All Posts (29910)
Sort by
ublished time: September 27, 2013 22:19
US officials have accused Iran of recently hacking unclassified Navy computers. If the allegations prove true, the incident would be one of the most serious cyberintrusions of American computer systems by the Islamic Republic.
The officials said hackers working for the Iranian government or a proxy group with approval from Iranian leaders are responsible for penetrating the unclassified Navy computer network.
US officials said they do not believe information of significant value was lifted, though the potency of such a cyberattack that accessed military data set off alarms at the Pentagon, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Iran’s cyber abilities have increased gradually, gaining further recognition from the US military, according to anonymous officials.
"Their ability to also play in this [cyber] sandbox compounds that concern," a US official said.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey were briefed on the infiltration and how the Pentagon is boosting its network strength. Congress has also been briefed on the hack, officials said.
Previous Iran-backed hacks and surveillance efforts have gone after US banks and energy industry computer networks.
The allegations occur as the US and Iranian governments have increased negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. US President Barack Obama and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani spoke on Friday, after both leaders delivered speeches this week before the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
Iranian officials did not return requests for comment, the WSJ reported.
The US led a cyberattack -- dubbed ‘Olympic Games’ -- on Iranian uranium enrichment facilities during the Bush and the Obama administrations, the New York Times reported last July. The program included a collaboration with Israeli hackers to develop the Stuxnet computer worm, which was used to infect Iranian computer networks and damage hundreds of centrifuges at the Natanz enrichment facility.
While Americans are focused on the implementation of ObamaCare and the battle of the budget, the House is preparing to vote on an amendment offered by Rep. Ben Lujan (D-NM) that is a dry-run to kill the Keystone Pipeline and other economic development projects across the nation.
The House is scheduled to consider a non-controversial land-swap deal in Arizona. Liberal Rep. Ben Lujan (D-NM) is preparing an amendment that would give the Secretary of the Department of Interior the power to designate the site a Native American "cultural site" killing the project in its tracks. The amendment is a dream for radical environmentalists who could use the amendment as a precedent to kill other developmental projects like Keystone Pipeline.
Supporters of the Lujan Amendment define "cultural sites" as anywhere where our original inhabitants' lived, prayed and worshiped would be barred from new development.
Some Republicans are supporting the amendment perhaps not recognizing its a camel's nose under the net. If this precedent is applied in the future it would have a destructive impact it would have on road construction, home building, land swaps, or even the development of the Keystone Pipeline.
The amendment would give environmentalists another tool in their arsenal to stop development of any project they do not support. Worse yet, there is little doubt, courthouses across the nation would be flooded with lawsuits from the radical environmentalists demanding "cultural site" designations anywhere and everywhere construction is proposed.
Contractors, road builders, pipelayers, and construction unions should be up in arms over the amendment but no one seems to realize its potential impact. One government official should not have the power to stop economic development across the nation. But if the Lujan amendment does become law, the Secretary of Interior would have that power. Overnight he would become one of the most powerful government officials in the nation. The Lujan amendment must be defeated.
http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/major-theft-of-u-s-weapons-in-libya/
Editor's Note: Sunday, November 11, 2012. In the 8 months that has passed since the original publication of this op-ed, ask yourself if President Obama's actions have led him more, or less, in the direction of an impeachment and imprisonment. This op-ed (now with more than 25 million views) has been updated with the most current facts for the case of Obama's Impeachable Offenses. Stay tuned right here at RedFlagNews.com for future updates!
I have repeatedly been asked by a number of different people if I think that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, has committed any offenses that subject him to being impeached by the Congress of the United States. The answer is without a doubt, yes because he has repeatedly breached his oath of office. The oath of office of the President of the United States is simple and concise. It reads:
"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Instead of living up to that oath, President Obama has actively attempted to subvert, ignore, and completely destroy large parts of the Constitution. I believe the President of the United States is well aware of what he is doing, and it is completely intentional. Based from my years as a constitutional attorney, listed below are what I believe are impeachable offenses, and the list continues to grow.
1. President Obama has appointed numerous people to cabinet level positions without the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, as is required by the Constitution. These individuals are given extraordinary power and independent funding, and are not under the scrutiny of Congress. The fact that Obama calls them Czars does not make them legal. He has also made illegal recess appointments of other members of his cabinet that required Senate approval. He simply declared that the U.S. Senate was in recess despite the fact that no such declaration had been made by the Senate. The President has no Constitutional authority to do this.
2. The push by Pres. Obama to pass healthcare legislation in the Congress of the United States that he was fully aware was unconstitutional. He has continued to use his powers and executive branch of government to implement this legislation despite the fact that a federal judge had declared the entire law unconstitutional, and ordered that it not be implemented. In addition, Obama has directed members of his administration to violate the right to freedom of religion protected by the 1st Amendment to the Constitution.
Religious institutions such as churches and schools have been ordered to provide contraceptives and abortion inducing morning after pills to employees as part of the health care bill requirements. The fact that this is a direct violation of their religious teaching is of no concern to Obama.
3. Despite the fact that the United States Senate refused to pass the Cap and Trade bill, the President has ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to use regulations to implement key portions of the bill, including those regulating so-called greenhouse gases. Obama himself has acknowledged that this will force energy prices in this country to skyrocket. He is taking these actions in direct defiance of the will of the people of the United States, the will of Congress, and the Constitution. The actions of the EPA include regulations that will force many coal burning power plants to close.
4. Through the Department of the Interior (DOI) Obama has placed a moratorium on offshore oil drilling or exploration off both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States and in parts of the Gulf of Mexico. He has also prohibited new drilling exploration on federal land in any states in the United States. These actions by the DOI have continued in direct defiance of several court orders issued by Federal Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans, Louisiana declaring that the department had no authority to issue such a moratorium on drilling in the Gulf. In fact, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior (DOI) has been held in contempt by the same judge. The administration has claimed to be complying, but has tied up the drilling permits in so much red tape that the effect is the same.
5. Instead of allowing American companies to drill for oil domestically, Obama has betrayed the American people and authorized loans of billions of dollars to countries like Brazil and Mexico so that they can drill for oil, and then sell that oil to the United States. This will dramatically increase our dependence on foreign nations including Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and even Libya that do not serve the interest of America or the American people.
Obama has also refused to approve the keystone pipeline from Canada to the United States that would not only lessen our dependence on oil from countries like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, but create thousands of new jobs in the United States. The decision on the pipeline is one that belongs in the hands of the members of Congress, not the President.
6. President Obama has abdicated his responsibility to enforce the laws of the United States against illegal immigration. He has virtually declared our southern border an open border by declaring certain areas of federal land in states like Arizona as off-limits to federal, state, and local authorities. This is despite the fact that these areas are being used to bring in thousands of illegal immigrants, massive amounts of drugs, and also being used by foreign terrorists to infiltrate the United States. He has also ordered the border patrol not to arrest most illegal immigrants entering the country, and has stopped deportation proceedings against thousands of people in this country illegally. He is in effect instituting the so-called “dream act” bypassing the Congress of the United States which has sole authority over immigration matters.
7. The President and his Attorney General Eric Holder have clearly violated their oath of office by joining with foreign countries such as Mexico, Bolivia, and Columbia, in lawsuits against the sovereign states of Arizona, Georgia, and Alabama to stop them from enforcing the federal immigration laws.
8. President Obama has ordered the Federal Communications Commission to adopt regulations giving the federal government control of the Internet and its contents, including providing Obama with a kill switch that gives him authority to shut down the Internet if he sees fit. This is in direct violation of a decision by the United States Supreme Court that the FCC has no Constitutional authority to control the Internet.
There were two bills pending in Congress to effectively give Obama the kill switch he wants over the Internet. When these two proposals, the Stop Internet Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) were withdrawn amid public outcry Obama announced he will sign an international treaty that purports to give him the same authority. He has signaled his intention to do this as an “Executive Act” and not bring the treaty to the Senate for ratification as required by Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution. I believe he intends to take the same action in regard to the United Nations Small arms treaty and the UN Law of the Sea treaty that are both unlikely to get Senate approval.
9. One of the paramount responsibilities of the President of the United States and his executive branch of government is to enforce and defend laws adopted by Congress unless they are declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. Obama has decided that he should ignore this Constitutional mandate, and that as President he is more powerful than either the Congress of the United States or the Supreme Court. He has unilaterally declared that the Defense of Marriage Act passed by the Congress is unconstitutional, and further declared that he will not have the Justice Department defend it against lawsuits.
His administration has also refused to enforce laws against voter intimidation and federal law that requires states to purge their voter registration lists of deceased individuals and those that are registered illegally. In addition, the Justice Department is refusing to allow states to enforce laws requiring proof of identity by voters at the polls. Obama has essentially said that he is the supreme ruler of the United States, and that the Congress and the Federal Judiciary are irrelevant.
10. It has been widely reported that acting through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms the Obama administration was involved for months in getting legitimate and law-abiding gun store owners along our southern border to supply weapons to straw buyers who the government knew would deliver them to the drug cartels in Mexico. This was billed as a sting operation against the cartels when in fact it was designed to produce fraudulent data showing that large numbers of weapons were going from the United States to the Mexican drug dealers.
This data was then to be used, and is being used, to try to justify new gun control regulations to limit the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms. It has nothing to do with arresting members of the drug operations. The administration has, in effect, armed our enemies, and one border patrol agent has already been killed by one of these weapons. Now, Obama continues to impose gun control laws by Executive order so he will not have to deal with Congress. The administration is also refusing to cooperate with the committees in the House of Representatives that are investigating the entire operation. It is even defying Congressional subpoenas.
11. The President of the United States is not authorized by the Constitution to take our nation to war without the consent of the Congress of the United States. The only exception to this is the authority granted to the President by Congress under the War Powers Act. This law allows the President to take immediate action without the consent of Congress if there is an imminent threat to the security of the United States, or its citizens. Although there was clearly no such imminent threat caused by the Civil War in Libya, the President committed members of the United States military to combat missions in a foreign country without the consent of Congress. He based his authority on a United Nations resolution, and a resolution by the Arab League.
Now, the President has carried it one step further. During testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on March 7, 2012, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told Senators that the President has authority to take our country to war without the Congressional approval required by Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution. The administration is taking the position that it can ignore Congress as long as it has United Nations approval or NATO approval.
However, these actions may be the least of the worries facing the American people. The White House insisted that language be included in the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that gives the President sole authority to order the military to arrest and indefinite detain American citizens on U.S. soil if the President suspects them of terrorist ties. This was amazingly passed overwhelmingly by Congress. It appears to be another situation where few members read the bill before voting on it.
This was almost immediately followed by another unconstitutional executive order titled the National Defense Resources Preparation order. It is similar to orders signed by past Presidents, but this one includes language that appears to give Obama the authority to declare martial law in peacetime, and take over the allocation of everything from food and fuel to transportation and health care. This violates the Constitution in a number of different ways.
12. Last but not the least of my dirty dozen of impeachable offenses, is the fact that since taking office the President has used executive orders, laws pushed through Congress in the dark of night, and administrative actions by his departments to nationalize and control automobile manufacturers, banks, insurance companies, and portions of the healthcare industry. This is designed to take our country from a free enterprise economy to a socialist economy. There is absolutely no authority in the Constitution of the United States that allows the President to do this.
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution provides as follows:
“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
I contend that among those high crimes and misdemeanors is the intentional violation of the oath of office administered to the President and all other federal officials. In fact, federal law at 5 U.S.C. 7311 specifically provides that violation of the oath of office includes advocating the overthrowing of our constitutional form of government. This is specifically declared a criminal offense in 18 U.S.C. 1918 and is punishable by both a fine and imprisonment.
In the 12 areas I mentioned in the paragraphs above I firmly believe that Obama, Eric Holder, and numerous other members of his administration have gone beyond just advocating the overthrow of our constitutional form of government. They are actually engaged in making it happen, and as a result should be impeached and convicted. There are also the emerging issues of corruption such as the Solyndra scandal caused by Obama using stimulus money to pay off campaign contributors.
Will there be an impeachment and conviction in the current Congress? Probably not, since it takes a two thirds vote in the House of Representatives to impeach, and a two thirds vote in the Senate to convict. With Harry Reid and the progressives still in control of the Senate, and many of them guilty of some of the same impeachable offenses, they will resist it.
However, we are the American people and we still have a right to control our government, and the people elected to represent us. Therefore, I am personally calling on the conservative members the House of Representatives to bring this action based on the grounds I have enumerated so that the American people can understand what is really at stake here. Then “we the people,” can make our voices heard.
http://www.change.org/petitions/to-the-house-and-senate-of-the-united-states-of-america-arrest-barack-hussein-obama-for-treason-now","newWindow":false}" data-block-type="13" id="block-79a2d72c241526edfabf">
At Food Democracy Now!, we believe it's time to end Monsanto's campaign of fear and intimidation against America's farmers! Join us to stand up for America's family farmers and the integrity of our food and agricultural heritage.
A Brief History: OSGATA vs Monsanto
Family farmers and farm organizations originally filed a lawsuit against Monsanto in March 2011 in an effort to invalidate Monsanto’s patents and protect organic and non-GMO family farmers from unwanted genetic contamination of their crops and from Monsanto’s aggressive patent infringement lawsuits.
Monsanto filed a motion to dismiss the case, which was heard in Federal District Court in New York City on January 31st, 2012. In February 2012, Federal Judge Naomi Buchwald dismissed the case, ruling that the farmers lacked legal standing regarding the concerns over genetic contamination and resulting economic harm.
In March 2012, Plaintiffs appealed the District Court's decision to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which scheduled oral argument in the case to be heard on January 10, 2013.
Lawyers from the Public Patent Foundation, who are representing the farmers have identified numerous reversible legal and factual errors committed by the judge which they assert caused her to mistakenly dismiss the case.
What’s at Stake
OSGATA vs Monsanto is a landmark legal case attempting to protect family farmers from Monsanto’s aggressive patent infringement lawsuits and unwanted genetic contamination that results when Monsanto’s patented, GMO pollen blowing across farmer’s fences and contaminates their crops against their wishes. In an effort to enforce their legal patents on their genetically engineered genes, Monsanto regularly sends their seed police out in rural America to trespass on farmer’s fields and steal their plants to take them back to their labs for testing.
Since 1997, one year after the approval of Monsanto’s GMO Roundup Ready soybeans, the world’s leading chemical and biotech seed company admits to filing 150 lawsuits against America’s family farmers, while settling another 700 out of court for undisclosed amounts. During this time, Monsanto has investigated an average of more than 500 family farmers each year.
Due to these aggressive lawsuits and investigations, Monsanto has created an atmosphere of fear in rural America and driven dozens of farmers into bankruptcy.
Original post: http://capblackhood.blogspot.com/2013/09/black-folks-love-talking-about-bad-cops.html
Complaining about bad cops allows bad parents and bad decision makers in the Black community to get the heat off their short comings.
Bad cops exist and innocent people of all colors have paid the price for their misdeeds, but it's not bad cops killing Black people daily!
Bad cops haven't made the inner city a war zone where seniors hide behind burglar bars and anyone with more than two nickels to rub together leave at warp speed.
Here's a text book case of what I mean:
There is a single mother of four I knew who always has a police complaint filed; is a huge Trayvon Martin supporter, including attending hoodie marches but doesn't march within herself to discover why her two oldest kids are always in juvenile custody.
She also hasn't examined why her boy friend is in jail nor the reason the father of three of her children is a felon. 96% of us are killed by thugs in blue jeans, not blue uniforms! Our single parent; illiteracy; domestic violence and other dismal stats aren't the result of bad cops but that's who gets the focus!
It's easier to blame cops or George Zimmerman than it is to combat the crime and crime enabling in our community.
A group which excuses drug dealers and repeat violent felons is a group which excuses itself out of society.
A day is coming when all the excuses in the world, slavery, Stop & Frisk complaints, you name it, will fall on deaf ears as martial law or its equivalent trample the discussion under the boots of National Guard or even federal troops.
We have a golden window with a bi-racial president who identifies as Black to attack inner city crime head on and not be stopped by cries of racism!
When this golden window closes, a White or even Black president who's a Republican may have to lead this long overdue charge and our majority Democrat community will probably riot in misguided defense of thugs killing us daily!
I type this in New Orleans, home of the NOPD, a chronically challenged agency in a chronically challenged city.
Black spokes persons , with a smattering of White socialists and anarchists, are essentially pro crime activists here who ignore daily Black On Black ( & other ) crime only to hold press conferences and marches when a cop or even more rare White citizen shoots a Black suspect.
Please note I typed " suspect, " because, civil rights crimes like the Danziger Bridge & Henry Glover cases aside, most Black people shot in these matters are engaged in a criminal act.
This is what our advocacy has sunk to, complaining about how criminals were mistreated in the commission of a crime??? This is how low the bar has sunk after the assassinations of Dr King and Malcolm X.
While police brutality is a real problem it isn't solved by Black folks who love talking about bad cops to avoid talking about their bad parenting and bad choices regarding violating the law.
Cap Black
Anti Crime Activist
504 214 3082
Coordinator
Home Defense Foundation
Are you as frustrated as I? You can count on one hand the conservative Republicans who are aggressively fighting Obama and the Democrat's fundamental transformation of America.
Sarah Palin is out there chastising “RINO” Republicans for putting politics over the best interest of We The People. Palin praised Ted Cruz for taking a stand for freedom and liberty. Thank God for sister Sarah, Sen. Cruz and Sen. Lee. But they need help!
Steve Lonegan is cut from the same cloth. Legally blind since childhood, Lonegan has never used his disability as a crutch. As mayor of Bogota, New Jersey, his record of conservative fiscally wise decisions speaks for itself. Lonegan is fearless, outspoken and relentless in his efforts to stop Obama's socialist/progressive agenda.
Think the iron-fist anti-christian, nanny state socialist/progressive agenda is not well on its way of being fully implemented, here are a few examples.
A parent was arrested at a school board meeting for questioning the new liberal curriculum. Can you believe that? What the heck is going on in our country?
California parents are outraged over a ruling by liberals to punish/fine youth football teams that score too many points. The message, a team can be good, but not too good.
A Fox Sports broadcaster was fired for having religious views which are not in sync with the Administration’s socialist/progressive agenda. Such attacks on religion and unapproved opinions are commonplace under Obama.
Kindergarten kids are forced to celebrate Gay Pride Month and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender History Month.
Dear Lord, I pray a majority of Americans will wake up and smell the tyranny before it is too late.
No Administration in U.S. History has had a record of bullying, intimidation and lawlessness like this one, using every governmental agency to punish and destroy those who oppose Emperor Obama.
After our “moderate” candidate lost the presidential election, the GOP embraced the liberal media, Democrats and consultant's spin that Conservatism and bad mouthing Obama was our downfall. They claim it turned off minorities and low-info voters.
Consequently, Republicans are timid about criticizing Obama and opposing the liberal agenda; Obamacare, raising the debt ceiling, abortion, gay marriage and illegal immigration. Incredibility, Republicans are actively seeking to chase conservatives out of the party.
If we do not send more conservative reinforcements to the front line, America as we know it will be over. Pure and simple. Thus, my passion for sending rock solid conservative Steve Lonegan to DC.
Funding from the people of New Jersey and grassroots has Lonegan surging. His extreme liberal opponent, Booker funded by Hollywood (Oprah, Ben Affleck and more) continues to decline.
EXCITING NEWS! Some polls have the race down to single digits.
Lonegan says the Wednesday, October 16th special election is really a referendum on Obamacare. Lonegan making such a bold statement in the midst of the GOP waving the white flag on numerous issues is truly refreshing. A Lonegan win will be a severely needed shot in the arm to the conservative movement.
Hear Steve's inspiring words on the John Gambling Show.
Patriots, in the tradition of Palin, Cruz and Lee, Steve Lonegan will not blink. He will fight for us. We need more heroes, NOW! You can help.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman: http://www.conservativecampaign.org/
LloydMarcus.com
By Oscar Y. Harward
GOP leaders and many other Republicans voted for ObamaCare in joining Obama and Capitol Hill Democrats to defeat Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX); an attempt to restore our Health Care and our fragile economy. Americans want jobs. ObamaCare is choking our economy. Businesses are having a difficult time by adding ObamaCare to their cost and competing in a world economy. Many of our manufacturing jobs have left the USA for friendlier nations.
Most Americans expected Harry Reid’s Senate Majority Democrats to, again, shove an unwanted, unwanted, and unneeded edition of ObamaCare crammed down our throats; however, no one ever expected so many Republicans to weaken in support of such a collapsing national economy damaging piece of legislation as ObamaCare and strained us and now perceive a forced re-run on Americans’ who are coveting jobs, not additional economic failures.
52 Democrat, 25 Republicans, and 2 Independents voted for Senate ‘Cloture’ on September 27, 2013 in moving ObamaCare in the direction of passage; legislation Democrats rammed down Americans throats in December 2009 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00206.
25 Senate Republicans voted for ‘Cloture’ with President Obama, Senator Harry Reid, and all other 52 voting Senate Democrats and 2 Independents in support of ObamaCare; the most ‘job-killing’ legislation ever in the USA.
25 Senate Republicans voting for ‘Cloture’ include: Alexander (R-TN), Ayotte (R-NH), Barrasso (R-WY), Blunt (R-MO), Boozman (R-AR), Burr (R-NC), Chambliss (R-GA), Chiesa (R-NJ), Coats (R-IN), Coburn (R-OK), Cochran (R-MS), Collins (R-ME), Corker (R-TN), Cornyn (R-TX), Graham (R-SC), Hoeven (R-ND), Isakson (R-GA), Johanns (R-NE), Johnson (R-WI), Kirk (R-IL), McCain (R-AZ), McConnell (R-KY), Murkowski (R-AK), Thune (R-SD), Wicker (R-MS).
All 52 Senate Democrats and 2 Independents voted for ‘Cloture’ with President Obama, Senator Harry Reid, and all other voting Democrats and 2 Independents in support of ObamaCare; the most ‘job-killing’ legislation ever in the USA.
14 Republican offices up for re-election in 2014: Alexander, Lamar (R - TN), Chambliss, Saxby (R - GA), Chiesa, Jeff (R - NJ), Cochran, Thad (R - MS), Collins, Susan M. (R - ME), Cornyn, John (R - TX), Enzi, Michael B. (R - WY), Graham, Lindsey (R - SC), Inhofe, James M. (R - OK), Johanns, Mike (R - NE), McConnell, Mitch (R - KY), Risch, James E. (R - ID), Roberts, Pat (R - KS), Sessions, Jeff (R - AL).
18 Democrat offices up for re-election in 2014: Baucus, Max (D - MT), Begich, Mark (D - AK), Coons, Christopher A.(D - DE), Durbin, Richard J. (D - IL), Franken, Al (D - MN), Hagan, Kay R. (D - NC), Harkin, Tom (D - IA), Johnson, Tim (D - SD), Landrieu, Mary L. (D - LA), Levin, Carl (D - MI), Markey, Edward J. (D - MA), Merkley, Jeff (D - OR), Pryor, Mark L. (D - AR), Reed, Jack (D - RI), Rockefeller, John D., IV (D - WV), Shaheen, Jeanne (D - NH), Udall, Mark (D - CO), Udall, Tom (D - NM).
None of the 2 Independent offices are up for re-election in 2014.
How will these 79 US Senators justify their voting record on this issue. How will the competing 18 Democrats and/or 14 Republicans defend their records for re-election(s)?
Most Americans and more than half of all small business now want ObamaCare to be repealed and/or defunded. Even Labor Unions are calling to end ObamaCare. Our US economy is in shambles; however, Capitol Hill GOP leaders led many Republicans to join in with President Obama, Sen. Harry Reid, and other Capitol Hill Democrats. Did you ever believe so many Republicans could and/or would make such a left turn. It is as if too many Capitol Hill legislators are drinking too much ‘Kool-Aid’ or consuming some other ‘mind bending’ substance(s).
Unfortunately, most Capitol Hill Democrat and Republican Party leaders have betrayed (y)our American businesses and their employees on ObamaCare.
Pennsylvania Avenue and many Democrat, Republican, and Independent Capitol Hill legislators are well overdue for replacements. Watch their Senate challengers ascend in 2014!
Note: I edited this article to rid it of unwanted links to obamaNOcare projects, etc.
August 15, 2013
Citing the H e a l t h and H u m a n Services website, a report posted Wednesday at the Freedom Outpost says that under
obam a care , government agents can engage in "home h e a l t h visits" for those in certain “high-risk” categories.
Those categories include:
• Families where mom is not yet 21;
• Families where someone is a tobacco user;
• Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities, and
• Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
According to HHS, the visits fall under what is called the "Maternal, Infant and early childhood home visiting p r o g r a m allegedly designed to “help parents and children,” and could impact millions of Americans.
Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown said that despite what HHS says...the p r o g r a m is not “voluntary."
"The eligible entity receiving the g r a n t for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks," he said. "A h o m e s c h o o ling family, for instance, may be subject to 'intervention' in 'school readiness' and 'social-emotional developmental indicators.' A farm family may be subject to 'intervention' in order to 'prevent child injuries.' The sky is the limit."
Joshua Cook said that while the administration would claim the
p r o g r a m only applies to those on Medicaid, the new law, by its own definition, has no such limitation.
"Intervention," he added, quoting Brown, "may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain s c h o o l s or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits.”
According to Cook, the p r o g r a m will require collection of a massive amount of private information including all sources of income and the amount gathered from each source.
One of the areas of emphasis mentioned by HHS is the development of comprehensive...early childhood systems that span the prenatal-through-age-eight continuum.
Last session, Cook added, South Carolina State Rep. Bill Chumley introduced a measure that would make the forced home visitations illegal in his state. The measure passed in the House but died in the Senate.
In 2011, he noted, HHS said $224 million would be allocated to support these home visiting p r o g r a m s.
There is a lot of truth here. Think about it.
While suturing a cut on the hand of a 75 year old rancher, whose hand was caught in the squeeze gate while working cattle, the doctor struck up a conversation with the old man.
Eventually the topic got around to Obama and his role as our president. The old rancher said, "Well, ya know, Obama is a 'Post Turtle'." Not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked him, what a 'post turtle' was. The old rancher said, "When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a 'post turtle'."
The old rancher saw the puzzled look on the doctor's face so he continued to explain. "You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up there, he doesn't know what to do while he's up there, he's elevated beyond his ability to function, and you just Wonder what kind of dumb ass put him up there to begin with."The doctor said, "Wow, this is the best explanation I've heard yet."
If, only part of this is true, it's pretty darn scary ............. !
It's all starting to make sense now...
SOME ADULT PHOTOS!
Read bits and pieces of this over the years, but pulling it altogether in one article really packs a punch.
A BOY NAMED STANLEY... a girl named Stanley.
Reading this will spoil an otherwise pleasant day. Is this a libelous exaggeration?
JUST IN CASE YOU WONDER WHY HE SURROUNDS HIMSELF WITH THE PEOPLE HE DOES AND WHY HE IS WHAT HE IS AND IS TERRIBLY GRATEFUL FOR THE PEOPLE WHO WERE AND CONTINUE TO BE SOME OF THE DUMBEST CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES.
A boy named Stanley is traumatized and abandoned.
1926: Eight year old Stanley Dunham discovers his mother's body after she has committed suicide. Stanley's father then abandons the traumatized boy, leaving Stanley in the care of his maternal grandparents in El Dorado, Kansas.
Stanley is psychologically devastated by suicide and abandonment!
Stanley Dunham becomes a troubled teen. The emotionally damaged boy grows into a rebellious teenager. Stanley punches his High School principal and becomes a drifter, hopping rail cars to Chicago, then California, then back again.
At age 20, he marries Madelyn Payne on the night of her Senior Prom. The hurt little boy grows into an angry and unstable young man. Stanley spends time as a rail hopping drifter.
Psycho Stanley fathers a girl --- names her Stanley!!!
Just before leaving to fight in World War II in 1942, Stanley impregnates Madelyn. A girl is born on November 29, 1942. Because Stanley wanted a son, he names the girl after himself, Stanley Dunham! (Middle name of Ann).
What kind of a psycho names his daughter Stanley?
Stanley Ann Dunham endures childhood trauma.
After the war, the Dunhams bounce around the country for 15 years - moving to California, back to Kansas, to Seattle, WA, to Mercer Island, WA, and finally to Hawaii.
Stanley is teased about her boyish name at every new school she attends. The instability of constantly moving, the teasing/bullying over her strange name, and the constant reminder that her father wanted a boy - will combine to turn young Stanley Ann into a traumatized psycho like her father.
A girl named Stanley is teased about her boyish name. Stanley Ann Dunham becomes a troubled teen. At 17, Stanley Ann now goes simply by "Ann". By this time, she has already embraced Marxism (as had her father), is posing naked for a Communist named Frank Marshall Davis, bashing America, and having sexual relations with older black men.
Frank Marshall Davis (right) had a passion for photography and pornography.
Ann is impregnated by one of two Black Communist.
1960: Still a 17 year old college freshman, Ann becomes pregnant. She claims that a Kenyan Marxist named Barack Obama, who she met in a Russian language class, is the father.
Obama is a drunk who, apparently unbeknownst to Dunham at the time, has his own wife and kids back in Kenya. It has since become apparent that Ann was also having sexual relations with another black man during this time. The admitted Communist Frank Marshall Davis, but more on him later.
Obama looks nothing like his Kenyan father, but
resembles Frank Marshall Davis very much!
Barack Obama Jr. is abandoned by his Kenyan father
Less than four years into the unlikely marriage, Ann divorces the drunken Kenyan bigamist. Barack Sr. returns to Africa in 1964. Little "Barry" experiences his first abandonment. Barry will briefly see his alleged father again in 1968, when he is about eight years old,only to have to say goodbye to him. Barack Sr. will later be killed in a drunk driving accident in 1982. Little Barry's fragile psyche was doomed from the start.
The reunion with the father figure he longed for was very brief
Ann remarries an Indonesian man and settles there.
In 1965, Ann marries Lolo Soetero. She, Lolo, and little Barry settle in Indonesia. (Ann and Lolo will divorce in 1980).
Stanley Ann has a baby girl with her new husband.
Ann hires a transvestite to be Barry's nanny! Already a full fledged feminist Marxist, Ann Soetero hires 'Evie",(a known a transsexual / transvestite!) to care for young Barry.
In 2012, it was revealed that Nanny Evie is now a broke homosexual prostitute.
Old lady/man Evie holds up a photo of his / her flaming younger self
Desperate and destitute, old Evie survives by prostitution.
Obama won't lift a finger to help!
Young Barry is bullied by his Asian classmates
The only Black boy in an Indonesian school, Barry is outcast and bullied as " the boy with big ears."
Little Barry Soetero doesn't fit in
Ann has a baby girl, then dumps Barry on her parents in Hawaii
Little Barry is again traumatized by the pain of rejection.
After having a daughter with Lolo, psycho Ann ships 10 year old Barry off to Hawaii to be raised by his grandfather.
Barry's little psyche is sent from the frying pan into the fire!
Grandpa introduces Barry to a Black Communist bi-sexual.
Grandpa Dunham is friends with the Communist bi-sexual Frank Marshall Davis. Davis will become a mentor to young Barry.
It was Davis, an avid photographer, who took the nude photographs of young Ann Dunham. Davis tells of his sexual deviance in a book entitled "Sex Rebel Black", written under the pen name of Bob Greene. In lurid detail, he describes 3-way sex sessions between himself, his wife,and a young girl named "Ann."
The dirty old Communist will finish corrupting little Barry.
Davis wrote the filthy "Sex Rebel Black" in 1968
Teenage Barry is lazy student and a heavy drug user
By the end of High School, generations of family dysfunction and painful rejection will have already shaped the man that Obama will become. By his own adult admission, Obama wastes his High School years as a heavy pot smoker and a mediocre student.
A self described "lazy student", Obama has a passion or smoking marijuana
(later on cocaine)
Barack Obama moves onto cocaine and homosexuality
After High School, Obama is a mediocre college student at Occidental College in California. His drug use continues and it appears that he has embraced the homosexual lifestyle.
1980's: Obama and his homosexual Pakistani "lover" holding hands.
1980's: Young Obama is plugged into the Globalist-Communist Presidential Pipeline
At some point during the 1980's, Frank Marshall Davis, and others above him, plug "Barack Obama Jr." into the subversive network of Professor William Ayers. Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, are former FBI fugitives and founders of the Communist/Terrorist Weather Underground.
The psycho Obama is to be decorated with phony Ivy League degrees and groomed to be "the first Black President."
Obama began his first political campaign in the Chicago living room of
Ayers (l) and Dohrn (r)!
- Aging hippie communists Ayers and Dohrn are still very active in politics today.
1990's: Communist "Reverend Wright" finds a "beard" to hide Obama's homosexuality
If Obama is to become President, he will need a wife and kids to conceal his homosexuality. The radical Marxist "Reverend" Jeremiah Wright specializes in finding unwanted women to marry the closeted homosexual, professional men who frequent his weird "church".
The homely and angry Michelle and the homosexual Obama are believed to have been matched up by the Radical Reverend. There is no record of any other women in Obama's life prior to Michele. No one in their right mind would marry such an angry woman! So Reverend Wright gave her to Obama.
Obama and the America hating Reverend go way back!
Reverend Wright with the Communist Bill Ayers
CONCLUSION / DIAGNOSIS
- The Superman persona is the mind's way of hiding the worthless being within.
Barack Obama is the product of generations of severe psychological dysfunction.
The neurotic manifestations rooted in both sides of his family tree include suicide, abandonment of children, multiple relocation's, polygamy, rejection, bullying, drug and alcohol abuse, homosexuality, transexualism, and communist subversion.
To cope with the pain and low self esteem of childhood trauma, the ego creates a false Superman. We clearly see the Narcissistic Personality Disorder manifested in the anti social behavior of Grandpa Dunham by naming a daughter after himself and joining the Communist Party.
- Stanley Ann Dunham posing for pornographic photos, having sex with older black men and dumping her child.
- Barack Sr. secretly keeping two families at the same time and driving drunk.
- Nanny Evie dressing up as a woman and engaging in homosexual prostitution.
- Frank Marshall Davis joining the Communist Party and boasting of sexual perversion.
This is why Obama himself is so arrogant, so conceited, so callous, so sensitive to criticism, so dishonest, so immoral, so vindictive, so cold, so cruel, and so dangerous.
Like the Frankenstein monster of Mary Shelley's classic novel, Obama is seething with rage at the society which he blames or the pain of his dysfunctional childhood.
Apart altogether from his flawed Marxist ideology and his manifest incompetence, OBAMA IS RUTHLESS..... the perfect man to lead a nation of dumbed down, degenerate sheep, many of whom are themselves Narcissistic psychopaths.
That is why Obama's invisible Globalist masters chose him!
And WHY, the 47%ers , Elected him !
Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States of America
http://autos.aol.com/article/cop-throws-family-to-ground-during-traffic-stop/
An under-staffed New Orleans Police Department and other agencies state wide means we citizens must step up to better defend our families under the law.
The best way under the law is fixing Louisiana Statute 1420, which we in the Home Defense Foundation call the " Home and Business Defense Law " given its language about using force to protect oneself at home; your place of business or during a car jacking.
We can't get more cops on the streets right now, but we can amend a law to allow us more protection as home and business owners against violent criminals facing far less opposition on the streets!
Currently, one faces little or no risk of prosecution should you kill a suspect while defending yourself.
Conversely, if the suspect survives, you, the would-be victim, could face politically motivated consequences in this post-Zimmerman era.
Are you willing to risk your life and that of your family with state staute 1420 as it presently reads?
Good people like you don't want to hurt others. You want to live peacefully- that's all.
You don't want yourself, your family nor any innocent to be hurt! You don't want yourself, your family nor any innocent to live in fear!
The Home Defense Foundation stands up for good people like you who don't start trouble but who deserve real statutory protection should you be forced to defend yourself and your family.
Visit http://www.fix1420.org and read our proposal to turn this law into legislation which truly safeguards, not hand cuffs, home and business defense in Louisiana!
Nadra Enzi aka Cap Black, The Anti Crime Activist is coordinator of the Home Defense Foundation of New Orleans http://www.hdfnola.org 504 214-3082.
There were 25 Republicans who betrayed their principles and voted for cloture, giving Democrats the power to implement this terrible law.
This is a disappointing loss, but the bill now goes back to the House where Republicans must hold their ground and refuse to fund Obamacare.
Here are the 25 Senate Republicans who voted to allow Harry Reid (D-NV) and the Democrats to fund Obamacare today:
| Lamar Alexander (R-TN) | John Cornyn (R-TX) |
| Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) | Lindsey Graham (R-SC) |
| John Barrasso (R-WY) | John Hoeven (R-ND) |
| Roy Blunt (R-MO) | Johnny Isakson (R-GA) |
| John Boozman (R-AR) | Mike Johanns (R-NE) |
| Richard Burr (R-NC) | Ron Johnson (R-WI) |
| Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) | Mark Kirk (R-IL) |
| Jeff Chiesa (R-NJ) | John McCain (R-AZ) |
| Dan Coats (R-IN) | Mitch McConnell (R-KY) |
| Tom Coburn (R-OK) | Lisa Murkowksi (R-AK) |
| Thad Cochran (R-MS) | John Thune (R-SD) |
| Susan Collins (R-ME) | Roger Wicker (R-MS) |
| Bob Corker (R-TN) |
LEADING THE SURRENDER
Detroit receives $100 million financial bailout from Obama
It seems that with a federal government on the brink of a shut-down and not a dime in sight to help balance the budget, President Obama still found millions for bankrupt Detroit. According to Fox News, the Obama administration has uncovered $100 million for fiscally beleaguered City of Detroit as a way of helping the city cope with mounting financial woes.
It appears that Christmas did come a bit early for the citizens of Detroit after learning that miracle of miracles the kitchen cabinet was not bare after all. This takes on an even more serious note, because Obama and his economic and political apologists like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had been insisting that, “There are no more cuts to make.”
Yet hiding in within the administration’s coffers was $100 million of taxpayer dollars that were not flowing to its intended funding obligations. It certainly does shore up the GOP claims in the House by its leaders, that Obama has no intention on coming clean with the House or with the American people when it comes to where dollars are spent, unspent or hidden from the public.
But there is a deeper more insidious issue which does rise above the mist of open deceit and that is whether or not, cities like Detroit with is $18 billion plus deficit and other urban cities teetering on the brink of insolvency like Chicago, New York, Washington D.C. and several in California including Los Angeles will be granted these $100 million paydays once, twice or many times.
http://nationalreport.net/obama-declares-november-national-muslim-appreciation-month/
Congress is poised to renew the Import-Export Bank and while Delta Airlines is lining up their lobbyists to oppose the reauthorization they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
Flight Global reports that Delta Air Lines has received export credit financing from Export Development Canada (EDC) for its order of up to 70 Bombardier CRJ900s, even as it opposes similar support from the Export-Import Bank of the US (US Ex-Im) to certain foreign carriers.
EDC agreed to provide between Canadian dollars (C$) 500 million ($484.4 million) and C$1 billion in financing for the order, under an agreement that was signed in December 2012 and disclosed by the export credit agency (ECA).
Atlanta-based Delta ordered 40 firm CRJ900s with options for another 30 aircraft the same month. At list prices, the firm order is worth $1.85 billion and the entire order $3.29 billion.
Delta-subsidiary Endeavor Air took delivery of the first aircraft on 29 August and will have 12 in its fleet by the end of the year, Flightglobal’s Ascend Online database shows. The regional carrier already operates 41 CRJ900s.
EDC declines to comment on the structure or tenor of the financing.
Delta’s use of export credit comes as it opposes similar financing to certain foreign competitors. The carrier filed a lawsuit with Hawaiian Airlines and the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) against US Ex-Im in April claiming negative economic consequences of the ECA’s loan guarantees for widebody aircraft.
“It's really investment grade companies that are owned by the government where the president of the country, the chairman of the board and the president of the airline are one in the same,” said Richard Anderson, chief executive of Delta, in a May speech.
While Delta is not government-owned, it is rated near investment grade and capable of securing competitively priced debt on commercial markets. It rejoined the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 index on 10 September after being dropped in 2005 and maintains B+, B1 and B+ ratings from rating agencies Fitch Ratings, Moody’s and S&P.
In addition, Delta’s claim of negative economic consequences stems from its having to compete with foreign carriers, such as Emirates, Etihad Airways and Korean Air, that benefit from US Ex-Im loan guarantees.
Air Canada could make a similar argument towards Delta’s use of EDC financing. The carriers compete on routes between Canada and the USA, including between Atlanta and Toronto Pearson where Delta flies CRJ900s as well as other Bombardier aircraft, according to Innovata FlightMaps Analytics.
American Airlines acknowledges some form of double standard between Delta’s claims and actions. Will Ris, senior vice-president of government and regulatory affairs at the Fort Worth, Texas-based carrier, told Flightglobal that American does not take a position on US Ex-Im financing to foreign carriers as it uses export credit itself, at an event in Washington DC on 24 September.
The airline has used financing Brazilian development bank BNDES for the Embraer regional jet fleet at its subsidiary American Eagle Airlines.
Delta did not immediately comment on its use of EDC financing while objecting to US Ex-Im guarantees.
