ACTION

Word has it that there may be violence at the RESTORE HONOR RALLY. To all members and friends that will carry signs. Instead if attaching signs to flimsy sticks you better make them stronger as in baseball bats.

Consider it cheap life insurance. Washington D. C. is a dangerous place, even when the rally is over and it is dark outside.

See you there, Tea Party member / conservativist.

By ROBERT R. MONROE

After returning from recess on Sept. 6, the Senate will consider whether to ratify New Start, the nuclear weapons treaty that President Barack Obama signed with his Russian counterpart in April. The treaty has many problems, from being unverifiable to giving Russia virtual veto power over U.S. missile defense, and more. But the Senate should block it for another more important reason: It is the first major step in the implementation of Mr. Obama's broader nuclear strategy. This strategy would gravely weaken American national security.

The Obama administration's nuclear policy is set out in the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), which was released in April, two days before the signing of New Start. The NPR is joined at the hip with New Start, and together they take this country down a dangerous path. For 65 years, the very existence of our nation has depended upon a strong nuclear deterrent. The new NPR wipes out this proven policy, substituting one of weakness in its place.

Mr. Obama's NPR treats nuclear weapons as an evil to be eliminated, rather than as the ultimate foundation of America's security in a dangerous world. The review opens with Mr. Obama's pledge to "seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons" and "to take concrete steps toward that goal, including by reducing the number of nuclear weapons and their role in national security policy."

Yet nuclear weapons have been our most effective means of avoiding and limiting conflicts, and of achieving our foreign policy goals, since World War II. Nuclear weapons ended the most destructive war in history. For a half-century thereafter they prevented a vastly more devastating war and were a huge factor in deterring proliferation.

By pledging not to develop new nuclear capabilities—including earth-penetration weapons and any new warheads—the new NPR also promises to let our deterrence atrophy. This ignores that threats and technology are changing, and our weapons must keep pace with them.

The NPR further hurts our ability to modernize our deteriorating nuclear arsenal by essentially cashiering the "replacement" approach, which allows for the use of nuclear components based on previously tested designs. And it undermines the reliability and effectiveness of our stockpile by pledging that the U.S. will not conduct any nuclear testing.

Finally, Obama's new nuclear strategy seriously limits our use of nuclear weapons. The NPR has an entire chapter on reducing their role that, among other things, commits us not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that comply with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty—even if they attack us with other weapons of mass destruction.

Mr. Obama's NPR amounts to a road map for achieving a position of strategic inferiority. As other states improve their nuclear arsenals, we will be carrying out unilateral nuclear disarmament.

How have we come to this? In essence, because the two elements of Mr. Obama's nuclear weapons policy are mutually incompatible. First, he has established the goal of "a world without nuclear weapons," pledging to take concrete steps to achieve it. Second, he's stated that as long as such weapons exist, the U.S. arsenal will be safe, secure and effective. Yet the NPR—the result of 12 months of intensive work by all relevant elements of the U.S. government—focuses only on the impossible goal of achieving a nuclear-free world. It fails utterly to maintain an effective nuclear arsenal.

The nuclear deterrent that has kept us safe for over half a century cannot be maintained under the Obama administration's limitations. Unless the Senate supports such nuclear disarmament, it must deny ratification to New Start, which is the first step in that direction.

Mr. Monroe, a retired vice admiral in the U.S. Navy, was director of the Defense Nuclear Agency from 1977-1980.

Last month 55% of Americans called Obama a “socialist”; 68% last week said the country under Obama is headed in the wrong direction; but 64% of us still today say, we believe he’s a “good guy” . . . . Americans, you‘ve let a grown wolf into your midst yet expect a happy home life . . . .

Feeling Sorry for Barack,

Hating His Message

Life is potentially very hard. The natural state of man or woman and the most desirable state for all of mankind is freedom, but life is hard and men must because of their mammalian nature survive by working together. We are both nurtured and enslaved at our mother’s teat. We do not begin as one of twenty-thousand fish eggs which never know their parents, or whose parents might hungrily gobble us up should we meet again in three days . . . we start as absolutely helpless infants who will soon die of lack of nurturing and require at a minimum the perfunctory care that passes for love among tortured souls. Very rarely does one of us turn out to be a hermit happily or unhappily living apart from mankind.

This dependence upon parents or other caretakers throughout all our early years and the virtual necessity of living among other men makes us vulnerable to immense pressure to “conform” to “fit-in” to be and live much like everybody else and thus “win their approval.” Much of this is good and helpful, but too much is crippling. This excess pressure and a certain self-loathing is what in modern times typically creates the statist, the totalitarian the progressive (we must progress beyond the ‘outdated’ and ‘flawed’ U.S. Constitution) when all around him clearly, freedom is beckoning. The phrase “nanny state” says it all. They must hate freedom for you because your freedom is a threat, how much better to have the state nuturing and burping everyone of us (and making us toe the line) all the long days of our lives . . . but then there are the “red-diaper babies.”

Red-diaper babies^^ like Barack Obama are a special breed. While the masses are stunting their own growth and embracing sheepdom, some have deliberately raised their children from the womb to be wolves. The tenets of Das Kapital is preached to red-diaper babies the way some fanatic and corrupt religious fundamentalists teach the tenets of Shariah Law and Jihad or the verses of the Bible to impressionable youngsters hatefully and ceaselessly. Red-diaper babies are raised as sociopathic wolves to prosper among the sheep. Every potential encounter they witness is preached over so that the creators and the givers in society, the capitalists and entrepreneurs, for example, who from nothing create a business and nurture it and some day provide jobs for 80 or 100 people, are portrayed at every juncture as the natural and mortal enemy of the wolf-cub/red-diaper baby.

“Look at that fat cat, lounging around thanks to the sweat of his workers. He gets to play while they’re dying under his oppression . . . etc., etc, ad nauseum every day of his life throughout the formative years and well-beyond (because naturally enough, he only feels semi-comfortable among the sheep and truly comfortable among his “own kind” where there is NO OTHER CONVERSATION because for them, the STATE has replaced religion, love and angst as the topic of their lives. So, Barack Obama is to be pitied, unlike perhaps 60% of the red-diaper babies he has never doubted, never wavered and thus never felt the need to break away. Those who do, tell us interesting stories of growing up wolf cubs** . . . those who don’t must continue to live the lie that they love the sheep and have only the sheep’s best interests at heart always.

Warning, loyal readers will find the following material repetitive of a couple of recent blogs . . . newcomers, sheep and otherwise, this is for you:

Enough of background philosophy, it has come to this . . . . Friends, Couch Potatoes, Babes in the Woods and other Trusting Souls . . . and yes, you SHEEP prefering to be men, these are the facts of life . . . this is where the message of progressivism from the wolf’s mouth has led us . . . .

11 Truths Voters Need to Know

In reverse order here’s what our gullible people should know but don’t. Our mainstream media needs to get real and do its job. I invite all readers to check my facts for 100% accuracy . . . .

11. Our government has been systematically lying to us or covering up for almost eight decades for example, . . . .

10. Obamacare, one law, a) creates 388 brand new government agencies b) funds abortions with federal money c) increases the deficit d) drives up the cost of health care and health insurance. All of this was easily foreseen but most chose to believe Obama’s promises that the opposite was true.

9. In 1975 one in 404 home loans was granted with 3% or less down payment. Five mortgage-guarantee laws later, it became in 2005, 34 out of 100 loans at less than 3% down. That's an amazing 13,600% more presumably bad loans today. The progressive left have pushed our lenders into bad loans by sponsoring these ill-conceived laws. This was easily foreseeable, but we were too busy with sitcoms and, of late, reality shows.

8. The United States used to have the world’s highest private home ownership, now Canada does. Our system was not broken, but the progressives fixed us with the Community Reinvestment Act under Carter and four expansions of CRA ’77 mortgage-guarantees in ’92, twice in ’95 and the steroid version in ’98 (the last three under Clinton). We all know better than to “fix what ain’t broke,” yet we allow the politicians we elect to do it every day.

7. Barack Obama was an ACORN lawyer shaking-down lenders to make unwise loans for parts of three years 1994-1996. Once Clinton’s steroid version of the law was passed in ’98, ACORN forced banks and other lenders to make home loans to people without ID; without jobs; with only food stamps to declare as income; without even rental history; with abysmal credit ratings; on welfare; illegal aliens; and other miserable loan prospects. Anyone listening with half an ear could see that all his promises could NOT be kept; anyone inspecting his past could see he was always way to good to be true. His communism was only slightly better hid.

6. ACORN discovered by early 2003 that they could get a $400,000 loan almost as easily as they could get a $120,000 loan for an indigent client and went about it with gusto. Why?

5. Alas, it gets even more sinister. In ’66 Richard Cloward and Frances Piven published their Cloward-Piven Strategy to end poverty by creating GNI, (guaranteed national income). In ’67 these two and George Wiley created the National Welfare Relief Organization (NWRO) put their strategy into action. In eight years they added over six million people to the welfare rolls in New York. By 1975, New York City was bankrupt and needed a federal bailout. New York state just missed bankruptcy. The threesome bragged about their accomplishment even though they made poverty worse and didn’t get GNI. C &P said the next two areas to work their “orchestrated crisis” magic upon were voter registration and housing. The sub-prime lending crisis and the ensuing financial meltdown were Cloward-Pivven at work once again as you'll soon see.

4. When CRA ’77 was passed, ACORN was immediately created in Arkansas (only later would the “A” stand for Association instead of Arkansas) to work C-P Strategy on housing and voter registration. They weren’t hugely successful at first, but they did put Bill Clinton into the governor’s mansion in Little Rock for 12 years; and he became the first ACORN president in ’92. One of his first official signings was the Motor Voter Act (“a license for voter fraud according to conservatives) with Cloward and Piven standing directly behind him in the official pictures. Three Clinton mortgage-guarantees followed in the next five years and ACORN went nuts making lenders meet their silly requirements. In effect Cloward-Piven Strategy was unleashed not on NYC this time but upon the entire USA.

3. Republicans in January, 2005, saw the handwriting on the wall and tried to repeal much of the mortgage-guarantee nonsense but were stopped cold by the Democrats. In July, 2007, enough Dems came to see the truth that a watered-down version of the earlier bill was passed. It was, of course, way too little – way too late. Nevertheless . . . .

2. Last week Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner praised George W. Bush for that 2007 law which he said prevented the recession from becoming much, much deeper and the drop in housing prices from tumbling to dangerous levels. In effect, Geithner altered Barack Obama’s car in the ditch story. You and I now know the bigger story: Obama, ACORN, and progressive Dems and Republicans pushed the car toward a 500-ft. CLIFF. G.W. Bush braked and steered the car into a controlled skid into a friendly-looking ditch.

1. The first ten problems are gnats compared to the herd of elephants in the room right next to us, because with all the unfunded liabilities we face (on top of the National debt and our present economic woes) including unbelievable Social Security, Medicare and the Federal Side of Medicaid obligations that amount to $112 Trillion in services the government owes its citizens but has refused to fund (which has been required by law lo’ these last 76 years). Throw-in the always unfunded welfare state and these unfunded obligations likely will hit $200 Trillion.


Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

^^ Evidence is proved in a hundred places in my blogwork, but for now consider the man whose dreams Barack, Jr. referred to in his book "Dreams from My Father. Most of our fathers don't openly advocate 100% taxes; or redistribution of wealth from Kenya's Asian and European populace to its Blacks; or communal ownership of property http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_eastafrica.html

** http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1893554058/lewrockwell/ or in novel format . . . .

http://www.johnsandford.org/prey15r.html

Pollster Scott Rasmussen says only 23 percent of the American people believe their government has the consent of the governed; that is to say the United States, the most powerful nation on earth, has a will of its own counter to the will of the people.

Imam Rauf is speaking about the government of the American people when he says America has more blood on its hands than Osama bin Laden. The current flap about the location of Imam Rauf’s mosque is not about freedom of religion. It is about a misunderstanding between America’s government and the American people. We, the American people, are the most compassionate, generous people on earth being led down a garden path by a President who has ideas foreign to the majority of the American people’s ideas.

Pollster Rasmussen says the media and politicians misread the Tea Party. He says the division is due to “political elites” and the people. Said political elites, including Obama, credit themselves, due to their higher education, as being more enlightened than the average citizen. They know better than we, the people know, what is good for America—with nothing at all to show for it.

Obama blames everything that goes wrong on Bush. After nearly two years in full control, Obama leaves America in far worse shape than Bush. Obama’s ship is sinking. The only question is what are the Republicans, who brought the economy to the brink of a melt-down, going to do, with the economy in far worse shape than when they lost control? The Democrats’ record is broken. The Republicans’ record is also broken. The only difference in the two parties is in the adjectives they use.

Republicans agree that federal spending has to be brought under control. The Democrats say cutting the tax on the rich; that is, the people who hire, will send spending out of control. Democrats give no credit to those who hire workers. They are “imperialists.” Government entitlements are involved. The music is going to stop and millions are going to be left standing. It involves federal income tax. The Republicans are not talking about these essential elements for getting federal spending under control. The moment they do, the Democrats will jump on them with both feet. As usual, they will not know what to say. They are above calling Democrats what they are. Democrats don’t have that problem.

I wrote about this problem yesterday, the case of misidentification. “You get wedded to your own version.” Both Democrats and Republicans, for the past 70 years, have been addressing the symptoms of the problem, this Democrat remedy or the Republican remedy, avoiding addressing the cause and cure, and in doing so dividing the people more and more. It’s the way of remaining in control at everyone’s expense. We, the people, have gotten wise to the shell game politicians of both parties are playing, according to Rasmussen

A tremendous technological change has taken place in the world in the past 70 years. In spite of the harm U.S. government policy has done to the American economy, generally, the American people are living far better today. One man can do the work of a hundred.

We are so preoccupied with the material we’ve lost site of the quality of life, actually, to the point that we are but a short step from losing it all. Thankfully, the Tea Party is not affiliated with either of the two major political parties. The ball is in our court. It is up to us to come up with a plan that works to the American people’s best interests.

With only 23 percent of the people on government’s side, how we get government entitlements under control is the same way they got control of us. We faze them out by not putting any new people on government entitlements, including illegals. In half a century, this government fraud is over and future generations are no longer forced to pay for our generation’s extravagance.

Labor unions and pensions are bankrupting us. Give states the right to declare bankruptcy. Why should states who keep a lid on spending pay for those states who don’t. The federal government is bailing out states catering to unions, and itself favoring unions at the expense of everyone who is not a member of a union. It’s killing the economy. Has any politician ever mentioned giving the states the right to declare bankruptcy? I’ve not heard anything on it from Republican or Democrat holding office.

We must do away with federal income tax and the IRS. It is a shell game politicians are playing—robbing Peter to pay Paul. We must replace federal income tax with a tax on spending. It does not matter how you make money. Many people making money—drug peddlers, whores, pimps, and such, don’t pay income tax. Businesses doing a cash business skim the cash register. The law is rigged so that billionaires pay less in taxes than middle income earners. A tax on spending would do away with the capital gains tax. Who should care how much money you have? What good is it if you don’t spend it? If you spend it by investing in the economy, we all gain. Nothing we could do would help the economy grow as much as the elimination of federal income tax and the hated IRS. Just think: no more federal snooping into our private affairs.

How did we ever get by before federal income tax and the IRS? How did we ever get by without government entitlements? I was here before average income earners paid federal income tax. I was here before government entitlements. The family was the American cornerstone. Local government was in control. In many ways, life was better when I was a boy than it is now, especially for children. I pity today’s children.

We, the people, are being pitted against each other. Just listen to Obama and Imam Rauf blowing smoke. They have no use for each other. It’s one trying to use the other for political gain. Both are after power and control. Rest assured that nothing is going to change until we, the people, take charge.

SHARIA LAW IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH U.S. DEMOCACY, AND NEVER WILL BE. IF THE ISLAMISTS ARE GOING TO PROVOKE UN-REST IN THIS COUNTRY,

THEN THEY SHOULD BE ASK TO LEAVE. WE HAVE A GOVERMENT TO PICK, WE DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR THIS BULL. THE NEW YORK TIME

S IS TO FAR LEFT.

What Progressives Don't Want
Voters to Know
Part I

Americans who listen to and believe the left-wing rhetoric of the progressive Democrats in power today really need to learn to separate facts from historical revisionism . . . the words here below are 100% true, Rajjpuut crosses his heart . . . .

Myth: The Nazis were fascists, and both fascists and Nazis were conservative (right-wing) organizations.

Truth:

The National SOCIALIST German Workers’ Party came into power by viciously attacking the Republican values and Democratic methods of the Weimar Republic. They promoted “a managed economy that was neither capitalist nor communist” according to their literature. The first time the world at large learned of them, was after Adolf Hitler’s “Beer Hall Putsch” an attempt to violently overthrow the government of Bavaria in southern Germany and replace those in power with Nazis. Until Hitler joined and took over, the Nazis were perhaps the most pathetic of about 20 leftist organizations vying for power in the country and most of them had the word “socialists” in their name. They were most jealous of the Communist Party’s large membership and Hitler made a point of blaming the loss of World War I on his three main scapegoats: the Jewish bankers and businessmen; the Communists and the so-called “November Criminals” that he said had all worked together and undermined the army in the field. The same areas so exciting to today’s progressives were big interests for the Nazis: environmentalism, nutrition, emphasis on organic and wholistic health and food-raising, and even state-run exercise and health programs and most importantly their utter conviction that they could create a utopian society.

The Nazis and Communists were both very popular in the 20’s and early 30’s but the two groups were decidedly incompatible. Why? Because Hitler emphasized the Aryan idea of purity and the notion that all things good came from their Teutonic heritage of blood and culture a direct attack on the made-in Russia worldwide communistic movement. For their part, the Reds after Hitler’s attack on Russia also felt a need to distance themselves from the Nazis because the Nazis were proof-positive that all revolutions were not good. They could have pointed to the French for that also. The lower classes were the Nazi’s base; only after Hitler came to power did the industrialists begin to show any attention to him. The Nazi’s burned the Reichstag and blamed it on a retarded communist, and immediately gained “emergency powers” that superceded the Weimar Constitution. Thus Hitler became a powerful dictator.

While we’re at it, today the left calls Nazis “fascists.” This is wrong, but more importantly the fascists (such as those found in Italy under Mussolini), were a labor-union phenomenon, hardly the stuff of right-wingers. The labor unions in Italy took over the corporations. In any case, we conservatives like very small government and do not like the totalitarian states which are found under Communism, Nazism, and Fascism. The Left has made a concerted effort since Woodrow Wilson (a progressive president who wrote his own interpretation of American History) to revise all of American and World History to reflect the notion that all things LEFT are “good.” Anyone who hasn’t read the epic expose` “The Nazi Seizure of Power” definitely should. In a fictional vein, Eric Maria Remarque’s novel “The Black Obelisk” vividly portrays the German landscape prior to and immediately after the Beer Hall Putsch as seen through the eyes of a lost soul who was one of a band of iconoclastic “merrymen” watching their civilization collapse around them.

Myth:

Communism is a benign political ideology. Che Guevarra and Mao, for example, are world cultural heroes.

Truth:

“Democide” or killing of citizens of the state by their very own government (including genocide and mass murder) is not a new idea. But the most efficient and ruthless in history were all 20^th

Century communist states. While Hitler killed 13 million of Europe’s assorted Jews, gypsies, intellectuals, royalty, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homeosexuals, aged, retarded, handicapped, and other folk they classified as “undesirables” . . . comparatively few German citizens were killed by the Third Reich say perhaps two and a half million. Communism, concentrating itself mostly upon “purifying” their own citizenry, was directly responsible for the deaths of 120-128 million people during the 20^th Century. Mao killed 54 million Chinese during peacetime. Stalin killed roughly 50 million in war and peace (not counting the 8 million Ukranians he deliberately starved to death that history likes to overlook) . Pol Pot killed 2.5 million in tiny Cambodia. Viet Namese communists, Tito’s Yugoslav communists, and North Korean Communists round out the sad story. Che Guevarra is said to have said he lost count of how many Cuban prisoners he’d personally killed somewhere after 150. Love those Mao and Che T-shirts, do you?

Myth:

The Communist Party has always had an evil effect in the USA.

Truth: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3732/is_200601/ai_n17174894/

While a lot of evil and mischief (our current financial crisis for example) are directly attributable to the Communists operating in this country, early on the Communist party was one of the few voices the common working man in America had. A lot of abuse by mega-corporations in the 1890’s and early 20^th

Century were vehemently opposed by communists and the early labor unions. Later when unions got big and powerful and virtually lockstepped themselves with communism and sought to gain huge war chests for political power . . . that’s when the whole process became ruinous rather than refreshing. It’s striking that now the left is calling “rednecks” racists and all manner of evil. When coal miners in West Virginia were advised by their communist and labor union leaders to wear red banadannas around their necks so they could identify themselves in a confrontation with corrupt mine owners and their machine gun wielding armies of “detectives” who’d already slaughtered some of the miners’ leaders . . . that was not a racist act but an act of labor defiance and fighting for human rights. “Red Necks” were originally union men or strikers (as the Southern Colorado miners in the Trinidad District Strike were). Only much later was the term applied to so-called “poor white trash” and “trailer trash” lumped together as racists and mental-defectives by the Left. Next time, Part II.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

NewsMax - Texas Governor Rick Perry has accused President Barack Obama of "gambling with American lives" after a bullet believed to be from a gun battle in Mexico hit a building. "For the second time in two months, bullets from a gun battle in the escalating drug war in Juarez have struck a building in El Paso," Texas’ Governor Perry said. By comparison, the border issue is minor. There is a far greater issue on our minds now, due to Obama’s late stand that gambles all American lives.

A blogger on Blogit wrote: “Don't try to explain why you are here. If you do, you will be gone.” This blogger’s thought was brought to mind when I read on MSN news today, under “misidentification,” a fault of the keepers of the law. After a person identifies a criminal from a police lineup or a picture, one or two years later at trial the identifier is more certain he was right. “You get wedded to your own version.” Innocent people are convicted. In short order you lose your freedom. Think about this. If you look like some criminal, you can be locked up for life. The case is closed. It is good for prosecutors.

“You get wedded to your own version” and justice in mind, obviously, there are a lot of opinions of who we, the American people, are. We’ve never been more divided and little wonder. The Founding Fathers wrote a Constitution we, the American people, have never followed. Today’s problems began on day one. We’ve expediently interpreted the law since day one to suit the needs of the moment. Today, misidentification of who we are is the Sword of Damocles hanging over every American’s head. It is good for Obama. He will own you if you let him have his way.

United we stand; divided we fall. The astrologers’ zodiac tells them America was born under the sign of Aquarius. Astrologer’s Handbook tells us Aquarius stands for brotherhood. There are lots of brotherhoods in the world. One is the Islamic Brotherhood, which operates under Sharia law. Violators are stoned to death. Jesus said we are our brother’s keeper. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. Sharia law or Jesus? It should not be a problem to decide, but it is. It comes under the heading of freedom of religion, a shrine to Sharia law on hallowed ground. In America, we believe we have souls. We value human life above religion, but Obama has a far different view. Marxist Obama refuses to comment on his idea. Beware! You are a short step from enslavement.

Marxism and Islam have this in common: neither gives any credit whatsoever to individual rights. If mainstream Marxism and Islam have their way, together they will rule the world. Thus, if you leave it to the authorities to decide your fate, if you try to explain why you are here, you will soon be gone. That’s for sure. Having said this, I have another question to the above mentioned blogger issue about explaining why you are here: Why would anyone in his right mind leave it to the authorities to decide his fate? If you value your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, why would you not stand up and be counted?

If we lived in a perfect universe, there would be no movement. Without movement, what you have is zilch, nothing, zero. You can’t zero out your soul; it is not a quantity. “Misidentification”—wedded to your own version? Excuse me! Your soul is defined as your immaterial essence, your animating principle, your actuating cause of life. You are here in a moving environment for your purpose, not authority’s purpose.

We fear movement, but change is certain to come. Should we move toward Marxism and Islam? According to the astrologer’s zodiac, we are leaving the Age of Pisces. We read that Pisceans have a terrible time in making up their minds of who they are. Yes, and while they are trying to make up their minds, we all lose every right we have. “The very purpose of the Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities.” West Va. State Board of Education v. Barnette. Adding to “Leadership Void throughout Government,” Timothy L. Peyton’s blog, something esoteric that never enters most American minds, making up our minds is not a problem for we Aquarians. We know the law of all times. The U.S. Constitution is a good Aquarian fit. A groundswell is building in the form of the Tea Party. Obama’s proposed transformation is sinking. He can’t change the universe to his version. The Tea Party and Aquarians operate as one on one; they fit the mold Jesus left.

At last, on earth as it is in heaven, we are going to start following America’s fundamental law—no expediencies. We are entering the Age of Aquarius. It’s something to look forward to, and BTW, in case you didn’t know, the U.S. Constitution is backed by “Higher Law.”

Double-Dip Recession

Courtesy of Obama, Soon Official

What happens when you combine gross INcompetence with hatred of capitalism and a vow to make a “fundamental transformation of America” (along Marxist lines): double-dip recession, that’s what! Mr. Obama has now officially made himself into the worst president in the history of the nation by damaging our economy and our way of life (via unending attacks upon the U.S. Constitution) in the shortest possible time frame (roughly 19 months). Short of turning our own nukes on us, how much harm can one man do?

Item: In one law, Obamacare, he created 388 new government agencies (almost ten times the output of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 12+ years in office.

Item: Calling himself a friend of business and the “Jobs President,” Obama forced through a $787 Billion job stimulus bill in February, 2009, that America didn’t want, claiming that when it was passed unemployment would not go above 8%. That figure shot to 10% and has been stuck at 9.5% in recent months. Our “Bailout President” has certainly disproven dramatically any claim to being the “Jobs President.”

Item: 27 percent drop in existing home sales on top of our other woes

Item: Home foreclosures have multiplied 10-fold over the last three years

Item: He is plotting to raise taxes in January, by NOT extending the Bush tax cuts now in place. If there is one item that all economists, even the most lost Keynesian economics professors, agree upon it is this . . . thou shalt NOT raise taxes in the midst of a recession. Of course, raising taxes in the middle of a double-dip recession is the ultimate government-interference sin.

Item: House Republican leader John Boehner, Tuesday, urged Obama to immediately support an extension of tax cuts and to fire key economic advisers, arguing that more than a year of "government as community organizer" has failed to revive the economy. Thus far Obama, now on vacation again (in Martha’s Vineyard this time) and his adminstration have not deigned to reply.

Item: Earlier this week, Treasury Secretary Timoth Geithner said that the George W. Bush law (originally pushed by Republicans in January, 2005, and finally in watered down form) passed in July, 2007 saved the economy from a much more severe recession than we’ve so far had and that without it home prices would have plummeted.

Item: Thanks to five progressive mortgage guarantee bills culminating in the three passed by Bill Clinton the statistic that only one in every 404 American home loans was made with 3% or less down payment, had changed to roughly one in three loans by 2005 were questionable loans forced upon lenders by government regulations. ACORN has been pursuing those loans for 33 years and Obama worked as an ACORN lawyer shaking-down lenders to make them follow the ignorant federal requirements so that people without ID, without jobs, without rental history, without decent credit ratings, with only food stamps to show as “income,” on welfare, and even illegal aliens could own $400,000 homes.

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut