I GUESS THE TEA PARTY IS WRONG ONCE IN A WHYLE. LIKE MY SPELLING.
All Posts (30448)
Sort by
 |
 Government "Whistleblower" Says Obama IS Planning to Declare Martial Law -- Click below to DEMAND Congress STOP Obama's "Emergency Powers" Executive Order: https://secure.conservativedonations.com/rm_martial-law/?a=7700 ALERT: A government "whistleblower" inside the Obama regime has blown the lid off of why Barack Hussein Obama has recently signed Executive Orders that give him the power to declare martial law across America! Obama, through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other agencies and "czars," is plotting a major "Reichstag" event to generate racial riots and produce the justification for martial law, delaying the November 2012 elections... possibly indefinitely! A DHS whistleblower informed the Canada Free Press "that the DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself, stating that 'a civil war' is the more appropriate term. 'Certain elements of the government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it.'" It's more and more obvious that Barack Obama is preparing to DECLARE MARTIAL LAW -- we MUST STOP HIM NOW! SEND A MESSAGE TO EVERY SINGLE U.S. A "Reichstag event" refers to a fire started in Germany's legislature during Hitler's rise to power. The fire allowed him to grab emergency powers and eliminate his opposition. While he blamed it on Communists, historians have long believed that Hitler started the fire himself. According to the anonymous "whistleblower" inside Obama's DHS, this "Reichstag event" would take the form of a staged assassination attempt against Barack Obama, "carefully choreographed" and manufactured by Obama operatives. It would subsequently be blamed on "white supremacists" and used to enrage the black community to rioting and looting, the DHS source warned. The Obama administration would then use the violence and chaos they created as justification for the imposition of martial law in major urban cities in America, the creation of DHS checkpoints, restriction of travel, and the indefinite delay of the November 2012 elections: "The DHS takes their marching orders from the Obama administration, from Obama himself, but mostly from his un-appointed czars. And Jarrett, especially Valerie Jarrett. Don't think for a minute that the administration is doing anything to stabilize events in the U.S. They are revolutionaries, and revolutionaries thrive on chaos," he added. This is getting TOO BIG to hide -- now, even the MEDIA is starting to pick up on the shocking news: Barack Hussein Obama has signed Executive Orders giving him the power to declare MARTIAL LAW in America! On a recent episode of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity himself declared: "Tonight... we shine the spotlight on an executive order that the White House was hoping that you would never learn about. Now, the President signed the Hannity then went on to discuss how "this would give the President of the United States the authority to declare basically Martial Law during times of peace. And to be sure, this is simply the latest string of actions taken by the administration that ignore the basic principles of our constitution." Barack Obama is OUT OF CONTROL -- we MUST STOP HIM NOW! SEND A MESSAGE TO EVERY SINGLE U.S. Of course, that Executive Order was only the BEGINNING. Obama's preparations to institute MARTIAL LAW IN AMERICA are coming together quickly. FIRST, he signed an Executive Order, for so-called "National Defense Resources  Preparedness" -- that would give him DICTATOR POWERS whenever he decides he "needs" them. THEN, he signed ANOTHER "Executive Order", this time to take control of America's domestic natural gas production. NOW, he's done it AGAIN -- Barack Hussein Obama has signed YET ANOTHER Executive Order... declaring INTERNATIONAL LAW for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! As reported by blogger Henry Shivley: "On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order - Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and its so-called trading partners. And what exactly can this latest unconstitutional Executive Order lead to? As Shivley states, "Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States." This new Executive Order came hot on the heels of the recent one that Barack Obama signed to take control of America's domestic natural gas production. As columnist Mac Slavo reports: "While Americans focused their attention on the Colombian controversy involving U.S. Secret Service agents, prostitutes and excessive drinking, President Obama quietly signed his latest Presidential Executive Order. So now, by Presidential decree alone, the federal government can "coordinate action" through thirteen core federal agencies against any domestic natural gas production facility -- all according to standards determined to be "appropriate" not by law, but because of political agenda. Moreover, because a key stated purpose of this latest Executive Order is to "ensure long-term supplies," Barack Obama's new decree gives the federal government the ability to shut down gas production operations as THEY see fit, which can lead directly to government price fixing and centralized control of an essential natural energy resource. While Obama's Executive Order aims to curtail some of the practices of the hydraulic  fracturing, or "fracking," industry, it further expands government control over our lives through more centralization of power and bureaucracy. THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE. As experts start to dig deeper into Barack Hussein Obama's recently-signed Executive Order, for so-called "National Defense Resources Preparedness," they are reporting just how bad this really is: OBAMA IS PREPARING TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW IN AMERICA. As detailed in this report from the Canada Free Press: Under this order the heads of these cabinet level positions; Agriculture, Energy, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Defense and Commerce can take food, livestock, fertilizer, farm equipment, all forms of energy, water resources, all forms of civil transportation (meaning any vehicles, boats, planes), and any other materials, including construction materials from wherever they are available. This is probably why the government has been visiting farms with GPS devices, so they know exactly where to go when they turn this one on. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS! BARACK OBAMA IS TRYING TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION, BECOME A DICTATOR, AND TAKE AWAY OUR RIGHTS! It's up to YOU AND ME to STOP HIM NOW! SEND A MESSAGE TO EVERY SINGLE U.S. We're not alone in reporting this. It's starting to be reported in more and more media sources: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HAS SIGNED A MARTIAL LAW EXECUTIVE ORDER! The latest report comes from the Russia Times: "As folks headed out to happy hour last Friday evening, President Obama signed an executive order that could potentially give him the power to institute martial law in the United States in times of peace or during a national threat... Many Americans were shocked to find out that this order gives the president practically unlimited power over US citizens and their property. All in the name of national security of course." IT'S TRUE! As we said, Barack Hussein Obama has signed a Presidential Executive Order,  which would give him the powers of a DICTATOR -- whenever HE thinks it's "necessary" to institute MARTIAL LAW! According to press reports, "A White House order updating federal emergency powers has raised alarm among some conservative commentators, and U.S. Rep. Sandy Adams, that President Barack Obama is attempting to grab unconstitutional powers." A columnist with The Washington Times declared the mid-March order -- an update of a 60-year-old document outlining the president's authority in a national emergency -- "stunning in its audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution." The conservative Drudge Report website linked to it with the headline, "Martial Law?" It's almost unbelievable what Barack Hussein Obama is trying to do -- BUT IT'S TRUE. According to a bombshell article in the Washington Times, "President Obama has given himself the powers to declare martial law -- especially in the event of a war with Iran. It is a sweeping power grab that should worry every American." On March 16, the White House released an executive order, "National Defense Resources Preparedness." The document is stunning in its audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution. It states that, in case of a war or national emergency, the federal government has the authority to take over almost every aspect of American society. Food, livestock, farming equipment, manufacturing, industry, energy, transportation, hospitals, health care facilities, water resources, defense and construction -- all of it could fall under the full control of Mr. Obama. The order empowers the president to dispense these vast resources as he sees fit during a national crisis.  In short, according to the Times, the order gives Barack Obama the ability to IMPOSE MARTIAL LAW: "He now possesses the potential powers of a dictator. The order is a direct assault on individual liberties, private property rights and the rule of law. It is blatantly unconstitutional. The executive branch is arrogating responsibilities precluded by the Constitution without even asking the permission of Congress. The order gives Mr. Obama a blank check to erect a centralized authoritarian state." But why this -- and why now? SIMPLE -- because he's about to provoke a confrontation with IRAN, which could give him the excuse to implement martial law in America: "Obama may be ready to launch devastating airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. If that should happen, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has promised massive retaliation. American troops will be targeted by Iranian proxies in Iraq and Afghanistan. American embassies will be struck across the Middle East and North Africa. Most ominously, Iranian-backed Hezbollah cells could launch devastating terrorist attacks in major U.S. cities, killing numerous citizens. The war may well come home, triggering domestic chaos. These are the very real risks of a major conflict with Iran." As columnist Jeffrey Kuhner notes, "The president does not - and should not - have the authority to subordinate the entire private economy to the government, especially without the consent of Congress and the American people. It is national socialism masquerading as military security. This is why conservatives -- those who are serious about defending our constitutional republic - should demand that the executive order be repealed immediately." THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE NEED TO DO -- RIGHT NOW! SEND A MESSAGE TO EVERY SINGLE U.S. Thankfully, there are Members of Congress who are standing UP for the U.S. Constitution. Rep. Sandy Adams (R-FL) has introduced H. Con. Res. 110 in response to President Obama's blatant attempt to go around the Constitution and institute martial law if HE thinks it's "necessary."  In introducing her bill, Rep. Adams stated, "President Obama issued a National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order on March 16, 2012 that raises some serious concerns in its wording and intent. The order has historically been based on the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.). However, unlike previous presidents, President Obama's executive order broadens the definition of 'national defense.' This leaves the door open for the president to give himself control over American resources during both times of peace, and national crisis. In response to the order, I have introduced a resolution to make it clear the president cannot use this as an excuse to abuse his executive power." Rep. Adams' bill presently has 37 co-sponsors -- but she needs a lot more to get the bill to the floor. THAT'S WHERE YOU AND I COME IN! If we can FLOOD the offices of all of these Congressmen, demanding that they SUPPORT H. Con. Res. 110, we CAN put a stop to Obama's attempt to circumvent the Constitution and lay the groundwork for martial law. But we need YOUR help. Send your Blast Faxes to every single U.S. Congressman and Senator NOW! Sincerely,  William Greene, President RightMarch.com P.S. As Rep. Adams stated when introducing her bill to stop Barack Obama's attempt to put in place the ability to institute martial law on his own whim, "Each of us in Congress began our service to our friends, neighbors, and communities with the knowledge it was our responsibility to uphold the Constitution. We were elected to protect the values that make our nation great and to be a line of defense against the growing interjection of government into the everyday lives of the American people. I will continue to defend the principles on which our nation was founded and I will continue to uphold our Constitution." YOU AND I need to JOIN IN and force the REST of Congress to uphold our Constitution! TAKE ACTION NOW! SEND A MESSAGE TO EVERY SINGLE U.S. As always, you can also send a FREE message directly to your Representative and Senators by clicking here. Thank you. The work of RightMarch.com is funded entirely by voluntary contributions. Paid for by RightMarch.com |
I WANT THE UNITED NATIONS BUILDING CLOSED OR MAKE IT INTO A OFFICE BUILDING AND LEAESE THE BUILDING OUT. ITS ALL AS USLESS AS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. LETS ALL VOTE REPUBLICAN THIS NOVEMBER.
SOS Liberty
@LibertySOS
A group of High School Students fighting for fiscal responsibility so the 'American Dream' is attainable for our generation and generations to come. #SOS
The United States of America · http://www.sosliberty.com/
This is very encouraging to me, seeing how many good, responsibile young students aren't brainwashed by Obama's policies. Check out their web-site!
Your thoughts?
Barack Obama signed four Executive Orders on Monday. These add to the President’s growing list of Executive Orders. They provide for an Order of Succession with the Department of Agriculture, the Office of Management and Budget, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Commerce.
These lines of succession also include changes for the Office of Personnel Management, the National Archives and the Records Administration, and the Millennium Challenge Corporation for foreign aid.
A White House official said these amounted to nothing more than basic bureaucratic housekeeping. Lines of succession can be very detailed as you can see by clicking the links below.
The Orders and their links are as follows:
Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Agriculture
Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Office of Management and Budget
Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Environmental Protection Agency
Executive Order — Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Commerce
Thirty days after being published in the Federal Register, executive orders become law. While they do bypass the U.S. Congress and the standard legislative law making process, no part of an executive order may direct the agencies to conduct illegal or unconstitutional activities.
One thing we do know, bi-partisanship only exists in the Obama administration at the bottom of the list of succession at the National Archives, where Alan C. Lowe, the director of the George W. Bush library was added as the fourth and last in line, bumping out Jimmy Carter library Driector Jay Hakes, who, coincidentally was put in that spot by George Bush in 2006.
It appears these particular Executive Orders will not lead to Armageddon, but might be poignant in the event of a nuclear disaster.
Before posting please read the Discussion Guidelines
OBAMA WILL NOT TELL YOU THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THE TRUTH, WOULD YOU VOTE FOR A LIER????
This youtube video shows a 13 year old girl named Aryn singing her favorite pop song: 'Someone Like you' by Adele. Aryn aspires to be a youth group pastor when she graduates from college and really enjoys singing pure songs like this. She is very proud of her Christian conservative values, and will never be seen performing half naked rapping about drugs, sex and slapping 'ho's'. Please enjoy and share with your friends and family.
thanks
The Dow Jones market lost $30 billion in the crash of 1929. Thirty billion dollars in 1929 would be the equivalent of $377 trillion today. The Dow Jones peaked on September 3, 1929 at 381 and bottomed out at 42.
During the Great Depression a gallon of East Texas gas in Dallas cost 11 cents. We bought a bushel of tomatoes at the Dallas City Market for 50 cents and canned them. For many, the soup kitchen was their only source of food.
The cause of the Great Depression is widely debated but typically the cause included a weak banking system, overproduction and bursting of the credit bubble. We didn’t learn a thing from the Great Depression.
The letter of the law has to do with the form of the law, the spirit with morals and ethics. Without the spirit of the law, you get the law of the jungle. I can tell you from personal experience how important it is to know the letter and spirit of the law.
Under the law of the jungle, the bigger you are, the more you consume: such as a herd of animals and a whale, in the human case, the majority vote or the king, president, dictator, capitalist, movie star, star athlete. None of the above connects with the spirit of the law. The spirit of the law connects with intrinsic principles, such as equal in rights.
For the sake of forming a union of states, America’s forefathers compromised. They allowed for slavery, compromised their principle in the right to property. Black slaves were the property of white people, the same as mules and cows. More lately, the courts have compromised principle in the right to property though the taxing and spending authority, allowing for tax slavery. Compromising intrinsic principles is always seen a being for the good of all—by kings, presidents, dictators, and the rich. Case in point: Although President Obama criticizes Governor Romney for catering to investors at the expense of jobs, he goes to the rich doing the same thing for campaign money. Obviously, Obama feels that his expedience is for the good of all and Romney’s is for the rich. Obama is trained in constitutional law, yet he does not seem to know the difference in the law of the jungle and the spirit of the law.
I’d like to point out the great difference in legal training in constitutional law and actually studying the Constitution and using reason and logic to determine which is lawful; that is, backed by intrinsic principles. To say that it is for the good of all to take from the rich and give to the poor violates intrinsic principles. How is one to know why one is rich and another poor? It doesn’t matter, say the makers and keepers of the law, because they have a certificate that says they know more than the people they control—or that they won an election. In either case, it’s the law of the jungle. You need to know this because it is you who loses your freedom.
You are either self-governed or governed by external authority. The original makers and keepers of American law gave you a Bill of Rights that cannot be taken from you except by due process of law, including your property.
If you knew the law, you would know chapter 29 of Magna Charta. Nothing compares in importance with America’s Constitution. “No free man shall be taken or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or of his liberties or free customs, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor shall we go upon him, nor shall we send upon him, except by a legal judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.”
The law of the land in America is the U. S. Constitution. Under the Fifth Amendment (in the Bill of Rights) every individual is guaranteed due process of law, as stated in chapter 29 of Magna Charta. Logically, a tax on income, under America’s law of the land, could not be constitutional if it taxed the individual out of a basic existence. In 1975, I was a single taxpayer employed in an entry level job. Government was taking withholding tax from my wages. I was unable to pay my rent. I was locked out. How can that be that under America’s Constitution? This individual deprived of his basic rights is conveniently kept out of sight, out of mind. In my case, it didn’t work. I was in control because I took the time to learn the law and my constitutional rights. It did something mysterious that people don’t grasp. Whereas, if anything could go wrong it did, after I took the bull by the horns, when everything should have gone wrong everything started going right.
Since when has it worked to turn your control over to government? After all, government is people in control of your life. Too much control is corrupting. In spite of this fact, more than half of the American people depend on government in one way or another.
Nature provides man with reason and logic to survive. This is fundamental to man’s law. But like other life, in that we possess the power drive, it causes us to form groups, and to look externally for our survival. Might makes right only so long. One ultimately becomes powerless. Compromising intrinsic principles is ultimately the reason nations come and go.
Starting with a life in ruins, by learning the law, directly, and using it, all of my dreams came true. The United States lost its tax case against me, not in court, but from the court record. I took it to the press. An investigation was made. The IRS admitted that for eleven years it had been wrong. I had been before the U.S. Tax Court, three U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. How could that be? The powers that be allow the IRS to make limitless mistakes. Is it for the good of all, or for the good of those with the power?
For some reason, it seems that I’ve been picked to tell the world the story of my life. In Earth as It Is in Heaven 2012 will be available at Amazon this June.
AS ALL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DO. OBAMA THINKS THAT HE KNOWS WHATS BEST FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. WE KNOW OBAMA IS JUST A PUPPET LIKE THE ONE WITH A LONG NOSE.
What do the top ten cities with the highest poverty rate all have in common?
DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP!
Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1961;
Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn’t elected one since 1954;
Cincinnati, OH (3rd)… since 1984;
Cleveland, OH (4th)… since 1989;
Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
St. Louis, MO (6th)…. since 1949;
El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
Milwaukee, WI (8th)… since 1908;
Philadelphia, PA (9th)… since 1952;
Newark, NJ (10th)… since 1907.
Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and always expecting different results.”
DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP!
Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1961;
Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn’t elected one since 1954;
Cincinnati, OH (3rd)… since 1984;
Cleveland, OH (4th)… since 1989;
Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
St. Louis, MO (6th)…. since 1949;
El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
Milwaukee, WI (8th)… since 1908;
Philadelphia, PA (9th)… since 1952;
Newark, NJ (10th)… since 1907.
Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and always expecting different results.”
Have you noticed that the media is blind to racism when it is a black individual being a racist. They give them a free ride on that.
Anyone what to bet that the Teacher in Arkansas that made the news this week is "BLACK" , but did you see her picture ? nope.
But when Zimmerman shot Martin his picture was all over national news.
Media bias is so strong it stinks to high heaven!
The Black democrats who keep race baiting sure must want a race war!
Lewis Countian Thomas Massie Wins GOP Nomination in Ky. 4th District
ADVERTISEMENT
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) -- With the political and financial clout of the tea party behind him, Republican Thomas Massie easily won the GOP nomination Tuesday to run for an open congressional seat in Kentucky's 4th District.
The relative newcomer of politics, a protege of U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, beat two well-established Republicans, state Rep. Alecia Webb-Edgington and Boone County Judge-Executive Gary Moore.
With 99 percent of precincts reporting, Massie had 19,638 votes or 45 percent, to 12,501 votes for Webb-Edgington or 29 percent. Moore had 6,503 votes or 15 percent.
The race showed that the tea party movement remains strong in Kentucky. Paul endorsed Massie and was actively involved in the race, even appearing in a TV ad. And a Texas-based tea party group put more than $500,000 into the race.
"Some people want to make this race about the tea party," Massie said after securing the victory. "Good campaigns and good government are about building coalitions. This is a coalition of the tea party, the liberty movement and grassroots Ronald Reagan Republicans. And we have one thing in common: We want less government, not more."
Republican strategist Mike Karem of Louisville said Massie's decisive victory sends a strong signal to Kentucky's GOP establishment.
“The tea party is, in fact, a force to be reckoned with," Karem said.
The Republican nominee in the 4th District will be the overwhelming favorite to win the November general election. The congressional seat, which is centered in the suburbs just south of Cincinnati, has been held by the GOP since 1967, except for a six-year stint between 1999 and 2005 when Democrat Ken Lucas served.
M PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS. WISE UP AND VOTE REPUBLICAN THIS NOVEMBER.
DONT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE ANY SAY ANY MORE? THE DEMOCRATIC RUN GOVERMENT IS OUR PROBLEM, TO MUCH GOVERMENT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAY FOR US TO GET THE HELL OUT NOW. YOU HAD BETTER START LISTINING TO THE REAL AMERICIAN PEOPLE, WE WANT LESS GOVERMENT CONTROL, WE WANT OUR FREEDOM .
DONT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE ANY SAY ANY MORE? THE DEMOCRATIC RUN GOVERMENT IS OUR PROBLEM, TO MUCH GOVERMENT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAY FOR US TO GET THE HELL OUT NOW. YOU HAD BETTER START LISTINING TO THE REAL AMERICIAN PEOPLE, WE WANT LESS GOVERMENT CONTROL, WE WANT OUR FREEDOM .
Interesting... Just got a message from TP Command Center about a post regarding "While the South Slept", but when I clicked on the link, the article wasn't there, and doesn't come up on a search... Why not? Anyone care to tell me the reason?
The Dems are saying the Reps will take Social Security away from elderly...
When Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA)
Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of
their annual Incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65% on the first $90,000
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be
deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund'
rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be
used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government
program.
Under Johnson, another Democrat, the money was moved to The General Fund and
Spent
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as
income.
Under Clinton & Gore, Democrats, Up to 85% of your Social Security can be
Taxed
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a
Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting
taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away'
for us -- you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust
Fund' and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social
Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding
vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
Q: Which Political Party decided to startgiving annuity payments to
immigrants?
AND MY FAVORITE:
A: That's right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social
Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even
though they never paid a dime into it!
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn
around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security
away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and
maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of
what isn't so.
It is sad that the word “gay” has been hijacked by an agenda driven group. There is nothing “gay” about homosexuality!
Read the rest at http://www.insectman.us/misc/gay-is-sad.htm.
THE ARABS BETRAYED THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN 1917
To: http://www.facebook.com/govsambrownback
Governor Brownback:
Pursuant to public outcry the Kansas Legislature passed law prohibiting foreign law (specifically Shariah Law) from being enforced by Kansas courts. In response, C.A.I.R., an unregistered foreign agent pending indictment for violation of the The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), has initiated an illegal (according FARA) political campaign to pressure you to veto the law. Please do not give in to such political terrorism. Please listen to your constituents and uphold your oath of office to preserve, protect, and defend the United States Constitution by preserving the ban on enforcement of Shariah law in Kansas courts. Shariah law (http://www.shafiifiqh.com/maktabah/relianceoftraveller.pdf) is in opposition to the United States Constitution and the freedoms guaranteed to citizens therein.
Thank you for your patriotism in this matter.