Minnesota: Leftists in city of jihad stabbing spree protest Iranian ex-Muslim’s speech: “Islamophobia is White Supremacy”

September 27, 2017 11:23 am By Robert Spencer 16 Comments

If any of these protesters had gone to St. Cloud’s Crossroads Center mall on September 17, 2016, they might have run into Dahir Adan, who stabbed 10 mall shoppers with kitchen knives after asking some if they were Muslim. He was screaming “Allahu akbar” during this stabbing spree.

In response to this jihad attack, the righteous Left mounted no protests against Dahir Adan’s mosque, or make any request that Muslims in the St. Cloud area stop preaching jihad violence. Instead, they protested against the appearance of an Iranian ex-Muslim who was warning against the jihad threat that Dahir Adan embodied. And they protested by holding a large sign reading “Islamophobia is White Supremacy.” So apparently jihad terror is brown and woke. But what about white jihadis, such as John Walker Lindh and Adam Gadahn and a host of others? Is opposing them white supremacy as well? Leftism is getting so complicated these days.

“Controversial Speaker Sparks Large Protest Outside Granite City Baptist Church,” by Richard Leguil, WJON, September 14, 2017:

ST. CLOUD — A former Iranian-Muslim turned Christian Pastor stopped to speak in St. Cloud Thursday night and drew both support- and protest – for his views on Islam.

Pastor and head of the “Truth in Love Project Ministries“, Shahram Hadian travels around the United States talking about Islam, its relationship to Christianity and his personal experiences inside and outside the religion, and from his time in Iran.

Thursday night he stopped by the Granite City Baptist Church to discuss the “Trojan Horse of Interfaith Dialogue”.

His family fled Iran in 1978, just before the Shah was overthrown and the Islamic Republic of Iran was established. His father had served in the Iranian military until 1976, and initially disowned Shahram after his conversion to Christianity.

He calls his time in Iran a “wonderful experience” and says his family still in Iran have shared with him the difference between the Shah and the Islamic Republic, and do not paint a good picture.

“Once we left, and witnessed what’s happened since 1979 is very sad. I still have a lot of family in Iran and we get updates all the time on how oppressive it’s been.”

Hadian says, based off of his own experiences within both faiths, Christianity and Islam do not share common ground.

“It was shown to me, that Islam – I was a Muslim – and Christianity do not have common ground, in fact they’re opposites. Therefore I had to make a choice, and I chose to leave Islam and become a Christian.”

The groups #UniteCloud and Standing up for Racial Justice (SURJ) Minnesota organized the protest outside the church, bringing over 60 people.

Genjo Conway is a Buddhist Priest and an organizer for the protest. He’s spent time in many Muslim nations and says, the protesters have a simple message, hate is not welcome.

“Hate speech and hate groups will not be welcomed into St. Cloud, this is a white supremacist organization that is bringing this speaker here, and that it’s important for us to stand up to that.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center does list Hadian’s group as a recognized anti-Muslim hate group based out of Chattaroy, Washington. Conway says, as much as Hadian talks about Muslim experiences and Islamic faith, he’s spreading a much different message.

“It’s not really about Islam – he wants to make it about Islam – what it’s about is white people trying to keep this community for white people and only white people. So it’s not really about Muslims, it’s about white people being racist and about white people trying to keep people out.”

The SPLC has been under fire recently for labeling several anti-extremist, and immigration groups as anti-Muslim hate groups. They currently estimate that 917 hate groups are currently active in America.

When it comes to freedom of speech, Conway says the views presented at Hadian’s talks do not represent that ideal.

“I think that’s a flimsy understanding of what free speech is, what’s protected by it and what it’s for. It’s not to incite violence or hatred, it’s to keep open dialogue, this is not about dialogue.”

The Supreme Court has ruled there are no “hate speech” exceptions to the 1st Amendment to the Constitution….

Student class photo in Sweden is causing a panic in Norway

By BareNakedIslam • Muslim Invaders •

Ex-Muslim: “This ideology is the enemy of human progress, and if we do not fight back it will transform societies into something between Saudi Arabia and Iran”

Islam

11

Recently an ex-Muslim who is still living in Lebanon wrote me about why he left Islam. I have withheld his name for obvious reasons.

I guess it was a bit natural for me given that my father lived more than 20 years in Germany where he got his Phd, my mother has always been very liberal and anti-extermism, I went to an international school and American University, and I read a lot.

1982 I saw the difference between western armies and our local muslim militias. Then the parents of two of my school buddies died in the marines barracks explosion. Muslims heralded it a victory. One friend works for US embassy now.

I despised the cultural norm that it is a “good” thing to go live on welfare in a western state. They even validate theft, and they actually consider stealing from a Jew, for example, or any enemy as a good thing. They really twist the common ethical values that are innate to humans.

I hate the ideology that is full of constraints. I hate how they consider dogs as “dirty” creatures.

I saw the rise of political Islam in my country and how it attracted the worst kind of violent lazy, unethical sort. They have nothing to offer except hate.

I also saw how they conduct their business. They consider ripping off others as allowed since the victim of their theft is not a “believer” like them. I saw how they degrade women.

They are hypocrites, lustful, anti-democracy, as for them it is only the cleric who knows how to rule. Almost always these clerics are corrupt, uneducated, extremely narrow minded. They hate everything and have no love for humanity and nor to nature.

They are against reading any book that is not based on the Koran or on their silly publications.

They are now creating a militaristic society taking advantage of bad economic times recruiting almost all youth to train and be ready for “Jihad” against the rest of the world. They openly preach murder. I saw all this and also saw the rest of the world, the supposed “evil” west and saw nothing but human rights, freedom, and progress.

They actively block progress including economic as it is in their best interest for their followers to be poor and uneducated. They explicitly discourage reading of anything that is not part of their propaganda, and focus on brainwashing their followers. Amazingly, they openly discourage thinking, claiming that God has told us everything we need to do and know and that extra thought often leads to “blasphemy”. I know this sounds unbelievable, but it is true, and to me this makes this ideology the enemy of human progress, and if we do not fight back it will transform societies into something between Saudi Arabia and Iran. This has already started, look at Europe and USA, and look at my tiny country Lebanon which was always liberal, it is now a mini-Iran.

They also advocate violence, as is obvious, which makes them dangerous. Violence for them is just another tool, so anyone standing up to them has to take that into account.

Carlos Khalil Guzman: Showing the True Face of Islam (Part 4)

Advancing Islamic Lies

15

Carlos Khalil Guzman is a “revert” to Islam who is now going about the country, taking pictures of cheerful, fresh-faced smiling Muslims, each of whom is asked to choose a favorite verse in the Qur’an, or a saying by Muhammad in the Hadith, and to explain why he, or she, has made that particular choice.

So far, [Guzman has] taken 52 portraits across about 26 states. His goal is to take 114 portraits, to symbolize the 114 chapters in the Quran. He hopes to finish the project this year, and later turn the entire series into an interactive traveling art exhibit. He said his sense of urgency to complete the project has been spurred on by reports of increasing levels of hate crimes against American Muslims.

He hopes his audience can come to understand that the challenges faced by Muslims in America are connected to the challenges faced by other marginalized groups.

“What affects one oppressed community in this country affects another oppressed community,” he said.

Are Muslims an “oppressed community” in this country? Where is the evidence for this? In the series of manufactured “hate crimes” used to swell the numbers of the latter? In all the examples of smarmy interfaith outreach where Christians and Jews feel they have to defend Muslims and Islam, but never feel they have an obligation to find out first about what is in the texts of Islam, and what Muslims are routinely taught, and especially how they are taught to regard Infidels? They defend the faith, by taking it on faith. If it is claimed by Guzman that Muslims are “oppressed” in this country, he should offer the evidence. What we see is something that hardly suggests oppression: the unseemly haste with which the media rush, after every atrocity committed by Muslims, to defend all the “real” Muslims and Islam, repeating the absurdist mantra that “Islam has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism,” the politicians and writers of editorials focussing after every attack by Muslim terrorists on the “need to reassure the Muslim community,” and holding those Interfaith meetings where Christian and Jewish clergymen stand side-by-side with their Muslim brothers. ” And at the same time the coherent critics of Islam, who carefully adduce the textual evidence from Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira, are cast into the outer darkness as “Islamophobes” and find that both Google and Facebook direct people away from them. In other words, at every step, far from being “oppressed,” the Muslim community finds itself the recipient of very public and uncritical support.

Read more https://pamelageller.com/2017/09/guzman-true-islam.html/

French Mayor: “It’s a war between Islam and Western culture”

France

Dateline Paris, France – 2017: In France, a land with over 2,000 years of history, and a nation with 1,000 years of continuous national history, there appear to be clear lines of separation between “foreigner” and “native,” “Muslim” and “Frenchman.” Thankfully, the symbolism of identity and the meaning of heritage have not been completely obliterated in the psyche of the real French people. The article below reveals to us this fact, and give us cause for hope and faith in a self-preserving France, once a bedrock of Western culture.

In spite of the sober-minded and lucid understanding of the worsening immigrant situation in France, even this mayor had to relent and allow for a new large mosque to be built in his city to accommodate the Muslim immigrants living there. It would appear that the Western Man is condemned to go down seeing at least what he is up against. Unlike his counterparts in pagan antiquity (the Roman Empire of the 3rd century of our era) who went under not seeing and oblivious to the dangers that overtook them, the modern Western Man can at least lay a claim to being informed, in no small part thanks to this website and watchdogs like Pamela Geller.

Xavier Lemoine (UMP): “Muslims declared war on France, it’s either us or them”

The left-wing Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz revisits the anti-Semitic provocation mounted by the small group “Tribe KA” in the Rue des Rosiers and takes the opportunity to draw up a very focused survey of immigration issues in France, through the riots in the suburbs and the claims of the descendants of slaves “who wish to obtain the same status as the survivors of the Holocaust.”

by Grégoire Seither

To illustrate his article, the local correspondent of Ha’aretz, Daniel Ben Simon, visited Xavier Lemoine, UMP party’s Mayor of Montfermeil. He has already several times presented his ideas of “war of civilizations” in the French press, but has obviously been self-censored every time so as not to fall under the anti-racist law. On the other hand, as Alain Finkielkraut had already done – also to an Israeli newspaper, when he speaks to the foreign press, Xavier Lemoine takes less precautions.

For Xavier Lemoine, the “Muslims” declared war on France and sought to subdue it. For the French (understood, the Muslims are not French) it is a matter of life or death. France must set an example on Israel to take care of the Muslims on its soil.

It is interesting to note that Daniel Ben Simon is so busy communicating with Xavier Lemoine in their common detestation of “Arabs” that he does not realize that Lemoine’s speech resumes the Nazi imagery of the 1930s on the Jewish plot world.

As sociologist Didier Cavin put it in Le Journal de Quebec: “For if Muslims are not compatible with France, what should we do with them? To force them to convert like the catholic kings of Spain in 1492? Expel them? But what about the millions of French Muslims? The reversal of their citizenship as the Germans did with the Jews in the 1930s? Putting them in concentration camps as did the United States with citizens of Japanese origin during the Second World War? If France is at war with the Muslims, must the army be sent to “pacify” the ghettos as it pacified the Aures and the Mitidja in Algeria in the 1950s? The warriors of Western civilization take good care not to publicly answer these questions, which stem directly from their argument. ”

Selected Interview Pieces:

“Look,” he said, standing in front of the window of his office and pointing to the neighbors of immigrants. “It’s them or it’s us. If they win, we are dead. I am proud to be French and Catholic and I do not intend to live as a ‘dhimmi’ in my own country. We are different from them and these people are not compatible with France. We are caught in the middle of an Islamic war on all fronts – Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Everything that happens there has repercussions here in France and influences immigrants. ” 

Initially he believed that “rebellion” was caused by poverty and problems of integration into a new society. But he quickly realized that Muslims represent a cultural challenge for his country. An incident, for example, continues to haunt him.

“It was two months after September 11,” he recalls. “We had a drawing contest in our kindergartens and kindergartens. I was stunned to find that 20% of the children, all Muslims, had drawn Ousama bin Laden under the figure of a cultural hero. This discovery continues to make me chill in the back. ”

Following the recent Muslim riots in Montfermeil, he was pursued by nightmares in recent nights. In a dream, he sees immigrants coming out of their homes and burning the city. He is convinced that Muslim immigrants have declared war on France and intend to bring it to their knees. He considers that in this war the Jews are allies. “I feel that my country is ashamed of its culture and values. When France denies its own history and continues to ask for forgiveness for slavery, conquest and colonization, how then can we be surprised that the immigrants stand up against it and show no respect for it? Unfortunately, by welcoming them, France did not require them to change. It allowed them to speak Arabic and cultivate their culture at the expense of French culture. ”

[Ironically] Montfermeil will soon begin the construction of a mosque with a minaret 12 meters high. According to Lemoine, he yielded to the pressure and granted the building permit in order to combat the shortage of Muslim places of worship. The new mosque will serve the 25,000 Muslims in the area. He hopes that the prayers and cultural activities offered will calm the spirits; but he has no illusions. “It’s a struggle between two cultures,” he sighs. “It’s a war between Islam and Western culture. France and all of Europe are in danger. If we refuse to see the extent of the Muslim threat, we are gravely at risk.

 

http://www.alterinfo.net/Xavier-Lemoine-UMP-les-musulmans-ont-declare-la-guerre-a-la-France-c-est-eux-ou-c-est-nous_a2145.html

Explosive: The Insidious Roots of Campus ‘Safe Spaces’

“Safe spaces.” “Speech codes.” “Consciousness raising.”

These are the slogans and catchphrases of the modern politically correct campus. For most Americans, they are simply expressions of political correctness run wild or of overly sensitive students being coddled. And while such developments might seem silly or stupid, most people certainly don’t regard them as dangerous . . .

Those behind this bizarre “new” phenomenon, Kengor shows in “The Marxist roots of the ‘safe spaces’ movement,” have drawn their influence from thinkers from the farthest reaches of the political Left, including:

Michel Foucault, an important theorist of the New Left, author of “A History of Sexuality” – and also a drug-obsessed homosexual and member of the French Communist Party;

Bell Hooks, a cultural Marxist, who worked to promote the idea of “education for critical consciousness,” which transforms the purpose of education from the transmission of knowledge and tradition, to turning students into agents of “deconstruction”;

(Read more from “Explosive: The Insidious Roots of Campus ‘Safe Spaces'” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/09/explosive-insidious-roots-campus-safe-spaces/

( Today is attack the N.F.L. DAY)

USAA Members Demand Organization Cut Ties With NFL

Members of the United Services Automobile Association (USAA) are calling for the company to end its sponsorship of the NFL after the string of recent protests during the national anthem, Sharon Ko of WTLV in San Antonio reports.

Since 2011, the USAA has served as the Official Military Appreciation Sponsor of the NFL, with the league shows appreciation for the military through its “Salute to Service” campaign.

But USSA members angry with the NFL are voicing their displeasure in community page forums and demanding the company cut ties with the league.

“Time for USAA to stand up, re-think its sponsorship of the NFL, remove all funding for the NFL, and send that $$$ somewhere worthy. Like it should have been done by noontime today, 25 Sep 17, Eastern,” wrote GoldenRudy.

“If you sponser [sic] them, you are neither honoring nor appreciating the military community. How is the NFL encouraging America to respect and say ‘thank you; to our military if they can’t even have their players show respect for our flag?! Our men come home dead underneath our flag! Cmon USAA do the right thing….” another user, Krispirkle wrote.

One user, John C., declared he has begun cancelling his USAA accounts.

“I just called to begin canceling my USAA products. The offices are closed now so I’ll call again in the morning. Credit card will be first. I have plenty of those. Insurance will be cancelled after that; I just have to find replacement coverage first. USAA, more than any other sponsor, should take the lead in dropping the NFL and sending a message. Absent that, this isn’t the company I thought it was so I’ll find other providers and send my own message,” he said.

And a contributor named Phyll said he was “ashamed” of the USAA.

“My dad died at age 61 from Agent Orange poisoning from his time in Vietnam. He was in the peacekeeping forces in Korea. He became an officer in the field in WWII. The National Anthem is the song praising America,” Phyll wrote.

“If not for the soldiers who fought, died, came home with horrible disabilities, our freedom would not be guaranteed. We all have 1st Amendment rights but disrespecting our country in this way is not the answer. Protest but don’t disrespect. Ashamed of USAA and I’ve been a member for decades!”

In its immediate response, the USAA announce there are currently no plans to end its sponsorship of the NFL.

But USAA did contact the NFL to “emphasize the significance of the national anthem.”

(For more from the author of “USAA Members Demand Organization Cut Ties With NFL” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/09/usaa-members-demand-organization-cut-ties-nfl/

While appearing on Monday’s edition of ESPN2’s “The Paul Finebaum Show,” San Antonio Spurs coach Gregg Popovich launched into a tirade against white people, Donald Trump and the United States, asserting that white “people have to be made to feel uncomfortable.”

“Well, because it’s uncomfortable, and there has to be an uncomfortable element in the discourse for anything to change. Whether it’s the LGBT movement, women’s suffrage, race, it doesn’t matter. People have to be made to feel uncomfortable, and especially white people because we’re comfortable. We still have no clue of what being born white means,” he said.

“If you read some of the recent literature, you’ll realize there really is no such thing as whiteness, but we kind of made that up. That’s not my original thought, but it’s true,” he asserted.

“Because you were born white, you have advantages that are systemically, culturally, psychologically there. And they have been built up and cemented for hundreds of years. But many people can’t look at it. It’s too difficult,” he added.  “It can’t be something that is on their plate on a daily basis. People want to hold their position, people want the status quo, people don’t want to give that up. And until it’s given up, it’s not going to be fixed.”

Here’s video of his statement:

Here’s another, longer clip, where he says that “our country’s an embarrassment.”

“Our country is an embarrassment in the world,” he said.  “This is an individual that when people held arms during games, [he thought] that they were doing it to honor the flag. That’s delusional. But it’s what we have to live with. You’ve got a choice: We can continue to bounce our heads off the walls with his conduct, or we can decide the institutions of our country are more important, people are more important, [the] decent America we all have and want is more important — get down to business at the grassroots level and do what we have to do.”

Paul Joseph Watson observed:

It’s odd that all this “white privilege” doesn’t extend to violent encounters with cops (the very thing the ‘take a knee’ gesture was started to protest). Figures show that significantly more white people are shot dead by cops every year, despite black people committing more violent crimes.

Popovich also failed to explain how white people being “uncomfortable” about their skin color is going to prevent the relentless carnage that is black on black murder.

Around 2400 black men are killed by other black men every single year. Compare that to just 16 unarmed black men who are killed by police every year (about the same number who get struck by lightning).

None of that has anything to do with “white privilege,” but then again, Popovich doesn’t really care about black lives, he cares about tedious virtue signalling and genuflecting to political correctness to make himself look good.

Writing at the Gateway Pundit, Cristina Laila correctly noted:

Millions of white people and Christians were starved and murdered because of Communism but they had white privilege so who cares, right Popovich?

Well over 1 million WHITE American men have died in wars, including the Civil War which ultimately freed black slaves. How’s that for ‘white privilege’?

There are also many impoverished whites in America today yet the left continues their attacks. This is precisely why Donald Trump won the 2016 election. Americans are fed up with round-the-clock accusations of racism.

Popovich, who happens to be white, served in the Air Force during the 1970s.

Videos  http://conservativefiringline.com/white-nba-coach-says-white-people-especially-need-made-u

( Today is attack the N.F.L. DAY )

Video https://www.facebook.com/groups/127220340622838/

( Today is attack the N.F.L. DAY )

Reporter Asked Steve Bannon About Anthem Protests, What He Said Next BLEW Their Mind..

Do you AGREE w/ David Harris ?

Video https://www.facebook.com/groups/WeThePeopleForDonaldTrump2016/?notif_t=group_r2j_approved&notif_id=1497557249462586

NFL and NFL players EXPOSED for what they Truly are !!!!! protesting ?

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pxlJhkdSWg&feature=share

Do you agree?

- Please comment & share.

Video https://www.facebook.com/groups/127220340622838/

VIDEO: NFL Player Richard Sherman Burns The U.S Flag In Front Of Camera On Live Game. Would You Support Arrest Or Deport Of Him ?

( The American PEOPLE will still support them and their rich life style by going to the games, buying the product and watching their games!  Every one has the right to free speech but with that comes accountable for what you say and do! It is our right to WHOLE these racist leftist accountable for what do and say!  Are WE going to whole the N.F.L. THE PLAYERS ACCOUNTABLE FOR ATTACKING OUR COUNTRY and the AMERICAN PEOPLE? Or our we going to  Wimp out again? )

Principles for a FREE SOCIETY     

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFjAmqAVS-8