All Posts (29116)

Sort by
Share

image: http://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/marco-rubio2-150x150.jpg

marco rubio. . .Friday’s news turns up the dial on his effort and tells us a few things about the race in general, and Rubio’s 2016 perceptions in particular.

First, Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney aren’t clearing the field. Bush has moved aggressively, announcing an exploratory committee and forming super PACs, while Romney’s evinced surprising interest in a race. That hasn’t scared off other candidates who might compete with them for the establishment and business wings of the GOP, however. Rubio’s moving. Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin has scheduled trips to the early-voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire.


Second, Rubio’s looking to President Obama for inspiration. Not in any ideological or policy sense, but in terms of baseline experience. Obama won the White House as a first-term Senate backbencher. If he could do it, why can’t Rubio? Many political strategists think voters might be looking for a governor with executive experience as their presidential choice in 2016, but political strategists say lots of stuff. Some of it is wrong.

Finally, the real divisions in the Republican primary field this time might be generational. Rubio isn’t a party outsider. He’s not a tea party favorite. He doesn’t have a support base among evangelicals, or Wall Street’s nod. But he hasn’t run for president twice before, like Mitt Romney. Or even once before, like Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. None of his relatives have been president, like Jeb Bush’s brother and Dad.

But if it turns out GOP primary voters are tired of the same-old, then Rubio can present himself as a fresh hat in the ring. (Read more about Rubio jumping in HERE)



Read more: http://joemiller.us/2015/01/three-pro-amnesty-establishment-field-grows-rubio-jumping/#ixzz3Pkh6Q6lx

Read more at http://joemiller.us/2015/01/three-pro-amnesty-establishment-field-grows-rubio-jumping/#QzlZSAAHd5ExMR9T.99

Read more…
Share

image: http://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/9750-150x150.jpg

100 dollarsThey claim they are IRS agents threatening you with arrest or court action if you don’t send them money immediately for back taxes. It’s a phone scam that’s been sweeping the nation. But when the scammers targeted Rachel Fitzsimmons of Denver, she fought back.

“I wanted to give them a taste of their own medicine,” said Fitzsimmons, a sales and marketingprofessional.


When the scammers left her voicemail messages on consecutive days this month, telling her they were filing a lawsuit against her for failing to pay her taxes, Fitzsimmons said, “I was really scared. I never had someone say they were filing a lawsuit against me, especially the IRS.”

But after a little research, Fitzsimmons realized it was nothing more than a scam which the U.S. government says has swindled nearly 3,000 people out of $14 million so far. The scammers typically alter their caller ID number to make it appear they are calling from an IRS office and pose as IRS agents offering up badge numbers and identification numbers.

So Fitzsimmons called back and recorded the entire conversation then put it on YouTube, hoping it would help others avoid falling for the scam. (Read more about the woman who fought back against IRS scammers HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.



Read more: http://joemiller.us/2015/01/woman-gives-irs-scammers-taste-medicine-video/#ixzz3PkeuMXeE

Read more at http://joemiller.us/2015/01/woman-gives-irs-scammers-taste-medicine-video/#lUk6AdE1jMs3VjQb.99

Read more…

ISN'T IT INTERESTING THAT OBAMA LET ALL THESE ILLEGALS IN AND NOW WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ALL THESE DISEASES WE HAD ELIMINATED!
NOW OUR HEALTH I AT RISK BECAUSE OF OBAMA, HIS ADMIRATION, THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS NOT ENFORCING THE LAW OR SECURING OUR BORDERS!
PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY

Share1

By Christie Ileto. A health warning. The extremely contagious measles virus is back. An outbreak that started at Disneyland is starting to sweep the country.

Christie Ileto has the push for children to get vaccinated.

Measles was thought to have been eliminated in the U.S. 15 years ago. Now its back, targeting those who haven’t been immunized.

The outbreak that started in California’s Disneyland is expanding. At least 75 cases of measles span six states.


“It’s scary to think the happiest place on Earth is infected with measles,” one Disney employee said. (Read more about the measles outbreak in California HERE)

____________________________________________

Arizona Medical Director on Measles: “One of the Most Contagious Diseases Known to Man”

By Connie Sexton. A recent but rare case of the measles in Maricopa County has health officials reminding the public of the disease’s potential harm and the benefits of being vaccinated.

“It’s one of the most contagious diseases known to man,” said Dr. Rebecca Sunenshine, the county’s medical director for disease control. Although measles are extremely rare, one in a thousand cases leads to inflammation around the brain, deafness and cognitive impairment, and one to two cases in a thousand are fatal, she said. “The measles vaccine is one of the best we have. No vaccine is perfect, but this is almost 100 percent perfect.”

County officials hope those who have never been vaccinated will do so now, in light of the news Thursday that a woman in her 50s living in the county tested positive for measles. Officials believe it’s likely the woman contracted the disease Dec. 15-20 while visiting Disneyland, which has been linked to an outbreak in California, Sunenshine said. (Read more from this story HERE)



Read more: http://joemiller.us/2015/01/disneyland-measles-outbreak-starting-sweep-country/#ixzz3Pka2oeMy

Read more at http://joemiller.us/2015/01/disneyland-measles-outbreak-starting-sweep-country/#ZvgU1R2Q5FGHBmd0.99

Read more…
Share

image: http://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Die-150x150.jpg

DieTwo Democratic state senators in California proposed a “right-to-die” bill to the state legislature on Wednesday, alongside the family of the young woman who brought the issue to light.

Late last year, Californian Brittany Maynard made waves on national news and social media as a result of her desire to end her life on her own terms, as opposed to her alternative of living out a painful terminal illness.


Maynard had tried to end her life at what she felt was an appropriate moment, as she was stricken with an aggressive and debilitating brain tumor.

When the state of California refused to help her carry out her decision, she and her husband ended up moving to Oregon, where assisted suicide isn’t prohibited by law.

She passed away on November 1, 2014. (Read more about the proposed law that will allow assisted suicide HERE)



Read more: http://joemiller.us/2015/01/proposed-law-allow-assisted-suicide-gaining-support/#ixzz3PkYtAXt7

Read more at http://joemiller.us/2015/01/proposed-law-allow-assisted-suicide-gaining-support/#Z8DlEGoMHHo7VmHw.99

Read more…

GOP RIP: The Formerly Pro-Life Party

Share

image: http://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/republican-represenatives-150x150.jpg

republican represenativesLast October, Reince Priebus gave a speech with a conspicuous omission. Just 33 days before the midterm elections, the Republican National Committee Chairman headed to George Washington University to give a speech on the issues that bring Republicans together. Priebus ticked off a lengthy list of policy proposals that all the party’s candidates could highlight, noting that they could work for anyone, “whether you’re running for governor in New England or Congress in the South or statehouse in the West.”

The speech was highly detailed. The chairman praised specific pieces of legislation and touted the construction of the Keystone Pipeline and the passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment as issues that could unite GOP politicians. On these points and many others, Priebus was clear as glass. But on one enormous issue, the chairman was oddly opaque.


“As Republicans we’re pro-family; and we’re also pro-life,” he said, according to the transcript of his prepared remarks. “So when a woman faces an unplanned pregnancy, society should offer our support and compassion. She should know that adoption is possible. Our laws should be improved to make adoption an easier path for families who want to open their homes to children.”

And that was it. The GOP is pro-life, the chairman said, so the GOP supports making adoption easier. Priebus didn’t add anything beyond that. He couldn’t have, given the reference to the party’s New England gubernatorial candidates, almost all of whom are pro-choice. As the last 24 hours have shown, anti-abortion votes are a dicey prospect for some Hill Republicans. And the Keystone Pipeline just might have broader support among Washington Republicans than the pro-life movement. (Read more about the formerly pro-life party HERE)



Read more: http://joemiller.us/2015/01/gop-rip-formerly-pro-life-party/#ixzz3PkWCjd00

Read more at http://joemiller.us/2015/01/gop-rip-formerly-pro-life-party/#mFcF2Ypria7UzXDr.99

Read more…

Saturday Morning - The Front Page Cover

The Front Page Cover
"I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened"
 
Featuring:
nObama To Media:
Don’t Report Against Muslim Jihadis
Gina Miller
 
"Rise up together as one voice"
"Be careful where you stand"
~~~lll~~~
 
 

 Trolling where the fish are -   The day after his State of the Union address President nObama travels to a bright red state to plug the themes laid out in his speech. It’s a longstanding trend. Daily Caller: “With his scheduled trip to Idaho on Wednesday, President nObama will have visited 47 U.S. states. Along with the Gem State, the remaining three, South Dakota, Utah and South Carolina, have something in common: they voted for Republicans by significant margins in 2008 and 2012…Seventeen of the 20 states visited most often by nObama during his presidency all supported him in the 2012 election, according to an analysis conducted by NPR in June. Likewise, out of nObama’s 20 least-visited states, 17 voted for [Mitt Romney] in 2012.” 
-Fox News 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQeFOR3xLOHyOJU5gUcwePdZn37ZUhRbPr05ACWmDzTBPLezX5R
 HOUSE TO MOVE ON LATE TERM ABORTION BAN 
U.S. News: “Abortion foes, encouraged by GOP control of the House and now also the Senate, are rallying behind a bill they believe will be the first step in a new campaign against the procedure. Congressional Republicans are fast-tracking legislation that would prohibit abortion 20 weeks after fertilization, with the House likely to bring the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act up for a vote on Jan. 22 to coincide with the anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision….‘It is a starting point. There is a direct route to very quickly -- it involves a presidential election -- to pass this legislation,’ Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion advocacy group Susan B. Anthony List, said at a National Press Club event Thursday. “When that happens, it will be the first time in 40 years that we have drawn a line and said, “After this point, no more.” A majority of Americans -- 60 percent in a November Quinnipiac University poll -- support banning abortion after 20 weeks. With President Barack nObama signaling his opposition, proponents compare the proposal’s path to that of the partial-birth abortion ban, which was signed into law by President George W. Bush after President Bill Clinton vetoed it twice before. They hope to make it an issue in the 2016 presidential campaign.   -Fox News 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQeFOR3xLOHyOJU5gUcwePdZn37ZUhRbPr05ACWmDzTBPLezX5R
 Keystone votes continue -   National Journal: “The Senate will enter into its second week of debate on the Keystone XL pipeline having taken exactly one vote on the issue. That vote was last Monday and, ironically, it was supposed to allow members to get to the business of amending and voting on the bill.….”   -Fox News 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQeFOR3xLOHyOJU5gUcwePdZn37ZUhRbPr05ACWmDzTBPLezX5R
 JUST IMAGINE THE SIZE OF THE BRISKET! 
Daniel
LaPoint had never run into anything quite like this in his years as a contractor. The Lansing [Mich.] State Journal explains: as LaPoint was excavating his neighbor’s yard to construct a pond, he uncovered a massive rib bone in a pile of dirt. The four-foot long piece of bone was gray with age, but this wasn’t a dinosaur, rather part of a mastodon skeleton. Together with his neighbor Eric Witzke, the pair continued digging discovering additional rib bones, leg, shoulder and hip bones as well as vertebrae and part of a tusk. The pair brought in paleontologist Daniel Fisher of the University of Michigan to examine their discovery, “Preliminary examination indicates that the animal may have been butchered by humans,” he said. Once donated to the museum a more exact age can be determined, but Fisher’s preliminary assessment puts the bones between 10,000 and 14,000 years old. The experience was the most fun LaPoint has had at work in a long time, “Digging and finding the bones for the first time, it's not something that can be replicated. It really is a once-in-a-lifetime thing.”   -Fox News 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQeFOR3xLOHyOJU5gUcwePdZn37ZUhRbPr05ACWmDzTBPLezX5R
 nOBAMA’S SPEECH A TIME MACHINE FOR LIBERAL DREAMS 
Not only will this package not pass a Republican Congress, it wouldn’t have passed a Democratic Congress. Some of the items actually already got rejected by Democrats and others he would never even have proposed for fear of forcing a difficult vote for Democrats. A tax on college savings funds? An increase in the death tax? Yikes! The headlines are delicious, but the proposals are all empty calories. Even after the president gives Republicans a black eye for blocking his Robin Hood act, there’s still not political nutrition here. As we have seen in other States of the Union, the enthusiasm of January produces a bitter autumn harvest when promised results do not materialize. But because Republicans will blockade the measures, the president feels at liberty to offer pie in the sky since no vulnerable Democrat will ever be forced to vote on the issue. Remember, these are not policies that have been broadly popular in his party.  -Fox News 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQeFOR3xLOHyOJU5gUcwePdZn37ZUhRbPr05ACWmDzTBPLezX5R
 
 
 
1.
 D.C. lawmakers float bill to allow voting without U.S. citizenship  
(Andrea Noble) - A bill introduced by D.C. lawmakers would grant some immigrants lacking U.S. citizenship the ability to vote in municipal elections...The Local Resident Voting Rights Act of 2015 would allow D.C. residents who are not U.S. citizens but meet the federal definition of having permanent residency status to cast ballots in local elections, including races for mayor and the D.C. Council as well as initiatives and charter referendums. D.C. Council member David Grosso, at-large independent, introduced the legislation Tuesday. In a statement announcing the introduction of the bill, Mr. Grosso cited statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau that indicate the District is home to nearly 54,000 foreign-born residents who are not naturalized U.S. citizens.       http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/20/dc-lawmakers-float-bill-voting-without-citizenship/
2.
 NY Times Boldly Lies About nObama’s Illegal Amnesty  
(Gina Miller) - OnTuesday I took a look at the New York Times website and made the mistake of reading a short piece from the opinion page. I say "mistake," because I needlessly subjected myself to a piece of lying propaganda that would make any communist regime proud...Billed as having been written by the "Editorial Board," the column, "Nativist Lawsuit on the Texas Border," is one of the most blatant examples of misinformation put out by an ostensibly "legitimate" news source I've ever seen. The title of the piece alone is enough to induce vomiting, as if wanting to protect our borders, national sovereignty and rule of law is a bad, "nativist" thing, but it gets worse. Take the opening paragraph (please!): The first thing to know about the lawsuit brought by two dozen states to block President nObama's executive actions on immigration is that it is a meritless screed wrapped in flimsy legal cloth and deposited on the doorstep of a federal district judge in Brownsville, Tex.       http://peacemoonbeam.typepad.com/gina_miller/
3.
 Gitmo releases by nObama based on lies and deception  
(Jim Kouri) - Despite the death and destruction this week and last week caused by Islamic terrorists from groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and Nigeria's ruthless and bloodthirsty Boko Haram...President Barack nObama continues to release captured terrorists -- including five Yemenis Wednesday night -- from the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay (Gitmo) which outraged lawmakers and citizens alike on Thursday morning, according to news stories. The White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, went so far as repeating the canard that Gitmo is a recruiting tool terrorists. In fact, he didn't say "it's believed" or "it's possible," he said that "we know" that Gitmo is being used to inflame the radical Muslim world. But many observers believe the arguments for closing the terrorist detention center are filled with lies and half-truths from an administration that's adept at covering up and escaping culpability.       http://www.examiner.com/article/gitmo-releases-by-obama-based-on-lies-and-deception-say-critics
4
 In Failing to Confront Islamism, the Left Betrays Itself  
(Tarek Fatah) - As the world struggles to understand and cope with the rise of pan-Islamism and international jihadi terrorism within Western countries, one thing is becoming increasingly clear...the success of the Islamists is partly due to what I believe is a grand betrayal of civil society by the political left in Western democracies. Instead of leading the fight against the fanatics' religious obscurantism, they have embraced it. The refusal of social democrats, liberals and leftists to stand up to Islamofascism in the democracies of Europe, North America, India and South Africa, has also had an unintended consequence. It has paved the way for an anti-immigrant backlash against all non-whites, in which the left are portrayed as apologists for religious fanaticism. An unnecessary rise of xenophobia that could have been avoided, had the left led the struggle against Islamofascism, is now entrenched.       http://www.meforum.org/4989/left-fails-confront-Islamism
5.
 The Two Faces of Renee “Abortion” Ellmers House Fail Pro-Lifers  
(Erick Erickson) - House Republicans were set to re-pass the 2013 Pain-Capable Unborn Children Protection Act today. The legislation would prohibit 99% of abortions after 20 weeks, the point at which there is no doubt children can feel pain...The measure is identical to the legislation passed in 2013. But this time, with a chance of passing both the House and Senate, Congresswoman Renee Ellmers (R-NC) worked tireless to scuttle the legislation then had the temerity to claim she actually would vote for if only it would come to the floor. Ellmers, according to multiple sources, persuaded a number of women in the House Republican Conference to walk away from the bill to ensure it could not pass. Then she declared she’d vote for it once she was sure it could not pass. It was a two-faced ploy that worked.       http://www.redstate.com/2015/01/22/the-two-faces-of-renee-ellmers-as-house-republicans-fail-pro-lifers/
6.
 U.N. Gun Treaty: It’s “Already” Being “Implemented” by nObama  
(Sara Noble) - The 50th country signed on to the UN Small Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) at the end of last September, putting it into effect. Mr. nObama has signed on to it and even helped plan the way it’s structured with the UN so he can implement it without Senate ratification...The U.N. Programme of of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects.” will now begin to meet on implementation. Mr. nObama is reportedly beginning to implement the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) without ratification by the Senate. nObama’s Assistant Secretary of State Tom Countryman told a group of NGOs and UN officials recently that the White House is “already implementing the treaty” without Senate ratification.       http://www.independentsentinel.com/dangerous-u-n-gun-treaty-already-being-implemented-by-barack-obama/
7.
 Flourishing ISIS Training Camps for Little Children  
(Sara Noble) - ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham) has an endless supply of militant terrorists as they train young boys to become ISIS terrorists...The children will be taught to hate instead of love, to kill instead of to protect, to become consumed with anger instead of peace, to die instead of live. Future generations in the Middle East will be ruined. Remember al Qaeda is hardly better. ISIS is an offshoot in competition with ISIS. People tend to minimize al Qaeda because ISIS is aggressively stealing lands and “appear” to be more violent which isn’t the case. Al Qaeda is now comprised of many groups and they’ve spread far and wide. Both plan to establish a global caliphate ruled under the harshest of laws – Sharia.       http://www.independentsentinel.com/frightening-flourishing-isis-terrorist-training-camps-for-little-children/
8.
 WorldNetDaily Examines Benghazi Through Citizens’ Commission  
(aim.org) - Jerome Corsi, Senior Staff Reporter for WorldNetDaily, is the first journalist to attempt to understand the 2012 Benghazi, Libya attacks through the eyes of the members of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi (CCB)...These members bring a vast array of knowledge, experience and contacts to the Commission. Corsi is writing a series of articles about the events surrounding the terrorist attacks on the U.S. Special Mission Compound and nearby CIA Annex on September 11 and 12, 2012, that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens. Accuracy in Media established the CCB in 2013. “[Paul] Vallely explained that the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi was formed ‘after we saw all the stumbling and deception that was going on’ with the initial round of Benghazi hearings held by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee in January 2013,” writes Corsi.       http://www.aim.org/on-target-blog/worldnetdaily-examines-benghazi-through-citizens-commission/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email012215&utm_medium=email
9.
 Senate Climate Alarmists Get Punked by GOP  
(Alex Newman) - As if to prove that global-warming alarmism is in fact a political movement rather than a scientific one, the U.S. Senate, composed primarily of carbon dioxide-spewing attorneys...voted this week to declare that the climate is changing as it always has, and that (natural) climate change is “not a hoax.” Warming theorists celebrated the news, as if a majority vote by lobbyist-controlled politicians — who remain less popular than cockroaches in most polls — constituted evidence of Truth. In the end, though, despite their cheering, many climate alarmists apparently either did not understand the measure or were deliberately trying to mislead the public about it. The Senate never agreed with their increasingly discredited catastrophic man-made global-warming theory. Instead, lawmakers simply stated the obvious: the climate changes, just as it has since Earth’s creation and just as it will likely continue to change as long the planet exists. http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/19956-senate-climate-alarmists-defeated-as-gop-foils-hoax-scheme?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_campaign=192d32232d-The_Editors_Top_Picks_3_12_143_12_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8ca494f2d2-192d32232d-289778381
10.
 Republicans Won’t Stop Amnesty Or Defund nObamacare  
(Rick Wells ) - Mark Levin has ideas on what the Republicans in Congress should be doing for the American people. He remarks that it is a difficult recommendation to make, since they have already handicapped themselves by surrendering their power of the purse...and other parts of article one of the U.S. Constitution. He says they should “take it back.” Congress should look at these bureaucracies and “take their law-making authority back.” He also recommends that they pass a federal statute that slashes spending across the board by five percent. He says it doesn’t matter if nObama signs it or not and that Republicans “need to make the case to the American people that they are going to save the Republic, they’re going to protect the Constitution, they’re going to do something about this debt which is absolute insanity.” Levin suggests, “When it comes to nobamacare, why don’t they try repealing it first and we the people, the private sector, the private industry, we’ll replace it. How about that as an idea, first of all?” He says in view of the fact that the Republicans already funded obamacare until September, they need to start making their case now to the American people that it is ending in October, they are not going to fund it and let the chips fall where they may.       http://gopthedailydose.com/2015/01/22/mark-levin-were-screwed-these-republicans-wont-stop-amnesty-or-defund-obamacare/
nObama To Media:
Don’t Report Against Muslim Jihadis
Gina Miller

     (barbwire.com) - There is truly no end to the string of outrages perpetrated on our nation by Barack nObama (or whatever his name is). The laundry list seems interminable, and today we can honestly regard anyone—anyone— who supports this man and his administration as being dangerously deceived. There is simply no defense of this lawless “president,” who is a clear and present danger to our freedoms, our economy, our healthcare system, our property rights, the freedom of the Internet, our military and national defense—every aspect of our constitutional Republic.

     Many of us have long observed that nObama has traitorously aided and abetted our Muslim enemies, giving them weapons, billions of taxpayer dollars and their formerly-imprisoned “soldiers of Allah,” to continue the spread of their cancerous caliphate across the Middle East and elsewhere. If we didn’t know any better, we would believe his sympathies lie on the side of the barbaric Islamists. In truth, we don’t know any better. The only rational conclusion is that this man is an enemy of the United States.

     Therefore, it was no surprise, but no less outrageous, when the Daily Caller reported on Tuesday that the White House Minister of Press Propaganda, Josh Earnest, reported that nObama wants to squash freedom of the press. Well, that’s not exactly how he put it. From the Daily Caller piece:

President Barack nObama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defense forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.

“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.

     Isn’t this always the case? Our freedoms are so often stolen by facetious claims of “safety.” It’s why we stupidly stand without shoes in airport “security” lines, and like sheep, allow junior power-trippers of the TSA to grope our bodies before boarding a plane. “Safety.”

     So, nObama, who believes the Muslim “call to prayer” is one of the “prettiest sounds on Earth,” wants to protect from offense the delicate sensibilities of his jihadi brethren by preventing the media from reporting the truth about Muslim jihad. Excuse me, but that’s not the American way, Mr. Quisling! Aside from the fact that one of our most sacred, God-given freedoms is freedom of speech, which includes freedom of the press, Americans do not bow to 7th century throwback Muslim bullies. But I don’t believe we are being ruled by an American—at least not in the theoretical sense of the word. Whatever nObama is, regardless of where this mystery man was or wasn’t born, he is not behaving like an American, much less an American President. He is behaving as a despotic, anti-American enemy within our nation.

     As with everything this man and his fellow travelers do, the ostensible reason is not the reason. Spokesmouth Earnest claims nObama’s desire to squelch media expression is for the “safety” of our military troops. That’s a lie. Since when does nObama give a rip about the military, much less its safety? Besides the fact that, if left to its own power, free from insane bureaucratic rules of engagement, the military can take care of itself, the past has shown us that caving to bully Muslims will never appease them. It only makes us appear weak and ripe for attacking. No. I’m certain that the real reason for this lunatic anti-American proclamation is that nObama agrees with one goal of the Islamists: to silence all criticism of Islam. He is just as offended by it as the most retrograde Muslim brute. After all, he claimed the future must not belong to those who “slander” the “prophet” of Islam, right?  And, in this case, “slander” means “tell the truth about.”

     I’m losing what little optimism I might have had about our chances of undoing nObama’s “fundamental transformation” of the United States. This man and his criminal cabal have their evil machine set on “full demolition,” and with a craven, corrupt Congress too scared of its own shadow to oppose him, and with a detestably compliant media—no longer a “free press,” by the way—from where can there possibly emerge a force to stop or reverse this dreadful course of tyranny on which we’re locked?

http://barbwire.com/2015/01/16/0700-obama-media-dont-report-muslim-jihadis/
Read more…

Friday Afternoon - The Front Page Cover

The Front Page Cover
"I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened"
 
Featuring:
Jews, get the blazes out of France . .. NOW
Caroline B. Glick
"Know who you are standing with"
"Show me your friends and I'll show you your future"
~~~lll~~~
 
 IS WALKER THE BRIDGE BUILDER? 
Dan Balz at WaPo looks at the candidate trying to bridge the gap between the warring wings of the GOP: “Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker doesn’t light up rooms when he enters. He is unassuming in that way, a proud cheesehead who wears a battery-powered electric jacket to keep warm at Packers and Badgers football games. He appears a Midwestern everyman, belied only by his burning ambition to be president…The Republican National Committee keeps a list of prospective candidates, names of those who have been mentioned as possibilities to run in 2016. It totals an astonishing 24 people. The eventual field almost certainly won’t be that big, but right now, at least among those with even an outside chance of being competitive, no one seems intimidated by the candidacy of anyone else. Candidates fill predictable lanes…
          “There are many questions about a Walker candidacy that go beyond whether he can break through in a field with bigger names and flashier personalities. Is he too much a stolid Midwesterner, too narrow in his Wisconsin grounding. Would he be able to marshal the necessary forces for a national campaign and to let go some of the strategic micromanagement of his own candidacy? Would he be able to withstand the rough-and-tumble ahead? Walker has focus and determination. His hope may be that he will be long underestimated, a candidate ready to surprise at the moments it counts most.”  -Fox News 
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJT2P3yeV8bMk5dvxUth1BWzs4ZSv9mkfWttCCY2pt-u3SjqB2rA
 
 RUBIO OUT FRONT ON CALL FOR IRAN CRACKDOWN 
The Hill: “Republican Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) on Sunday argued for additional sanctions on Iran amid a veto threat from President nObama. The Florida lawmaker said that the only reason Iran is at the negotiating table is because of existing sanctions. On Friday, the president said he would veto any plan produced by Congress to expand sanctions on Iran. He argued that piling on sanctions would derail the steady work done to craft an agreement to limit Iran's nuclear capability. But Rubio expressed doubts that any agreement will come out of the discussions. ‘These negotiations that are going on now are really not going to bear fruit,’ he said on CBS's ‘Face the Nation.’ He argued that the proposed sanctions could go into place if talks fail.”  
-Fox News 
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJT2P3yeV8bMk5dvxUth1BWzs4ZSv9mkfWttCCY2pt-u3SjqB2rA
 
 nOBAMA TAX HIKES DESIGNED TO TROLL GOP 
President nObama
is staying on offense with a campaign-speech-style State of Union message that has appeal to the liberal Democratic base. The proposals have even less chance in a Republican-controlled Senate than they did when Democrats let similar ideas languish, but the message matters. As conservative columnist John Podhoretz, observes: “Tuesday night’s State of the Union address could be the first one in history deliberately designed solely to generate a Pavlovian rage response in members of the opposing party….nObama and his team have clearly decided that one of the metrics by which they will measure their success is by just how wild he drives his Republican opposition in Washington and conservatives across the country.” 
-Fox News 
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJT2P3yeV8bMk5dvxUth1BWzs4ZSv9mkfWttCCY2pt-u3SjqB2rA
 
 What’s in the plan -   AP: “The centerpiece of the president’s tax proposal is an increase in the capital gains rate on couples making more than $500,000 per year to 28 percent…The top capital gains rate has already been raised from 15 percent to 23.8 percent during nObama’s presidency. nObama also wants to close what the administration is calling the ‘trust fund loophole,’ a change that would require estates to pay capital gains taxes on securities at the time they're inherited.…Raising the capital gains rate, ending the inheritance loophole and tacking a fee on financial firms would generate $320 billion in revenue over a decade, according to administration estimates. nObama wants to put the bulk of that money into a series of measures aimed at helping middle-class Americans. Among them:
* A credit of up to $500 for families in which both spouses work.
* Expanding the child care tax credit to up to $3,000 per child under age 5.
* Overhauling the education tax system by consolidating six provisions into two”
          [The latest WSJ/NBC News poll finds the American public to be less pessimistic. 38 percent of voters chose descriptions such as “recovering” or “hopeful” up slightly from a year ago…. 48% chose negative descriptions of the nation, such as “troubled’’ and “deteriorating.’’ Fewer people chose those terms than a year ago.]
          “And it is the simple proposition that, now that the economy is in a stronger place than it has been in a very long time, we need to double down on our efforts to deal with wage stagnation and declining economic mobility, and so the simple proposition that we should ask the wealthy to pay a little more and invest more in the middle class, give the middle class a raise.” – White House Adviser Dan Pfeiffer, CBS’s “Face the Nation”  -Fox News 
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJT2P3yeV8bMk5dvxUth1BWzs4ZSv9mkfWttCCY2pt-u3SjqB2rA
 SOTU soothsayers -   It’s State of the Union time and Power Play host Chris Stirewalt is joined by Democratic strategist Liz Chadderdon and Republican strategist Steve Snyder to discuss what we can expect from the president. nObama says he’s going on offense, rolling out a wish list that is highly partisan and unlikely to pass. And then there’s the legacy imperative. The president may be concerned about his place in the history books, but his party is worried the next election. WATCH HERE -Fox News 
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJT2P3yeV8bMk5dvxUth1BWzs4ZSv9mkfWttCCY2pt-u3SjqB2rA
 
 
 
1.
 Legendary A-10 'Warthog' sends ISIS fleeing faces Pentagon cuts  
(FoxNews.com) - With a roaring engine, 30-mm. cannon and nose painted like a toothsome, snarling beast, the A-10 Thunderbolt sends ISIS fighters scattering like cockroaches on the Iraqi desert plains...but the legendary fighter plane pilots call the "Warthog" may be fighting for its own life. The venerable plane, first built for destroying Soviet tanks, has been on the chopping block since the sequester of 2011 mandated steep cuts in the Pentagon budget. Although the planes haven't been built in more than 30 years, the Defense Department believes it can save maintenance costs by phasing them out. Air Force brass believes newer, faster aircraft like the F-16, F-15E, and, eventually, Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fighter can do a better job of the Warthog’s mission of providing close air support to soldiers on the ground. But supporters say Islamic State fighters are finding out the hard way what they have said all along.       http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/01/21/legendary-10-warthog-sends-isis-fleeing-even-as-it-faces-pentagon-cuts/?cmpid=NL_fntop
2.
 Norway Finally Had Enough Of Radical Muslims, Deport Them  
(americanoverlook.com) - Norway recently instated a program that seeks to deport radical Muslims in an attempt to lower crime rates throughout the country. Despite the fact that liberals are labeling this program as racist, the program has seen amazing success...According to crime data and records, violent crime in the country is down by approximately 30 percent since this program has gone into affect. However, liberals are still demanding the program be shut down because they believe it is racist and that it unfairly targets a religious group.        http://americanoverlook.com/norway-has-finally-had-enough-of-radical-muslims-so-they-deported-them-all-what-happened-next-wow/34220
3.
 Rubio Hints He Won’t Run In 2016  
(Neil Munro) - Sen. Marco Rubio today suggested that he will not run for the presidency in 2016... “I need to make a decision in due time if I want to mount a credible campaign for the presidency,” he told reporters attending a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. Staying in the GOP majority will give him the opportunity to get things done, he suggested.       http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/rubio-hints-he-wont-run-in-2016/?advD=1248%2C48782&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiJjNTliYzIxYy1kM2ZhLTQ5MWMtYjhmZC02M2M2MjhjYzNjZjMifQ%3D%3D#mnetint
4.
 Will the Natural Born Citizen Requirements for Pres Haunt GOP 
(Suzanne Hamner) - Most everyone is familiar with the saying, “two wrongs don’t make a right.” What this commonly refers to is that violating a law, ethic or moral, is justified as long as someone else does...For example, an employee embezzles from his employer because his employer is cheating on his taxes. Both are clearly wrong and in violation of the law; but one precedent of wrong-doing by one does not make it acceptable to engage in additional wrong-doing or the same wrong-doing by another. It becomes a fallacy that the actions cancel each other out. For the past six years, Barack nObama’s eligibility to hold the office of the president has been questioned on the “natural born citizen” requirement. And, many debate what constitutes a “natural born citizen.” While some may disagree, “natural born citizen” refers to a person, regardless of birth location, born to citizen parents in some sources; whereas, other sources follow natural law meaning the individual, regardless of birth location, follows the citizenship of the father to be classified as “natural born.” Either way, this brings into question the eligibility of nObama to even seek the office much less occupy the office of the presidency. It is known that nObama’s alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a US citizen; but, nObama’s Kenyan father, as listed on his “legal” birth certificate, has never been proven to be a US citizen through naturalization.       http://sonsoflibertymedia.com/2015/01/will-natural-born-citizen-requirements-president-haunt-gop-candidates-2016/
5.
 Proof Of Green Communist Agenda, From Jarrett And Jones  
(Rick Wells) - Valerie Jarrett was gushing in this event over the fact that the nObama regime was able to recruit the communist community organizer Van Jones into the administration...It was those same communist ties, along with comments related to the 911 truth movement which would eventually play a role in his later resignation. The position to which Jones was appointed was one which was created just for him in the czar mill that was the nObama regime in the early days, that of Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality. It’s a vague and long title for a position which, as he explains in the video, builds upon the Rosa Parks model, using the climate and global warming as a mechanism to achieve a political end.
6.
 New House Bill Removes 66 Miles Of Border Fence  
(Rick Wells) - What is being labeled by its RINO proponent, Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mike McCaul (R-TX), as a border bill, might lead one to believe it provides for increased enforcement. That’s where the trickery part comes into play...It actually calls for the removal of 66 miles of bothersome border fencing that gets in the way of those foreigners wishing to travel back and forth into our nation illegally at will. In exchange, 27 miles of fencing will be built in other areas. It’s a dismal drop in the bucket when compared to the 700 miles of similar, double layer fencing that was approved in 2006 and never built, in spite of full funding being appropriated by Congress at a time when Michael Chertoff headed the DHS. What seemed to be an inexplicable resistance to national security at the time is now been exposed as a component in the long term plan intended to create the North American Union.       http://www.rickwells.us/new-house-bill-removes-66-miles-border-fence-sellout-american-citizens-marches/
7.
 States continue war over nObamacare  
(Fred Schulte) - Oklahoma State Rep. Mike Ritze is a foot soldier—one of hundreds— in a passionate war over the Affordable Care Act that is reigniting as state legislatures convene across the country...The Republican lawmaker, a family doctor, has stood behind three anti-nObamacare bills supported by conservative groups in Oklahoma and other states. None has made it into law, but Ritze plans to pick up the fight in the 2015 legislative session that convenes in the Sooner state next month. “We need to do everything we can to try and reverse this,” said Ritze, who practices in Broken Arrow. “We can make it harder to enforce if the states get together…to attack it on all fronts.”       http://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/01/21/16633/states-continue-war-over-obamacare
8.
 Pupils at Christian school branded 'bigots' ordered it to CLOSE 
(Eleanor Harding and Mario Ledwith for the Daily Mail) - Pupils at a Christian school have been branded bigots after a young boy gave the wrong answer when asked what a Muslim was...Durham Free has been told to close after inspectors branded it an educational failure and said some children displayed ‘discriminatory views’ toward people of other faiths. The boy’s answer to the Muslim question apparently included a reference to terrorism. But teachers said the verdict was grossly unfair and based on a throwaway and ignorant comment made by a single pupil. They said the school’s Christian ethos made it an easy target for officials who wanted to show they were promoting the Government’s diversity agenda. Why don't the muslim grow some skin. The Christians are always being discriminated against.        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2918711/Christian-faith-school-graded-best-performing-placed-special-measures-Ofsted-inspectors-does-not-promote-British-values.html
9.
 Ex-Muslim Tells of Literal Slaughterhouses where Christians are  Dissected (Onan Coca) - This may be one of the most disgusting things I’ve ever had to report on. The intrepid and brave Walid and Theodore Shoebat are reporting on a story out of Albania that has been breaking over the last couple of months...Muslim Albanians in Kosovo are apparently kidnapping Christians in an effort to harvest and sell their organs before killing them. A Serbian Christian and former Special Forces officer tipped them off to the insidious story. “They abduct people in Kosovo, Serbian people — in some cases Albanian people — and they take their organs… they torture the people and take their organs while they are still live.” He also said that the victims are usually, “Christians serbs, young women, and men, and also children.” Please be advised the videos are incredibly graphic and not suitable for everyone.       http://eaglerising.com/14192/ex-muslim-tells-literal-slaughterhouses-kidnapped-christians-dissected-organs-sold-islamic-nations/
10.
 Dems Kick And Scream As Border Security Bill Cruises The House  
(Rachel Stoltzfoos) - The House version of a Border Security bill cleared committee Wednesday night, after frustrated Democratic committee members ran out of ways to effectively stomp their feet...Members of the Committee on Homeland Security met soon after 2 p.m. Wednesday to consider and debate potential amendments to the “Secure Our Borders First Act,” before passing it through to the House. Chairman Michael McCaul introduced the bill Friday, saying it would beef up border patrol capabilities, and establish an independent commission to verify the security of the border. It’s on a leadership sponsored fast track that is frustrating Democrats, so they used procedural maneuvers and delay tactics to obstruct the bill and make things difficult for McCaul and the rest of the Republican committee members.       http://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2015/01/22/dems-kick-and-scream-as-border-security-bill-cruises-through-the-house/
Jews, get the blazes out of France . .. NOW
Caroline B. Glick
 
     (jewishworldreview) - January 16 is the nine-year anniversary of the beginning of the Ilan Halimi disaster.

     On January 16, 2006, Sorour Arbabzadeh, the seductress from the Muslim anti-Jewish kidnapping gang led by Youssouf Fofana, entered the cellphone store where Halimi worked and set the honey trap.

     Four days later, Halimi met Arbabzadeh for a drink at a working class bar and agreed to walk her home. She walked him straight into an ambush. Her comrades beat him, bound him and threw him into the trunk of their car.

     They brought Halimi to a slum apartment and tortured him for 24 days and 24 nights before dumping him, handcuffed, naked, stabbed and suffering from third degree burns over two-thirds of his body, at a railway siding in Paris.

He died a few hours later in the hospital.

     In an impassioned address to the French parliament on Tuesday, Prime Minister Manuel Valls gave a stirring denunciation of anti-Semitism, and demanded that his people stop treating it as someone else’s problem.

     In his words, “Since Ilan Halimi in 2006... anti-Semitic acts in France have grown to an intolerable degree. The words, the insults, the gestures, the shameful attacks... did not produce the national outrage that our Jewish compatriots expected.”

     Valls insisted that France needs to protect its Jewish community, lest France itself be destroyed.

     “Without its Jews France would not be France, this is the message we have to communicate loud and clear. We haven’t done so. We haven’t shown enough outrage. How can we accept that in certain schools and colleges the Holocaust can’t be taught? How can we accept that when a child is asked, ‘Who is your enemy?’ the response is ‘The Jew?’ When the Jews of France are attacked France is attacked, the conscience of humanity is attacked. Let us never forget it.”

     Valls words were uplifting. But it is hard to see how they change the basic reality that the Jews of France face.

     When all is said and done, it is their necks on the line while humanity’s conscience is merely troubled.

     Ilan Halimi’s case is more or less a textbook case of the impossible reality French Jewry faces. And, as Valls noted, the situation has only gotten worse in the intervening nine years. Much worse.

     But back when things were much better, Ilan Halimi was kidnapped, tortured for 24 days and murdered. As Tablet online magazine’s Marc Weitzmann reported last September in an in-depth summary of ordeal, the gang that perpetrated the atrocity had been hunting for Jewish victims for several weeks before Arbabzadeh set her trap for Halimi. All their previous attempts had failed. Their previous marks included Jewish doctors, lawyers, television directors and human rights activists, as well as Jews of no particular distinction aside from the fact that they were Jews.

     The anti-Jewish nature of the gang was clear from its chosen victims. The anti-Semitic nature of their atrocious crime against Halimi was obvious from the first time they contacted his mother, Ruth Halimi, demanding ransom for his release. They made anti-Jewish slurs in all their communications with her.

     And as she heard her son's tortured cries in the background, Ruth was subjected to his torturers’ recitation of Koranic verses.

     And yet, throughout the period of his captivity, French authorities refused to consider the anti-Jewish nature of the crime, and as a result, refused to treat the case as life threatening or urgent.

     The same attitude continued well after Halimi was found. As Weitzmann noted, the investigative magistrate insisted “There isn’t a single element to allow one to attach this murder to an anti-Semitic purpose or an anti-Semitic act.”

     The denial went on through the 2009 trials of the 29 kidnappers and their accomplices. Anti-Semitism was listed as an aggravating circumstance of the crime – and as such, a cause for harsher sentencing – only for the gang leader Fofana. And in the end, even for him, the judges did not take it into account at sentencing.

     As for those 29 kidnappers and accomplices, as Weitzmann notes, each one of them had a circle of friends and family.

     As a consequence, by a one reporters’ conservative estimate, at least 50 people were aware of the crime and where Halimi was being held, while he was being held. And not one of them called the police. Not one of them felt moved to make a call that could save the life of a Jew.
 
     After the fact, the media in France were happy to publish articles by the torturers’ defense lawyers insisting, “Only people motivated by ‘political reasons’ would try to sell the opinion that anti-Semitism is eating away at French society.”

     When the Halimi family lawyer boasted of close ties to the government and announced he would appeal the sentences of the perpetrators if he didn’t think their punishments were sufficient, the French media eagerly shifted the conversation from the torture and murder of a Parisian who just happened to be a Jew by a band of sadists who just happened to be Muslims, to the more comfortable narrative of the Jewish lobby and Jewish power. So, too, when Halimi, and six years later when the three children and the rabbi massacred at Otzar Hatorah Jewish day school in Toulouse, were brought to Israel for burial, the media reported their decision in a negative way hinting that it was evidence of the basic disloyalty, or otherness of the Jews of France.

     In other words, what Halimi’s murder exposed is that anti-Semitism in France is systemic. Muslims are the main perpetrators of violence. And they operate in social environments that are at a minimum indifferent to Jewish suffering and victimization. This violence and indifference is abetted by non-Islamic elites. French authorities minimize the unique threat Jews face. And the media are happy to ignore the issue, or when given the slightest opportunity, to claim that the Jews are responsible for their own victimization.

     Indeed, in live reports from the scene of the hostage taking at the kosher supermarket in Paris last week, Weitzmann noted that in the early hours of the attack, French media failed to mention that the hostages were Jews.

     Under these circumstances, where the entire French system is stacked against them, what can be done for French Jewry? What can they do for themselves? It is far from clear that France is capable of correcting its downward trajectory.
 
     Demography is moving France in a different direction. According to Israeli political scientist Guy Bechor, Marseilles will be the first Western European city with a Muslim majority. The ruling Socialists owe their victory to the Muslim vote. It is hard to see French President François Hollande and his comrades taking actions that could anger that constituency which votes as a bloc.

     Moreover, anti-Semitism in all its forms is manifested throughout French society. For instance, the prosecutor in the Halimi murder trial is the son of a French Nazi collaborator and according to Weitzmann, spent an inordinate amount of the trial trying to understand the perpetrators.

     Then there is the Israel issue. Valls has distinguished himself from his colleagues for his willingness to acknowledge that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.

     But his is a voice in the wilderness. The overwhelming sentiment of the French elites is hostility toward Israel.

     This sentiment was manifested in Hollande’s treatment of Israel, and through it of the French Jewish community, in the aftermath of the supermarket massacre last Friday.

     Hollande told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attend the anti-terror march in Paris on Sunday, claiming that Netanyahu’s presence would detract from the message of unity against terrorism that he hoped the march would communicate.

The underlying assumption of Hollande’s message is deeply disturbing.

     That assumption is that anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism and is not, as a result, evil. The subtext is that the murder of Jews by Islamic terrorists who seek Israel’s destruction is similarly not a crime deserving of the same condemnation as the jihadist murder of French journalists.

     Netanyahu rightly ignored Hollande’s request that he not attend. And for this move he was subjected to harsh criticism by the French media which accused him of crashing the party and pushing himself onto center stage against the wishes of his unwilling hosts.

     Their criticism was then parroted by the Israeli media that studiously ignored the endemic anti-Israel hostility of the French media and the anti-Israel policies of the Hollande government. The Hebrew media, together with Hatnua leader Tzipi Livni, also ferociously attacked Netanyahu as well as Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman and Economy Minister Naftali Bennett for upsetting French sensibilities by calling on French Jewry to make aliya, ascend to the Holy Land.

     But aliya is the key for contending with the increasing danger that the Jews of France face from the systemic nature of French anti-Semitism. This is true first of all because as France makes it clear that it is not a warm home for its Jews, Israel is a better option. Israel exists so that Jews always will have a better option than suffering at the hands of hostile non-Jews.

     Speaking of aliya is also essential because so far the only thing that has caused French authorities to speak directly against anti-Semitism and take action to defend French Jewry has been the prospect of a mass exodus of their Jews.

     The year 2014 saw a 50 percent increase in French aliya. And the Jewish Agency anticipates that that number will double to 15,000 in 2015, with 50,000 more not far behind.

     After Ilan Halimi was murdered, out of fear of upsetting the French, no Israeli leader, including then-foreign minister Livni, uttered a word of condemnation against the atrocity. No Israeli representative attended his memorial ceremony.

No one urged French Jews to make aliya.

     And the number of anti-Semitic attacks increased massively each year. French governmental hostility toward Israel similarly escalated with each passing year.

     There is unfortunately every reason to believe that the massacre at the kosher supermarket in Paris last Friday will not be the last one. But it is also clear that the best way to avert more suffering is to speak often and forcefully about the option of moving to Israel. Israel must also take active steps to prepare the country for the arrival of our French brothers and sisters.

     Hollande will certainly express his annoyance as he continues to condemn Israel at every turn for imaginary misdeeds. But the French Jews will be strengthened. While the conscience of humanity may be uselessly miffed by the victimization of Jews, the Jews of France will know that there is one place on earth that exists to prevent that victimization, and that they are welcome here whenever they choose to come.

 

Read more…

WE WILL RECLAIM CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY

By: Juan Reynoso, activist  -  voteforamerica@gmail.com

http://anticorruptionact.org/.     STAND FOR AMERICA        http://www.teaparty.org/

"Americas must realize that self-scrutiny is not treason. Self-examination is not disloyalty."

We seek the truth and let the people know. America will never be destroyed from the outside; it will be destroyed from within. Corporate greed and the love for power and money are evil.

We will reclaim control of our own country. United we stand defending our freedom and our economic prosperity.

http://economyincrisis.org/?gclid=CPq17JDap8MCFdNj7AodqF4APA

We are the hope of our country. United we stand to reclaim our freedom and work for the prosperity of the American people. This coming economic catastrophe will wake us up and force us to deal with reality and take our country back from the elite economic predators of our country.

http://howtheworldreallyworks.info/

Fellow Americans, we have the power to start fresh and build a new American. God’s gift of a new day is universal and with that gift we get choices, now is the time to get unite as one to take our country back for our prosperity and the posterity of our children and future generations. We must get the knowledge to make the right choices and get our country on the path of prosperity.

This is the truth. We are in an economic and moral crisis; our country’s leadership has loss their moral compass and they are destroying our country by the implementation of ill policies that benefit the elite of our country at the expenses of the American working class. Their policies made us economic slaves. Free trade and Globalization, demise our manufacturing and our jobs,  40 years of trade deficits and the economic strategy to fix the crisis made the situation worst and since 2008 we implemented more of the same policies that fail to get our country on the path of job creation and the prosperity of Americans. The next economic crisis is going to be worst, but we can start fresh if we get united as one and work together.    

Here are a few choices and actions we can take to start fresh to take our country back.

1-     Stop this free trade agenda. Buy made in America only, support your local small business and avoid buying anything from the predator American corporations.  If you, I and our families are less dependents on imports and a host of potential products and services that are sold to us by the American predator corporatism and If we Americans grow our own food, and build our energy, health service and security, we will be our own customers and build a system of interdependence. This is basic our interpretation of affluence and more dependent of our American ingenuity and self-reliance

2-     Stop feeding the corrupt Baking System. Pull your savings and any investment connected to Banks,  and deposit your money on credit unions, they are non-profit financial organizations that will provide you with financial service at lower cost to you.  Avoid Predatory Lenders and stop buying anything on credit.

3-     Stop making rich corporate American at the expenses of your community. Form small investment groups to finance small business that will create employment for 6 to 10 persons and be the promoter of these business buy becoming a customer of the business and advertising the business by word of mouth and the use of social media. Prime opportunity for building community oriented business and retain your money in the community.

4-     Make a reality, your dream to own your own home; without a down payment. For detail contact, Juan Reynoso at clearglobal2016@gmail.com

5-     Focus on the education of your family and work to be the best you can be to serve your family and your community. Freedom comes with responsibilities; a safe and prosperous community its build by respecting the rights of others and being an example of moral leadership.

6-     Demand the stop of any military intervention in the world. Wars are made to control others countries economic and the exploitation of the emerging countries human capital.

 To share this please clicks here       Share

Sources for this article include:

Congress gives the power to corporate American to control Washington.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-powers-and-abuses-of-americas-mega-corporations/5371901

Corporate world’s Predators

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Transnational_corps/Earth_Predators.html

Corporations: Our Natural Predators

http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/corporations-our-natural-predators-5650

Multinational corporations are not paying U.S. taxes.

http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/top-10-worst-tax-avoidance-corporations

 329,745 died in the Iraq and Afghan wars, The Bush war for oil.

http://costsofwar.org/sites/default/files/The%20Costs%20of%20War%20Since%202001%20Executive%20Summary%203.13.pdf

American corporate gets rich while the killings continue.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/iraq-nation-destroyed-oil-riches-confiscated-surviving-iraqi-population-impoverished/5375905

Blood and oil

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/blood-and-oil-how-the-west-will-profit-from-iraqs-most-precious-commodity-431119.html

The Iraq War Exposed -The Bush deception and betrayal.

http://netctr.com/iraqwar.html

Read more…

This is article about a school classroom in Denver that had the classmates dress, act and go to a mosque to experience their religion... (their parents were livid that it happened )this presentation addresses that in more detail and why our children are being brainwashed into believing that America is bad. Please take the time to watch this speaker if you haven't seen it before, it is excellent and definitely an eye opener. Then forward this to everyone in your address book, so we can educate other Americans!!

One more reason to fight Common Core! Watch ALL of this video and get involved….
A breath of fresh air in our corrupt world!
THIS IS HAPPENING RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES - THANKS TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS - IT'S A LITTLE LONG (10 to 12 min) BUT WELL WORTH THE TIME - MIND BOGGLING -

EXCELLENT PRESENTATION

Be proud of her!!
This presentation is extremely interesting and quite frightening as to what is happening in the USA today. Much food for thought.

This lady is Brigitte Gabriel the Founder and President of Act! for America. She is well worth listening to.

This lady has her facts straight and has a passion about what she is talking about.

Something for all parents and grandparents to be aware of.

EVERYONE SHOULD WATCH THIS!!!

I am speechless!
This woman should be heard by every North American and people of the world!

This is a brutal Eye Opener. She is not reading from a TelePrompter either

Please watch and listen. Very frightening, infuriating, and informative.

Click here: TaboolaArticle

http://link.brightcove.com/servic…/player/bcpid949801312001…

Read more…

AMERICANS IT'S TIME TO STAND UP AND DEFEND OUR WAY OF LIFE AND OUR FREEDOM AGAINST ISLAM!

PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY

Read more…

No-Go Zones Sparking Tension Between Black and Muslim Communities in UK

via Report: UK No-Go Zones Sparking Tension Between Black and Muslim Communities – Breitbart.

Ezra Levant uncovered a video from eleven years ago – when, as he points out, the Muslim population in the Birmingham area of England was half as large as it is today – in which a filmmaker from Trinidad, interested in documenting race relations across the Western world, described a “tense atmosphere” in which “outsiders feel threatened” at the conclusion of the Ramadan holiday (segment begins at 15:18):

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/are-there-‘no-go-zones’-in-france-or-not%3F/4003587359001

A great deal of visual and audio evidence of this tension is provided, with tasteful blurring of the most unwelcoming hand gestures.  Clearly the police are on hand – quite a few of them, in fact – so at this point Birmingham’s Muslim district could not be accurately described as a place the police simply refuse to go.  They do not, however, look happy to be there.

The tension was particularly acute between blacks and Muslims (or “Asians,” as they are commonly called in the UK.)  The black people interviewed in the video speak of facing blocked roads, and being physically pushed out of the area by Muslims.  How’s that for a “no-go zone?”

When the black filmmaker tried to sit down with some Pakistani Muslim immigrants to discuss tolerance, things went sour so quickly that he walked away from the meeting… only to be followed, harassed, and threatened with violence.  His Muslim director had more success engaging the young men in conversation, which turned to talk about a global Islamic brotherhood uniting for a confrontation with everyone else.  The sad conclusion was that Middle Eastern conflicts were spilling over into Muslim neighborhoods “are unleashing a torrent of vitriol on British streets.”

As Levant went on to document, this vitriol was not unleashed exclusively by hotheaded young men with too much time on their hands.  The “Trojan Horse” effort to infuse sharia law into Birmingham public schools is mentioned, along with the troubling problem mainstream media and political authorities don’t want to discuss: certain Muslim-dominated areas of Europe have become quite literal “no-go zones” for specific classes of people, even if they’re not labelled on the map as such, or marked with warning signs.  A Pakistani-born bishop is quoted criticizing British multi-culturalism for turning “already separate communities into no-go areas” six years ago.

When the pushback against such warnings devolves to hair-splitting about the precise words used to describe insular areas, or whether they’re officially recognized as such in government documents, we are taking leave of reality to engage in rhetorical and ideological combat.  There is clearly basis in reality for talking about “no-go zones.”  That does not relieve commentators of the burden of describing them accurately.  Likewise, their critics are not relieved of the burden of proving that nothing of the kind exists anywhere in Europe.


Levant also has another segment, part of it here, on no go zones:

Read more…
THERE IS ONLY ONE SUPREME LAW OF THE OUR CONSTITUTION AND IT' BILL OF RIGHTS THERE NO OTHER!
PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY

Texas: Media booted from Islamic conference, Muslims outside want sharia law (video)

What were they hiding?

Bill O’Reilly can pooh-pooh the desire for sharia law away all he wants, but the reality is that these same Muslims have recently built a mega-mosque in Garland – where this event took place – and that compound includes the Texas Islamic Court and in Houston 200 imams taught how to run sharia courts!!! Clearly sharia is something Muslims in Texas, and the world over, want.

Not only were they hiding something, “English-sounding” and “Jewish” names were purged from “Stand With the Prophet” the attendance rolls.

Read more…

JIHAD WATCH

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Read more…

THE PATRIOT POST

Daily Digest

Jan. 23, 2015
Print Email Bigger Smaller

THE FOUNDATION

“If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretense of taking care of them, they must become happy.” –Thomas Jefferson, letter to Thomas Cooper, 1802

TOP 5 RIGHT HOOKS

Obama’s YouTubing Is Embarrassing

2015-01-23-208053d2.pngObama breaking his ban on selfies with YouTube entertainers

Since 2010, the White House has invited fawning political neophytes to converse with the president after his State of the Union address. It’s another way for Barack Obama to circumvent the watchdog media and virtually kiss babies. This year, three entertainers who garnered fame on YouTube “interviewed” Obama. Instead of pitching the hardball questions, Hank Green thanked the president for ObamaCare. Bethany Mota, 19, who earned a following for dispensing fashion advice, admitted she didn’t care about politics until YouTube asked her to conduct the interview. And so, Obama used her naiveté to his advantage by twisting the history of American education, saying politicians created the first colleges. Comedian GloZell Green, who pulled stunts like bathing in a bathtub of milk and Fruit Loops, probably asked the hardball question of the evening when she said former Cuban dictator Fidel Castro “puts the d— in dictatorship.” The interviews were embarrassing – even for Obama, as he was hugging himself at one point. “He’s got a good sense of humor – that’s a political asset,” media analyst Howard Kurtz said. “But it just seemed beneath the dignity of the office to be hanging out with some of these YouTubers.” But the one who is really beneath Obama’s dignity, the White House made clear, is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. More…

Comment | Share

Obama Flips on Gov’t Funds Used for Abortion

On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Barack Obama called abortion a “core constitutional right” and threatened to veto a bill Congress has passed every year banning the use of federal funds for abortions. The statement read, “I am deeply committed to protecting this core constitutional right, and I believe that efforts like H.R. 7, the bill the House considered today, would intrude on women’s reproductive freedom and access to health care and unnecessarily restrict the private insurance choices that consumers have today.” It didn’t used to be this way. “And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up,” Obama told Congress in 2009, “under our plan [ObamaCare], no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place.” We’re shocked that Obama lied. He not only supports abortion in any and all circumstances but he wants you to pay for it. More…

Comment | Share

Saudi King Dead, Iran Advances

“King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, who came to the throne in old age and earned a reputation as a cautious reformer even as the Arab Spring revolts toppled heads of state and Islamic State militants threatened the Muslim establishment that he represented, died on Friday,” reports The New York Times. “Toppled heads” is an interesting choice of words, given the Saudis' regular use of beheading. Still, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia have long been allies, in large part because of oil. The Wall Street Journal reports that even with the ascension of Crown Prince Salman, “[T]he kingdom is likely to continue to pump crude in the face of a global glut, which has helped push prices down by more than 55% since last June.” Saudi Arabia is also an important regional counterweight to both al-Qaida and Iran. And as we now see in Yemen, those are getting harder to come by. In fact, Salman assumes the throne at a time when his nation is surrounded by Iran’s proxies – Syria, Lebanon, and increasingly Iraq and Yemen.

Comment | Share

SOTU Rebuttal: Climate Change Scheme ‘Wealth Redistribution’

In his rebuttal of Barack Obama’s State of the Union address, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) said the president’s plans to save the earth from climate change by enacting massive regulation are nothing but “a wealth redistribution scheme.” Inhofe argued that even if Obama could enact his policies, they would not do enough to change the globe’s climate. “Why the pain for no gain?” He continued, “The President’s agenda will cost our economy $479-billion dollars; we will experience a double-digit electricity price increase; and tens of thousands of Americans will lose access to well-paying jobs over the course of the next decade.” Inhofe surprised the Left by co-sponsoring an amendment saying climate change is happening. Unlike the Left, however, Inhofe realizes that if climate change can in any way be mitigated, we will need a strong economy to do so.More…

Comment | Share

Envirofascists Deploy 1,700 Jets to Switzerland

The 45th World Economic Forum kicked off this week in beautiful Switzerland, where organizers will hash out policy agendas, among them how to address the global effects of climate change. With that glorious goal in mind, one would hope that attendees would at least set a good example by burning as little fossil fuel as possible. After all, writes Brendan Bordelon at National Review, “Climate scientists view air travel as the most costly per-person contributor to carbon emissions, with some estimates saying it accounts for 5 percent of ‘warming.’” Except “green” travel isn’t what they did at all. According to reports, envirofascists needed roughly 1,700 airplanes to transport over 2,500 ticket-holders at $40,000 a pop. And just how does WEF plan on neutralizing such a heavy carbon footprint? So far, the answer to that is … crickets. The enviro-elite are quick to lecture us peons about the importance of ridding the world of fossil fuels. That is, as long as it doesn’t cramp their luxurious lifestyle. More…

Comment | Share

For more, visit Right Hooks.

RIGHT ANALYSIS

An Offer You Can’t Refuse?

2015-01-23-8b01b2f6_large.jpg

Barack Obama hit the campaign trail this week after his State of the Union address to sell his new pet phrase “middle-class economics,” a phrase he’s working to ingrain in the political lexicon. According to the president, speaking at Boise State University, middle-class economics “means helping folks afford child care, and college, and paid leave at work, and health care, and retirement.” But beware of statists bearing gifts.

Middle-class economics is nothing more than a cradle-to-grave welfare state paid for through wealth redistribution. It will ultimately stifle economic growth and require – wait for it – more government welfare spending.

Obama latched onto this middle-class economics concept as a way to set the Democrats' class warfare theme for the 2016 election. He spent much of 2014 trying to convince the public that, thanks to his policies, the economy was on the mend. Few believed him. So he came up with a clever new name for wealth redistribution and is now trying to rewrite history from the campaign trail.

Going on the road, giving speeches and lambasting Republicans as the enemies of the middle class are parlor games for Obama. This strategy guided everything that he, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid did when Democrats ran all of Washington. Now that Republicans control Congress, it’s a bit more difficult to label them obstructionist – not that Obama won’t try. Republicans have the power to set the legislative agenda, but that’s not going to stop this imperial president.

“I know there are Republicans who disagree with my approach,” Obama told the Boise crowd. “And if they do disagree with me, then I look forward to hearing from them how they want to pay for things like R&D and infrastructure that we need to grow. They should put forward some alternative proposals.”

Of course, Obama doesn’t want to hear ideas that aren’t in lockstep with his agenda. Indeed, he’s already threatened to veto just about every Republican bill under consideration. Yet he has the audacity to declare, “Work with me. Don’t just say no. You can’t just say no.”

Obama and his fellow statists assume the government should be involved in every aspect of the American economy. There is no debate about the constitutional role of government, only over how to pay for all the goodies. And that’s where class warfare and wealth redistribution come in.

Democrats hope to regain control in 2016 by appearing to be champions of the middle class. And they want to do it with “free” gifts paid for with higher taxes on the “wealthy.”

Unfortunately, this strategy often works.

The welfare state has greatly expanded over the last 50 years because people can’t say “no” to “free” stuff. Political analyst George Will explains, “More than twice as many households receive ‘anti-poverty’ benefits than receive Social Security or Medicare. Between 1983 and 2012, the population increased by almost 83 million – and people accepting means-tested benefits increased by 67 million. So, for every 100-person increase in the population there was an 80-person increase in the recipients of means-tested payments. Food stamp recipients increased from 19 million to 51 million – more than the combined populations of 24 states.”

This cycle of government welfare only perpetuates itself. It has become a way of life that is truly changing the American character. In the last 50 years, the number of men 25 to 34 who are neither working nor looking for work has almost quadrupled. The percentage of children born to unmarried women was nearly six times higher in 2012 than in 1964. And the percentage of people living under the poverty line hasn’t budged in 30 years.

Former New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a lifelong liberal, warned, “The issue of welfare is not what it costs those who provide it, but what it costs those who receive it.” Even he saw the inevitable. Today’s Democrats don’t care, however, as long as they can win elections.

Comment | Share

Another Foreign Policy ‘Success’ Story

2015-01-23-bdb4c60d.jpgIranian-backed Houthis gain

As more proof that drone strikes and occasional American advisory assistance are no way to bring peace and stability, let us present the woebegone desert nation of Yemen. It’s virtually under siege and perfectly illustrates Barack Obama’s failed foreign policy.

Few Americans can locate Yemen on a world map, but Yemenis are the largest group still held at Guantanamo Bay, and al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), which claimed the Charlie Hebdo massacre as one of its operations, is based there. To paraphrase Joe Biden: In the world of Islamic terrorism, Yemen is a “big effing deal.”

It’s so big a deal that the U.S. had to put an informal halt on releasing Gitmo detainees who hail from Yemen.

While Obama had previously pointed to Yemen as a successful model in his fight against radical Islamic terror vague operation of appearing to care about national security, that confidence vanished in recent days. Neither al-Qaida nor Yemen was mentioned in the very brief portion of the State of the Union address that dealt with “violent extremism.” It’s no wonder Obama avoided the topic, as Yemen has crumbled in recent weeks. To mention it also would have brought up the obvious questions about Obama’s absence from the Paris demonstrations and his lack of success against other terror groups.

While direct attacks on Americans, such as a rocket fired at the American embassy last September, are rare, strife in the capital of Sana'a involving Shiite rebels known as the Houthis has otherwise reached a fever pitch. After Houthis battled their way into the presidential palace, pro-American Yemeni President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi resigned on Thursday, shortly afterPrime Minister Khalid Bahah and his 36-member cabinet all left office. This left Parliament Speaker Yahia al-Rai as the nation’s titular head, although the Houthis with the guns are truly in charge.

While a possible fringe benefit of these events could be a check on the Sunni sectarian AQAP, the need for assistance from the Yemeni government for the overall war on terror outweighs the limited advantages.

This was bad news for Obama, as Hadi’s cooperation in Yemen was a linchpin of his hands-off, no-boots-on-the-ground strategy to fight the Long War. Obama said just last September, “This strategy of taking out terrorists who threaten us, while supporting partners on the front lines, is one that we have successfully pursued in Yemen and Somalia for years.” With that government out of the picture and infighting among religious, tribal and regional factions tearing apart the small nation, the likelihood of significant progress on that war front is not good.

Not only that, but it’s good news for Iran. Political analyst Charles Krauthammer explains, “Why should we care about the coup? First, because we depend on Yemen’s government to support our drone war against another local menace, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. It’s not clear if we can even maintain our embassy in Yemen, let alone conduct operations against AQAP. And second, because growing Iranian hegemony is a mortal threat to our allies and interests in the entire Middle East. … Our regional allies – Saudi Arabia, the other five Gulf states, Jordan, Egypt and Israel – are deeply worried. Tehran is visibly on the march on the ground and openly on the march to nuclear status.”

In other words, Yemen’s collapse continues Obama’s track record of alienating allies and conceding to foes. So much for a model of success.

Comment | Share

For more, visit Right Analysis.

TOP 5 RIGHT OPINION COLUMNS

For more, visit Right Opinion.

OPINION IN BRIEF

Novelist James Baldwin (1924-1987): “Freedom is not something that can be given. Freedom is something people take, and people are as free as they want to be.”

Columnist David Harsanyi: “Here’s a short list of things that are less popular than banning late-term abortions: ‘Acting’ on climate change. ‘Free’ community college. Taxing the wealthy. Building the Keystone XL pipeline. President Barack Obama. Future President Hillary Clinton. Every Republican who’s thinking about running for president. … Yet the GOP caves on a bill that would prohibit most abortions after 20 weeks and promises instead to pass another worthless ban on taxpayer-funded abortions – which we all know can be ignored by hiring an accountant. … This is about politics. Tragically incompetent politics. Even though a veto was imminent, you have to wonder: If the party representing the pro-life position, a party with a sizable majority, can’t pull together a vote on an issue as unambiguous and risk-free as this one, what are the chances of it coming to a consensus and offering compelling arguments on issues such as health care and tax reform? Very little, I imagine.”

Comment | Share

Columnist Mona Charen: “Barack Obama’s sixth State of the Union address was an homage to France. The president might not have intended it as such – he mentioned the nation only glancingly when denouncing terror attacks in Pakistan and Paris. Yet France was at the heart of the president’s address. … France is Obamaland. Government sucks up 56 percent of GDP. The state offers cradle-to-grave subsidies for child care, health, disability, unemployment, old age and more. The welfare state discourages work in myriad ways – most French retire at age 60, and many at 55. The workweek is 35 hours. (Obamacare defines it as 30 hours.) France’s labor code is 3,600 pages long (sound familiar?) and makes it practically impossible to fire anyone. Shockingly, businesses are wary about hiring. France’s growth rate has averaged .3 percent annually since 2008. Everyone from taxi drivers to notary publics to dentists goes on strike at the drop of a chapeau. All of this looks like paradise to Obama. … France has its virtues, but the policies Obama admires have brought the nation stagnation, unemployment, high taxes, constant strikes, restive and unassimilated immigrants, and domestic terrorism. The French don’t seem to know what went wrong. Our president doesn’t, either.”

Comment | Share

Comedian Seth Meyers: “Obama gave the State of the Union address, and I just have to say that I don’t know what union he was describing. But I want to live there. I want to move. It sounds outstanding. There’s a middle class. They have small businesses. It sounds great.”

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!

Join us in daily prayer for our Patriots in uniform – Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen – standing in harm’s way in defense of Liberty, and for their families.

Read more…

WAHHADISM PART 3

WAHHADISM PART 3

Practices[edit]

As a religious revivalist movement that works to bring Muslims back from what it believes are foreign accretions that have corrupted Islam,[193] and believes that Islam is a complete way of life and so has prescriptions for all aspects of life, Wahhabism is quite strict in what it considers Islamic behavior.

This does not mean however, that all adherents agree on what is required or forbidden, or that rules have not varied by area or changed over time. In Saudi Arabia the strict religious atmosphere of Wahhabi doctrine is visible in the conformity in dress, public deportment, and public prayer,[188] and makes its presence felt by the wide freedom of action of the "religious police", clerics in mosques, teachers in schools, and judges (who are religious legal scholars) in Saudi courts.[194]

Commanding right and forbidding wrong[edit]

Wahhabism is noted for its policy of "compelling its own followers and other Muslims strictly to observe the religious duties of Islam, such as the five prayers", and for "enforcement of public morals to a degree not found elsewhere".[195]

While other Muslims might urge abstention from alcohol, modest dress, and salatprayer, for Wahhabis prayer "that is punctual, ritually correct, and communally performed not only is urged but publicly required of men." Not only is wine forbidden, but so are "all intoxicating drinks and other stimulants, including tobacco." Not only is modest dress prescribed, but the type of clothing that should be worn, especially by women (a black abaya, covering all but the eyes and hands) is specified.[63]

Following the preaching and practice of Abdul Wahhab that coercion should be used to enforce following of sharia, an official committeehas been empowered to "Command the Good and Forbid the Evil" (the so-called "religious police")[179][195]in Saudi Arabia—the one country founded with the help of Wahhabi warriors and whose scholars and pious[citation needed] dominate many aspects of the Kingdom's life. Committee "field officers" enforce strict closing of shops at prayer time, segregation of the sexes, prohibition of the sale and consumption of alcohol, driving of motor vehicles by women, and other social restrictions.[196]

A large number of practices have been reported forbidden by Saudi Wahhabi officials, preachers or religious police. Practices that have been forbidden as Bida'a(innovation) or shirk and sometimes "punished by flogging" during Wahhabi history include performing or listening to music, dancing, fortune telling, ambulets, television programs (unless religious), smoking, playing backgammon, chess, or cards, drawing human or animal figures, acting in a play or writing fiction (both are considered forms of lying), dissecting cadavers (even in criminal investigations and for the purposes of medical research), recorded music played over telephones on hold, the sending of flowers to friends or relatives who are in the hospital[111][197][198][199][200][201] Common Muslim practices Wahhabis believe are contrary to Islam include listening to music in praise of Muhammad, praying to God while visiting tombs (including the tomb of Muhammad), celebrating mawlid (birthday of the Prophet),[202] the use of ornamentation on or in mosques.[203] The driving of motor vehicles by women is allowed in every country but Wahhabi-dominated Saudi Arabia,[204] the famously strict Taliban practiced dream interpretation, discouraged by Wahhabis.[205][206]

Wahhabism emphasizes "Thaqafah Islamiyyah" or Islamic culture and the importance of avoiding non-Islamic cultural practices and non-Muslim friendship no matter how innocent these may appear,[207][208] on the grounds that the Sunnaforbids imitating non-Muslims.[209]Foreign practices sometimes punished and sometimes simply condemned by Wahhabi preachers as unIslamic, include celebrating foreign days (such as Valentine's Day[210] or Mothers Day.[207][209]) shaving, cutting or trimming of beards,[211] giving of flowers,[212]standing up in honor of someone, celebrating birthdays (including the Prophet's), keeping or petting dogs.[200] Wahhabi scholars have warned against taking non-Muslims as friends, smiling at or wishing them well on their holidays.[60]

Wahhabis are not in unanimous agreement on what is forbidden as sin. Some Wahhabi preachers or activists go further than the official Saudi Arabian Council of Senior Scholars in forbidding (what they believe to be) sin. Several wahhabis have declared Football (Soccer) forbidden for a variety of reasons (because it is a non-Muslim, foreign practice—because of the revealing uniforms, or because of the foreign non-Muslim language (foulpenalty kick) used in matches.[213] [214]) The Saudi Grand Mufti, on the other hand has declared football permissible (halal). [215]

Senior Wahhabi leaders in Saudi Arabia have determined that Islam forbids the traveling or working outside the home by a woman without their husband's permission—permission which may be revoked at any time—on the grounds that the different physiological structures and biological functions of the different genders mean that each sex is assigned a different role to play in the family.[216] As mentioned before, Wahhabism also forbids the driving of motor vehicles by women. Sexual intercourse out of wedlock may be punished with beheading[217] although sex out of wedlock is permissible with a slave women (Prince Bandar bin Sultan was the product of "a brief encounter" between his father Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz" -- the Saudi defense minister for many years -- and "his slave, a black servingwoman")[142] or was before slavery was banned in Saudi Arabia in 1962.[218]

Despite this strictness, senior Wahhabi scholars of Islam in the Saudi kingdom have made exceptions in ruling on what is haram. Foreign non-Muslim troops are forbidden in Arabia except when the king needed them to confront Saddam Hussein in 1990; gender mixing of men and women is forbidden, and fraternization with non-Muslims is discouraged, but not at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). Movie theaters and driving by women are forbidden except at the ARAMCO compound in eastern Saudi, populated by workers for the company that provides almost all the government's revenue. (The exceptions made at KAUST are also in effect at ARAMCO.)[219]

And more general rules of what is permissible have changed over time. Abdul-Aziz Ibn Saud imposed Wahhabi doctrines and practices "in a progressively gentler form" as his early 20th century conquests expanded his state into urban areas, especially the Hejab.[220] After vigorous debate Wahhabi religious authorities in Saudi Arabia allowed the use of paper money (in 1951), the abolition of slavery (in 1962), education of females (1964), and use of television (1965).[218] Music the sound of which once might have led to summary execution is now commonly heard on Saudi radios. [220] Minarets for mosques and use of funeral markers, which were once forbidden, are now allowed. Prayer attendance which was once enforced by flogging, is no longer. [221]

Appearance[edit]

The uniformity of dress among men and women in Saudi Arabia (compared to other Muslim countries in the Middle East) has been called a "striking example of Wahhabism's outward influence on Saudi society", and an example of the Wahhabi belief that "outward appearances and expressions are directly connected to one's inward state."[203] The "long, white flowing thobe" worn by men of Saudi Arabia has been called the "Wahhabi national dress".[222] Red-and-white checkered or white head scarves know as Ghutrah are worn. In public women are required to wear a black abaya or other black clothing that covers every part of their body other than hands and eyes.

A "badge" of a particularly pious Salafi or Wahhabi man is a robe too short to cover the ankle, an untrimmed beard,[223] and no cord (Agal) to hold the head scarf in place.[224] The warriors of the Ikhwan Wahhabi religious militia wore a white turban in place of anagal.[225]

Wahhabiyya mission[edit]

Wahhabi mission, or Dawah Wahhabiyya, is to spread purified Islam through the world, both Muslim and non-Muslim. [226] Tens of billions of dollars have been spent by the Saudi government and charities on mosques, schools, education materials, scholarships, throughout the world to promote Islam and the Wahhabi interpretation of it. Tens of thousands of volunteers[163] and several billion dollars also went in support of the jihad against the atheist communist regime governing Muslim Afghanistan.[164]

Regions[edit]

Wahhabism originated in the Najd region, and its conservative practices have stronger support there than in regions in the kingdom to the east or west of it.[227][228][229] Glasse credits the softening of some Wahhabi doctrines and practices on the conquest of the Hejaz region "with its more cosmopolitan traditions and the traffic of pilgrims which the new rulers could not afford to alienate".[220]

The only other country "whose native population is Wahhabi and that adheres to the Wahhabi creed", is the small gulf monarchy ofQatar,[230][231] whose version of Wahhabism is notably less strict.

Unlike Saudi Arabia, Qatar made significant changes in the 1990s. Women are now allowed to drive and travel independently; non-Muslims are permitted to consume alcohol and pork. The country sponsors a film festival, has a "world-class art museums", host the Al Jazeera and will hold the 2022 football World Cup, and has no religious force that polices public morality. Qatari's attribute its different interpretation of Islam to the absence of an indigenous clerical class and autonomous bureaucracy (religious affairs authority, endowments, Grand Mufti), the fact that Qatari rulers do not derive their legitimacy from such a class.[231][232]

Beliefs[edit]

Adherents to the Wahhabi movement are self-described Sunni Muslims (although some dispute whether they actually are).[233][234] The primary Wahhabi doctrine is the uniqueness and unity of God (Tawhid),[18][235] and opposition to shirk(polytheism), "the one unforgivable sin" (according to Wahhabism).[236]

They call for a return to the Islamic practices of the first generations of Muslims and an adherence to original texts, believing that Islamic practice has since drifted away from its roots through various interpretations. They generally take a literalist approach to Islamic religious writings and are often called fundamentalists. They also oppose doctrines held by other sects – particularly Sufis and Shiites. They place a strong emphasis on absolute monotheism and reject practices such as worshiping the graves of Muslim prophets and leaders. They also reject debate on and new interpretations of Islamic theology and practice.[233]

Wahhabis aspire to assimilate with the beliefs of the early Muslims, specifically the first three generations known as the Salaf. According to Wahhabi creed or Aqeedah, the Quran and Hadith are the only fundamental and authoritative texts taken with the understanding of the Salaf. The exegesis of the Quran and statements of the early Muslims were later codified by a number of scholars, the most well known being the 13th century Syrian scholar Ibn Taymiyyah.[18] Commentaries and "the examples of the early Muslim community (Ummah) and the four Rightly Guided Caliphs (AD 632–661)" are used to support these texts (but are not considered independently authoritative).

Wahhabis reject Islamic "theology" (kalam) in favor of strict textualism in interpreting the Quran, and are sometimes described as being in the Athari school.[237]Because of the importance placed on the Salaf generation—which include the four Rightly Guided Caliphs(Rashidun)—Ibn Abd al-Wahhab strongly opposed the basicShia tenant of the denial of the legitimacy of the first three caliphs (Abu BakrUmarand Uthman ibn Affan) and the designation of Ali ibn Abī Ṭālib as "the most preferred of the companions".[238]

One scholar (David Commins) describes the "pivotal idea" in Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teaching as being that "Muslims who disagreed with his definition of monotheism were not ... misguided Muslims, but outside the pale of Islam altogether." This put Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teaching at odds with that of most Muslims through history who believed that the "shahada" profession of faith ("There is no god but God, Muhammad is his messenger") made one a Muslim, and that shortcomings in that person's behavior and performance of other obligatory rituals rendered them "a sinner", but "not an unbeliever."

Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab did not accept that view. He argued that the criterion for one's standing as either a Muslim or an unbeliever was correct worship as an expression of belief in one God. ... any act or statement that indicates devotion to a being other than God is to associate another creature with God's power, and that is tantamount to idolatry (shirk). Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab included in the category of such acts popular religious practices that made holy men into intercessors with God. That was the core of the controversy between him and his adversaries, including his own brother.[239]

In Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's major work, a small book called Kitab al-Tawhid, he states that worship in Islam is limited to conventional acts of worship such as the five daily prayers (salat); fasting for Ramadan (Sawm); Dua (supplication); Istia'dha (seeking protection or refuge); Ist'ana (seeking help), and Istigatha to Allah (seeking benefits and calling upon Allah alone). Worship beyond this—making du'a or calling upon anyone or anything other than God, or seeking supernatural help and protection from something other than Allah—are acts of shirkand in violation of the tenets ofTawhid (montheism).[240][page needed][241]

Ibn Abd al-Wahahb's justification for considering the self-proclaimed Muslims of Arabia to be unbelievers, and for waging war on them, can be summed up as his belief that the original pagans the prophet Muhammad fought "affirmed that God is the creator, the sustainer and the master of all affairs; they gave alms, they performed pilgrimage and they avoided forbidden things from fear of God". What made them pagans whose blood could be shed and wealth plundered was that "they sacrificed animals to other beings; they sought the help of other beings; they swore vows by other beings." Someone who does such things even if their lives are otherwise exemplary is not a Muslim but an unbeliever (Ibn Abd al-Wahahb believed). Once such people have received the call to true Islam, understood it and then rejected it, their blood and treasure are forfeit.[242][243]

This disagreement between Wahhabis and non-Wahhabi Muslims over the definition of worship and monotheism has remained much the same since 1740, according to David Commins,[239] although, according to Saudi writer and religious television show host Abdul Aziz Qassim, as of 2014, "there are changes happening within the [Wahhabi] doctrine and among its followers."[14]

Other differences between orthodox Sunni Islam and Wahhabism (according to one critic—Ahmed Moussalli) include:

  1. the claim that Allah's attributes are "literal",[244]
    1. which attributes to God attributes such as a direction and position, which are human characteristics, and
    2. the claim that created things existed eternally with Allah (examples being the claim that Allah literally sits on the throne (al-kursi) and has left space for Prophet Muhammad to sit next to Him, or that Allah descends physically);
  2. opposition to the scholarly consensus on the divorce issue;
  3. opposition to the orthodox Sunni practice of tawassul (i.e. to the practice of asking Allah for things using a deceased pious saint as an intermediary);
  4. the claim that Allah has a limit (hadd) that only He knows;
  5. Ibn Abd al-Wahahb's classifying of oneness in worship of Allah (tawhid) into two parts: tawhid al-rububiyya and tawhid al-uluhiyya, something never done by pious adherents or al-salaf.[48]

Whether the teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab included the need for social renewal and "plans for socio-religious reform of society" in the Arabian Peninsula, rather than simply a return to "ritual correctness and moral purity", is disputed.[245][246]

Islamic law and fiqh[edit]

Of the four binding sources in Islamic law for Sunni jurists—

  1. the Quran,
  2. the Sunna,
  3. "consensus" (ijma), and
  4. "analogy" (qiyas) --

Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's writings emphasized the Quran and Sunna. He used ijma only "in conjunction with its corroboration of the Quran and hadith"[247] (and giving preference to the ijma of Muhammad's companions rather than the ijma of legal specialists after his time), and qiyas only in cases of extreme necessity.[248] He rejected the imitation of past scholarship (taqlid) in favor of independent reasoning (ijtihad), opposed using local customs.[249] He urged his followers to "return to the primary sources" of Islam in order "to determine how the Quran and Muhammad dealt with specific situations",[250] when using ijtihad ("independent reasoning"). According to Edward Mortimer, it was at the scholarly level in the face of a clear evidence or proof from a hadeeth or Qur'anic text, that Ibn Abd al-Wahhabcondemned taqlid.[251] (According to one scholar—Natana DeLong-Bas—Wahhabi focus on failure to abide by Islamic law as grounds for declaring a Muslim an apostate is not based on the Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's preaching but an adaption of the ideology of Ibn Taymiyya, that came after the death of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab.[252])

According to an expert on law in Saudi Arabia (Frank Vogel), Ibn Abd al-Wahhab himself "produced no unprecedented opinions". The "Wahhabis' bitter differences with other Muslims were not over fiqh rules at all, but over aqida, or theological positions", and in fiqh.[253]Scholar David Cummings also states that early disputes with other Muslims did not center on fiqh, (Wahhabis association with theHanbalischool notwithstanding), and that the belief that Wahhabism was borne of Hanbali thought is a "myth".[254]

Some scholars are ambivalent as to whether Wahhabis belong to the Hanbali legal tradition (i.e. school of fiqh, or Madhhab). Just as theSalaf followed no school of fiqh (as they had not been developed), so Wahhabis—as imitators of the Salaf—are outside of any school.[255] The Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim Worldmaintains Wahhabis "rejected all jurisprudence that in their opinion did not adhere strictly to the letter of the Qur'an and the hadith".[45] Cyril Glasse's New Encyclopedia of Islam states that "strictly speaking", Wahhabis "do not see themselves as belonging to any school,"[255] and that in doing so they correspond to the ideal aimed at by Ibn Hanbal, and thus they can be said to be of his 'school'.[256] [257] According to DeLong-Bas, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab never directly claimed to be a Hanbali jurist, warned his followers about the dangers of adhering unquestionably to fiqh, and did not consider "the opinion of any law school to be binding."[258] He did, however, follow the Hanbali methodology of extreme conservatism in interpretation of the Sharia.[258]

At least one Wahhabis source also states that at least in some circumstance bin Abd al-Wahhaab did "not prohibit following a madhhab [school of fiqh such as Hanbali] so long as there is no clash with a clear, plain legislative text". It quotes correspondence by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab in support[259] arguing that abandoning Madhhab precedent is simply a revival of the practice of early students of the scholars of the Madh'hab (fiqh schools) who would leave their teacher's position in light of a newly found evidence.[260][261]

Loyalty and disassociation[edit]

According to various sources—scholars,[32][48][53] [262] [263][264] former Saudi students, [265] Arabic-speaking/reading teachers who have had access to Saudi text books, [266] and journalists[267] —Ibn `Abd al Wahhab and his successors preach that theirs is the one true form of Islam. According to a doctrine known as al-wala` wa al-bara` (literally, "loyalty and disassociation"), Abd al-Wahhab argued that it was "imperative for Muslims not to befriend, ally themselves with, or imitate non-Muslims or heretical Muslims", and that this "enmity and hostility of Muslims toward non-Muslims and heretical had to be visible and unequivocal".[268] Even as late as 2003, entire pages in Saudi textbooks were devoted to explaining to undergraduate that all forms of Islam except Wahhabism were deviation,[266] although, according to one source (Hamid Algar) Wahhabis have "discreetly concealed" this view from other Muslims outside Saudi Arabia "over the years".[269][270]

In reply, the Saudi Arabian government "has strenuously denied the above allegations", including that "their government exports religious or cultural extremism or supports extremist religious education."[271]

Politics[edit]

According to ibn Abdal-Wahhab there are three objectives for Islamic government and society: "to believe in Allah, enjoin good behavior, and forbid wrongdoing." This doctrine has been sustained in missionary literature, sermons, fatwa rulings, and explications of religious doctrine by Wahhabis since the death of ibn Abdal-Wahhab.[63] Ibn Abd al-Wahhab saw a role for the imam, "responsible for religious matters", and the amir, "in charge of political and military issues".[272] (In Saudi history the imam has not been a religious preacher or scholar, but Muhammad ibn Saud[273]and subsequent Saudi rulers.[54][274]).

He also taught that the Muslim ruler is owed unquestioned allegiance as a religious obligation from his people so long as he leads the community according to the laws of God. A Muslim must present a bayah, or oath of allegiance, to a Muslim ruler during his lifetime to ensure his redemption after death.[63][275] Any counsel given to a ruler from community leaders or ulama should be private, not through public acts such as petitions, demonstrations, etc. [276] [277] (This strict obedience can become problematic if a dynastic dispute arises and someone rebelling against the ruler succeeds and becomes the ruler, as happened in the late 19th century at the end of the second al-Saud state.[278] Is the successful rebel a ruler to be obeyed, or a usurper?[279])

While this gives the king wide power, respecting shari'a does impose limits, such as giving qadi (Islamic judges) independence. This means not interfering in their deliberations, but also not codifying laws, following precedents or establishing a uniform system of law courts—both of which violate the qadi's independence.[280]

Wahhabis have traditionally given their allegiance to the House of Saud, but a movement of "Salafi jihadis" has developed among those who believe Al Saud has abandoned the laws of God.[178][179] According to Zubair Qamar, while the "standard view" is that "Wahhabis are apolitical and do not oppose the State", there is/was another "strain" of Wahhabism that "found prominence among a group of Wahhabis after the fall of the second Saudi State in the 1800s", and post 9/11 is associated with Jordanian/Palestinian scholar Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi and "Wahhabi scholars of the 'Shu’aybi' school".[281]

Wahhabis share the belief of Islamists such as the Muslim Brotherhood in Islamic dominion over politics and government and the importance of dawah (proselytizing or preaching of Islam) not just towards non-Muslims but towards erroring Muslims. However Wahhabi preachers are conservative and do not deal with concepts such as social justiceanticolonialism, or economic equality, expounded upon by Islamist Muslims.[282] Ibn Abdul Wahhab's original pact promised whoever championed his message, he promised, 'will, by means of it, rule and lands and men.'"[19]

Disregarding (most) Islamic scholars[edit]

Because Wahhabis believe that opinions expressed by Muslims (other than those of the first three generations of Muslims) on what is Islamic are not worthy of consideration they do not follow the "consensus" (or ijma`) of non-Salafi Islamic scholars that came after those generations as a basis of shariah.[283]

Ibn Abdal-Wahhab opposed Taqlid, what he perceived to be blind deference to religious authority, believing that it obstructs direct connection with the Qur'an and Sunnah. This led him to deprecate the importance and full authority of Islamicscholars and muftis of the age. In his arguments, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab would use translations and interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an (ayat) that were contrary to the consensus amongst the scholars of the age, and positions against which there had been consensus for centuries. This methodology was argued to be erroneous by a number of scholars.[284][285][286]

However the Wahhabi movement saw itself as championing the re-opening ofijtihad, being intellectual pursuit of scholarly work clarifying opinions in the face of new evidence being a newly proven sound or sahih hadeeth, a discovered historical early ijma (scholarly consensus from the early Muslims) or a suitable analogy, qiyas, based on historical records.[287]

Attributes of God[edit]

Wahhabis have been accused of being anthropomorphic. According to Ibn Taymiyyah however, the Salaf is to take the middle path between the extremes of anthropomorphism and resorting to allegorical/metaphorical interpretations of the Divine Names and Attributes.[288][289] Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab said this about God's attributes:

And it is that we accept the aayaat [verses of the Quran] and ahaadeeth [recorded doings and sayings of the prophet] of the Attributes [of God] upon their apparent meanings, and we leave their true meanings, while believing in their realities, to Allaah ta'aalaa. For Maalik, one of the greatest of the "ulamaa" of the Salaf, when asked about al-istiwaa' in His Saying (ta'aalaa): "Ar-Rahmaan [one of the names of God] rose over the Throne." [Taa-Haa: 5] said: "Al-istiwaa' [rising] is known, the 'how' of it is unknown, believing in it is waajib [an obligation for Muslims], and asking about it is bid'ah [a forbidden innovation]."[261][290]

Population[edit]

One of the more detailed estimates of religious population in the Persian Gulf is byMehrdad Izady who estimates, "using cultural and not confessional criteria", only 4.56 million Wahhabis in the Persian Gulf region, about 4 million from Saudi Arabia, (mostly the Najd), and the rest coming overwhelmingly from the Emirates and Qatar.[22] Most Sunni Qataris are Wahhabis (46.87% of all Qataris)[22] and 44.8% ofEmiratis are Wahhabis,[22] 5.7% of Bahrainis are Wahhabis, and 2.17% ofKuwaitis are Wahhabis.[22]

Notable leaders[edit]

There has traditionally been a recognized head of the Wahhabi "religious estate", often a member of Al ash-Sheikh (a decedent ofMuhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab) or related to another religious head. For example, Abd al-Latif was the son of Abd al-Rahman ibn Hasan.

  • Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703-1792) was the founder of the Wahhabi movement.[291]
  • Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1752-1826) was the head of Wahhabism after his father retired from public life in 1773. After the fall of the first Saudi emirate, Abd Allah went into exile in Cairo where he died.[291]
  • Sulayman ibn Abd Allah (1780-1818) was a grandson of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and author of an influential treatise that restricted travel to and residing in land of idolaters (i.e. land outside of the Wahhabi area).[292]
  • Abd al-Rahman ibn Hasan (1780-1869) was head of the religious estate in thesecond Saudi emirate.[291]
  • Abd al-Latif ibn Abd al-Rahman (1810-1876) Head of religious estate in 1860 and early 1870s.[291]
  • Abd Allah ibn Abd al-Latif Al ash-Sheikh (1848-1921) was the head of religious estate during period of Rashidi rule and the early years of King Abd al-Aziz ibn Saud.[291]
  • Muhammad ibn Ibrahim Al ash-Sheikh (1893-1969) was the head of Wahhabism in mid twentieth century. He has been said to have "dominated the Wahhabi religious estate and enjoyed unrivaled religious authority."[293]

In more recent times, a couple of Wahhabi clerics have risen to prominence that have no relation to ibn Abd al-Wahhab.

  • Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, has been called "the most prominent proponent" of Wahhabism during his time. He died in 1999.[294]
  • Muhammad ibn al-Uthaymeen, another "giant" died in 2001. According to David Dean Commins, no one "has emerged" with the same "degree of authority in the Saudi religious establishment" since their deaths.[294]

International influence and propagation[edit]

Explanation for influence[edit]

Khaled Abou El Fadl attributed the appeal of Wahhabism to some Muslims as stemming from

  • Arab nationalism, which followed the Wahhabi attack on the Ottoman Empire
  • Reformism, which followed a return to Salaf (as-Salaf aṣ-Ṣāliḥ;)
  • Destruction of the Hejaz Khilafa in 1925;
  • Control of Mecca and Medina, which gave Wahhabis great influence on Muslim culture and thinking;
  • Oil, which after 1975 allowed Wahhabis to promote their interpretations of Islam using billions from oil export revenue.[295]

Scholar Gilles Kepel, agrees that the tripling in the price of oil in the mid-1970s and the progressive takeover of Saudi Aramco in the 1974–1980 period, provided the source of much influence of Wahhabism in the Islamic World.

... the financial clout of Saudi Arabia had been amply demonstrated during the oil embargo against the United States, following the Arab-Israeli war of 1973. This show of international power, along with the nation's astronomical increase in wealth, allowed Saudi Arabia's puritanical, conservative Wahhabite faction to attain a preeminent position of strength in the global expression of Islam. Saudi Arabia's impact on Muslims throughout the world was less visible than that of Khomeini's Iran, but the effect was deeper and more enduring. .... it reorganized the religious landscape by promoting those associations and ulemas who followed its lead, and then, by injecting substantial amounts of money into Islamic interests of all sorts, it won over many more converts. Above all, the Saudis raised a new standard -- the virtuous Islamic civilization -- as foil for the corrupting influence of the West.[73]

Funding factor[edit]

Estimates of Saudi spending on religious causes abroad include "upward of $100 billion",[296] between $2 and 3 billion per year since 1975. (compared to the annual Soviet propaganda budget of $1 billion/year),[297] and "at least $87 billion" from 1987-2007[298]

Its largesse funded an estimated "90% of the expenses of the entire faith", throughout the Muslim World, according to journalist Dawood al-Shirian.[299] It extended to young and old, from children's madrasas to high-level scholarship.[300]"Books, scholarships, fellowships, mosques" (for example, "more than 1,500 mosques were built from Saudi public funds over the last 50 years") were paid for.[301] It rewarded journalists and academics, who followed it and built satellite campuses around Egypt for Al Azhar, the oldest and most influential Islamic university.[156] Yahya Birt counts spending on "1,500 mosques, 210 Islamic centres and dozens of Muslim academies and schools".[297][302]

This financial aid has done much to overwhelm less strict local interpretations of Islam, according to observers like Dawood al-Shirian and Lee Kuan Yew,[299] and has caused the Saudi interpretation (sometimes called "petro-Islam"[303]) to be perceived as the correct interpretation—or the "gold standard" of Islam—in many Muslims' minds.[304][305]

Militant and political Islam[edit]

According to counter-terrorism scholar Thomas F. Lynch III, Sunni extremists perpetrated about 700 terror attacks killing roughly 7,000 people from 1981-2006.[306] What connection, if any, there is between Wahhabism and the Jihadi Salafissuch as Al-Qaeda who carried out these attacks, is disputed.

Natana De Long-Bas, senior research assistant at the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University, argues:

The militant Islam of Osama bin Laden did not have its origins in the teachings of Ibn Abd-al-Wahhab and was not representative of Wahhabi Islam as it is practiced in contemporary Saudi Arabia, yet for the media it came to define Wahhabi Islam during the later years of bin Laden's lifetime. However "unrepresentative" bin Laden's global jihad was of Islam in general and Wahhabi Islam in particular, its prominence in headline news took Wahhabi Islam across the spectrum from revival and reform to global jihad.[307]

Noah Feldman distinguishes between what he calls the "deeply conservative" Wahhabis and what he calls the "followers of political Islam in the 1980s and 1990s," such as Egyptian Islamic Jihad and later Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. While Saudi Wahhabis were "the largest funders of local Muslim Brotherhood chapters and other hard-line Islamists" during this time, they opposed jihadi resistance to Muslim governments and assassination of Muslim leaders because of their belief that "the decision to wage jihad lay with the ruler, not the individual believer".[308]

Karen Armstrong states that Osama bin Laden, like most extremists, followed the ideology of Sayyid Qutb, not "Wahhabism".[309]

More recently the self-declared "Islamic State" in Iraq and Syria headed by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has been described as both more violent than al-Qaeda and more closely aligned with Wahhabism.

For their guiding principles, the leaders of the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, are open and clear about their almost exclusive commitment to the Wahhabi movement of Sunni Islam. The group circulates images of Wahhabi religious textbooks from Saudi Arabia in the schools it controls. Videos from the group's territory have shown Wahhabi texts plastered on the sides of an official missionary van.[310]

According to scholar Bernard Haykel, "for Al Qaeda, violence is a means to an ends; for ISIS, it is an end in itself." Wahhabism is the Islamic States "closest religious cognate."[310]

Criticism and controversy[edit]

Criticism by other Muslims[edit]

Among the criticism, or comments made critics, of Wahhabi movement are

  • that it is not so much strict and uncompromising as aberrant,[311] going beyond the bounds of Islam in its restricted definition oftawhid (monotheism), and much too willing to takfir (declare non-Muslim and subject to execution) Muslims it found in violation of Islam[312] (in the second Wahhabi-Saudi jihad/conquest of the Arabian peninsula, an estimated 400,000 were killed or wounded according to some estimates[109][110][111][112]);
  • that bin Saud's agreement to wage jihad to spread Ibn Abdul Wahhab's teachings had more to do with traditional Najd practice of raiding -- "instinctive fight for survival and appetite for lucre"—than with religion;[313]
  • that it has no connection to other Islamic revival movements;[53]
  • that unlike other revivalists, its founder Abd ul-Wahhab showed little scholarship—writing little and making even less commentary;[53]
  • that its contention that ziyara (visiting tombs of Muhammad, his family members, descendants, companions, or Sufi saints) andtawassul(intercession), violate tauhid al-'ibada (directing all worship to God alone) has no basis in tradition, in consensus or in hadith, and that even if it did, it would not be grounds for excluding practitioners of ziyara and tawassul from Islam;[312]
  • that historically Wahhabis have had a suspicious willingness to ally itself with non-Muslim powers (specifically America and Britain), and in particular to ignore the encroachments into Muslim territory of a non-Muslim imperial power (the British) while waging jihad and weakening the Muslim Caliphate of the Ottomans;[314][315] and
  • that Wahhabi strictness in matters of hijab and separation of the sexes, has led not to a more pious and virtuous Saudi Arabia, but to a society showing a very unIslamic lack of respect towards women.

Initial opposition[edit]

Allegedly the first people to oppose Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab were his father Abd al-Wahhab and his brother Salman Ibn Abd al-Wahhab who was an Islamic scholar and qadi. Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's brother wrote a book in refutation of his brothers' new teachings, called: "The Final Word from the Qur'an, the Hadith, and the Sayings of the Scholars Concerning the School of Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab"), also known as: "Al-Sawa`iq al-Ilahiyya fi Madhhab al-Wahhabiyya" ("The Divine Thunderbolts Concerning the Wahhabi School").[316]

In "The Refutation of Wahhabism in Arabic Sources, 1745–1932",[316] Hamadi Redissi provides original references to the description of Wahhabis as a divisive sect (firqa) and outliers (Kharijites) in communications between Ottomans and Egyptian Khedive Muhammad Ali. Redissi details refutations of Wahhabis by scholars (muftis); among them Ahmed Barakat Tandatawin, who in 1743 describes Wahhabism as ignorance (Jahala).

Shi'a criticism[edit]

In 1801 and 1802, the Saudi Wahhabis under Abdul Aziz ibn Muhammad ibn Saudattacked and captured the holy Shia cities of Karbalaand Najaf in Iraq and destroyed the tombs of Husayn ibn Ali who is the grandson of Muhammad, and son of Ali (Ali bin Abu Talib), the son-in-law of Muhammad (see: Saudi sponsorship mentioned previously). In 1803 and 1804 the Saudis captured Mecca and Madinah and demolished various venerated shrines, monuments and removed a number of what was seen as sources or possible gateways to polytheism or shirk - such as the shrine built over the tomb of Fatimah, the daughter of Muhammad. In 1998 the Saudis bulldozed and allegedly poured gasoline over the grave of Aminah bint Wahb, the mother of Muhammad, causing resentment throughout the Muslim World.[317][318][319] Shi'a and other minorities in Islam insist that Wahhabis are behind targeted killings in many countries such as Iraq, Pakistan and Bahrain.

Sunni and Sufi criticism[edit]

One early rebuttal of Wahhabism, (by Sunni jurist Ibn Jirjis) argued that Whoever declares that there is no god but God and prays toward Mecca is a believer, supplicating the dead is permitted because it is not a form of worship but merely calling out to them, and that worship at graves is not idolatry unless the supplicant believes that buried saints have the power to determine the course of events. (These arguments were specifically rejected as heretical by the Wahhabi leader at the time.) [320]

The Syrian professor and scholar Dr. Muhammad Sa'id Ramadan al-Buti criticises the Salafi movement in a few of his works.[321]

The Sufi Islamic Supreme Council of America founded by the Naqshbandi Sufi Shaykh Hisham Kabbani classify Wahhabbism as being extremist and heretical based on Wahhabbism's rejection of Sufism and what they believe to be traditionalsufi scholars.[322][323][324]

Non-Religious motivations[edit]

According to at least one critic, the 1744-1745 alliance between Ibn Abdul Wahhab and the tribal chief Muhammad bin Saud to wage jihad on neighboring allegedly false-Muslims, was a "consecration" by Ibn Abdul Wahhab of bin Saud tribe's long standing raids on neighboring oases by "renaming those raids jihad." Part of the Najd's "Hobbesian state of perpetual war pitted Beouin bribes against one another for control of the scarce resources that could stave off starvation." And a case of substituting fath, "the 'opening' or conquest of a vast territory through religious zeal", for the "instinctive fight for survival and appetite for lucre." [313]

Wahhabism in the United States[edit]

A study conducted by the NGO Freedom House found Wahhabi publications inmosques in the United States. These publications included statements that Muslims should not only "always oppose" infidels "in every way", but "hate them for their religion … for Allah's sake", that democracy "is responsible for all the horrible wars... the number of wars it started in the 20th century alone is more than 130 wars," and that Shia and certain Sunni Muslims were infidels.[325][326] In a response to the report, the Saudi government stated, "[It has] worked diligently during the last five years to overhaul its education system" but "[o]verhauling an educational system is a massive undertaking."[327]

A review of the study by Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU) complained the study cited documents from only a few mosques, arguing most mosques in the U.S. are not under Wahhabi influence.[328] ISPU comments on the study were not entirely negative however, and concluded:

American-Muslim leaders must thoroughly scrutinize this study. Despite its limitations, the study highlights an ugly undercurrent in modern Islamic discourse that American-Muslims must openly confront. However, in the vigor to expose strains of extremism, we must not forget that open discussion is the best tool to debunk the extremist literature rather than a suppression of First Amendment rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.[328]

Read more…

WAHHADISM PART 2

WAHHADISM PART 2

Definitions[edit]

Some definitions or uses of the term Wahhabi Islam include:

  • "a corpus of doctrines,it is also a set of attitudes and behavior, derived from the teachings of a particularly severe religious reformist who lived in central Arabia in the mid-eighteenth century" (Gilles Kepel)[43]
  • "pure Islam" (David Commins, paraphrasing supporters' definition),[44] that does not deviate from Sharia law in any way and should be called Islam and not Wahhabism. (Prince Salman bin Abdul Aziz, the governor of the Saudi capital Riyadh)[14]
  • "a misguided creed that fosters intolerance, promotes simplistic theology, and restricts Islam's capacity for adaption to diverse and shifting circumstances" (David Commins, paraphrasing opponents' definition)[44]
  • "a conservative reform movement ... the creed upon which the kingdom of Saudi Arabia was founded, and [which] has influenced Islamic movements worldwide" (Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world)[45]
  • "a sect dominant in Saudi Arabia and Qatar" with footholds in "India, Africa, and elsewhere", with a "steadfastly fundamentalist interpretation of Islam in the tradition of Ibn Hanbal" (Cyril Glasse)[20]
  • an "eighteenth-century reformist/revivalist movement for sociomoral reconstruction of society", "founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab" (Oxford Dictionary of Islam).[46]
  • originally a "literal revivification" of Islamic principles that ignored the spiritual side of Islam, that "rose on the wings of enthusiasm апd longing and then sank down into the lowlands of pharisaic self-righteousness" after gaining power and losing its "longing and humility" (Muhammad Asad)[47]
  • "a political trend" within Islam that "has been adopted for power-sharing purposes", but cannot be called a sect because "It has no special practices, nor special rites, and no special interpretation of religion that differ from the main body of Sunni Islam" (Abdallah Al Obeid, the former dean of the Islamic University of Medina and member of the Saudi Consultative Council)[37]
  • "the true salafist movement". Starting out as a theological reform movement, it had "the goal of calling (da'wa) people to restore the 'real' meaning of tawhid (oneness of God or monotheism) and to disregard and deconstruct 'traditional' disciplines and practices that evolved in Islamic history such as theology and jurisprudence and the traditions of visiting tombs and shrines of venerated individuals." (Ahmad Moussalli)[48]
  • a term used by opponents of Salafism in hopes of besmirching that movement by suggesting foreign influence and "conjuring up images of Saudi Arabia". The term is "most frequently used in countries where Salafis are a small minority" of the Muslim community but "have made recent inroads" in "converting" the local population to Salafism. (Quintan Wiktorowicz)[13]
  • a blanket term used inaccurately to refer to "any Islamic movement that has an apparent tendency toward misogyny, militantism, extremism, or strict and literal interpretation of the Quran and hadith" (Natana J. DeLong-Bas)[49]

Etymology[edit]

According to Saudi writer Abdul Aziz Qassim and others, it was the Ottomans who "first labelled Abdul Wahhab's school of Islam in Saudi Arabia as Wahhabism". The British also adopted it and expanded its use in the Middle East.[50]

Wahhabis do not like—or at least did not like—the term. Ibn Abd-Al-Wahhab's was averse to the elevation of scholars and other individuals, including using a person's name to label an Islamic school.[13][31][51]

Naming controversy: Wahhabis, Muwahhidun, and Salafis[edit]

According to Robert Lacey "the Wahhabis have always disliked the name customarily given to them" and preferred to be calledMuwahhidun (Unitarians). Another preferred term was simply "Muslims" since their creed is "pure Islam".[52]However critics complain these terms imply non-Wahhabis are not monotheists or Muslims,[52][53] and the English translation of that term causes confusion with the Christian denomination (Unitarian Universalism).

Other terms Wahhabis have been said to use and/or prefer include ahl al-hadith("people of hadith"), Salafi Da'wa or al-da'wa ila al-tawhid[54] ("Salafi preaching" or "preaching of monotheism", for the school rather than the adherents) or Ahl ul-Sunna wal Jama'a("people of the tradition of Muhammad and the consensus of the Ummah"),[5] Ahl al-Sunnah ("People of the Sunna"),[55] or "the reform or Salafi movement of the Sheikh" (the sheikh being ibn Abdul-Wahhab).[56] Early Salafis referred to themselves simply as "Muslims", believing the neighboring Ottoman Caliphate was al-dawlah al-kufriyya (a heretical nation) and its self-professed Muslim inhabitants actually non-Muslim.[30][57][58][59]

Many, such as writer Quinton Wiktorowicz, urge use of the term Salafi, maintaining that "one would be hard pressed to find individuals who refer to themselves as Wahhabis or organizations that use 'Wahhabi' in their title, or refer to their ideology in this manner (unless they are speaking to a Western audience that is unfamiliar with Islamic terminology, and even then usage is limited and often appears as 'Salafi/Wahhabi')."[13] A New York Times journalist writes that Saudis "abhor" the term Wahhabism, "feeling it sets them apart and contradicts the notion that Islam is a monolithic faith."[60] Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud for example has attacked the term as 'a doctrine that doesn't exist here (Saudi Arabia)' and dared users of the term to locate any "deviance of the form of Islam practiced inSaudi Arabia from the teachings of the Quran and Prophetic Hadiths".[61][62]

But authors at Global Security and Library of Congress state the term is now commonplace and used even by Wahhabi scholars in the Najd,[5][63] a region often called the "heartland" of Wahhabism.[64] Journalist Karen House calls Salafi, "a more politically correct term" for Wahhabi.[65]

In any case, according to Lacey, none of the other terms have caught on, and so like the Christian Quakers, Wahhabis have "remained known by the name first assigned to them by their detractors."[66]

Wahhabis and Salafis[edit]

Many scholars and critics distinguish between Wahhabi and Salafi. According to American scholar Christopher M. Blanchard,[67]Wahhabism refers to "a conservative Islamic creed centered in and emanating from Saudi Arabia," whileSalafiyya is "a more general puritanical Islamic movement that has developed independently at various times and in various places in the Islamic world."[31]Others call Wahhabism a more strict, Saudi form of Salafi.[68][69] Wahhabism is the Saudi version of Salafism, according to Mark Durie, who states Saudi leaders "are active and diligent" using their considerable financial resources "in funding and promoting Salafism all around the world."[70] Ahmad Moussalli tends to agree Wahhabism is a subset of Salafism, saying "As a rule, all Wahhabis are salafists, but not all salafists are Wahhabis".[48]

According to the Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism, the principal distinction between the two (at least originally) was that Wahhabism accepted a ruler that imposed Sharia law, while Salafism desired the return of the caliphate, with a single ruler for the entire Muslim world.[71]

Hamid Algar lists three "elements" Wahhabism and Salafism had in common.

  1. "above all disdain for all developments subsequent to al-Salaf al-Salih (the first two or three generations of Islam),
  2. "the rejection of Sufism, and
  3. "the abandonment of consistent adherence to one of the four Sunni Madhhabs(schools of fiqh).

And "two important and interrelated features" that distinguished Salafis from the Wahhabis:

  1. "a reliance on attempts at persuasion rather than coercion in order to rally other Muslims to their cause; and
  2. "an informed awareness of the political and socio-economic crises confronting the Muslim world.[53]

Hamid Algar and another critic, Khaled Abou El Fadl, argue Saudi oil-export funding "co-opted" the "symbolism and language of Salafism", during the 1960s and 70s, making them practically indistinguishable by the 1970s,[72] and now the two ideologies have "melded". Abou El Fadl believes Wahhabism rebranded itself as Salafism knowing it could not "spread in the modern Muslim world" as Wahhabism.[38]

History[edit]

The Wahhabi mission started as a revivalist movement in the remote, arid region of Najd. With the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, the Al Saud dynasty, and with it Wahhabism, spread to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. After the discovery of petroleum near the Persian Gulf in 1939, it had access to oil export revenues, revenue that grew to billions of dollars. This money—spent on books, media, schools, universities, mosques, scholarships, fellowships, lucrative jobs for journalists, academics and Islamic scholars—gave Wahhabism a "preeminent position of strength" in Islam around the world.[73]

In the country of Wahhabism's founding—and by far the largest and most powerful country where it is the state religion—Wahhabi ulama gained control over education, law, public morality and religious institutions in the 20th century, while permitting as a "trade-off" doctrinally objectionable actions such as the import of modern technology and communications, and dealings with non-Muslims, for the sake of the consolidation of the power of its political guardian, the Al Saud dynasty.[74]

However, in the last couple of decades of the twentieth century several crises worked to erode Wahhabi "credibility" in Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Muslim world—the November 1979 seizure of the Grand Mosque by militants; the deployment of US troops in Saudi during the 1991 Gulf War against Iraq; and the9/11 2001 al-Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington.[75]

In each case the Wahhabi establishment was called on to support the dynasty's efforts to suppress religious dissent—and in each case it did[75]—exposing its dependence on the Saudi dynasty and its often unpopular policies.[76][77]

In the West, the end of the Cold War and the anti-communist alliance with conservative, religious Saudi Arabia, and the 9/11 attacks created enormous distrust towards the kingdom and especially its official religion.[78]

Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab[edit]

Main article: Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab

The founder of Wahhabism, Mohammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab, was born around 1700 in a small oasis town in the Najd region, in what is now central Saudi Arabia. He studied in Basra (in what is now Iraq)[79][80] and possibly Mecca and Medina while there to performHajj,[81][82] before returning to his home town of 'Uyayna in 1740. There he worked to spread (what he believed to be) the call (da'wa) for a restoration of true monotheistic worship,[83] purified of innovations, such as invoking or making vows to "holy men" or "saints". The "pivotal idea" of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teaching was that people who called themselves Muslims but who participated in such innovations were not just misguided or committing a sin, but were "outside the pale of Islam altogether," as were Muslims who disagreed with his definition. [84]

This included not just lax, unlettered, nomadic Bedu, but ShiaSufi, and Ottomans.[85] Such infidels were not to be killed outright, but to be given a chance to repent first.[86][87]

With the support of the ruler of the town—Uthman ibn Mu'ammar—he carried out some of his religious reforms in 'Uyayna, including the demolition of the tomb ofZayd ibn al-Khattab (one of the Sahaba (companions) of the prophet Muhammad), and the stoning to death of an adulterous woman.[88] However, a more powerful chief, (Sulaiman ibn Muhammad ibn Ghurayr), pressured Uthman ibn Mu'ammar to expel him from 'Uyayna.[89]

Alliance with the House of Saud[edit]

Further information: First Saudi StateThe First Saudi state1744-1818The Second Saudi state1850The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia after unification in 1932

The ruler of nearby town, Muhammad ibn Saud, invited ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab to join him, and in 1744 a pact was made between the two. [90] Ibn Saud would protect and propagate the doctrines of the Wahhabi mission, while ibn Abdul Wahhab "would support the ruler, supplying him with 'glory and power.'" Whoever championed his message, ibn Abdul Wahhab promised, "will, by means of it, rule the lands and men." [19] Ibn Saud would abandon un-Sharia taxation of local harvests, and in return God might compensate him with booty from conquest and sharia compliant taxes that would exceed what he gave up.[91] The alliance between the Wahhabi mission and Al Saud family has "endured for more than two and half centuries," surviving defeat and collapse.[90][92] The two families have intermarried multiple times over the years and in today's Saudi Arabia, the minister of religion is always a member of the Al ash-Sheikh family, (i.e. a descendent of Ibn Abdul Wahhab).[93]

According to most sources, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab declared jihad against neighboring tribes, whose practices of praying to saints, making pilgrimages to tombs and special mosques, he believed to be the work of idolaters/unbelievers. [32] [53][86][94] (One academic disputes this. According to Natana DeLong-Bas, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab was restrained in urging fighting with perceived unbelievers, preferring to preach and persuade rather than attack.[95] [96][97] It was only after the death ofMuhammad bin Saud in 1765 that, according to DeLong-Bas, Muhammad bin Saud's son and successor, Abdul-Aziz bin Muhammad, used a "convert or die" approach to expand his domain,[98] and when Wahhabis adopted the takfir ideas ofIbn Taymiyya.[99])

Conquest expanded through the Arabian Peninsula until it conquered Mecca and Medina the early 19th century. [63][100] (It was at this time, according to DeLong-Bas, that Wahhabis embraced the ideas of Ibn Taymiyya—which allow self-professed Muslim who do not follow Islamic law to be declared non-Muslims—to justify their warring and conquering the Muslim Sharifs of Hijaz.[99])

One of their most noteworthy and controversial attacks was on Karbala in 1802 (1217 AH). There, according to a Wahhabi chronicler `Uthman b. `Abdullah b. Bishr: "The Muslims"—as the Wahhabis referred to themselves, not feeling the need to distinguish themselves from other Muslims, since they did not believe them to be Muslims --

scaled the walls, entered the city ... and killed the majority of its people in the markets and in their homes. [They] destroyed the dome placed over the grave of al-Husayn [and took] whatever they found inside the dome and its surroundings ... the grille surrounding the tomb which was encrusted with emeralds, rubies, and other jewels ... different types of property, weapons, clothing, carpets, gold, silver, precious copies of the Qur'an."[101]

Wahhabis also massacred the male population and enslaved the women and children of the city of Ta'if in Hejaz in 1803.[102]

The Ottoman Empire eventually succeeded in counterattacking. In 1818 they defeated Al Saud, leveling the capital (Diriyah, executing the Al-Saud emir, exiling the emirate's polittical and religious leadership,[92][103] and otherwise unsuccessfully attempted to stamp out not just the House of Saud but the Wahhabi mission.[104] A second, smaller Saudi state (Emirate of Nejd) lasted from 1819-1891. Its borders being within Najd, Wahhabism was protected from further Ottoman or Egyptian campaigns by the Najd's isolation, lack of valuable resources, and that era's limited communication and transportation.[105]

By the 1880s, at least among townsmen if not bedohin, Wahhabi strict monotheistic doctrine had become the native religious culture of the Najd.[106]

Abdul-Aziz Ibn Saud[edit]

Ibn Saud, the first king of Saudi ArabiaFurther information:History of Saudi ArabiaT. E. Lawrence was sympathetic toSalafi elements in the Arabian Peninsula that intended to oust theOttoman Empire.

In 1901, Abdul-Aziz Ibn Saud, a fifth generation descendent of Muhammad ibn Saud,[107] began a military campaign that led to the conquest of much of the Arabian peninsula and the founding of present day Saudi Arabia, after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.[108] The result that safeguarded the vision of Islam based around the tenets of Islam as preached by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was not bloodless, as 40,000 public executions and 350,000 amputations were carried out during its course, according to some estimates.[109][110][111][112]

Under the reign of Abdul-Aziz, "political considerations trumped religious idealism" favored by pious Wahhabis. His political and military success gave the Wahhabi ulama control over religious institutions with jurisdiction over considerable territory, and in later years Wahhabi ideas formed the basis of the rules and laws concerning social affairs, and shaped the kingdom's judicial and educational policies.[113] But protests from Wahhabi ulama were overridden when it came to consolidating power in Hijaz and al-Hasa, avoiding clashes with the great power of the region (Britain), adopting modern technology, establishing a simple governmental administrative framework, or signing an oil concession with the U.S. [114] The Wahhabi ulama also issued a fatwa affirming that "only the ruler could declare a jihad"[115] (a violation of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teaching according to Deong-Bas.[49])

As the realm of Wahhabism expanded under Ibn Saud into areas of Shiite (Al-Hasa, conquered in 1913) and pluralistic Muslim tradition (Hejaz, conquered in 1924-5), Wahhabis pressed for forced conversion of Shia and an eradication of (what they saw as) idolatry. Ibn Saud sought "a more relaxed approach".[116]

In al-Hasa, efforts to stop the observance of Shia religious holidays and replace teaching and preaching duties of Shia clerics with Wahhabi, lasted only a year.[117]

In Mecca and Jeddah (in Hejaz) prohibition of tobacco, alcohol, playing cards and listening to music on the phonograph was looser than in Najd. Over the objections of Wahhabi ulama, Ibn Saud permitted both the driving of automobiles and the attendance of Shia at hajj.[118]

Enforcement of the commanding right and forbidding wrong, such as enforcing prayer observance and separation the sexes, developed a prominent place during the second Saudi emirate, and in 1926 a formal committee for enforcement was founded in Mecca. [20][119] [120]

While Wahhabi warriors swore loyalty to monarchs of Al Saud, there was one major rebellion. King Abdul-Aziz put down rebelling Ikhwan—nomadic tribesmen turned Wahhabi warriors who opposed his "introducing such innovations as telephones, automobiles, and the telegraph" and his "sending his son to a country of unbelievers (Egypt)". [121] Britain had aided Abdul-Aziz, and when the Ikhwan attacked the British protectorates of TransjordanIraq and Kuwait, as a continuation of jihad to expand the Wahhabist realm, Abdul-Aziz struck, killing hundreds before the rebels surrendered in 1929.[122]

Connection with the outside[edit]

Before Abdul-Aziz, during most of the second half of the 19th century, there was a strong aversion in Wahhabi lands to mixing with "idolaters" (which included most of the Muslim world). Voluntary contact was considered by Wahhabi clerics to be at least a sin, and if one enjoyed the company of idolaters, and "approved of their religion", an act of unbelief.[123] Travel outside the pale of Najd to the Ottoman lands "was tightly controlled, if not prohibited altogether".[124]

Over the course of its history, however, Wahhabism has became more accommodating towards the outside world.[125] In the late 1800s, Wahhabis found Muslims with at least similar beliefs—first with Ahl-i Hadith in India,[126] and later with Islamic revivalists in Arab states (one being Mahmud Sahiri al-Alusi in Baghdad).[127] The revivalists and Wahhabis shared a common interest in Ibn Taymiyya's thought, the permissibility of ijtihad, and the need to purify worship practices of innovation.[128] In the 1920s, Rashid Rida, a pioneer Salafistwhose periodical al-Manar was widely read in the Muslim world, published an "anthology of Wahhabi treatises," and a work praising the Ibn Saud as "the savior of the Haramayn [the two holy cities] and a practitioner of authentic Islamic rule".[129][130]

In a bid "to join the Muslim mainstream and to erase the reputation of extreme sectarianism associated with the Ikhwan," in 1926 Ibn Saud convened a Muslim congress of representatives of Muslim governments and popular associations.[131]By the early 1950s, the "pressures" on Ibn Saud of controlling the regions of Hejaz and al-Hasa—"outside the Wahhabi heartland"—and of "navigating the currents of regional politics" "punctured the seal" between the Wahhabi heartland and the "land of idolatry" outside.[132][133]

A major current in regional politics at that time was secular nationalism, which,Gamal Abdul Nasser, was sweeping the Arab world. To combat it, Wahhabi missionary outreach worked closely with Saudi foreign policy initiatives. In May 1962, a conference in Mecca organized by Saudis discussed ways to combat secularism and socialism. In its wake, the World Muslim League was established.[134] To propagate Islam and "repel inimical trends and dogmas", the League opened branch offices around the globe.[53] It developed closer association between Wahhabis and leading Salafis, and made common cause with the Islamic revivalist Muslim BrotherhoodAhl al-Hadith and the Jamaat-i Islami, combating Sufism and "innovative" popular religious practices[134] and rejecting the West and Western "ways which were so deleterious of Muslim piety and values."[135]Missionaries were sent to West Africa, where the League funded schools, distributed religious literature, and gave scholarships to attend Saudi religious universities. One result was the Izala Societywhich fought Sufism in Nigeria, Chad, Niger, and Cameroon.[136]

An event that had a great effect on Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia[137] was the "infiltration of the transnationalist revival movement" in the form of thousands of pious, Islamist Arab Muslim Brotherhood refugees from Egypt following Nasser's clampdown on the brotherhood[138] (and also from similar nationalist clampdowns in Iraq[139] and Syria.[140]), to help staff the new school system of (the largely illiterate) Kingdom.[141]

The Brotherhood's Islamist ideology differed from the more conservative Wahhabism which preached loyal obedience to the king. The Brotherhood dealt in what one author (Robert Lacey) called "change-promoting concepts" like social justice, and anticolonialism, and gave "a radical, but still apparently safe, religious twist" to the Wahhabi values Saudi students "had absorbed in childhood". With the Brotherhood's "hands-on, radical Islam", jihad became a "practical possibility today", not just part of history.[142]

The Brethren were ordered by the Saudi clergy and government not to attempt to proselytize or otherwise get involved in religious doctrinal matters within the Kingdom, but nonetheless "took control" of Saudi Arabia's intellectual life" by publishing books and participating in discussion circles and salons held by princes.[143] In time they took leading roles in key governmental ministries,[144] and had influence on education curriculum.[145] An Islamic university in Medina created in 1961 to train—mostly non-Saudi—proselytizers to Wahhabism, [146] became "a haven" for Muslim Brother refugees from Egypt.[147] The Brothers' ideas eventually spread throughout the kingdom and had great effect on Wahhabism—although observers differ as to whether this was by "undermining" it[137][148] or "blending" with it.[149][150]

Growth[edit]

In the 1950s and 60s within Saudi Arabia, the Wahhabi ulama maintained their hold on religious law courts, presided over the creation of Islamic universities, and a public school system which gave students "a heavy dose of religious instruction".[151] Outside of Saudi the Wahhabi ulama became "less combative" toward the rest of the Muslim world. In confronting the challenge of the West, Wahhabi doctrine "served well" for many Muslims as a "platform" and "gained converts beyond the peninsula."[151][152]

A number of reasons have been given for this success. The growth in popularity and strength of both Arab nationalism (although Wahhabis opposed any form of nationalism as an ideology, Saudis were Arabs, and their enemy the Ottoman caliphate was ethnically Turkish),[26] and Islamic reform (specifically reform by following the example of those first three generations of Muslims known as theSalaf);[26] the destruction of the Ottoman Empire which sponsored their most effective critics,[153] the destruction of another rival, theKhilafa in Hejaz, in 1925.[26] Not least in importance was the money Saudi Arabia earned from exporting oil.[73]

Petroleum export era[edit]

The pumping and export of oil from Saudi Arabia started during World War II, and its earnings helped fund religious activities in the 1950s and 60. But it was the 1973 oil crisis and quadrupling in the price of oil that both increased the kingdom's wealth astronomically and enhanced its prestige by demonstrating its international power as a leader of OPEC. By 1980, Saudi Arabia was earning every three days the income from oil it had taken a year to earn before the embargo.[154] Tens of billions of dollars of this money were spent on books, media, schools, scholarships for students (from primary to post-graduate), fellowships and subsidies to reward journalists, academics and Islamic scholars, the building of hundreds of Islamic centers and universities, and over one thousand schools and one thousand mosques.[155][156] [157] During this time, Wahhabism attained what Gilles Kepel called a "preeminent position of strength in the global expression of Islam."[73]

Afghanistan jihad[edit]

The "apex of cooperation" between Wahhabis and Muslim revivalist groups was the Afghan jihad.[158]

In December 1979, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan—its poor Muslim neighbor—concerned about a growing Islamic insurgency against a friendly, pro-modernization regime there. Shortly thereafter, Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a Muslim Brother cleric with ties to Saudi religious institutions,[159] issued a fatwa[160]declaring defensive jihad in Afghanistan against the atheist Soviet Union, "fard ayn", a personal (or individual) obligation for all Muslims. The edict was supported by Saudi Arabia's Grand Mufti (highest religious scholar), Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz, among others.[161][162]

Between 1982 and 1992 an estimated 35,000 individual Muslim volunteers went to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets and their Afghan regime. Thousands more attended frontier schools teeming with former and future fighters. Somewhere between 12,000 and 25,000 of these volunteers came from Saudi Arabia.[163] Saudi Arabia and the other conservative Gulf monarchies also provided considerable financial support to the jihad -- $600 million a year by 1982.[164]

By 1989, Soviet troops had withdrawn and within a few years not only had the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul collapsed, so had the Soviet Union.

This Saudi/Wahhabi religious triumph further stood out in the Muslim world because many Muslim-majority states (and the PLO) were allied with the Soviet Union and did not support the Afghan jihad.[165] But many jihad volunteers (most famouslyOsama bin Laden) returning home to Saudi and elsewhere were often radicalized by Islamic militants who were "much more extreme than their Saudi sponsors."[165]

"Erosion" of Wahhabism[edit]

Grand Mosque seizure[edit]

Main article: Grand Mosque Seizure

In 1979, 400–500 Islamist insurgents using smuggled weapons and supplies, took over the Grand mosque in Mecca, called for an overthrow of the monarchy, denounced the Wahhabi ulama as royal puppets, and announced the arrival of theMahdi of "end time". The insurgents deviated from Wahhabi doctrine in significant details,[166] but were also associated with leading Wahhabi ulama (Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz knew the insurgent's leader, Juhayman al-Otaybi).[167] Their seizure of Islam's holiest site, the taking hostage of hundreds of hajj pilgrims, and the deaths of hundreds of militants, security forces and hostages caught in crossfire during the two-week-long retaking of the mosque, all shocked the Islamic world[168] and did not enhance the prestige of Al Saud as "custodians" of the mosque.

The incident also damaged the prestige of the Wahhabi establishment. Saudi leadership sought and received Wahhabi fatawa to approve the military removal of the insurgents and after that to execute them.[169] But Wahhabi clerics also fell under suspicion for involvement with the insurgents. [170] In part as a consequence, Sahwa clerics influenced by Brethren's ideas were given freer rein. Their ideology was also thought more likely to compete with the recent Islamic revolutionism/third-worldism of the Iranian Revolution.[170]

Although the insurgents were motivated by religious puritanism, the incident was not followed by a crackdown on other religious purists, but by giving greater power to the ulama and religious conservatives to more strictly enforce Islamic codes in myriad ways[171]—from the banning of women's images in the media to adding even more hours of Islamic studies in school and giving more power and money to the religious police to enforce conservative rules of behaviour.[172][173][174]

1990 Gulf War[edit]

In August 1990 Iraq invaded and annexed Kuwait. Concerned that Saddam Husseinmight push south and seize its own oil fields, Saudis requested military support from the US and allowed tens of thousands of US troops to be based in the Kingdom to fight Iraq.[144]

But what "amounted to seeking infidels' assistance against a Muslim power" was difficult to justify in terms of Wahhabi doctrine.[175][176]

Again Saudi authorities sought and received a fatwa from leading Wahhabi ulama supporting their action. The fatwa failed to persuade many conservative Muslims and ulama who strongly opposed US presence, including the Muslim Brotherhood-supported the Sahwah "Awakening" movement that began pushing for political change in the Kingdom.[177] Outside the kingdom, Islamist/Islamic revival groups that had long received aid from Saudi and had ties with Wahhabis (Arab jihadists, Pakistani and Afghan Islamists) supported Iraq, not Saudi.[25]

During this time and later, many in the Wahhabi/Salafi movement (such as Osama bin Laden) not only no longer looked to the Saudi monarch as an emir of Islam, but supported his overthrow, focusing on jihad (Salafist jihadists) against the US and (what they believe are) other enemies of Islam.[178][179] (This movement is sometimes called neo-Wahhabi or neo-salafi.[38][48])

After 9/11[edit]

The 2001 9/11 attacks on (Saudi's putative ally) the US that killed almost 3,000 people and caused at least $10 billion in property and infrastructure damage[180]were assumed by many (at least outside the kingdom) to be "an expression of Wahhabism", since the Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and most of the 9/11 hijackers are Saudi nationals.[181] A backlash in the formerly hospitable US against the kingdom focused on its official religion that came to be considered by "some ... a doctrine of terrorism and hate."[78]

Inside the kingdom, Crown Prince Abdullah addressed the country's religious, tribal, business, and media leadership following the attacks in a series of televised gatherings calling for a strategy to correct what has gone wrong. According to authorRobert Lacey, the gatherings and later articles and replies by a top cleric (Dr. Adullah Turki) and two top Al Saud princes (Prince Turki Al-Faisal, Prince Talal bin Abdul Aziz), served as an occasion to sort out who had the ultimate power in the kingdom—the Al Saud dynasty and not the ulema. It was declared that it has always been the role of executive rulers in Islamic history to exercise power and the job of the religious scholars to advise, never to govern.[142]

In 2003-2004, Saudi Arabia saw a wave of Al-Qaeda-related suicide bombings,attacks on Non-Muslim foreigners (about 80% of those employed in the Saudi private sector are foreign workers[182] and constitute about 30% of the country's population[183]) and gun battles between Saudi security forces and militants. One reaction to the attacks was a trimming back of the Wahhabi establishment's domination of religion and society. "National Dialogues" were held that "included Shiites, Sufis, liberal reformers, and professional women."[184] In 2009, as part of what some called an effort to "take on the ulema and reform the clerical establishment", King Abdullah issued a decree that only "officially approved" religious scholars would be allowed to issue fatwas in Saudi Arabia. The king also expanded the Council of Senior Scholars (containing officially approved religious scholars) to include scholars from Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence other than the Hanbali madhabShafi'iHanafi and Maliki schools.[185]

Relations with the Muslim Brotherhood have deteriorated steadily. After 9/11, the then interior minister Prince Nayef, blamed the Brotherhood, for extremism in the kingdom,[186] and he declared it guilty of "betrayal of pledges and ingratitude" and "the source of all problems in the Islamic world", after it was elected to power in Egypt.[187] In March 2014 the Saudi government declared the Brotherhood a "terrorist organization".[144]

Wahhabi influence in Saudi Arabia, however, remained tangible in the physical conformity in dress, in public deportment, and in public prayer. Most significantly, the Wahhabi legacy was manifest in the social ethos that presumed government responsibility for the collective moral ordering of society, from the behavior of individuals, to institutions, to businesses, to the government itself.[188]

Memoirs of Mr. Hempher[edit]

A widely circulated but discredited apocryphal description of the founding of Wahhabism[189][190] known as Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy to the Middle East (other titles have been used),[191] alleges that a British agent named Hempher was responsible for creation of Wahhabism. In the "memoir", Hempher corrupts Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, manipulating him[192] to preach his new interpretation of Islam for the purpose of sowing dissension and disunity among Muslims so that "We, the English people, ... may live in welfare and luxury."[191]

Read more…

WAHHADISM PART 1

WAHHADISM PART 1

Wahhabism (Arabicوهابية‎, Wahhābiyyah) or Wahhabi mission[1] (/wəˈhɑːbi, wɑː-/;[2] Arabic:ألدعوة ألوهابية‎, al-Da'wa al-Wahhābiyyah ) is a religious movement or sect or form[3] of Sunni Islam[4][5][6] variously described as "orthodox", "ultraconservative",[7] "austere",[3]"fundamentalist",[8] "puritanical"[9] (or "puritan").[10] It describes an Islamic "reform movement" to restore "pure monotheistic worship",[11] or an "extremist pseudo-Sunni movement".[12] Adherents often object to the term Wahhabi or Wahhabism as derogatory, and prefer to be called Salafi ormuwahhid.[13][14][15]

Wahhabism is named after an eighteenth century preacher and scholar, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703–1792).[16] He started a revivalist movement in the remote, sparsely populated region of Najd,[17] advocating a purging of practices such as the popular cult of saints, and shrine and tomb visitation, widespread among Muslims, but which he considered idolatry, impurities and innovations inIslam.[5][18] Eventually he formed a pact with a local leader Muhammad bin Saudoffering political obedience and promising that protection and propagation of the Wahhabi movement, would mean "power and glory" and rule of "lands and men."[19] The movement is centered on the principle of Tawhid,[20] or the "uniqueness" and "unity" of God.[18]

The alliance between followers of ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Muhammad bin Saud's successors (the House of Saud) proved to be a rather durable alliance. The house of ibn Saud continued to maintain its politico-religious alliance with the Wahhabi sect through the waxing and waning of its own political fortunes over the next 150 years, through to its eventual proclamation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932, and then afterwards, on into modern times. Today Mohammed bin Abd Al-Wahhab's teachings are state-sponsored and are the dominant form of Islam[3][21] in 21st century Saudi Arabia.

The majority of the world's Wahhabis are from QatarUAE and Saudi Arabia.[22]46.87% ofQataris[22] and 44.8% of Emiratis are Wahhabis.[22] 5.7% of Bahrainisare Wahhabis and 2.17% of Kuwaitis are Wahhabis.[22]

Wahhabis are the "dominant minority" in Saudi Arabia.[23] There are 4 million Saudi Wahhabis(concentrated in Najd) representing 22.9% of the population.[22][24] With the help of funding from petroleum exports[25] (and other factors[26]), the movement underwent "explosive growth" beginning in the 1970s and now has worldwide influence.[3] The movement is centered on the principle of Tawhid,[20] or the "uniqueness" and "unity" of God.[18] The movement also draws from the teachings of Medieval theologian Ibn Taymiyyah and early juristAhmad ibn Hanbal.[27]

Wahhabism has been accused of being "a source of global terrorism",[28][29] and for causing disunity in the Muslim community by labeling non-Wahhabi Muslims asapostates[30] (takfir) thus paving the way for their bloodshed.[31][32][33] It has also been criticized for the destruction of historic mazaarsmausoleums, and other Muslim and non-Muslim buildings and artifacts.[34][35][36] The "boundaries" of what make up Wahhabism have been called "difficult to pinpoint",[37] but in contemporary usage, the terms Wahhabi and Salafi are often used interchangeably, and considered to be movements with different roots that have merged since the 1960s.[38][39] [40] But Wahhabism has also been called "a particular orientation within Salafism",[5] or an ultra-conservative, Saudi brand of Salafism.[41][42]

Contents

[hide]

Read more…

THE DAILY JOT

Bill Wilson
The Daily Jot 

Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic persp
ective.  
 


NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them. 

  

Friday, January 23, 2015

 

Prophetic significance of King Abdullah's death


While Saudi Arabia has on the outside looked like a kingdom that was at peace with Israel, on the inside it bred and evangelized one of the most radical sects of Islam--Wahhabism. It persecuted Christians and Jews. It controlled the world's oil market. It was the mixture of Islamic wealth and modernism with the archaic medieval brutality that serves as the foundation to Islam. Religious freedom, women's rights, freedom of speech, and other freedoms--all the things that undergird liberty were not found in Saudi Arabia as they are not found in the Koran. Saudi Arabia is the home of Mecca, Islam's most "holy" city. The leaders of the world bowed to its king. King Abdullah's death has prophetic significance.


The things we see on the surface are not always what is real. For years, the Western media has speculated on the secession plan for the inevitable. Questions arise about oil production and the type of Islamic conservatism that would come in the aftermath of Abdullah's death. There have been rumblings of rebellion and the King's troops brutally bringing such rumors into submission. The Sunni kingdom saw Shiite Iran as its rival. And while it may appear that Saudi Arabia allied with the US and Israel, Abdullah was more likely using these nations to hold in check his Persian rivals rather than having any friendly ties. Remember, Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of al Qaeda. There are no allegiances to non-Islamists.


Ezekiel 38 describes the colossal end time battle where Gog, the chief prince of Magog (modern Turkey), leads a coalition of Islamists against Israel. Included in that group is modern Iran (Persia) and parts of Saudi Arabia. 38:13 says, "Sheba, and Dedan and the merchants of Tarshis, with all the young lions thereof, shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?" Ancient Dedan and Sheba are located in what is now Saudi Arabia. The Ismaelites mentioned as enemies of Israel in Psalm 83 are also considered to be from the regional area of Saudi Arabia. 


Abdullah's death brings some uncertainty to the region. Already oil prices have risen. Coincidentally or not, the Islamic State has called for Islamists in Saudi Arabia to rise up against the kingdom. Reuters reported in November 2014 that IS leader Abu Bakr Baghdadi said in a speech, "O sons of al-Haramayn (Saudi Arabia)...the serpent's head and the stronghold of the disease are there...draw your swords and divorce life, because there should be no security for the Saloul (a derogatory name for the Saudi leadership)." Certainly, the prize of the new Caliphate is Mecca. Those who watch prophecy would do well to keep an eye on Saudi Arabia, the Islamic State, and Iran in the months ahead.

Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson
www.dailyjot.com

PS. Please use the forward link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
NOTICE: If you would like to forward this message to others, please use the  link.  
 
Otherwise recipients who receive it and don't appreciate it may unknowingly unsubscribe you
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!  - Bill Wilson,  The Daily Jot

 

Join the "200 Club"  

by committing to support this ministry with $25 a month.   Click Here to support the DAILY JOT via secure online donations.

 

 
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
- Bill Wilson, Daily Jot 

 

Read more…