process (7)


A prestigious Private Detetcive Agency named Public Security LLC, is now providing expert process serving in Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania and Virginia. 

Public Security LLC is a license private security and investigation firm led by a former member of the United States Secert Service, Barry Donadio. 

Customer Service 855-589-2267


See why we are the first choice of lawyers and private citizens across the country for their process serving needs:

PROCESS SERVING: For immediate cases that absolutely need to be served the same day and ASAP. We will serve in New York, Washington DC, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. Prices vary depending on each location and case.

FILING COURT PAPERS: We are here to do what it takes to get your case moving for a positive result . We will file your documents at the court if needed. We are registered in Marylands’ MDEC E-FILE, New York’s eCourts and the U.S. Federal Government PACER.

COURIER SERVICES: For times when the mail isn't fast enough. We can run errands for your office when needed.

INVESTIGATIVE SPECIAL SERVICE: Call us for your most difficult Process Serving requests and investigative services directed against the other party in the case. Need surveillance? We are a licensed Private Detective Agency.

ATTORNEY SERVICE: We work for our clients with the utmost discipline and confidentiality We know how important your case is. That's why we take great care in every single case. We assist you with whatever legal service needed to complete your case and stay with you until your case is complete. We are willing to testify when needed. If you have any other special requests, let us know. We are here to serve you.

BODY CAMERAS AND DASHBOARD CAMERAS: All of our Process Servers, Officers and Private Detectives have body cameras and dashboard cameras to record legal service of process.

PRIVATE SECURITY: Do you or your clients need security? We are high profile private security and investigation licensed in Maryland and New York. We serve low risk to high-risk clients.

BODYGUARDS: Do you or any of your clients require special protection because of high risk such as being a victim of domestic violence? Has your client We are on call and ready to service your executive protection needs at any time. The President of our company is Barry Donadio. He is a former member of the U.S. Secret Service that was assigned to the White House during the Bush and Obama Administrations. Let us protect what matters most.

Associate Member of the Maryland State Bar Association #140177

Maryland Private Security and Detective Agency License #106-4352

New York Private Investigator License #11000165760

Customer Service 855-589-2267


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in the Family Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County Courts, Nassau County Courts, New York City Courts and Upstate Courts.


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in all of the District and circut courts in the State of Maryland.


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in all Delaware Courts.


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in all the courts in Pennsylvania.


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in all of the courts in the District of Colombia.


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in all of the New Jersey Courts.


We serve summons, petitions, divorce papers and motions filed in all of the courts in the Commonwealth of Virginia.


  Customer Service 855-589-2267



Process Service General Locations:

*New York *Maryland

*Long Island *Baltimore

*Suffolk County *Annapolis

*Nassau County *Silver Spring

*Southampton Town *Hyattsville

*East Hampton Town *Rockville

*Riverhead *Fredrick

*Fire Island *Kent Island

*New York City *Delmarva

*Queens *Stevensville

*Brooklyn *Chester

*Bayshore *Easton

*Central Islip *Salisbury

*Wyandanch *Grasonville

*Brentwood *Cambridge

*Hemstead *Eastern Shore

*Patchogue *Glen Burnie

*Mastic *Ocean City

*Shirley *Denton

*Mineola *Mongomery County

*Smithtown *Laurel

*Freeport *Bowie

*Port Washington *Oxon Hill

*Jerico *Waldorf

*Sayville *Upper Malboro

*Oakdale *Wheaton

*Ronkonkoma *Greenbelt

*Babylon *Gaithersburg

*Northport *Towson

*Syosset *St. Michaels

*Farmingdale *Greensboro

*Westhampton *Federalsburg

*Southampton *Ridgely

*Wading River *Parole

*Port Jefferson Station *Crofton

*Lake Grove *Ellicott City

*Hauppauge *Columbia

*Garden City *Fredrick

*Stony Brook *Bethesda

*Mt Siani *Edgewater

*Rockypoint *Largo

*Moriches *College Park

*Center Moriches *Sudlersville

*Southampton *Church Hill

*Westhampton *Chestertown

*Montauk *Galena

*Orient Point *Marydel

*Yapank *Trappe

*Calverton *Queenstown

*Selden *Crownsville

*Setauket *New Carrolton

*Chillum *Riverdale Park

*Huntington *Takoma Park

*Hicksville *Chevy Chase

*Rockville Centre *District Heights

*Corona *Marlow Heights

*Woodside *Davidsonville

*Floral Park *Mayo

*Delaware *New Jersey

*Wilmington *Newark

*Dover *Trenton

*Middletown *Jersey City

*Smyrna *Carneys Point

*Washington D.C. *Virginia

*Adams Morgan *Arlington

*Captiol Hill *Alexandria

*Georgetown *Falls Church

*Trinidad *McLean

Customer Service 855-589-2267

Read more…


The continually growing private security company "Public Security LLC" obtained a Private Detective Agency license in the District of Columbia.

On May 15th 2015 Public Security LLC was issued a Private Detective Agency license in the District of Columbia ‪#‎PDB24729‬.
The license enables Public Security LLC to legally:
1. Detect, discover and or reveal crime and or criminals.
2. Secure information for evidence relating to crime or criminals.
3. Discovering or revealing the identity, whereabouts, character
or actions of any person(s) or thing(s)
Public Security LLC is one of our nations few publicly declared Private Intelligence Agencies. The firm also provides security, executive protection and private investigation services in the states of New York and Maryland. Public Security LLC is led by its President Barry Donadio whom is a Military Veteran and a former member of the U.S. Secret Service during the Bush and Obama administrations. 

Read more…

For most of my adult life, I have worked with refugees both overseas and in the US. So, I DO understand the plight of refugees and the challenges of successfully resettling them in their new American homeland.

That said, I just read a lengthy article in the local newspaper in which the mayor and the local refugee resettlement director discounted the Syrian refugee threat by sweepingly equating the reaction of those of us with legitimate concerns about the flawed vetting process of Syrian refugees with "knee-jerk reactions of politicians". I was understandably irked. The very idea of my being a politician is offensive. But, at least my colleagues and I weren't characterized as bigots, racists, xenophobes or Islamophobes. Very surprising, indeed.

In the article, the local director was quoted as saying that "all refugees go through a rigorous review process before being allowed to come to the U.S." He went on to say that "we shouldn't allow terrorists and criminals to dictate changes to our great tradition of welcoming the stranger", pointing out that local resettlement agencies "can't pick and choose whom to accept."

That last string of quotes smacked of talking points--not reasoned arguments--for permitting the influx of inadequately vetted Syrian refugees into our community. I immediately questioned that if the threat of "terrorists and criminals" should not dictate how we tackle the question of welcoming potential terrorists and criminals into our midst, then what exactly should dictate whom we permit to resettle next door to us.

His also stating that local agencies "can't pick and choose whom to accept" is, for the most part, false. In the case of refugees entering to join family members already here, then, yes, the agency is expected to accept them into our community; however, so-called "free cases", or those refugees without anchor relatives already in place in the community, may be rejected for resettlement by the local agency. Bear that mind.

He went on by asserting that "Syrians coming to the US will likely come through an orderly process from refugee camps," again adding that "it is a very secure process." Likely? Not reassuring.

Obviously he has ignored or entirely discounted the remarks of our security agency heads who have consistently and unambiguously warned about the flawed vetting process of Syrian and other Middle Eastern refugees.

Since I'm sure the local resettlement program has come under considerable pressure of late, and not wanting to pile on, I contacted an old colleague and friend at the national refugee resettlement agency with which the local agency is affiliated.

I explained that local community groups with whom I am closely affiliated have understandable concerns about the resettlement of Syrian refugees in our community, and went on to cite the quotes of the local director which appeared in the newspaper.

His first reaction was that it was not true that the local agency cannot reject refugees. Those who are not arriving to join family members already resettled in the community may be rejected by the local agency. This would certainly describe all the Syrian refugees earmarked for resettlement in this community. 

Throughout the cordial conversation--we hadn't spoken for years--I sensed a inclination on his part to adroitly skirt the potential threat posed by the resettlement of Syrian refugees. When queried about the inadequate vetting process for Syrian refugees in particular, he seemed unaware of the DIA's, FBI's and DOD's warnings about the absence of an adequate database to properly vet these refugees. Has there been a news blackout?

He emailed me an updated version of the 13-step vetting process currently in use, and seemed convinced that the process was adequate. I pointed out that the vetting process is fine as it applies to non-Middle Eastern refugee groups, but that we're talking about Islamic refugees, some of whom could well be ISIS or Al Quaida infiltrators; that it only took 8 radical Islamists to slaughter 129 people in Paris. He gingerly acknowledged this threat, but quickly went on to point out the obvious: these refugees have been in camps for up to 4 years and are badly in need of help; that after such a prolonged period of time "one would think" that [even without a database with which to work] that the wheat could be effectively separated from the chaff. 

I opined that merely hoping that such is the case is one thing, but asked if on that hope alone were we willing to risk a terrorist attack which might otherwise have been averted. He again gently agreed, but kept returning to the genuine suffering of the bulk of Syrian refugees. That was his fallback position throughout the conversation. He could never really bring himself to fully grapple with the real threat of improperly vetted Syrian refugees. For him, compassion alone trumped caution.

We both worked in refugee camps in Southeast Asia and were both involved in interviewing and otherwise screening SEA refugees before they were finally approved for entry into the US. Clearly, these were entirely different refugee groups--no terrorist inclinations among them at all. Thus, the vetting process for SEA refugees proved to be adequate and no warnings from our security agencies about the vetting process were necessarily forthcoming.

We agreed that the suffering Syrian refugees needed help, but we couldn't agree that a moratorium on the resettlement of Syrian refugees was the responsible course of action to take.

We then spoke about the difficulty we all had with smoothly resettling Somalian refugees in the past, but he couldn't recall but two Somalians being arrested for terrorist related activities after arrival. I reminded him of a substantial number of Somalian refugees who had been resettled in Minnesota who had linked up with ISIS; that although they are likely under close surveillance by the U.S. government they are still free and their legal status here unchanged. In short, I reminded him that they remained a serious potential terrorist threat to the homeland. Again he agreed, but was indisposed to grasp the true nature of the threat. Like so many companies and organizations, it is difficult for resettlement agencies, local or national, to see things as they really are, in this case to clearly see the threat attending a flawed vetting process. As always, agency and organization culture and those inevitable talking points pretty much dictates an employee's outlook and opinions. So, while his stance was unsurprising, when weighing the validity of refugee program commentary, from the start we must all bear carefully in mind this ingrained myopia.

Possible remedy: if a refugee is a "Free Case" (with no familial US ties), the local resettlement agency CAN, in fact, say no. Thus, the remedy for those of us who are pushing for a moratorium  on the resettlement of Syrian refugees may be to pressure the local resettlement agency to reject Free Syrian cases. In most communities without Syrian refugees already in place, such an effort would most certainly stop the influx. Moratorium accomplished on the local level.

With this in mind, I drafted the following editorial for local consumption. The newspaper's being a seriously liberal newspaper, who can say if it will be published:

"Dear Editor:

Though ISIS has dubbed the Islamist terrorist attack on Paris as but the
“first of the storm”, Pres. Obama continues to mystifyingly describe “global
warming”, coal and CO2 as THE most profound threats we face as a nation; worse,
he continues to vigorously push for the entrance of thousands of inadequately
vetted Syrian “refugees” into our homeland.
Despite the existential threat of Islamic terrorism, and warnings against such a
Syrian influx by our own security agencies, the Administration remains
recklessly determined to resettle these refugees in our communities.
I've worked with refugees both here and abroad for most of my adult life, so no
one can honestly discount my compassion when it comes to helping suffering
refugees; however, until our security agencies verify that an adequate vetting
process is in place a moratorium on the resettlement of Syrian “refugees” is a
no-brainer.  Anything less would be terribly irresponsible.
Moving past empty-headed political correctness, delusional ideology and faux
compassion, let’s properly safeguard our homeland and families from the menace
of radical Islamic terrorism."

Read more…

“Never apologize and never explain--it's a sign of weakness."--- John Wayne in “She Wore a Yellow Ribbon”"

“Apologizing as a coward to appease murderous communists, Moslems and Black Supremacists is weakness.”----Confede on Scribd

 Obama Hidden Agenda Apologies

Apologizing when carried out by the tyrant Obama is a way of insulting and besmirching the USA. He symbolically informs, evil, twisted and hateful foreign crowds: “I am a felon who seized control of the USA illegally. I seized that power so that I could destroy the US. One part of my destructive strategy is to join America’s enemies in condemning America as bad and problematic. In this way I undermine the hope, pride and honor of white Americans. When they see me, an evil ignoramus, apologize for the heroes of the American past and for mistakes that other nations have made in far greater frequency. I am saying that white Americans who voted me into office to prove how much they love Africans, are  such low down scum that I, President for Life, Tutu Obama will symbolically make them grovel, just as the crook they elected grovels before the thugocracies of the world.”

 Obama's apologies made the US more vulnerable to attack because enemies realize that they can commit mass murder in America and then build mosques on the ashes of the murdered. The Bwana Obama claimed that he wanted to engage enemies through the application of "smart power" (apologies are stupid surrenders of self and power) so you carried out a series of stupid power apologies to mass murderers and tyrants everywhere. Appeasement consists of letting certain special religions and races commit crimes which only white Americans are forced to pay for. Recent missile tests by Iran and North Korea show there's nothing smart in "appeasing rogue states." Thanks to Obama, the US is increasingly "jeered rather than feared" by enemies. No leader in American history has gone to greater lengths than Barack Obama to make amends for his own country. From condemnation of American “arrogance” in a speech in Strasbourg to acknowledging U.S.“mistakes” before millions of Muslims on Arab television, Obama has rarely missed an opportunity to apologize for the actions of the American people.

President Obama has elevated the art of national self-loathing to new heights, and seems to delight in prostrating the most powerful nation on the face of the earth before its critics and rivals, especially on foreign soil. The Obama world view revolves around the central premise that the United States must be humble and “engage” and work with its enemies through the application of “smart power”. There is nothing smart, however, in appeasing rogue states such as North Korea or Iran. The Obama doctrine is now lying in tatters after North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-Il and Iranian demagogue Mahmoud Ahmadinejad met Obama’s recent overtures with missile tests and even a nuclear blast from Pyongyang. The president’s video message in March offering “a new beginning” to “the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran” was followed by the launch of a surface-to-surface missile with a range of 1,200 miles capable of reaching southern Europe. Incredibly,the U.S. response has been to slash defense spending, with a dramatic scaling down of plans for a global missile defense shield.

The world today is considerably more dangerous, than it was in the days of the Bush Administration, and the Obama White House has nothing to show for its weak-kneed, anti-American efforts, but premeditated failure. The brutal truth is that the United States is increasingly viewed as a soft touch by its enemies, increasingly jeered rather than feared.

 It will be hugely tempting for the rock star president “obama” to play to his Arab and European audiences by scoring points against his hugely unpopular predecessor. He could easily rail against the Bush Administration’s enhanced interrogation techniques, boast of the impending closure of the Guantanamo detention facility, or revive the ghosts of Abu Ghraib. The president’s advisers are no doubt furiously trying to outdo one another with the most original mea culpas.

 Obama’s supine approach has become a humiliating spectacle for a country that, together with Great Britain, has done more to advance the cause of liberty and freedom across the world than any nation in the world. Every groveling apology by the president undermines America’s confidence, standing and power, and strengthens the hand of those who seek her destruction.

 Obama is exercising another form of the put-down power of apologies which the racist, minority parasites that he really represents, use to heap scorn on white Americans. It is white Americans who have awarded black treachery, violence and racism by transforming them into the most evil, pampered, privileged synthetic parasitic communist elite in the world. Pampered false elites who have extorted their wealth from the majority simply because their skin color and souls are varying degrees of black, will always stab their benefactors in the back.

 Everyday in North America and Europe gangster minority parasites are wrenching apologies from national political figures. Those apologizing national political figures are always communists who fanatically promote African and Islamic supremacy paid for by the hard work of white working and middles classes. Although the evil wretches and political whores who are pulling the strings behind the scenes of the “Apologies Movement,” are among the most craven political gangsters in the world and are infamous for using their political power to get rich and enrich their cronies, they remain immune from criticism.

The Apologies Movement

The fact that the “Apologies Movement,” is just another communist program to gain more financial handouts for the real constituents of the American democrat-republican party is only sensed by the enraged American public.

It is time to spell out exactly what the “Apologies Movement,” is after. In fact the “Apologies Movement,” has two goals:

 -Extort money and privileges from the white enemy

   A major weapon constantly exercised by professional racist negroes in America is the “Apology Card.” Racist communists claim that apologies are meant to accomplish positive things. However the apologies are always one sided, discriminatory and dishonest. If the minorities seeking apology were honest and sincere, they would also apologize for many of their own shortcoming, violence, murders and racist/religious hate crimes.

  The subversive aspect of the “Apologies Movement,” is important to recognize. Among its several real purposes are the demands that white working and middle class people be apologized “for” by a communist political whore and hypocrite. Such apologies by an arrogant commie political “Ho”, is in fact, nothing more than :

  Humiliation rituals, the apologizing white race must grovel and heap public scorn on itself as evil, although the true facts about each “crime” committed are not honestly brought to light.

   Domination rituals, by apologizing one submits to the minority parasite group and accepts their control.

   Dishonest, there are two or more sides to every issue and the people who are forced to apologize are convicted of guilt without a fair hearing.

   Mercenary, the real purpose of the apology by a lying political whore who presumes to apologize for white America, is to justify more reparations in the form of financial payments to the phony “aggrieved parties.”

   Unfair, political whores who are elected to represent the best interests of all of their constituents decide that one race is guilty and must be apologized for while another race is pimped as heroic victims. In other words the political/cultural apology process is an exercise in deceit and duplicity.

   Institutionalizes communist values: Communism has always preached that groups and/or races are guilty of the “crimes” that their ancestors supposedly committed, and must pay for them currently. The so-called “guilty party” is robbed to enrich the “aggrieved party.” Such reparations never end and in the long run produce a false nobility of racist parasites who are paid to live a life of leisure.

   Illegal: White people are judged as guilty and all rights to legal due process are abrogated in order to satisfy the demands of minority parasites.

   Institutionalizes racism and religious bigotry: White Christians are evil, black muslims are good

    Promotes Anti-Democratic Police State Communism: When one group of people is proclaimed to be guilty, without recourse to the constitutional right to trial by jury, it is illegal. When the same group is forced to pay reparations as well as grovel by participating in humiliating and obnoxious apologies, the group judged guilty is discriminated against. It is thereafter treated as a criminal. Were the architects of the “Apologist Movement,” among the hundreds of thousands (over 500,000 foreign moslems attend US universities at US taxpayer expense) of college professors and student who, a few years ago, signed a petition demanding the genocide of all white Americans?

 Who is Behind the Apology Scam?

    No one should be surprised to learn that the usual combination of back stabbing communists are behind the “Apologies Movement,” scam. That gang of political gangsters includes communist black/Islamic supremacists from: US universities, the federal government and the media. In other words the usual political criminals who re always involved in scheme to embarrass and rob the white working and middle classes are at it again.

    A leading communist academician behind the “Apologies Movement,” is Melissa Nobles, Associate Professor of Political Science at MIT. She holds a BA in history from Brown University and an MA and PhD in political science from Yale University. She is a black racist and has written: The Politics of Official Apologies (Cambridge University Press, 2008). Nobles argues that political apologies help to alter the terms and meanings of national membership. It raises the prestige of one race at the expense of another. Minorities demand apologies in order to focus attention on self-serving and moot historical injustices, the rectification of which, they argue, should guide changes in present-day government policies that favor special rights above the civil rights paid for by taxpayers. When employed by political whores apologizing for white people without their agreement or approval, apologies play an important, if under appreciated, role in bringing certain views about history and moral obligation to bear in public life.

   The apology-reparations process institutionalizes minority parasitism, forever. The so-called “moral obligation” of white working taxpayers, consists of accepting minority parasite charges without questions, apologizing and then awarding the parasitic minority power and financial handouts known as reparations. Nobles preaches that white people owe blacks and moslems reparations and contrite apologies. Examples of such apologies and reparations are the German government’s continuous apology and ongoing reparations for the pay 70 years to Jews after WWII and the state of Israel, and U.S. President Ronald Reagan providing $20,000 to every surviving Japanese-Americans who claimed to be affected by the necessary internment of Japanese fifth columnists during World War II. Nobles insist that, “what is the least desirable is an apology that is just said and is not followed by any kind of compensation...” Guess who has to pay.

 What About Communist-Congress Political Whores of the One Party System?

Two congressional communists, Republican Sam Brownback and Democrat Rep. Stephen I. Cohen are pimping two of the most sweeping, unfair and insulting apology stunts in American history.

Cohen, a Tennessee communist-Democrat, has introduced a resolution apologizing for all of the supposed wrongs suffered by blacks at the hands of the U.S. government, especially slavery and segregation (over a hundred and fifty years ago). And red-leg Brownback, a Kansas communist-Republican, is pushing a measure offering "an apology to all native peoples" for hundreds of years of government hostility and oppression.

 Brownback, who is seeking the GOP presidential nomination (and will never get it now), has offered his American Indian resolution in the last two Congresses, and it was approved by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee in 2005. But it has never been adopted by the full Senate. His co-sponsors consists of a rogues gallery of congressional communist whores who have been robbing the American people for decades, including: Sens. MariaCantwell (D-Wash.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Mary L. Landrieu (D-La.).

Brownback's resolution opens with declarations that the government "violated many of the treaties ratified by Congress and other diplomatic agreements with Indian tribes" and took numerous official actions that caused immense harm to American Indians, including "extermination, termination, forced removal and relocation, the outlawing of traditional religions and the destruction of sacred places," the resolution says. And these policies contribute to the social and economic problems facing American Indians today. Brownback wants a formal apology to American Indians from the president and Congress.

In a speech on the House floor a few years ago, Cohen, a freshman communist party hack representing a predominantly black district in Memphis, spoke out passionately for his resolution apologizing for the wrongs inflicted on blacks. (Cohen is well hated in TN for his racism.) Gives typically communist reasons why modern, post-slavery white Americans must grovel and pay reparations to rampageous black minority parasites." For 246 years, our Constitution and our laws allowed a system that made people slaves, that divided people from their families and treated them as property," Cohen said. "And for 100 years thereafter, a system of laws in many states throughout the country had Jim Crow laws that deprived people of the opportunity for equal access to education, health care, public facilities and other types of programs. These ended by law in the [1960s], somewhat through the efforts of Thurgood Marshall and other attorneys in Brown v. Board of Education, but the effects are lingering. "This country needs to apologize for a brutal, inhumane system of slavery and Jim Crow laws," Cohen (who is a grotesque black racist bigot and has never mentioned black racism or black supremacy in his white put-down harangues), went on. "President Bush has made remarks similar to this in Senegal; President Clinton also in the [commonwealth] of Virginia most recently."Cohen's resolution is graphic. "Slavery in America resembled no other form of involuntary servitude known in history, as Africans were captured and sold at auction like inanimate objects or animals," it says.

Cohen also states that "the system of de jure racial segregation known as 'Jim Crow,' which arose in certain parts of the nation following the Civil War to create separate and unequal societies for whites and African-Americans" still has some "vestiges" today. Cohen wants the House to acknowledge "the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow" and officially apologize to "African-Americans on behalf of the people of the United States" and offer a "commitment to rectify the lingering consequences of the misdeeds committed against African-Americans under slavery and Jim Crow and to stop the occurrence of human rights violations in the future."

Cohen has 36 co-sponsors for his resolution, all of which are the usual communist suspects that have been involved in dozens of criminal rip offs, immoral acts and legislation designed to suppress white civil rights for years, including Reps. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) and Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio), as well as House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and several other members of the extremely racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus.

Cohen tried to join the Black Caucus after the November election but was turned down because he's white. He talks the commie talk, but his skin is the wrong color to be accepted by his black racist cronies who insist upon segregation, for themselves only.

Read more…

The Stupidity of the Impeach Now Movement

Why I have maintained that attempting to impeach the man in the White House is down right stupid is really simple; however, the explanation takes a little time as it involves education. Try to remember that a failure to convict on the articles of impeachment will render it impossible to do so at a later date., for any reason.

Impeachment is not a finding, it is an indictment. After the indictment comes the trail. Impeaching BOH would be easy. The house presents a Articles of Impeachemnt, the votes are counted and he is impeached. Then comes the problem. The trial. That is conducted in the Senate only and the judge is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court as mandated in our constitution. Even Dirty Harry cannot refuse to hold that trial and the president can't use an executive order to make it go away. He must be tried if the house impeaches, BUT, and it is a big but, as things stand now the senate would never vote to convict. So we wait. Thank goodness some of the politicians are being smart. Not too many I agree, but there are some.

If we can take control of the senate with just a few votes over a simple majority there MIGHT be a chance. Here is the full process and some comments on that process:
In the Senate
The Articles of Impeachment are received from the House.
The Senate formulates rules and procedures for holding a trial.
A trial will be held. The President will be represented by his lawyers. A select group of House members will serve as "prosecutors." The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (currently John G. Roberts) will preside with all 100 Senators acting as the jury.
The Senate will meet in private session to debate a verdict.
The Senate, in open session, will vote on a verdict. A 2/3 vote of the Senate will result in a conviction. (note: 67 senators have to vote for conviction)
The Senate will vote to remove the President from office.
The Senate may also vote (by a simple majority) to prohibit the President from holding any public office in the future.
Impeachable Offenses
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says, "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." In his report, Independent Counsel, Starr accuses President Clinton of committing eleven acts for which he could be removed from office by impeachment. Are any of those acts "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors?" Well, that's up to the members of the House of Representatives. According to constitutional lawyers, "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" are (1) real criminality -- breaking a law; (2) abuses of power; (3) "violation of public trust" as defined by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. In 1970, then Representative Gerald R. Ford defined impeachable offenses as "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." An excellent definition, Mr. Former President. In the past, Congress has issued Articles of Impeachment for acts in three general categories:
Exceeding the constitutional bounds of the powers of the office.
Behavior grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office.
Employing the power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.
There are obvious land mines in this process. One of those is when the senate retires to consider it's verdict. The prosecuting attorneys are excluded because they are not senators. How about the defense attorneys? Any defense attorney, selected by the president remember, that is a member of the senate is going to be part of that closed session. Just one reason it has never resulted in conviction. Then there is the seeming fact that one of the things a person serving a full term in the senate seems to misplace is his, or her, conscience. It just seems to get lost, somehow.

So what do we need to impeach and convict this usurper? It appears that we need about 56 conservatives to be elected to the senate. I don't see that happening, do you? However let is be positive. The next session of congress is convened and Dirty Harry is relegated to senate minority leader. The conservatives and the swell of grass roots conservatism convinces a few more liberals that their interest in power is best served by getting BOH out of the White House. Just might happen. Sure can't happen as things stand now.

Read more…

Congressman Massie,

Greetings Sir!
I am not one of your constituents - please ask Senator Paul about me, he can advise, tell you who I am.

I write today about the press release of your new amendments to the NDAA to protect civil rights of American Citizens.

Sir, I like what I read however I believe you need to make a small change..

The annual reporting requirements are not going to work. They provide far too much leeway for the Military to incarcerate in any given "year" and then fail to report it... as they might no longer be "incarcerated". I refuse to go into implications of that statement.

Not only that - an American might be incarcerated for twelve months - their rights to due process lost for twelve months - their freedom guaranteed under our Constitution lost for twelve months - before Congress found out about it. Before anyone found out about it.

I would make a suggestion that these amendments be modified with language that essentially states Congress be immediately notified in each and every incident of incarceration - not an annual report.

I understand the potential difficulties Military might have with something like that - but Sir, we are talking about freedom - not paperwork...


SFC (retired) Aubrey Mason
San Antonio, Texas

(address redacted for publication)

Read more…

Author: Brian D. Hill

Source: USWGO Alternative News


Most theme parks condition you to accept the Police State but at Dollywoodthey did not do Thumb Scans, not even bag searches.

While I was at Universal Studios, Disney World, and Kennedy Space Center they didone or more of the following to me while I was there:

  1. Searched my bags
  2. Checked my cameras to make sure they were cameras by forcing me to turn them on and show them the display screen.
  3. Made me go through a Thumb Scan
  4. Made me give some form of Identification or personal information

I had went through tyranny in 3 theme parks and it is all for the guise of NationalSecurity and stopping Terrorism.

While I went to Dollywood all I had to do was buy the ticket (They accept untraceable cash as well),take it to the gate along with my camera bags, the gate guards onlychecked my ticket and told me to go through and that was it. There wasno bag search, there was no retinal scan, there was no thumb scan,there was no request for Identification, there was no no-fly list thatcompares names of random people, the theme park was relaxed and had noneed for any bag searches.

Dollywood may lead the way to what Theme Parks used to be like before 9/11. The way all theme parks usedto be was if you didn't want to pay three to four bucks per drink youcould sneak a couple cans and nobody would be the wiser, and if youhave diabetes you can sneak candy and never have to pay loads just for abit of candy because since nobody searches your bags they can't bounceyou from the theme parks due to being unable to keep paying loads perdrink.

Dollywood is the only American theme park these days that doesn't tyrannize and force their patrons to pay loads more on food.

So while Universal theme park has a thumb scan database and other theme parks are heading that way Dollywood which is technically a themepark that has faith doesn't fear the terrorists so they don't give anypower to the globalists and their fake terrorist forces that are beingfinanced by the Rothschild controlled banking groups.

When all theme parks begin to do things such as forced thumb scans, forcedretinal scans, forced drug testing, forced Identification and forcedsocial security number requests, and forced bag searches the themeparks begin to precondition us to support the Police State, that aslong as we are safe it is ok to be tyrannized and in fact the themeparks sponsored by globalists may even promote these tyrannical securitymeasures as something fun, flashy, or something cool to get everybodyinto being used to Police State measures.

The Globalists want us to accept the Police State and bag searches everywhere like it is thenorm, that there is no Constitution, that we do not need a fair justicecourt, that only precrime and invasive bag searches at every facilitycan save us from the cursive terrorists.

I believe we need to boycott all theme parks except Dollywood because since they don'tsearch bags and don't give into to tyrannical police state measures weneed to make a positive example out of this and spread the message tothe world that we don't need to let the terrorists put us in fearbecause if we do then we Have NO Human Rights because security willdissolve Liberty.

Tell everyone to only visit Dollywood not just because they don't search bags but also because they don't believe inushering in the Police State for a One World Government run by a tinyelite.

Read more…