ACTION

First let me state my bias to this book and the author. I read the original book by Wanda Draper. It was a breath of fresh air to find a person that knew so much about true life that actually wrote a book about children. It made sense how this could be once I found out how much exprereince Wanda had taught at all levels; from preschool to teaching medical students. True to fashion when I came to know her the matter of fact common sense nature of the book was present in her personality as well. Wanda wasn't a person to get stuck on letters after her name. She respects the knowledge parents have when it comes to their child(ren). Unlike many experts that dismiss the input of parents or downplay the parents knowledge of their own child(ren). In the introduction Wanda states her 4 reasons for writing this book (or re-realsing..which I am glad she did) as; *To increase awareness of a child's capabilities and potentional. *To better understand and accept the feelings and thoughts of a child. *To appreciate the child's perception. *To act in relation to what will bring about a stronger and more meaningful connection between you and your child or your student. I know Wanda personally writes out of a caring heart. She is extremely busy working. Taking the time to do this book meant extra work. Doing the book means she want to accomplish the goals in real terms and real time. "Your child has the capacity to succeed--in life and in school. I believe that ever child is endowed with sensitivity or a spirit of hope from within, that makes it possible to adapt to virtually any situation." She does say that those with special challages face unique battles. Yet, as a mother, this was unique for me. Most experts tell you what your child can't do and try to prepare you for the disapointments that are soon to be at hand. Gloom and doom are the things they preach. Other publications point out that if a child isn't reading by third grade on a certain level it is doubtful that child will ever go beyond that. Wanda, instead points out there is potential and one can rise to the occasion. The book doesn't way a ton but covers all the milestones, secrets of talking and how to get along with your child. Even if you don't have children the book would be a great read on how to get along with others. Wanda talks about how lucky shew was to attend a meeting of atronauts, her work with ophanages overseees and beliefs there are five elements basic to success; *Getting along with others. *Self-confidence. *Vision and a sense of wonder. *The abiity to focus. *Self reflection. Wanda tells you how to do set about helping your child to obtain the skills in working with your child(ren). Furhtermore, she doesn't rag on the parents about the past. She acknowleges one can't do anything about that but can work on things in the present and the future; basically giving hope and encouragement. Of course she explains the develomental milestones of childhood and when it is time to be concerned. She explains in depth about child develpment. Wanda doesn't have to make herself sound good. She writes a short book that delivers content. At the end she give recipes for paste and the likes of home made. This offers savings and a chance to engage parent and child in activites. I do have biasis as Wanda being a friend. Yet, when I bought the first version of the book I didn't know her. That book gave me back my gumption as a parent. Parents without confidence are like a boat without a captian. In short this is a must book for all parents, teachers or provider working with children. It is priced appropriately. Here is the Amazon link to order the book. http://www.amazon.com/Your-Child-Smarter-Than-Think/dp/1614489912/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1389061786&sr=8-1&keywords=Your+child+is+smarter+than+you+think. The hard cover is priced at $33.18, paperback $12.96 and the Kindle edition is $9.99. Here is the book information. *Publisher is Morgan-James. *ISBN-10: 1614489912. *ISBN-13: 978-1614489917.

What’s refreshing about this issue, if we are to change the destructive direction that our Country/Republic is on?-You Decide:

Posted on WND.com-By DREW ZAHN-On January 6, 2014:

What to do about the alleged unconstitutional and unlawful actions of President Barack Obama?

Some have proposed marches. Others hearings. Some have demanded the president’s resignation. Some have called for impeachment, even though a Democrat-controlled Senate would be unlikely to oust their party’s leader.

Polls show Americans of all parties are upset with the direction of the country, but what can they actually do to make a difference?

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, as chairman of Stand Up America, has been at the forefront of many of these rallying cries, encouraging Americans to take action in a number of ways.

But now the former deputy commanding general of the U.S. Army in the Pacific has settled upon a battle plan he believes could actually work: a House-led, parliamentary style vote of “no confidence” in Obama’s administration.

“I have already achieved a level of ‘no confidence’ in Obama as a leader, but now I urge you to examine this concept,” Vallely wrote in an email to supporters obtained by WND. “If you agree with me that all confidence is lost, I urge you to then ask yourself what is in the realm of the possible. I implore you to push aside the urge to try and fix everything in one fell swoop.

“Now is the time for something a dear friend calls ‘conviction without eviction,’ an end that can be brought on through a vote of no confidence, locally, statewide and nationally,” Vallely claims. “This is just a first step in what can only be repaired over time, but it is achievable in the short term and starts to remove Obama’s ability to continue his ruinous ways now.”

In a blog post on the battle plan posted Dec. 15, the general explained he already has a man on the ground in Washington working to make it happen.

Vallely quotes “a prominent Washington, D.C., insider with whom Stand Up America is coordinating –and who prefers to remain under the radar for the moment while conferring with potential House co-sponsors on both the basic rationale and the detailed content of such a House Resolution of no confidence” as offering the following justification for this novel course of action:

“First, in most of the world’s so-called ‘democracies’ – actually, multi-party constitutional republics – a formal vote of ‘no confidence’ by the Lower House suspends or greatly limits the governing authority of the party in power and, in a ‘recall’ of sorts, mandates new elections within 30-60 days,” the insider reportedly reasons. “Although we have no such instrument in our Constitution or in existing law, there is nothing to prevent its use as a comprehensive de facto indictment and conviction for contempt of Congress, violations of oath of office and of the Constitution itself – for all of the reasons stated in such a resolution.

“Second,” he reasons, “it would be much easier to cosponsor [than impeachment articles], to be formally adopted by the House and to achieve what might be called Obama’s ‘conviction without eviction’ – in which wholesale repudiation by the House, loss of control of the Senate and a substantial diminution of power and influence during his remaining time in office would be the penalties.

“We know there is no legal standing in a vote of ‘no confidence’ that would come of this act, but at least one thing will certainly occur: We take back the power of discourse,” the insider contends. “What do we do? We conduct a national ‘vote of no confidence.’”

To join the general’s call for action, visit the Stand Up America contact page to see how you can get involved.

“We cannot possibly believe that impeachment is attainable, and we know he will never resign,” Vallely adds, “but at least we can show other leaders the way; show our collective voices that we have no confidence in [Obama].”

Vellely contends the vote also would defuse some of the partisan finger-pointing that infects not only D.C. but the entire country.

“You are not calling anyone names, or labeling others. You are not trying to encapsulate each and every event,” he explains. “Rather, what you are doing is telling the world that ‘I have no confidence in him or his team anymore.’ They cannot take that away from you or attack you for it.

“A vote of ‘no confidence,’ albeit symbolic, at least focuses the discussion on something you can own as I own. This ownership is in your opinion; one based in fact and close analysis, not in emotion, ‘talking points’ or ulterior motives,” Vallely continued. “If asked or challenged tomorrow by his supporters that my lack of confidence is a political ploy, I will say, ‘No, I own my conclusions, I own my opinions and I have a deep sense of no confidence in Obama.’

“The House of Representatives must follow our lead and take up a resolution of no confidence,” the general contends.

Vallely’s calls to action have been immensely popular among tea party organizations that are seeking a way to restore the rule of law to Washington.

Among other examples they cite as evidence of disregard for law and the Constitution are the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, and the 15 or more times Obama has changed the law – without consulting Congress.

“What else is our nation to do now that the rule of law has effectively been thrown out the window by the Obama administration?” Vallely asks. “How are we to trust our government anymore, now that lying and fraud are acceptable practices?”

Sign the petition urging Congress to pursue impeachment right away!

Vallely listed a sampling of Obama’s broken promises and lies, crediting Peter Wehner at Commentary Magazine:

1. His promise not to allow lobbyists to work in his administration. (They have.)
2. His commitment to slash earmarks. (He didn’t.)
3. To be the most transparent presidency in history. (He’s not.)
4. To put an end to “phony accounting.” (It started almost on Day 1 and continues.)
5. And to restore trust in government. (Trust in government is at near-historic lows.)
6. His pledge to seek public financing in the general election. (He didn’t.)
7. To treat super-PACS as a “threat to democracy.” (He embraced them.)
8. His pledge to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent. (It remained above 8 percent for the longest stretch since the Great Depression.)
9. To create five million new energy jobs alone. (The total number of jobs created in Obama’s first term was roughly one-tenth that figure.)
10. To identify all those “shovel-ready’ jobs. (Mr. Obama later chuckled that his much-hyped “shovel-ready projects” were “not as shovel-ready as we expected.”)
11. To lift two million Americans from poverty. (A record 46 million Americans are living in poverty during the Obama era.)
12. His promise to bring down health care premiums by $2,500 for the typical family (they went up) … allow Americans to keep the health care coverage they currently have (many can’t) … refuse to fund abortion via the Affordable Care Act (it did) … to respect religious liberties (he has violated them) … and the insistent that a mandate to buy insurance, enforced by financial penalties, was not a tax (it is).
13. Obama’s pledge to stop the rise of oceans. (It hasn’t.)
14. To “remake the world” and to “heal the planet.” (Hardly.)
15. To usher in a “new beginning” based on “mutual respect” with the Arab and Islamic world and “help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East.” (Come again?)
16. To punish Syria if it crossed the “red line” of using chemical weapons. (The “red line” was crossed earlier this year – and nothing of consequence happened.)
17. That as president “I don’t bluff.” (See the previous sentence on Syria.)
18. And of course the much-ballyhooed Russian reset. (Tensions between Russia and the United States are increasing and examples of Russia undermining U.S. interests are multiplying.)
19. And let’s not forget Mr. Obama’s promise to bring us together. (He is the most polarizing president in the history of the Gallup polling.)
20. Or his assurance to us that he would put an end to the type of politics that “breeds division and conflict and cynicism.” (All three have increased during the Obama presidency.)
21. And his counsel to us to “resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long.” (Remind me again whose campaign allies accused Mitt Romney of being responsible for the cancer death of a steelworker’s wife.)

“It is time to recall the reprobates and reclaim the power of the people,” Vallely said. “We need to start with the White House and all of Obama’s appointees, especially Eric Holder. … Then on to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi – the architects who shoved Obamacare down our throats. We also cannot forget John Boehner and company who openly castigate the tea-party caucus, which are only doing that which they campaigned upon.”

Read the definitive case for removing Barack Obama from office in “Impeachable Offenses” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.

Congress already is addressing charges that Obama is violating the Constitution.

WND reported when Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said Obama’s actions have reached “an unprecedented level, and we’ve got to do something about it.

{…}

“Assume that a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president require three forms? Can the president require one form? Can you suspend all requirements? If not, why not?” he said. “If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?”

Gowdy cited Obama’s decisions to ignore certain immigration laws, even though Congress did not approve the changes. He also cited arbitrary changes to the Obamacare law and Obama’s “recess appointments” of judges even though the U.S. Senate was not in recess.

His proposal is for Congress to take the White House to court over the president’s actions, through a resolution proposed by Rep. Tom Rice, R-Ga., that would authorize the House to sue the Obama administration. It has 30 co-sponsors.

Rice said that because of “this disregard of our country’s checks and balances, many of you have asked me to bring legal action against the president.”

“After carefully researching the standing the House of Representatives has and what action we can take, I have introduced a resolution to stop the president’s clear overreach,” he said.

A Fox News interviewer asked Gowdy if Obama could refuse to enforce election laws.

“Why not?” asked Gowdy, “If you can turn off immigration laws, if you can turn off the mandatory minimum in our drug statutes, if you can turn off the so-called Affordable Care Act – why not election laws?”

Gowdy noted that a liberal law professor, Jonathan Turley, agrees.

WND reported Turley’s concerns in December.

Turley has represented members of Congress in a lawsuit over the Libyan war, represented workers at the secret Area 51 military base and served as counsel on national security cases. He now says Obama is a danger to the U.S. Constitution.

He was addressing a House Judiciary Committee hearing Dec. 4. Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., asked him: “Professor Turley, the Constitution, the system of separated powers is not simply about stopping one branch of government from usurping another. It’s about protecting the liberty of Americans from the dangers of concentrated government power. How does the president’s unilateral modification of act[s] of Congress affect both the balance of power between the political branches and the liberty interests of the American people?”

Turley replied: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The danger is quite severe. The problem with what the president is doing is that he’s not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He’s becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power.”

Turley explained that the “Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration.”

“There are two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress,” he said. “One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction.”

Turley was appointed in 1998 to the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest at Georgetown. He has handled a wide range of precedent-setting and headline-making cases, including the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia.

Turley also has served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British Columbia Supreme Court. He’s been a consultant on homeland security, and his articles appear regularly in national publications such as the New York Times and USA Today.

WND reported that it was at the same hearing that Michael Cannon, director of Health Policy Studies for the Cato Institute, said there is “one last thing to which the people can resort if the government does not respect the restraints that the Constitution places of the government.”

“Abraham Lincoln talked about our right to alter our government or our revolutionary right to overthrow it,” he said.

“That is certainly something that no one wants to contemplate. If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws, then they will conclude that neither are they.”

Cannon said it is “very dangerous” for the president to “wantonly ignore the laws, to try to impose obligations upon people that the legislature did not approve.”

Several members of Congress also contributed their opinions in an interview with talk-show host Sean Hannity.

See the Hannity segment:

{…}

Vallely explained that a “no confidence” vote now “would also tell the world that we recognize the mess this administration has wrought upon the world and we do not support his actions. Despite what supporters of Obama say about our standing in the world, the world is laughing at us. We are not pleased!”

Without that action, he writes, “Obama will just continue to subvert the Constitution he took an oath to faithfully protect.”

To join the general’s call for action, visit the Stand Up America contact page to see how you can get involved.

Source Link:

http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/general-cements-plan-to-end-obamas-reign/#vRJwPhvbDtgJ1YLX.99

Note: The following articles and/or blogs and websites reveal "Operation American Spring," which relates to this issue-You Decide:

Another top military official calls for “Second American Revolution”!-Posted on TeaParty.org-On January 6, 2014:

Citizens won’t leave Washington until change is made

(Tea Party) – Veterans, truckers and bikers all rallied in DC, taking a stand to restore America but after they departed the Washington establishment continued running the nation amok. According to one man he hopes an mass rally in the works for this spring will be different.

Retired US Army Col. Harry G. Riley, who runs the Patriots for America website, doesn’t have an organized sponsor for the rally. Instead, he’s calling on individual Americans. He wants them to assemble and demand America be restored to her former glory.

FAX BLAST SPECIAL: Impeach Obama NOW!

Riley has pledged that they will not leave Washington until they see change.

“One million or more of the assembled 10 million must be prepared to stay in D.C. as long as it takes to see Obama, Biden, Reid, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, and Attorney General Holder removed from office,” explained Riley in an email regarding his plan.

Riley continued:

“The senior Republican in the U.S. House of Representatives will become Speaker of the House and the U.S. House of Representatives will elect a temporary president and vice president of the United States. The U.S. Senate will take action to elect a new majority and minority leader.”

“As required, the U.S. Congress will execute appropriate legislation to convene new elections or U.S. states will appoint replacements for positions vacated consistent with established constitutional requirements.”

With more than 34 years in the US military and multiple tours of duty worldwide, Riley received numerous honors and medals including the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Air Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal among other honors.

Having been successful in a variety of efforts, including the 2007 Gathering of Eagles, Riley has not gone without his share of attacks from the left.

Of the upcoming spring march, Riley says:

“There is not much time and the only planning necessary is to select a starting date, which we have done, and then show up in Washington, D.C., on that date, and plan to stay for the duration. The goal is restoring the U.S. Constitution as the law of the land, removing the lawless leadership.”

“Will this be a cake-walk? No, it will be painful, and some people may die because the government will not be non-violent; some of us will end up in a cell, and some may be injured. If that’s what it will take to save our nation, do we have any choice? Freedom loving Americans will say there is no choice, we must begin the second American Revolution. Not with guns, but with millions of Americans demanding a return to constitutional government and the resignation of Obama, Biden, Reid, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, and Holder as a start…then the constitutional restoration process can begin.”

Riley is urging “all organizations, groups, particularly veterans and military retirees, [to] begin planning to visit Washington, D.C., beginning May 16, 2014.”

Another military leaders, Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely has also called on millions of Americans to “stand up” to a government that is “conducting treason … violating the Constitution, violating our laws.”

Vallely is also calling on Americans to march, urging a legislative “no confidence” vote in President Obama as well as Congress in addition to citizen arrests.  It was the 33 million Egyptians who rose up against their government and removed Muslim Brotherhood officials from office that gave him the inspiration.

Vallely claims that his call for a new American uprising struck a note with millions of modern tea partiers—those looking for unifying leadership.

It’s been all over Facebook, a number of websites, radio shows calling me for interviews,” Vallely said. “And the response I’ve received has been 99-percent positive.”

“I think the biggest thing is that someone is finally standing up to lead.” “We need someone to lead; we need a new George Washington,” said Vallely.

Riley expanded on his philosophy:

“Similar to our Founding Fathers, citizens and patriots in America now find themselves increasingly denied freedom and liberty from a government leadership (A new crown) that is focused on self-serving, power hungry, deception, and betrayal motivations…the ultimate goal of U.S. Constitutional destruction,” he writes. “While our Founding Fathers endured pain and suffering from the British Crown, there came a time when they declared ‘enough is enough.’ Thus, the Declaration of Independence was drafted. We should read our Declaration of Independence and note the grievances that led to the decision of ‘independence or death.’ America is under the heel of a new ‘crown,’ enduring grievances of which are not far removed from conditions our Founding Fathers experienced. The Founders moved to action. Now is the time for American patriots to move to action.”

“Underlying the plan is the invitation to “patriots” to help restore the constitutional government, rule of law, freedom and liberty” from what is described as a “despotic and tyrannical federal leadership.”

Step one is for millions of Americans to assemble peaceably and physically unarmed, showing their loyalty to the US Constitution.  The next step is for a large number of those who assemble to stay in Washington until changes that are “consistent with the Constitution” are made.

Riley said he’s never seen so much interest in such a move. “This has to be done,” he said.

“We are past the point of no return, thus must move forward with an effort to save our nation, as there is no other choice. We are asking, pleading with you, and any others that have resources, national voices, email lists, blogs, FB, Twitter, to call for a non-violent American Spring May 16, 2014, in Washington D.C. We must appeal to ten million and more American patriots to come and stay in Washington, D.C., to stop the White House and Congress from total destruction of the United States. It’s now or never. God help us.”

He went on to say, “The Congress and the administration are just totally oblivious to the American people. They go their own way. The administration makes its own laws. They have their own Congress in the president’s staff.”

Riley’s inspiration was Georgetown University’s Jonathan Turley and his recent Congressional testimony. Turley represented members of Congress in a lawsuit over the Libyan war as well as workers at the top-secret Area 51 military base. He’s also served at counsel on national security cases. Turley is now saying that Obama is a danger to the US Constitution.

During a House Judiciary Committee meeting on December 4, Turley was asked by Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R. VA., “Professor Turley, the Constitution, the system of separated powers is not simply about stopping one branch of government from usurping another. It’s about protecting the liberty of Americans from the dangers of concentrated government power. How does the president’s unilateral modification of act[s] of Congress affect both the balance of power between the political branches and the liberty interests of the American people?”

Turley’s response: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The danger is quite severe. The problem with what the president is doing is that he’s not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He’s becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power.”

“The Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration,” said Turley.

“There are two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress,” he said. “One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction.”

Watch Vallely call for millions of Americans to march on Washington during this radio interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlZi-7bOAzo

Vallely is a huge favorite among the tea party organizations seeking to bring Rule of Law back to Washington. The tea party has cited Obamacare and the more than 15 times that Obama has changed the law without Congressional involvement.

Vallely sees a vote of “no confidence” as the solution.

The founder of Stand Up America, an organization dedicated to providing education resources based on the values of the Founding Fathers said: “Clearly America has lost confidence and no longer trusts those in power at a most critical time in our history. … It is true that not all who ply the halls of power fit under that broad brush, but most of them are guilty of many egregious acts, and we say it is time to hold a vote of no confidence. It’s time for a ‘recall.’”

There are members of Congress addressing Obama’s violations of the Constitution. Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-SC., has said that Obama’s actions have reached unprecedented levels and that we must do something about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20EEGFikubM

“Assume that a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president require three forms? Can the president require one form? Can you suspend all requirements? If not, why not?” he said. “If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?”

Gowdy cited several instances of Obama’s usurping of power including Obama’s decision to ignore immigration law despite Congress not approving the changes. In addition, Gowdy cited the arbitrary changes to Obamacare as well as “recess appointments” of judges even though the Senate was not in recess.

Gowdy is proposing that Congress take the White House to court over Obama’s actions. A resolution that has been proposed by Rep. Tom Rice, R-GA., would authorize the House to sue the Obama administration. Currently, the resolution has 30 co-sponsors backing it.

Because of “this disregard of our country’s checks and balances, many of you have asked me to bring legal action against the president,” said Rice.

“After carefully researching the standing the House of Representatives has and what action we can take, I have introduced a resolution to stop the president’s clear overreach,” Rice said.

Gowdy was asked by a Fox News interviewer if Obama could refuse to enforce election laws.

“Why not?” asked Gowdy, “If you can turn off immigration laws, if you can turn off the mandatory minimum in our drug statutes, if you can turn off the so-called Affordable Care Act – why not election laws?”

Michael Cannon, director of Health Policy Studies for the Cato Institute said that there is “one last thing to which the people can resort if the government does not respect the restraints that the Constitution places of the government.”

“Abraham Lincoln talked about our right to alter our government or our revolutionary right to overthrow it,” said Cannon.

“That is certainly something that no one wants to contemplate. If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws, then they will conclude that neither are they.”

Cannon continued, saying it is “very dangerous” for President Obama to “wantonly ignore the laws, to try to impose obligations upon people that the legislature did not approve.”

Larry Klayman, former Reagan Justice Department lawyer, hopes that November 19^th will rank with the 4^th of July someday. Klayman called the day the start of “The Second American Revolution.”  November 19^th was the day that Klayman organized a rally by “The Reclaim America Now” coalition at Lafayette Park across from the White House.

The “Reclaim America Now” coalition is composed of approximately three dozen conservative groups, including Freedom Watch, Gun Owners of America, Tea Party Patriots, 2 Million Bikers to D.C., Jihad Watch, and the Western Center for Journalism among others.

Two hundred or so people gathered at the rally where speakers called for two things: The renewal of America and the resignation of Obama.

Klayman accused Obama of tyranny while calling for peaceful change, declaring: “We the People have had enough of the corrupt and incompetent ways of the Obama administration and its bipartisan political enablers. It is time for action, not words.”

It is the hope of Riley, Vallely and many others that this coming May 16^th will bring millions upon millions of Americans to DC for an American revolution that will change the course of history back to the one our Founding Fathers envisioned.

Source Link:

http://www.teaparty.org/32803-32803/

A Constitutional Patriot Launches Operation American Spring!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On January 5, 2014:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/01/05/a-constitutional-patriot-launches-operation-american-spring%E2%80%8F/print/

OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING!

http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/

Will the U.S. military put down a Veterans’ March on D.C. in 2014 as in 1932?-Posted on The DC Clothesline-By Dr. Eowyn-On January 8, 2014:

http://dcclothesline.com/2014/01/08/will-u-s-military-put-veterans-march-d-c-2014-1932/

Operation American Spring’s Call To Action – Petition Congress for a Redress of Grievances:

http://calltoaction.oas2014.com/

Regime Change America – Propaganda Or Truth?-Posted on Before It’s News-By Wake up America (Reporter)-On April 6, 2014:

http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2014/04/regime-change-america-propaganda-or-truth-2451556.html

Regime Change America – Propaganda Or Truth?-HEY WE GET A PLUG IN THIS ONE!-Posted on OAS-By Pinkorchid, Senior Member-On April 6, 2014:

http://www.operationamericanspring.org/forum/showthread.php/2908-Regime-Change-America-%96-Propaganda-Or-Truth-HEY-WE-GET-A-PLUG-IN-THIS-ONE?s=4148347a62dbc28e5f1f318de7befeb3&p=7360#post7360

Note: The following articles and/or blogs and videos relate to this issue-You Decide:

Intelligent Populism vs. Mindless Progressivism!-Posted on PJ Media-By Victor Davis Hanson-On January 6, 2014:

http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/mindless-progressivism/?singlepage=true

OBAMA TO BE ‘PRESIDENT’ EVEN WHEN TERM ENDS: ‘Bold prediction about what happens in 2017’!-Posted on WND.com-By KATHY SHAIDLE-On January 7, 2014:

http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/obama-to-be-president-even-when-term-ends/#YytbjwpKgFZkqypB.99

Cruz Calls President ‘Dangerous And Terrifying’!-Posted on CBS Houston-By Assocaited Press-On January 10, 2014:

http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/01/10/cruz-calls-president-dangerous-and-terrifying/#sthash.L54cV7iB.dpuf

504 Documented Examples of Obama’s Lies, Lawbreaking, Corruption, Cronyism, Etc.!-Posted on The DC Clothesline-By Tim Brown-On January 11, 2014:

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/01/11/504-documented-examples-obamas-lies-lawbreaking-corruption-cronyism-etc-3/

People Power Alone Can Save Us!-Posted on VT News-By Stephen Lendman-On October 15, 2013:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/15/people-power-alone-can-save-us/

Video: A Vote of No Confidence in Barack Obama & His Administration!-Posted on Conservatvie Videos-On January 11, 2014:

http://conservativevideos.com/2014/01/vote-confidence-barack-obama-administration/#olEmmzhcm0ZBW7AR.99

Have You Signed the Impeach Obama Petition?-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By National Director, Dee-On January 14, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=4301673%3ATopic%3A2310529&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

Video: The Coming Civil War: 6 Generals On Our Side!-Posted on Before It’s News-By Mort Amsel (Reporter)-On January 14, 2014:

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/01/the-coming-civil-war-6-generals-on-our-side-video-2873804.html?utm_campaign=&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FhRu1&utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse

Obama Terminates Another 34 Nuclear Missile Air Force Officers!-Posted on FoxNews.com-On January 16, 2014:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/16/air-force-34-nuclear-missile-officers-implicated-in-cheating-scandal/

Why Are Dozens Of High Ranking Officers Being Purged From The U.S. Military?-Posted on Freedom Outpost-By Michael Snyder-Nn January 17, 2014:

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/dozens-high-ranking-officers-purged-u-s-military/#DrvwuZcu0kGq7jV4.99

STOP OBAMA’S MILITARY ‘PURGE’!

https://secure.freedomdonations.com/patriotpac/obama_purge/?a=2042-ppac

Florida Republican Calls Obama a Traitor – Liberals Whine and Moan!-Posted on Eagle Rising-By Onan Coca-On January 23, 2014:

http://eaglerising.com/4282/florida-republican-calls-obama-traitor-liberals-whine-moan/#rStfpZVj4FRJj9eK.99

Liberal Icon: Obama Most “Dangerous” President Ever, Must Be Impeached!-Posted on Mr. Conservative-By Sean Brown-On January 22, 2014:

http://www.mrconservative.com/2014/01/30819-liberal-journalist-claims-obama-the-most-dangerous-president-ever-calls-for-impeachment/

Video: Ted Nugent: “Subhuman Mongrel” Obama Should Be Jailed For Treason!-Posted on Western Journalism-By TOM HINCHEY-On January 23, 2014:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-nugent-subhuman-mongrel-obama-jailed-treason/#MjCCTWELiHd4GXZX.99

Video: Stockman: In Senate, I Would Vote To Convict Obama!-Posted on Western Journalism-By B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE-On February 17, 2014:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/stockman-senate-vote-convict-obama...

The World Is Being Run By Psychopaths & Sociopaths!-Posted on Before It’s News-By FSN-On February 11, 2014:

http://beforeitsnews.com/economy/2014/02/celente-the-world-is-being...

Sheep Never Stalk The Tiger!-Posted on Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On February 23, 2014:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/02/23/sheep-never-stalk-the-tiger/...

Black Pastor Calls President Obama the Worst President He’s Ever Seen!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By Gary Demar-On February 26, 2014:

http://godfatherpolitics.com/14523/black-pastor-calls-president-obama-worst-president-hes-ever-seen/#iIfH6IzJ4RsZbQs4.99

Video: Ted Nugent Nukes CNN: History Will Show That I’m Right About Obama: ‘CNN’s Erin Burnett interviews Rocker Ted Nugent’!-Posted on Western Journalism-On February 26, 2014:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-nugent-nukes-cnn-history-will-show-im-right-obama/#LX4hVRiemcIXOevM.99

Video: Actor Steven Seagal Calls For Obama’s Impeachment: ‘Actor Steven Seagal appeared at the Western Conservative Conference in Phoenix on February 22, 2014, where he called for the impeachment of President Obama’!-Posted on Western Journalism-On February 26, 2014:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/actor-steven-seagal-calls-obama-impeachment/#VIspUqHkv7d0KRyh.99

David Frank on American Restoration: “We Have to Take Responsibility”!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On February 25, 2014:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/02/25/david-frank-on-american-restoration-we-have-to-take-responsibility/print/

AMERICA, YOU ARE THE MILITIA!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Bradlee Dean-On February 26, 2014:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Bradlee/dean160.htm

Law professor: Americans are rising up against government!-Posted on The D.C. Clothesline-By Dr. Eowyn-On February 26, 2014:

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/02/26/law-professor-americans-rising-government/

“Impeach Obama” Organization Just Getting Started!-Posted on Western Journalism-By B. Christopher Agee-On April 3, 2014:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/impeach-obama-organization-just-getting-started/#8vcyWlMZ0YSEdkqZ.99

Note:  My following blogs relate to and/or further support this disturbing and gut-wrenching issue-You Decide:

Obama is the Manifestation of a Multi-Generational Soviet Plot to Destroy America!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 2, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-is-the-manifestati..

Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 29, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-senator-martin-heinrich-re-petition-for

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Are 9 Dead Bankers A Sign Of Pending Economic Collapse?-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 27, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/are-9-dead-bankers-a-sig...

Was Obama’s Real Job to Destroy America’s Moral & Ethical Foundations?-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 24, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/was-obama-s-real-job-to-destroy-america-s-moral-ethical

U.S. GENERALS NOW TAKE ACTION TO WATCH OBAMA: Retired Army, Air Force leaders say ‘government continues down path of destroying America’!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/u-s-generals-now-take-action-to-watch-obama-retired-army-air

Obama’s Weakened America Equals…World in Chaos!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 4, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-s-weakened-america-equals-world-in-chaos

Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away (Part 16)!

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/americans-like-nazi-germ...

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetr...

Who Is George Soros?

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dishonest-media-avoids-t...

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-tr...

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-oba...

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for...

Note:  The following videos wholeheartedly share my sentiments regarding what we are currently experiencing in America today-You Decide:

A Republic, If You Can Keep It!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0

The Fightin Side of Me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32-OyyLJzHw&feature=player_embed...

When Injustice Becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrqO_Hljf08

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide: 

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/what-happened-to-free-speech/

“Food For Thought”

God Bless General Vallely & Colonel Riley-God Bless America!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

http://www.greatdanepro.com/Pray%20For%20America/index.htm

Semper Fi!

Jake

                Same Sex Marriage has been put on Hold in Utah - Photo Credit - ABC-4 News

Same-Sex couples can no longer do the happy wedded bliss dance in Utah due to a temporary halt of marriage licenses to gay couples due to the U.S. Supreme Court, reported CNN. This ruling allows Utah state officials to uphold their state ban on gay marriages while the federal court judge’s decision is appealed.

For many Utah residents who voted in favor of traditional biblical marriage principles which support marriage between a man and a woman, Federal Court District Judge Robert Shelby ‘s decision last month was a blow. The judge decided that the state same-sex marriage ban was somehow unconstitutional when it forbid lesbians and gays from being legally married.

The federal judge relied upon the “Equal Protection and Due Process” safeguard of the U.S. Constitution to decide that gay couples were being deprived of their rights due to the Utah state ban. The 2004 ban had been supported and approved by Utah voters which coincide with the general principled beliefs of the state’s residents.

( Click to Read More )

So Obama wants to use the federal infrastructure of the DC Metropolitan government to infringe upon the 2^nd Amendment right of U.S. citizens living there to keep and bear arms.  He grudgingly finds that since he can’t presently impose his imperial will on Virginia, Maryland, or any of the other States, he can dictatorially repress the rights of the people of the federal district, which, he hopes, will embolden the anti-patriots around the Republic favoring identification of those Americans who own and have the ability to bear firearms.  Anyone who thinks that the idea of mandating the re-registering firearms purchased in the District of Columbia came from the DC Metropolitan government is pretty naive in political thinking.  It’s pretty obvious to me that a federal Executive branch cabal, or conspiracy, is exuding from Obama and his cohorts to negate the 2^nd Amendment, and the Executive branch has people in their enforcement agencies willing to do anything they are told to do by their tyrannical boss.  Let me again declare that I firmly believe that these enforcement agencies have had the opportunity, the means, and the motive to deliberately orchestrate what has been represented by mainstream media propaganda as random mass shootings around the nation by crazed individuals possessing automatic and semiautomatic weapons.  I have good reason to believe that, since the Patriot Act was passed, these agencies (Homeland Security, the NSA, the CIA, the FBI, and the DIA) have worked closely together to covertly plan and orchestrate every mass shooting and bombing that have occurred around the nation, and they have done it with a “Manchurian Candidate style” motif.  When all of the correct facts surrounding these killings are closely examined, the explanations provided by the federal government, through the mainstream media, just don’t add-up.  Moreover, the frequency of the, supposedly, random occurrences of mass shootings is not statistically viable, based upon the frequency and number of pre-9/11 mass shootings.  Accurate statistics don’t lie, and the clustering of these mass shootings after 9/11 indicate anything but randomness. But why on God’s green earth would the federal government perpetuate such deliberate horror?   

As millions of other rational Americans currently believe, the federal government wouldn’t mind killing a few hundred or, even, a few thousand American citizens in order to perpetuate the illusion throughout the nation that the constitutional right to keep and bear firearms should be abolished.  In order to execute this plan to abrogate the 2^nd Amendment, the federal government first needed a majority of the American people to support an austere law that would serve to severely restrict civil liberties.  The Patriot Act was such a legislation that had actually been written as a bill a number of years earlier for a very sinister, though unnamed, purpose.  As that sinister purpose has been fully realized, the effect of the Patriot Act is very similar to the effect of the Nazi Enabling Act of 1933 (supported by a majority of the German people), in that with it came the creation of a centralized police/spy organization to enforce it, Homeland Security, a federal agency closely resembling the Nazi German Gestapo.  On 9/11, the federal government succeeded in staging a horrible debacle that caused 90 percent of the American public to falsely believe that Islamic terrorists were responsible for the deaths of over 3,000 innocent human beings.  Currently, however, around 80 percent of the American electorate (the voting-age American citizens) suspects that the federal government was, in some way, responsible for what happened at the WTC and the Pentagon on 9/11.  As a result, the federal Executive branch enforcement agencies are presently working overtime to keep the truthful reality about the Pentagon bombing, and the collapse of the WTC Tower and WTC Building 7, from fully dawning on the minds of the American public.  You see, the great many salient facts about the WTC and Pentagon bombings were deliberately omitted from the “Report of the 9/11 Commission,” which directly suggested federal conspiracy, and the subsequent disclosure of those startling facts to the public since 9/11, through the work of dedicated investigative reporters, has loudly shouted the reality of federal conspiracy.  And it was all perpetrated to delude the American people into giving up their unalienable rights contained in the Bill of Rights for an illusion of security.  And to embellish this illusion, the federal government continues to clandestinely orchestrate shootings and bombings in order to engender fear among the masses, so that fundamental freedoms may be more greatly curtailed in the name of national security.  I mean, what can you say when it has been revealed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that those super-structure skyscrapers were not totally collapsed by the jet aircraft that crashed into Towers 1 and 2, and the two controlled fires on two floors of the 47-story Building 7.  Such was scientifically impossible.  Those three buildings totally collapsed because of controlled demolition.  That was the only way it could have happened, according to over 2,000 eminent architects, engineers, and physicists who have gone on-record with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in order to get this information out to the American public.  So, if carefully planned and executed controlled demolition was how the 9/11 WTC debacle was orchestrated, who but the federal government had the opportunity, the means, and the motive for doing it?

Getting back to the federally mandated re-registration of firearms in the District of Columbia, this is, but, a means of knowing where the citizens owning and possessing guns are located.  It is the first step to eventual gun confiscation by the conspiring federal government.  The Honorable James Madison wrote Federalist 46 in 1788 to allay the fears of the States about the possibility of the federal government using the federal army to impose tyranny on the People.  In that essay he said,

 Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops.”

 In Federalist 46, James Madison clearly stated that, with an armed citizenry, the States would greatly outnumber the federal army if the federal government would try to impose tyranny on the People.  Madison called tyranny “danger” when he said that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel that danger.  Madison did not refer to the militia as an organized army of soldiers, but, instead, the total armed citizenry of the 13 original States, which numbered, in 1788, to half a million citizens.  Those citizens were the men, women, and children who could fire muskets, pistols, and cannon in order to fight for their common liberties while united under their State governments for which they had affection and confidence.

 There is certainly a difference between the danger of tyranny that existed then, in 1788, and the greater danger of tyranny that exists now in 2013.  We, the people, should fear much more greatly the power possessed by a federal army, navy, marine corps, and air force numbering over a million armed soldiers, and the paramilitary forces comprised by the federal enforcement agencies (CIA, NSA, FBI, DIA, Homeland Security) numbering more than 100,000 armed cadre.  In 1788, the weaponry possessed by the federal army was basically the same as the weaponry possessed by the citizens.  Now, the federal military and paramilitary forces greatly out-gun the citizens.  That question posed by the very arrogant U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein about the 2^nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, “Do you need a bazooka?” may be answered in the affirmative.  For the citizens to oppose the tyranny that may be imposed by a federal army in 2013, much more than a bazooka will be needed.

 So, what is there to do?  The tyranny imposed by Obama on the District of Columbia, to either re-register your firearms or go to jail, cannot be tolerated by patriots.  In the District, there are obviously many more anti-patriots than patriots.  What are the DC patriots to do?  I suggest that all those patriots in the District who believe that their God-given 2^nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms is being trampled by the tyrannical federal government, should sell their property, leave the District, and relocate to Virginia, Texas, Arizona, South Carolina, or any other state where the right to keep and bear arms is held sacred.  A mass exodus from the District, by patriots, would show Obama that he can’t force patriotic red-blooded Americans to yield to tyranny.                       

http://downtrend.com/brian-carey/mitt-romney-says-his-african-american-grandson-is-an-answer-to-prayer/

                        I find it very interesting how people view Jesus today.  I am not a bible scholar and cannot quote more than just a few very common scripture verses, but is being able to quote chapter and verse from the Holy Bible really that important?  Knowing what the Bible says is important.  Living by Scripture, especially by the New Testament things taught by Jesus and his Apostles are important, but I find a lot of people who are so quote-crazy they don’t really seem to know much about what they are quoting.

For instance, Jesus is portrayed in most churches that I know of, and by every Christian I know as pious, benevolent, quiet, and soft spoken.  I don’t see him that way at all, at least not all the time.  As a matter of fact I think of Jesus as quite forceful, and a pain in the butt to the bureaucracy of his time; and to the “progressives” who now control our nation.  I see a side of Jesus that is often more like a drill sergeant in the Army. 

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2014/01/what-would-jesus-really-do/

 
  

  
 
   

 
 
  

 
 
  
    
  proud moment
if you’re a  socialist
 
 
 
 
 
why work  when its
free.

 
 


 
 

    socialism on the 
rise.......
 
    

 
 
 

 
 
 
& yet
government  expanded. Of course..... it takes more idiots to  do the work of
1
 
    

 
 
 

 
 
 
who is
going to pay for the  food stamps, health care, illegal immigrants,  and the
rest of the free stuff 
?
 
    

 
 
 

 
 
 
 


 
    

 
 
 
outrageous,  don't they take
enough money from us  already

 
 


 
 
HOW CAN  YOU
HELP?

Send copies of this letter to  at least
two other people. 100 would  be even better.

Click here for story.... http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2014/01/if-i-were-americas-foreign-enemy-id.html

When the Typhoo went though Leyte it not only rep Tacloban a part but also other parts of coast city's like Jaro Leyte. Jaro is well my family wife lives. We did find them and moved them to Manila, but now they will be going back to try and rebuild they home. It will take some time. What my wife and I am doing is getting need supply's not just for them but also for other who really had nothing before the Typhoo  really has nothing now. I have lived they for over 3 years and come to know and love a lot of them. I  am like a grandfather to a lot of the children .So what I am asking for is any help that your may be able to give and this site lets me ask your. If not them that is ok, but I tried anyway. Every dime will go to them our pastor living they will give out ever thing to all in need  If you can then just copy and paste the below link.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=RRQRSH8ANQUPE&lc=US&item_name=chrizhel%20relief%20fund&currency_code=USD&bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donateCC_LG%2egif%3aNonHosted

I would like to thank all of my Tea Party family

As a rule of thumb, I don't believe in the popular notion of Black revolutionaries because failure to be productive citizens in this society isn't a good indicator of future performance in one starting from scratch.

The most revolutionary thing a Black man can is simple. It's not even as drastic as changing his name; diet or religion, though these are game changing assertions of a self freed from limiting past constructs.

The most revolutionary thing a Black man can do is... not become a felon!

TA-DAHHH!!! EUREKA! SHAZAM!AMEN! HALLELUYAH! ASHE! and every other exclamation to the Divine supplicants can utter.

A Black man with a felony, let alone several. voluntarily places himself into legal bondage.

He can be legally excluded from employment; federal financial aid; public housing; private housing from discerning land lords; entering certain professions; voting; running for office; owning fire arms and other weapons... need I continue?

That's right brothers, you can allow people to legally discriminate against you and there isn't anything you can do about it in the age of the background check. You can hope against hope some liberal or even libertarian politician can get enough support to change state or federal law, but it's not likely to happen soon enough to help millions of self-enslaved Black men!

Think about that the next time some felon ( or future one ) wants you to join him in selling some crack; robbing somebody or breaking into a home or business.

Definitely think about if you're the one planning a felony crime because it's like jumping into the slave ship and telling the captain, " Let's go! " Felonies equal slavery and I'm not mad that they do.

Look at any inner city crime rate and guess who's committing most of the offenses, you guessed it, felons i.e., so-called brothers and sisters who do serious crime as a life style.

Think long and hard about whether you want to be a legal slave whom people can discriminate against or worse, use as a meal ticket for reentry programs which make money off your slave status. That's why the most revolutionary thing a Black man can do is not become a felon and therefore deny others legal reasons to limit his opportunities or worse, profiteer from his plight.

But, if you do choose to become a felon, please, don't waste my time complaining how hard life is for you.

It's already hard enough for brothers and others who aren't felons or " reborn " ones who've left felonious lifestyles in their distant past! Be a real Black revolutionary- don't be a felon!

                        I was listening to Rush Limbaugh (Wednesday Dec. 17, 2013) and he had a very interesting call from a woman relating to a survey Limbaugh discussed about men not arguing with or disagreeing with their wife.  The survey found that when men never challenged the wife’s decisions the marriage got worse instead of getting better as is the common belief.  http://www.today.com/health/marriage-dilemma-it-better-be-happy-or-right-2D11758343?cid=eml_nhh_20131218   The caller made the point that men who never stand up for their opinions and beliefs don’t get respect from women.

Read More:

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2014/01/the-republican-party-when-the-body-guard-joins-the-bully/

It amuses me no end to witness White liberals speak authoritatively about Black crime as if no Blacks are intelligent enough to disrupt droning monologues.

I'm further amused by Black liberals who accuse anti crime activism-while-Black as somehow aiding racists???

It's in my own enlightened self-interest to promote production of fewer thugs I call, " chocolate Klansmen, " which reduces inner city homicide and violence.

As an American ( forgive me Afrocentrists, but I wasn't born overseas ), reducing chocolate Klansman production reduces homicide and violence inflicted upon non-Blacks.

How " awful " of me to promote reducing Black On Black and Black On Other crime as a " ghetto criminologist, " if you will, whose proverbial shingle is hung on streets and within sub-culture far removed from the academy.

The plight of the ghetto criminologist is White liberal " allies ; friends, etc. " actively blocking access to the public policy rostrum  for fear they'll become irrelevant and lose a cash cow seconds after we speak!

So this is " progress? "

What a New Year, yet can we not wonder this simple question. Is this the end?

Could there be more of a premise to the future of this nation than our present condition? Are we as a nation not in the same irony of the end of civilization before? The ‘beginning of the end’ as Wilson Churchill applied so apply after the ‘Battle of Britain.’ His metaphor applies conveying the reality the depths of destruction had been halted currently, and the future of the nation may survive. While currently in this nation—the destructive forces are as some never-ending tsunami of culture destruction destroying our society, while at the same time condemning our civilization.

Is it absolutely incomprehensible that a nation with the foundations by their very design allowed the people of this nation to stand apart, above all other societies that ever were; is now reduced to serfdom lower than any nation of chattel, potentate, or totalitarian nation or society every known in the history of mankind. Condemned not because so much as we have fallen, but because the incomprehensible of what we were when this tragedy began. No nation ever has the comparative of such a beginning as they rush headlong to a despair of what we are becoming. A nation from the pinnacle of design, to the depths of hell, our trajectory more magnified from the simple acknowledgment of how high were this nation’s ideals when it began. We now experience this free fall of absolute madness. The depths of the fall, only magnifies the absoluteness of the tragedy. For no nation, ever had achieved the pinnacle of magnifying the Protestant Christian concepts of Christianity applied in the form of government as this nation. Many scoff at that little reality, little realizing that if there was one iconic identifier of this nation wonder, and its destruction, the same barometer would be the signification. For if Christian of whatever else there is, perhaps papist, in the concept of the simple foundations of man’s right to ‘liberty’ it is not written or magnified in any doctrine other than the reformation of the concept of Christian belief. For it is, now as always, the only doctrine that recognizes the free-will, and the reality, the cognitiveness, that as the physics of the universe proclaim, it is man who comprehends in the very foundations of his soul that right and wrong exists. Good and bad is as much a part of man as his physical construct. For when man acknowledges that there is a right way, and a wrong way, to view all we do, does the reality when right is identified, and right is advanced has civilization advanced. Then man can truly stick out his chest, announce to the world, it may not be perfect but the way we do it is better than any before. Then the society, the civilization of that nation can they flout their hubris success, their acknowledgement that ‘no it wasn’t magical’ they have experienced the effort to achieve the result. Those results came from careful reasoning, studying, and acknowledging that not only in society, but also in the very soul of man is tacitly some magical identifier of evaluation. It is ‘absolutely’ remarkable to imagine that men are soulless, to a man with a soul. Yet in our experience as society as the citizens of our nation, as the actions of our political environment inundates us daily, that there are those without a soul. They also have no respect for man, or even the society in which we live. They refute the foundations of this nation, this civilization, the philosophy of Western Man since the known history of man, and the literacy of our species on a continuum.

Once a young man, a true idealist that in all his errors understood the absolute miracle of this nation, John Kennedy told us; ‘A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on.’  

If anything emphasizes the loss in this nation, this little simple statement does. For in the history of mankind—no society, no people, no civilization—ever first acknowledged that as the scripture identifies, there is right and wrong, then reacted on that simple cognitive observation—that absolute common sense reality.

This nation, this absolute miracle, this acknowledgement of the conclusion of the reformation of national design, which began at the infancy of man’s literacy, achieved the highest pinnacle of design known then, or known today. That simple concept, the mirror of the Christian principles of man’s dignity of as living entities have, and deserve that simple reality—we stand as men who were born free, without constraint, without dictate, and that as men with free-will, will make those decisions. We make them for not only our government but our society as well. We as a people acknowledge men are born with liberty, and it is their right, by their approval to acquiesce that intrusion of government, to reduce their freedom by that choice.

Our nation’s founding father, George Washington understood the dichotomy of man as the agent for any legislation. ‘Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government,’ Washington told us. Is not the current situation of what our government is doing proof positive of this reality? Is not the continuum of dismissing the whole concept of an ‘enumerated’ republic, with specified duties and responsibilities of what government is not only dedicated to do, but is restricted in what they can do, disappeared from our genre. On the other hand, even the design of what our government does. Has not the men, those who have gained the power of this nation…as men…completely disregarded our nation’s design…proving beyond any doubt that men are unfit for their own government?

In the journey of man, we have little knowledge of all events. In the last 6,000 years, since for some reason man miraculously decided that literacy, to think, and to record that thinking in the form of written language, was a great idea, we know. Yet in that adventure, we have many conflicting ideas, ideals, philosophies, and even ideologies, along with the theologies that man has experienced. In all of the different evaluations of mankind one thing seems, by objective confirmation, that has always been identified as man’s major deficiency of society; ‘theft.’ Even the concept of laws, organized society, legislation or even forming a society has always been with this simple foundation. This simple reality, this cognitive observation, we see actually written in the commandments of the Christian foundations. That it must be written as a law—or was written as a law—is ample proof that Washington’s observation of mankind, existed long before his evaluation. For it was written the simple doctrine; ‘thou shall not steal.’ In the doctrine of preservation of the theology of Judea-Christian foundations of a monolithic religious order, and the doctrine of such, why the commandment of ‘not stealing’ was included is a question hard to visualize and respect how important is this simple requirement for civilized society. So important it is inclusive in the basic doctrine of the theology of the religious foundations we identify as Christianity.

As many things that are but hypothesis, such as man’s evolution, never proven but accepted as doctrine; we can identify that the societies of mankind have been, in the quest to find and apply this simple construct, to create a society, and a governance applying this same principle. In man’s past, and the history of man, one thing has been clear. Man did not come with our foundations of society. In fact, even under the hypothesis of evolution, man is animal that has somehow transformed to a homo sapient, a thinking man. In that process, one of the results is civilization. Though some would question with the individual elected to lead this nation, perhaps not all in society advanced along this path, content in some retardation of development; or perhaps destructive behavior of drug use, and mental destructiveness.

Things developed, such as society, civilization, and the interactions of mankind’s genesis is difficult to trace. To say that ‘Theft’ is the driver of man’s society, is acceptable, as all of history verifies it. For what is the hierarchy of our societies known as government? Are they not based on the form of theft we identify as taxation? Has not taxation been identified since the beginning of man’s literacy, this record of the past, as theft? Yet the theft of all for the reason of a few is so accepted in this irrational comprehension we are a ‘democracy’ where the dumbest among us can elect their idol, the epitome of the dumbest among us. Who can and has shown in the position of power in a government without restriction—one without rules and enumerations of what it can and cannot do—has shown through action in such a glimpse of time, that any government can debauch and destroy any nation…and sadly even this one as the current scenario is confirming.

http://lgstarr.blogspot.com/2014/01/fox-news-reporter-suggests-obama-is.html

Are you the Asshole Marie describes in her book?  The type of person that makes raising a child with blindness, autism, both, other disability and/or multiple disabilities worse?  "I am just writing truths and opinions about my life, my own experience , and my own feelings concerning caring for my own son." States Marie Duke in Autism and Assholes the book she wrote.

While the title seemed extreme to me at first; after reading the book I agree the title fits her walk in the realm of disability child rearing/raising. A reader that wants to read a story on heroism, is a newbie parent to the realm of disability child rearing and people involved in providing services to children with disabilities might want to consider this to be put on the top of their reading list.

I haven't excused the general public yet.  People that want a peek to see what it is on the inside of this world should read it before they stick their nose in other's business.    "You should put him in a home," is a sentence Marie heard.  I also as a mother of a child with autism heard this very same sentence spoken to me be by experts.

One child developmental specialist Wanda Draper, that has a redo of her book, "Your Child is Smarter Than You Think," was the only one to say anything about the importance of the parents.  She remains positive about the children.

Autism and Assholes is $11.99 in paper pack at Amazon and the Kindle is $6.99.   The ISBN is 149215887 and the ASIN is BOOEKRNW7.

I consider this a must read to gain insight into how little people understand the real world of disabilities.  How dare some tell us to put our children in a home so early in life.  This proved to be wrong for Marie and me.

A heart wrenching story that will give you the understanding she deserves.  You may take offense at the title but after reading it, I promise you will want to call her up and offer a heartfelt apology.

This isn't the normal book review.  I don't want to take away from the story.  I mainly wanted to explain and tell you why to read the book.  Marie in my opinion was too nice to the people that provided services to her son.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=autism%20and%20assholes&sprefix=autis%2Caps&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Aautism%20and%20assholes

• William Overstreet Jr., a former captain in the U.S. Air Corps, passed away on Sunday at a hospital in Roanoke
• He famously flew his plane beneath the Eiffel Tower in Nazi-occupied Paris in 1944, lifting the spirits of French troops on the ground
• In 2009, he was presented France's Legion of Honor

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2533373/WWII-fighter-pilot-flew-THROUGH-Eiffel-Tower-dies-Virginia-aged-92.html

Marine Corps Rules:

1. Be courteous to everyone, friendly to no one.
2. Decide to be aggressive enough, quickly enough.
3. Have a plan.
4. Have a back-up plan, because the first one probably won’t work.
5. Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
6. Do not attend a gunfight with a handgun whose caliber does not start with a “4.”
7. Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Life is expensive.
8. Move away from your attacker. Distance is your friend. (Lateral & diagonal preferred.)
9. Use cover or concealment as much as possible.
10. Flank your adversary when possible. Protect yours.
11. Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.
12. In ten years nobody will remember the details of caliber, stance, or tactics. They will only remember who lived.
13. If you are not shooting, you should be communicating your intention to shoot…

Navy SEAL’s Rules:

1. Look very cool in sunglasses.
2. Kill every living thing within view.
3. Adjust Speedo.
4. Check hair in mirror.

US Army Rangers Rules:

1. Walk in 50 miles wearing 75 pound rucksack while starving.
2. Locate individuals requiring killing.
3. Request permission via radio from “Higher” to perform killing.
4. Curse bitterly when mission is aborted.
5. Walk out 50 miles wearing a 75 pound rucksack while starving.

US Army Rules:

1. Curse bitterly when receiving operational order.
2. Make sure there is extra ammo and extra coffee.
3. Curse bitterly.
4. Curse bitterly
5. Do not listen to 2nd Lieutenants. They can get you killed.
6. Curse bitterly.

US Air Force Rules:

1. Have a cocktail.
2. Adjust temperature on air-conditioner.
3. See what’s on HBO.
4. Ask “What is a gunfight?”
5. Request more funding from Congress with a “killer” Power Point presentation.
6. Wine & dine ‘key’ Congressmen, invite DOD & defense industry executives.
7. Receive funding, set up new command and assemble assets.
8. Declare the assets “strategic” and never deploy them operationally.
9. Hurry to make 1345 tee-time.
10. Make sure the base is as far as possible from the conflict but close enough to have tax exemption.

US Navy Rules:

1. Go to Sea.
2. Drink Coffee.
3. Deploy Marines

Thought you would enjoy this

http://misguidedchildren.com/domestic-affairs/2014/01/new-study-gun-control-laws-are-good-for-nothing/10157

Folks, We have a Senator Hagan up for re-election. Who do we have to challenge her? We will have Rep. McIntyre up for US Congress in 2016, who do we have to challenge him?