All Posts (30294)

Sort by

Free / Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Top Foreign Threats Facing the U.S. in 2020
BmZf0Lgg6geQOH3qnxWSq7MdOXIymQpnv5iZeaRlLd7Cb0V74PPRuXpY3_4IXvE9cV-X0WHZsTixC4XQvWEGQqYtI_ftUWDdyrBKRhc6AB6YPcEFQEh9wrkP46cWv_k1Y-8v9yGPkx9a7Fhm0Mz7kOEK7TvVePJuLbiYn54=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Friday Top News Executive Summary
A5leBj_gr3cQRqN6H85QrEI9B2ve8lqzsQgKAzXCyLAaqTUWlnu2-IBT8Wdc86jL4ZSVLbwlbkZ19QdeVfWDL-KsXnqdTD7eFRKnVp1C6sz9KALptptu4yqfdlFi5XvWaxXXjkM4vV-AIDeBOmbP_hAq2Ks6S7epttc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors:  Above the Fold


TERRORIST NEUTRALIZED: Iran vows “harsh” response to U.S. killing of top general, Qassem Soleimani; meanwhile, Americans are implored to leave Iraq “immediately” (Associated Press)

SANITY: Marine Corps authorizes concealed carry on bases following recent shootings (National Review)

Government & Politics


CIRCLING THE WAGONS: Media struggle to explain recent wave of anti-Semitic attacks without blaming Jews, Trump (The Washington Free Beacon)

LIMITED VAPING BAN: Trump administration declares ban on mint, fruit-flavored vaping products (The Hill)

Virginia


GUN-GRAB PROPOSAL: Virginia governor’s call for 18-person gun-ban force comes under fire (Washington Examiner)

STOCKING UP: Guns and ammo “flying off the shelves” in Virginia as Democrats pursue confiscation (The Daily Wire)

REVISIONIST HISTORY: Ralph Northam calls for removing statue of Robert E. Lee from U.S. Capitol (The Daily Wire)

Culture


“A RADICALLY UNSETTLED PRECEDENT”: Two hundred members of Congress are urging the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade (The Daily Caller)

MOTHER, DOCTORS DISAGREE: Texas judge rules 11-month-old to be taken off life support against mom’s wishes (The Daily Wire)

“THE LIES … HAVE BEEN FOREVER EXPOSED”: First trans person to obtain legal “non-binary” sex status changes back to birth sex in blow to LGBT movement (PJ Media)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: Qassem Soleimani’s death a “major operational, psychological victory” for the U.S. (The Heritage Foundation)

POLICY: The surprisingly good news about American family life — for kids (American Enterprise Institute)

HUMOR: Racist Democrats kick another minority out of 2020 presidential primary (Genesius Times)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/67677?mailing_id=4779&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4779&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
US assassinates Qasem Soleimani, 
Iran's Khamenei warns of 'harsh revenge'
uco-FJZSDaibzuXaYz4oYtJuSGIbOJXubz659rum1vgvF54hK_lRabSkMQgReXZcK4h7BX_kUXGbD7HRHKGGKcEtU4fhGkByAkBL0oRNGt1KUci4JdfWF-ugxhDG830TYxjiBE67QBhOmOyv17ua=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By OMRI NAHMIAS
{ jpost.com } ~ IRGC Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani and Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, along with at least 10 other people... were killed in an attack by US forces in Baghdad on Friday morning Israel time, according to reports confirmed by the Pentagon and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC). In a statement, the Pentagon said that the US killed Soleimani and al-Muhandis in an airstrike inside Baghdad International Airport.  "At the direction of the President, the US military has taken decisive defensive action to protect US personnel abroad by killing Qasem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force, a US-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization," the Pentagon's statement read. According to the Pentagon, Soleimani was actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq and throughout the region. "General Soleimani and his Quds Force were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American and coalition service members and the wounding of thousands more," the Pentagon claimed, noting that the Iranian leader had orchestrated attacks on coalition bases in Iraq over the last several months, "including the attack on December 27th, culminating in the death and wounding of additional American and Iraqi personnel. "General Soleimani also approved the attacks on the US Embassy in Baghdad that took place this week," the Pentagon added, clarifying that the strike was aimed at  deterring future Iranian attack plans."The United States will continue to take all necessary action to protect our people and our interests wherever they are around the world," the statement concluded...
.
State Department urges U.S. citizens 
to leave Iraq immediately
KIRz_PHfarwADxvCopSd2u7GCWX_qtqr0X0zQLkUwgkwuWP2CagPVoj1XpjCnuqxZSJQ3b8s4XOtNHCHVn5ONzd7g-ndT5c7uFQQwU_CG9-g0JVWHHObEEiWBzOuT-uQYREaX9kkEY4q5seHkGkippGyLQMdN34Jl5v2BCi-Ed8cygNS7yZBAYlV=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brie Stimson
{ foxnews.com } ~ The State Department issued a security alert early Friday morning urging Americans in Iraq to leave the country immediately... The warning comes hours after Iran promised “harsh retaliation” against the United States for an airstrike that killed top Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani at the Baghdad International Airport. “Due to heightened tensions in Iraq and the region, we urge U.S. citizens to depart Iraq immediately,” the State Department said in the alert. The alert also said all consular operations are suspended at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad “Due to Iranian-backed militia attacks at the U.S. Embassy compound.” “U.S. citizens should not approach the Embassy," the alert said.
.
liar-Pelosi and McConnell begin 
2020 in standoff over Trump trial
8gPOQt15Gv8d8X9hhVlg-jrk7kYPL5RnGc77vXyNdv2r6m5rJF7OBgXVttK4M7tztnbucLd6r0gVA5hUyJTJwLkcGlO1tzy5gFBHi4NfJEB8pL2v80xhGQ-rFM0wbIQJayxQXenOt-E_mX5T=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Erik Wasson
{ personalliberty.com } ~ House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are locked in a stare-down over the terms of President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial... which carries political risks for both sides if it continues deeper into January. The two-week congressional holiday break produced no new negotiations on the contours of the Senate trial, according to people familiar with the matter. liar-Pelosi is leaving the talks with McConnell up to Senate Democratic leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer, with whom she’s been coordinating, officials in the speaker’s office said. liar-Pelosi has held up delivering to the Senate the two articles of impeachment adopted by the Democratic-majority House, saying she wants to see a “fair” process for the trial. Officials in liar-Pelosi’s office said she and scumbag-Schumer are in lockstep on what that means: trial procedures that would include documents and testimony from witnesses that were blocked by Trump during the House’s impeachment inquiry. “Neither Senator McConnell, nor any Republican senator, has articulated a single good reason why the trial shouldn’t have these witnesses or these documents,” scumbag-Schumer said at a news conference Monday in New York. McConnell is showing no signs of shifting off his position that a vote on calling witnesses can be left until after the impeachment case is argued by House managers and Trump’s counsel. While most lawmakers won’t return to Washington until next week — when haggling over the trial process is likely to begin in earnest — McConnell is expected to deliver remarks on the Senate floor Friday criticizing the Democrats’ position. In the background is the 2020 election campaign that will decide control of the White House and both chambers of Congress, and that’s putting pressure on both sides in the impeachment drama...   https://personalliberty.com/pelosi-and-mcconnell-begin-2020-in-standoff-over-trump-trial/   
Pompeo Responds to Iran's Three Demands Following Their Attack on the 
U.S. Embassy
88X8rmKtZCkACDNgyacy3BSlQf84CT8NomWUxG-K24xgS3Y1agut0uKiFFacyxuhqhYaKzo2jwEtxXs__hcf3S3McOrKLLiru_nLBRFxM1V7_2tu0sGWymgwblCbKYiJRnfQdww1_GEKCNlli5qU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Beth Baumann
{ townhall.com } ~ Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Tuesday night discussed the attacks on the United States' embassy in Baghdad with Fox News' Mike Emanuel... According to Pompeo, those who carried out the attacks are terrorists that are backed by the Islamic Republic of Iran. "Well, what you say was Iranian-backed terrorists. Many of them are individuals that have been designated terrorists by the United States and others, coming to the American embassy and posing a risk to the American diplomats and personnel inside the embassy," Pompeo explained. "You saw President Trump direct a quick, decisive, prudent response by making sure that we had all the resources necessary to keep our people safe and to secure the compound as well." "Any plans to evacuate the embassy in Baghdad, sir?" Emanuel asked. "None," Pompeo replied. "Okay. Any plans to pull some of the 5,000 U.S. troops in Iraq out?" Emanuel asked. "None," Pompeo replied. On Tuesday, the Pentagon deployed 750 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division in Fort Bragg that were sent to nearby military bases where they will wait until they are needed in Baghdad. Up to 5,000 troops from the 82nd are reportedly being sent overseas. Emanuel asked about the 82nd being used to "bolster forces in the region." According to the Secretary of State, more context has to be given to the situation. "This is 40 years of the Islamic Republic of Iran being engaged in global terror campaigns, nuclear weapons dreams and nuclear enrichment capability existing today," he explained. Pompeo said that when the Trump administration took over, they inherited a difficult situation. "The previous administration provided lots of money, lots of money that was used for that nuclear program, lots of money that had been used for terror all around the world, to develop their missile program," he said. "The Trump administration has taken a much different view." "We put real pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran," he explained. "We will continue to do so. And you saw the president say today we will continue to hold the Islamic Republic of Iran accountable wherever we find their malign activity and we'll make sure we have the resources to do so." Although Pompeo refused to talk about specific actions that can and will be taken against Iran, he reiterated President Trump's stance that Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei will feel America's power if the situation warrants it...
.
Trey Gowdy Shreds Democrats’ Impeachment 
Case, Gives Update On Joining Trump Legal 
Team After Playing Golf With Trump
G0yUrselHGqt3p8hLpTkT1RLv0ci9Hhcx7dStUBTUwdLI9DoQDiVac7ArfOwdMLroBpyJaJtWPQios1xMCv7EHw1oaALcLtPJso17hxyNnMz--yOYGWJE7_XElFhBjzweUwZHnDUQtUI75O-CJ5aXW19Rc_Z-npSzL5RuhIiXpWzr2FTUiIOzPWA9NI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by dailywire.com ~ Former South Carolina Representative Trey Gowdy dismantled Democrats’ impeachment case against President Donald Trump during an interview on Fox News this week and gave an update... on whether he was joining Trump’s legal defense team for the upcoming Senate trial. Gowdy, who made the remarks on Fox News’s “The Ingraham Angle” with guest host Jason Chaffetz, was originally was set to join Trump’s legal team late last year before learning that he would have to wait until the new year before he could join due to lobbying rules. “Getting serious here, are you going to represent President Trump coming into 2020?” Jason Chaffetz asked. “No, the president has got great lawyers and more importantly than having great lawyers, he’s got great facts,” Gowdy responded. “I think for several months we’ve been talking about the process and how fundamentally flawed it’s been. Imagine being investigated by somebody like scumag/liar-Adam Schiff, that’s the process. But Jason, I focus on the substance. The single best piece of evidence for the president is the transcript itself. You know because you are familiar with the transcript.” “This is the second phone call President Trump and President Zelensky had. If President Trump were obsessed with conditioning aid on investigations, he would have brought that up in the first phone call, right?” Gowdy continued. “If you are really obsessed with it, you’re going to bring it up every chance you get. Go pull the transcript from the first phone call. Not a single word. Look at the remainder of the transcript. What do the president say? He said I want you to do ‘us’ a favor. For those wondering who ‘us’ is, he answered it, he said I want you, our country has been through a lot. The ‘us’ is linked to the country.” “Who brought up Rudy Giuliani’s name? Was President Trump or President Zelensky? It was President Zelensky, that’s who introduced Rudy Giuliani into the conversation,” Gowdy concluded. “The only thing President Trump did is he inserted Bill Barr and if it’s an impeachable offense to ask the attorney general, the top law enforcement officials of the country, to look in to potential impropriety, if that’s an impeachable offense, then we’re not going to have presidents serving very long.” Gowdy also mocked Democrat presidential candidate loose lips liar-Joe Biden over his flip-flops on whether he would comply with subpoena from the Senate, saying, “Yeah, if you don’t like loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s answer just wait about an hour and he’ll give you the exact opposite.”...
.
The Myth of Voter Suppression  
bE3hxYy_svVlQSZeW0BC10WpjVZlwsuOCxN_-Tu-SM3ExQKX6_7YR2vmebjBFKn7-JpaBIcxN_VF1DeYETP8xoFEj-mN5H4s0pnwnYF40ZGB3LZq1xVWoZs7PNt138xCBOKTs4bSp4P75N5IXhJABBXeqQq7OrNXGmrDQpApGFGNx6IX6bfCGgAN1gTKDfuAdbYkJQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jason Riley 
{ youtube.com } ~ Do Republicans win elections by preventing minorities from voting? The Left says yes, but the data says no. In the latest short video from Prager University, Jason Riley, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, settles the argument with hard evidence, separating fact from fiction. Don't miss it!  
.
Homeland Security Chief Orders Review of 
State Laws Allowing Driver’s 
Licenses for Illegal Aliens
zSyCl0CzXMI2bdp8SW-LTMPWHUw1ZV8U1-Isp3Dhnqiq9dFsiUOdmoIzgcoycDSPsV3ZiJp8XuoAKEwB1TAXWBuQFzYBapC7TDrG-W0fcYvMpueZbciRD0q2yNSY2ua_1XQ3vw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jason Hopkins
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Chad Wolf, the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, ordered a review of state laws that allow illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses and restrict data sharing with federal immigration authorities... Wolf on Tuesday ordered all of the components of DHS to conduct a department-wide review of the state laws to determine how they affect their day-to-day operations, according to a memo obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The DHS chief’s directive indicates he is prepared to take aim against the state laws. “Accordingly, I am instructing each operational component to conduct an assessment of the impact of these laws, so that the Department is prepared to deal with and counter these impacts as we protect the homeland,” Wolf’s memo read. The memo follows implementation of New York’s “Green Light” law, and passage of a similar bill in New Jersey in December. Both laws not only allow illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses, but also restrict DMV data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies within the Department of Homeland Security. In New York, in particular, numerous county clerks have expressed reservation over the fact that illegal aliens can obtain a driver’s license with foreign documentation—arguing that such a policy paves the way for voter fraud, identity theft, and even terrorism. DHS had already voiced its opposition to a provision in the New York law that prohibits Homeland Security Investigations, a division of ICE, from accessing DMV information—even if the agency is investigating serious crimes... NY and NJ have looked the other way and disregarded the law against illegals.
.
Keystone State learning from Gosnell tragedy?
tKHNaUMN6f9P-MAoe4wOwGaV1vpmtndxyqbu_woC2RnASn9RyXdCOTRDvnB4WyN4cn0bw6tqDHSz2Z5Fvde05zcAYpYfQn9tVojdghw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Charlie Butts
{ onenewsnow.com } ~ Pennsylvania could soon consider legislation that would give women seeking an abortion more helpful information... The state has passed House Bill 2138 -- what Maria Gallagher of the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation calls a "common sense measure" that calls for set standards and regular and surprise inspections of the state's abortion clinics. "Pennsylvania suffered a terrible tragedy with Kermit Gosnell and his house of horrors in West Philadelphia, where newborn babies were murdered and where women lost their lives," Gallagher notes. "So we need to make sure that our laws are as strong as possible." Gosnell, whose clinic was filthy and whose workers were not properly trained, is serving three consecutive life sentences for killing babies born alive after failed abortions. State Representative Timothy O'Neal (R) has introduced the bill that would require abortuaries to post the results of state health department inspection reports, as well as their plans for correcting any violations. "When you're talking about informed consent, it's important that the woman be apprised of all of the information that's available for a particular abortion facility, and this bill would guarantee that," Gallagher explains. The measure might also motivate poorly operated abortion clinics to work harder to meet the state's minimum requirements for abortion facilities.
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Top Foreign Threats Facing the U.S. in 2020
BmZf0Lgg6geQOH3qnxWSq7MdOXIymQpnv5iZeaRlLd7Cb0V74PPRuXpY3_4IXvE9cV-X0WHZsTixC4XQvWEGQqYtI_ftUWDdyrBKRhc6AB6YPcEFQEh9wrkP46cWv_k1Y-8v9yGPkx9a7Fhm0Mz7kOEK7TvVePJuLbiYn54=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin:  As we enter a new year and a new decade, Americans were reminded anew that our old geopolitical foes still present a significant threat to our nation and our way of life. In Baghdad, Iraq, the U.S. embassy was attacked by Iran-backed “protesters” angered at President Donald Trump’s authorization of air strikes against the Iran-backed terrorist group Kataib Hezbollah — a jihadi group that had killed an American civilian contractor. Trump was quick to send in the U.S. Marines to secure the embassy and prevent another Benghazi fiasco. He also warned, “Iran killed an American contractor wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will. Now Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. They will be held fully responsible.”

Iran continues to be provocative in an effort to get Trump to back off his crippling sanctions, while the regime continues its pursuit of building a nuclear weapon. Thus far, Trump has avoided being pulled into a war with Iran, but as the Iranians get more desperate, expect an increase in the number of attacks against U.S. interests and allies.

At the same time, North Korea has once again ramped up its saber-rattling, with Kim Jong-un claiming to possess a “new strategic weapon” while also suggesting he will end the moratorium against testing long-rang missiles. For the moment, Trump seems content to hold the line on sanctions while continuing his charm offensive. He continues to avoid offering any heated criticism of Kim while effectively calling on Beijing’s puppet to uphold the denuclearization agreement “he did sign.”

Finally, the ongoing trade war with China. There was some recent positive news, as the White House announced that a “phase one” deal agreed to last month would be signed on January 15. The deal would cancel a new round of $156 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods as well as slash current tariffs on another $120 billion in goods. While it is undeniable that the trade war has hurt certain sectors of the U.S. economy, it has been necessary to fight against Chinese cheating. However, this fight is far from over, as Beijing would love nothing more than to see Trump lose his reelection bid with an aim to continue its unfair trade practices.

In short, as 2019 passes into 2020, there are some things that haven’t changed and will require continued American vigilance. 

~The Patriot Post 

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67648?mailing_id=4776&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4776&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Trump Administration's Record 
Bodes Well for 2020
WU97tKfRJgkGtukjZOEI6ew-A-WJq9Bf4-33hEAAekRC6g2EZwocUkvRoLbVDKC0E1QmbgP6CltL9MgdcGoXOtrCszU3vDJHWb5CAES2RFqo3Bt8_i0uH20hn0qAckv_BKj9oZcXTLSsjdUMyFudzJ7TDKlgDpc2J4L_Auw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump orders attack that kills Iranian Gen.
 Qassem Soleimani, other military officials 
in Baghdad, Pentagon says
LN886xZChM-hUJtA5BfyAaIHeBSLXtLMtmJwe8WrXOmUgZX2wZXc9xietO8mZRW-XpAZDSu_uwLKBzIz9tSCjpMsHJgfpl3T7-blMZMccY3xbvGjD18ks26OV4_G3jWeoIVOcXEy8h5M-w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Frank Miles
{ foxnews.com } ~ President Trump ordered a game-changing U.S. military attack that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' elite Quds Force...among other military officials at Baghdad  International Airport early Friday, the Pentagon confirmed. Soleimani is the military mastermind whom Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had deemed equally as dangerous as Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. In October, Baghdadi killed himself during a U.S. raid on a compound in northwest Syria, seven months after the so-called ISIS "caliphate" crumbled as the terrorist group lost its final swath of Syrian territory in March. Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted after the attack "The US' act of international terrorism, targeting & assassinating General Soleimani—THE most effective force fighting Daesh (ISIS), Al Nusrah, Al Qaeda et al—is extremely dangerous & a foolish escalation." He added that the U.S. "bears responsibility for all consequences of its rogue adventurism."In April 2019, the State Department announced Iran was responsible for killing 608 U.S. troops during the Iraq War. Soleimani was the head of the Iranian and Iranian-backed forces carrying out those operations killing American troops. According to the State Department, 17 percent of all deaths of U.S. personnel in Iraq from 2003 to 2011 were orchestrated by Soleimani. As recently as 2015, a travel ban and United Nations Security Council resolutions had barred Soleimani from leaving Iran. Friday's Baghdad strike also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, a source told Fox News. In all, at least seven people were killed and at least three rockets were fired, officials told The Associated Press. An official with the Popular Mobilization Forces said its airport protocol officer, Mohammed Reda, also died...  https://www.foxnews.com/world/rockets-baghdad-airport-injuries-reported 
.
Iran Can No Longer Rely on 
Shia Militias to Fight its Wars
1wDvoUZbF8GSusAxfRhmDdFX2nSTjo2KiBTWbnWSM3uAu4MlYQ1Sb8R2L30L5MDPOaDOHDWrXYRzh3CJAEAbFiFWKw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Con Coughlin
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ The intense pressure Iran is facing over its continued meddling in Iraq is the key factor behind the recent upsurge of violence in the Middle East that has resulted... in American warplanes carrying out their biggest attack in a decade on Iran-backed militias. Ever since the ayatollahs came to power more than 40 years ago, they have sought to distract attention away from their domestic unpopularity by getting Iran-backed Shia militias to carry out high profile attacks. From the devastating car bomb attacks the Iranian-backed Hizbollah militia carried out against American bases in Beirut in the 1980s to the more recent attacks on Saudi Arabia's Aramco oil facilities in October 2019, the Iranian regime has repeatedly used its proxy Shia militias to great effect to distract attention away from its domestic travails. The beauty of this arrangement, so far as the ayatollahs are concerned, is that, by relying on Shia militias to do their dirty work, whether it is firing missiles at Israel or carrying out assassinations in Europe, Tehran is able to deny any involvement in wrongdoing. No longer. By launching a series of air strikes against Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria on Sunday night, the Trump administration has made it abundantly clear that it will no longer tolerate Tehran's denials of its involvement in attacks against the US and its allies. Moreover, after Washington accused Iran of being responsible for the subsequent attacks against the US Embassy in Baghdad that followed the air strikes, Tehran is risking a direct military confrontation with the US if it persists with the underhand tactic of employing proxies to carry out attacks on its behalf...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15368/iran-shia-militias-iraq 
President Trump Announces Delegation for 
Davos Worldwide Economic Forum Conference
DW-UIaBmI_CSkD_-b5mXXYw-1XKC54s_7TI0C80RXoUlvo5B1f0eQYBF3b120lM_JaX1A54PDH18SwEUHEA2esIQoMSFWSeBdHXvOIeSjpYxaLci-6PgO4QUTi6fQpGRkoU0-IhGtEz2iKxV-ceoFec=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ The 2020 Davos economic conference will be a little more important to watch this year as it was in 2017 due to the completed U.S. Trade Agreements S Korea, Japan, Mexico, Canada, and China... and the predicted focus for the Trump administration to pivot from Asia to the EU and U.K. for the next critical phase of the ‘America-First’ global trade reset. As a result of the recent U.K. election, pending Brexit, a favorable $7.5 billion WTO ruling and USTR Lighthizer’s new $2.4 billion EU targeted tariff program, the administration has significant advantages going into a trade discussion with the EU in 2020. Team USA has the world’s strongest economy, the largest market, legally bolstered tariff authority and a quiver full of powerful economic arrows. Meanwhile Team EU has: (1) the UK leaving; (2) severe drops in German industrial manufacturing; (3) a shrinking French economy; (4) yellow-vests in the streets; and (5) demands for greater economic autonomy from many key member states. Overlay Germany, France and Italy large economy challenges such as: their promise to meet NATO obligations – and their attachment to the strangling Paris Climate Treaty, and the EU’s collective economic position is precarious at best...   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/01/president-trump-announces-delegation-for-davos-worldwide-economic-forum-conference/ 
The Media Is Lying About The 
Attacks On The Embassy In Baghdad 
Yx_mcV7aSwJbuphtdHTInQfNE_K58MX8wn7uFGSeFs41pUDANwuA6bFOg2H--WMut-cWTyZu7sdQYMCfOIaRcT9ZAvwruTuJ8eTsiCIRbiEYIALnmu-ER5JmT8Pjvo5R1XeJkdAWD-UXwhX4fYIY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Erielle Davidson
{ thefederalist.com } ~ You can tell that the scumbag/liar-nObama administration’s legacy in the Middle East is in danger because the media, as the self-appointed janitors of that legacy, have gone into overdrive obfuscating the timing... context, and significance of this week’s attack on the United States embassy in Baghdad. Although President Donald Trump has gone a long way to dismantling scumbag/liar-nObama’s legacy in the region, much more remains to be done, including a halt to American taxpayer money that has been flowing into Iranian-controlled governments in Iraq and Lebanon.  Earlier this week Iran-backed militias stormed the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, chanting “Down, down USA!” and hurling water bottles and smashing security cameras. The attackers breached parts of the embassy and were only disbursed the next day, after Trump deployed Marines to ensure the safety of our embassy personnel and property. The attacks have been building for months, including roughly a dozen attacks on U.S. assets by these militias and American retaliatory strikes against five locations in Iraq and Syria belonging to the Iranian-backed Kata’ib Hezbollah. The group represents an ongoing replication of the “Islamic revolutionary model” that Iran first “exported” to and “perfected” in Lebanon in the early 1980s.  The New York Times has labeled the attackers “mourners” responding to the U.S. strikes, while the front page of the first Washington Post edition of 2020 labeled them “protesters.” The latter is a particularly pernicious mislabeling. The media has done its best to conflate the attacks with anti-Iran protests that have been happening across Iraq for the last three months, but of course those actual protesters are pro-Iraqi sovereignty demonstrators fed up with the corruption and the broad perception that the Iraqi government is controlled by Iran. Confirming exactly that accusation, the Iraqi government has repeatedly attacked the anti-Iran protesters, killing hundreds and wounding thousands, while giving a free pass and ready access to the Iran-backed fighters who stormed our embassy. The media’s goal is to characterize the protests as a wholesale rejection of Trump’s policies in the region, hence the wall-to-wall disinformation about mourning and protesting. What’s actually at stake is scumbag/liar-nObama’s legacy. The Iran Deal was a bargain in which Iran would be handed control over the Middle East in exchange for some temporary limitations on nuclear activities...
.
Climate Predictions – Doubling Down on Stupid
mAhNJgrNtzY6ICWX1wfun1XoEz6KazvSp9mLgTaZ0rC2Isj55TlscM7--TujcdmANklmbmQY8t3z7-PVOZx8iViyzHUdyhoBRmr5Da_jFlV03mj4W1s=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brian C Joondeph
{ americanthinker.com } ~ If the “science is settled” regarding global warming, climate change, extreme weather, or whatever it goes by these days, why are past predictions not more accurate?...Weather forecasting, although frequently off the mark, is usually fairly accurate. If snow is predicted, it typically falls. It may be a few inches more or less than predicted but it isn’t sunny and 80 degrees on a day a major snowstorm is forecast. Yet climate, which is a longer-term measure of weather, cannot be predicted with any more accuracy than flipping a coin or throwing dice. Let’s look at some past predictions. Almost twenty years ago, in 2004, the Guardian reported what U.S. defense officials at the Pentagon warned about the future climate: Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters. A secret report, suppressed by US defense chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world. The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies.  The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents. As 2020 has just arrived, let’s see how those predictions turned out. For New Year’s Day, London is predicted to have a high of 46 degrees. While in Novosibirsk, the largest city in Siberia, the New Year’s Day high was only 23 degrees. So much for “Britain is plunged into a Siberian climate by 2020.” London was Siberia at one time, but 200 years ago. Remember the snow and ice in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol? “Dickens grew up during the coldest years of the Little Ice Age, between 1805 to 1820.”...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/_climate_predictions__doubling_down_on_stupid.html   
One Barack scumbag/liar-nObama Deep state 
cover up is even worse than you think
LIe_gBi2__57P-wdjs3KnKYW0u4DEPR_zYxQkA9grhgrbPl31vi-NUOlfQwJbTUCiB5w1YfIVmMegf-uaxc0NcOhIietpMEJsw_EtBzikm3VvdBmgHVW3BzoSIleENWda8NRHXYmcCDpWTAqBsniu0qbdjj_-g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by renewedright.com ~ Barack scumbag/liar-nObama and his Deep State allies are still shielding their co-conspirators from criminal prosecution. The scumbag/liar-nObama Deep State is desperate to prevent the American people from knowing... the extent of the crimes committed against Donald Trump in the 2016 election. And one Barack scumbag/liar-nObama Deep state cover up is even worse than you think. Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on the FBI spying on the Trump campaign found 17 significant errors and omissions by the FBI in applications for FISA warrants to spy on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. The FISA court pretended to be outraged, but in reality is trying to continue the cover up by only ordering a review of FISA applications by a FBI lawyer accused of doctoring evidence, and not reassessing all FISA warrant applications by every FBI agent named in the report. Earlier this month, the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ordered the FBI to re-verify all previous warrant applications involving the FBI attorney who falsified evidence against the former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. However, Fox News has learned the court did not order the FBI to double-check warrant applications involving other officials who made key omissions and errors in warrant applications as the bureau sought to surveil Page. The FISC’s failure to request a comprehensive evaluation of previous submissions has stunned court-watchers who have questioned whether enough is being done to deter future misconduct by the FBI. In the past, the FISC has gone so far as to prohibit some FBI agents from appearing before the court after finding impropriety. In response to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s recent report into FBI surveillance abuses, FBI Director Christopher Wray has claimed that the agency “embraces the need for thoughtful, meaningful remedial action.” Congressional Republicans, however, remain unconvinced that the bureau will solve the problem on its own...
.
scumbag-James Comey
The 21st Century's Benedict Arnold
By John Leonard
{ americanthinker.com } ~ When I was a child, history was my favorite subject. I even took enough elective history classes at the collegiate level to earn a Bachelor of Arts degree with a double major in history and political science (pre-law)... I changed my major to business after watching Al Pacino overact while portraying a criminal defense attorney in the movie And Justice for All. I probably ought to write Mr. Pacino a letter thanking him for crushing my naïve fantasy of becoming a real-life Perry Mason. I should also thank God that Al Pacino never played the part of a software developer or a writer, because he probably would have killed any future interest in those professions as well. The only safe career for me might have been as a sanitation worker. If you've never seen the docudrama Turn, about General Washington's spies during the Revolutionary War, it is well worth the time to binge-watch and appreciate what America was like before it became the beacon of freedom and hope that I've been blessed and privileged to call home for my entire lifetime. I can virtually guarantee that everyone will learn something about the origin of our country they either never knew or had forgotten as some obscure footnote of history. For example, I clearly remembered that General Benedict Arnold was widely considered the most notorious traitor in U.S. history, but I couldn't remember specifically what he had done to betray General Washington and the Continental Army he negotiated to sell a map of our defenses at West Point to spymaster Major John Andre of the British Army or why the previously distinguished military hero would have done such a despicable deed. If Benedict Arnold hadn't escaped to England, he would have been hanged as a traitor. This makes for a nice segue to scumbag-James Comey, former FBI director and one of the lead conspirators in the plot to overthrow the presidency of Donald Trump. At minimum, scumbag-James Comey is guilty of sedition. If there was a crime like perjury for repeatedly lying through the mainstream media to the American people about a criminal conspiracy to overthrow our elected government, scumbag-Comey would probably get locked in a cell for the rest of his miserable life. Instead, this disgraceful excuse for a human being has thus far been rewarded for his treachery  with a multimillion-dollar deal to write a book irony alert! on loyalty. And if that isn't bad enough, the Washington Post just published one of the most disgusting "opinion" pieces in recent memory, authored by this disgraceful excuse for a former FBI director, in which he whines about being the target of Donald Trump's wrath while making absurd and audacious claims such as "Foreign leaders laugh at him and throw his letters in the trash." Yes, we've all seen the video of Macron and Trudeau laughing and making jokes at Trump's expense. Serious question: who cares what Macron or Trudeau thinks?...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Trump Administration's Record 
Bodes Well for 2020
WU97tKfRJgkGtukjZOEI6ew-A-WJq9Bf4-33hEAAekRC6g2EZwocUkvRoLbVDKC0E1QmbgP6CltL9MgdcGoXOtrCszU3vDJHWb5CAES2RFqo3Bt8_i0uH20hn0qAckv_BKj9oZcXTLSsjdUMyFudzJ7TDKlgDpc2J4L_Auw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  The new year is always a good time to reflect on blessings of the past and hope for the future. In that spirit, here’s a highlight reel of good stuff resulting from the Trump administration’s policy achievements.
 
  • Jobs are plentiful. The White House says seven million jobs have been created since Donald Trump’s election. Record numbers of Americans are employed, and wages are rising as employers compete for workers. The headline unemployment rate is at its lowest in 50 years, with minorities in particular enjoying the fruits of this labor.

  • The stock market has continued to break records, yielding benefits for the investment and retirement accounts of more than half of all Americans. The Dow Jones average rose 22% in 2019, while the S&P was up 29% and the NASDAQ climbed 35%. When Trump was elected, the market was pretty volatile, and New York Times economist Paul Krugman predicted, “If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.” Boy was he ever wrong.

  • Consumer optimism is reflected in year-end retail sales. Gary Bauer notes, “Retail sales surged 3.4% over last year, led by record online spending. The period between Thanksgiving and Christmas is a critical time for the economy. According to Reuters, sales during these few weeks can account for up to 40% of all annual sales for many retailers.”

  • Regulations reduced. Economic growth comes when government gets out of the way, contrary to the “stimulus” philosophy of the last administration. The White House says, “Since taking office, President Trump has rolled back nearly 8 regulations for every new one, saving American taxpayers more than $50 billion in the process — with bigger savings still to come.” That includes rolling back a lot of his predecessor’s environmental controls. The Daily Caller reports that Trump “nixed nearly 100 environmental regulations during his first three years in office.”

  • Not only has Trump cut red tape, he’s been slow to add new regulations. According to The Washington Times, “The Trump administration issued the fewest new regulations during 2019 than in any year since the government began keeping track more than four decades ago.” All three of the lowest regulation totals belong to President Trump.

  • Judicial appointments. Not all of Trump’s success has been economic. An astounding 20% of the federal judiciary is now composed of Trump appointments after the Republican-controlled Senate has confirmed 187 of his nominees. For the pace of that success, Republicans at least owe a wink and nod to former Democrat Senate Leader Harry Reid, who nuked the filibuster for judges in 2013. Judges were a big reason for millions of conservative votes in 2016, and Trump has delivered.

  • Defeating terrorists. After Barack scumbag/liar-nObama fomented the rise of the Islamic State, Trump has spent three years fighting back. It hasn’t been free of controversy, but it’s hard to argue with success like the death of ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi.

  • Other gains include military funding and rebuilding, immigration policy, and — we hope — trade.

Not bad for a guy Democrats have been hell-bent on impeaching. Meanwhile, 2020 is, of course, an election year and Americans will choose whether or not they want to stay this positive course. 

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67646?mailing_id=4776&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4776&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Thursday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Netanyahu asks Knesset for immunity 
from prosecution, delaying indictment
f3kFvqODDuI8DNV_E3yWvHLC8Gaa98yOYVcS-c1SHDO2hH__KH7jyWLfcOSRvZ3rz35mEH_qZFIm7nJnnT49IHA0vQCjzs7EIDWEXzrFddb8IYVM6x6YID7Zsg_fT52MLe-Nh-VZ3c_GTIGp-Cw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Raoul Wootliff
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Secretary Pompeo Cancels Travel Plans 
to Remain Focused on Iraq Crisis
VLmRtYYqgs7iPm9gkanQ8Xf747GEb3NVLBKc54ETQKEekPev4Zef9LgA4m_2_EDUtZ8sn-uozqgQzBM6mFUUiH6GVPgxF9_zuN_3ex7a0UyWt4bdYanQtGtspfyya0Q_FHAFMktBRjaF9RihMn497TGSTA0_gyAr=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ At the time of a Tuesday evening Fox News interview Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was affirming his trip to Ukraine was still planned. However, by the time Pompeo woke up on Wednesday morning those plans were cancelled…Perhaps someone told the secretary he needed to stay-attached to the crisis he helped inspire? U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Wednesday postponed a trip to Ukraine so he could focus on the situation in Iraq after demonstrators attacked the U.S. embassy. Supporters of Iranian-backed Iraqi paramilitary groups stormed the U.S. embassy’s perimeter and hurled rocks in two days of protests. They withdrew on Wednesday after Washington dispatched extra troops and threatened reprisals against Tehran. Pompeo postponed his trip to Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Cyprus “due to the need for the Secretary to be in Washington, D.C., to continue monitoring the ongoing situation in Iraq and ensure the safety and security of Americans in the Middle East,” State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus said in a statement. On Tuesday evening Pompeo had told Fox News the Ukraine trip was still on.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/01/secretary-pompeo-cancels-travel-plans-to-remain-focused-on-iraq-crisis/ 
Netanyahu quits ministerial positions
PrTASlQofdT7UoeZAy9piC2lBHKiZ_JBfxZZqiSRJI1Jo5NyKw_AiwwzH6-2wH3gpIPfN0DUdhjM-qMp2CVaLT86v0DWiHarezaOOjF_Vpe-no0TLobFlp0dy15C5ybo8AVSjTDAv1uaafV8a7lI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By GIL HOFFMAN
{ jpost.com } ~Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced shortly before midnight on Wednesday that he was quitting his cabinet posts because of his criminal indictments... Facing a High Court of Justice petition, Netanyahu announced on December 12 that he would drop all his portfolios on January 1 other then his role as prime minister. Beside being prime minister, Netanyahu was social welfare minister, Diaspora affairs minister and acting agricultural minister. He was also the health minister – until Sunday, when the cabinet approved the promotion of deputy health minister Ya’acov Litzman (United Torah Judaism).  The Movement for Quality Government in Israel had threatened a lawsuit for shaming the court if Netanyahu did not quit by Wednesday night. Netanyahu left on Thursday morning for Greece and will only be back on Sunday, which is the earliest possible day that new ministers can be appointed. Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely will be appointed Diaspora affairs minister after receiving a promise from Netanyahu’s chief of staff, Asher Hayon. Candidates for the Agriculture Ministry are MKs David Bitan and Nir Barkat. Shas sources said that MK Meshulam Nahari is a likely candidate for welfare minister. The resignations will only take effect 48 hours after they were issued at 11:45 p.m. on Wednesday night. Because the 25 hours of Shabbat are not counted, Netanyahu technically still remains in all three posts until Sunday...
.
Happy New Year! commie-Ocasio-Cortez's 
seat in Congress may vanish
X2RegZcapUtvalatW1sPYw8FXSDwR44ysRemIeDs6uXauS5IQxdkgFstxGoqSDyt-v4tKjWRBlWfeC55obZw-MsPclHrIEbasa2wzMrIshAP7WK9rSxUW8mVERX2GhdBqegoX-2JdhxDKD2ws-dIMi_4jWc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Joe Kovacs
{ wnd.com } ~ As the year 2020 rings in, one of the most controversial names in American politics may soon lose her seat in the House of Representatives... That well-known leftist figure is U.S. Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.  With this being the year of the 2020 Census, it's possible the Democrat's district could be completely eliminated. "New York is expected to lose a House seat after the 2020 Census, and state Democrats are looking to draw out @commie-AOC's district," pollster Frank Luntz tweeted on New Year's Eve. Luntz attached his comment to a story from the local New York City magazine known as the City, which proffered the notion that commie-Ocasio-Cortez is intensifying her efforts to persuade her constituents to fill out the Census to help keep her in office. "Our strategy is all about building trust in the community before the enumerators even come to your door," commie-Ocasio-Cortez told the magazine. "There's been an increased use of one's immigration status as a form of intimidation." A whopping 47 percent of the residents in commkie-AOC's district are foreign born, and many may fear filling out any official government count...   https://www.wnd.com/2020/01/happy-new-year-ocasio-cortezs-house-seat-may-vanish/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-breaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking 
ABC News Fears American People 
Might Interfere in 2020 U.S. Election
y-Gi8bZLbQQTi41NYOrRNsgHCzK1k3UivEhzegFYpeIMdJPSJF31H6Q2Bz5EI7euy2UC6W98zXaBRgAgldW1REnxydYvtrNd_DazrLFmEkjMqkXp3ZQ6UGM5t1mXuAU-3Ovj5QW63X0SmHM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Despite the initial reaction a stable-minded person would likely take away from the headline, it is a good thing that ABC News and other MSM have dropped their pretense and shallow-efforts to retain their open secrets... In this example while lamenting the outcome of the recent U.K. election that saw the socialists and leftists crushed by conservative and pragmatic voters, ABC is concerned the American people may end up similarly interfering in media objectives for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The problem they discover is this pesky concept called “freedom”.Consider this argument from the article: “One of the things that we’re always very cautious about is everyone looking at Russia. But actually, we should be looking at the party and political dynamics closer to home and how domestic actors are using the platforms and manipulating the systems to spread information or misinformation that’s favorable to their political stance.” I mean seriously. Can you imagine a world where U.S. politicians easily spread information favorable to their political stance. Oh.My.God…The outcome is almost unimaginable….People, allowed to think for themselves. Yikes, the horror of it.   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/01/abc-news-fears-american-people-might-interfere-in-2020-u-s-election/ 
Gregg Jarrett says McConnell should hold impeachment trial -- without liar-Pelosi's OK
x498vpxCh2O5aV-3vzqbYGScWMSWAlIe_0AtY-l6uTAMLF1gIWH4JRJ3UdSemY0yt7gHiLYPxrhKM9dfmnesgnWLrfGLvlhTfDn3gkMUwE6NL5jyGPYcautT-ozaZgNckJdu4I5LpeVIdh6gS2BvvaCV67QKxNpKGe8_bAJrMt8N_cqKCbg_8eU-CeGQR5a4MEhJap18zfCQaqS4VUpcYKmVpg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Victor Garcia
{ foxnews.com } ~ Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett blasted House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Friday for not sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial... and saying that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., should proceed with an impeachment trial without the Democratic leader's involvement. "The framers never envisioned a stunt pulled by a speaker of the House like liar-Nancy Pelosi holding onto articles of impeachment. Two decades ago it was sent over immediately, within minutes. There was a vote to convey and transmit it," Jarrett said on "Hannity." "The Constitution is actually silent about that. It doesn't say that the Senate has to wait until it's transmitted. It's simply a Senate rule." Jarrett advised McConnell to "alter the rule" and proceed with an impeachment trial. "Mitch McConnell shouldn't be subjecting himself to the extortion of liar-Nancy Pelosi," Jarrett said to guest host Tammy Bruce. "He can, beginning in January, simply alter the rule or eliminate it entirely and set a date for an impeachment trial." President Trump tore into House Democrats this week over their handling of the impeachment process, calling them "hypocrites" and "liars" for allegedly seeking concessions in the Senate that Republicans were not afforded in the House -- and for hitting pause on impeachment after previously portraying it as an urgent matter. Jarrett said McConnell could just ignore impeachment but that liar-Pelosi could use the articles to hurt Trump. "Mitch McConnell can say, 'Well, if you're not going to send them over, I don't care. We're not we're not going to deal with it,'" Jarrett said. "liar-Nancy Pelosi, though, could then use it as a cudgel to hit Trump over the head at every turn -- add things to it." "Simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it. Do it on your own terms," Jarrett advised McConnell.   https://www.foxnews.com/media/gregg-jarrett-says-mcconnell-can-move-forward-with-impeachment-trial-without-pelosi  
.
Judicial Watch Sues CIA And DOJ For 
Information On Alleged Whistleblower
V5KQkO5D7bs80NGcAwrjsMl9j7LezBAJ7rFsjgxuuFO8vgUceO9TiPlVprco1XYTzz3nekHOVEXzdKfZAWg-96G_QahItIplTxZkHJTLvSLj_chFXZbixRG79szZ6mpaqt8nsg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Sara Carter
{ saraacarter.com } ~ Judicial Watch announced Friday that it filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against both the  Department of Justice and CIA for information on the whistleblower... whose complaint led to the House Democratic impeachment of President Donald Trump. According to  numerous reports the alleged whistleblower is CIA employee Eric Ciaramella. Ciarmella allegedly worked on Ukraine issues while on detail to both President scumbag/liar-nObama and President Trump administrations. The whistleblower did not have first hand knowledge of any of the allegations submitted in the report to the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General and was protected by Democrats in the committee from testifying. There is significant public interest, thanks to the scumbag/liar-nObama Spygate scandal and the related abusive impeachment of President Trump, in what Eric Ciaramella was up to, Tom Fitton. Ciaramella’s name was circulating during the House impeachment proceedings and many Republican lawmakers wanted to call on him to testify, according to numerous Congressional sources. The sources stipulated that none of the Congressional members named Ciaramella publicly because of protections granted whistleblowers...   https://saraacarter.com/judicial-watch-sues-cia-and-doj-for-information-on-alleged-whistleblower/?utm_source=Darkwire+Inc&utm_campaign=16950ed04e-Jan+1&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5f3d745e4f-16950ed04e-283256057 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Netanyahu asks Knesset for immunity 
from prosecution, delaying indictment
f3kFvqODDuI8DNV_E3yWvHLC8Gaa98yOYVcS-c1SHDO2hH__KH7jyWLfcOSRvZ3rz35mEH_qZFIm7nJnnT49IHA0vQCjzs7EIDWEXzrFddb8IYVM6x6YID7Zsg_fT52MLe-Nh-VZ3c_GTIGp-Cw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Raoul Wootliff

{ timesofisrael.com } ~ Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu officially announced Wednesday night that he would ask the Knesset for immunity from prosecution in the three criminal cases against him.

Netanyahu made the statement in a nationally televised appearance four hours before a midnight deadline, defending the decision as protection from “trumped-up charges.”

“In order to continue to lead Israel to great achievements, I intend to approach the speaker of the Knesset in accordance with chapter 4C of the law (Hebrew link), in order to fulfill my right, my duty and my mission to continue to serve you for the future of Israel,” he said.

 An official request was later submitted to Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein from a law firm retained by Netanyahu.

Moments after the announcement, Yisrael Beytenu leader Avigdor Liberman announced his party would oppose immunity, drastically complicating Netanyahu’s prospects of winning the necessary 61 votes he will need. But the request effectively freezes the criminal process against him until the Knesset rules on the matter — a process which, due to parliament’s dissolution last month ahead of new elections, could buy Netanyahu several months until a formal indictment can be filed with the Jerusalem District Court.

The premier has been charged with fraud and breach of trust in three criminal cases and bribery in one of them.

Days after giving a speech in which he defended immunity as a “cornerstone of democracy,” the prime minister repeated his claims that he was the victim of persecution by authorities, and asserted that “immunity is intended to protect elected representatives from trumped up charges. It was intended to ensure that those elected by the people can serve the people, according to the will of the people.”

The ask essentially sets up the upcoming March 2 election as a referendum on Netanyahu and his legal troubles. The Likud leader’s allies have presented the judicial proceedings as an undemocratic attempt to remove him from power and have begun campaigning on the idea of voting Likud as a way of protecting the prime minister from prosecution.

Touting his accomplishments as prime minister over the past decade, Netanyahu said: “I intend to keep leading Israel for many more years to historic achievements which I am working towards day and night… achievements we could once only dream of and which are now within reach.” He vowed to stop Iran, set Israel’s permanent borders, sign a defense pact with the US, obtain more peace agreements with Arab states, and extend Israeli sovereignty into the territories.

The premier’s announcement came after months in which he has remained evasive when questioned about his intentions on the matter, and in one case told Channel 12 during an interview “no way,” when asked if he would make any move to thwart his indictment.

On Wednesday he defended that statement, saying he continued to stand behind his words and insisting he would not avoid an eventual day in court.

“Immunity is always temporary. It is canceled at the end of the term of the Knesset that gave it. By law there is no way for anyone to avoid prosecution. So when I was asked by Channel 12 ‘Will you push for a law or move that will prevent you from being prosecuted?’ I said no. Tonight I once again say ‘No way.’ I did not advance any law or change any law. I intend to go to court and destroy all the preposterous claims against me [after leaving office].”

He once again alluded to a conspiracy against him, accusing authorities of engaging in “trumped-up charges, selective enforcement, blackmail of state’s witnesses” and more. He claimed exonerating information was “being held in the shadows under gag orders and attorney general decisions.”

Under a 2005 change to the Knesset immunity law, members of the legislature no longer receive automatic immunity from prosecution but must request it from the plenum when relevant. Netanyahu is apparently planning to base his petition on clauses in the immunity law that allow an MK to ask for protection from prosecution under the claim that an indictment has been filed in “bad faith” or while discriminating against the defendant, and/or that prosecution would counter the will of the electorate.

 Despite Netanyahu’s assertion that any immunity would be temporary, his actual request sent to Edelstein indicated otherwise: the prime minister’s lawyers wrote he was asking for functional immunity in one of the three cases against him as well as in certain aspects of another. Functional immunity protects parliamentarians from prosecution for things they did in fulfilling their parliamentary work, and is permanent, rather than temporary. Procedural immunity is temporary, and has to do with offenses committed by a parliamentarian that are unrelated to his parliamentary work.

Netanyahu’s attorneys, in their request to the Knesset speaker, asserted that his actions in Case 2000 — in which he is suspected of an illicit quid pro quo deal with Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper publisher Arnon Mozes that would weaken a rival daily — fell under the purview of functional immunity as “all that is attributed to him in this charge was done by the prime minister as part of his work as a Knesset member.”

They also said his alleged attempts to extend tax exemptions for returning expats to aid billionaire Arnon Milchan, under Case 1000, deserved functional immunity “as here too the indictment attributes actions to the prime minister carried out as part of his work as a Knesset member, in the framework of reviewing potential legislation.”

Issuing a scathing response even before Netanyahu’s presser was over, Liberman said his party would oppose the immunity request.

“Now it is clear beyond doubt. The only thing that has interested and interests Netanyahu is immunity,” Liberman wrote in a Facebook post. “The State of Israel has become a hostage to Netanyahu’s personal problem. He doesn’t care about left or right, religious or secular. The only thing that concerns him is a coalition for immunity. The rest is old wives’ tales.”

Blue and White chairman Benny Gantz said Netanyahu’s announcement showed the premier “knows he is guilty.” Gantz said his party would push for the establishment of the Knesset House Committee so the immunity request can be debated by parliament quickly.

Gantz said the country now faced a choice between “the Kingdom of Netanyahu… or the State of Israel.”

Netanyahu’s announcement came four hours before his midnight deadline to make the request or forfeit his right to do so. Some reports suggested that the decision came down to the wire, with the premier’s inner circle deeply uncertain about the move.

Reports on Channel 12, Channel 13 and Kan said Netanyahu’s advisers were concerned that an immunity request, seen as unpopular among the general public, could hurt the prime minister’s chances in the March 2 election and make him less likely to be able to cobble together a majority coalition following the national poll — a feat he also failed to achieve in 2019’s two elections.

The prime minister is far from assured of getting majority support for immunity and many pundits believe his bid will not succeed. But failing to make the request would have meant the criminal process against him would immediately move forward.

His request must now by weighed by the Knesset House Committee before it can be voted upon by the plenum, but due to the lack of a functioning legislature amid ongoing political deadlock, and with new elections set, there is currently no functioning House Committee. The Knesset will thus likely only be able to review and decide on his request after a coalition is formed — if it is finally formed — following the March 2 vote.

Netanyahu’s chief rivals in the Knesset, the Blue and White party, are seeking to expedite the process. Party MK Avi Nissenkorn has asked Knesset Speaker Edelstein to swiftly call a meeting of the Knesset Arrangements Committee, which Nissenkorn heads, to discuss the possibility of forming a House Committee under the special circumstances to discuss Netanyahu’s request.

The matter is legally contentious, and led recently to mud-slinging and arguments as to whether the Arrangements Committee has the authority to form a House Committee during a transitional government.

Blue and White complained Wednesday that Edelstein was delaying the process, responding that he was abroad until the weekend, and wished to meet with the Knesset’s legal adviser before reviewing Nissenkorn’s request.

“Edelstein’s response is a shameful attempt to prevent the Knesset from discussing Netanyahu’s immunity request. We would not have imagined that the Knesset speaker would use his statesman’s position to turn the Israeli Knesset into a shelter [from prosecution],” Blue and White said in a statement.

In recent days Netanyahu had described his right to immunity as “a cornerstone of democracy.”

A request from the Knesset for immunity is seen as unpopular among voters, even among many of the prime minister’s supporters. A poll published Sunday evening by Channel 12 news found that 51 percent of Israelis oppose such a move, while only 33% support it.

Channel 13 television news reported Monday that Netanyahu had already formulated his request and informed Edelstein of his intention to submit it.

The unsourced television report said that Netanyahu wrote in the letter that he would be willing to face criminal prosecution, but only after he left political life.

He reportedly argued that trying him now would compromise the will of the electorate and harm the Knesset, since many of the witnesses in the trial are current lawmakers; that it would discriminate against him, since indictments haven’t been filed against other politicians; and that the charges were announced in “bad faith,” since Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit made his decision too soon after the pre-indictment hearing, and the process was marred by numerous leaks to the press.

Edelstein’s office rejected the report, with a spokesperson telling The Times of Israel late Monday: “No request has been made.”

Earlier on Monday, Netanyahu’s staff invited the media to a live statement to the press for 8 p.m., only to cancel it just half an hour later. Netanyahu was believed to have planned to formally announce he would be seeking immunity.

It was not immediately clear why Netanyahu canceled the announcement, which came shortly before hundreds of his supporters gathered Monday evening at Habima Square in Tel Aviv to protest against the criminal cases and support his immunity bid.

Mandelblit in November announced his intention to indict the prime minister in three corruption cases. Netanyahu is charged with fraud and breach of trust in all three cases, as well as bribery in one of them. He denies wrongdoing and has accused police and state prosecutors of an “attempted coup” against him.

In a related development, the High Court of Justice on Tuesday morning held a preliminary hearing on whether a lawmaker facing criminal indictment can be tapped to form a coalition. Ruling against the possibility of tasking an indicted lawmaker with forming a government would immensely complicate Netanyahu’s position. The court indicated its wariness on making such a fateful ruling during the election period and after concluding the session said that a decision would be handed down at a later date.

The cloud of corruption charges hanging over the premier is widely seen as one of the chief reasons he has failed to form a government in the wake of two elections in 2019. Blue and White has repeatedly said it would not join a coalition under Netanyahu so long as he is suspected of criminal wrongdoing.
Read more…

Thurs/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Ted Cruz Demolishes Mayor Pete's Malicious 
Lie About the Founders and Slavery
z7IwIfvSHNaSbGQj08U2xc72qdoDFg54A-xXVbLeFNXwQWWs0SDGE-blWPnEa1SGPgd9gLXUTTZA5cPZCQoU5kR9tJQKofXMrCIoucNQ9hT5EckcdtjY-_y7dZ78bX9LB09rsvdLu8FoFOWNUlrViGSNhVyNEjb-Nkc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By TYLER O'NEIL
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Thursday Top News Executive Summary
jY5fvDfbZaDZSgfxxB5HRuBnYVa4HTmwkKCblzyw1Bc3rgIMR-emZE4rWXla5Cyssw0yGJM4msrHKcnQ9bdBxi7mTTk9xNKStkMYWRClQAgFxqsZagQ-Z6MtvuP_cyuO71m7gj9c5la8tL27rmQf4Td15AWPgJIAeKM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Media Editors:  Above the Fold


PROXY WAR: Iran-backed militiamen withdraw from U.S. embassy but Iraq tensions linger (Associated Press)

THANKS, scumbag/liar-nOBAMA: In 2011, scumbag/liar-nObama met with one of the leaders in Baghdad embassy attack (PJ Media)

Government & Politics


CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: Trump honored with “Bipartisan Justice Award” by black leaders (The Western Journal)

TOO GOOD TO IGNORE: CBS News reporter highlights minority improvements under Trump as most underreported story (The Daily Wire)

MASSIVE: commie-Bernie Sanders tops Democrat field with massive $34.5 million haul in fourth quarter (ABC News)

MORE MASSIVE: Trump camp raises $46 million in final quarter; reelect team says impeachment drove best haul to date (The Washington Times)

MAGA: Trump beats own record for fewest new regulations issued in a year (The Washington Times)

POLITICAL FUTURES: New census data suggests previous report wrong: Republican states gaining seats in Congress (The Daily Wire)

DECADE REWIND


PRESENTED IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER: The 24 most absurd PC moments of the 2010s (National Review)

DECADE OF DEBT: Federal debt up more than $10 trillion in 2010s (CNSNews.com)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: A New Year’s revolution for Iran (Issues & Insights)

POLICY: GOP should “double down” on tax cuts 2.0 (The Heritage Foundation)

SATIRE: scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton slams Trump for not taking a more “hands-off” approach to embassy attack (The Babylon Bee)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/67643?mailing_id=4776&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4776&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body     
Trump Responds to Iran
“This is Not a Warning, it is a Threat”
mzYpzkvQLsgh1nYiDg0jQIzhem0oqH1dKyK-NcoSeMXkRv20EhwLt7TWDXkgD5rVbBr3T8R3oNgd6HBncQgu64Uq88Nu2Hk0Ku3SkEC8IxB30zTm-U2E9eMKLaICIeuDj7BaWsat9CTTAbE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ President Trump responds to the domestic and foreign alignment of provocations. President Trump doesn’t have too many options here. However... he’s a much more cunning adversary than the Deep State has faced previously.  Strategically a good decision to head-off those carrying the banners in the war parade. Secretary Pompeo, Secretary Asper, Joint Chiefs’ Milley have an alignment of domestic interests well organized. Resounding applause will be heard from The State Department, the Pentagon, the CIA, Nikki Haley, Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham, John Bolton, Tom Cotton, Adam Kinzinger, Mark Levin, rino-Mitt Romney and a host of well positioned senators, soon to be jurists…. The domestic warning was akin to ‘we can create a Benghazi, watch‘.  POTUS takes the energy from the threat, uses a little judo adding his own energy, and controls the outcome. “Happy New Year” is akin to “Relax, I got this“…. So now we watch.   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/31/president-trump-responds-to-iran-this-is-not-a-warning-it-is-a-threat/ 
Corey Lewandowski announces 
decision on running for US Senate seat
eajek8-qC1UTJf1zQAoMUrI9NC91C0NSlukP-6xx4XnRd-gJdr_Y7G7_kXD882m9bayjvgjjAA20Dy_lsaG1J2nWErajcCuUEgUhwwCl8s71vxmcbty3S6GF9Qd-id4Ansq2NwIR=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Chuck Ross  
{ dailycallernewsfoundation.org } ~ Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Tuesday he will not run for Senate in New Hampshire... where he was considering a challenge of Democratic incumbent Jeanne Shaheen. “After much consideration I have decided to forgo a campaign for the US Senate,” Lewandowski wrote on Twitter. “While taking on a career politician from the Washington swamp is a tall order, I am certain I would have won. My priorities remain my family and ensuring that @realDonaldTrump is re-elected POTUS.”  Lewandowski has been toying for months with a Senate run, and President Donald Trump encouraged him to do so during a New Hampshire rally in August. Lewandowski launched a website for a potential Senate run Sept. 17, during a break while he was testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. “I am truly humbled by the outpouring of support I have received from people across New Hampshire and the country,” Lewandowski wrote on Twitter. Lewandowski was fired from the Trump campaign June 20, 2016, but has remained one of the president’s most ardent defenders. He has not held a job at the White House, but is considered an informal adviser to Trump.  http://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2019/12/31/corey-lewandowski-isnt-running-for-us-senate-seat/   
Trump says he will go 
to Beijing for 'phase two' of trade talks
ILhkwjx7zx7IKESZVY3WOL0BZNxi8gE--Wej4N_CWQYm1Bpo-HzOoLqkR2JHSkH3HtZKpeNNYTYakXmNYaJLexqKCL7tjlgLZhDrHWU-QzNevb42KXoSClS1sOM7sG8ibyKPb_jHhu2PkQLbp1tAR92a3GxmP_0BLtOR57gigLPe24KTN78-9n-ME_FwZO1HfEftLAk9yDLDT_h0itYoF1Jz0X1zlXybNFCnudo3eE5ij57JOqrGjHw43rUgv3AhJwsXjN8AbqtcAzwdTFUejaUi8djBsbEsFx3HklBi9p2gs0g0vDmLCINSBVydkvPvS-r5OxSwWjXFhG8h2Do=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Sean Higgins
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ President Trump said that he will head to Beijing next year to begin "phase two" of trade talks with China... following a Jan. 15 signing ceremony for "phase one" of the deal. "I will be signing our very large and comprehensive Phase One Trade Deal with China on January 15. The ceremony will take place at the White House. High level representatives of China will be present. At a later date I will be going to Beijing where talks will begin on Phase Two!" Trump tweeted Tuesday. The current talks involve firming up details regarding a trade agreement that was reached in October. Progress in the talks has been slow as China has been reluctant to commit details to writing and demanded the White House roll back existing tariffs. The White House has said the talks will likely have three phases. The administration has placed tariffs of 25% on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods and 7.5% tariffs on another $120 billion worth of goods. Beijing had tariffs of up to 25% on $185 billion worth of U.S. goods.
.
Attacks on Jews in NYC and 
Media Double Standards
00d70UqyJJBovEyDg2JrQwKjaqwonx3hn83ioSbZ8HchvZGLXNlGNUI4ViS7vdc2Prn7W4uYCEF4OPdds5hCUovW26AeMwLxi1V3s8fNw6ilnkbFVRef8d9PjPyZFm38W_Ro7zYchKdFGTW5YrQOVGCl3uF9PSESdZ0_ZguxHWtLhXtT=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Danusha V. Goska
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ December 26, 2019, the day after Christmas, those Americans who emerged from their holiday celebrations to check world headlines were in for a shock... Police reported several attacks on Jews in New York. Americans don't think of their largest city, a world center of finance and the arts, a cosmopolitan capital where one can enjoy cuisine from any continent at any hour of the day or night, as a place where Jews are unsafe on the streets. New York is the city of Seinfeld, of Woody Allen and three-time mayor Michael Bloomberg. Former Mayor David Dinkins famously called New York a "gorgeous mosaic" of diverse peoples. But in fact, these Christmas-and-Hanukkah-week attacks were part of a trend. As bad as they were, worse was yet to come. On Saturday, December 28, Rabbi Chaim Rottenberg and his guests celebrated the closing nights of Hanukkah in Monsey, a suburb north of Manhattan. An intruder burst into the home and stabbed five people. Recent attacks on Jews in New York City typically involve unprovoked punching, cursing, and hurling of objects ranging from soft drinks to large and potentially deadly stones. Victims range from children to the elderly, and include mothers accompanied by their babies. Attackers sometimes yell anti-Semitic comments.  Videos reveal that attackers are frequently black. In one startling video from November 4, 2018, a group of young African Americans congregate outside a Brooklyn synagogue, talk among themselves, hurl a pole through the synagogue window, and then run away. In another attack, a Jewish man is walking down the sidewalk when what appears to be a black youth runs up behind him and punches him hard in the head, nearly knocking him over. In a March, 2019 assault, an apparently healthy, young man kicks a toddler's stroller being pushed by the child's mother. Attacks are not always violent. In one videotaped confrontation, a black woman screamed verbal abuse at a Jewish man on the New York City subway. On December 10, 2019, David Anderson and Francine Graham killed four people in Jersey City, just across the Hudson River from Manhattan. Deceased victims include Police Detective Joseph Seals, Leah Ferencz, owner of a kosher grocery store, Moshe Deutsch, a rabbinical student and a shopper at that store, and Douglas Rodriguez, a store employee and immigrant from Ecuador. Shooter David Anderson was an anti-Semite who had been influenced by the Black Hebrew Israelites, who claim that Jews are not really Jewish, and that the characters in the Bible were all really black. In this ideology, contemporary Jews are labeled "imposter Jews" and "so-called Jews." This idea is not limited to violent extremists. On December 14, Saturday Night Live comic Kenan Thompson referred to "historically correct black Jesus." Jersey City killer  David Anderson used the word "imposter" to refer to modern-day Jews. Anderson and Graham's killings were classified as a terrorist incident and a hate crime. The New Jersey attorney general said that the killers "had a tremendous amount of firepower. They had a pipe bomb in their van." In the wake of this attack, Jersey City school board member Joan Terrell-Paige appeared to attempt to justify it. Terrell-Paige called "jews," as she spelled the word, in lower-case, "brutes," and said that people should seek a "message" in the killers' actions...
.
scumbag-Soros’ War Against the Jews
thzfRYouzg9N7V4jNJEu1oASUQtBXZMtKrrkjr79LEkh54bmk6k2zvXl5ey4oIk4VccgjA7BbR1BxmHBa7lIeQSww25CUcwq_DieCUMKPQpXldsJBrveQIgKwzZcWDyN3CBqahS_Z4Z5wLZiAOYicaNpCSi-VtsYAaF8qlQAWYFGKYgAAF0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Daniel Greenfield
{ frontpagemag.com } ~ When scumbag-George Soros hit middle age, he began seeing a shrink. The ruthless financier's problem was that he was burdened with an "oversized" sense of shame over a "guilty secret"... That guilty shameful secret which sent scumbag-Soros to a psychoanalyst was "Jewishness".scumbag-Soros’ Jewish problem was generational. He grew up in, in his own words, a "Jewish, anti-Semitic home" He had adopted his father Tivadar’s worldview, that God was a human invention. It was Tivadar who forged and sold documents to Jews trying to escape the Holocaust, charging "wealthy clients", as he put it, "whatever the market would bear". And it was Tidavar who found his teenage son a place with a Hungarian fascist official who was confiscating Jewish property. In his biography, Tivadar later described the trip to confiscate Jewish property as a move by the "kind-hearted" Nazi collaborator to "cheer the unhappy lad up" where after a dose of watching the persecution of Jews, "he quickly regained his spirits". scumbag-Soros would later describe this, a period that most Jews remember as a time of utter horror, as “the most exciting time of my life” or an “adventure”. Tivadar’s amorality thoroughly infected his son. In an infamous 60 Minutes interview, which the scumbag-Soros network and his media allies have worked hard to spin, scumbag-Soros coolly agreed that he had "helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.” Then denied any feelings of guilt. "It’s just like in the markets — that if I weren’t there — of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would," he observed. It echoed his response to allegations of hurting the British economy. “When you speculate in the financial markets, you are free of most of the moral concerns that confront an ordinary businessman.”...   https://cms.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2019/12/soros-war-against-jews-daniel-greenfield   
Israel Finally Gets Help in 
the War Against Iran
Rp2s72Dk9rb6GsLcitUHNR0jhhXM2uy-_YtIxKjhjrPCNfcotFvNVj9m3p5E5vBjvFUGQ0BGJao60yjIr3o0sRZc6ytU-dkvj_ysJBFW5KUoKN0xXhpsj9jtXIpGV42DxBVM9fE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Yochanan Visser  
{ israeltoday.co.il } ~ On Sunday, Israel finally got help from the US military in the battle against Iran and its numerous proxies in the Middle East... when American warplanes fired more than 30 missiles at 5 bases of the Kata’ib Hezbollah militia in both Iraq and Syria. US F-15 Strike Eagles bombed weapon depots and command centers of Kata’ib Hezbollah meaning: battalion of the party of God killing 25 members of the militia which is part of the Iranian-backed al-Hashd al-Shaabi umbrella organization of predominantly Shiite militias in Iraq. Kata’ib Hezbollah is believed getting its orders from Qassem Soleimani the crafty commander of the Quds Force, the branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) which is tasked with exporting the Islamic Revolution of 1979 in Iran. The American attack took place after Kata’ib Hezbollah on Friday attacked a US military facility in the vicinity of the Kurdish city of Kirkuk in northern Iraq killing an American contractor and wounding four US soldiers. Jonathan Hoffman the US Deputy Secretary of Defense said that the attack was a response to “repeated Kata’ib Hezbollah attacks on Iraqi bases that host Operation Inherent Resolve coalition forces” a reference to the US-led international coalition of forces that fought ISIS in both Syria and Iraq. The attack on US personnel in Iraq was anticipated for a long time after Kata’ib Hezbollah and other al-Hashd al-Shaabi militias demanded that all US forces leave Iraq thereby paving the way for the completion of the so-called Iranian land-bridge from Tehran to the Mediterranean Sea and the Israeli Golan Heights. When the Americans didn’t give in Kata’ib Hezbollah and other militias belonging to al-Hashd al-Shaabi started to launch missiles and mortars at US facilities in Iraq such as the American embassy in Baghdad’s Green Zone...  https://www.israeltoday.co.il/read/analysis-israel-finally-gets-help-in-the-war-against-iran/  
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Ted Cruz Demolishes Mayor Pete's Malicious 
Lie About the Founders and Slavery
z7IwIfvSHNaSbGQj08U2xc72qdoDFg54A-xXVbLeFNXwQWWs0SDGE-blWPnEa1SGPgd9gLXUTTZA5cPZCQoU5kR9tJQKofXMrCIoucNQ9hT5EckcdtjY-_y7dZ78bX9LB09rsvdLu8FoFOWNUlrViGSNhVyNEjb-Nkc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By TYLER O'NEIL

{ pjmedia.com } ~ Speaking to schoolchildren, 2020 Democrat Mayor Pete Buttigieg insisted that the authors of the Constitution "did not understand that slavery was a bad thing." Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) demolished this claim with direct quotes from the Founders, who very much understood the evil of slavery but compromised on the issue in order to keep the early United States together.

Buttigieg addressed the amendment process, saying that the Founders "were wise enough to realize that they didn’t have all the answers and that some things would change. A good example of this is something like slavery or civil rights. It’s an embarrassing thing to admit but the people who wrote the Constitution did not understand that slavery was a bad thing."

Mayor Pete was correct that the Founders instituted the amendment process in the Constitution partially because they were humble enough to realize things would change. In fact, the amendment process is the correct way for the government to recognize new rights, not Supreme Court interventions like Roe v. Wade (1973).

However, Buttigieg was entirely off base to suggest the Founders did not understand the evils of slavery. In fact, many of them acknowledged the evils of slavery, but they compromised in order to hold the new nation together. As Matt Spalding wrote for the Heritage Foundation, "Those who founded this nation chose to make practical compromises for the sake of establishing in principle a new nation dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."

Ted Cruz rebuked Buttigieg by posting a string of direct quotes from the Founders.

"Slavery is an evil of Colossal magnitude & I am utterly averse to the admission of slavery into the Missouri Territories. It being among my first wishes to see some plan adopted by which slavery in this country may be abolished by law," Cruz quoted from John Adams, a Founding Father and the second president.

"Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature," he quoted from Benjamin Franklin, who was a member of an abolitionist society. "Neither my tongue, nor my pen, nor purse shall be wanting to promote the abolition of what to me appears so inconsistent with humanity and Christianity."

"Who talks most about freedom and equality? Is it not those who hold a bill of Rights in one hand and a whip for affrighted slaves in the other?" Cruz quoted from Alexander Hamilton, an abolitionist and the first secretary of the Treasury.

"It is much to be wished that slavery may be abolished," John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, wrote. "The honor of the States as well as justice and humanity, in my opinion, loudly call upon them to emancipate these unhappy people. ... To contend for our own liberty, and to deny that blessing to others, involves an inconsistency not to be excused."

The Northwest Ordinance, one of the very first laws passed under both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, explicitly excluded slavery from the Northwest Territory, which would become the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and part of Minnesota. This set the precedent that slavery would not be allowed to expand into federal territories,  setting the stage for a debate that would escalate into the Civil War.

The Founders compromised on banning the slave trade, restricting Congress from doing so until 1808 — in order to appease the southern states. Yet Congress did indeed ban the slave trade as soon as possible.

Buttigieg should know these things — he majored in history and literature at Harvard. Yet the identity politics narrative simplifies the complex history of the Founders, painting them as evil rich old white oppressors. Perhaps Mayor Pete has allowed himself to get infected by a little too much "woke"ness.
Read more…

Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
New California Laws Spell Trouble for Cops, 
Workers, Housing Providers
Yupxvn8eKT_rNo1PNRsPxCoCGEqCVyfNBDpXKSmogyfE0r_gXtgFzw658A4gdyI_d1eg84wTg4uIe17gYvCznstYtUN8HDgpPS4_BZn9vLvG_d-5ptuEDKo_8Hsjc-R8qSryCmwlYDs1lMYjFUxLWuKNukYVwn7BW2Gk_fO7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Israel’s Foreign Minister Warns 
Iran Not to ‘Drag Us Into’ Iraq Crisis
Tz41G39Dvg1KhbCkcUqgharFlLCFxK7wVWU1nNaCL4FMKq9m3UkSK49wVpHnQta_iOHOhMOLSJneKIPV8kA9wtNodNbSaY1XMy8c0lckWXgnku7kyebeT4-l8t4Z5Ni_s-rk8_r1W0q6ghWjNt4QL5Jn8AmJmw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Benjamin Kerstein
{ algemeiner.com } ~ Israeli Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz said on Tuesday that the Tehran regime should not try to drag Israel into the crisis... surrounding the violent riots outside the US Embassy in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad by a pro-Iran mob. If it did so, he warned, “We will respond powerfully.”“From Israel’s perspective,” Katz said, according to Israeli news site Mako, “if Iran tries to drag us into this, beyond demonstrators screaming, ‘Death to Israel,’ we will respond powerfully. I advise Iran not to test our patience.” “This is a dramatic development,” Katz said of the unrest, adding that Iran had a “mistaken understanding of the essence of the American superpower.” “When the US decides to react, they do it powerfully,” he asserted. “They’ve proved that historically.” “Not just the secretary of state, but also President Donald Trump said that this attack on the embassy was carried out by Iran and it will be answered,” Katz noted.
.
Prosecutor John Durham Looking into Ex-CIA Director scumbag/commie-Brennan’s 
Role in Russia Hoax
H6oPklK5FGZyMSeYplWxadv_WvxBf9A9sEC5ny6OkdiKO4-Se5XdZANukCx0TB2EfINLtbTX_Tkh5QMpNkGsmczGg1MXh9wgvm_jW58HwIZxbZD1Zo6Adi3FndmQQkIMxhsfVhE2cvEnhklXYZLi0MVXhcj8Xw-OJ1A_E2mXjmXGbehLJHbHYqziS5TAcWlXVPuEr1un7hmpYwg43De6caQiJlthbSE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by EDWIN MORA
{ breitbart.com  } ~ The federal prosecutor probing the origins of the Russia-collusion hoax has requested “emails, call logs and other documents” from scumbag/commie-John Brennan... former President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s CIA director turned NBC and MSNBC contributor, the New York Times reported Thursday.  Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor charged with conducting the review into the origins of the Russia collusion probe, “wants to learn what Mr. scumbag/commie-Brennan told other officials, including the former FBI director scumbag-James B. Comey, about his and the C.I.A.’s views of a notorious dossier of assertions about Russia and Trump associates,” the Times noted, adding: Mr. Durham’s pursuit of Mr. scumbag/commie-Brennan’s records is certain to add to accusations that Mr. Trump is using the Justice Department to go after his perceived enemies. The president has long attacked Mr. scumbag/commie-Brennan as part of his narrative about a so-called deep state cabal of scumbag/liar-nObama administration officials who tried to sabotage his campaign, and Mr. Trump has held out Mr. Durham’s investigation as a potential avenue for proving those claims. scumbag/commie-Brennan is considered an ardent critic of the Trump administration. Durham is also investigating whether scumbag/commie-Brennan “privately contradicted his public comments, including May 2017 testimony to Congress, about both the dossier and about any debate among the intelligence agencies over their conclusions on Russia’s interference,” the Times learned...
.
5 Predictions For The Next 
Five Years Of Global Power Struggles 
oiMuUBDOLRxPorGrgD8qUBCClqBrlnJGxxuc44OIfwbAvR_EiD08QS0pTuC6W-xwKUyQyZ56-8Ry0_BnnaZ_b6Oe-Ta3zOf8hOTJf5JCvJvymoRUgFlXn5wT2uRXNkmLVk30ZL4lJy0TRG_uVzOlO8gIDkK4nxzb=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Edward Chang
{ thefederalist.com } ~ In 2008, as the scumbag/liar-nObama administration prepared to take control in Washington, retired Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey offered a list of bold predictions for the coming five years... Some of them bore out: The economy performed well globally despite the Great Recession, relations with Russia became more hostile without devolving into outright dysfunction, and the United States withdrew from Iraq right at the 36-month mark, which McCaffrey specified. Other predictions, such as a North Korean collapse, improved prospects for success in Afghanistan following a massive commitment of resources, and a nuclear breakout for Iran, never occurred. A year later, geopolitical analyst George Friedman published the widely read “The Next 100 Years.” Like McCaffrey, Friedman correctly predicted a new cold war between the United States and Russia, but he also foresaw the emergence of Turkey as a major regional power, the consequences of demographic change in Europe and North America, and tensions between the United States and Mexico as instability in Latin America threatens to generate a crisis on the southern border. Friedman got some things wrong, to be sure, but the number of things he got right is fascinating. Making accurate predictions is no easy feat, leading some to take the “wait and see” approach. However, I offer six predictions, in no particular order, that will have serious implications for American national security and foreign policy in the 2020s. 1. Russia Will Lose Great Power Status 2. China Will Double Down on Authoritarianism 3. Japan Will Rise as Asia’s Powerhouse 4. Germany Will Flirt with the Idea of Leaving the EU 5. Latin America Will Become America’s No.1 National Security Challenge...
.
Mexican Cop Arrested In Connection 
To Massacre Of American Mormon Family
BBmj0rJcMHpIbcNi5ZRc2Z4KPsHBinB8zxNtPJDbgQRsD6j5eG5AvSNFkusdL629yWNmsZ3S936mv3udqL2RICemk7_x--nrIs3YYUrIt_GsYBg5jPRK=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by JASON HOPKINS
{ dailycaller.com } ~ In a shocking development in the hunt to locate those responsible for the massacre of nine U.S. citizens at the hands of suspected cartel gunmen... authorities arrested a Mexican police chief. Federal authorities arrested Fidel Alejandro Villegas, the police chief of Janos, a small town in the state of Chihuahua, earlier this week, Mexico’s Public Security Ministry  announced Friday. Villegas is suspected of not only being involved in local organized crime, but of also having a hand in the killings that took place in November. The arrest confirms a longstanding criticism of the country’s law enforcement: that many are on cartels’ payroll. “It’s common knowledge down here that the police work with the criminals,” Julián LeBarón, a relative of the victims, told The New York Times. “They have a monopoly on security and they get paid a wage for protection, and later we find out that they participate in the murder of women and children,” he continued. “These people take resources to protect us and they are murderers themselves.” The arrest follows the Nov. 4 murders of a binational Mexican-American Mormon family. While driving through a remote area near the southern border, the family was suddenly gunned down by suspected members of a cartel. The massacre left three women and their six children — two of whom were infants — dead. It’s still not entirely clear why the family was targeted, but authorities suspect they were mistakenly suspected of belonging to a rival cartel...  https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/28/mexican-police-chief-arrested-mormon/  
.
Giant Star That’s Acting Strange 
Could Explode Soon, Scientists Say
VxjJJAVa8dNeCAcdsMP9IMieFtl-HhhMEYihkMpQeNUIx6ABDKMedT4MD9rzxqSV0rVMYmGyc8Vllnfe3qQGB7Y5Cfn5PIcybFnDUFFCWobsf8Tg-qWAl6OycwUUh1BjeBMrJwvdH_eiVsMN_grir7XAOOluzoBEVM2ZWa-KTTba8MHhcdpHrOZSeu79DTPvzVSQeP0yTMLT9VrG13PjndibyhWJDoYTjtNUENU3tEkO89Un0U0IQa9h3jxFd-yzGH4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by KYLE HOOTEN
{ dailycaller.com } ~ The Constellation Orion may look very different soon if astronomers are right about the giant star Betelgeuse which marks the starry hunter’s right shoulder... Betelgeuse was once in among the top 10 brightest  stars in the night sky, but since October it’s been dimming so much that it’s no longer even in the top 20, according to The Astronomer’s Telegram. This is remarkable for a star that is 20 times more massive than our sun. This reduction in brilliance is significant because the dimming of a star often foreshadows an incredibly bright, explosive conclusion to the life of a stellar body in the form of a supernova, according to National Geographic. If Betelgeuse were to go supernova, it would put on a show for the ages as it collapses into itself and detonates. From earth, this event would be clearly observable, briefly outshining even a full moon in our night sky before going dark forever, reports National Geographic. “Betelgeuse is living on borrowed time and could explode as a supernova any day now,” Fraser Cain, publisher of Universe Today explained recently on his  YouTube channel. However, he also noted that it “might not detonate for another 100,000 years, we just don’t know.”...   https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/30/giant-star-explode-scientists-orion/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=11441  
.
UK Sex Grooming Gangs 
Victimize 19,000 Children in 2019
tw5s7_nE2xD9oqLvS8eowKlN_25dLbNVnEoEOQ23w8kpL6v5JZHFTOeG2WCs6bC_cycSIdyShC5e1g2gVgPakKtRbnggwLSV-nPAVqUT5KZpdLiTez8ROZqZkPTdzDkJ2jBnavslNZvkKYXzofyl2XdvpUZPsRBkRo8NMO1BSboRA8lw7SxhM4mAvTqfjWUW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by clarionproject.org ~ Despite the publicity given to UK’s Pakistani sex grooming gangs since 2012, close to 19,000 children have been victimized by UK sex grooming gangs in 2019... The number represents a 3,300 increase from five years ago. In a report by the Independent, activists say the true number is much higher, as many of these crimes go unreported. After underage girls are groomed using drugs and alcohol, many are reluctant to go to the authorities as their groomers convince them that due to the illegality of the substances, the victims themselves will be punished. The exploitation has been widely known to local government officials, social workers and law enforcement officials for over a decade. However, for fear of being called racists, authorities took no steps to prevent the horrific abuse of young, white British girls. Sarah Champion is a Labour MP from Rotherham where the story broke in 2012 and a tireless campaigner for the victims of these gangs. In 2017, Champion was forced to resign from her position as shadow opposition secretary for women and equalities after writing an article in The Sun telling the facts about the sex grooming gangs: Frustrated that years after recommendations were made to endless government commissions with no measures taken to support victims and prevent such abuse in the future, Champion wrote, “Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls … There. I said it. Does that make me a racist? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?”...   https://clarionproject.org/uk-sex-grooming-gangs-victimize-19000-children-in-2019/?utm_source=Clarion+Project+Newsletter&utm_campaign=7cbab34b96-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_12_31_02_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_60abb35148-7cbab34b96-6442509&mc_cid=7cbab34b96&mc_eid=b83b13a9b5   
Taliban says it ‘has no intention 
of declaring a ceasefire’
By BILL ROGGIO 
{ longwarjournal.org } ~ The Taliban has denied press reports indicating the group was on the cusp of declaring a ceasefire in Afghanistan, saying this is “false and baseless.”... Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid issued an official statement denying the reports, which claimed that the group’s ruling council has approved a ceasefire, thereby opening the door for possible intra-Afghan negotiations. However, it was unclear if the reported ceasefire would include Taliban attacks against the Afghan government and security forces. The reported ceasefire agreement was sourced to “Taliban officials familiar with the negotiations” who “spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media,” the Associated Press reported on Dec. 29. Mujahid chastised the media for “publishing false and baseless reports about a ceasefire by the Islamic Emirate,” the name the Taliban calls its official government. Mujahid also denied that there is a “supposed schism within the Islamic Emirate on the issue of a ceasefire.” “The reality of the situation is that the Islamic Emirate has no intention of declaring a ceasefire,” he continued. Mujahid said the Taliban’s Rabhari Shura, which better known as the Quetta Shura, was considering “a reduction in the scale and intensity of violence,” which was requested by the U.S. negotiating team...   https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2019/12/taliban-says-it-has-no-intention-of-declaring-a-ceasefire.php 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
New California Laws Spell Trouble for Cops, 
Workers, Housing Providers
Yupxvn8eKT_rNo1PNRsPxCoCGEqCVyfNBDpXKSmogyfE0r_gXtgFzw658A4gdyI_d1eg84wTg4uIe17gYvCznstYtUN8HDgpPS4_BZn9vLvG_d-5ptuEDKo_8Hsjc-R8qSryCmwlYDs1lMYjFUxLWuKNukYVwn7BW2Gk_fO7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x

California’s long tradition of advancing nation-leading legislation continues into the new year, with laws reining in the gig economy, boosting online privacy and discouraging shootings by police, among other potential trend-setters.

The laws have sent jobs-producing businesses like Uber, Lyft and Google scrambling — raised the ire of law enforcement, and drawn negative reaction from President Donald Trump.

The state dominated by Democrats routinely locks horns with the White House on immigration and other issues,

But the state’s Democrats lost a major fight when legislation requiring Trump to reveal his tax returns was found unconstitutional by their own state Supreme Court — in a unanimous decision.

Some of the higher-profile new laws taking effect Jan. 1 include:

Hitting Job Creators, Workers

California is making it harder for many industries to treat workers like contractors instead of employees who are entitled to minimum wage and other benefits such as workers compensation. The Legislature carved out certain exemptions after the state Supreme Court ruled in favor of workers at the delivery company Dynamex in 2018...

Restricting cops

Two new laws together give California one of the nation’s most comprehensive approaches to restricting police use of force. One changes the legal standard for when police can use deadly force, while the companion law increases officers’ training on how to handle confrontations...   

Online privacy

The nation’s most sweeping data privacy law takes effect with the new year. The law passed in 2018 requires companies to tell consumers what data they collect about them, why it was collected and who sees it. Consumers can refuse to let companies sell that data, and companies are barred from selling data from children younger than 16 without consent...  

Limiting school and employer authority

California becomes the first state to bar workplace and school discrimination against black people for wearing hairstyles such as braids, twists and locks. The new law says hairstyles are associated with race and therefore protected against discrimination...

Vaccinations

State public health officials have new tools to crack down on doctors who write fraudulent medical exemptions for schoolchildren’s vaccinations, after the most emotionally charged legislative debate of the year repeatedly drew hundreds of supporters and opponents to the Capitol...

Restricting property rights

Landlords will be barred from raising yearly rent prices by more than 5 percent plus the cost of inflation under a new law that drew supporters who said they can no longer afford the state’s soaring housing costs. Landlords also won’t be allowed to evict someone without a reason or refuse to rent to someone solely because they have a federal Section 8 housing voucher...

Child sex assault

California is joining several other states in giving adults who were sexually assaulted as children more time to sue, a measure expected to trigger multitudes of new lawsuits against the Catholic church, Boy Scouts of America and other organizations...
Read more…

Wednesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Can the Union Endure?
EfJY-S_X6R4cF5SJrdiOzEDB8xz3mJok8n4YEfn6Rw__bDMbSG6hJo98NfA4p5iAbt9JCvFireO5-MofUGNotzgeZIntXKgSiy27psUePltSeetJhJw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Christopher Skeet
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
THE ANTI-BENGHAZI
YfbgF2viK_CT7WOVfJEOLGN3fQjA58YJR_X7dbvkZ2jG9Vyq4xuAf9r0YcTiDlCOauhU47hXCMMcNi8I0Pp4UdS43PvvpOn0zFBidUh2OAjhFf2Vr1JB8kpZK7vjZ5EHN1lv7Bq066VvwSis8si8H0F3sQCNiF_168Jv5yGQ9n8K9hL08xBK=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by JOHN HINDERAKER 
{ powerlineblog.com } ~As Paul noted a little while ago, pro-Iran militia forces known as Kataeb Hezbollah have besieged the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. They are being referred to in news accounts a “protesters,”... but in fact they are a trained and organized military force. The attackers breached the outer wall of the embassy compound and then milled around, set fires, etc. Apparently many liberals are trying to portray this attack as Trump’s Benghazi; “Benghazi” is now the most trending word on Twitter, with 231,000 tweets. There is, of course, no analogy: President Trump has not ignored calls for help, and instead has sent Marines to reinforce the embassy’s guards and Iraqi troops. So far, there have been no American casualties. Trump has been tweeting up a storm today. Some, but by no means most of his tweets have related to the Iranian military operation in Baghdad. Many more at the link. All of this has to do with the fact that Iran’s leaders are feeling the heat of President Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign. Last Friday, a missile strike by Iran or one of its proxies on a military installation in Kirkuk killed a civilian American contractor and wounded several American, as well as Iraqi, troops. In retaliation, the U.S. carried out strikes that killed 25 Kataeb Hezbollah members. Iran responded with today’s embassy attack. President Trump vowed further retaliation via the tweet above. I assume it will be forthcoming.   https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/12/the-anti-benghazi.php
.
Pentagon Sends More Marines, 
Army Battalion to Iraq
8QI5rIaYRRiv9rZwAcqQQPHMJ4J7ca0dpAn3hz_ji0cCR9eGe_BSjQvMPLVo6mB1wOLEY5QbS_C6qGEW9qIVrVlOUSM_oxPeLDWgcz3Ljw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Ben Werner
{ news.usni.org } ~ The Pentagon is sending more forces, including roughly 100 Marines, to provide additional security to the U.S. embassy in Baghdad after a mob stormed the compound’s main entrance on Tuesday... Marines assigned to Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command deployed to Baghdad Tuesday from Kuwait, according to the Pentagon. Addtitionally, an infantry battalion from the Immediate Response Force (IRF) of the 82nd Airborne Division are headed to U.S. Central Command, the Pentagon announced following an earlier version of this post. “Approximately 750 soldiers will deploy to the region immediately, and additional forces from the IRF are prepared to deploy over the next several days,” the Pentagon said in a statement. “This deployment is an appropriate and precautionary action taken in response to increased threat levels against U.S. personnel and facilities, such as we witnessed in Baghdad today.” The protesters included members of the Shia group Kataib Hezbollah militia, according to an NPR report. Group members were protesting recent U.S. military airstrikes on five Hezbollah sites in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. airstrikes were in response to Kataib Hezbollah militia attacks on Iraqi bases hosting Operation Inherent Resolve coalition forces including U.S. military personnel, according to a statement released Sunday by chief Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman...  https://news.usni.org/2019/12/31/video-pentagon-sends-more-marines-army-helos-to-u-s-embassy-in-baghdad?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=0f1828c801-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-0f1828c801-231491269&mc_cid=0f1828c801&mc_eid=3999f18767  
.
Trump Calls Embassy Attack 'The Anti-Benghazi' 'This Is Not a Warning, It Is a Threat'
Ll0NJBUCbJQLIy7HynRjddDqqYGL2pkSs6hclOQKeawqndfTH7XrO0tiNJP5r3PpPCvMbqNvQiVH8Wxyj9geWy0tcuaaLZGsk2l0qFs37oogs_MvSE9g7Rx-WVmri3qHGEwfzba91UlEH-I8vUeGvzle4CyemhkF79KAGY2Z=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Joe Saunders 
{ westernjournal.com } ~ As much as liberals and the mainstream media will hate it, Baghdad isn’t Benghazi — and the Trump White House isn’t scumbag/liar-nObama’s... President Donald Trump issued a forceful reminder of both of those facts on Tuesday with Twitter posts declaring that he regards Iran as the instigator of Tuesday’s attack on the United States Embassy in Iraq’s capital — and vowing to protect the embassy and its personnel. “The U.S. Embassy in Iraq is, & has been for hours, SAFE,” Trump wrote. “Many of our great warfighters, together with the most lethal military equipment in the world, was immediately rushed to the site.” He also made clear that if the murderous mullahs in Tehran think they can use their Iraqi supporters to avoid the consequences for their own role in the proxy war in Iraq, they’re much mistaken. “Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities,” Trump wrote. “They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year.” In a separate post, as if to drive the point home, Trump wrote: “The anti-Benghazi.” The reference, of course, was to the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including the United States ambassador. To its eternal shame, the scumbag/liar-nObama White House not only made no effort to aid the outpost while the attack was in progress, but flat-out lied to the American people in the aftermath, pretending the deaths were the result of spontaneous demonstrations. As Trump’s actions Tuesday made clear, he wouldn’t follow either example when it came to the Baghdad embassy crisis. In addition to deploying 100 Marines to Iraq to reinforce security personnel at the embassy,  the U.S. military flew an Apache attack helicopter over the embassy Tuesday, firing flares as a show of force to the militants surrounding the compound. According to Fox News, paratroopers from the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division have been ordered to deploy to Kuwait to be on hand if they are needed...
.
Pro-Iran protesters fully withdraw 
from US embassy in Baghdad
HO8ZheTJEy5J0rsgLwFbYr6WDr9gi4awBL-iV3STykuzG_ALb70KwfEznE16Sm85k4Wcl2H6LCEvYTdENi1P2ek04wmwO8Kd0ERxNDM5cOBIG9bghij8df9Z6cYJqul7=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by AHMAD AL-RUBAYE
{ timesofisrael.com } ~ Pro-Iran demonstrators Wednesday ended a sit-in outside the US embassy in Iraq’s capital after an order from the Hashed al-Shaabi military force... an AFP correspondent said, a day after their dramatic incursion. “We burned them!” the demonstrators shouted as they streamed out of the high-security Green Zone housing the embassy just as easily as they had walked in on Tuesday. Trucks picked up the tents and makeshift barricades that had been brought in for the planned sit-in.Thousands of Iraqi supporters of the largely Iranian-trained Hashed force had gathered at the embassy on Tuesday, outraged by US strikes that killed 25 Hashed fighters over the weekend. They marched unimpeded through the checkpoints of the usually high-security Green Zone to the embassy gates, where they broke through a reception area, chanting “Death to America” and scribbling pro-Iran graffiti on the walls. Iraq’s caretaker premier Adel Abdel Mahdi called on the angry crowd to leave the embassy but most spent the night in dozens of tents set up outside the perimeter wall...
.
Iran-backed militiamen withdraw from siege 
of US Embassy in Baghdad as more
 American troops deployed
B4Ae_ppzrFIVRt5Gy7h8aHdMnofu7hqiAN1ZiJvHvUkciy7WnztG1An3H1eEyZzg73NnomqG7gLj-7DBGQ8ldV1KUZPJb_Z5Qg-yV3MoIpNfMGmQ9Py1VIkc-eWVLwBe2nIzDQOTtqQupGeAREnZJvPs7qFK1rqt2GqgswU6-QOWZwEkOcUnxp20=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Lucia I. Suarez Sang
{ foxnews.com } ~ The siege outside of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad came to an end Wednesday afternoon after dozens of pro-Iran militiamen and their supporters withdrew from the compound... The two-day crisis started early Tuesday, when, in an orchestrated assault, hundreds of militiamen stormed the embassy compound, one of the most heavily fortified U.S. diplomatic missions in the world. As the militiamen cleared the area, smoke still rose from a section of the compound building where hours before they had lit a fire on the roof. The violent protests, which included smashed windows and sprayed graffiti on the embassy's walls, were said to be in protest of the deadly U.S. airstrikes that targeted an Iran-backed militia over the weekend, killing 25 fighters. In turn, those strikes had been in response to a rocket attack on an Iraqi Army base that killed a U.S. contractor and injured several American troops. The protests prompted the Pentagon to send hundreds of additional troops to the Middle East. Earlier Wednesday morning, the protesters had set up around 50 tents, along with a makeshift clinic. Cooks with aprons were serving meals out of giant pots. Outside one of the gates, a Shiite cleric recited verses from the Muslim holy book, the Koran, through a loudspeaker. Elsewhere, demonstrators could be seen hurling rocks over the walls of the embassy compound before U.S. troops responded by firing tear gas from the roofs of the buildings. The Popular Mobilization Forces, an umbrella group of state-allied militias — many backed by Iran — called on its supporters to withdraw in response to an appeal by the Iraqi government, saying “your message has been received.” By late afternoon the tents had been taken down and the protesters relocated to the opposite side of the Tigris River, outside the so-called Green Zone housing government offices and foreign embassies. U.S. Apache helicopters circled overhead. "After achieving the intended aim, we pulled out from this place triumphantly," said Fadhil al-Gezzi, a militia supporter, told the Associated Press. “We rubbed America's nose in the dirt.”...   https://www.foxnews.com/world/iraq-us-embassy-troops-protests-tear-gas  
.
As Wednesday night deadline looms,
 Netanyahu expected to request immunity
vvW3rTqjzH5P83f4VGNcHKwFK2Cynl7sasdJFxU4Oid5a3Q7xS_4yhDsVTdxOwqWgDNpPg3hpc12KXHlVwwAprhKSXD4e0EZ4h21gSw5IWyGqd12csHk8VAmmeQCH1U=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by timesofisrael.com ~ Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was expected Wednesday to ask the Knesset to grant him immunity from prosecution in the three corruption cases against him... as the clock counted down toward a midnight deadline for him to seek the protection. Netanyahu has described his right to immunity as “a cornerstone of democracy.” However, rather than make a public announcement at a press conference, as is Netanyahu’s preferred style for key developments, and was apparently his intention at the beginning of the week, he is seeking to keep a low profile and will likely reveal his request in a social media post, Channel 12 news reported. Netanyahu and his aides are eager to remove the topic from the public agenda as quickly as possible, the report said. The prime minister has told close associates he is concerned that making the request for immunity, which must be formally delivered to Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein, could impact his campaign for the coming March 2 elections, the Kan public broadcaster reported Tuesday. In addition, Netanyahu is worried that the Knesset may vote against granting him immunity or that, even if lawmakers approve it, the High Court of Justice could intervene and overturn it. A request from the Knesset for immunity is seen as unpopular among voters, even among many of the prime minister’s supporters. A poll published Sunday evening by Channel 12 news found that 51 percent of Israelis oppose such a move, while only 33% support it. Netanyahu must announce whether he wants to seek immunity by midnight or automatically forfeit his right to do so. Though the premier is far from guaranteed to get a Knesset majority to support an immunity bid, merely asking for it will likely delay any potential trial by months...  https://www.timesofisrael.com/as-wednesday-deadline-looms-netanyahu-expected-to-request-immunity/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2020-01-01&utm_medium=email   
Europe: Anti-Christian Attacks Reach 
All-Time High in 2019
VVgb1ki4kH6uhnZgVNFfh-6i5OrwH19Q4-6Ko7BPez3-a3H1nqz_uVy-YAjJN7FZPQIsOh-7EVpksUSi4-bSL3Vpsw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Soeren Kern
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ Anti-Christian hostility is sweeping across Western Europe, where, during 2019, Christian churches and symbols were deliberately attacked day after day... Gatestone Institute reviewed thousands of newspaper reports, police blotters, parliamentary inquiries, social media posts and specialized blogs from Britain, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy and Spain. The research shows that roughly 3,000 Christian churches, schools, cemeteries and monuments were vandalized, looted or defaced in Europe during 2019 — which is on track to becoming a record year for anti-Christian sacrilege on the continent. Violence against Christian sites is most widespread in France, where churches, schools, cemeteries and monuments are being vandalized, desecrated and burned at an average rate of three per day, according to government statistics. In Germany, attacks against Christian churches are occurring at an average rate of two per day, according to police blotters. Attacks on Christian churches and symbols are also commonplace in Belgium, Britain, Denmark, Ireland, Italy and Spain. The attacks overwhelmingly involve Roman Catholic sites and symbols, although in Germany, Protestant churches are also being targeted. The perpetrators of anti-Christian attacks — which include acts of arson, defecation, desecration, looting, mockery, profanation, Satanism, theft, urination and vandalism — are rarely caught. When they are, police and media often censor information about their identities and ethnic backgrounds. Many suspects are said to have mental disorders; as a result, many anti-Christian attacks are not categorized as hate crimes...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15366/europe-anti-christian-attacks 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Can the Union Endure?
EfJY-S_X6R4cF5SJrdiOzEDB8xz3mJok8n4YEfn6Rw__bDMbSG6hJo98NfA4p5iAbt9JCvFireO5-MofUGNotzgeZIntXKgSiy27psUePltSeetJhJw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Christopher Skeet

{ americanthinker.com } ~ At this point, Red and Blue America are not even speaking the same language.  We stand near the point of what divorce lawyers term “irreconcilable differences.” In increasingly strident and self-assured tones, the Left believes it is morally superior, intellectually untouchable, and wholly justified in pursuing whatever extralegal, corrupt, or violent methods available to implement their ideology.

Talk of a breaking point has been circling conservative circles for some time, with three tangible options arising from the chatter:

1) continued focus on barely winning elections, appointing "conservative" judges that uphold scumbag/liar-nObamacare, keeping Arizona from going blue, etc.;

2) a “divorce” of sorts that peaceably divides the United States into permanent blue and red territories, or;

3) civil war.

The first option clearly is the best. It is the least disruptive and preserves the Union and the Constitution, the goal that Abraham Lincoln fought our bloodiest war to support.

But what if it is sabotaged? Trump is an anomaly from both the Democrat and Republican point of view. His no-holds-barred street fighting style has been a welcome change for many Republican voters.  But once his presidency ends, is there likely to be a Trump-like figure? Rest assured, the GOP Establishment is busy re-calibrating its primary process that “allowed” Trump to win the nomination to begin with. Republican voters thinking they won’t attempt to force-feed us a rino-Romney or Jeb! next time around are fooling themselves.

At a minimum, in order to keep them honest, we need to be able to consider the other options.

The second option, that of an amicable divorce between red and blue states (and allowing for counties to switch states) seems the best option towards the preservation of the American ideal. While true that the United States of America would lose some coastline and a few radical hotbeds to the newfound Socialist Republics of Wokestan, we could permanently consolidate our strongholds, restructure our judiciary, clean the Augean stables we call public schooling, and amend our Constitution with stronger protections.

Such a “divorce” would be messy.  Questions of interstate travel, resources, airspace regulation, migration control, and a million unforeseeable disputes would need to be hashed out before we were able to cut away the deadwood.  But it’s doable. Europe is in the throes of a polygamous divorce, but it is proceeding bumpily along. Even Sudan pulled it off.

The problem is the Left probably wouldn't agree to a divorce.  It will play the part of the jealous, manipulative, control freak husband who never loved his wife, but rather savored the power he exerted over her. The Left will delay, obfuscate, and resist divorce at all costs, even if the Right unilaterally gave up the sports car, the big screen TV, and the dog in an attempt to cut loose as quickly as possible.

The economy would unfortunately be, to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, a "known unknown." We would have to prepare for a temporary state of flux. We lose a fair amount of ports, transportation hubs, and financial sectors. The world's two largest stock exchanges (the NYSE and NADSAQ), each of which trade over one trillion dollars a month, are both located in New York City. Silicon Valley alone, were it its own nation, would be one of the world's richest and most productive.

But though we would have to brace ourselves to find our economic footing, we would not be without our own advantages. The Bakken Formation of North Dakota alone is estimated to hold 30 to 40 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Of the 31 states that currently produce oil, 25 (over 82% of total production) went for Trump in 2016. In addition, the United States has seen its best manufacturing boom in three decades, with over 500,000 manufacturing jobs created since Trump took office. In the third quarter of 2019, manufacturers' biggest concern was a shortage of skilled labor to keep up with hiring demands.  This is not the concern of an industry in trouble.

Our new economy would be stabilized by stable tax policy, deregulation, America-first trade negotiations, audits of the Federal Reserve (assuming we keep it), and deference to supply-side, free market principles. And assuming Wokestan pursued the socialistic policies they preach, now unencumbered by such antiquated annoyances like constitutions and elections, their economy would free fall.

Silicon Valley is already bleeding residents to more tax-friendly states like Colorado, Texas, and North Carolina. Predictably, problems arise when they refuse to concede that their progressive policies were what caused their home state to go bankrupt. In our new America, gone would be the days when blue state progressives are allowed to migrate to red states, bringing their ignorant voting patterns with them. America could focus on God, freedom, family, and productivity. Wokestan could focus on socialism, homeless encampments, needle programs, and post-birth abortions. A wall would surely be built, either by us to keep them out, or by them to keep them in.

The third option is civil war.

Suffice to say, victory in such a war would be a foregone conclusion. Antifa punks fancy themselves brave while terrorizing progressive cities whose socialist mayors green light their thuggery, but when met with actual force they always skitter away. In a civil war, during which the American side will enjoy the support and firepower of the vast majority of the military, the police, the food and energy sectors, most of the blue-collar class, and over 100 million gun owners, it's doubtful gaggles of black-masked, androgynous incels would offer much “resistance.”

We won the first Civil War, and we would win a second. This time around, the slavers have no Robert Lee, Stonewall Jackson, or James Longstreet, but rather the likes of Messers Manning, Bergdahl, and Vindman. Long gone are the days when Trotsky led the Red Army full of dedicated shock troops into battle. Today's Left lacks the discipline, the courage, and the spirit of self-sacrifice necessary to muster up enough volunteers for a national army.  Men who micturate aghast at the torment of doing their own laundry don't win wars.

Still, I would argue against this path, which can and always does lead to unintended consequences. Increasing numbers of conservative thinkers appear open to the idea of civil war. Most do so hesitatingly, but others seem to relish the prospect, and chortle at the idea of plunging the rest of us into the abyss.

Even for the winning side, the cost of both innocent victims and the quality of life endured by the survivors is far greater than those clamoring for war care to admit. Internet tough guys who’ve never seen what a bullet does to human flesh can let me know in the "Comments" section just how big of a pansy I am. That’s fine. But to more mature readers who ponder their own capabilities for wanton bloodshed more judiciously, I implore you to seriously reckon the ramifications upon our civilian population that civil war would entail. Sherman’s March to the Sea will seem, by comparison, a sweet dream.

Civil war in present-day America would not consist of professional armies mowing each other down across empty fields. It would be a house-to-house, street-by-street massacre, more akin to Hotel Rwanda than the battlefields of the American or even the Russian and Spanish civil wars.

The majority of the fighting would be carried out not by professional armies, but by private citizens, vigilantes, partisans, ad hoc neighborhood units, and the like. People on both sides would use the breakdown of order to settle private scores and commit crimes of opportunity. Others would kill indiscriminately based on “offenses” such as voting records, yard signs, etc.

Schools would close. Hospitals would become graveyards for the untreated. Water purification plants, oil refineries, and transportation hubs would be sabotaged. Even in red states, food and energy supplies would be unreliable. Sympathizers would be targeted, mobs would destroy, and homes would burn. Bombings that bedeviled Great Britain during the Troubles or present-day Afghanistan would become the norm here.

I freely admit this is all conjecture. Maybe it will be Grenada 2.0, like the neo-cons told us Iraq and Afghanistan would be. But when contemplating war, especially war in our own streets and neighborhoods, it behooves us to err on the side of caution. Wars usually go worse than predicted, and we have no idea what it would unleash here. Despite the aforementioned advantages we would retain, the last century has proven that the Left possesses an unfathomable capacity for atrocity, cruelty, and mass murder in the furtherance of its ideology.  Progressives will burn this nation to the ground before letting anyone enjoy it free from their benevolence. They wouldn't hesitate to murder their own children on their altars, and would hesitate even less about murdering yours.

In between today and this hypothetical civil war is the option of divorce. Knowing the Left, it will only be dragged to the arbitration table kicking and screaming. But we should at least attempt it before delving blindfolded into slaughter.
Read more…

Happy New Year ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
US Embassy compound in Baghdad 
under siege as crowds protesting 
airstrikes break through gate
Bdb327xcSf1U6lT3Ov-wd3MXPFh3iK4uB4ZvX6vEHFg58HMZowKfCLGhUMD09w0hEzbqoixsP2sXpb_FROZ3W2ajFQmncBDnQy3SR4VmhEjfaC6u8bXSRensleQ6HMFNyu_N-NlkFnkA-rHmIFKzo3ilhDH97yXtLnBvDrcn82bGU2xULhiVpw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Greg Norman and Edmund DeMarche
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Former House Oversight Chairman 
Trey Gowdy Discusses Impeachment Outlook
OTgjdViKU3uZd7APq2HLsV0exUr6NHQK2AU9zsOU5DwLoMSI0jXlGWc0IstD9z6tvt-lYlTBdgzSMELvRz8HxVohM033Zk_PWLQ8kdtAZa3xSlnpcSp4iDIA-qUOfJddjIwcvltXcjuna3UwtMfwDZpW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Former representative Trey Gowdy appears on Fox News for a discussion of the current impeachment process and his outlook for the Senate trial. Mr. Gowdy spent some time with President Trump last weekend, but states he will not be part of the legal team moving forward.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/31/former-house-oversight-chairman-trey-gowdy-discusses-impeachment-outlook/  
.
Col Douglas Macgregor Has Suspicions 
About Pompeo, Esper and Milley
uJPquvZmn_L-mqCxCAdn-J4fqAttxpX-GQSoVF3M44Xyxr4dmV7UumJYX7RU65j70PH2ObedHzDkh0PUO1hTEUr4z0AbCD9wTuFu78zK45zTnOedjeU17FXS-cqnmm58AfG6J1d1dqSzT57a7jTEIV1c4rHTd-0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Well, well, well…. we are not alone in our suspicions of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley... Tonight Col Douglas Macgregor outlines his own suspicions about the U.S. military attack in Iraq and Syria that parallel our initial gut reaction. Macgregor states his belief that President Trump is being “skillfully misinformed”.
.
The Polling Trend on Impeachment Shows 
the True Impact of the Democrats’ Sham
08HoMJ4bTCIUHAneftkdGgONNEDg8EPI5a38Pby6wVnsxGpeaM5f8VsIRnLGBV3CgAPEI_vZKs0Ml9600SHJMBJhtuuLvHyN3AO_t10UBfuSkwmhpR0qNPi-sMzYTREDGAC-G3hTXdzV_1LC99B1=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Michael Glassner
{ townhall.com } ~ If the Democrat establishment thought that their chances of ousting President Trump were slim a few months ago, the latest polls prove that their obstructionist agenda is utterly hopeless... other than a contingent of radical leftists, Americans have officially lost any belief in the Democrats’ partisan impeachment sham. Of course, there is a good reason why the Democrats are losing on impeachment -- the entire process has been unjust from the start. “They treated us very unfairly,” President Trump said during an event on Christmas eve. “They didn’t give us due process. They didn’t give us a lawyer. They didn’t give us anything. Now they come to the Senate and they want everything.” The voters, it turns out, were not blind to the Democrat Party’s dirty tricks. According to a recent survey from Gallup, public support for impeachment has now dropped to 46 percent, down six percentage points since the start of the impeachment inquiry. But that’s not the only bad news for the impeachment-crazed Democrats -- the same poll also found that 51 percent of Americans oppose impeaching and removing Donald Trump from office, a five percent increase during the same time period. Likewise, Gallup found that President Trump’s approval rating has increased by six percentage points since the launch of the impeachment probe in the fall and is now at 45 percent. Mind you, national polls have rarely reflected that actual support for President Trump since he first descended down the Trump Tower escalator in 2015. That’s why this trend is so encouraging for the millions and millions of Americans who love and support this President. Much to its dismay, even CNN published a poll that found support for impeachment was even dropping among Democrats, while opposition was growing across the country. And the long list of similar impeachment polls goes on, and on, and on. The Democrat leadership in the House took the bait -- their ongoing partisan impeachment sham has done irreversible damage to their political aspirations, further strengthening President Trump’s chances of winning the 2020 election. “All I know is my poll numbers are the highest they’ve ever been,” the President said in his remarks on Christmas eve, adding that “our fundraising in the Republican Party is the highest it’s ever been.” The Democrat Party’s failure to spearhead a legitimate impeachment process was evident from the very start of this charade. The Democrats never had enough evidence to impeach President Trump in the first place, which is exactly why House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi avoided impeachment like the plague until September...
.
After US attacks Iranian-backed militias, 
is America back in the game?
XUCInkqyXlU4psa6saZQ6Fca9HIGk6vWLoOAtZPA3FjkpkaeBlCEKZfGx9-UZZqwNSEmTn7xw_87U2QOAB1o978wCfUP4y8-b88lrfkILDLBm2SxDzOn20J12vuPaf0CKZipAOZ0iM4sqoKxWaZ4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By ANNA AHRONHEIM  
{ jpost.com } ~ Just days after IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Aviv Kochavi lamented that Israel was going up against Iran alone... airstrikes rocked several locations belonging to Iranian-backed Kata’ib Hezbollah in Iraq and Syria, killing dozens. The airstrikes, which came two days after a barrage of over 30 rockets were fired towards the K1 Iraqi military base in Kirkuk which killed a US civilian contractor and wounding dozens of Iraqi and American troops, were described by the Pentagon as “precision defensive strikes” against the group that "will degrade" the group's ability to carry out future attacks against coalition forces.  The rocket barrage and the subsequent retaliatory strikes in the area of Al-Qaim are the latest peak in tensions between Washington and Tehran. And might have negative effects on Israel, which has been carrying out a war-between-the wars campaign against Iranian entrenchment since 2013. Situated in Iraq’s restive Anbar province on one side and Syria’ Deir Ezzor province, al-Qaim is an area which is under the control of pro-Iranian Shiite militias who are handled by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds force.  Only last week Israel’s top military chief publicly admitted to Israeli airstrikes in Iraq, stating that Iran’s Quds force is smuggling advanced weapons in the country on a monthly basis “and we can’t allow that.” The first strike close to Iraq attributed to Israel was in June of last year near the town of Al-Bukamal, killing 22 members of a Shiite militia.  The next month several other blasts rocked Shiite militia warehouses and bases across the country. Both Israel and the US have warned that Iran and its proxy militias are the biggest threats to peace in the region and hope to weaken Tehran's growing influence across the Middle East and the Persian Gulf...
.
NSA Whistleblower Karen Stewart Exposes 
Biggest False Flag Operation In History
FBI / Fusion Centers
8WSdMkeBF7pXfrzwT3v_tmLRNTUIBAbg8WybCemiGCeirNYNHFb5ZLt08Tv14koTFfFD2xdhlvdVWS9jVAxGwpGqnx5cD01m6PyIKw_Bcmq9O8NQVnSqqTIC5BiLpG5VsU5auU0GH3f0osq8GCXs7bdea-fAEsmR=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Tim Brown
{ thewashingtonstandard.com } ~ FBI / Fusion Centers, created after 911 to “fuse” Federal and Local Law Enforcement information to protect America from “Terrorists,”... INSTEAD have been creating hundreds of thousands of FALSE DOSSIERS on perfectly INNOCENT AMERICANS (Targeted Individuals) to JUSTIFY secretly bloating the fraud Terrorist Watchlist, for a fabricated enemy to rally resources against and keep the population frightened and accepting of a Police State. NSA whistleblower and retired intelligence analyst Karen Stewart joins me to expose exactly what is going on. Ms. Stewart sent this to Sen Lindsey Graham after hearing his recent speech on CNN2 about “FISA abuse could happen to you” to his colleagues. Only Lindsey really pushed for this kind of thing years ago on the Senate floor when he proclaimed “You don’t get a lawyer.” INSTEAD have been creating hundreds of thousands of FALSE DOSSIERS on perfectly INNOCENT AMERICANS (Targeted Individuals) to JUSTIFY secretly bloating the fraud Terrorist Watchlist, for a fabricated enemy to rally resources against and keep the population frightened and accepting of a Police State. E.O. S-1233 , DOD Directive S-3321.1 and National Security Directive 130,  the United States military and Intelligence Communities are forbidden by law from targeting U.S. citizens with PSYOPS within US borders. A SECRET UNCONSTITUTIONAL ARMY of NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH-TYPE Civilian Mercenaries, like INFRAGARD, were TRAINED in covert and overt intimidation surveillance, along with covert vicious libel/slander, stalking, harassment, assault, and murder techniques, utilizing HIGH TECH and ADVANCED WEAPONRY difficult to detect on their innocent civilian neighbors, for what amounts to “practice and training” of a guerrilla army of extrajudicial “enforcers” thugs to keep people compliant as the US is subverted. They are richly compensated and promised immunity by rogue Fusion Center officials...
.
Despite Intense Media Disinformation 
Zogby Poll Shows President Trump 
Beating all Dem Candidates
rDKRPjhQx9RIZ2OeLHDfz9CysVhH5XdK4DSMcmUIAx344-nbmiuUJ9S0K58Sm5tAwBKn1XMN6xSIil48RVzvlmMVptV3lz_oEM6cFJhddXncld5iBEDLLF1VOt-thQYlM3hQALL2jiA_jE-qoyqpvQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ The scale of media involvement in the 2020 election will likely be the most massively biased propaganda effort in the history of U.S. media manipulation... Together with the big tech effort from control operatives in social media, the scale of unified effort is likely to exceed Orwellian proportions…However, that said, after three years of constant media propaganda and narrative engineering, recent polling shows President Trump beating all Democrat candidates.Some of the interesting details inside the polling shows that when the furthest-left candidates commie-Sanders and dinky/liar-Warren are polled against President Trump the college educated numbers swing quickly in Trump’s favor 50% to 45%. Trump is winning with union voters (Trump leads 48% to 42%) and consumers-NASCAR fans (Trump leads 63% to 32%), weekly Walmart shoppers (Trump leads 54% to 37%), and weekly Amazon shoppers (Trump leads 54% to 43%).
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
US Embassy compound in Baghdad 
under siege as crowds protesting 
airstrikes break through gate
Bdb327xcSf1U6lT3Ov-wd3MXPFh3iK4uB4ZvX6vEHFg58HMZowKfCLGhUMD09w0hEzbqoixsP2sXpb_FROZ3W2ajFQmncBDnQy3SR4VmhEjfaC6u8bXSRensleQ6HMFNyu_N-NlkFnkA-rHmIFKzo3ilhDH97yXtLnBvDrcn82bGU2xULhiVpw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Greg Norman and Edmund DeMarche

{foxnews.com } ~
 Crowds of angry Iraqis protesting America’s recent airstrikes against an Iran-backed militia laid siege to the U.S. Embassy compound in Baghdad Tuesday, chanting “Down, Down USA!” as they stormed through a main gate, prompting U.S. troops to fire back tear gas in response.

On Tuesday afternoon the chaotic scene was still unfolding in the Iraqi capital. At least six U.S. soldiers  were seen standing on the roof of the main building pointing their firearms at the demonstrators and sounds of gunfire could be heard.

Two Iraqi foreign ministry officials initially told Reuters the U.S. ambassador and staff were evacuated, but U.S. officials pushed back, telling Fox News that was not correct. Ambassador Matthew H. Tueller was not evacuated, but was out of the country on a previously planned vacation, an official said.

“Now Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. They will be held fully responsible,” President Trump tweeted. “In addition, we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified!”

Dozens of protesters, many of whom are reported to be wearing militia uniforms, are said to have come within 200 yards of the embassy after busting through an entrance used by cars.

The embassy attack, one of the worst in recent memory, followed deadly U.S. airstrikes on Sunday that killed 25 fighters of the Iran-backed group, the Kataeb Hezbollah. The U.S. military said the airstrikes were in retaliation for last week's killing of an American contractor in a rocket attack on an Iraqi military base, which the U.S. blamed on the militia.

Military jet fighters conducted "precision defensive strikes" on five sites belonging to Kataeb Hezbollah, Jonathan Hoffman, a spokesperson for the Pentagon told Fox News. Two defense officials added that Air Force F-15 jet fighters carried out the strikes.

Supporters of the militia held funerals Tuesday for the fighters killed, before setting their sights on the embassy.

The mob shouted “Down, Down USA!” as the crowd first tried to push inside the embassy grounds, hurling water and stones over its walls, the Associated Press reports. They raised yellow militia flags and taunted the embassy's security staff who remained behind the glass windows in the gates' reception area. The mob also sprayed red graffiti on the wall and windows, in support of the Kataeb Hezbollah, reading: “Closed in the name of the resistance.”

 Following the breach of the gate, an Associated Press reporter at the scene saw flames rising from inside the compound. Smoke from tear gas that was fired rose in the area, and at least three of the protesters appeared to have difficulties breathing. A man on a loudspeaker also was heard urging the mob not to enter the compound, saying: “The message was delivered.”

No one was immediately reported hurt in the rampage and security staff withdrew inside the embassy when protesters started to gather outside.

"We differentiate between these militia groups and the legitimate protesters who have been in the streets for the last couple months demanding a better government and a better future for themselves. These people came right on in. They are very clearly identified," a U.S. official told Fox News.

"Iraqi security forces did participate in protecting the embassy and the President's message is that we continue to do so," the official added. "Our first priority is the security of our people and assets in the embassy. The President was very clear in the tweet that the government of Iraq needs to protect the embassy."

As tempers rose, the mob also set fire to three trailers used by security guards along the embassy wall.

Yassine al-Yasseri, Iraq's interior minister, appeared outside the embassy at one point and walked around to inspect the scene. He told the AP that the prime minister had warned the U.S. strikes on the Shiite militiamen would have serious consequences.

"This is one of the implications," al-Yasseri said. "This is a problem and is embarrassing to the government."

He said more security will be deployed to separate the protesters from the embassy, an indication the Iraqi troops would not move in to break up the crowd by force.

Seven armored vehicles with about 30 Iraqi soldiers arrived near the embassy hours after the violence erupted, deploying near the embassy walls but not close to the breached area. Four vehicles carrying riot police approached the embassy later but were forced back by the protesters who blocked their path.

Sen. Marco Rubio took to Twitter early Tuesday and said Iran was directly responsible for orchestrating the breach.  There was no immediate comment from the Pentagon and the State Department.

But U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said Sunday's strikes send the message that the U.S. will not tolerate actions by Iran that jeopardize American lives.
Read more…

Tuesday ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The DoJ FISA Report — Trump Was Right
2xXBIrJ4JOczd_LRVw4bmM_QNLAzU9nc1W1R9gz9Bavp0r6VpPAFn5h4Jkx4v0vKexoqrLVU_aORJ5pKGE8O-kDbLiah24n622keGfh80mkRj5TZ6M1iYOI3qokolNOwy4xaUCh4UIO_qLIUsnCGPp36M12j_UVH14Th7Yg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Law professor writes Kentucky newspaper 
op-ed accusing McConnell of breaking two oaths
wSoYtMy7kbWB-N5pJuddXChTNV6cIJfyii7QzdB1X6j4Q3hwE9dEmNzC7r4BMgMq-j3NV976srtp3snvUx56telt83vFFwhGrOYXjbWWTrqXHnjJSHG-9QOVNefdqav5e0gmyrIw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By MARTY JOHNSON
{ thehill.com } ~ A Kentucky-born law professor went after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in an op-ed Friday, saying that the senator broke two of the three oaths in the U.S. Constitution... The Boston College law professor, Kent Greenfield, criticized McConnell's comments about an impeachment trial for President Trump. "We Kentuckians know that our word is our bond. Oaths are the most solemn of promises, and their breach results in serious reputational — and sometimes legal — consequences," Greenfield wrote in his op-ed published by the Courier Journal."President Donald Trump will soon be on trial in the Senate on grounds that he breached one oath," Greenfield wrote. "Senate Leader Mitch McConnell is about to breach two." The first oath McConnell is breaking, Greenfield states, is the oath that he took when took office. It's an oath that all state and federal officers take, an “Oath … to support this Constitution.” The second oath pertains to the impeachment trial that will take place sometime after the new year. "In Article I, the Constitution gives the Senate the 'sole' power to 'try all impeachments,' and the Constitution requires that 'when sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation,' " Greenfield wrote... Why didn't the professor go after the leaders in the House.  https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/476042-law-professor-writes-kentucky-newspaper-op-ed-accusing-mcconnell-of-breaking   
Trump impeachment is culmination of
four-decade feud between Giuliani
and loose lips liar-Biden
XCApDg_zNOnZc4_fE3nDXWPhJvtgoi0TwuGra3nKElbj0b7UjlpnRSRD_9BL9nq2_WNhEfJA53zKOOc6Lg0r1Du9KU16yQaQFj6fzIR3OHZtibpmA6WQlR2yO0dr0bWYZY0rt6b6x9tZeV4GiuzHOQ32i6ljL8v0y1NckBe969w2Vl0ir0Y1ob6bFsi2u3uO_m5yMSIo6HHJEh6lF7jlKYTLJ6MQk_Ms6izhd5Zg6zbzhUNeJygxrLX9o6kwE4Rbk9xF8mENhmjXfkML2IJkfA8ZKBxk5VbPvVLdFWzWh8xmfsBGmqWN_uMTOEMDXteUCTCWyaF6Bg3-Ng=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jerry Dunleavy
{ washingtonexaminer.com  } ~ Clashes between Rudy Giuliani and loose lips liar-Joe Biden go back decades, starting in the early days of Ronald Reagan’s administration... and eventually leading to Ukraine and President Trump’s impeachment. For months, Giuliani, 75, has touted damning evidence of corruption in Ukraine linked to loose lips liar-Biden, 77. “If you’re going to go on national television and tell the country that you found evidence of a cover-up, then I hope you know what you’re talking about,” Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said last week. “So I’m going to have an open invitation to Rudy Giuliani to come to the Senate Judiciary Committee and tell us what you found. And if he comes, you gotta be willing to ask questions about your conduct. It’s just not good for the country to make these accusations on cable television without them being tested.” A spokesman for the Democratic front-runner said earlier this year that “bringing forward noted conspiracist and liar Rudy Giuliani would further discredit the reputation of the Senate Judiciary Committee under Senator Graham.” During the July 25 phone call which led to a whistleblower complaint and an impeachment effort, immediately after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed interest in purchasing anti-tank weaponry, Trump asked Zelensky "to do us a favor” to look into CrowdStrike and any possible Ukrainian election interference in 2016. Trump also urged Zelensky to investigate “the other thing,” referring to allegations of corruption  related to loose lips liar-Joe and Hunter Biden, telling Zelensky to speak with Attorney General William Barr and Giuliani...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/analysis-giuliani-and-biden-spent-decades-butting-heads-before-ukraine-and-impeachment?utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_12/29/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief&rid=5261   
Germany Puts Its Head in Russia's 
Energy Pipeline Noose
u8C7DhStgt1FfgPxXY-zLyFeIzvXUQDxXXLaaXa_AwrUhlGbcYkWWPBPKpLJyWFYpnL4-MqPCdrQPC8sWry4vOZQEw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Soeren Kern
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ A Swiss company working on the controversial Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline directly linking Russia to Germany has suspended pipelaying operations... after U.S. President Donald J. Trump signed into law new sanctions. The sanctions are part of an effort by the United States to halt completion of the €9.5 billion ($10.5 billion) pipeline, which would double shipments of Russian natural gas to Germany by transporting the gas under the Baltic Sea. Opponents of the pipeline warn that it will give Russia a stranglehold over Germany's energy supply. Proponents counter that with European domestic natural gas production in rapid decline, the pipeline will enhance security of supply. American sanctions may delay Nord Stream 2, but they are probably too late to kill the project. More than 80% of the 1,230-km (764-mile) pipeline has already been laid and the project is expected to be completed in 2020, according to Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak. On December 17, the U.S. Senate, by a vote of 86 to 6, passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the annual defense spending bill, which includes the Nord Stream 2 sanctions language. The measure previously cleared the U.S. House of Representatives on December 11 by a vote of 377 to 48. President Trump signed it into law on December 20. The legislation requires the U.S. State and Treasury departments to submit a report within 60 days that identifies "vessels that are engaged in pipe-laying at depths of 100 feet or more below sea level for the construction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project, the TurkStream pipeline project a new gas pipeline stretching from Russia to Turkey across the Black Sea or any project that is a successor to either such project."...
.
'Don't touch kids, you pervert!': 
loose lips liar-Biden slammed by 
protesters at campaign rally
s8P3fr1001cb5rgEO2AOFP5xhcb2aKbw66Qn4BaZ-H5aGowelKFrT4DAU0FnqKvjP5zt3hIdFyu2e0qZX6rxmSn94tnGjGsYfij80EIhxmZ_UHwSt1ljnt_DAhXW6AXV33ZZqRbGgaCvkOCG-gm2jPWNRQwIWFgmkoXZ2umt4M32UnCx7TGcBw88pOW_78yz8aleB6h8eYBpi6fawAfJYsB8iYmypTgjVLkkcOR6WU9hUCAF_0xWx_2blTxGPQo3NYkrCrMti5xHYEysEOAdhsRxzOeUheVJOEsqKDEyglpwnuO2nZSAubrsiiNN1z4eMNtF7C0J7Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Spencer Neale
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Several audience members at loose lips liar-Joe Biden's 2020 campaign rally in Milford, New Hampshire, lashed out at the former vice president... calling him a number of insults, including "pervert" and "quid pro loose4 lips liar-Joe." loose lips liar-Biden, 77, was speaking on Sunday night ahead of the state's Feb. 11 Democratic primary, where he is trailing South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Vermont Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders, according to RealClearPolitics. A handful of those present interrupted the event on multiple occasions with heckles."Quite a start to loose lips liar-Biden’s event in Milford, NH — He was quickly interrupted near the top of his remarks by a protestor who called him “creepy” & made false claims about him being a “pervert,” tweeted NBC News's Marianna Sotomayor. "Another woman then yelled “quid pro loose lips liar-Joe” before another man began to shout about Ukraine."Video from the campaign stop shows a man asking loose lips liar-Biden about old videos that show him touching children and adults. “You touch kids on video, and women," said the man. "We don’t need another old, white man running for president." loose lips liar-Biden quickly reprimanded the man, saying, "This isn't a Trump rally." The man continued to speak, saying he wasn't a Trump supporter before yelling, "Don't touch kids, you pervert!" "This is democracy," said loose lips liar-Biden, before another audience member shouted, "The truth is going to come out, buddy."...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/dont-touch-kids-you-pervert-biden-slammed-by-protesters-at-campaign-rally?utm_source=WEX_Breaking%20News%20Alert_12/29/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_Breaking%20News&rid=5261   
Ex-FBI Analyst Sentenced to Jail for Hacking 
Private Email To Protect Mueller
G8usc5uG6sOBDYpXG7_Noa2SkKJol-zBA5A_LiFym_7vqZV27mDaaE-LMvhlqRL9YTrGyILvQZMT-cLBgmlGnuIdlVNGUF55ZugfP50G0GaCgp6Jb1-f0rAU_iU8NWCHj2zdINyOO2YpysaexpBr5jx7coeYKs8qGn2oRk0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By C. Douglas Golden 
{ westernjournal.com } ~ If you’re a law enforcement official who has more allegiance to ideology than to the law or to the country, where does that get you?... For former FBI analyst Mark Tolson, the answer is jail — however briefly. Tolson is best-known — if he’s known at all — as the man who broke into a pro-Trump operative’s email account in October 2018, took screen-shots of some of the messages, then sent images to a reporter and offered the reporter the password, according to Politico. The unnamed member of the media turned down the opportunity. Tolson, 60, said he did it because that activist was claiming, absent any evidence, that then-special counsel Robert Mueller had committed sexual assault. “I did what I did to try to protect Director Mueller, who can protect himself,” Tolson said at his sentencing at an Alexandria, Virginia, court on Dec. 20, according to The Washington Post. “I’m terribly sorry.” For breaking into the email account, a misdemeanor, Tolson was sentenced Dec. 20 to seven days behind bars and pay $500 in fines, according to the  Washington Examiner. The sentence includes 50 hours of community service and a year of probation. The jail time could be served after the holidays, the judge ruled. The details are these: Tolson broke into the email account of Jack Burkman, a neighbor of his in Alexandria, back in October of 2018. Burkman had announced he was about to call a news conference at which he would announce the details on his very dubious allegations regarding Mueller. Tolson’s wife, Sarah Gilbert Fox, had done some work for Burkman and had the password to his email account. “It was because of the press conference, your honor,” the former FBI analyst said in court, according to Politico...   https://www.westernjournal.com/ex-fbi-analyst-sentenced-jail-hacking-private-email-protect-mueller/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-CT&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=conservative-tribune   
loose lips liar-Biden Will Defy 
Senate Impeachment Trial Subpoena
LllFuBRZaopuetQKUnhy411tdGipN9NO7pKD-EV4nSyY1SqwL7Z4uFLU2axA27jVwgTiydUgGelNUk2EfFvlSpgrhbKKpddthccOx_NluD5feEn29T3YtVZhTkVd-JVBcBh7mrKCKZKdTOWFPDx_4TxjrucaO3SZxPNOWr-V=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Tom Borelli
{ deneenborelli.com } ~ 2020 presidential candidate and former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden will not be part of the impeachment trial for President Trump... loose lip liar-Biden made the statement during an interview with The Des Moines Register where he clearly states he will refuse to testify in the Senate impeachment trial. The video also includes a political panel discussing the impact of an impeachment trial on Democrats running to be the party’s nominee to face President Trump in 2020. loose lips liar-Biden justified his position by stating, “The reason I wouldn’t is because it’s all designed to deal with Trump doing what he’s done his whole life: trying to take the focus off him.” This is not the first time loose lips liar-Biden stated he is not willing to appear in the Senate as part of the impeachment trial. During an interview with NPR in early December, loose lips ;liar-Biden responded to a question about whether he would comply with a Senate subpoena saying, “No, I will not yield to what everybody is looking for here. And that is to take the eye off the ball.” President Trump’s witness list includes loose lips liar-Biden and his son Hunter.Biden’s clarification is meaningless. He is merely trying to justify his decision by claiming a Republican-driven subpoena is not legitimate. It’s just a convenient excuse not to appear in the Senate. Most certainly, loose lips liar-Biden does not want to face challenging questions from Republican Senators. Moreover, the possibility of his son Hunter testifying must keep the former vice president up at night.
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The DoJ FISA Report — Trump Was Right
2xXBIrJ4JOczd_LRVw4bmM_QNLAzU9nc1W1R9gz9Bavp0r6VpPAFn5h4Jkx4v0vKexoqrLVU_aORJ5pKGE8O-kDbLiah24n622keGfh80mkRj5TZ6M1iYOI3qokolNOwy4xaUCh4UIO_qLIUsnCGPp36M12j_UVH14Th7Yg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander:  The best indication that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s review of FISA applications is a serious problem for Democrats is the fact that The Washington Post listed it as third down in its political headlines this morning.

If the report had dispensed with the Trump administration’s claim that a handful of top government bureaucrats who supported scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton, most notably Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s former FBI Director scumbag-James Comey and former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan, used the FISA court search warrants as a layup for Robert Mueller’s investigation — in effect a bureaucratic coup d'etat to take Trump down — the report would have been the top headline this morning. That would have teed up subsequent headlines about the House impeachment inquisition and Articles of Impeachment.

scumbag/commie-Brennan and scumbag-Comey, and their corrupt scumbag/liar-Clinton cronies, used their “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation to set Trump up for a takedown. And the best evidence supporting that fact provided by Horowitz: Of the 17 most egregious “errors” a handful of corrupt FBI managers committed in order to justify the FISA warrants and launch the Mueller investigation, every one favored the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign.

As you recall, the Russia-collusion investigation  originated with the FBI’s “evidence” for unaccredited FISA warrants linked to the fake Trump dossier they knew was funded by the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign.

And that has been the fundamental basis for our objection to these “investigations” from their inception.

According to Horowitz’s report: “We identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional errors in the Woods Procedures. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct on the part of the case agents … we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for the errors or problems we identified. In most instances, the agents and supervisors told us that they either did not know or recall why the information was not shared with the OI (Office of Investigations), that the failure to do so may have been an oversight, that they did not recognize at the time the relevance of the information to the FISA application, or that they did not believe the missing information to be significant. On this last point, we believe that case agents may have improperly substituted their own judgments in place of the judgment of the OI, or in place of the court, to weigh the probative value of the information.”

In other words, members of the deep-state cabal who set Trump up proceeded on the basis of their opinion, which was obviously a reflection of their bias.

To that end, the Horowitz report concludes: “We also found that the FBI did not aggressively seek to obtain certain potentially important information from Steele author of the fake Trump/Russia dossier. For example, the FBI did not press Steele for information about the actual funding force source for his election reporting work.”

So, we are to believe that nobody involved in this setup thought to ask the critical question, “Who funded the dossier?” — even though it had been suggested the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign was behind it. How convenient! Again, we now know, as scumbag/liar-Clinton’s FBI backers knew then — that the funding was from the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee.

And a note regarding the report’s assertion that, based on the mandate of what Horowitz was tasked to investigate, there was no evidence of “bias.” scumbag/liar-Clinton’s backers were high-ranking FBI bureaucrats — of course they did not leave an official trail of evidence pointing to their political bias in kicking off this investigation. However, there is no question that each of the individuals involved in the chain of command demonstrated significant personal bias against Trump. Horowitz was not tasked with evaluating their personal bias, only the evidence directly related to the FISA warrants.

The FBI’s predication for those FISA warrants is what prompted Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham to declare the Horowitz report woefully incomplete.

According to AG Barr: “The Inspector General’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken. It is also clear that, from its inception, the evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory. Nevertheless, the investigation and surveillance was pushed forward for the duration of the campaign and deep into President Trump’s administration. In the rush to obtain and maintain FISA surveillance of Trump campaign associates, FBI officials misled the FISA court, omitted critical exculpatory facts from their filings, and suppressed or ignored information negating the reliability of their principal source. The Inspector General found the explanations given for these actions unsatisfactory.”

Barr was highly critical of the implications of the FBI’s “gross abuses” of FISA: “I think from a civil liberties standpoint, the greatest danger to our free system is that the incumbent government use the apparatus of the state…both to spy on political opponents, but also to use them in a way that could affect the outcome of an election. As far as I am aware, this is the first time in history that this has been done… And here I felt this was very flimsy… I think our nation was turned on its head for three years based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by a completely irresponsible press. I think that there were gross abuses of FISA and inexplicable behavior that is intolerable in the FBI. I think that leaves open the possibility that there was bad faith.”

Durham, whose criminal investigation report into the origins of scumbag-Comey’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation is still months away from conclusion, took the unusual step of commenting: “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff, however, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Additionally, FBI Director Christopher Wray issued a response to the FISA report, concluding: “We will review the performance and conduct of certain FBI employees who were referenced in the Report’s recommendations – including managers, supervisors, and senior officials at the time. The FBI will take appropriate disciplinary action where warranted. Notably, many of the employees described in the report are no longer employed at the FBI.”

The Wall Street Journal notes, “The FBI corrupted the secret court process for obtaining warrants to spy on former Trump aide Carter Page. And it did so by supplying the court with false information produced by Christopher Steele, an agent of the Hillary Clinton campaign.” The editors noted further, regarding the report’s finding that “the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order,” that “This confirms what Rep. Devin Nunes and House Republicans first disclosed in February 2018, which was denied by Rep. scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff and sneered at by the press at the time.”

Senior Senate Judiciary Committee member Charles Grassley added: “Anyone who values fundamental civil liberties in the United States should be disgusted and terrified by what the inspector general uncovered…on the FBI’s spying on an American citizen. The FBI’s job is to protect Americans, our democracy and our rights. Its actions have done great harm to the public trust and jeopardize the important work that rank-and-file agents do every day for our nation.”

Predictably, Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer declared: “For years, President trump and his Republican allies in Congress and the media have speculated wildly about deep-state conspiracies against his presidency. They’re based on the claim that the FBI opened an investigation into the president’s campaign with political motives. Yesterday we…got a report from the Department of Justice inspector general that puts these conspiracy theories to rest once and for all. This report conclusively debunks the baseless conspiracy that the investigation into Mr. Trump’s campaign and its ties to Russia originated with political bias.”

That is an award-winning obfuscation!

His House sidekick scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff piled it on, “It may be too much to hope that this report will put to rest the conspiracy theories about the 2016 election — especially now when the president and his allies are eager to distract from mounting evidence of his abuse of power with respect to Ukraine.”

That notwithstanding, seasoned political analyst Brit Hume concludes, “The 17 instances of misconduct cited in the report — they are damning… The FISA court was clearly taken for a ride by the FBI … up and down the chain of command. … The FBI has had some dark days in its past, but nothing like this recently. … This was very serious misconduct on the part of the FBI.”

Of course, the now-demented scumbag-James Comey is out taking a victory lap, laughably insisting, “The FBI fulfilled its mission — protecting the American people and upholding the U.S. Constitution.” While most rank-and-file agents are devoted to that mission, scumbag-Comey was not among them. The report indicates that, among other things, scumbag-Comey lied to Congress when he asserted he did not open a counterintelligence investigation into Trump prior to the 2016 election, leading to the FISA warrants. But in fact, he did just that.

Finally, responding to the FISA report, Trump said: “They got caught, they got caught red-handed. … Never ever should this happen again in our country.” And he is right.

Stay tuned for the Durham report…  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/alexander/67271-the-doj-fisa-report-trump-was-right-2019-12-10?mailing_id=4775&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4775&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

America can we keep it?

I read the last blog post and agree.  Since the lat 1950s and early 1960s we the people may not have seen how the left snuck in and took over.  What did they do?

1. THEY GOT INTO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AND ARE NOW TEACHING OUR KIDS TO HATE AMERICA, THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT TAUGHT, THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGENCE IS WELL MOSTLY GONE, THE HISTORY OF AMERICA IS TAUGHT LITTLE IF ANY  AND WE HAVE TO RECLAIM IT OR LOOSE OUR CHILDREN AND THE COUNTRY.  IT IS OUR JOB TO TEACH THEM BEFORE SCHOOL BEFORE KINDERGARTEN OR WE COULD BE LOST;

2. THEY TOOK OVER THE MEDIA MOST OF IT NOW IS ALL LEFT WING DEM.  THEY ARE IN LOCKSTEP W/THE DEM PARTY AND PUSH THEIR AGENDA.  

3. THEY GIVE COVER TO BIDEN AND THE DEMS AND THEIR HATE OF PRES TRUMP IS DISGUSTING HE AND US STAND IN THEIR WAY OF NWO TAKEOVER.

4. THE UN ; IS A DISASTER WE SHOULD BE OUT OF IT AND IT NEEDS TO BE GONE.  

5. LOOK WHAT OBAMA DID: HE VIOLATED THE US CONSTITUTION LEFT AND RIGHT AND NEARY A WIMPER FROM THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED HE WAS NOT;

6. HILLARY; A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE ON HER OWN.  TOO LONG TO LIST BUT YOU GET THE BIG PIC.

WE AS AMERICANS HAVE A GREAT COUNTRY BUT IF WE DO NOT VOTE OUT THE ENTRENCHED POLITICIANS IN THEIR NOW BOY ARE WE IN FOR SOME TOUGH DOING.  THE FEW LIKE 10 IN THEIR NOW WHO ARE GOOD WE NEED THE REST NO WAY.  IT IS OUR JOB NOW  THE WORLD AGAINST AMERICA WE ARE IN FOR THE FIGHT OF OUR LIVES.  

Read more…

WORLD AGAINST AMERICA

   I am now 70 years old. I have watched the social changes during and since the 1950's, back then too young to understand most things, but learned more as I grew up. Children should NOT be allowed to participate in political things until they are old enough to VOTE, and that should not be until they are age 21. I have been a legal professional a very long time, and I am a supporter of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. I have been involved in criminal litigation, and have done work in criminal cases where I had to investigate a criminal's entire history. The U.S. Supreme Court in several major decisions about crime by adolescents has relied on findings from the professional community (psychologists/psychiatrists) that reveal and conclude that the human brain does not fully mature until late teens through early 20's, and therefore their minds do not fully mature until the brain is fully mature. I agree. Deductive reasoning is not yet mature and therefore conclusions and decisions made by adolescents are typically made from their emotional senses, the "feel good" and "I want" perspective, which explains a great deal about misbehavior and, in America today, why a large percentage of our young folks have become brainwashed with the "feel good" propaganda of the pro-socialists. I am aware through my own research and listening to experts in the field that our schools and universities have long been infiltrated by Marxist teachers and professors, and I have learned that Russia, who long ago took the same approach, is heavily involved in that infiltration in our own country. Envy and jealousy is something each of us knows on the small scale, i.e., the guy with the fancy car, the lady with expensive jewels, the list for envious responses is endless. And so it is on the world stage, with countries around the world "hating" America and Americans because it is the best country there ever was. So they're trying to take it down, and they are doing it from within. Anyone with an open mind and decent reasoning should already know this to be true. Our President Donald Trump, by his election, got in their way, blocked their agenda, and has been ruthlessly attacked by those factions trying to destroy our country. This is no joke. I have finished two books, and hope to get them published in spring of 2020; truth is I lack the funding at this time, but I do have someone famous looking it over now, and I do have a couple of investors interested in helping me get it done. I cannot do much in the way of campaigning, but I can write well, and I have spent countless hours over 5-years investigating and writing it all down. This is what I can do for my country, and I hope I can make a difference for all patriots of our American ideology, regardless of what Party they belong to. The Left seems to blindly accepts the "feel good" type propaganda and ignore reality itself. Patriots should use more common sense and deductive reasoning, not cognitive dissonance like that coming from the far Left. I hope to inspire a new movement, called the American Patriots Party, not as a political party in addition to the established institutions, but as a movement across the land where we can network and blossom into a power sufficient to stop those trying to destroy our home, and America is our HOME. I am tired of being a "nobody" who is helpless to help my country, who feels he is but one person who can't make a difference. I want to make a difference. I want to make a lasting contribution to my home before I die.  

Read more…

Monday ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Hellish Dingell Legacy
by Daniel Greenfield 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Whoops – CBS Major Garrett Notes Highly 
Effective Trump Minority Policies 
“Any President Would Want to Claim”
95GBjy6Sn18SEUDxYp4Md9DyP-oePrKZcMhV3CAwA_mBxdKtc1WRbbv40SnR3wKLYyTKtVPE7G3PJlxdlNVGcCC6OK-BdtTdwk9TcbCALjZO-LCmqpcHbB8sp0gRrYCDGCVcXwQ1WiH_qg-JlK5oAyocVk9-FA5PY6zdyEDcz097icLhxghk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Oh dear, CBS’s Major Garrett is going to be in trouble now. During a panel discussion Garrett pointed out President Trump’s accomplishments on behalf of minority communities is a legacy any President “would want to claim”:
.
U.S. Military Strikes Iranian Militia in Iraq 
and Northern Syria – Secretary Pompeo 
and Esper Briefing
uJPquvZmn_L-mqCxCAdn-J4fqAttxpX-GQSoVF3M44Xyxr4dmV7UumJYX7RU65j70PH2ObedHzDkh0PUO1hTEUr4z0AbCD9wTuFu78zK45zTnOedjeU17FXS-cqnmm58AfG6J1d1dqSzT57a7jTEIV1c4rHTd-0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Miley traveled to Mar-a-Lago today to brief President Trump on issues around the middle-east... The three leaders also held a press briefing this evening about U.S. military strikes that took place earlier today. At the beginning of his remarks Secretary Pompeo stated “we came to Florida today to brief the president on activities that have taken place in the Middle East over the course of the last 72 hours.” Additionally Pompeo said he would let Esper discuss “the military aspects but I wanted to put into context our policy with respect to the Islamic Republic of Iran.”...
.
NatSec Advisor Robert O’Brien -vs- Jonathan Karl
efmQjGme1TWPiX2yN1vLwZY0YEDSukwvdx3H2qspF9x-6OQZAwRvpE3shfmkjbId2Gx_k8ngyQeiG6e_bo0alWsyXGODTnENyr7iXhBvEsJf-F7qMfXZervcbLNqof2uL7NfWEuZaK5KYpFLsb8VeA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien appeared on ABC This Week with Jonathan Karl to discuss the ongoing issues with North Korea... Karl attempted the oft familiar approach of pitting O’Brien against former advisor John Bolton, by highlighting Bolton’s always customary and short-sighted war mongering approach against the more pragmatic position of President Trump. O’Brien did well to swat down that media tactic. Jonathan Karl quickly shifts tactics by using North Korea’s Kim Jong Chol comments in an effort to undermine President Trump’s strategic policy with Kim Jong-un. That too failed. Taking a third swing at the administration Karl shifts narrative construction to the case of Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher by using leaked prosecution video in an effort to undermine the intervention of malicious prosecution through a pardon by President Trump. O’Brien smartly deflects the side-snark by reminding the narrative engineer that President Trump not only has pardon authority but also delivered criminal justice reform which produced a similar outcome for many non-military Americans.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/29/sunday-talks-natsec-advisor-robert-obrien-vs-jonathan-karl/  
.
Senator Ted Cruz Breaks-down 
Likely Impeachment Process
RUX5XlMgtYAi52LO_NABhOfch7ATDmgg3AvAZwQ_FSRfPgJEy8NYRG_3r3GTb9pO14KLNcpA2GYE-UJthOzo9MpiqzzRulhfdRXhVfatfn_t6_EJbfsAWuIz6GMaIoTAbbsxHoUflZM9hXsn_IYfRsInA-LsAUDDyVT9=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Senator Ted Cruz appears on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to break down the likely procedural process for an impeachment trial in the upper chamber... Senator Cruz walks through the likely scenario based on current Senate rules of impeachment. It should be noted the rules are subject to changes at any time by the Senate. Additionally, Senator Cruz discusses the specific points of each article of impeachment which make the construct weak; hence, the liar-Pelosi, scumbag liar-Nadler and Lawfare effort to delay sending the articles and gather more evidence.
.
Ivanka Trump -vs- Margaret Brennan
PEioLH48x1SJVo7q3DbvP8svVGR5CHGNs6LgDmneLaCq3Q2QG2A1VbiduM3GC5MmLUaHRYVnmVEqzv26qYp2MoneWwkfHNo6542-NxsBfM2VKCyHBslhIgqdRk5zUZZVHzBrDFOpl-JNBKGXKIHvulKcm9Gwram98KbqnQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Ivanka Trump appears on Face the Nation to discuss the ongoing initiatives around paid family leave. Ms. Brennan exhibits serious envy as she attempts to position Ms. Trump on the defensive... However, Ivanka Trump is deeply informed on the nuances, details and challenges of the proposal and easily handles the narrative engineering effort of Brennan. The family leave topic is a serious policy proposal that crosses into the larger America First economic need for a vibrant U.S. workforce. Additionally, the topic of balance between family and work is critically important for middle-class and main street workers. There are currently seven million jobs available and policies that help working families with children have long-term benefits beyond economics.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/29/sunday-talks-ivanka-trump-vs-margaret-brennan/  
.
We Can No Longer Ignore
 The Attacks On Jews In New York
gpb8DUNutNwt5e-MVPzTimBv_OYyyvck9TRkVE-8HM5IUrlSfK1Xdrb1Zi9pqtZ2ggmtkOZ1lYtIP7fuydangqD3O0e5Rc737h9fRyeAXOPNzZy1_8m2OUyRS-pTaAHiMQ72=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By David Marcus
{ thefederalist.com } ~ In Rockland County last night, during a Chanukah celebration at a synagogue a man stormed in with a machete and stabbed at least five victims, who were taken to the hospital... This is the latest in a string of antisemitic attacks in the New York City area, coming in the wake of the tragic killing of four people during an attack on a Jewish grocery store in Jersey City. These two acts of violence this month have brought renewed attention to the sharp uptick in anti Jewish violence that has quietly held New York City in its grip over the past few years. Sadly, Mayor Bill de Blasio, who spent much of the year more concerned with his farcical run for president than protecting the citizens of his own city, and the state governments of New York and New Jersey have, been flatfooted in addressing the growing concern.It has frankly been astounding how little attention attacks on Jews in the New York City area have received. If any other minority group were subject to such abuse, it would be a leading national story. Why have these attacks been swept under the carpet? The clearest answer seems to be that the news media and our political leadership are uncomfortable with the fact that many of these attacks, including last night’s, were perpetrated by black people. Make no mistake, if white supremacists in MAGA hats were shooting minorities or carving them up with machetes, it wouldn’t just be news, it would be the only news. So satisfying would that narrative be to our politicians and scribes that we would scarcely be able to turn away. But alas, it’s Jews being killed and maimed. And the criminals don’t fit the bill of right-wing, Trump-supporting Nazis, so, you know, it’s complicated. De Blasio, who has ignored this festering problem for years, had this to tweet last night: “Horrific, So many Jewish families in our city have close ties to Monsey. We cannot overstate the fear people are feeling right now. I’ve spoken to longtime friends who, for the first time in their lives, are fearful to show outward signs of their Jewish faith.” Seriously, Bill? You are just realizing this now? Attacks on ultra-Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn have become an almost weekly occurrence under de Blasio. Synagogues and schuls are vandalized regularly, and children and old people are attacked. This is a crisis and has all too often happened throughout Jewish history. It has typically been ignored at best. At worst, the victims are blamed for not fitting in. Nobody wants to talk about it, but something is going on between the black and Jewish communities in the New York City area that needs to be addressed. The Jersey City shooters were Black Hebrew Israelites; the machete-wielding man who attacked last night was also identified as black. It is time we stop simply wishing that this problem did not exist and address it full on...   https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/29/we-can-no-longer-ignore-the-attacks-on-jews-in-new-york/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=692d7c00bd-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-692d7c00bd-83771801 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Hellish Dingell Legacy
by Daniel Greenfield 

{ sultanknish.blogspot.com } ~ A decade ago, Time Magazine unveiled an in-depth article on the death of Detroit. One of the politicians whom the article blamed for Detroit’s woes was Rep. John Dingell.

The Dingell clan has held a congressional seat outside Detroit since 1932. Their 87-year tenure has not coincidentally coincided with the decline of a thriving industrial city into a post-apocalyptic wasteland.

But it’s been good for the Dingells, three of whom have sat in their congressional seat since the days of Herbert Hoover, the rise of Hitler, and the radio age, and fattened their pockets on its sinecures.

Dingell Sr. was the son of Polish immigrants who started out in politics as a union boss, jumped into a newly created seat, and kept it through eleven elections before passing it on to his son. Dingell Jr, outdid daddy by becoming the longest serving member of Congress in American history. Before he died, he passed on the seat to his second wife, whom he married when she was 28 and he was 55 years old.

She was a GM lobbyist who married the Congressman from GM. What was good for GM was good for the Dingells.

By 2014, Dingell Jr. was listed as the third richest member of Congress from Michigan with a net worth of $3.5 million. When Debbie took over for him next year, her net worth was up to $3.6 million. The salary for House members was $174,000. The median household income is $57,000 in the 12th.

Not bad for a family whose business was and is the 12th district from western Detroit through Ann Arbor. Much of the Dingell money came through GM. And Rep. John Dingell had vocally fought for the GM bailout. The GM couple, which had millions in GM stock, had a lot riding on taxpayers bailing them out.

Taxpayers spent billions and the Dingells got millions in an arrangement made in the depths of hell.

Even though Rep. Debbie Dingell ran unopposed in the Democrat primary, and even though she was running for office in one of the most heavily Democrat districts in the country, she still raised over $1 million for that campaign, and another $1.2 million for 2018, and is already up to half a million now.

Even though no one running in the 12th whose last name is Dingell could lose an election to Abe Lincoln.

Where’s the money coming from? Unions, PACs, including the GM PAC, the Ford PAC, Walmart, and, insurance companies. GM, Ford, and Chrysler had also been paying her an undisclosed salary before she took over her husband’s congressional seat. It was a very neat arrangement.

The Dingells take care of them and they take care of the Dingells. Everyone else can go to hell.

Despite Rep. John Dingell’s motorcade pausing at the Capitol, and the gushing tributes to the “longest-serving” member of Congress, even his own party loathed him in life.

In 1996, the New York Times called him a “bully”. Some years earlier, Bloomberg had accused him of the, “bullying of bureaucrats, executives, and colleagues.”

“In the arrogance of his power, he terrorized individuals and institutions that he wanted to humble,” Anthony Lewis wrote in the Times.

"There isn't an industry in the country not touched by our committee,” Rep. John Dingell had bragged.

That includes finance which dragged him into the BCCI scandal through a $10,000 contribution and a mortgage on a home in McLean, Virginia.

After ruling the Committee on Energy and Commerce for 28 years, his own party grew tired of him and unprecedentedly forced him out in 2008. The overthrow of the corrupt "old bull" was the work of none other than Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi.

Despite eventually becoming the longest-serving member of the House, it was his fellow Democrats who conspired to take away the privileges of his seniority.

All that has been forgotten. Dingell’s descriptions of Asians as “little yellow people”, his greed, shameless abuse of power, and arrogance were replaced with empty tributes to his greatness.

President Trump hasn’t forgotten.

And so, at a campaign rally in Michigan, Trump recalled a phone call from Rep. Debbie Dingell on her husband’s funeral. “‘He’s looking down, he’d be so thrilled,’” He recalled her saying. “I said, that’s okay, don’t worry about it. Maybe he’s looking up, I don’t know. I don't know. I don’t know. Maybe. Maybe. But let’s assume he’s looking down."

The locals laughed.

It was impossible to be from Michigan, to have had a front row seat to the antics of the Dingell clan which practically date back to the birth of mass automobile ownership, and imagine “Big John” in heaven. The image of the old crooked thug with wings and a harp is hopelessly laughable.

It’s easy to imagine him looking up, but President Trump generously tried to assume otherwise.

This isn’t the first time that Trump has gotten into trouble for bluntly poking fun at the niceties of a political industry where every crook is “honorable” and everyone pretends to believe it in public.

Does Speaker liar-Pelosi really believe that Rep. John Dingell was a saint? If she does, why did she conspire to take away his chairmanship, against precedent and the seniority rules of the road?

Do the New York Times and Bloomberg want to apologize for calling him a bully?

John Dingell was not a nice guy. Nobody seriously thinks he would have been traumatized by the suggestion that he might not be going to heaven. This was a man who admired a tombstone that read, “He’s done his damnedest.” There’s two ways to read that one. But Dingell never pretended to be a saint. His calling card was hauling pork back to his district and supporting local companies. Like GM.

Nor did he restrain his rhetoric.

"I've read enough of that Steele dossier to know just how risky a ‘used Trump hotel mattress’ can truly be," he tweeted in 2018, referencing a smear by the scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign.

But Trump reached out to Rep. Debbie Dingell. John got a nice funeral in Washington D.C. And Debbie responded by voting to impeach President Trump for the smears of her fellow Democrats.

Nor is Debbie a nice person. At one point she inveighed against the, "the 13 white boys–sorry to say it that way–that are going to be doing this in the Senate". So much for civility and collegiality.

Was Trump really supposed to pretend that this racist, thieving clan is heavenly?

The D.C. political class throws a fit every time President Trump speaks bluntly about members of the swamp. And Rep. John Dingell wasn’t just part of the swamp. He owned his own mire. In his days ruling the Committee on Energy and Commerce with an iron fist, he would define his jurisdiction by pointing at the planet. These days his ambit, wherever it may be, is a whole lot smaller. And that’s for the best.

There’s a place for civility and collegiality. And had the Dingell clan sailed off into the sunset, maybe we could all remember them fondly the way we do the Hapsburgs, the Bourbons, and the Gambinos.

But they’re not going anywhere. That’s what this is all about.

After John Sr, came John Jr, and after John Jr. came Debbie, and after Debbie will come Christopher, currently a Michigan judge, and on and on, endless generations of Dingells, marching through the House, porking, thieving, and procuring, passing the family legacy of taxpayer money on through the ages until the Republic falls. Should President Trump or anyone else really be afraid to say it’s so?

America didn’t need a single Dingell in her House. It certainly didn’t need three.

If the country is to be rid of them, the chattering classes will have to accept hearing that John Dingell Jr. might not, despite his lifetime of good deeds for GM at taxpayer expense, have made it to heaven.
Read more…

Saturday ~ thefrontpagecover

IYTaPFligsuOQnb3KpY6e8EIfbRYbxGaXEy74toCam53VAlK2BU_zHqHRZOoSXqHvoAdusjFGrHrr7jggO3_gsFWuxy7XukRwXf9bcAs3YgfszlMZ5kAoKRzg9juK5B8ZKCjMjU2Rw7J5SqGovNzWSBoxIHjawZYlz-CkMAHjWNMmMzLIpGPDtgQKYPEFUPU5PMAl7wF212LPdK0aDE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Happy New Years
From TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Demos' Socialist Cloward-Piven Pivot
HWEnMmXt0ytzpNZsuzkAFu4Iv38Vb94uwgJp6gVtIGt_2sUsB6oaJoIr2m9iKPmxHPaByz9Va1vEZYyRPWhGxeW-wbM3gemSnZHZnPJiG71F4nS_QI8yyhN7CbVO30aXSwt8TyKRSe_ZOLhJmUuRoeTr1tBR2QLK_o90YAA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Trump Presidency Exposed Scope of Deep 
State Corruption and Influence
O6-Vn7p3fc84H537Ys5BRgAkYkCuxn6EZxLEE7GttnViaDZnEhyhDkEfnyuv2MFhhgh5DHliWMOYbxJwtU4cpEcKgLhl2AFihT4-VbSpOaJpffX1rYuhEj5puzfEvjwF-3hy2ahOGlGKLY9z9Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~Tammy Bruce is filling in for Sean Hannity. Refreshing. Congressman Louie Gohmert discusses the status of the political impeachment effort... and Speaker liar-Pelosi’s refusal to send the articles to the Senate. Ms. Bruce notes the DC reaction to an outsider administration was predictable; President Trump is adverse to their self-interests.   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/26/gohmert-trump-presidency-exposed-scope-of-deep-state-corruption-and-influence/
.
scumbag/liar-Schiff hired former colleague 
of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella 
the day after Trump-Ukraine call
-g3eIXS0zwu4cbh6t58TpKaiYvFFow_5zVRQG5ZcYIDORz0XT4IEMmWBbqD_DL1-ySt3BXN3-yIbUXr8Jp-uGqvkO7Ygmy-9hMoUFyt2Se-sjmEBCzUbRC_PQHhDGJYBjB1uOrUr75BBA-wLfbbfFp_zG4X1H0O96GykJIcd=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Kerry Picket
{washingtonexaminer.com } ~House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff hired a former National Security Council aide who worked with alleged Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramella... at the NSC during the scumbag/liar-nObama and Trump administrations the day after the phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. It was previously reported by the Washington Examiner that public records indicated Sean Misko, 37, started work on scumbag/liar-Schiff’s committee in August as a professional staff member. A specific start date was not available until this week when the latest congressional quarterly disbursements were released. The new records show that Misko’s official hire date was July 26. Misko was the director for the Gulf States at the NSC between 2015 until the first half of 2018. The Washington Examiner has established that the whistleblower is a CIA officer who was on the NSC during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and worked on Ukrainian issues with loose lips liar-Joe Biden, the 2020 Democratic candidate, when he was vice president. Ciaramella, 33, is a career CIA analyst and was the Ukraine director on the NSC from 2016 until the summer of 2017. In October 2016, he was loose lips liar-Biden's guest at a State Department banquet. Before joining the NSC, Misko worked in the scumbag/liar-nObama administration at the State Department for deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan, who went on to become scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton's senior foreign policy adviser during her 2016 presidential campaign. Both Ciaramella and Misko started their tenures during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and left during the first year of the Trump administration...
.
Judicial Watch Sues scumbag/liar-Adam 
Schiff for Phone Snooping Records
BgQDzk3H9AKxpDCVasu_bhFe04VdqaDsf2v5MHtlwMmLhheTAd9ZUGFOkq8wpV4B26bSjkhgz--tUQjaG1eLDFlddo0ak8iYLG9NW91wH0CRp226oDrmHAhsNHIQuTIVJ1SzQHHX=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by JOEL B. POLLAK
{ breitbart.com } ~ Judicial Watch has sued the House Intelligence Committee and its chairman, scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff (D-CA), on Friday for records relating to scumbag/liar-Schiff’s phone snooping... on his Republican counterpart, a journalist, and the president’s lawyer. scumbag/liar-Schiff included phone logs purporting to document communications between Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA), journalist John Solomon, and presidential lawyer Rudy Giuliani, among others, attempting to implicate them in a plot to smear the reputation of then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, whom President Donald Trump had constitutional authority to fire for any reason, regardless. The phone records led to the publication of the private phone records of Giuliani, Congressman Devon Nunes, journalist John Solomon, Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, attorney Victoria Toensing, and other American citizens. Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit under the public’s common-law right of public access to examine government records after it received no response to a December 6, 2019, records request (Judicial Watch v scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff and U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (No. 1:19-cv-03790)): All subpoenas issued by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on or about September 30, 2019 to any telecommunications provider including, but not limited to AT&T, Inc., for records of telephone calls of any individuals; All responses received to the above-referenced subpoenas. Judicial Watch accused scumbag/liar-Schiff of abusing his power. scumbag/liar-Schiff allegedly used a subpoena to AT&T for the records of several unidentified phone numbers in an apparent attempt to conceal the fact that he was trying to reconstruct the phone conversations of his intended targets, which he then published in the Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report. scumbag/liar-Schiff did not cite any legal authority for his actions, which arguably violated the First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution. Nunes has said that scumbag/liar-Schiff violated his civil liberties, and that he will pursue all legal options; the White House responded by noting that one of the phone numbers in the report was incorrect.   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/22/judicial-watch-sues-adam-schiff-for-phone-snooping-records/   
Health Care and Dollar Efficiency
0dw6v1F5--HhmYjzPKp8gU39tTCE3Maq0Z0EbDjEIxvKYYfErFqptkLMgUolw3nmF0lx4LYEUZWRjAazWvOtWSxXUqiRVtGuEd8qJDTOcMvI7m2zL5Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Deane Waldman
{ americanthinker.com } ~ As U.S. healthcare slides toward collapse, Americans are looking in the wrong direction for a cure. They are trying to cut costs and save money in order to make healthcare affordable. No one is focusing what really matters: dollar efficiency... To avoid miscommunication, terms should be clearly defined. Healthcare, one word, refers to a complex system that cost Americans $3.65 trillion in 2018 (19.4 percent of U.S. GDP). That amount is 130 percent of Great Britain’s GDP. Health care as two words includes the services or work product of health professionals as well as the goods and devices involved in diagnosis and treatment. Health care is a legally protected fiduciary relationship between a patient and a care provider.  Cost in healthcare is often expressed in confusing, incomplete, and inaccurate ways. When I asked a hospital CFO how much it cost to do a cardiac catherization, he accessed his computer and told me a number in thousands of dollars. When I asked how he knew this, he answered, “Simple. We divided the number of catheterizations you did by the budget allocation for the catherization lab.” There was no aggregation of costs such as labor hours, disposables, durable goods and devices, amortization schedules, and overhead. True or accounting cost is the sum of all sellers’ expenditures necessary to bring products or services to market. Costs in healthcare are not accounted that way. They are allocated or calculated. Out-of-pocket cost is the consumer’s personal expenditure. Dollar efficiency refers to the percentage of dollars that go into a system or organization that contributes to desired outputs or outcomes. In healthcare, efficiently spent dollars are those that produce what patients (consumers) need: care. Having insurance might be a necessary process step, but only if it leads to the desired outcome: care. Similarly, saving money is a desirable phase of the process but not an outcome. No one wants to save money if such saving leads to unfavorable medical outcomes, such as the death-by-queueing experienced by those with government-supplied Medicaid and TriCare insurance...  
.
Win/Win – Speculation of Mike Pompeo 
Running for Kansas Senate Seat
15nhVvw52M63Ap7EWZRWgkabZehmp34uIXwOxOuIJ3pASIch06DHH0p1N6tVkuQE8Ny_xulTMEU223hBain7PB6MZLUq1pawJF59_nnNLz-DIh5v-gGR1g4_cIDtq1Cm0VvQUXL_-ZB29d-TSWvD14iq2X-3MhM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Several news articles are speculating that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo might run for the U.S. Senate Seat from Kansas... If accurate, that move would seem to solve a few personnel issues in a rather diplomatic way. Since the Sept./Oct. impeachment operation started there has been a considerable shift notable in the relationship between President Trump and Secretary Pompeo; especially after officials from within the Dept. of State came out strong against President Trump after CIA whistle-blower Eric Ciaramella lit the fuse…. and Pompeo was, well, essentially mute. Getting rid of Pompeo for a Senate bid would be a win/win. Absent the dangerous Siren voice from Nikki Haley spit-spit-spit moving Treasury Sec. Mnuchin or similar to State would be a good transition. Mnuchin already knows the players and has contacts therein etc. A Senate Foreign Relations Committee confirmation should be seamless, well, sans the predictable rino-Mitt Romney grandstanding. Spitballing CTH could see moving Mick Mulvaney (or similar) to Treasury Senate Finance Confirmation and then put Mark Meadows in as chief-of-staff and/or Robert O’Brien with Meadows becoming Nat Sec Advisor. Or something similar...
.
Libya's Political Instability 
Makes Room for ISIS to Regroup
J8tTsO_csgd1fC-eH3hBt8qOm4aPc3FmY2KNvYt_MhCO3WaVtcKDTWn6ZBCHG1W6vrWz-CP6Ict4VhlXsANd8ciccQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Ahmed Charai
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan opened the way on December 26 for direct military intervention in Libya: he announced a parliamentary vote in early January on sending troops to support the UN-backed Tripoli government against General Khalifa Haftar... Instructors, equipment and Turkish special forces are already operating in Libya alongside pro-government militias. Erdogan said that Turkey would also be willing to send aerial and naval assistance if circumstances require it. Sending Turkish troops will complicate the situation in an already fragile country, torn by internal dissent since the ouster and killing of the dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The map of foreign intervention in Libya is important: In the east of the country, forces from Saudi Arabia and Egypt support Gen. Haftar, the separatist who heads the Libyan National Army -- not the country's national army. Arrayed against them are Turkey and Qatar, supporting the recognized government headed by Fayez al-Sarraj, but his government is not supported by the legislature. Then there is Russia. It has dispatched militia forces known as the Wagner Group, which have already carried out operations in Syria, are also operating in several African countries -- supporting and assisting Haftar's forces. France has joined the group of countries that support the rebel general, while Italy backs Sarraj's recognized government. As it has done in Syria, the United States has so far refrained from any intervention. Instead, the US has clung to the position of an outside observer, ready to offer advice and diplomatic assistance to resolve the Libyan crisis. Turkey, which signed a military and economic accord with the Libyan government in November, could deprive Greece and the Greek Cypriots of large swaths of their oil and gas exploration areas and force Egypt and Israel to negotiate with Turkey over the construction of natural gas pipelines to Europe. Libya is now one of the main axes of future ISIS operations, to compensate for the loss of ground in Syria. ISIS in Libya finances its activities through robbery, kidnapping for ransom, extorting Libyan citizens and cross-border smuggling of artifacts and other commodities...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15348/libya-instability-turkey 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Demos' Socialist Cloward-Piven Pivot
HWEnMmXt0ytzpNZsuzkAFu4Iv38Vb94uwgJp6gVtIGt_2sUsB6oaJoIr2m9iKPmxHPaByz9Va1vEZYyRPWhGxeW-wbM3gemSnZHZnPJiG71F4nS_QI8yyhN7CbVO30aXSwt8TyKRSe_ZOLhJmUuRoeTr1tBR2QLK_o90YAA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander:  Since broadcasting our first email digest more than 20 years ago, our Patriot Post editorial team has reviewed, daily, the full spectrum of political advocacy and rhetoric. After all, the best way to understand the strategies and tactics used by the adversaries of Liberty and Rule of Law is to go straight to the source. And so, every day, my inbox is filled with a wide range of email — from the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) on the Left to the John Birch Society on the Right.

Reviewing everything the Left spews is a dirty job, but somebody has to do it!

Over the last decade, the political and policy positions of the CPUSA and those of the Socialist Democrat Party leadership increasingly constitute a distinction without much difference — Democrats are just more tactful than communists (sometimes). It’s no small irony that we observed “The Communist Centennial of Tyranny and Terror” during the same year that, thank goodness, Donald Trump defeated scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton.

Ahead of 2020, the cadres of assorted statists who make up the Democrats’ presidential primary plethora hope to defeat Trump with their collective constituencies strategy. Their socialist pacesetter is commie-Bernie Sanders, who was sandbagged by the Democrats in the 2016 primary, and his loudmouthed gaggle of socialist sycophants includes four congresswomen — commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, worthless-Ilhan Omar, worthless-Rashida Tlaib, and worthless-Ayanna Pressley, collectively labeled “The Squad,” but more accurately, “The Gang of Four.”

Indicative of the backroom alliance between Tom Perez’s Democrat National Committee (DNC) and John Bachtell’s CPUSA was a recent email I received. No, it didn’t announce the merger of the two organizations, but it did do something much more subtle.

In order to track incoming email from various sources, I use more than 30 email address variants. But three weeks ago, I started receiving duplicate emails from the DNC — and I noted that those duplicates were using the specific address I use for incoming email from CPUSA. Not that I was surprised, but how revealing. For the record, when one organization integrates the email list of another, without the knowledge or permission of those being merged, it violates a lot of email double-opt-in protocols. When this happens, the email from the sender will typically be marked “spam” and this will hinder delivery of the sender’s email — in this case, that of the DNC. Not a problem! (For the record, Patriot Post subscribers have to double-opt-in to receive our publications, and we do not share or sell that information to any third party, which is why our email lists are “spam free” and our delivery rates are very high.)

So, what objectives and strategies do the Democrat Party and CPUSA have in common? Well, how much time do you have?

Most notably, both are advocates of the Cloward-Piven Strategy, which is the ‘60s-era brainchild of two hard-left academics to “end poverty” by creating an economic crisis that would lead to the collapse of capitalism resulting in its replacement with socialism.

As one of our political analysts, Arnold Ahlert, wrote: “In 1966, Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven formulated the Cloward-Piven Strategy. It was a plan to overthrow America’s capitalist system by overloading the welfare state bureaucracy with demands that were impossible to meet, thereby precipitating a revolution.” Ahlert noted that the latest “effort to 'crash the system’” is to overload it with illegal immigrants.

This explains the Demos’ 2020 platform: “Open Borders and Free Stuff.” Indeed, the party that was once the champion of blue-collar workers now supports the greatest threat to labor, wage growth, and the economy overall: the influx of millions of illegal aliens competing for jobs, willing to take lower wages, and soaking up enormous taxpayer resources in terms of medical care, welfare, housing, and education.

According to Cloward and Piven, to achieve their goal, it would necessitate “a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls,” followed by “a federal program of income redistribution … necessary to elevate the poor en masse from poverty.” That income redistribution would take the form of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.” Except the only thing that’s equal under socialism is poverty — except, of course, for the political class.

Cloward and Piven insisted: “Republicans are always ready to declaim the evils of public welfare, and they would probably be the first to raise a hue and cry. But deeper and politically more telling conflicts would take place within the Democratic coalition. … Whites — both working class ethnic groups and many in the middle class — would be aroused against the ghetto poor, while liberal groups, which until recently have been comforted by the notion that the poor are few … would probably support the movement. Group conflict, spelling political crisis for the local party apparatus, would thus become acute as welfare rolls mounted and the strains on local budgets became more severe.”

Their strategy is similar (albeit more radical) to the failed model Franklin Delano Roosevelt called “The New Deal.” FDR infamously proclaimed, “Here is my principle: Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle.” Of course, that “American principle” is merely a paraphrase from Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, in which he declared, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.”

FDR’s failed programs were reincarnated as the Democrats’ so-called “Great Society,” which, in effect, enslaved millions of poor Americans on urban poverty plantations and coincided with the first publication of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

Today, 50 years after the Left’s so-called “War on Poverty,” many Americans are now “institutionally impoverished,” unprepared and unwilling to rise above the poverty line because they’ve been generationally disabled from doing so.

As Cloward and Piven noted: “As the crisis develops, it will be important to use the mass media to inform the broader liberal community about the inefficiencies and injustices of welfare.” The Demo/MSM propaganda machine is just waiting for the signal from its leftist puppeteers! The organizing arm this plan utilizes Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” model for “community organizers.”

The Democrats almost achieved critical economic overload in 2008, when their statist “economic equality” policies resulted in the near-collapse of our economy. I detailed this in “How Democrats Seeded the 2008 Financial Crisis.” That was a near miss, but they did get an ideological socialist as a consolation prize: eight years of Barack scumbag/liar-nObama as president of the United States.

As I wrote eight months ago, Democrats are desperately hoping for a recession before the 2020 election. And they’re ready to pounce on the next opening to overload the system and create a crisis, adhering to the advice of scumbag/liar-nObama’s former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

Fellow Patriots, stand ready and keep your powder dry! 

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/alexander/64501?mailing_id=4763&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4763&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Friday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

IYTaPFligsuOQnb3KpY6e8EIfbRYbxGaXEy74toCam53VAlK2BU_zHqHRZOoSXqHvoAdusjFGrHrr7jggO3_gsFWuxy7XukRwXf9bcAs3YgfszlMZ5kAoKRzg9juK5B8ZKCjMjU2Rw7J5SqGovNzWSBoxIHjawZYlz-CkMAHjWNMmMzLIpGPDtgQKYPEFUPU5PMAl7wF212LPdK0aDE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Happy New Years
From TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Former NSA chief helping criminal 
probe of Russia-collusion claims
s_tHLIMRnl6ryejI5O6YWfWdvZMy6FXwWd_Jvkil5SOWOziWG8lSNShsbDd4YkOf8-eRDf1mBynwEVpKaAIfiiLcLIzEaENwiTb4HnA4i_oa17Bf1Q9PXV4_KITXHqJjMg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by wnd.com 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Against Impeachment for Thought Crimes
4bSiOt2PUlZzc5uzAY2wUqoXxVTHoXUM_YoXh2Ae2GgXgTIrmtpgpFqnKJtixQ4_Erg2V5944VmATBB97o1kJu77qrA1zSAgt854tJR_oWDpRVII7xozX4qW0J8syAC4fsSc6V4lR4Q44rZw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by E. DONALD ELLIOTT
{ spectator.org } ~ Both of the articles of impeachment passed by the Democrats in the House are unprecedented in that they charge “thought crimes” against a president... They are based on the dubious legal theory that doing something that is legal in and of itself but with a supposedly improper mental attitude turns an otherwise legal act into an impeachable offense. Lawyers call such offenses “specific intent” crimes, which means they turn on what was in someone’s mind at the time of the actions in question. If accepted by the Senate as a valid basis for impeachment, these articles of impeachment would set a dangerous precedent that a president may be removed from office any time that a majority of the House is suspicious of a president’s motives, which occurs frequently in an era of divided government. It is legal for a president, who is under a constitutional duty to enforce the law, to ask a foreign government to cooperate with the Attorney General to investigate an American citizen about allegations that involve possible misuse of office for private gain. It is also legal for the President to delay the delivery of foreign aid to make sure he gets the foreign government’s attention; that’s not “extortion,” which is also a specific intent crime that requires a “wrongful” or corrupt purpose. On the contrary, one of the recognized purposes of foreign aid is “to reward a government for behavior desired by the donor.” Under the theory adopted by the Democrats in the House, the President’s otherwise legal acts supposedly become “high crimes and misdemeanors” warranting impeachment if they were done with the allegedly improper intent of “digging up dirt on a political rival,” rather than for a legitimate purpose. But why isn’t “digging up dirt” on a political opponent in an election year a legitimate purpose? It is called “opposition research” and the Democrats do it all the time. Their original theory was that because a foreign government was involved, the request for an investigation would have been soliciting an illegal campaign contribution. That tortured legal theory that asking for an investigation that never happened was an impeachable offense was abandoned when the Republicans pointed out that a foreign government provided information against candidate Trump in the notorious Steele dossier.  The second article of impeachment for so-called obstruction of Congress also involves a thought crime, but based on an even more far-fetched theory. The idea there is that by invoking Executive privilege, the president was somehow “obstructing” a Congressional investigation. This is specious, as Professor Jonathan Turley rightly pointed out in his testimony to the House judiciary committee.  Presidents, like all other American citizens, are entitled to raise plausible objections to a Congressional subpoena and to direct their subordinates to do likewise; if the House does not agree, it may go to the third branch, the judiciary, to resolve the dispute...
.
Netanyahu wins Likud leadership race 
by landslide, defeating Sa’ar 72%-27%
UI5OmSQUkDIWZKwGbKazFinDhVqLKlkIQ75uZGHUnNh7YoTAuExFjoJgN_5CQrCPSa4FWhGD6VgpuafUSz7dqZbvUQwFcfpg-5iymOQEiprrkuwfYUSB1c1QE-xRl7d7KmiKAzhhKg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by timesofisrael.com ~ Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu trounced his rival Gideon Sa’ar in the Likud leadership race early Friday, winning some 72.5% of the party vote in a landslide victory for the longtime Likud leader... Netanyahu declared victory soon after midnight Thursday-Friday, as the count was underway, while Sa’ar conceded an hour later. As the final results were announced, Sa’ar called Netanyahu to congratulate him.“This is a huge victory! Thank you Likud members for your trust, support and love,” Netanyahu said in a message to supporters, vowing to “lead Likud to a great victory in the upcoming [national] elections and continue to lead the State of Israel to unprecedented achievements.”“We won! Thank you for your support,” Netanyahu later tweeted. At 1 a.m., Sa’ar conceded defeat, saying that while “we don’t have the final figures, the result is clear.” He said he would “congratulate the prime minister on his victory,” and pledged support for Netanyahu and Likud ahead of the March 2 general elections. “The contest was vital to the Likud and its democratic character,” said Sa’ar. “My decision to run was right and necessary. Whoever isn’t prepared to take a chance for the path he believes in, will never win.” The contest was the first significant challenge to Netanyahu’s leadership of the Likud in more than a decade, but he maintained the support of the vast majority of the party’s Knesset members and its prominent local leaders and activists, and can thus utilize the result as a boost ahead of Israel’s third general elections in under a year...   https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-declares-victory-in-likud-primary-appears-headed-for-landslide-win/?utm_source=Breaking+News&utm_campaign=breaking-news-2019-12-27-2209242&utm_medium=email   
These Former Intelligence Chiefs Fit Perfectly
Into Our Media Advocacy Culture
QbB2LVok8DHtjGFTm56VRUm4W22DMVHGGbrdlWhFfDINvE6M-g1PDExVat7A24UR2zw9yirlxiiTT2yARSnELmALpl6C-TcRvg2GvHWxov7WBSRqI0D2BE83adgR_h9CDeyvYQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Victor Davis Hanson
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Former FBI Director scumbag-James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan, and former Director of National Intelligence scumbag-James Clapper have lots of things in common... One, they ran the nation’s key intelligence and investigatory agencies under President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama. They were deeply involved in the “Russian collusion” hoax. And they participated in the surveillance of the Trump campaign and transition. scumbag-Comey and McCabe both signed applications for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrants requesting surveillance on Trump campaign aide Carter Page. A report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz criticized scumbag-Comey and McCabe’s FBI for falsehoods and misrepresentations during its investigation of the Trump campaign. scumbag-Clapper, scumbag/commie-Brennan, and the FBI helped to disseminate the fallacious Steele dossier to the press and among government agencies. Two, scumbag-Comey, McCabe, scumbag/commie-Brennan, and scumbag-Clapper have all lied either under oath or in the public sphere. Horowitz has said that he referred scumbag-Comey for criminal prosecution for leaking classified memos he wrote about his confidential conversations with the president, but the Justice Department did not pursue charges. He signed FISA warrant applications that the inspector general has determined were misleading at best and at worst simply flat-out wrong. In testimony before the House Judiciary and Oversight committees, there were 245 occasions on which scumbag-Comey claimed he couldn’t remember details or couldn’t answer questions. scumbag-Comey did not tell the truth when he said the Steele dossier was not the prime evidence that he submitted to the FISA court. He also lied about when he was briefed on the dossier...
.
The Accelerating Growth Of The 
Second Amendment Sanctuary Movement
IK_I7cQNgmZsHhuZYw289n_Xd-fF4pi_EpilWm8pY_kA3HlSyvGmEAvPT044q0_z9wv7ngYVdyot9fKO_QGL3nq-tbi7Uew1uxnvhQrO5_d9rX6-905FKs9HytDtOqvrcSBSRQmaWBBPT8l3E-bM6Cmz-K2FbjOZkwBm_hISfgHXk2E3Wq62KPn53q7W=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Dave Workman
{ lidblog.com } ~ More than a hundred counties, cities, and towns in Virginia have joined the spreading Second Amendment Sanctuary movement... as newly-empowered Democrats look to crack down on gun owners. In New Jersey, the community of West Milford Township has been joined by the community of Sussex Borough in opposition to new gun control laws. In Washington, grassroots volunteers are scrambling to fill Initiative 1094 petitions to get on the November ballot. That initiative seeks to repeal gun control Initiative 1639, adopted by voters in 2018. In Illinois, more than half of the counties have adopted sanctuary resolutions. Ditto in Colorado. These and other signs—the entire states of Alaska, Idaho Kansas, and Wyoming have “gone sanctuary”—suggest that the long-anticipated “civil war” may have already started. However, it’s a war of words and ideals. No shots have been fired, no state has seceded, but the combined message is simple: Leave our guns and our rights alone. Anti-gunners contend this is nothing more than symbolism, but symbolism can be a powerful political weapon. Not since the national elections in 1994, when more than 50 members of Congress lost their jobs after voting for the scumbag/liar-Clinton Crime ban, has there appeared to be a renewed sense of urgency among gun owners. Despite the presence of Donald Trump in the Oval Office making the threat seem diminished, with Democrats now in control of legislatures in both Washington and West Virginia, there appears to be a growing likelihood of legislative confrontations over respective state legislation aimed at gun restrictions...   https://lidblog.com/second-amendment-sanctuary-movement/   
DiGenova Calls Admiral Mike Rogers’ 
Cooperation With Durham Team to Be the 
‘Biggest Single Development’ in Case
uxkkEMEVRXese5WrPYbgSyYc4m-v6y6MZv37fvqpOi18iduMf0pxvf6gRKdKr_89CTroGLLNj4mmgEF6BSOyrmPmICtHTRhBhA4Z1td2td7GkwMgL2IHvzDTmqZ1RN4Sjt0vJmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Elizabeth Vaughn
{ redstate.com } ~ Last week, it was reported that Admiral Mike Rogers, who served as Director of the National Security Agency under President scumbag/liar-nObama... has been cooperating with U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal inquiry into the origins of the Trump/Russia collusion investigation. This was big news for two reasons. I wrote about the first reason in a recent post, in which I called Rogers the “Unsung Hero.” He was one of the few scumbag/liar-nObama administration officials who actually had integrity, a man who noticed that something was amiss and acted. It was this man who traveled to Trump Tower on November 17, 2016, to brief then-President-elect Donald Trump that communications from the building were being tapped. He did not notify his superior, then-Director of National Intelligence scumbag-James Clapper, beforehand. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced they were moving their operations to a new location in New Jersey. Within days, the Washington Post reported that “scumbag-James Clapper and Defense Secretary Ash Carter had recommended the removal of Mike Rogers from his NSA position.” Rogers was not fired, for obvious reasons. The second reason predates the FBI’s application to the FISA Court for a warrant to spy on Carter Page by a couple of years, but in light of IG Horowitz’s report, this story becomes even more relevant. Rogers discovered that American citizens were being spied upon and drew attention to the abuse of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by the scumbag/liar-nObama administration. According to former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova, Section 702 allows the government to essentially weaponize the NSA’s ability to collect data and surveil private U.S. citizens. Used as intended, it has been a useful law enforcement tool. Abused as it had been by scumbag/liar-nObama administration officials up until Rogers’ discovery in 2014, it became a weapon. DiGenova said, “For more than four years before the election of Donald Trump, there was an illegal spying operation going on by FBI private contractors — four of them — to steal personal information, electronic information about Americans and to use it against the Republican Party.”...
.
Here Are the ‘Courageous’ 
Leaders Honored by CAIR
nhVFdb8eSXZSJynJ8LG7zPo40hbxyljHzV5ptQZicOzZEnOLV7YEODR5w4uHQnA09RhAg--XLWkj_-EGDnWKpUPsTPY8qQ059rjt8ZMw25V6JMj6-8_SgU8dK2in1k6PMM9tRYvrdkwh3afDBoo8AXQ83VKike3DRwU1eee6WbW_rmPxK4fHtqrMB0aZdMc_KLkQjOtbpc6kzzXawtk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by clarionproject.org ~ “Courage Under Fire” was the theme of this year’s banquet held by the Los Angeles branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)... Those “courageous leaders” under fire included featured speakers: Pennsylvania State Representative Movita Johnson-Harrell, accused of stealing $500,000 from a charity fund...Temple University Professor Marc Lamont Hill, an anti-Semite who supports the eradication violent, if necessary of the state of Israel...CAIR-LA executive director Hussam Ayloush, a Muslim Brotherhood and avid Hamas supporter...Law professor and comedian Amer Zahr, who proudly serenaded Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh and compares Israel to ISIS and describes the Jews of Israel as white supremacists. Far from being victims under fire, these featured speakers are also anything but “courageous leaders.” Meanwhile in Canada, Islamists were much more open about their agenda at a recent conference in Toronto titled “Reviving the Islamic Spirit.” The conference, touted as Canada’s largest Islamic conference attracting thousands, featured radical Islamist American preachers Omar Suleiman, Yasir Qadhi, Zaid Shakir and Siraj Wahhaj, among others. More accurately, the conference should have been titled “Reviving the Islamist Spirit.” Ironically, while North American Islamists are hell-bent on keeping Islamist supremacy alive, author Ed Husain, a former Islamist radical, notes that a new Arab-Israeli alliance is forming in the Middle East, which he predicts will lead to less antisemitism and a pushback against Islamism...   https://clarionproject.org/courageous-leaders-honored-by-cair/?utm_source=Clarion+Project+Newsletter&utm_campaign=248085d35a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_12_26_02_59&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_60abb35148-248085d35a-6442509&mc_cid=248085d35a&mc_eid=b83b13a9b5   . 
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Former NSA chief helping criminal 
probe of Russia-collusion claims
s_tHLIMRnl6ryejI5O6YWfWdvZMy6FXwWd_Jvkil5SOWOziWG8lSNShsbDd4YkOf8-eRDf1mBynwEVpKaAIfiiLcLIzEaENwiTb4HnA4i_oa17Bf1Q9PXV4_KITXHqJjMg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by wnd.com 

There's been a fair bit of information that's become available about the criminal investigation U.S. Attorney John Durham is doing into the origins of the scumbag/liar-nObama administration's "Russia collusion" claims about the Trump 2016 investigation.

We know that it now involves potential criminal activity. We know several of the top Obama administration intel agency officials have come under review. And we know he disagrees with some of the relatively mild conclusions from a report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz into the same issues.

Now The Intercept is reporting that retired Adm. Michael Rogers is cooperating with Durham's investigation.

He is a former director of the National Security Agency.

The report said the information was confirmed by four people familiar with the situation.

"Rogers has met the prosecutor leading the probe, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, on multiple occasions, according to two people familiar with Rogers's cooperation. While the substance of those meetings is not clear, Rogers has cooperated voluntarily, several people with knowledge of the matter said," according to the report.

The report explained, "The inquiry has been a pillar of Attorney General William Barr's tenure. He appointed Durham to lead the inquiry last spring, directing him to determine whether the FBI was justified in opening a counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and alleged links between Russia and the Trump campaign, among other matters. What began as a broad review has turned into a criminal investigation, according to the New York Times."

The report said a week ago a nonpartisan review of the investigation by the Justice Department inspector general concluded that while the FBI and Justice Department committed serious errors in their applications to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, the investigation was opened properly and without political bias.

It was over that report that Barr and Durham both disagreed with Horowitz.

The revelation points out that Rogers is the first former intel director known to have been interviewed in the investigation.

"Politico and NBC News have previously reported that Durham intends to interview both former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence scumbag-James Clapper. It is unclear if that has happened. scumbag/commie-Brennan and the Justice Department declined to comment. scumbag-Clapper could not be reached for comment," the report said.

The Washington Examiner reported Rogers is the "latest to sit down with U.S. Atttorney John Durham in the widening inquiry."  
Read more…

Friday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

IYTaPFligsuOQnb3KpY6e8EIfbRYbxGaXEy74toCam53VAlK2BU_zHqHRZOoSXqHvoAdusjFGrHrr7jggO3_gsFWuxy7XukRwXf9bcAs3YgfszlMZ5kAoKRzg9juK5B8ZKCjMjU2Rw7J5SqGovNzWSBoxIHjawZYlz-CkMAHjWNMmMzLIpGPDtgQKYPEFUPU5PMAl7wF212LPdK0aDE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Happy New Years
From TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Antifa Is Dangerous and It's Time 
for the Feds to Step In
yl4hDEcj5FyXDcRmKDaKjKlRL-8ywAeahZKn8U_iueyyNaI5HFurYYZC2aHgL50JEEeBvmdSjI207QUS4IHTioYHqdhWfcGPx5c54NRyMApxgSIsdUz2BiuYyv6YL695w4lOTBT4fb9qDOLb531CeGu3ID8DApo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Hans von Spakovsky
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
liar-Pelosi's Ploy
LGH2LjThfn86dLTUh0bsL34XM5hOlysaWsSk6JUic79YiYrIDFxTNhmysyI1c3bGBb4X5D9VfIBjdiswAEGS5Rzr5TyR36dSuGn4oNB3LENHXPpD4nc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By William L. Gensert
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Some say there is an evil genius to liar-Pelosi’s withholding Articles of Impeachment from the Senate where they are certain to face ignominious defeat... As long as she refuses to submit, the “Wicked B!tch of the West” can claim Trump has been impeached without having to acknowledge that her crimeless Articles are doomed to an unceremonious trouncing in a Republican-controlled Senate. She is counting on an uninformed public, unaware that constitutionally, until she transmits the articles to the Senate, Trump has not been impeached. A grand jury can decide for indictment but if the prosecutor chooses not to file the indictment with the court, that person has not been indicted. To paraphrase her ideological thought-mate, Ted Kaczynski, liar-Pelosi, with the delay of her impeachment bomb, “wants to eat her cake and have it too.” She knows people will believe that Trump has been impeached. After all, it’s often said Nixon was impeached, despite the easily findable information that he resigned before Articles of Impeachment were voted on. Yet, at best for liar-Pelosi, like Schrodinger's cat, Trump now is neither impeached nor unimpeached, or both, at this time, or any time, I don’t know, it’s all so confusing -- I would never put a cat in a box a hat perhaps…, especially with something that could kill it. Still, the Speaker has been effective at staining Trump, the man and his presidency, with the dreaded “asterisk” of shame. And, maybe that was her goal all along. I’m not so sure, however. I’m more inclined to believe that liar-Nancy is past her “mumble-by” date and allowed her hatred to obscure the idiocies of the Laurel and Hardy of the House, scumbag/liar-Schiff and scumbag liar-Nadler, while facilitating her succumbing to their seductive pursuit of the president. It wasn’t her plan, to withhold the Articles from the Senate. But she knew that regardless of what was in the Articles, it was going down to defeat. She deliberately didn’t include crimes because she didn’t want a “not guilty” verdict in the Senate to preclude the use of any of her crime allegations in future impeachments. So, she’s saving them for next time...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/pelosis_ploy.html   

IG FISA Report Identifies One Confidential 
Human Source Leading to Audit of FBI Activity
bxVDJN3absp0POz3cUk9d5lBxyWV7lagJmyG3gqNhjfpTFPYYkhEMDwZkAdXMCbb3i69rgQPJCz7W9ypwwWMlPF5h7WWrDtF9X4JXAcJNqP07c_s0qN1jEeSepVz9Oo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Yesterday we identified one FBI Confidential Human Source who was part of the Trump campaign. Today we identify another, more interesting, one... Throughout the 478-page IG report on FBI FISA misconduct there are several mentions of Confidential Human Sources (CHSs) who were either officially “tasked” or unofficially involved in the 2016 FBI investigation of the Trump campaign. The inspector general review of the CHS activity is fraught with examples of the FBI denying many of the numerous “non-tasked” sources were acting in an official capacity. The inspector general’s office knowing the FBI were lacking candor is one thing; however, proving that is another matter entirely. The ‘having to take them at their word‘ dynamic appears throughout the chapters on the use of Confidential Human Sources. Horowitz report shows the level of denial and justification by FBI officials in Washington DC surrounding the deployment of human sources stretches credulity. It really is quite something to take the totality of the FBI denials, for repeated and specific events, place them all together and then determine all of this is just random, happenstance activity...
.
Understanding Why There’s No
FBI Whistleblowers Outlining
Institutional Corruption
jConQSZ7fOqkZa1677FF0vKrKI3PDQZ_7WvZNRFBj6KZJYrRGUHPCxIHxM-8DTLRYmbyRmJ2fbWdoMy0lco5Yyc_EN1Q_PZd-i_xG7bdHJ8VDhIsKgvIGE12Ur7y_K0Og_ZhdvOC1B06sUF3=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ {To understand why there’s no-one in the administrative mid-tier of the FBI acting in a whistle-blowing capacity requires a background perspective looking at the totality of corruption... The institutions are protecting themselves; and yes, that protection applies to the internal dynamics. Former DAG Rod Rosenstein was dirty. He might not have started out dirty, but his actions in office created a dirty mess. Rosenstein facilitated the McCabe operation against Trump during the May 16th, 2017, White House FBI sting against Trump with Mueller.  Rosenstein also facilitated the special counsel writ large, and provided three scope memos to expand the corrupt investigation of President Trump. According to the inaction of AG Bill Barr, we’re not allowed to see those authorizing scope memos. Additionally, despite knowing the Trump investigation held a false predicate, Rosenstein signed the 3rd renewal of a fraudulent FISA application. Worse yet, even if Rosenstein was caught up by corruption around him, he did nothing to stop the fraud once identified. Why is Rosenstein a key inflection point? Because Rod Rosenstein recommended current FBI Director Christopher Wray to President Trump. POTUS then allowed Wray, as he does all department heads, to select his deputy – Wray chose David Bowditch. ♦Keep in mind the National Security Division of the DOJ (DOJ-NSD) was/is the epicenter of many corrupt activities, including filing the fraudulent FISA application, manipulating interpretations of law for FARA (§901) violations, and doing all of this while denying any inspector general oversight. As FISA Judge Rosemary Collyer recently noted, the DOJ-NSD is positioned as a rogue legal arm of the U.S. intelligence apparatus...
.
Three FBI Officials Quietly 
Working to Reveal the Truth
-bBRap_RDJkuGcGJzbgawgzmh5luZrIqdQZtbynV0LscNCUXVP-BNJR73955gs6AyCvQeGNMwmWY8LTY6L5k7KqNsFd4yYvjW6urkQryOb4Vkx1riFjn6i_fVO2TDwIqJ10UENXGW-xLdq9J=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ I’m not sure exactly who they are, and there’s a possibility  they might just be one person; however, it appears there are three distinct FBI officials engaged in an overall investigative capacity... attempting to break the truth through the corrupt machinery. Each individual is noted within a specific event or outcome. Hopefully AG Bill Barr has tasked his deputy James Rosen to hold an honest ‘climate assessment‘ discussion with these individuals. ♦The first honorable FBI Agent is the FBI official who enhanced the DOJ sentencing memo for James Wolfe. The DOJ prosecution, namely DC U.S. Attorney Jessie K Liu -possibly following instructions from Rod Rosenstein- was  trying to cover-up the classified intelligence leak of SSCI Security Director James Wolfe in order to protect powerful Senators. One FBI agent was obviously not happy with that DOJ leadership decision and seeded the DOJ ‘sentencing memo’ with a key sentence that exposed the cover-up: For him or her we are thankful. That sunlight, though unsuccessful in stopping the corrupt cover-up, provided just enough undeniable evidence to highlight the severity of a cover-up initiated by those running the DOJ in 2018. We note everyone associated with that decision has since been removed. ♦The second FBI official to note, might actually be a key top-level DOJ official – though that seems less likely. The second FBI official is however high ranking. The high ranking FBI position is likely because the top level security clearance was needed for this FBI agent to travel to CIA headquarters and review the CIA operation file on Carter Page. The CIA file on Carter Page included a copy of the return memo to the FBI outlining Mr. Page as a source for CIA information involving various Russian individuals. That CIA return memo was edited by corrupt FBI lead lawyer Kevin Clinesmith to hide Page’s action on behalf of the CIA...
.
Its Resolution to Ban Hezbollah 
is Just a Legal Charade 
-lUfv4hc9tmybLI_ZA6pB4NmkuzrdfnAZJVB7ltuiK6mWGEC9HlEHDxSFlCDcSNnUAQs9fgCyPSkTNSeA4TSEoTVOQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Soeren Kern
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ Gatestone Institute recently reported that a December 19 German parliamentary resolution, which claims to call for a complete ban in Germany of Hezbollah Arabic for "The Party of Allah"... actually falls short of demanding a comprehensive ban of the terrorist organization. A senior US government official called the article "flat wrong". If only it were. Gatestone Institute wholeheartedly supports U.S. President Donald J. Trump's efforts to ban Hezbollah in Europe. The Bundestag resolution, however, calls for an incomplete ban, which appears aimed at providing the German government with political cover that would allow Berlin to claim that it has banned the group even if it has not. The Bundestag itself has issued a statement which states that it is calling for an activity ban Betätigungsverbot of Hezbollah, but not an organizational ban Organisationsverbot — an important distinction because the activity ban is legally weaker than the organizational ban. The Bundestag claimed that it is not calling for a complete organizational ban of Hezbollah because the group's structures in Germany are "not currently ascertainable." The Bundestag's statement in the original German clearly states: "Hezbollah-related association structures, which could justify an organizational ban, are not currently ascertainable." "Der Hisbollah zuzurechnende Vereinsstrukturen, die ein vereinsrechtliches Organisationsverbot begründen könnten, seien derzeit jedoch nicht feststellbar."...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15346/german-parliament-hezbollah-update 
If The FBI’s Contempt For The Law Is 
Not Reined In, Its Abuses Will Get Worse 
By Adam Mill
{ thefederalist.com } ~ In 2018, the U.S. government filed 1,117 final applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court for authority for the FBI to conduct electronic surveillance and physical searches... One application was withdrawn. One other was denied. The remaining 1,115 were granted. Hours before the FISA court issued a December 17 order openly declaring that it could no longer trust any of the sworn statements the FBI had submitted to justify spying on Americans, The New York Times published an opinion  article by William Webster, a former director of both the FBI and the CIA. Webster wrote, “Today, the integrity of the institutions that protect our civil order is, tragically, under assault from too many people whose job it should be to protect them.” The New York Times worked to expose government abuse of power. The New York Times now defends power from truth. Setting aside the very dubious propositions that the FBI and the CIA should be protected from criticism, let’s plumb the depths of the Webster/NYT argument. Who, according to Webster, has the job of protecting the FBI and the CIA? Webster explains exactly who he means: “I am deeply disturbed by the assertion of President Trump that our ‘current director’ — as he refers to the man he selected for the job of running the F.B.I. — cannot fix what the president calls a broken agency.” Webster goes on to suggest that the FBI should operate as an independent agency and that he is outraged by the “president’s thinly veiled suggestion that the director, Christopher Wray, like his banished predecessor, scumbag-James Comey, could be on the chopping block.” He adds, “The independence of both the F.B.I. and its director is critical and should be fiercely protected by each branch of government.” Webster goes on to make it clear that the “rule of law” is threatened by the president criticizing the FBI. The article is a symptom of how the establishment media has become the propaganda arm of an increasingly robust authoritarian movement in the United States. This movement inverts constitutional principles so that it becomes the president’s job to protect the FBI from criticism and his threat to fire an FBI chief is a threat to the Constitution. This is the kind of thing that Vladimir Putin might have told Tass to publish as he sought to seize power from Boris Yeltsin in the 1990s...   https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/26/if-the-fbis-contempt-for-the-law-is-not-reined-in-its-abuses-will-get-worse/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=f21425296d-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-f21425296d-83771801   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Antifa Is Dangerous and It's Time \
for the Feds to Step In
yl4hDEcj5FyXDcRmKDaKjKlRL-8ywAeahZKn8U_iueyyNaI5HFurYYZC2aHgL50JEEeBvmdSjI207QUS4IHTioYHqdhWfcGPx5c54NRyMApxgSIsdUz2BiuYyv6YL695w4lOTBT4fb9qDOLb531CeGu3ID8DApo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Hans von Spakovsky
 

Enough is enough. The U.S. Justice Department needs to immediately open a criminal civil rights investigation of Antifa, an affiliation of radical activists and left-wing groups whose name, ironically enough, is short for “anti-fascists.”

Their attack on journalist Andy Ngo was beyond the pale. Federal law enforcement has an obligation to stop any extremist organization that is apparently organizing and precipitating violent attacks, especially if state and local authorities seem reluctant to take action against what has all the makings of a domestic terrorist organization.

We cannot have any confidence that the political leadership of the City of Portland will allow its local law enforcement to do anything about this, either. The Portland Police Association released a statement after the attack criticizing the mayor for restricting the ability of the police to stop Antifa, saying “our hands are tied.” The Association also says it has no doubt that no such restrictions would not have been in place “if this violence had been directed at Antifa.”

Mayor Ted Wheeler claims that he had not “directed Police Chief Danielle Outlaw or other officials to change their approach to arrests,” in addition to “defend[ing] the city’s response, or lack thereof, to members of Antifa who [have] blocked traffic and harassed bystanders” in the past. But even the U.S. Ambassador to Germany criticized the city’s executive in a series of tweets, questioning what more needs to happen to Wheeler’s citizens before protective action will be taken. Wheeler’s inaction is even less defensible because the mayor of Portland is also its police commissioner.

Ngo was punched, pushed, robbed, and hit with tossed milkshakes purportedly mixed with quick-drying cement. The well-known Quillette journalist wasn’t the only bystander attacked, as The Washington Times reports that “two [other] Oregon men — John Blum and Adam Kelly — were mobbed and pummeled by black-masked protesters in a horrific attack that left Mr. Blum bleeding profusely from wounds to his face and skull.”

Columnist Michelle Malkin noted that “both John & Adam were beaten by Antifa after trying to help a gay man in a sundress being chased down the street.” This all occurred in broad daylight, and was filmed by multiple bystanders while Portland police stood on the sidelines and did nothing to stop it.

The assault did not come out of nowhere. In fact, it seems to have been a targeted attack given that the protest planners specifically (and falsely) labeled Ngo as a “far-right Islamophobic journalist who…also targets the Democratic Socialists of America while dismissing as hoaxes a series of assaults against the Portland LGBTQ community” in advertising the event in the days leading up to the march.

Federal criminal law has a provision that applies directly to what Antifa is apparently doing: 18 U.S.C. §241 prohibits conspiracies to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person…in the exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” Moreover, that same law prohibits individuals from going “in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured.”

Acting as a journalist, Ngo was obviously exercising his press freedom as secured by the First Amendment, and the Antifa thugs who attacked him violated Section 241, particularly since they were disguised. Violating this statute is punishable by up to 10 years in federal prison. Further, as noted in a 1951 University of Pennsylvania Law Review article, “the ‘in disguise’ language [that] began the section…had its origin in ‘the doings of the Ku Klux Klan.’” Antifa seems to have adopted the KKK’s tactics.

Ngo also may have a personal claim for damages under federal law against Antifa and its members. Another federal statute, 42 U.S.C. §1985(3), says that “If two or more persons…conspire or go in disguise…for the purpose of depriving…any person…of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws…the party so injured [may recover] damages… against any one or more of the conspirators.”

As we now know, Mayor Ted Wheeler failed to protect his citizens, as police were noticeably absent when Ngo was being attacked, despite Antifa’s long record of violence, attacks and mob behavior. As a result, Ngo may have a claim directly against Wheeler and other city officials under 42 U.S.C. §1986, which creates liability for anyone who “having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done” in violation of Section 1985 “are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission” fails to do so.

As National Review’s Douglas Murray wrote in his article on the protest, the “real lesson of Saturday is that anybody interested in genuine anti-fascism should from now on aim themselves directly at Portland’s Antifa. These are the people of our day who behave most like fascists. It is high time that they were treated as such by officialdom and civil society alike.”

On “It’s Going Down,” a popular website for Antifa and their supporters, a 2016 blog post predicted the chaos which has now become commonplace in more “progressive” parts of the country. When asked who on the left can respond to the inauguration of Donald Trump, the authors wrote, “The answer is clear as day, but it isn’t in the halls of power, in the politicians, the leaders of the unions, or in the big NGOs. Instead it’s in the rioters. The blockaders. The people in ski masks and in the streets. The ones on the front lines fighting with the cops.”

It is shocking to assert that “rioters, blockaders, cop-fighters, and people in ski masks” are the enlightened nobility who can save our constitutional republic from internal ruin. It is also plainly wrong. And it is time that federal law enforcement and Justice Department officials took notice of this potentially ominous threat to our civil society.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/64150?mailing_id=4761&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4761&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Thursday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

.
IYTaPFligsuOQnb3KpY6e8EIfbRYbxGaXEy74toCam53VAlK2BU_zHqHRZOoSXqHvoAdusjFGrHrr7jggO3_gsFWuxy7XukRwXf9bcAs3YgfszlMZ5kAoKRzg9juK5B8ZKCjMjU2Rw7J5SqGovNzWSBoxIHjawZYlz-CkMAHjWNMmMzLIpGPDtgQKYPEFUPU5PMAl7wF212LPdK0aDE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Happy New Years
From TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Christianity Today Joins the Leftist Mob
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=Gary Bauer
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Gowdy: liar-Pelosi Has No Constitutional 
Authority to Dictate the Rules of a 
SenateImpeachment Trial
2wbDrC3v086ydztcmTxNIx-ueW3ZeFwnazSh_z_ZaaKlrakh6067vD8hxesxcRCRbzwlEXcoJG57adLTb4DK6tvYA8CR0R99rpAtG-72T9PSx_3GE1BWG836OcnvniQjFdldAVJ9NiuLwGTI8Dd3=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Katie Pavlich
{ townhall.com | ~ Former prosecutor and Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy is weighing in on House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi's continued refusal to turn over two articles of impeachment... against President Trump to the Senate for a trial. "If he[President Trump really is an existential threat the Republic, if he really has committed conduct that should result in his removal from office, then why would you not send it onto the Senate? The Constitution gives the House no role in deciding how this trial takes place. It is exclusively within the province of the Senate," Gowdy said during an interview with Fox News. "I think most of my fellow citizens will see through this 'lets hurry up and impeach him' and then sit on the indictment." Gowdy also took on the issue of "impartial jurors." "You had scumbag-Eric Swalwell investigating the president while he was trying to become president," Gowdy said. "The jury has already made up its mind." "How many members of the jury are actually running to take Donald Trump's job? You would never have that in a real judicial proceeding. So, Mitch McConnell is right, this is a political trial not a judicial trial," he continued. liar-Pelosi is demanding that the terms of a trial be "fair" before she proceeds with the articles after the holiday recess.   https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2019/12/24/gowdy-pelosi-has-no-constitutional-authority-to-dictate-the-rules-of-a-senate-impeachment-trial-n2558505?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=&bcid=7220442bc3498cb5e2d68f3cb4d11680&recip=18305623  
.
Christianity Today Regurgitates 
Dem Talking Points
30VxQyHZX1BbNQuZG4G4kT-51sbexqxoqT0sSguuz8LxIYtA1IAFajuXAuaOPcRtVriR9hmvm8k0MApkQ_WJBxZ5ONucEPSqOFkXzTR3uqutrJp_6B_L13SZ3NsMe0277owA2AV5ozf9acql83d0ng1p55wWRZWsk0vMGFQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin:  It’s wrong for evangelical Christians to support President Donald Trump against the Democrats’ partisan impeachment charade. That’s the basic argument offered by Christianity Today editor-in-chief Mark Galli in an editorial published last Thursday. Galli asserts about impeachment, “The facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.” Evidently, Galli has elected not only to accept the Democrats’ partisan conjecture and unsubstantiated talking points as a substitute for actual evidence and facts, but to make matters worse he has used the CT platform to moralize the Democrats’ anti-Trump message.
 

While admitting to the blatant partisan and fundamentally unjust manner in which the House Democrats conducted their impeachment case against Trump, Galli dubiously claims that the only moral choice for Christians is to support Trump’s removal from office. “That [Trump] should be removed, we believe, is not a matter of partisan loyalties but loyalty to the Creator and the Ten Commandments,” Galli writes.

So, uncritically accepting the Democrats’ many demonstrably false assertions against Trump (such as scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff’s made-up conversation of Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president) comports with the Ninth Commandment’s prohibition against bearing false witness against one’s neighbor?

Furthermore, the broad-brush insinuation that Christians who support Trump and reject the assertion that he deserves to be impeached and removed from office are doing so out of blind “partisan loyalties” ironically smacks of blind anti-Trump partisan animus.

The fundamental flaw in Galli’s thinking is conflating support for Trump’s presidency with justification for his entire “blackened moral record.” Galli asks, “Can [Christians] say with a straight face that abortion is a great evil that cannot be tolerated and, with the same straight face, say that the bent and broken character of our nation’s leader doesn’t really matter in the end?” But is that actually what Christians have been saying?

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins gave a cogent response that says otherwise: “Putting aside Galli’s holier-than-thou patronization, the underdeveloped political theology advanced here represents a failure to look at Trump’s record and the growing contrast between the two parties on life, family, and religious liberty. Although Galli recognizes Trump’s accomplishments in these areas, Galli goes on to say these positives do not compensate for Trump’s failings in other areas. And while President Trump is certainly not perfect, it is totally unfair to imply that support for Trump jeopardizes Christian witness to Christ when many Christians support the president because of his commitment to policies that are grounded in a biblical worldview. Not only is it unfair, but it betrays the prudence and measured judgment that Christians ought to be bringing to a broken world, and a political system which is not perfect but requires us to apply our faith in the best way we can.”

As Mark Alexander observes: “It is one thing to disagree with Trump’s style or policies, but quite another for editors of an evangelical Christian publication to advocate for a purely political ruse to remove a president.”

In the end, Galli’s screed comes off as just another textbook example of the “orange man bad” polemic. It is merely a repackaging of Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s condescending “wrong side of history” trope, only aimed at Christians. And we should all expect better from the publication started by Billy Graham.   

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67564?mailing_id=4772&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4772&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   
Marc Short -vs- Chuck Todd
w_mX8FGTPB0_Qv_joyNvBd5iOBwcxixKZR7_ckSETGmB5CH2ORffhVNwRn9YqidXdGoqH8NycA4Z1Dnj5szyxqF_8oze9IuvvbsuqBa9Rj9uJyVkeSjTw8iiRdiNbSTAjpqqLrDDRhjch3Q42h_ENftOGUhrc5wU3dKRavn228Ddv-zb=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Marc Short, Chief of Staff to Vice President Mike Pence, appears on Meet The Press with Chuck Todd to discuss what the White House expects from a Senate impeachment trial. Oddly, something about Short’s demeanor seems to neutralize the traditional partisan gibberish Toady is famous for. There’s still a lot of pontification, but Short does a great job cutting through Toad’s burping noises.
.
Ted Cruz Discusses Pelosi Withholding 
Impeachment Articles and “Spygate” Fraud
vbX7AGu_l6dkCb195a9P-u3Zx2bgvC9rr8VO9YdjEMcR0GccaJ2RY_1MjeXoNEGJ3_bEwTaWLouDUthz-7lcjyWljnScPnXJ_KitdCkltbrA92SQoHMOtz6tLvBfRfyLtkksyfQ3QaoKkxCIuVkB9uwz-QtBC7cpuBp05Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Maria Bartiromo shares an earlier interview with Senator Ted Cruz after the House passed two impeachment articles...   Senator Cruz is questioned about the impeachment fraud and the latest revelations in the 2016 election surveillance known as “spygate”. LOL… “Welcome to the party pal“… Wait til Cruz finds out he too was a campaign target as outlined by the FBI instructions to Patrick Byrne; I digress.  Within the interview Cruz actually does a good job of outlining a brief cocktail party-length explanation of corrupt FBI conduct toward the FISA court. “Political Espionage” – During the 2016 election season, Butina’s useful purpose appeared to be the reason the FBI in Washington DC enlisted Patrick Byrne as a handler, giving Butina specific instructions and introductions to Republican presidential candidates. Once those candidates were contacted the FBI’s background surveillance transferred to the republican politicians, including persons in/around the Trump orbit. Mr. Byrne stated several times that FBI Agent Peter Strzok, and persons working on his behalf, were the FBI officials directing the engagements. Byrne claims he was asked to participate in an FBI intelligence operation and to introduce, and/or facilitate the introduction of, Ms. Butina to the campaigns of Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump...
.
Chairman Lindsey Graham -vs- Maria
 Bartiromo – Impeachment, Spygate and 
Lessons in Can-Kicking
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham appears on SMF with Maria Bartiromo to discuss House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi withholding articles of impeachment from the Senate...  Senator Graham does a good job explaining the fraudulent visible reasons, purposes and strategy for establishing the House obstruction article; however, Graham completely overlooks the hidden motive for withholding it/them. Moving to “spygate” Bartiromo points out Special Counsel Mueller never investigated the “dossier”; however, Bartiromo misses that Rosensteins’ second scope memo in August 2017 specifically empowered the research of ie. use of the dossier for his probe. *POINT: In my opinion, this is the reason why the DOJ (AG Bill Barr) will not release the scope memos…. Barr is protecting DAG Rosenstein and his good friend Robert Mueller. Lindsey Graham goes on to discuss the background surveillance on the Trump campaign; and outlines questions he has and potential witnesses before his committee. Pause for a moment in this part of Graham’s interview, and notice how the answer to every question is within the declassification documents we have discussed. We know where the answers are. Amid the twists and turns many people have forgotten about the material congress asked President Trump to declassify a year-and-a-half ago. Additionally there has been some material cited that just seemingly slipped away without follow-up.  Consider...
.
IDF preparing for confrontation with Iran - 
Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi
4DlRDKygwh1MaqlsUstb2n5MtjnmZDwzrKq1iGJT3u8MrIR417FUPDZvUdGiSG8jrHaornXmck_Thc8Qd9Tl_uD4TOeoRk0sfvurmoEZPGpOfhWtJti_dAQx6mWRTMTATtL14vBmoNwrtWJYaP7i=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By ANNA AHRONHEIM
{ jpost.com } ~The IDF is preparing for a limited confrontation with the Islamic Republic as Israel continues to act against Iranian entrenchment... IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Aviv Kochavi warned on Wednesday.  “There is a possibility that we will face a limited confrontation with Iran and we are preparing for it,” Kochavi said at a conference in honor of former IDF chief of staff Lt.-Gen. Amnon Lipkin-Shahak at the IDC Interdisciplinary Center in Herzilya.  “We will continue to act and responsibly,” Israel’s top military officer said, adding it would have been better had Israel not been the only one engaged in the effort to stop Iran. The IDF, he said, is carrying out operations both publicly and below-the-radar to prevent the enemy from obtaining precision missiles, even if those operations bring about a confrontation. “We will not allow Iran to entrench itself in Syria, or in Iraq,” Kochavi said, publicly acknowledging for the first time the Israel Air Force has attacked against Iranian targets in Iraq. “Iraq is undergoing a civil war, when the Quds Force is operating there on a daily basis, when the country itself has turned into an ungoverned area.  Advanced weapons are being smuggled by the Quds Force in Iraq on a monthly basis and we can’t allow that,” he said. According to Kochavi, there’s been a change in threats, with all fronts active in trying to carry out terror or rocket attacks against Israel. “It wasn’t always like that,” he said, pointing to years of relative quiet from Lebanon and Syria. But over the last few months there were many instances where there were warnings of immediate threats to Israel that the military had to contend with...   https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/IDF-Chief-of-Staff-Aviv-Kochavi-Conflict-with-Iran-a-possibility-612079   
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Christianity Today Joins the Leftist Mob
AX7E-R2UbdvckzDHiXztJ0PrsBebykPkX60JtYcR_I4608MD076l3V9DM56LXG126QqiqyjwJU4uLeHIHNWELSuFmJDr00xxfT1wi2BFE5pmvYMjSPdiSp0pm81qJSNJCuQoXzac3cPEsCeA3dLfufo3Acxlxes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Gary Bauer
 

My wife and I attended a holiday party Thursday night where we were blessed to have the opportunity to talk with many Christian heroes and luminaries, including Dr. James Dobson and Rev. Franklin Graham. There were many Christians serving in government there as well at Vice President Mike Pence’s home, including Justice Clarence Thomas. 

It was an encouraging time and a reminder of all the battles that have been raging for decades in which we all did the best we could as followers of Jesus Christ.

As Carol and I were returning home we heard the news that Christianity Today's (CT) editor-in-chief, Mark Galli, had just released an editorial entitled, “Trump Should Be Removed From Office.”

This once respected publication, which Billy Graham helped to launch, has just thrown its lot in with the aggressively secular, abortion-on-demand movement that has spent the last 20 years trying to rip America out of the rich soil of our Judeo-Christian heritage. Some Christmas present to their subscribers. Shame on them!

Franklin Graham was quick to react. In a lengthy Facebook post, Graham revealed that the last vote his father cast was for Donald Trump. Graham wrote:

My father knew Donald Trump, he believed in Donald Trump, and he voted for Donald Trump. He believed that Donald J. Trump was the man for this hour in history for our nation.

Graham added this impeachment sham was “politically motivated, 100% partisan,” and he blasted CT, writing, “It’s obvious that Christianity Today has moved to the left and is representing the elitist liberal wing of evangelicalism.”

Graham is absolutely right. Five paragraphs into the anti-Trump editorial — there’s no other way to put it — CT engaged in a bald-face lie. It wrote: “But the facts in this instance [the Ukrainian phone call] are unambiguous." 

No they are not. That’s why legal scholars, members of Congress, and the American people are divided about the phone call. 

What follows in the editorial is a description of the call, which, if I did not know better, I would swear had been written by liar-Nancy Pelosi or scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff. I will not poison your mind by quoting it because you have heard similar things over and over again by far-left fanatics who hate everything that Donald Trump believes and, by the way, that Christianity Today claims to believe.

The editorial later asserts that they are "agnostic” about whether Trump should be removed by the Senate or at the ballot box in the next election. But it declares that he should be removed out of “loyalty to the Creator of the Ten Commandments." 

So, Christianity Today just endorsed a Democrat presidential candidate whose name we do not know yet. Whether that nominee is a class-warfare candidate like Sanders or Warren, who use envy to attack successful people, or Pete Buttigieg, who is committed to normalizing the homosexual political agenda, or whether it’s a resurrected scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton, that candidate is CT's choice in 2020.

Any Democrat candidate will be totally committed to abortion on demand, to taxpayer subsidies of abortion, to the restriction of religious liberty, and very likely anti-Israel. In short, everything that the Creator of the Ten Commandments, as CT put it, would abhor.

Here’s some breaking news for CT: No election involves a sinner running against a saint. All candidates are sinners. All the voters who vote for them have sinned. In the real world, most elections are a binary choice between fallen human beings who are willing to defend certain values and oppose other values. 

Donald Trump has boldly taken the side of believing Christians on every major public-policy issue: our freedom of religion, the humanity of the unborn child, that liberty comes from God, and many, many more. 

On the day CT printed this editorial, 13 more judicial nominees who will defend our values, nominated by President Trump, advanced in the Senate over the objections of progressives CT wants to see back in power next November.

Years ago, when I was a senior vice president at Focus on the Family, Dr. James Dobson and I were often in the foxhole together battling the left. We were also trying to alert the church about what was coming down the road. 

I don’t remember a day when the attacks by the left, often involving death threats, ever caused Dr. Dobson and I to waver or get depressed or to think of giving up. 

But there were days we would get letters from churches upset that we had criticized their deacon who happened to run the local abortion clinic. There were days when publications like CT, claiming to speak for the church, said we were being "alarmist” and that Christians should not be involved in politics at all. Those days depressed both of us more than anything else. 

Dr. Dobson never stopped fighting, and I haven’t either. But today, I will confess to you is a tough day when you’re fending off blows from liar-Pelosi and progressive activists, and suddenly all the reporters in Washington are calling, eagerly wanting to talk to me because CT just took the side of the radical secular left.

Please, my friends, take a moment today to pray for all the Christians involved in government and in the public-policy debate – Vice President Pence, Justice Thomas, Franklin Graham, and, yes, the president too. I would also covet your prayers for myself and my family.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/67542?mailing_id=4772&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4772&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Merry Christmas

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
Christmas is the time to enjoy and celebrate the
birth of God's son, Jesus Christ, the lame, 
who die and rose to take away our sins 
and give us eternal life.
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Gloria In Excelsis Deo
by Menagerie
Glory to God in the highest, the Greater Doxology, is the song the angels sang at Christ’s birth. Perhaps no other song, no other phrase, so greatly expresses the joy of the moment. I love all the children in this video. One of my favorite memories of Christmases past is that of our sons placing baby Jesus in the manger after coming home from Midnight Mass. These days, as I observe Advent as a time of preparation, I place the figures of the Nativity scene in a journey, and move them closer on each Sunday of Advent. Our nativity always had an empty manger until Christmas, as a way to help our sons remember and anticipate the birth of our savior. Now we still follow that tradition and have a grandchild place Jesus in the manger. May all hearts be opened as the moment we celebrate, remember, treasure, and rejoice in comes closer.  May we unite in this ancient call to our God as we celebrate His gift to all mankind. And someday, may we all be present before the Living God to unite in this great outpouring of praise to Him. Merry Christmas!
Read more…

Tuesday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Preaching a Conspiracy Theory
T5Lzk4Om_UMzwuqZewwuD8xSwyv3cw0AyfTY0JS3yyxbCNZUb9nrfXVbntpBOW8_voifKHBbQcfUsVoxHNdKorCKCm1hRXjFuVums98oa8xgQkQl1IuMegbVlT2ifOM9IECs3izSeIOpmtcIwG7SCAHPKFvFTgPUsCQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Allen C. Guelzo
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
liar-Pelosi's Impeachment Articles '
Quid Pro Quo'
TYQgt_YK8QvKB1eWYuZQLC1MfYRDNANjIufCHGS92m8QAjpPD0Exg3ZUbpFgBz2eZVjCiVxZxNjRmlXhGCd4nN3iaX3g-Wc2TnW2-PKyBHAMOUbB4ocC3jmjTmZzF4PCcKRRRMl1quwDCoIL1z3pEYBUGsfVoH5n_AZldvM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin:  While Senate Republicans were busy approving 12 more of President Donald Trump’s judicial appointments, House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi added another slice of baloney to the Democrats’ sham impeachment. liar-Pelosi broke from the Constitution and announced that she would not send the articles of impeachment to the Senate “until we see what the process is on the Senate side.” She complained, “So far we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us.”
 

Of course, there was nothing “fair” to see on the House side.

The Constitution clearly states that the House has “the sole power of impeachment” but gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” liar-Pelosi is trying to game the system in order to perpetuate the false narrative that it is Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans who will not hold a fair trial – thus, Trump must be guilty. She’s demanding that, as speaker of the House, she dictate how the Senate runs its impeachment trial before she sends over the House impeachment articles. That’s unconstitutional, but our Constitution is just a speed bump on the Democrat agenda highway.

As Mark Alexander observed, “liar-Pelosi is demanding certain conditions be met before she will release the articles of impeachment…so, a quid pro quo?”

It’s obvious that liar-Pelosi and company have been planning this delay tactic for some time. She’s running interference for Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer, hoping to damage Senate Republicans enough to win back that chamber for Democrats come November.

lair-Pelosi will likely hold off on sending the articles of impeachment through at least the holidays and maybe well into January. Will her gamble pay off? Only if McConnell and Senate Republicans fail to expose and resist the Democrats’ fraudulent “fairness” game.

Fortunately, Republicans won’t acquiesce. In fact, McConnell is already calling the Dems’ bluff: “The House’s conduct risks deeply damaging the institutions of American government. This particular House of Representatives has let its partisan rage at this particular president create a toxic new precedent that will echo into the future. … This case is not compelling, not overwhelming, and as a result, not bipartisan. … And it was made even more clear last night, when Speaker liar-Pelosi suggested that House Democrats may be too afraid to even transmit their work product to the Senate. The prosecutors are getting cold feet in front of the entire country and second-guessing whether they even want to go to trial.” He later astutely noted, “They said impeachment was so urgent that it could not even wait for due process, but now they’re content to sit on their hands. It is comical.”

Finally, an interesting fact that will likely become a big talking point for Trump and Republicans should liar-Pelosi continue her stalling tactic: The president is not officially impeached until the House delivers its articles of impeachment to the Senate. So, as things currently stand, Trump hasn’t yet been impeached.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67531?mailing_id=4759&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4759&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  
.  
liar-Nancy Pelosi , Not Trump, 
Is Provoking A Constitutional Crisis  
-JBo_WorfeDA_4C_i1MYxfzekMXfP1sMWp1RsoH9lTea_7itoomJSbWOHybZn33Wud997Y1YQgL6xam_xFhhCqD3KhaHx2QecS9slx_xg8G1YTNvLVqZbZrazrSYuM_TQd2M-KLSrANTsJU9nu7CrxnD7EclgZR13Lj7IFUH-iL7hlLa39i63bHv=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By John Daniel Davidson
{ thefederalist.com } ~ House  Speaker  liar-Nancy Pelosi ’s decision not to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial on the pretext that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell won’t conduct the trial in a manner approved by House Democrats.. .introduces a novel and dangerous dynamic to the impeachment of President Trump—namely, a constitutional crisis, not between the legislative and executive branches, but between the House and the Senate. Under the Constitution, the House has the sole power of impeachment and the Senate has the sole power of conducting a trial. Although the Constitution doesn’t say the House must go through a formal process of “transmitting” the articles of impeachment to the Senate, precedent and Senate rules dictate that the Senate does not take up measures passed in the House until they have been certified and transmitted, and that it won’t take up an impeachment trial until the House appoints impeachment managers or prosecutors for the trial.This  liar-Pelosi has refused to do. She is in effect asserting the primacy of the House over the Senate, insisting that the Senate conduct an impeachment trial on terms dictated by the House. The pretext for her gambit are a few comments this week by McConnell that he’s “not an impartial juror,” and that he’s taking his cues from the White House. “The House made a partisan political decision to impeach,” McConnell said Tuesday. “I would anticipate we will have a largely partisan outcome in the Senate. I’m not impartial about this at all.” Of course,  liar-Pelosi  and the other House Democrats have not been impartial, either.  liar-Pelosi  seized on McConnell’s comments as evidence that any Senate trial would be a kangaroo court, a partisan and unfair show-trial whose outcome is predetermined. That is of course precisely what Republicans have said about House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, the outcome of which was inevitable from the moment it was announced. As my colleagues Sean Davis and Mollie emingway noted yesterday, “ liar-Pelosi apparently wants to control the Senate process from her perch in the House, a power grab that looks a lot like an abuse of power.” Likewise, her decision to withhold the articles of impeachment from the Senate and not appoint impeachment managers looks a lot like obstructing the Senate. House Democrats impeached Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress—the very things liar-Pelosi now appears to be doing...  https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/20/nancy-pelosi-not-trump-is-provoking-a-constitutional-crisis/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=84271c6216-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-84271c6216-83771801  
.
As liar-Pelosi plays games with 
impeachment, what next for GOP?
qkbuL5IGZfF_omZZ1l_tvXVxUGcbRC_eZ3u43gaZ1DDuUz5hrF09bqRXSkjiBiIkiF8JH4BS_vTgnOPbRfbM9R-RcPr4IqcqlR3TDOPffSZ_elhkuQpnWyTpa2V3VWRtiKHrfu6Q_1M5cl_VcBOTYs0yS9UlsoshNFJgWfrtMZgJEpAUsRjtjdAlh0hoPfENYeioMJCpCZpx0R8wGfsOstyOKi26eZLphz77y_mtBuIkrJKWsVVE5pC2VAixnTNv-PbrVH-uNgrzSBO_LFnLM9eHQ6cdqwlMeci4YDGPf6aHok3TP_DbfSBbg0NaZImuWVsj8j8gKOlVTzJuNPU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Byron York
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ The House of Representatives impeached President scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton on Dec. 19, 1998. It was a Saturday. The votes, in which two articles of impeachment passed, were held around midday... By 3 p.m., the House had passed a resolution naming its impeachment managers, and those managers had physically delivered the articles to the Senate for trial.Impeachment was on. The House, controlled by a Republican majority, was serious about its ultimately failed effort to remove scumbag/liar-Clinton from office. Contrast that to today. On Wednesday, Dec. 18, at around 8 p.m., the Democratic-controlled House passed two articles of impeachment against President Trump. Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi immediately announced that the House would not appoint managers, and the articles would not be delivered to the Senate. The next day, liar-Pelosi told reporters she did not want to talk any more about it, and the House went into recess until Jan. 7. Impeachment was not on, or at least a Senate trial was not on. liar-Pelosi was holding out, apparently, for better terms in a Senate trial. That is where events stand today. liar-Pelosi acted after a Harvard professor and zealous impeachment advocate, Laurence Tribe, published an op-ed in the Washington Post arguing the Democratic strategy should be "voting for articles of impeachment but holding off for the time being on transmitting them to the Senate." Withholding the articles, Tribe said, would strengthen Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer's hand as he negotiates with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on the terms of the trial. It would do so, Tribe speculated, "because of McConnell's and Trump's urgent desire to get this whole business behind them. "Without McConnell's concessions, Tribe urged Democrats to withhold the articles indefinitely because a trial dominated by majority Republicans "would fail to render a meaningful verdict of acquittal." It seemed a far-fetched idea, to be generous. McConnell and Senate Republicans would be perfectly happy if they never had to hold a trial; after all, they didn't impeach Trump. "I admit I'm not sure what leverage there is in refraining from sending us something we do not want," McConnell said daily. After the weekly Senate Republican lunch, I asked one GOP lawmaker, via text, what the party's reaction was. He texted back a one-word answer: "Laughter."...  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/as-pelosi-plays-games-with-impeachment-what-next-for-gop?utm_source=breaking_push&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications&utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_12/21/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief&rid=5261  
.
scumbag-Schumer's Corrupt Democratic Jurors
d7zr61ky7qsqpqppl0W4kWWjrwNg8N3CXWfg4kaW62iV4xDGtTwds1vwYMhKdJMrUFp2wQsnKCdU84US4awxnY6GYvh4dG1yx_9s2mIGm0N_SVQKp-w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Daniel John Sobieski
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was right to so eloquently smack down cryin’ Chuck scumbag-Schumer’s request for a “scumbag-Schumer do-over” of the House impeachment process with unheard-from witnesses... If, as House Democrats insist, the “evidence” is “uncontested,” why does scumbag-Schumer seek new evidence and want to hear new witnesses, providing a list of White House advisers but not a list that includes the alleged Ukraine whistleblower? scumbag-Schumer whines that McConnell has said he will take his cues on a Senate trial from President Trump, whom the House denied due process and the right to confront his accuser. Too bad, cryin’ Chuck, for just as in the House, elections have consequences. Republicans won the Senate so you play by their rules  scumbag-Schumer pretends that a Senate impeachment trial is like a trial in criminal or civil court and that McConnell can’t act as both a juror and a defense attorney. Of course he can -- an impeachment trial is more of a political process than a judicial one. scumbag-Schumer is trying to depose a sitting President of the United States and overturn the results of an election, disenfranchising 63 million voters, without a crime or evidence of a crime, and he wants to talk about fairness? McConnell is no more “tainted” as a juror for working with President Trump than the Senate Democrats, also jurors, who ran and are still running against Trump in 2020 -- Kobuchar, Harris, dinky/liar-Warren, scumbag-Booker, commie-Sanders. They had or have a vested interest in Trump’s removal that in a regular trial would constitute a disqualifying conflict of interest. They would personally benefit from Trump’s removal so should they recuse themselves as some have asked McConnell to do. Tainted Senate jurors? How about Democrat Senators scumbag-Durbin,scumbag- Menendez, and scumbag-Leahy, who begged Ukraine officials to give them some dirt on Donald Trump and to help with the Mueller investigation: Democrats wrote to the Ukrainian government in May 2018 urging it to continue investigations into President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign -- collusion later found not to exist.. The demand, which came from U.S. Senators scumbag-Robert Menendez (D-NJ), scumbag-Dick Durbin (D-IL), and scumbag-Patrick Leahy (D-VT), resurfaced Wednesday in an opinion piece written by conservative Marc Thiessen in the Washington Post: It got almost no attention, but in May, CNN reported that Sens. scumbag-Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), scumbag-Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and scumbag-Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported the capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these democratic principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.” So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate?...
.
Demo Debate: Gross Word Distortions
FxfFlb_oTztHXPz8mrgbzEW9zUB4La6k6PjH7JWV7DZ6fF-xjphb__IS7bkolTCno2E5WI4W05fYsPcp0bZzbJeCx1bZ2ShqpBVQPiyThfLb7u2tVlyyn34FLTvGQ0E5wuoO2knsxvc7P-dDzUL8b-X8RbeV586N9hTiSss=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  Last night was the final Democrat debate of 2019. We say “debate” only loosely, because all seven of the remaining candidates on stage agree on the basics of the Democrat platform — higher taxes, “free” stuff for constituents, racial division, and hating President Donald Trump. So, rather than another lowlights reel of outrageous comments or meaningless tussles between candidates, we thought a brief word study would be enlightening.
 

The word “Liberty” was not used in last night’s Democrat debate. That should surprise no one, and it may be about all you need to know about the Democrat field.

Though the word “freedom was used nine times, it was used twice to defend abortion, twice to attack Trump for daring to complain about the Democrats’ Leftmedia super PAC, and three times to argue for income redistribution — specifically, Andrew Yang’s "freedom dividend” wealth transfer of $1,000 from some Americans to other Americans.

“Constitution” or “constitutional” were used 11 times. Primarily, that was in reference to the Democrats’ impeachment charade — a sad spectacle of political theater made all the more absurd by House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi’s decision to delay sending those articles to the Senate for trial. Nonetheless, all seven Democrat candidates waxed eloquent about their solemn duty “to support and defend” the Constitution — a document they rip to shreds with every policy proposal and actual law or regulation they pass.

When the Constitution wasn’t being used as an impeachment fainting couch, Democrats were using it to make false allegations of voter suppression of minorities or to whine about money in politics, which we thought they already “fixed” with campaign-finance reform nearly 20 years ago. As with all Democrat “fixes,” however, the fix needs fixing, and Democrats always propose even more government.

A theme running throughout the evening is that Democrat presidential candidates routinely declare they will do what a president has no constitutional authority to do. Every one of the seven Democrats on stage seems to have no problem with an imperial presidency, so long as it’s their own. Their distortions of words like “freedom” and “Constitution” belie their fundamental bent toward authoritarian power. That aptly sums up today’s Democrat Party.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67530?mailing_id=4759&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4759&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   
Plenty of Bipartisanship on Debt Spending
6Ytzh0t004tRSIBkz-M0368mhzK9Iq1GtYjFalIs_n8dNrBgZn8AKdOvtlZ7yXd9RUK-2Fz06lHTetsShHTaoqeWWPv6lLXFI4pYAA5GEVkzWs4S11vT71T5bdiulmAemsfmG33zsMzPXhESf_CdPEb47UeidhbBgjP34dE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Brian Mark Weber:  This was a somber and serious week for the U.S. House of Representatives — a week in which the actions of Democrats and Republicans will affect the fate of our nation for years to come. Indeed, some sober-minded analysts claim we may never recover from the votes cast this week in the lower chamber.

But this has nothing to do with the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump.

While our country was focused on the impeachment farce, few Americans noticed that just the day before the House vote both Democrats and Republicans worked in bipartisan fashion to pass a $1.4 trillion spending package that then sailed through the Senate Thursday before being signed by the president, likely today.

Impeachment is serious business, of course, but President Trump’s acquittal in the Senate is a foregone conclusion — if the House ever does its duty and sends impeachment articles to the upper chamber. What’s far more troubling, though, is that no one in Congress from either party seems to care that our national debt is rocketing out of control.

One sensible Republican lawmaker, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, just couldn’t bring himself to vote for the massive spending bill even though he’s generally a supporter of the president.

As with most presidents, Trump’s excuse is that our national security is at stake. Rep. Roy certainly wants to fund the military, but he also wants some clarification on the Afghanistan mission to accompany the funding. Roy wrote on his Twitter account that “for this and other reasons I am a ‘no.’”

The Wall Street Journal’s James Freeman argues that the real scandal in Trump’s presidency has nothing to do with Russia collusion or any of the other nonsense impeachment charges, but instead the reckless spending. “Dangerous” is the term he uses to describe the president’s “willingness to spend taxpayer dollars just as promiscuously as the regular politicians.”

While it’s true that Trump never focused on fiscal conservatism during his 2016 campaign, the fact that a businessman-turned-politician can’t sign a responsible budget is a legitimate concern. The editors at National Review note, “In the private sector, Donald Trump famously called himself the ‘king of debt.’ With the spending deal negotiated by his administration with Congress, he is carrying that title over into government work. The $1.4 trillion spending deal reflects a number of left-wing priorities, such as funding gun-control activism that is masquerading as research.”

They add, “The president likes to boast about his skill as a negotiator, which is, in this instance, nowhere to be seen. The president enjoys mean-mugging on Twitter, but in the real world, he’s willing to sign off on $1.4 trillion for lopsidedly Democratic priorities in order to avoid a confrontation with liar-Nancy Pelosi.”

One of the more problematic provisions in the bill is a seven-year extension of the Export-Import Bank.

“Both Republican and Democratic establishment leaders know that if the Export-Import Bank were properly debated and scrutinized, few voters would actually support reauthorizing it,” writes the Washington Examiner’s Brad Polumbo. “It exists to hand out taxpayer money to foreign governments and U.S. companies in the hope that they’ll buy more American goods and services, usually from Boeing.”

None of this should be a surprise.

Daniel Horowitz writes at Conservative Review, “It’s become an annual ritual before Christmas. Both parties, despite the fake wrestling of soap opera politics, come together to increase spending and add special interest policy riders into a 2,000-page omnibus bill dropped hours before a vote is conducted, while nothing in the bill addresses the core challenges of our time that matter most to the citizenry. This occurs whether Republicans control one, two, or all three branches of the legislative process.”

If he signs this sorry spending package as is, President Trump will have violated his 2018 pledge to never again approve such a rushed and overloaded omnibus bill. In addition, he’ll have sacrificed any political leverage he enjoyed for the rest of his first term. Trump should veto this bill, force both parties to engage in a national debate over spending, and make this a core issue during the 2020 presidential campaign.

But beyond the obvious fiscal imperative, why would Trump hand liar-Nancy Pelosi and her ilk such an easy victory at the very moment they’ve impeached him? If President Trump is indeed intent on making America great again, he should veto this abomination and send it back into the swamp for reconsideration.

As our country’s debt soars past $23 trillion, Trump ought to get serious about the issue of federal spending. If not, he has no business talking about draining the swamp.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67528?mailing_id=4759&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4759&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
Preaching a Conspiracy Theory
T5Lzk4Om_UMzwuqZewwuD8xSwyv3cw0AyfTY0JS3yyxbCNZUb9nrfXVbntpBOW8_voifKHBbQcfUsVoxHNdKorCKCm1hRXjFuVums98oa8xgQkQl1IuMegbVlT2ifOM9IECs3izSeIOpmtcIwG7SCAHPKFvFTgPUsCQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Allen C. Guelzo

{ city-journal.org } ~ There is one sense in which the 1619 Project’s attempt to rewrite U.S. history in the image of slavery is right: America’s founding was like nothing else seen in the history of human societies. But not because of slavery. Instead, it was because the American republic modeled itself on the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century by trying to find a natural order in human politics, rather than fall back upon the artificial and irrational hierarchies that governed how the ancients had understood both the physical and political universes. Our Declaration of Independence stated as a self-evident truth of nature that “all men are created equal”; our Constitution prohibited all titles of nobility and required virtually all offices to be matters of public election rather than inheritance or class. The American republic would be a theater of those who, like Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass, could be “self-made men,” and the solutions to the problems of their day would be generated by a host of voluntary associations, working from the bottom up, rather than through government, from the top down.

Yet, nature is not always kind or predictable, and neither is the path of the republic. The temptation has always existed to slide back into the comfortable abyss of hierarchy, whether it be the racial hierarchy of slaveholders in the Civil War or the newer hierarchies of bureaucracy and socialism. It is that temptation to backsliding which the 1619 Project wants to insist is the real story; but this is like taking the stage crew out from behind the curtain and insisting that they’re the real musical.

So, let us speak of slavery. The American republic inherited slavery from the British empire, in much the same way that it inherited its fiscal poverty, its lack of manufacturing capability, and its primitive infrastructure. We expected to overcome all of these in time. And we would have dealt the same way with slavery, too. At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Gouverneur Morris attacked slavery wholesale as “a nefarious institution” which had “the curse of heaven . . . where it prevailed.” But the expectation of the Founders was that slavery was a dying institution. So, the Convention turned a blind eye to slavery, even as it insisted that turning that blind eye was not meant, as James Madison said, “to admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in men.”

They were, of course, wrong. The explosion of Britain’s Industrial Revolution, built on the production of cotton textiles and the invention of the cotton gin, turned slave-based cotton agriculture into a roaring inferno of profitability. Profitability first erased shame and then stimulated angry self-justifications; and instead of painlessly winking out, slavery had to be exterminated by the force of civil war before it could strangle the life of the republic itself. Even then, we botched the eradication of slavery’s racial legacy through a badly designed Reconstruction. We have paid the price for that ever since.

This is not, however, the story told by the so-called 1619 Project. Designed largely by journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones and members of the New York Times editorial staff, the 1619 Project aspires—through essays, poems, and short fiction—to rewrite entirely the narrative of American slavery, not as an unwilling inheritance of British colonialism but as the love-object of American capitalism from its very origins. It reviews slavery not as a blemish that the Founders grudgingly tolerated with the understanding that it must soon evaporate, but as the prize that the Constitution went out of its way to secure and protect. The Times presents slavery not as a regrettable chapter in the distant past, but as the living, breathing pattern upon which all American social life is based, world without end.

The 1619 Project is not history: it is polemic, born in the imaginations of those whose primary target is capitalism itself and who hope to tarnish capitalism by associating it with slavery. Slavery made cotton profitable; but profitability is not capitalism. Profit-seeking has been around since Abraham bought the cave at Machpelah in the book of Genesis. If profitability were capitalism, then the Soviet Union’s highly profitable sales of natural gas and other commodities would surely make it one of the great success stories of capitalism – which, of course, it was not. Ask any worthwhile Marxist: capitalism is about the creation of class, and especially the bourgeoisie. And one thing the South never developed was a bourgeoisie. Which is why no single American, North or South, before 1861 ever imagined that slavery and capitalism were anything but mortal enemies. The proslavery apologist, George Fitzhugh, frankly declared that slavery was a form, not of capitalism, but feudal socialism; the antislavery president, Abraham Lincoln, explained the war on slavery as a war on behalf of free labor.

The 1619 Project commits, moreover, the Supply Chain Fallacy—that slavery was necessary for capitalism and as a result inhabits every level of capitalism’s subsequent development. This is the same reasoning that suggests that if a scientist receives a grant from the National Science Foundation for research, the result of the research is a production of the government. As economic historian Deirdre McCloskey comments, “It’s a legal way of thinking, not economic.” And not much in the way of historical thinking, either.

Again: the 1619 Project is not history; it is conspiracy theory. And like all conspiracy theories, the 1619 Project announces with a eureka! that it has acquired the explanation to everything, and thus gives an aggrieved audience a sense that finally it is in control, through its understanding of the real cause of its unhappiness. But historians—and most journalists—know that human experience is multivalent, contingent, and contradictory. And it bodes ill for the 1619 Project that while conspiracy theories arouse tidal waves of attention in their first unveiling, they also—like the Grassy Knoll or the Blood Libel—wear out quickly, because their ability to explain everything usually ends up explaining nothing.

And again: the 1619 Project is not history; it is ignorance. It claims that the American Revolution was staged to protect slavery, though it never once occurs to the Project to ask, in that case, why the British West Indies which had a far larger and infinitely more malignant slave system than the 13 American colonies never joined us in that revolution. It claims that the Constitution’s three-fifths clause was designed by the Founders as the keystone that would keep the slave states in power, though the 1619 Project seems not to have noticed that at the time of the Constitutional Convention, all of the states were slave states save only Massachusetts, so that the three-fifths clause could not have been intended to confer such a mysterious power on slavery unless the Founders had come to the Convention equipped with crystal balls. It behaves as though the Civil War never happened, that the slaves somehow freed themselves, and that a white president never put weapons into the hands of black men and bid them kill rebels who had taken up arms in defense of bondage. The 1619 Project forgets, in other words, that there was an 1863 Project, and that its name was emancipation.

Finally: the 1619 Project is not history; it is evangelism, but evangelism for a gospel of disenchantment whose ultimate purpose is the hollowing out of the meaning of freedom, so that every defense of freedom drops nervously from the hands of people who have been made too ashamed to defend it. No nation can live without a history, and no free nation can flourish without a history that affirms—in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s words in 1856—“that the evil eye can wither, that the heart’s blessing can heal; that love can exalt talent” and “overcome all odds.” What the 1619 Project offers instead is bitterness, fragility, and intellectual corruption—not history.

It is the bitterest of ironies that the 1619 Project dispenses this malediction from the chair of ultimate cultural privilege in America, because in no human society has an enslaved people suddenly found itself vaulted into positions of such privilege, and with the consent—even the approbation—of those who were once the enslavers. The 156 years since emancipation are less than a second on human history’s long clock, so that such a transformation is more in the nature of a miracle to be celebrated than a failure to be deplored for any seeming slowness. It is a miracle Frederick Douglass celebrated; it is a miracle Sergeant William Carney celebrated on the ramparts of Fort Wagner; it is a miracle Dorie Miller and the Tuskegee Airmen celebrated; and it is a miracle Colin Powell and Ben Carson have celebrated. Why not the 1619Project?
Read more…

Mon/Med AM ~ thefrontpagecover

Monday Top News Executive Summary
Kyz6XnOU32ORIuafw2ASBkmGYehmUTKEBvkM0YTe_yQ0iOW6uNlChPiSpsyyAcGVKep6d9rissKSmO9GkshfRnPpDwwNldRQ4wrlvUTjfFe7lrWx7clusMo9sRgGoz9egLzUih3I4MYgOLFgdEVd1OuggCGVBK9anW8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xMedia Editors:  Above the Fold


SPENDING BILL SIGNED: President Trump signed into law Friday night a $1.4 trillion spending package that avoids a government shutdown, funds all federal agencies through September, provides up to 12 weeks of paid family leave for most federal employees and spends $1.375 billion on his border wall (The Washington Times)

“OFFENSIVELY QUESTIONED … SPIRITUAL INTEGRITY”: Nearly 200 evangelical leaders condemned Christianity Today editorial on Trump (Fox News)

Government & Politics


DEFENDING RULE OF LAW: President Trump has installed 187 federal judges so far (Disrn)

FAKE NEWS: Bloomberg ad makes wildly misleading claim: 263 school shootings “since Trump took office” (The Daily Wire)

NO RACISM: Service academies find cadets were playing “circle game” and not making white-power hand gesture during Army-Navy game (National Review)

KINSHIP: Trump hosts Amish in historic Oval Office visit (The Washington Times)

National Security


KHASHOGGI TRIAL: Saudi Arabia sentences five to death for Jamal Khashoggi’s brutal murder (Associated Press)

“A MAJOR BLOW TO THE GANG’S LEADERSHIP”:  Ninety-six MS-13 members arrested in New York in largest takedown of gang (U.S. News & World Report)

Other Notables


BLUE-STATE EXODUS: California population growth slowest since 1900 as residents leave, immigration decelerates (Los Angeles Times)

COMMUNISM RISING: Here’s how China became the world’s No. 2 economy and how it plans on being No. 1 (CNBC)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: Raising the smoking age is a drastic response to a nonexistent problem (Washington Examiner)

POLICY: Immigration will shift Electoral College in favor of Democrats, study finds (The Daily Signal)

HUMOR: Dems ban red plastic Solo cups because they “look too much like MAGA hats” (Genesius Times)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/67555?mailing_id=4772&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4772&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body    

Read more…

Monday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
liar-Pelosi's Democrats Unite and 
Catalyze the GOP
94fuUGGIUhFqFBkhrpKYpYUEMt7HQtSbeDZEAATehLOXddJPoLEoXRuwMBtEJS9MVgCcmqBwfpGTfgoG9IEec8wJJHisFwU1VEaK5dxKWLH_Nhss7dds4HcQJYAQdjWDcCe4KyBy8UNofZ3yDSWJenvlaI0fbTA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= David Limbaugh
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
liar-Nancy Pelosi’s Impeachment 
Blunder Will Play Out In 2020
ZwG6SGllUSyrr9XaJNMJFBOo-WhPJK2fSlNNJP5zrV53iJz57SgRz3a9tfSoGx71Ac4LCmzkW6n-QQHnP1UyckANYvkH6IfUK69sfia32cb3OksFFy-ECTY01sC3_430Z_B3LbQyo5SaxHzeFcjDnAk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Ben Domenech
{ thefederalist.com } ~ The decision by liar-Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic House leadership to depart from Washington without resolving whether the Senate trial of the president will even happen is a blunder of potentially serious proportions... It totally undermines everything the Democrats have done narratively for the past several months, embracing their role as defenders of the Constitution against a clear and present danger to its tenets. Instead, impeachment now looks more like an example of that ancient term: a partisan traveshamockery. liar-Pelosi’s supporters who are hard core Democratic donors and partisans may like this move, since it denies the president the surety of what is almost assuredly going to be a bipartisan vote to acquit him on both charges in the Senate. These are the same people who wanted to extend the process by forcing Mick Mulvaney and John Bolton to testify via the courts, who hold out hope to this day that the Southern District of New York will turn up something on Rudy Giuliani that will make for even more articles of impeachment. They want impeachment now, impeachment tomorrow, impeachment forever – asterisks all the way down. But for the approximately 30 members who stood with liar-Pelosi to make this tough vote, they don’t want impeachment to extend further into the new year – they want it over as quickly as possible. The narrative argument they can make is obvious: “yes, we voted for impeachment, we had to do it because of the Constitution, but the very next day we proved we could work with the president on trade, and we’ll work with him on prescription drug prices and other issues moving forward.” That’s how they got elected in the first place, after all – and defending those members is what liar-Pelosi has concentrated on. It’s why she didn’t want to do this in the first place. The idea that liar-Pelosi would hold on to these articles isn’t envisioned in the process or rules. Noah Feldman, who testified for the Democrats during their proceedings, maintains that Trump isn’t actually impeached until the House sends over the articles. It also prompts a host of questions about whether the Senate could hold a trial even if the House does not transmit the Articles of Impeachment. Weird granular debates about legislative rules seems like exactly what’s needed to increase the momentum toward removal, guys – great job. But liar-Pelosi’s move is also something that makes for an incoherent series of talking points in media appearances. Watch this appearance by Majority Whip James Clyburn on CNN yesterday...
.
‘Keep Those Articles Here’: Top Dem Demands 
Quid Pro Quo Before Sending 
Impeachment To Senate
coD0kHg_kLu_uom-PQvFWzTcIktgprh_otUhDQFTJCPiyG6dbYd-2vzzn_dB3oGg3QFVRhXhkrUUO4nQVeRBdF88_PqF4DNt-p93NUtCMgwhVgwiSgcxK4MULjXqtJhxtA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Chrissy Clark
{ thefederalist.com } ~ Democratic House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn told CNN, if it were up to him, he would withhold articles of impeachment from the Senate indefinitely... Clyburn said he would only send the articles of impeachment to the Senate for if Democrat’s were promised a “fair” trial. By “fair trial,” Clyburn means allowing new witnesses and deliberation to take place in the Senate. But, deliberations and witness testimony is a job meant for the House of Representatives. Clearly, Rep. Adam Schiff and House Democrats bungled their hearings and concluded with extremely weak articles of impeachment they know will get zero bipartisan support. Now, they want more witnesses called because they didn’t do their job well their first time.“Why the delay Congressman?” CNN anchor John Berman asked. “Well the delay is made necessary because the Majority Leader of the Senate has made it very clear that he is not going to be impartial, he is not going to be fair. He will collude, if you please, with the White House, at least the White Houses’s attorneys, in order to decide how he will go forward,” Clyburn said. “How long are you willing to wait?” Berman asked. “As long as it takes. Even if Mitch McConnell doesn’t come around to committing to a fair trial, keep those articles here, so, keep them as long as it takes,” Clyburn said. “Are you suggesting it’s possible you will never transmit the articles of impeachment [to the Senate]?” Berman asked. “If it were me, yes, that’s what I’m saying,” Clyburn said. Suddenly, the Democrats’s strategy to impeach Trump looks like obstructing the process of impeaching Trump. As Sean Davis and Mollie Hemingway wrote, “Preventing people from wasting their time on something that they don’t want to waste their time on is not a victory.”...
.
As 2019 Ends, Trump Economy Running 
Full Speed Ahead
WePqBgjDbhFmMqCO3gLgbIh9Bh2lRx7kYDOlAsyTo8J2VL_iyiNuA9ceYLajFrxNw7nPFYdNQJCRVzG3nSk4fdtVuKULMUBxsIG6HF5icMi3EbIp7MdwEsi4j-pD5QVz0xkBjm4VEz-MDfFKzMkcP2NBkgNnbkcjWVKXoLM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Louis DeBroux:  In June 2016, New York Times economic correspondent Neil Irwin, echoing the findings of economists at Moody’s Analytics, predicted that if Republican Donald J. Trump was elected, “the United States would experience a lengthy recession, enormous job losses, much higher interest rates and diminished long-term growth prospects.”
 

On Nov. 9, 2016, after global stock markets plunged following the shocking victory of Trump over scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton the day before, Nobel Prize-winning economist and NYT writer Paul Krugman wrote, “It really does now look like [America elected] President Donald J. Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect them to recover? … A first-pass answer is never.”

Krugman continued his demoralized denunciation of Trump, declaring, “Under any circumstances, putting an irresponsible, ignorant man who takes his advice from all the wrong people in charge of the nation with the world’s most important economy would be very bad news. … So we are very probably looking at a global recession, with no end in sight.”

Never let it be said that the NYT or Paul Krugman ever missed an opportunity to be spectacularly wrong.

Ironically enough for these naysayers, nearly half of the counties carried by Trump were actually already in recession in 2016 — during the Barack scumbag/liar-nObama “recovery” — and thus voters took a chance on the business mogul.

Now, not quite three years into the Trump presidency, it’s hard to imagine the economic news being much rosier, especially considering Democrats’ completely unified opposition to every effort by President Trump to bring us out of the economic doldrums of the scumbag/liar-nObama years.

Yet Trump, working with House and Senate Republicans, has unleashed a wave of economic good news unimaginable three years ago. With passage of the GOP’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — without a single Democrat vote — the corporate tax rate was slashed from 35% to 21%, resulting in a huge influx of capital investment and job creation.

Contrary to Krugman’s false prophecy of the markets “never” recovering, the Dow Jones recently gained its 10,000th point since Trump’s election. There have been more than 100 new record highs since Trump took office, and he now presides over the longest bull market in history, which is fattening up 401(k) retirement accounts for workers.

In November, the economy created 266,000 new jobs, nearly 80,000 more than expected, driving the unemployment rate down to 3.5%, the lowest level since the end of WWII. For historical perspective, the last time the unemployment rate was below 3.5% was 1929.

And it is not just “the rich” or white Americans who are benefitting. The black unemployment rate of 5.4% in October and the Hispanic unemployment rate of 3.9% in September were both the lowest ever recorded.

Additionally, the Trump-signed GOP tax bill created Opportunity Zones in low-income, distressed minority neighborhoods, encouraging investment in those communities. This and other pro-small-business policies have resulted in an increase in minority-owned businesses.

The Trump economy is so good that there are actually more job openings than Americans looking for work. Employers struggle to find available workers with the necessary skills.

The Trump economy has been a huge boon for families, with median income up $4,144 in just three years under Trump, an increase of 6.8%, and a more than quadrupling of the modest $1,000 increase during the eight years of scumbag/liar-nObama.

The GOP tax cuts have also allowed workers to keep much more of their earnings. The increase in the standard deduction and a doubling of the Child Tax Credit has spurred consumer spending, debt reduction, and savings, allowing Americans to spend on what is important to them.

And Republican improvements in the 529 education savings plans now allow parents to not only save for college, but to use the money for K-12 education expenses in public, private, and religious schools.

Earlier this year, Democrats claimed Trump’s hard-nose tactics with Canada and Mexico in negotiating a new trade agreement, as well as an escalating trade war with China, would send the U.S. economy into a downward spiral.

Yet those tactics resulted in the recent vote by the Democrat-controlled House to pass the Trump-negotiated USMCA (U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement), giving American businesses and consumers more favorable trading terms and purchasing power.

And after threats of massive new tariffs on China made markets nervous, Trump recently announced he’d reached consensus on “phase one” of a new trade agreement, which addresses the structural trade imbalance between the nations. Trump has agreed to back off of some tariffs, and China has committed to making an additional $200 billion in purchases of U.S. goods over the next two years. This is expected to drive GDP growth up to around 3% next year.

This forced the anti-Trump Washington Post to admit a “dramatic turnaround in momentum,” with economists reversing their predictions of a looming recession from just a few months ago.

Of course, this is horrible news for Democrats, who see their chances of retaking the White House evaporating even as their farcical impeachment efforts get more and more desperate. They know that no president since WWII has lost reelection when unemployment was below 7.4%. Trump’s unemployment rate is less than half that.

This realization caused a panicked Georgia House Democrat leader to fret following the recent jobs report, “If … the economy doesn’t take a nose dive, I fear we lose to President ImANut.” This echoed the lament of Democrat Congressman scumbag-Al Green, who warned that Democrats must impeach Trump to prevent his reelection.

Try as they desperately have, Democrats just haven’t been able to derail the Trump economy.

And that is a very, very, very good thing for the American people.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67437?mailing_id=4749&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4749&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   
Judges in GA and WI Okay 
Voter-Registry Cleanup
iCNr6PnauJGqSwuIhXSWM2kH2J0LjR6LM8f_CWVMT69pN00HqXM91JZx4WF8T-HESxgRrgUkyNh6jdHycP9HY4veyU0IsVkiZA4VdvlCFMZWJhVmLxwEtHBTn-3P27IVMJA07oQCBn4KAJeGPL0OE-ggNTNKg6CC92PEGjA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Political Editors:  Despite howls of anger from the Left, judges in Georgia and Wisconsin have given the green light to state authorities to move forward on cleaning up their voter rolls. In Georgia, 309,000 names will be removed, including 120,000 names of voters who have not cast a vote since 2012, while the bulk of the other registered voters removed are due primarily to those individuals having left the state. Wisconsin will remove more than 200,000 names from its voter rolls.

Both states are acting to remain compliant with each state’s respective laws requiring the election commissions to maintain accurate registries of active voters. In his ruling on Georgia, U.S. District Judge Steve Jones noted, “The court’s ruling is based largely on defense counsel’s statement … that any voter registration that is canceled today can be restored within 24 to 48 hours.”

Predictably, the leftist activist group “Fair Fight Action,” a group founded by Georgia’s failed Democrat gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, filed an emergency motion to stop the registration cleanup, dubiously claiming, “Georgia’s practice of removing voters who have declined to participate in recent elections violates the United States Constitution.” Recall that Abrams, who still refuses to accept the fact that she lost the election, blamed her loss on false allegations of widespread voter suppression.

In Wisconsin, it was a lawsuit raised by voters that can be credited with successfully pushing the state’s elections commission to follow the state’s law requiring the purging from the registry voters who failed to respond to a notice verifying their address after 30 days. As The Wall Street Journal reported, “The commission decided not to deactivate registrations until 12 to 24 months after voters failed to respond rather than 30 days. The commission also jettisoned a formal rule making, which state law requires when an agency changes statutory interpretation or enforcement.” Of the more than 200,000 voters flagged as movers (individuals with multiple mailing addresses), only 16,500 have registered at a new address.

Furthermore, the Journal notes, “Enforcing the state law will merely help ensure that a liberal University of Wisconsin student doesn’t vote in both Madison and Milwaukee — or a Trump supporter in Wisconsin and Iowa. Democrats use cries of disenfranchisement to motivate their voters, but voter integrity shouldn’t be a partisan issue and it isn’t in this case in Wisconsin.”

For a party that has spent the last three years trying to impeach a president over phony charges of election rigging, Democrats sure do whatever they can to prevent actual election integrity.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67434?mailing_id=4749&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4749&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   
Trump Impeached — Now Ahead 
of All Dem Candidates
8hHxgF9kjB3xWDj4cuJMT58J66M7ACtLiA5V4a8-qoI9kTSQlheHsCGysyAXuP-N76Jng5hzlrtgKO8BGzBlrXIZS4fesbCHCdaWDYQAdFpBfEF7ZJqh9NkOLmPVH7E1W1C22MGkA2o-WmYrS_YTlS29JnPjFjJ5xDOpXms=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Thomas Gallatin:  On the eve of the House Democrats’ somber gleeful vote to impeach President Donald Trump, a new poll showed him beating every potential Democrat candidate in hypothetical head-to-head contests in 2020. The USA Today/Suffolk University Poll observed, “The national survey, taken as the House of Representatives planned an impeachment vote and the Senate a trial, showed Trump defeating former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden by 3 percentage points, Vermont Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders by 5 points, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren by 8 points.” Clearly, the Democrats’ partisan impeachment gamble has not played out as they had hoped.
 

Having gone all-in, Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and company were left with little choice but to continue the charade, so on Wednesday the House held the impeachment vote. As expected, both articles of impeachment passed. liar-Pelosi sought to moralize the vote, boasting, “I could not be prouder or more inspired by the moral courage of the House Democrats. We never asked one of [them] how they were going to vote. We never whipped this vote.” She honestly expects us to believe she had no idea how this would turn out?

More significantly, liar-Pelosi failed to garner the bipartisan support she had previously insisted was necessary when considering such a serious move as impeachment. In fact, it is the Republicans who can claim the bipartisan banner, as two Democrats crossed the aisle to vote against the “abuse of power” charge, and a third Democrat joined them in opposing the charge of “obstructing Congress.”

It’s now official — Democrats have successfully lowered the bar on impeachment to now include partisan policy disagreements. Furthermore, liar-Pelosi plans to delay sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate until she deems Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s rules to be “fair.” This is a clear play by liar-Pelosi to continue the false narrative initiated by Chuck scumbag-Schumer, who vacuously claims that Republicans aren’t playing fair. As usual, the Democrats’ definition of “fairness” is to acquiesce to their every demand.

But McConnell, who is no stranger to the Democrats’ long history of disingenuous demands for “fairness,” pointedly responded: “House Democrats embarked on the most rushed, least thorough, and most unfair impeachment inquiry in modern history. The framers built the Senate to provide stability … to keep partisan passions from boiling over. Moments like this are why the United States Senate exists.” In other words, take a hike.

Trump took the occasion in stride. As Democrats were voting, he held a rally before a packed house in Battle Creek, Michigan, where he taunted the Democrats: “It doesn’t really feel like we’re being impeached.” He further blasted “the do-nothing Democrats” who he noted “do nothing” beyond “declaring their deep hatred and disdain for [the] American voter.” He added that their impeachment is “political suicide.”

During his speech, a staffer interrupted Trump to inform him of the final vote, to which he commented, “The Republicans have never been so affronted but they’ve never been so united as they are right now.” He then observed, “I’m the first person to ever get impeached and there’s no crime!”

Finally, while Democrats and the Leftmedia spent the evening gleefully relishing the House’s partisan impeachment vote, in the broader scheme of things they have just increased the likelihood of Trump winning in 2020.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67495?mailing_id=4755&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4755&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
liar-Pelosi's Democrats Unite and 
Catalyze the GOP
94fuUGGIUhFqFBkhrpKYpYUEMt7HQtSbeDZEAATehLOXddJPoLEoXRuwMBtEJS9MVgCcmqBwfpGTfgoG9IEec8wJJHisFwU1VEaK5dxKWLH_Nhss7dds4HcQJYAQdjWDcCe4KyBy8UNofZ3yDSWJenvlaI0fbTA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= David Limbaugh
 

Nothing has done more to unite Republicans — from GOP congressmen in Washington, D.C., to malodorous Walmart patrons in rural America — than the Democrats’ quixotic, vendetta-fueled crusade against President Donald Trump.

Trump’s election was a seismic blow to the left, which has paralyzed it with hatred and reduced it to a gigantic mob of bloated self-importance and radical opposition.

Have you ever heard congressional Democrats pay such homage to the Constitution? A Martian visitor to the House Democratic impeachment speeches might conclude that he happened upon a cult of constitutional originalists — that earthling James Madison’s ghost had possessed every last one of them.

If I hear the words “threat to our democracy” one more time, I might just have to surrender out of sheer listener fatigue. You have to admire their energy.

But even if their phony case against Trump on Ukraine weren’t so specious, an objective observer would be skeptical of their good faith, given their nonstop, three-year impeachment quest over things too trivial to be admitted out loud, and their ever-changing charges against Trump.

Despite all their professions of love for “our democracy,” they are fair-weather supporters of our system and of the people’s will, flouting the system whenever it serves their ends. They are authoritarian bullies who believe people with different views shouldn’t even be entitled to speak in certain quarters, and certainly shouldn’t be allowed to elect a president who will implement those views.

They must believe that when they feign undying allegiance to constitutional principles with which they’ve never flirted, much less asked to the prom, we will believe they mean it — as opposed to recognize they’re implementing an Orwellian strategy to disenfranchise us while pretending to safeguard our system. They must think that if they keep hectoring us about how despicable Trump is, we’ll finally be swayed to their position, even though their contempt for Trump reveals their similar disdain for his 63 million supporters.

Indeed, their arrogance and authoritarianism, and their contempt for flyover country and conservative America, were major factors in Trump’s election. These are among the principle drivers of their endless refusal to accept the 2016 election results. And we still see right through them.

The Democratic impeachment cabal has been hyperventilating over a supposed constitutional crisis, but can you imagine what might happen if Democrats were to have control of both chambers of Congress with a Republican president? They might oust him before he has taken one presidential act. Their rationale could be that rational people couldn’t possibly have elected such an unpresidential maniac; therefore, the election must be presumed invalid. If you think about it, that’s really been their rationale for impeaching him all along, and it explains why they have never been too particular about any of their bogus bill of particulars against him.

Yes, everything is urgent to them when it comes to Trump. He is so bad — such a threat to the republic — that it is imperative they remove him yesterday, so critical that they have virtually ignored their proper legislative duties for two years. And yet House Speaker liar-Pelosi i is now saying she won’t submit the articles of impeachment to the Senate? These Democrats always assume that our memories expire in 24 hours.

Once again, their lies are too obvious to pass the laugh test. At the very time liar-Pelosi i and her merry band of pseudo-guardians of the Constitution were yelling about urgency, they were planning their disgraceful stunt to withhold the articles from the Senate, which confirms there was never any urgency with the impeachment. The urgency was to further smear Trump and taint his legacy. The urgency was to distract the public’s attention from the damning revelations of the inspector general’s report. The urgency is the poor health of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  

They pretend they are bargaining for fairness in the Senate, but they have no authority over the conduct of the Senate trial. And where were their concerns for fairness during their lawless show trial in the House?

Everyone understands this isn’t about fairness in the Senate. It’s about more unfairness from the House, where Democrats seek to preserve their official impeachment libel by denying Trump his right to vindication in the Senate. Only their side is entitled to due process, fairness and common decency. It wasn’t enough that they ran roughshod over procedural norms in the House; they believe they can extend their long arm of wickedness into the Senate. But like all of their other ploys, this, too, will fall flat on its face.

We can only hope that  liar-Pelosi’s charlatans persist and double down on their malfeasance, as their impeachment charade has exposed them as the political cutthroats they are, and severely damaged their credibility and, more importantly, their electability. I can’t remember a time when Republicans have been so united and energized. At this rate, the Democrats will not only lose the presidency again but also lose both houses of Congress.    ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/67510?mailing_id=4759&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4759&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

Read more…

Saturday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

Saturday Top News Executive Summary

pitNLYYe00aKlVz1grkUwqFMd1ELACsHo0etqWpBZDj_EEEDe6wRKk7i-CX--wugp2IPUXnTC2dmLDp73gEkjR3ye7l6cCwTdpuQCxDmNnNLsUwF31N0lePeNOV392KfnxnxvTCJNVB2JPORDwaeOh3cJtgWbx5u7nc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x

Political Editors  Above the Fold


POLITICAL THEATER: It’s official: House Democrats close up shop without sending articles of impeachment to the Senate (PJ Media)

WANDERING MINDS WANTS TO KNOW: If impeachment articles are not delivered, did impeachment happen? Sure, it’s a stupid question … but we’re living in stupid times. (National Review)

Government & Politics


“THIS LEGISLATION TOUCHES ALL 50 STATES”: Senate sends 2020 budget to Trump’s desk (National Review)

FOR THE RECORD: Twenty-one things 18-year-olds can do under spending bill before they can legally buy cigarettes (The Federalist)

IN CASE OF BOREDOM… Here is everything you intentionally missed during Thursday night’s Democrat debate (The Daily Caller)

WHAT DID HE KNOW, AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT? U.S. Attorney John Durham is scrutinizing ex-CIA Director John Brennan’s role in Russian-interference findings (The New York Times)

SENATE SHOULD PASS IT EARLY NEXT YEAR: United States-Mexico-Canada trade deal passes House with broad bipartisan support (National Review)

MORE EVIDENCE OF RACISM: Trump signs “groundbreaking” legislation supporting historically black colleges and universities (The Daily Caller)

Culture


RAINBOW MAFIA POUNCES: J. K. Rowling is indicted by the Woke Enforcement Agency. Her transgression? “Transphobia.” (National Review)

BUT BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG IS “FREE SPEECH”? Iowa man who burned LGBTQ flag sentenced to 16 years (The Washington Times)

Closing Arguments


POLICY: Big teacher-pay proposals are missing the mark (The Hill)

POLICY: Russia’s Eastern Mediterranean strategy — implications for the U.S. and Israel (Hudson Institute)

HUMOR: BREAKING: American Express sends fraud alert to taxpayers: “Did you just try to spend $1.4 trillion in Congress?” (Genesius Times)  

~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/67532?mailing_id=4759&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4759&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body   

Read more…