Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate!

Wanna get out of America for a little while?

You won’t even need a passport. Just head for Dearborn (better known as Dearbornistan) Michigan…where you’ll feel like you are in downtown Baghdad.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjTxvUJ93ro

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More…

Bare Naked Islam

to read all articles go to http://www.barenakedislam.com/

The WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM

SWEDEN: Muslim “NO-GO Zones” are so dangerous, ambulance drivers won’t go into them without armed police escorts

Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate!
To the leftist media apologists for Islam, who continue to deny that there is any such thing in Europe as “NO-GO Zones” (at least 55 in Sweden, 750 in France, and dozens in every other EU country) where non-Muslims dare not go, here is further evidence.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Wd2AQL7J8

Nearly a third of FBI domestic terrorism cases involve Muslim refugees

March 7, 2017 / 

And those are just the ones the feds knows about. How do we know they are Muslim? Because 99% of refugees Obama imported to the U.S. are Muslim. Source: 300 refugees subjects of FBI terror investigations, U.S. officials say Nearly a third of the 1,000 FBI domestic terrorism cases – 300 – involve those admitted to the U.S. as refugees, a Department of Homeland Security official said Monday. That number was confirmed later in the day by Attorney General Jeff Sessions during a news conference. Officials said some of those 300 came to “infiltrate” the U.S., while others were radicalized once they were in the country. The officials who spoke Monday morning didn’t detail the current immigration status of those 300 people who were subjects of government terror probes, Reuters reported, citing a source. Several refugees have already participated in mass attacks in recent years motivated by apparent Islamic radicalism. Somali refugee Abdul Razak Ali Artan rammed his car into a crowd at The Ohio State University in November after posting a message on Facebook warning America not to interfere with Muslim communities. Somali refugee Dahir Adan reportedly yelled “Allahu Akbar” and asked one victim if they were Muslim during a September rampage in which he stabbed and injured nine people at a Minnesota mall. Seddique Mateen, the father of Pulse nightclub shooter Omar Mateen, is an Afghan refugee. Countless other refugees have been convicted of plotting attacks or planning to join ISIS abroad. Daniel Greenfield links to the White House statement where the 300 figure originates: 300 Muslim Refugees are Under Investigation for Terrorism The new travel pause is out. It exempts Iraqis. It doesn’t focus in on Syrians. Much of it is aimed at defending the previous executive order. And spelling out why the six countries are on the terror list. There’s also an interesting, but unsurprising, reference. Recent history shows that some of those who have entered the United States through our immigration system have proved to be threats to our national security. Since 2001, hundreds of persons born abroad have been convicted of terrorism-related crimes in the United States. They have included not just persons who came here legally on visas but also individuals who first entered the country as refugees. For example, in January 2013, two Iraqi nationals admitted to the United States as refugees in 2009 were sentenced to 40 years and to life in prison, respectively, for multiple terrorism-related offenses. And in October 2014, a native of Somalia who had been brought to the United States as a child refugee and later became a naturalized United States citizen was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction as part of a plot to detonate a bomb at a crowded Christmas-tree-lighting ceremony in Portland, Oregon. The Attorney General has reported to me that more than 300 persons who entered the United States as refugees are currently the subjects of counterterrorism investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I guess that’s the enhanced vetting that the media keeps crowing about. We let refugee terrorists into this country and then we keep on vetting them for years and years. Until they kill someone. Or rape multiple women. Or sexually assault under-age girls. Or boys. Or drive around neighborhoods threatening to rape women. Or beating them with American flags. Or steal millions from taxpayers. Or send suitcases full of taxpayer-funded welfare cash to jihadists. Or…the list goes on. Apparently Americans can’t be protected from Muslims who do those things, unless they protect themselves, which of course is Islamophobic. Please Share & Help Wake America Up

Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate!

The Islamic Society of North America’s (ISNA) Destructive Agenda

… and its ties to a number of leading Democrats.

Creeping Sharia

To read all articles go to ,https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

Vessels from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps force US Navy ship to change course

March 6, 2017

  By Robert Spencer

The official said attempts were made to communicate over radio, but there was no response and the interaction was “unsafe and unprofessional.” “Unprofessional”? No. It was a deliberate provocation. This weak and limp schoolmarmery from the Navy only encourages more such provocations. Note also that Reuters refers to the “Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps,” leaving out the “Islamic” from the group’s name. “U.S. Navy ship changes course after Iran vessel interaction: U.S. official,” Reuters, March 6, 2017: WASHINGTON, March 6 (Reuters) – Multiple fast-attack vessels from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps came close to a U.S. Navy ship in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, forcing it to change direction… …the IRGCN boats came within 600 yards of the USNS Invincible, a tracking ship, and stopped. The Invincible was being accompanied by three ships from British Royal Navy and forced the formation to change course. The official said attempts were made to communicate over radio, but there was no response and the interaction was “unsafe and unprofessional.”

Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate!

Sweden: Muslim migrant teens rape 14-year-old girl at school, they stay at school, she is transferred

March 7, 2017 8:29 am By Robert Spencer 20 Comments

Jihad Watch

To read all articles go to https://www.jihadwatch.org/

The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM

Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 8, “Booty,” verses 31-75

November 5, 2007 6:29 am By Robert Spencer

Part 25
 ( Read find what the Qur'an really teaches )

Allah then discusses the perversity of the pagan Quraysh, whom the Muslims have just defeated in the Battle of Badr (vv. 31-40). They reject Muhammad’s preaching as “legends of the former peoples” (v. 31) and keep the Muslims out of the Sacred Mosque in Mecca (v. 34). In verses 38-40, Allah tells Muhammad to call them to accept Islam, “And fight them until there is no fitnah and the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease – then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.” (v. 39).

According to Ibn Abbas, Abu Al-Aliyah, Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Qatadah, Ar-Rabi bin Anas, As-Suddi, Muqatil bin Hayyan and Zayd bin Aslam, the statement that Muslims must fight until there is no more fitnah means that they must fight “so that there is no more Shirk.” Shirk is the association of partners with Allah — i.e., calling Jesus the Son of God. So this verse, although it was revealed in the aftermath of a seventh-century battle between Muslims and pagans, has a universal application: the Tafsir al-Jalalayn glosses it this way: “And fight them until sedition, idolatry, is, exists, no more and religion is all for Allah, alone, none other being worshipped.” Muhammad himself said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.” (Sahih Muslim 30)

Allah then speaks about the battle itself (vv. 41-44). After the Muslims’ victory, Allah directs the Muslims to give a fifth of the booty to Muhammad (v. 41). An Islamic tradition amplifies this with an account of Muhammad’s generosity: after one battle, Muhammad prayed “facing a camel from the war booty,” and then, holding some of the camel’s hair between his fingers, said to his men: “This is also a part of the war booty you earned. Verily, I have no share in it, except my own share, the fifth designated to me. Even that fifth will be given to you.” Muhammad continued by exhorting the Muslims to turn over all the spoils of war to him for just distribution: “Therefore, surrender even the needle and the thread, and whatever is bigger or smaller than that (from the war spoils). Do not cheat with any of it, for stealing from the war booty before its distribution is Fire and a shame on its people in this life and the Hereafter. Perform Jihad against the people in Allah’s cause, whether they are near or far, and do not fear the blame of the blamers, as long as you are in Allah’s cause. Establish Allah’s rules while in your area and while traveling. Perform Jihad in Allah’s cause, for Jihad is a tremendous door leading to Paradise. Through it, Allah saves (one) from sadness and grief.”

Then Allah reminds Muhammad of various events before and during the battle, emphasizing how Allah controlled events and saved the Muslims (vv. 42-44).

After that, Allah address the believers (vv. 45-63), telling them not to imitate those who, like the “the people of Pharaoh and of those before them…disbelieved in the signs of Allah, so Allah seized them for their sins. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and severe in penalty.” (v. 52). (Here again, “signs” is ayat, the word used for the verses of the Qur’an.) For “the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not [ever] believe ” (v. 55) — another indication that unbelievers are worthy of no respect or consideration. If the Muslims “fear treachery” from unbelievers with whom they have a treaty, they should simply break the treaty (v. 58). Ibn Kathir says this means that Muslims should tell the unbelievers “that you are severing the treaty. This way, you will be on equal terms, in that, you and they will be aware that a state of war exists between you and that the bilateral peace treaty is null and void.” The Muslims should “make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies” (v. 60), while being ready to make peace if the enemy wishes to do so (v. 61). Some however, do not believe this truce should be indefinite in length. Qutb explains:

At the time when this surah was revealed, God instructed His Messenger to remain at peace with those groups who refrained from fighting him and the Muslims, whether they entered into a formal treaty with the Muslims or not. The Prophet continued to accept a peaceful relationship with unbelievers and people of earlier revelations until Surah 9 was revealed, when he could only accept one of two alternatives: either they embraced Islam or paid jizyah [a tax levied on non-Muslims, per Qur’an 9:29] which indicated a state of peace. Otherwise, the only alternative was war, whenever this was feasible for the Muslims to undertake, so that all people submit to God alone.

Allah then address Muhammad himself, giving him various instructions (vv. 62-75). Allah tells him that he will give pious Muslims more victories, even if they face odds even more prohibitive than those they had overcome at Badr, although this promise is almost immediately backtracked: originally a hundred would defeat a thousand unbelievers (v. 65), but this is then reduced to a hundred believers vanquishing two hundred unbelievers (v. 66). These became recurring themes of jihad literature throughout the centuries, up to the present day: piety will bring military victory, and the Muslims will conquer even against overwhelming odds.

According to the Tafsir al-Jalalayn, verse 67 — “It is not for a prophet to have captives until he inflicts a massacre in the land” — was revealed when the Muslims “ransomed those taken captive at Badr.” The Muslims had released some of the prisoners at Badr, but this was out of their base desire for material gain: the money they would receive in ransom. The tafsir continues: “You, O believers, desire the transient things of this world, its ephemeral gains, by ransoming, while God desires, for you, the Hereafter, that is, its reward, through your killing them.” In other words, they should have killed the captives rather than ransoming them. However, the Tafsir al-Jalalayn concludes by asserting that v. 67 was abrogated by 47:4, which allows for ransom. Ibn Kathir notes that “the majority of the scholars say that the matter of prisoners of war is up to the Imam. If he decides, he can have them killed, such as in the case of Bani Qurayzah. If he decides, he can accept a ransom for them, as in the case of the prisoners of Badr, or exchange them for Muslim prisoners.”

(Revised May 2015)

Allah then discusses the perversity of the pagan Quraysh, whom the Muslims have just defeated in the Battle of Badr (vv. 31-40). They reject Muhammad’s preaching as “legends of the former peoples” (v. 31) and keep the Muslims out of the Sacred Mosque in Mecca (v. 34). In verses 38-40, Allah tells Muhammad to call them to accept Islam, “And fight them until there is no fitnah and the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease – then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.” (v. 39).

According to Ibn Abbas, Abu Al-Aliyah, Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Qatadah, Ar-Rabi bin Anas, As-Suddi, Muqatil bin Hayyan and Zayd bin Aslam, the statement that Muslims must fight until there is no more fitnah means that they must fight “so that there is no more Shirk.” Shirk is the association of partners with Allah — i.e., calling Jesus the Son of God. So this verse, although it was revealed in the aftermath of a seventh-century battle between Muslims and pagans, has a universal application: the Tafsir al-Jalalayn glosses it this way: “And fight them until sedition, idolatry, is, exists, no more and religion is all for Allah, alone, none other being worshipped.” Muhammad himself said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.” (Sahih Muslim 30)

Allah then speaks about the battle itself (vv. 41-44). After the Muslims’ victory, Allah directs the Muslims to give a fifth of the booty to Muhammad (v. 41). An Islamic tradition amplifies this with an account of Muhammad’s generosity: after one battle, Muhammad prayed “facing a camel from the war booty,” and then, holding some of the camel’s hair between his fingers, said to his men: “This is also a part of the war booty you earned. Verily, I have no share in it, except my own share, the fifth designated to me. Even that fifth will be given to you.” Muhammad continued by exhorting the Muslims to turn over all the spoils of war to him for just distribution: “Therefore, surrender even the needle and the thread, and whatever is bigger or smaller than that (from the war spoils). Do not cheat with any of it, for stealing from the war booty before its distribution is Fire and a shame on its people in this life and the Hereafter. Perform Jihad against the people in Allah’s cause, whether they are near or far, and do not fear the blame of the blamers, as long as you are in Allah’s cause. Establish Allah’s rules while in your area and while traveling. Perform Jihad in Allah’s cause, for Jihad is a tremendous door leading to Paradise. Through it, Allah saves (one) from sadness and grief.”

Then Allah reminds Muhammad of various events before and during the battle, emphasizing how Allah controlled events and saved the Muslims (vv. 42-44).

After that, Allah address the believers (vv. 45-63), telling them not to imitate those who, like the “the people of Pharaoh and of those before them…disbelieved in the signs of Allah, so Allah seized them for their sins. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and severe in penalty.” (v. 52). (Here again, “signs” is ayat, the word used for the verses of the Qur’an.) For “the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not [ever] believe ” (v. 55) — another indication that unbelievers are worthy of no respect or consideration. If the Muslims “fear treachery” from unbelievers with whom they have a treaty, they should simply break the treaty (v. 58). Ibn Kathir says this means that Muslims should tell the unbelievers “that you are severing the treaty. This way, you will be on equal terms, in that, you and they will be aware that a state of war exists between you and that the bilateral peace treaty is null and void.” The Muslims should “make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies” (v. 60), while being ready to make peace if the enemy wishes to do so (v. 61). Some however, do not believe this truce should be indefinite in length. Qutb explains:

At the time when this surah was revealed, God instructed His Messenger to remain at peace with those groups who refrained from fighting him and the Muslims, whether they entered into a formal treaty with the Muslims or not. The Prophet continued to accept a peaceful relationship with unbelievers and people of earlier revelations until Surah 9 was revealed, when he could only accept one of two alternatives: either they embraced Islam or paid jizyah [a tax levied on non-Muslims, per Qur’an 9:29] which indicated a state of peace. Otherwise, the only alternative was war, whenever this was feasible for the Muslims to undertake, so that all people submit to God alone.

Allah then address Muhammad himself, giving him various instructions (vv. 62-75). Allah tells him that he will give pious Muslims more victories, even if they face odds even more prohibitive than those they had overcome at Badr, although this promise is almost immediately backtracked: originally a hundred would defeat a thousand unbelievers (v. 65), but this is then reduced to a hundred believers vanquishing two hundred unbelievers (v. 66). These became recurring themes of jihad literature throughout the centuries, up to the present day: piety will bring military victory, and the Muslims will conquer even against overwhelming odds.

According to the Tafsir al-Jalalayn, verse 67 — “It is not for a prophet to have captives until he inflicts a massacre in the land” — was revealed when the Muslims “ransomed those taken captive at Badr.” The Muslims had released some of the prisoners at Badr, but this was out of their base desire for material gain: the money they would receive in ransom. The tafsir continues: “You, O believers, desire the transient things of this world, its ephemeral gains, by ransoming, while God desires, for you, the Hereafter, that is, its reward, through your killing them.” In other words, they should have killed the captives rather than ransoming them. However, the Tafsir al-Jalalayn concludes by asserting that v. 67 was abrogated by 47:4, which allows for ransom. Ibn Kathir notes that “the majority of the scholars say that the matter of prisoners of war is up to the Imam. If he decides, he can have them killed, such as in the case of Bani Qurayzah. If he decides, he can accept a ransom for them, as in the case of the prisoners of Badr, or exchange them for Muslim prisoners.”

(Revised May 2015)

The Daily Jot Daily

reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective Bill Wilson Getting to the bottom of the wire tapping NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.

Tuesday, March 7, 2017 President Donald Trump accused the ex-"president" of wire-tapping his campaign, setting off a barrage of sanctimonious denials from Democrats and from the ex "president." The former "president's" spokesman Kevin Lewis said, "A cardinal rule of the [sic] Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, neither the [sic] "president" nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any US citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false." The facts, dating back to the 2012 campaign, however, indicate just the opposite. In fact, the White House had routinely ordered surveillance on US citizens. In June 2013, the UK Guardian released an investigative story on how the White House used the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to bypass the Patriot Act. The Guardian published documents submitted to the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), signed by Attorney General Eric Holder July 29, 2009. The documents indicate the White House used this court to back door "authority" to collect information on American citizens. The Guardian reported that the broad scope of the court orders and nature of the procedures established in the documents appeared "to clash" with assurances from the White House that our telephone and email information could not be accessed without warrants. Also in June 2013, The ACLU filed a lawsuit in the US District Court against James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, National Security Agency Director Keith Alexander, Defense Secretary Charles Hagel, Attorney General Eric Holder, and FBI Director Robert Mueller III for spying on Americans. The suit claimed these agencies illegally obtained "a comprehensive record" of citizens' "familial, political, professional, religious, and intimate associations." On May 13, 2013, AP reported that the DOJ had secretly obtained two months of telephone records of Associated Press reporters and editors during the 2012 campaign. Wire-tapping was routine at the previous White House. CBS and Fox News reporters were also confirmed to be targets of the Administration's surveillance. The story that tipped off Trump to the ex-"president's" wire tapping hobby was found in the New York Times January 19 article, stating " Numerous news outlets, including The New York Times, have reported on the F.B.I. investigations into Mr. Trump's advisers. BBC and then McClatchy revealed the existence of a multiagency working group to coordinate investigations across the government." There is also documentation that in June 2016 the ex-"president" submitted a request to the FISC to monitor communications by Trump, which was denied. In November 2016, HeatStreet reported "that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of 'US persons' in Donald Trump's campaign with ties to Russia." No evidence was found, but the wire-taps were continued, according to HeatStreet and the New York Times, under the pretext of national security. While the ex "president" himself may or may not have ordered wire taps and surveillance on Trump, even after he was elected, evidence suggests the ex "president's" Administration did spy on Trump and numerous other US citizens during his two terms in office. It is reported, documented and was considered routine. They are lying to cover it up. In John 3:20, Jesus said, " For everyone that does evil hates the light, neither comes to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed." We need to continue to expose these deeds and demand accountability, otherwise your freedom of religion and of speech will be crushed in darkness. Have a Blessed and Powerful Day! Bill Wilson www.dailyjot.com PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!

This Isn’t Over: SCOTUS May Have Put Its Trans-Bathroom Case on Hold, but More Are to Follow

School administrators trying to set common-sense bathroom safety policies received a temporary respite from the Supreme Court Monday. But the fight is far from over.

The court announced Monday morning that in the case of G.G. vs Gloucester County School Board, the judgment has been vacated and remanded to the Fourth Circuit appeals court in light of the Trump administration’s recent rescinding of the Obama-era transgender bathroom guidance.

The Supreme Court decided that it would not hear the case of biological teenage girl Gavin Grimm, who sued her local Virginia school board to use the boys’ room, citing federal discrimination law under Title IX, the 14th Amendment, and the Obama-era set of administrative guidelines.

A vacate and remand offers the parents and administrators temporary respite from complying with any court orders to the subject, as a vacated decision renders all previous judgement – which sided with Grimm – void, while allowing the competing arguments to be evaluated without Obama’s bureaucratic interpretation in the mix.

“The first duty of school districts is to protect the bodily privacy rights of all of the students who attend their schools and to respect the rights of parents who understandably don’t want their children exposed in intimate changing areas like locker rooms and showers,” reads a statement from Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Kerri Kupec, whose organization represents the school board.

“It only makes sense for the Supreme Court to vacate the 4th Circuit’s earlier decision and instruct it to reconsider this case,” Kupec said. “The 4th Circuit should affirm the plain meaning of Title IX, which protects boys’ and girls’ privacy in locker rooms, showers, and restrooms. School officials should be free to protect their students’ privacy, safety, and dignity without federal government interference.”

This development follows the news that both parties actually wanted to press forward with the case, despite the rollback of the Obama administration edict.

According to SCOTUSblog’s Amy Howe, while the parties still wanted the case heard by the high court, they differed on the when. The student’s ACLU legal team wanted the justices to hear the case and rule as planned, while the school board asked for more time.

However, the debate over who sets privacy policies in public schools – judges, bureaucrats, legislators, or educators and parents at the local level – isn’t over.

In addition to the eventual Fourth Circuit decision, there still remains the issue of the plaintiffs in the Sixth Circuit and two lower-level cases that were awaiting a ruling in Gloucester that will now be “coming out of hibernation,” ADF senior counsel Gary McCaleb explained in a phone interview.

Simply, for opponents of unconstitutionally rewriting federal discrimination law, this is more a breather than a win.

At heart, the cases raise the question of which branch writes our laws and further highlights the need for legislative or administrative language clarifying what Title IX actually means.

Title IX is the product of a 1972 law that prohibits schools receiving federal funds from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” While the law was clearly passed by Congress with biological sex in mind, there has been a concerted push from the Left in recent years to redefine that understanding to mean gender (which, of course, is based on thoughts and feelings, rather than science).

As we have previously pointed out at CR, legislation that would analogously redefine sex as gender identity in federal law has already been introduced in multiple congressional sessions, to no avail. Since Democrats have failed to get this sort of legislation through Congress thus far, that effort has now moved to the courtroom with these such cases.

Last year, Rep. Pete Olson, R-Texas (F, 58%) introduced a bill aimed at clearing up this confusion once and for all. The Civil Rights Uniformity Act of 2016 would have sought to “prevent the [Obama administration] from unilaterally rewriting Federal civil rights laws,” by barring the executive branch from interpreting Title IX’s provisions on “sex” to mean “gender.”

There may no longer be a soft mandate from the executive branch, but the ongoing nature of these cases shows that the American people have the option to answer this question via Congress, or leave it up to the federal judiciary. (For more from the author of “This Isn’t Over: SCOTUS May Have Put Its Trans-Bathroom Case on Hold, but More Are to Follow” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/03/isnt-scotus-may-put-trans-bathroom-case-hold-follow/

Will Trump Act to End Common Core’s Disastrous Math Slump?

The verdict is in on Common Core and it’s bad. International tests towards which Common Core was supposed to be “benchmarked” show that American students’ reading and science scores are stagnant. And math scores are tanking badly. Of the 35 industrialized nations, U..S. students have slipped into the 31st place in math achievement.

“We really are doing a lot worse in math than we are in science and reading,” Peggy Carr, the acting commissioner for the National Center for Education Statistics, told The Hechinger Report. Students across the board in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests are doing worse, from bottom to middle to top performance.

The sharp drop in math performance on the international test confirms the lower scores seen on the United States’ National Assessment on Education Progress, in which both 4th graders and 8th graders posted lower math scores on the 2015 test.

Why the Drop in Math Performance is Not Surprising

To critics of Common Core this should come as no surprise. The “Common Core moms” were repeatedly derided by the experts for noticing the sudden strange collapse in math teaching standards. I first wrote about one such mom, Heather Crossin, in 2013:

In September 2011, Heather suddenly noticed a sharp decline in the math homework her eight-year-old daughter was bringing home from Catholic school. “Instead of many arithmetic problems, the homework would contain only three or four questions, and two of those would be ‘explain your answer,’” Heather told me. “Like, ‘One bridge is 412 feet long and the other bridge is 206 feet long. Which bridge is longer? How do you know?’ She found she could not help her daughter answer the latter question: The “right” answer involved heavy quotation from Common Core language. A program designed to encourage thought had ended up encouraging rote memorization not of math but of scripts about math.

When Heather and other parents complained to the principal — at a private Catholic school mind you — he threw up his hands and said he didn’t like it either but they had to teach to the state test which was now based on Common Core standards. Yet Common Core advocates persist in the Big Lie that national standards leave states free to develop their own curricula. Here’s the truth: If you control the standards you control the curriculum.

Mothers like Heather Crossin were called ignoramuses. They were told that the experts had developed wonderful new standards that were “internationally benchmarked,” that is, that they were the kind of standards countries with high performing math students use. That was also a Big Lie. The one actual mathematician on the board that developed them, Stanford mathematics professor R. James Milgram, rejected the Common Core math standards. Prof. Milgram concluded that the Common Core standards are, as he told the Texas state legislature, “in large measure a political document that … is written at a very low level and does not adequately reflect our current understanding of why the math programs in the high-achieving countries give dramatically better results.”

The education school math education “experts” managed to impose on almost the entire country standards based on untested education theories, not empirical evidence. Most of its advocates probably had no clue. They trusted the “experts” in spite of the fact that such progressive education theories get it wrong time after time. (Remember “whole language” reading wars?)

They should have known better: When most states adopted Common Core the standards had not yet been written. They were buying a pig in a poke. And students are paying the price.

Trump Recognized Common Core’s Problems — At First

Donald Trump, to his credit, acknowledged the problem.

Or at least on the campaign trail he did. He opposed Common Core from the first moment he announced his campaign in June 2015, to the closing argument on his whirlwind tour the day before the election. He used it as a club to beat back Jeb Bush (the leader of the Republican support for Common Core, whose protégé, Betsy DeVos, now heads up the Education Department).

As Breitbart’s Dr. Susan Berry reported, “Numerous reports have observed the presence of Jeb Bush supporters and Obama holdovers in the federal education department. U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos herself was both a generous contributor to and board member of Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education (FEE), which promoted Common Core nationwide. Bush himself said of DeVos’s nomination, ‘I’m so excited.’”

Common Core critics are now increasingly concerned that President Trump has gone silent on Common Core.

As Fred Barnes pointed out, “He didn’t mention it … in his hour-long speech to a joint session of Congress. He didn’t repeat his promise to end it in his inaugural address a month ago. And he neglected to cite it in his rousing talk at the Conservative Political Action Conference.”

Trump’s education policy since taking office has been all school choice, with dramatic silence on Common Core. But school choice has little meaning if “common standards” put pressure on virtually every public, charter, and private school to create Common Core curricula, driven by state-imposed standardized tests.

Republicans who originally supported Common Core meant well. They thought they were endorsing high academic standards that would help students learn. That’s why they made a deal with the Obama administration. But now we know the truth.

Will President Trump care enough about the Common Core moms like Heather to deliver on one of his most-frequently repeated campaign promises?

Common Core Re-branded is Still Bad

As Frank Cannon, president of the American Principles Project (where I am a senior fellow) told Breitbart, given the Jeb-heavy cast of his education appointments, “I think it’s important for Trump to personally drive to completion on this promise, as he has on so many other promises.”

There are practical steps that can be taken immediately to ease the federal pressures on states to continue with failed math standards and the curriculum craziness produced by those standards. (Given the failure of Common Core to improve reading and silence standards, states should be free to experiment across the board.)

Jane Robbins, a senior fellow at American Principles Project (see full disclosure above) has been working with state legislatures on what they can do to undo Common Core. She finds the heavy hand of the federal government is still playing an outsize role:

DeVos can ease federal mandates on standards and testing, letting states choose their own standards — that is, ditch Common Core — without fear of federal penalty, and giving them a waiver from testing requirements while they revamp their standards and aligned tests. She should also comb through all 1,061 pages of Every Child Succeeds Act passed in 2015 and push Congress to eliminate its mandates.

“What we can’t have is the components of Common Core and have it be rebranded as something else. We can’t have the testing, we can’t have the lowering of standards that is part of Common Core, we can’t have the one-size-fits-all and pretend because the words Common Core have been removed from the education lexicon, that we removed the content and substance of that,” says Fank Cannon.

Here’s the thing: Unless Trump takes a personal interest in delivering on his campaign promise, nothing in Betsy DeVos’ background as a Bush protégé makes it likely she will act. A good first step would be getting Common Core critics like Prof. Milgram, Sandra Stotsky, Jane Robbins, and Heather Crossin in a room with the President and the Education secretary to share their concerns about what must be done. (For more from the author of “Will Trump Act to End Common Core’s Disastrous Math Slump?” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/03/will-trump-act-end-common-cores-disastrous-math-slump/

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

You know what they say…

Those who live in glass houses…will have many dead birds at their foundations.

While liberals make slobbering fools of themselves regarding Jeff Sessions and his meeting with a Russian Ambassador, insisting that he either recuse himself from any investigation related to the Trump administration and the Russians…which he has done…or resign over HIS meeting with Ambassador Kislyak…they forgot to close their own drapes.

Did Sessions meet with Kislyak? Yep, he sure did.

Did he discuss the 2016 election with Kislyak? He says he didn’t, and there is no evidence to counter that claim.

Was his meeting with Kislyak illegal, in any way, shape or form?

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Decoding Flynn-gate: Russia, the Middle East, and the US Elections

BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 418, March 6, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The FBI has concluded that ousted National Security Advisor (NSA) Mike Flynn’s contact with Russian ambassador Sergei Kisliak was not, in fact, illicit. Prior NSAs, aware that the Kremlin can influence close elections, have courted its “vote” for their candidates. Flynn acted as his predecessors did while protecting his back channel and his loyalty to Trump. The ongoing witch-hunt is emblematic of an unprecedented political power struggle in the US that reflects widely divergent policies toward Russia, the Middle East, and Ukraine.

Why was General Mike Flynn, Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser, fired? Did he do anything out of the ordinary by communicating with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during and shortly after the 2016 elections?

Former Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin, as well as former acting KGB resident in America Oleg Kalugin, have both revealed in their memoirs that during close US presidential elections there were debates in the Kremlin about whom to “vote” for. The preferred candidate was whichever of the contenders was the less menacing for Russia and had the greater potential to unleash a new era of partnership. Moreover, aides to US presidential candidates have been known to actively court the Kremlin’s favor on behalf of their candidates. Election tampering goes in both directions.    

As Dobrynin describes in In Confidence, in the tight 1968 elections, he viewed Democrat Vice President Hubert Humphrey as far preferable to the Republican candidate Richard Nixon, whom he described as “an anti-Soviet, Cold War warrior.” Based on Dobrynin’s reports, the Kremlin took the “unprecedented” step of “secretly” offering Humphrey financial aid. Dobrynin conceded that this was a “dangerous venture … if discovered it would have certainly backfired.”

Humphrey wisely turned the offer down, satisfying himself with “Moscow’s good wishes,” and never revealed it to anyone. Why did he not inform the FBI of the offer? Because had he done so, Nixon would have labeled him the Manchurian candidate.

But Humphrey was not the Soviets’ only choice. In The First Directorate, Kalugin reveals, “We in the KGB took a different view … We liked Nixon,” who could “take giant steps” towards improving Soviet-US relations. The reason for this, as the former KGB official explains, was that “no one could accuse Nixon of being soft on communism.” Kalugin had his man, Boris Sedov, develop a back channel with Henry Kissinger. Sedov then conveyed to the Kremlin that Nixon should be their man in Washington.   

As the election approached, however, Humphrey was still the Kremlin’s choice. And so, as Clark Clifford showed in Counsel to the Presidents, Humphrey’s chief fan in the Kremlin, Premier Alexei Kosygin, helped Lyndon B. Johnson instigate an “October Surprise.” On October 30, 1968, LBJ, acting in concert with the Kremlin, agreed to a ceasefire in Vietnam. Meanwhile, Kosygin prodded Hanoi to open negotiations in Paris with the US and Saigon. Peace now beckoned – and with it, perhaps, a Humphrey victory.

But Nixon correctly interpreted Johnson’s move as a political stunt and torpedoed it. He instructed his emissary to persuade the South Vietnamese government not to participate in the negotiations on the grounds that they would get a better deal if Nixon was elected. Nixon thus squeezed out an election victory. Sedov continued meeting with Nixon’s aide, Richard Allen, for the next two years.

During the 1976 elections, the Kremlin had a slight preference for Nixon’s successor, Gerald Ford, who was a known quantity. However, on October 30, 1976, Ford’s NSA, General Brent Scowcroft, felt compelled to inform Dobrynin why the president had sent a virtual ultimatum to the Kremlin demanding that it permit Jewish emigration from the USSR. He revealed apologetically that, following Carter’s example, Ford had yielded to the demands of American Jewish leaders and asked Dobrynin for “patience and understanding for another 48 hours, until this madhouse is over.” After November 2, he promised, “everything was going to be back to normal.”

But Carter won, and the “madhouse” continued. Carter’s human rights policy would plague the Kremlin for the next four years.

Fast forward to March 1979. Richard Allen again courted the Kremlin, this time on behalf of Ronald Reagan. So did Scowcroft. Allen, drawing “a parallel between Reagan and Nixon,” indicated that a reset of the superpowers’ relationship was likewise possible under Reagan. Scowcroft advised that if the USSR “gave no trumps to Carter,” Reagan had a good chance of winning.

On October 16, 1980, Zbigniew Brzezinski came courting for Carter. He promised Dobrynin that Carter would adopt a soft line toward Moscow’s clients Angola, Vietnam, and Cuba. A US-Sino military alliance was also “absolutely out of the question.’’ The message was clear: Moscow should do nothing to diminish Carter’s election chances “and might even help a bit.”

On October 22, it was Kissinger’s turn. Now a private citizen, but acting with Reagan’s consent, he told Dobrynin that “The Reagan camp was fairly confident of victory absent some last minute surprise.” Moreover, Reagan “was not the mad, anti-Soviet right-winger” they may have thought he was.

In the end, the Kremlin “voted” to “stay on the fence.” Reagan won the elections and eventually embarked on a reset with Mikhail Gorbachev.

In 2012, President Barack Obama did his own marketing, promising outgoing President Dmitri Medvedev that “After my election I [will] have more flexibility.” Meanwhile, Mitt Romney declared that Russia “is, without question, our number one geopolitical foe,” a viewpoint that was openly mocked by Obama. The Kremlin’s “vote” was for Obama, although Putin was already blaming Hillary and her State Department for provoking protests during Russia’s December 2011 parliamentary elections.

In 2016, Hillary’s hacked e-mails revealed her as having been a major proponent of arming the rebels who killed Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi. As former defense secretary Robert Gates concluded in Duty, the Russians, who lost Libyan oil contracts, realized they had been tricked. They had not blocked a NATO intervention in Libya because it had been sold to them at the UN as a “humanitarian” effort to rescue civilians during the country’s civil war.

In 2015, having learned that Washington had been arming Syrian rebels against his client, Bashar Assad, Putin intervened militarily in Syria. He had watched Iraq and Libya become failed jihadist states after the deaths of their dictators, and was resolved to save Assad. It was not just oil contracts and future pipelines that were at stake, but also Russia’s heavy investments in upgrading Syria’s Port of Tartus.

The turning point may have come in the summer of 2016, when Hillary associate  Mike Morell, her likely CIA Director had she won, advocated “killing Russians” in Syria. In marked contrast, Donald Trump expressed a desire to work jointly with Moscow against the Islamists. Thereafter, the Russians sought to help Trump, their preferred candidate.

The unprecedented witch-hunt of Flynn-gate, now extended to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is symptomatic of the enormous political power struggle in Washington, coupled with the deepening crisis of confidence in national institutions. It is also related to persistent divisions within US government bureaucracies over American relations with Russia, Syria, and Ukraine.

The new NSA, Gen. H.R. McMaster, can be expected to try to bridge these differences within a new unified framework. We recommend that the Trump administration not contemplate the lifting of sanctions without linking them to the conflicts in both Syria and Ukraine, and insisting on Russia’s compliance with the Minsk agreements.

The purge of Flynn is only the hors d’oeuvres. The calls for Sessions’s resignation and for the naming of a special prosecutor indicate that the sharks are hoping for the chef d’oeuvre – Trump – as the Manchurian candidate.

View PDF

Dr. Jiri Valenta and his wife, Leni, are the principals of The Institute of Post Communist Studies and Terrorism (jvlv.net). They are authors of a forthcoming book on Russia and US interventions in the 21st century. A prominent author and speaker, Jiri served for decade as a professor and coordinator of Soviet and East European Studies at the US Naval Post-Graduate School and former consultant to senior members of Reagan administration.

BESA Center Perspectives Papers are published through the generosity of the Greg Rosshandler Family

Decoding Flynn-gate: Russia, the Middle East, and the US Elections

BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 418, March 6, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The FBI has concluded that ousted National Security Advisor (NSA) Mike Flynn’s contact with Russian ambassador Sergei Kisliak was not, in fact, illicit. Prior NSAs, aware that the Kremlin can influence close elections, have courted its “vote” for their candidates. Flynn acted as his predecessors did while protecting his back channel and his loyalty to Trump. The ongoing witch-hunt is emblematic of an unprecedented political power struggle in the US that reflects widely divergent policies toward Russia, the Middle East, and Ukraine.

Why was General Mike Flynn, Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser, fired? Did he do anything out of the ordinary by communicating with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during and shortly after the 2016 elections?

Former Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin, as well as former acting KGB resident in America Oleg Kalugin, have both revealed in their memoirs that during close US presidential elections there were debates in the Kremlin about whom to “vote” for. The preferred candidate was whichever of the contenders was the less menacing for Russia and had the greater potential to unleash a new era of partnership. Moreover, aides to US presidential candidates have been known to actively court the Kremlin’s favor on behalf of their candidates. Election tampering goes in both directions.    

As Dobrynin describes in In Confidence, in the tight 1968 elections, he viewed Democrat Vice President Hubert Humphrey as far preferable to the Republican candidate Richard Nixon, whom he described as “an anti-Soviet, Cold War warrior.” Based on Dobrynin’s reports, the Kremlin took the “unprecedented” step of “secretly” offering Humphrey financial aid. Dobrynin conceded that this was a “dangerous venture … if discovered it would have certainly backfired.”

Humphrey wisely turned the offer down, satisfying himself with “Moscow’s good wishes,” and never revealed it to anyone. Why did he not inform the FBI of the offer? Because had he done so, Nixon would have labeled him the Manchurian candidate.

But Humphrey was not the Soviets’ only choice. In The First Directorate, Kalugin reveals, “We in the KGB took a different view … We liked Nixon,” who could “take giant steps” towards improving Soviet-US relations. The reason for this, as the former KGB official explains, was that “no one could accuse Nixon of being soft on communism.” Kalugin had his man, Boris Sedov, develop a back channel with Henry Kissinger. Sedov then conveyed to the Kremlin that Nixon should be their man in Washington.   

As the election approached, however, Humphrey was still the Kremlin’s choice. And so, as Clark Clifford showed in Counsel to the Presidents, Humphrey’s chief fan in the Kremlin, Premier Alexei Kosygin, helped Lyndon B. Johnson instigate an “October Surprise.” On October 30, 1968, LBJ, acting in concert with the Kremlin, agreed to a ceasefire in Vietnam. Meanwhile, Kosygin prodded Hanoi to open negotiations in Paris with the US and Saigon. Peace now beckoned – and with it, perhaps, a Humphrey victory.

But Nixon correctly interpreted Johnson’s move as a political stunt and torpedoed it. He instructed his emissary to persuade the South Vietnamese government not to participate in the negotiations on the grounds that they would get a better deal if Nixon was elected. Nixon thus squeezed out an election victory. Sedov continued meeting with Nixon’s aide, Richard Allen, for the next two years.

During the 1976 elections, the Kremlin had a slight preference for Nixon’s successor, Gerald Ford, who was a known quantity. However, on October 30, 1976, Ford’s NSA, General Brent Scowcroft, felt compelled to inform Dobrynin why the president had sent a virtual ultimatum to the Kremlin demanding that it permit Jewish emigration from the USSR. He revealed apologetically that, following Carter’s example, Ford had yielded to the demands of American Jewish leaders and asked Dobrynin for “patience and understanding for another 48 hours, until this madhouse is over.” After November 2, he promised, “everything was going to be back to normal.”

But Carter won, and the “madhouse” continued. Carter’s human rights policy would plague the Kremlin for the next four years.

Fast forward to March 1979. Richard Allen again courted the Kremlin, this time on behalf of Ronald Reagan. So did Scowcroft. Allen, drawing “a parallel between Reagan and Nixon,” indicated that a reset of the superpowers’ relationship was likewise possible under Reagan. Scowcroft advised that if the USSR “gave no trumps to Carter,” Reagan had a good chance of winning.

On October 16, 1980, Zbigniew Brzezinski came courting for Carter. He promised Dobrynin that Carter would adopt a soft line toward Moscow’s clients Angola, Vietnam, and Cuba. A US-Sino military alliance was also “absolutely out of the question.’’ The message was clear: Moscow should do nothing to diminish Carter’s election chances “and might even help a bit.”

On October 22, it was Kissinger’s turn. Now a private citizen, but acting with Reagan’s consent, he told Dobrynin that “The Reagan camp was fairly confident of victory absent some last minute surprise.” Moreover, Reagan “was not the mad, anti-Soviet right-winger” they may have thought he was.

In the end, the Kremlin “voted” to “stay on the fence.” Reagan won the elections and eventually embarked on a reset with Mikhail Gorbachev.

In 2012, President Barack Obama did his own marketing, promising outgoing President Dmitri Medvedev that “After my election I [will] have more flexibility.” Meanwhile, Mitt Romney declared that Russia “is, without question, our number one geopolitical foe,” a viewpoint that was openly mocked by Obama. The Kremlin’s “vote” was for Obama, although Putin was already blaming Hillary and her State Department for provoking protests during Russia’s December 2011 parliamentary elections.

In 2016, Hillary’s hacked e-mails revealed her as having been a major proponent of arming the rebels who killed Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi. As former defense secretary Robert Gates concluded in Duty, the Russians, who lost Libyan oil contracts, realized they had been tricked. They had not blocked a NATO intervention in Libya because it had been sold to them at the UN as a “humanitarian” effort to rescue civilians during the country’s civil war.

In 2015, having learned that Washington had been arming Syrian rebels against his client, Bashar Assad, Putin intervened militarily in Syria. He had watched Iraq and Libya become failed jihadist states after the deaths of their dictators, and was resolved to save Assad. It was not just oil contracts and future pipelines that were at stake, but also Russia’s heavy investments in upgrading Syria’s Port of Tartus.

The turning point may have come in the summer of 2016, when Hillary associate  Mike Morell, her likely CIA Director had she won, advocated “killing Russians” in Syria. In marked contrast, Donald Trump expressed a desire to work jointly with Moscow against the Islamists. Thereafter, the Russians sought to help Trump, their preferred candidate.

The unprecedented witch-hunt of Flynn-gate, now extended to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is symptomatic of the enormous political power struggle in Washington, coupled with the deepening crisis of confidence in national institutions. It is also related to persistent divisions within US government bureaucracies over American relations with Russia, Syria, and Ukraine.

The new NSA, Gen. H.R. McMaster, can be expected to try to bridge these differences within a new unified framework. We recommend that the Trump administration not contemplate the lifting of sanctions without linking them to the conflicts in both Syria and Ukraine, and insisting on Russia’s compliance with the Minsk agreements.

The purge of Flynn is only the hors d’oeuvres. The calls for Sessions’s resignation and for the naming of a special prosecutor indicate that the sharks are hoping for the chef d’oeuvre – Trump – as the Manchurian candidate.

View PDF

Dr. Jiri Valenta and his wife, Leni, are the principals of The Institute of Post Communist Studies and Terrorism (jvlv.net). They are authors of a forthcoming book on Russia and US interventions in the 21st century. A prominent author and speaker, Jiri served for decade as a professor and coordinator of Soviet and East European Studies at the US Naval Post-Graduate School and former consultant to senior members of Reagan administration.

BESA Center Perspectives Papers are published through the generosity of the Greg Rosshandler Family

Please Read Part 21:

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 21)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 3, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-most-dangerous-and-treacherous-times-in-u-s-history-part-21

The following recent article revealed that President Trump gave a good speech on last Tuesday night, but his presidency is still hanging by a thread and that Attorney Larry Klayman recently stated that an ‘alternative government’ in the intelligence community continues to target him. It also revealed that Klayman stated on the Fox Business Network, ‘These intelligence agencies are more powerful than the president himself,’ along with, ‘They have the ability to blackmail people in this administration to the point that the American people’s interests are going to be subverted’ and ‘How can he President Trump represent the interests of the American people when he knows the NSA is likely wiretapping everything he says with foreign leaders and everyone else?’ Additionally, it revealed that it may seem like ancient history, but the media used to be concerned about surveillance of American citizens by U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies, but after President Trump was elected, such concern suddenly disappeared and, in fact, the ‘media became the recipients of illegal leaks of private conversations by Trump administration officials and one such leak forced the resignation of national security adviser Michael T. Flynn.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

The ‘Alternative Government’ vs. Trump!-Posted on Barb Wire-By Cliff Kincaid-On March 3, 2017:

President Trump gave a good speech on Tuesday night, but his presidency is still hanging by a thread. Attorney Larry Klayman says an “alternative government” in the intelligence community continues to target him. “These intelligence agencies are more powerful than the president himself,” Klayman said on the Fox Business Network. “They have the ability to blackmail people in this administration to the point that the American people’s interests are going to be subverted.”

Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch, said, “How can he [President Trump] represent the interests of the American people when he knows the NSA is likely wiretapping everything he says with foreign leaders and everyone else?”

It may seem like ancient history, but the media used to be concerned about surveillance of American citizens by U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies. After President Trump was elected, such concern suddenly disappeared. In fact, the media became the recipients of illegal leaks of private conversations by Trump administration officials. One such leak forced the resignation of national security adviser Michael T. Flynn.

Claude Barfield, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), writes that there was nothing improper with U.S. intelligence surveillance of phone calls to and from the Russian ambassador. However, in regard to Flynn, existing law does not permit the NSA or FBI to “listen to the communications of Americans who may be caught in…eavesdropping.”

The allegation that Flynn violated “the ancient 18th century Logan Act that forbids diplomatic activity by private U.S. citizens is no longer relevant, according to almost all legal experts,” notes Barfield. So the wiretaps could not be justified on that flimsy basis.

Flynn was forced out on the equally spurious grounds that he forgot to tell Vice President Mike Pence about elements of the conversations he had with the Russian official.

Barfield says that “a criminal—and certainly civil rights—violation did occur with the public leaks of the details of his conversations with the foreign ambassador from someone (or some persons) in the intelligence community.” The leak violated the Espionage Act, which makes intentional disclosure of classified “communications intelligence activities” a felony. What’s more, citing Timothy H. Edgar of Brown University, it is also a crime for national security officials “to leverage legitimate foreign intelligence collection to reveal public information in order to damage [an] individual they do not believe should serve.”

It is well-known that Flynn’s appointment as national security adviser was opposed by elements in the intelligence community, especially the CIA.

Edgar writes that “Flynn himself may be the first victim of civil liberties abuse during the Trump administration.” He says, “If officials had concerns about Flynn, the law requires they lodge those complaints through the system and not through leaks.”

This means that some intelligence officials viewed Flynn as a threat and wanted him out, using any means possible.

Edgar suggests that Flynn call the ACLU for legal help, but a far better course of action would be to call litigator Larry Klayman, who says it’s clear that “the NSA is spying on the President, his White House, and the administration in general.”

Klayman believes that “loyalists to former President Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, and their leftist comrades” are behind the illegal surveillance.

Former Congressman Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) told Newsmax TV that the NSA “can collect on the Russian embassy, no problem,” but that “when they collect on an American, whether it’s here in the United States or when we collect inadvertently on an American overseas, that information immediately should be what we call minimized. The name should be taken away.”

“Hoekstra explained that a court order must be granted in order to receive permission to release the name of any American captured by the NSA’s spying techniques,” the Newsmax story said.

Rather than be minimized or eliminated, the name was illegally leaked to Washington Post columnist David Ignatius. We discussed this sequence of events in the column, “Why the CIA Wants to Destroy Flynn.” Ignatius quoted “a senior U.S. government official” as the source of the information about Flynn.

During his appearance on the Fox Business Channel, Klayman discussed this illegal surveillance and offered to represent Flynn in a legal action. He repeated his claim that the intelligence community was engaged in illegal surveillance not only of Flynn but of other Trump officials, including the President himself.

Klayman has asked for an emergency hearing on this matter from Judge Richard Leon, who had previously ruled in Klayman’s favor in a lawsuit against NSA surveillance. He said the evidence suggests the existence of an “alternative government,” based in the intelligence community, which is more powerful than elected officials.

On the same program, a clip was played of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, saying that the Flynn case represented an abuse of authority. He said that Flynn had his telephone call listened to by the government and leaked to the press, and that if this had happened to a member of the Obama administration, “you can imagine the Democrats in the House and Senate would be going crazy…”

Nunes said that, in order for the intelligence community to listen to an American such as Flynn, a special warrant is required. “I am quite sure this wasn’t done in this case,” he said.

The Washington Monthly, a liberal publication, published a story by Martin Longman that began, “When it comes to Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, I have long seen him as an informal member of the intelligence community who often acts as their mouthpiece.” Longman concluded that “the intelligence community took down Flynn…”

The official bio for Ignatius mentions that he covered the CIA when he worked for The Wall Street Journal.

At the Post, Ignatius has expressed concern about whether Obama CIA director John Brennan’s “modernization” of the agency will survive Trump. “After interviewing several dozen CIA officers and veterans over the past several months,” Ignatius wrote, “my conclusion is that Brennan’s reforms should continue…”

Based on stories like this, it would appear that Ignatius is more than willing, even anxious, to advertise his CIA connections.

Any investigation of what Trump calls “illegal leaks” should begin with him.

Source Link:

http://barbwire.com/2017/03/03/alternative-government-vs-trump/

The following recent video revealed Attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch recently stated, ‘This country is becoming unglued. We're in the stage of a revolution here,’ along with ‘alternative government’ in the intelligence community continues to target President Trump for the purpose of overthrowing his administration’ and ‘These intelligence agencies are more powerful than the president himself.’ Additionally, the video contains ‘Cliff Kincaid of USA Survival’ talking to Klayman about the issue-You Decide:

Video: A Revolutionary ‘Deep State’ Conspiracy Against Trump!-Posted on Freedom Watch-By USA Survival-By Larry Klayman-On March 4, 2017:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/a-revolutionary-deep-state-conspiracy-against-trump

The following recent article revealed that ‘Freedom Center founder David Horowitz’ recently appeared on Lou Dobbs Tonight to discuss the ‘growing movement to take down the Trump administration’-You Decide:

Video: David Horowitz Discusses the Shadow Government with Lou Dobbs: ‘Freedom Center founder weighs in on the behind-the-scenes movement to take down Trump’!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Frontpagemag.com-On March 6, 2017:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266008/video-david-horowitz-discusses-shadow-government-frontpagemagcom

Note: I wanted to take the liberty of sharing the following thought-provoking videos, articles, along with a Wikipedia reports, which I believe relate to the above thought-provoking article as it relates to ‘illegal leaks’ that involve ‘American journalists, Hollywood and the CIA’-You Decide:

The following recent thought-provoking video revealed the ‘CIA and Establishment Media’ attack on President Trump and his administration-You Decide:

Video: Mockingbird Part Deux: CIA and Media Coordinate Attack On Trump!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Alex Jones Channel-On January 6, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SM-Pl9L6YM

The following recent article revealed that the ‘United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities’ found in ‘1975 that the CIA submitted stories to the American press.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Newly-Declassified Documents Show that CIA Worked Closely with Owners and Journalists with Many of the Largest Media Outlets!-Posted on Zero Hedge-By George Washington-On February 28, 2017:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-28/newly-declassified-documents-show-senior-cia-agent-and-deputy-director-directorate-i

The following thought-provoking video revealed that allegedly CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper’ admitted that he was a ‘CIA Operative,’ ‘Operation Mockingbird’ and the ‘CIA and Media/Hollywood’ connections-You Decide:

Video: CNN's Anderson Cooper Admits Working for the CIA - Operation Mockingbird Asset Exposed!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Mark Dice-On September 20, 2014:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwMCIe2AGW8

The following thought-provoking article from the recent past revealed that since the end of World War II the ‘Central Intelligence Agency has been a major force in US and foreign news media,’ exerting considerable influence over what the public sees, hears and reads on a regular basis and that ‘CIA publicists and journalists alike will assert they have few, if any, relationships, yet the seldom acknowledged history of their intimate collaboration indicates a far different story and one that media historians are reluctant to examine.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

The CIA and the Media: 50 Facts the World Needs to Know: ‘Facts American public is wholly ignorant of’!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Prof. James F. Tracy, Infowars.com-On September 5, 2015:

http://www.infowars.com/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know/

The following article revealed that Obama's critics on the left and right are beginning to coalesce around the idea that the ‘White House should be punished for selectively leaking flattering details about covert operations while at the same time zealously prosecuting whistleblowers who reveal less flattering secrets,’ but the author states that this is stupid because ‘every leak is a good leak.’ It also revealed that allegedly any time a soft-brained war-lover like Sen. John McCain and an anti-war zealot like Salon's Glenn Greenwald get behind the same national security program, you know something is wrong, but that both men, along with many of their cohorts on the anti-Obama right and the anti-war left, are furious with the ‘White House's apparent willingness to reveal highly classified details of Obama's drone program, the Stuxnet virus aimed at derailing Iran's nuclear program, and a multi-agency collaboration to infiltrate Al Qaeda's Yemeni affiliate to the New York Times and other outlets, not to mention the virtually unfettered access the CIA and Pentagon—with White House approval—gave to filmmakers researching the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

All Leaks Are Good Leaks!-Posted GAWKER-By John Cook-On June 8, 2012:

http://gawker.com/5916901/all-leaks-are-good-leaks

The following article and/or report revealed that ‘American journalists have long been bitterly opposed to the recruitment of reporters by U.S. intelligence agencies,’ and the ‘fraudulent use of journalism credentials by intelligence operatives’ and that since the mid-1970s, journalists and others, including some of the nation's top ‘foreign policy makers believed that the CIA could no longer recruit reporters as spies’ because they shared a widespread but ‘inaccurate assumption that the U.S. government had banned such objectionable practices’ as part of a package of reforms revamping ‘codes of conduct for covert intelligence operations’ adopted in response to recommendations of the ‘1976 Church Committee report.’ It also revealed that in its investigation of U.S. foreign and military intelligence operations, the ‘Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, chaired by Senator Frank Church (D-Idaho) found that more than 50 American journalists had worked clandestinely as CIA agents during the Cold War era’ and that the committee's final report strongly condemned this practice and unequivocally called on the intelligence community to ‘permit American journalists and news organizations to pursue their work without jeopardizing their credibility in the eyes of the world through covert use of them.’-You Decide:

Subverting Journalism: ‘Reporters and the CIA’!-Posted on CPJ.org-By Kate Houghton:

https://www.cpj.org/attacks96/sreports/cia.html

The following Wikipedia report revealed that at various times, under its own authority or in accordance with directives from the President of the United States or the National Security Council staff, the Central Intelligence Agency has attempted to ‘influence domestic and international public opinion’ and ‘sometimes law enforcement.’ It also revealed that this report does not address, other than incidental to influencing opinion or actions reasonably associated with CIA security, possibly ‘illegal domestic surveillance’ because this is an area with many shades of gray and that there is little argument, for example, that the ‘CIA acted inappropriately in providing technical support to White House operatives conducting both political and security investigations, with no legal authority’ to do so. Additionally, it revealed that ‘not all inappropriate activities were initiated or conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency,’ but by other members of the United States Intelligence Community and, in particular, the 'Federal Bureau of Investigation' took a very broad view of its mandate to collect information to protect the state from domestic subversion and that in other cases, the 'National Security Agency' intercepted electronic communications ‘without the warrants deemed necessary at the time’-You Decide:

CIA influence on public opinion!-Posted on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_influence_on_public_opinion

The following Wikipedia report revealed that ‘Operation Mockingbird’ was allegedly a large-scale program of the ‘United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)’ that, beginning in the early 1950s, attempted to ‘manipulate news media for propaganda purposes,’ and funded student and cultural organizations and magazines as front organizations and that according to writer Deborah Davis, ‘Mockingbird recruited leading American journalists into a propaganda network and oversaw the operations of front groups.’ It also revealed that ‘CIA support of front groups’ was exposed after a 1967 Ramparts magazine article revealed that the 'National Student Association received funding from the CIA and that Congressional investigations and reports in the 1970s also revealed Agency connections with journalists and civic groups.' Additionally, it revealed that ‘none of these reports, however, mentions an Operation Mockingbird controlling or supporting these activities,’ but that a Project Mockingbird is mentioned in the CIA Family Jewels report, compiled in the mid-70s and that according to the declassified version of the report released in 2007, ‘Project Mockingbird involved wire-tapping of two American journalists for several months in the early 1960s’-You Decide:

Operation Mockingbird!-Posted on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

The following thought-provoking video from the recent past revealed ‘Operation Mockingbird’ and the connection between the ‘CIA and the Establishment Media’-You Decide:

Video: Operation Mockingbird: The CIA and the Media!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Our Hidden History-On March 1, 2016:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Hm0Sla65E

The following recent video revealed that Steve Pieczenik recently exposed Obama as a ‘CIA plant.’  If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

Video: Steve Pieczenik: There Is Really No More Democratic Party As Far As We Are Concerned!-Posted on YouTube.com-By OpenMind-On January 3, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOnebrqakYg

I believe that the following article and videos from the past relate to and/or further support the above video regarding Obama being a ‘CIA plant.’-You Decide:

Bombshell: Barack H. Obama Is The CIA's Greatest Creation!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes,
Infowars.com-On 
August 18, 2010:

http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-barack-obama-conclusively-outed-a...

Video: Wayne Madsen Bombshell: Barack Obama Conclusively Outed as CIA Creation!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Alex Jones Channel-On August 19, 2010:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okKud3SHUjY

Video: Obama The CIA Made Man!–Posted on YouTube.com-By ATLAHWorldwide-On April 22, 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sqF_GoPOOY&feature=related

Video: The Manufacturing of a President - Obama's CIA family EXPOSED!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Destroyedbydesign-On  January 29, 2013:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR2wR4vp_ao

Video: BARACK OBAMA IS A CIA CREATION!-Posted on YouTube.com-By STOP THE CRIMINAL CIA NWO-On November 21, 2013:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcUtGfL__uw

Video: Former CIA Asset: Obama Is 'Indonesian Citizen' Who Was Created by the Saudis!-Posted on YouTube.com-By DAHBOO777-On September 23, 2014:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug9O9tj3gEo

The following recent article revealed that former President Obama, 'who possesses quite a history of ordering wiretaps and computer hackings of his perceived enemies,' is now being accused on Saturday of having had his minions wiretap the campaign headquarters of a GOP candidate he feared would eliminate his so-called legacy and that, according to a number of news stories, ‘President Donald Trump accused former President Obama of ordering his Trump Tower phones tapped during the final weeks of Trump's campaign leading up to his November 8, 2016 election victory over Hillary Clinton.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

President Trump Accuses Obama Of Wiretapping Trump Tower Phones!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news571.htm

The following recent article revealed that the White House’s recent statement on ‘DeepStateGate,’ which is allegedly ‘President Trump’s allegations that former President Barack Obama ordered surveillance on him during his 2016 presidential campaign,’ has the feel of ‘cards and chips thumping down on the table’-You Decide:

DeepStateGate: Trump Ends the Wiretapping Innuendo Game by Dealing Himself In!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By John Hayward-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/05/trump-ends-innuendo-game-dealing/

The following recent article revealed that in what has already been a historically bad year for Democrats, it just may be that they’re about to lose again to Donald Trump, this time in a high-stakes game of Russian roulette because the 'Democrats’ Putin smear was supposed to paint President Trump as a friend of the tyrant and beneficiary of Russian meddling' in the election, but, instead, ‘it is the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party, former President Barack Obama, who may take the fall because snooping on a presidential candidate is serious business.’  It also revealed that the Democrats want you to think this is a ‘crazy conspiracy theory for an unhinged tweeting president,’ but ‘Obama has a rich legacy of using the federal government as a political weapon’ and it would be foolish to think he suddenly started restraining himself, when ‘he was never held to account for by either the media or Democrats in power.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

For Obama, Spying is Nothing New!-Posted on GOP USA-By Tom Shattuck, Boston Herald-On March 6, 2017:

http://www.gopusa.com/?p=21519?omhide=true

The following recent article revealed that former 'CIA analyst Larry C. Johnson' says that according to his sources, the ‘Obama administration worked with the NSA, the CIA and Britain’s GCHQ to disseminate information about Donald Trump that was illegally obtained via surveillance before the election.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Former CIA Analyst: Obama Gave “Green Light” For NSA, CIA to Sabotage Trump: ‘Clapper & Brennan "intimately involved" in plot to derail Trump's candidacy’!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars.com-On March 6, 2017:

http://www.infowars.com/former-cia-analyst-obama-gave-green-light-for-nsa-cia-to-sabotage-trump/

The following recent article revealed that in an article published at Newsmax and at his Freedom Watch website on Sunday, Attorney. Larry Klayman released additional information about data his client, ‘Dennis Montgomery, claims was harvested by U.S. intelligence agencies for a number of years on both public and private citizens.’ It also revealed that Klayman has named former ‘Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan’ as those ordering the collection of the information using the considerable capabilities of the ‘U.S. intelligence community, which consists of 17 different agencies, according to public reports.’ Additionally, it revealed that Clapper has denied having ordered ‘wiretapping’ Trump claimed on Saturday morning to have occurred last October in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election and that ‘Clapper’s denial has been refuted by some who claim that reports issued by McClatchy, The New York Times, HeatStreet, and National Review’ all confirmed the existence of several ongoing ‘investigations’ into possible ties between the Trump campaign or associates and Russia. Surprised?-You Decide:

Klayman: “Mass Surveillance” Yielded SCOTUS Chief Justice’s “Financial Records”!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/03/05/klayman-mass-surveillance-yielded-scotus-chief-justices-financial-records/

The following recent video revealed Attorney Larry Klayman recently claimed that the ‘illegal Obama wiretaps are real’ and provided some evidence to back his statement-You Decide:

Video: Illegal Obama Wiretaps Of Trump Are Real: ‘Klayman Pursuing Court Remedies’!-Posted on Freedom Watch TV-On March 6, 2017:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/illegal-obama-wiretaps-of-trump-are-real

The following recent article revealed that ‘The Gateway Pundit (TGP)’ reported earlier that the ‘first FISA request came right after 'AG Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016' and that the 'second FISA request was submitted, on October of 2016, just before the election.’ It also revealed that Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet, on October 31^st, stating, ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server,’ so allegedly it appears that she was tipped off to the wiretapping prior to the election. Surprised?-You Decide:

Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election!-Posted on The Gateway Pundit-By Cristina Laila-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-tipped-off-trump-wiretap-tweeted-one-week-prior-election/

The following recent article revealed that President Donald Trump caused a media firestorm by claiming over the weekend that then-President Obama wire-tapped telephones at Trump Tower in Manhattan during the final leg of last year's election campaign and that seeing the writing on the wall, tainted ‘FBI Director James Comey promptly and publicly urged the Department of Justice to reject Trump’s claims and that, although it is an attempt at a cover-up, it is an admirably transparent one.’ It also revealed that the outlines of a ‘Watergate-like conspiracy are emerging in which a sitting Democrat president apparently used the apparatus of the state to spy on a Republican presidential candidate,’ but that Watergate differed in that President Nixon didn’t get involved in the plot against the Democratic National Committee until later as an accomplice after the fact and here allegedly ‘Obama likely masterminded, or oversaw someone like the diabolical Benghazi cover-up artist Ben Rhodes, masterminding the whole thing.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Obama’s Wiretaps? ‘Details of a Watergate-style conspiracy against Trump emerge’!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Matthew Vadum-On March 6, 2017:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266016/obamas-wiretaps-matthew-vadum

The following recent video revealed that conservative radio host and constitutional lawyer Mark Levin slammed the Obama administration for its politicized overreach and ‘police-state tactics,’ claiming Sunday morning evidence backing President Donald Trump's claims Obama spied on him using wiretaps ‘is overwhelming.’ It also revealed that Levin told ‘Fox & Friends Sunday,’  ‘This is not about President Trump's tweeting,’ ‘This is about the Obama administration spying and the question is not whether they spied we know they went to court twice. Who they did spy? Trump transition, Trump surrogates,’ along with ‘Two separate sources with links to the counter intelligence community have confirmed that the FBI sought and was granted a foreign intelligence surveillance act court order. This is spying.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Levin: Trump a 'Victim' of 'Police-State Tactics'!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Eric Mack-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.newsmax.com/US/levin-trump-police-state-tactics/2017/03/05/id/777013/

The following recent article revealed that given the developments of Saturday in which President Donald Trump accused the Obama regime of wiretapping him during the last month of the 2016 presidential campaign, 'former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino' tweeted on Saturday night that he will be releasing ‘more about the Obama administration this week.’ It also revealed that to date, Bongino has said very little about specifics of his position at the Secret Service, however, he has suggested that corruption in Washington, DC is worse than most Americans know and is author of the book ‘Life Inside the Bubble:  Why a Top-Ranked Secret Service Agent Walked Away from It All’ published in late 2013 and ‘The Fight: A Secret Service Agent’s Inside Account of Security Failings.’-You Decide:

NBC’s Chuck Todd Connects 'the Dots’ of ‘Growing Evidence’ of Collusion!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Nicholas Fondacaro-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/03/04/former-secret-service-agent-promises-release-information-obama-week/

The following recent article revealed that A few days ago, under the headline, ‘The Department of Homeland Security Takes on President Trump,’ Virgil took note of a leak from the department, observing that the Deep State is ‘Always doing something to undermine the Trump administration’ and that now, thanks to another leak from DHS, it’s time for an update: ‘On March 2, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow had a scoop paid for, of course, by American taxpayers and that ‘Media Matters for America, the lefty outfit founded by David Brock,’ wrote up the segment under the headline, ‘Rachel Maddow Exclusive Debunks ‘Extreme Vetting’ Propaganda Of Muslim Ban.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Virgil: The Deep State Strikes Again with Rachel Maddow Department of Homeland Security Leak!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Virgil-On March 3, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/03/virgil-the-deep-state-strikes-again-with-rachel-maddow-department-of-homeland-security-leak/

The following recent video that the ‘Russian connection accusation’ is allegedly the current weapon of the ‘left and the deep state,’ which they already used effectively against Michael Flynn, and now Attorney General Jeff Sessions has landed in their crosshairs, but what are the true motives behind this and in the video, Right Wing News looks at how the pervasive Russian connection accusations, which the ‘dishonest media is single-mindedly focusing on,’ is nothing but a ‘smokescreen to cover up the true threat that is allegedly the high-level pedophiles in Washington DC’ and that ‘President Trump, who has already cracked down on 1,500+ child sex offenders, intends to use Jeff Sessions as his own secret weapon against the DC pedophiles.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

AG Jeff Sessions to Pelosi: Expect Pedophile Investigations to Begin!-Posted on Freedom Outpost-By MIchael DePinto-On March 4, 2017:

http://freedomoutpost.com/ag-jeff-sessions-to-pelosi-expect-pedophile-investigations-to-begin/

The following recent article revealed that, according to Joseph DiGenova, a former US Attorney under Reagan, the ‘CIA is aware of the identities of the leakers and has turned over those names to Attorney General Sessions,’ himself a victim of the lying Obama holdovers in government and ‘we can only hope this means that these law breaking Leftist loyalists in the government will soon be outed and prosecuted for their crimes’-You Decide:

REPORT: CIA Has Turned Over The Names Of Those Classified As ‘Leakers’ to DOJ!-Posted on Right Wing News-By Sonja Bochow-On March 5, 2017:

http://rightwingnews.com/donald-trump/report-cia-has-turned-over-the-names-of-those-classified-as-leakers-to-doj/

The following recent article revealed that ‘Democratic leaders like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are responsible for the huge lies that Russia hacked into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and our election’ and that there is no evidence that anything happened between Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians and now, new evidence has allegedly recently been uncovered that revealed that the ‘Democrats secretly paid for the Russian hacking lies to be sold to the American people.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

PROOF Democrats Paid for RUSSIAN HACKING, Big Conspiracy to Impeach Trump!-Posted on Rea Party News-On March 3, 2017:

http://www.teaparty.org/222187-222187/

The following recent article revealed that, after Donald Trump blew the whistle on the eavesdropping of his 2016 campaign headquarters by Barack Obama’s administration, few in the media or elsewhere seem to be asking the obvious questions: ‘Was it legal?’ ‘Was it ethical – in the American way?’ but that one thing is for certain: ‘If the roles were reversed and the Trump administration bugged Democrats, you can imagine the media would take a much different view.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Was Obama's tap of Trump legal, American? ‘Exclusive: Joseph Farah reveals why scandal is 'bigger and worse than Watergate'!-Posted on WND.com-By Joseph Farah-On March 5, 2017:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/was-obamas-tap-of-trump-legal-american/#WBQx6bZcCOMVjsez.99

The following video from the recent past revealed that Attorney Larry Klayman (Freedom Watch) recently offered to represent President Trump and White Hose on ‘Obama’s illegal wiretapping’-You Decide:

Video: Klayman and Freedom Watch offer to represent President Trump and White House over illegal Obama wiretapping!-Posted on FoxNewsBusiness.com-On February 15, 2017:

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5324653657001/?#sp=show-clips

The following recent article revealed that the Obama administration’s former 'Attorney General Loretta Lynch' has made an impassioned video plea for ‘more marching, blood and death on the streets,’ which was on a video that was later posted on the FaceBook page of Senate Democrats as ‘words of inspiration.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Loretta Lynch: Need more marching, blood, death on streets: ‘Senate Dems post her impassioned plea on Facebook page as 'words of inspiration'!-Posted on WND.com-On March 4, 2017:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/#cUDguPjRaKW65c2K.99

The following recent article revealed that, as reported by The Daily Caller, ‘the Obama administration helped set up the first meeting Jeff Sessions had with the Russian ambassador in 2016’ and that Foundation scholar Hans von Spakovsky wrote at FoxNews.com that the event at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland that his employer hosted was attended by Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, along with stating that that the event was a conference titled ‘Global Partners in Diplomacy,’ where Sessions was the keynote speaker. It also revealed that it was ‘sponsored by the State Department, the Heritage Foundation and other organizations’ and that Spakovsky stated, ‘The conference was an educational program for ambassadors invited by the Obama State Department to observe the convention. The Obama State Department handled all of the coordination with ambassadors and their staff, of which there were about 100 at the conference.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

It Turns Out Obama White House Had a Direct Role in Sessions Meeting with Russian Ambassador!-Posted on Independent Journal Review-By Kyle Becker-On March 3, 2017:

http://ijr.com/2017/03/816469-it-turns-out-obama-white-house-had-a-direct-role-in-sessions-meeting-with-russian-ambassador/

The following article front the recent past revealed that Breitbart’s editor at large and the author of  ‘Clinton Cash,’ Peter Schweizer said that there needs to be a federal investigation into the ‘Russian uranium deal that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved after the Clinton Foundation received $145 million from the shareholders of Uranium One.’ Totally Agree?-You Decide:

Video: Schweizer: American Soil Is Owned by Putin’s Government Because of Hillary’s Uranium Deal!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Pam Key-On June 29, 2016:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/06/29/schweizer-american-soil-is-owned-by-putins-government-because-of-hillarys-uranium-deal/

The following recent video revealed that nn Friday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s ‘All In,’ Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) stated that she believes ‘there was a connection between Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians’ and ‘I think there is a trail, and I think that the Obama administration has done everything that it can possibly do to make sure that enough people have seen some of the meetings and some of the connections, so that they have something to go on when the investigations are really underway.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Video: Dem Rep Waters: Obama Admin ‘Has Done Everything’ It Can To ‘Make Sure’ People See Trump-Russia Connections!-Posted on Breibart.com-By Ian Hanchett-On March 3, 2017:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/03/03/dem-rep-waters-obama-admin-has-done-everything-it-can-to-make-sure-people-see-trump-russia-connections/

The following recent thought-provoking video revealed a former ‘NSA operative,’ who recently revealed details about everything from the ‘Clinton scandal, to #PizzaGate, to the silent coup attempting to remove President Trump’ from office right now-You Decide:

Video: Former NSA Operative Expounds on Clinton Scandal, Pizzagate, Coup to Overthrow Trump and More!-Posted on Freedom Outpost-By MIchael DePinto-On March 3, 2017:

http://freedomoutpost.com/former-nsa-operative-expounds-on-clinton-scandal-pizzagate-coup-to-overthrow-trump-and-more-video/

The following recent article revealed that the ‘US economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission and that the Commission had been created in 1973 as an ‘informal discussion group’ by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Brzezinski,’ who would become Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor and that shortly after Carter won the presidential election, his aide, 'Hamilton Jordan,' said that, if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, ‘We have lost. And I will quit.’  It also revealed that what was allegedly lost is that ‘both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.’  Additionally, it revealed that ‘Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser,’ as Jordan feared, but he didn’t quit and became Carter’s chief of staff and then flash forward again, to the ‘Obama administration and that allegedly in the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski’ and that four years before birthing the Commission with his boss of bosses, ‘David Rockefeller,’ Brzezinski wrote: ‘The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.’ Surprised?-You Decide:

Globalists Interviewed: They Admitted They Controlled The Government!-Posted on Activist Post-By Jon Rappoport-On March 2, 2017:

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/03/globalists-interviewed-admitted-controlled-government.html

Please Read Part 23:

The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 23)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 8, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-most-dangerous-and-treacherous-times-in-u-s-history-part-23

I believe that the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:

Nazi Collaborator Soros Continues Multi-pronged War on Trump, Calls Him “Would-be Dictator”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nazi-collaborator-soros-...

Obama: Submit to Globalism or Face War, Death, Destruction!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 17, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/obama-submit-to-globalism-...

The Left's Coming Counter-Attack!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 8, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-left-s-coming-counte...

CIA Assessment Concludes Putin Was Trying to Help Trump Win White House!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 10, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/cia-assessment-concludes...

Russian Election Intervention Is Nothing New: ‘The Kremlin’s history of backing the losers’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 14, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/russian-election-interve...

Not Since JFK, Has a President Spit Into the Face of the Globalists, Until Now!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 21, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/not-since-jfk-has-a-pres...

Trump Will Declare the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 16, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/trump-will-declare-the-m...

Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/saudi-arabia-implicated-...

New Report Exposes Rockefeller Dynasty's Role in 'Climate Scam'!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/new-report-exposes-rocke...

Why Democrats Don’t Want To Make America Great Again!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/why-democrats-don-t-want...

Retired Head of the FBI Tells All about Illuminati, Satanism, Pedophile Rings in U.S. Government!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 23, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/retired-head-of-the-fbi-...

Attention Obama: Ft. Leavenworth is Calling You For Treason!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 10, 2017:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/attention-obama-ft-leave...

Vote Fraud – What They Aren’t Telling You!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 7, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPos...

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 3)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 7, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Faith of Our Forefathers!-Posted on WordPress.com-On May 9, 2010:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/faith-of-our-forefathers/

Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 4)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 22, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/brainwashing-in-america-...

Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 30, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-sen...

Response from and to NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (Re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 7, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/response-from-and-to-nm-...

Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 8, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-sen...

Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-rep...

Letter to our NM Governor Martinez (re: The Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 8, 2015:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-governo...

The MSM conglomerates are the most prolific and insidious "fake news" propagators in the marketplace of ideas!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-msm-conglomerates-ar...

  Recommended by MAXINE WATERS

: ] Obama’s Left A “very, very powerful” database in place…”Will have information about EVERYTHING…on EVERY INDIVIDUAL in ways that it’s never been done before” [VIDEO

By 100% FED Up - Mar 6, 2017 5.
shares Share Tweet Plus Congresswoman Maxine Waters released a bombshell that should frighten every American during an interview with Roland Martin of Washington Watch that focused on the start of Obama’s second term. At around the 4:00 mark in the video, Maxine points out that Obama will become more aggressive in his second term. Waters suggests Obama’s ability to push immigration and some of the other radical issues on his agenda during first term were thwarted by the opposition, or more specifically by the “Right” and by the “Tea Party”. Martin then tells Waters that Obama better get busy and get done what needs to be done during his second term. Roland tells Waters,“The inauguration represented the beginning of the second term, but it also represented the countdown of the end of his presidency. And the reality is, uh, like anything else, you better get what you can while he’s there, because look…come 2016, that’s it.” Waters responds, “Well you know, I don’t know. And I think some people are missing something here. The President has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful.” Martin asks, “In terms of the ‘Organizing for America’ that he’s now shifting to become a 501C4 ?” Waters responds, “That’s right. That’s right. And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.” Here is the shortened clip: Here is the full interview. The bombshell revelation by Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) starts at around the 4:00 mark:

To see videos go to http://100percentfedup.com/maxine-waters-obamas-left-powerful-database-placewill-information-ev

I performed my original song, "We Are Americans," at the Orlando March 4 Trump rally.  It felt like a family reunion, seeing patriots from the early days of the Tea Party movement – lots of hugs.  The mood of the rally was electric.  Everyone was happy, excited, and fired up about President Trump.

To the fake news media and Obama, who think their orchestrated lying campaign to destroy Trump is working, I say, "Forget about it!  It ain't workin'!"

Trump-mania is alive and well, stronger than ever!

Vendors were selling Trump caps, t-shirts, and everything in between, including Trump welcome mats.  One elderly patriot adorned head to toe in red, white, and blue Trump paraphernalia told me she feared putting a Trump welcome mat outside her front door.  She said it is unfair that we cannot freely support our president without fear of attacks.

The emcee instructed all us speakers to stay close to the stage.  However, I knew there were a few speakers ahead of me on the program, so I wandered away into the crowd to chat with people.

A white gentleman shared with me his frustration trying to legally bring his foreign wife to the United States.  He said after battling incompetence, submitting a mountain of documents, and spending $18,000 thus far, his wife still has not been granted entry into the U.S.  We talked about the unfairness.  He is respecting and adhering to our immigration laws.  And yet Obama opened the floodgates to illegals, totally unvetted, gifting them government freebies unavailable to Americans.  I told the brother to hang in there.  Trump is cutting bureaucracy.

I met a white woman who is chair of a Republican Club.  She said they have been reaching out to blacks in a sincere attempt to add more diversity to their club.  She asked my advice.  I chuckled and said, "Good luck with that!"  I have been trying to get blacks to break their mindless loyalty to the Democrats for over a decade.  Still, I told the patriot sister to keep trying.  With God's help, suddenly mindsets can change.

I asked a young white kid around 14 years old about the unique flag he was waving: blue with a crescent moon and the word "liberty."  The kid was an encyclopedia regarding American flags, giving me the full history.  Blown away, I said, "You are way too smart for public school.  You have got to be homeschooled."  He replied, "Yes, sir."  I knew it.  In my years of touring the country on 14 Tea Party national bus tours, homeschooled kids were strikingly different: calmer, smarter, behaved, and well educated.  Leftists are at war with parents, trying to outlaw homeschooling.

Everyone was buzzing about Trump tweeting about Obama bugging Trump Tower before the election.  Enraged fake news, Democrats, and other leftists bash Trump for tweeting, declaring it un-presidential.  Clearly, Trump supporters, over 60 million Americans, love it.  They love Trump speaking directly to them, bypassing leftist operatives disguised as mainstream media.

An Asian female speaker addressing the crowd said it took her 35 years to become a legal U.S. citizen with the right to vote.  She expressed how proud she was to be an American.  The audience went nuts.  They loved her.

Representatives from Hispanics, women, and blacks for Trump spoke from the stage.  They were warmly and enthusiastically embraced by the crowd.  We were family, united in our love for our country, excited about President Trump and his agenda: putting America first and making her great again.  Such was the theme of the day.

I chatted with blacks at the rally to support Trump.  Interestingly, they were entrepreneurs.  It is funny how when you're a businessperson trying to achieve your American Dream, you are well aware of the roadblocks placed in your path by high taxes and the government's tyrannical, absurd regulations.

The biggest thing I noticed at the Orlando rally for Trump was the obvious political growth and political sophistication of the participants.  Back in the early days of the Tea Party movement, we were naive patriots.  We thought we were fighting only the socialist policies of a left-leaning president and the Democrats.

Today, we know our enemies: radical leftist Obama and his army of thugs; the fake news media; the corrupt Washington, D.C. political establishment (Republicans and Democrats); and NeverTrumps – united in their mission to destroy Trump's presidency.

We the People are politically well educated and well organized.  We are spiritually, emotionally, and intellectually locked and loaded, really for battle – really to support and defend our new president.

Please continue moving forward, Mr. President.  We the People have your back!

Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Lloyd Marcus.com
mr_lloydmarcus@hotmail.com