In another stunning act of either ignorance, intentional myopia, or outright promotions of falsehood, the Liar-n-Thief announced he would REDUCE REGULATORY OVERSIGHT to increase American business and CREATE JOBS!!!!    

YAAAAAYYYYHHHH!!!

Now, how does he deal with this little gem?---

DOJ Raids Gibson Guitars looking for Illegal Wood

In another stunning act of either ignorance, intentional myopia, or outright promotions of falsehood, the Liar-n-Thief announced he would REDUCE REGULATORY OVERSIGHT to increase American business and CREATE JOBS!!!!    

YAAAAAYYYYHHHH!!!

Now, how does he deal with this little gem?---

DOJ Raids Gibson Guitars looking for Illegal Wood

Have to share this bunch of bs. Obama has signed an executive order creating a new office of diversity and inclusion. Aimed to put more minorities in federal government positions across the board. Last time i looked there are a lot of minorities on the fed. payroll - so wth? This is pandering to the blacks complaining of unemployment numbers or he's simply a clear cut racist. Nice that this hurricane is keeping the media focus off of this crap!

   THE MUSLIMS STARTED A HOLY WAR KILLED

  13,200 PEOPLE SO FAR. ALL OF

   CHRISTENDOM AND THE HOUSE OF DAVID

   UNITE !!! WE ARE NOT CATTLE TO BE

   SLAUGHTERED !!! IF THEY DO NOT STOP,

   WE WILL START ON THE HERETICS !!!

    UNITE AND STAND ~ WASHINGTON IS

    OUT OF IT ~ WITH THERE POLICY 

    CORRECT DOCTRINE ~ WE ARE AT WAR.

Liberals are mentally disturbed. They do not understand what a Republic is or how it works. They do not and will not understand what it means to be a 'Non-Dependent Citizen'. They cannot conceptualize the ability of an individual to make a profit so vast as to pay their bills, provide for their family while paying their taxes. These concepts and several others are foreign to them and beyond their comprehension.

Dr. Savage is right, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder.   

Or am I mad to even think such an obtrusive thought?

BEST KEPT SECRET OF THE CENTURY: Laws our Government Agency Leaders don’t know, or are purposely keeping from the Taxpayers! 

By Alexis Stuart, the Credit Whisperer®

Question: can an individual donate to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and/or The Department of Defense and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes?

Can you guess which government agency still refuses to provide a written answer?

Can you guess which government agency provided the correct answer?

Can you guess why any government agency would not want taxpayers to know the Best Kept Secret I have discovered?

Can you guess why none of our government officials or any current presidential candidates are suggesting this idea?

Uncovering this “BEST KEPT SECRET OF THE CENTURY” all started in 2006, with an idea I had to help The Social Security Funds.  I first thought, “Why not donate to Social Security?” Then, I thought, I could start a nonprofit and get people to donate to our mission to help Social Security.  We could use the donations to help people buy or start businesses, create jobs and at the same time contribute to the economy and increase revenue to the Social Security Funds.  In a few years our nonprofit could donate to Social Security Funds when it is scheduled to run out of money.  As a Real Estate Broker and business owner, always looking for another good business to buy, I would follow the progress of small businesses for sale on the Multiple Listing Service. Many times, if the owners could not sell the business, they would end up closing.  I wanted to help employees build their credit power so they could buy the business from their boss, keep it alive and keep all of the employees working.  

This raised the question, “can a nonprofit donate to social security?” Better yet, “can an individual donate to social security and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes?”

To find the answer I called The Social Security Administration Commissioner’s office on February 2, 2006 and was told by the secretary that she had never been asked that questions before. I was put on hold while she tried to find the answer. The secretary returned and told me she could not find anyone that knew the answer. Because no one in the office knew if donations were allowed, or if an individual could write them off on their taxes, she told me to write a letter to the Social Security Administration Commissioner and pose the question. 

It took three months to get an answer, but I received a letter dated 5/3/06 from Annie White, Associate Commissioner of Social Security Administration stating  “You may be interested to know that section 201(i)(1) of the Social Security Act currently provides for tax-deductible gifts to the Social Security trust funds”. The entire letter is available online at www.creditwhisperer.com/solution.htm   

I did form a nonprofit organization; Credit Power Educational Foundation, Inc., and part of our mission is to “STRENGTHEN our national economy and Social Security Fund”.

After watching many news reports on how the Department of Defense is the main purpose of the Federal Government and how Medicare and Medicaid were also running out of funds, I decided to ask them the same question I asked the Social Security Administration.

On March 14, 2011, I first called the Medicare and Medicaid office and the female who answered the phone said she had never been asked that question before. She put me on hold and then told me she could not find anyone that knew the answer and they would need to have someone call me back. I did not get a return call.

Next on March 14, 2011, I called the Department of Defense, and just like my call to the Social Security Administration, Medicare and Medicaid, was told by the Public Communication Responder for the Department of Defense that he did not know the answer so he put me on hold while he asked someone else. He returned and said they did not know if donations were allowed or if you could write them off on your taxes, so he put in a written request for an answer.

I did receive an email confirming my question and the following is a portion of the answer:

 “Unfortunately the Department of Defense does not accept monetary donations but we thank you for your interest and support.  We encourage you to visit our Community Relations website which lists a variety of pre-screened charitable organizations focused on supporting the military community.  http://www.ourmilitary.mil/help.shtml”

Question Reference #110314-000075

---------------------------------------------------------------

   Topic Level 1: Department of Defense

   Topic Level 2: Policy and Programs

    Date Created: 03/14/2011 02:06 PM

    Last Updated: 03/15/2011 04:14 PM

          Status: Solved

[---001:001561:14959---]

Because of other business activities I did not get back to my quest for an answer with Medicare and Medicaid until May 19, 2011. I again called trying to get an answer to my questions.  I was told to send a letter.  I called back and asked for the Director of Medicare and Medicaid and was transferred to Danette Greenwood, the personal secretary of Dr. Donald M. Berwick. I asked Danette “Can an individual donate to the Medicare or Medicaid Trust Fund and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes?  Danette was very quick to answer “NO!” 

I asked Danette if I could speak to Dr. Donald M. Berwick and she said “I handle all of his calls”.  I asked if they do not accept donations could Dr. Berwick suggest that Congress, the Senate and President Barack Obama change the law. Danette suggested I contact my congressman to suggest a change in the law. I told Danette that I had already written to many congressmen and Senators and only received a few automated responses.  I suggested that Dr. Berwick has connections it would make more sense for him to bring it to the attention of the IRS, Congress, the Senate and President Barack Obama that we need to change the law so individuals can donate to the Medicare and Medicaid funds and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes.

Danette finally agreed and told me to email my idea in and she would forward it to Dr. Berwick.  I sent an email on May 19, 2011. I did not get an answer, so I called Danette on June 3, 2011 and asked if she forwarded the email to Dr. Berwick. Danette said she forwarded my email to a group of people who would be responding to my email. Danette said she would check to see if any progress had been made in getting me an answer. I asked Danette if she would please put the answer in writing. Danette said she could not put her verbal “no” answer to my “can you donate question” in writing, but she would send me an email confirming that she received my email.  

I called Danette again on June 6, 2011 at 1:14pm

A man answered phone: “OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR”. He asked what it was concerning and put me on hold, came back and told me Danette had just gone into a meeting and he said he left a message at her desk.

I asked for his name and he refused to give it. He said it was none of my business and he did not want to be involved in the middle when my business is with Danette.

I then asked for Dr. Berwick and the man who refused to give me his name said he would never forward me directly to him, that Danette takes care of his schedule.

I called back on June 7, 2011 at 12:14 p.m.

I was able to speak to Danette; she said they would be getting back to me next Monday on June 13^th.

Danette still would not send me an email with the verbal “no” answer to my “can you donate question”. She said the other group of people will get back to me.

Danette agreed to send me a confirmation with a time line to get an answer to my question. She also agreed to send me an email after she called the other people to push them for an answer and let me know when I might expect an answer.

I called Danette again on June 8, 2011 at 11:55 a.m. I think I spoke to the same man with no name. He said Danette was in a meeting and she already had my message from before. I asked his name and he refused, saying, “I do not give out my name to anyone outside CMS”.

On June 8, 2011 at 1:21 p.m., I called Danette again and spoke to the man with no name. He said “Danette is busy, it is ongoing”. He refused to let me hold for Danette. I asked if Danette was avoiding me. He claimed Danette was not avoiding me and suggested that I email her.  I told him I was a taxpayer and wanted to hold. He said “That is not going to happen”, and hung up on me.

I sent Danette another email and received a response.

Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM

RE: Response requested

Hi Alexis,

I will follow up with the component today to see exactly how long they will be in getting you an answer and get back to you as soon as possible.

Regards,

Danette

To see the email go to www.creditwhisperer.com/solution.htm

I still do not have an answer as of July 12, 2011 from Danette, Dr. Berwick, or the “component”.

On June 30, 2011 Danette finally told me to contact Dianne Heffron, the staffer working on an answer.  It took six days for me to finally connect with Dianne Heffron who is the Director of Financial Management Group of the CMSO

Dianne told me she had not received my email. She was able to find my email while I was on the phone. I refreshed her memory as to the fact Danette Greenwood had forwarded my letter and emails to her. Dianne said she was still working on an answer for me. So far she believed that I could donate to Medicaid on the state level, but not to their department. She suggested I contact Toby Douglass, the Secretary of the California Department of Health. She said they only match the state payments. (Another wrong answer)

Dianne said she was still doing research on the Medicare side. She did not know who would even be able to take the donation. She was sure that her department not able to take any donations.  I asked if she could put her answer in writing. Dianne said since the letter was addressed to the Director, Dr. Donald M. Berwick, she could not answer my letter or questions in writing. Dianne said Dr. Donald M. Berwick would need to down-grade the response to her.  She said that could take two weeks to get the down-grade.

I suggested that I send another letter addressed to her so she could answer it. Dianne said that would work, so I re-sent the letter, and another email, addressed to her on July 6, 2011.

I phoned Dianne Heffron on July 12, 2011, but she did not answer, so I left a message. I still do not have an answer.

I sent a letter to Dr. Berwick on June 15, 2011 informing him of the additional information I had uncovered concerning donating to the Medicare and Medicaid Trust.  A copy of the letter is available at www.creditwhisperer.com/solution.htm

Most people are unaware of this option, including Ms Greenwood.

I continued my research after I was told by Danette Greenwood that an individual cannot donate to the Medicare or Medicaid Trust Fund and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes. 

It seems that contrary to the information I was given by Danette, an individual actually can donate to Medicare and Medicaid and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes.

I contacted the IRS and spoke to Jacob, i.d. #1054973526.

Jacob put me on hold while he searched for the answer to my question, which was:

“Can an individual donate to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and/or The Department of Defense and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on their taxes?”

Jacob told me to look in Pub 78 to find organizations that are currently tax exempt. He said Pub 78 lists most organizations but does not include all organizations and it does not list Federal, State and Local government organizations as they are not required to file for tax exempt status.

I asked Jacob for more details of how donations to a government agency can be written off on your taxes.  Jacob had to put me on hold again to search for additional information.  Jacob instructed me to search for Pub 526 on their website and to look at Table 1, page 2. Table 1 defines “Deductible as Charitable Contributions” for “Federal, state, and local governments, if your contribution is solely for public purposes (for example, a gift to reduce the public debt)”.

Here is the link for pub 526: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p526.pdf

I asked for additional information to clarify the terminology “public purpose”.

Jacob was unable to answer my question and transferred me to the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division of the IRS. I spoke to Miss Lee, i.d. # 1001181273.

Miss Lee was also unable to answer my question and needed to put me on hold to find the answer: She did not find anything to further clarify the terminology “public purpose”.

Miss Lee said, Federal, State and Local government organizations are not required to apply for formal recognition. She also said any government organization could request an Affirmation Letter to show that donors could donate to their organization and write it off on the donor’s taxes. 

Miss Lee also suggested that I look at Pub 557, page 30, which defines what a “government unit” includes.

Here is the link for pub 557: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p557.pdf

I asked Miss Lee if I could get an Affirmation Letter to prove I could donate to a government organization.  She said if I could give her an address, she would search to verify if the government organization was in their system. If she found them in the system she could then send me an Affirmation Letter.

Because I had already spent 1 hour and 45 minutes to get to this point with the IRS, I asked if she could hold while I gathered the addresses for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the Department of Defense.

As I found each address, Miss Lee was able to first confirm the Social Security

Administration, then Medicare and Medicaid, but was not able to confirm the Department of Defense.

Miss Lee said she would send me separate Affirmation Letters for the Social Security Administration, Medicare and Medicaid, that confirms that I can make a charitable donation. I have received the two Affirmation Letters and a copy is available at www.creditwhisperer.com/solution.htm

I asked if I could speak to a supervisor as Miss Lee could not explain why she could not find the Department of Defense in their system. 

Two days later a supervisor, Mr. Cordell, i.d. # 1000196899, returned my call. Mr. Cordell said, “The Taxability of Donations account for the Department of Defense was not active”.  He said if I could contact someone at the Department of Defense and ask them to call (877) 829-5500 they would be able to verify and reactivate their account by phone.

Mr. Cordell said because government organizations are not required to file a 990, their account can go inactive. Once the Department of Defense calls the IRS, they will be able to verify the account and have it placed back into an active status.  After that, I will be able to request an Affirmation Letter for the Department of Defense.

You would think if the head of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and the Department of Defense and any other governmental unit could raise extra money via a tax deductable donation they would be talking about it and encouraging as many people as possible. Isn’t this solution better than relying on taxes being raised.

It does raise the question, how to control the spending? We need to get control of the spending and we need reform.  If our government officials were more responsible in how they spend our tax dollars, then the public might be more willing to donate.

It is understood that we need to reform Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and the Department of Defense. We need to eliminate the fraud and keep our officials from using the funds for unauthorized purposes. The wealthy would be more willing to donate if they had more confidence that the government would protect the funds, and if a firm plan was in place for reforming the systems. The reform is needed no matter if we voluntarily donate or the money is taken from us as a tax.

I have been told by The Social Security Administration, The Medicare Office and The Department of Defense that no one has ever asked if an individual can donate to their organizations and write it off as a tax-deductible charitable gift on the donor’s taxes.   

Once I discovered government employees didn’t have a clue, to prove my point this is the “BEST KEPT SECRET OF THE CENTURY”, I decided to call a few CPA’s in several states and posed the same question. Surely, they will know.  I found that most CPA’s did not have a clue. The CPA’s also did not have any clients that had ever donated to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid or the Department of Defense or had ever asked if they could. The nicest and most knowledgeable CPA I spoke to was George Williams in Allen, Texas. Thank you George, for your kind words and interest in my quest.

So why do we have laws to allow us to make a charitable donation, yet our government officials, employees and CPA’s don’t know about it?

Why has no one educated the public about this solution to help the entire country?

I feel our country is more important than any embarrassment any government official may fear. Our government officials need to start making the public aware.

Recap as to knowledge of the tax law:

The Social Security Administration has been aware that an individual can donate and write it off as a tax deductible contribution since May 3, 2006 and has not notified the public.

Danette Greenwood gave me an incorrect verbal answer. Danette is the personal secretary to Dr. Donald M. Berwick, the director of Medicare and Medicaid and is still unaware of the law unless Dr. Berwick has read my letter dated June 15, 2011. Dianne Heffron the Director of Financial Management Group of the CMSO

is working on a written answer, but the verbal answer I have received from her is incorrect. I finally received an email response from Danette Greenwood on July 26, 2011 citing IRS Publication 526 after I pointed out this publication in my letter to Dr. Berwick on June 15, 2011.

I sent a letter to Dr. Berwick on July 27, 2011 asking the following:

Now that Peter M. Kelchner, CPA, at CMS, has researched Publication 526 and recognized that the Federal government is considered as a qualified organization for charitable purposes, I again ask the following questions:

1. Will you please set up a donation page on the website for both Medicare and Medicaid?
2. Can you bring this matter to the attention of the public, and the employees of the Department of Health and Human Services? You can even go further and ask the public to voluntarily donate to Medicare and Medicaid instead of relying on their taxes being raised.
3. Can you start an ongoing educational campaign to bring Publication 526 and Section 170(c)(1) to the forefront, so people will realize there is the possibility to donate to Medicare and Medicaid?

On August 20, 2011, I received a letter dated August 15, 2011, from Joseph Dion, Lead Ethics Administrator with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Obviously he did not understand the questions I posed to Dr. Berwick in my letter dated July 27, 2011.

As of August 22, 2011, I have not received an answer from Dr. Berwick to my letter dated July 27, 2011.

Department of Defense sent me a response which was incorrect and may still be unaware unless they read my email dated June 13, 2011. The DOD still needs to contact the IRS at (877) 829-5500 to reactivate their account. I have made multiple calls to the Department of Defense. Commander Kathleen Kessler told me to send a letter to the Secretary of Defense. She told me no one has the authority to connect me to someone that can call the IRS to reactivate their account.  I sent a letter on 7/8/11 to Leon Panetta, the Secretary of Defense. As of August 17, 2011, I have not received an answer from Leon Panetta to my letter dated July 8, 2011. I phoned the IRS to ask for an Affirmation Letter on August 16, 2011 and spoke with Miss Lee, i.d. # 1001181273 again.  Miss Lee told me the Department of Defense is still not showing as an active government unit. Miss Lee submitted a referral asking for a letter referencing the Department of Defense as a government unit as tax deductable. She said it may take 30 days to get a response.

All documents can be viewed at www.creditwhisperer.com/solution.htm

I am just one of the little people. I need the help of government officials, media, teachers and the public to spread the word. You can all make a difference.

Alexis Stuart, the Credit Whisperer®,

is the author of “CAPITALIZE on CREDIT POWER”

This book will build a better country!

You can purchase the book at www.capitalizeoncreditpower.com

or www.creditwhisperer.com

© 2011

WITH ALL THE VITRIOLIC, HYPERBOLIC, RHETORIC BEING PUT OUT ABOUT THE TEA PARTY AND ITS MEMBERS, ONE CANNOT BUT WONDER HOW ANY RATIONAL PATRIOTIC AMERICAN  COULD HATE PEOPLE THAT VALUE FREEDOM, LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL .  COULD IT BE BECAUSE THAT THE DE-EVOLUTION OF OUR SOCIETY HAS GOTTEN SO BAD THAT ANY GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE IDEAS OF A FEW ORATICALY TALENTED PEOPLE AS GOSPEL WITH OUT QUESTION??

EVERY ORGINIZATION WILL ATTRACT A FEW VIOLANTLY  INCLINED MAL CONTENTS, AND A FEW RACISTS, ETC, AND I DON'T DOUBT THAT SOME OF THOSE HAVE JOINED THE TEA PARTY FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF FURTHERING THEIR OWN PERSONAL VENDETTAS.  MY EXPERIENCE SINCE I JOINED THIS MOVEMENT HAS BEEN THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF YOU TRUE PATRIOTS REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT TYPE OF BEHAVIOUR.

WE DON'T USE GUNS, BOMBS, PIPES, BASEBALL BATS, KNIVES OR ANTHRAX TO GET OUR POINTS ACROSS, WE HAVE AND USE SOMETHING MORE POWERFUL AND IRRSESISTABLE, OUR VOTE.

THOSE PEOPLE WHO WOULD MAKE US PUPPETS FOR THEM TO CONTROL ARE SO FRIGHTENED OF OUR VOTES THAT THEY WILL RESORT TO ANY MEANS OF HYPERBOLE AND INNUENDO TO TRY TO DISCREDIT US.  THEY UNDERSTIMATE THE STRENGTH OF CHARACTER THAT THE PRINCIPLES UPON WHICH THIS COUNTRY HAS BEEN FORMED HAS INSTILLED IN ITS CITIZENS.

THE PIONEER SPIRIT IS NOT DEAD EVEN IF THERE ARE NO MORE PHYSICAL FRONTIERS TO CONQUER, SARAH PALIN HAS AWAKENED THIS SPIRIT IN A GREAT MANY PEOPLE. LETS NOT LET IT GO TO WASTE OR BE DISCARDED AS UNAMERICAN OR UNPATRIOTIC.

THE POWER OF OUR VOTE CANNOT BE OVERCOME AS LONG AS WE USE IT WISELY  

AFTER YEARS OF PLEADING FOR SOME ACTION FOR THE SENIORS AS STATED IN MY BLOG "SOCIAL SECURITY TAX RIPOFFS OF SENIORS", I RECIEVED A POSITIVE REPLY THIS MORNING FROM REPRESENTATIVE CHRIS GIBSON, ONE OF THE MOST RECENTLY ELECTED MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. I HAD ALSO RECAPPED MY BLOGS "TAX POLICY WHICH FAVOR THE RICH ETC", "CORPORATE TAX LOOPHOLES", AND "WHO DESERVES TAX CREDITS".  CONGRESSMAN GIBSON FEELS MY SUGGESTIONS "ARE WORTHY OF ALL DUE CONSIDERATION IN THE 112 CONGRESS".  HE WILL BE SETTING UP 3 MEETINGS WITH ME TO DISCUSS THESE ISSUES. HE HAS ALSO TAKEN THE LIBERTY OF REFFERING MY LETTERS TO CONGRESSMAN PAUL TONKO AND WILL ATTEMPT TO HAVE ME MEET WITH THE 2 OF THEM IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS IS A BIT IRONICAL AS CONGRESSMAN TONKO NEVER EVEN SENT ME A FORM LETTER IN RESPONSE TO MY CORRESPONDANCE WITH HIM.. 

IS IT POSSABLE THAT WE ARE MAKING SOME PROGRESS??

Commentary on national and local issues.

http://dmillson.blogspot.com

Ask yourself if Americans are better off today than ten years ago.

Since mid 1980’s, Americans have silently accepted the government policies which exchanged US manufacturing jobs for lower priced consumer products. It is an understatement to say, we all thought we got something for very little cost.  But how wrong we were to go along with the governement's line of thinking that these exported jobs were undesirable positions that most Americans considered to be too low skilled.  Also, we shared their vision of the future employment for America.  Job seekers were instructed to focus on networking and software industries.  In addition, they were also led to believe that a vibrant service market would employ a large number of people.  We have lost a decade of our earnings, our savings and our precious time.  If you believed that Americans are richer now than ever before, consider these issues:

1) When we had a strong manufacturing base, US employment ran near to full employment i.e. 96% were employed,  Now, we are dreading multiple years of unemployment across the many states between 18% to 22%.  

2) According the third party government agencies, under a strong economy that is to say when times were good,  US poverty rates decreased to almost 10%.  Now, almost 15% of the US population or 44 MILLION Americans live in poverty.

3) We have experience two major market bubbles, namely the 2001 Technology/Internet Bubble & 2008 Mortgage Backed Securities, both were directly caused by failed government monetary policies.  For the past ten years, the retired citizens including the Baby Boomers generation are quickly realizing that their financial planners were wrong about the projected returns of 6-8% return for conservative investment strategies.  Worst yet, retired folks expected to make fixed income on CD yields but for the past three years these investments are a far cry from what people had expected for their safe money. 

4) Federal shot term deficits should be an important matter. The accelerating debt spending is a desperate attempt to cover the liabilities which have resulted from a reckless government that has continued to spend beyond our means. Social security surpluses were borrowed (raided) and never invested to cover future commitments. Other harmful government policies dealing with deregulation of the banking industry have allowed for irrational speculation and unrestrained liquidity to be pumped into the stock and bond markets.  Americans are realizing their 401K’s were knocked down twice in ten years and more aptly called 201K’s.  

5) One of the largest budget breaking line items is our US Defense.  It appears that many Americans are unfazed that our government continues to spend over $800 BILLION per year (and constantly growing) on an unending series of military conflicts.  Most Americans are so distracted by media and government officials that no one seems to hold "candidate" Obama accountable for his promise to end US involvement in  Middle East wars.

To an outside observer, it must be confusing to see most Americans more passionate about their local sports teams than they are about our failed foreign policies that have resulted in thousands of our brothers and sisters either being killed and maimed in these undeclared wars, and spiraling financial costs that keep pumping up the debt ceiling.  Consider this. Our foreign policy currently has American military involved in four different fronts; Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Libya.  We should return to our founding father’s foreign policies of non interventionism.   

To summary, we are at the tipping point.  Most Americans seem to be sleep walking and do not realize what it means to our financial future if we allow our government to continue printing money to cover banking speculation.  Our debt ceiling is growing exponentially.  Prior to 5 years ago, we were conditioned to accept annual debt ceiling increases of 30Bn to 100Bn. The water is getting warmer for us frogs. What is happening now is pure madness. We just increased the debt ceiling over the past two years by over $3 trillion dollars. If unchecked, it is simply unsustainable and will lead to hyperinflation.

I hope it is not too late. The cancerous financial problems have more to do with past govt. mistakes such as deregulating the banking industry through the repeal of Glass-Steagall and (not-so-fair) trade agreements that expedited the off shoring of US manufacturing capability & jobs over to Asian countries. To have a redistribution of wealth, it will need to start by reversing these failed govt. policies. Only then we will begin to see a transfer of foreign based factories back into US. 

Tea Party Express V national bus tour begins this Saturday in Napa, CA. As I pack my bags and organize my performance music in preparation to embark on my fifth national Tea Party Express tour, I am a bit frustrated by those still clueless about the Tea Party movement; who we are and our propose.

Please excuse my frankness. Despite all the Tea Party has done to pull our country back from diving over the cliff to it's death into liberal socialistic hell, incredibly, there are still “Republicans” who think we are “fringe loonies”. If God had not sent the Tea Party, America as we know it would be over!

Then, we have the racist Congressional Black Caucus. Rather than abandoning their racial bias to make an honest assessment of President Obama's job performance and his failed economic policies, they blame epidemic high black unemployment on the Tea Party. Their accusation is so despicable and absurd, it is unworthy of a response.

Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus said, “Let us all remember who the real enemy is,” she added. “The real enemy is the Tea Party. The Tea Party holds the Congress hostage. They have one goal in mind, and that’s to make President Obama a one-term president.”

Another member of the Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), said, “The tea party can go to hell.”

Rep. Wilson, you did get one point 100% correct. It is and should be the goal of every patriot who loves, freedom, liberty and America to “make President Obama a one-term president.” I pray, “Dear Lord, pleeeeease make it so.”

Another member of the tag team assaulting and slandering the tea party is the liberal media. I have attended over 200 tea parties nationwide including Alaska. On numerous occasions the media has asked, basically, “Why are you, a black man, hanging with these racist white folks?”

My response is always the same, “These folks are not opposing Obama's skin color. Several even voted for him. They are simply saying no to his socialistic agenda.”

Unfortunately, I have witnessed liberal media completely ignoring the mood and tone of a tea party rally to fit their preconceived report of the event.

Case in point. On a beautiful sunny day at a tea party rally in Michigan, I sang “God Bless the USA” for the finale of my performance. The response of the thousand or more in the audience was tremendous; a celebration of love for America. Afterwards, I could hardly make my way through the crowd because of so many patriots wanting to shake my hand and take pictures.

Also, at that rally was a white woman in a wheelchair who was terminally ill. Her daughter told one of our staff, “My mom said all she wanted to do before dying is to meet Lloyd Marcus.”

Wow, I can not begin to tell you how much that humbles me.

Amidst the overwhelmingly loving, happy and upbeat atmosphere, a stoned faced reporter approached me. She asked me if I felt comfortable at this racist hate-filled tea party. I wanted to say, “Are you nuts?” Despite holding my tongue and trying to politely convince the stern reporter otherwise, she became visibly angry at me, abruptly turned and walked away.

Brother and sister patriots, I am so looking forward to seeing and fellowshipping with you; hanging with my true “homies”; folks who share my love for America.

My plan is to give you daily updates from the road; highlights of the rallies, the local food favorites I sample (my mouth still waters thinking about the awesome bar-b-que spare-ribs a woman greeted our bus with in Memphis; the best I've ever eaten. Sorry mom.) and the extraordinary patriots I meet on every tour.

Please check out our tour schedule. I would love to include you in my “Million Hand Shake March” across America. http://www.teapartyexpress.org/tour-schedule/

And with that, I leave you with a song, “On the road again! I just can't wait to get on the road again. I'm looking forward to seein' all my patriot friends. I can't wait to get on the road again.”

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Co-Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.

Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.

Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin

LloydMarcus.com

   ARE YOU ACTIVE AND ENGAGED IN YOUR

  TOWN OR STATE, OR JUST A ON LOOKER ?

Caught In Hypocrisy - Obama Slams His Own  Policies as 'Unpatriotic'!

Most Americans don't really like the type of sleazy, hypocritical politician who will rip his predecessor for something, then turn around and do the exact same thing, in an even more egregious manner.

Perhaps this is one of the many reasons Americans just don't approve of what Obama's doing these days.

Here's the CBS News reporting that prompted this flashback to the 2008 Presidential Election Campaign, followed by the sharp-eyed Ed Morrissey from Hot Air explaining this one

--------

National debt has Increased $4 Trillion Under Obama

By Mark Knoller | August 22, 2011 6:34 PM

The latest posting by the Treasury Department shows the national debt has now increased $4 trillion on President Obama's watch.

The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Mr. Obama took office. The latest calculation from Treasury shows the debt has now hit $14.639 trillion.

It's the most rapid increase in the debt under any U.S. president.

The national debt increased $4.9 trillion during the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush. The debt now is rising at a pace to surpass that amount during Mr. Obama's four-year term.

Mr. Obama blames policies inherited from his predecessor's administration for the soaring debt. He singles out:

• "two wars we didn't pay for"
• "a prescription drug program for seniors...we didn't pay for."
• "tax cuts in 2001 and 2003 that were not paid for."

He goes on to blame the recession, and its resulting decrease in tax revenue on businesses, for making fewer sales, and more employees being laid off. He says the recession also resulted in more government spending due to increased unemployment insurance payments, subsidies to farms and funding of infrastructure programs that were part of his stimulus program.

At the first town hall meeting of his Midwestern bus trip last week, Mr. Obama told an audience in Minnesota that "the debt problem is real and the deficit problem is real."
[...]
The Gross National Debt now stands at 97.6 percent of the nation's Gross Domestic Product - the total value of goods and services produced by labor and property in the U.S.

--------

Flashback: Obama Calls Adding $4 Trillion to National Debt “Unpatri...

POSTED AT 10:45 AM ON AUGUST 24, 2011 BY ED MORRISSEY

Yesterday, I wrote about the CBS News story showing that Barack Obama had added over $4 trillion to the national debt in less than three years, which puts the current President on track in one term (and probably less) to beat the record that took his predecessor two terms to set. Some called this an unfair attack, noting that Congress authorizes spending, a point I addressed yesterday and which does Democrats no good at all. But guess who else blamed rising national debt on a President? Why, it’s Candidate (and then-Senator) Obama,. who not only blamed George Bush for adding more national debt than his previous 42 predecessors combined, but also questioned Bush’s patriotism for the same policies that Obama accelerated as President himself:

The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents – #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.

“Credit card from the Bank of China”? That was a favorite phrase of Obama’s during the campaign. A quick search shows that he used it in an April 2008 debate, this June 2008 appearance, and others as well, usually tying it to tax cuts.

And what exactly has Obama done as President? Despite claiming that he has known that deficit reduction has been needed since the first day he took office, Obama has offered no deficit reduction proposals in his term as President. In fact, he has submitted budget proposals that have massively expanded deficit spending.

Just how patriotic is that? After all, if Obama can use the increase in the national debt to question Bush’s patriotism, doesn’t it follow that increasing deficit spending by 152% per month makes Obama 152% more “unpatriotic” than Bush?

WITH ALL THE HYPERBOLE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ABOUT WHO IS PATRIOTIC AND WHO ARE THE TRAITERS, I DECIDED TO CONDUCT A PRIVATE CITIZENS POLL ON WHO PROUDLY DISPLAYS THE AMERICAN FLAG.

I CHOSE THE MONTHS OF MAY, JUNE AND JULY AS THESE MONTHS CONTAIN 3 DAYS WHEN DISPLAYING THE FLAG IS MOST COMMON-MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY AND JULY 4 TH.

SEVERAL TIMES DURING THIS 3 MONTH PERIOD, I DROVE AROUND THE TOWNS, VILLAGES, CITIES AND RURAL AREAS STOPPING WHENEVER I SIGHTED A FLAG WAVING,  I THEN ASKED THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS- ARE YOU REGISTERED TO VOTE, HOW ARE YOU REGISTERED AND HOW OFTEN DO YOU VOTE.  I TOOK NOTICE OF EACH HOME I STOPPED AT TO MAKE SURE I DID NOT MAKE A REPEAT STOP AT ANY ONE HOME.   

I MADE 284 STOPS AND TALLIED UP THE RESULTS AS FOLLOWS

REPUBLICANS      95

INDEPENTENTS 119

DEMOCRATS      24

UNREGISTERED  46

WHEN I DISCUSSED VOTING WITH THE UNREGISTERED PEOPLE, THEY ALL TOLD ME THAT THEY GOT SO FED UP WITH POLITICS THAT THEY REFUSED TO VOTE.  I DISCUSSED VOTING WITH THEM BECAUSE I SYMPATHIZED WITH THEM INASMUCH AS I ONCE WENT FOR 3 YEARS REFUSING TO VOTE FOR THE SAME REASONS.

I TOLD THEM THAT MANY TIMES I LIKED CERTAIN ONES WHO WERE SEEKING OFFICE AND WISHED I COULD HAVE VOTED FOR THEM SO AFTER 3 YEARS I REGISTERED TO VOTE AS AN INDEPENDENT AND THEN I COULD VOTE FOR ANY PERSON I LIKED, EVEN IF IT WAS ONLY ONE CANDIDATE ON THE BALLOT THAT I VOTED FOR.  32 OF THOSE UNREGISTERED CITIZENS TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE GOING TO FOLLOW MY EXAMPLE. SO THEY COULD SUPPORT, WITH THEIR VOTE ANY CANDIDATE THAT THEY BELIEVED IN.

THIS WAS NOT A SCIENTIFIC POLL, JUST A CONCERNED CITIZEN TALAKING WITH OTHER CONCERNED CITIZENS AND FINDING OUT THAT THE UNREGISTERED CITIZENS WERE VERY MUCH CONCERNED WITH THE DIRECTION THE COUNTRY WAS HEADED.  THE MORE I THINK ABOUT WHAT I DID HAD POSITIVE RESULTS AND I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT OTHERS GET OUT AND TAKE A POLL OF THERE NEIGHBORS.  I DID NOT DISCUSS OR RECOMMEND ANY CANIDITATE BUT ENCOURAGED EVERY PERSON I TALKED WITH TO BE A FREE THINKER IN MAKING UP THEIR MIND IF THEY WOULD VOTE AND FOR WHOM. 

Next Up on the Gay Agenda: Legalizing Sex with Children

Yes you read correctly.  Sex with children.  Pedophilia.  Hebephilia.  Now that the gay lobby has had such resounding success getting gay marriage passed in some states, and queering the U.S. military, the new “frontier” is legally having access to your children.   If you are not worried about this, you are not paying attention.

Gays will never be able to change the law to allow sex with children?  Wake up!  They are doing it already…. confusing  your kids sexual identities and desensitizing them to homosexual  sex techniques  in the public schools. 

The next phase is the American Psychiatric Association followed by ….the law/Constitution.

There is now a cadre of gay/child predator/perverts  [my terms for them, obviously not theirs]  “mental health” professionals who are working “through channels” to get the American Psychiatric Association to say that having sex with children is “normal.”  If they are successful in getting the APA manual changed, that sets the stage to begin changing the law.

Hamas/Gaza: Child brides lined up with their husbands for a group wedding

Don’t forget:  under Islamic ‘shariah ‘ law, men are allowed to marry babies.   But before the American gay community decides to “bond” with Islamics on pedophilia, realize that homosexuality  under shariah is punishable by death.

Iran gay teens hung

One of the biggest child stars of the 1980s, Corey Feldman, is throwing some sunshine on a very shadowy problem that is unpopular and very non-politically-correct to discuss:

“I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia. That’s the biggest problem for children in this industry. … It’s the big secret,” Feldman said.

“I was surrounded by [pedophiles] when I was 14 years old. … Didn’t even know it. It wasn’t until I was old enough to realize what they were and what they wanted … till I went, Oh, my God. They were everywhere,” Feldman, now 40, said.”

Child stars Corey Feldman and Corey Haim each claimed they were abused by pedophiles as teenagers in the movie business

Openly-gay director Joel Schumacher hired Haim and Feldman when they were teenagers to star in "Lost Boys."

Here are reports and commentary from a recent conference in Baltimore to legalize pedophilia.

Daily Caller:

“If a small group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals have their way at a conference this week, pedophiles themselves could play a role in removing pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s bible of mental illnesses — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), set to undergo a significant revision by 2013. Critics warn that their success could lead to the decriminalization of pedophilia.

The August 17 Baltimore conference is sponsored by B4U-ACT, a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists. According to the conference brochure, the event will examine “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.

Researchers from Harvard University, the Johns Hopkins University, the University of Louisville, and the University of Illinois will be among the panelists at the conference.

B4U-ACT has been active attacking the APA’s definition of pedophilia in the run up to the conference, denouncing its description of “minor-attracted persons” as “inaccurate” and “misleading” because the current DSM links pedophilia with criminality.

“It is based on data from prison studies, which completely ignore the existence of those who are law-abiding,” said Howard Kline, science director of B4U-ACT, in a July 25, 2011 press release. “The proposed new diagnostic criteria specify ages and frequencies with no scientific basis whatsoever.”

The press release announced a letter the group sent to the APA criticizing its approach, and inviting its leaders to participate in the August 17 conference. “The DSM should meet a higher standard than that,” Kline continued. “We can help them, because we are the people they are writing about.”

B4U-Act.org website:

Principles are that people who are attracted to children are not mentally ill, and their preference to have sex with children……. is “not their fault.“

One News Now:

Liberty Counsel Action‘s Matt Barber attended the conference and says he felt he was on a different planet, as the presenting professionals aimed to remove pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). That would mean that pedophilia would no longer be considered a mental disorder.

“The entire focus of the event was on the victimhood of the pedophile,” Barber accounts. There was “very little concern for the children who are the victims of these individuals when they are raped, who these individuals lust after,” he adds.

And he says the experts’ discussions were focused on “destigmatizing pedophilia … removing the stigma, and [getting] the public to stop demonizing pedophiles.”

But the attorney reports that the APA is already moving toward declassifying pedophilia as a mental disorder “by saying that a pedophile is only a pedophile in their latest DSM … if they are distressed by their attractions or behaviors.” 

“Hebephilia”  experts are trying to justify sex with teenagers [as opposed to pedophiles having sex with pre-pubescent kids] …..as if somehow that is more acceptable.

Hebephiles argue how Michael Jackson really wasn’t a “pedophile,” technically speaking, or even wrong to have relations with teenagers.

Conservatives who attended filed this report from the B4U-Act conference:

‘Time to Normalize Pedophilia’: Firsthand Report on B4U-ACT Conference  

Lynchburg, VA –“ On Wednesday, August 17, child advocates Matt Barber, Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action, and Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting law professor at Liberty University School of Law, attended a Baltimore, MD conference hosted by the pedophile group B4U-ACT. Around 50 individuals were in attendance including a number of admitted pedophiles – or “Minor-Attracted Persons” as they prefer to be identified (MAP “sexual orientation”) – as well as several supportive mental health professionals. World renowned “sexologist,” Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University gave the keynote address, saying: “I want to completely support the goal of B4U-ACT.”

Highlights of the conference:

• Pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society.
• There was concern about “vice-laden diagnostic criteria” and “cultural baggage of wrongfulness.”
• “We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child’s sexuality.”
• “Children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult.
• “In Western culture sex is taken too seriously.”
• “Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and ‘Puritanical’]. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They’ve always been able to have sex at any age.”
• An adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”
• Our society should “maximize individual liberty. … We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty.”
• “Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization.”
• “These things are not black and white; there are various shades of gray.”
• A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
• Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to that witnessed at the conference, rather than scientific considerations that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder: The reason “homosexuality was taken out of DSM is that people didn’t want the government in the bedroom,” he said.
• Dr. Berlin appeared to endorse the politically maligned clinical practice of “reparative therapy” for homosexuals and pedophiles alike, saying, “If someone, for their own reasons, doesn’t want to live a homosexual lifestyle, I tell them that it’s hard but I’ll try to help them.”
• The DSM ignores that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adult heterosexuals and homosexuals have romantic feelings for one another.
• “The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational.”
• The DSM should “focus on the needs” of the pedophile, and should have “a minimal focus on social control,” rather than obsessing about the “need to protect children.”
• Self-descried “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic, slang language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) “on or with” a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault.

Jacob Breslow: Originally from Walnut Creek, CA. Attended UC-Santa Cruz. Since he is describing in detail having sex with children at the conference, get a good look and don't let him near your kids

Another group to watch is Reform Sex Offender Laws [RSOL]

Daniel Villareal at the gay website, “Queerty,” shows how the gay movement is no longer pretending that it doesn’t want to recruit kids:  “Can We Please Just Start Admitting That We Do Actually Want To Indoctrinate Kids?”

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?

[…]

I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start fucking men. I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously munch box. I want this just as badly as many parents want their own kids to grow up and rub urinary tracts together to trade proteins and forcefully excrete a baby.

I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.”

 

In California, a petition drive is underway to repeal a new state law which mandates “positive” gay role models in the curriculum.  It is not clear what exactly will be required of textbooks and content.

Meanwhile, California Teachers’ Association appoints another openly gay member, San Francisco teacher Eric Heins, to the union board, ostensibly to ensure the delivery of the “gay agenda” to public classrooms:

“Heins, a longtime homosexual teacher, announced that he always kept pro-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) books in his classroom library and spoke to his students about alternate lifestyles. Now, he reportedly plans to use his position in the union to fight for the LGBT community.

Steve Macias is the West Coast regional coordinator of Students for Life of America and a member of the California Republican Assembly.

“They want to use schoolteachers’ paychecks to pay for politicians who will do nothing but continue to push these seemingly alternative lifestyles that are really damaging to not only the mental health, but the physical health and the spiritual health of our children.”

He goes on to warn that the CTA will continue to push for pro-homosexual indoctrination in California’s schools. “What we can really expect from them is these tolerance laws, these ideas that make Christian speech against homosexuality, against abortion, intolerable,” Macias adds.
He points out that the CTA donated $1.25 million to stop Proposition 8, the 2008 measure passed by a majority of the state’s voters to define marriage as between one man and one woman. The union also supports S.B. 48, a bill that was recently signed into law that requires the state’s schools to teach on the contributions of LGBT individuals.”