Look to History. And you will find that almost every great empire and nation that fell aside from war, happened because of Moral decay. Those Nations peoples turned to Sodomy and Homosexuality. Corruptions, Lying, Greed and thievery. And now look at our Nation. Take a good hard look. We no longer have a Constitutional Government. We have an Executive branch that is clueless, And lies at every turn. A branch that trys to make its own laws when ever its conveneit. And ignores other laws when they are not of their choosing. A Congress or law making branch thats just a lip service for the executive branch. With no guts or back bone of its own. People who are so concerned with hanging on to their jobs that they are willing to sell their souls to keep them. And the corrupt power that goes with them. With no concern for the people,there rights, or freedoms. And now a Judicial Branch that no longer adheres to our Constitution or Gods laws. But just make up new ones so a small minority of perverted sinners can feel good about themselves. No we have no reasonable Goverment left. We anarchy. The Supreme Court in one swift Un-Holy and disasterous moment of 5 Ignorant Jusices have openned Pandora's box. The ramifications and unintended consequences of their collective stupidity will forever haunt and bring down this Nation. Now instead of just Gay marriage we will see an onslaught of Sodomy. Immediate family members wanting to marry. People wanting to marry animals, adults wanting to marry children, etc. And now because of this ruling the courts can't tell the others no. Because now we have no Moral standard to base anything on. And the Homosexual movement will now deliberately see out Churches and Pastors that they can get to refuse their marriages so they can claim fowl. And either get their tax exempt status's taken away or declare discrimination and hate speech. The only way such a perversion of Homosexuality and Sodomy can feel good about its sinful life, Is to totally silence the Church, Religion, and the Pulpit. So that they can call the lifestyles normal and natural. So in coming up with their Court decision those Justices have not only circumvented God and the Bible, But also our own Constitution. Which declares Freedom of Speech and Religion. Here just like with abortion. Abortion the premeditated murder of human life. Just because the vast number of men and women, mostly young feel no accountability or responsibility for their own sinful actions that led to an unwanted pregancy. So lets call it a health issue for women and to make these sinners feel ok about their collective abortions we will make it legal to murder babies. These is the same crazy, totally ludicrious thinking the Supreme Court is once again using here with Gay Marriage. We don't want anyone to feel bad about themselves or their sins or be offended. So lets give them what they want. We can offend God, And every living Christian or God fearing person. Or anyone else who believes in a right and true life. But how dare we offend these sinful, sick, selfish, minorities who want to corrupt us all. The Constitution explicitly says any power that isn't definely granted to the Federal Govt. goes to the States and the People. What part of this does the Scotus not understand. Or that God's laws are above all other laws and man. It figures we have a President who thinks hes a Messiah, Why not some Justices to. At this point anything the Scotus does won't matter. That have in whole taken away any direction, authority, or respect that they once had. Its the peoples time in this moment in History. And only the people themselves and their collective wills, faith,unity, and power can reverse all this tragedy. Its now or never people. To stand up and let your vioces be heard. And to be accountable to God, Family, and Country.
All Posts (30563)
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs: Islam, Jihad, Israel and the Islamic War on the West - 12 new articles
|
US Officials Warn of ISIS Attacks on July 4What a way to live. Everyone is waiting for the shoe to drop, or should I say the bomb to drop, all the while attacking any and all of us who oppose jihad. Vicious cowards.
Tunisia jihadi was local break-dancing celebrity, fan of Real Madrid: “He went to mosque and prayed, but just like the other young men”“Yes, he went to mosque and prayed, but just like the other young men, he would then go to a cafe and play football with his friends.” The Tunisian jihadi who opened fire on tourists at a Tunisian beach resort on Friday, killing at least 39 people, most of them tourists, was reportedly a local “break-dancing star” and a fan of Real Madrid. Real Madrid is a football club. Real Madrid coaches Palestinian children in West Bank The Israeli ambassador to Spain was called “Jew dog” at a Real Madrid game. Israel’s ambassador to Spain says he was assaulted by slurs like “Jewish dog” and “dirty Jew” as they left a Madrid soccer match. Palestinian supporters claim that Portuguese... Saturday Night Cinema: Cornered (1945)Tonight’s Saturday Cinema feature is the 1945 little gem, Cornered, starring Dick Powell, Walter Slezak, Nina Vale, Micheline Cheirel, Morris Carnovsky, and Luther Adler. “A dark, morally ambiguous mission has Dick Powell ‘Cornered’ against evil.”
Jihad Porn: Devout French Muslim took SELFIE with beheaded victim *WARNING*This is what they do. They post their unimaginable savagery online to recruit other Muslims. The devout Muslim who opened fire on children in a Jewish day school in Toulouse, France posted the slaughter of little girls and boys moments after his murderous rampage. It’s what they do. Yassin Salhi sent the selfie using the WhatsApp instant messaging application to a North American phone number, said one of these sources. French delivery business owner Herve Cornara, seen here, was decapitated by jihadi Yassin Salhi, who left his severed head hanging from the fence of a U.S.-owned company near Lyon, police said. The severed head of his boss was found later on a chain-link fence, along with Muslim writings. Watch VIDEO: Horrific moment the Islamic State kills four gay men by throwing them from a roofIf the gay establishment agitated against the jihad the way they went after gay marriage, these men might be alive today, along with the other tens of thousands of gays persecuted and slaughtered under Islamic law. Here’s how the Islamic State celebrates the passage of gay marriage. Why isn’t the enemedia blaming SCOTUS the way they blame AFDI, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, Bosch Fawstin for jihad terror? Tunisian jihadi
Obama-backed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt rejects Sisi’s call for coexistenceObama’s terror group in Egypt refused Sisi’s call for coexistence — how very Obama. Obama supports these bloody terrorists — even still.
Watch VIDEO: Amateur, terrifying, up-close footage of Tunisia beach shooting (WARNING — DISTURBING FOOTAGE)SEE IT: Terrifying, up-close footage of Tunisia beach shooting emerges online, as ISIS claims responsibility and killer is identified (WARNING — DISTURBING FOOTAGE)NY Daily News, June 27, 2015:
UK beefs up security after report of Islamic State bomb plotIn the wake of yesterday’s slaughter of British tourists in Tunisia, UK Prime Minister David Cameron said, “Islam is a religion of peace.”
Tunisia to close 80 mosques for inciting violence, after hotel attack @CBLDF
While Tunisia, a Muslim country, is closing mosques for inciting to jihad, the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (CBLDF) has blacklisted Bosch Fawstin, who was and is literally under fire and under death threats because he submitted a cartoon to our exhibit. CBLDF founder Michael Berger cowed and cravenly crowed that Pamela Geller has “openly advocated that every mosque in the US should be subjected to regular government inspections.” What we... Australian Prime Minister: Islamic State group is ‘coming after us’At least one world leader will state the obvious. One. “This is the grim reality the world faces now.”
And a head. Here’s the thing: for years my colleagues and I have been warning the West. We work tirelessly to rouse the slumbering masses. We were smeared, booed, hissed, defamed for trying to ward off this war. And still, even today, the campaign of personal attacks and destruction continues, because we oppose Islamic supremacism and jihad. It never should have come to this.
Tens of thousands of Iranian women have undergone FGM; “needs to be done otherwise a girl would have so much sexual desire it would be scandalous”Female genital mutilation (FGM) or clitoridectomy is an Islamic tradition, rampant in the Muslim world. Over 96% of the women in Egypt have been clitoridectomized. Back in 2008, devout members of the Egyptian parliament have made female genital mutilation (circumcision) legal again in Egypt. This has become a pressing issue here in America. The American Academy of Pediatricsproposed a resolution to begin to practice this barbaric mutilation in a multicultural, dhimmi effort — a “nick,” as it were. Whatever their twisted multi-culti, dhimmi intention, this would have given clitoridectomy the seal of approval by the American Academy of Pediatrics. There was uniform protest by counter-jihadists and other human rights groups to... Majority of 38 Tunisia Jihad Attack Victims are Britons: UK PM Cameron, “Islam is a religion of peace.”Islamic State claimed responsibility for the Tunisian attack.
The UK Prime Minister Cameron said, today’s jihad attacks are “not in the name of Islam. Islam is a religion of peace.” And today all the President of the United States could talk about was …. gay marriage. At this rate there is no way the West won’t be defeated.
|
Churches could lose tax exemption over gay marriage
Lost in the celebrations over universal gay marriage, like abortion, being deemed a right found in the “penumbras and emanations” of the Constitution is the chilling effect the ruling has on religious liberty. In a telling exchange between the Obama administration’s Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. and Justice Samuel Alito, detailed by Tom Blumer at Newsbusters.com, in which Verrilli admitted that churches could lose their tax exemptions if they refuse to perform gay weddings:
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/06/churches_could_lose_tax_exemption_over_gay_marriage.html#ixzz3eMa1NAvb
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
By Oscar Y. Harward
Americans are troubled with SCOTUS’s Decision on ‘same-sex’ marriage? Who is/are responsible?
Everyone must look at their family, their neighbors, their friends, their brothers and sisters in their Houses of Worship, and look into the mirror. Review yourself as to how you/they vote, it you/they vote, and to whom do you/they support and on what issues. What are you doing in helping?
President Obama has presented 2 SCOTUS nominees to the Senate and perhaps, upwards toward 50 or more for ‘confirmation’ or ‘rejection’ into the Federal Judiciary.
Current History reveals Democrats consistently support ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-Christian’ value based nominees.
Among 2 Obama SCOTUS nominees, whom both were known as having histories of ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-Christian’ opinions and values, several Republicans In Name Only (RINO) Republicans voted ‘AYE’ to ‘confirm’ these and other ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-Christian’ value based Obama nominees.
On 8/06/2009, and on ‘confirmation’ votes of SCOTUS nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, 9 Senate Republicans voted ‘AYE’ to ‘confirm’ this nominee: Alexander (R-TN), Bond (R-MO), Collins (R-ME), Graham (R-SC), Gregg (R-NH), Lugar (R-IN), Martinez (R-FL), Snowe (R-ME), and Voinovich (R-OH). http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00262
On 8/05/2010, and on ‘confirmation’ votes of SCOTUS nominee, Elena Kagan, 5 Senate Republicans voted ‘AYE’ to ‘confirm’ this nominee: Collins (R-ME), Graham (R-SC), Gregg (R-NH), Lugar (R-IN), and Snowe (R-ME). http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00229
You may find many RINO Republican with high record votes representations contrary to (y)our GOP Platform. The GOP Platform is ‘right’ on fiscal, social, and national security issues. Many Republicans do not support (y)our Platform; but do receive Republican Party monies ‘solicited’ and ‘disbursed’ regardless of their support on Platform issues. https://cdn.gop.com/docs/2012GOPPlatform.pdf
Capitol Hill Republican leaders have gone astray from our GOP Platform issues. Conservative Republicans Christians must support Christian values. Otherwise, get out!
Hastening to capitalize on the turbulent winds following the Charleston shootings, Hilly Clinton holds a discussion of the massacre and race relations in Missouri today. The open to press event was added to Clinton’s fundraising tour Monday and is sandwiched between a pair of private high-dollar Midwest donor stops and Wednesday’s star-studded concert for the Democratic front runner in New York. It comes a day after President nObama, who has not lived up to expectations on improving race relations, created a stir by using a racial epithet in an interview to express his frustration on the issue. Clinton’s campaign has been pushing race to forefront since the shootings and is holding today’s discussion in a church not far from Ferguson, where racial tensions boiled over last year. With the press allowed in, Clinton is again selectively surfacing on issues with direct appeal to her base, even as she avoids those where the direction of the political wind is less certain. -Fox News
[How Jeb dealt with Florida’s flag flap - WSJ: “When former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush quietly took down the Confederate battle flag from the state capitol in 2001, he was called ‘spineless’ and ‘racist to Southern people,’ and was accused of ‘pandering’ to African-Americans. He was also repeatedly warned he would be defeated in the next election…As Mr. Bush did throughout his two terms, from 1999 to 2007, he personally responded to several emails he received on the issue from constituents who condemned and hailed his decision…To those who attacked him for his decision, Mr. Bush responded tersely but politely, at times with deadpan humor, emails released earlier this year show.”]
Graham opts to heal his home state - Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., released a statement shifting from an earlier ambiguous position to a clear stance. Graham said, “I hope that, by removing the flag, we can take another step towards healing and recognition – and a sign that South Carolina is moving forward”
[WashEx’s David Drucker observes it was evident the political sand trap for Republicans over South Carolina’s flag controversy was causing high anxiety in the national party. “There was Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus on Monday, standing behind Gov. Nikki Haley in Columbia as she announced that the Confederate battle flag should come down…” ]
PLEASE SHARE THE AWARENESS ON EVERY WEB SITE YOU CAN AND ALL YOUR CONNECTIONS , FAMILY, NEIGHBORS, AND FRIENDS
THANK YOU
PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM
A FREE MORAL PERSON WITH NO GOVERNMENT OR the RULE OF LAW OF A FREE PEOPLE TO BE GOVERN BY OUR CONSTITUTION!
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs: Islam, Jihad, Israel and the Islamic War on the West - 12 new articles
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs: Islam, Jihad, Israel and the Islamic War on the West - 12 new articles
|
PLEASE SHARE THE AWARENESS ON EVERY WEB SITE YOU CAN AND ALL YOUR CONNECTIONS , FAMILY, NEIGHBORS, AND FRIENDS
THANK YOU
PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM
A FREE MORAL PERSON WITH NO GOVERNMENT OR the RULE OF LAW OF A FREE PEOPLE TO BE GOVERN BY OUR CONSTITUTION!
First they gave us the Patriot Act, but it turned out to be anti-Patriotic. Then they gave us the Freedom Act, which turned out to be anti-Freedom. Let's not forget about the Affordable Health Act, which turned out to be anti-affordable. It's all about the Orwellian 1984 - tell the proles we've never been at war with East Asia, but then tell them we've always been at war with East Asia. At least in that instance they actually told the proles that. In our time, they don't even bother to tell us anything; they just move forward without even acknowledging we exist. If we're dying of thirst, they won't even piss on us.
The latest fiasco is the Trans Pacific Partnership, a corporate combination of the North American Union (us, yes, we are a union now with Mexico and Canada, not a sovereign nation), the European Union, and the Asian Pacific Union. They claim it's about Trade, but the secret intent of it all is absolute control of the globe. Just picture the movie Springtime for Hitler, where he's dancing around his office with a beach ball painted as a globe, and he's merrily tossing it in the air, and perching it under his arm, as he waltzes around his desk, laughing and full of himself. He's the symbol for the current Corporate Combine that essentially is doing the same thing.
We as a Nation are not done yet. They may have passed this so-called Treaty, but they will have to implement it in the near future. That's where you come in. You must resist. You must point out to others the Fraud that will take place as the implementation of this commences. Stop obsessing on the Confederate Battle Flag, Peacock Jenner, Trans-sexual nonsense, Gay marriage, Genderless bathrooms, and all the pop culture trash that they lay before us as a distraction. They want us diverted from what's really going on - the destruction of the USA so they can roll in the NWO.
Get focused on the important stuff - bought and paid-for politicians, puppet presidents, economic warfare, medical tyranny, high tech gadgetry designed to rob us of our humanity, political correctness implemented to divide and conquer us, things of this nature; not baseball scores, movie titles, television buffoonery, video game drudgery, women's issues that are, by and large, bogus. Where are the women regarding the horrible abuse of other women in the Middle East? Nowhere; hiding under the table and putting us, the relatively harmless Western jerks, in the cross-hairs to make themselves feel good and powerful, while the real atrocities go unchecked.
When all is said and done, You Are The Resistance. Don't let this mockery of the USA be enforced. Support the Laws of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; not the laws of their god, the Evil One.
We all need to contact our local state representatives and flood our Governors offices. And the state attorney generals office. And tell them that we don't want our state recognizing the Supreme Courts ruling on gay marriages. This issue of marriage is completely a peoples right of choice and a States Right. Given by the Constitution. The Supreme Court does not have the right to force states to adopt their ruling. The Supreme Court overstepped their Judical Authority on this matter. Just like Obama oversteps his authority at every turn. We need to move fast and strong on this issue. No allowing same sex marriages. Get the word out people or we all live with this perverted, sinful, lifestyle.
By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net
The sun did indeed rise in the east this morning regardless of the ruling by the Supreme Court that same sex marriage is now legal in all 50 states and I drove around town yesterday…AFTER the ruling…and failed to notice even one pillar of salt.
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supremes decided that the same LEGAL standing…the same LEGAL protections and the same LEGAL benefits are to be extended to same sex married couples as are extended to opposite sex married couples.
It’s not the end of the world though you might have a different impression if you browse social media posts which include everything from the sky is falling to this is the end of our nation and the end of times.
Equal protection under the law has always been a hallmark of our Constitution and of our country although there are obviously some out there who believe those equal protections should extend only to those exactly like them.
Among those who are most distressed over the ruling are those who claim that this is an assault on religious freedom.
They are wrong in that interpretation as the ruling says nothing regarding nor does it interfere in any with religious precepts, religious doctrines or religious interpretations regarding marriage.
I’ll get back to that point shortly but before I do…
Wash Ex: “Roughly sixty new emails published by the committee Monday suggest Clinton relied heavily on what lawmakers have called ‘unvetted intelligence’ from [Sidney Blumenthal] in the months before and after the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi. Many of the emails indicate she implored Blumenthal to funnel information about Libya to her, despite her recent claims that her ‘old friend’ Blumenthal simply sent her ‘unsolicited emails.’”
Clinton cash dash - Bloomberg: “Clinton is set to attend 26 fundraisers between Monday and July 3, including 11 in New York City, according to a review of her public schedule and newly obtained invitations. Many events come with a recommended contribution of the $2,700 legal maximum for her primary campaign or require attendees to raise at least $27,000. After the quarter ends, the Clinton campaign is required to file disclosures with the Federal Elections Commission. Allies have tried to downplay expectations, stressing that because Clinton is only accepting primary cash, the total may not be as impressive as the first quarter of President Barack nObama’s 2012 re-election campaign.”
Hilly hires potential veep’s staffer - BuzzFeed: “The latest high-profile Latina hire by Clinton is Betsaida Alcantara, who is leaving the communications department at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to join the Clinton campaign as director of media planning….[HUD Secretary Julian Castro] has often been floated as a possible vice presidential nominee to join Clinton should she win the Democratic nomination…” -Fox News
“Had the flag not existed or been on the ground of the capitol this massacre would have happened in any case. But it’s the standard liberal impulse, something happened really bad. So there’s got to be a problem, there has to be a solution, we must do something, even if the something is entirely irrelevant.” – Charles Krauthammer on “Special Report with Bret Baier” Watch here. -Fox News

The court says the ACA’s stipulation that subsidies are to be administered by the IRS using exchanges “established by the State” should not be construed to mean what it says. Otherwise the law will not reach as far as it will if federal exchanges can administer subsidies in states that choose not to establish exchanges. The ACA’s legislative history, however, demonstrates that the subsidies were deliberately restricted to distribution through states’ exchanges in order to pressure the states into establishing their own exchanges.
The most durable damage from Thursday’s decision is not the perpetuation of the ACA, which can be undone by what created it — legislative action. The paramount injury is the court’s embrace of a duty to ratify and even facilitate lawless discretion exercised by administrative agencies and the executive branch generally.
[Adler: To save nObamacare, John Roberts rewrites the law]
The court’s decision flowed from many decisions by which the judiciary has written rules that favor the government in cases of statutory construction. The decision also resulted from Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s embrace of the doctrine that courts, owing vast deference to the purposes of the political branches, are obligated to do whatever is required to make a law efficient, regardless of how the law is written. What Roberts does by way of, to be polite, creative construing (Justice Antonin Scalia, dissenting, calls it “somersaults of statutory interpretation”) is legislating, not judging.
Rolling up the sleeves of his black robe and buckling down to the business of redrafting the ACA, Roberts invents a corollary to “Chevron deference.”
Named for a 1984 case, Chevron deference has become central to the way today’s regulatory state functions. It says that agencies charged with administering statutes are entitled to deference when they interpret ambiguous statutory language. While purporting to not apply Chevron, Roberts expands it to empower all of the executive branch to ignore or rewrite congressional language that is not at all ambiguous but is inconvenient for the smooth operation of something Congress created. Exercising judicial discretion in the name of deference, Roberts enlarges executive discretion. He does so by validating what the IRS did when it ignored the ACA’s text in order to disburse billions of dollars of subsidies through federal exchanges not established by the states.
Chevron deference does for executive agencies what the “rational basis” test, another judicial invention, does for legislative discretion.
Since the New Deal, courts have permitted almost any legislative infringement of economic liberty that can be said to have a rational basis. Applying this extremely permissive test, courts usually approve any purpose that a legislature asserts. Courts even concoct purposes that legislatures neglect to articulate. This fulfills the Roberts Doctrine that it is a judicial function to construe laws in ways that make them perform better, meaning more efficiently, than they would as written by Congress.
[Bernstein: Why the Affordable Care Act is so messed up]
Thursday’s decision demonstrates how easily, indeed inevitably, judicial deference becomes judicial dereliction, with anticonstitutional consequences. We are, says William R. Maurer of the Institute for Justice, becoming “a country in which all the branches of government work in tandem to achieve policy outcomes, instead of checking one another to protect individual rights. Besides violating the separation of powers, this approach raises serious issues about whether litigants before the courts are receiving the process that is due to them under the Constitution.”
Roberts says “we must respect the role of the Legislature” but “[A] fair reading of legislation demands a fair understanding of the legislative plan.” However, he goes beyond “understanding” the plan; he adopts a legislator’s role in order to rescue the legislature’s plan from the consequences of the legislature’s dubious decisions. By blurring, to the point of erasure, constitutional boundaries, he damages all institutions, not least his court.
Daily Digest
THE FOUNDATION
“All know and feel … the sacredness of the connection between husband and wife. All know that the sweetness of social intercourse, the harmony of society, the happiness of families, depend on that mutual partiality which they feel, or that delicate forbearance which they manifest towards each other.” —John Marshall, Sexton v. Wheaton, 1823
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
NPS Removes Battle Flag From Battlefield
The hive mind appears to be taking over. While we can at least understand the push to remove the Confederate flag from the South Carolina state capitol grounds, the rush to jerk it from all store shelves or any public view is astounding. From the “General Lee” of Dukes of Hazzard fame, to Apple pulling Civil War games from the App Store, to the National Cathedral removing stained glass over the mere presence of the Confederate flag, the reaction quickly became absurd. Now, the nation’s first National Military Park, Chickamauga, a park established in 1890 for reconciliation between veterans of the Confederate and Union forces after the War Between the States, has removed Confederate battle flags from its gift shops. Gettysburg has done so as well. Undoubtedly there was a memo from the National Park Service requiring this asinine measure — in order to propagate Obama’s race-bait narrative. It has been said that ignorance is bliss, but the fact is, ignorance is miserable.
Meanwhile, Obama no doubt will be promoting his race bait later today when delivering the eulogy for Rev. Clementa Pinckney, who, again, supported the flying of the Confederate flag at the SC capitol. If black lives really matter, then why does Obama not deliver eulogies for the other 20 blacks murdered every day on average, most by other blacks? Simple: It doesn’t fit the race-bait narrative.
Finally, of course, the American flag flew over those 13 rebellious states before the Confederate battle flag was ever flown. Better get that American flag down next.


Clinton Strings Along Investigators With Hidden Emails
We’re still trying to grasp all we don’t know about Hillary Clinton’s cannon of destroyed documentation. On Thursday, the State Department admitted that nine full emails and six partial emails that Clinton lackey Sidney Blumenthal handed over to the Select Committee on Benghazi were not in the reams of printed emails Clinton dumped on the department. Clinton had to have known this. Earlier this year, Clinton said she handed over all the emails regarding her tenure as secretary of state, though she admitted that she destroyed half of her emails because they were “private.” Clinton swears she told the truth, but it was not the whole truth and nothing but the truth about the events leading up to the day when jihadists killed four Americans in Benghazi. “This has implications far beyond Libya, Benghazi and our committee’s work,” Benghazi Committee Chair Trey Gowdy said. “This conclusively shows her email arrangement with herself, which was then vetted by her own lawyers, has resulted in an incomplete public record. … The revelation these messages were not originally produced to the State Department by Clinton is significant and troubling.” The emails show that Clinton was encouraging Blumenthal to send her intelligence reports on Benghazi, despite Clinton’s claim that the reports were unsolicited. So why is the State Department cooperating with the Benghazi investigation now? It’s very possible Hillary, Blumenthal and Co. are contriving these releases as a red herring designed to tie up Republican political capital on an issue that may be a nonstarter. Barack Obama did the same thing with his birth certificate.
House Republicans Mull Impeachment of IRS Head
Last February, Barack Obama glibly claimed there was “not even a smidgen of corruption” at the IRS. A month later, at the height of the scandal over the IRS targeting conservative nonprofits, the agency destroyed 422 backup tapes that might have contained 24,000 of Lois Lerner’s emails. Here’s what the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee learned at their hearing yesterday: Yes, the IRS knew of significant gaps in the public record. Yes, Congress issued a preservation order and a subpoena. But still, records were destroyed. Furthermore, eight days after former chair of the House Ways and Means Committee David Camp sent a letter to the IRS in June 2011 inquiring about the targeting of Tea Party groups, Lerner’s hard drive somehow crashed. Tim Camus, the deputy inspector for investigations, calls the whole email-destroying frenzy an “unbelievable set of circumstances.” As for Republican lawmakers, they think the unbelievable set of circumstances is grounds for the impeachment of IRS commissioner John Koskinen. A Republican on the House Oversight committee told National Review, “We’ve briefed the leadership’s counsel, and I think that they’re open to it, but it’s the type of thing where this town is like, ‘oh, that’s not how we do things, it’s not really been used lately.’ But, quite frankly, we really haven’t had executive branch officials behave this way like we do now.”
Your Support Matters
Since our founding nearly 19 years ago, we have never charged a subscription fee or accepted advertising. We rely completely on the voluntary financial support of our readers. If you can, please make your secure online donation today. Your support ensures that our dedicated team of editors, writers and support staff can continue to provide The Patriot Post, free of charge, to grassroots leaders and like-minded Patriots around the nation.
Our operations and mission are funded by — and depend entirely upon — the financial support of American Patriots like you. Thank you for standing with us. —Nate Jackson, Managing Editor
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS
SCOTUS Endorses Same-Sex Marriage
By John J. Bastiat

Continuing to goose-step onward in its blitzkrieg against Rule of Law in America, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 today in favor of allowing homosexuals the “right” to marry. The ruling effectively invalidates bans on same-sex marriage remaining in 14 states and mandates that homosexuals can marry anywhere in the U.S. The importance of this ruling, especially for Christians, cannot be overstated. Nor can the damage done to the Third Pillar of Liberty.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in the other three major homosexual-rights cases over the past 20 years, wrote the majority opinion. He was joined, of course, by the reliably liberal clown act that is the leftist side of the bench: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Rather than rehash the sordid trail of this abrogation of Rule of Law, we thought we’d let the dissenting justices (who wrote four separate dissents) address the issue themselves:
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote:
“Petitioners make strong arguments rooted in social policy and considerations of fairness. … But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be.”
We do note here, however, the irony of Roberts' statement in light of yesterday’s atrociousObamaCare ruling.
Roberts continued, “Although the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not. The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage. And a State’s decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational. In short, our Constitution does not enact any one theory of marriage. The people of a State are free to expand marriage to include same-sex couples, or to retain the historic definition.”
“But for those who believe in a government of laws, not of men, the majority’s approach is deeply disheartening.”
“Supporters of same-sex marriage have achieved considerable success persuading their fellow citizens — through the democratic process — to adopt their view. That ends today. Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law.”
“The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedent.”
Justice Antonin Scalia noted:
“This is a naked judicial claim to legislative — indeed, super-legislative — power; a claim fundamentally at odds with our system of government.”
“So it is not of special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court.”
“The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact — and the furthest extension one can even imagine — of the Court’s claimed power to create ‘liberties’ that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.”
“These [precedent] cases ask us to decide whether the Fourteenth Amendment contains a limitation that requires the States to license and recognize marriages between two people of the same sex. Does it remove that issue from the political process? Of course not. It would be surprising to find a prescription regarding marriage in the Federal Constitution since, as the author of today’s opinion reminded us only two years ago (in an opinion joined by the same Justices who join him today): ‘[R]egulation of domestic relations is an area that has long been regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States.’”
“But the Court ends this debate, in an opinion lacking even a thin veneer of law. Buried beneath the mummeries and straining-to-be-memorable passages of the opinion is a candid and startling assertion: No matter what it was the People ratified, the Fourteenth Amendment protects those rights that the Judiciary, in its ‘reasoned judgment,’ thinks the Fourteenth Amendment ought to protect.”
“But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch. The five Justices who compose today’s majority are entirely comfortable concluding that every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003.”
“They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a ‘fundamental right’ overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in the time since. They see what lesser legal minds — minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly — could not.”
Justice Clarence Thomas explained:
“The Court’s decision today is at odds not only with the Constitution, but with the principles upon which our Nation was built. Since well before 1787, liberty has been understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement to government benefits.”
“Yet the majority invokes our Constitution in the name of a ‘liberty’ that the Framers would not have recognized, to the detriment of the liberty they sought to protect. Along the way, it rejects the idea — captured in our Declaration of Independence — that human dignity is innate and suggests instead that it comes from the Government. This distortion of our Constitution not only ignores the text, it inverts the relationship between the individual and the state in our Republic.”
“Petitioners argue that by enshrining the traditional definition of marriage in their State Constitutions through voter-approved amendments, the States have put the issue ‘beyond the reach of the normal democratic process.’ But the result petitioners seek is far less democratic. They ask nine judges on this Court to enshrine their definition of marriage in the Federal Constitution and thus put it beyond the reach of the normal democratic process for the entire Nation.”
“The majority’s inversion of the original meaning of liberty will likely cause collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that protect liberty.”
“Aside from undermining the political processes that protect our liberty, the majority’s decision threatens the religious liberty our Nation has long sought to protect.”
We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.
The impact of this ruling will be felt far and wide. It won’t be simply Christian bakers, florists and photographers who are assaulted by the Rainbow Mafia for daring to have their own conscience. Christian churches, schools, agencies and so on will soon be in the crosshairs for opposing this heretofore undiscovered constitutional right. This is only the beginning.
TODAY AT PATRIOTPOST.US
- ANALYSIS: Housing Discrimination, or Just Obama’s Economy?
- ANALYSIS: Iran Deal Is Nothing but Legacy for Obama, Kerry
- Krauthammer: Roberts Just Wants to Save the Court
- Will There Soon Be More American Hostages?
- Schumer: POTUS Hillary Will Create Carbon Tax
- Holder’s Idea of Terrorism Depends on the Perpetrator
- The Left Has Found Its 1 in 5 Rape Statistic
- The Dirty Little Secret Behind Obama’s Earth Day Lecture
- The UN Report On The Israel/Hamas Conflict Is Useless
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
- Tony Perkins: With Ruling, SCOTUS Poisons Burwell
- David Harsanyi: Supreme Court vs. Rule of Law
- Charles Krauthammer: On Lowering the Flag
- Jonah Goldberg: Liberals Are Playing a Racial Shell Game
- Mona Charen: Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History
For more, visit Right Opinion.
OPINION IN BRIEF
Charles Krauthammer: “[T]here’s a deeper reason for this rush to banish Confederate symbols, to move them from the public square to the museum. The trigger was not just the massacre itself, but even more tellingly, the breathtaking display of nobility and spiritual generosity by the victims' relatives. Within 48 hours of the murder of their loved ones, they spoke of redemption and reconciliation and even forgiveness of the killer himself. It was an astonishingly moving expression of Christian charity. Such grace demands a response. In a fascinating dynamic, it created a feeling of moral obligation to reciprocate in some way. The flag was not material to the crime itself, but its connection to the underlying race history behind the crime suggested that its removal from the statehouse grounds — whatever the endlessly debated merits of the case — could serve as a reciprocal gesture of reconciliation. The result was a microcosm of — and a historical lesson in — the moral force of the original civil rights movement, whose genius was to understand the effect that combating evil with good, violence with grace would have on a fundamentally decent American nation. America was indeed moved. The result was the civil rights acts. The issue today is no longer legal equality. It is more a matter of sorting through historical memory. … Perhaps we can learn a lesson from Arlington National Cemetery, founded by the victorious Union to bury its dead. There you will find Section 16. It contains the remains of hundreds of Confederate soldiers grouped around a modest, moving monument to their devotion to ‘duty as they understood it’ — a gesture by the Union of soldierly respect, without any concession regarding the taintedness of their cause. Or shall we uproot them as well?”
SHORT CUTS
Feel the burn: “Under all the usual rules of interpretation, in short, the Government should lose this case. But normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved.” —Justice Antonin Scalia in dissent in theObamaCare case
Another zinger: “Justice [Antonin] Scalia quips acidly that ‘we should start calling this law SCOTUScare,’ but the better term is RobertsCare. By volunteering as Nancy Pelosi’s copy editor, [John Roberts] is making her infamous line about passing the law to find out what’s in it even more true than she knew at the time.” —Wall Street Journal
Upright: “Here is John Roberts, chief oracle of the United States of America, from Thursday’s King v. Burwell decision: ‘Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them. If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter.’ … [I]magine for a moment if a Supreme Court justice argued that the Defense of Marriage Act was passed to improve marriage rather than destroy it so we must focus on the former rather than the latter and uphold any retroactive provisions the Bush administration cooked up to make that law work.” —David Harsanyi
Gloating: “After multiple challenges before the Supreme Court, the Affordable Care Act is here to stay.” —Barack Obama
The BIG Lie: “The Supreme Court ruled that the millions of Americans … be able to keep their affordable coverage.” —DNC Chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Unfortunately, as a taxpayer funding ObamaCare, YOU may not be able keep your plan or your doctor, and on average, YOUR family premiums are going up almost $3,000.)
Non Compos Mentis, part I: “For the second time, the Affordable Care Act has been upheld by the Supreme Court. … There wasn’t even a dissenting opinion, as I understand it. Or so far we haven’t seen it.” —Nancy Pelosi
Non Compos Mentis, part II: “The Supreme Court ruled against a Republican-led tax hike for 6.4 million Americans!” —Sen. Debbie Stabenow
And last… “At a fundraiser, President Obama complained that the public has ‘forgotten his successes.’ Forgotten? We’re still working on forgiving.” —Fred Thompson
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis!
Managing Editor Nate Jackson
Join us in daily prayer for our Patriots in uniform — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm’s way in defense of Liberty, and for their families.
PLEASE SHARE THE AWARENESS ON EVERY WEB SITE YOU CAN AND ALL YOUR CONNECTIONS , FAMILY, NEIGHBORS, AND FRIENDS
THANK YOU
PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs: Islam, Jihad, Israel and the Islamic War on the West - 11 new articles
Interview with 2nd Victim of Okla Muslim Beheader: ‘He Started Slicing My Neck’ ‘Shouting in Arabic’Here’s what the media didn’t tell you about the devout Muslim who beheaded his co-worker Collen Hufford and attempted to behead a second victim, Traci Johnson. Here is the Facebook page of the devout Muslim who beheaded a female co-worker and attempted to behead a second. It is all about Islam. Here’s his last post:
Landmark anti-BDS law passes final Senate legislative hurdleThe vicious Jews such as Alissa Doctoroff, Edith Everett, Jim Joseph Foundation, Carole and Saul Zabar, Charlene Seidle, Karen Adler, Leichtag Foundation, the Bronfman Foundation, the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, Alan B. Slifka Foundation, David Hochberg, Dr. Gabor T. Herman, Geoffrey Biddle, Joel Greenblatt, Murray Koppelman, Peter Stein and all the other anti-Jewws that fund BDS will be made to answer for their sins. Our campaign to out these quislings and destroy the Jew-hatred movement is bearing fruit.
Ramadan in China: Least 18 Killed In Jihad Attack on Police HQRamadan Bomb-a-thon day 8, dateline China. At least 18 people have died after Chinese Muslims attacked police with knives and bombs at a traffic checkpoint. China, Russia, Europe, Australia, Syria, Iraq, America, Canada — everywhere it’s the same regardless of color, nationality or sock color. Jihad is jihad. The dhimmis at IBT describe the attackers as Chinese Muslims (Uighurs) “who are seeking independence” — in other words, an Islamic State — just like the Muslims who are waging bloody jihad in Thailand, Kenya, Nigeria, the Philippines, Gaza, Judea, Samaria, Chechnya, Russia, Iraq, Syria ……
ISIS Attacks Christians in LebanonNext up: Lebanon in the cross-hairs. The Islamic State means to cleanse the region of all non-Muslims and religious minorities, in accordance with Islamic law (sharia).
American Muslim ISIS Supporters Focusing on US Attacks, Study SaysNot that we needed a study to tell us what we see happening every day. And yet the elites want to blame, attack, put down those of us who oppose jihad terror and savagery. “Stay quiet and you’ll be okay” — those were Mohammed Atta’s words to his passengers on 9/11. And that’s exactly what the media, political and academic elites are telling us to do now. “Individuals charged with ISIS-inspired terrorism in the U.S. cannot be profiled.” Thanks to Muslim groups who dictate Obama’s domestic-terror policies.
Muslim Rape gangs were targeting schools 5 years ago, authorities did nothingThey did nothing and they still do nothing. One of the victims did a comprehensive interview with me here and here. She had over 100 names of rapists and traffickers, but the police “didn’t have time” to take all the names.
They school never questioned who was taking her out or why. They did nothing. But they did ban Robert Spencer and me from visiting the UK, because our... FBI Rounding Up Islamic State SuspectsThe investigation of the jihad attack on the AFDI Art Exhibit in Garland, Texas continues to bear fruit and smoke out American terror cells. Law enforcement is rounding up jihad-supporting Muslims — a “mounting threat of domestic attacks inspired by the Islamic State.”
Boston Marathon jihadi murderer: “I am Muslim. My religion is Islam”The victims of the Boston jihad bombing didn’t fall for Dzhokhar’s hollow apology, a feeble attempt to save his own worthless life. Victims React to Boston Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Apology: ‘Nothing Sincere’
Judge George O’Toole told Tsarnaev he had embraced a cruel God, heeded the jihadist “siren song” and engaged in “monstrous self-deception” to carry out the bombings.... Obama Offers to Give Iran Nuclear ReactorsThe treachery and treason of Obama and his enemy administration is shocking. This is surreal — we are going to give Iran nuclear reactor parts to keep it from making a bomb? Madness. America is in so much trouble …. and the band plays on. His own advisors, as bad as they are, have denounced Obama’s serpentine submission to the Iran Islamic Republic of Iran. Five former members of President Obama’s inner circle of Iran advisers have written an open letter condemning Obama’s Iran deal, saying it “fall[s] short of meeting the administration’s own standard of a ‘good’ agreement” and laying out a series of minimum requirements that Iran must agree to in coming days for them to support a final... Former CAIR-Canada Official Represents Egyptian Muslim BrotherhoodHamas-CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood organization, so this is no surprise. What is unforgivable is that the enemedia continually ignores the subversive activity of Hamas-CAIR, and treats it as if it were a genuine civil rights organization.
Newsmax: “75 Most Influential Jewish Republicans”Newsmax has issued it’s list of the “75 Most Influential Jewish Republicans”, and yours truly emerges at …. #60. Although how Geraldo Rivera makes this list is beyond me. If he’s a Jew or a Republican, I’m a monk. And if he’s influential, I’ll eat my hat. Outside of that misstep, it’s an interesting list.
|
PLEASE SHARE THE AWARENESS ON EVERY WEB SITE YOU CAN AND ALL YOUR CONNECTIONS , FAMILY, NEIGHBORS, AND FRIENDS
THANK YOU
PRINCIPLES FOR A FREE SOCIETY
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM
"When Good Caves In To Evil, A Nation Is Destroyed "
READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT THIS LINK... http://blackroberegimentpastor.blogspot.com/2015/06/when-good-caves-in-to-evil-nation-is.html
Looks like our invincibly arrogant Supreme Court is on a Progressive roll--a veritable steamroller of errant and overreaching Delphic rulings quite at odds with our Constitution.
On the heels of the Court's outrageous ruling yesterday on Obamacare, here it goes again by "ruling" that same-sex marriage is a "constitutional right". Huh? Constitutional right? This ruling is much more than mystifying; it is subversive.
While the same-sex ruling was entirely predictable--no less so than the Obamacare, aka SCOTUScare, ruling yesterday--I am no less stunned by this judicial quackery and lawlessness.
Thinking I may have missed something along the way, this morning I carefully re-read my copy of the Constitution, and for the life of me I couldn't find marriage of any kind defined as a "constitutional right". Nowhere! In fact, marriage isn't even mentioned in the text.
Per the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, any power not specifically/expressly delegated by the States to the federal government remains with the States and the People. Thus, defining marriage is a State power and same-sex marriage is constitutional ONLY if the individual State and its citizenry says it is. This isn't rocket science, folks. It's the law. And the obscene misapplication of the 14th Amendment's ""equal protection" clause yet again cannot nullify the authority of the 9th and 10th Amendments. Only a constitutional amendment can do that.
Just what Constitution are these Progressive judicial oligarchs reading? Have they even read the Constitution? And, if so, do they at all regard the US Constitution as the supreme law of the land? Obviously not. Clearly, Judicial Supremacy has virtually supplanted Constitutional Supremacy. And therein lies the seed of our self-destruction.
Wouldn't it be splendid--indeed, principled and courageous--were the States to exercise their lawful authority by NULLIFYING this outrageous judicial usurpation of State sovereignty? Without spine and political courage at the State level, the US Constitution is, without question, D-E-A-D and this "constitutional republic" but an illusion.
Until this judicial tyranny is stopped, what precious remains of this tattered constitutional republic will be relegated to the dustbin of history.
I do not see a good end to this lawlessness. As to a remedy, let our Founders be our guide ...
After yesterday and especially this morning. The ruling by a Supreme Court gone amuck. Has thoroughly shown that we have a totally disfunctional government. That every branch has been corrupted. When the Supreme Court once again infers that it not only knows more then God almighty. But has the power to overrule God. We are all in trouble. Their ruling on Abortion was bad enough and just as Un-Holy. But this defies all logic. And unfortunately the very few in that cesspool they call Washington DC, Who are good men and women. Who truly do believe in our Country, and God. Who are true Christians are outnumbered. No election is going to change much of anything. Only we the people can do that. If our Country falls, If all our Freedoms are taken away, If our very God and religious rights are kept from us. We Only Have Ourselves to blame for allowing it to happen. The time is here. It has finally come Who will actually stand up For Their God, Their Family, Their Country, for our Republic. Who will say enough is enough. Who will say, You've pushed me far enough but not one inch farther. Who is really ready to commit to our endeavor to restore our God, Country and way of life that was founded some 200+ years ago. I am!! Are you. I'm waiting.
By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net
Did Nikki Haley really cave to political correctness in now agreeing that the Confederate flag be taken down from the North Carolina statehouse?
And why are Conservatives all bent over that flag being taken down?
There are plenty of people out there turning themselves inside out trying to make a case for leaving that flag flying and they’re using the flag’s design to justify it.
I have seen thousands of comments and posts regarding the Confederate flag over the last week or so and many of them are along these lines…“Neither the design nor the content of the flag has anything to do with racism, slavery, hatred or white supremacy. Nothing.”
That of course, is correct…there IS nothing in the DESIGN of the Confederate flag that denotes racism. But…is the design of the rebel flag all there is to it?
Look…I know about the Confederate flag design…
A new WSJ/NBC News poll shows a narrowing gap between GOP frontrunner Jeb Bush, and political protégé Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. Seventy-five percent of Republicans say they could see themselves supporting Bush, versus 22 percent who couldn’t. The five point gain from the April’s (70 percent – 27 percent) poll shows promise for the former Florida governor’s rebranding as Jeb! instead of Jeb Bush. But for Rubio news is even better. While Bush tops the list as the candidate the most people could support, nearly a quarter of people who still say they couldn’t support him. Rubio’s support comes second in the poll at 74 percent, but only 15 of voters say they couldn’t support him. Rubio’s numbers haven’t changed since the April poll, an indication his dialogue has kept him in steady favor with voters. The poll was also conducted after Bush’s campaign officially kicked off showing that his launch didn’t give him much of a surge ahead of the competition. -Fox

By Oscar Y. Harward
(Y)our GOP, as an organization, has serious problems with their leadership. The Washington based RNC, Capitol Hill GOP leaders, and others have their own Political Action Committees (PAC).
You will find the Republican National Committee (RNC), Republican National Congressional Committee (RNCC), the National Republican Senatorial Committee (RNSC), Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, Speaker of the House, John Boehner, and others are all requesting, calling, writing, and begging, etc. for Republican Party dollars.
As American individuals and others send GOP dollars in, the monies are dispersed as they choose; based only on the Republican Party candidates registration. PAC leaders direct this money in support of their own favorite candidates; not as to whether they support the Republican Party and/or the GOP Platform. The only requirement is that the candidate support the leadership, regardless of how moderate of even liberal their votes represent.
All candidates for reelection and all new candidates for election should be required to show their support on all ‘divided’ issues of 80%.
Divided issues should be rated on whether the issue is opposing opinions between Conservative Republicans v. Liberal Democrats. With that, the GOP will see a more secure group of legislators on Capitol Hill.
When Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) was up for reelection in 2006, the National Republican Senatorial Committee (RNSC) sent some $3 Million into his campaign for his campaign. The record will show that on ‘divided’ issues,
Sen. Chafee voted with Democrat Party Liberals some 90% of the time compared to Conservative Republicans some 10% on ‘divided’ issues. That was a wasted $3 Million dollar donation of ‘precious’ GOP money on Platform issues.
You can take the most ‘liberal’ voting Republican record on Capitol Hill and see these GOP organizations disperse GOP monies to their campaigns; while at the same time, reject candidates who can prove their support of the GOP Platform on the issues.

















