Muslims are not what is wrong with Islam. This is what has been nearly impossible to communicate to most Liberals today. The problem with Islam is the Prophet Muhammad. According to Islamic scripture, in other words, what mainstream Muslims are taught to believe, the Prophet Muhammad was a slave owner, a rapist, committed mass murder, hated Jews with a passion, wanted homosexuals punished, killed his critics, stripped women of all rights and had sex with a nine year old girl, whom he married when she was six, named Aisha.
If the Prophet Muhammad was a Republican Senator from Kentucky, Liberals would oppose him vehemently. But as I have stated before, within the Liberal mind there seems to be a perceptive disability. When I say “Islam” they hear “Muslim”. Such is the nature of the Collectivist mind.
But Muslims are a symptom and not the source of the problem. The problem is the Prophet Muhammad. If he were alive today, Amnesty International would certainly have a problem with his followers obeying his laws, which demand that certain people have their limbs amputated and their nose cut off. The Democrats would have him in their crosshairs as being at the forefront on the “war against women”. The New York Times would certainly seek to expose him and any whistle blower in his ranks would be celebrated as the next Julian Assange.
The Huffington Post and Daily Kos would be collecting signatures, to demand that our government do something to stop him. Media Matters would be reprinting all of the outrageous things he said, such as “I have become victorious through terror”.
Michael Moore would probably follow the Prophet around, trying to trick him into a “gotcha” question, then win an Academy Award for his latest documentary, “Muhammad and Me”. The poster would feature Michael Moore gloating in his baseball cap, next to a cut out of the Prophet – and then of course he would be executed, because of the depiction of the Prophet.
Gloria Allred would be representing all of the women whom the Prophet Muhammad took as sex slaves. Every major women’s rights group in America would send out mailers, asking for donations to stop the Prophet Muhammad from instructing his followers to rape his enemies, as an act of war. Rachel Maddow would have a field day, every day, with this story – and rightfully so. Organizations for the rights of women would have an issue with the Prophet Muhammad, were he alive today.
CNN’s Anderson Cooper would profile the Prophet Muhammad in his “Keeping Them Honest” segment of his highly rated show, because of all the contradictions in Muhammad’s best seller, the Holy Quran (look up “Abrogation”). Cat Stevens would be held in Guantanamo Bay for aiding an enemy of the United States, since he is a follower of the Prophet and Muhammad says that no government is legitimate, unless it follows the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. And he would be likely be sharing a bunk with Representative Keith Ellison.
The ADL would have an issue with the Prophet Muhammad stating that Jews are all apes and pigs (see Suras 2:65, 5:60, and 7:166), rather than trying to protect the rights of Islam’s female followers to wear black sheets over their bodies, as the Prophet’s laws command. If someone were alive today, calling Jews apes and pigs, while having 1.6 billion followers, the ADL would have something to say about it.
The Daily Show would have more fun mocking the Prophet than taking pot shots at Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck. Bill Maher and Sean Hannity would ironically be sharing a Nobel Peace Prize for their brave and pioneering work, in exposing the war crimes of the Prophet Muhammad. No one would be drawing parallels between the persecuted yet devout followers of Muhammad and the Holocaust, if the Prophet Muhammad were conducting his mass genocide of infidels today (see Quran 9:5).
Gay rights groups would be a little concerned about the Mormon Church, but totally freaked out about anyone who follows the laws of the Prophet, known as the Sharia, because Sharia Law calls for homosexuals to be severely punished. Every cult awareness website and organization out there would put out an alert, since the penalty for leaving the Prophet’s religion is death.
After the Prophet Muhammad beheaded an entire tribe of Jews, possibly no one would have a problem with waterboarding anyone who knew where to find him. The Prophet Muhammad had several wives, but the one named Safiyya became his wife after he tortured and killed her father, her brothers, the men in her tribe, told his fighters to take the women of that tribe as sex slaves and then raped Safia that night. Anyone who had a problem with that, which would be anyone in their right mind, would not be called a “bigot”.
Given that the Prophet Muhammad advocated slavery and owned slaves, it would be unlikely that any African Americans would follow him. Louis Farrakhan’s speeches would end up on a blooper reel, right next to Malcom X and of course the champion of human rights, Ben Affleck.
The young multibillionaire owner of the world’s largest social network would not be able to quietly obey the blasphemy laws of the Prophet Muhammad, were he alive today. But the Prophet is said to have been told about his impending death by the Angel Gabriel. He was said to have been given a choice between being a great king on Earth and going to meet Allah. Apparently he chose not to remain immortal. However, if we compare the body counts of Pol Pot, Hitler and Chairman Mao against the 270 million people killed in the name of the Prophet Muhammad, I guess you can say he has become immortal after all.
Anyway, that young multibillionaire is named Mark Zuckerberg and his social network is called Facebook. At the time this article was written, there are an estimated 1.2 billion Facebook members and the average time a member spends on Facebook is 55 minutes a day. So, whatever policy Facebook decides to adopt is kind of a big deal – in some ways it has more of an impact than what the United Nations decides.
Currently the United Nations has approximately 57 nations which make up what is called the OIC, or the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The OIC is trying to make it an international law that criticizing the Prophet Muhammad become illegal. Vice President of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, here in the United States, Syrian immigrant Abdou Kattih, said he supports such a law. But the OIC are lightweights compared to the power of Facebook. There is an argument to be made that the world went inside the internet and became the world.
Today as I write this, there have been about 25,000 acts of terrorism committed, just since 9/11 alone, in the name of the Prophet Muhammad. That is several per day – approximately 2 million people actually. But you can’t say that on Facebook. A new Facebook educational page went up this morning, called “Exposing the Prophet Muhammad” and was taken down, hours later, as it violates Facebook’s policy concerning anything that offends the followers of the Prophet Muhammad.
What did that Facebook page post that was so offensive? It posted a video that referenced all of the Islamic scripture that tells the story of how Muhammad took Aisha as his wife when she was six years old and consummated their marriage when she was nine. Oh, and it referenced the Islamic law that states that anyone drawing a picture of the Prophet be killed.
What does this mean for you and me? It means that in the Information Age, the most powerful force on the internet has agreed to follow the blasphemy laws of the Prophet Muhammad. Islamic Law is also called “Sharia”. Do you still think the Sharia scare is some crazy Right Wing conspiracy theory?
Eric Allen Bell is a writer, filmmaker and Media Adviser living in Los Angeles, California. While making a documentary about the construction of a 53,000 square foot mega mosque in Murfreesboro, TN he attempted to expose “Islamophobia”. Once he stated that Islam was the biggest threat to human rights in the world today, he was banned from the writing for Daily Kos and MichaelMoore.com, after LoonWatch.com created a petition to silence him. His article, “The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam” has been widely circulated and has caused several Liberals to rethink how they look at the Religion of Peace.
Muslims are not what is wrong with Islam. This is what has been nearly impossible to communicate to most Liberals today. The problem with Islam is the Prophet Muhammad. According to Islamic scripture, in other words, what mainstream Muslims are taught to believe, the Prophet Muhammad was a slave owner, a rapist, committed mass murder, hated Jews with a passion, wanted homosexuals punished, killed his critics, stripped women of all rights and had sex with a nine year old girl, whom he married when she was six, named Aisha.
If the Prophet Muhammad was a Republican Senator from Kentucky, Liberals would oppose him vehemently. But as I have stated before, within the Liberal mind there seems to be a perceptive disability. When I say “Islam” they hear “Muslim”. Such is the nature of the Collectivist mind.
But Muslims are a symptom and not the source of the problem. The problem is the Prophet Muhammad. If he were alive today, Amnesty International would certainly have a problem with his followers obeying his laws, which demand that certain people have their limbs amputated and their nose cut off. The Democrats would have him in their cross hairs as being at the forefront on the “war against women”. The New York Times would certainly seek to expose him and any whistle blower in his ranks would be celebrated as the next Julian Assange.
The Huffington Post and Daily Kos would be collecting signatures, to demand that our government do something to stop him. Media Matters would be reprinting all of the outrageous things he said, such as “I have become victorious through terror”.
Michael Moore would probably follow the Prophet around, trying to trick him into a “gotcha” question, then win an Academy Award for his latest documentary, “Muhammad and Me”. The poster would feature Michael Moore gloating in his baseball cap, next to a cut out of the Prophet – and then of course he would be executed, because of the depiction of the Prophet.
Gloria Allred would be representing all of the women whom the Prophet Muhammad took as sex slaves. Every major women’s rights group in America would send out mailers, asking for donations to stop the Prophet Muhammad from instructing his followers to rape his enemies, as an act of war. Rachel Maddow would have a field day, every day, with this story – and rightfully so. Organizations for the rights of women would have an issue with the Prophet Muhammad, were he alive today.
CNN’s Anderson Cooper would profile the Prophet Muhammad in his “Keeping Them Honest” segment of his highly rated show, because of all the contradictions in Muhammad’s best seller, the Holy Quran (look up “Abrogation”).
Cat Stevens would be held in Guantanamo Bay for aiding an enemy of the United States, since he is a follower of the Prophet and Muhammad says that no government is legitimate, unless it follows the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. And he would be likely be sharing a bunk with Representative Keith Ellison.
The ADL would have an issue with the Prophet Muhammad stating that Jews are all apes and pigs (see Suras 2:65, 5:60, and 7:166), rather than trying to protect the rights of Islam’s female followers to wear black sheets over their bodies, as the Prophet’s laws command. If someone were alive today, calling Jews apes and pigs, while having 1.6 billion followers, the ADL would have something to say about it.
The Daily Show would have more fun mocking the Prophet than taking pot shots at Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck. Bill Maher and Sean Hannity would ironically be sharing a Nobel Peace Prize for their brave and pioneering work, in exposing the war crimes of the Prophet Muhammad. No one would be drawing parallels between the persecuted yet devout followers of Muhammad and the Holocaust, if the Prophet Muhammad were conducting his mass genocide of infidels today (see Quran 9:5).
Gay rights groups would be a little concerned about the Mormon Church, but totally freaked out about anyone who follows the laws of the Prophet, known as the Sharia, because Sharia Law calls for homosexuals to be severely punished. Every cult awareness website and organization out there would put out an alert, since the penalty for leaving the Prophet’s religion is death.
After the Prophet Muhammad beheaded an entire tribe of Jews, possibly no one would have a problem with waterboarding anyone who knew where to find him. The Prophet Muhammad had several wives, but the one named Safiyya became his wife after he tortured and killed her father, her brothers, the men in her tribe, told his fighters to take the women of that tribe as sex slaves and then raped Safiyya that night. Anyone who had a problem with that, which would be anyone in their right mind, would not be called a “bigot”.
Given that the Prophet Muhammad advocated slavery and owned slaves, it would be unlikely that any African Americans would follow him. Louis Farrakhan’s speeches would end up on a blooper reel, right next to Malcom X and of course the champion of human rights, Ben Affleck.
The young multibillionaire owner of the world’s largest social network would not be able to quietly obey the blasphemy laws of the Prophet Muhammad, were he alive today. But the Prophet is said to have been told about his impending death by the Angel Gabriel. He was said to have been given a choice between being a great king on Earth and going to meet Allah. Apparently he chose not to remain immortal. However, if we compare the body counts of Pol Pot, Hitler and Chairman Mao against the 270 million people killed in the name of the Prophet Muhammad, I guess you can say he has become immortal after all.
Anyway, that young multibillionaire is named Mark Zuckerberg and his social network is called Facebook. At the time this article was written, there are an estimated 1.2 billion Facebook members and the average time a member spends on Facebook is 55 minutes a day. So, whatever policy Facebook decides to adopt is kind of a big deal – in some ways it has more of an impact on what the United Nations decides.
Currently the United Nations has approximately 57 nations which make up what is called the OIC, or the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The OIC is trying to make it an international law that criticizing the Prophet Muhammad become illegal. Vice President of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, here in the United States, Syrian immigrant Abdou Kattih, said he supports such a law. But the OIC are lightweights compared to the power of Facebook. There is an argument to be made that the world went inside the internet and became the world.
Today as I write this, there have been about 25,000 acts of terrorism committed, just since 9/11 alone, in the name of the Prophet Muhammad. That is several per day – approximately 2 million people actually. But you can’t say that on Facebook. A new Facebook educational page went up this morning, called “Exposing the Prophet Muhammad” and was taken down, hours later, as it violates Facebook’s policy concerning anything that offends the followers of the Prophet Muhammad.
What did that Facebook page post that was so offensive? It posted a video that referenced all of the Islamic scripture that tells the story of how Muhammad took Aisha as his wife when she was six years old and consummated their marriage when she was nine. Oh, and it referenced the Islamic law that states that anyone drawing a picture of the Prophet be killed.
What does this mean for you and me? It means that in the Information Age, the most powerful force on the internet has agreed to follow the blasphemy laws of the Prophet Muhammad. Islamic Law is also called “Sharia”. Do you still think the Sharia scare is some crazy Right Wing conspiracy theory?
Eric Allen Bell is a writer, filmmaker and Media Adviser living in Los Angeles, California. While making a documentary about the construction of a 53,000 square foot mega mosque in Murfreesboro, TN he attempted to expose “Islamophobia”. Once he stated that Islam was the biggest threat to human rights in the world today, he was banned from the writing for Daily Kos and MichaelMoore.com, after LoonWatch.com created a petition to silence him. His article, “The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam” has been widely circulated and has caused several Liberals to rethink how they look at the Religion of Peace.
PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO REPRINT THIS IN ITS ENTIRETY UNALTERED
THE TIME HAS COME TO CLOSE ALL MOSQUES IN AMERICA. WHY? A mosque is place where the Sharia is taught. Sharia is brutal and sadistic and runs counter to human rights. A mosque is a place where sedition and treason are taught, and this runs counter to the preservation of American values and ideals. A mosque is a place where superstition is taught, and this runs counter to reason and rational thinking. A mosque is a place where Islam, meaning "submission" is taught. And submission runs counter to Liberty. Liberty means that you own you. Liberty is one of the founding principles upon which America stands. Islam and Liberty cannot coexist. Islam is anti-human rights, anti-reason, anti-liberty and anti-American. Islam is the most intolerant belief system in the world! Nothing is more xenophobic and toxic than Islam. And the mandate of Islam is to FORCE the world to submit to Islamic Law, by any means necessary. Islam sees all civilizations, that do not submit to Sharia Law, as invalid. Historically, after they invade, "victory mosques" are built. New mosque construction in America has DOUBLED since 9/11.
Most mosques get some of their funding from Islamic countries and/or organizations which are hostile to the free world. We can and we must stop its conquest of America, using our laws, our culture, our media and our extraordinary American power and innovation. If we do not disassemble Islam in the world, it will disassemble the world. Islamic terrorists, also known as "Devout Muslims" will get their hands on a nuke. We do not have time for diplomacy here. The time has come for clarity and action. We must destroy Islam.
The Islamic lobby in America (CAIR) may have some of the people here fooled for now, but it won't last. With so many red flags popping up, it's just a matter of time. Without the use of violence, hate speech, or violating anyone's civil rights – so many brave voices in the civilized and free world are committed, to exposing the Islamic agenda, in their attempt to destroy our civilization from within. We must not fail. We will not fail. I remember when I met Bill Warner for the first time. He is a lecturer and author of several books, including “Sharia Law for Non-Muslims”. And Bill told me about a quote I had never heard before. It goes something like this, “You can wake a person who is sleeping, but you cannot wake a person who is pretending to be asleep”. The enemy of Islamic conquest is information. It is time for ALL OF US to start waking people up. Don't wait for your leaders to do their jobs. We are the ones we have been waiting for! "The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers... " - Tayyip Erdogan, President of (so-called "Moderate") Turkey WE MUST END SHARIA IN OUR TIME. The enemy of Islamic brutality and domination is information. Spread it on social media. Tell your friends about the inhumanity of Islam. NOW IS YOUR TIME to stand up and be counted. - Eric Allen Bell
CIVILIZED PEOPLE DO NOT VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF OTHERS.
We do not vandalize. We do not engage in hate speech. We have respect for the law. We do not harm our fellow citizens. We are slow to anger and when we finally get angry, we express that anger in a civilized way. UNDER THAT BANNER, I WILL STATE THE FOLLOWING:
Follower of Islam, I do not tolerate you. Your feigned or willful ignorance, about Islam, is no longer an excuse. I hold you personally accountable. In the Quran, Islam has declared itself my enemy.
I am offended by you. I cannot and will not tolerate a person, who follows an ideology, which teaches the inferiority of women, the killing and hatred of Jews, the execution of homosexuals, the silencing of free speech, forced amputations, the stoning of rape victims, genital mutilation, and the violent overthrow of all non-Islamic governments and civilizations.
Islam is Nazism with a god. And I cannot and will not “coexist” with Nazis. I will not patronize your places of business. I will not hire you. I will not buy your products. I will not support politicians who support you. I will not be your friend. And if I am your neighbor, I will watch you like a hawk. And everyone you know will find out what you represent and what you support. I want you to feel so uncomfortable in my free country, in my civilized country, that you renounce your allegiance to this savage ideology or leave.
ISLAM IS THE ENEMY of free speech, of human rights and of Liberty. If you follow Islam, you are my enemy. I encourage you now to leave Islam and take your place among the civilized people of this world. But if you insist on remaining loyal to the brutal savagery of Islam, your enemies will grow faster than can be contained, by an Islamic lobbyist group or the media or any government agency.
ISLAM HAS BEEN AT WAR FOR 1,400 YEARS with freedom and all that is good. But my head is no longer hidden in the sand. I am at war with you. All people who value human rights, freedom and Liberty should be at war with you. And they will be soon enough, because the enemy of Islam is information and we are spreading information faster than you can keep up with. There is no way to put this genie back in the bottle now. The information age will be the death of Islam.
Your 1,400 year reign of terror is coming to an end. And you, follower of Islam, are on the wrong side of history.
It is time for all civilized people to find the moral clarity and the courage to GET ANGRY and to BECOME INTOLERANT. You have the ability to do this in a civilized way. We must not become like the savages whom we oppose – otherwise they win. Islam is Nazism with a god. Islam must be stopped. When you support the followers of Islam, you support an ideology that promotes genocide against the unbeliever - as clearly outlined in the Quran.
THE TIME HAS COME TO BOYCOTT THE SO-CALLED "MODERATE" FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM:
IRAQ IS GOING TO FALL AND THE ISLAMIC STATE IS GOING TO TAKE OVER. This is all because of the worst military blunder in the history of the United States, on the part of Obama. THE TIME TO PUT BOOTS ON THE GROUND IS NOW. The time to defeat The Islamic State is NOW.
The 3rd World War started on 9/11/2001 and it is between Islam and the Civilized World. But the fox is guarding the hen house. The President despises the idea of American exceptionalism, apologizes for our footprint on the world and sympathizes with the enemy.
THE GROWTH OF POLITICAL ISLAM HAS NEVER KNOWN A MORE POWERFUL ADVOCATE THAN BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
The racist, Muslim, mad man of decades past, Malcolm X, once remarked that, “You don’t stick a knife in a man’s back nine inches and then pull it out six inches and say you’re making progress”. And how right he was indeed.
At the end of his life, Malcolm X was said to have come to a point of peace within himself. He renounced his hatred of “the white man” and non-Muslims publicly. And then of course he was mowed down by bullets, savagely assassinated by devotees of the “religion of peace”.
Once upon a time there was a destructive deity named Allah, who kept the whole world under constant surveillance and was very, very pissed off at everyone. And Allah emerged from the disturbed mind, of a mad man named Muhammad. And so it came to pass that Muhammad and Allah decided to work together, to bring peace into the world, by slaughtering and enslaving everyone who disagreed with them. The end. Or not. You see, before Muhammad went off to Paradise, to meet his 72 virgins, he wrote a best seller which he quaintly titled, “The Holy Quran”. It’s all the rage these days. And this rage has really created quite an endless riot.
Anyway, as it turns out, Muhammad’s mental condition was never properly diagnosed, prior to the publishing of “The Holy Quran”. And this has had grave consequences – about 270 million graves actually, according to Jihad death toll estimates from Dr. Bill Warner of The Center for the Study of Political Islam. For the past 1,400 years, Muhammad-mania has swept across the globe, cutting off heads and hands, raping, torturing, crucifying, genitally mutilating, bombing, hijacking, Jew hating, fist shaking, rock throwing, nose cutting, child molesting, kidnapping and otherwise spreading the religion of peace.
And yet to this day, many in the field of Psychiatry are still unwilling to admit that Muhammad’s mental illness is in fact contagious. Sadly, it seems that several Psychiatrists are suffering from another common mental disorder, known as “Political Correctness” or simply PC. The diagnostic manual for the field of Psychiatry, called the DSM-IV-TR, refuses to acknowledge the personality disorder of PC because this would not be Politically Correct.
Much like alcoholism, PC is a condition which often requires intervention, on the part of loved ones. Like alcoholism, the person afflicted with PC tends to go into an erratic and defensive state of powerful denial, name calling, finger pointing, and fits of self-righteous indignation. Watching this violent and painful process can however be somewhat intriguing, such as slowing down on the freeway to check out a horrible accident on the side of the road. So it should come as no surprise, in this age of shameless media spectacle, that an entire cable news network has devoted itself to this kind of sick entertainment. They call themselves MSNBC.
Slow progress is being made in combating this condition. However, PC still affects millions of Americans today, according to a recent map of red states and blue states, which I recently saw while watching MSNBC.
ABOVE: A Failed Attempted Intervention for Someone Suffering from PC
Recent studies show that the growing epidemic of Muhammad-mania however, is an opportunistic infection. And wherever there is an outbreak of PC, one can almost surely be certain that Muhammad-mania has spread into the affected community and/or individual. Muhammad-mania is a condition that knows no boundaries, doesn’t care how smart or rich you are or what your background is. Once this mental illness lights up the addiction center of the brain, it is very hard to get it out of your head and start to think for yourself.
Withdrawal effects can include “Sudden Jihad Syndrome”, mood swings, anxiety, insomnia, or freaking out in an airplane, thus causing several Chinese people to bludgeon you to death, with their bare hands (see The Blaze, 7/2/2012). However, rates of rehabilitation are rather recently on the rise, due to the pioneering work of such notable experts as Ali Sina, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Dr. Wafa Sultan – just to name a few.
In recent years, a new field has emerged which specializes in both identifying and combatting the effects of Muhammad-mania, called “Counter Jihad”. This often marginalized group of bold visionaries is made of people who have either avoided or overcome the epidemic of PC. They have somehow found the courage and conviction, to expose the truth about the militantly-mean Muhammad and his imaginary loyal sidekick, the always-angry Allah.
Sadly however, among the ranks of the otherwise courageous Counter Jihadists are those who have taken it upon themselves to treat Muhammad-Mania by means of courteous compromise. Such well-meaning freedom fighters have cozied up to “moderate” devotees of the doctrine of death – a doctrine which has placed a nine inch blade into the backs of us infidels for the past 1,400 years. This deviation, from the clarity which Counter Jihad generally represents, is something which I personally find deeply disturbing – even as these “moderates” promise to pull the blade out by six inches.
ABOVE: Moderate Muslims Express Clearly What They Believe and Why
When asked to give an assessment of the threat, regarding the rapidly expanding Islamic colonization – the rioting, the demands for special treatment in Europe and America, the implementation of brutal Islamic law, the honor killings, the Sharia-controlled neighborhoods, blasphemy laws, the emerging global Islamic Caliphate, stealth infiltration into the power structures of civilized nations, and the threat of nuclear armed Islamic militaries – Dutch politician Geert Wilders answered simply by saying, “It is already now five minutes to twelve”.
Having watched this interview several times, I was left with two nagging questions: 1) Is that his natural hair color? and; 2) How in the world did the PC epidemic allow Muhammad-mania to get so out of control?
The very blonde Geert Wilders later went on to clarify the seriousness of the Jihadist threat, in a short film entitled “Fitna” after which he was arrested and put on trial, for agitating the condition of those tragically afflicted with PC. Geert Wilders has since been released, and then marked for death and now lives his life under constant, 24 hour protection from homicidal Muhammad enthusiasts.
Geert Wilders went on to state very clearly what it means to be a follower of Muhammad saying, “Unfortunately these are dramatic times. We are now witnessing profound changes that will forever alter our destiny. Islam is a political ideology. Islam’s heart lies in the Quran and the Quran is a book that calls for hatred, that calls for violence, that calls for murder, that calls for war, that calls for submission. And the Quran asks and orders Muslims to kill non-Muslims. The Quran describes Jews as monkeys and pigs.” And so on.
Unfortunately, everything that Geert Wilders is saying is actually true. A simple first-hand read of the Quran will make this self-evident to anyone – that is unless the reader is afflicted with PC or Muhammad-mania. In such cases, one either goes to great lengths to rationalize the violent commands, or worse to follow these Quranic commands and carry out Jihad.
ABOVE: "Fitna" a Film by Geert Wilders Causing Him to be Marked for Death
The Islamic scriptures clearly state, at least 30 times in the Quran alone, that Muhammad is to be the highest moral example to his followers. To be a devout Muslim one must follow the example of Muhammad. The Quran clearly states, no less than 40 times, that not to follow the example of Muhammad will cause a Muslim to burn in hell. Therefore, to follow the example of Muhammad one cannot be “moderate” since Muhammad was a rapist, a slave owner, a pedophile, a killer and the creator of Jihad. Simple, right? Enter one Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, the “moderate Muslim” who is just here to help.
Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, whose full name is Mohamed Zuhdi Jasser (I know, right?) is presently serving on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom – funded entirely by the Federal Government (your tax dollars at work). He has also been embraced by law enforcement and numerous private organizations, who seek the aide of “moderate” Muslims to help identify so-called “radical” Muslims.
Muhammad Zuhdi Jasser: The “Moderate” Muslim - Just Here to Help
It is probably worth noting at this point that typically the word “radical” means that one is seeking to fundamentally change something. Islam in its pure form looks something like the Taliban. What Jasser is trying to do is to fundamentally change Islam. So really, who is the radical and who is the moderate?
Here is a man for whom, during his development years, Islamo-brainwashers stuck a nine inch knife into his back. He has managed to pull it out, but by only six inches – and now pretends that the knife is not there at all. But some of us can still see it, plain as day. I recognize this because, as a filmmaker I have tragically witnessed many people get up from the table, at a Hollywood lunch meeting, with a knife sticking out of their back. And they don’t know it’s there either. They get up politely and shake hands with their new “friends”. Very embarrassing. Not a pretty sight.
So, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, if you are reading this – my message to you is that it’s time to put on your big boy pants. If you are really, really serious about fighting Jihad, then stop being a follower of the man who invented it. Jihad is the duty of every Muslim. And almost every single mention of Jihad, in the Islamic scriptures refers to violent Jihad and not the PG-13 “inner spiritual struggle” Jihad touted by Islamo-apologists. But of course, Dr. Jasser, you already know this.
Zuhdi, if you really want to help the civilized world to fight the Jihadists, please stop lying to yourself. Because when you do, you are also lying to others about the true nature of Islam. I don’t think you are intentionally deceiving anyone, but the net effect is just the same. You might as well be a professional liar for Islam, like the Hamas member turned CAIR founder, Nihad Awad. It’s the same difference. You’re fooling yourself and you’re taking a lot of people with you. Snap out of it, man.
If you really want to fight Jihad, then get up off the ground with your face to the floor, groveling before the frightening figment of your brainwashed mind – the almighty Allah. Renounce the savage and sadistic mad man Muhammad. As a follower of the Quran, Dr. Jasser, you should know that the Quran commands you to make Muhammad into your highest moral example. You know that. To think you can be a self-declared “devout Muslim” but not follow the commands of “the prophet” is nothing short of pure delusion. It’s also considered blasphemy in Islam. And the penalty for that, under Sharia Law – it’s not so good – even for “moderates” such as you. And trying to get rid of Sharia, for a Muslim, is apostasy. And we both know that in Islam, the penalty for apostasy is death. It’s time to quit this thing, cold turkey. And as a former smoker I can tell you, there is never an ideal time to quit. You just have to do it.
So why am I being so hard on poor Zuhdi? After all, I’ve only figured out that Islam is a serious threat fairly recently. And Dr. Zuhdi Jasser has appeared in “The Third Jihad” a documentary that was being used by the NYPD to help train their officers about counter-terrorism. He’s very helpful. He’s everywhere. He’s everyone’s favorite “moderate” Muslim. And that is exactly where the problem exists. Because once one opens that door, the door to let the “helpful moderate Muslims” in to law enforcement, government oversight, intelligence briefings, FBI sensitivity training, and so on – we end up with the Fox guarding the hen house. And that is exactly where we in America find ourselves today.
Dr. Zuddi Jasser is a deceiver, whether he means to be or not. And those organizations who have been taken in by him are helping to spread this deception. Stealth Jihad, by any other name, is still Stealth Jihad.
We have watched as conspirators in the largest FBI bust of an Islamic terrorist funding operation (see the Holy Land Foundation Trial) become the largest Islamic lobbying organization in America – CAIR. Nihad Awad, a member of the Hamas terrorist organization, is now Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and now has his dirty fingers in every pie – especially the great big American pie. And he is poisoning it on purpose. That is what Nihad Awad is here to do.
Nihad Awad - Leader of CAIR - Supporter of Hamas
And just to be super clear about this creepy Quranic criminal, Nihad Awad, he publicly declared “I am in support of the Hamas movement,” during a March 1994 symposium at Barry University. And that was long before Islamo-lunatics moronically and democratically elected this terrorist organization to be their leadership in “Palestine”. This was back in the, strap on a bomb, scream “Allahu Akbar” and blow yourself up with as many Jewish civilians as you can days of Hamas. Actually, isn’t that still happening? Well, not when CAIR slithers into the PC infected media – no, not so much. Just think happy thoughts and maybe it will all go away.
Today, Islamists intent on destroying America from the inside, have infiltrated the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the CIA and numerous other law enforcement and intelligence gathering agencies in America, under the guise of being “moderate” Muslims who are just here to help. But I don’t blame Dr. Zuhdi Jasser. He’s mentally ill. He thinks that the murderous Muhammad is actually a prophet. The real people to blame are the adults who are enabling him.
Winston Churchill once famously remarked that “an appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last”. Now is not the time for appeasement. Churchill’s predecessor tried that last century and it didn’t work out so well. You can’t be a “moderate” member of the Manson family. And yet, the Manson Family is as harmless as the Brady Bunch kids singing “It’s a Bright Shiny Day” compared to the savage and sadistic world of Islam.
A “Moderate” follower of Muhammad is, according to Islamic scripture, really a blaspheming apostate anyway. Why not go all the way? Rip the band aid off all at once, because that is what your violent system of superstition really is – a band aid. It’s a band aid for a wound and the wound is the human condition. And no false prophet is going to get you out of this one. It’s time to grow up, man up, and stop following the made up, homicidal mad man. The “moderate” Muslim is a Trojan horse which the Civilized World simply cannot afford.
“You don’t stick a knife in a man’s back nine inches and then pull it out six inches and say you’re making progress”. – The late moderate Muslim, Malcolm X