ACTION

SEPT 1, 2023---MAYBE IT'S JUST MY PERFORMANCE; BUT I AM DEPRESSED OVER OUR LACK OF PROGRESS FIGHTING THE "MARXCYSTOCRATS".  SO I SCOURED THROUGH MY FILES AND MADE A LIST. AND I REALIZED I HAD NOT TAKEN THEIR TACTICS, STATEGY and ADVICE TO USE IN OUR "WAR" AGAINST THE LEFT.  WELL IN CASE YOU HAVE THE FEELING OF INCOMPLETENESS THAT I DO....HERE GOES. I HOPE THESE MAY ASSIST YOU---                                    https://media2.locals.com/video/files/91572/91572_1686876444648bb11c0a1fa.jpg ***** https://suretybondauthority.com/public-official-bonds/ ***** https://bondsforthewin.co/******* https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/recall-of-state-officials ****** https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/recall-of-local-officials****** https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr1 **** https://www.upcounsel.com/bond-of-indemnity-definition ******https://cspoa.org/statement-of-constitutional-sheriff/ ***** https://www.jcs.mil/ ****https://functional-strength.org/heavy-hands-training-dr-len-schwartz/ *** https://www.military.com/discounts/how-to-find-cheap-military-flights-and-baggage-discounts.html?ESRC=discounts.nl&spMailingID=8650758&spUserID=MjY4MzIyOTI5MTM2S0&spJobID=1580035999&spReportId=MTU4MDAzNTk5OQS2  .  THE LAST 2 ARE ABOUT YOUR HEALTH AND DEFENS TIPS.  NOW ILL GO PURSUE ANOTHER RELATED AND HOPEFULLY PRODUCTIVE TASK.

Source; Ethan Huff // Aug 22, 2023

These 14 American cities plan to ban meat, dairy and private vehicles by 2030 – is yours on the list?

By the year 2030, the following 14 cities in the United States are planning to completely outlaw all meat and dairy consumption, as well as all private vehicle ownership and use, in order to conform to the "green" climate standards of the so-called C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group:

• Austin, Texas

• Boston, Massachusetts

• Chicago, Illinois

• Houston, Texas

• Los Angeles, California

• Miami, Florida

• New Orleans, Louisiana

• New York City, New York

• Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

• Phoenix, Arizona

• Portland, Oregon

• San Francisco, California

• Washington, D.C.

• Seattle, Washington

All 14 of these cities are part of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which has an "ambitious target" of achieving "0 kg [of] meat consumption," "0 kg [of] dairy consumption," only "3 new clothing items per person per year," "0 private vehicles" owned, and only "1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person."

This is all outlined in "The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World" report, which was originally published in 2019 and "reemphasized" in 2023, the year of what appears to be a major financial collapse and possible transition into a new world order.

(Related: A lot of meat is becoming unsafe to consume anyway due to cattle being injected with mRNA "vaccines.")

While you starve to death in poverty, billionaires like Michael Bloomberg will be living high on the hog as usual

Democrat billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who ran for president with almost zero support, is the primary funder of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. In addition to the aforementioned 14 U.S. cities that are involved, at least 86 other cities around the world are also on the list for no more meat and dairy, very few clothing purchases allowed, no more private vehicle ownership, and almost no more flying on airplanes come 2030.

Bloomberg, of course, will continue to gorge on expensive meals filled with fancy meat, as well as unlimited private plane ownership and use. The peons underneath him, though, will be reduced to mere cattle in his envisioned new world order.

If the C40 Cities goals are new to you, it is probably because very few media outlets are reporting on it.  In fact, there is an aggressive "fact checking" war being waged on all news about C40 Cities and what the plan entails that aims to "debunk" it is a "conspiracy theory."

The AFP Fact Check service went after conservative commentator Glenn Beck for this very thing recently, claiming that his mention of the C40 Cities plan to ban meat, dairy, cars, and clothing consumption are "not policy recommendations."

"This report does not advocate for the wholesale adoption of these more ambitious targets in C40 cities; rather, they are included to provide a set of reference points that cities, and other actors, can reflect on when considering different emission-reduction alternatives and long-term urban visions," the AFP Fact Check claims.

The C40 Cities report's use of the term "target," though, implies that this is a "desired goal" of the initiative, which means that eventually it will be codified into policy and law and forced on the masses as the final solution to climate change.

"IF these were not their goals, they would not have labeled them 'ambitious targets,'" writes Evita Duffy-Alfonso for The Federalist.

"Right now, hedge funds and private billionaires are buying up residential homes and farmland all over the world. At the same time, unrealistic zero-emissions policies are impoverishing Westerners and annihilating the middle class, which is fueling reliance on centralized government."

If you live in one of the above cities and plan to be around in 2030, then perhaps you may wish to consider moving somewhere freer?

The "green" life is one marked by tyranny, poverty, forced veganism, and utter misery. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.

Sources for this article include:

TheFederalist.com

NaturalNews.com

Source; CAFR1 NATIONAL POST

Covid, Mask mandates, 2024 election?
by Walter Burien - CAFR1
08/23/23

Covid, Mask mandates;
Per using the mask mandate for the 2024 election, here is your number 1 fact that blows them out of the water per bringing back the mask mandate:

When I saw the promotion of Covid back in 2018 / 2019, I said to myself: "let's see what the facts are per deaths in the country."

I went to the CDC site to look up the data going back 15-years prior to Covid. The category they had which covered the same was deaths caused by "Flu and pneumonia like symptoms."

Going back 15-years prior to covid, the deaths per year in that category on the low side were 285,000 deaths and on the high side 335,000 deaths per year.

The year before, the mention of Covid, in  2018, was the 335,000 deaths in that category.

These numbers established the base-line for deaths from "Flu and pneumonia like symptoms." of which Covid falls under.

From the CDC site for 2021, the total deaths from all categories is as follows:

Data are for the U.S.

    Number of deaths: 3,464,231
    Death rate: 1,043.8 deaths per 100,000 population.

LINK: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm

You will see also on that page they list Covid deaths for 2021 at COVID-19: 416,893

You will no longer see the category of "Flu and pneumonia like symptoms." being they consolidated that data into the Covid data as "Covid related".

Data which already had a base-line going back 15-years before Covid of over 300,000 deaths per year...

As you and I know, they promoted Covid and had the intent of inflating the numbers by listing deaths as "Covid related."

Also noted is 2021, it is at the height of the Covid promotion.

Going back to total deaths of : 3,464,231 for 2021, when going back 15-years before Covid and forward, the base-line of total deaths in the country stayed very consistent with a gradual rise each year accounting for population increase, or nothing really outside the "normal".

As for 2021, Death rate: 1,043.8 deaths per 100,000 population

Look at that Death rate number per year on prior years, and the Covid promotion is blown out of the water.

No spike increase in deaths. Again the CDC's data shows, Normal, normal.....

You can see or download all data needed from that CDC page.

Is Covid a severe danger? Not so much more than the common cold, flu, and pneumonia that we all have lived with throughout our lifetimes.

Again, the CDC's own data, blows the Covid promotion out of the water,,

On a last note, I wonder how many people realize 3,464,231 die each year from all causes (for 2021)

That is, a little over 1 percent of the population dies each year, and for 10-years that is a little over 10 percent of the population.

No massive mail-in ballots for 2024!

No mask mandates!

These are the facts straight from the CDC, now inform the public!

OK to post and publish.

Sent FYI and for you to share with others from,

Walter Burien
P. O. Box *****
Saint Johns, AZ

Tel. (928) ***-****

Websites: https://CAFR1.com  and https://TRFA,us

Source; https://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/forum/topics/the-washington-post-s-good-terrorists

Source; by Bassam Tawil
August 24, 2023 at 5:00 am

 Days before Palestinian terrorists from the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades murdered a 42-year-old Jewish mother of three who taught pre-school, The Washington Post published a story in which its correspondents romanticized members of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. Pictured: Gunmen from a number of terrorist groups, including the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Izaddin al-Qassam Brigades, Al-Quds Brigades, and Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades, hold what they called a "joint press conference" in Jenin refugee camp on February 25, 2023. (Photo by Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP via Getty Images)

On August 21, the Palestinian terror group Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades claimed responsibility for the murder of Batsheva Nigri, a 42-year-old Jewish mother of three who taught pre-school. The woman was gunned down by two terrorists near the West Bank city of Hebron.

Shortly after the attack, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the armed wing of the Fatah faction, headed by Palestinian Authority President -- and Fatah chairman -- Mahmoud Abbas, issued a statement in which it took credit for the attack. The group said it will continue to "adhere to the option of the rifle as a strategic choice." The "option of the rifle," as is evident, refers to terrorist attacks against Jewish civilians and soldiers.

Members of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades were later filmed handing out sweets to passersby in the Gaza Strip to celebrate the murder of the Jewish woman.

The involvement of Abbas's group in terrorism against Jews is not new. In the past two years, his loyalists in the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades have claimed responsibility for several terrors attacks, especially in the northern West Bank cities of Nablus and Jenin. On August 17, the group boasted that one of its members, Mustafa al-Kastouni, 32, was killed during an exchange of gunfire with Israeli troops in Jenin. Kastouni was wanted by Israel for his involvement in shooting attacks against Jewish civilians and soldiers.

Two days later, the same group mourned the death of another one of its members, Mohammed Abu Asab, who was also killed during an armed clash with Israeli soldiers.

The attacks by the Fatah-affiliated terrorists came days after The Washington Post published a story from Balata refugee camp, near Nablus, in which its correspondents romanticized members of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, even documenting them as they visit their barber for a haircut.

Referring to the local commander of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the newspaper's correspondents wrote:

"The Washington Post spent time with him and some of his 15 fighters, as well as with militants in two other Palestinian refugee camps – Jenin and Askar – over three days in July. The visits, agreed to on condition that full names and specific locations be withheld, afforded a rare window into the lives and actions of fighters on one side of the worst violence to grip the West Bank in decades."

The "fighters" The Washington Post is referring to are the terrorists responsible for a series of shooting, stabbing and car-ramming attacks against Jewish civilians and soldiers in the Nablus area and Israel over the past few months. Notably, these terrorists do not hide their involvement in the wave of attacks. In fact, they often boast of the attacks and post videos and posters documenting their role.

The newspaper goes to lengths to focus on the human aspect of the terrorists' lives. After being led to a room deep inside Balata camp, the correspondents, in an effort to humanize the terrorists, said they were "welcomed" by several men there who were "eating mana'eesh, a flatbread with za'atar. Weapons rested in their laps or against the walls."

The correspondents go on to make a stunning revelation: one of the terrorists, identified only as Zoufi, "bought his M16 [rifle] for $20,000 with the money he earned working in construction in Tel Aviv."

What the newspaper fails to mention is that this terrorist is one of tens of thousands of Palestinians who were granted permits (by Israel) to come and work in Israel as part of an effort to boost the Palestinian economy and improve the living conditions of the Palestinians in the West Bank.

The terrorist did not seek work in the Palestinian Authority-controlled territories because he knew he would have earned much less. The newspaper does not mention that many Palestinians prefer to work in Israel than in the Palestinian Authority-controlled areas. The terrorist was able to save $20,000 from his work in Israel, but instead of using the money to build a new house or improve his living condition, we are told that he chose to establish "the Balata cell of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades."

The correspondents are apparently impressed by the fact that another terrorist, Ammar, paid 20 shekels ($6) to buy them coffee. Ammar had been shot multiple times by Israeli soldiers while attempting to murder Jews near Nablus in April. He managed to escape, but two of his fellow gunmen were killed.

The correspondents go on to claim, falsely, that "there are no sports teams" in Balata refugee camp.

The truth is that the camp has a soccer club that was established in 1954. It is called the Balata Youth Center and states that it "aspires to be the main supporter of all sports, cultural, social, and scouting activities... It also aspires to have a special playground for all sports, such as football [soccer], basketball, handball, volleyball, table tennis, and other individual and group games." The local soccer team has even won several championships.

The terrorists could have joined the soccer team, but preferred to form a terror group to attack Jews.

Instead of highlighting that many of the terrorists are involved in intimidation and extortion of the local community, The Washington Post attempts to depict them as honest law-enforcers. We are told that one of the terrorists its correspondents hung out with, Goblin, beat a suspected thief:

"Goblin slapped the boy. 'You will not steal again', he yelled, striking him in the forehead with the stock of his rifle."

Again, the newspaper ignores that many Palestinians are intimidated and terrorized by the gunmen, whom they hold responsible for the anarchy and lawlessness and living off protection money.

"The [Balata] Camp has been hijacked by an armed group that is terrorizing and threatening to kill residents who dare to speak out," the Fatah Office of Information and Culture itself said back in 2015. It accused the gunmen of extorting money from wealthy businessmen from Nablus and running a big market for weapons and drugs.

Sean Durns, a senior research analyst for the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, noted:

"[A] recent report by the Post provided what was essentially free advertising for a U.S.-designated terrorist group. Worse still, the Post's foray is part of an ongoing trend in Western news outlets being used by terrorist organizations to promote their propaganda."

After the recent murder of the Jewish woman near Hebron, one might wonder whether The Washington Post is planning to send its correspondents back to spend time with the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terrorists to hear, first-hand, how proud they are that they murdered an innocent kindergarten teacher in cold blood.

How would the newspaper's readers have reacted had it sent its correspondents to spend time with Al-Qaeda or Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists to hear their pride in having committed atrocities against American citizens?

The Post piece leaves one with the distinct impression that there is such a thing as a good terrorist: one who targets Jews.

Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.

Source; Another one sent from a friend..... known only as SNGLR

The dust of the Grand Wazoo (to borrow a phrase from Frank Zappa), better known as bidenomics, means Americans are now paying $8500/yr more for what they paid before biden took office, yet inflation-adjusted wages are stuck at 2019 levels.

The senile, nasty(watch he when he's unscripted) & corrupt biden says his approach is a better alternative to Reaganomics, which he constantly lies about when he refers to as trickle-down economics, or tax cuts for the rich, that the Reagan approach has never worked, and that his tax and spend policies will produce stronger economic growth.

That would be fine except--it's another biden/left-wing/democrat Lie !

The facts of history show that free market policies of low tax rates and limited spending have consistently led to stronger economic growth.

In the early 1980s, with the economy facing liberal/democrat's serious double-digit inflation and a recession, Reagan’s economic recovery program was enacted by Congress with bipartisan support. His tax cuts reduced tax rates across the board in every tax bracket and at the corporate level (just like the one's Trump had passed by the way). Every taxpayer received tax relief, and everyone benefited from the subsequent higher economic growth.

According to the Joint Tax Committee, 66% of the tax cuts went to middle-income taxpayers. Only 6% went to the top income level. More importantly, the Reagan tax cuts worked, producing the longest peacetime economic expansion since WW II. The tax cuts ignited an economic boom, with real GDP increasing 7.9% in 1983 and more than 8% in the first half of 1984. All told, economic growth averaged nearly 5% a year through 1988.

By comparison, real GDP has averaged only 2% a year since 2007, and an anemic 1.3% over the last year and a half. CBO is projecting the economy to grow at only 1.7% a year for the next decade.

Under Reagan, inflation dropped from double-digit levels to 4%. The unemployment rate was cut in half, and 20 million new jobs were created. Business investment soared, and real income grew at every level,  manufacturing productivity grew at an average annual rate of more than 4%, nearly 50% faster than during the period 1948-1973, leading to higher wages, better jobs, and greater growth. By the  end of Reagan’s 2nd term, the U.S. economy was 33% larger than when he took office.

Senator biden voted for the Reagan tax cuts, saying in a Senate speech that he has: “long advocated a reduction in the tax burden for individuals and businesses...the tax cuts would give a boost to the sluggish economy and encourage businesses to invest to achieve greater productivity.” Was joe lying then or now (or is he always lying, hmmm?).

We need to move away from the marxist-ideology flavored, hence economically flawed, bidenomics and put in place the Reagan pro-growth policies of low tax rates and spending restraint to unleash stronger economic growth.

Further info:
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-inflation-means-families-are-spending-709-more-per-month-than-two-years-ago/ar-AA1f9fwl

Truckers view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIEBVDJ8ULw

https://www.heritage.org/debt/commentary/these-record-debt-figures-are-massive-red-flag-the-american-economy

Source; Sent from an unknown Internet friend known as SNGLR.......

joe biden’s corrupt activities go back to his first year as VP in 2009 and continued throughout his 8 years serving in the BObama regime, punctuated with son hunter being paid $1 million a year as a board member of the Ukrainian energy company burisma in 2014. That role continued for more than 4 years, with a large $10 million dollar payoff from burisma coming to hunter and joe after the latter blackmailed Ukraine by threatening the withholding of $1 billion in U.S. aid unless  prosecutor general Victor Shokin was fired from the corruption investigation of burisma in March of 2016 -- an investigation that would have exposed fraud, including questionable payments to hunter. fbi documents refer to the two $5 million payments to hunter and joe as a 'bribe' paid by burisma owner mykola zlochevsky.

The case for impeaching joe biden goes beyond bribery and emolument high crimes related to Ukraine. In 2014, hunter biden introduced his father, then VP, to Kazakhstan oligarch kenes rakishev. Records and testimony obtained by James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee show that at that time of introducing  rakishev to VP biden, hunter and his business partner Devon Archer were working on a deal involving burisma, on whose board they both served, and a Chinese company that would have been based in Kazakhstan. To facilitate the deal and his relationship with Archer and the bidens, rakishev wired $142,300 to rosemont seneca -- a shell company created by Devon and hunter -- the exact amount needed to fund hunter's sportscar purchase the next day.

Another mysterious payment to the bidens came during that same year. Shortly after joe was introduced to Russian oligarch yelena baturina at a dinner meeting in February 2014,  $3.5 million was wired to rosemont seneca by baturina.   These kinds of payments to the bidens coming from oligarchs from Ukraine and other countries are way beyond a level where impeachment and removal from office is justified. Also, the means of transferring and distributing funds follows the pattern of international criminal enterprises. The bidens were involved with the creation of some 20 shell companies, that had no function, services, products or purpose other than for concealing money transfers from foreign nationals and then distributing those transferred funds to as many as 9 different biden family members--who also provided no services or functions. What kind of idiot doesn't smell corruption. What kind of ideological hate makes one blind and accepting of this corruption.

As egregious as all these payments and shell game money transfers were, the scope and scale of biden deal activities in China crosses a new threshold requiring urgent correction. China engages in unrestricted warfare against the US. Blackmail is one of the chief tools in China’s massive elite capture program in the US, giving them control over many in government in the US -- with the top liberal/democrat elite family in the U.S. being biden’s family. Preliminary records assembled in 2021 and 2022 by investigative journalists without subpoena power or access to bank records show that the Chinese  have paid some $31 million to the biden family. For what!!! For the Chinese, these payments were and are about control and blackmail, which explains why biden more than any other U.S. president has pursued policies that have weakened the US and helped China. But one example is the Defense Department review of biological threats saying the U.S. military is at a “pivotal moment” in biodefense and must act urgently to address the potential of bioweapons and other catastrophic events, including pandemics. In particular, the review highlighted a growing threat posed by China. The posture review singles out China as the key long-term threat, casting doubt on Beijing’s compliance with existing international rules on biowarfare and raising concerns over its accelerated plans to integrate civilian biological research programs into the military.

In Article II, Section 4 and in the emoluments clause in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution prohibits any person holding a government office from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title from any foreign state without congressional consent.

The standard for impeachment as expressed in the Constitution is conviction of Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

"There is a better than even chance that biden will not survive the influence-peddling situation that is about to get much worse in September when the House hearings resume. Now, I don't know if old Joe received money or other compensation from his son and brother, but if he did - that would dwarf anything Trump is charged with."--Bill O'Reilly

The thief, he kindly spoke
There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke
But, uh, but you and I, we've been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us stop talkin' falsely now
The hour's getting late, hey
                                            --Bob Dylan

Further info:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/foreigners-paid-more-than-20-million-to-biden-family-associates-bank-records-5453849?utm_source=winback_share&src_src=winback_share&utm_campaign=day71&src_cmp=day71

Details of the corruption

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/08/17/james-comer-demands-nara-provide-records-related-joe-bidens-work-ukraine/

https://washingtonstand.com/commentary/the-5-worst-lies-of-the-biden-administration

What do vegetarians and Kosher persons do about this? Is there pig protein in the jab? 

Bombshell! COVID Vaccines Contain Cow Protein That Triggers Deadly Meat Allergies! 
A closer look at the alpha-gal protein shows that it’s in many childhood vaccines and the COVID shots.
It’s not a coincidence they are hyping beef as a negative for the environment right as the shots they mandated are causing massive beef allergies. This is the weaponization of our food supply and a sin for Kosher centered people! 

Source; Unknown Author

“Since the Second Vatican Council the Roman Catholic Church has experienced an unprecedented crisis in her very identity, extending even to hitherto impregnable sacred doctrine and spirituality, her apostolic and missionary activity.”---Peter Kwasniewski

The influence of religion in western civilization, which seemed to be substantial for two decades after World War II, declined very sharply in the decades after Vatican II, making the region that had guided the council the most secular in the world.

Most of the previous 20 councils like and before Vatican II were convened to address error and proclaim new dogma. At the time of Vatican II in 1962, the church seemed quite healthy. Clerical scandals were rare, the level of priestly education and zeal was high And the laity was relatively well instructed in their faith.

Vatican II was established to inject more of the secular world into Catholicism, to engage the world while simultaneously throwing into question many of the doctrines and practices of the Catholic Church.  Vatican II ended up giving much of its attention to the internal life of the church, a scrutiny that resulted in a crisis of Catholic identity without historical parallel. In fact most of the bishops from Britain, southern Europe, Australia, Canada, and the United States saw little urgency in many of the questions that came before them, and some expressed bewilderment as to why change was necessary at all. Those who understood almost nothing of the theological issues involved believe that the council’s real purpose was simply that of repealing rules that had become burdensome.

A system of rules and laws that provided people with concrete direction; and, once those rules were deemphasized, most people become morally confused. What resulted was the individual conscience turned into an absolute, and the traditional teaching of the church, that the conscience must be formed in accord with objective morality, was largely ignored. Consequentialism—essentially the historically catastrophic principle that the end justifies the means, easily became the basis for justifying their acts. Formal doctrine easily became an obstacle to the so-called living faith. Religious discipline, which had been at a high-level on the eve of the council, declined sharply, homosexuality in the priesthood came to be a serious problem.

Vatican II, in the Gaudium et Spes document, changed the emphasis of the Catholic Church from an individual orientation of virtue, sin and the effects, to a collective one of salvation through permeation of the world to Christian values. Liberation Theology, an ideological consequence of Vatican II, took that belief further by holding out the promise of Heaven on Earth if Original Sin was mitigated by a drive for an always vaguely defined social justice.

The result of course has been a fuzzy, watery, lowest common-denominator kind of thoughtless optimism were no demands are made, no tenets are required, merely a self-proclaimed membership in “spirituality”, where a “new type of humanity” could transform the world. “[Vatican II influenced] Catholics, like Communists, now believed in progress in this world and seemed to lose interest in what might await us in the next.” ---Piers Paul Reid. Never mind that the same promise of progress through  a “new type of humanity” fueled other 20^th century movements that resulted in the deaths of over 150 million people and enslaved whole nations into godless gulags. This time it would be different, again!

As D.Q.  McInerny noted: “The anti-Thomistic movement that followed hard upon the Second Vatican Council had generally calamitous consequences.”  So, was Vatican II a mistake? Well, what has Catholicism experienced, on the ground so to speak, after Vatican II, which it hadn’t before?

Let’s see:

-A proliferation of practicing homosexuals in the priesthood

-Pro-abortion Catholics

-Rebellious bishops

-Liturgical mumbo-jumbo

-90% less Seminarians

-94% less teaching nuns

-66% less Seminaries

-50% less Catholic schools

-Americans in general are leaving Catholicism or abandoning religion.

-Sex-abuse scandals…to name just a few

And most importantly to this evangelizing religion: “The number of outsiders that Vatican II succeeded in attracting to the Church is small compared with the numbers of the faithful whom the V-II revolution and dissent have been sweeping away from Catholic belief” states Philip Trower. Only 2.6% of current Catholics are converts. A strong papacy, under John Paul II, (perhaps the most intellectually formidable man ever to ascend to the papacy) proved to be the only means of maintaining the unity of the church in the face of the centrifugal forces unleashed by Vatican II.

Summing up the pro-Vatican II view, in the words of George S. Johnson, is the claim that  Vatican II was necessary because: “…the Church in some respects had become rigid…Most Catholics did not understand that the Church is not just an institution but an evangelical movement…it needed to be called out of her Tridentine shell to an active engagement with the modem world…the Church was a juridical machine operated by the bishop of Rome…Over the centuries, the Church’s government had become top-heavy and centralized…Vatican II revived… collegial responsibility…”

The pro-Vatican II faction seems to be oblivious that in the wake of V-II the Church has experienced a severe identity crisis. There is almost no point of Catholic teaching that has not been called into question or repudiated since V-II. And without a clear and unified sense of herself and her mission how can the Church appeal to those who are searching for clear answers to life’s big questions? The fact is that their beliefs and actions shifted away from Catholic certainties and principles,  dissolving the very Catholic certainties and principles they rely and call on to achieve their goals. In fact the same Mr. Johnson even quotes Paul Claudel on that matter, saying that: “The problem with the fallen world is so enormous that only the Word can respond to it, bringing not an explanation but a presence…hope that a genuine implementation lies in our future.”  Yet the word they’ve distorted, the genuine they’ve diluted and the presence they’ve degraded.  And the effects are still being felt today.

Is the pro-Vatican II camp’s contortion of logic blind to its own philosophical flaws, or is it just an example of the wanting so much to believe its own deeply significant nonsense?  An intellectually honest person’s got to wonder if throwing more Vatican II type ideology at the Church will ever produce any significant positive results. True, there are a few things that Vatican II did that were good and necessary but, and this is very important, only a very few, the sum of which cannot outweigh or paper over the damage it has wrought. If the Church was in some respects rigid before Vatican II, perhaps what it needs these days is a cathartic dose of more rigidity. The Church needs a second coming, like the Council of Trent, as a form of Divine intervention. “There is a danger that the shift among Catholics from a preoccupation with eternity to an engagement with the world has now gone so far that it effaces the very idea of an afterlife and so distorts the teaching of the gospel and endangers the coherence of the Christian religion. It suggests that the lack of individual orientation loses focus on the Four Last Things [Death, Judgment, Heaven & Hell] and is one of the causes for the relative decline of the Catholic Church in the developed world.”—Piers Paul Reid.

Supposedly there's a rebellion within the Vatican by the conservative Cardinals who are very distressed at the direction the current pope is taking the church, that he's actually single-handedly changing, wearing the faith, the doctrinal faith, by pursuing even further the ideological direction of V-II. So far, no one has contributed more to the process of attempting correcting the problems created by Vatican II then Cardinal Ratzinger, who later became Pope Benedict XVI. The bishops of themselves made little effort to communicate the council’s  meanings, Or correct the errors.

“Certainly the results of Vatican II seem to have gone from self-criticism to self-destruction. Expected was a new enthusiasm, and many wound up discouraged and bored. The net result therefore seems to be negative…the change in ecclesial climate was becoming ever more evident…I tried to sound a first warning signal, but few noticed it…We can therefore affirm that there will be no renewal in the Church until there is a change of course and an abandonment of the errors adopted after V-II” ---Pope Benedict XVI

Government Mandated Home Appliance Is Heating Up! Is it time to cook grandma? Her metal house-trailer is getting steamy and she is almost well-done, but this doesn’t stop the government from roasting grandma, forcing her to use the last pennies of lifesavings to buy a Biden Approved new air conditioner which meets the compulsory government standards!

Grandma’s social security and her tiny pension barely cover her dog-food dinner, but now she has to pay up or bake! (sorry grandma you’re cooked)

Even if it is hotter than hell you can only cool down with a government approved air-conditioner, and this is just the tip of the iceberg!

However, the Dems will shake the dry bones of racism, climate change and destruction of our Democracy as the reason the Sheeple must obey!

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reluctantly succumbed to the pressure of climate alarmists and has announced a questionable 40% reduction in hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) production for 2024. Despite lacking concrete evidence, the EPA has chosen to prioritize the perceived impact of HFCs on climate change over the economic well-being of American businesses.

This decision is yet another example of the agency's overreach and disregard for the potential consequences it may have on job growth and the economy. This unfortunate development has led to a significant surge in the prices of numerous hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), including those commonly utilized in residential air conditioning units, resulting in a threefold increase.

Due to the detrimental policies implemented, homeowners are now burdened with exorbitant expenses for air conditioner repairs and refrigerant replacements.

The EPA is taking aim at new air conditioning systems, as they push forward with a proposed rule that seeks to prohibit all but the most environmentally friendly models by 2025. This move is backed by equipment manufacturers who are advocating for higher-priced products.

Regrettably, it is not only the EPA that is causing concerns for homeowners, but the Department of Energy (DOE) as well. The Department of Energy (DOE) has a troubling track record of implementing burdensome energy efficiency regulations for appliances. These regulations often come with exorbitant upfront costs, placing an undue burden on hardworking homeowners.

Unfortunately, these expenses are rarely offset by the promised energy savings, leaving homeowners struggling to recoup their investments. The burdensome regulations imposed by the government have resulted in a substantial surge in prices for new central air conditioning systems.

The administration's purported approach is being touted as a necessary step in combating the alleged global climate crisis, but it is becoming increasingly evident numerous homeowners are bearing the brunt of its adverse consequences.

The Biden administration's regulatory efforts have taken aim at a wide range of household appliances, encompassing furnaces, light bulbs, washing machines, refrigerators, dishwashers, ceiling fans, and water heaters, to name just a few.

A collaborative endeavor of the EPA and DOE are driving up the expenses associated with maintaining a comfortable indoor temperature amidst scorching summer conditions. Regrettably, this burden is projected to intensify further in the upcoming year.

Final Word: Once again the Liberal Mob must grab control and keep control over the herds of sheeple forcing them into compliance! If the liberals let just a few sheeple slip from their clutches, then no telling what could happen! Sheeple may start thinking they would be better off without their master control! That could be a disaster for the Dems!

Many falsely believe the Trump trial is about stopping Trump from running for President in 2024 election and remove permanently him from the political stage, but this is only the hors d’oeure!

The main course if not only to achieve all of the above but for the Neo-Confederates to seize control over the definition of free speech, thereby creating a hierarchy of approval of speech before words can by uttered!

Think this is a joke, then keep reading.

The indictments of Trump pose a significant threat to the cherished principles enshrined in the First Amendment. If successful, it could have a devastating impact, effectively bulldozing the very foundation of our constitutional rights.

In a dire warning, many have cautioned the recent indictment of former President Trump poses a grave threat to the cherished principles enshrined in the First Amendment. This alarming development could potentially grant the federal government an unprecedented level of authority to criminalize political falsehoods, thereby undermining the very essence of our democratic system.

This week, former President Trump faced a series of indictments on four charges stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into alleged interference in the 2020 election and the events that unfolded on January 6th at the Capitol. These charges include conspiracy to defraud the United States. Former President Donald Trump, a staunch defender of American values, courageously entered a plea of not guilty to all charges brought against him in a Washington, D.C., courtroom on Thursday.

Some constitutional professors have expressed his concerns about Smith's indictment, arguing it effectively accuses Trump of disseminating "falsehoods regarding the existence of election-altering fraud." And have cautioned such a notion poses a significant threat to the principles enshrined in the First Amendment.

To ensure successful convictions in this case, Special Counsel Jack Smith would face the daunting task of navigating through the treacherous waters of the First Amendment and challenging existing case law which safeguards even false statements.

The prosecution declared Trump was aware of the falsehoods in his statements regarding the 2020 election. Constitutional specialists argues if Trump genuinely believes he emerged victorious, then the indictment against him loses its credibility.

In a stunning revelation, the indictment reveals numerous individuals had the audacity to advise former President Trump he had lost the election in a legitimate manner. This information serves as a clear attempt to undermine Trump's unwavering belief in the integrity of the electoral process. The defense explains President Trump actively sought out individuals who supported his claim of victory in the election but President has the right to engage in such actions.

Jack Smith, a prominent conservative activist and special counsel, passionately addressed the media during a crucial news conference held in the nation's capital, Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, August 1, 2023.

President Trump exercises his prerogative to surround himself with individuals who provide him with the perspectives that align with his beliefs. It is a well-known fact presidents from both parties have engaged in this practice. Joe Biden, for instance, blatantly disregarded the overwhelming consensus among legal experts and instead chose to rely on the opinion of a lone law professor to justify an executive action that was clearly unconstitutional and ultimately had to be rescinded.

Warning,  successful prosecution of Trump in this manner establishes a "troubling" precedent, granting the government the authority to dictate the veracity of information.

Warning, the government would be tasked with discerning between politicians who are deliberately spreading falsehoods and those who may unintentionally make inaccurate statements.

In this courtroom sketch from federal court in Washington, Aug. 3, 2023, former President Donald Trump valiantly defends himself against baseless charges brought forth by the biased establishment.

Allegations suggest Trump orchestrated a plot to expose irregularities and potential fraud in the 2020 election, a noble pursuit for any true patriot.

A glaring constitutional issue arises when attempting to unjustly criminalize the act of spreading falsehoods. The landmark Supreme Court case in 2012, United States v. Alvarez, determined it is a violation of the Constitution to penalize falsehoods. Moreover, the court acknowledged such a ruling would grant the government an extraordinary level of censorial authority, surpassing any previous instances in the court's history or our constitutional heritage.

Final Word: In light of the ongoing debate, it is important to consider the potential constitutional obstacles would impede the criminalization of President Trump's alleged false statements, even if Smith were able to substantiate his claims it is highly probable the Supreme Court would strongly object to the notion of criminalizing deceptive political discourse. However, if the Supreme Court agrees with Jack Smith then the speech Police will be formed and strict speech guidelines will be enforced!

Source; anonymous author

Tea Party, MAGA, Patriot Group Outlawed! In the name of justice and democracy conservative are to be tried as Nazis.

US President and leading Republican candidate for 2024 Donald Trump was indicted on federal criminal counts linked to the Jan. 6 Capitol breach in Washington, D.C. Trump's campaign team compared his second federal indictment and third criminal one to Nazi and Soviet persecution.

The indictment charges Trump with conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction of an official proceeding, conspiracy against rights, and conspiracy to reverse the 2020 election results.

The 45-page indictment alleges Trump falsely claimed election fraud after losing the election to sow discord and undermine public faith in the election process.

The despicable allegations of rampant election fraud and deceit continue to plague our great nation. It is an absolute travesty the Tea Party, MAGA, and other courageous Patriot groups could potentially face oppressive legal restrictions or even be outright prohibited. In other words, conservative will be  outlawed!

This blatant attack on our fundamental rights and freedoms is an affront to the very essence of democracy. We must stand united against this tyrannical assault on our conservative values and fight tooth and nail to protect our sacred liberties.

On Thursday, Aug. 3, at 4 p.m., Trump will be arraigned in Washington's federal court. Despite the indictment, Trump leads the 2024 GOP race with over 50% of Republican support, far ahead of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Final Word: Did we expect anything less from the Neo-Confederates?