You call this compatible with Western Civilization and in particular with our way of life in the United States or even more succinct, Christianity anywhere on this planet?
Sexual Slavery: "Nothing to do with Islam"?
by Uzay Bulut
October 5, 2015 at 5:00 am
"They are also taught that white non-Muslims are easy, cheap, dirty sluts and that it is their right [to take them]. ... On top of this, teaching people to hate anyone who is not a Muslim -- as is done in many mosques -- will, of course, lead to a lot of people hating anyone who is not a Muslim. ... The problem, however, is also due to police, judges, lawyers, and teachers, fearing the words 'racist' and 'Islamophobe' -- and nothing is being done to stop that." -- Toni Bugle, women's rights activist, founder of Mothers against Radical Islam and Sharia, and victim of child-rape.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6630/sexual-slavery-islam
https://www.facebook.com/groups/christansdefendingchristianityintheus/
All Posts (29183)
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton blame guns and gunmakers for the shootings that have been occurring across the country. Both feigning outrage. Both on peretual campaign mode. Both remain disturbingly silent when it comes to the gun violence that occur on a daily basis in cities like Chicago - which is the mecca of pro,iment radicals like Rahm Emanuel, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan and more. It's also the old stomping ground of both Obama and Hillary as well. Both have so much in common, including their stances where Iran and Israel are concerned, and Islamists and Judeo-Christians, and Benghazi as well. Both are as equally silent and indifferent about the brutal and ruthless murders of Christians by ISIS as they are the shootings occurring in the major metro cities around the country.
There's something else these prominent liberals have in common. One is their obvious disdain of law enforcement officers; the second is their pronounced admiration, and perhaps idolization of, 60s ultra radical, Saul Alinsky - who had dedicated his book. "Rules For Radicals", admiringly to the Devil himself (Lucifer).
Franklin Graham (son of Billy Graham) had written an article on how Christian persecution in America is rising. He's right. We now see that the American flag and christians being associated with hatred and racism. Where a monument of the Ten Commandments was quickly removed because it "offended" some. Yet, a nine feet tall statue of Satan w/ two children idolizing the beastly image is now being proudly displayed in Detriot; another major democrat run metro city.
There's a passage in the New Testament where Jesus said, 'If they hate you, remember they hated me before they hated you,' (John 15:18).
No one should be the least bit surprised. America is choosing to leave the light - to live within the Darkness.
Luis
The Chicago Way has a simple formula -- reward your friends and punish your enemies. President Obama plays the game well and rewards those who take care of him -- even when they take care of themselves in the process. The game is being played out at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) where the president has nominated Andy Slavitt to become head of the agency.
Slavitt was the CEO of Optum/QSSI, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation's largest health insurers. In order to be appointed to CMS, the administration granted Slavitt an "ethics waiver," allowing him to receive $4.8 million in tax-free money when he joined the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Optum/QSSI had been building the data services hub for the online marketplace Healthcare.gov under an $85 million contract before it was chosen to serve as the systems integrator in late October 2013, just weeks after the website famously imploded. Slavitt may have played a roll in the contract award.
Slavitt has helped turn Obamacare into a slush fund for blue states who were rewarded billions in federal dollars to build state exchanges. After receiving $179 in federal grants to build a failed state exchange, Maryland sued the contractors who built it. When the state attorney general received a settlement, Slavitt gave $45 million to the state, a nice pat on the back for building the exchange in the first place -- even though Maryland didn't spend a nickel of their own funds to build it.
Taxpayers want to know what role Slavitt had in covering up the dismemberment of Oregon's health care exchange. As you recall, Cover Oregon was killed for political purposes when the Democrat governor, John Kitzhaber, who has since resigned in disgrace, tasked his political director to oversee the exchange. She pulled the plug for political reasons, fleecing taxpayers of $300 million without a howl of protest from. Mr. Slavitt and his team in Washington.
To their credit, the GOP Senate has refused to act on the nomination and is demanding answers. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said, "Mr. Slavitt will need to answer a number of tough questions regarding his former employer and their relationship with the agency" and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) stated, "I have asked CMS to provide details on how it's walling off Mr. Slavitt from potential conflicts of interest. I will continue to ask these questions as part of the nomination process." So far, no answers have been forthcoming.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell often seems to care more about making sure the trains run on time rather than standing up to fight on principle. If there was ever an easy fight to win, this is it. Slavitt is a walking ethics violation with conflicts of interest coming out his ears. One can only hope that McConnell and his allies in the Senate don't cut a deal to see that Slavitt is confirmed.
Why have Democrats long resisted any limitations on elective abortions? After all it’s not like supporting anything called ‘partial-birth abortion’ is a political winner.
The answer is the same as why Republicans resist new gun control laws of any kind, even those that have popular support. Any restriction on abortion that is tied to the humanness of an unborn child is the ultimate in slippery-slopes for the pro-choice crowd.
As Cecile Richards, the head of Planned Parenthood, arrives on Capitol Hill to testify about a series of shocking videos that depict the business of harvesting and selling the body parts of aborted babies, she and the 60-year-old pro-choice movement are at a crossroads.
In some ways things have never been better. A WSJ/NBC News poll 61 percent of respondents opposed ending the half-billion-dollar subsidy Planned Parenthood gets from federal taxpayers, which Republicans are trying to do. And for the first time since 2008, the pro-choice position had a clear lead on the pro-life point of view in Gallup’s polling.
[Nerd alert: A pro-choice majority or plurality was the norm for decades until pro-lifers moved into the lead, or parity. This may be a little misleading, however, since “pro-life” and “pro-choice” are fungible terms. More significant is what restrictions, if any, do voters want to see on elective abortions? There things are pretty stable, which is the plurality position remains that abortion should be “legal in only a few circumstances.” This mirrors the political position shorthanded as “pro-life, with exceptions.”]
Despite the national furor over the videos from the Center for Medical Progress Republican efforts to cut off the funding seem not only doomed to fail, but Richards & Co. promise to make the GOP pay a steep political price next year for a “relentless assault” on reproductive healthcare.
So you can see why pro-choice activists are feeling optimistic. They have seemingly survived the video scandals, their Republican detractors are tied in knots, and Democrats are solidly on board.
National Journal: “Majority Whip Steve Scalise became the House’s third-ranking Republican by touting Southern pride and conservative bona fides. But just more than one year into his tenure, both attributes come with major downsides in his attempt to become the next House Majority Leader. His shaky first year on the job, mixed reviews from the conservative base he pledged to represent, and persistent news reports that he may have spoken at a white supremacist rally when he was a state legislator in 2002 could hamper the Louisianan’s continued rapid rise, according to several Republican members and aides. … That leaves an opening for [Rep.Tom Price], who Monday was endorsed by Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling – both good friends and influential conservatives. It is still very early in the race, but Price, by virtue of his committee leadership and close loss to [Cathy McMorris Rodgers] for the conference chairmanship in 2014, is already perceived as a stronger candidate than Rep. Marlin Stutzman… -Fox News
In a new book, Unlikeable: The Problem with Hilly, journalist and longtime Clinton family antagonist Edward Klein claims that Bill Clinton once pushed his wife to engage filmmaker Steven Spielberg to help make her more appealing. If true, Spielberg was an odd choice for acting coach. His films are known primarily for their sweeping cinematic qualities and sharp storytelling, not necessarily for the top-shelf performances he coaxes out of his actors. In an excerpt from his book in the New York Post, Klein reports that Hilly reluctantly agreed to the sessions. “I get $250,000 to give a speech . . . and these Hollywood jackasses are going to tell me how to do it!” she reportedly said.
If Klein’s information is correct, and if the quote is accurate, the Clintons are more confused about how to improve Hilly’s public image than anyone knew. For one thing, they’ve made the fundamental mistake of confusing the demands of performing before a live audience with the art of performing for the camera. Giving paid speeches is more like doing the work of a stage actor. Working on camera is a different discipline. No novice performer would ever confuse the two. That Bill and Hilly, this late in their political careers, would fail to recognize the difference is surprising.
All politics is performance, but presidential politics is performance art. The successful candidate adjusts each appearance—whether on stage or on camera—in order to come across as knowledgeable, sincere, reasonable, diplomatic, and, above all, presidential. An actor used to working on stage alters his performance when he appears before a camera. Auditoriums are big; they need big voices and oversize personalities to fill them. Like stage actors, politicians working a live audience need to play to the last row. When a politician speaks from a podium, hosts a town hall meeting, or presses the flesh, the goal is to have each member of the audience leave thinking the performance was delivered directly to him.
Television screens, by contrast, are smaller, and demand a different type of performance. You don’t have to work so hard to get someone watching you on television to think that you’re talking directly to him. Close-ups reward subtlety, honesty, and true emotion. A camera is like an X-Ray machine. “The camera looks into your mind, and the audience sees what the camera sees,” writes the actor Michael Caine in his book, Acting in Film. You can’t lie to a camera; it will expose you. Ronald Reagan understood this better than anyone.
The good news for Hilly is that coming across as genuine on camera is a skill that can be taught. Of course, it helps if you have talent. It’s even better if you take the job seriously, which, according to Klein, she did not. “I decided I had enough with the camera and the recordings and the coaches,” Hilly allegedly said. “I got so angry I knocked the f- -king camera off its tripod. That was the end of my Stanislavski period.” (It’s perhaps worth pointing out that Constantin Stanislavski, the Russian actor and director credited with pioneering an approach to acting eventually known as “the Method,” worked in live theater, not in film.)
With new details about the personal e-mail server she used while secretary of state dribbling out every week, Hilly may have even bigger problems to deal with than likeability. In any event, likeability is not something one easily cultivates. In his 1997 biography of Reagan, Dinesh D’Souza summarized the 40th president’s take on the relationship between honesty and likeability: “Only an actor who truly believes his lines can produce a convincing performance before the lens.” Therein could be Hilly’s biggest hurdle of all.
This is not the America I know. Our culture that has always been a shining beacon for the world has been toppled, broken, crushed. It started long ago with a loss of pride in our country and a loss of individual responsibility. Those in our country with a lack of moral clarity bordering on the criminal have been allowed to overtake our institutions from academia to politics. The economic and moral support given to the charlatans has been given by an underclass whose sole purpose is to take from others and those of us who are going about our day to day lives trying just to get by. They find themselves without the clarity to think about such things as freedom, achievement, values or morals.
Crime and violence has been the response to the devaluing of the currency of morality. What was unthought-of 20 years ago is now commonplace. Our cities, mostly under Democratic control have become war zones, law enforcement is being stalked and ambushed, and the Obama administration has embraced the thug culture by actively criticizing law enforcement.
It is Obama who has caused a great deal of the turmoil that we see today. From the “Black Liberation Theology” taught in a church he attended for twenty years but ostensibly never heard the denigration of America while there, to Frank Marshall Davis his communist mentor while growing up, our Community Organizer has always had a deep seated bias against any authority, particularly white authority.
With a Department of Justice used for the implementation of revenge type social justice this bias was allowed to blossom into the full time bias we observe today. Holder discussed race only as far as blaming whites for the challenges blacks face even going so far as to call us cowards who would not discuss race. But his cowardice and bias was on display when he cancelled the Philadelphia Black Panther case. It showed that Holder was nothing more than one of Obamas thugs used to push a progressive socialist agenda.
Law enforcement has been forced to back off any situation that may be construed as volatile for fear of the federal government and the media creating a circus out of any decision law enforcement makes that the PC crowd does not agree with. Under Obama, Holder, and the media, the destruction of the rule of law has been ongoing for six years and is a fundamental building block for the chaos to come. If the chaos breaks down what is left of our cultural society, the radicals will be making the rules and deciding who will prosper under an “ends justifies the means” society. It is to be expected from an administration that has flaunted the rule of law, ignored both the judicial and legislatives branches of government to rule by executive order and has ignored the will of the country as a matter of routine. We have a President who lives in his own narcissist reality, claiming the economy is fine, and we are well loved by all in the world.
The customs, principles, traditions and moral values of our country is what makes us who we are. These teachings of religious principles have been overtaken by those in the politically correct movement. The Ten Commandments were a foundation to base the etiquette and conduct for many generations. The expectation of generally good conduct was within our society. Today things have changed. We use scantily clad women to sell hamburgers, children can use words to their parents that would have caused stern discipline in days past, and everyone except the white heterosexual male is a victim. Unwed mothers are given everything they need to live a life of dependence with no input from the babys’ father, and the taxpayer is made to foot the bill. &2% of black children and 30% of white children are illegitimate. But we have no one to blame but ourselves. If we allow the media, and progressives to tell us that traditional values and morality are not moral absolutes and that what is or is not moral is a personal decision, this will continue. In schools, students learn values clarification, undermining both parents and religious teachings. Where does this lead? It is one of the reasons why, in a great many states a teenage girl can now get an abortion with parental consent with the assistance of the school she attends. It is why schools have bowls of condoms in the nurses office so the students can pick one up whenever they like without any questions. We live in a country now where more and more people are being placed in positions where they must depend on the government for help, where more small businesses have closed than have opened, and where people are being told by the media only what the government wants them to know.
The different agencies of this government have taken it upon themselves with the blessings of this administration to pass regulations with the full force of law that have never been voted upon in Congress. Both the Democrats and Republicans are to blame for allowing the executive branch the powers given to Congress, allowing them to pass laws and then charge those who break these laws and levying enormous fines without benefit of trial. This allows our government to be accountable to no one.
Tolerance is no longer expected by those on the right. The progressives speak of tolerance, but only of the opinions and “truths” that they hold dear. There is a simple test to show how all encompassing this thought control is. Go into any school and mention God. You know what the response would be. We now are so tolerant that we allow satanic displays next to the manger during Christmas. To be honest in some places we can’t say Christmas anymore, it has to be Happy Holidays. Stores that require Happy Holidays do not get my business.
The tolerance expected of the American people is reaching a breaking point. What of the father of three kids who wakes up in the middle of the might worrying about how he is going to feed his children the next day without a job. Or the family who has to pack up the belongings they have and store them with friends until they can find a place to stay. How can either of them explain to the children that most of the jobs since the last collapse have gone to illegals, and there is no work to be found. And how can you explain to these same children that Obama refuses to deport these illegals until the job market improves.
Tolerance can only go so far. This country was based on certain values, and tolerance was one of the. But tolerance stops at the barrier of social degeneracy, tyranny, and victims of their own stupidity.
By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net
While Obama and his socialist ilk do whatever they can to politicize the Oregon shooting tragedy, including going TO Oregon to mastermind the politicizing in PERSON…some on the right, or supposedly on the right, are still having kittens over gay people getting married.
NOT that gay people getting married effects THEM in any way,shape or form but…you would THINK that the holier-than-thous were being forced into ARRANGED marriages with people sporting the same parts as THEY have.
Just a couple of days ago…Pat Robertson reportedly decided to politicize the South Carolina FLOODS by issuing a statement in answer to a call in question…”Are the South Carolina floods a sign from God?”
“Well,” said Robertson…“that’s a mighty fine question. We all know that God’s main weapon of choice for the mass culling of the human race is a flood, so yes, I do think God’s hand is at work in South Carolina.”
And then, he said it…
Sweden was used for years as an example of where Socialism works. Never did, when you look into the details and facts, and now this. Another country dealing with both Socialism and the Moslem refugee issue. Is America going to wake up soon………..all Americans? Sweden is just one of many European countries to look at.
Sweden: 'No Apartments, No Jobs, No Shopping Without a Gun'
by Ingrid Carlqvist
October 3, 2015 at 5:00 am
The Swedes see the welfare systems failing them. Swedes have had to get used to the government prioritizing refugees and migrants above native Swedes.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6607/sweden-migrants-fear
By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist - texusa2016@gmail.com
Americas must realize that self-examination is not disloyalty.
Seek the truth and expose the criminals; Truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties
Afghanistan: Nine Doctors without Borders staff killed in suspected US airstrike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi_mIlZcGRA
Our Republic.
http://www.ourrepubliconline.com/Topic/13
Poverty, homeless people, the economic demise, the huge debt and the future destruction of America, is God’s punishment for all the crimes that our sycophant, sociopath government leaders commit against humanly.
14 years has passed and our Government fail to tell the American people the truth about the 9/11 demise of the WTC 1 and 2, and the 47-story WTC 7. The truth is that this was the work of our own government; the Bush administration was the architect and executioners of this control demolition of the towers to get the support for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. The Middle East wars is the worse genocide committed by the United States against humanity.
Enough is enough, we Christians must cry out for justice and stop this illegal war and the killing of millions innocent people. The aerial bombardments early Saturday blew apart the medical facility of Doctors without borders, killing at least 22 innocent people, but the US government as always cover-up their crime with lies and deception; the fact is that this is a war crime and cannot be justified by any fabricated excuses produce by this sycophant, narcissism government. Our duty and moral responsibility as Christians, is to renounce and expose this evil tyrannical system of government; I love my country, but we cannot continue being in complete denial of all the atrocities, war crimes, murders, rapes and all the killings done in our name under the pretense of defending our security and interest of the American people. Let’s face it we are being deceive and betray by the people we elected to represent us; they are traitors that they must pay for their betrayal and all the crimes against humanity; we must not let the US Department of justice give a carte blanche to the sycophants to commit crimes in the name of democracy and in our name. May God have mercy on the innocent people of our country that trusted our government and were betray by the very people that they elected to represent them.
May God have mercy in our country, because knowing and being in denial of the true, is partaking in the crimes. Seek the truth and renounce and expose the criminals, the truth will set you free.
To share this please clicks here Share
Sources for this article include:
9/11 VERDICT: Mainstream Media Guilty Of the Biggest Cover-up in US History
U.S. Officials Guilty of War Crimes for Using 9/11 As a False Justification for the Iraq War
9/11 was a conspiracy
http://www.sprword.com/9_11.html
9/11 was an inside job. Report on Build # 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1biKeaOH3qc
9/11 cover up the work of the CIA
http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11cover-up
9-11 excuse for US global genocide. The REAL 9-11 atrocity: 9-11 Million Dead in Bush Wars
https://sites.google.com/site/palestinegenocideessays/9-11-excuse-for-us-global-genocide
The American Genocide Against Iraq: 4% of Population Dead as result of US sanctions, wars
http://www.juancole.com/2013/10/american-population-sanctions.html
9/11: Beyond the Seal of Approval by israelshamir.net is undated
Bush Administration Convicted of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
Who’s to Blame for Syria Mess?
A Timeline of CIA Atrocities
National Journal: “Conservatives had vowed to hold a vote to take away [backstabber Speaker John Boehner’s] gavel if he forced a vote on a clean bill, but with that point now moot, conservatives are shifting their focus to the upcoming leadership elections and their next opportunity to defund Planned Parenthood—another spending bill in December. A few dozen conservative members are still expected to oppose the CR, but even members of the House Freedom Caucus admit there will not be enough votes to take down the bill and force a shutdown. ‘It’s not going to happen,’ Rep. Matt Salmon said Friday. The real action in the House will come in the form of phone calls and whip lists clutched to the chests of the next would-be speaker and other members looking for a seat at the new leadership table. Though the election for speaker won’t occur until late October, several members are already taking a look at the race, and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, the clear front-runner for the job, could face competition. A host of other members are looking to move up if McCarthy wins.” -Fox News
Most of the 3,849 emails date back to 2011, when the security situation in Libya was deteriorating and Clinton was leading an international charge to intervene in the conflict. The documents shed new light on how forcefully Clinton fought for the U.S. to become involved in the civil war there, but long stretches of time without any mention of the conflict revives questions about whether she turned over everything related to the crisis.
Huma Abedin, Clinton's deputy chief of staff, forwarded Clinton in April 2011 a lengthy description of the security situation in Libya and the whereabouts of Chris Stevens, the ambassador who was killed in the terror attack in Benghazi the following year.
The memo outlined the need to consider "resource constraints" when addressing threats to diplomatic security in the country.
In Aug. 2011, Jake Sullivan, Clinton's former director of policy planning, put together a detailed timeline of actions Clinton had taken to deepen U.S. involvement in the conflict.
"This is basically off the top of my head," Sullivan wrote, but noted the list highlighted Clinton's "leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country's Libya policy from start to finish."
Since the NATO intervention in Libya, of which Clinton was a major proponent, the country has become a stronghold for the Islamic State and has increasingly devolved into chaos.
The destabilization of Libya led to the rise of violence that ultimately spawned an attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi in 2012.
Clinton was receiving regular updates from staff on the ground about Benghazi and the formation of the Libyan government. In one email from Aug. 2011, a staff member called Stevens "heroic" for his work in Libya.
The former secretary of state also received advice about how to handle Libya from a variety of sources outside the State Department.
For example, James Rubin, executive editor of Bloomberg View, sent Clinton "some thoughts on Libya" in July 2011. Rubin told Clinton he hoped the memo would be "as welcome as last message," suggesting he shared ideas with Clinton more than once.
Sidney Blumenthal, a divisive confidante of Clinton's who served as an informal advisor on Libyan foreign policy, advised Clinton on how to take credit for the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi, the former Libyan dictator who was overthrown by rebels.
"You should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation house," Blumenthal told Clinton on Aug. 22, 2011, shortly after rebels overran the capital city of Tripoli and deposed Gaddafi.
"You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment," Blumenthal added. "The most important phrase is: 'successful strategy.'"
Much of the information that was passed back and forth between Clinton and her aides was classified, however. The sensitive nature of the materials raises questions about why it would be classified today but not considered classified at the time, when a civil war was raging in the country and such information would have had actual implications for events on the ground.
For example, a readout of calls to members of the African Union about whether to freeze Libyan assets, sent to Clinton by Abedin, was classified.
Classified emails included a message from Susan Rice, then the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, about an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council.
The emergency meeting, which took place in Dec. 2010, was called by Russia in response to developments in North Korea. Most of the emails from Rice are redacted and classified.
Some conversations are so heavily classified that they are difficult to interpret. In one email chain about Pakistan, Clinton's messages to Sullivan are completely redacted, raising questions about her previous statements that she never sent any classified material.
The release of new emails Wednesday came amid intense scrutiny over recent developments that have cast doubt on Clinton's past statements.
One involved conflicting accounts of how and when the State Department asked Clinton to turn over her personal emails.
The State Department initially said it requested emails from Clinton as part of a routine housekeeping inquiry sent to all former secretaries.
Agency officials and Clinton herself suggested the State Department first contacted Clinton to ask about her emails in October of last year. Clinton said she responded quickly and thoroughly to the request, handing over a dozen boxes of documents in Dec. 2014.
But invoices obtained by Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson's office indicated Clinton began paying a technology company to archive her private emails in February of last year —a full 10 months before she finally submitted them to the government.
The State Department soon acknowledged it had only reached out to Clinton after realizing the former secretary of state had never used an official email account. Agency officials were, at the time, combing through their records to find documents requested by the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
Clinton struggled to explain the discrepancies between her account and the new one provided by the State Department. Her campaign downplayed the significance of the reports, arguing the agency's explanation of the document request did not invalidate the one provided by Clinton.
The Democratic candidate faces additional questions about whether she gave the State Department all of her work-related emails. Clinton asserted she had handed over all official communications in a sworn declaration filed with the court Aug. 10.
An email chain provided to State by the Pentagon last week indicates Clinton may have withheld at least one record: a conversation between herself and Gen. David Petraeus, then the head of U.S. Central Command. The Jan. 2009 exchange was not included in the collection of emails Clinton provided to the State Department.
Sidney Blumenthal, a divisive confidante of Clinton's who served as an informal advisor on Libyan foreign policy, raised similar concerns when he gave the Benghazi committee 15 emails Clinton herself had never submitted.
Clinton has yet to explain the missing records beyond attributing a two-month gap in her emails to a "transition period," during which she said she lost all records.
Her campaign has repeatedly dismissed allegations that Clinton aides transmitted classified information on the private server network even though the intelligence community inspector general cited emails that should have been classified at the time they were written.
The State Department maintains that, for the hundreds of emails that have been classified, unrelated circumstances that developed over the past few years warranted retroactive classification in each case.
FBI investigators are looking into whether Clinton and her staff mishandled sensitive material on the private server, although Clinton's campaign has characterized the probe as a benign "security inquiry" and not a criminal investigation. Clinton has argued nothing she transmitted was marked classified when sent or received.
The FBI has recovered deleted emails off the server Clinton used to house her communications, fueling new speculation about whether Clinton erased emails that should have been submitted to the State Department. Investigators have refused to disclose details of their probe, rebuffing a court order earlier this month that would have forced the FBI to cooperate with the State Department in the search for missing emails.
By: Juan Reynoso, WTP Activist - texusa2016@gmail.com
Seek the truth, truth and knowledge diffused among the people are necessary for the reclamation and preservation of our Democracy, rights, freedom and liberties
2016-ECONOMIC REVOLUTION.
Reducing poverty and creating jobs through cooperatives. We the people have the power to stop our economic slavery and reclaim the American dream.
What is a Worker Cooperative?
https://www.usworker.coop/about/what-is-a-worker-coop
Today, Washington is full of fake politicians controlled by the oligarchs; our economy is horribly, our justice system is corrupt, our jail system has become an industry that pray on the Black and the Hispanic poor, in fact our jails are the cash cow for big business, the mega-corporations that run our jail system. Our education system is expensive, unequal and bad. We could literally go on forever about how screwed up our government is and the damage that is done to the people. But despite all of that, I still have faith on us the people of these Unite States. We must work together and get our country on the right path. Our founding fathers hate tyranny and love liberty this is why they work together and they forged the greatest document ever created in this country, the Constitution of the United States of America. This document guarantees the Rights and Freedoms of every American and our duty as Americans is to defend it at all cost.
Now our number one priority is to create jobs to stop the demise of our communities in our country, but our government main interest is to protect the interest of the corporate establishment by the promotion of free trades and the out sourcing of American’s jobs , and will never have the will to promote cooperatives as the solution to this mega unemployment problem; it is up to the people to get united and start forming cooperatives to create jobs for Americans and to service the community better than any corporation will ever do. Cooperatives are the solution to this mega problem. By aligning community and philanthropic resources with initiatives and activities for economic development and jobs creating cooperatives, we can alleviate the issue of poverty, unemployment and low income in our communities.
Why We Need More Employee-Owned Businesses
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/05/31/why-we-need-more-employee-owned-businesses
Frequently Asked Questions about Worker Cooperatives
https://usworker.coop/frequently-asked-questions-about-worker-cooperatives
How to Build an Employee-Owned Business
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/241522
How Worker Cooperatives Work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbZ8ojEuN5I
Worker Cooperatives and Revolution: History and Possibilities in the United States
http://www.amazon.com/Worker-Cooperatives-Revolution-History-Possibilities/dp/1632634325/ref=sr_sp-atf_title_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1409866442&sr=8-1&keywords=worker+cooperatives+revolution
America's Largest Majority Employee-Owned Companies
https://www.nceo.org/articles/employee-ownership-100
By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net
One thing is clear…liberals and socialists running for the 2016 nomination want to extend Obama style, pen and phone executive orders and our 2nd Amendment is on their chopping block.
According to Bernie Sanders, a confirmed, self-avowed socialist, “The president is right. Condolences are not enough. We’ve got to do something … We need sensible gun control legislation. What we need, as a nation, is to get beyond the shouting, Some people want to ban every gun in America and some people believe in nothing at all. I think the vast majority of the American people, as the president indicated, including gun owners — and I know that’s true here in Vermont — want sensible gun control legislation and they also believe that we should have more access to mental health facilities and counselors than we presently do.”
In the words of one Hillary Clinton, whose campaign is floundering…
The Answer To This Question Has Been Right In Front Of Our Faces For A Long Long Time. See If You Agree!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 5, 2015
Method for Stopping Shooting Rampages Emerges
by Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman
Hard evidence -- not doctor theories, news commentary, conjecture, hyperbole, rumor, innuendo or any other proposals -- clearly shows that the only known way to actually stop spree murderers is to shoot them -- or scare them into shooting themselves. Time and again society has found this works.
According to the evidence, every mass murder in recent times has been halted, in the final analysis, by shooting the murderers, or threatening to shoot them, with guns. Members of the press corps continue to debate the subject, despite the evidence. Sources speaking privately say the media consciously reject this fact. In stark contrast, self-defense incidents using guns are suppressed, by news-media policy, and do not appear on the public stage.
An excellent write up about the censorship of firearms used in self defense appears here --
http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/usa-today-ad-campaign-features-armed-heroes
and here --
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/09/since-usa-today-wont-publish-good-gun-news-author-alan-korwin-publishes-advertorial-of-good-gun-news
Multiple reports of self-defense, accomplished by shooting criminals, appear as paid space in USA Today, which otherwise censors such reports:
http://www.gunlaws.com/TheFirstRespondersReport.htm
Although knowledgeable commentators are still debating the merits of shooting murderers, the visible evidence clearly demonstrates that shooting the perpetrators does take care of the problem. No other solutions have worked.
The only problem identified is the relative slowness of this effective remedy, due mainly to the delay in getting guns to the scene where innocent victims are assaulted. The scenes have virtually always been in supposed "gun-free zones," with posted signs flatly rejected by the perpetrators.
President Barack Hussein Obama, whose middle name is not supposed to be used, went on national TV, twice in the past week, to propose other solutions, which he announced as "politicized." He promised to "continue talking."
Further analysis conducted by The Uninvited Ombudsman, has determined that background checks, or newly proposed additional background checks, recommended by Mr. Obama and others, would be pointless for people who already own guns, since they already own guns. The best estimates indicate this is about 100 million armed Americans.
And in other analysis conducted by The Uninvited Ombudsman, waiting periods have no meaning whatsoever for Americans who already own guns, when they go shopping for guns, since they already own guns. That is also 100 million Americans.
Waiting periods have one additional drawback overlooked in mainstream reports. They require the public to trust psychotic individuals who wait five days to get their first gun, to remain calm for the balance of their lives. Somehow, the five-day waiting period doesn't seem like a long enough "cooling off" period, but this has not made it into nightly "news" reports, or the President's commentaries, for reasons that were unclear at press time.
The murderer in Oregon who sparked the recent repetitive debates owned more than a dozen guns, according to early reports, all legally acquired. While Hillary, Mr. Obama and others are still calling for more background checks, they have apparently failed to notice these obvious errors in their plan.
Only new, or "virgin" gun buyers would be affected, most of whom would pass checks anyway, according to leading experts and past experience. The point of adding even more checks, when current checks are not used to take criminals off the streets, was not clear as this report was prepped for release.
"News" commentators have also failed to make this connection, so far, and have repeated the calls from politicians on both sides of the aisle, who are discussing background checks and waiting periods.
The role of ultra-violent body-rending video games, horrific grizzly blood and all gore movies on nightly TV and a debasement of popular American culture at every level has not figured prominently into the president's prolific pronouncements.
The public -- not some famous vilified "the gun lobby" -- rises up loudly to condemn the assault on their fundamental civil and human rights. This is the same 100 million armed Americans mentioned earlier. Some reports suggest it is "only" 80 million armed Americans. The NRA, often cited as "the gun lobby," has only 5 million members.
Counter-Intuitive Man Says:
Referring to murderers as "gun men" is offensive to men, a violation of journalism ethics, due to its biased and prejudicial nature, and sexist.
Calling murderers "gun men" is virtually propaganda against men and firearms.
It denigrates men, it is derogatory, defamatory and it is discriminatory.
What would media and pundits say if a woman was the criminal perpetrator?
The correct terms include murderer, killer, villain, criminal, assailant and perpetrator, without gratuitously singling out gender.
By using the propaganda term "gun man," the media vilifies a tool they frequently demonstrate hatred for, along with men, which agenda-driven political groups seek to demean or belittle. That's simply wrong, and unethical.
Murderers should be called murderers, not gun men. This would help remove the glorification many mass murderers seek, which encourages others to copy their behavior.
By encouraging such behavior, the media shares responsibility for these acts, according to leading national experts, who are speaking out against such behavior in increasing numbers.
Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman
Author of ten books on gun law
Publisher, Bloomfield Press
P.S. My previous request to the President, to have him call me for common-sense solutions he is not getting from his side of the aisle, has gone unanswered so far. I patiently await. The ideas coming from the TV set are so off base it is hard to imagine they are actually on the air. Has anyone considered education in the schools yet? Schools are currently an empty hole of ignorance on the subject.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/conservativeoasis/
Many have mused over how history would have been different if someone had killedAdolf Hitler before World War II began. But one man lived the final 40 years of his live believing he had the chance to do it, and chose not to. On this day in 1918 British Pvt. Henry Tandey most certainly did not shoot injured German Cpl. Hitler at the fifth Battle of Ypres. Twenty years later, Hitler would credit Tandey, a highly decorated soldier, with sparing his life. And Tandrey seemed to have believed it, saying after his own home was bombed by Hitler’s Luftwaffe in 1940, "When I saw all the people and women and children he had killed and wounded I was sorry to God I let him go." But BBC has the story that seems to prove that Hitler was, as often, lying to enhance his own cult of personality. -Fox News
To what do we attribute Hilly Clinton’s reversal from her defiance and taking of responsibility for her email debacle of mid-August to Sunday’s cringy, legalistic evasion? Evidence that badly uncut her prior claims for one thing and for another, she now knows that there’s a pretty decent chance that the emails she ordered destroyed may be recovered.
USA Today: “Asked [on NBC News] about her written statement under oath that she had turned over all of her work-related State Department emails, only to have some turn up that were sent to then-commander of the U.S. Central Command David Petraeus, Clinton insisted that a ‘very thorough review process’ had been conducted by her lawyers. When asked about the ‘discrepancy’ between her statement that her email system began in March 2009 and the existence of emails between her and Petraeus from January of that year, Clinton said ‘there was a transition period’ and added that she wasn’t ‘focused’ on her email account. ‘I can’t control the technical aspects of it,’ she said. ‘I’m not by any means a technical expert. I relied on people who were.’ -Fox News
You have a good chance of scoring a touchdown from there — if you can get your act together. But you could also find yourself having to settle for a field goal. Or for a missed field goal.
And of course you can also fumble the ball and have the other team grab it — and run it all the way back across the field to score a touchdown against you. With Republicans, it would be chancy to make a bet as to which of these scenarios is most likely.
baclstabber Speaker Boehner had a tough hand to play, given the internal splits among House Republicans. But backstabber Boehner’s biggest problem was backstabber Boehner. And it is a recurring Republican problem.
Nothing epitomized backstabber Boehner’s wrong-headedness like an occasion when he emerged from the White House, after a conference with President nObama and others, to face a vast battery of microphones and television cameras.
Here was a golden opportunity for Speaker backstabber Boehner to make his case directly to the American people, unfiltered by the media. Instead, he just walked over to the microphones and cameras, briefly expressed his disgust with the conference he had just come from, and then walked on away.
Surely backstabber Boehner knew, going into this White House conference, that it could fail. And, surely, he knew that there would be an opportunity immediately afterwards to present his case to the public. But, like so many Republican leaders over the years, he seemed to have no sense of the importance of doing so — or for the time and efforts needed to prepare for such an opportunity beforehand.
Whoever the next Speaker of the House is, someone should have a plaque made up to put on his desk — a plaque reading: TALK, DAMMIT!
If the political situation in Washington is such that many of the expectations of Republican voters cannot be met, then at least take the time and trouble to spell that out in plain language to the public.
Maybe the smug consultants in Washington don’t think the public can understand. But Ronald Reagan won two landslide elections by doing what subsequent Republican leaders disdained to do.
In between, he accomplished what was called “the Reagan revolution” without ever having a majority in both Houses of Congress. He could go over the heads of Congressional Democrats and explain to the public why certain legislation was needed — and once he won over the voters, Democrats in Congress were not about to jeopardize their reelection chances by going against them.
One of the secrets of Reagan’s political success was a segment of the population that was called “Reagan Democrats.” These were voters who traditionally voted for Democrats but who had been won over to Reagan’s agenda.
Contrary to the thinking — or lack of thinking — among today’s Republican leaders, Reagan did not go to these Democratic voters and pander to them by offering them a watered-down version of what the Democrats were offering. He took his case to them and talked — yes, TALKED — to let them know what his own agenda offered to them and to the country.
Today’s Republicans who proclaim a need to “reach out” to a wider constituency almost invariably mean pandering to those groups’ current beliefs, not showing them how your agenda and your principles — if you have any — apply to their situation and to the good of the country.
You won’t swing a whole constituency of Democrats your way, and neither did Ronald Reagan. But he swung enough of them to win elections and to force Congressional Democrats to respect the “Reagan Democrats” he had won over.
There are issues on which Republicans can appeal to blacks — school choice being just one obvious and important issue. And it is unlikely that all Hispanic voters want open borders, through which criminals can come in and settle in their communities.
But unspoken words will never tap these sources of votes, nor perhaps even convince Congressional Republicans. And if the quarterback is unsure what to do, being first and goal on the ten-yard line may not mean much.
Why This President Is Either Totally Deaf Or Just Plain An Obsessive Liar When It Comes To All Gun Related Crimes, Just Like His Moronic Supporters. Take A Look At Some Facts As Related To Gun Shootings. Post this link and let them choke on their lies whenever they bring up the topic.
Gunshot Demographics
The ugly underbelly of the anti-gun-rights position
How "The Bad Part of Town" and failed social policies
are used for sinister attacks on the right to keep and bear arms,
and help justify the law enforcement world and its budgets.
While anti-rights activists speak emotionally about
"gun violence""gun deaths" "human tragedy" and saving lives,
what they refuse to say is this—
http://www.gunlaws.com/GunshotDemographics.htm
Source Page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/conservativeoasis/
"Christian Lives Matter, Even In Oregon & When The US Government Say's Not"
Read The Entire Article At... http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2015/10/christian-lives-matter-even-in-oregon.html
This common good also includes the earth, a central theme of the encyclical which I recently wrote in order to enter into dialogue with all people about our common home. We need a conversation which includes everyone, since the environmental challenge we are undergoing, and its human roots, concerns and affects us all. In "Laudato Si," I call for a courageous and responsible effort to redirect our steps and to avert the most serious effects of the environmental deterioration caused by human activity. I am convinced that we can make a difference and I have no doubt that the United States — and this Congress — have an important role to play. Now is the time for courageous actions and strategies, aimed at implementing a culture of care and an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature.
At first hearing, there's really not much for conservatives who are conservationists to disagree with there. But there are two key problems: the pope's assertion that climate change is "caused by human activity," and who he addressed his comments to — Congress. The science is far from settled on the cause or reach of climate change (humans do impact the environment, but how much is the question), and most proposals before Congress involve hampering economic activity — i.e., exacerbating and not "combating poverty" — to fight a supposed menace we don't fully understand. -The Patriot Post
Honorable men in uniform risked their careers and lives to stop the abuse. Yet, the White House -- which was busy tweeting about its new feminism-pandering "It's On Us" campaign against an alleged college rape crisis based on debunked statistics -- is AWOL on the actual pedophilia epidemic known as "bacha bazi." On Thursday, nObama administration flacks went out of their way to downplay Afghan child rape as "abhorrent," but "fundamentally" a local "law enforcement matter."
This is the price the innocents pay for blind multiculturalism.
A New York Times report on the Afghan Muslim practice this week garnered attention and outrage on Capitol Hill -- and prompted a river of denials from nObama Defense Department brass, who insisted our troops were not ordered to look the other way.
But the subjugation and sexual assault of these children -- and their victimization by Afghan military personnel working alongside our troops -- is not new.
Afghan journalist Najibullah Quraishi's wrenching documentary on "The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan" aired in London and the U.S. in 2010. The United Nations has known and done nothing as Taliban warlords and Afghan police groomed, sodomized and sexually trafficked generations of young boys. The U.S. State Department acknowledged last year that "there were reports security officials and those connected to the ANP (Afghan National Police) raped children with impunity."
In February, I reported on the case of Maj. Jason Brezler. He's still fighting for his reputation and his military career after warning colleagues of an insider attack on an American base in the Helmand province.
Refresher: The highly decorated Marine reserve civil affairs officer had sent a classified document through his personal email account to fellow Marines at Forward Operating Base Delhi in 2012. The correspondence, which came in response to a FOB Delhi Marine's request for information, involved the shady history of Taliban-tied Afghan police chief and accused drug lord and child molester Sarwar Jan.
Jan had been suspected of coordinating Taliban operations, selling Afghan police uniforms to our enemies and raping at least nine boys on base. A few weeks after Brezler's warning, which went unheeded, one of Jan's teenage "tea boys" went on a shooting spree at FOB Delhi. Marine Staff Sgt. Cody Rhode was shot five times, but survived. Three others died of gunshot wounds: Staff Sgt. Scott Dickinson, Cpl. Richard Rivera and Lance Cpl. Greg Buckley. Buckley's relatives filed suit against the government last fall over what they believe has been a coordinated and illegal attempt to suppress details of the insider attack.
Meanwhile, Brezler is forced to watch Hilly Clinton get away with massive email security violations, while he's railroaded for using a personal Yahoo account to try to protect his fellow Marines.
In a separate case, the Army this month denied an appeal by decorated Green Beret Sgt. First Class Charles Martland, who was discharged in 2011 after physically confronting an Afghan police commander accused of kidnapping, chaining and raping a local village boy, beating his mother, and laughing about it when questioned. Another soldier who joined Martland in the confrontation, Cpt. Daniel Quinn, was reprimanded and left the Army.
Asked whether the president had taken steps to review his military's treatment of these whistleblowers, White House spokesman apathetically shrugged: "Not that I'm aware of."
Ho-hum.
A White House that wants to spend billions to stop "climate change" in the name of saving all the children of the planet can't bother to stop the violent sexual assaults of boys held hostage right under our noses by our warmly embraced "allies" in the Afghan military.
A White House that splashed social media with pleas to "Bring Back Our Girls" after Boko Haram jihadists in Nigeria kidnapped 300 girls and women has nothing to say about the legions of boys forced into prostitution and pedophilia rings witnessed by U.S. troops.
A White House bent on whitewashing away radical Islam's sins against Christians, Jews, gays, apostates, cartoonists, genitally mutilated women and child brides would rather celebrate "diversity" than lift a finger to protect the victims of political correctness run amok.
To paraphrase 2009 Nobel Prize winner President nObama: It's on you.
By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net
“There is a gun for roughly every man, woman, and child in America. So how can you, with a straight face, make the argument that more guns will make us safer? We know that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths. So the notion that gun laws don’t work, or just will make it harder for law-abiding citizens and criminals will still get their guns is not borne out by the evidence.”
Those were the words of Obama, Thursday, after he rushed to the White House briefing room before the bodies were cold in Roseburg Oregon…not allowing a crisis go to waste…to promote his anti 2nd Amendment agenda.
Let’s just see about his statement shall we?
Where ARE the MOST “gun laws” in our nation found?
Chicago Illinois…and how is that working out?
Well…
Message From The GOA (Gun Owners of America)
They call it “Misstatements”, the rest of us refer to it a lousy pile of lies one on top of another. You really have to read this in detail, remember it, and share it. The GOA pushes his lies right back into his face. Every time we have something called a "mass shooting", this clown comes out of his office before anyone knows any of the details and starts talking "mass gun control laws".
Response to the President
Created: Friday, 02 October 2015
GOA Responds to the President on the Oregon Shooting
-- Top Ten misstatements made by Obama
http://www.gunowners.org/response-to-the-president.htm
Shared From: https://www.facebook.com/groups/conservativeoasis
By Oscar Y. Harward
Mr. President, at this point in time, you turn out to be the very WORST President in the history of the USA. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ouch-by-3-1-nations-top-presidential-experts-call-obama-the-worst-overrated/article/2560276
Mr. President, will you PLEASE address and demand the stoppage of ‘Islamic’ Muslims who are killing Americans, Israelis, and other Christians around the world; all people who oppose ‘Islam’? http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Mr. President, will you PLEASE address any and each of ‘Islam's Latest Contributions to Peace’? http://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2014/01/islams-latest-contributions-to-peace-1-2547064.html
Mr. President, will you PLEASE call on and ‘demand’ all ‘Islamic’ Muslims to call all other ‘Islamic’ nations’ governments and ‘terrorist’ Islamic groups to stop telling the world that ‘Islam’ will destroy the State of Israel and America? http://www.buzzfeed.com/jerusalemcenter/sworn-to-destruction-20-threats-iranian-leaders-m-hys5
Mr. President, will you PLEASE lead the way and call on our Capitol Hill legislators to pass legislation that will identify that ‘Islam’ or any other organization demanding the death of any other Christian government and/or groups are not a religion(s). http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/top-10-reasons.htm
Mr. President, will you PLEASE lead the way and call on our Democrat, Republican, and Independent Capitol Hill legislators to pass legislation to ‘deny’ tax-deductible donations to all associated ‘Islamic’ Muslim Mosques and their organizations. http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/p/islkam-is-not-religion.html
Mr. President, will you PLEASE quit funding a war and sending our US Military to fight for another ‘Islamic’ Muslims’ nation’s government and/or another ‘terrorist’ group when at the same time you are allowing the Americans’ taxpayers’ funding of this other opposition ‘Islamic’ Muslim nation’s government and/or ‘terrorist’ groups in the battle fields. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/09/26/syrian-commander-gives-equipment-to-al-qaeda-affiliate-us-military-says/
Like other liberally motiivated and dominated States, like NY, IL, and of course our capitol, Oregon is an anti-self defense State. Where the Second Amendment, like our First Amendment, our National Security policies, and even the very US Constitution, has been buried under thousands of pages of laws and regulations that defy our Natural Rights to defend ourselves, our loved ones, and our property.
When a Citizen is stripped of these rights, they instantly become targets for criminals to prey on.
Under Obama's very liberal policies, Islamic groups from Al Qaeda to ISIS to the Muslim'hood, etc, have been emboldened to indulge in their heinous and inhumane acts of PUBLIC violence against Christians, Jews, and Americans and Israelis as a whole. Obama calls it his Foreign Policy. Where the innocent are kidnapped, raped and murdered. But, if the victims are "lucky", they just won't get murdered. But, n exchange, they will get sold as sex slaves - regardless of how YOUNG they are.
The same policies that are being applied in the MidEast has been being applied here at home. Christians and Jews are being targetted and murdered. But, it doesn't end there. White people and police officers are being hunted as well. Groups like the militant, pro Islamic groups, like Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, and the latest faction known as Black Lives Matter have been virtually given the WH's blessing to commit crime. And it can all be traced back to Philadelphia during the 2008 Presidential Elections. Where the original racist militant faction known as The Black Panther Party broke the law by blocking the poll etrance first by intimidation. They garnished militant gear and waved night sticks. When that wasn't enough, they vocally yelled racial death threats to the white voters on line; and even against a black man for accompanying his white girlfriend that were also on line.
How do I know this for sure? THERE ARE VIDEOS! And the DoJ has copies! Was an investigation started? Yes. What was the outcome? NOTHING! The moment Eric Holder was appointed by Obama as the US Atty Gen, which puts him in charge of the Justice Dept, he fired the lead investigator and dropped the case despite SOLID EVIDENCE that a grand jury would have sent to trial. The former USAG had been reported as to saying that he was not going after black people. Shortly after, Obama had critcized the police in Cambridge as to "acting stupidly" - although he had admitted just seconds prior that he knew none of the details of the situation at hand. In the end, Obama's insults were not justified. But it was these beginnings of Obama's "social justice" policies that set off the events that we've been seeing since 2009.. The democrat's have always believed that a gun free society, w/ open borders, is the path to their "utopian" society. Here's a question. Do the surviving victims or their families believe that these policies are working? Are we any closer to "utopia" at all? Just think about it.
ps: To Army veteran Chris Mintz. You've earned my respect and admiration. Your selfless actions epitomize true heroism and patriotism. People like yourself give us hope. Happy Birthday to your 6 year old son. God Bless.
Luis