TEA PARTY CONADATES MAY ALSO GET TO GETHER.
All Posts (28930)
Sort by
OORAH!!
Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On January 3, 2012:
“Others, including top constitutional expert Herb Titus, contend that the term “natural-born citizen,” which is not defined in the Constitution, would have been understood when the document was written to mean the offspring of two U.S. citizens. That argument is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision
Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father, as identified on the “Certificate of Live Birth” image released by the White House, was a foreign national who came from Kenya to study in the U.S. and never was a citizen.
The ruling came today from Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings.
In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.
While Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had argued that the requirements didn’t apply to candidates for a presidential primary, the judge said that isn’t how he reads state law.
“Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this court finds that the cases cited by [Obama] are not controlling. When the court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the ‘first step … is to examine the plain statutory language,” the judge wrote. “Section 21-2-1(a) states that ‘every candidate for federal and state office’ must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary.”
The decision from Malihi came as a result of a series of complaints that were consolidated by the court. They were brought against Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 election primary ballot by David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by attorney Orly Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield.
The judge’s decision was to refuse to dismiss the complaints, an action that had been sought by Obama. He also granted a motion to sever the cases, and he scheduled a hearing at 9 a.m. on Jan. 26 for the complaint brought by Weldon. Following immediately will be hearings for the cases brought by Swensson and Powell, and the issue raised by Farrar, Lax, Judy, Malaren and Roth will be third.
Malihi’s ruling said: “The court finds that defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
There are similar challenges to Obama’s 2012 candidacy being raised before state election or other commissions in Tennessee, Arizona and New Hampshire as well.
Taitz told WND she will present the decision to a court in Hawaii, where she is arguing to have access to Obama’s original birth documentation as it exists in the state, which for many years allowed relatives of babies to simply make a statement and register a birth, even though the child may not have been born in Hawaii.
Irion had argued in his opposition to Obama’s demand to dismiss the concerns that, “The only fact relevant to this case is the fact that the defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen. This fact has been repeatedly documented and stated by the party opponent, defendant Obama. This fact is also evidenced by plaintiff’s exhibit 6, previously submitted with plaintiff’s pre-trial order, and apparently authenticated by defendant’s citation to this exhibit in defendant’s ‘Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute,’ number 7.
“The lengths to which the defendant goes in order to avoid the one relevant fact is telling. The defendant asks this court to interpret Georgia election code in a way that leaves the code in conflict with itself, goes against the plain language of the law, leaves the law without meaning, and conflicts with common sense. He then cites freedom-to-associate precedent to support an assertion that has never been supported by such precedent, and which would nullify election codes in several states. All of these arguments are futile attempts to distract from the undeniable conclusion: Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of president of the United States,” Irion wrote.
He continued, “It is true that some states lack election codes authorizing any state officials to screen candidate selections from political parties. In these states political parties have essentially unfettered authority to determine which candidates appear on ballots. However, these instances represent decisions of the states to not screen candidates. It is the states’ right to decide how to administer its elections. The fact that some states have decided to not protect their citizens from unqualified candidates does not mean that other states don’t have the right to screen candidates. It simply means that some states have left the screening to the political parties.
“Georgia has determined that it is in the best interest of its citizens to screen candidates prior to placement on the ballot.
“Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, the defendant can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court. Therefore, the defendant cannot meet the constitutional requirements to hold the office of president. See U.S. Const. Art. II Section 1.5 Georgia election code requires such a candidate to be stricken from any Georgia ballot.”
The U.S. Supreme Court opinion cited is Minor v. Happersett from 1875. It includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Irion said the goal would be an injunction that would deprive Obama of Democratic Party certification.
“Without such certification from the party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election,” his organization said in an announcement when the cases were launched.
Liberty Legal said it is not addressing Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate.
“These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” the group said.
WND has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into whether Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012. A full report is expected within weeks.
The White House in April released an image of a “Certificate of Live Birth” from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama’s claim that he was born in the state. The White House has not addressed the questions raised by Obama’s father’s nationality. In addition, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated the document image appears to be a forgery.
The image that the new lawsuits contend is irrelevant:
http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.
“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”
If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.
“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Open Letter to Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia: ‘The Rule Of Law Must Be Upheld!’
Right ON!
Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On January 3, 2012:
“January 3, 2012
Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi
Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings
230 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 850
Atlanta, GA 30303
Dear Judge Malihi:
I am editor of an electronic newspaper, The Post & Email (www.thepostemail.com) which covers constitutional issues and government corruption, and I am writing to express my sincerest appreciation for your ruling today which supported Georgia law O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a) in favor of a voter’s right to challenge the eligibility of any candidate for public office.
For more than three years, a debate has raged as to whether or not the man who occupies the White House is eligible to serve as President and commander-in-chief. The questions surrounding his eligibility do not have to do with the number of years he has resided in the United States nor his age, but rather, the “natural born Citizen” requirement expressed in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
There are questions about whether or not a person born to a father who was not an American citizen can be considered “natural born” and whether or not Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims. There are questions about whether or not birthplace is a determining factor for “natural born” citizenship or if it is something else altogether.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear all challenges to Obama’s eligibility on the merits, the American people have been forced to live under the exigencies of a constitutional crisis since the 2008 election. No public servant in any branch of government has upheld his or her oath and commenced scrutiny of the meaning of the “natural born Citizen” clause in relation to Obama’s background. The legislative, judicial and executive branches of government at every level have failed in their duty to their constituents, instead issuing purposely-deceitful form letters, relying on faulty information which they have repeated ad nauseum, and denying U.S. military members discovery so that they might know that the orders they have received are legally issued.
The Congressional Research Service has published four memos to members of Congress which obfuscate and even omit relevant parts of law cases which directly impact whether or not Obama is eligible for the position he holds. The U.S. Justice Department has managed to have all cases brought to obtain the truth dismissed on technicalities rather than simply presenting the evidence. It is now clear that our government is perpetuating a charade of mammoth proportions while holding the American people hostage, not unlike that which catapulted the 13 colonies into revolution in 1776 and eventual independence from Great Britain.
The Framers of the Constitution specifically included the term “natural born” for the office of President to indicate a higher level of qualification than simply “citizen.” Originally, they had used the term “citizen” but changed it after considering John Jay’s letter to George Washington cautioning that the highest office in the land required absolute allegiance to the new nation.
In order for our state and federal governments to operate properly, those elected to serve must respond to those who placed their trust in them. For more than three years, millions of Americans have asked questions about Obama’s eligibility and been rebuked, ridiculed, rebuffed, ignored, or lied to by their representatives. It is a fact that the term “citizen” is not the same as “natural born Citizen,” yet our elected representatives would have us believe that their meanings are identical. Judges have used the “no standing” excuse myriads of times rather than hear a case on the merits, whether out of cowardice, fear, lack of principle, or perhaps something more sinister.
True statesmen and public servants are very hard to find in today’s America, and I believe it is accurate to state that confidence in our government is dangerously low.
The U.S. military has a right to know if its commander-in-chief is eligible to issue orders. The American people have a right to know if the President has foreign allegiances which affect his ability to make decisions in the best interests of their country. Because of your decision issued today, perhaps we will finally have that opportunity, and for that, I thank you.
During a time when morality, ethics, high standards and doing what is right are rare things, my deepest respect is extended to you, sir, for reading the law as it is stated rather than making excuses for allowing this horrendous situation to continue. There is an abundance of evidence that many, if not most, judges in this country today issue decisions which are not based on the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, but rather, on a whim, a political viewpoint, or worse, a bribe. For example, if one examines the judiciary in Monroe County, TN, it becomes obvious that our founding documents have not seen the light of day there in a very long time, and the rule of law is nonexistent. This is what all of America will become if her laws are not enforced.
When we know for a fact whether or not Obama is eligible, the outcome will be dealt with and the nation can begin to heal from the tremendous conflict which has torn it asunder for so long. Constitutional eligibility is not a Democrat or Republican issue; it is a fundamental constitutional issue which must be addressed. I believe that today’s decision was the first step in that direction.
Very truly yours,
Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email
editor@thepostemail.com
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT 06076”
Source:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/open-letter-to-judge-michael-malihi-of-georgia/
II. Lawmakers: Obama ballot challenge unfairly denied!
Right ON!
Posted on Concord Monitor-By Maddie Hanna / Monitor staff-On January 4, 2012:
“New Hampshire election law officials previously rejected their request to remove President Obama’s name from the ballot in advance of next week’s presidential primary, but that hasn’t stopped several state representatives, who yesterday presented what they said was proof that officials had unfairly denied their challenge to the president’s citizenship.
“Our complaint was denied, but there appears to be an inconsistency in the process of the challenge,” said Rep. Larry Rappaport, addressing several reporters and a group of supporters at a press conference called on the eve of the new legislative session. The lawmakers demanded an investigation into Obama’s eligibility to appear on the state’s primary ballot.
In a new twist on the challenge made in November, when California attorney Orly Taitz appeared before the state Ballot Law Commission to question the veracity of Obama’s birth certificates and Social Security number, Rappaport and other Republican representatives - including Lucien and Carol Vita, Harry Accornero and Laurie Pettengill - say the New Hampshire secretary of state’s office has been inconsistent in evaluating whether candidates meet the citizenship requirement established by the U.S. Constitution.
The representatives - who say Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen because his father was Kenyan - cite two instances from 2007 and 2011 in which prospective presidential candidates were told by the secretary of state’s office they had to be natural-born citizens to appear on the ballot. They see a discrepancy between those actions and statements made during the November ballot law hearing by a representative of the secretary of state’s office, which said its purview was restricted to ensuring that candidates properly filled out their paperwork and paid the requisite filing fee.
Given the precedent for denying a candidate based on citizenship, “we believe the secretary of state should launch an investigation,” Rappaport said. He also filed an affidavit yesterday morning with the state attorney general’s office describing a conversation he said he and the Vitas had in 2009 with Attorney General Michael Delaney, who told them Obama’s citizenship was a question for the federal government and “refused to investigate,” Rappaport said.
He and other supporters seemed to believe that giving the office that affidavit would lead to action. “They’re going to be forced to do something about it, an obstruction of justice, now that they’ve been served with that information,” said Mark Rossetti, a Manchester man who attended and said he helped organize the press conference.
But the attorney general’s office doesn’t plan to respond. “There’s no request in it,” said Associate Attorney General Richard Head, when asked about the affidavit yesterday. “I honestly can’t figure it out.”
Secretary of State Bill Gardner, meanwhile, said the examples cited by the representatives had far different circumstances than the challenges to Obama’s eligibility. In the first situation, an Egyptian man who filed a declaration of candidacy in 2007 was disqualified after the man acknowledged he wasn’t a natural-born citizen.
But the office didn’t learn that as the result of an investigation, Gardner said. He couldn’t remember how it came to his office’s attention that the man was Egyptian, but when it did, the office called the man, and he said he didn’t realize citizenship was a requirement, Gardner said.
In the second example, which happened in 2011, a man wrote to Gardner’s office saying he met all the constitutional requirements to become president - except for being a natural-born citizen, Gardner said. The man had filed a federal lawsuit asking a court to overturn that requirement.
Assistant Secretary of State Karen Ladd sent the man a letter the next day saying the office would not accept a filing for a person who is not a natural-born citizen.
“If the person admits it, then we can take you off the ballot,” Gardner said. “But if you don’t admit it, we don’t investigate. We don’t deal with Social Security or try to find out. We’ve never done that.”
The state Ballot Law Commission is charged with addressing challenges to a candidate’s eligibility, but the complaint that was filed by Taitz and backed by the state representatives alleged criminal activity, which is beyond the commission’s authority to decide, Gardner said.
Head said his office had received a request for a criminal investigation of Obama, “which we declined to do.” He said complaints about the qualifications of a sitting U.S. president should be handled by Congress, and the attorney general’s office would not be investigating questions about Obama’s eligibility.
Representatives at yesterday’s press conference repeatedly tried to distance themselves from the “birther” movement. They are “in no way making a consideration about where he was born,” Rappaport said - and described their concerns as constitutional and nonpartisan in nature.
But state Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley, who attended the event, disagreed with that characterization.
“There’s no legitimate Democrat certainly north of the Mason-Dixon Line that is involved in any way with this,” Buckley said.”
- Maddie Hanna can be reached at 369-3321 or mhanna@cmonitor.com.
Source:
III. Video: Press Conference with New Hampshire Representatives Regarding Obama Ballot Access Challenge and Fraud!-Posted on YouTube.com-By bikerbillnh-On January 3, 2012:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OR__vYime8
IV. BREAKING!!! Georgia Court to Hear Natural Born Citizen Case vs Obama!-Posted on The National Patriot-By Craig Andresen-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=3722
V. SHERIFF JOE TARGETED FOR OUSTER: ‘Faces ‘resign now’ campaign as Cold Case Posse prepares Obama eligibility report!’-Posted on WND.com-By Jerome R. Corsi-On January 3, 2012:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/sheriff-joe-targeted-for-ouster/
VI. Video: Arpaio Slaps Down Critics Who Tell Him to Step Down!-Posted on YouTube.com-By abc15com-On December 29, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a2Fz5513gg&feature=player_embedded#
Americans are waking up!
Thanks to WND’s un-wavering commitment and fortitude many Americans across the country are starting to wake up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.
Sources:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/video/atty-dr-herb-titus-obama-not-a-natural-born-citizen
Additionally, Several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.
Sources:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/superpac-founder-explains-mission-of-natural-born-citizen-pac
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-ballot-challenge-founder-interviewed-by-post-email
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/retired-marine-captain-files-obama-ballot-challenge-in-new-mexico
Word of Caution: Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.
So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide.
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
I KNOW THE TEA PARTY DOES NOT LIKE THE WAY IT WENT MITT A MODERT.
FINALLY! Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. will have her day in court! On Jan. 26, the court will hear two atty.s here in Georgia AND Dr. Taitz as they present evidence regarding Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot here for the 2012 election. Obamalinsky had filed a motion to dismiss, and the judge TURNED IT DOWN. For Orly's take on this, http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29976
For those of you who listened in on Tea Party Radio a few weeks ago, Dr. Taitz joined us on the program and this was one of the topics of discussion. Go to the link above for more detailed information from Dr. Taitz herself.
Tune in tomorrow, Wednesday, Jan. 4, for Tea Party Radio where we have as our featured guest conservative columnist Mychal Massie. He will be joining us @ 9 pm EST and we will be discussing his latest observations posted on World Net Daily, and his blog @ http://mychal-massie.com/premium/
With your continuing participation and voice, we can and will make a difference!
All the possessions we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly as a man must work to appreciate the value of life. Not only the value of his own life but that of others. Heaven alone knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if LIFE, LIBERTY and FREEDOM should not be highly rated.
What does God think about where we as a nation place the value of life, liberty (freedom) and the pursuit of happiness today?
From sea to shining sea as a nation we have been richly blessed by the Lord God Almighty. He has shown us many times that everything we have is provided by Him and that we are in control of none of it. Any time He wants he can take it all away. We are his people and yet we run from doing His will and seeking to bless Him.
Look back in history to the times the future of our nation was on the line. Times like the revolutionary war, the civil war, WWI and WWII, the great depression, the sixties, 9-11, Katrina, and the financial crash of ’08 we should ask ourselves why would God let this happen to his people. Why would He allow the Islamic wars today?
The answer is God is in control He uses these times of trials and tribulations to purify us. He is doing a good work in us to clarify, our view on life, our rules, our regulations and how we relate to one another. God controls our destiny, as a nation we can follow Him in faith as the founders did and receive His continued blessings. If we chose not to follow Him He has other options.
We cannot deny that we are a Christian nation as some would like. To do so is to invite the wrath of God, for it is in times of affliction that people will earnestly seek Jesus Christ. They must come to the point they realize that He is in control of everything; nothing is outside of His sovereignty.
If we seek Him as a nation He will guide us and give us strength to will and to work for His good pleasure and we will find in doing so that we are richly blessed and provided for in ways that do not fail.
The question is what more does God have to do to get our attention? What is next on the road traveled by the prodigal son that we seem to be following? What will it take to purify our collective conscience to the point that we seek to find acceptance in our father’s love? How low must we go to become humble and seek God's forgiveness and return from our evil ways? Must we return to the captivity of Egypt?
As a nation each crisis we face when viewed in the passage of time has served as a blessing to the nation as a whole drawing us closer as a people and closer to God. Our greatest leaders have come in difficult times when they have recognized their dependence on God.
Jesus Christ is the ultimate blessing and leader our heavenly father has bestowed upon us, GOD himself in human flesh, who came and died to take the punishment for our sins which bankrupt our souls and left us questioning why these disasters happen to us. All we have to do as a Nation is cry out to Him and admit our guilt and once again as history has shown, He will bless his people. His grace covers all.
Where do we place our faith? In our government, may it never be. Spending all that fiat money on old technologies like trains, obsolete power distribution systems, dysfunctional over crowded roadways, social security and a socialist medical insurance system, will not buy security. In GOD we trust is printed on the United States dollar for a reason. GOD is in charge of everything and we need not worry about tomorrow; for tomorrow will care for itself. We should place our faith in GOD.
We could be on the cusp of one of the most dramatic technological, social and environmental transformations ever undertaken. As a nation we are the envy of the world.
We have the opportunity to build entirely new information, manufacturing and transportation economies which will create a foundation not only for our country to build upon but which can also inspire the world to reach new heights.
Are we ready to lead the world? No. The pervasive dissolution of our culture due to the lack of moral principles will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the radical Muslim enemy who stands ready to fill the void.
Without common integrity and virtue, we appear to be ready to surrender our liberties to either the highest bidder or the most secretive invader.
We have totally forgotten that "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever."- Thomas Jefferson was correct!
Have we forgotten that the basis of our country is on the Bible, the perfect law, the law of Liberty?
The Word of God is the means of regeneration, a mirror reflecting man's defects, the ethical guide for Christian living, and the standard for judgment. The Law serves as a tutor to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. As such one should expect that when the Bible is rejected as a trusted source of wisdom and living principles all liberty will be lost. Because where there is no God there can be no freedom, liberty or constitutional law. When man becomes the ultimate authority, there is no respect for God or fellow man. Everyone acts on behalf of their own good thus secular Humanism, where man is god, becomes the religion of the land.
America, consider your ways, as a people you are looking for government to provide what God has withheld. As a nation we have turned our backs on Him and tried to be our own provider. Frustration and futility are the corrective disciplines of God.
Who is left among us who saw the country in its former glory? How do you see it now? Does it not seem to you like nothing in comparison?
Even in today's circumstances the Lord of hosts, says take courage and work for "I am with you;--- My Spirit is abiding in your midst; do not fear."
The Spirit of the Lord is with us when we follow Him in wholehearted obedience. We have the reassurance of the empowerment of the Spirit when we choose to work with Him on the building of His house here on earth.
We cannot provide a rebirth of individual virtue based on moral character, only God can stir up the spirit of the remnant of His people still living in the land.
Holiness characterizes the entire life of God's people- private, personal, public, cultural and as a nation.
The Spirit comes not only to renew human life from within but also this sanctifying renewal spreads to the full range of human activities and the society at large. There is no limit to the operation of the Holy Spirit!
Hence we should be humble and pray for the renewal of the Spirit in America for when we are unified in Spirit with God all things are possible through Him. Men are imperfect and power corrupts. It is only with humility before God that we learn to lead, and through knowledge of our ignorance that we learn to seek the truth.
God specifically says that "If My people who are called by My name humble them-selves and pray, and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." "but if you turn away and forsake My statutes and My commandments which I have set before you and shall go and serve other gods and worship them, then I will uproot you from My land which I have given you, -----and everyone who pasted by it will be astonished and say, Why has the Lord done thus to this land and to this house?" and They will say why have you despised the word of the Lord, the God of your fathers, by doing evil in His sight? Why have you removed yourself from God's blessings by totally disregarding His commands, even removing them from the court houses of your land?
Wither we choose to try and follow the Ten Commandments or totally remove them from our society God still has a purpose and a calling for this nation. Which one is it? That we should be known as a former Christian nation that was once the greatest nation on earth with intelligent strong and wealthy people until they turned their backs on God. Or, Could it not be that the purpose is that we live and witness and serve as a people of God reflecting the great spiritual heritage of our ancestors.
Be humble; let the rectitude of your intentions be made know with your declaration of independence from the laws of man knowing that you will stand before the judgment seat of God the Supreme Judge of the world. Join with our founding fathers, humble men who declared that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" as citizens of the United States of America we should work like the life of our country depends upon following the Ten Commandments, and pray continually for God's mercy. With a declaration of faith in Jesus Christ we are free from the laws of man but forever we shall remain under the simple laws of the God of all creation.
The 10 commandments come from Exodus 20:1-17. Here are the verses:
And God spoke all these words, saying: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.You shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself any carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.
You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your manservant, nor your maidservant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor’s.”
The above commandments need no explanation. They mean exactly what they say.
The awareness of the Ten Commandments in your heart, soul, mind and strength of your being will engineer a new way of life when you accept by faith that Jesus Christ was sent by GOD that your sins would be forgiven.
God knows what goes on inside our minds. He evaluates our intents and motivations. The internal aspects of our character count the most with Him. He considers our behavior in light of what is in our hearts. Our human Character is comprised of our innermost thoughts, motives and attitudes.
The heart of a nation is used to describe a nations character just as the heart of man is used to describe his character. Our nation is nothing more than a collection of individuals; it does not function on its own but rather reflects the character and morality of the men who are willing to accept the responsibility of leadership and the people who select them as leaders. If as a society we have no provision for teaching Godly character to our children we can expect more of the moral decay we see today. For, ultimately, liberalism in democracy acknowledges no limitation upon individual will except that which is imposed by individual conscience.
The whole obligation for realizing order in a democratic society rests upon the individual, specifically, upon individual conscience. Only conscience, belief in God, bids the individual to follow the dictates of reason rather than those of desire and unrestrained pleasure. Therefore, Conscience, the corner stone of individual character is the foundation upon which democracy exists. Ultimately the character and moral conscience of the individuals in our society determine the choice between order and anarchy.
Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story wondered if we could survive as a nation if we did not teach our children about religion and morality as restraints upon the liberal sensual desires of freemen. Well since June 25, l962, students are forbidden to do what they and their predecessors had been doing since the founding of our nation - publicly calling upon the name of the Lord at the beginning of each school day. The prayer which prompted the Engel vs. Vitale ruling had simply prayed: "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence on Thee and beg Thy blessing over us, our parents, our teachers and our nation." As a result of this decision which removed the Bible, prayer and any mention of God from our schools we have been brought to our knees. And that is where we should stay in prayer for our nation and our children’s future.
If we are going to emerge from our youthful indiscretions to become a nation of character the United States will have to provide for the re-introduction of the Bible into our schools as the text book for teaching morality to our heirs. The Bible’s teachings have brought us thus for and we must repair the cracks in our foundation if we are to survive as a nation. There is nothing more important than teaching our children and our citizens about the foundations of our God given Liberty.
Therefore we should all pray as everything depends on God the Father, Jesus Christ His son and the Holy Spirit for life and guidance. The Lord is the Spirit and where the Lord is, there is Liberty. Our nation’s founders knew that no man is perfect that only through God's grace do we have liberty!
My continued prayer as an individual and for my nation is break me, Lord, Until I am wholly yours and Renew your spirit within! For through you and to you are all things, and my sole desire is to bring you glory. Let your Spirit be my guide and our guide as a nation.
God Bless the United States of America, One Nation Under God Indivisible with Liberty and Justice for All. The sum total of the decisions we make as individuals represents who we are as a nation. When we stand together we all win.
The outcome of the ensuing conflagration is in the hands of God!
See my web site: http://theaveragejoeforpresident.com/ following is an Interview with the CW of New Hampshire:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgYvHLNhL6U
As Americans we must Be Humble.
In Christ,
Joe Story
12012 Flynn Road
Jacksonville, Florida 32223Phone 904-260-7791
theaveragejoeforpresident@gmail.com
http://theaveragejoeforpresident.com/
What’s wrong with this picture?
Posted on America’s Survival-By Cliff Kincaid-On December 28, 2011:
“A May 24 Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) Frontline program quoted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as saying he’d never had any contact with Bradley Manning and that he had no information indicating that the former Army intelligence analyst was the source of the classified U.S. intelligence information released by WikiLeaks.
On December 19, Frontline posted this follow-up information, “New Evidence of Assange-Manning Link,” and came clean in acknowledging that the new evidence in the case casts the statements by Assange in serious doubt:
{…}
“In an interview last April with Frontline correspondent Martin Smith, Julian Assange flatly denied that he’d ever had any contact with Bradley Manning, the young Army private accused of leaking half a million classified documents to Assange’s WikiLeaks. Asked about the implication in online conversations apparently between Manning and ex-hacker Adrian Lamo that Manning had gone around WikiLeaks’ normal protocols and established a personal relationship with Assange, Assange was adamant, even suggesting that Manning might have been inflating himself to others by claiming a relationship that did not exist. ‘We don’t have sources that we know about. And I had never heard the name Bradley Manning before. I never heard the name Bradass87 before.’”
Manning had used the name “Bradass87” in on-line chats and bragged about engineering “possibly the largest data spillage in American history.”
The new evidence in the case, disclosed in Manning’s preliminary hearing, established a direct connection between Assange and Manning. Frontline noted that Army digital forensics contractor Mark Johnson, testifying in Manning’s pretrial hearing, “says that he found communications between Manning and a chat user named ‘Julian Assange’ on Manning’s personal computer and a phone number for Assange in Iceland…”
The evidence puts Manning and Assange “in a precarious legal position,” Frontline now acknowledges. In effect, the evidence demonstrates that they were engaged in what amounts to a conspiracy to steal classified information from U.S. Army computers. This is espionage.
As such, Assange may have been lying about his contact with Manning in order to avoid implicating himself in a conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act. The WikiLeaks founder, an Australian and convicted computer hacker, is facing deportation from Britain to Sweden on sex crimes charges. He could eventually face deportation to the U.S., if he is ever indicted by the Obama/Holder Justice Department.
Meanwhile, more statements from Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul defending WikiLeaks, the recipient of the largest release of classified information in American history, are starting to get media attention. These appearances included:
- On the Fox Business Network Paul said, “This whole notion that Assange, who’s an Australian, that we want to prosecute him for treason. I mean, aren’t they jumping to a wild conclusion? This is media, isn’t it? I mean, why don’t we prosecute The New York Times or anybody that releases this?”
- On the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives he said, “Is there not a huge difference between releasing secret information to help the enemy in a time of declared war, which is treason, and the releasing of information to expose our government lies that promote secret wars, death and corruption?”
- Paul went on Twitter to declare that WikiLeaks was providing “truth.”
Referring to the Fox Business Channel appearance, Politico said that Paul was “taking a stand as one of Julian Assange’s few defenders in Washington, arguing that the WikiLeaks founder should get the same protections as the media.”
In contrast to Paul’s support for WikiLeaks, Assange, and Manning, whom Paul called a “hero” and “patriot,” both Democrats and Republicans have called for Assange to be prosecuted. More than a year ago, on December 2, 2010, U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Christopher (Kit) Bond (R-Mo.), vice chairman of the committee, sent a letter to Attorney General Holder requesting prosecution of Assange. They said the unauthorized release was “a serious breach of national security and could be used to severely harm the United States and its worldwide interests.”
{…}
The May 24 PBS program featured correspondent Martin Smith and was written and produced by Marcela Gaviria and Smith. It repeatedly tried to suggest, through interviews with Assange and “experts” like Eric Schmitt of the New York Times, that any direct connection between Assange and Manning was highly unlikely, if not impossible.
Schmitt said, “We don’t really know whether Manning approached WikiLeaks or people around WikiLeaks, or if it was the other way around. But my theory is whichever way it is, there’s an intermediary.”
Schmitt added, “I think Assange is savvy enough that he would have tried to avoid at all costs any direct contact with Bradley Manning, understanding that that could later lead to a much easier prosecution on the grounds of conspiracy to commit espionage.”
This, then, is why it was necessary to try to suggest some distance between Assange and Manning. Evidence of a direct connection would facilitate prosecution of Manning AND Assange on espionage charges.
Martin Smith of Frontline recognized the possibility, saying to Schmitt, “In other words, if WikiLeaks actively helped someone violate secrecy laws, Assange and his colleagues could be held criminally liable.”
“Assange says he designed WikiLeaks so that he wouldn’t even know who his sources were,” Smith reported, getting Assange off the hook.
Assange was brought back to say, “We do not know whether Mr. Manning is our source or not. And of course, if we did know, we are obligated ethically to not reveal it.”
It now looks like Assange wasn’t concerned with ethics but his own hide. He was trying to avoid or postpone an indictment on espionage charges.
Although some of the information released by WikiLeaks was seen as not harmful or just embarrassing to U.S. officials and U.S. allies, the controversial website also released classified information about U.S. counter-terrorism operations and the locations of facilities vital to national security and vulnerable to terrorist threat. Such disclosures clearly assisted the enemies of the United States, an official charge being leveled against Manning.
As PBS acknowledges, the new evidence released during his preliminary hearing was explosive in terms of establishing the link between Manning and Assange. Many different media organizations now acknowledge the strength of the government’s case.
As Wired put it, “a government digital forensic expert examining the computer of accused WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning retrieved communications between Manning and an online chat user identified on Manning’s computer as ‘Julian Assange’…Investigators also found an Icelandic phone number for Assange…” Manning’s computer also revealed a chat with a hacker located in the U.S. in which Manning said he was responsible for the leaking of an Apache helicopter video released by WikiLeaks in spring 2010, the publication said.
{…}
But there’s more. Wired added, “Assange’s name was attached to a chat handle ‘dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de’ listed in Manning’s buddy list in the Adium chat program on his computer. That Jabber address uses the same domain name allegedly mentioned by Manning in the chat logs that ex-hacker Adrian Lamo gave to the FBI and to Wired.com last year. In that earlier chat log, Manning was making reference to a domain that Assange was known to use.”
The publication added, “in Manning’s buddy list there was also a second handle, ‘pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de,’ which had two aliases associated with it: Julian Assange and Nathaniel Frank. CCC.de in the domain refers to the Chaos Computer Club, a hacker club in Germany that operates the Jabber server.”
{…}
The Daily Mail cited much of the same evidence and said, “He [Assange] has denied direct contact with Manning, but his lawyers believe the evidence produced in the military court would form an espionage conspiracy case against their client.”
Assange had counted on the international media to cover for him and treat WikiLeaks as a legitimate news organization, rather than the criminal enterprise it is. His cover is now blown and prominent news organizations which quoted him uncritically have egg all over their faces.
Columnist Doug Mataconi had been suspicious of Assange’s claims, noting, “Assange has always denied direct contact with Manning, although he has never revealed how the materials that Manning stole just happened to come into the possession of Wikileaks. These revelations appear to provide at least a clue on that last part, and suggest that Assange has been lying about his contact with Manning.”
As the New Yorker put it, “The new evidence is not only bad news for Manning, who will find out early next year what charges he will face if his court martial proceeds, but for Assange as well. In a separate federal investigation, the Justice Department is considering several offenses with which to charge Assange — including conspiracy and trafficking in stolen property.”
Not only is Assange under renewed scrutiny, but those media organizations which accepted and publicized his claims of non-involvement are facing questions as well. PBS is only one of them.
NBC News chief Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski produced a January 24, 2011, report which said:
“U.S. military officials tell NBC News that investigators have been unable to make any direct connection between a jailed army private suspected with leaking secret documents and Julian Assange, founder of the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.
“The officials say that while investigators have determined that Manning had allegedly unlawfully downloaded tens of thousands of documents onto his own computer and passed them to an unauthorized person, there is apparently no evidence he passed the files directly to Assange, or had any direct contact with the controversial WikiLeaks figure.”
Clearly, Miklaszewski’s “sources” were all wet and had no knowledge of the evidence against Manning.
{…}
However, Miklaszewski went on to quote Assange in his own defense: “Assange told MSNBC TV last month that WikiLeaks was unsure Army PFC Bradley Manning is the source for the classified documents appearing on his site. ‘That’s not how our technology works, that’s not how our organization works,’ Assange said. ‘I never heard of the name of Bradley Manning before it appeared in the media.’”
Assange told MSNBC that allegations that WikiLeaks had conspired with Manning were “absolute nonsense.”
The evidence, however, even impressed the Washington Post, for it ran a story under the headline, “Prosecutors say Manning collaborated with WikiLeaks’ Assange in stealing secret documents.” The story by Ellen Nakashima and Julie Tate said that military prosecutors had presented “new and detailed evidence” showing that Manning “collaborated” with Assange “in stealing more than 700,000 documents from classified computer systems and publishing them on the Internet.”
The story included these revealing paragraphs:
“In just over an hour of closing arguments at a pretrial hearing, the prosecutors disclosed three new excerpts of chat logs taken from Manning’s personal Macintosh laptop. In one, he allegedly asks Assange for help in figuring out a password. In another, he allegedly tells Assange ‘i’m throwing everything i’ve got on’ Guantanamo detainee reports ‘at you now’ and estimates the ‘upload is about 36 pct’ complete.
“To which Assange replied, according to the prosecutors’ PowerPoint presentation, ‘OK ... great.’”
While media organizations duped by Assange into thinking he had no contact with Manning now look like complete fools, Ron Paul’s defense of WikiLeaks and Assange is even more serious, considering his desire to be President and in possession of the state secrets of the United States.
Source:
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.28.11.html
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. How did Bradley Manning ever get control of 700,000 secret military files?-Posted on Western Journalism-By BREAKING NEWS-On January 2, 2012:
II. Hot Post: WikiLeaks’ Internal E-Mails Revealed: Show Intent To Bring Down The U.S. Government And Possible Connections to George Soros-Posted on NewsReal Blog-By JOSEPH KLEIN-On December 5, 2010:
III. Soros and WikiLeaks: Time To Investigate Their Connection-Posted on NewsReal Blog-By JOSEPH KLEIN-On December 2, 2010:
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/12/02/soros-and-wikileaks-time-to-investigate-their-connection/
Note: The following article and/or blog post reveals how the Main Stream Media is assisting President Obama and his minions to bring down capitalist America, as the propaganda machine of the neo-fascist Left-You Decide:
The Judas Media-Posted on Floyd Reports-Guest Writer-On April 27, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
Individuals and news organizations that leaked Wikileaks documents should be prosecuted!
Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
If you live in Iowa, please vote for me today. I am the other condidate. Here are some words to live by...."Do what is right, not what you think the high headquarters wants or what you think will make you look good."
Norman Schwarzkopf
What’s wrong with this picture?
Ron Paul’s Soros Defense Plan!
Posted on Soros Files-On January 2, 2012:
“It was recently observed that Ron Paul was to the left of Obama on national security and the best evidence for that statement can be found when one year ago Ron Paul joined forces with
Barney Frank on a proposal to gut national defense via a panel of experts, quite a few of whom were tied to
In July 2010, Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a Huffington Post article rolling out their Sustainable Defense Task Force. The Task Force “consisting of experts on military expenditures that span the ideological spectrum” would recommend a trillion dollars in defense cuts. The experts, however, didn’t quite “span the ideological spectrum” — more like float under it.
The panel of experts who would decide how to best gut national defense featured such independent thinkers as William D. Hartung of the New America Foundation. Hartung’s main expertise was appearing in “Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire.”
Then there was Lawrence J. Kolb of the Center for American Progress and Miriam Pemberton of the Institute for Policy Studies. If you want to know what the Center, the Foundation and the Institute all have in common, it’s Hungarian and smells like stale cabbage and the death of nations.
The rather creepy Institute for Policy Studies issued a paper proposing that Obama act as king and rule through executive orders. The New American Foundation is not only backed by Soros but has his son on its leadership council. The Center for American Progress is run by the co-chair of Obama’s transition team and is, for all intents and purposes, the think tank of the White House. All three are Soros funded.
But it doesn’t end there. Also on the panel was Christopher Hellman of the National Priorities Project (NPP). If you are wondering what the NPP is, it’s a think tank whose objective is to “influence national spending priorities.” And if you’re in the mood for a double, Miriam Pemberton is also on the board of the NPP. The man behind the curtain at NPP? None other than our favorite Hungarian James Bond villain.
Going further down the list there’s Winslow Wheeler of the Center for Defense Information (CDI). The CDI’s goal is to strengthen “national and international security through international cooperation [and] reduced reliance on unilateral military power to resolve conflict.” CDI operates under the aegis of the World Security Institute, which is apparently the least creepy name they could think of. Wheeler is a Counterpunch contributor, a site which even Stalinists think goes a bit too far. CDI gets money from the Open Society Institute (OSI) where the stench of death and stale cabbage never goes away.
Then there’s Charles Knight and Carl Conetta of the Project for Defense Alternatives, which appears to be a subset of the Commonwealth Institute. Of its board of directors, S.M. Miller is also the founder of United for a Fair Economy which enjoys generous support from a certain philanthropic chap who occasionally destroys economies for sport. Another member, Guy Molyneux, has also worked with OSI. A third board member, Richard Healey, was formerly director of the Institute for Policy Studies and is on the advisory board of the Center for Social Inclusion, founded by two OSI veterans.
If you think this can’t get any worse, meet Paul Kawika Martin of Peace Action (PA). You might know PA better by its old name, the “Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy” or just “SANE,” a Communist front group investigated by none other than Senator Thomas Dodd. PA has the same attitude toward American defense that burglars have toward alarm systems in other people’s homes. They don’t like them very much. And they have a “five year strategic plan” for the job.
Paul Kawika Martin travels around fighting progress on board The Rainbow Warrior and is also involved with Physicians for Social Responsibility. Martin has also collaborated with the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a front for the Iranian regime. I think you can guess by now who funds Physicians for Social Responsibility.
Also on the task force is Laicie Olson of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. The Center is actually a subset of the Council for a Livable World. Olson originally worked for Physicians for Social Responsibility.
Another task force member was Heather Hurlburt of the National Security Network (NSN). The NSN’s goals are to “build a strong progressive national security and counter conservative spin.” Its founder was part of Obama’s transition team and resigned to work for Janet Napolitano. Soros’s OSI helped fund NSN, and its Special Counsel was on the NSN Policy Committee.
If you’re tired of reading through all this, then here’s the summary. Of the Paul-Frank Task Force, 9 out of 14 members were linked to Soros’s organs. Two were affiliated with the Cato Institute. One is indeterminate.
Ron Paul proposed to put a bunch of Soros-funded think tank experts in charge of dismantling the US military. Think about that for a moment. Ron Paul supporters can see conspiracies in a glass of water; can they see anything wrong with this picture? Can they see anything wrong with having a man from a group that was investigated for its Communist ties in the driver’s seat on national defense?
The task force’s proposals included cutting nuclear deterrence; reducing the fleet by 57 ships, including two carriers; canceling the Joint Strike Fighter; “severely curtail missile defense” — and that is a direct quote from the report — retiring four Marine battalions; reducing the military by 200,000 personnel; cutting defense research spending by 50 billion over ten years; and increasing health care fees for members of the military.
Not only did Paul join forces with Barney Frank to slash military preparedness, but he ended up putting the experts of a foreign billionaire with global ambitions in charge of the project. And that was what he did as a congressman. Can anyone imagine what he would do as president?
But why would Ron Paul allow George Soros that much power and influence over America’s defense policy? There are a number of possibilities. There is the possibility that Ron Paul just didn’t know and didn’t bother to do his research. Which is not much of a recommendation for the job he’s running for. There’s another possibility that Ron Paul knew and didn’t care, that he had no objection to being part of a left-right alliance against the “American Empire” with Soros. But there’s also a third possibility.
During the previous election, Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI) ran an ad praising Ron Paul for his position against the war. AAEI was an umbrella group for MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, SEIU, Americans United For Change, the National Security Network and others in the progressive bestiary. A number of those beasties were Soros groups.
I’m not one to dabble in conspiracy theories, but when Soros pays for an ad praising you during the Republican primaries and then you put his experts in charge of America’s defense policy, then maybe some questions should be asked.”
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Source:
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/
Ron Paul Helps Obama Slash National Defense
In line with Obama chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel’s admonition that no crisis should go to waste, the Obama Administration is preparing to use the matter of massive debt and deficits to push for drastic cuts in our national U.S. military budget. The proposed cuts, which total $960 billion, could leave the U.S. as a second-rate military power.
Playing a critical role in the effort is Rep. Ron Paul, who is generally considered by his followers to be an opponent of Obama’s liberal agenda. His son Rand Paul is running for the Senate in Kentucky as a libertarian Republican who believes in a strong national defense.
Rep. Paul has called for a U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan and has joined with the far-left in Congress to urge reductions in funding for the war effort there. He calls the U.S. military effort to defeat Al Qaeda and the Taliban an “occupation” of the country and “an ill-advised quagmire with no end in sight.” He says the effort is too expensive and won’t be successful. “It is time to leave Afghanistan to the Afghans to sort out,” he says.
President Obama has already appointed a National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform to look at long-term budgetary trends and vote on a final report no later than December 1. The proposals are likely to include massive tax increases, some minor spending cuts in domestic spending programs, and major reductions to the U.S. national defense budget.
The plan is being presented by the media as a bipartisan effort to make “substantial cuts” to the national defense budget.
Under the “Sustainable Defense Task Force” plan advanced by the so-called “odd couple” of Reps. Ron Paul (R-Tx.) and Barney Frank (D-Ma.), the U.S. Navy would be cut to 230 combat ships (from a planned number of 313). Under President Reagan, the U.S. had come close to achieving a 600-ship Navy.
Other proposals include:
- Reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
- Slash spending on missile defense and space.
- Retire two Navy aircraft carriers and two naval air wings.
- Reduce F-35 fighter procurement by 220 aircraft.
- Cancel or delay the Joint Strike Fighter.
- End procurement of the MV-22 Osprey.
Rep. Frank, one of the most left-wing members of Congress, created the “Sustainable Defense Task Force” that came up with the cuts and worked in cooperation with Reps. Paul, Walter Jones (R-N.C.), and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). Their plan is designed to serve as a model for Obama’s proposed cuts.
The “left-right coalition” making up the membership of the group included people from the Center for American Progress and the Cato Institute, both of them funded by George Soros. Another member came from the pro-Marxist Institute for Policy Studies.
Its members included:
- Carl Conetta, Co-Director, Project on Defense Alternatives (Commonwealth Institute)
- Benjamin Friedman, Cato Institute
- William Hartung, New America Foundation
- Chris Hellman, National Priorities Project
- Heather Hurlburt, National Security Network
- John Isaacs, Executive Director, Council for a Livable World
- Charles Knight, Co-Director, Project on Defense Alternatives (Commonwealth Institute)
- Larry Korb, Center for American Progress
- Paul Martin, PeaceAction
- Laicie Olsen, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
- Prasannan Parthasarathi, Boston College
- Miriam Pemberton, Foreign Policy in Focus, Institute for Policy Studies
- Laura Peterson, Taxpayers for Common Sense
- Christopher Preble, Director of Foreign Policy Studies, Cato Institute
- Winslow Wheeler, Center for Defense Information.
The involvement of two officials of the libertarian Cato Institute confirms our fears about the influence of what we called the “Progressive Libertarians.”
These libertarians, sometimes mistakenly referred to as conservatives, have often collaborated with left-wing organizations and individuals, especially on cuts to national defense and on the liberal social agenda.
We noted, “The seeds of this strange collaboration of interests were planted decades ago, when the pro-Marxist Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) held a seminar under the title of ‘Left and Right,’ featuring Marcus Raskin of IPS and Karl Hess, then an IPS fellow. The speakers at this 1969 event included economist Murray Rothbard and Jeff Liebling, the latter identified as ‘former Youth for Goldwater’ and ‘SDS member.’ Hess, a former Barry Goldwater speechwriter who died in 1994, traveled easily between left and right.”
The Soros Connection:
A September 1970 IPS seminar on “U.S. Strategy in Asia” was organized by Earl C. Ravenal, then an IPS Associate Fellow, who would later join the Cato Institute as a distinguished senior fellow in foreign policy studies. A book featuring the proceedings of the event reveals the participation of Morton Halperin, then with the liberal Brookings Institution and now a top employee of George Soros.
We noted that Justin Logan of the Cato Institute had appeared on the Glenn Beck show along with another Cato scholar, Chris Edwards, who said that we should “pull back the foreign troops” and drastically reduce the U.S. defense budget. This will produce “higher security” for the U.S., he claimed.
Sounding like an anti-war progressive, Edwards charged that sinister arms manufacturers were pushing funding for unneeded weapons.
Obama had already cancelled the F-22 Raptor, the most advanced air superiority fighter in the U.S. inventory, at a time when the Russians are developing their own version of a fifth generation fighter.
The Cato Institute favored the Obama policy of killing the F-22.
On top of this cut, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates pledged on June 28 to cut $100 billion from the military budget over the next five years.
The left-wing IPS, a key component of the “progressive” coalition backing Obama, has been waging a campaign to have Obama veto more “unneeded weapons systems” and is urging the President to make the defense cuts “much deeper” than those already proposed.”
Source:
http://sorosfiles.com/soros/2012/01/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan.html
Note: The following eye opening article and/or blog post reveals a George Soros funded unincorporated association by the name of “Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)”, which was established in 1999 and consists of more than 50 private and public foundations that give a portion of their $27 billion in combined assets to leftist organizations that undermine the war on terror in several interrelated ways: (a) by characterizing the United States as an evil, militaristic, oppressive nation that exploits vulverable populations all over the globe; (b) by accusing the U.S. of having provoked, through its unjust policies and actions, the terror attacks against it, and consequently casting those attacks as self-defensive measures taken in response to American transgressions; (c) by depicting America's military and legislative actions against terror as unjustified, extreme, and immoral-You Decide:
Funding the War Against the War on Terror!-Posted on FrontPageMagazine.com-By: John Perazzo –On October 6, 2006:
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=2309
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts reveal that the president is an Alinskyite, so steeped in the ideology of the seminal community organizer that he became a top instructor in Alinskyite tactics for other up-and-coming fifth-column radicals, whose single, animating ambition is to overthrow the capitalist social order, which they claim to see as racist, corrupt, exploitative, imperialist, etc. He also frames national security as a distraction from his more important work socializing our economy and thus knows that as long as he is tepidly supportive of a military mission, even one that neither aims to achieve nor can possibly achieve victory over America’s enemies, conservatives will not only overlook the slights, but will anxiously commend him and help the New York Times take the lash to those who won’t-You Decide:
Alinsky Does Afghanistan! (Part I)-Posted on National Review Online- By Andrew C. McCarthy-On December 4, 2010:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228741/alinsky-does-afghanistan/andrew-c-mccarthy
Alinksy Does Afghanistan! (Part II)-Posted on National Review Online-By Andrew C. McCarthy-On June 23, 2011:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270378/alinksi-does-afghanistan-part-ii-andrew-c-mccarthy
Note: The following eye opening articles and/or blog posts reveal that President Obama can unilaterally use our military to protect ‘national interests’ and that he can also use our Armed Forces to push his and his minion’s progressive agenda-You Decide:
Panetta: Obama Can Unilaterally Use Military to Protect ‘National Interests’!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On June 13, 2011:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/panetta-obama-can-use-military-without-c
Podesta: Obama Can Use ‘Armed Forces’ To Push Progressive Agenda!-Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On November 18, 2010:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/podesta-obama-can-use-armed-forces-to-push-progressive-agenda/
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos reveal Leon Panetta’s Communist ties-You Decide:
Top spy points finger at Panetta friend!-Posted on America’s Surival-By Wes Vernon-On June 20, 2011:
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck06.20.2011.html
Media Blackout: CIA director accused of links to Communist spy contact—scandal ignored!-Posted on RenewAmerica-By Wes Vernon-On June 13, 2011:
Leon Panetta Praises Communist Party USA Member!-Posted on America’s Survival-By Cliff Kincaid-On June 13, 2011:
Leon Panetta’s U.S. Senator Armed Services Committee Confirmation Hearing On June 9, 2011:
http://armed-services.senate.gov/Webcasts/2011/06%20June/06-09-11%20Webcast.html
Obama’s CIA Director Linked to Spies Through Communist Party Figure!-Posted on TrevorLoudon.com-By Trevor-On June 8, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/the-military-pays-the-price-for-obama’s-agenda/
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/veterans-and-members-of-our-armed-forces-under-attack/
Treason in America: Move Over ‘Hanoi Jane’!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/16/treason-in-america-move-over-‘hanoi-jane’/
Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
DO NOT GUT NATIONAL DEFENSE ! WHEN EVERY ONE IS BUILDING
UP THERE DEFENSES !
What’s disturbing about this picture?
Posted on WND-On January 2, 2011:
“WASHINGTON – A radical jihadist group responsible for nearly 50 attacks on American soil is operating 35 terrorist training camps across the nation, but the U.S. government refuses to include the organization on the State Department’s list of foreign terrorists.
Jamaat ul-Fuqra, known in the U.S. as “Muslims of America,” has purchased or leased hundreds of acres of property – from New York to California – in which the leader, Sheikh Mubarak Gilani, boasts of conducting “the most advanced training courses in Islamic military warfare.”
In a recruitment video captured from Gilani’s “Soldiers of Allah,” he states in English: “We are fighting to destroy the enemy. We are dealing with evil at its roots and its roots are America.”
Though Gilani and his organization is suspected of committing assassinations and firebombings inside the U.S., and is also suspected of the beheading murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, the terrorist camps spread through the country continue to expand in numbers and population.
A documentary called “Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S.” provides compelling evidence of how “Muslims of America” operates with impunity inside the U.S. In the video, producers visited some camps, attempted to visit others and interviewed neighbors and local police officials. It also include excerpts of the “Muslims of America” recruitment video.
The recruitment video shows American converts to Islam being instructed in the operation of AK-47 rifles, rocket launchers and machine guns and C4 explosives. It provides instruction in how to kidnap Americans, kill them and how to conduct sabotage and subversive operations.
Jamaat ul-Fuqra’s attacks on American soil range from bombings to murder to plots to blow up U.S. landmarks. A 2006 Department of Justice report states Jamaat ul-Fuqra “has more than 35 suspected communes and more than 3,000 members spread across the United States, all in support of one goal: the purification of Islam through violence.” In 2005, the Department of Homeland Security predicted the group would continue to carry out attacks in the U.S.
“Act like you are his friend. Then kill him,” says Gilani in the recruitment video, explaining how to handle American “infidels.”
Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was attempting to interview Jamaat ul-Fuqra’s leader, Gilani, in 2002 when he was kidnapped and later beheaded. One year later, Iyman Faris, member of both Jamaat ul-Fuqra and al-Qaida, pleaded guilty in federal court to a plot to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge.
Gilani was at one time in Pakistani custody for the abduction of Pearl. Intelligence sources also suggest a link between Jamaat ul Fuqra and Richard Reid, the infamous “shoe bomber” who attempted to ignite explosives aboard a Paris-to-Miami passenger flight Dec. 22, 2001.
“What we are witnessing here is kind of a brand-new form of terrorism,” says FBI Special Agent Jody Weis in the documentary. “These home-grown terrorists can prove to be as dangerous as any known group, if not more so,”
As WND reported, a covert visit to a Jamaat ul-Fuqra encampment in upstate New York by the Northeast Intelligence Network found neighboring residents deeply concerned about military-style training taking place there but frustrated by the lack of attention from federal authorities.
{…}
“HOMEGROWN JIHAD” Trailer from John Eagle on Vimeo.
Muslims of the Americas Inc., a tax-exempt organization, has been directly linked by court documents to Jamaat ul-Fuqra. The organization operates communes of primarily black, American-born Muslims throughout the U.S. The investigation confirmed members commonly use aliases and intentional spelling variations of their names and routinely deny the existence of Jamaat ul-Fuqra.
The group openly recruits through various social service organizations in the U.S., including the prison system. Members live in compounds where they agree to abide by the laws of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, which are considered to be above local, state and federal authority.
U.S. authorities have probed the group for charges ranging from links to al-Qaida to laundering and funneling money into Pakistan for terrorist activities. The organization supports various terrorist groups operating in Pakistan and Kashmir, and Gilani himself is linked directly to Hamas and Hezbollah.
Gilani’s American headquarters is in Hancock, N.Y., where training is provided to recruits who are later sent to Pakistan for more jihadist paramilitary training, according to law enforcement authorities.
A Justice Department report to law enforcement agencies, prepared in 2006, provides a glimpse into how long Jamaat ul-Fuqra or “Muslims of America” has been operating inside the U.S.: “Over the past two decades, a terrorist group known as Jamaat ul-Fuqra, or ‘Community of the Impoverished,’ has been linked to multiple murders, bombings and various other felonies throughout the United States and Canada.”
Gilani’s “communes” are described by law enforcement as “classically structured terrorist cells.”
Seven of the compounds have been identified as training facilities: Marion, Alabama; Commerce, Georgia; Macon, Georgia; Talihina, Oklahoma; York County, South Carolina; Dover, Tennessee and Red House, Virginia. Other compounds are located in California, Colorado, Texas, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington, Michigan and West Virginia.
Source:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/381953/
Note: What follows are articles and/or blog posts and reports that revealed that there are numerous Muslim terrorist organizations and/or training camps that have been discovered inside our U.S. borders-You Decide:
Muslim Terrorist Training Camps in North America: “New report of radical, anti-U.S. Islamic centers confirms our 2004-05 findings”-Posted on Northeast Intelligence Network-By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director:
Stealth Jihad? Islamic training camps in the USA? (Updated)-By Brenda J. Elliott-Posted on RBO-On December 5, 2009:
http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/stealth-jihad-islamic-training-camps-in-the-usa/
Terror Training Camps On American Soil-Posted on HumanEvents.com-By Robert Spencer-On February 19, 2009:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30762
35 jihad training compounds on American soil-Posted on JihadWatch.org-By Robert-On February 9, 2009:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/02/35-jihad-training-compounds-on-american-soil.html
CRS Report for Congress (RL32223.pdf): “Foreign Terrorist Organizations”-Completed by Audrey Kurth Cronin, Specialist in Terrorism, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division and Huda Aden, Adam Frost, and Benjamin Jones, Research Associates, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division-On February 6, 2004:
http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32223.pdf
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos reveal President Obama’s ties to Muslims-You Decide:
Obama’s ineligibility: Muslim-leftist radical in the White House!-Posted on U.S. Justice Foundation-On September 14, 2011:
http://usjf.net/2011/09/obama’s-ineligibility-muslim-leftist-radical-in-the-white-house/
Video: Is Our President A Terrorist?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-fmtJ5kh-50#at=2334
Obama: Consistently Anti-American-Posted on Big Government-By Pamela Geller-On March 21, 2011:
http://biggovernment.com/pgeller/2011/03/21/obama-consistently-anti-american/
Obama to face Shariah court? ‘Cleric says president ‘must embrace Islam’ or be tried when Muslims take over U.S.’-Posted on WND.com-On February 27, 2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=268989
Obama’s Grandmother Prays for Conversion to Islam-Posted on Israel National News-By Maayana Miskin-On February 26, 2011:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/140852
Why Americans think president is Muslim: ‘Obama bears the lion’s share of the responsibility for any confusion’-Posted on WND.com-On August 20, 2010:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=193749
1-in-4 Americans Believe Obama is a Muslim; Here’s Why-Posted on ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-By Ben-On August 19, 2010:
Why Obama is a cultural Muslim-Posted on The Washington Times-By Jeffrey T. Kuhner-On July 8, 2010:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/8/why-obama-is-a-cultural-muslim/
“I am a Muslim” Obama Tells Egyptian Foreign Minister!-Posted on Atlas Shrugs-On June 12, 2010:-Posted on Atlas Shrugs-On June 12, 2010:
Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/12/look-who-ran-cover-for-obamas-islamic-background/
Video: Obama Must Convert To Islam, Or Else!-Posted on YouTube.com-By lnfideI-On Dec 5, 2008:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj29Df-fy5M&feature=related
Barack Obama’s Early Years as a Muslim!-Posted on DanielPipes.org-By Daniel Pipes-Updated on October 23, 2008:
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2008/08/bibliography-my-writings-on-barack-obamas
Obama Would Fail Security Clearance because of his many ties to extremist Islam!-Posted Philadelphia Bulletin-By Daniel Pipes-On October 21, 2008:
http://www.danielpipes.org/5983/obama-would-fail-security-clearance
Confirmed: Barack Obama Practiced Islam!-Posted on DanielPipes.org-By Daniel Pipes, FrontPageMagazine.com-On January 7, 2008:
http://www.danielpipes.org/5354/confirmed-barack-obama-practiced-islam
Video: Obama’s Middle East Ties!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rhmnBig4gc&feature=player_embedded#at=119
Question: What did President Obama mean by the following quote found in his second book “The Audacity of Hope” (Page 261)-You Decide:
“Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific reassurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
What follows are fact checks relating to this quote posted on Snopes, FactCheck and Politifact:
Snopes:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/ownwords.asp
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_write_that_he_would_stand.html
It is interesting to me that all these fact checks seemed to infer that President Obama was referring to Arabs and Pakistanis and not Muslims in the above quote, but my question to them is-aren’t there any Muslim Arabs or Pakistanis as noted in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world?
I hate to be so critical about President Obama, but, after approximately three years of him governing our country, my experience has been that he, his administration and allies have lied and deceived the American public non-stop since day one and as a result I am now extremely leery about anything they say or do and have an extremely difficult time believing anything that comes from them.
Note: What follows is a special report on the Illuminati Network that provides us with concrete evidence of a “New World Order & One World Government” agenda, to include the Islamic agenda-You Decide:
Illuminati Network!-Posted on Global Watch Special Report 2010:
http://www.globalreport2010.com/globalwatchspecialreport.pdf
Note: What follows is a web site that reveals a George Soros funded group titled “Arab American Institute (AAI)”, which is a self-described "nonpartisan" group, that was established in 1985 to promote "Arab American participation in the U.S. electoral system" and to advocate for the "domestic and policy concerns" of that demographic.
The AAI has developed a strong reputation for organizing "voter-education" campaigns and acting as a liaison between the Arab American community and the major national political parties. The AAI opposed the end of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’athist regime and opposes Israel’s security wall.
Also included is an excerpt from the booklet that reveals the historical background of Arabs and Muslims in the U.S. and Canada, along with revealing that communities of Arab Americans and American born Muslims are now dominated by advocacy organizations that rose to prominence in the 1980s and have assumed a particularly important role after 9/11. These groups are linked in the American Muslim Political Coordination Council (AMPCC), which was set up by the former American Muslim Alliance (AMA), since linked with the Muslim American Society (MAS), along with the American Muslim Council (AMC), the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), and Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC):
Arab American Institute (AAI)-Posted on DiscoverNetWorks.org:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6174
An Activist's Guide to Arab and Muslim Campus and Community Organizations in North America!-Posted on FrontPageMag.com-By: Stephen Schwartz-On May 26, 2003:
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtId=18058
Note: The following eye opening article and/or blog post reveals a George Soros funded unincorporated association by the name of “Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)”, which was established in 1999 and consists of more than 50 private and public foundations that give a portion of their $27 billion in combined assets to leftist organizations that undermine the war on terror in several interrelated ways, to include one that strives to eradicate America's national borders and institute a system of mass, unregulated migration into and out of the United States -- thereby rendering all distinctions between legal and illegal immigrants anachronistic, and making it much easier for aspiring terrorists to enter our country-You Decide:
Funding the War Against the War on Terror!-Posted on FrontPageMagazine.com-By: John Perazzo –On October 6, 2006:
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=2309
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Joint Terrorism Task Force Raid Militia Groups!
White House Quietly Courts Muslims in U.S.!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/white-house-quietly-courts-muslims-in-u-s/
Rising Muslim Hopes from Obama’s Outreach May Backfire!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/rising-muslim-hopes-from-obama’s-outreach-may-backfire/
Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?
The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!
FBI Escorts Known Hamas Operative Through Top-Secret National Counterterrorism Center!
Obama’s New OIC Envoy Defended Activist Who Aided Terrorist Group!
Are Intelligence Personnel Empowered to Employ Their Ingenuity and Resourcefulness to Connect The Dots?
Backsliding On National Security: The Immigration Connection:
Why Should Terrorists Be Given The Extraordinary Protections That You and I Have As American Citizens?
When Did the American People Elect Eric Holder Commander in Chief?
Obama and Holder’s Hidden Agenda!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/obama-and-holders-hidden-agenda/
Another Imminent Homeland & National Security Issue!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/another-imminent-homeland-national-security-issue/
Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!
It’s Getting Very Serious Now!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/
Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/is-president-obama-in-on-the-uprising-in-egypt/
Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/
Is U.S. Negotiating with the Taliban?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/is-u-s-negotiating-with-the-taliban/
Is Our Government Seriously Misreading Al-Qaida’s Operational Objectives?
High Level Pentagon Official Blames U.S. For Al-Qaeda Attacks!
Why is Obama Handing out Millions of Dollars to Terrorists?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/why-is-obama-handing-out-millions-of-dollars-to-terrorists/
Sen. Obama’s Radical Islamic Past and Ties To Terrorist Groups!
Did Saudis Buy Obama 2008 Election?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/did-saudis-buy-obama-2008-election/
What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/
What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?
Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/
Should Americans Fear Islam?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/
Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/islam’s-child-martyrs-in-america/
Spitting in the Face of Everyone Murdered on 9/11!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/spitting-in-the-face-of-everyone-murdered-on-911/
Drawing a Line in the Sand!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/drawing-a-line-in-the-sand/
What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/6951/
Muslim Brotherhood Declares War on America-Will America Notice!
Radical Movement’s Leader Forecasts America’s Demise!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/radical-movements-leader-forecasts-americas-demise/
Europe’s Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
MABY MITT WILL LET THE TEA PARTY PICK A V.P LETS HOPE SO.
JOBS OUT WEIGH ANY THING ELSE. DEMOCRATS ARE HOLDING THE WHOLE THING UP FOR VOTES, ITS THAT SIMPLE. THE DEMOCRATS THINK THEY KNOW MORE THAN THE PEOPLE OF THIS ONCE GREAT COUNTRY. ALL THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO DO IS SPEND DOLLARS WE DO NOT HAVE, BUT THEY KNOW MORE THAN US PEOPLE.LET THE PEOPLE RULE. FOR ONCE.
MR. RON PAUL IS A DANGEROUS THINKER !!!
Please vote for me today as the 'other' candidate. We must stop electing career politicians and millionaires. Elect someone who has struggled in this terrible economy, but has the ideas and courage to turn it around. Please see my Facebook page and 'Google' me. Let's end the "entitlement" mentality, the "nanny state" and political correctness. Let's call it like it is and change things for the better for EVERY citizen. No special interests, no lobbyists in my circle. Thank you for your consideration.
je souhaite une bonne année 2012 pour tous les américains qui aiment leurs pays.
LETS PRAY THAT THERE IS NO TROUBLE ANY PLACE, I GUESS THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN, OUR GOVERMENT RIGHT NOW IS VERY WEAK, WE NEED THE TEA PARTY WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TO NOW TAKE OVER. WIN ALL SENITE SEATS, SO WE HAVE IT ALL REPUBLICAN.
Six months ago, I returned home to discover a family had moved into my backyard storage shed. Displaying an incredible sense of entitlement and off the chain arrogance, the family refused to leave, arguing they were simply seeking a better life. Adding insult to injury, their TV, computers and etc were powered by an electrical cord plugged into the exterior outlet of my home.
Infuriated, I immediately sought help from law enforcement to remove the squatters from my property. After inquiring about the race of my intruders, law enforcement accused me of racism. Law enforcement declined to assist me. I yelled, “These people are breaking the law! What about my rights as a property owner?”
Law Enforcement scolded me, “Don't try to hide your racism behind the law!”
I returned home frustrated to witness more of the trespasser's family and friends setting up residency in my backyard. One invader brought an old piece of crap RV. My Home Owner's Association is fining me daily until its removal. There are tents and people living in an old Chevy station-wagon; all powered by a dangerous poor imitation of a MacGyver style electrical hookup into my power including a maze of electrical cords.
To stop further invasion, armed buddies volunteered to secure my fence, take turns keeping watch. Local media caught wind of my buddies sympathetic generous offer and branded them an angry racist mob of vigilantes. Law enforcement threatened my buddies with arrests if they intervened in any way.
With city elections only a few months away, the mayor showed up at my home with fruit baskets for the invaders. His honor assured the invaders that he supported their honorable pursuit of a better life 100% and would not tolerate the “racist” property owner (me), evicting them. After the thunderous applause subsided, the mayor's assistant made sure each invader filled out a voter registration form which he collected before the mayor and his entourage departed.
So, here I am. My monthly electric bill has tripled. Cited for code violations, I was forced to install more outlets and electrical power. My backyard landscape with my wife's prize-winning flower garden is now a mud-pit resembling a scene from the movie, “Woodstock”. Invaders now occupy every inch of our exterior property.
Local media continually write stories about what a cruel, heartless, evil and racist SOB I am for not providing food for my “guests” and adding them to my health insurance.
Upon returning home from school, we keep our kids in the house. Our neighborhood has become unsafe and in rapid decline; selling drugs and lord knows what illegal activities are taking place in our backyard.
The Home Owner's Association sent a petition to the city demanding they do something to stop the invasion spreading all over our community. In response, the city is suing us. The local media has joined the city in their effort to portray us as racists who are somehow breaking the law.
Unbelievably, to assist the invaders, the city has raised our taxes to provide by-lingual signage throughout our community, food, education and health care for our “guests”.
Please understand. Our history of swiftly coming to the aid of people in need around the world confirms that my neighbors and I are a charitable, generous and compassionate people. Thus, we wholeheartedly support anyone seeking a better life.
But, there is a right and wrong way of doing things. An illegal invasion is not the correct way. It is also immoral to send a message that it is acceptable to break our laws; a slap in the face to all who play by the rules.
What happened to “equal justice for all”? Law enforcement and government lending a deaf ear to lawbreakers for political reasons is the worse kind of corruption. Their motives are not about compassion, but rather securing potential new voters. Such a self-serving exploitation of power is shameful, despicable and ugly. How can my city, with a straight face, instruct kids to obey the law and not sell drugs when the city decides to enforce laws based on their agenda or the race of the offender?
Got to run, the Spot-O-Potty delivery guys have arrived. Yes, it is another expense, but it is worth it.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.
Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin.
Spokesperson for Tea Party Express
Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.
LloydMarcus.com
MABY MITT WILL PLACE A TEA PARTY SUPPORTER TO BE HIS VICE PRESIDENT, THAT WOULD BE NICE.
OORAH!!
Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On January 1, 2012:
“(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.
The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
The website of the New Hampshire House of Representatives provides the following history regarding its beginnings:
Although threatened with reprisals from the British Crown and a bitterly divided constituency, New Hampshire’s leaders set the course for self-government in January 1776. Determined to keep the government close to the people, our forefathers fixed the size of the House of Representatives as a direct ratio to the state’s population. The first House consisted of 87 members, each one representing 100 families. As time passed and the population increased, the number of Representatives grew, until there were 443. In 1942, a constitutional amendment limited the size of the House to 400 but not less than 375 members. As a result, the New Hampshire House is the largest state legislative body in the United States.
New Hampshire has the largest House of Representatives in the nation. The Concord Monitor has stated that New Hampshire has “the most localized representation of any state in the country.”
On November 15, 2011, Atty. Orly Taitz filed a complaint with the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission regarding the placing of Obama’s name on the state ballot, citing his use of a social security number not assigned to him as well as having presented two forged birth certificates as proof that he was born in Hawaii. Several state representatives joined the complaint, and citizens from around the country filed challenges as well. A U.S. Army reserve retired colonel has launched a campaign to prevent Obama’s name from being included on the New Hampshire ballot.
The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission responded to Taitz by holding a hearing on November 18, during which Taitz presented her case challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility, focusing on the crimes which she alleged he committed.
Although the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s office has disallowed candidates from running for the presidency due to foreign birthplaces in the recent past, the decision of the Ballot Law Commission was that because Obama completed the application and paid the requisite $1,000 fee, it could not prevent his name from appearing on the 2012 ballot.
Atty. Taitz has since stated that “massive election fraud” is occurring in New Hampshire because it appears that in 2008, boxes of ballots were left out on tables rather than locked in a vault, which Gardner admitted in a video to be a deviation from standard protocol.
Nine members of the New Hampshire House attended the hearing of the Ballot Law Commission, one of whom was Rep. Laurence Rappaport (R-Coos). Rappaport stated that there were nine representatives present at the Ballot Law Commission hearing and that some or all of them organized the press conference to be held on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.
We first asked him about his reaction to the outcome of the Ballot Law Commission hearing, he responded, “I was extremely disappointed.”
We then asked him about the investigation called for by Attorney General Michael Delaney regarding alleged misconduct on the part of some of the representatives at the Ballot Law Commission hearing. Rappaport’s response was, “There were two investigations. One was by the House Security, run by Randy Joyner, and he reported to the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General asked the State Police to investigate. Neither one of them contacted me, probably because although I was there, I never said anything. The results of the investigation, as I understand it, were that there were no threats made, and it was basically a non-event.”
Rappaport said that at the time we spoke with him on December 31, a statement to be made at the press conference was in second-draft format. Working on the statement with him are Reps. Lou and Carol Vita and Harry Accornero.
“What we really need to do is emphasize that Barack Obama was not eligible and is not eligible to become president. At the Ballot Law hearing, the Commission and the Assistant Secretary of State said publicly, under oath, on the record, that their authority was only to see that the paperwork was properly filled out and that the $1,000 fee was paid. If you go back a little farther, you find out that they had disqualified a man named Sal Mohamed and another named Abdul Hassan. There are letters, of which we have copies, signed by Karen Ladd, the Assistant Secretary of State. So we applied for a rehearing, which was denied, and we applied to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and last week they denied us a hearing. We can provide complete copies of all of these challenges.”
The Post & Email asked, “Were you surprised that your own state Supreme Court refused to hear your appeal?” and Rappaport responded, “Yes, I was surprised.” He stated that in the letter he received, having been one of the plaintiffs, no reason had been provided.
Rappaort described the purpose of the press conference:
Our biggest concern is that the public becomes aware of what’s going on. We think that the public does not understand, and it is our effort to try to enlighten them. I would cite three things: First of all, there was Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations, which gave the definition at the time of the Founders. Second, there was the case Minor v. Happersett from 1875, which established the definition of “natural born Citizen” as one who has two American-citizen parents. We have tons of evidence that Obama’s alleged father was not a citizen. He never held a green card and was never a resident alien. In fact, the truth is he was thrown out of the country.
Rappaport also cited Senate Resolution 511, passed in April 2008, which declared that John McCain was a natural born Citizen by virtue of having two U.S.-citizen parents, but that Obama was not held to the same standard, and he “didn’t know why.”
The Post & Email asked Rappaport, “Do you think that most of your constituents support what you are doing?” and he responded, “Yes. Obama is definitely not very popular in northern New Hampshire.” He stated that Coos County is the largest land mass in the state, has only about 30,000 residents, and was the reason he moved there. New Hampshire has a total of about 1,300,000 residents.
As to his reason for questioning Obama’s eligibility, Rappaport said, “We all swore an oath to two constitutions: the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution. I take my oath very seriously, and I feel that I’m required by that oath to do this. I feel very strongly about that. I’ve received a death threat on this go-around and a lot of letters from people who disagree with me. I’ve been called names, but I’ve never gotten a reasoned explanation, not one. I feel as if everyone is claiming ‘This is a settled matter, but I haven’t heard that.’”
We then asked him, “Do you believe the April 27, 2011 purported birth certificate being released to the public is what they’re considering the point which ‘settled’ it?” and he responded, “It didn’t come from him specifically; it came from the ‘White House.’ It is my opinion that not only is it a forgery, but it is a lousy forgery. I printed it from the White House website, and I was able to take it apart using Adobe Illustrator. There were something like 12 different layers. Through a process called ‘flattening,’ which puts all the layers together such that they can’t be separated, the layers should have been flattened, although a document expert could have still determined that it was a forgery.”
Rappaport stated that his background was in electrical engineering and that he “wrote computer software.” He said his skills include laying out a website, although he sometimes “hired other people” to do things beyond his skill level and is not a computer “expert.” Other New Hampshire representatives also have stated that they believe the image is a forgery.
The press conference is expected to last about 30 minutes, and New Hampshire media will be notified. “There’s no guarantee that any major media will cover it, but my biggest hope is that major media is finally waking up. When I was growing up, I read The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Back then, The Times, in particular, was a really good newspaper. What you read on the front page was news, and what you read on the Editorial page was opinion, and the two were not mixed. Today, the news is highly biased. I feel as if The New York Times and The Washington Post report on a story only if it’s something they agree with. If it’s something they don’t agree with, it doesn’t appear anywhere. If it’s something that they mostly agree with, then you’ll find it on page 40.”
Rappaport is 71 and serving his second term in the New Hampshire House. He stated that the organizers of the press conference would have preferred to have more time to plan, but the New Hampshire primary is fast approaching on January 10 and they want to inform the people of what they believe has transpired. The group will also invite the attorney general and all New Hampshire representatives. “My plan is to put out an announcement to all representatives inviting them to support us and to come,” he said.
Final details of the time and place will be released shortly.”
Source:
Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
I. Constitutional Justice Rally outside of the NH Statehouse at 10 AM On January 3, 2011!
http://nhcjr.blogspot.com/2011/12/constitutional-justice-rally-outside-of.html
II. Video: NH Ballot Law Commission Committed Election Fraud!-Posted on YouTube.com-By lmmortalDyad -On December 31, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTKHG2Miw-A
III. Video: Orly Taitz vs NH Ballot Law Commission Obama Birth!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TJCTV-On November 19, 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BUcyb5pmUKI
IV. Georgia Registered Voter Files Petition for Special Grand Jury to Investigate Secretary of State!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On December 29, 2011:
Note: My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/
Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial. Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
May you and your loved ones "Happy and Prosperous New Year."
God Bless the U.S.A.!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related
Semper Fi!
Jake
AMERICA IS A NATION OF LAWS ~ MR. OBAMA IS NOT ABOVE THE
THE LAW. MR. OBAMA HAS BEEN OFFICE NOW OVER THREE YEARS.
MOST PEOPLE KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING. IF HE IS TAKING OUR
MONEY OR SPENDING OUR MONEY, NOT FILLING HIS DUTIES AS
PRESIDENT. THEN HE SHOULD BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURTS.
IF FOUND GUILTY, SHOULD BE PUT OUT OF OFFICE . WHY ARE NOT THE GOOD PEOPLE IN OFFICE AND OUT OF OFFICE DOING THIS ????
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND ~
