Cap and Trade Fix is in, NOAA Says
Earth Growing Warmer Last Five Decades +
Where did that quote in the headline come from? Here it is, from Townhall.com and TEA party blogger Rajjpuut as spoken three seconds ago, “Scientific evidence of NOAA’s and Jane Lubchenco’s bullsh__ is unmistakable.” Yep, folks, the fix is in! In deference to Barack Obama’s “Cap and Trade” legislation being in deep trouble . . . and despite the facts that the world’s premier climate research organization’s (the East Anglia University’s Climate Research Unit or CRU) purportedly 2500 year statistical study have been proven doctored and flim-flammed; and the 300-year long Medieval Warm Period a.k.a. Medieval Optimum or Medieval Climate Anomaly
http://www.prisonplanet.com/medieval-warm-period-rediscovered.html
was deliberately omitted by CRU’s (United Nation’s) climate calculations to give them their infamous “hockey stick” spike in recent years’ figures
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece
Item: You might be able to fool liberals and people tied to the environmental agenda again, but when you cry “Wolf!” too often, people with common sense stop listening . . . .
http://www.petitionproject.org/
Item: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, run by an Obama appointee Jane Lubchenco naturally, is now making climate conclusions based upon fifty-plus years instead of the 2,500 years that CRU supposedly was considering.
Item: Ms. Lubchenco calls herself a scientist, but is not, not a real scientist, she’s a gung ho “environmentalist” whose conclusions all fit the environmentalist razzle-dazzle that “the sky is falling” and “we’re all gonna die.”
Item: Until recently, the climate functioning of NOAA, was known as AIRS, the Atmospheric Institute for Research Science out of Boulder, Colorado. They were supposedly the premier Climate research group in the nation. Since they weren’t amenable to global-warming corruption, the Maryland-based NOAA was tasked with climate matters for the country. So the question is, where did this 50-years + worth of weather data come from? And, of course, talking about climate with only a fifty-year base is kind of ludicrous on the face of it.**
Item: Purportedly Ms. Lubchenco has 50 years of increasing temperatures working for her, back in 1974, the experts talked about a serious cooling trend from 1923-1974 an overlapping 51-year cooling trend. Can the “experts” from this administration be trusted to accurately research and present any facts at all? Rajjpuut remembers quite well, and perhaps you do also, that in the ‘70’s we were eaten alive by the environmental kooks^^ saying we had been in a rapid cooling period for the last fifty-one years caused by man’s corrupton of the environment and a new ice age was likely. Obama Science Czar John Holdren was quoted extensively in depth by all the print and broadcast media back then about the coming ice age.
Item: The mainstream media in Europe dutifully reported the Climate Gate rigged-science scandal when the e-mail leak made it evident back in November, 2009. Even the ultra-liberal London Times did the story up rightly . . . .
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936289.ece
but the American media in loyalty to Obama (400+ person JournoList scandal to protect him and to cover up anti-Obama stories,
http://dailycaller.com/buzz/journolist/
to protect Obama from the Rev. Wright scandal by making “racism” charges against several leading Republicans rather than covering the Wright story, to dirty the name of Sarah Palin, and even reaching back 13 years NOT to ask the National Organization of Women (NOW) or leading feminists any questions about Bill Clinton and M0nica Lewinsky (with several leading feminist journalists talking about how tough it was to ‘bite the bullet’ for Clinton). It all comes down to a horrific journalistic scandal to control the country for liberal politician’s benefit which naturally assumes that the progressive/liberal agenda has got things straight . . . but they don’t.
Item: the #1 seminal-environmental ‘easy-read’ of all time was a 1962 pseudo-scientific expose by Rachel Carlson called “Silent Spring.” The thesis of the book was that we were wrecking our environment and soon we might have silent springs without birdsong as a result. The truth is a lot of what she was saying made easy and obvious sense. You needn’t be a rocket scientist or an environmentalist to realize that “crapping in one’s nest” is not a good long-term policy.
However, the larger truth is that a lot of what she claimed to be “science” and representing real and serious studies were balderdash. The chief results of the book’s overnight popularity is that A) the United Nations led by USA banned the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) as a dangerous substance and pretty much a worldwide ban ensued and B) malaria deaths which had dropped to 42,000 have been averaging more than 2 million annually worldwide ever since which amounts to roughly 60 million unnecessary deaths since the ban began because C) none of Ms. Carlson’s claims against DDT were ever verified and most are untrue and D) to date, no reputable studies have ever been done showing DDT causes human cancers; or kills any animals other than mosquitoes, lice, fleas, apple boreworms, corn earworm, cotton bollworm, tobacco budworms, several varieties of potato beetles and other insects; or causes genetic defects in birds, humans, mammals, amphibians, fish or reptiles; or that DDT makes the shells of bird’s eggs thinner endangering the chicks.
Forgetting the rest of those nasty insects: the mosquito alone (remember those two million malaria deaths annully) and its gifts to humanity such as malaria, yellow fever, West Nile virus, encephalitis, meningitis, dengue fever as well as equine encephalitis, canine and feline heartworms and roughly twenty other serious diseases is the bane of mankind and nothing ever handled mosquitoes nearly so effectively as DDT. Two pieces of good news: A) Recently the World Health Organization rescinded their ban on DDT and countries like Uganda immediately began fighting malaria with it. B) Though undocumented rumors of laboratory success in doing so have floated about for years, it’s virtually impossible to transmit AIDS via mosquitoes . . . that is, because of mosquito$$ plumbing, it mighy actually happen in nature once and then not happen again for fifteen years or longer. Studying mosquito-borne diseases is a much simpler scientific venture than studying so-called global warming and so-called anthropomorphic (man-caused) global warming; and studying whether carbon dioxide can actually make global temperatures rise . . . and the selfsame environmentalist who sold us on DDT’s evil are no selling us another bill of goods. As a great, great man recently said, “Scientific evidence of NOAA’s and Jane Lubchenco’s bullsh__ is unmistakable.”
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
** In fairness, Rajjpuut must admit that while weather can be easily monitored from Boulder, Colorado . . . monitoring climate from Boulder is like monitoring chipmunk populations from the moon. The oceans create and control climate so Maryland is presumably a far better place to study oceans and climate from . . . but why do we need Ms. Lubchenco, a 2009 Obama appointee involved, why replace competent oceanographers at NOAA with a political hack who’s sold her soul to the environmental extremist contigent at birth?
^^Most notably Obama Science Czar John Holdren wrote several articles on the coming ice age and the need for population control based upon the impossibility of feeding our present world populations under frigid conditions) and he also co-wrote a book about the same time combining all the extreme leftist concerns (population, environment, pollution, etc.) in which he advocated sterilizing agents in the water and food supply, forced abortions, and compulsory sterilizations. Recently, Mr. Holdren has contorted the past mightily to distance himself from his extremism.
$$ The only vector (means) for mosquito-borne AIDS would be if microscopic droplets outside the mosquito probosis (blood-sucking nose-like part) gained entrance into the next human’s body which is virtually, but not utterly impossible because of the refined techniques mosquitoes employ in sucking us dry
