The Front Page Cover
"I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened"
.
Featuring:
Iran is Nuclear Now! With Weapons
Development and Delivery Systems
MG Paul Vallely, US Army (Ret) and
LTC Denny Haney, USAF (Ret)
.
"Know who you are standing with"
"Show me your friends and I'll show you your future"
~~~lll~~~
.
Alaska Is More Than a Photo Op
Barack nObama has no long-term, consistent strategy for Alaska. Well, other than his climate agenda. He's visiting The Last Frontier this week to plug for an even more aggressive approach to "man-made" global warming, as he spoke before an international conference in Anchorage Monday. As The Washington Post pointed out, nObama simply used the wilderness as a visual aid for his arguments. Ahead of the conference, titled GLACIER, NASA said sea levels are rising faster than expected, and nObama matched that level of alarm. "We're not moving fast enough," nObama warned. "None of the nations represented here are moving fast enough." nObama's comments quickly descended into adolescent sniping, as he completely belittled skeptics to his regulation-heavy, Big Government "solutions" to climate change. "The time to heed the critics and the cynics and the deniers is past," he continued. "The time to plead ignorance is surely past. Those who want to ignore the science, they are increasingly alone. They're on their own shrinking island."
If nObama wants to talk about shrinking islands, he should reconsider the threat Russia poses in Arctic waters. Just like the situation in Ukraine, Russia is pushing boundaries in the Arctic, trying to grab the natural resources that lie under the ice. Currently, Russia operates 40 icebreakers and is making 11 more. The U.S.? It has only two and nObama proposes the U.S. buy one more. But nObama ignores the long-term significance of Alaska and its waters for our nation's security and energy policies to yammer about the temperature and to take a hike with reality TV star Bear Grylls. -The Patriot Post
.
.
About That Rad New Psych Study You Heard Of...
Apparently, the psych science is not settled. The Guardian reports, "Of 100 studies published in top-ranking journals in 2008, 75% of social psychology experiments and half of cognitive studies failed the replication test." There are many reasons why an experiment might fail to replicate, but more than this the study has highlighted some issues with academic publishing and modern science. University of Virginia psychology professor Brian A. Nosek, who led the effort to reproduce the experiments, told the Guardian, "The key caution that an average reader should take away is any one study is not going to be the last word. Science is a process of uncertainty reduction, and no one study is almost ever a definitive result on its own." And while the media might want to breathlessly report on a study that displays some kind of psychological quirk, the real scientific process is much more involved than one study. Climate alarmists take note... -The Patriot Post 
.
.
.
Think Canada Is a Model? Think Again
Some presidential candidates have pointed to Canada as a model for things like single-payer health care. (That would be Donald Trump, for those keeping score.) Of course, to keep a single-payer system running costs a lot of money, and that money has to come from somewhere. Or nearly everywhere, as it turns out. Reuters reports, "Canadians spend more on taxes than on food, clothing and shelter combined, according to a report released on Thursday, as increases in an average family's tax bill have outpaced the cost of basic necessities in the last five decades." The Frasier Institute report says the average Canadian family brings in about $60,000 (in U.S. dollars), of which 36% goes to cover basic needs and 42% is confiscated by the government. Fifty years ago, those numbers were 56% and 33%, respectively. Oh, and by the way, Canada is now arguably in recession. Call us old fashioned, but the new model doesn't sound like the one best for America. -The Patriot Post
.
.
Email Document Dump Catches Clinton in Serious Lie
Hilly Clinton has repeatedly claimed that she never sent classified emails over her private server. Oh, she might have received some that were unintentionally unmarked, but she claims she was clean as a freshly wiped email server. But in the newest round of Hilly's emails released Monday, the State Department, sure enough, redacted email after email from public view. The Clinton campaign responded with a memo claiming the emails where just a mildly interesting sideshow into the internal communications of a presidential cabinet member. The memo said of the classified portions, "This group of emails include 125 that have had portions classified after the fact, but as confirmed again by the State Department, nothing she sent or received was marked classified." But as The Federalist's Sean Davis reports, the State Department will declassify material 10 or 15 years after the material is either created or after it receives an after-the-fact classification. State chose to declassify this material from the time it was created. In other words, from the moment Clinton's fingers typed up an email and she hit send, the document should have been classified. But her material never went through the proper classification channels, making her argument now a pathetically circular one. Furthermore, she sent some of these emails to Clinton operative Sidney Blumenthal, a person outside the State Department. What's worse? Keep in mind that these are only the emails that survived Clinton's email purge. She knew exactly what she was doing. -The Patriot Post
.
.
Media Nervous Over Hilly Sting Videos
You know an event is potentially damaging to Hilly Clinton or other top Democrats when Dana Milbank of The Washington Post shows up... Hence, Milbank’s attendance at Tuesday’s James O’Keefe news conference on Clinton campaign violations of federal election law was an indication that the Democrats are concerned. This time, despite video evidence of top staffers for Hilly accepting cash from a known foreign national, most of the media reaction was vintage Milbank. “Is this a joke?” the media wanted to know. In fairness, Milbank’s questions seemed mild, when compared to some of the other media reactions. The joke question came from Olivia Nuzzi of The Daily Beast, with other liberals joining in and wondering what the press conference was all about. The law says that foreigners are strictly prohibited from contributing to U.S. political campaigns, and O’Keefe had dramatic evidence of the campaign law violation. The video was played on a television screen for all to see.
.
Iran Promises to ‘Set Fire’ to U.S. Interests
{Adam Kredo} ~ A senior Iranian military official has vowed to “set fire” to all U.S. interests in the region and maintained that the Islamic Republic welcomes war with America, according to regional reports demonstrating that Tehran is still committed to fighting the United States in the wake of a recently inked nuclear accord... “In threatening remarks,” a top Iranian commander of the Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) stated that Iran is prepared to “annihilate” U.S. and Israeli war forces should they “take the slightest military move against Iran,” according to Iran’s state-controlled Fars News Agency. “We monitor their acts day and night and will take every opportunity to set fire to all their economic and political interests if they do a wrong deed,” Brigadier General Hossein Salami, the IRGC’s lieutenant commander, was quoted as saying in Tehran on Thursday.
.
Iran Vows to Violate UN Restrictions on Ballistic Missiles
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani vowed that the Islamic Republic would violate outstanding United Nations restrictions governing the country’s ballistic missile program and that the behavior would not violate the recent nuclear accord... according to a translation of the leader’s remarks performed by the CIA’s Open Source Center. Iran is “not committed to the restrictions on its missile program,” according to a recent comment made by Rouhani, who said a violation of international restrictions would not impact the nuclear accord recently reached with global powers. “We have formally announced that we are not committed to these provisions related to missiles mentioned in the U.N. resolution,” Rouhani was quoted as saying in an Aug. 29 Persian language speech broadcast on Iran’s state-controlled television networks. It is written into the nuclear accord that a violation of U.N. bans on Iran’s missile program will not impact the deal. The Senate is making a big mistake in supporting this deal. http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-vows-to-violate-un-restrictions-on-ballistic-missiles/
.
Clinton Told Aide to Send Classified Info to Personal Email Address
{Lachlan Markay} ~ On the same day that the “hacktivist” group WikiLeaks posted tens of thousands of classified State Department communications online, then-Secretary of State Hilly Clinton told a top deputy to send now-classified information to her personal email address, newly released emails reveal... “Here’s my personal email,” Clinton told former Sen. George Mitchell, then Clinton’s special envoy for Middle East peace. “Pls use this for reply.” Mitchell responded with details of discussions with Italian foreign minister Franco Frattini. Most of the contents of the email, released by the State Department on Monday night, are redacted pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act exemption designed to protect classified national security information.
.
Cheney: The nuclear deal with Iran and the implications for US security
On Tuesday, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney spoke at AEI on the consequences of the Iran nuclear agreement... Cheney argued that this agreement will not prevent a nuclear Iran but instead allow a nuclear arsenal and facilitate Iran’s support of terrorists, including those threatening the US and its allies. American allies have watched the Iranians outsmart the United States in these negotiations, and they know the US is simultaneously withdrawing from the region and making cuts to its own nuclear arsenal and defense budget. In this environment, Cheney stressed, our allies will likely determine that they need nuclear weapons for their own security, thus accelerating nuclear proliferation. http://www.aei.org/events/the-nuclear-deal-with-iran-and-the-implications-for-us-security-a-speech-by-former-vice-president-richard-b-cheney/?utm_source=paramount&utm_medium=email&utm_content=AEITODAY&utm_campaign=090415
.
Nuclear Jihad
"Some analysts," writes the historian and former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, "claimed the president Barack nObama regarded Iran as an ascendant and logical power -- unlike the feckless, disunited Arabs and those troublemaking Israelis... that could assist in resolving other regional conflicts. I first heard this theory at Georgetown back in 2008, in conversation with think tankers and former State Department officials. They also believed Iran's radical Islam was merely an expression of interests and fears that the United States could with sufficient goodwill, meet and allay. ... Iran, according to nObama was a pragmatic player with addressable interest. For Netanyahu, Iran was irrational, messianic, and genocidal – 'worse,' he said, 'than fifty North Koreas.'"Since the signing of the deal at the UN, hot-tempered criticisms and defences have gone into overdrive in the political, journalistic, and diplomatic spheres. Acres have been written and are still being written about the deal, making it the hottest political potato of recent years. Expert analysts such as Omri Ceren and, more recently, Joel Rosenberg have cut through the deliberate obfuscation to show the extent of the dangers the deal presents to the Middle East, the United States, Israel, and the world. http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6461/nuclear-jihad
.
Illegal Aliens Sue State DMV For Drivers Licenses
{rickwells.us} ~ Attorneys for a group of illegal aliens squatting in Georgia filed a lawsuit on Monday against the Georgia Department of Driver Services charging that the state agency is violating their “constitutional rights” by denying them drivers licenses... Neither they nor their attorneys seem to have a grasp of the definition of illegal or the rights of America citizens not applying to non-Americans. Why not try to sign them up for a US passport while you’re at it, boys? The lawsuit states that the plaintiffs, who aren’t named because of “safety concerns” and “possible retaliation,” are under deportation orders and are attempting to have those orders suspended. Some of the individuals are of such outstanding character that their nations of origin have refused to accept them back.
.
Climate Propaganda Paves Way for “Pig Power”
{Cliff Kincaid} ~ Having been bamboozled into passing a mere bill to thwart the Iran deal, rather than treating the agreement as a treaty, the Republican-controlled Congress is on the verge of being taken to the cleaners again... This time, President nObama is maneuvering to authorize U.S. participation in a United Nations climate change treaty through an executive agreement. The treaty is expected to come out of the December meeting in Paris of parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. Rather than submit the agreement to the Senate as an Article II Treaty, it is anticipated that the nObama administration will simply accept the treaty on the basis of what it claims to be “existing” presidential authority. The agreement could establish or propose legally binding limits on carbon emissions, crippling what’s left of our industrial economy, along with new legally binding financial commitments that could run into the trillions of dollars to be “redistributed” from the U.S. and other “rich” nations. nObama has told the U.N. that the United States will meet a pledge of 26 to 28 percent emissions reduction by 2025. http://www.aim.org/aim-column/climate-propaganda-paves-way-for-pig-power/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email090715&utm_medium=email
.
How Dangerous is ISIS to Israel?
{Efraim Inbar} ~ ISIS, a radical Islamist group, has killed thousands of people since it declared an Islamic caliphate in June 2014, with the city of Raqqa as its de facto capital... It captured tremendous international attention by swiftly conquering large swaths of land and by releasing gruesome pictures of beheadings and other means of executions. In Israel, concern is increasing as ISIS nears Israeli borders. Yet, several analyses of the threat ISIS poses to Israel seem to be unnecessarily alarmist. ISIS is primarily successful where there is a political void. Although the offensives in Syria and Iraq showed the Islamic State's tactical capabilities, they were directed against failed states with weakened militaries. When and where ISIS has met well organized opposition by non-state entities, such as that posed by Kurdish militias, the group's performance has been less convincing. http://www.meforum.org/5473/israel-isis
.
nObama Set To Announce Expanded US Syrian “Refugee” Policy
{rickwells.us} ~ The orchestrated invasion of Europe and the United States is an unfolding, deliberate act. It is being conducted by the global elites whose objective is to create a world government under a UN that they control... It is an evolving process, with the theatrical presentation to the gullible masses being constructed one layer upon another. As with every drama, a villain is needed to make it interesting and believable. For the invasion of Western civilization, they’ve created the most depraved of villains imaginable, ISIS. The threat of ISIS is a multi-function cover which provides a humanitarian premise through which pressure is applied as well as the mechanism by which to vilify anyone who offers resistance as being heartless and selfish. Photos of children who died in the process of fleeing the barbarism will seal the deal. Rational thought is no match for emotional reaction of the masses. Now, as expected, Hussein nObama is engaged in the pre-announcement, trail balloon stage of expanding the number of “refugees” being imported into this country on a basis of the same false humanitarian reasons, our responsibility in recognition of the “need” to respond to the ISIS crisis that he and his ilk have created.
.
.
Iran is Nuclear Now! With Weapons
Development and Delivery Systems
MG Paul Vallely, US Army (Ret) and
LTC Denny Haney, USAF (Ret)
.
{aim.org} - Since 1979, a cabal of nations has aided and abetted Iran in its efforts to develop a robust nuclear program under the guise of generating a nuclear energy system. This cabal is mainly comprised of Russia, China, and North Korea. Since sanctions began being placed on Iran in 1979, with more added since, Iran still had enough free reign to develop its capabilities despite the sanctions regime because of this cabal. All the moving parts are in place, the material is there, and this means they are already nuclear – “break out” is imminent now.
.
During this period, North Korea had evaded sanctions, and like Iran, lied, cheated, and broke virtually every agreement it ever signed with the United Nations. Now North Korea is a nuclear weapons power, and we believe Iran has already done the same. Each had created hidden facilities but only North Korea has actually tested weapons fully. Because Iran has to date only detonated trigger devices that does not mean the Mullahs do not have weapons capability now because they certainly have enough material.
.
Both Iran and North Korea are also fast approaching inter-continental missile capability, and Iranian government observers, research scientists, and senior military officials have been on-site in North Korea for the testing of its systems. In essence, Iran has had the benefit of having North Korea essentially do their development and testing for them.
.
Iran has tested their launch systems like the Shahab series of launch and delivery vehicles and the attendant guidance and control systems, and they certainly had fine mentors along the way. The cabal has assisted Iran along all the pathways for acquisition of a nuclear weapon; from system requirements, specifications, prototyping, development, and acquisition. Iran has NEVER had to go it alone.
.
These are facts. Please feel free to challenge our findings and discuss where you think we have gone wrong.
.
- The coalition of Russia, China and North Korea have assisted Iran in achieving a nuclear capable weapon. Since the 1979 sanctions have been in place, Iran has had free reign to develop their nuclear weapons program unabated. This weapons program was under the guise of a nuclear energy program for domestic energy production. China and North Korea during this same timeframe developed their nuclear programs, maturing same to include land-based and sea-launch weapons systems, testing their entire launch, delivery and detonation process through actual nuclear detonations.
- Iranian Government observers, research scientists, and senior Military officials have been on-site in North Korea for all their tests of nuclear component systems. In essence, Iran has had the benefit of having North Korea essentially do their development and testing for them.
- Iran was able to test their launch systems (i.e., the Shahab series of launch and delivery vehicles and the attendant guidance and control systems). Russia, China and North Korea always had the latitude and time to develop and test warhead design, fissionable material and detonation testing. Iran participated onsite in most all of the scheduled testing.
- The coalition of Russia, China and North Korea have assisted Iran along all the pathways for acquisition of a nuclear weapon, from system requirements, specifications, prototyping, development, and acquisition. Iran has NEVER had to go it alone. The coalition support them 100%.
.
It is now clear that since 2009, the nObama administration has crafted a plan that guarantees Iran will have a nuclear weapon, and the devil is in the details. For instance; the copy of the agreement handed out in English for the American delegation did not fully replicate the copy handed out in Farsi for the Iranians. The American delegation never mentioned this to the West and especially not to the American people nor Congress. The Iranian delegation read both the English and Farsi-worded agreements, and declared that while they agreed with the one in Farsi, the one in English WAS NOT THE SAME, AND WAS IN NO WAY ACCEPTABLE TO THEM.
.
In addition, there are more devils in the details, and these are in the side agreements between Iran and the IAEA. We now know that one of those arrangements calls for Iran to actually be its own inspecting body. The fox gets to be the hen house security team. With nObama’s statement to Russian President Dimitri Medvedev in 2012, incoming President Vladimir Putin knew he had the green light on a host of issues with the now famous “live mike” incident.
.
The green light was not just for missile defense, it also applied to all things Iran. We know this because Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani was seen in Moscow despite a worldwide travel ban, just prior to Secretary of State Hanoi John Kerry testifying before Congress on the agreement reached with Iran.
The green light was not just for missile defense, it also applied to all things Iran. We know this because Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani was seen in Moscow despite a worldwide travel ban, just prior to Secretary of State Hanoi John Kerry testifying before Congress on the agreement reached with Iran.
.
Being proven communist sympathizers, Hanoi John Kerry, nObama, and his henchwoman, Iranian born Valerie Jarret, it is demonstrable that their plan has always been to aid that cabal. Prime negotiator Hanoi John Kerry, who has his very own place in Communist Vietnam’s War Memorial with a photo, recently admitted that his daughter married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran. Incidentally, Hanoi Kerry’s chief counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations, Mohammad Javad Zarif’s son was the best man.
Being proven communist sympathizers, Hanoi John Kerry, nObama, and his henchwoman, Iranian born Valerie Jarret, it is demonstrable that their plan has always been to aid that cabal. Prime negotiator Hanoi John Kerry, who has his very own place in Communist Vietnam’s War Memorial with a photo, recently admitted that his daughter married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran. Incidentally, Hanoi Kerry’s chief counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations, Mohammad Javad Zarif’s son was the best man.
.
We remind all that Barack nObama, mentored during his formative years by Frank Marshall Davis, a confirmed member of the American Communist Party, is also demonstrably not only predisposed to support all things Islam, he has a close relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood as has been proven in the “Betrayal Papers” series.
.
Now that the agreement has become a settled international agreement, where the United States would be going it alone if Congress somehow negates our involvement in it, the world will release of up to $150 Billion in Iranian assets all but guarantees funding for their nuclear weapons program and their terrorist proxies, Hezbollah, and Hamas and others, to include Assad of Syria.
Now that the agreement has become a settled international agreement, where the United States would be going it alone if Congress somehow negates our involvement in it, the world will release of up to $150 Billion in Iranian assets all but guarantees funding for their nuclear weapons program and their terrorist proxies, Hezbollah, and Hamas and others, to include Assad of Syria.
.
What better way to wipe Israel off the face of the earth than a well-timed and specifically-delivered nuclear weapon? And what better time to “negotiate” a pathway to “achieving” a nuclear weapons capability, than when you already have one? It is important to note as well, that Iran has been designing plans for the United States as well, after all, intercontinental ballistic missiles are not intended for neighboring Israel, they are aimed at the United States and they have plans for an EMP already drafted.
What better way to wipe Israel off the face of the earth than a well-timed and specifically-delivered nuclear weapon? And what better time to “negotiate” a pathway to “achieving” a nuclear weapons capability, than when you already have one? It is important to note as well, that Iran has been designing plans for the United States as well, after all, intercontinental ballistic missiles are not intended for neighboring Israel, they are aimed at the United States and they have plans for an EMP already drafted.
.
In January 2014, the Arms Control Association even agreed that “…as Iran progresses down a path towards a nuclear-weapons capability, the difficulties in finding a compromise that would protect against a nuclear-armed Iran while being acceptable to the leadership in Tehran have grown.” nObama and Hanoi Kerry are pushing an agreement upon America that surely many members of Congress have not read, and are not adding to the confidence level needed to ensure Iran does not “go nuclear.”
In January 2014, the Arms Control Association even agreed that “…as Iran progresses down a path towards a nuclear-weapons capability, the difficulties in finding a compromise that would protect against a nuclear-armed Iran while being acceptable to the leadership in Tehran have grown.” nObama and Hanoi Kerry are pushing an agreement upon America that surely many members of Congress have not read, and are not adding to the confidence level needed to ensure Iran does not “go nuclear.”
.
IT WON’T BE LONG BEFORE IRAN DETONATES ITS FIRST NUCLEAR DEVICE.
IT WON’T BE LONG BEFORE IRAN DETONATES ITS FIRST NUCLEAR DEVICE.
.
In 2015, given that the Iranians have not agreed to any inspection of any facility for many years, and WILL NOT NOW AGREE TO INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, the odds that Iran already has a nuclear weapon are really quite high. Why is it acceptable to so many that Iran gets to be its own inspector? The likely answer is, they know Iran already has the capability.
In 2015, given that the Iranians have not agreed to any inspection of any facility for many years, and WILL NOT NOW AGREE TO INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, the odds that Iran already has a nuclear weapon are really quite high. Why is it acceptable to so many that Iran gets to be its own inspector? The likely answer is, they know Iran already has the capability.
.
From the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) web site: “Iran acquired the Soviet R-17 (R-300; NATO: Scud-B) from Libya. Tehran has continued to utilize a number of foreign suppliers to develop a missile production infrastructure. To date, Iran claims to have developed five liquid-propellant ballistic missiles, (the Shahab-1, Shahab-2, Shahab-3, Ghadr-1 and Qiam); the Safir space launch vehicle (SLV); and the solid-propellant Sejjil missile.”
From the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) web site: “Iran acquired the Soviet R-17 (R-300; NATO: Scud-B) from Libya. Tehran has continued to utilize a number of foreign suppliers to develop a missile production infrastructure. To date, Iran claims to have developed five liquid-propellant ballistic missiles, (the Shahab-1, Shahab-2, Shahab-3, Ghadr-1 and Qiam); the Safir space launch vehicle (SLV); and the solid-propellant Sejjil missile.”
.
With $150 Billion in assets already flowing their way, they will finalize the first series of deliverable weapons. A first-strike launch against Israel? Support of international radical Islam, the global Caliphate, and terrorism will accelerate worldwide. Nothing will stop Iran and its proxies now if the “Iran Deal” goes forward.
With $150 Billion in assets already flowing their way, they will finalize the first series of deliverable weapons. A first-strike launch against Israel? Support of international radical Islam, the global Caliphate, and terrorism will accelerate worldwide. Nothing will stop Iran and its proxies now if the “Iran Deal” goes forward.
.
The so-called “Iran Deal” is moot at this time and not worth the paper it is written on. The cabal wins!
The so-called “Iran Deal” is moot at this time and not worth the paper it is written on. The cabal wins!
.
ht
As I write replies on this site, just after I have completed my second paragraph, someone pulls the plug and my entire extemporaneous reaction is gone forever. That pisses me off.
I evidently do much better research than most of you, or I am better trained and experienced or better informed. Even so , most of you cannot tell whether a person knows much about what he is saying and has evidence, or he is just yapping. Most of you just yap. That's egotistical. I am always humble enough to back up what I say with evidence (which I do not always share). You have to be trained to prepare for political activity, if you want to win. Its soo much easy to read conservative propaganda (very shallow).
So many of you fly by the seat of your pants, intellectually. So therefore you assume I fly by the seat of my pants too. When you think like that, you are using the most stupid value of the commie media, its called mirror imaging. Mirror imaging is based upon the false-idiotic media-originated assumption that "all people are the same and think the same". Then the next step is moronically-logical, look in the mirror, ask yourself what YOU think. Then you know what other people think. Then you know how they feel and can predict their behavior. That's totally absurd.
There are methods of telling what other people think and predicting their behavior. Not a one of you, except James Sales, has demonstrated any proficiency in that skill set. I am also humble enough to use that skill set and I will defeat most of you every time because you are not trained to fight political war. Many of you may have the brains for it, but do you have the interest, drive to win and the energy? Energy, for example, is a habit. If your main past time is watching sports, then you are a sports voyeur and have no intellectual or physical energy for anything more than a masturbatory approach to life. Energy utilization is very different from voyeurism. That is why the media encourages voyeurism, a form of self stimulation or masturbation, especially mental masturbation.
Peter you are too much of a mirror imagery person. You should learn how to be proficient at political warfare. That's what this is.