All Posts (28398)

Sort by

This Letter is Worth Revisiting

 This has been around before, in one form or fashion, but it bears repeating over...and over...and over...

Chilling Letter from Proctor & Gamble to Obama 
Who would have thought, and yet many are thinking it.

 

By Lou Pritchett, Procter & Gamble 

A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO THE PRESIDENT* THE LAST SENTENCE IS THE MOST CHILLING 
Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America 's true living legends- an 
Acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world's highest 
Rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize 
Him as the foremost leader in change management.. Lou changed the way 
America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to 
Be known as "partnering."

 

Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble and over the course of 36 years; made corporate history. 

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

 

 

Dear President Obama: 

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike 
Any of the others, you truly scare me. 

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you. 

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive 
Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no 
Visible signs of support. 

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth 
Growing up in America and culturally you are not an American. 

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll. 

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus 
Don't understand it at its core. 

You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', always blaming others. 

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned 
Yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to 
Publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.. 

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America ' 
Crowd and deliver this message abroad. 

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style 
Country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.. 

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system 
With a government controlled one. 

You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly 
Capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves. 

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose 
That lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of 
Living in the world. 

You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics 
Against certain banks and corporations. 

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from 
Challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals 

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider 
Opposing points of view from intelligent people. 

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both 
Omnipotent and omniscient. 

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything 
You do. 

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the 
Limbaugh's, Hannitys, O'Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, 
Conservative points of view. 

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing. 

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will 
Probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years. 

Lou Pritchett 

*

This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it. 
Big surprise. Since it hit the Internet, however, it has had over 
500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for

good men do nothing.. It's happening right now.

 

 

The CHANGE is here!! 90% of Americans will forward this. WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH!

 

 

Read more…

 

The same old arguments keep surfacing. Decades of debate have settled nothing. Why? Because those who want to redistribute your wealth and those who hope to receive that wealth (and many of those who should be aware of them and their nonsense) are too lazy or too stupid to learn from history. They prefer instead to learn from opium-pipe dreams based upon their “virtue” being ultimately rewarded by “a gentler, more just society” (created precisely to reward only those who believe precisely as they do).  When the voters stay willfully ignorant of history, they keep electing and re-electing the same monsters who’ve destroyed our nation’s prospects year after year after year over the last century.
 
 
The Age Old Questions Still Seek Answers
“What Makes Your Political Self-Interest More
Virtuous than My Economic Self-Interest?”
 
Because Americans don’t know the history of the financial collapse, they are repeating the same mistakes that got us into it and kept destroying the economy for the last 45 years.  Back when the Black Panthers and the hippies were literally setting the world afire in the early 70’s, a Black FBI undercover agent spent some time with the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the Weather Underground and the Black Panthers. The SDS wanted a revolution. After The Revolution people like them would be in charge everywhere and the kinder, gentler American nation would be in place operating under neo-Marxist principles. When the FBI operative acted like a confused neophyte and asked “what would happen next once their victory had been won?” He was told that a “re-education of everybody in the country opposed to their new system would begin and people would all come to understand and appreciate them and their better ways. When he pressed the question further and further he was told “Yes, sadly it’s true there are some people who will “never get it” and might have to be imprisoned or even killed. “ How many? “Oh, perhaps 10-15%.” That’s a huge price for kinder-gentler wealth distribution.
Thirty-two years ago Milton Friedman was interviewed by a very young Phil Donahue who asked him “When you see around the globe the mal-distribution of wealth; the desperate plight of millions of people in under-developed countries; when you see so few ‘haves’ and so many ‘have nots; when you see the greed and the concentration of power; didn’t you ever have a moment’s doubt about capitalism and whether ‘GREED’s’ a good idea to run (things) on?” Tell me that’s not a question of import!
That took 24 seconds for Phil. With little interruption Friedman took exactly the next 120 seconds to set the record straight and to disarm Donahue’s and his audiences’ predisposition toward that buzzword “Greed” and toward another buzzword Donahue uttered later “VIRTUE” when Donahue added “But it seems to reward not virtue but ability to manipulate the system . . . .” That’s the content of the first video linked above.
 
If you want to know how the United States of America got into its present god-awful economic situation . . . it’s called street theater. Saul Alinsky author of Rules for Radicals and Reveille for Radicals laid out all the ground rules on how to make a scene; get it aired in the media and then create bogus advances for neo-Marxism. More on how today’s actions tie into the financial mess later. Here’s the second video linked above you NEED to Watch:
He was immaculately dressed and kneeling in the street in front of Chase Bank.  “Right there, right there, that’s the bank that took my parents’ homes. Take me, I submit, it’s just not right! I’m going to be arrested, take me!” Wow, it all seemed so incredible and all the network media (MSM) ran the story without investigating. Then when the story was flat-out refuted; surprise the MSM forgot to clue its viewers on to the fact that they had allowed themselves to be shamefully used by this punk born with a silver-spoon in his mouth.
Barack Obama’s willingness to lie to America’s voters in order to get re-elected seems to be catching on. One of the most clear-cut areas where lying is par for the course is on display today during the “Days of Rage”; and “Occupy Wall Street” protests. One of those darling kids kneeling in the street in front of Wall Street firms and large banks really pulled a “Barack” of prodigious grandiosity as part of the left’s so-called “Days of Rage” protests.   Shouting out that the bank was “taking my parents’ home” as he was arrested; he made quite a scene for the mainstream media (MSM) cameras. Only problem: it was all theater, a lie!  A lie his mother later refuted.
No bank is taking his parents’ home; and the bank in question has nothing to do with his parents. His parents both hold Master’s degrees and their half-a-million home is only $60,000 from being entirely theirs. Oh, and the kid himself? He attends an exclusive law school. All this information came courtesy of his mother refuting the scene the little bugger made on national TV.   In other words the protestor’s (Robert Stephens’) story is (surprise!) completely bogus.
County property records reveal that the Stephens’ home has never beenin foreclosure. The taxes on the huge home are paid and amount to almost exactly what a year at his law school costs the family. The family did take a financial hit when the meltdown came and they are selling their home for a bit less than they originally wanted. Oh, and the mother, Marquita Stephens, said they probably wouldn’t stay in their St. Paul Minnesota suburb because the area is “a bit too conservative.”
What’s all that got to do with the price of tea and TEA Party actions in this tumultuous world?   The thesis of this blog is the undoubtable fact that the same old arguments keep surfacing. Decades of debate have settled nothing. Why?  Because those who want to redistribute your wealth and those who expect to receive that wealth (and many of those who should be aware of them and their nonsense) are too lazy or too stupid to learn from history. They prefer instead to learn from opium pipe dreams based upon their “virtue” being ultimately rewarded by “a gentler, more just society” (created precisely to reward only those who believe precisely as they do).  When the voters stay willfully  ignorant of history, they keep electing and re-electing the same monsters who’ve destroyed our nation’s prospects year after year after year over the last century.**
But just because they’re too stupid and lazy to learn from history doesn’t mean YOU can’t gain from it. As mentioned Saul Alinsky is the father of today’s problems.  If 70% of Americans knew and understood these pieces of history, 95% of the problems are nation now faces could be soon eliminated.
1.       Alinsky was a self-described “neo-Marxist” Chicago area community organizer with two infamous books on “effective” radical behavior on his resume`. Based upon Alinsky’s street theater and idea of creating crises to make your point resonate within the mainstream media (MSM) so as to get your story before the public. Even before Alinsky wrote his second book, at Columbia University (NYC) two sociology professors, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven (married to each other), decided Alinsky’s ideas could be the basis of profound shifts in the American scene based upon their admittedly Communist/Socialist view of life.  
 
Some important background: in 1964 the nation was then undergoing President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s great society program and the much-ballyhooed “War on Poverty.” One good thing was accomplished: the Civil Rights Act was passed. Two good-sounding things were also accomplished Medicare and the state and federal combination called Medicaid were created. These programs would never actually be funded as the law required – their supposed “lockboxes” were raided constantly over the years and today the UNfunded liability from these two programs is roughly $65 TRillion. In addition all then current welfare programs were expanded and the welfare rolls swelled.
 
2.      Cloward and Piven wrote an article in the May, 1966 edition of the leftist magazine The Nation titled The Weight of the Poor:  a Strategy to Eliminate Poverty. The article was based upon Alinsky’s ideas and methods and called for creating a welfare crisis. Because of the crisis, the article said, the Democratic Congress (both House and Senate) would feel compelled to create a GNI (guaranteed national income) and POOF-ABRACADABRA! Poverty would be eliminated over-night. This article became the rage everywhere leftist ideas were discussed. Cloward and Piven and a man named George Wiley took the idea further.
 
3.     Wiley, Piven and Cloward created the NWRO (National Welfare Rights Organization) in late 1967 and by 1968 were so well organized that their people were engaging in street theater across the nation. By 1973 the welfare rolls had doubled from eight million to sixteen million recipients. They never got their GNI. What they got was the worst economic down-turn since the Great Depression and a stock market collapse of almost exactly 24 months duration. What they got was the bankruptcy of their hometown New York City. What they got was the near bankruptcy of several other large cities around the nation; the near bankruptcy of New York State and New Jersey and Illinois and financial chaos in many other states and large cities. Wiley, Cloward and Piven in print and otherwise publicly bragged about the great thing they’d accomplished. They advised their followers that their next attacks would come in housing and voter registration.
 
4.     In 1976 progressive Democrat Jimmy Carter and a Democratic House and Congress were put into office. Within weeks of taking office in January, 1977, they created the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA ’77) which for the first time FORCED banks and mortgage companies to knowingly make horrendously bad loans to totally unqualified home loan applicants. The free market was ended for the mortgage industry. At that time only 0.24% were considered “suspect,” that is granted with less than 3% down payment. About the same time, a Cloward-Piven, Wiley Lieutenant from the welfare wars (sent to Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1970)Wade Rathke, was assigned the task of creating a strategic way to exploit this new chink in America’s armor in Alinsky fashion. ACORN was born. Besides destroying capitalism directly, CRA law aimed to massively redistribute wealth. The twisted thinking went something like this: America has (64%) the highest private home ownership in the world, but it’s not enough.  Everybody SHOULD own their own home. Besides home prices never go down so if we put poor people into homes, even if they can’t afford them, they can always sell and make a profit that way and thus gain a larger slice of the pie.^^
 
5.     In 1977 ACORN stood for Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now. Arkansas was chosen for three reasons: Rathke was GOOD at his work; Bill Clinton was the most up-and-coming young politician in the country and he lived in Arkansas and he was ambitious and his wife Hillary was not only ambitious but she was a Chicago girl and a favorite student of Saul Alinsky who even wrote her college thesis on Alinsky techniques. Cloward and Piven and Wiley had chosen wisely . . . and the nightmare we’re living today attests to it.
 
6.     ACORN gathered voter registration forms in a get-out-the-vote campaign across the state then promptly threw away all those who hadn’t registered as Democrats. Lieutenant Governor Bill Clinton won easily and won the right for he and Hillary to live in the governor’s mansion. They would do so for 12 of the next 14 years; and Bill would become the first ACORN president after the elections of 1992. Meanwhile Rathke’s work with CRA was bearing slow, steady and sure fruit. By 1985 the ACORN street-theater in Arkansas alone (a la Alinsky) had doubled the nation’s suspect home loan rate. Now 0.51% of the nation’s mortgages were granted at 3% or less down payment. ACORN was expanded to all 50 states and became the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. The nightmare was alive and well.
 
7.     Bill Clinton took the Oval Office in January, 1993. Two of his first acts rewarded ACORN’s and Cloward and Piven’s work in his behalf. The Motor Voter Act was passed with Cloward and Piven standing behind him in the signing ceremony as you see here . . . . http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/what_the_dems_know_universal_v.html 
Motor Voter has been called “a twelve-lane highway to voter fraud” and ACORN has been found guilty repeatedly of voter registration fraud over the years. Clinton also made a dramatic expansion of CRA ’77 law by presidential edict. He would continue that fiat expansion of CRA for eight years. In 1975 Clinton twice fooled the Republicans and passed moderate legislative expansions of CRA ’77. In 1998 he passed a monster steroid expansion of CRA laws.
8.    Two brief side notes . . . you may have noticed the term “community organizations” as part of the ACORN name. Alinsky was the most famous community organizer in history until Barack Obama came along. Obama was an ACORN lawyer for roughly two years in Chicago from 1994-96. He shook down and extorted cooperation with ACORN from numerous lenders in Chicago. He was famous for getting the banks to agree to donate a little on the side for ACORN operating costs. While Clinton was steroid-expanding CRA, Texas governor George W. Bush passed a law in 1998 requiring all mortgages in Texas to require 20% down (typically 85% of all loans are granted with 15%-25% down payment). Bush’s decision kept Texas prosperous and the site of an awful large percentage of the nation’s job growth to this day.
 
9.     The rest is history. Fueled by Clinton’s steroid version expansion of CRA ’77 ACORN now found it easier to put actually impoverished home loan applicants into $440,000 homes in the 21st Century than they had been able to put better qualified (but still unqualified) applicants into $110,000 homes a decade earlier. By 2005 the “suspect loans” in this country amounted to 34.2% of all home mortgages. 
 
Many of the new wave of borrowers were granted 0% (zero percent!) down payments. Many of them had no jobs; a horrible credit rating; their only listed “income” (thanks to Clinton’s steroid-expansion) was food stamps; and even illegal aliens were put into $300,000-$350,000 homes. To protect themselves the banks wrapped the mortgages together in a package and tried to sell them. Because the law required government agencies to be involved a lot of “bad paper” was bought up by foolish investors, Wall Street, and even other banks and insurance agencies. It all came crashing down about October, 2008 after a year of financial malaise.
 
10.President George W. Bush made a speech in January, 2005 warning about the “sub-prime lending” fiasco and seeking to pass a repeal of virtually all the CRA legislation. Eighteen Bush speeches and thirty months later a watered-down bi-partisan repeal of parts of CRA law was passed in July, 2007. It proved too little and too late as far as stopping the financial collapse, but it did enough to keep home prices from plummeting far, far faster and lower.
 
11.   Barack Obama today often talks about the “financial mess” he “inherited” and blames the economy being driven into the ditch upon Conservatives, the G.O.P., Wall Street, and even the free market itself. It took seven years for Cloward and Piven and Wiley to bankrupt New York City by welfare fraud. It took 30 years for the progressives to ruin the free market sufficiently to bring on this collapse and bankrupt the whole nation and they want you to vote for them in 2012 because they say somebody else drove the country into the ditch.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
**            Our first Progressive president was Teddy Roosevelt. Thankfully, his progressivism was mildly megalomaniacal and not economically-based compared to the control-the-economy progressives to come. Woodrow Wilson, Herbert Hoover, FDR, LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Clinton and Obama are the worst pure progressives we’ve seen in the Oval Office. Progressivism as a doctrine jumped the Atlantic from England where the Fabian Socialists called for things like euthanasia and eugenics.
Progressives are Marxists who do NOT believe in violent revolution until much later in the process but rather expect to make incremental gains in socialism over the decades until the scene is set and they can exploit matters. Rajjpuut’s definition of progressives: Progressives believe in the doctrine that “we must progress beyond the ‘ill-conceived and outdated U.S. Constitution’ to make progress toward an earthly (Marxist) Utopia.”
By the way, a lady named Ayn Rand had lived through creation of the Soviet society in Russia and knew and understood history enough that she wrote a three-part novel called Atlas Shrugged. That book’s prophetic powers are now 85% confirmed with more history unfolding every day. And Part I of that novel was made into a superb movie which this month came out on DVD. Every reasonable and intelligent American who believes in fiscal responsibility and Constitutional-fidelity should own this wonderful movie.
^^ It was also a direct attack on Capitalism as the driving engine of the American Dream. The people who rent homes and apartments tend to be hard-workers who live frugally and save and use that method to move ahead economically. Landlords tend to be such people. Destroying this opportunity is criminal. What is so wrong about renting anyway? It sure beats living with so many of the headaches homeowners now are living through. And the author of the Rich Dad, Poor Dad financial advice books told us a decade ago that a home is a liability and NOT to be considered an investment as most people believe.
Read more…
flagwave13.gif








By John W. Lillpop


Herman Cain brings extraordinary credentials to his candidacy for U.S. President.

As documented at the reference he is the quintessential example of American Exceptionalism

He graduated from Morehouse College in 1967 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics and received a Master of Science degree in computer science from Purdue University in 1971, while he was also working full-time in ballistics for the U.S. Department of the Navy. Cain has authored four books: Leadership is Common Sense (1997), Speak as a Leader (1999), CEO of SELF (October 2001), and They Think You're Stupid (May 2005). He also authored an article titled "The Intangibles of Implementation" in the technical journal Interfaces (Vol. 9, No. 5, 1979, pp. 144-147), published by the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences

After completing his master's degree from Purdue, Cain left the Department of the Navy and began working for The Coca-Cola Company as a business analyst. In 1977, he joined Pillsbury where he rose to the position of Vice President by the early 1980s. He left his executive post to work for Burger King – a Pillsbury subsidiary at the time – managing 400 stores in the Philadelphia area. Under Cain's leadership, his region went from the least profitable for Burger King to the most profitable in three years. This prompted Pillsbury to appoint him President and CEO of Godfather's Pizza, another of their then-subsidiaries. Within 14 months, Cain had taken Godfather's Pizza from 911 stores down to 420 stores and reduced costs significantly. As a result of his efforts Godfather's Pizza finally became profitable. In a leveraged buyout in 1988, Cain, Executive Vice-President and COO Ronald B. Gartlan and a group of investors bought Godfather's from Pillsbury. Cain continued as CEO until 1996, when he was asked to resign by the board. Later that year he became CEO of the National Restaurant Association – a trade group and lobby organization for the restaurant industry – where he had previously been chairman concurrently with his role at Godfather's.

Cain became a member of the board of directors to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in 1992 and served as its chairman from January 1995 to August 1996, when he resigned to become active in national politics. Cain was a 1996 recipient of the Horatio Alger Award.

Cain was on the board of directors of Aquila, Inc. from 1992 to 2008, and also served as a board member for Nabisco, Whirlpool, Reader's Digest, and AGCO, Inc.


 
Wow! This is a man who is running for office based on his abilities, eduction, and proven record of accomplishment.

Look at his background in economics!

Oh, did I mention that this American patriot just happens to
be black? An American of African descent as it were.

Because of his education AND practical experience, Mr. Cain has far more going for him than the color of his skin.

This is no intellectual elitist who speaks in ‘professorial’ baby talk which sounds terrific, but which completely lacks substance.

Herman Cain does not ‘talk down’ to people, nor does he woo voters with flowery promises of ‘Hope and Change,’ and other leftist campaign pap.

Herman Cain would never use the federal government to bankrupt American industry.

Herman Cain understands private enterprise. He HAS met payrolls and successfully managed multiple businesses.

Herman Cain would NEVER burden American taxpayers with a trillion-dollar stimulus plan.

Herman Cain would never promote job-killing regulations and higher taxes.

Herman Cain was a key player in defeating socialized medicine during the Clinton presidency.

Herman Cain would not make the closure of GITMO a major, or even minor, priority of his administration.

Herman Cain would never insist that terrorists caught on the battlefield be read their Miranda Rights and tried in civilian courts.

Herman Cain understands and respects the U.S. military.

Herman Cain is an American citizen and owns no baggage which challenges his eligibility to serve as President.
 
Herman Cain LOVES America!

Herman Cain MUST be on the Republican presidential ticket in 2012!

Herman Cain: Let's CHANGE America back to the great nation we used to be!
  
Read more…

Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On September 26, 2011:

The dispute over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president erupted during the 2008 election campaign and featured among others a lawsuit filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes against California election officials who did not check whether Obama was eligibile. Now the 2012 campaign is charging ahead at full throttle, and the issue is still alive.

That’s because the case was before the U.S. Supreme Court for a conference today. A conference is a meeting at which the justices decide which cases they will review. To date, none of the Obama eligibility challenges that have reached the high court have been accepted. It could be as long as a week or more before an announcement comes from the court.

Attorney Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation is handling the case.

“If the U.S. Supreme court agrees to hear this case, and we pray that it will, it will send shock waves through the Washington political establishment,” Kreep said. “It will mean that the Supreme Court is going to follow the lead of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals justice who has publicly commented that this is an important constitutional issue.”

He continued, “We are awaiting the court’s decision.”

It was Judge Marsha Berzon of the 9th Circuit who commented during the oral arguments on the dispute that the issued appeared to be something of importance that needed to be resolved.

The case is Alan Keyes, et al., v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State, et al.

The closest that anything has come to an explanation for the high court’s refusal to address the issue was a series of remarks by Justice Clarence Thomas, who appeared before a U.S. house subcommittee and responded to the issue.

Thomas was before the House subcommittee when Chairman Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., raised the question amid a discussion on racial diversity in the judiciary.

“I’m still waiting for the [court decision] on whether or not a Puerto Rican can run for president of the United States,” said Serrano, who was born in the island territory. “That’s another issue.”

Yet after Serrano questioned him on whether or not the land’s highest court would be well-served by a justice who had never been a judge, Thomas not only answered in the affirmative but also hinted that Serrano would be better off seeking a seat in the Supreme Court than a chair in the Oval Office.

“I’m glad to hear that you don’t think there has to be a judge on the court,” said Serrano, “because I’m not a judge; I’ve never been a judge.”

“And you don’t have to be born in the United States,” said Thomas, referring to the Constitution, which requires the president to be a natural-born citizen but has no such requirement for a Supreme Court justice, “so you never have to answer that question.”

“Oh really?” asked Serrano. “So you haven’t answered the one about whether I can serve as president, but you answer this one?”

“We’re evading that one,” answered Thomas, referring to questions of presidential eligibility and prompting laughter in the chamber. “We’re giving you another option.”

The video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=O7qEH-tKoXA

A recent case rejected by the highest court was brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Greg Hollister.

When the justices refused to listen to the concerns, Laurence Elgin, one of the experts working with the Constitutional Rule of Law Fund and website and monitoring the case, said, “Their defiance of the court cases, their attitude they don’t really need to adhere to the law, is really unparalleled.

“The public is going to grow increasingly concerned about Obama and the failure of the courts to deal with these concerns,” he told WND.

The latest developments include an investigation of Obama announced by Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio based on a complaint from constituents that Obama’s birth certification documentation is fraudulent.

The president, after essentially ignoring the controversy for years, personally has gotten involved in defending his eligibility recently. In April he dispatched a private attorney to Hawaii to pick up a copy of what the state purported to be his original birth documentation.

This is the image that was released:

http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

However, the authenticity of the image posted by the White House has been challenged by a number of analysts and other critics as fraudulent. And some note that if the document is real, it lists Barack Obama Sr. as the father, proving Obama Jr.’s ineligibility since a “natural born Citizen” was considered by scholars cited by the Founding Fathers to be the offspring of two citizen parents.

State officials declined to respond when Obama released the “Certificate of Live Birth” image and WND requested confirmation that the image released was an accurate representation of the state’s records.

The Keyes case, filed at the 2008 election, argues that officials previously had investigated candidates’ qualifications and should have done so in this instance. Kreep is representing Keyes, Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson in the case that up until now was being heard in the California state court system.

Kreep and attorney Orly Taitz represent the same individuals and others in a similar case that has been travelingthrough the federal court system. In that case, arguments were presented recently before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, but a decision has not been released.

Kreep’s state court case was rejected by the California Supreme Court earlier this year, opening the path for appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In his arguments, Kreep cites a decision by California officials in 1968 in which the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a presidential candidate. He said the California secretary of state at the time, Frank Jordan, found Cleaver was only 34 years old, one year short of the 35 years required by the Constitution for presidential candidates, and removed him from the ballot.

A legal case ensued, and the U.S. Supreme Court ,by denying review, affirmed the actions of the secretary of state.

“Similarly, in 1984, the Peace and Freedom Party listed Mr. Larry Holmes as an eligible candidate in the presidential primary,” the arguments explained. “When the then SOS checked his eligibility, it was found that Mr. Holmes was, similarly, not eligible, and Mr. Holmes was removed from the ballot.

“In this case [Obama], we have a similar situation in that the Democratic Party submitted the name of Obama as a candidate for president,” the arguments explain.

The arguments suggest that since the courts have determined they don’t have jurisdiction in such eligibility cases, and there is no effective procedure to qualify candidates in Congress, the logical result would be to have election officials, such as the secretary of state, make such decisions.

And regarding the removal of a sitting official who is ineligible, there is state Supreme Court precedent, the petition argues.

It was in the 1930s in North Dakota when Thomas H. Moodie was “duly elected to the office of governor,” the case explains.

Later, “It was discovered that Thomas H. Moodie was not eligible for the position of governor, as he had not resided in the state for a requisite five years before running for office, and, because of that ineligibility, he was removed from office and replaced by the lieutenant governor.”

North Dakota’s historical archives document the case.

The Democrat was nominated by his party for governor in 1934 and beat his Republican opponent, Lydia Langer.

“As soon as the election was over, there was talk of impeachment, but no charges were filed,” the state’s archives report. “After Moodie’s inauguration on January 7, 1935, it was revealed that he had voted in a 1932 municipal election in Minnesota. In order to be eligible for governor, an individual has to have lived in the state for five consecutive years before the election. The State Supreme Court determined that Governor Moodie was ineligible to serve, and he was removed from office on February 16, 1935,” the state reports.

The case there called the “lack of residential qualifications” a “legal disability.”

“Here, in like manner, appellants allege that Obama is legally disabled by his citizenship status. Therefore, all votes cast in favor of the Obama/Biden joint and unseverable ticket by the California Electors should be deemed null and void, since the votes were cast for an individual ineligible to run for the office of president of the United States of America.”

There is no constitutional provision addressing the process to determine candidates’ eligibility, nor does federal law address the question, Kreep wrote. But he said the courts clearly have the authority to rule on the controversy at hand.

“The issue here is not one of determining new election law, but one of whether California was in line both with its own state constitution and the United States Constitution on this issue,” the case alleges.

“The issue of whether Obama is eligible to serve as president of the United States is one that has ‘significant political overtones,’ given that it has a direct relation to the election of the most powerful political office in the Untied States, but it is, nonetheless, an issue which the courts can make a determination on, because the requirements for said office are clearly stated in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, of the U.S. Constitution, and courts routinely decide questions such as at issue in this case.”

At the appellate court level in California, the judges appeared to say a judicial review of a president’s eligibility is a possibility – after the Electoral College and congressional procedures run their courses.

The results are found in the opinion that upheld a state district court’s dismissal of a challenge to the procedures under which California’s electors helped install Obama in the Oval Office.

The appellate opinion in the case, which alleges both California Secretary of State Debra Bowen and the state’s electors for the Electoral College in the 2008 election failed to verify that Obama is eligible, said the eligibility of candidates “is best left to each party.”

The opinion said that should a “president-elect shall have failed to qualify,” the responsibility rests with Congress.

But the opinion also suggested a line of responsibility that would include the courts. It warned that should Congress fail to act “in the first instance” – and during the 2008 election there was no action on the part of Congress regarding the issue – “Judicial review, if any, should occur only after the electoral and congressional processes have run their course.”

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=349217

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Sheriff's Notified - Crimes Against Citizens in Your Jurisdiction!

Posted on The Steady Drip-By Rev. Samuel Sewell-On September 27, 2011:

From: Rev. Samuel Sewell

10202 Vanderbilt Drive

Naples, FL 34108

TO: Sherriff

Subject: Crimes Against Citizens in Your Jurisdiction and MISPRISION OF FELONY

I am Samuel Sewell a citizen of the United States of America, 70 years of age, and of sound mind. I must address a matter of grave concern to me, and to our nation.

There is enough evidence available to the public for any Grand Jury to indict our fraudulent president for the crimes of Social Security Number fraud, birth certificate forgery, draft registration fraud, and identity theft in addition to election fraud in every jurisdiction in America. As it is now, and has been for some time widely known in America, as well as in many foreign countries that putative President Obama has submitted a form of his Certificate of Live Birth that has been proven by numerous well qualified official sources to be fraudulent and forged. It is a matter of concern that I write to you in the hopes that you will take action to investigate or initiate proceedings leading to prosecution of putative President Barack Hussein Obama, A.K.A. Barry Soetoro for the commission of this outrageous fraud perpetrated against the people of America, and the Constitution of the Republic of the United States.

The very fabric of our great nation has become a laughing stock at best, and many know of the validity of criminal charges that can and must be brought. By his own admission, in published book form, as well as upon releasing the forgery and claiming it as his real birth certificate, he has shown himself to be unquestionably ineligible to hold the office he now subverts by virtue of the US Supreme Court Precedence established with Minor vs Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) which specifically defines an Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens.

Therefore, Obama—according to US Supreme Court precedent—is not eligible to be President, and his attempt to overcome that requirement, being other than natural born, constitutes criminal charges, and he should be indicted, and a trial should be held that may lead to removal from office. Obama cannot be leagally impeached.

As a fraud was facilitated by Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, the Notary Public certifying the candidacy nomination forms, and others in the Democratic National Committee charged with the duty to provide affirmation of his eligibility, they too must be investigated and brought to face charges of Fraud and Misprision of Felonies and other misdemeanors as outlined in U.S.C. 18 Ch 1, § 4.

In the interest of preservation of our great nation, I would strongly encourage your immediate action in moving forward to end this fraud. I have listed links to on-line sources for reference below to facilitate your ease of access. Thank you for standing up for law and order.

With all due respect,

Reverend Samuel Sewell

President, InterFaith Ministries.

Sources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfETrtdnZ0g

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/09/e-verify-letter-to-obama.html

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/us-supreme-court...

U.S.C 18 Ch1, § 4 Misprision of Felony and other Misdemeanors

Misprision of felony is still an offense under United States federal law after being codified in 1909 under 18 U.S.C. § 4:

“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

This letter hereby absolves me of my obligation to report crimes to authorities.”

  • Rev. Sewell is a member of Mensa, a U.S. Navy Veteran, and a Member of the Association For Intelligence Officers.
  • He is an International Commentator and a member of the Society of Professional Journalists, a frequent commentator on religious and political issues. His articles are published by “Intellectual Conservative”, “American Thinker” and various periodicals.
  • His award winning research on Family issues is published in several languages.
  • Member of Sigma Delta Chi Honor Society.

Source:

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/09/sheriffs-notified-crimes-against.html

II. Washington Times Advertisement: Obama’s SSN Fails-E-Verify System!-Posted on Scribd-On September 26, 2011:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/66340890/Obama-s-SSN-Fails-E-Verify-System-26-Sep-2011-Wash-Times-National-Wkly-edition-pg-5

III. Sheriff's eligibility 'posse' sparks media whirlwind!-Posted on WND.com-By Drew Zahn-On September 20, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=346981

IV. Sheriff Joe picks 'Cold Case Posse' to investigate president's eligibility!-Posted on WND.com-By Jarome R. Corsi-On September 18, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=346201

V. Video: Pat Boone: Obama Born in Kenya; His Long-Form Birth Certificate is a Total Fraud!-Posted on BirtherReport.com-On September 17, 2011:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/09/pat-boone-obama-born-in-kenya-his-long.html

VI. Attack Watch still obsessing over Obama’s birth certificate!-Posted on The Examiner-By Joe Newby, Spokane Conservative Examiner-On September 16, 2011:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/attack-watch-still-obsessing-over-obama-s-birth-certificate

VII. Birthers: $10,000 for Obama Birth News Clip!-Posted on Honolulu Civil Beat-By Chad Blair-Updated on September 15, 2011:

http://www.civilbeat.com/posts/2011/09/14/12843-birther-nuts-in-town/

VIII. Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. files motion for reconsideration in SSA challenge!-Posted on Sonoran News-By Linda Bentley-On September 14, 2011:

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/110914/frontpage-everify.html

IX. American Citizens’ Demand for Justice Against the Overthrow of the U.S. Constitution!-Posted on Post & Email-By Kathleen Gotto-On May 31, 2011:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/31/american-citizens-demand-for-justice-against-the-overthrow-of-the-u-s-constitution/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on DickMorris.com-By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann-On September 28, 2011:

For twenty years – long before 9/11 – the danger of terrorists armed with surface to air missiles shooting at passenger planes has been the secret fear of many top political leaders. In the late 90s, a terrorist network was nabbed trying to bring them into Newark Airport, but the airline industry and the government have done nothing to equip passenger airplanes with any defense against these always deadly missiles.

Now Barack Obama has committed the ultimate sin: He has let 20,000 surface-to-air missiles escape from military depots in Libya. According to ABC News “U.S. officials had once thought there was little chance that terrorists could get their hands on many of the portable surface-to-air missiles that can bring down a commercial jet liner. But now that calculation is out the window, with officials at a recent secret White House meeting reporting that thousands of them have gone missing in Libya.” An estimated 20,000 of these “portable, heat-seeking missiles have gone missing from unguarded Army weapons warehouses.”

Senator Barbara Boxer, of the Senate’s Commerce, Energy, and Transportation Committee said that “matching up a terrorist with a shoulder-fired missile, that’s our worst nightmare.”

And now, thanks to Obama’s carelessness and his unnecessary decision to intervene in Libya, it may be our future reality.

ABC News describes the missing missiles as “four to six-feet long and Russian-made, [they] can weight just 55 pounds with launcher.” They are accurate within a range of more than two miles. That a terrorist could sit on a boat off JFK airport and shoot down a passenger plane as it ascends could now be a real possibility.

In the Iraq War, during the run-up to the 2004 election, there were reports of unguarded US military depots from which insurgents allegedly stole thousands of explosives. The story broke in the week before the election and Kerry took down all his other ads and focused on this issue, first reported in the New York Times. By Election Day, it was proven that the report was bogus, adding to Kerry’s woes. Now, faced with this massive blunder and security threat, we hear nothing but the sounds of silence from any of the mainstream media except, to its immense credit, ABC News.

We need to assign a top priority to hunting down these missiles. In Afghanistan, our troops jumped through hoops to corral all the Stinger Missiles left over from the Russian War. This potential leak of these dangerous weapons is vastly more threatening. Obama needs to face this issue squarely and publicly. And we all need to learn the cost we may pay from having elected a rank amateur as president.”

Source:

http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/obama’s-blunder-missing-libyan-surface-to-air-missiles/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Video: Thousands Of Surface-To-Air Missiles Unaccounted For In Libya!-Posted on Breitbart.tv-By ABC News-On September 27, 2011:

http://www.breitbart.tv/thousands-of-surface-to-air-missiles-unaccounted-for-in-libya/

II. Obama’s Analysts: Oops! We Put Muslim Radicals in Charge of Libya!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September 30, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/obamas-analysts-oops-we-put-muslim-radicals-in-charge-of-libya/

III. Muslim Brotherhood's Growing Influence!-Posted on CBN.com-On September 21, 2011:

http://www.cbn.com/media/player/index.aspx?s=/Archive/News/Stakelbeck_Terror_092011_WS&search=stakelbeckepisodes&p=1&parent=0&subnav=false

IV. Islam, Appeasement, and Western Suicide!-Posted on CultureWatch-By Bill Muehlenberg-On September 3, 2011:

http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2011/09/03/islam-appeasement-and-western-suicide/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/is-president-obama-in-on-the-uprising-in-egypt/

Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/is-israel-the-next-arab-facebook-campaign/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

The Post-Racial Echo Chamber of Ignorance!

Right On!

Posted on BlackSphere-By Kevin Jackson-On September 1, 2011:

“Welcome to the echo chamber of ignorance of the Left’s post-racial America. Black Liberals thought that electing a black president would make them happier than a Michael Vick pound pup, but instead most are now madder than Whoopi Goldberg’s blind date.

In an America where black achievement can be seen and heard everywhere, Andre Carson and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) are crying foul, saying that the Tea Party wants to take America back to the ‘60’s. Don’t believe your lying eyes showcasing black achievement all over America, because black people are being oppressed.  By the Tea Party who wants black people “hanging from trees.”

Yes, the three-year old Tea Party movement is responsible for the decades of degradation within the black community, according to Carson and other members of the CBC.

Who knew it was the Tea Party doing all those drive-bys in black neighborhoods, and robbing black folks. Here I thought it was black thugs and gang members.

Who knew it was the evil Tea Party who foreclosed on black homeowners, or that the Tea Party set up all those substandard government schools in black neighborhoods.

Apparently America’s police are loaded with Tea Party members, and the cops are out to get black people.  Prior to the Tea Party, there we NO black people in prison.  Over the last three years, the Tea Party cops have begun rounding up black people and wrongfully incarcerating them.

Worse yet, while in prison, black people are being forced to listen to Bluegrass music and watch reruns of The Dukes of Hazard…with Daisy Duke edited out!

Sure, the new America is like the ‘60’s, only this time it’s black people intimidating white folks. The New Black Panthers are threatening to kill white babies and suppressing the Republican vote.  Civil unrest is all over America with black flash mobs.  Black people doing meet-ups to give beat ups.

Black mobs in Green Bay WI?! How many black folks do they have there anyway?  20, not including the players for the Packers?  Did ACORN have to bus these black folks in?  Whites outnumber blacks in Green Bay about 100 to 1, yet those white people were willing to take a butt kicking while leaving the fair in order to avoid being called racists.

And black flash mobs are happening all over the country, like in Peoria, IL where cops told residents to “stay in your homes,” to avoid the mobs.  Seriously? That’s the solution. In America?

Black people in America are being told that they are owed something. Flash mobs are robbing stores, stealing, like a swarm of locusts, and little is happening to stop them.

White people are too afraid to fight back, because they don’t want to risk being called racists.  Can you imagine an America where you’d rather take an butt kicking than be called a racist? We’re there.  To quote Visa:  PRICELESS!

The CBC is the newest flash mob, running around the country fomenting racial hatred. That’s what Democrats do. Andre Carson and others of the CBC are only doing what good Democrats do when their backs are against the wall:Intimidate.

When Obama loses the next election, you are getting a look at what America will look like for some time. Black flash mobs will roam the cities saying that the Republicans ripped them off.  Black Liberals will have the built-in excuse that “The Tea Party didn’t want the black president to succeed…and chickens coming home to roost,” both favorite mantras of the great black Left.

Obama’s loss in 2012 will be the political equivalent of the OJ verdict, giving black Liberals an excuse to continue to be victims. “We have our chance, but the white man wouldn’t let the black president succeed.”

Welcome to Black Liberal Democrat Progressive Regressive University where Victimization 101 is a required course.

If America were honest, they would state openly that it is the CBC who should be publicly flogged for their representation of black America. The CBC is touring the oppressed areas that they serve to discuss one thing:  Black victimization.

Black Liberal leaders preach how weak black America is. Without government, black people are nothing.  When is the last time you’ve heard a black Liberal leader talk empowerment of the black community, and not lace their speech with the “blame whitey” meme?

Only the Right is post-racial in America. The Left is a hateful bunch who loves to use racism to keep people thinking inside the box they’ve been put in. Whether 8 to 80, blind, cripple or crazy, the Left has your box.

The CBC invests heavily in the “idea” of a racist America, because that’s their meal ticket. They love to invoke imagery of lynching and Jim Crow, all legacy Democrat badges of honor.  But don’t let black Liberals know they are supporting the Democrats’ heinous past or black Liberals could leave the CBC’s echo chamber of ignorance.

That’s my rant!”

Source:

http://theblacksphere.net/post-racial-echo-chamber-of-ignorance/

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Black Pastor Sues Obama & Democratic Party for Racism!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On September 25, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/black-pastor-sues-obama-democratic-party-for-racism

II. Video: Tea Party Racism: Rev. Perryman Says Enough!-Posted on YouTube.com-By RevWaynePerryman-On September 18, 2009:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzM22US-Jo&NR=1

III. Video: Drama of Obama Regarding Racism!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFOd7wb1Cpo&feature=player_embedded

IV. Video: Herman Cain Takes on Morgan Freeman for Calling Tea Party Racist!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On September 25, 2011:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2011/09/25/video-herman-cain-takes-on-morgan-freeman-for-calling-tea-party-racist/

V. Morgan Freeman: Obama Made Racism Worse, Tea Party Will Do ‘Whatever [It] Can To Get This Black Man Outta Here’!-Posted on News Busters-By Noel Sheppard-On September 23, 2011:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/09/23/morgan-freeman-obama-has-made-racism-worse-tea-party-will-do-whatever#ixzz1YnWDliVr

VI. Blacks File Class Action Racial Discrimination Suit Against Obama & Democrats!-Posted on The Frederick Douglas Foundation-On September 12, 2011:

http://www.icontact-archive.com/vYs-Zyo3vj9g_57o0kqV3gG521zwvWdH?w=2

VII. ‘This Is War’—Congressional Black Cauccus Travels US Cities Using Violent Rhetoric: Declares ‘War’ on Racist Tea Party, Says Tea Party Wants To Lynch Blacks, Calls For Bank Runs, Civil Unrest In Their Neighborhoods And Homes!-Posted on The Blaze-By Naked Emperor News-On August 30, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/this-is-war-congressional-black-caucus-travels-us-cities-using-violent-rhetoric-declares-war-on-racist-tea-party-says-tea-party-wants-to-lynch-blacks-calls-for-bank-runs-civil-unrest-in-th/

VIII. Video: Beat Whitey Night - Attacks mar Iowa State Fair!-Posted on YouTube.com-By 17R3W-On August 25, 2010:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qeMslmDBxY

IX. Witnesses describe mobs, some people claim racially-charged attacks!-Posted on WTMJ News-By Jay Sorgi and the WTMJ News Team-On August 5, 2011:

http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/126825018.html

X. Video: Jesse Lee Peterson-Obama Hates the White Man and he is a dangerous man!-Posted on YouTube.com-By psam4711-On June 25, 2009:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgpVQvqD1vQ&feature=related

XI. Angry Flash Mobs, Brought to You by Obama!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Floyd Brown and Mary Beth Brown-On June 10, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/angry-flash-mobs-brought-to-you-by-obama/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-have-con...

The Racial Mess!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-racial-mess/

Obama is fomenting a race war?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/obama-is-fomenting-a-race-...

'Game Change':  New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns' Messy Moments-To Include Racism!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/game-change-new-book-revea...

How ABC, CBS and NBC Have Dismissed and Disparaged the Tea Party Movement!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/how-abc-cbs-and-nbc-have-d...

Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-in-support-of-the-agenda/

Restoring Honor In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/restoring-honor-in-america/

Is History Repeating Itself?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/is-history-repeating-itself/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-underst...

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

HOW DO WE EVALUATE THE PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULLS

I AM CONSTANTLY EVALUATING THE ANNOUNCED AND UNANNOUNCED POLITICAL WANNABEES.

 

MITT ROMNEY- A COLD CALCULATING BUSINESS AUTOCRAT WHO WOULD BRING MANY PROFFESSIONAL GIFTS TO THE PRESIDENCY OR TO  A CABINET POST DEALING WITH THE BUSINESS OF RUNNING THE COUNTRY

RICK PERRY- ONE WHO IS ADEPT, YET INFLEXIBLE AT ADJUSTING TO CHANGING CONDITIONS, BUT UNWILLING TO CHANGE HIS PHILOSOPHY WHEN SOMEHING DOESN T WORK IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY

 

HERMAN CAIN- A GIFTED BUSINESS MAN WHOSE ONLY EXPERIENCE IS IN BUISINESS' OF A MINISCULE NATURE WHEN COMPARED TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE CHANGING PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY. COULD BEN EXCELLENT CHOICE FOR A CABINET POSITION

 

MICHELE BACHMAN- A BEAUTIFUL LADY ON A MISSION WHICH I FEAR IS TO COMPLEX FOR HER EXPERIENCE, I THINK SHE CAN CONTRIBUTE MORE TO THE WELFARE OF THE COUNTRY SERVING IN THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

 

NEWT GINGRICH- A BRILLIANT AND KNOWLEDGABLE MAN WHOSE KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES WOULD BE OF GREAT VALUE FOR A VICE PRESIDENT

SANTORUM- A SKILLED LEGISLATOR WHOS TALENTS WOULD BE MORE VALUABLE IN THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

 

HUNTSMAN- A TALENTED GOVERNOR WHO WOULD BE A GREAT ADDITION TO A CABINET POOST

 

DNALD TRUMP- DONALD IS DONALD AND WOULD BE GREAT AT SHAKING THINGS UP BUT SOMETIMES HAS THE MENTALITY OF A BULL IN A CHINA SHOP. HAS TALENTS THAST COULD PROVE INVALUABLE IN A CABINET POST

 

SARAH PALIN- ONE OF THE MOST REMARKABLE WOMAN WE WILL EVER HAVE THE PLEASURE OF REPRESENATING US.  THERE WOULD BE A PERIOD OF NOVICENESS WITH HER, BUT SHE IS A QUICK LEARNER, VERY ADAPTABLE AND FLEXIBLE TO SITUATIONS, SHE IS BRUTALLY HONEST IN HER BELIEFS AND IN EVERYTHING SHE SAYS, NEVER AFRAID TO ADMIT THAT THERE IS A BETTER PLAN AND SHE DOESN'T ALLOW HER POLITICAL IDEALOGY GET IN THE WAY OF HER PEOPLE ORIENTATION.

 

O K IF YOU DISAGREE WITH MY EVALUATIONS, LET ME KNOW, I AM NEVER TO OLD TO LEARN

Read more…

WE NEED A REMADE CONGRESS AS WELL AS A NEW PRESIDENT

I LOOK FORE THE SAME QUALITIES IN A LEGISLATOR AS I DO FOR PRESIDENT

MORE PEOPLE ORIENTED THAN POLITICAL IDEOLOGY ORIENTED, THE COURAGE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITION OF THE UNITED STATES WHICH WAS WRITTEN WITHOUT ANY PARTISAN IDEOLOGY EVEN WHEN THEIR PERSONAL POLITICAL IDEOLOGY IS IN CONFLICT, ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS OF THIS NATION REGARDLESS OF POLITICAL AFFILIATION OR PERSONAL BELIEF.  I DON'T NOW OF ANYONE IN THE CURRENT BATCH OF POSSABLES WHO I AM SATISFIED WITH ACCORDANCE TO THESE QUALITIES.  WE ARE A HYBRID POPULATION WITH A COMPLEX SOCIETY DEVELOPED THROUGH THE VAST MIXTURE OF SOCIETY'S. IT IS IMPOSSABLE FOR ANY ONE PERSON TO SATISFY EVERY BODY.  THE FOUNDERS OF THIS COUNTRY UNDERSTOOD THAT AND INSTALLED A MIXED GOVERNMENT SO THAT ALL PEOPLES COULD BE PROPERLY REPRESENTED.  THE ALSO REALISED THAT A MIXED GOVERNMENT COULD BECOME CLANNISH, TRIBAL OR WHATEVER GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH DIFFERING VALUES.  I BELIEVE THAT GOD WANTED US EACH TO RETAIN OUR INDIVIDUALITY OF INTELLEGENCE AND TALENTS. I DO NOT BELIEVGE WE WERE EVER INTENDED TO BE DOM INATED BY ANY ONE GROUP OR CLUB.  UNFORTUNATLY POLITICS HAS DEGENERATED TO A STATUS OF A POWER STRUCTURE AND WHOVER HAD THE MOST POWER HAD THE ABILITY TO CONTROL AND DOMINATE THE MASSES.

UNFORTUNATLY, THOISE WHO HAVE ATTAINED THAT LEVEL OF POWER LOSE THEIR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT THE FEELINGS AND BELIEFS OF ANYONE, EVEN THEIR OWN FAM ILY.

THIS IS EXACTALY THE REASON THAT WE, AS A PEOPLE MUST ROTATE THE POWER STRUCTURE AND GET HOSE WHO LET POWER GROW THIER EGOS AND TEND TO DOMINATE EVERYTHING AND EVERYBODY

I REFUSE TO BE DOMINATED BY ANY ONE, ANY GROUP, ANY POLITICAL ENTITY AND WILL FOREVER EXCERCISE MY FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AAND INDEPENDANCE AND IF WE ALL RISE UP AND SAY-I DONT EXPECT TO ALWAS AGREE WITH YOU BUT I WILL NEVER GIVE UP MY FREEDOM TO DISAGREE.  

Read more…

We must make Obama a 1 term President!

Friends, Are u better of now than u were, say, 4 years ago?. Sure, the country was in financial turmoil, but has it improved under Obama? Obama has set  us on course to bankruptcy & Bolshevism. In fact, He has been a Bolshevik most of his life, Anyway, Obamacare is not only going to raise taxes, but it`ll will take away emloyee`s insurance beneifits provided by their employers, it`ll drive doctors & other physicians out of businesss, but that`ws not all, His wife wants to take away the parent`s right to raise thier children & feed them. I think she wants to be a dietician or something. When Michelle says, "Let`s Move", I say, "I`ll move (away from you & your husband). We must "move" away form Obama`s Manchurian candidate like moves.Obama wants to raise your taxes, increase spending, & give more power to the government than it already has. This President is a disaster for this country, & i don`t think it`s racist to be against him. Obama has a hidden agenda, not unlike the movie "The Manchurian Candidate". He had a well-known terrorist & armored car robber named Marylin Katz, work for him on his campaign, He had an endorsement from the CPUSA(Communist Party of the U.S.) His Transportation secretary wanted to track how many miles you took in your car. His spiritual leader cursed oue country, and like Malcolm X, who made an inflammatory remark after Pres. Kennedy was assassinated, Rev. Wright made an equally inflammatory remark after 9/11. I could go on & on about how wrong Obama is for this country, but that would take way too long. We need someone better, someone who can turn our country around not just financially, but morally as well.
Read more…
 

 By John W. Lillpop

Some stories are just too silly to take seriously.

That would include the story titled, Was the Associated Press transcription of Obama’s CBC speech ‘racist’? at the reference.

The story, in part:

By most accounts, President Obama gave a fiery speech at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's annual awards dinner in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, telling blacks to "quit crying and complaining" and support him in the fight for jobs, according to the Associated Press. But was the AP transcription of Obama's remarks racist?

That's the subject currently being debated after the issue was raised on Chris Hayes' MSNBC show on Sunday.

On MSNBC, the African-American author Karen Hunter complained the news service transcribed Obama's speech without cleaning it up as other outlets did--specifically including the "dropped g's."

Via the AP version:

"Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes," he said, his voice rising as applause and cheers mounted. "Shake it off. Stop complainin'. Stop grumblin'. Stop cryin'. We are going to press on. We have work to do."

 
How in the hell can any sane person allege racism on the part of AP when they simply repeated the President’s words, exactly?


Then we have the inimitable Maxine Waters, and thank the Lord she cannot be cloned!

As reported in part at the reference, the California liberal extremist objected to Obama’s harsh words:

Rep. Maxine Waters is angry about President Barack Obama’s admonition to black Americans to “stop complaining.”

The California Democrat insisted during an interview on the “Early Show” on CBS today that he wouldn’t speak to any other group, such as Hispanics, Jews, or members of the gay and lesbian community, in such a disparaging way.

Obama, speaking Saturday at an awards dinner for the Congressional Black Caucus, told those present should “take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes. Shake it off. Stop complaining, stop grumbling, stop crying. We are going to press on. We’ve got work to do, CBC.”

Waters, a frequent Obama critic, responded on the “Early Show”: “I don’t know who he was talking to, because we’re certainly not complaining. We are working. We support him and we are protecting that base because we want people to be enthusiastic about him when that election rolls around.”

 
Earth to Maxine Waters: When President Barack Obama told black Americans to quit complaining, he was talking directly to YOU, darling!


Do yourself a favor and ‘Google” your name and take a peek at the quotes attributed to you recently. If that ain’t complaining, nothing is!

In fact, Rep. Waters, with your urgent pleas for Obama to do more for the black community, you have advocated, perhaps unwittingly, that racial profiling be used by the President to address unemployment.

Shame on you, Congresswoman!


Read more…

What’s wrong with this picture?

Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On September 26, 2011:

President Obama’s nominee for Commerce secretary served as chairman of the board of a solar energy company that recently received a $1.37 billion federal loan guarantee – the largest the Department of Energy has ever given for a solar power project.

Now that company, BrightSource Energy, is attempting to build the world’s largest solar power plant amid concerns such ventures may be too risky an investment for the federal government.

In June, BrightSource Chairman John Bryson was nominated by Obama to head the Commerce Department.

WND reported in June that Bryson co-founded an environmental activist group that is a member and funder of the controversial Apollo Alliance.

Apollo is run by a slew of socialists and radicals, including Jeff Jones, a founder of the Weather Undergrounddomestic terrorist organization. Jones himself boasts of doing work for the environmental group founded by Bryson, the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Bryson served until June as co-chairman of the Pacific Council on International Policy, a globalist organization whose members can be found throughout the Obama administration.

The massive loan guarantee to BrightSource is meant to build an expensive California desert solar plant known as the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System.

The system will feature mirrors that reflect sun toward a massive central tower that is in turn heated to produce steam meant to spin turbines to produce electricity.

The size of the BrightSource plant is thought to produce enough power to meet the needs of hundreds of thousands of Californians.

During a national address last October, Obama mentioned the possible benefits of BrightSource Energy’s“revolutionary new type of solar power plant.”

However, some have doubted that the massive solar plant will actually work.

The Bay Citizen quoted Michael Boyd, president of the nonprofit Californians for Renewable Energy, as saying there is“no evidence” BrightSource’s project will succeed.

Boyd complained most of the equipment used at the plant would be manufactured in China and Germany.

“Stimulus money isn’t going to jobs here in the U.S. It’s going to jobs overseas,” he said.

Boyd’s group last year reportedly filed an administrative complaint seeking to block the U.S. loan guarantee, alleging in the complaint the solar project “could have the unintended consequences of killing innovation if these projects fail.”

In a briefing last month, BrightSource CEO John Woolard was confident his plant would significantly lower the costs of energy.

“We were able to drop costs down significantly,” he said. “Ivanpah is the culmination of two and a half decades of work and thinking around solar.”

However, the entire solar energy enterprise is now being questioned as overseas manufacturers, particularly China and Taiwan, have produced similar products and services at much lower prices.

Already, the cost of generating power with panels plunged about 37 percent in the past year, Bloomberg reported yesterday, as Chinese factories cut prices. The price slashes pushed three U.S. makers, including Solyndra, into bankruptcy protection in the past quarter.

The news media and lawmaker focus on the Obama administration’s use of funds for solar energy could draw focus to Bryson himself, since he chaired the company that received the largest amount of funds.

Globalist, CO2 activist:

Besides his position at BrightSource, which he vacated when he was selected as Obama’s Commerce pick, Bryson is the former chairman, chief executive officer and president of Edison International, the parent company of Southern California Edison.

He serves on the U.N. secretary-general’s advisory group on energy and climate change and as co-chairman of the globalist PCIP, a partner of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1970, Bryson co-founded the Natural Resources Defense Council, or NRDC, with a $400,000 seed grant from the Ford Foundation.

The group is also funded by the Tides Foundation, to which philanthropist George Soros has donated more than $7 million over the years. Tides itself is a major funder of leftist causes, including ACORN, whose founder and former chief organizer, Wade Rathke, is a Tides board member.

The NRDC is a major proponent of fighting so-called global warming. It recently endorsed a document called the Earth Charter, which, Discover the Networks notes, blames capitalism for many of the world’s environmental, social and economic problems.

The charter maintains that “the dominant patterns of production and consumption are causing environmental devastation, the depletion of resources, and a massive extinction of species. The benefits of development are not shared equitably and the gap between rich and poor is widening.”

The NRDC is a member of the Apollo Alliance. NRDC’s president, Frances Beinecke, is on Apollo’s board. The NRDC is also listed by Apollo as a funder of the group, having donated between $1,200 to $2,999 to become an Apollo “clean energy benefactor.”

The NRDC endorses many Apollo initiatives.

Apollo’s New York office is run by Jeff Jones, who founded the Weather Underground with terrorists Bill Ayers and radical Mark Rudd when the three signed an infamous statement calling for a revolution against the American government inside and outside the country to fight and defeat what the group called U.S. imperialism.

Jones currently boasts on his personal website that he has done consulting work for the NRDC.

Apollo has been credited by the Obama administration with helping craft portions of the $787-billion “stimulus” bill signed into law.

The Apollo Alliance has boasted in promotional material that it was behind several of the Obama administration’s“green” initiatives, in addition to crafting “green” sections of the stimulus bill.

Among Apollo’s board members are a group of extremists including:

  • Van Jones, President Obama’s controversial former “green jobs czar” who resigned in September 2009 after it was exposed he founded a communist revolutionary organization and signed a statement that accused the Bush administration of possible involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Jones also called for “resistance” against the U.S. 

Jones himself described the Apollo Alliance’s mission as “sort of a grand unified field theory for progressive left causes.” 

  • Joel Rogers, a founder of the socialist New Party. WND reported evidence indicating Obama was a New Party member. In an interview with WND, New Party co-founder and Marxist activist Carl Davidson previously recounted Obama’s participation with the New Party.

Following publicity of Apollo’s radicalism, including scores of articles by WND and investigations by the Fox News Channel, Apollo announced it will merge with the BlueGreen Alliance, a collaboration of large environmental groups and unions.

Globalism:

Meanwhile, Bryson is co-chairman of the PCIP, which was founded in 1995 in partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations.

The group says it is the “premier international affairs organization focused on policy issues of special resonance to the West Coast.”

Its goals include “building our network of globally oriented business, civic, and government leaders.” Also, the group aims to convene exchanges with global policy makers and opinion leaders while partnering with organizations around the world to “promote mutual understanding and coordinated action.”

The PCIP is funded by the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Obama’s ambassador to France, Charles Rivkin, is a member of the PCIP. Last October, he invited a 29-member delegation from the PCIP to a conference in France for the stated purpose of discussing Arab and Islamic relations in the country.

Rivkin was at the center of a scandal when WikiLeaks released a cable in which he proposed the U.S. Embassy in France initiate a multipronged effort to “engage” and help to “empower” France’s Muslim minorities.

Rivkin called the effort a “Minority Engagement Strategy,” which was largely directed at Muslims in France.

Other PCIP members abound through the Obama administration, WND has learned.

James B. Steinberg, deputy secretary of state, serves on the PICP board of directors. He also serves on the science and security board of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, a journal that argued during the Cold War for the U.S. to hand its nuclear weapons to an international organization.

The Bulletin, as WND reported, was founded by scientists who were long accused of spying for the Soviets and passing along vital nuclear secrets.

Vilma S. Martinez, U.S. ambassador to Argentina, is the chairman of the PCIP’s Mexico Study Group.

Former Utah Gov. Jon M. Huntsman Jr., a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, was appointed by Obama as ambassador to China in August 2009. He is a PCIP founding director.

Jeffrey L. Bleich, Obama’s appointment for U.S. ambassador to Australia, is a PCIP member.

Diana Farrell, deputy director of the National Economic Council, is a member of the PCIP as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bretton Woods Committee. She is a frequent speaker on U.S. global engagement.

Byron Auguste, a member of Obama’s White House Council for Community Solutions, serves on the PCIP board. He is also on the board of trustees of the Center for American Progress, which is funded by Soros and led by John Podesta, who served as co-chairman of Obama’s transition team.

Last year, PCIP member Steven Myers joined the State Department’s advisory committee on international economic policy.

John B. Emerson, appointee for Obama’s advisory committee for trade policy and negotiations, is a member of both the PCIP and CFR.

In April, Obama nominated PCIP member Janet Yellen to serve as vice chairman of the Federal Reserve.

PCIP member Alan D. Bersin was appointed commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Last March, Obama appointed PCIP member Michael Camuñez to the position of assistant secretary for market access and compliance in the Department of Commerce.

Ernest James Wilson, a member of the PCIP board, was elected chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in September 2009. He served as a policy advisor on Obama’s presidential transition team on matters of communication technology and public diplomacy.

Also on Obama’s transition team was Jonathan Greenblat, chairman of the PCIP’s energy and environment committee.

The PCIP has some ties to billionaire activist George Soros. Among PCIP fellows is Ahmed Rashid , a Pakistani journalist and writer who is a member of the advisory board of Eurasia Net of the Soros Foundation. He is also a scholar of the Davos World Economic Forum and a consultant for Human Rights Watch.

At the invitation of the then-U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, he became the first journalist to address the U.N. General Assembly in New York in September 2002 and the first journalist to address NATO ambassadors in Brussels in September 2003.”

  • With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott.

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=349101

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Obama’s Predictable Scandals!

How much more will Americans put up with?

Posted on National Review Online-By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON-On September 21, 2011:

The media finally conceded the Obama administration to be inexperienced and inept, reminiscent of the Carter administration — but, they maintained, not possibly involved in any corruption. Then suddenly scandals erupted on nearly every conceivable front: the crony-capitalist half-billion-dollar loan guarantee to a now bankrupt Solyndra; the Fast and Furious gun deal, in which, in lunatic fashion, the U.S. government sold deadly automatic weapons to Mexican drug-cartel killers; the administration’s pressure on a four-star general to fudge his testimony as a favor to a big campaign donor whose suspect company, LightSquared, was doing business with the Pentagon; and the politically inspired dropping of investigations by the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department.

The administration got itself into these messes because it customarily counts on a medieval notion of compartmentalized exemption. In the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama’s loud and welcomed hope-and-change promises to end insider influence, lobbying, and earmarks were essential to his well-crafted image of the outsider reformer. Once that liberal narrative was embraced by the media, few seemed to care whether the other, cynical Obama was the first candidate in the history of public financing of presidential campaigns to renounce the program — in order to maximize his campaign stash, much of it pouring in from firms like Goldman Sachs and BP.

The country shrugged at such contradictions: Surely such a saintly progressive had saintly reasons; or, if he didn’t, exemption must be given for a messianic figure to use questionable means to achieve his noble ends. Yet, according to PolitiFact, the fact-checking arm of the St. Petersburg Times, of the 17 grand promises candidate Obama made on ethics reform, he has so far kept only five.

That principle of liberal exemption from accountability explains much of both the fundamental and the trivial about the Obama administration. As a candidate, Obama railed against “Karl Rove politics.” Few seemed to notice that he had established a website (“Fight the Smears”) asking supporters to collect information on opponents, in a Nixonian effort at preemptive action to discourage opposition. The notorious and now-defunct JournoList followed. Currently we see that creepy tactic resurfacing a third time with the new AttackWatch.com website, which lists pictures and names, in the glaring red-and-black style of an intelligence dossier, of those who have criticized Obama  — juxtaposed with supposed rebuttals and a puerile request for readers to snoop about and send in more names of those who dare to oppose the president.

“Civility” has followed the same tired script. Channeling the outrage over the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Obama in sonorous accents called for a new civility and a softer tone of public discourse — even though the man who shot Congresswoman Giffords was clearly sick and incited by neither left nor right political rhetoric. That the president, both in campaigns and in governance, had begged Latinos to “punish our enemies” and had called on supporters to “get in their faces” was irrelevant. The Congressional Black Caucus and the union bosses apparently understood that disconnect, as progressives called Tea Party types “son of bitches” who could go “straight to Hell” — the modern equivalents of the lynch mobs of the old segregated South. In the postmodernism of Obama, self-proclaimed underdogs and victims are not bound by protocols intended for their oppressors: Some illiberal targets clearly have to be demonized to thwart their demonic plans.

We all know that Obama supports the DREAM Act and ridiculed the calls to build a border fence as a conservative effort to install “moats and alligators.” Why, then, would such an enlightened administration that wished brotherly porous borders have its agents sell guns to Mexican killers? No doubt a rogue subordinate, or a well-intentioned effort to do some sort of good, would soon surface in righteous explanation that would preclude partisan gotcha audits.

The Solyndra mess, in Sophoclean tragic fashion, revealed these same requisite exemptions and penances. In 2010, a buoyant Obama visited the doomed plant to boast of government-generated green and homegrown jobs. By inference, Solyndra was just the sort of noble federally sponsored factory that the greedy private oil companies, non-union profit-hungry employers, and dastardly outsourcing CEOs just won’t build. The far wiser China and Germany subsidize green energy, so we must too. Case closed.

Once that huge moral superstructure went up, then no naysayers dared to look into the nitty-gritty mechanics down below, where some insider financiers and con artists were squeezing out of the taxpayers a $500 million loan without much intention of ever paying it back. The earthly laws of profit and loss, market demand and rationale, and the human tendency to connive to find profit were all to be superseded by Barack Obama’s ethereal appeals to help the unemployed and cool the planet.

In this world of liberal exemption, a suspect Dick Cheney conspires with an evil Halliburton; but liberal financiers who donated to Barack Obama to ensure progressive change can’t really want unwarranted insider profits from a Solyndra or a LightSquared. We are supposed to be outraged by recent lurid revelations that yokels like non-presidential candidate Sarah Palin supposedly long ago in her youth once tried coke; when Barack Obama confessed in print that he did so rather routinely, we automatically appreciated the angst of a sensitive soul coming of age in the course of his long odyssey to a progressive presidency. Sins are to be magnified or lessened depending on the larger perceived moral intentions of the sinner.

Liberal pundits are outraged that candidate Rick Perry was supposedly a dismal student from the evidence of his leaked undergraduate transcript. Yet they were weirdly reluctant to ask candidate Barack Obama what exactly were his grades at Columbia and Occidental — still unknown to the public. Grades from decades ago are absolutely necessary to deconstruct questionable Texas cowboys, but need not be produced to confirm the assumed straight A’s that earned Obama a scholarship to Harvard Law.

At some point, Barack Obama and those around him grasped that utopian rhetoric and progressive intentions made discordant facts irrelevant. They appreciated that they could do pretty much what they wished and could outsource the rationalization to enthralled intellectuals, academics, and activists, without worry of much media scrutiny. That they thereby helped to destroy the reputations of the bamboozled media was of no concern.

But in tragic fashion, such hubris ensured the present nemesis of Obama — and the loss of credibility among his media apologists. In short, it would have been odd if scandals like Solyndra had not followed from such liberal exemption — and odder still should no more surface.”

  • NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author most recently of the just-released The End of Sparta, a novel about ancient freedom.

Source:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/277797/obama-s-predictable-scandals-victor-davis-hanson#

II. The Obama Investigations!-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On September 21, 2011:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/09/21/morning-bell-the-obama-investigations/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

III. Video: Obama's Cronies of Corruption take the 5th In Solyndra Scandal!-Posted on PopModal.com-ByJeffersDodge-On September 23, 2011:

http://www.popmodal.com/video/9446/Obamas-Cronies-of-Corruption-take-the-5th-Solyndra-was-a-play-for-pay-play-for-Obama

IV. Obama vs. GPS!-Posted on National Review Online- By Arthur Herman-On September 21, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/277939/obama-vs-gps-arthur-herman

V. HHS Privately Calls Obamacare “Recipe For Disaster”!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On September 16, 2011:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/comment/reply/10820

VI. Video: New ATF Recordings Raise Questions About “Fast and Furious”!-Posted on CBSNews.com-By Sharyl Attkisson,CBS News-On September 19, 2011:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20108240-10391695.html

VII. Mexican Officials Furious Over ATF Gunrunning!-Posted on NewAmerican-By ALEX NEWMAN-On September 21, 2011:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/north-america-mainmenu-36/9064-mexican-officials-furious-over-atf-gunrunning

VIII. Documents Suggest New ATF Gun Running Scandal in Indiana!-Posted on InfoWars.com-On September 7, 2011:

http://www.infowars.com/documents-suggest-new-atf-gun-running-scandal-in-indiana/

IX. Video: Communism & Islam!-Posted on PopModal.com-By HonestAmerican-On September 18, 2011:

http://www.popmodal.com/video/9328/COMMUNISM--ISLAM

X. Republican Fear Empowers Obama’s Corruption!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Floyd Brown-On September 19, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/republican-fear-empowers-obamas-corruption/

XI. Washington Times Columnist to Obama: Resign!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On August 12, 2011:

http://floydreports.com/washington-times-columnist-to-obama-resign/

XII. Video: What’s the Biggest Threat in America?-Posted on The Patriot Update-On September 27, 2011:

http://patriotupdate.com/videos/whats-the-biggest-threat-in-america

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Did ATF provide weapons to Mexican drug cartels that were subsequently used to kill one of our own?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/did-atf-provide-weapons-to-mexican-drug-cartels-that-were-subsequently-used-to-kill-one-of-our-own/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/

New World Order By Executive Order!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/new-world-order-by-executive-order/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

Obama's “Hate the Rich” Campaign

4063385894?profile=originalIn his so-called jobs speeches, Obama exploits class envy shrouded in fairness. President Obama continues to escalate his divisive and evil assault on achievers, purposely pitting Americans against each other.

 

Obama's “Hate the Rich” campaign appeals to our lower nature and encourages the sin of covetousness. If Obama's despicable campaign proves successful, it will be a sad commentary about who we have become as a people and how far we have fallen as Americans.

 

It angers me that Obama and his minions in the liberal media have put achievers, risk takers, on the defensive. It angers me that Obama's looser followers think they are entitled to the fruit of someone else's labor.

 

Americans are extremely generous and willing to help people in need domestic and foreign. But no one is entitled to share in the bounty resulting from someone's risk, blood, sweat and tears. Any government which confiscates and redistributes wealth is immoral and evil.

 

God has designed life that success requires backbone; in other words, taking risks. Playing it safe profits very little. God's system is anathema to liberals. They strive to achieve “equal outcomes” or “fairness”, as they describe it, via legislation and redistribution.

 

Mary and I fed seagulls at the beach by throwing crackers on the sand close to us. Upon calculating the risk, seagulls moved in close and fed. Two bold seagulls feasted on crackers by feeding directly from Mary's hand. Then there were the seagulls who were too fearful to come close enough to retrieve any crackers. Interestingly, the cowardly seagulls screamed in frustration and even attacked the bold seagulls who were enjoying the rewards of their risk taking.

 

If a majority of Americans have become spineless, lazy and envious seagulls demanding the government take from the courageous to give to them, the spirit of America is dead.

 

Quite frankly, the entitlement mindset turns my stomach. My mom worked as a domestic cleaning white folks homes. My dad was one of the first blacks to break the color barrier into the Baltimore Fire Dept. My parents were hard working Christians and honorable people. My four younger siblings and I were not taught that anyone owed us anything. Today, we are all successful responsible citizens.

 

I suspect the mentality of my parents was typical of most Americans in the 1950s. Charities and churches assisted the poor before government replaced daddies (President Johnson's War on Poverty) in 1964; enslaving the poor to a cradle-to-grave dependency on government solely to secure Democrat votes. This strategy continues to devastate the black family; over 70% of black babies are born out of wedlock.

 

Blacks progressing from being brought to America as slaves to a black man being voted leader of the free world epitomizes the godliness and greatness of America. And yet, Obama and company, displaying a severe lack of character, relentlessly play the race, victim and class envy cards; designed to divide Americans to further the Obama administration's socialistic agenda.

 

Great leaders appeal to their follower's higher nature inspiring them to dig deeper into their souls and soar higher than they thought possible for themselves. America's first president, George Washington was such an inspirational leader.

 

As an American who happens to be black, I was badgered, “Lloyd, you should be delighted by the historical context of America electing it's first black president”. I was not.

 

Feeling like a lone voice crying in the wilderness, I dared to follow the instruction of an extraordinary leader, Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Therefore, I judged Barack Hussein Obama by the content of his character rather than the color of his skin.

 

Obama's admitted plan to “spread the wealth around” and his anti-American associations told me he was the wrong man to lead the greatest nation on the planet. Obama's divisive, dictatorial and bullying behavior have proven me correct.

 

Our president is nothing more than a Chicago thug community agitator stirring up discontent, inspiring racial hatred and hatred for achievers. The bottom line of every Obama speech regarding the economy is you have too little because those guys have too much.

 

Obama's approach is non-presidential, totally low rent appealing to our lower nature and totally despicable. Lord help us.

 

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Co-Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.

Please help me spread my message by joining my
Liberty Network.

Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the
American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin

LloydMarcus.com

 

 

 

 

Read more…

Muslim Brotherhood's Growing Influence!

Posted on CBN.com-On September 21, 2011:

It’s been one year since CBN News aired the Stakelbeck on Terror special, “The Muslim Brotherhood in America.”

Now, CBN News has brought back the same panel of experts to examine the Brotherhood’s growing power in 2011.

Former FBI special agent John Guandolo and investigative journalist Patrick Poole say the revolutions sweeping across the Arab world have made the Brotherhood stronger than ever, not only in the Middle East, but in America.

View Eye-Opening Video Here:

http://www.cbn.com/media/player/index.aspx?s=/Archive/News/Stakelbeck_Terror_092011_WS&search=stakelbeckepisodes&p=1&parent=0&subnav=false

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. DOJ in bed with Islamic supremacist groups!-Posted on WND.com-By Pamela Geller-On September 6, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342081

II. Islam, Appeasement, and Western Suicide!-Posted on CultureWatch-By Bill Muehlenberg-On September 3, 2011:

http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2011/09/03/islam-appeasement-and-western-suicide/

III. The Administration Takes on ‘Islamophobia’: ‘The White House is giving free-speech opponents a megaphone’-Posted on National Review Online-By NINA SHEA-On September 1, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/276021/administration-takes-islamophobia-nina-shea?page=1

IV. Radical Group Seeks Islamic World Order!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Steve Emerson-On July 11, 2011:

http://www.newsmax.com/Emerson/Hizbut-Tahrir-RadicalIslam/2011/07/11/id/403148

V. Is George Soros Forging a Closer Alliance With the Muslim Brotherhood?-Posted on The Blaze-ByTiffany Gabbay-On June 30, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-george-soros-forging-a-closer-alliance-with-the-muslim-brotherhood/

VI. The Obama Administration Opens Formal Contacts With the Muslim Brotherhood!-Posted on National Review Online- By Andrew C. McCarthy-On June 30, 2011:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270864/obama-administration-opens-formal-contacts-muslim-brotherhood-andrew-c-mccarthy

VII. Obama Reaching Out to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood!-Posted on CNSNews.com- By BRADLEY KLAPPER, Associated Press-On June 30, 2011:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-reaching-out-egypt-s-muslim-brothe

VIII. Clinton Admits We Are Now Reaching Out to the Muslim Brotherhood!-Posted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On June 30, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/clinton-admits-we-are-now-reaching-out-to-the-muslim-brotherhood/

IX. Obama Faith Advisor Says Washington Not Worried About Muslim Brotherhood; Defends Role of Religion In Prote-Posted on The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report-On April 11, 2011:

http://globalmbreport.org/?p=4165

X. DHS launches community outreach to Muslims, (illegal) immigrants-Posted on Creeping Sharia-On April 7, 2011:

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/dhs-launches-community-outreach-to-muslims-illegal-immigrants/

XI. Georgia Middle School Assignment Depicts ‘Positive’ Aspects Of Shariah Law!-Posted on The Blaze-ByMadeleine Morgenstern-On September 26, 2011:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/georgia-middle-school-assignment-depicts-positive-aspects-of-shariah-law/

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

Muslim Brotherhood Declares War on America-Will America Notice!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/muslim-brotherhood-declares-war-on-america-will-america-notice/

Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/

Should Americans Fear Islam?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/should-americans-fear-islam/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/is-president-obama-in-on-the-uprising-in-egypt/

Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/could-steps-that-team-obama-has-taken-be-emboldening-terrorists/

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note:  If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…

  

Obama Ignores “Going Concern Doubt” Analysis
Before Cheerfully Subsidizing Solyndra
 
 
                Did you know that the recently bankrupt Solyndra, green-tech firm propped up with $535 million federal assistance wanted to go public? That they wanted to go public and sell stock in the company even before Mr. Obama began touting them? That the planned initial public offering (IPO) was abandoned. That one of the steps required before any IPO is an audit of the company finances and an examination of their business plan for the future? That the solar-power panel company’s finances were so awful that two months before an Obama visit to Solyndra the accounting firm of Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLC warned investors that Solyndra had financial problems so deep that they “raised substantial doubt about it ability to continue as a going concern?” Did you know that the standard wording from audits which use the word “doubt” and “going concern” in the same sentence is known in the business world as the “Kiss of Death” letter and means that over 80% of the firms so described will NOT be in business a year from now?
            Did you know that a day before Solyndra went belly-up that the Energy Department turned down a request to renegotiate the loan agreement because another “restructuring was not feasible.” Did you know that one month before that . . . Solyndra executives were allegedly telling California representative Henry Waxman that everything was going great and the company expected to “double revenues in 2012?  Does that mean they expected to lose twice as much money as well? Could it be they hoped Rep. Waxman would take their threat** as a promise? Did you know Solyndra spent more than $480,000 on lobbying in Washington in the last 365 days? Could it be they hoped Congress and the Obama administration could be cajoled into helping them endlessly?
            Three more questions?   Would you have been as cheerful knowing the financial status of the company as President Obama and Vice President Biden were during their many Solyndra photo op visits? Do you believe, as your blogger Rajjpuut does, that Mr. Obama’s proclivity for throwing money at problems (a mere cash infusion will make everything okey-dokey at Solyndra right away) blinded him to the reality that Solyndra was a losing proposition, a reality that any sensible person should have seen? Would Obama have invested HIS money as recklessly as he did YOURS? Does the FBI routinely raid bankrupt companies? Oooops, that’s four questions.
            On his May 2010 photo op when Obama told America that the Solyndra California factory he was visiting, subsidized by U.S. taxpayers displayed “the promise of clean energy isn’t just an article of faith.” Despite the two month lead time to read over and understand the Pricewaterhouse financial analysis, it appears certain that Mr. Obama did believe that throwing money at Solyndra’s way would “turn the ugly duckling into a swan.” Mr. Obama also seems to be ignorant of the fact that good money can be sent after bad, but never should be. The inevitable abandonment of the IPO; the whole history of Solyndra’s existence (never once showing a single profitable quarter in five years); and then allowing a last-minute effort to refinance with taxpayers (the most important investors) taking a back seat to the new investors . . . none of these obvious red flags seemed to alarm the president about OUR money. Mr. Obama refused to accept what was obvious to anyone who chose to open their eyes and their mind.
            Eric Shultz, a Whitehouse spokesman, thinks we’re all stupid and that it’s still possible to pull the wool over our magnifying glasses and fool us about Solyndra and Obama’s green-tech initiatives. Schultz said in an e-mailed statement that selection of companies to receive U.S. backing are “merit- based decisions made by career staffers at the Department of Energy. He added that the process for this particular loan application had begun under President George W. Bush, not mentioning that the loan was denied for three consecutive years by the Bush administration.  “Every project that receives financing through the Energy Department goes through a rigorous financial, legal and technical review process.” WOW, really??? Really??? Let’s see now? 
The Obama $787 Billion stimulus was supposed to create jobs. So far the green-tech initiatives (Mr. Obama promised to create five million new green jobs in his first term) have created roughly 3,500 jobs total at an average cost of $10.88 MILLION per green job taking an average of 1.4 years to create each job. Solyndra just laid off 1,100 workers when it filed for bankruptcy. Exactly how “rigorous” is this financial, legal and technical review process anyway?  Could it be that government playing “venture capitalists” is a very bad, indeed ruinous idea? Could it be that the 72% of the Obama stimulus was aimed at Obama cronies and Obama campaign supporters without regard to ethics or financial reality?
Of course you’ve probably heard that Energy Secretary Steven Chu made a public commitment to “speed up the approval process” of green-tech applications for federal loans and subsidies. How wonderful!
Bottom line: Solyndra disclosed the “going concern” warning by PricewaterhouseCoopers, its accounting firm, in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on March 16, 2010.  So it’s quite possible that Solyndra’s execs up until the time they told Rep. Waxman that everything was going great, etc. were dealing an honest hand . . . which makes the Obama administration criminally negligent with the taxpayer’s money. The warning read:
“The company has suffered recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows since inception and has a net stockholders’ deficit,”
In June 2010, the month after the President Obama visit mentioned above, Solyndra executives withdrew their planned $300 million IPO.   Solyndra’s business model was based upon a supposedly strong competitive advantage employing thinner panels that could be used on virtually any roof and because they used less of the expensive silicone it was felt that the cost of their more expensive technology could be somewhat balanced by the lower cost of resources. Silicone prices have fallen recently and fell another 30% in the last year evaporating any hope of the company ever becoming competitive in the marketplace. Problems and temporary solutions for Solyndra kept taxpayer money slipping down a rat-hole after that. 
In February of this year House Republicans began investigating Solyndra’s loan-guarantee program and sent a letter to Energy Secretary Chu announcing their actions. The investigations so far point to crony-capitalism and a surprising new twist: socialist venture capitalism as the Obama administration sought to pick the winners and losers in the marketplace with foolish infusions of money into failing concerns in favored industries. The Republican investigations showed that Obama campaign fundraiser George Kaiser’s foundation (George Kaiser Family Foundation based in Tulsa, OK) owns 37% of Solyndra. Mr. Kaiser made 16 visits to the White House since 2009 according to visitor logs. 
Besides the statements allegedly made to Rep. Waxman that Solyndra “was in a strong financial position” a July 13 letter from Solyndra to the Energy Committee said revenue had increased to $140 million from just $6 million in 2008 and was projected to almost double in 2012.    Could it be that the Energy department doesn’t understand that if you’re selling more product but losing money on each sale . . . that doesn’t mean too much. The idea is to make a GASP “profit.” Yes, yes, we know that’s considered an ugly word in the liberal, progressive and socialist lexicon . . . but such are the facts of life.
 
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
** Rajjpuut strongly suspects that the good congressman may be throwing Solyndra’s execs under the infamous bus. Mr. Waxman is purportedly part of the gang that was pushing so hard for Solyndra to get the federal dough. It’s also possible he’s merely stupid. An awful lot of people do NOT actually listen too well . . . instead they tend to hear either what they fear; or what they want to hear. Being told revenues have gone up 23 times in three years and that revenues would almost double again in 2012 . . . is clearly NOT the same as being told that PROFITS have gone up 23 times and would almost double . . . sad but true but politicos seldom can be expected to sympathize with nor understand business jargon. So, Friend, what questions would you have asked here? Perhaps something silly like, “Wow, that sounds impressive, so how much money are you guys making? Perhaps the progressive politicians being in “over-their-heads” when dealing with business explains why it’s been 900 days since the Democratically-controlled Senate passed a budget? Or why the Democratically-controlled House of Representatives didn’t pass a 2011 budget?  It could explain a lot.  The fact is that despite Hollywood's eternal enthrallment with "lovable losers," in politics as in the rest of life:  incompetence (unlike absence) does NOT make the heart grow fonder.
Read more…

Posted on The Patriot Update-By Ann-Marie Murrell-On September 25, 2011:

I recently interviewed a man who is suing the Obama administration for racial discrimination–against white people.  Normally I wouldn’t describe anyone by their skin color, but it’s interesting to note in this instance that the man filing the lawsuit is Black.

Reverend Wayne Perryman began the lawsuit (case C11-1503) along with journalist Robert Parks because he was fed up with all the rhetoric coming from the left, blaming all of Obama’s failures on race.  Perryman and Parks began researching the Democrat Party and became enraged when they noticed the Democrat Party—via their website–was whitewashing their own history.

On the archived Democrat.org site—which has since been scrubbed– they gave a brief acknowledgment that their party was formed over 200 years ago.

Over two hundred years ago, our Party’s founders decided that wealth and social status were not an entitlement to rule.

That was it—no mention of any of their mistakes—including the fact that also over 200 years ago, the Democrat Party blocked all efforts by Republicans to abolish slavery.

When challenged, they added the following paragraph to the history portion of their website:

Change is the inescapable driver of history in the United States. Our party’s founders believed then, just as we do now, that being a Democrat means meeting the challenges of changing times so that all Americans can prosper. That’s why the people of this county have always turned to Democrats when times got tough.

In addition to trying to re-write history regarding Democrats and slavery, they are also trying to hypnotize people into believing the Democrats were instrumental in Civil Rights—not mentioning anything about all the efforts they made to BLOCK all of the Republicans efforts toward Civil Rights:

Democrats are unwavering in our support of equal opportunity for all Americans. That’s why we’ve worked to pass every one of our nation’s Civil Rights laws, and every law that protects workers. Most recently, Democrats stood together to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act.

On every civil rights issue, Democrats have led the fight. We support vigorous enforcement of existing laws, and remain committed to protecting fundamental civil rights in America.

This is a blatant lie, and Reverend Wayne Perryman and Robert Parks have called them on it.

“Rev. Sharpton said we never got our ‘40 acres and a mule’, wrote Parks in his legal brief to the courts.

”Yes, we did, and they were taken away by a Democrat.”

From Parks’ legal brief:

On January 12, 1865, General Sherman and Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton went to meet with twenty Black community leaders in Savannah, Georgia to discuss freedom and reparations for former Black slaves.… By June 1865, over 40,000 former slaves were settled on 40-acre tracts of land. Over 400,000 acres were allocated. In September of 1865, Democrat President Andrew Johnson reversed Field Order No. 15, issued special pardons, and returned the land to former slave owners.’ The Republicans gave, yet a Democrat took it away.

Part of the lawsuit is to ensure the Democrat Party is portraying their history truthfully and factually.  Rev. Perryman writes:

Modern-day Democrats must stop preaching that they are the compassionate party of black people and confess that it was their predecessors who started many of the racist practices that we are now trying to eradicate. History clearly shows two things: (1) that the roots of racism grew deep in the hearts and souls of the Democrats and (2) without the past efforts of the Radical Republicans and the Abolitionists, the Civil Rights Legislation of the sixties would not have been possible. Republicans laid the foundation for civil rights by passing legislation and instituting programs that Democrats’ were adamantly opposed to, such as:

1. The Thirteenth Amendment in 1865 to abolish slavery.

2. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 to give Negroes citizenship and protect freed men from Black Codes and other repressive legislation.

3. The First Reconstruction Act of 1867 to provide more efficient Government of the Rebel- or Democrat-controlled states.

4. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 to make all persons born in the United States citizens. Part of this Amendment specifically states “No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; or deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

5. The Fifteenth Amendment of 1870 to give the right to vote to every citizen.

6. The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 to stop Klan terrorists to terrorized black voters, Republicans, white teachers who taught blacks, and Abolitionists.

7. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights and to prohibit racial discrimination in places of public accommodation.

8. Freedmen’s Bureau was a social program established by Republicans to feed, protect, and educate the former slaves.

9. The 1957 Civil Rights Act and the 1960 Civil Rights Act were signed into law by President Eisenhower who also established the U.S. Civil Rights Commission in 1958, a commission that was rejected by Truman during his administration.

10. The 1964 Civil Rights Act which key Republicans pushed law through while key Southern Democrats like Al Gore Sr. debated against its passage. More Republicans (in percentages) voted for this law than Democrats.”

Parks says, “They are ashamed of their past and do not want Blacks to look under the hood of their history.”

Case in point, President Woodrow Wilson is a hero to the Democratic Party but Parks says there is much about Wilson’s racist-driven presidency that he “didn’t learn in college.”

“Wilson allowed various officials to segregate the toilets, cafeterias, and work areas of their departments. One justification involved health:  White government workers had to be protected from contagious diseases, especially venereal diseases, that racists imagined were being spread by blacks. In extreme cases, federal officials built separate structures to house black workers. Most black diplomats were replaced by whites; numerous black federal officials in the South were removed from their posts; the local Washington police force and fire department stopped hiring blacks. Wilson’s own view, as he expressed it to intimates, was that federal segregation was an act of kindness.”

“Suppose a Republican president had done all that in the past. Democrats would raise hell,” said Parks, adding, “You can Google ‘Woodrow Wilson Segregationist.’  Democrats did not count on the internet to give people access to truth.  Many Democrats don’t want to deal with me when I ask them about Wilson. Why?”

The Amicus Curiae ends with this:  “Since the DNC sees fit to distort and cover-up their true racist history to cause black Americans to feel good towards them, I say to the Democrat Party like Rev. Jesse Jackson said to George W. Bush: ‘Come clean!’  No matter what, the Democratic Party owns its racist history and must admit to black Americans the truth.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFOd7wb1Cpo&feature=player_embedded

Source:

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/black-pastor-sues-obama-democratic-party-for-racism

Note: The following article and/or blog post and video relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

I. Blacks File Class Action Racial Discrimination Suit Against Obama & Democrats!-Posted on The Frederick Douglas Foundation-On September 12, 2011:

http://www.icontact-archive.com/vYs-Zyo3vj9g_57o0kqV3gG521zwvWdH?w=2

II. Video: Tea Party Racism: Rev. Perryman Says Enough!-Posted on YouTube.com-By RevWaynePerryman-On September 18, 2009:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzM22US-Jo&NR=1

Note:  My following blog posts contain numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-have-contributed-to-the-racial-mess-in-our-country/

The Racial Mess!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-racial-mess/

Obama is fomenting a race war?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/obama-is-fomenting-a-race-war/

'Game Change':  New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns' Messy Moments-To Include Racism!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/game-change-new-book-reveals-2008-campaigns-messy-moments-to-include-racism/

How ABC, CBS and NBC Have Dismissed and Disparaged the Tea Party Movement!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/how-abc-cbs-and-nbc-have-dismissed-and-disparaged-the-tea-party-movement/

Restoring Honor In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/restoring-honor-in-america/

Is History Repeating Itself?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/is-history-repeating-itself/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Note If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts please copy web site and paste it on your browser. Be aware that some of the articles and/or blog posts or videos listed within the contents of the above blog post(s) may have been removed by this administration because they may have considered them to be too controversial.  Sure seems like any subject matter that may shed some negative light on this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related

Semper Fi!

Jake

Read more…