Please Read Part 1:

Biden: I Don't Have Any of the Facts on Colorado, But We Definitely Need a Gun Ban (Part 1)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 22, 2021:

4063359777?profile=originalNote:  I believe that the disturbing information revealed on the following recent articles, podcasts and videos relates to and/or further supports the information contained in my above blog, along with my following blogs from the recent past-You Decide:


Biden Administration Asks the U.S. Supreme Court to Judicially Nullify the Right to Bear Arms

Biden Administration Asks the U.S. Supreme Court to Judicially Nullify the Right to Bear Arms!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On September 27, 2021:

On September 21, the Biden Administration filed an amicus brief in the pending U.S. Supreme Court case of New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, supporting New York’s draconian and unconstitutional restrictions on the right to bear firearms in public for self-defense.

This NRA-supported challenge to New York’s “may-issue” licensing scheme for public handgun carry will be the first Second Amendment challenge to a firearm law to be considered by the high court on the merits since 2010.

New York’s law presumptively denies the right to bear arms for self-defense unless a license applicant can demonstrate a special need for self-protection that distinguishes the person from the general population.

In practice, this means the rich and well-connected can get unrestricted carry licenses but ordinary people cannot, even if they actually face a greater risk of being violently victimized while going about their daily lives in public. The law effectively nullifies for most New Yorkers what the Supreme Court has already characterized as “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.”

New York’s “may-issue” scheme in fact gives authorities so much discretion that it has fostered a culture of corruption, particularly within the Licensing Division of the New York City Police Department (NYPD). There have been repeated scandals involving the NYPD Licensing Division’s application process, with “facilitators” offering gifts and bribes to licensing personnel to approve or expedite their clients’ applications. In some cases, this has resulted in the issuance of carry licenses to applicants with otherwise disqualifying criminal histories and in criminal convictions for NYPD officers. In other locales, licenses are issued by elected sheriffs, with preference given to political donors and supporters.

The entire point of the New York scheme is not simply or primarily to screen out applicants who fail to meet objective standards of responsible and law-abiding behavior. It is to give authorities complete control over who gets to exercise the right and who does not. This, of course, is wholly incompatible with the idea of a fundamental right, which exists, as the Supreme Court said in the Second Amendment context, “to take certain policy choices off the table.” If the starting point for a carry licensing scheme is presumptive denial, then there is no right at all, only a privilege administered to the favored few.

And this is absolutely fine for the Biden Administration, at least when it comes to the Second Amendment.

After all, as we’ve reported, Biden’s own son Hunter has the manifest privilege of violating with impunity various federal gun control laws the government brief insists are so necessary to protect public safety. This is in addition to his apparent immunity to other laws against things like drug possession and distribution, prostitution, and the list continues.

The government’s brief, filed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Justice, also gives complete vindication to the NRA’s opposition to now Attorney General Merrick Garland’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016, when he was a federal appellate judge. Anti-gun pundits had mocked that opposition at the time, falsely claiming there was no legal basis for it, even though Garland had voted to rehear a case that had ruled an outright ban on handgun possession violated the Second Amendment. Yet, as we had explained, the only plausible reason to support such a “do-over” was that the court had come to the wrong conclusion. Why repeat something already done correctly?

Now, as AG, Garland is advocating that the U.S. Supreme Court effectively remove the right to “bear arms” from the U.S. Constitution.  The administration’s brief additionally argues for what it calls a “reasonable regulation” standard for other types of gun control and for its implementation via “intermediate scrutiny.” Activist and anti-gun courts have used this standard to uphold not just may-issue licensing schemes but sweeping bans on some of America’s most popular types of firearms and magazines.

Fortunately, the United States Senate blocked Garland’s Supreme Court appointment in 2016. Thus, while his noxious view of the Second Amendment will still be put forth before the court, he at least won’t have the opportunity to cast a vote against the right to bear arms himself, as he undoubtedly would have.

While no outcome at the Supreme Court is ever guaranteed, Second Amendment advocates should if anything be in an even stronger position this time around than during the court’s prior visitations of the Second Amendment in 2008 and 2010.

And Merrick Garland --Barack Obama’s handpicked choice to replace the legendary Justice Antonin Scalia, author of the landmark Second Amendment opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller – will have to watch from the sidelines as just another lawyer.

Source Link:

4063359777?profile=originalNote:  I believe that the extremely disturbing information revealed on the above article from the recent past by NRA-LA relates to and is further supported by the following recent articles, podcasts and videos, along with my following blogs from the recent past-You Decide:


NYSRPA Case Exposes Biden’s Anti-Second Amendment Bias, Vindicates Opposition to Garland

NYSRPA Case Exposes Biden’s Anti-Second Amendment Bias, Vindicates Opposition to Garland!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On October 18, 2021:

Further evidence of Joe Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland’s contempt for the Second Amendment has emerged in recent weeks.

On September 21, the solicitor general of the U.S. (an office of the Department of Justice that reports to the Attorney General) filed a brief on behalf of the federal government supporting New York’s may-issue carry licensing regime in the U.S. Supreme Court case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. That same day, the solicitor general filed for leave to participate in oral arguments. The court granted this leave on October 12. Therefore, on the November 3, the American public will be treated to a verbal presentation of the Biden administration’s disdain for the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense outside the home.

New York’s may-issue carry licensing scheme requires applicants to demonstrate that “proper cause exists for the issuance” of a license, in addition to the standardized requirements attendant most carry permitting regimes (certification in firearm safety training, no serious criminal record, etc.). This structure grants unfettered discretion to government officials to determine who may bear a firearm outside the home for self-defense. In many parts of New York, the “proper cause” regime is used to effectively bar law-abiding individuals from exercising their rights.=

According to the Biden administration, New York’s discretionary approach to administering a Constitutional right “does not violate the Second Amendment.”

Rejecting the Court’s ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Biden administration’s brief noted, “A court should uphold an arms regulation if it is validated by text, history, and tradition or if it satisfies intermediate scrutiny.” Of course, the Heller decision did not contemplate a tiered-scrutiny analysis for Second Amendment cases.

Under tiered-scrutiny analysis, a government regulation that impacts a right is examined under one of three rubrics. The severity of the test depends on which right is impacted. Under the lowest tier, rational basis review, the government only needs to prove that the regulation has some rational connection to furthering a government interest. Intermediate scrutiny requires the government to show that a regulation furthers an important government interest in a manner related to that interest. Strict scrutiny requires a regulation to be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest.

The subjective nature of this mode of analysis enables judges to come to decisions that align with their preferred policy preferences rather than the law. This may be why Justice Antonin Scalia eschewed such an approach in Heller.

Moreover, in arguing that restrictions on the Second Amendment right should only face intermediate scrutiny, the Biden administration is making clear that it views the right to keep and bear arms as a second-class right. Under a tiered-scrutiny approach, regulations that implicate fundamental rights are reviewed with strict scrutiny.

Of course, the Biden administration’s entire argument should be irrelevant in light of Heller. As NYSRPA’s reply explained,

Heller held that the Second Amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.” 554 U.S. at 592. And it explained that the term “bear,” as used in the text, means to “wear” or to “carry … upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose … of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

In an interesting note, the Biden administration cited federal laws of dubious legitimacy in arguing to uphold New York’s law. The brief stated,

Federal law illustrates the types of regulations that legislatures may constitutionally adopt. Congress has disarmed felons and others who may be dangerous or irresponsible. It has forbidden the carrying of arms in sensitive places, such as courthouses and school zones. And it has extensively regulated commerce in arms. All those regulations pass constitutional muster.

First, whether or not extinguishing the Second Amendment rights of nonviolent felons, particularly given the modern ever-expanding categories of nonviolent felonies, is permissible government action is the topic of significant legal debate.

Second, the federal government’s purported authority to ban firearms in school zones is suspect at best. Those older than the clerks in the solicitor general’s office might recall the U.S. Supreme Court case U.S. v. Lopez (1995). In it, the federal government claimed that the Article I’s oft-abused Commerce Clause empowered the federal government to legislate to ban guns around all of the nation’s schools under the guise that it somehow related to commerce. The Court didn’t buy that nonsense, striking down the federal overreach.

The school zones language was later reenacted with a tacked-on reference to firearms that had travelled in interstate commerce. Assuming this Court would fall for Congress’s lame attempt to circumvent the Lopez ruling seems presumptuous.

The Biden administration’s characterization of the Second Amendment right as a second-class right should come as no surprise, as there is significant evidence Biden doesn’t accept that the amendment protects and individual right to keep and bear arms at all.

During a September 2019 “townhall” hosted by New Hampshire ABC affiliate WMUR, then-candidate Biden made clear that he does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms and that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Heller was incorrect.

During the event, Biden was asked, “Do you agree with the D.C. v. Heller decision in regards to protecting the individual right to bear arms that are in common use and which are utilized for lawful purposes?”

Biden responded in part, “If I were on the court I wouldn’t have made the same ruling. OK, that’s number one.”

Later, the noted resume padder and law school plagiarist boasted,

And I taught for years Constitutional law and separation of powers, I taught the Second Amendment. And the Second Amendment is not absolute. And we can argue, the fundamental argument is well regulated militia and all those things, I won’t get into that. I think that the fundamental argument is the reason that was given as a right because we needed to be able to muster people to deal with an enemy called Great Britain we were fighting in a war.

The Biden administration’s actions in the NYSRPA case have also vindicated NRA-ILA’s opposition to Garland’s 2016 nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. At that time, NRA-ILA explained, “a basic analysis of Merrick Garland’s judicial record shows that he does not respect our fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.” Labelled by partisan forces as a “smear” campaign, NRA-ILA’s considered analysis proved prescient.

NRA members and other gun rights supporters are encouraged learn more about what the Biden administration thinks of their Second Amendment rights by tuning into the oral arguments in the NRA-supported NYSRPA case on the U.S. Supreme Court’s website on November 3.

Source Link:

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks to reporters in New York City on Sept. 8, 2021. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Four States in Northeast US Sign Pact to Share Data on Guns!-Posted on The Epoch Times-By Zachary Stieber-On October 9, 2021:


Stay in Your Lane: Teachers Unions Lecture on Guns: Besides being completely inaccurate, gun control is not the purview of teachers unions!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Emmy Griffin-On October 11, 2021:

Biden Administration Asks the U.S. Supreme Court to Judicially Nullify the Right to Bear Arms

Anti-gunners Launch Campaign to Intimidate U.S. Supreme Court as Second Amendment Case Looms!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On October 11, 2021:

Pistols are offered for sale at Freddie Bear Sports in Tinley Park, Illinois, on Oct. 18, 2012. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Illinois Supreme Court Rules Unconstitutional Tax on Guns and Ammo!-Posted on The Epoch Times-By Lorenz Duchamps-On October 23, 2021:

Pennsylvania State Senator Pushes for Expansion of State’s Castle Doctrine

Pennsylvania State Senator Pushes for Expansion of State’s Castle Doctrine!-Posted on The New American-By James Murphy-On October 29, 2021:


New York’s Conceal Carry Restrictions Racist? Supreme Court to hear arguments against the Empire State’s anti-Second Amendment law!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Thomas Gallatin-On November 2, 2021:


SCOTUS Justice Kavanaugh Criticizes Placing 2A Rights at Police Discretion!-Posted on AWR Hawkins-On November 4, 2021:

Hand-wringing MSNBC op-ed warns of America’s ‘infatuation’ with guns!-Posted on Patriot News Alerts-By Jen Krausz-On November 7, 2021:

The Right to Bear Arms Gets Its Day in Court

The Right to Bear Arms Gets Its Day in Court!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On November 8, 2021:


Video: Mike Hammond of Gun Owners of America on Possible 2nd Amendment VIctory at the U.S. Supreme Court And Why The Kyle Rittenhouse Prosecutor Looks Like A Fool!-Posted on Brannon Howse Live-On November 8, 2021:

An ATF agent lifts crime scene tape outside the scene of two murders Thursday morning, Aug. 8, 2013, in DeSoto, Texas. Four people were killed at two different locations in South Dallas County and the suspected shooter is in police custody. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Establishment Media up in Arms over Missouri Law Nullifying Federal Gun Control!-Posted on AWR Hawkins-On November 8, 2021:


Feds pull trigger, collect records on 54 million U.S. gun owners: 2nd Amendment supporters warn feds are creating a 'national database!'-Posted on WND-By Bob Unruh-On November 8, 2021:

Out-of-Business Dealer Records Prompt Concerns of Backdoor Gun Registry

Out-of-Business Dealer Records Prompt Concerns of Backdoor Gun Registry!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On November 16, 2021:

Remington Firearms Becomes Latest Manufacturer to Flee an Anti-Gun State to Warmer Business Climate in the South!-Posted on Craig Bannister-On November 10, 2021:

That’s Not How Research Works

That’s Not How Research Works!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On November 16, 2021:

Crime, Biden Drive Down Americans’ Demand for Stricter Gun Laws

Crime, Biden Drive Down Americans’ Demand for Stricter Gun Laws!-Posted on The New American-By Bob Adelmann-On November 17, 2021:

The Common Denominator

The Common Denominator!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On January 10, 2022:

What You Need to Know about ATF’s New eForms System

What You Need to Know about ATF’s New eForms System!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On January 10, 2022:


More Guns = More Self-Defense: Americans legally bought more than 18 million firearms last year, and they’ve been putting those purchases to good use!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Douglas Andrews-On January 14, 2022: 

Did Joe Finally Admit His Anti-Gun Agenda’s True Goal

Did Joe Finally Admit His Anti-Gun Agenda’s True Goal!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On January 24, 2022:

Lisa Caso sells guns at Caso's Gun-A-Rama store in Jersey City, N.J., on March 25, 2021.  (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

25 States Urge Supreme Court to Strike Down Maryland’s Far-Reaching Gun Ban!-Posted on The Epoch Times-By Matthew Vadum-On January 30, 2022:

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) holds a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 5, 2021. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Schumer Announces $1.5 Billion Push for Interstate Gun Task Force!-Posted on The Epoch Times-By Jack Phillips-On January 31, 2022:

ATF Reveals It Has a National Gun Registry Already in Place

ATF Reveals It Has a National Gun Registry Already in Place!-Posted on The New
American-By Bob Adelmann-On February 1, 2022:

Gun Control is Dead! Ghost Gunner 3 Makes 0% Receivers In Your Home — SHOT Show 2022!-Posted on Guns America-By Levi Sim-On February 1, 2022:


Joe Biden, Super Hero Crime Fighter? Surging violence is the direct result of Democrat urban politics and policies, not a “gun problem!”-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Mark Alexander-On February 4, 2022:







Biden Calls America’s Most Popular Handgun A Weapon Of War During Gun Control Speech!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Brianna Lyman, Reporter-On February 3, 2022:

Mayor Plans to Seize Guns of Citizens Who Haven't Paid 'Fee' to Exercise Their 2nd Amendment Rights!-Posted on The Western Journal-By Jack Davis-On February 6, 2022:

Growing ATF Database Prompts Fears of Gun Registry

Growing ATF Database Prompts Fears of Gun Registry!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On February 7, 2022:

Biden Supports “Curtailing Rights”

Biden Supports “Curtailing Rights!”-Posted on NRA-ILA-On February 7, 2022: 

The advantage of being armed!-Posted on Bob Livingston-On February 7, 2022:

This February 4, 2013 photo illustration in Manassas, Virginia, shows a Colt AR-15 semi-automatic rifle a Colt .45 semi-auto handgun and a Walther PK380 semi-auto handgun and a copy of the US Constitution on top of the American flag. US President Barack Obama Monday heaped pressure on Congress for action …

Los Angeles County DA Asks Credit Card Companies to Halt Gun Kit Purchases!-Posted on AWR Hawkins-On February 9, 2022:

Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Beto O'Rourke speaks with members of the press at a campaign rally on November 16, 2021 in San Antonio, Texas. O'Rourke drew a large crowd at his first campaign event since announcing his candidacy on Monday, November 15, for what could be a closely watched 2022 …

Beto O’Rourke Pivots: ‘I’m Not Interested in Taking Anything from Anyone!’-Posted on AWR Hawkins-On February 9, 2022:


11 Examples of Defensive Gun Use Highlight Importance of Second Amendment in New Year!-Posted on The Daily Signal-By Amy Swearer / @AmySwearer / Abby Kassal-On February 7, 2022:

New Mexico: House Committee Tables HB 9, Gun Owner Liability Bill; Session Ends This Coming Week!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On February 12, 2022:

Parents leave a staging area after being reunited with their children following a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., on Dec. 14, 2012. (Jessica Hill/AP Photo)

Remington Reaches $73 Million Settlement With Sandy Hook Parents!-Posted on The Epoch Times-By Zachary Stieber-On February 15, 2022:


Remington’s $73M Settlement Sets Bad Precedent: In paying victims’ families for the Sandy Hook massacre, the liability door is opened wide!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Nate Jackson-On February 16, 2022:


The Gun Registry That Isn’t — At Least Not Yet: When “fact-checkers” are put on the case, you may not be far from the truth!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Michael Swartz-On February 16, 2022:


Biden DOJ Sues Missouri on Gun Rights Law: The Show Me State isn’t inclined to let the federal government encroach upon its citizens’ right to keep and bear arms!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Douglas Andrews-On February 21, 2022:

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey speaks at a news conference in Beauregard, Ala., on March 4, 2019. (Vasha Hunt/AP Photo)

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey Signs Bill to Eliminate Permit Requirement for Carrying Pistols!-Posted on The Epoch Times-By Allen Zhong-On March 12, 2022:

Omnibus Spending Bill Contains Anti-gun Measures

Omnibus Spending Bill Contains Anti-gun Measures!-Posted on The New American-By  Bob Adelmann-On March 14, 2022:

Arms Rights Round-Up!-Posted on Sidney Secular-On March 18, 2022:

Democratic Administrations Flip-Flop-Flip on Gun Dealer Licensing

Democratic Administrations Flip-Flop-Flip on Gun Dealer Licensing!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On March 21, 2022:

Federal Appropriations: Pro-Gun Language Restored

Federal Appropriations: Pro-Gun Language Restored!-Posted on NRA-ILA-On March 21, 2022:

American Constitutional Rights Union

Video: Muster with Allen West: The Biden Administration's Assault on the Second Amendment!-Posted on American Constitutional Rights Union-On April 14, 2023:

4063359777?profile=originalMy Blogs:


Image: Civil war is coming, and the COLLAPSE is imminent… here’s how to maintain your sanity as it all comes down

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 104D)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 4, 2020:


Letter to NM Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Re: NM Soros-Backed Secretary of State allegedly used illegal software to combine election results thereby breaking several state and local laws!)(Part 10)-Posted on Patriot Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 14, 2023:


Letter to Our NM Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Re: Newly Proposed Gun Control Measures)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 19, 2019:


Billionaire Leftists Attack Your Gun Rights!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 28, 2014: 








Brainwashed the DocuMovie Part One (Part 89)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-March 31, 2022:


Brainwashed the DocuMovie Part One!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 17, 2021:

God Bless-Take care and stay safe.


Semper Fi!


E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center


    "I don't have any facts on Biden but we need a Dem-Ban."
This reply was deleted.