All Posts (32566)

Sort by

JAIL TIME: Kathy Griffin ‘BEHEADS’ PRESIDENT TRUMP in new photo – WARNING: VERY GRAPHIC (NSFW)


Kathy Griffin

Kathy Griffin may have just guaranteed herself jail time for her latest stunt: a picture in which she is holding the bloodied head of a decapitated President Donald Trump. WARNING: the uncensored photo (featured below) is extremely graphic and is definitely NOT SAFE FOR WORK (NSFW).


TMZ just broke the story, and it marks the latest outrageous stunt from the C-list actress/comedienne. Griffin has been a long-time critic of the President, but she may have crossed a legal line here. Threats against the President, no matter how unrealistic or frivolous, are a federal crime and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

TMZ reports.

Kathy Griffin wants Donald Trump’s head … but she wants it bloody and detached from his body.

The comedian posed for the gory shot during a photo session with famed photog Tyler Shields, who’s known for edgy, shocking pics. We got the pic before the release.

During the photo shoot, Kathy joked that she and Tyler would need to move to Mexico once the pics got released, for fear they’d be thrown in prison.

Here is the photo.

Kathy Griffin

Read more…

Tuesday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
Bloodsucking elitists and the father of lies
Ks2PWJQEcKMTZpr1PO5lU2YqqBJbTytbiXMF5qVAeco2paFrkUZA3OpDlfFbsf8TPAxq8NWf2AqkWuLnGLROkdlhJJP_tt0Jx1WatY31hAH5=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Craige McMillan
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Top Headlines 
Crb22h7XrYZIGsLccJa1iCQTMWoj-RkbdbXOjjvcEKEmPcaUHQIyeNI7cVm1zYX0Xm8j_kNFJTW3zGxSbejEm4FiiSgRcU1moBtj5x52uQoZzDKdwj4yJYl6m9klRw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Rejecting hanoi-Kerry's appeals, Senate committee passes new Iran sanctions bill with strong Dem support. (CNS News)
 
Navy warship exercises close to Chinese claimed reef in S. China Sea. (The Washington Free Beacon)
 
11 unauthorized government spending programs Trump cut from his 2018 budget. (The Daily Wire)
 
Senate mulls health-law rewrite pushing liar-nObamaCare repeal to 2020. (Bloomberg)
 
Senate confirms Judge Thapar to Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. (The Washington Times)
 
Bloody Chicago only major U.S. city to lose population from 2015 to 2016. (Chicago Tribune)
 
Top Democrats just endorsed a $15 minimum wage, but don't pay their interns that much. (Washington Examiner)
 
Students and faculty protesters demand punishment of College Republicans chapter. (The Daily Signal)
 
FBI won't provide Comey memos to Congress yet. (Politico)
 
Satire: ISIS lays down arms after Katy Perry's impassioned plea to "like, just coexist." (The Babylon Bee)
 
Policy: Don't restrain the shale revolution. (U.S. News & World Report)
 
Policy: Budget bloodbath a result of lawmaker refusal to confront entitlement spending. (E21)  ~The Patriot Post
.
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Why Eastern Syria is Essential to Containing Iran
UItxA_W90Lnm5JOIETN_1rSz6SEpmQrQ375mRXzEXkUhgyzh1UwBWapfeLDzhVvHAzQt7S2p-oSeCTUUOE89BA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
Islamic State lacks the manpower to defend its diminishing territory in eastern Syria
by Jonathan Spyer
{meforum.org} ~ Events taking place in a remote stretch of southeast Syrian desert in recent days reveal the current direction of US Middle East strategy... An observable ratcheting up of US and allied air and special forces activity in eastern Syria is currently under way. This in turn appears to derive from a new, hard-nosed understanding of the nature of the strategic game in the large, strife-ridden area covering what was once Syria and Iraq. On Thursday, May 18th, US aircraft launched strikes on a column of Assad regime vehicles including tanks and earth-movers, 18 miles from the town of al-Tanf, on the Syrian-Iraqi border. The strikes took place after the vehicles entered an agreed deconfliction zone around the town. US and British special forces are currently training "vetted partner forces," i.e. Syrian Sunni Arab rebels, in the town... http://www.meforum.org/6717/eclipsing-caliphate-the-fight-for-eastern-syria?utm_source=Middle+East+Forum&utm_campaign=07623d312b-spyer_jonathan_2017_05_28&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_086cfd423c-07623d312b-33703665&goal=0_086cfd423c-07623d312b-33703665
.
MSM Claims Trump Shared Sensitive
Data Despite Zero Evidence
MSmksZSOvenGrorZfA-vkGqh_H2Uin8m8COEAoH0aAsYRslxNMF95sdGJKporVF5kzkzp1ERkY2JKrp7MGzJ92J5wL-OTpB0D6W39vT9FHOrUiw-GX5RxRRkxeQjgn_0qKCaJlG3I-zIoyGx3n2N6w_N=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
{libertyplanet.com} ~ Earlier this week, the New York Times followed up on a Washington Post story which claimed that President Trump had revealed top secret information to a Russian foreign minister... Since then, the entire mainstream media has been abuzz with talk about whether on not this was treason, and printing guesses on how quickly he will be impeached. Of course, none of the left-wing outlets which were so anxious to print the story stopped for a moment to ask this question: How can the plans of a common enemy- a terrorist organization be classified? This would be like the heads of two LA County police departments sharing information on the movements of local gangs, and some barely post-pubescent paparazzi rushing to his desk to call it interdepartmental espionage... http://www.libertyplanet.com/articles/msm-claims-trump-shared-sensitive-data-despite-zero-evidence/
.
Naive Patriots Falling Victim To “Evil
Populism” In Defending America
h1nYCZL3TTQgNA1_jtJ4g2Yys5uYTGmw-jOQusqJf_0GdLt_4NyYTMCrfJHBujEYoorVs7aTq_2D90LSjZc6Zh9Zm0xPY48OD-M2rexc9WdD5fDzjXUKAoPGoA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Libtard globalist and former Vice President Joe loose lips-Biden spoke to a group of young comrades at Cornell University’s Convocation ceremony on Saturday... giving them that not-so-gentle commie kick out of their safe zones and into the real world. It’s the first of many kicks they’ll encounter as they face a future of being met with realities that belie and frustrate their leftist indoctrination. They’ve been trained well though, few realities can displace their programmed thinking and perspectives. They know when things go wrong it’s because of patriotic American citizens, they’ve learned to always reflexively “blame righty.” loose lips-Biden denounced the “disorienting” and “disheartening” “forces of populism” at home and abroad, insinuating that Donald Trump legitimized what they like to call “hate speech” during the 2016 presidential election...http://rickwells.us/biden-bites-naive-patriots-falling-victim-evil-populism-defending-america/
.
N Korea Fires Unknown Projectile
At South Korea!
_voPUcujx4EmZNdqqFT_ZyFURqG_9cCULnE2Y9kGhaBkjv_FrPTiG0w9cSRNZy4LtImiafrKtGJJqcPPogJhBHMna3a9VHtey5p4BApwjUKO8MjmhOP5PQN1rvU7MmILZ2A3R-vqXoO2-17pRVp1nEz4KtizKjgEe7HG4n8UCoIBBEm99BChXBHn4Shp2KCZ_BTj9bNYSEPv673UC5zgg3lVCWmHVqnhmCPaGLJQQRcYuNtqrB1IrPxjpebvmBtc1PmbDjHRwZbi2PCLvUo1VV3zgewsbrmpMwkXoEQHmlodEIt7JbCzSA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The South Korean military is reporting that the mental midget from North Korea has had some sort of yet to be identified projectile at South Korea... Initial reports from the South Korean Military are that the projectile was fired from the Wonsan region on its east coast and the projectile traveled along in an easterly direction. South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency is reporting that an unidentified source has confirmed to them that it was likely a ballistic missile. The projectile is expected to end up landing within Japan’s exclusive economic zone according to more unidentified sources, this one from Japan Reuters reports... http://rickwells.us/breaking-news-n-korea-fires-unknown-projectile-south-korea/
.
Trump Signals New US Approach
to China With Tough Actions
ku6HS83IlTjGN59hfAujhbOOVjPh4cfegnydEdx8Ft333OB-A0w24Yc-ynBsdlunSNgfitSoqPC6aA6ZBrAg9RcEtK_ticialiKVxE39IPWEMGl5xiFtkJBx6Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Dean Cheng
{dailysignal.com} ~ The more publicly discussed event involves the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Dewey, which conducted a freedom of navigation operation near Mischief Reef in the Spratlys island group... This is the first freedom of navigation action conducted by the Trump administration. It is the first true freedom of navigation conducted since at least 2012. By contrast, the liar-nObama administration had undertaken a handful of “innocent passage” activities in the South China Sea, which failed to demonstrate the critical issues at stake...http://dailysignal.com/2017/05/26/trump-signals-new-us-approach-china-tough-actions/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTlRReVpXUTVZV0l5TWpneSIsInQiOiJpdW5ncFAyZThPV0dHaGZNZ05VcVh4WWlDYmRaRWtlQWFCRjRkY2xSNmV0bnVLZmh1N2tlVzRlcWpcL1htalwvNjROaDh1RTVYaktROFwvd2RcL2Y2bHdVNmFyNlliemRMMzJ4Y1dmaVRNQ0FTRDFJXC9CT3pUMnloQ2VWTGl6dHVOZDY0In0%3D
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Bloodsucking elitists and the father of lies
Ks2PWJQEcKMTZpr1PO5lU2YqqBJbTytbiXMF5qVAeco2paFrkUZA3OpDlfFbsf8TPAxq8NWf2AqkWuLnGLROkdlhJJP_tt0Jx1WatY31hAH5=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 by Craige McMillan
{wnd.com} ~ I wonder if even one of the parents grieving the seven murdered children in Monday’s Manchester, England, concert bombing understands that their own government conspired to murder their offspring.

If the government hadn’t intended the deaths to occur, they never would have permitted the importation of Salman Abedi’s parents from Libya in the early 1990s (several arrested are among his own family). They never would have fed and clothed Islamists over Christians, whom the Islamists in their home country both then and now murder with glee and the blessing of Allah, because the Christians refuse to convert to Islam.

Apparently, importing people whose religious beliefs include murdering everyone who doesn’t agree with them is completely compatible with the Labor/liberal/progressive/Democrat bloodline – because that is what they have intentionally done.

Harsh words, but what else can be said when the bomber was “known to security services because of his radical views.” Hmm … I wonder where young Salman got those radical views? Did he arrive at them by spending time alone, contemplating Allah’s plan for his life? Or did he have teachers and family who directed him to murder as many non-believers as possible? Is that why Salman made those trips to Libya – to further his terrorist education?

The Labor/liberal/progressive/
Democrat elitist swamp loves to blame “lone wolves,” because it serves two purposes. It warns off many people from “thinking for themselves,” lest they arrive at the truth of the situation over the noise the elitists and their media whores make as they whoop it up in bed together. Second, it deflects attention from the most obvious, common-sense explanation of the crime – in this case, Islamic terrorism intended to subdue the host nation’s population.

The highly intelligent either become independent thinkers or elitist parasites. Elitist parasites are what inhabit the swamp that engulfs Washington, D.C., London, Brussels and many other “seats of government.” Once the elitists have burrowed themselves into positions of power they can suck dry a nation’s blood for their own benefit and at their leisure.

If the elitist bloodsucking entails unleashing Islamic terrorists inside their own nation to keep the blood flowing, then so be it. The greed for money and power knows no bounds. The elitists’ lives, hopes and aspirations are so, so much more important then all the rest of us!

So by all means say a prayer, light a candle, leave flowers at the gravesites of Islamic terrorism’s latest young victims – children who never had a chance because they never knew the truth. Just don’t forget who orchestrated their murder. Elitists the world over have a plan for you. They see it as the shining city on a hill. In fact, it has been devised by – and its foundations rest upon – the father of lies, who long ago so corrupted their minds and thoughts that they would not be able to recognize the truth.

Nine lone wolves sounds like a bloody big pack of lies to me.
Read more…
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
Secret Court confirms spying on US citizens

Remember it is the Socialist

NOTE:  When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
( Remember that it is the Socialist Democratic Party that did this in 2018 elections
Principles for a Free Society )
  
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
In March, President Donald Trump accused the ex-"president" of wire-tapping his campaign, setting off a barrage of sanctimonious denials from Democrats and the ex "president." The ex-"president's" spokesman Kevin Lewis said, "A cardinal rule of the [sic] Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, neither the [sic] "president" nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any US citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false." Lewis lied. The White House had routinely ordered surveillance on US citizens. This is now confirmed by a secret US court's investigation into the spying.
 
In June 2013, the UK Guardian released an investigative story on how the White House used the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to bypass the Patriot Act. The Guardian published documents submitted to the secret FISC, signed by Attorney General Eric Holder July 29, 2009. The documents indicate the White House used this court to back door "authority" to collect information on American citizens. The Guardian reported that the broad scope of the court orders and nature of the procedures established in the documents appeared "to clash" with assurances from the White House that our telephone and email information could not be accessed without warrants.
 
Now the FISC has audited this spying and has issued an opinion. In summary, the 99 page opinion written by FISC judge Rosemary Collyer states that Fourth Amendment violations of rights of privacy were violated by the ex "president's" National Security Agency as early as October 2011 and continued through 2016. And the information collected on US citizens was shared with the FBI, CIA and National Counterterrorism Center in violation of regulations. Collyer wrote that this constituted a "lack of candor" on NSA's part and "is a very serious Fourth Amendment issue." The court requested more information and NSA has stonewalled the investigation by repeatedly asking for deadline extensions through April 26. NSA reported to the court that it is destroying the information it collected on individuals.
 
Since taking office, the Trump Administration has taken steps to correct these instituted spying violations of privacy, according to the opinion. Which may be another reason why the Fifth Estate (CIA, FBI, NSA, NCTC, etc,) is at war with Trump-he has exposed their extraordinary spying on US citizens, condoned and practiced by the previous "president." In John 3:20, Jesus said, " For everyone that does evil hates the light, neither comes to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed." We need to continue to expose these deeds and demand accountability, otherwise your freedoms of religion, speech, and privacy will be crushed in darkness.
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson


PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!  

Read more…

Google, Facebook Are Super Upset They May No Longer Be Able to Sell Your Internet Data Without Permission

Google and Facebook are actively trying to stop a proposed law that would force them to acquire consent from users before collecting their personal information.

The “Browser Act,” introduced May 18 by Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, mandates that people must explicitly give permission to internet service providers (ISPs) and websites wanting to use their browsing history and other data for business purposes.

“I think it is necessary to get our consumers the strongest toolbox possible to allow them to control their virtual presence,” Blackburn told The Daily Caller News Foundation (TheDCNF) in an interview. “Individuals in the physical world have the opportunity to hold personal information private and they should have that same opportunity in the virtual space.”

The legislation’s primary focus is sectored into two categories. User information considered sensitive would be subjected to an opt-in approval system, meaning the data would only be permitted for company use if the person gives clear approval. In contrast, user information deemed non-sensitive would be subjected to an opt-out approval system in which data is automatically permitted for business operations unless notified otherwise.

Blackburn said she came up with this arrangement after talking with both members of the affected industry and consumers. (Read more from “Google, Facebook Are Super Upset They May No Longer Be Able to Sell Your Internet Data Without Permission” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/google-facebook-super-upset-may-no-longer-able-sell-interne

Read more…

Betsy DeVos Won’t Promise Extra Privileges to LGBT Activists. And Liberals Are Mad

A U.S. congressional hearing last week provided a stark lesson on how “LGBT anti-discrimination” laws are used to crush freedom of people to live according to their faith-informed conscience.

Trump’s education secretary, Betsy DeVos, was testifying at a House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on the topic of school choice and vouchers – federal grants provided to the states to be dispersed in a way that allows parents to choose the best school for their children, regardless of whether it is public or private, religious or secular.

Championing school choice, especially for disadvantaged poor children shackled to failing public schools, is DeVos’ calling in life and the reason Donald Trump picked her to run the Education Department. By appointing her, Trump defied the hysterical complaints of “educrat” elites and the radically pro-LGBT teachers’ unions, who view DeVos as an urgent threat to their agenda and their monopoly on education policy. (Read more from “Betsy DeVos Won’t Promise Extra Privileges to LGBT Activists. And Liberals Are Mad” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/betsy-devos-wont-promise-extra-privileges-lgbt-activists-liber

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=W6RTjS6Jcpc

Read more…

Obama Loyalist Brennan Drove FBI to Begin Investigating Trump Associates Last Summer

The Socialist Democratic Party is the party of conspiracy and treason against the AMERICAN PEOPLE remember this in the 2018 election for our congress and any other office that is involved in this election at all level of our government local county, state!!

Principles for a Free Society 

What caused the Barack Obama administration to begin investigating the Donald Trump campaign last summer has come into clearer focus following a string of congressional hearings on Russian interference in the presidential election.

It was then-CIA director John O. Brennan, a close confidant of Mr. Obama’s, who provided the information — what he termed the “basis” — for the FBI to start the counterintelligence investigation last summer. Mr. Brennan served on the former president’s 2008 presidential campaign and in his White House.

Mr. Brennan told the House Intelligence Committee on May 23 that the intelligence community was picking up tidbits on Trump associates making contacts with Russians. Mr. Brennan did not name either the Russians or the Trump people. He indicated he did not know what was said.

But he said he believed the contacts were numerous enough to alert the FBI, which began its probe into Trump associates that same July, according to previous congressional testimony from then-FBI director James B. Comey.

The FBI probe of contacts came the same month the intelligence community fingered Russian agents as orchestrating hacks into Democratic Party computers and providing stolen emails to WikiLeaks. (Read more from “Obama Loyalist Brennan Drove FBI to Begin Investigating Trump Associates Last Summer” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/obama-loyalist-brennan-drove-fbi-begin-investigating-trump-a

Read more…

Tues/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The Liberal Order Is Rigged
by Jeff D. Colgan and Robert O. Keohane
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Trump's Welcome Bluntness 
sGTQ0EEzliOsUixVo3O0Vc1ymL2lu6-LVkawtQlOOHxpEMjZm7PbmcYNbzWVWQClYxrvgeTInhctQO2oZFOKxUUKAlufaOWnrx3JwxsIdncgs-1Fi2vRCPZDOVw87A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
NATO has been a subject of some controversy for President Donald Trump. During last year's Republican primary campaign, Trump alleged, "NATO is costing us a fortune" and is "obsolete" because other nations aren't pulling their weight. At the time, it was jarring because conservative politicians don't talk that way about our allies. Trump walked back the "obsolete" charge, but otherwise he's stuck to his guns.
          Just yesterday at NATO headquarters in Brussels, he called out several NATO member leaders as they literally stood behind him. "These grave security concerns are the same reason that I have been very, very direct with Secretary [Jens] Stoltenberg and members of the alliance in saying that NATO members must finally contribute their fair share and meet their financial obligations," Trump said, "for 23 of the 28 member nations are still not paying what they should be paying and what they are supposed to be paying for their defense. This is not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States."
          "We should recognize that with these chronic underpayments and growing threats, even two percent of GDP is insufficient to close the gaps in modernizing readiness and the size of forces," he continued. "We have to make up for the many years lost. Two percent is the bare minimum for confronting today's very real and very vicious threats."
          Some critics pounced, citing this as evidence that Trump won't follow through on America's Article 5 obligations to come to Europe's defense. But that's just utter silliness that, frankly, serves Vladimir Putin's agenda. At an event unveiling a memorial to 9/11 and NATO's first and only invocation of Article 5, Trump praised NATO for responding "swiftly and decisively" after those attacks. He added, "We will never forsake the friends who stood by our side." How do those remarks constitute any waffling on U.S. commitments?
          Trump's loose lips can indeed be a problem, and no doubt our allies would appreciate consistency. But his admonition to NATO members who don't contribute fully could be the impetus for a needed course correction for the old alliance. Furthermore, it's certainly part of the larger strategy of his first foreign trip — cleaning up Barack liar-nObama's mess and fighting terrorism. ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Ramadan Bombathon Begins
by David Wood
{answeringmuslims.com} ~ Ramadan 2017 has arrived, which means that we're going to see a massive number of terrorist attacks carried out in the name of Allah... The "Religion of Peace" website keeps a running tally of these terrorist attacks and compares them with the terrorist attacks carried out in the name of all other religions combined. Let's see if all religions are equally violent. http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2017/05/ramadan-bombathon-begins.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+answeringmuslims%2FynNl+%28Answering+Muslims%29
.
De Blasio Staffer, Rising Democrat,
Caught With Child Porn
3GKVlOgnvVx5eSE_TiSrtf2gmiVgXKkRKp4bEXPt8ud2of3c031-JDxMLPgMFYR1tV2OsidPAef3AsoDOdmzh-08jC1JYU62FXTXjegdTlgaL6tXYhK1jyV4vldSswMu3vY4kLXD0kZo7_A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Mike Raust
{dailycaller.com} ~ Jacob Schwartz was a prominent young Democrat and a staffer for New York City mayor Bill de Blasio. That is until he got caught with an alleged truckload of kiddie porn this week... Schwartz’s collection included 89 videos and over 3,000 images of girls between the ages of 6 months and 16 years, often performing sexual acts on adult men. He was apprehended by the New York Police Department computer-crimes investigators on Thursday. Schwartz’s political career began at a young age. Until very recently he was the head of Manhattan Democrats, and he got his start assisting his father, lawyer and Democratic operative Arthur Schwartz in campaigning for various candidates...http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/26/de-blasio-staffer-rising-democrat-caught-with-child-porn/
.
Europe Fights Back with Candles
and Teddy Bears
ud8HIyav8H9Nwm6NGe3ri-SQv2NGg0Mt_r82GNqhPxu4xxtNy-c2Ax483mdDjnlKNReySdPyhn9oFFpp9f6CLHZs1kzQpg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Giulio Meotti
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ This long and sad list is the human harvest of Islamic terrorism on Europe's soil:.. Madrid: 191. London: 58. Amsterdam: 1. Paris: 148. Brussels: 36. Copenhagen: 2. Nice: 86. Stockholm: 4. Berlin: 12. Manchester: 22. And it does not take into account the hundreds of Europeans butchered abroad, in Bali, in Sousse, in Dakka, in Jerusalem, in Sharm el Sheikh, in Istanbul. But after 567 victims of terror, Europe still does not understand. Just the first half of 2017 has seen terror attacks attempted in Europe every nine days on average. Yet, despite this Islamist offensive, Europe is fighting back with teddy bears, candles, flowers, vigils, Twitter hashtags and cartoons... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10430/terrorism-candles-teddy-bears
.
Clapper Says No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence Of Collusion, Though ‘Dashboard’ Lit Up With Warnings
LRhAPFO2qvHY8IOR8URPkNR6MASkD_wmefRHRmiR4QrwLI9xRSc8CFCm-P7L98kChEN4YBx4s4xt4Bpua3MLl0UB7cGGo22DzSkcZHx2lAXG75jU0rxqBft3rphTXMXnPjlyPW5DXpsf8sHWYX_3w8MgydeAmlkpsRNc5e1WvB_NF0rgl6I2MfteMxmrH323ZnKArHcuAuo7RwsLYgcf=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Chuck Ross
{dailycaller.com} ~ Former director of national intelligence James Clapper reiterated on Sunday that he saw no “smoking gun” evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government... But he did say that his “dashboard was lit up” with concerns about Trump advisers’ interactions with Russians before he left office on Jan. 20. “I have to say, at the time I left, I did not see any smoking gun certitude evidence of collusion. But it certainly was appropriate given all the signs…for the FBI to investigate,” Clapper said in an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Clapper was specifically asked about new reports that Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner asked Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December about the possibilities of setting up a secret communications channel with the Kremlin... http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/28/clapper-says-no-smoking-gun-evidence-of-collusion-though-dashboard-lit-up-with-warnings-video/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=TheDC%20Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC%20Weekend
.
Manchester Failures, 23,000 Suspects
In Britain, Things Must Change
GsWlUt_798Q1n3wrqYfx7aoMRBysSW-lY6L9Xd1B12U1nd4SHnNfnYItpIBMQwAw3yPTlIXpj_YunNO7ef9CLtEUyyDdWuPeTh4L1Co2kKRYe2QOx9xgyveTS9pYhA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Nigel Farage joined Greg Gutfeld for a discussion on a serious topic following the terrorist strike in Manchester... the intelligence failures and glossing over that has led the UK to the point it is at now.  Gutfeld notes that the UK is the world’s fifth largest economy,  but that they often use the excuse of having limited resources. He asks, “Even if you have limited resources, shouldn’t that go to this, defense of the realm? Wouldn’t that be the most important?? Farage responds sarcastically, in the context of the globalist control of Europe, saying, “No, good Lord no, you’re missing the point. We’re spending all of our money on foreign aid and giving money to the European Union. I mean it’s mad, isn’t it?”... http://rickwells.us/farage-manchester-failures-23000-suspects-britain-things-must-change/
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Liberal Order Is Rigged
by Jeff D. Colgan and Robert O. Keohane
{foreignaffairs.com} ~ Prior to 2016, debates about the global order mostly revolved around its structure and the question of whether the United States should actively lead it or should retrench, pulling back from its alliances and other commitments. But during the past year or two, it became clear that those debates had missed a key point: today’s crucial foreign policy challenges arise less from problems between countries than from domestic politics within them. That is one lesson of the sudden and surprising return of populism to Western countries, a trend that found its most powerful expression last year in the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the EU, or Brexit, and the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president.

It can be hard to pin down the meaning of “populism,” but its crucial identifying mark is the belief that each country has an authentic “people” who are held back by the collusion of foreign forces and self-serving elites at home. A populist leader claims to represent the people and seeks to weaken or destroy institutions such as legislatures, judiciaries, and the press and to cast off external restraints in defense of national sovereignty. Populism comes in a range of ideological flavors. Left-wing populists want to “soak the rich” in the name of equality; right-wing populists want to remove constraints on wealth in the name of growth. Populism is therefore defined not by a particular view of economic distribution but by a faith in strong leaders and a dislike of limits on sovereignty and of powerful institutions.

Such institutions are, of course, key features of the liberal order: think of the UN, the EU, the World Trade Organization (WTO), and major alliances such as NATO. Through them, the Washington-led order encourages multilateral cooperation on issues ranging from security to trade to climate change. Since 1945, the order has helped preserve peace among the great powers. In addition to the order’s other accomplishments, the stability it provides has discouraged countries such as Germany, Japan, Saudi Arabia, and South Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons.

This peace-building aspect of the liberal order has been an extraordinary success. So, too, is the way in which the order has allowed the developing world to advance, with billions of people rising out of crippling poverty and new middle classes burgeoning all over the world. But for all of the order’s success, its institutions have become disconnected from publics in the very countries that created them. Since the early 1980s, the effects of a neoliberal economic agenda have eroded the social contract that had previously ensured crucial political support for the order. Many middle- and working-class voters in the United Kingdom, the United States, and elsewhere have come to believe—with a good deal of justification—that the system is rigged.

Those of us who have not only analyzed globalization and the liberal order but also celebrated them share some responsibility for the rise of populism. We did not pay enough attention as capitalism hijacked globalization. Economic elites designed international institutions to serve their own interests and to create firmer links between themselves and governments. Ordinary people were left out. The time has come to acknowledge this reality and push for policies that can save the liberal order before it is too late.

THE BOATS THAT DIDN'T RISE

In 2016, the two states that had done the most to construct the liberal order—the United Kingdom and the United States—seemed to turn their backs on it. In the former, the successful Brexit campaign focused on restoring British sovereignty; in the latter, the Trump campaign was explicitly nationalist in tone and content. Not surprisingly, this has prompted strong reactions in places that continue to value the liberal order, such as Germany: a poll published in February by the German newspaper Die Welt found that only 22 percent of Germans believe that the United States is a trustworthy ally, down from 59 percent just three months earlier, prior to Trump’s victory—a whopping 37-point decrease.

The Brexit and Trump phenomena reflect a breakdown in the social contract at the core of liberal democracy: those who do well in a market-based society promise to make sure that those disadvantaged by market forces do not fall too far behind. But fall behind they have. Between 1974 and 2015, the real median household income for Americans without high school diplomas fell by almost 20 percent. And even those with high school diplomas, but without any college education, saw their real median household income plummet by 24 percent. On the other hand, those with college degrees saw their incomes and wealth expand. Among those Americans, the real median household income rose by 17 percent; those with graduate degrees did even better.

As political scientists such as Robert Putnam and Margaret Weir have documented, such trends have led to different sets of Americans living in separate worlds. The well-off do not live near the poor or interact with them in public institutions as much as they used to. This self-segregation has sapped a sense of solidarity from American civic life: even as communications technology has connected people as never before, different social classes have drifted further apart, becoming almost alien to one another. And since cosmopolitan elites were doing so well, many came to the conclusion—often without realizing it—that solidarity just wasn’t that important for a well-functioning democracy.

Elites have taken advantage of the global liberal order—sometimes inadvertently, sometimes intentionally—to capture most of the income and wealth gains in recent decades, and they have not shared much with the middle and lower classes. Wealthier, better-educated Americans have pushed for or accepted regressive tax policies, trade and investment agreements that encouraged corporate outsourcing, and the underfunding of public and higher education. The result of such policies has been to undermine what the political scientist John Ruggie once called “embedded liberalism”: a global order made up of free-market societies that nevertheless preserved welfare states and labor-market policies that allowed for the retraining of people whose skills became obsolete, compensation for those who lost out from trade liberalization, and validation of the self-worth of all citizens, even if they were not highly productive in economic terms. Elites pushed for and supported the first part of this vision—free markets, open borders, and multilateralism—but in the 1970s and even more so in the 1980s, they began to neglect the other part of the bargain: a robust safety net for those who struggled. That imbalance undermined domestic support for free trade, military alliances, and much else.

The bill for that broken social contract came due in 2016 on both sides of the Atlantic. And yet even now, many observers downplay the threat this political shift poses to the liberal order. Some argue that the economic benefits of global integration are so overwhelming that national governments will find their way back to liberalism, regardless of campaign rhetoric and populist posturing. But the fact is that politicians respond to electoral incentives even when those incentives diverge considerably from their country’s long-term interests—and in recent years, many voters have joined in the populist rejection of globalization and the liberal order.

Moreover, business leaders and stock markets, which might have been expected to serve as a brake on populist fervor, have instead mostly rewarded proposals for lower taxes with no accompanying reduction in government spending. This is shortsighted. Grabbing even more of the benefits of globalization at the expense of the middle and working classes might further undermine political support for the integrated supply chains and immigration on which the U.S. economy depends. This position is reminiscent of the way that eighteenth-century French aristocrats refused to pay taxes while indulging in expensive foreign military adventures. They got away with it for many years—until the French Revolution suddenly laid waste to their privilege. Today’s elites risk making a similar mistake.
Read more…

The true and most common meaning of “jihad” as explained by an ex-Muslim

“Jihad” is only one of many terms in Arabic used in Islamic scriptures to advocate violence against unbelievers…negating the concept that Islam could ever be a “religion of peace.”

Video http://www.barenakedislam.com/2017/05/29/the-true-and-most-common-meaning-of-jihad-as-explained-by-an-ex-muslim/

Share
Read more…

CHURCHILL-like Polish Prime Minister: “We will not be blackmailed by the European political elite into accepting mandated quotas of Muslim invaders”

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

“We will never allow Polish children to fear for their safety at public events. EU elites must get off their knees and awaken from their lethargy or else we will weep for their dead children everyday.”

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=3BO7C_9xizk

Vlad Tepesblog

Read more…

Preachers at UK mosque where Manchester bomber prayed called for British soldiers, gays, and non-believers to be killed

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! ) If you think that this is not happening in the mosque in our country you are deceiving your selves and putting yourselves  in harm ways as well as your family and your fellow AMERICAN!!! 

DIDSBURY MOSQUE mosque where suicide bomber Salman Abedi ­worshipped hosted hate preachers who called for British soldiers to be killed and homosexuals and adulterers to be stoned to death. The mosque’s YouTube channel still features videos from clerics including American Abdullah Hakim Quick.

%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/nintchdbpict000326551738.jpg?resize=800%2C533" alt="" width="590" height="393" />

The Sun  He called for homosexuals to be killed and death for those who do not follow Islam. MPs accused the mosque of playing a part in Abedi’s radicalisation.

Labour’s Khalid Mahmood said: “It has to be asked where a 22-year-old man born and bred in Manchester gets that sort of hatred from. “We tend to think the problem is the internet and social media.

“But people don’t just turn up one day and look at things online.” “They have to be groomed towards such ideas and extremist preachers often act as a gateway.

“They set up the thought process and once someone’s mind is conditioned towards hatred they stop seeing people around them as human.”

Share this news

Read more…

NWO/OWO IS TRUE

The New World Order or NWO is claimed to be an emerging clandestine totalitarian world government by various conspiracy theories.[3][4][5][6][7]

The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government—which will replace sovereign nation-states—and an all-encompassing propaganda whose ideology hails the establishment of the New World Order as the culmination of history's progress. Many influential historical and contemporary figures have therefore been purported to be part of a cabal that operates through many front organizations to orchestrate significant political and financial events, ranging from causing systemic crises to pushing through controversial policies, at both national and international levels, as steps in an ongoing plot to achieve world domination.[3][4][5][6][7]

History of The Term NEW WORLD ORDER

During the 20th century many politicians, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history characterised by a dramatic change in world political thought and in the balance of power after World War I and World War II.[citation needed] They all saw the period as an opportunity to implement idealistic proposals for global governance in the sense of new collective efforts to address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve, while always respecting the right of nations to self-determination. These proposals led to the formation of international organizations (such as the UN in 1945 and NATO in 1949), and international regimes (such as the Bretton Woods system (1944-1971) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, 1947-1994)), which were calculated[by whom?] both to maintain a balance of power in favor of the United States and to regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism. These creations in particular and liberal internationalism in general, however, were regularly criticized and opposed by American paleoconservative business nationalists from the 1930s on.[10][need quotation to verify]

Progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes in the aftermath of the two World Wars, but argued that they suffered from a democratic deficit and were therefore inadequate not only to prevent another global war but to foster global justice. The United Nations was designed in 1945 by US bankers and State Department planners, and was always intended to remain a free association of sovereign nation-states, not a transition to democratic world government. Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement, hoping in vain to create a "real" new world order.[11]

British writer and futurist H. G. Wells went further than progressives in the 1940s, by appropriating and redefining the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a technocratic world state and of a planned economy.[12] Despite the popularity of his ideas in some state-socialist circles, Wells failed to exert a deeper and more lasting influence because he was unable to concentrate his energies on a direct appeal to the intelligentsias who would ultimately have to coordinate a Wellsian new world order.[13]

During the Red Scare of 1947–1957, agitators of the American secular and Christian right, influenced by the work of Canadian conspiracy theorist William Guy Carr, increasingly embraced and spread unfounded fears of Freemasons, Illuminati and Jews as the alleged driving forces behind an "international communist conspiracy". The threat of "Godless communism", in the form of a state atheistic and bureaucratic collectivist world government, demonized as the "Red Menace", therefore became the focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. The Red Scare came to shape one of the core ideas of the political right in the United States, which is that liberals and progressives, with their welfare-state policies and international cooperation programs such as foreign aid, supposedly contribute to a gradual process of collectivism that will inevitably lead to nations being replaced with a communist one-world government.[14]

Right-wing populist advocacy groups with a paleoconservative world-view, such as the John Birch Society, disseminated a multitude of conspiracy theories in the 1960s claiming that the governments of both the United States and the Soviet Union were controlled by a cabal of corporate internationalists, greedy bankers and corrupt politicians who were intent on using the U.N. as the vehicle to create a "One World Government". This right-wing anti-globalist conspiracism fuelled the Bircher campaign for US withdrawal from the UN. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the establishment of the US Federal Reserve in 1913 by international bankers, whom she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as a shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, many readers would have interpreted "international bankers" as a reference to a postulated "international Jewish banking conspiracy" masterminded by the Rothschilds.[14]

Claiming that the term "New World Order" is used by a secretive elite dedicated to the destruction of all national sovereignties, American writer Gary Allen—in his books None Dare Call It Conspiracy (1971), Rockefeller: Campaigning for the New World Order (1974), and Say "No!" to the New World Order (1987)—articulated the anti-globalist theme of much current right-wing populist conspiracism in the US. Thus, after the fall of communism in the early 1990s, the main demonized scapegoat of the American far right shifted seamlessly from crypto-communists, who plotted on behalf of the Red Menace, to globalists, plotting on behalf of the New World Order. The relatively painless nature of the shift was due to growing right-wing populist opposition to corporate internationalism, but also in part to the basic underlying apocalyptic millenarian paradigm, which fed the Cold War (ca 1947-1991) and the witch-hunts of the McCarthy period[14] (1950s).

In his speech, Toward a New World Order, delivered on September 11, 1990 during a joint session of the US Congress, President George H. W. Bush described his objectives for post-Cold War global governance in cooperation with post-Soviet states. He stated:

Until now, the world we've known has been a world divided—a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the principles of justice and fair play ... protect the weak against the strong ..." A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.[15]

The New York Times observed that progressives were denouncing this new world order as a rationalization of American imperial ambitions in the Middle East, while conservatives rejected any new security arrangements altogether and fulminated about any possibility of a UN revival.[16] Chip Berlet, an American investigative reporter specializing in the study of right-wing movements in the US, wrote that the Christian and secular hard right were especially terrified by the speech. The Christians saw Bush's words as signaling the End Times, while the seculars approached it from an anti-communist and anti-collectivist standpoint and feared for a hegemony over all countries by the United Nations.[4]}}

American televangelist Pat Robertson wrote the 1991 best-selling book The New World Order

American televangelist Pat Robertson, with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order, became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history. He describes a scenario where Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging people constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.[6]

Observers note that the galvanizing of right-wing populist conspiracy theorists such as Linda Thompson, Mark Koernke and Robert K. Spear into militancy led to the rise[when?] of the militia movement, which spread its anti-government ideology through speeches at rallies and meetings, books and videotapes sold at gun shows, shortwave and satellite radio, fax networks and computer bulletin boards.[14] However, it is overnight AM radio shows and viral propaganda on the Internet that have most effectively contributed to their extremist political ideas about the New World Order finding their way into the previously apolitical literature of numerous Kennedy assassinologists, ufologists, lost land theorists and, most recently, occultists. From the mid–1990s on, the worldwide appeal of those subcultures transmitted New World Order conspiracism like a "mind virus" to a large new audience of seekers of stigmatized knowledge.[6]

Hollywood conspiracy-thriller television shows and films also played a role in introducing a vast popular audience to various fringe theories related to New World Order conspiracism—black helicopters, FEMA "concentration camps", etc.— theories which for decades previously were confined to radical right-wing subcultures. The 1993–2002 television series The X-Files, the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory and the 1998 film The X-Files: Fight the Future are often cited as notable examples.[6]

Following the start of the 21st century, and specifically during the late-2000s financial crisis, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown[17] and Henry Kissinger,[18] used the term "new world order" in their advocacy for a comprehensive reform of the global financial system and their calls for a "New Bretton Woods" taking into account emerging markets such as China and India. These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, which culminated in talk-show host Sean Hannity stating on his Fox News Channel program Hannity that the "conspiracy theorists were right".[19] Progressive media-watchdog groups have repeatedly criticized Fox News in general and its opinion show Glenn Beck in particular for not only mainstreaming the New World Order conspiracy theories of the radical right, but possibly agitating its lone wolves into action.[20][21]

In 2009 American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists - such as American radio host Alex Jones - who consistently expose and vigorously oppose what they perceive as an emerging New World Order.[22] The growing dissemination and popularity of conspiracy theories has also created an alliance between right-wing populist agitators (such as Alex Jones) and hip hop music's left-wing populist rappers (such as KRS-One, Professor Griff of Public Enemy and Immortal Technique), thus illustrating how anti-elitist conspiracism can create unlikely political allies in efforts to oppose a political system.[23]

FOLLOW THE DOTS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Sbmc0oMy0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr8NZAJUD_w

JWS

Read more…


Pew: Muslim population in U.S. to double by 2050

( Muslim do not ,assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Excerpts from: Muslims and Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world | Pew Research Center

Here are answers to some key questions about Muslims, compiled from several Pew Research Center reports published in recent years:

Islam is currently the world’s second-largest religion (after Christianity), it is the fastest-growing major religion. Indeed, if current demographic trends continue, the number of Muslims is expected to exceed the number of Christians by the end of this century.

How many Muslims are there in the United States?

In 2015, according to our best estimate, there were 3.3 million Muslims of all ages in the U.S., or about 1% of the U.S. population. Pew Research Center’s 2014 Religious Landscape Study (conducted in English and Spanish) found that 0.9% of U.S. adults identify as Muslims. A 2011 survey of Muslim Americans, which was conducted in English as well as Arabic, Farsi and Urdu, estimated that there were 1.8 million Muslim adults (and 2.75 million Muslims of all ages) in the country. That survey also found that a majority of U.S. Muslims (63%) are immigrants.

Our demographic projections estimate that Muslims will make up 2.1% of the U.S. population by the year 2050, surpassing people who identify as Jewish on the basis of religion as the second-largest faith group in the country (not including people who say they have no religion).

A recent Pew Research Center report estimated that the Muslim share of immigrants granted permanent residency status (green cards) increased from about 5% in 1992 to roughly 10% in 2012, representing about 100,000 immigrants in that year.

While it does not change the global population, migration is helping to increase the Muslim population in some regions, including North America and Europe.

About half of Americans (49%) think at least “some” U.S. Muslims are anti-American, greater than the share who say “just a few” or “none” are anti-American, according to a January 2016 survey. Views on this question have become much more partisan in the last 14 years (see graphic). But most Americans do not see widespread support for extremism among Muslims living in the U.S., according to a February 2017 survey. Overall, 40% say there is not much support for extremism among U.S. Muslims, while an additional 15% say there is none at all. About a quarter say there is a fair amount of support (24%) for extremism among U.S. Muslims; 11% say there is a great deal of support.


Most Americans still don’t get it.

Read more…

Maine: Portland high school buys hijabs for Muslim athletes

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! ) Did you buy any thing for the other athletes who ,are not Muslim??

Ironically, it was the school’s lesbian athletic director behind the purchases. Source: Deering High may be first U.S. school to offer athletic hijabs – Portland Press Herald

This spring, Deering apparently became the first school in the nation to outfit athletes with hijabs designed for physical activity – a move athletic director Melanie Craig hopes will encourage more Muslim girls to play sports.

Athletes have long struggled to compete in their traditional hijabs – the headscarves worn in public by many Muslim girls and women to reflect devotion to their faith. Traditional headscarves are often thick and prone to unraveling, but sports hijabs are made from lightweight, sweat-wicking mesh and designed to pull on rather than wrap around to stay in place.

“You often see them flipping a scarf over their shoulder while they’re trying to get the ball,” Craig said of traditional hijabs. “We pride ourselves in celebrating our diversity, but this has really been a challenge for my female Muslim student-athletes.”

Hijabi athletes are now being recognized on the largest of stages. Last summer, Ibtihaj Muhammad – a saber fencer from New Jersey – became the first American to compete at the Olympic Games while wearing a hijab, earning a bronze medal. Earlier this month, the International Basketball Federation, or FIBA, overturned a ban on religious headgear. FIFA, the international soccer organization, lifted its ban on head coverings in 2014.

“If I’m going to buy a football helmet,” Craig said, “I’m going to buy a hijab.”

[Illogical leftist statement – will she buy crucifixes for Catholics? Kippahs for Jews? Kirpans for Sikhs?]

The sports hijabs also are helping to foster a greater sense of inclusivity in a social climate where Muslims have been targeted. There was a 44 percent increase in anti-Muslim hate crimes in America from 2015 to 2016, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations – the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization.

[More leftist diatribe. Muslims killed or injured more Americans from 2015 to 2016 than any time since 9/11 but the media fails to mention that.]

Deering lacrosse player Sulwan Ahmed said teachers and administrators have started taking extra steps this year to make sure Muslim students feel “safe, secure and valued.

“I feel like, within the Muslim community and communities of color, we weren’t really heard before. Now our teachers are listening to us. Deering is actually taking in what we’re saying and taking action.”

[Always the victims.]

Deering is part of the Portland Public Schools district – the most diverse in Maine. About one-third of the district’s students speak a primary language other than English. However, the number of Muslim students who attend Deering is unknown. Portland Public Schools does not collect data on student religious beliefs, nor does the Maine Department of Education.

Reza Jalali, a professor at the University of Southern Maine, estimates that there are about 8,000 Muslims in Maine. He called Deering’s sports hijabs a “milestone” and “testimony to the changing landscape in Maine” – the country’s whitest state, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

[The Islamization of Maine, and the U.S.]

Ten of the sports hijabs are in use by Deering athletes involved in tennis, lacrosse and track. They will be issued at the beginning of every season and collected afterward, as with any other uniform. Athletes have the option of choosing among black, white and purple – Deering’s school colors. Craig said she hopes to eventually customize the hijabs with the letter “D.”

Craig purchased 25 sports hijabs for $45 apiece from ASIYA – a Minnesota company that specializes in modest active wear. While Nike has unveiled plans to release an athletic hijab next spring, ASIYA remains the only one in the United States to offer the product, which became available for purchase in March.

“They (Deering) are the first school in the U.S. to have ordered hijabs from us on behalf of their athletes,” ASIYA co-founder Jamie Glover said. “For us, that’s super exciting because we do see this as just another part of the uniform – another piece of equipment that we feel athletes need to be able to play.”

[More non-sense, the hijab is not a piece of equipment.]

Nike’s promotion of its upcoming Pro Hijab brought the topic to light at Deering. After spotting an ad for the product, girls’ tennis co-captains Liva Pierce and Anaise Manikunda created a GoFundMe campaign to help Deering buy sports hijabs. They shared the link on social media and quickly raised $425 – almost doubling their original goal of $250. Craig said the rest of the money for the hijabs – about $700 – came from an anonymous donation.

Neither Pierce nor Manikunda is Muslim, but three of their teammates wear hijabs. One of them is Kadhim, who moved to the United States from Jordan four years ago. She said her sports-loving family shared her excitement, and her surprise, over the sports hijabs.

“I feel so happy and glad that we’re a diverse and inclusive team and that they actually care about me,” Kadhim said. “At first, I felt like they did not care about me and, actually, they did. I love my team.”

[Like most supposed anti-Muslim hate crimes, they are fake. Kadhim’s feelings are based on her own anti-American prejudice.]


As for the athletic director, she’s no stranger to controversy. As Deering athletic director, Melanie Craig broke policy by using school stationery to praise her wife’s clinic. She was not punished for the violation.

Would Kadhim’s family welcome Craig and her wife to their home, their mosque, their native Jordan?

Deering athletic director Melanie Craig

Read more…

UK textbook tells children to “respect” jihad terrorists and write them letters

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! ) The same kind of things are going on in our public schools and college only we can stop the indoctrination of our children and our people to Islam!!!

“The book, Talking About Terrorism, published weeks before the Manchester Arena atrocity, describes the indiscriminate mass murder of innocent members of the public as a ‘type of war.'”

It is a “type of war,” but not one that sweet letters from schoolchildren will bring to a satisfactory close. British schools should be teaching children about the Islamic doctrine of jihad, and explaining exactly what “type of war” they will be facing as they reach adulthood. Instead, this defeatist twaddle that once again places the blame for jihad violence upon its Infidel victims.

If Britain is not finished, how exactly will it survive the relentless fecklessness and treasonous willful ignorance of its leaders?

“Write a letter to terrorists! Children told to ‘respect’ killers in new teaching aid,” by Jon Coates, Express, May 28, 2017 (thanks to A.):

A NEW teaching aid that recommends schoolchildren as young as seven “write a letter to a terrorist” to help understand their motives has been condemned as “dangerous and misguided”.

The book, Talking About Terrorism, published weeks before the Manchester Arena atrocity, describes the indiscriminate mass murder of innocent members of the public as a “type of war”.

It tells primary age children that terrorists kill people because they believe they are being treated “unfairly and not shown respect”.

It gives examples of “terrorists” whose ideas then turn out to be right: “The Suffragettes used violence and were called terrorists,,,,” it stated.

“Today many people think of them as brave women and admire their struggle for the right to vote.”

In an activity recommended for pupils aged seven to 11, teachers are urged to “invite children to write a letter to a terrorist. If they could ask a terrorist six questions, what would they be?”

The book, published by Brilliant Publications and containing a foreword by Peter Wanless, the chief executive of the NSPCC, has been slammed by critics who say it is potentially dangerous.

Chris McGovern, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, said the letter task would confuse and potentially upset pupils.

He said: “This a crackpot idea based on the misguided notion that primary school children must engage with, and show “respect” for, religious fanatics who are seeking to kill them.

“It is part of the “British Values” agenda that is being forced on schools by Ofsted and the educational establishment.

“The primary school classroom is not the place to humanise terrorism by ‘pretend dialogue’.”…

Read more…

Memorial Day and the conquest of Constantinople

( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE )

The goal ,is to enslave to Islam this has been going on for 1400 years!!

As we remember, with a debt of gratitude we can never repay, those who have died to keep us free, let us also remember what the consequences will be if we lose this great defense against jihad that the free world isn’t even seriously fighting.

Today is May 29, the anniversary of the Muslim conquest of Constantinople, which took place on May 29, 1453.

It is useful, in our comfortable complacency and general lack of any historical memory at all, and overarching concern to avoid “Islamophobia,” to recall what happened when the Muslims entered the great city.

Historian Steven Runciman notes that the Muslim soldiers “slew everyone that they met in the streets, men, women, and children without discrimination. The blood ran in rivers down the steep streets from the heights of Petra toward the Golden Horn. But soon the lust for slaughter was assuaged. The soldiers realized that captives and precious objects would bring them greater profit.” (The Fall of Constantinople 1453, Cambridge University Press, 1965, p. 145.)

Some jihadists “made for the small but splendid churches by the walls, Saint George by the Charisian Gate, Saint John in Petra, and the lovely church of the monastery of the Holy Saviour in Chora, to strip them of their stores of plate and their vestments and everything else that could be torn from them. In the Chora they left the mosaics and frescoes, but they destroyed the icon of the Mother of God, the Hodigitria, the holiest picture in all Byzantium, painted, so men said, by Saint Luke himself. It had been taken there from its own church beside the Palace at the beginning of the siege, that its beneficient presence might be at hand to inspire the defenders on the walls. It was taken from its setting and hacked into four pieces.” (P. 146.)

It won’t be like that here, right? Right? Our people will always live in safety, and our culture and our civilization will never be cast into the dust. Boston strong, right? Manchester strong. San Bernardino strong. Brussels strong. Berlin strong. Nice strong. Orlando strong. And all the rest. How strong we are, except for the racist “Islamophobes” who try to divide us! We are strong everywhere, with our candles and vigils so very strong, and with our love we will overcome the “far-right” and the terrorists both! Won’t we?

Read more…

Portland mayor asks feds to bar free-speech and anti-sharia rallies after stabbings

(  MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE! The Socialist Democratic Party are the problem they repeatedly take the side of Islam over the AMERICAN PEOPLE this is conspiracy and treason against the AMERICAN PEOPLE ! )

“The mayor of Portland, Ore., is calling on federal authorities to cancel a pair of upcoming rallies organized by conservative groups, saying the city was still ‘in shock’ after two men were fatally stabbed on a commuter train Friday while fending off a man shouting anti-Muslim slurs.”

So says the Washington Post, following the establishment media that this was an “Islamophobic hate crime.” The truth is, as always, different from the media narrative. In reality, this is one part of Jeremy Joseph Christian’s rant: “You don’t like it? You got a problem with what I’m saying? F*** all you Christians and Muslims and f****** Jews , f****** die. Burn you at the stake… f****** die.”

That’s right: he railed against Jews, Christians, and Muslims. But there are so few actual hate crimes against Muslims, belying the establishment media narrative that Muslims are routinely victimized in the U.S., and so this one will have to do, and is being pressed into service to shore up the sagging “Islamophobia” narrative.

Meanwhile, contrary to establishment media claims that Christian was abusing two Muslim women, here is a photo of one of the women he was yelling at. If she is Muslim, she is not showing it by wearing hijab or any other visible sign of her faith:

Despite the facts of the case, Portland’s fascist mayor, Ted Wheeler, is seizing upon Jeremy Joseph Christian’s crime to try to shut down free speech and anti-Sharia rallies in his city. A maniac killed two people, and so therefore dissent from the establishment line and opposition to a legal system that denies basic rights to women and non-Muslims must be forbidden.

“Portland mayor asks feds to bar free-speech and anti-sharia rallies after stabbings,” by Derek Hawkins, Washington Post, May 30, 2017 (thanks to Darcy):

The mayor of Portland, Ore., is calling on federal authorities to cancel a pair of upcoming rallies organized by conservative groups, saying the city was still “in shock” after two men were fatally stabbed on a commuter train Friday while fending off a man shouting anti-Muslim slurs.

Mayor Ted Wheeler asked the federal government to revoke a permit authorizing a June 4 “Trump Free Speech Rally” in Portland’s downtown. He also called on the government to block a “March Against Sharia” that is scheduled for June 10 but has not received permits.

“Our city is in mourning, our community’s anger is real, and the timing and subject of these events can only exacerbate an already difficult situation,” Wheeler wrote in a Facebook post Monday.

He added that he had asked the organizers of the rallies, which he referred to as “alt-right demonstrations,” to cancel their events.

“I urge them to ask their supporters to stay away from Portland,” Wheeler wrote. “There is never a place for bigotry or hatred in our community, and especially not now.”

The federal government controls permitting for the plaza where both rallies are set to take place. The city of Portland will not issue any of its own permits allowing organizers to hold the events elsewhere, Wheeler said.

Portland has spent several days reeling from the deaths of Taliesin Myrddin Namkai Meche, 23, and Ricky John Best, 53, who were stabbed and killed as they tried to protect two young women from a man who boarded a light-rail train and began yelling hateful comments about Muslims at them. A third man who intervened was injured.

The suspect, 35-year-old Jeremy Joseph Christian, has a history of making bigoted comments online and was photographed giving a Nazi salute at a recent protest organized by the group behind the “Trump Free Speech Rally.” Local publications as well as the Southern Poverty Law Center have described him as a “known white supremacist.” He is charged with aggravated murder, attempted murder and other charges….

And the Southern Poverty Law Center is a trustworthy source because…?

The organizer of the “Trump Free Speech Rally,” Joey Gibson, sought to distance himself and his group, Patriot Prayer, from Christian, especially as reports surfaced that he appeared at the group’s other events. In a video posted to Facebook on Sunday, Gibson condemned Christian and said antifa protesters were trying to incite chaos at the upcoming rally by exploiting the attacks on the train.

“There’s going to be more intensity, there’s going to be more threats,” Gibson said. “They’re using the deaths of these two people and Jeremy Christian — they’re using it to get Portland all rowdy about our June 4 rally and it’s absolutely disgusting.”

Gibson urged his supporters to remain calm. “You throw one punch, you’re going to jail,” he said.

A Facebook page for the event says the rally will feature live music and “speakers exercising their free speech.”

The “March Against Sharia,” which Gibson is also involved in, says Islamic law “is incompatible with our Constitution and American values.” The event page calls on supporters who “stand for human rights.”

The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon criticized the mayor’s attempts to shut down both rallies, saying the government can’t revoke or deny a permit based on the demonstrators’ views.

“It may be tempting to shut down speech we disagree with,” the ACLU tweeted, “but once we allow the government to decide what we can say, see, or hear, or who we can gather with, history shows us that the most marginalized will be disproportionately censored and punished for unpopular speech.”

“If we allow the government to shut down speech for some, we all will pay the price down the line,” the organization added….

In April, Portland’s typically family-friendly rose parade was canceled after antifa activists threatened to shut down roads if a Republican group wasn’t barred from the event. And earlier this month, dozens of “black bloc” anarchists destroyed property at May Day protests….

Read more…

Glazov Gang: John Guandolo on “Trump vs. Brotherhood Infiltration”

( Muslimws do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfzHgOSdxlM

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.

This new special edition of The Glazov Gang features John Guandolo, a former FBI agent, combat veteran Marine, and now the President of Understanding the Threat.

Read more…

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Read more…

Muslim in France smashes bottles of wine because it’s Ramadan and NO ONE CAN DRINK during Ramadan

( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )

Story Continues Below

He is muslim and he is from Algeria and living in Paris. He says on his FB page, however, that he apologizes and was put up to his shenanigans of scaring the crap out of cafe patrons and market shoppers. The complete full video of Hasnaoui breaking up lunch, bottles of wine and someone's (stolen?) car is what he assumes passes for comedy these days.

This is what sharia law is, and how it is enforced. Moe muslim on the street just makes it so expensive and dangerous to preserve your own laws and culture that people submit. It requires no act of legislation, no vote and no official change. Just a gang of thugs, seemingly protected from the legal consequences of their actions, to make it impossible to live how you want.

Video http://vidmax.com/video/157723-Muslim-in-France-smashes-bottles-of-wine-because-it-s

Read more…

Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
How Liberal Short-Term
Thinking Is Destroying America
by John Hawkins
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 A Genuine Investigation or a Witch Hunt? 
_RR7VxIl4h9TeKCx6lrBP7G_zeWSfoTBk7UEFhsT5QZDn_2NMfvCl10tKwDr0VLEV-BOac2WIVuILrRNWtkyr11jpmwl1e3GmB__DLGEHTdjjVcIpm0SRh1Zn0dEww=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Arnold Ahlert: America will now endure an investigation led by former FBI director Robert Mueller regarding "Russian influence" in the election and Donald Trump's campaign. One driven by an overwhelmingly slanted Leftmedia campaign determined to shape a relentlessly anti-Trump narrative, one anonymous felony-committing source after another.
          Yet what — exactly — is Mueller investigating? As former CIA director John Brennan told the House Intelligence Committee Tuesday, there was "information intelligence about interactions and contacts between U.S. persons and the Russians" — even as he admitted he didn't have "sufficient information to make a determination whether or not there was cooperation or complicity or collusion."
          That's the evidentiary "standard" for precipitating a special counsel-led investigation? Then why did Democrat exchanges with the Russians never precipitate one?
          Bill liar-nClinton was paid $500,000 for a 2010 Moscow speech by Renaissance Capital, a firm with ties to Russian intelligence. Uranium One, a company whose sale to the Russian government was approved by the liar-Clinton-led State Department — giving them control of over 20% of America's uranium supply — donated millions of dollars to the liar-Clinton Foundation.
          liar-Clinton campaign manager, John Podesta, enjoyed a relationship with Joule Unlimited, a Kremlin-financed company that employed him as a director and gave him 75,000 shares of stock. His brother Tony lobbied on behalf of Sberbank, an institution completely beholden to Vladimir Putin, and one accused by Ukraine's Security Service of financing terrorism.
          Couldn't those contacts could be characterized as "cooperation or complicity or collusion" by law enforcement officials and a hysterical media — if it suited their purposes? If this investigation doesn't examine Republicans and Democrats, it's a sham.
          Another element of these machinations that doesn't pass the smell test is the appointment of Mueller himself, championed as a paragon of integrity and impartiality.
          Impartial? "While Mueller technically reported to Comey as deputy attorney general, Comey, two decades his junior, treated Mueller as a close friend and almost mentor," Politico reported last week.
          If Mueller is the consummate straight-shooter we're assured he is, why not recuse himself for this transparent conflict of interest? "The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits [Mueller] from serving if he has a conflict of interest in the case," Fox News contributor and attorney Gregg Jarret explains. "The rule has been interpreted to mean that even the appearance of a conflict is sufficient for disqualification."
          Jarrett presumes Comey himself is being investigated. Yet on Monday, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz revealed Comey's scheduled testimony was postponed — because he "wants to speak with" Mueller prior to going public. Thus, unless this is Comey-Mueller version of the liar-Clinton-Lynch a "Tarmac Moment," we now know Comey is not being investigated.
          Why not? In a masterful connect-the-dot piece of journalism, columnist Diana West explains a substantial part of the assertion the Russians hacked the DNC computers is based on statements made by security experts from CrowdStrike, the private cyber security firm hired and paid by the DNC.
          The FBI? At a March 20, 2017 House Intelligence Committee hearing, Comey testified the agency "never got direct access to the machines themselves."
          At the same meeting, NSA Director Michael Rogers, another liar-nObama administration holdover, was asked if his agency directly accessed the computers. "The NSA didn't ask for access," he stated. "That's not in our job..."
          Rep. Will Hurd pressed the issue with Comey. "So, director, the FBI notified the DNC early, before any information was put on WikiLeaks and when — you have still never been given access to any of the technical or the physical machines that were hacked by the Russians?" he asked. "That's correct," Comey answered, "although we got the forensics from the pros that they hired. ... Again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute."
          Second-hand information provided by a biased source is an appropriate substitute? For what? What stopped Comey from getting a subpoena and seizing the machines?
          By itself, this example of Comey's seeming determination to avoid conducting a thorough investigation should warrant his investigation. Yet the FBI also allowed liar-Hillary Clinton testify about her personal server without recording or transcribing the conversation. And the agency granted wholly unnecessary immunity deals to liar-Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson that included two side agreements — one limiting the FBI's scrutinization of documents to a time period before the most likely evidence about obstruction of justice occurred, and the other a promise to destroy the aides' computers after their examination. Even more egregious, Mills and Samuelson were allowed to function as part of liar-Clinton's legal team even though they were subjects of the same FBI investigation.
          If all of that was done with Comey's knowledge and presumed approval — how can he remain inviolate?
          According to yet another unnamed source, CNN is reporting that Comey is sharing his Trump memos with Mueller. What about memos with regard to liar-nObama, liar-Clinton, or Loretta Lynch? The same Loretta Lynch whose meeting with Bill liar-Clinton prompted Comey to assert the DOJ "could not credibly complete the investigation and decline prosecution without grievous damage to the American people's confidence in the justice system," in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee?
          "If the massive intelligence capabilities of the NSA and the CIA are being used for internal political purposes, the United States of America, as we know it and the Founders envisioned it, no longer exists," warns PJ Media's Roger Simon. "We are a post-modern totalitarianism and the Russian collusion scandal was just an excuse to impose it — or, more scarily, to cement what was already there."
          A bombshell report released yesterday — one so far avoided by every mainstream media outlet — reveals liar-nObama's NSA routinely violated Americans' Fourth Amendment-based privacy protections. Were Trump and/or his associates some of those Americans?
          Either this blatant abuse of power now becomes an integral part of the investigation — or America has ceased being a constitutional republic. And this investigation is a witch hunt.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Left's biggest lies exposed on major TV show
EtWPTHK8SwV7r4C_Hh4eDDrdWEtS2MzkUdxBk6EGI2VNihs2Ddz6qxqnlSRIPdT96P7AnNHjiR1XxrC8CXriz5AO=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Bremmer
{wnd.com} ~ The legal principle of “separation of church and state” is enshrined in the Constitution, right? After all, Americans hear it all the time from their politicians and judges and mainstream journalists... Authorities and “experts” would never tell such a huge lie, would they? Wouldn’t they be afraid of being found out? But as psychologists have observed over the decades, repeat a lie often enough, no matter how blatantly false it is, and many people come to believe it. “Separation of church and state,” in fact, is never mentioned in the Constitution or Bill of Rights, yet the left in politics, academia, law and the media have drilled it into Americans’ consciousness as though it were true... http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/lefts-biggest-lies-exposed-on-major-tv-show/
.
Tillerson State Dept Doubles Refugee
Import Levels While Trump Overseas
0V30RiCVoGYsqpI6xKsZduU7OpSGrAzLqSZ6ZRDW9wG8fJD6rTqw1XHy_Oy0CCNYQuo3w0RJT1HUFS7mWA06lf7WgBNbLgJYodO0h1MSb5GCg33LtIQKU8xuzcVJPpR6hMOSAlFRiJNE6w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The strange goings-on at the State Department continue, with nobody other than the Secretary himself behaving in a manner that would be reflective of the new president’s leadership and consistent with his agenda... If he’s truly representing the president, another round of wholesale firings is clearly in order. Earlier this month the State Department fought the release of two un-redacted emails to Judicial Watch that contain information relevant to the criminal activities of liar-Hillary Clinton and on  Friday they acted as representatives of liar-Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit filed by two family members of the victims of liar-Clinton’s fatal mischief in Benghazi. America is tired of the secrecy of our shadow government and our supposedly legitimate version as well. We hired Donald Trump to clean the mess up, not to allow business to continue as usual. They work for him and for us. In yet another instance where the State Department is acting as if Hussein liar-nObama is still in the White House, in a Democrat-style Thursday before a holiday weekend email notification, they revealed that the restrictions on the flow of “refugees,” terrorists and terrorist sympathizer applicants into the US would now be readjusted to Hussein liar-nObama’s “the sky is the limit” levels, effective immediately...http://rickwells.us/tillerson-state-dept-doubles-refugee-import-levels-trump-overseas/
.
Rumsfeld: There's No Evidence of
Trump-Russia Collusion
JvIE7BSe1wmXk30gVwgu2U0EP_SA0CeQFEqBFMSGA70p4ZAl8Ww_jAtq-dreL-wVxXEB3dWpqSvIrcJKsv2_s9av4Lsw6G4UajuQBprhmP700G_mwnl03y-g2nyuj03pF04x5XZuRfYlt_tS17IfSIbAFk_s-iZHyQglQf8g5dnmK2e3PY5xgUwV6rM_lBaXMjAG=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Leah Barkoukis
{townhall.com} ~ Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld agreed Friday that the Russians tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election but said he did not see any evidence of collusion... “I assume you agree that the Russians attacked our election via false news and cyber hacking and all that,” conservative host Hugh Hewitt asked. “Sure. I mean, in that the Russians and other countries have an interest in what goes on in the United States. And to the extent they have the kinds of capabilities the Russians do, they have the ability and capability of engaging in things that are disruptive and harmful to other countries, including the United States,” he replied... https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2017/05/26/rumsfeld-russia-comments-n2332187?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
.
New Kushner-Russia Story Stokes
Concern of West Wing Leakers
CAOWzpmB75_QvTYxeQZv4xebEPFQDBvOWPdlywXtJumMC9LcDMD04m70N3TjL8MUfZbRE7UokKvcvmEHZZKoCldSKFsD-L3LYInKXJn-rKJkOzH3xdjumuGuQxCxm19btME49Z0vIvArID7FkuxpDtyiegXk66qnqNVr5RX4zw4e5zaDRRGhHyUPmpBCTPc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Margaret Menge
{lifezette.com} ~ Another Washington Post anonymously sourced hit job dropped on the Trump White House — this one about Jared Kushner asking the Russian ambassador for a “secret channel.”... It landed just in time to greet the president upon his return from his first international trip and shortly after Attorney General Jeff Sessions pledged to “put an end to” the rampant leaks coming from within the government. An administration plagued with leaks is now trying to determine whether recent damaging claims may have been fanned from within the West Wing... http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-kushner-russia-story-stokes-concern-west-wing-leakers/
.
Pulosi Short-Circuits To Avoid Giving
Trump Credit For Anything
7uaJ1M4nvUBePfI3Hc0Z7xTy9xAXGUteTpNs0V1SvR-wtKERr-KwqFFY3X3SZeaErozoEpLvNjNJhcDQpvHE_PtbFiiOPgl_vQ5CGZtyhoUPLJIQjvnVjVVVPNGmuw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Nancy Pulosi is asked in her weekly DC press briefing for her impression of President Trump’s first foreign trip and if she thinks it’s been a successful one... Rather than answer that question, which might involve her actually having to give credit to the President for an accomplishment or two, dunderhead Pulosi starts blabbering on about a trip she made to four or five unnamed countries and how she didn’t criticize the President to local folks. Finally she’s found someone she won’t badmouth the President to. She says she told those raising the issue that “That’s not why we’re here. We don’t criticize our President when we go abroad.” Really, Pulosi? When did that start? That must be a new policy, something that Potty Mouth Perez implemented or something. That’s pretty unlikely; it’s much more probable that she’s just lying, that’s what Dems do...http://rickwells.us/pelosi-short-circuits-avoid-giving-trump-credit-anything/
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
How Liberal Short-Term
Thinking Is Destroying America
MHdNmBo6CSDN9NHjPT-LOqt3LfXinnm5PDFMX66hh2EhTBEtH5a8XMxW4M0yG102DX1sIbYTadvxbrFxbwnad8YzSuEpFAMEiK4kRBw-3mMVjJSrVwJrekl5hFG3FlESAf1_lj3UiHDw2qqJmt35FhSQn4Fyfj50Nxh5TK-FJu-N39DDabvw9LQp=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by John Hawkins
{townhall.com} ~
Like a crack addict who can’t seem to think about anything other than his next fix, liberals can’t seem to think about anything but spewing their emotions at the world. They may be reflexively saying something that makes them feel compassionate, outraged, sensitive or angry, but liberals usually seem to be caught in the grip of some strong emotion.

Of course, it goes without saying that emotion unmoored from logic produces a lot of warped views, but it also mires a person in short term thinking….if you could even call it that. Because when you’re emotional, most of the time you’re not thinking; you’re reacting based on your “feels.” This is where a lot of liberals live 24 x 7 and so, it’s not shocking that their behavior is so thoughtless.

Take rock star Katy Perry’s reaction to the Manchester bombing, "No barriers, no borders, we all just need to coexist.” So, what does co-existing with radical Islamic terrorists who want to kill you mean? Is Katy Perry going to invite ISIS terrorists from Syria to bomb her next concert?

Can you imagine how bizarre the typical liberal reaction to terrorism must seem to the terrorists?

Terrorist: We want to kill you in the name of Allah because we’re good Muslims!

Liberal: No, you’re not. That’s not what you believe.

Terrorist: Yes, it is.

Liberal: No, no…you’re oppressed and probably upset about global warming.

Terrorist: Wait, what?

Liberal: Let’s all co-exist!

Terrorist: How did you miss the entire, “We want to kill you in the name of Allah” thing? What is wrong with you?

Then there are the Trump Administration leaks. Undoubtedly, some of the leaks inside the Trump Administration are coming from his staff, but others appear to be coming from the “deep state.” In other words, Democratic holdovers in the government bureaucracy are leaking information to the press in order to attempt to sabotage a rival political party. Obviously, these leakers are so consumed with their hatred for Trump that they feel politically motivated leaks are justifiable. Except what’s going to almost inevitably happen once a Democrat gets back into office? Republicans in the deep state are now going to leak things in an attempt to embarrass him.

Liberals are so overwrought with emotion that they don’t get the idea that they’re setting precedents when they do these sort of things. It’s like the shock and surprise they experienced when they used the nuclear option to keep Republicans from blocking Barack liar-nObama’s cabinet appointments, only to find that it also meant they couldn’t stop Trump’s cabinet appointments. Wait, you mean that applies to liberals, too? Yes, and those leaks? The next Democrat President is likely to be undermined in exactly the same way.

Look at the liberal threats and violence at universities that have become a regular occurrence. At worst, liberals riot when people they disagree with speak on college campuses and at best, they make threats and do everything they can to rob conservative speakers of their First Amendment rights. Liberals are so supportive of this kind of thing that the police in liberal cities or on liberal campuses refuse to stop the rioting or disruptions.

In other words, conservatives no longer get the same protection from the police. Even illegal aliens are treated better by the police on campuses controlled by liberals. So, when that’s the case, is anyone surprised to see that someone like Based Stick Man was warmly received by conservatives for breaking a stick over a violent ANTIFA protestor’s head? It wouldn’t surprise me if we start seeing armed gangs of conservatives policing marches to protect other people on the Right from armed gangs of liberals since the Left has convinced the police not to do it. This is the world liberals are creating with their short term thinking: one where both sides of the political argument will have armed factions at political rallies. How healthy does that sound for the country?

Liberals do the same thing on the deficit. “Supporting that program makes me feel good! Spend somebody else’s money on it and I don’t like thinking about the debt; so just ignore that.”

They did it with liar-nObamacare. They lied about the bill, assumed no one would recognize they were misled to when the bill became law and cared nothing about creating an expensive new entitlement program when the country is drowning in debt.

They get upset that Trump actually told NATO that if we’re going to be in a military alliance, then the nations involved will have to spend enough on their militaries so that they field an effective military force. How dare Trump try to make NATO useful again!

They’re so blinded by their emotions that they’ll even rank liar-Hillary Clinton as the 6th most beautiful woman on the planet. Seriously.

It is impossible to competently govern a nation based on pure emotion and short term thinking. Additionally as a practical matter, it’s impossible to cut a deal with people whose entire rationale for doing things is, “A celebrity told me what I should believe and now I have to do it” or “I heard a sad story yesterday; so everything has changed.” At some point, liberals have to engage in some long term thinking that goes beyond, “As long as we’re in charge, everything we do is okay,” or our country is going to get dragged down the tubes along with them.

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2017/05/27/how-liberal-shortterm-thinking-is-destroying-america-n2332321?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=

Read more…