WHY IS SESSIONS HIDING URANIUM ONE INFORMANT?

                                                                                     By

                                                                       Daniel John Sobieski

Perhaps as startling as the revelation that the FBI was investigating the Hillary Clinton/Russia/Uranium One collusion  and that key figures like Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Special Counsel Robert Mueller and Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe knew about it and said nothing, is the refusal by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to remove the non-disclosure agreement gag order on the FBI informant who arguably could put Bill and Hillary Clinton and a few others in federal prison.

It was said the Jeff Sessions recused himself from all things Russian because of election campaign conflicts but is it really because he thought it would insulate him from having to divulge what he knew about Uranium One and the people who at the very least knew about the deal, some who approved the deal, including past and present members of the FBI, the DOJ, and Special Counsel Robert Miller’s team? Is Jeff Sessions part of the Uranium One cover-up? If not then he needs to explain why he is thus far refusing Sen. Chuck Grassley’s request to lift the gag order imposed by the Obama administration as part of the Uranium One cover-up :

A top Senate Republican is calling for the Justice Department to lift an apparent “gag order” on an FBI informant who reportedly helped the U.S. uncover a corruption and bribery scheme by Russian nuclear officials but allegedly was “threatened” by the Obama administration to stay quiet….

“Witnesses who want to talk to Congress should not be gagged and threatened with prosecution for talking. If that has happened, senior DOJ leadership needs to fix it and release the witness from the gag order,” Grassley said in a statement.

Victoria Toensing, a lawyer for the former FBI informant, told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” that her client has “specific information about contributions and bribes to various entities and people in the United States.”

She said she could not go further because her client has not been released from a nondisclosure agreement but suggested the gag order could be lifted soon. Toensing also claimed that her client was “threatened by the Loretta Lynch Justice Department” when he pursued a civil action in which he reportedly sought to disclose some information about the case.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Grassley said such an NDA would “appear to improperly prevent the individual from making critical, good faith disclosures to Congress of potential wrongdoing.”…

The Hill reported earlier this week that the FBI had evidence as early as 2009 that Russian operatives used bribes, kickbacks and other dirty tactics to expand Moscow’s atomic energy footprint in the U.S. Grassley on Wednesday released a series of letters he fired off last week to 10 federal agencies, raising the question of whether the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which approved the uranium transaction was aware of that FBI probe -- and pointing to potential “conflicts” involving the Clintons. The committee included then-Secretary of State Clinton.

So why not just lift the gag order, vacate the non-disclosure agreement, which Sessions has the power to do, and key the informant come forward with information on how and why the Clintons conspired to put 20 percent of our uranium assets under Russian control while lining the pockets of the Clintons and their pay-for-play foundation? As Toensing notes, Sessions could do it, and thereby bring to light the details of this criminal enterprise:

The lead investigators on the case included Rod Rosenstein, who is now the deputy attorney general, and Andrew McCabe, who is now the deputy FBI director. Rosenstein is the DOJ official who appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller to investigate alleged collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the collusion/campaign investigation.  He could waive the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) signed by the informant, said Toensing. "Yes, Jeff could do it," she said. "He is not recused from this matter and should not be."

However, Rod Rosenstein "is conflicted," said Toensing, "because he was the U.S. attorney who oversaw the case involving my client."  Toensing added that she has "asked an oversight committee to pursue the release" of the NDA so her client may testify before Congress about what he knows.

In lifting the gag order, Sessions might have to explain the real reasons behind his recusal and why people who knew of actual collusion between Russia and the Clintons were silent, only to reappear to investigate and pursue prosecution of non-existent collusion between Russia and Team Trump. He might have to explain why Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstein and other were allowed to hide the truth from the American people and why they should not be summarily fired. As Grassley notes, neither Sessions or anyone in the Justice Department has the authority to block the informant from testifying before Congress or issue non-disclosure agreements to thwart Congressional oversight:

“The Executive Branch does not have the authority to use non-disclosure agreements to avoid Congressional scrutiny," Grassley wrote. "If the FBI is allowed to contract itself out of Congressional oversight, it would seriously undermine our Constitutional system of checks and balances. The Justice Department needs to work with the Committee to ensure that witnesses are free to speak without fear, intimidation or retaliation from law enforcement."

Again, perhaps the reluctance of Jeff Sessions stems from the web of deceit and complicity that ensnares many in the FBI and the Justice Department. As Fox News analyst Gregg Jarrett notes on the Uranium One scandal:

It seems it was all covered up for years by the same three people who are now involved in the investigation of President Donald Trump over so-called Russian “collusion.”…

But why has there been no prosecution of Clinton?  Why did the FBI and the Department of Justice during the Obama administration keep the evidence secret?  Was it concealed to prevent a scandal that would poison Barack Obama’s presidency?  Was Hillary Clinton being protected in her quest to succeed him?

The answer may lie with the people who were in charge of the investigation and who knew of its explosive impact.   Who are they?

Eric Holder was the Attorney General when the FBI began uncovering the Russian corruption scheme in 2009.  Since the FBI reports to him, he surely knew what the bureau had uncovered.

What’s more, Holder was a member of the “Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States” which approved the uranium sale to the Russians in 2010.  Since the vote was unanimous, it appears Holder knowingly and deliberately countenanced a deal that was based on illegal activities and which gave Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium assets.

It gets worse.  Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case.  Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney, was supervising the case.  There is no indication that any of these men ever told Congress of all the incriminating evidence they had discovered and the connection to Clinton.  The entire matter was kept secret from the American public.

It may be no coincidence that Mueller (now special counsel) and Rosenstein (now Deputy Attorney General) are the two top people currently investigating whether the Trump campaign conspired with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election.  Mueller reports to Rosenstein, while Comey is a key witness in the case.  It is not unreasonable to conclude that Mueller, Rosenstein and Comey may have covered up potential crimes involving Clinton and Russia, but are now determined to find some evidence that Trump “colluded” with Russia.

Boom. The question is now whether Jeff Sessions wants to help President Trump to drain the swamp be vacating the gag order and letting evidence come forth proving the Clintons orchestrated the greatest criminal conspiracy in U.S. history at the expense of American national security or whether he is just another swamp thing committed to clogging up the drainage pipes. Justice may be blind, but it should never be gagged.

          Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.               

                                           ROBERT NUELLER ADOPTS STALIN TACTICS

                                                                                     By

                                                                       Daniel John Sobieski

We may be thankful to Alan Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School, for reminding us of the delicious irony of an investigation which began with “reports” of collusion with the Russians by Team Trump and charges of Russian hacking of our elections, noe reverting to the tactics of Russia’s most murderous tyrant, Josef Stalin. As Dershowitz writes in the Washington Examiner:

Special counsel Robert Mueller was commissioned to investigate not only crime but the entire Russian "matter." That is an ominous development that endangers the civil liberties of all Americans.

Federal prosecutors generally begin by identifying specific crimes that may have been committed — in this case, violation of federal statutes. But no one has yet identified the specific statute or statutes that constrain Mueller's investigation of the Russian matter. It is not a violation of any federal law for a campaign to have collaborated with a foreign government to help elect their candidate….

One does not have to go back to the Soviet Union and Lavrentiy Beria's infamous boast to Stalin, "Show me the man and I will show you the crime," in order to be concerned about the expansion of elastic criminal statutes. There are enough examples of abuse in our own history.

From McCarthyism to the failed prosecutions of Sen. Ted Stevens, Rep. Thomas DeLay, Gov. Rick Perry and others, we have seen vague criminal statutes stretched in an effort to criminalize political differences.

Indeed, now we here reports that Mueller’s investigation will range anywhere from Jared Kutchner’s finances to perhaps any unpaid parking tickets Sean Spicer may have. To paraphrase the boast of head of Stalin’s secret police ,  show Mueller the man, and he will find a crime, just as Mueller’s best friend, James Comey, found with Martha Stewart.

There too we see a vindicative prosecutor in search of a crime and it doesn’t have to be the original charge, if there is an original charge. As the Daily Caller reported:

FBI Director James Comey declined to recommend criminal charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified material Tuesday. But back in 2004, he led what legal observers call a “petty and vindictive” prosecution against interior design icon Martha Stewart for a lesser offense.

Stewart served a five-month prison sentence in 2004 at the Federal Prison Camp in Alderson, West Virginia, also known as “Camp Cupcake,” for lying to federal investigators about possible insider trading. In the years since the case, there is a consensus in the legal community that Comey’s prosecution was overzealous and vindictive.

The Cato Institute’s Gene Healy condemned Comey’s actions as temperamental and political in a 2004 column. Healy argued that Stewart’s indictment was largely possible because the sheer volume of federal laws makes it possible to indict almost any individual on some basis — reasonable or unreasonable. Quoting former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Healy wrote prosecutors “will pick people that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted.”His Cato colleague Alan Reynolds argued Comey prosecuted Stewart for “having misled people by denying having committed a crime with which she was not charged.”

We saw this Stalinesque persecution in the case of Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff. Libby was convicted, again of lying to the FBI, because he misremembered events under relentless questioning. He was charge long after prosecutors knoew it was Richard Armitage who leaked the name of CIA desk jockey Valerie Plame to the press. Instead of dropping the investigation at hat point, prosecutors persisted, knowing they had to find a crime committed by someone somewhere to justify their existence.

Libby was Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff when he was charged with obstruction of an investigation into the “outing” of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative. Plame was in fact a desk jockey at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia, not a secret agent in harm’s way. As Investor’s Business Daily noted:

Remember the alleged outing of the already known CIA officer and desk jockey Valerie Plame? We were told then that the Vanity Fair cover girl's 15 minutes of fame jeopardized our national security even if everybody already knew who she was.

"Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, went to jail because his memory of events and who said what to whom regarding Plame differed from the recollections of others, particularly news reporters.

Yes, Virginia, this is a witch hunt. Robert Mueller III was appointed special cunsel after his friend, the vindictive James Comey, committed a federal crime by leaking a memo which was a government record to the press. Mueller has picked staff and prosecutors as if he were stocking Hillary Clinton’s Department of Justice. He has picked a bevy of Clinton donors, an attorney who worked for the Clinton Foundation, a former Watergate assistant prosecutor, and evn a senior advise to Eric Hiolder. Objective professionals all (snarkiness intended ).

Mueller is in fact colluding with Comey to enact revenge on President Trump for Comey’s firing, something which even Comey said Trump was constitutionally entitled to do. There is no evidence of collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. It is not obstruction of justice for a President to exercise his legal and constitutional authority.

The facts and the lack of an actual crime will not stop Robert Mueller. Just show him the man, or woman, and he will show you the crime.

          Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.               

DID BRENNAN COLLUDE WITH FOREIGN SPIES TO HELP HILLARY?

                                                                                     By

                                                                       Daniel John Sobieski

John Brennan defended his thesis that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win before the Hoiuse Intelligence Committee. He did nothing to disabuse Congressional Democrats or the mainstream media of the notion that Team Trump colluded with Moscow to change the results of the 2016 election.

Brennan  didn’t explain why he thought that the Russians didn’t want Hillary Clinton to win. Perhaps Clapper could explain why they didn’t prefer Hillary who was Secretary of State when President Obama let Russia violate the INF Missile Treaty and colluded with the Russians to kill missile defense in Europe, telling Then Russian President Dimitri Medvedev to tell Putin he would have more “flexibility” after his reelection.

Clapper didn’t explain why he the Russians didn’t prefer Hillary, Secretary of State for an administration that did nothing when Russia annexed Crimea and invaded Ukraine. Why wouldn’t the Russians want the Secretary of State who called murderous Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad a reformer and was there when President Obama drew the first of his “red lines” than did nothing to prevent the slaughter of 500,000 Syrians while giving Russia freerein in that country?

Why would Russia prefer Trump over Hillary after she and husband Bill brokered deals giving Russia and Putin 20 percent of our uranium supply to benefit  Clinton Foundation donors, including Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra.

As the New York Times reported, this mutual back-scratching gave Clinton donor Giustra control of a significant portion of the world’s uranium supply:

Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton….

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges….

In February 2007, a company called Uranium One agreed to pay $3.1 billion to acquire UrAsia. Mr. Giustra, a director and major shareholder in UrAsia, would be paid $7.05 per share for a company that just two years earlier was trading at 10 cents per share.

Now isn’t that special. Both the Clintons and their donor made off handsomely. Uranium One, which was gradually taken over by the Russians, would later be involved in a curious deal involving Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State. As the New York Times reported:

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well….

Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah.

So Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with husband Bill, in exchange for donations, gave nuclear power Russia and Putin control of 20 percent of the world’s uranium supply. Is that what Hillary Clinton meant by a “Russian reset”? Yet neither Congressional Democrats, who accuse Trump  of being too cozy with Moscow, nor their wholly owned subsidiary, the mainstream media, are eager to talk about the Clinton uranium deals with Russia.

Based on this assessment, Brennan is wrong that the Russians wanted Hillary to win. They may have hacked into the DNC emails, but they didn’t write them. They didn’t keep Hilary from campaigning in Wisconsin, or make her motivate Trump supporters by calling half of them “deplorable”, or cause ObamaCare premiums to spike weeks before the November election.

There is another scenario as equally plausible as the one saying Team Trump, and perhaps President Trump himself, colluded with the Russians. It is that John Brennan himself colluded with the Russians to help Hillary win to guarantee his continued tenure as CIA Director. It involves the infamous anti-Trump dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele, used by Brenan and others as a pretext for a Trump investigation bonanza.  As the American Spectator reported:

An article in the Guardian last week provides more confirmation that John Brennan was the American progenitor of political espionage aimed at defeating Donald Trump. One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election — Hillary’s.

Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy. He used their phony intelligence as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people….

The Guardian story is written in a style designed to flatter its sources (they are cast as high-minded whistleblowers), but the upshot of it is devastating for them, nonetheless, and explains why all the criminal leaks against Trump first originated in the British press. According to the story, Brennan got his anti-Trump tips primarily from British spies but also Estonian spies and others. The story confirms that the seed of the espionage into Trump was planted by Estonia. The BBC’s Paul Wood reported last year that the intelligence agency of an unnamed Baltic State had tipped Brennan off in April 2016 to a conversation purporting to show that the Kremlin was funneling cash into the Trump campaign.

Any other CIA director would have disregarded such a flaky tip, recognizing that Estonia was eager to see Trump lose (its officials had bought into Hillary’s propaganda that Trump was going to pull out of NATO and leave Baltic countries exposed to Putin). But Brennan opportunistically seized on it, as he later that summer seized on the half-baked intelligence of British spy agencies (also full of officials who wanted to see Trump lose).

The Guardian says that British spy head Robert Hannigan “passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan.” To ensure that these flaky tips leaked out, Brennan disseminated them on Capitol Hill. In August and September of 2016, he gave briefings to the “Gang of Eight” about them, which then turned up on the front page of the New York Times.

Could it be that Brennan himself is the leaker of classified information? There are reports suggesting he is and isn’t that what is going on in Washington these days – bogus investigations based on reports of collusion with the Russians and other shenanigans. Could that be any crazier than investigations triggered by the Steele dossier, a classic work of slanderous fiction? Two things we do know – that the only crime is the leaking of classified information to the newspapers to damage Donald Trump and that Brennan is wrong on ewho the Russians wanted to win.

          Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.               

Great interest has been shown in this alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. I say alleged because this is a story that should have been gone months ago.  The intelligence agencies of this country have presented all parties with the basic intelligence that Russians attempt to influence the intelligence, but none that they succeeded nor of the collusion between the Trump administration and the Russian government.

The question on what they have presented to these committees is this. What exactly is this information that leads to this conclusion? The American people have not seen it because it is being hidden by the intelligence agencies. We keep hearing the 16 different agencies have agreed on the conclusion, and the sycophantic media has followed right along as if this was “settle science”.  And like climate change, the settled science is based on innuendo and rumors from “unnamed sources”

 But let’s just make one thing clear, there has been no evidence, NONE, that showed collusion between the present Trump administration and Russia. It is being used now and for as far into the future as possible to attempt to delegitimize our President and along with paid and planned for riots to sow the seeds of chaos. The New York Times, the BBC, and the Washington Post have all blared this fake collusion far and wide, and all the networks, even Fox start any conversation with “Russian hacking”. But where is the proof. Julian Assange of Wikileaks, the entity who is responsible for the dissemination of the DNC emails has said emphatically that it was not the Russians, but leaked from the inside. No one to this day has asked Assange for any information.

The involvement of the Obama administration with Russia as evidenced in the Uranium One deal was never investigated and neither was Bill Clintons enormous speaking fees. But then again it would have been investigated by the FBI, the same FBI that ignored Hillary Clinton’s treasonous use of a server, and the debacle of Benghazi.

And where was the media during all this? They we accumulating all the information they needed from Obamas intelligence agencies to use against Donald Trump. Since his last election, when he declared during one of his debates to Mitt Romney that the 80’s called and wanted their foreign policy back. Another brilliant move by our past Muslin-in-Chief.

Why is it that Putin invading Crimea and Ukraine did not set off a firestorm, but the hacking (or leaking) of Podesta’s emails and those from others in the DNC did. Could it be that the progressive/socialists running the DNC were finally shown for who they are?

So how did the FBI make a decision that it was Russian hackers that overran the DNC servers and make all this information available. Did they do forensics on the server? NO, the DNC wouldn’t allow thathe FBI, perhaps because of the administration in charge never pushed to do the job it was intended to do. It was based on the information provided by a company called CrowdStrike, a company that recently was caught setting up another Russian Hacking scheme by using false facts.

And what of the FISA courts? In October 2016, BEFORE the election, the Obama administration requested a warrant to target a computer server in Trump Tower. Even after no evidence was found, the wiretap continued. See (http://ufpnews.com/obamas-shadow-government-belongs-jail/).

There are a plethora of interesting aspects to this entire debacle. NSA Director Michael Rogers took part in the National Security Summit where Obama officially blamed Putin on October 8^th 2016. On November 17^th 2016 Rogers met with President-elect Trump in New York. The next day, the Washington Post reported that there was a “recommendation” from the NSA and the Pentagon that Admiral Rogers be removed from his position. The demand was made by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper who had already lied to Congress about wiretapping of the citizens of this country.

There are hackers of unknown origin blackmailing Democrats to release the product of their illegal actions. There have been a great many Democratic Groups that have been hacked, including those non profit groups that are using grant money to cover the costs of anti-Trump protests along with funding from George Soros.

The DNC, which was the start of this, is a private organization and not in any way connected to the Government. Rather than focus on the information which was disseminated by Wikileaks and which no Democrat can deny, it laid bare the manipulation and outright lies that were used to assure that Hillary would get the nomination. The cacophony of the Democrats over the supposed “Russian meddling” is only because they got caught. So we got Obama sanctioning the Russians knowing full well there was no proof that the Russians had done anything, and not willing to admit that what came out through Wikileaks were just that, leaks from within the government. Blaming Russia and putting sanctions in place were to be used in an attempt to create a higher level of tension between Russia and the new administration and if they could be used to attempt to topple Trump, so much the better. This was accomplished by Obama signing an executive order to further expand the sharing of raw intelligence across all agencies before any classification was assigned.

The government has moved to vilify anyone connected to the Trump campaign. A memo relaeased claimed that Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen had a “covert Relationship” with Russia. It stated  ” that Cohen’s wife is of Russian descent and her father a property developer in Moscow”. Michael Cohens wife is actually Ukrainian and has been in the United states since 1972. Cohen has proven he never made the trip that the memo describes, and has never been to Czechoslovakia or Russia. An intelligence hoax, why are not the intelligence committees looking for the source, perhaps because the source is within one of our own intelligence agencies.

So for now, I suppose we must continue to listen about Trumps “collusion” with the Russians, and continue to listen to Democrat sycophants like the Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN, and all the other fakestream media about how Trump is Hitle, how the Russians helped him win, Even thought it was Obama who spied on the Associated Press, James Rosen, Susan Attkinson and others, he would never go so far as to attempt to destroy the Trump Presidency.

And we will continue to have to listen to Maxine Waters, the icoherent senile loudmouth who has no basis in fact for calling for the impeachment of Trump, but like a broken record will continue to whine. Where were you Maxine when Benghazi happened, or the targeting of the IRS on conservative groups, or even fast and furious. It is these things that should show you why people don’t listen you do. Selective outrage is your only selling point, and it doesn’t sell to anyone with half a brain.

And we will have to keep watching on our TVs such people as Rep. Adam Shiff, with his serious, “we need to catch a criminal” face telling us that there are mountains of evidence that ties Trumps campaign to Russia. He even was so sure of his superior intellect that he tweeted to our President that no one disputed the fact but Presdient Trump. Bad news Adam, a lot of people know you are a partisan hack and were lying as you proved this morning on CNN. Where is your proof Adam, and where is the apology. And no, most of the country know you are a partisan hack. If you weren’t why aren’t you investigating the ties between the Russians and Hillary and the Clinton Foundation.

This whole debacle is nothing more that Democratic Saboteurs attempting to thwart the will of the people. The people will not be stopped, and if you continue your violence you will learn just how many patriots are tired of your “resistance” and will move things forward far more quickly than you can imagine. 

Rykov, Lenin's successor in the Council of Soviet Commissars, corroborated: "It is our duty to inculcate in the minds of nations the theories of international friendship, pacifism, and disarmament, encouraging their resistance to military appropriations and training, without ever relaxing our own efforts in building our military equipment."

Manuilsky, a prominent Soviet professor at the School of Political Warfare, said: "The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. We shall begin by launch-in the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard-of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends."

And Khrushchev, a more contemporary Soviet prime minister, said: "We cannot expect Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find out they have communism."

http://www.marianland.com/bromlibor/whereisyouramerica.html

Putin Worth $200 Billion, Was 'Stealing As Much Money As He Could' Says Investor 

A foreign investor and former Putin supporter pegs the Russian leader's worth at $200 billion, says he was stealing for years.

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/_200_billion_putin_s_reign_has_been_about_stealing_as_much_money_as_he_could_says_investor

Putin created all refugee crisis for his own benefit.

If Putin would not continue protecting evil dictators of Syria and Iran we would finish with both very fast. Romney was right. KGB Russia is and was always geopolitical enemy. Nothing changed in former Soviet Union. Problem is that some Godless "Conservatives" still have crush on staged macho images of Putin. As soon as they see him they start to masturbate with their idiotic adoration of this geopolitical enemy not realizing that he is digging their graves. Putin's Communist KGB trained and placed Trojan Horse Obama in the white house and exported all Marxist poison to the Free West. Now Putin is acting as a "Good Christian" and "Savior" of the world while his crooked economy in Russia is total disaster, that is why Putin needs wars and chaos to keep his starving Russian people preoccupied with hate of sinful Free West and adoration of Putin's staged "patriotic" macho image.

http://www.rafaelbrom.com/

In the midst of President Obama increasing Sanctions on Russia, he announces a prisoner exchange with Cuba. 

While the media has focused on the idealogy of such a bold move by President Obama, they ignore
the current climate of America's relations with Russia.

Russia has been making their presense known in Cuba this past year, as confirmed by the Pentagon
in April. Lt. Col. Tom Crosson, a Pentagon spokesman stated "We are aware that the Russian ships
Viktor Leonov and Nikolay Chiker are currently operating in waters that are beyond U.S. territorial
seas but near Cuba”.

In July of this year, Russia re-opened their signals intelligence facility in Lourdes, south of
Havana which is just 155 miles from America after forgiving 90% of Cuba's unpaid Soviet-era debts,
which totalled $32billion.

Along with the prisoner exchange, President Obama is seeking to establish an Embassy in Havana and
ease sanctions with Cuba.

Right now President Reagan's Star Wars Program is looking pretty good. I just hope we win this
Tug-of-War.

A new petition has been started by former U.S. Congressman George Hochbrueckner, calling on Congress and the White House to ban imports of Russian fish, which has infiltrated American restaurants, supermarkets, and homes under the guise of American seafood (the FDA shockingly allows Russian pollock to be sold as "Alaska" pollock)! You may have seen op-eds about the campaign in The Daily Caller and The Hill this week. 

I encourage you all to sign our petition on change.org and share with all your friends! We need national support to send a message to Vladimir Putin that we won't stand for his violent behavior, nor his attempts to undermine hard-working American workers. 

Pay Attention to this... Be ready for the vanishing DOLLAR!!!

Michael Snyder
Economic Collapse
May 22, 2014

Russia and China have just signed what is being called “the gas deal of the century”, and the two countries are discussing moving away from the U.S. dollar and using their own currencies to trade with one another.  This has huge implications for the future of the U.S. economy, but the mainstream media in the United States is being strangely quiet about all of this. 

Image: BRICS Leaders (Wiki Commons).

For example, I searched CNN’s website to see if I could find something about this gas deal between Russia and China and I did not find anything.  But I did find links to “top stories” entitled “Celebs who went faux red” and “Adorable kid tugs on Obama’s ear“.  Is it any wonder why the mainstream media is dying?  If a particular story does not fit their agenda, they will simply ignore it.  But the truth is that this new agreement between Russia and China is huge.  It could end up fundamentally changing the global financial system, and not in a way that would be beneficial for the United States.

Russia and China had been negotiating this natural gas deal for ten years, and now it is finally done.  Russia is the largest exporter of natural gas on the entire planet, and China is poised to become the world’s largest economy in just a few years.  This new $400 billion agreement means that these two superpowers could potentially enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship for the next 30 years…

Russia reached a $400 billion deal to supply natural gas to China through a new pipeline over 30 years, a milestone in relations between the world’s largest energy producer and the biggest consumer.

President Vladimir Putin is turning to China to bolster Russia’s economy as relations sour with the U.S. and European Union because of the crisis in Ukraine. Today’s accord, signed after more than a decade of talks, will allow state-run gas producer OAO Gazprom (GAZP) to invest $55 billion developing giant gas fields in eastern Siberia and building the pipeline, Putin said.

It’s an “epochal event,” Putin said in Shanghai after the contract was signed. Both countries are satisfied with the price, he said.

Of course countries sell oil and natural gas to each other all the time.  But what makes this deal such a potential problem for the U.S. is the fact that Russia and China are working on cutting the U.S. dollar out of the entire equation.  Just check out the following excerpt from a recent article in a Russian news source…

Russia and China are planning to increase the volume of direct payments in mutual trade in their national currencies, according to a joint statement on a new stage of comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation signed during high-level talks in Shanghai on Tuesday.

“The sides intend to take new steps to increase the level and expansion of spheres of Russian-Chinese practical cooperation, in particular to establish close cooperation in the financial sphere, including an increase in direct payments in the Russian and Chinese national currencies in trade, investments and loan services,” the statement said.

In my recent article entitled “De-Dollarization: Russia Is On The Verge Of Dealing A Massive Blow To The Petrodollar“, I warned about what could happen if the petrodollar monopoly ends.  In the United States, our current standard of living is extremely dependent on the rest of the world continuing to use our currency to trade with one another.  If Russia starts selling natural gas to China without the U.S. dollar being involved, that would be a monumental blow to the petrodollar.  And if other nations started following the lead of Russia and China, that could result in an avalanche from which the petrodollar may never recover.

And it isn’t just the national governments of Russia and China that are discussing moving away from the U.S. dollar.  For example, the second largest bank in Russia just signed a deal with the Bank of China “to pay each other in domestic currencies”…

VTB, Russia’s second biggest lender, has signed a deal with Bank of China, which includes an agreement to pay each other in domestic currencies.

“Under the agreement, the banks plan to develop their partnership in a number of areas, including cooperation on ruble and renminbi settlements, investment banking, inter-bank lending, trade finance and capital-markets transactions,” says the official VTB statement.

The deal underlines VTB Group’s growing interest in Asian markets and will help grow trade between Russia and China that are already close trading partners, said VTB Bank Management Board Vasily Titov.

You can almost feel the power of the U.S. dollar fading.

A few months ago, when I wrote about how China had announced that it no longer planned to stockpile more U.S. dollars, I speculated that it may be evidence that China planned to start making a big move away from the U.S. dollar.

Well, now China’s intentions have become even more clear.

The Chinese do not plan to allow the United States to indefinitely dominate the globe financially.  In the long run, the Chinese plan to be the ones calling the shots, and that means that the power of the U.S. dollar must decline.

These days, instead of piling up mountains of U.S. currency, China has started accumulating hard assets instead.  In the past, I have written about how China is rapidly stockpiling gold, and it turns out that the Chinese have also been very busy stockpiling oil as well…

China is stockpiling oil for its strategic petroleum reserve at a record pace, intervening on a scale large enough to send a powerful pulse through the world crude market.

The move comes as tensions mount in the South China Sea and the West prepares possible oil sanctions against Russia over the crisis in eastern Ukraine. Analysts believe China is quietly building up buffers against a possible spike in oil prices or disruptions in supply.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) said in its latest monthly report that China imported 6.81m barrels per day (bpd) in April, an all-time high.

Once upon a time, China was extremely dependent on the United States economically.  The same was true with most of the rest of the world.

But now economic power has shifted so dramatically that nations such as Russia and China are realizing that they don’t really need to be dependent on the United States any longer.

And with each passing year, the relationship between Russia and China is becoming stronger.  As Pepe Escobar recently observed, this emerging alliance is causing quite a bit of consternation in Washington…

And no wonder Washington is anxious. That alliance is already a done deal in a variety of ways: through the BRICS group of emerging powers (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa); at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Asian counterweight to NATO; inside the G20; and via the 120-member-nation Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Trade and commerce are just part of the future bargain. Synergies in the development of new military technologies beckon as well. After Russia’s Star Wars-style, ultra-sophisticated S-500 air defense anti-missile system comes online in 2018, Beijing is sure to want a version of it. Meanwhile, Russia is about to sell dozens of state-of-the-art Sukhoi Su-35 jet fighters to the Chinese as Beijing and Moscow move to seal an aviation-industrial partnership.

Meanwhile, the relationship that the U.S. has with both nations is quickly going sour.  The crisis in Ukraine has caused relations with Russia to drop to the lowest point since the end of the Cold War, and now China is deeply offended by charges that Chinese military officers have been involved in cyberspying on the United States…

China on Tuesday warned the United States was jeopardizing military ties by charging five Chinese officers with cyberspying and tried to turn the tables on Washington by calling it “the biggest attacker of China’s cyberspace.”

China announced it was suspending cooperation with the United States in a joint cybersecurity task force over Monday’s charges that officers stole trade secrets from major American companies. The Foreign Ministry demanded Washington withdraw the indictment.

The testy exchange marked an escalation in tensions over U.S. complaints that China’s military uses its cyber warfare skills to steal foreign trade secrets to help the country’s vast state-owned industrial sector.

The divide between the East and the West is growing.

But the Obama administration has not figured out that we need the East more than they need us.

Right now, the number one U.S. export is U.S. dollars.  Our massively inflated standard of living is very heavily dependent on the rest of the world using our currency to trade with one another and lending it to us at super low interest rates.

If the rest of the world quits playing our game, our debt-based financial system will quickly fall apart.

Unfortunately, nobody in the Obama administration seems to have much understanding of global economics, and they will probably continue to antagonize Russia and China.

In the end, the consequences for antagonizing them could end up being far greater than any of us ever imagined.

By

EMP Attack On US Would Be ‘Catastrophic,’ Congress Told: China and Russia have the Technology

An Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) attack on the United States, whether manmade or naturally occurring, could result in the deaths of nine out of ten Americans through starvation, disease and the collapse of modern society, warned Dr. Vincent Peter Pry, a member of the congressional EMP Commission and executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security. 

“A natural EMP catastrophe or nuclear EMP attack could blackout the national electric grid for months or years and collapse all the other critical infrastructures -- communications, transportation, banking and finance, food and water -- necessary to sustain modern society and the lives of 310 million Americans,” Pry this week told the House Committee on Homeland Security Committee’s Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies.

The subcommittee herd testimony from a variety of experts during a hearing to examine the potentially catastrophic impact of an EMP attack on America’s largely unsecured electrical grid and critical infrastructure.

An electromagnetic pulse is a high-intensity burst of electromagnetic energy that is capable of severely damaging or destroying the electronic systems that make modern society possible. Natural occurrences, like a solar storm, as well as manmade events like a nuclear attack, can generate EMP. Either way, the results could be devastating.

“Some would say it’s low probability, but the damage that could be caused in the event of an EMP attack, both by the sun, a solar event, or a man-made attack, would be catastrophic,” said Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas).

In 1859, a geomagnetic storm known as the “Carrington Event” resulted in fires in telegraph stations and burnt out the just-laid transatlantic cable. Since electronic systems were not a critical component of society at the time, the event was not disastrous. Scientists estimate that the same event today would devastate essential infrastructure. They predict that we are long overdue for another geomagnetic storm, and the next one -- the first in the modern era -- would be catastrophic.

“NASA and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) published a blue-ribbon study independently confirming the warning of the EMP Commission about the threat posed by a great geomagnetic storm,” said Pry, a former CIA intelligence officer. “The EMP Commission and the NASA-NAS reports, and several subsequent independent studies, conclude that if a great geomagnetic storm like the 1859 Carrington Event happened today, millions could die.”

Subcommittee Vice Chairman Scott Perry (R-Penn.) said China and Russia already have the technology to launch an EMP attack, and that Iran and North Korea may also be developing EMP weapon technology.

read more:

http://www.hstoday.us/briefings/daily-news-analysis/single-article/emp-attack-on-us-would-be-catastrophic-congress-told/1b5e33a26545ac5ebf9398f00064dc0a.html

Gentlemen, Ladies,

I am truly sorry I intrude on your work so often - but the truth must be heard.

We are facing a National Security crisis of a magnitude unknown in our history.
I wrote you earlier today of the "state department" involvement in the Ukrainian uprising - and the possibility the "state department" may have been involved in the Russian oil refinery destruction.
I wrote that if Prime Minister Putin found indisputable evidence our "state department" was involved in the latter - we, as a Nation and people - might find ourselves in dire circumstances indeed - as Russia may take action against our Nation - possibly in force.

While I pray that does not happen - below is an article I discovered from the Turner Radio Network showing there is something else going on you really should be paying attention to.

I pray you remove this corrupt administration in it's entirety before citizens pay the price for their actions and deeds..............

I believe I speak for every citizen of this Nation when I say this: We do not want war!

http://www.turnerradionetwork.com/news/347-pat

FBI: Navy Yard shooter 'delusional,' said 'low frequency attacks' drove him to kill

"'ELF' refers to low-frequency electromagnetic waves, a technology used for submarine communications that conspiracy theorists believe the government employs to monitor and manipulate unsuspecting citizens, the FBI said." CNN 9/26/13

This is how CNN & the F.B.I. presented Aaron Alexis to the public. That he was "delusional." However, the FBI may have overlooked a crucial point of evidence.

It dates back to Waco, Texas and The Branch Davidians. That evidence is that the FBI considered employing the same technology Aaron Alexis said was being used on him to the incidence in Waco, Texas in 1993. They commissioned a specialist in the very same field of technology that Aaron Alexis described to the Newport, Rhode Island Police Dept.

The technology the FBI considered employing was though a Russian scientist named Igor Smirnov.

"Smirnov's background included military research, and the care of drug addiction and mental illness. He founded the Psychotechnology Research Institute at the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia to work on ideas like "psychocorrection", a term he used to denote the 
use of subliminal messages to alter a subject's will, or even modify a person's personality without their knowledge.

The Institute caught the attention of Chris Morris and Janet Morris who were reportedly attempting to sell technology to the United States military. The FBI consulted Smirnov regarding the Waco Siege in 1993. Smirnov proposed piping subliminal messages from sect members' families through the phone lines during negotiations. David Koresh to surrender, however the FBI declined the plan. Smirnov died in November 5, 2004, leaving his wife to run the Institute."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Smirnov_%28scientist%29 "Morris was elected to the New York Academy of Sciences in 1980. Morris served as Research Director and Senior Fellow (1989–1994) at the United States Global Strategy Council, as well as Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (1993–1995). Morris partnered with John B. Alexander and co-authored The Warriors Edge, which explores embracing unconventional psychological combat techniques, in 1990. Janet Morris and the USGSC's campaign for the creation of a non-lethality panel resulted in the assembly of the Non-lethality Policy Review Group, led by Major General Chris S. Adams, USAF (retd.) in 1991. The group earned the political backing of Sam Nunn, chair of the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services.


Janet Morris published numerous white papers in 1991, detailing the USGSC’s non-lethal war doctrine proposals. The papers promoted diversifying and expanding non-lethal weapon capability for use in increased American intervention in global conflicts. The papers urged additional development of anti-personnel incapacitant s as well as 
vehicular area denial devices.

Morris visited Moscow in 1991 to the Moscow Institute of Psycho-correlations and observed the demonstration of the transmission of subliminal commands via infrasound.
In 1995, Morris and her husband and frequent co-writer Christopher Morris founded M2 Technologies."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Morris

Here is the web address of M2 Technologies:

www.m2tech.us

Which advertised in their "Publications" section "Weapons of Mass Protection." But the website is not coming up. It also has vanished from Google's search engine. However, Janet Morris' co-author, John B,. Alexander still has his website:

http://www.johnbalexander.com/

Perhaps the F.B.I. should stop by and ask Mr. Alexander what he can tell them about "conspiracy theories."

Why Are American Conservatives Praising Pretender Putin? Because looks like they have temporary amnesia. They forgot that Putin and his KGB Orthodox Church are fake Christians for very long time and that Putin and his KGB bosses always take side with enemies of America. Russian KGB killed over 30 million Christians and now the same criminals pretending that they are a "Good Christians" by preaching that free people in the in the West are bad Christians. None of these Communist criminals ever went to jail for their crimes in Russia. What a joke. Now KGB dictator Putin brainwashing Russians and the World that Free West is bad and that Russian KGB dictatorship is good. Looks like that corrupted Communist Abortionist Obama made American Conservatives afraid of freedom, so now they look up to another perverted wolf in sheep's clothing - KGB Dictator Putin. Maybe is time that American Conservatives start praising only one true leader: Son of God Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Putin is not "Bored Kid' he is 'Bored Professional Killer' thirsty for more innocent blood so that he can please his KGB Master Satan.

http://www.marianland.com/rafael_thoughts/thoughts001.html

After watching Hannity interview the US Muslim man that wants to have a Muslim march in Washington DC on 9/11/13, I saw a picture of that Muslim smiling in a picture with Joe Biden. WE know Obama has hired several Muslim Brotherhood members and placed some of them in our Homeland Security organization.  Obama had the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leaders visit the Whitehouse while they were in power and suspending their Constitution, implementing Sharia law after promising otherwise and Christians were being murdered. It is hard to understand what this administration is doing and why they are doing it.

We know Obama regrets that our Constitution is a set of negative rights and restricts him, we know he wants to cut 12 military brigades, we know he would like zero nuclear weapons in the US , but would settle for 300 hundred which is smaller than China's arsenal, we know he unilaterally cut missile defense in Europe to appease Putin and reset our relationship to a weaker position, we know Obama does not like the Second Amendment by his actions and the multitude of democratic anti gun laws pending.

" The fire walls to our Constitution have been breached." Mark Levin. Our Congress is suppose to protect us but so far they have not. Unlike previous Presidents Barak Hussein Obama may not limit his imperial actions but rather continue to expand his abuses of power. Hopefully at some point Congress will have enough while they still have any real power.

ADDENDUM TO MAIL SENT THIS MORNING

IMMEDIATE ACTION NECESSARY

The Honorable Congressman Smith         2 July 2013

The Honorable Senator Cornyn

The Honorable Senator Cruz

Gentlemen,

Apparently, I spoke late in my earlier mail....

We are indeed "out of time" and your actions are needed immediately lest our Nation be overrun and destroyed.

Posted on 27 June 2013 In the European Union Times online news outlet is found an article stating the Obama administration has requested 15,000 Russian Troops to be placed on alert for immediate action in FEMA Region III - the Washington DC and surrounding area.

http://www.eutimes.net/2013/06/obama-requests-15000-russian-troops-for-upcoming-disaster/

Gentlemen, you are the ones at immediate risk here, FEMA Region III is you - not me here in Texas. Read your History and discover what adolph hitler did with the Reichstag (German version of our Congress prior to hitler).

I strongly encourage you to act immediately and remove this administration in its entirety.

Respectfully,

SFC (retired) Aubrey Mason

San Antonio, Texas

CC;

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott

The Honorable Congressman Stockman

The Honorable Congressman Issa

Chairman, House Judicial Committee, The Honorable Congressman Goodlatte

The Honorable Senator Paul

An Open letter to my Elected

The Honorable Congressman Smith         2 July 2013

The Honorable Senator Cornyn

The Honorable Senator Cruz

Gentlemen,

President Obama and his Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) signed a "deal" yesterday to "allow" Russian troops on U.S. soil to provide "security"!

WHISKY TANGO FOXTROT!

This action DIRECTLY violates the Constitution of the United States, directly violates the Posse Comitatus Act - 18 U.S.C. § 1385 - and as soon as Americans discover this - I expect an immediate reaction from every constituent with a brain!

Libyan Intelligence has determined - and published - Dr. Morsi (Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood President funded into office by Barack Hussein Obama) was directly implicated in Benghazi and the murder of Ambassador Stevens, this was first aired in Kuwait News last week, it is all over the Arabic news channels, it is very slowly making its way into English language news - and President Obama continues to dump Billions of U.S. Taxpayer dollars into Egypt!

Gentlemen, I do not wear a tin-foil hat. I am a Retired Soldier and I swore an Oath to defend our Constitution against enemies foreign or domestic - as did you. I have done my diligent best the past two years writing you with every incident I can discover proving President Obama is NOT what he says he is and that his agenda for our Nation is not in the best interests of our Nation. Was that all for naught? Have I been spinning my wheels writing you and telling you everything I have discovered... just for Congress collectively to allow this man to usurp our Nation and destroy it?

I know for a fact that other Retired Soldiers - Officers and Senior Non-Commissioned Officers alike -  have written you with the same, if not similar concerns, LTC (retired) Allen West has been most vocal on these topics - why is Congress not listening to your Military? We have some experience in these things... we have personally witnessed them in foreign lands, only now to find them now occurring in our own Nation - and we are rightfully concerned!

Collectively, Congress has allowed treason to occur, the rest of the people in the World seem to know it, there are demonstrations all over the world against America, creating a situation where anyplace outside our own borders is not a secure place for Americans  - all of these things this man has done were done in the name of the People of the United States - to include killing foreign civilians by drone attacks  - and the People of the United States have been continuously writing and calling their elected in attempts to put a stop to it - you have seen evidence of this by your telephone systems being overloaded to the point of shutdown on multiple occasions, your staff continually weeks behind in responding to constituents letters and faxes  - without Congress doing more than talking, writing letters, holding hearings.... and this agenda continues!

Our National deficit is at the highest point in history; Congress has continued to allow this man to take "vacations" at U. S. taxpayer expense, the most recent - also the most expensive in the written history of man - without action on your part. What happened to "sequestration"?

Gentlemen, the time to act is now - if you fail to act and remove this entire administration - our Nation WILL fall. Congress will go down in the history books (if there are any left to write history books) as the facilitator. Do you really want that?

We ARE out of time - this is not going to go away and we are not going to survive as a free Nation if you fail to act now. The petty squabbles and partisan politics in Congress have to stop.

Are you planning on waiting until Obama declares Martial Law to act?

Don't you think by that time it just might be a little late?

Honorable Sir's; Do you want proof?

I know you keep records, go back through every letter I have written you in the past two years and look at what I wrote you about, look at the timelines - and you will discover that in almost every incidence, my forewarning to you has been vindicated by press releases and intelligence. Sometimes it took weeks, sometimes it took months - but the proof is already in your own hands.

Gentlemen, You folks are the ones we citizens elected to be our Statesmen, to represent citizens concerns in the National arena. Neither I, nor any other citizen expects you to do more than that nor do we have ANY desire for you to violate the law... we just want you to be the Statesmen we elected you to be. To uphold the principles and the Law our Nation was founded upon.

The Constitution of the United States.

Respectfully,

SFC (retired) Aubrey Mason

San Antonio, Texas

cc;

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott

The Honorable Congressman Stockman

The Honorable Congressman Issa

House Judicial Chairman, The Honorable Congressman Goodlatte

The Honorable Senator Paul

Obama continues his successful march to diminish and reduce America to a second class non super power without any moral compass. In my opinion, his actions make him the worse President, but in his mind he has nationalized health care, placed more people on welfare than ever, increased spending to highest level in our history along with the highest deficit, on the road to triple what Bush left him with in 2009. The assault continues on every front. Degrade, demoralize and downsize the military, CORE curriculum to continue to brainwash our children, Executive orders establishing his imperial Presidency, via climate control, EPA, CZARS, IRS, Energy, Land Management other departments doing his bidding. The EPA will cause 238 coal plants to close and may lose 84,000 coal related  jobs,  while the EPA goes around the will of our weak kneed Congress. Now the military standards will be changed along with the elimination of 10 Brigades, while the Islamic terrorists are still at war with us, along with Egypt and others. I am sure they are glad that we are not in a war footing and are leading from behind, as Obama stated.

China and Russia must be happy that Obama would like to have zero nuclear weapons, but would settle for a 45% unilateral reduction. Of course, Russia is developing a new treaty violating med range missile and China is also building their military ASAP. They just launched an air craft carrier, but Obama's staff has declared a WAR ON COAL, OMG. Obama lies about so many things and issues it is impossible to note them all here, but one big one is that the Earth's temperature has gone up. It has gone down for a decade and the Russian's say they expect it to drop for 200 to 250 years or more. Of course, that is d Is based on un biased research and not tied to the wests global cap and trade Ponzi scheme. More to follow....

Jihad has come to America as its tentacles reach out across the world affecting every country.

The global jihad is shown on a map in the early part of the video with *red* "X's that reveal the monstrosity of the Islamic attacks on the world; their goal is to bring every nation under terror and submission to Islam.

This film targets the radical Islamic Jihadi's that are the most faithful to Islam - these jihadi warriors are about 10% of the 1.5 Billion Muslims worldwide, which means approximately 150+ Million (the numbers are much higher) jihadists are recruiting, training, prepared, and ready to commit jihad terror at any given moment in any country. Hundreds of thousands of Jihadi terrorists are in American training in cell camps across our land. Lest we forget, that even though many Moslems are not involved as warrior Jihadists they supporting it verbally, secretly, financially, teach it and cheer it on in their mosques.

A must see video. (60 minutes long)

See also this other video I posted called "Islam-What the West Needs to Know":

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/islam-what-the-west-needs-to-know?xg_source=activity