BREAKING: NFL Player Richard Sherman, Who Burned U.S Flag, Has Been Thrown Out From The Team. Do You Support This?

Felons disguised as lawmakers hold America hostage
Michael Berry
U.S. Veteran Journalist

In an unprecedented attempt to blatantly usurp Constitutional authority from the federal government, lawmakers in California on September 16th passed Senate Bill 54, with a 27-11 vote along party lines, which limits state and local law enforcement communication with federal immigration authorities and prevents officers from questioning and holding people on immigration violations. This bill was signed into law by California’s Governor Jerry Brown on October 5th.

Regardless of the staunch opposition from Republican sheriffs or threats from the Trump administration that this action has faced, California lawmakers have chosen to directly violate federal law and impose their views upon the Nation.

Under Title 8, U.S. Code § 1324 a person (including a group of persons, business, organization or government) commits a federal felony when he harbors, encourages, or aids in the commission of either offense. The criminal nature of the action holds true whether the person did so knowingly or simply by the reckless disregard of the fact.

“Harboring – Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324 Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.”

“Encouraging/Inducing -- Title 8, U.S.C. § Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.”

“Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Title 8, U.S.C. § Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.”

Penalties include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Provisions in the law allow for harsher penalties when such action result in serious injury or death.

“With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years.”

Charging an ordinary citizen with violating a federal law is a fairly simple process. A local prosecutor simply refers the case to a federal prosecutor who, after review, presents a criminal complaint to a Federal Magistrate Judge who determines if there is probable cause. Unlike a civil case, the person referring the case to the federal court must be acting under the authority of the U.S. Attorney General.

But what happens when politicians or ranking officials violate federal laws? In the case of Hilary Clinton, the director of the FBI simply drafts a memo in advance stating his investigation showed no evidence. In the case of political adversaries, politicians demand the appointment of special prosecutors charging them with the mission of finding violations regardless of evidence.

The question then becomes, how does the average citizen force accountability upon these legislators and ranking officials?

Average citizens do not have the means nor ready access to vast media conglomerates like those they are trying to hold accountable. Average citizens don’t have vast networks of people nor do they have large scale platforms to express their views.

Average citizens can vote, yet those they believe need to be held accountable control the time, structure, and methods of elections. So how can they initiate change?
In the case of runaway politicians from other states trying to impose their views, like those in California and similar states, the old adage “give me a lever and a place to stand and I will move the world” comes to mind.

To institute change and force accountability, average citizens must leverage the system which they do have access and encourage that system to act. For most, this system is that of local and state government.

States, like the Federal government and most other governmental bodies, cannot be sued by individuals; however, suits can be brought against a State by another State. Moreover, Under Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over cases between states…. thus, by-passing the fickle U.S. circuit courts which have confused, delayed, and often attempted to legislate from the bench.

True change will only begin by average citizens uniting together and urging their state government to fight back against other states’ intrusion upon federal law and against other states attempting to impose their will upon the entire nation.

Average citizens are being harmed (i.e. increased threat of terror, increased spending, economic instability, etc.), by the actions of the California State lawmakers. Average citizens are being harmed by the multiple frivolous lawsuits being filed by California’s and other state’s Attorney Generals aimed at disrupting the Constitutional powers of the Federal government and forcing their political view upon all states in this Nation.

State Attorney Generals from all the “fly-over” states should be filing suit against California State and other like-minded states causing this harm to their residents. They should be seeking recovery of tax payer dollars their states have been forced to spend protecting its citizens from the actions being taken by these other states. The additional law enforcement dollars Texas, Missouri, and other “flyover” states are having to spend because California, Washington, New York wants open borders. The additional cost to life caused by these same states passing laws to harbor, encourage, and aid illegal immigrants who repeatedly sneak across our border committing heinous acts against U.S. citizens.

With so many states facing budget issues, State Attorney Generals should be jumping at the opportunity to recover the hard-earned tax dollars its citizens are being intimidated into spending to provide social welfare programs for the troves of illegal immigrants being encouraged to unlawfully enter and remain in this great Nation because of actions such as the California lawmakers have taken.

How does the average citizen force accountability? They call their State legislators, Governors, Attorney Generals and demand the State use its vast power to protect them from the unwanted and illegal intrusions being thrust upon them by these leftist states. Demand they sue to protect them and recover hard-earned dollars in the U.S. Supreme Court and maybe, just maybe, when these offending states are forced to face the reality that their actions have real repercussions; they will stop the political game play and stop trying to force their will upon the Nation.

Do you like one of the appetizer called " Escargot " ? 

Love Letter V

I used run a around like naked in the rainy day !  .. Music song are playing love of snail  as  la ... la ... while I was asleep on the cloudy days with qualities mood. I thought a lot of lyric in between my vacation and radio at noon next to my chili mid-summer. After perception slowing down to my brainwave are clicking voice to play magic scene for my air playground fields. Station stays : ... : " In the depth of my sleeping conciseness and energy spirit falling you are the cliffer side of my ocean cave. My eyeball are open- up senses of my perception in a moment to the darkness are fulfill the unknown tense of visionary. Volume said : " Do you swing on the sunny day. I said : " I guess I do ".  

I keep search for mysterious voice of virtue hope  to participate enjoy  a summer course festival seems so great by that signal.Can you hear it ? " Volume as a touch tenderness of the ache soul ". I have already eat something on mind that afraid not to stand outside the hotel whatever you might feel is very cool things to look at. My true sense of beauty going to get along from nature and leaf see-sighting travel to the sun-up at a icy mountain. Water would be the key term leading guy of our tour team. So, finding love element should be sexy tone of late night show on television.   

I played music on slow-motion for some reason that is all above raining fall on my organic body. Only if I try to move in terms of my audience stage there is amazing eyes to taste of the " Escargot " (( snail with Mozzarella cheese )) cuisine for my ladies pina colada as you. One for you !  

(\_(\    
(=' :') ~♥    
(,(')(')

Herrick 2018 

The Mulcahy family

#Breaking (Aspen): Tea Party of Aspen leader Lee Mulcahy, accused the local affiliate of National Public Radio of altering an article post-hoc on the conflict of interest of the private attorney who represents city of Aspen housing (APCHA). Mulcahy stated, "During the investigation of Tom Smith by the state Supreme Court for conflict of interest and other issues, Aspen Public Radio (APR) removed audio that implicated Mr. Smith's dishonesty. APR's audio portion contained a statement where Mr. Smith promised to pay the town of Basalt back for bilking us citizens. He never did. And to top if off, APR revised the article to remove that very important fact. In essence, at a critical time, APR revised their journalism so it appeared that Mr. Smith didn't lie. This is concerning."

Attorney Mary Kenyon stated, ""He (Tom Smith) billed the town for personally representing Jacque and Pam," Kenyon alleged. "Then Aspen Public Radio interviewed him and asked if he didn't think that was a conflict of interest. During that interview, he issued what amounted to a mea culpa and promised to pay the town back the money he was paid. He has never done that."

Mr. Smith, also the private attorney of the town of Basalt, was later cleared because no employee for the Town of Basalt would testify against him.

The radio station's news manager Carolyn Sackariason later restored the article to its original content.

Glenn Greenwald writes, "One of the principal institutions devoted to monitoring and checking abuse of state power is the political media. The theory of a 'fourth estate' is to ensure government transparency and provide a check on overreach.... But that check is only effective if journalist act adversarially to those who wield political power. Instead, the US media has frequently abdicated this role, being subservient to the government's interests, even amplifyng, rather than scrutinizing, its messages and carrying out its dirty work."

Lee Mulcahy is considered controversial. He was formerly one of Aspen's most requested ski and snowboard instructors but was fired for attempting to unionize the employees of Aspen Skiing where he was an employee for 16 years. Later, he was expelled from the Aspen Institute for speaking truth to power and predicting revolution but the ban went to the Colorado Supreme Court and Mulcahy won. He is an internationally exhibited artist. Currently, the City of Aspen is attempting to evict him from the house his family built with their own hands.

After his accusation, Aspen Public Radio has refused to allow Lee Mulcahy to advertise as an artist and refused his $2500.00 member donation.

Neither Aspen Public Radio's executive director or its news director Carolyn Sachariason has returned emails or phone calls for comment.

Teacher Gives An “Assassinate Trump” Quiz – Look At The Question She Asked Students (VIDEO)

Jon Anthony 17 hours ago

Ever since President Trump was elected as President, liberal teachers all over the nation have worked tirelessly to brainwash students into hating him. While you would expect them to uphold the values of education, unfortunately, many do not.

Evidence of teacher bias against Trump exists across the country. One such example was the middle school boy, Jason Newberry, who refused to kneel for his class’s pledge of allegiance. Apparently his liberal teacher wasn’t too happy about this, and she decided to shame him in front of the whole class, which prompted the students to call him names such as KKK, Nazi, and racist.

Silence is Consent already previously reported on the matter, noting that one teacher “showed the entire class liberal propaganda” of NFL thugs kneeling and disrespecting our flag, and then conducted a rigged poll on what the class thought about the matter.

After a Jackson Hole High School teacher just issued an online quiz that may be encouraging Trump’s assassination however, parents are absolutely furious. The quiz was given in Carin Aufderheide’s English class, and was on the topic of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. The question read:

Napoleon has the gun fired for a new occasion. What is the new occasion?

• He was shooting at Trump
• His birthday
• For completion of the windmill
• To scare off the attackers of Animal Farm.

Many conservative parents have grown furious after discovering that this teacher was making a joke about assassinating President Trump. Others have noted that if a teacher even breathed a word of assassinating President Obama, the liberal media would completely destroy his reputation and secret service would be on him in a second.

Unfortunately, however, in this country liberals tend to get away with murder. Breitbart reports:

According to the news report, junior Rylee McCollum took a screenshot of the question and showed it to his father, Jim McCollum, who was angered by the question.

“It’s about respect for the office more than anything,” McCollum said. “That’s enough of this. No way.”

McCollum reportedly voted for Trump in the 2016 election, though he admits he “cringes at some of the things he says.”

“It was so inappropriate to show a name of a sitting president in that question,” McCollum said. “To me, that is so wrong in light of the situation in our country and the divisiveness and all.” Many other parents agreed with McCollum, one of them stating that “liberal bias” has infected the high school

This question is of paramount importance, in the wake of the tragic Las Vegas massacre which specifically targeted country fans. The left has been normalizing violence against conservatives for over a year now, and some have pointed out that if we don’t stop it soon, we may just see another massacre.

James Hodgkinson, the Stephen Scalise shooter, was allegedly influenced by the liberal media to carry out his sick deed. Every single day CNN, MSNBC, and the other liberal news outlets spread hatred and fear, encouraging liberals to attack conservatives…and if they don’t stop soon enough, we may have an all out civil war on our hands.

Video http://silenceisconsent.net/disgusting-teacher-gives-assassinate-trump-quiz-look-sick-qu

If you think that this teacher should be FIRED, please give this article a share! Thank you and God bless!

#UnderCoverAntifa: Louder with Crowder Exposes the Dangerous Truth of Antifa

It was time to go #UnderCoverAntifa, since the media would not. The left is in a quandary. They sympathize with their cause, but find some of Antifa’s tactics “problematic.” Which is why recently, the left has tried distancing themselves from the “anti-fascist” group.

Start increasing that distance, guys. Sprint. Take the advice of Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park, because after this video goes viral, the media must distance itself faster. 

Incidentally, if the left is so against guns, why does Antifa have guns in their cars? Can we expect the anti-gun groups to condemn Antifa? If the left claims to hate violence, then surely, surely, every leftist from Hillary Clinton to Van Jones will come out and thoroughly denounce Antifa after this. Right? Wait, right?

Again, we’re not asking for anyone to be doxxed. But if you recognize someone, if you know someone who’s working within Antifa, report them to the authorities before someone gets shanked. Antifa seems to use any and all excuses to be violent. Even calling Super Jew Ben Shapiro, who likely stands at a threatening 5’9″ a “Nazi.” That’s reaching.

What do you think? Is this the end of Antifa? Or will the media do whatever it can to protect it?

House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes recused himself from the Russia probe for speaking out in public without his committee's support or foreknowledge. Senate Leader, Mitch McConnell, should do the same with Corker since he obviously doesn't have the political integrity to remove himself.