy, or you will be crying over your children every day.
If you cannot see that terrorism has the potential to hurt every country in Europe, and you think that Poland should not defend itself, you are going hand in hand with those who point this weapon against Europe, against all of us.
Do we want politicians who say we have to ‘get used to’ terrorist attacks?…














